►
From YouTube: Bellevue Council Meeting April. 12, 2021
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
D
B
We
have
council
member
stokes,
he
may
be
having
an
audio
issue,
but
he
is
connected
council
members
on
here.
Thank.
F
A
A
D
A
G
And
whereas
preventing
distracted,
driving
injuries
and
deaths
requires
the
cooperation
of
all
levels
of
government,
employers
and
the
general
public.
And
whereas
the
city
of
bellevue
and
the
national
safety
council
works
to
promote
policies,
practices
and
procedures
leading
to
increased
safety
on
roads
and
elsewhere
and
whereas
bellevