►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting - February 1, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
great
welcome
everybody
to
the
regular
bellevue
city
council
meeting
for
february
1st
2021
clerk.
Could
you
please
do
the
role
mayor.
C
C
D
E
H
I
K
A
Any
opposed
great
okay
city
clerk,
how
about
oral
communications?
Do
we
have
people
signed
up
for
tonight?
Thank
you.
B
Mayor
yes,
this
evening
there
are
six
pre-registered
speakers.
Four
of
those
speakers
are
in
support
of
item
10a
on
our
agenda,
so
unfortunately,
pursuant
to
council
rules,
only
three
will
be
allowed
to
speak,
and
with
that
I
will
call
our
first
speaker,
who
is
randy
banneker.
L
Okay,
thank
you,
madam
mayor
and
members
of
the
council.
I'm
randy
banneker
here
on
behalf
of
the
seattle
king
county
realtors
tonight,
I'd
like
to
thank
you
for
your
work
on
the
accessory
dwelling
unit
and
unit
lot
subdivision
land
use
code,
amendments
and
I'd
like
to
encourage
your
support
of
the
package.
These
two
code
amendments
represent
important
housing,
affordability,
strategies
and
expanded
home
ownership
opportunities
consistent
with
the
city's
affordable
housing
strategy.
L
L
Caring
for
aging
parents
or
enabling
grandparents
to
take
care
of
grandkids
unit
lot
subdivisions
offer
a
fee
simple
alternative
to
condominium
ownership.
This
is
important
because
condominium
construction
liability,
while
easing
through
amendments
to
the
state
condominium
act,
remains
a
costly
barrier
to
new
condo
construction
as
a
result,
condos.
L
M
M
M
M
M
We
want
to
make
sure
that
your
current
residents
are
also
part
of
the
consideration
and
their
voices
are
also
heard
when
talking
about
affordable
housing
as
citizens
and
homeowners.
We
want
to
contribute
and
provide
input
into
this
serious
problem.
After
all,
we
are
also
going
to
live
here
once
the
builders
finish
their
work
and
recruit
their
investments.
M
H
Thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
address
you.
My
name
is
michelle
wannamaker
I
live
in
eastgate
and
my
address
is
on
file.
We've
had
a
huge
amount
of
new
construction
homes
built
in
eastgate
in
the
last
five
to
six
years
and
to
the
best
of
my
knowledge,
they
have
all
been
mcmansions
and
if
I
thought
this
proposal
to
remove
the
three-year
wait
period
on
building
adus
on
new
construction
homes
would
help
the
affordable
housing
crisis.
I
would
be
more
in
support
of
it,
but
it
won't.
H
I've
heard
the
council,
the
planning,
commission
and
staff
all
refer
to
this
proposal
as
a
means
of
helping
long-term
residents
continue
to
remain
in
their
neighborhood,
and
I
have
no
doubt
that
this
is
how
the
developers
sold
this
proposal
to
you.
Well.
The
flaw
in
your
plan
is
there
is
nothing
that
ensures
pricing
will
remain
low
and
greed.
It's
human
nature.
Those
new
mcmasters
will
try
to
get
as
much
as
they
can
for
rent.
H
I
was
appalled
when
I
listened
to
the
planning
commission
meeting
in
which
the
hearing
on
this
proposal
was
held
all,
but
one
commissioner,
was
attempting
to
go
beyond
what
you
proposed
by
removing
the
parking
requirements.
Removing
the
owner
occupancy
occupancy
requirement,
allowing
dad
use
plus
allowing
the
property
owner
to
rent
out
the
main
house,
adu
and
dadu
all
at
the
same
time,
all
to
different
renters.
H
That's
multi-family,
housing,
eastgate
and
other
neighborhoods
with
moderately
priced
homes
were
built
in
the
50s,
with
single
car,
driveways
garages
and
carports,
so
many
homes
already
have
one
or
more
cars
parked
at
the
curb,
and
so
far
I
have
only
heard
reference
to
the
adu
being
rented
out,
whereas
in
the
east
gate
I
have
two
cases
near
me
in
which
the
owner
lives
in
the
dead.
U,
which
are
grandfathered
in
and
rents
out,
the
main
house
each
has
at
least
one
parking
space
for
the
adu,
but
there
is
not
adequate
parking
for
the
main
house.
H
In
this
case,
the
owner
and
tenants
have
four
vehicles
parked
on
the
street
every
night.
The
city
council
needs
to
step
back
and
revisit
the
parking
issue
for
80
years.
Since
you
don't
know
if
it
will
be
the
adu
or
the
main
house
that
gets
rented
out,
you
need
to
look
at
them
as
a
whole
and
calculate
needed
parking.
H
Eastgate
already
has
a
lot
of
rentals,
but
removing
owner
occupancy
requirements
and
allowing
dadus
would
change
our
family-oriented
neighborhood
into
a
business-oriented
and
investor-oriented
culture.
So
why
should
the
three-year
wait
period
be
retained
because
it
gives
new
residents
an
opportunity
to
become
and
feel
like?
They
are
part
of
the
community.
H
N
Bellevue
has
been
a
regional
leader
in
planning
for
growth.
The
council
has
seriously
considered
citizen
participation
and
the
level
of
services
and
infrastructure
been
planning
the
process,
the
local
planning
of
downtown
belra
wilberton
and
in
the
future,
factoria
have
been
essential
to
our
growth
strategy.
Great
neighborhoods
will
add
the
legacy
of
community-centered
forward
thinking.
N
N
N
Bellevue
has
committed
to
doing
comprehensive
planning
right.
We
have
used
the
gma
framework
throughout
the
comprehensive
plan.
We
have
used
the
gma
timeline
with
the
next
plan
due
in
2024.
Bellevue
has
been
committed
to
planning,
please
consider
taking
action
to
reject
the
state
from
usurping
local
planning,
scope
and
timeline.
Let
us
continue
to
achieve
great
results.
The
bellevue
way.
Thank
you.
O
Great
thank
you
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
new
in-house
members
of
the
council.
My
name
is
jared
axelrod.
I
lead
local
public
policy
and
external
affairs
for
amazon,
thanks
for
the
opportunity
to
speak
with
you
this
evening
here
this
evening
to
speak
in
support
of
item
10a
on
your
agenda,
the
luca
which
would
amend
the
city's
accessory
dwelling
unit
policy.
O
I'll
start
by
saying
that
amazon
believes
that
all
people
should
have
access
to
housing
they
can
afford,
while
only
governments
at
the
local
state
and
federal
level
have
the
capacity
to
implement
more
effective
housing
policies.
We
believe
the
private
and
public
sectors
can
work
together
to
address
this
challenge,
we
will
use
our
position
as
a
large
employer
to
support
innovative
housing,
affordability
initiatives,
and
this
luca
does
just
that.
O
Amazon
supports
the
city's
effort
to
modify
and
update
the
land
use
code
to
allow
adus
to
be
built
at
the
time
of
construction
and,
as
I
mentioned
at
the
planning
commission,
when
this
was
reviewed
when
they
reviewed
this
luca
and
as
you'll
see
in
in
the
recommendation
provided
by
the
commission
that
they
transmitted
to
the
council.
O
We
also
encourage
the
council
to
use
this
opportunity
to
consider
some
further
modifications
to
the
land
use
code
in
this
area
to
spur
the
build
out
of
new
adus
and
make
housing
more
affordable
in
a
few
ways.
First,
the
current
code
requires
that
either
the
primary
residence
or
the
edu
must
be
occupied
by
an
owner
of
the
property.
O
Second,
the
current
code
requires
one
off
street
parking
space
for
the
adu.
In
addition
to
any
off-street
parking
for
the
primary
residence,
the
council
should
consider
removing
this
requirement
for
adus
within
proximity
to
frequent
transit
service,
as
is
currently
being
considered
by
the
planning
commission
for
other
residential
developments
and
third,
the
code
current
code
prohibits
detached
accessory
dwelling
units
or
dadus,
including
guest
cottages
and
detached
garages.
These
prevent
homeowners
from
using
one
of
the
easiest
and
least
expensive
methods
for
creating
an
adu
such
as
using
in
a
detached
garage
commission.
O
The
council
should
consider
removing
this
prohibition.
I'd
also
like
to
suggest
that
the
council
used
this
opportunity,
while
you're
studying
this
luca,
to
make
the
modifications
here,
rather
than
seeking
a
second
subsequent
modification
to
the
land
use
code.
In
this
way,
affordable
housing
is
an
urgent
priority
and
the
council
should
use
this
opportunity
with
the
current
luca
to
act
with
urgency.
Doing
so
will
save
valuable
staff
time
and
let
the
council
on
the
commission
continue
to
study
and
develop
other
affordable
policies
on
the
docket
as
put
forward
in
the
city's
affordable
housing
strategy.
O
B
Thank
you,
mr
axelrod.
The
final
pre-registered
speaker
this
evening
was
going
to
speak
in
support
of
the
item.
10A
the
adu
lucas.
We
have
already
had
three
speakers
in
support.
We've
had
two
speakers
with
opposition
are
concerned.
So
at
this
point
I
would
ask:
is
there
anyone
connected
to
this
call
this
evening?
B
B
P
Good,
I'm
honored
to
speak
before
the
council
and
mayor
robinson,
I
agree
with
the
others.
Bellevue
citizens
who
spoke
about
the
adu
and
the
the
mother-in-law
apartments,
as
I
call
them,
and
the
town
home
land
use
code
amendments.
P
I
agree
that
eliminating
the
three-year
wait
period
would
be
a
good
idea,
but
I
would
like
the
council
to
just
stick
with
that
and
steer
clear
of
changing
the
owner
occupation
restriction
and
the
parking
restriction
and
put
the
detached
accessory
dwelling
units
to
the
neighborhoods.
As
you
originally
said,
also
at
the
planning
commission
meeting,
there
was
another
speaker
who
requested
the
consideration
of
at
least
a
three
month:
rental
agreement
on
the
attached
dwelling
units
or
accessory
dwelling
units
to
provide
more
stability
in
the
neighborhood.
P
Otherwise,
it
would
be
just
a
revolving
door
and
and
as
we
heard
from
bizwanamaker,
just
an
investor's
dream
instead
of
a
homeowner's
stream-
and
I
also
heard
from
facebook
friends
that
mentioned
anybody
who
can
afford
a
house
in
bellevue
really
doesn't
need
at
this
time
the
extra
income
that
might
be
provided
from
mother-in-law
apartment
also,
as
the
planning
commissioners
pointed
out,
chances
of
it
being
affordable
in
whatever
terms
that
might
be,
it
would
be
more
likely
to
be
a
market
rate
rental,
and
I
I
just
have
always
wondered
why
the
town
homes,
where
you
own
the
property
and
your
portion
of
the
attached
wall
unit,
were
not
previously
allowed
in
multi-family
developments.
P
I
hope
that
that's
clarified
during
the
meeting.
It
sounds
like
a
good
idea
here
in
east
bellevue
between
140
140th
148th.
We
have
representations
of
all
the
various
forms
of
housing
available.
Multi-Family
condos,
the
town
homes
are
on
an
r5,
developed
or
zoned
area,
then
down
the
street,
we
have
condos,
and
then
we
have
the
r10s
r20s,
our
30s,
that
have
apartment
houses
as
well
as
duplexes
and
fourplexes
and
triplexes.
So
that
all
sounds.
P
I
wish
that
the
rest
of
bellevue
is
as
well
integrated
in
their
diversity
of
housing
and
as
east
bellevue
is
so.
I
hope
that
this
helps
that
happen.
I
also
wonder
you
know
when
they
talk
about
affordable
for
those
town
homes,
and
that
was
one
of
the
first
things
that
the
planning
commission
pointed
out
is
they're
not
going
to
be
really
affordable,
even
the
condos,
where
they're
just
owning
the
unit.
P
B
At
this
point
we
have
had
three
speakers
on
either
side
of
item
10a
on
tonight's
agenda.
I
would
ask
if
there
was
anyone
else
connected
to
this
call,
who
would
like
to
make
comment
to
the
council
on
another
subject?
If
so,
please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
or
star
9
if
you're
connected
with
a
phone.
Q
Evening,
mayor,
council,
members
and
city
staff,
this
is
heidi
dean
calling
in
from
newport
hills,
and
I
just
I
don't
know
how
many
of
you
are
following
along.
What's
going
on
down
in
factoria,
I
just
came
from
a
facebook
discussion
with
people.
There
is
a
facebook
page
that
some
of
you
may
be
aware
of.
It's
called
factorial
looks
like
bleep
and
because
we
are
having
continued
problems
with
people
deciding
that
they
are
going
to
live
on
the
street
next
to
walmart.
Q
It
started
off
with
a
couple
of
rv
rvs
there
over
the
years
and
has
now
progressed
to
people
with
decommissioned
metro
buses,
two
of
them
box
trucks
that
are
being
used
as
campers
or
or
rvs.
And
now,
at
this
point
on
friday,
one
of
those
box
truck
people
decided
to
dump
all
of
their
stuff
out
onto
the
sidewalk
area
the
parking
strip
next
to
where
they
were
parked
and
leave
it
there.
So
there's
growing
concern.
Q
That
was
also
the
area
where
the
two
kids
that
murdered
that
man
out
in
the
may
valley
were
living
in
their
car
there
in
factoria
right
on
that
street.
We're
starting
to
feel
like
we
don't
know,
what's
happening,
we
have
an
ordinance
that
passed.
We
were
told
that
when
cfh
opened
year
round-
and
we
could
offer
year-round
shelter
that
public
camping
like
this
wouldn't
be
allowed,
but
yet
it
is
continued.
Q
It
is
allowed
there's
a
tent
up
in
eastgate.
That's
still
there
a
new
one
popped
up,
apparently
at
the
mormon
church,
now
we'd
like
to
know
what's
going
on,
why?
Why
is
our
ordinance
not
being
enforced?
We've
been
told
that
it's
pandemic.
We
can't
overcrowd
the
shelters
and
I
get
that
truly.
But
I'd
like
to
know.
Why
are
we-
and
why
is
king
county
not
doing
anything
with
those
tents,
the
big
hospital
tents
that
they
set
up
on
the
county
property
where
the
cfh
shelter
is
going
to
go?
Q
Q
Why
is
the
city
of
bellevue
not
asking
king
county
council,
and
particularly
the
chairperson,
claudia
balducci,
our
former
mayor,
why
we
cannot
put
some
of
these
folks
who
are
still
living
out
on
our
streets
into
those
tents,
at
least
for
the
meantime,
before
finding
shelter,
instead
of
allowing
them
to
live
out
on
the
streets
like
this?
It's
not
safe.
It's
not
sanitary
and
south
bellevue's
getting
fed
up.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
B
A
K
A
C
Thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
As
you
mentioned,
we
have
two
items.
The
first
one
is
our
recommended
land
use
code,
amendments
related
to
the
city's
affordable
housing
strategy.
Excuse
me
tonight
the
council
will
hear
about
two
land
use
code.
Amendments
are
related,
the
first
one
being
to
remove
the
three-year
wait
period
to
allow
the
accessory
dwelling
units
to
be
built
in
a
new
single-family
home
sooner.
The
second
is
a
land
use
code
amendment
to
establish
provisions
for
unit
lot
subdivisions
in
the
city
where
multi-family
development
is
currently
allowed.
C
The
planning
commission
did
take
up
both
these
land
use
code.
Amendments
recently,
as
well
as
held
public
hearings
on
them,
and
the
planning
commission
is
recommending
adoption
of
both
these
land
use
code.
Amendments
joining
us
evening
to
provide
a
staff
report
is
mike
brennan,
tris,
nathanas,
nick
whipple,
all
from
the
development
services
department
has
also
joining
us.
This
evening
is
erratica
moga
carr,
who
is
the
chair
of
the
planning
commission
and
present
the
planning
commission's
recommendation.
C
We
are
looking
for
direction
from
the
council
to
bring
back
an
ordinance,
possibly
for
final
action
at
a
future
meeting
and
with
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
mike
brennan.
The
director
mike.
R
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki
good
evening,
mia
robinson,
councilmember,
newan
or
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
council
members.
As
city
manager
miyaki
mentioned,
we
are
advancing
two
languages
code.
Amendments
for
council
consideration
this
evening,
both
recommended
by
the
planning
commission,
which
you'll
hear
more
from
the
chair
a
bit
later
on
that
recommendation.
R
Again,
these
do
align
with
the
council's
affordable
housing
strategy
and
by
eliminating
barriers
to
promote
more
housing
options
in
the
city,
I'm
going
to
hand
over
hand
it
over
to
trisnap
tennis
who's
going
to
provide
some
additional
background
and
again
as
a
reminder,
we
are
seeking
council
direction
this
evening
to
bring
these
ordinances
back
for
final
action
at
a
date
likely
later
this
month.
If
the
council
agrees
to
advance
them
further,
trisnat
go
ahead.
S
Mike
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
council
members,
city
manager,
miyaki
and
those
attending
tonight
for
staff's
presentation,
we
will
begin
by
giving
a
brief
explanation
about
each
of
the
recommended
land
use
code,
amendments
or
lucas,
starting
with
the
adu
luca,
and
then
the
unit
lot
subdivision
luca.
We
will
talk
about
the
public
engagement
that
we've
had
with
with
the
community
and
the
development
community,
as
well
as
the
just
the
residential
communities
after
planning.
S
We
will
close
with
providing
information
about
the
process
that
we've
gone
through
for
these
lucas
and
our
anticipated
next
steps.
And,
lastly,
we
will
recap
with
asking
for
direction
from
council
so
to
begin.
I
want
to
briefly
touch
on
the
city's
affordable
housing
strategy
with
which
the
city
council
adopted
in
2017
the
affordable
housing
strategy
included
several
strategies
and
within
each
strategy
there
is
a
number
of
action
items.
One
of
the
strategies
strategy
b
is
to
create
a
variety
of
housing
choices
and,
under
this
strategy,
action
2b
action.
S
S
It
is
also
worth
pointing
out
that
adus
provide
diversity
in
housing,
size
type,
geographic
location
and
cultural
options.
Therefore,
therefore
helping
to
ensure
all
residents
are
welcomed
and
allow
for
long-term
residents
to
remain
in
bellevue
to
provide
an
orientation
to
the
city's
adu
regulations.
I
want
to
start
by
giving
a
quick
overview
of
what
we
have
in
place.
The
regulations
that
we
have
for
adus,
that's
in
land
use
code,
2020
120,
were
established
back
in
1993.
S
that
ordinance
attempted
to
achieve
a
balance
between
encouraging
adus
as
additional
housing
units.
S
The
remaining
provisions
in
this
section
of
the
land
use
code
are
not
included
in
this
luca,
but
I
think
it's
worthwhile
to
just
go
through
the
requirements
with
you
tonight
there
there
is
a
requirement
that
only
one
adu
is
allowed
and
that
adu
must
be
attached
to
the
primary
residence
and
the
primary
the
property
owner
must
occupy
either
the
primary
residence
or
the
adu.
S
The
combined
number
of
occupants
who
live
in
the
primary
residence
as
well
as
adu
in
a
combined
total,
cannot
exceed
four
unrelated
adults
or
the
definition
of
family
in
the
land
use
code.
The
adu
must
be
at
least
300
square
feet
and
cannot
exceed
800
square
feet.
It
also
cannot
exceed
40
percent
of
the
total
square
feet
of
the
home.
S
S
So,
as
noted
earlier,
action
b2
is
to
update
the
city's
adu
regulations
to
add
housing
units
and
choices.
This
recommended
luca
is
targeted
as
a
targeted
update,
in
that
this
luca
is
only
to
remove
the
three-year
wait
period
imposed
on
new
construction.
This
would
allow
an
adu
to
be
built
and
established.
At
the
same
time,
a
single
family
is
built.
This
narrow
change
in
the
city's
adu
regulations
is
anticipated
to
make
adus
more
feasible
to
build
and
encourage
construction
of
this
type
of
housing
options
in
residential
neighborhoods.
S
By
way
of
permitting
and
construction
data
in
2020,
the
city
had
five
registrations
for
new
adus
and
in
2019
there
were
eight
in
comparison,
the
city
had
149
new
single-family
building
permits
issued
in
2020
out
of
this
149
new
single-family
building
permits
nearly
25
included
space
or
elements
such
as
the
wet
bar
or
water
line,
connection
cabinets
or
refrigerator
to
make
it
easier
to
build
and
establish
a
future
adu.
After
that
three-year
wait.
S
This
three-year
wait
has
been
a
barrier
to
adding
this
type
of
housing
unit
and
housing
option.
So
this
luca
removes
this
barrier
so
that
a
property
owner
may
install
an
adu
in
an
efficient
and
cost-effective
way
at
the
same
time
that
they
are
constructed
in
their
new
home
and
to
be
able
to
register
and
use
that
additional
dwelling
unit
as
soon
as
they
get
their
final
inspection
and
occupancy
approval.
S
T
Great
thank
you
trisna
and
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newton
house
and
members
of
the
council
in
the
next
slides.
I
will
cover
the
proposed
unit
lot
subdivision
land
use
code,
amendment
the
second
land
use
code,
amendment
that
we'll
be
discussing
this
evening
in
the
the
next
slides,
we'll
we'll
go
over.
What
we
anticipate
the
outcomes
of
this
coded
option
would
be
what
our
public
engagement
process
has
been
like
for
both
of
these
land
use
code
amendments
and
then
we'll
have
the
chair
of
the
planning
commission
here
to
present
as
well.
T
So
one
of
the
objectives
of
of
this
luca
is
to
respond
to
the
affordable
housing
strategy
b,
which
calls
for
the
creation
of
a
variety
of
housing
choices
in
the
city
unit.
Lot
subdivisions
are
a
tool.
That's
typically
used
to
produce
town
homes
and,
while
town
homes
created
by
the
provisions
of
the
proposed
land
use
code,
are
not
anticipated
to
be
income
restricted
or
affordable
housing
units
per
se.
There
is
still
value
in
this
land
use
code,
amendment
and
a
relationship
to
the
city's
affordable
housing
strategy.
T
So,
given
the
magnitude
of
the
region's
housing
crisis,
a
broad
range
of
solutions
are
needed
to
address
the
crisis
from
multiple
angles.
So
this
luca
is
intended
to
minimize
some
of
the
barriers
that
we've
heard
to
increase
the
supply
of
housing
in
bellevue,
promote
a
different
type
of
housing
in
the
city
and
also
broaden
home
ownership
opportunities
in
bellevue.
T
A
pud
or
planned
unit
development
is
often
utilized
when
there's
a
need
for
a
special
development
feature
oftentimes
due
to
critical
areas,
and
it
entails
its
own
specialized
process.
T
T
The
unit
lot
subdivision
land
use
code,
amendment
will
amend
land
use,
code
chapters,
2045a
plating
and
subdivisions
and
2045b
short
plots
and
short
subdivisions
to
allow
for
fee
simple
ownerships,
feasible
ownership
opportunities
in
the
city.
The
distinction
between
the
two
chapters,
so
2445a
planning
and
subdivision
refers
to
projects
that
that
propose
10
or
more
units,
and
then
2045b
refers
to
projects
that
are
nine
or
fewer
units.
T
T
It
will
also
include
general
requirements
for
unilot
subdivisions.
The
general
requirements
which
we'll
get
to
in
the
next
slide
refer
to
the
dimensional
standards
that
apply
to
this
type
of
development,
as
well
as
some
of
the
other
standards
that
may
be
modified
to
accommodate
this
type
of
development.
T
There's
also
a
new
subsection
created
that
will
label
this
type
of
development
as
a
unilot
subdivision,
and
it
will
also
in
this
subsection,
clarify
that
the
unit
lots
are
not
separate
building
sites,
meaning
that
the
design
and
the
layout
is
based
on
the
parent
lot
and
any
future
plotting
actions.
Any
building
additions
or
modifications
must
conform
to
the
requirements
of
the
parent
lot,
that's
created,
which
we'll
get
into
in
the
next
slide
and
just
for
reference.
The
strike
draft
is
included
as
attachment
f
in
your
materials
and
to
the
next
bullet.
T
T
Next
slide,
please
so,
as
illustrated
in
the
diagram
on
this
slide
unit
lot
subdivisions
are
a
mechanism
to
allow
planning
where
there's
not
where
it's
not
currently
feasible,
due
to
conflicts
between
characteristics
of
certain
development
types
and
the
applicable
dimensional
standards.
T
So,
under
the
current
code,
individual
town
homes
cannot
be
separated
into
individual
lots
since
side
setback
requirements
as
an
example
from
the
lot
lines
would
coincide
with
a
shared
wall.
Other
dimensional
requirements,
like
lock,
coverage
by
structure
impervious
surface
coverage
limits,
could
be
challenging
to
meet
on
a
per
lot
per
unit
lot
basis.
T
T
To
allow
greater
opportunities
for
townhomes
in
bellevue,
the
luca
will
create
individual
fee,
simple
ownership
of
townhome
units,
so
broadening
home
ownership
opportunities
to
include
more
fee,
simple
purchase
options
will
increase
housing
choices
in
bellevue,
provide
an
alternative
to
condominium
ownership
and
provide
a
less
expense.
Excuse
me
a
less
expensive
option
than
detached
single-family
homes
and
the
lucas.
Not
it
will
not
change
the
allowed
density.
T
So
a
builder
may
build
the
same
number
of
units
in
a
unit
lot
subdivision,
as
they
would
be
able
to
build
under
a
current
code
as
a
condominium
development,
and
then
there
is
last
thing:
there's
no
change
the
appearance
of
a
townhouse
townhouse
developed
as
a
unilate
subdivision.
So
again,
the
only
difference
between
a
townhouse
developed
under
the
current
code
and
a
townhouse
developed
as
a
unilot
subdivision
is
just
the
form
of
ownership,
condo
versus
fee.
Simple
next
slide.
Please.
T
The
purpose
of
the
public
engagement
that
we
set
out
on
was
to
inform
the
public
of
the
substance
of
both
land
use
code
amendments
and
help
people
to
understand
how
they
can
engage
in
the
amendment
process
with
that
staff
provided
three
modes
of
outreach,
so
we
do
have
process
four
requirements
in
the
land
use
code.
Those
requirements
include
a
notice
of
application
or
cpa
notification,
notice
of
hearing
etc.
So
all
the
process
four
requirements
were
followed.
T
We
also
implemented
enhanced
engagement,
which
included
direct
engagement
and
feedback
with
stakeholders,
so
staff
had
ongoing
dialogue
with
the
master
builders
association
of
king
and
sonoma
county.
We
also
spoke
with
developers,
potential
applicants
and
just
interested
members
of
the
public
regarding
the
the
two
land
use
code
amendments
and,
lastly,
we
encourage
engagement
through
our
online
presence,
so
staff
launched
two
web
pages.
We
provided
information
related
to
each
of
the
code
amendments
both
the
adu
and
the
unit
lot
subdivision
amendments.
T
T
G
Thank
you
nick
thank
you
trisna
for
the
presentation
and
thanks
to
the
council
for
having
me
so
during
the
planning
commission's
december
9th
session,
the
commission
heard
public
support
for
the
proposed
amendment
and
after
discussion,
the
planning
commission
directed
staff
to
prepare
the
luca
for
a
public
hearing
on
january
13th.
G
The
recommendation
is
included
in
the
planning
commission's
resolution
as
attachment
a
of
your
packet
today.
In
addition,
the
resolution
asked
for
who
had
another
request
from
the
planning
commission
for
council.
It
requested
the
council
consider
further
amendments,
the
adu
regulations
based
on
public
testimony
and
discussion.
G
Many
people
spoke
to
the
benefits
of
the
adus
that
they
provide
incremental
housing
supply
and
allow
residents
to
age
in
place.
Certain
individuals
also
suggested
other
changes
to
the
city's
adu
regulations,
including
eliminating
requirements
for
owner
occupied
occupancy,
off-street
parking
and
the
restriction
on
detached
adus.
G
Many
people
offer
testimony
for
and
get
and
against
further
changes
to
the
city's
adu
regulation.
During
the
public
hearing
and
subsequent
written
communications
with
the
planning
commission,
the
planning
commission
is
aware
that
the
council
has
made
a
policy
decision
to
allow
detached
accessory
dwelling
units
in
self-selected
neighborhoods
and
that
this
process
is
underway
with
the
great
neighborhoods
initiative,
and
with
that
I
would
appreciate
the
next
slide.
G
Similarly,
during
the
planning
commission's
december
9th
study
session
staff
also
presented
the
luca
to
establish
provisions
in
the
land
use
code,
amendment
for
unit
lots
of
subdivisions
within
land
use
districts
where
multi-family
development
is
currently
allowed.
Commissioners
again
heard
public
testimony
public
support
for
the
proposed
amendment
and
in
our
discussion
of
the
luca,
the
planting
commission
clarified
that
the
unit
lot
subdivisions
would
not
create
affordable
units.
G
On
january
13th,
the
planning
commission
heard
the
public
hearing
for
the
proposed
unit
lot
subdivision
luca
many
members
of
the
public
provided
testimony
during
the
public
hearing
all
or
all
oral
communications
supported
the
proposed
luca
to
establish
provisions
in
the
land
use
code
for
the
unit
lot.
Subdivisions
within
land
use
districts
where
multi-family
development
is
currently
allowed
upon
further
discussion.
G
R
Mike,
thank
you.
Thank
you,
chairman
golf
car
for
your
presentation
on
the
planning
commission
recommendation.
So
this
last
slide
well,
second,
to
last
lights
are
almost
there.
I'm
really
is
providing
to
provide
some
clarification
in
one
spot
of
kind
of
where
we
are
within
the
work
plan
on
the
various
elements
that
have
been
discussed
this
evening
related
to
adus
again,
as
you
heard
first
off
the
first
line
here,
the
three-year
wait
is
the
issue
before
the
council
this
evening
in
the
proposed
land
use
code
amendment
and
the
recommendation
from
the
planning
commission.
R
Last
year,
the
state
legislature
passed
an
amendment
that
eliminated
the
requirement
for
adus
within
frequent
transit
areas
and
that
provision
is
being
considered
as
part
of
that
broader
land
use
code
amendment
that
will
be
before
the
council
in
the
march
april
time
frame.
So
again,
there
is
a
very
narrow
amendment
to
align
the
city's
code
with
the
state
changes
related
to
parking
associated
with
adus
within
frequent
transit
areas.
R
The
reducing
or
eliminating
the
parking
requirement
that
we
currently
have
in
our
code
for
areas
outside
those
frequent
transit
areas
is
not
within
the
current
work
plan
and
similarly,
removal
of
the
owner
occupancy
requirement
that
you
heard
at
trisome,
explain
at
the
beginning
of
the
presentation
is
also
not
included
in
a
current
work
plan.
Next
slide,
please.
So
this
one
is
our
final
slide
just
to
show
the
council
kind
of
where
we
are
in
the
process
and
kind
of
the
final
steps
moving
forward.
Again,
it's
been
through
the
planning
commission
study
session.
R
The
planning
commission
held
the
public
hearing
on
january
13th
over
here
this
evening,
presenting
the
planning
commission's
recommendation
to
the
council
for
these
two
land
use
code
amendments
tomorrow
evening,
there's
a
courtesy
public
hearing
with
the
east
bellevue
community
council,
where
they
will
hear
of
these
two
land
use
code
amendments
and
then
at
a
future
meeting,
if
directed
by
the
council,
we
would
return
for
final
action
by
the
council
sometime
most
likely
later
this
month.
R
If
the
council
concurs
and
then
finally
back
to
the
east
bellevue
community
council
for
a
public
hearing
and
approval
disapproval
of
these
proposed
land
use
code
amendments,
should
the
council
approve
them
within
the
jurisdiction
of
the
east?
Bellevue
community
council
next
slide,
please!
So
again
this
evening
we
are
seeking
council
direction
to
advance
these
code
amendments
to
to
for
final
approval
at
a
future
meeting
with
the
council,
and
with
that
mayor,
I
will
hand
it
back
to
you
for
any
questions
or
comments
from
the
council.
A
A
I
hope
you
can
stay
on
the
call
here
in
case
anybody
has
questions
of
you,
okay,
but
you
you
can
turn
your
camera
off
if
you
want
just
be
around
so
tonight,
we're
basically
looking
at
the
recommendations
from
the
planning
commission,
which
are
dealing
with
two
separate
things.
One
is
adus
whether
to
remove
the
three-year
waiting
period
and
the
other
is
the
unit
lot
subdivisions
within
land
use
districts
and
whether
or
not
to
allow
that
for
where
multi-family
development
is
currently
allowed
to
allow
the
the
townhouses
there.
A
So
those
are
the
two
things
on
the
table
and
mike
you
put
up
a
slide.
I
think
it
was
slide
number
three,
I'm
not
positive,
where
you
basically
listed
all
the
current
rules,
because
we'll
do
the
adus
first,
so
the
rules
that
are
in
effect
right
now,
so
the
the
owner
presence,
you
know
living
on
the
property
and
the
parking
requirement
and
the
bloody
blast.
A
So
can
you
put
that
slide
up
again
as
reference,
because
these
are
the
rules
already
in
place
tonight
and
really
we're
just
talking
about
the
three-year
waiting
period,
whether
or
not
to
follow
the
recommendation
to
get
rid
of
that
so
there
thank
you
side,
five
perfect,
so
we're
looking
at
removing
the
one
in
yellow,
but
the
other
ones
are
already
in
place.
A
So
I'm
going
to
give
everybody
a
chance
to
comment
and
ask
questions
and
I'm
going
to
let
council
member
barksdale
begin
since
he's
the
liaison
for
the
planning
commission
and
then
council,
member
robertson,
stokes,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house,
council,
member
zahn
lee
and
then
myself
in
that
order,
so
council
member
bark
sale.
Would
you
like
to
start
us
off?
Please.
E
I
support
the
recommendations
from
the
planning
commission
for
removing
the
three-year
weight
and
for
allowing
the
subdivision
of
unit
lots
and
similar
to
how
we've
done
in
the
past.
You
know
entertain
the
further
recommendations
that
planning
commission
has
brought
to
the
council.
I
support
those
as
well.
E
I
think
it's
important
for
us
to
consider
those
and
explore
them
as,
as
was
the
language
specifically
was
to
explore
them,
and
I
think
that's
important
with
community
engagement
looking
at
where
it's
worked
in
other
cities,
so
we
can
learn
from
those
and
also
like
for
us
to
consider
what
programs
and
services
we
might
also
provide
to
complement
those
changes
so
that,
because
I
I
it's,
I
think
it's
we're
at
an
inflection
point
where
it's
partially
about
what
gets
built,
but
it's
also
about
how
we
engage
as
a
community
and
interact,
and
so
I
think,
it'd
be
interesting
to
think
about
what
services
and
programs
that
might
complement
this
group.
E
So
I
would
love
to
see
some
alternatives
related
to
ada,
specifically
and
information
about
how
we
might
how
we
could
proceed
instead
of
maybe
just
saying.
Let's
not
do
these
other
things.
Let's
get
past
that
and
think
about
how
we
can
get
can
support
the
removal
of
barriers
for
adus,
while
at
the
same
time
helping
to
make
sure
that
the
community
engagement
is
part
of
that
and
building
community.
U
Mayor
you
know
I
appreciate
hearing
from
the
planning
commission
on
this.
I
I
really
support.
I
think
the
council
sent
this
to
the
planning
commission
saying
we
want
this
three-year
rule
removed
and
we
want
to
allow
zero
lot
line
development
as
low-hanging
fruit
to
allow
addition
different
housing
choice.
U
So
I
really
support
that
and
that's
the
question
on
the
table
tonight
with
regard
to
additional
adu
regulations,
there
may
be
some
I
might
want
to
personally
modify,
but
I
don't
think
that
that
is
the
best
use
of
the
planning
commission's
time
right
now
or
the
council's
time
or
our
planning
staff's
time,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
one.
We
made
a
promise
to
the
neighborhoods
that
the
detached
adus
would
be
part
of
the
neighborhood
area
planning
process.
Now
that
has
been
delayed.
That
is
not
the
neighborhood's
fault.
U
Having
been
on
this
council
for
more
than
well,
I
don't
know
how
many
years
12
years
or
something
adus
particularly
detached,
have
been
very
controversial
and
not
every
neighborhood
is
the
same.
I
would
personally
love
to
have
a
dadu
in
my
backyard.
I
have
the
space
for
it.
I
have
a
nice
big
backyard
would
love
to
build
one,
even
if
the
city
passed
the
law
allowing
it.
I
couldn't
because
there's
covenants
on
my
property
that
wouldn't
allow
that,
but
we
promised
the
neighborhoods
that
would
be
part
of
the
neighborhood
area
planning
process.
U
So
I
think
it
needs
to
be
part
of
the
neighborhood
area
planning
process
and
the
reason
I
don't
think
it's
such
a
great
use
of
the
planning
commission's
time
at
this
time
is.
We
have
other
major
work
to
do,
and
those
for
this
council
and
the
planning
commission
is
that
we've
got
to
finish
up
east
maine.
U
We
need
to
launch
wilberton
and
we
need
to
do
the
bellred
look
back
and
if
we're
talking
about
affordable
housing,
adding
a
changing
adu
so
that
we'll
have
more
beyond
what
we're
talking
about
tonight
is
really
nibbling
around
the
edges.
If
we
really
want
to
create
more
housing-
and
we
really
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
affordable
housing,
because
this
wouldn't
necessarily
be
affordable,
we
need
to
do
bigger
things
and
that
is
making
sure
our
growth
areas
have
the
capacity
to
have
the
affordable
housing
and
the
housing
units.
U
U
That's
going
to
really
make
a
difference,
and
I
just
wanted
to
remind
this
council
that
east
maine
was
delivered
to
the
council
and
the
whole
process
for
the
comp
plan
and
land
use
code
was
started
when
obama
was
still
president
okay,
when
obama
was
still
president
and
are
we
done
with
it?
No
we're
not
wilberton
cac
was
delivered
to
the
council
almost
three
years
ago.
Have
we
even
sent
it
to
the
planning
commission?
No,
we
have
not.
The
bellred
look
back
was
supposed
to
happen
in
2014,
it's
2021.
U
We
could
allow
some
major
increases
around
those
light
rail
stations
with
tod
with
tod
and
more
affordable
housing.
We
haven't
even
started
it.
Those
are
the
things
that
we
should
be
spending
our
time
on,
rather
than
nibbling
around
the
edges
and
taking
something
that
was
supposed
to
be
in
this
other
process
and
putting
it
in
this.
So
I
absolutely
support
bringing
this
forward.
U
I
definitely
am
going
to
want
to
hear
what
happens
at
east
bellevue
community
council,
because
I
would
hate
to
see
that
they
they
would
reject
this
and
I'll,
allow
this
housing
type
in
their
area.
So
I'm
not
going
to
want
to
know
that
when
it
comes
back,
but
I
just
don't
think
it's
a
really
worth
the
use
of
our
time.
At
this
point
it's
going
to
be
dealt
with
in
the
in
the
neighborhood
area
planning
and
I'm
good
with
that.
Let's
do
the
other
things
that
are
going
to
make
way
more
of
a
difference.
K
Yeah,
I
think
I
mean
our
concentration
really
is
on
the
two
items
that
are
before
us
and
I
agree
with
those
I
think
the
staff
and
then
the
planning
commission
done
a
great
job
both
on
eliminating
the
three-year
wait
period
and
having
the
unified
lot
subdivision
process
go
forward.
K
I
it's
interesting
with
listening
with
great
interest
to
my
my
colleague,
and
I
was
at
first
thinking
wait
a
minute,
but
then
I
I
she
hit
some
notes
that
I
wanna
I've
often
talked
about.
Is
it
shouldn't?
Take
us
forever
to
do
things
and
we
we
have
things
that
are
really
important
before
us
now
that
are
affecting
and
are
working
on,
affordable
housing,
and
I
agree
we
need
to
work
on
those.
K
I
do
think
that
the
adu
piece
is
in
the
and
the
detached
adu
piece
will
come
up
and
the
planning
is
somewhere
in
you
know
between
now
and
the
end
of
the
year.
I
think
we
should
be
aggressive
on
talking
to
the
neighborhood
areas
about
that
and
we'll
see
what
you
know
how
that
comes
up.
I
don't.
I
don't
think
we
need
to
put
this
off
and
come
back
later
and
say
well
five
years
ago
we
said
we're
going
to
look
at
this.
We
haven't
done
it
yet.
K
So
you
know
we
need
to
balance
these
things,
but
I
agree.
I
would
like
to
see
us
be
able
to
move
on
things
in
a
little
quicker
fashion,
and
I
hope
it
doesn't
take
us
three
four
years
to
implement
these
two
things
we're
doing
tonight.
K
So
I
think
we're
and
I
think,
staff
and
the
commissions
are,
and
the
council
are
a
lot
more
focused
nowadays
on
moving
things.
I
think
this
whole
situation
we're
going
through
has
given
us
some
new
energy
and
and
some
new
understanding
that
you
know
times
change
and
things
are
not
just
going
to
go
along
for
the
next
five
six,
seven,
eight
nine
nine
ten
years,
and
we
can
get
something
done
along
there.
We
need
to
move
on
things
and
we
need
to
move
quickly
now
on
affordable
housing.
K
You
know
we
put
that
together.
I
worked
hard
with
council
and
with
the
with
the
mayor
on
this
and
at
the
time.
Well,
I
was
working
myself
in
the
current
mayor
to
get
that
in
place
and
we
need
to
move
on
that
in
in
number
of
ways.
So
I
I
agree
that
we
need
to
look
at
what
is
the
balance?
What
are
the
most
important
things?
K
We
want
to
work
on
and
move
those
forward
and
not
forget
these
items
we
have
on
here,
but
get
these
two
pieces
done
really
start
focusing
on
affordable
all
the
issues
of
affordable
housing
and
homelessness
concentrate
on
those
and
where
pieces
like
this
can
come
in,
as
has
been
suggested
by
some
of
the
people.
Some
of
the
you
know
comments
we've
had
will
be
helpful.
We
can
add
those,
but
we
have
to
be.
K
We
talk
about
being
nimble,
but
now
is
the
time
and
if
we
don't
get
something
done
quickly
here
we're
going
to
be
way
behind
and
we
will
be
overcome
by
all
the
people
coming
in
all
the
stuff
that
is
happening,
and
so
we
have
this
great
opportunity
to
move
forward
really
good
work
tonight,
really
good
conversation
among
with
and
comments
from
people
from
the
audience
from
the
community.
K
So,
let's
adopt
these
two
and
then
start
working
on
these
other
things
with
some
alacrity,
so
we
can
actually
deal
with
the
problem
and
and
do
something
with
it
and
not
just
talk
about
doing
something
with
it.
So
thank.
A
A
All
right,
great
deputy
mayor.
J
Thank
you
mayor
first,
just
want
to
thank
mike
and
trisna
and
nick
and
the
planning
commission
for
their
for
their
work
on
this
obviously
important
work
and,
and
speaking
of
the
the
planning
commission.
I
I
believe
that
this
was
passed
five
to
one.
I
believe
one
of
one
of
the
commissioners
voted
against
this.
I'm
just
curious.
If
we
can
get
just
a
very
quick
recap
about
what
the
issue
was,
that
prevented
this
from
being
a
unanimous
vote.
G
Well,
I'll
I'll
start
and
I'll
let
staff
go.
I
believe
that
it
was
commissioner
davidos
who
voted
against
it
and
he
was
concerned
that
this
wasn't
fair
to
the
neighborhoods.
I
think
it
just
boiled
down
to
that.
It
was
a
brief
statement
about
the
neighborhoods,
not
it.
This
might
not
be
fair
to
what
they
wanted.
A
I'm
gonna
weigh
in
here
because
I
actually
spoke
with
him
about
this
today
and
I
asked
him
why,
and
he
gave
me
a
little
different
story.
He
said
because
it
was
presented
as
an
affordable
housing
strategy
and
he
didn't
feel
that
it
actually
created
affordable
housing.
However,
he
was
in
support
of
it
in
general.
So
there's
a
couple.
A
J
Actually,
that's
that's!
That's
enough.
I
think
I'll
move
on
to
my
next
question,
but
thank
you
mayor
for
that.
Next
question
is
for
staff.
I
think
trisna
so,
based
on
the
math
I
saw
up
there.
I
think
you're
we're
looking
at
potentially
that
this
could
this
removal
of
this
three-year
rule
could
equate
to
about
40
units
a
year,
potentially
maybe
more.
The
staff
has
a
any
sense
of
how
many
adus
might
be
created
once
this
is
lifted
almost
immediately
and
then
going
forward.
S
Yes,
thank
you,
deputy
mayor,
that
is
the
the
numbers
based
on
permit
data
approximately
25,
so
in
that
35
40
range
of
units
we're
expecting
to
be
able
to
have
adus
right
away
as
part
of
the
their
new
construction.
J
J
J
You
know
certain,
certainly
you
know
if,
if
a
property
owner
can
can
make
more
money
off
of
it,
they
certainly
will,
unless
you
know
the
family
members
living
there
or
what
have
you
so
and
and
I'm
generally
in
support
of
both
of
these
you
know,
lifting
lifting
the
the
three
or
weight
makes
complete
sense
for
us
and
I'm
in
favor
of
it.
I
I
have
to
agree
with
councilmember
roberson.
J
I
think
we
should
pump
the
brakes
a
little
bit
on
some
of
those
other
suggestions,
and
it
looks
like,
as
mike
pointed
out
earlier,
that
we
have
a
pathway
to
discuss
those
when
they
do
come
up,
but
we've
got
a
lot
of
other
things
on
our
plate
as
well,
but
generally
in
support.
So
again,
thanks
for
the
great
presentation.
F
Councilmember
zahn.
Yes,
thank
you
mayor,
so
I
thank
the
staff
and
the
planning
commission
as
well
for
this
work.
I
didn't
realize
how
much
how
many
years
I've
been
sitting
waiting
for
us
to
adopt
this,
so
I'm
glad
that
it
moved
up
in
priority.
F
F
F
We
can
do
lots
of
things
at
the
same
time,
so
I
would
say
that
for
me,
I
look
at
this
as
a
yes
and
and
not
in
either
or
so.
I
would
suggest
to
my
fellow
council
members
that,
in
addition
to
looking
at
those
large
pieces
of
work
related
to
bell
red,
look
back
wilberton
east
main,
that
this
is
another
piece
of
the
entire
puzzle
for
bellevue
to
look
at
those
further
explorations
recommended
by
our
planning
commission.
Thank
you.
A
Councilmember
zone
councilmember
lee.
D
Thanks,
madam
mayor,
I
think
both
council
members
are
ticketed
very
well.
You
know
we
all
need
more
housing.
We
need
a
variety
of
housing.
Why
not?
And
we've
been.
Unfortunately,
we've
been
talking
about
affordable
housing
for
a
long
time.
Bellevue
is
expensive
place.
We
all
know
that
and
more
people
want
to
live
here.
As
a
result,
the
price
got
pushed
up,
and
so
it's
unfortunate,
but
our
focus
is
on
affordable
housing.
So
I
support
absolutely.
D
You
know
we
need
to
have
more
housing,
look
at
more
varieties,
but
you
know
we
should.
I
sympathize
with
the
commissioner
double
those
when
we,
because
the
reason
is
because
when
we
talk
to
the
public,
the
people
who
are
out
there
who
are
not
so
intimately
as
we
are
looking
at
from
the
inside
out,
they
are
being
told
that
this
is
so
to
be
affordable.
It's
not
just
a
matter
of
how
many
what
kind
of
housing
we
have,
but
it's
the
cost.
It's
the
cost.
D
It's
got
to
be
a
lower
cost
and
if
it
is
not,
then
it's
it
doesn't
meet
that
affordable
criteria,
and
so,
but
you
know
so,
I
agree
that
we
need
to
have
more
housing
as
a
result,
three-year
rule
publish
you
know,
I
agree
it
should
be
removed,
should
make
it
easier
to
make
it
easier
to
have
a
variety
of
choices,
because
we
all
change.
You
know
when
you
get
older,
you
want
to
downsize.
You
want
to
have
a
choice.
You
want
a
living
w,
you
don't
want
to
be
going
somewhere
else.
D
You
know
people
have
been
doing
this
all
over
the
world
and
we
can
do
a
lot
of
things
to
do
it,
and
so
the
point
is
that
if
I
agree
with
trans
member
robinson
100,
it's
a
practical
matter
when
we
talk
to
the
citizens
and
when
we
tell
them
it's
unaffordable
housing,
we
tell
them
what
we're
doing
and
when
you
see
that
it
doesn't
really
quite
fit
that
they
have
fits.
D
So
when
we're
nibbling
around
the
edges,
when
they
don't
understand
what
we're
trying
to
do,
we
are
having
a
a
very
uncomfortable
conversation,
and
so
I
so
I
my
question
is:
when
we
do
this
online
engagement.
How
much
of
input
do
we
get
from
the
people
really
in
the
neighborhoods?
So
I
think
to
do
justice
to
let
people
know
what
we're
doing.
This
is
a
big
project
big
deal
because.
A
Let
me
interrupt
you
for
one
second:
do
you
want
to
speak
to
the
community
process
like
what
kind
of
an
outreach
or
response
did
you
get
and
at
planning
commission
as
well?
The
public
comment.
S
Sure
thank
you
mayor.
Actually,
I'm
going
to
turn
this
over
to
nick.
He
has
more
information
on
this.
T
Great
thank
you
and
thank
you
mayor
for
the
question
and
and
council
member
lee,
so
the
the
outreach
involved,
the
two
web
pages
that
we
created.
So
if
we're
talking
about
the
adu
specifically
a
lot
of
the
messaging,
was
around
what's
before
you
today,
so
the
removal
of
the
three-year
wait
period.
I
did
get
a
number
of
inquiries
from
people
that
actually
have
permits
in
the
pipeline
that
would
like
to
incorporate
adus
into
their
homes
where
they
wouldn't
be
able
to
do
so
today.
T
So
we
did
hear
from
the
public.
In
that
regard,
we
heard
from
a
lot
of
members
that
wanted
to
comment
on.
I
would
say,
provisions
that
were
outside
of
the
scope
that
council
provided
us
in
terms
of
the
three-year
wait
period.
So
there's
certainly
interest
in
in
talking
about
some
of
those
other
provisions.
But
really
we
tried
to
kind
of
focus
that
conversation
on
the
three-year
weight,
removal
which
we
did
see
broad
support
for
with
the
public.
D
Well
again,
I
think
you're
talking
about
people
who
are
interested
in
adu
or
who
are
looking
at
adus,
but
the
general
public.
I
think
that's
the
reason
why
it's
so
important.
We
go
to
the
neighborhood
planning
process
because
neighborhood
represents
the
whole
city.
You
know
they
they're
concerned
about
neighborhood
characters
and
all
that
stuff.
So
I
sympathize
completely
with
employers
such
as
you
know
we
heard
from
amazon.
Yes,
their
employees
want
to
have
a
place
to
live
a
choice
of
homes
and
all
that
stuff.
D
Absolutely
we
need
to
provide
many
many
more
homes
because
the
growth
is
demanding
it.
Then
that
goes
with
transportation.
Everything
else
right,
but
adu
is
but
we're
talking
to
people
they're
glad
to
believe
that
we're
talking
about
affordable
the
cost
is
a
big
consideration.
So
I
think
it's
important
to
let
the
neighbors
on
board
that
they
understand
that
you
know
we
are
talking
about
general,
increasing
housing
style
as
well
as
creating
affordable
housing
at
cost
basis.
So
I
think
otherwise
we're
going
to
be
hearing
from
people
all
over
the
place.
D
A
You
councilmember
lee,
appreciate
that,
and
you
know
I'll
tell
you
it's
now.
It's
my
turn
to
talk.
You
characterized,
mr
davidos's
comments
very
well
in
your
in
your
in
your
discussion
there,
and
I
agree
with
you.
I
is
increasing
housing
stock
and,
and
apparently
you
know,
we
hope
that
housing
prices
go
down
is
housing
stock
increases.
A
I
I
looked
at
this
from
the
bellevue
network
on
aging
perspective,
which
I
was
on.
When
we
first
started
looking
at
adus,
it
was
really
to
preserve
the
ability
of
an
old,
an
aging
bellevue
resident
to
have
the
choice
to
either
stay
in
their
home
or
downsize
in
their
neighborhood.
A
You
know
and
rent
out
their
home
and
downsize
into
an
adu,
and
so
it
was
about
aging
in
place,
maybe
getting
a
little
income
to
help
pay
for
property
taxes
and
being
able
to
stay
within
the
neighborhood
and
actually
the
the
second
item
that
we're
voting
on
with
the
townhouses
is
another
one
that
preserves
people
who
are
downsizing
the
ability
to
stay
closer
to
their
neighborhood.
A
So
one
statistic-
that's
really
interesting-
is
that
50
of
the
housing
available
in
bellevue
right
now
is
single
family,
home
and
50
of
single-family
homes
are
occupied
by
one
or
two
adults,
and
the
average
single-family
home
in
bellevue
is
a
four-bedroom
house.
So
that's
a
lot
of
house
for
a
few
people,
but
you
know
as
an
empty
nester
myself,
there's
not
a
whole
lot
of
places
to
downsize.
A
So
I
think
that
if
we
create
more
opportunities
for
people
to
downsize,
if
they
want
to,
if
that's
their
choice,
to
do
that
and
reduce
their
expenses
but
be
able
to
stay
in
the
in
the
in
bellevue,
I
think
that
we
will
open
up
single-family
home
stock
to
families
who
want
to
come
and
have
their
kids
walk
to
school
and
and
have
a
safe
street
and
all
the
good
that
comes
with
raising
your
family
in
in
bellevue.
A
So
I'm
very
supportive
of
these
two
recommendations
from
the
planning
commission
and
I
look
forward
to
for
more
discussions
on
this.
I
think
the
detached
dwelling
units
I'm
looking
forward
to
robust
neighborhood
discussions
that
might
help
us
characterize
what's
best
for
the
entire
city
and
that
will
come
with
a
good
community
process,
and
I
agree
that
we
shouldn't
be
taking
so
long
to
do
things.
I
think
there's
a
real
feeling
that
we've
got
like
three
years
before
light
rail
comes
into
bellevue
and
we
need
to
get
moving
on
this
sooner
than
later.
A
E
A
I
see
councilmember
barksdale,
so
let
me
finish
so.
I'm
really
excited
at
the
motion
movement
that
we're
having
right
now
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
more
conversations
on
this.
So
I
will
be
supporting
both
of
the
planning
commission's
recommendations
and
I'm
going
to
let
councilmember
barksdale
have
another
fight
at
the
apple
here.
Go
ahead.
E
Thank
you.
I
just.
I
just
wanted
to
comment
that
you
know.
I
agree
that
there's
a
lot
of
work
on
our
plate
and
I
think
I
don't
think
this
has
to
understanding
more
about
the
where
the
community
is
and
how
we
can
help
adu
promote
adu
development,
lower
the
barriers
in
a
way
that
still
builds
community
has
to
take
that
long.
E
The
challenge
with
the
great
neighborhoods
program
is
that
we're
seven
years
out
from
completing
that
great
neighborhoods
program,
and
so,
if
we're
waiting
seven
years
before,
we
have
the
discussion
again
about
adus.
That's
a
long
time,
especially
given
the
point
that
you
just
made
mayor
that
that
light
rail
was
coming
here
in
three
years.
So
I.
E
A
E
Nope
I'm
saying
I
would
like
I'm
saying
I'm
saying
that
just
just
noting
the
time
line
for
the
great
neighborhoods
program,
which
we've
talked
about
as
being
an
avenue
and
how
long
that
takes.
So,
I
think,
there's
some
value
in
saying.
How
do
we
do
a
shorter
term
review
of
like
removing
barriers
for
adus
generally,
because
if
we
versus
just
about
the
adus,
but
just
generally
removing
barriers.
A
So
how
do
we
do
a
robust
public
process?
It
doesn't
take
seven
years,
yes
got
it.
I
think
we're
all
in
support
of
that
one.
So
thank
you
for
bringing
that
to
light,
because
I
I
agree
with
you
and
I
think
we
all
do.
We
need
to
get
that
conversation
going,
and
so
I
know
we're
scheduled
to
do
it
with
our
first
two
to
four
neighborhoods,
but
as
a
you
know,
waiting
for
the
whole
process.
Maybe
there's
a
way
we
can
engage
the
other
neighborhoods
more
quickly.
A
So
that's
something
that
we'd,
like
staff,
I'm
sure
to
look
at
how
to
do
a
little
quicker
of
a
robust
community
process
to
have
that
discussion,
not
preordaining
what
the
outcome's
going
to
be
right.
So
tonight
we
are
going
to
vote
on
the
planning
commission's
two
recommendations
and
I'd
like
our
daily
mayor,
to
make
a
motion.
Please.
A
C
Yet
sorry,
I
need
to
mute
sorry
about
that.
So
the
next
item
is
with
respect
to
a
discussion
on
the
house
bill,
1590
interest
statement
and
just
by
way
of
background
american
council
members,
that
council
enacted
resolution
926
on
october
12th
of
2020,
which
allowed
bellevue
to
collect
the
10th
of
a
percent
sales
tax
for
the
use
for
affordable
housing
and
behavioral
health
services.
We
also
again
refer
to
that
as
house
bill
1590
money.
C
This
was
last
in
front
of
council.
This
topic
of
house
bill
1590
money.
It
was
last
in
front
of
council
on
december
14th
of
2020,
where
council
initiated
a
work
plan
regarding
the
implementation
of
the
use
of
these
funds.
This
night
staff
is
returning
to
the
council
related
to
the
out
the
first
element
of
the
work
plan,
and
that
is
development
of
the
interest
statement
for
council
consideration.
C
Joining
us
tonight
is
matt
cummins,
the
director
of
community
development.
We
have
stephanie
martinez,
also
our
homeless
outreach
coordinator
with
the
city
manager's
office,
as
well
as
lisa
olson
management.
Fellow
of
the
city
manager's
office.
Before
I
turn
over
to
mac,
staff
is
seeking
direction
from
the
council
for
purposes
of
adopting
the
interest
statement.
V
V
As
we
start
our
introduction
this
evening,
I
thought
I
might
just
quickly
mention
I.
I
think
this
is
actually
the
first
presentation
with
the
council
for
both
liesel
olsen
who's,
a
management
fellow
with
the
city
and
the
city
manager's
office
and
stephanie
martinez
who's.
V
Our
homelessness
outreach
coordinator,
so
just
want
to
welcome
them
to
the
fray
and
they're,
going
to
be
walking
through
the
actual
interest
statement
here
in
a
few
minutes
when
we
get
to
that,
I
thought
by
way
of
a
background,
as
we
start
to
put
up
the
slides
talking
a
little
bit
about
so
we
were
here
last
year
in
december,
as
city
manager
miyake
mentioned.
V
At
that
time
we
indicated
to
the
council
that
the
work
program
would
likely
involve
a
number
of
study
sessions,
starting
here
as
soon
as
we
could,
after
the
first
of
the
year,
so
tonight's,
the
first
of
those
and
then
going
through
roughly
the
springtime
and
we're
anticipating
between
six
and
eight
study
sessions,
depending
on
the
council
and
working
through
the
decision
making
process.
So
tonight
is
the
first
of
those
and
we're
gonna
walk
through
the
overall
work
program
with
you
and
then
talk
about.
V
What's
what
the
next
steps
are,
so
we
can
flip
to
the
next
slide.
Lisa.
Thank
you.
So
the
direction
we're
looking
for
from
the
council
this
evening
is
adoption
of
the
proposed
interest
statement
that
was
contained
in
your
packet
and
there's
a
there's,
a
couple
components
to
that
that
we
want
to
mention
and
you're
going
to
hear
this
a
couple
of
times
tonight.
The
interest
statement
that
we're
asking
you
to
reflect
on
and
adopt
this
evening
is
a
consolidation
of
existing
policies.
There
are
no
new
policies
contained
in
that
interest
statement.
V
It
is
formatted
in
narrative
and
paragraph
form
around
nine
separate
principles
which
are
the
consolidation
of
a
number
of
policies
from
a
number
of
different
documents,
notably
the
city's
comprehensive
plan
series.
Many
elements,
the
affordable
housing
strategic
plan
and
the
human
services
needs
update.
V
So
we
believe
that
this
interest
statement
will
be
an
opportunity,
if
adopted,
to
allow
us
to
start
approaching
our
regional
partners
and
the
service
providers
and
or
the
development
community
and
a
number
of
folks,
as
well
as
our
community,
start
to
talk
about
evaluating
the
different
funding
opportunities
within
the
1590
funding
stream.
So,
let's
flip
to
the
agenda
slide
tonight.
What
we'd
like
to
do
is
go
through
the
work
plan
overview
and
talk
about
how
the
interest
statement
fits
into
that
we're.
V
Also
looking
at
revisiting
exactly
what
the
1590
funds
can
be
used
for.
Now
we're
not
going
to
talk
tonight
about
use
of
the
1590
funds,
we're
just
going
to
be
talking
about
the
interest
statement,
but
we
also
know
there's
a
lot
of
misunderstanding
out
in
the
public
and
we're
getting
a
lot
of
questions
at
the
staff
level
and
I'm
sure
you
are
as
well
where
folks
think
this
is
just
a
homelessness
program,
or
this
is
just
an
affordable
housing
program
and
there
are
very
specific
allowances
for
what
you
can
do
with
the
1590
funds.
V
So
we
plan
on
actually
covering
that
at
pretty
much
all
the
study
sessions.
There
may
be
some
new
viewers
that
will
want
to
want
to
see
that
information,
we'll
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
existing
policies
and
how
they
were
consolidated
and
rolled
into
the
interest
statement
and
then
we'll
actually
go
through
the
nine
principles
in
the
interest
statement
for
you
all
and
then
talk
about
the
next
steps.
Assuming
that
you
adopt
the
the
statement
of
stephen.
V
So
if
we
go
to
the
next
slide,
so
this
is
the
overall
work
plan
and
we're
building
towards
a
prioritization
and
a
set
of
recommendations
on
what
we
would
want
to
use
the
1590
monies
to
fund.
And
in
our
preliminary
discussions
with
the
council,
there
was
a
wide
range
of
ideas
and
potential
opportunities.
V
So
when
we
talked
to
the
council
in
december,
we
set
about
an
idea
of
putting
together
an
interest
statement
and
one
of
the
main
goals
of
putting
together.
That
interest
statement
was
to
see
what
policies
the
city
had
already
adopted,
that
were
applicable
to
the
1590
house
bill
and
or
to
see
if
there
was
any
gaps
in
policy.
V
In
other
words,
was
there
a
need
to
create
any
new
policy
based
on
some
of
the
ideas
for
project
types
or
or
funding,
or
geographic
distribution,
or
a
whole
host
of
things
that
came
up
and
what
we
found
was
there?
There
really
aren't
any
gaps.
The
city
has
tremendous
policy
around
affordable
housing
need
for
different
types
of
that
housing.
V
Human
services
needs
gaps
in
funding
and
it's
actually
identified
quite
a
bit
of
things
that
the
1590
funds
could
fit
into
very
nicely
in
terms
of
that
space.
So
the
idea
for
the
work
plan
was
to
create
an
interest
statement
that
would
put
all
of
those
policies
in
one
place,
and
the
value
of
that
is.
V
It
allows
us
to
go
talk
to
all
the
folks
I
started
to
mention
earlier,
and
each
of
you
individually
has
given
us
a
number
of
of
different
ideas
of
different
governmental
entities,
housing
consortiums
developers
and
the
like
to
start
that
that
dialogue
and
if
we
can
take
an
adopted
interest
statement
that
has
all
the
city's
policies
put
into
those
topical
buckets
with
references
to
the
policies
themselves,
all
in
one
place
that
will
greatly
aid
us
as
we
start
our
evaluation
of
the
universe
of
alternatives,
some
of
which
may
not
make
sense
in
bellevue
for
a
variety
of
reasons,
and
some
may
make
a
lot
more
sense,
depending
on
all
the
different
variables
that
you're
all
going
to
be
considering.
V
So
the
other.
The
other
value
of
the
interest
statement
is
it
helps
to
identify
the
needs
in
the
community
and
that
stems
right
out
of
the
affordable
housing
work
and
human
services
work.
So
by
identifying
those
needs
in
the
written
document,
we'll
have
something
that
we
can
take
to
people
and
leave
with
them
and
continue
to
take
feedback
about
about
potential
projects
and
potential
deals.
V
Another
main
point
that
I'm
going
to
mention
here:
it's
not
overtly
in
the
interest
statement
we,
but
it's
going
to
move
pretty
quickly.
Here
is
the
idea
of
early
winds
and
how
we
can
start
to
advance
some
of
these
things,
because
we
know
there
are
a
lot
of
service
providers
and
or
would-be
project
developers
that
are
interested
in
participating
in
the
program.
So
let's
go
on
to
the
next
slide
liesel.
V
So
we
talked
earlier
about
how
we
would
go
through
the
the
funding
itself
and
the
opportunities
house
bill.
1590
breaks
the
funding
stream
and
again
just
in
round
numbers
in
working
with
our
finance
department
that
one
tenth
of
one
percent,
we
believe
will
likely
yield
somewhere
around
9
million
of
which
50
can
have
debt
issued
against
it.
V
So
and
again
we're
not
talking
about
how
we
may
spend
the
money
tonight,
but
we'll
reiterate
that
at
all
the
meetings
at
least
60
of
whatever
monies
are
collected
must
be
spent
on
creating
constructing
affordable
housing,
constructing
facilities
that
provide
housing,
related
services
and
mental
and
behavioral
health
facilities,
and
then
a
series
of
operations
and
maintenance.
Things
related
to
those
within
that
there
are
very
specific
requirements
for
that.
V
Housing
and
housing-related
services
and
the
targeted
populations
need
to
be
at
60,
ami
or
less,
and
specifically
only
the
following
populations
can
be
served.
Persons
with
mental
and
behavioral
health,
disabilities,
veterans
senior
citizens
homeless,
or
at
risk
of
being
homeless,
families
with
children
and
that's
important
because
it's
one
of
the
most
misunderstood
parts
of
house
bill
1590.
It
is
only
homeless,
families
with
children
or
unaccompanied
homeless,
youth,
young
adults.
V
It
is
not
just
an
overall
homelessness
program
and
the
last
category
domestic
violence,
survivors
and
so
those
are
the
requirements
to
go
with
the
construction
of
the
housing
or
housing
related
services.
No
more
than
40
percent
of
the
money
can
be
spent
on
the
operation,
delivery
and
evaluation
of
the
mental
and
behavioral
treatment,
programs
and
housing-related
services.
V
V
1590
says
that
at
least
60
has
to
be
spent
on
that
whole
first
category
that
I
mentioned,
and
then
no
more
than
40
percent
would
be
spent
on
the
human
services
part
and
when
we
get
into
the
prioritization
discussion
with
you
all
how
we
decide
to
split
up
those
commun
monies
as
a
council
here,
for
you
will
be
a
pretty
important
choice
and
and
again
that
comes
downstream
because
there's
a
number
of
variables
that
will
go
into
that.
But
again
it's
not
a
static
model.
V
So
the
opportunity
to
change
your
prioritization
year
to
year
every
couple
of
years,
depending
on
what
makes
the
most
sense
will
will
be
there,
and
this
is
an
ongoing
revenue
stream
so
that
nine
million
a
year
looks
like
it
will
be
there
for
some
time,
let's
go
to
the
next
slide
lethal.
V
We
took
those
and
put
them
into
thematic
areas
as
principles,
because
we
believe
that's
the
best
way
to
articulate
the
the
city's
identified,
needs
and
policies
around
bridging
that
gap,
to
create
the
types
of
policies
and
or
treatment
for
folks
that
this
funding
stream
would
allow.
So
with
that,
I'm
going
to
hand
it
off
to
lisa
olsen
one
of
our
project
managers
to
walk
you
through
the
interest
statement.
I
Great
thanks
mac
good
evening,
everyone
and
thank
you
for
having
me
this
evening,
I'll
just
expand
a
little
bit
on
the
consolidation
of
existing
policies.
Like
mac
mentioned,
we
worked
with
a
cross-departmental
work
team
to
identify
the
relevant
policy
documents
that
were
related
to
the
use
of
the
hb
1590
funds.
I
Some
of
those
documents
that
we
used
were
the
comprehensive
plan,
including
the
human
services,
the
housing
and
the
economic
development
elements.
The
affordable
housing
strategy,
the
2019-2020
human
needs
update
that
really
helped
us
identify
the
the
needs
and
the
themes
to
kind
of
have
that
broad
understanding
of
the
human
services
needs
in
bellevue.
I
We
also
looked
at
documents
like
the
diversity
advantage
initiative
and
the
economic
development
plan,
so
the
work
team
worked
with
these
documents
again
to
look
at
all
applicable
policies,
needs
and
strategies,
really
looking
to
identify
any
gaps
with
policies
that
bellevue
already
has,
and
we
did
not
end
up
finding
that,
and
so
you'll
see
this
consolidation
of
existing
policies
and
documents
in
your
council
packet
as
attachment
be
and
just
again
to
reiterate
what
mac
talked
about.
These
principles
are
describing
current
adopted
policies
of
the
city.
I
So
with
that,
I
will
take
you
into
our
interest
statement.
This
is
presented
in
your
council
packet
as
attachment
a
and,
as
has
been
previously
mentioned,
you
know
this
interest
statement
we
believe
will
effectively
and
efficiently
address
the
community
needs
in
bellevue
and
really
serve
as
that
guiding
document
to
help
us
prioritize
hb,
1590
funding.
I
I
Housing
element
in
existing
strategies
within
the
affordable
housing
strategy
in
needs
identified
in
the
human
service
needs
update,
and
we
believe
you
know,
existing
funding
is
really
insufficient
to
meet
this
housing
need,
especially
for
those
households
who
may
be
experiencing
housing
instability,
and
so
this
revenue
source
is
really
going
to
be
critical
in
helping
to
address
this
housing
gap
and
add
those
units
that
can
really
serve
our
economically
diverse
households
in
bellevue.
I
The
second
second
principle
within
the
interest
statement,
is
increase,
housing
types
and
opportunities
so
to
really
meet
to
the
diverse,
affordable
housing
needs
for
residents.
There
is
this
need
to
increase
kind
of
a
broad
range
of
housing
choices
to
again
serve
those
income
levels
between
zero
and
sixty
percent
of
ami.
I
We
see
this
represented
in
existing
policies
through
the
comprehensive
plan,
housing
element
and
again
in
strategies
in
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
the
economic
development
plan
as
well.
So
policies
that
provide
a
range
of
housing
choices,
encourage
partnerships
with
housing
developers
on
providing
that
array
of
housing
options
and
encouraging
housing
opportunities
in
different
settings
throughout
the
city.
I
The
third
principle
in
the
interest
statement,
is
adopt
a
city-wide
approach.
This
principle
really
speaks
to
the
city's
commitment
to
support,
affordable
housing,
behavioral
health
and
housing
related
services
that
are
located
throughout
bellevue.
So
again,
this
really.
This
speaks
to
the
geographic
distribution
of
these
programs
and
services,
ensuring
that
they
are
easily
accessible
and
located
throughout
bellevue
and
avoiding
concentrating
facilities
and
services.
W
Hi
everyone
thanks
liesel
mayor
deputy
mayor
members
of
council,
thanks
for
having
me
here
tonight,
I'm
stephanie
martinez.
Again,
I'm
the
homeless
outreach
coordinator
for
the
city,
so
bringing
us
back
to
some
of
the
principles.
So
our
fourth
principle
is
meet.
The
spectrum
of
housing
and
service
needs.
So
there's
a
wide
range
of
housing
types
and
service
needs
identified
in
our
already
adopted
documents
and
policies
such
as
those
in
the
housing
element
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
The
human
services
needs
assessment,
affordable
housing
strategy
and
strategies
in
our
economic
development
plan.
W
The
continuum
of
human
services
so
from
our
human
services
needs
assessment,
as
well
as
the
human
services
element
in
the
comprehensive
plan,
really
the
development
and
the
identification
of
opportunities
that
are
preventative
in
nature
and
provide
those
more
upstream
responses
are
key
in
addressing
a
variety
of
human
services
needs
so,
for
example,
by
closing
the
affordable
housing
gap
and
by
increasing
access
to
mental
and
behavioral
health
services.
We
can
really
provide
more
upstream
responses
that
help
stabilize
and
resolve
current
housing
crises,
as
well
as
any
future
crises
or
mental
or
behavioral
health
crises.
W
The
types
of
housing
and
services
that
can
be
funded
through
the
use
of
hp
1590
really
advances
our
current
continuum
of
human
services,
so
that
we're
not
only
able
to
intervene
and
respond
to
current
crises,
but
also
prevent
future
housing,
instability
and
other
crises,
and
these
funds
can
contribute
to
the
enhancement
of
our
current
networks
of
programs
and
services,
providing
a
safety
net
of
sorts
that
serves
to
address
and
prevent
housing
instability
and
our
last
one.
On
this
slide
number
six.
The
sixth
principle
is
enhance:
equitable
and
accessible
housing
and
supportive
services.
W
W
Bellevue
really
remains
committed
to
enhancing
equity
and
access
to
the
spectrum
of
housing
and
supportive
services
that
we've
discussed
tonight
through
the
creation
of
housing
choices
and
supportive
services
that
support
our
economically
diverse
households,
such
as
those
through
zero
to
sixty
percent.
Ami
bellevue
can
really
advance
our
accessibility
to
our
vulnerable
communities.
W
Our
underserved
communities
and
those
that
are
disproportionately
affected
by
housing,
instability
and
homelessness,
such
as
our
communities
of
color
hb
1590
funds,
can
really
be
that
tool
that
enhances
our
current
action
and
commitment,
because
the
funding
really
does
focus
and
allows
us
to
address
these
sort
of
systemic
and
structural
factors
that
lead
to
homelessness,
housing
and
economic
instability,
because
these
funds
can
really
close
the
affordable
housing
gap
and
enhance
the
behavioral
health
services
as
well
and
next
slide.
W
Please
going
to
principle
7,
strengthen
and
foster
self-sufficiency
to
achieve
potential
across
all
of
the
documents
that
we
continue
to
discuss
tonight,
such
as
the
human
services
needs
assessment,
the
affordable
housing
strategy
and
the
economic
development
plan.
There's
really
a
shared
identified
theme
across
all
of
these
documents,
and
it's
really
that
by
addressing
these
systemic
factors
such
as
affordable
housing
crises
and
the
need
for
mental
behavioral
health
services,
we
are
ultimately
fostering
self-sufficiency,
human
potential
and
housing
and
economic
stability
across
our
most
vulnerable
and
economically
diverse
populations.
W
This
will
really
allow
us
to
meet
the
variety
of
housing
types
and
needs
in
bellevue,
but
it'll
also
really
help
us
collaborate,
coordinate
and
really
leverage
resources,
while
being
in
coordination
to
address
these
sort
of
shared
needs
and
again,
this
collaboration
will
further
allow
us
to
develop
our
priorities
and
remain
strategic
in
our
short
and
long
term.
Efforts
as
well
and
last
but
not
least,
going
to
number
nine
be
an
active
and
collaborative
regional
partner.
V
All
right,
thank
you,
stephanie.
So
the
the
work
plan
contemplates
the
adoption
of
an
interest
statement
this
evening
and
then
moving
directly
into
the
stakeholder
outreach
and
or
starting
to
evaluate
and
analyze
the
various
opportunities
that
the
1590
funds
could
be
used
for
with
an
idea
to
come
back
to
council
every
four
to
six
weeks,
with
a
new
study
session
to
be
working
through
the
different
variables
and
or
the
different
opportunities
to
eventually
land
somewhere
between
five
and
seven
study
sessions.
From
now
on,
a
set
of
prioritizations.
V
That
would
give
guidance
for
how
you
would
like
the
first
set
of
monies
to
be
to
be
allocated.
So
we
imagine
a
very
robust
discussion
at
the
next
study
session
around
the
kinds
of
feedback
that
we're
hearing
and
where
the
opportunities
really
lie
within
bellevue,
as
well
as
some
initial
staff
analysis.
V
A
Okay,
great,
that's
a
terrific
presentation.
I
appreciate
it
and
and
lisa
and
stephanie
it's
nice
to
see
your
faces
at
the
meeting
tonight
and,
of
course
mac
yours
as
well,
but
we
see
you
more
often,
so
I'm
going
to
give
everybody
a
chance
to
comment
or
ask
questions
in
this
order.
Member
stokes,
followed
by
council
member
lee
zhan
robertson,
barksdale,
a
deputy
mayor
noon
house
and
then
myself
so
councilmember
stokes.
Do
you
want
to
start
us
off?
Please.
K
Absolutely
thank
you.
I
have
to
say
I
I
am
so
excited
about
this.
You
know
we.
We
have
a
great
base
for
this
with
our
affordable
housing
strategy
and
strategies
have
to
be
put
into
into
play,
and
you
know
we
had
a
good
discussion
about
this
1590
money
and
how
it
would
how
we
would
use
it
and
how
it
would
help
us
really
elevate
our
game,
and
I
we're
doing
that,
and
I
just
I
and
I
think
it's
really
great
work
staff
has
done.
K
I
appreciate
the
the
focus
and
I
agree
with
you-
know
the
setting
up
this
the
work
plan
this
way
and
I'm
just
I,
I
think,
we're
getting
ourselves
set
to
really
do
what
we've
been
talking
about
for
some
time
in
a
very
effective
way,
and
I
see
this
as
something
that
will
keep
moving
along,
and
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we
will
have
you
know
frequent,
planned
updates
on
this,
which
is
very
important.
Sometimes
we
go
for
a
long
time
and
don't
do
that.
So
this
is
a.
K
K
It
takes
us
back
to
2015
when
we
came
up
with
our
vision
statement
and
with
our
priorities
over
the
time
period
and
then,
as
we've
progressed
as
a
council
and
as
a
city
working
together
to
afford
to
come
up
with
affordable
housing
and
homeless
strategies
which
are
all
intertwined,
and
I
think,
following
up
on
our
taking
advantage
of
the
opportunity
that
dropped
into
our
laps
at
the
you
know
a
couple
of
months
ago,
or
so
we
have
made
great
strides
and
I'm
I'm
just
excited
about
getting
this
going
forward.
K
So
I
don't
have
any
questions.
You
know
we
can
always
think
of
questions,
but
I
think
what
we
have
before
is
a
work
plan
and
I'm
really
excited
about
seeing
this
going
forward,
and
I
do
of
course
I
always
believe
that
it's
very
important
to
be
to
work
on
this,
both
in
bellevue
and
regionally,
because
well,
one
of
the
things
is
a
majority
of
people
who
work
in
bellevue
live
outside
of
bellevue.
K
So
we
do
a
lot
of
things
that
help
and
are
affected
for
businesses
and
people
who
work
outside
and
don't
live
in
bellevue,
but
who
are
here
and
the
same
thing
applies.
So
I
think
this
gives
us
a
leadership
position
will
give
us
a
leadership
position
in
the
region
and
it
will
end
up
making
better
bellevue's
approach
to
this
and
the
services
to
people
in
bellevue
much
better
by
doing
that,
so
I'm
excited
about
and
ready
to
go.
Thank
you
great.
Thank.
A
You
councilmember
lee.
D
Thanks,
madame
kudos
to
the
staff,
this
is
well
done.
I
mean
the
way
you
put
it
and
I
think,
really
shows
also
kudos
to
the
city
of
bellevue,
and
you
mentioned
you
know
the
city
has
all
these
specific
programs
already
in
place?
Basically,
you
kind
of
just
you
know,
summarize
it
and
figure
out.
You
know
how
to
consolidate,
consolidate
the
programs
and
into
an
interest
statement-
and
it's
very
very,
very
well-
was
well
written
very
well
done.
D
So
I'm
going
to
ask
you
only
one
question
which
is
regarding
the
complete
the
city.
Why
we
just
went
through
this
affordable
housing
discussion
before
this,
so
you
know
still
fresh.
D
You
know.
This
is
something
that
combines
all
the
programs
we
look
at,
which
is
important
to
the
city,
which
is
social.
You
mentioned
economic,
which
is
a
to
me.
It's
social,
economic
and
another
one
is
age.
One
thing
that
is
not
specifically
mentioned:
we
talk
about
follow-up
housing.
You
know
we're
on
aging
place.
We
don't
want
to
leave
the
city
because
we
have
a
different
need
for
housing
and
there's
nothing
there
right
so
and
then.
Finally,
it's
a
culture
as
well.
D
You
know,
because
you
mentioned
39
of
our
populations,
foreign
bond
and
they
have
different
culture,
and
so
that
makes
a
difference.
You
know
you.
I
think
that
is
a
consideration
then
also
ability.
You
know
ability
means
people
of
all
sorts
of
needs
that
need
to
be
considered.
You
know
it's
also
part
of
the
housing
as
well
affordable
housing.
D
So
I
think
this
is
a
really
a
very
wonderful
overall
umbrella,
where
you
are
building
a
physical
supply
provision,
how
to
help
our
people-
and
specifically,
in
this
case,
it's
housing
and
that's
a
very
major
element
of
it.
So
I
think
this
is
very
well
done
very
inclusive,
except
for
what
I
brought
up
you
know,
maybe
you
can
answer
a
little
bit
on
those
on
that
what
particular
issue?
How
do
you
address
age?
How
do
you
address
social?
How
do
you
address
culture?
How
to
address
ability.
A
Thank
you,
miss
councilmember
lee.
Do
you
can
you
answer
that
lisa
or
stephanie.
I
Yeah
so
in
specifically
related
to
age
and
ability,
we
kind
of
tried
to
incorporate
that
generally
into
the
principles.
I
think
specifically
around
kind
of
meeting
the
spectrum
of
housing
needs
and
understanding
that
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
needs
that
are
that
can
fit
underneath
that
guiding
principle,
I
think,
also
increased
housing
types
and
opportunities
was
one
that
we
specifically
looked
at
specifically
with
bellevue's
policies
related
to
aging
kind
of
fitting
fitting
under
that
that
guiding
principle.
W
W
A
F
Yes,
thank
you.
You
know
I
want
to
echo
the
good
job
to
to
both
of
you,
liesel
and
stephanie.
I
mean
I
thought
that
the
interest
statement
was
was
very
inclusive.
It
had
all
of
the
elements
that
we've
been
talking
about.
I
really
appreciated
the
consolidated
policies
as
well,
because
to
me,
as
I
thought
about
this
opportunity
with
the
1590
money.
F
Some
of
the
statistics
that
really
struck
me
was
that
49
of
bellevue
jobs
earns
less
than
50
000
a
year
and
those
are
your
dental
assistants,
hotel
workers,
baristas
and
that
that
17
of
the
households
in
bellevue
earns
less
than
50
000
a
year.
F
That's
17
of
our
households,
but
only
6
of
the
units
in
bellevue
are
affordable.
So
it
makes
me
wonder
how
are
the
other
you
know,
11
percent
actually
surviving
living
in
bellevue
and
to
me.
I
think
that
we
need
to
be
a
community
that
really
looks
at
how
we
support
people
being
able
to
live
here
at
all
different
income
levels,
and
not
just
people
that
can
afford,
on
the
the
market
rate
rents
that
we
have
in
bellevue.
F
So
I
really
appreciated
having
that
backstory
backdrop
of
need,
because
I
think
it
really
helps
us
frame.
Why
we're
doing
this
work,
because
if
half
the
jobs
in
bellevue
are
less
than
50k
and
only
six
percent
of
the
housing
stock
is
affordable.
F
There's
an
issue
here
and
I
think
it's
going
to
exacerbate
our
transportation
challenges
if
you
know
94
of
the
people
that
work
here
are
commuting
from
other
places
because
they
can't
afford
to
be
here
so
anyway.
I
really
appreciate
this
work,
especially
the
one
about
equitable
and
accessible
housing.
I
think
it's
a
yes
and
of
how
we
make
that
happen,
and
I
really
appreciate
1590
talking
about
homeless
families,
because
what
I
hear
is
sometimes
you
know.
F
As
we
come
out
of
covid,
we
might
have
families
that
are
going
to
be
in
that
cusp
of
of
losing
their
housing,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
there's
an
ability
for
them
to
stay
together
as
a
family,
so
you
don't
have
right
parents
in
one
place
and
kids
having
to
be
shuffled
off
someplace
else.
So
I
think
that's
important.
F
My
understanding
is
currently.
Preservation
is
not
in
our
interest
statement,
because
1590
doesn't
currently
allow
that.
So
if
the
state
actually
makes
that
change,
will
we
come
back
and
and
adjust
our
interest
statement
to
allow
to
talk
about
preservation
as
well
as
building.
V
Yeah
so
two
two
different
issues.
The
question
of
there
is
an
allowance
in
1590
and
we
are
still
working
on
exactly
how
this
may
get
executed,
but
there
is
an
allowance
for
the
creation
of
new,
affordable
units
in
existing
buildings
and
exactly
how
that
would
happen
or
what
you
know
that
so
we're
going
to
be
looking
at
that
and
we're
working
with
our
city,
attorney's
office
and
that'll,
be
one
of
the
things
that
comes
back
to
you
all.
On
the
broader
question
right
now.
Yes,
the
state
legislature
is
taking
up
some
potential
tweaks.
V
We
are
not
actually
evaluating
those
tweaks
through
this
process.
We're
we're
moving
forward
here
with
lisa
and
stephanie,
using
all
of
our
existing
policy
and
then
we'll
be
commenting
through
joyce
and
the
intergovernmental
program
on
anything
that
comes
through
any
changes
at
the
state
legislature.
F
Okay
and
then
the
partnership
would
allow
us
to
potentially
infuse
some
of
the
1590
money
into
development
so
that
we
get
market
rate
all
the
way
down
to
affordable
housing
in
in
partnership,
whether
that's
regionally
or
locally
within
bellevue.
Is
that
right?
I
just
want
to
make
sure.
V
Yes,
I
think
if
you're
asking
the
question,
can
we
subsidize
units
down
to
under
60
ami?
That's
something
we're
looking
into
and
council
member
robertson
asked
us
that
exact
same
question.
So
can
we
look
at
market
rate
buildings
and
try
to
buy
down
the
units
to
60
or
30?
So
that's
one
of
the
things
you'll
be
taking
up
at
your
next
couple.
Study
sessions.
U
Hey
so
stephanie
and
lisa
great
job
on
your
first
council
zoom
game
show
the
the
powerpoint
was
excellent
and
your
presentation
was
excellent,
too
good
job
back
also.
So
you
know,
like
my
colleagues,
I'm
very
excited
about
this
1590
opportunity.
I
was
very
happy
to
support
it
and
I
definitely
want
to
see
you
know.
Council
is
going
to
want
to
have
a
high
touch
with
this.
U
So
I'm
glad
that
you're
coming
back
a
lot
because,
rather
than
just
adopting
an
interest
statement
and
saying,
go,
do
it
and
bring
us
back
budgets.
That
is
not
the
way
we
I
personally
want
to
go.
I
don't
think
my
colleagues
want
to
go
that
way
either.
That
said,
I
think
that
the
interest
statement
it's
it
does
a
good
capture
of
where
we
are,
and
I
particularly
like
the
last
three,
the
you
know,
number
seven,
eight
and
nine.
U
It
doesn't
really
tell
us
where
we
want
to
go
and
how
we
want
to
spend
the
money
and
how
we
want
to
prioritize
it,
and
so
that's
where
you
know
I.
I
wish
that
this
had
gone
circulated,
like
our
legislative
issue
statement
did
with
council
before
it
was
daylighted
in
a
meeting
so
that
we
could
have
in
input
into
it
as
it
was
being
developed,
because
I
really
would
like
to
see
more
specificity.
U
So,
for
example,
you
know
because
this
doesn't
really
specify
on
what
we
want
to
what
we
hold
most
dear
I'd
like
to
prioritize,
affordable
housing
and
tod
areas
around
high-capacity
transit.
I'd
like
to
make
sure
that
the
affordable
housing
is
dispersed
throughout
the
city,
as
well
as
within
projects
themselves.
I'd
like
to
prioritize
serve
the
services
as
well
as
residents
residential
units
for
people
who
are
already
in
bellevue
or
who
are
working
in
bellevue.
U
We
need
to
look
at
what
our
community
needs
are
and
step
up
and
serve
those
when
it
comes
to
among
the
groups,
I'd
like
to
prioritize
making
sure
that
those
families,
as
council
members
on
said
that
maybe
losing
their
homes
that
may
be
homeless,
kids
in
the
bellevue
school
district.
I
want
to
prioritize
serving
them.
I
want
to
prioritize
serving
the
youth
who've
grown
up
in
bellevue
and
now
can't
afford
to
live
here
when
they're
out
of
the
house.
U
So
I'd
also
like
to
support
services
that
move
people
out
of
homelessness
into
stable
situations
and
self-sufficiency,
that's
kind
of
captured
in
number
seven.
I
also
really
like
the
partnership
idea.
I
love
the
preservation
idea.
U
I
know
that
we've
talked
about
that
I'd
like
to
see
that
in
here
and
I'd
like
to
see
something
in
here
about
or
taking
advantage
of,
early
wins
and
being
nimble,
because
when
we
are
prioritizing
I'd
like
to
have
it
whatever
we're
prioritizing
be
clear
enough,
so
that
you,
the
staff,
knows
what
projects
we're
looking
for,
how
we
want
to
spend
the
money,
but
also
not
be
so
strict
that
we
can't
be
nimble
if
a
great
opportunity
comes
into
it
comes
up
so
I'd
like
to
somehow
get
that
in
there,
and
I
don't
know
whether
that
can
be
woven
into
the
interest
statement
or
whether
that's
going
to
come
forward
in
a
prioritization
and
implementation
plan,
but
whatever
it
is.
U
This
reads
like
a
comp
plan,
kind
of
because
it
is
it's
taken
from
those
policies,
but
the
comp
plan
doesn't
really
decide
how
bellevue
it's
the
goal
of
how
we
want
to
develop
bellevue
but
where
the
rubber
meets
the
road
is
in
our
land
use
code.
So
I'm
looking
forward
to
how
are
we
going
to
do
the
basically,
the
land
use
code
equivalent
for
the
1590
money,
because
that's
where
council's
priority
prioritization
and
you
know
a
little
bit
more
specific
direction-
will
really
come
into
play.
U
So
I
guess
my
my
question
for
mac
or
whoever
wants
to
answer
it
is
you
know,
because
I
think
this
is
great,
and
I
like
it,
but
it's
really
not
specific
enough.
It
doesn't
tell
us
how
to
go
forward.
So
how
are
we
going
to
get
to
the
level
of
specificity
where
we
find
out
the
seven
of
us
say
we
all
want
to
prioritize
families.
How
are
we
going
to
get
there?
U
And
what's
the
next
step
in
that,
because
I
understand
we're
going
to
be
prioritizing,
but
it
looks
like
this
interest
statement
is
just
going
to
go
to
outreach
without
that
level
of
specificity
and
if
you're,
trying
to
vet
projects
that
are
coming
in,
that
doesn't
really
help
it's
just
too
general.
V
So,
thank
you,
councilmember
robertson,
yeah.
The
interest
statement
that
you're
looking
at
tonight
is
not
the
filter
designed
to
do
what
what
you
are
getting
to.
So
we
imagine
the
next
several
study
sessions
being
a
a
refinement
and
and
the
filter
that
that
you're
talking
about
to
get
to
the
highest
priorities.
V
We
would
like
to
take
the
existing
policies
of
the
city
out
to
start
to
vet.
The
different
variables
that
are
going
to
go
into
your
discussion
be
able
to
give
you
some
feedback
about
where
the
early
wins
are
and
what
types
of
projects
are
more
realistic
than
others,
maybe
in
the
short,
medium
or
long
term,
a
whole
host
of
things
that
will
help
you
in
your
discussions
around
how
you
want
to
try
to
prioritize
those
things,
the
outcome
of
which
will
likely
be
some
type
of
implementation
plan.
U
My
recommendation
for
what
it's
worth
is
that
that
when
this,
when
we
come
back
to
the
implementation
prioritization,
that
we
create
kind
of
kind
of
like
our
council
vision,
where
we
have
the
vision
and
then
we
have
the
priorities,
I'd
love
to
see
something
where
we
have
the
interest
statement.
And
then
we
have
the
prioritizations.
And
then
we
have
the
implementation
plan,
because
those
are
all
three
different
things,
and
I
think
if
we
have
that,
because
certainly
we
want
a
lot
of
high
touch
right
now.
U
But
I
envision
setting
this
up
so
that
in
the
future
it
really
is
more
of
a
budget
issue
with
the
council
that
they're
not
vetting
every
little
thing
that
comes
in
when
there's
opportunities.
So
I
that
to
me
would
be
the
right
way
to
go
so
and
if
we're
you're
we're
being
asked
to
move
on
this
tonight.
U
E
All
right,
thank
you
mayor.
I
think
my
colleagues
have
already
had
a
number
of
the
points
that
I
wanted
to
hit,
but
I
want
to
reiterate
councilmember
robertson's
point,
because
I
was
actually
going
to
bring
up
the
implementation
plan
as
well.
E
I
know
that
was
a
big
deal
for
us,
as
we
were
in
the
earlier
discussions,
and
so
I
would
also
like
to
see
that
and
then,
as
part
of
that
any
sort
of-
and
I
imagine
this
would
be
part
of
it
any
sort
of
metrics.
That
would
help
us
get
a
sense
of
how
things
are
progressing
through
that.
So
for
the
outreach
just
to
clarify.
Is
that
coming
back
to
us,
not
just
the
updates
from
the
outreach,
but
the
approach
to
outreach
is
that
coming
back
to
us
as
well.
V
It's
not
coming
back
as
a
decision
point
for
you
all.
We
had
planned
on
updating
you
routinely
as
we
start
the
outreach
and
then
we're
going
to
be
giving
feedback
and
in
terms
of
the
types
of
things
that
we're
hearing
so
at
the
last
work
session,
you
all
gave
us
ideas
about
things
you
wanted
to
know
about
and
specific
entities
that
you
wanted
us
to
talk
to.
V
E
Okay,
all
right
yeah,
just
looking
to
see
to
make
sure
that
we're
actually
reaching
the
broad
segments
of
our
community.
So
if
you
could
include
that
as
part
of
discuss
the
results
from
the
outreach
that'd
be
great,
that's
all
I
have
thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
council
member
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
thank.
J
You
mayor,
yes,
I
will
pile
on
and
certainly
great
presentation
from
from
everyone
tonight,
and
I
share
many
of
my
colleagues
thoughts.
It's
it's
a
great
presentation.
J
It's
a
very
exciting
time
at
a
time
when
you
know
that
we
really
need
these
funds
to
address
a
lot
of
issues
in
our
community
right
now,
especially
due
to
the
pandemic.
So
this
couldn't
have
happened
at
a
better
time.
I
mean
obviously
a
lot
of
these
of
these
issues
regarding
affordable
housing,
mental
health,
behavior,
all
those
existed,
but
it's
all
been
exasperated
through
the
pandemic.
So
I
also
share
council
member.
J
You
know
robertson's
thoughts
and
also
customer
barksdale
about
some
specifics,
but
I
understand
you
got
your
plan,
I'm
a
little
bit
impatient
by
nature
mac,
but
we
you
know,
we
really
want
some
early
wins
here
and-
and
I
really
hope
that
part
of
the
the
outreach
and
part
of
the
I
guess
identified-
needs
that
we
would
make
use
of
the
human
services
commission
when
they've
gone
through
their
assessment
and
needs.
J
So
in
terms
of
hitting
the
ground
even
quicker,
I
think
there
might
be
some
key
learnings
there
that
we
might
be
able
to
take
advantage
of
to
help
start
to
distribute
some
of
these
funds,
because
my
understanding
is
we're
going
to
start
receiving
money
at
the
end
of
this
quarter
already,
but
given
that
the
process
that
we're
going
through
we're
at
least
another
18
weeks
away
before
we
finish
this
plan,
it
would
just
be
great
if
we
could
have
some
of
those
early.
Nice
wins
up
front,
even
if
they're
smaller.
J
I
want
to
put
this
money
to
work
as
soon
as
we
possibly
can
to
start
making
an
impact
in
helping
people
in
need,
be
a
mental
health,
behavioral
or
or
or
getting
someone
in
into
an
affordable
unit
somewhere
in
bellevue.
I
want
to
start
putting
this
into
action
right
away,
so
that's
my
only
request
but
again
fantastic
presentation
and
really
excited
about
where
this
is
going
and
and
so
glad.
This
is
coming
to
us
right
now
and
so
proud
of
this
council
that
we
took
this
vote
unanimously
unanimously
to
take
these
funds
for
1590.
A
Thank
you.
Well,
I'm
very
proud
to
sit
on
this
council
amongst
my
colleagues
who,
with
their
passion
for
caring
about
the
community,
I
mean
this
is
these
comments
are
all
outstanding
and
I
just
have
a
few
to
say:
council
zaan's
comments.
A
I
would
like
to
add
to
that
as
well,
because
I
agree
with
her
with
just
a
few
more
statistics
that
over
half
of
the
renters
in
bellevue
are
considered
cost
burdened
where
they're
spending
more
than
30
of
their
income
on
a
month
on
housing
and
only
10
of
the
housing
available
in
bellevue
is
affordable
to
a
family
of
four
earning
80
000
a
year
or
less.
A
That
is
not
much
affordable,
housing
stock
and
eighty
thousand
dollars
a
year
is
a
lot
of
money
so
that
that
really
gives
a
picture
of
the
challenge
that
we
have
right
now
and
we're
all
feeling
the
need
to
move
quickly,
and
I
do
too
the
thing
I
really
like
about
what
you
presented
tonight
is:
these
are
guiding
principles
and
I
feel
like
as
a
healthcare
professional.
This
totally
makes
sense
to
me
this.
This
opens
all
the
doors
to
doing
everything.
A
I
think
we
need
to
do
without
being
confining
so,
basically,
whatever
fits
under
these
principles,
we
can
do
how
we
are
going
to
do
it.
What
exactly
we're
going
to
do
we're
going
to
define
in
the
next
steps,
but
this
gives
us
guidance
to
make
sure
that
we're
making
all
the
considerations
that
we
need
to
do
to
do
good
work
for
everybody
in
the
community.
So
I'm
very
happy
with
these
principles.
A
I
think
you've
done
an
excellent
job
of
con,
consolidating
all
the
work
that
the
council
has
done
in
the
past
years
and
bringing
what's
pertinent
to
this
bill
for
forward
so
that
we
can
utilize
it.
So
thank
you
for
doing
that.
I
think
we're
unless
anybody
has
anything
more
to
say,
I
think
we're
ready
for
a
vote.
So
a
motion
from
the
deputy
mayor.
I.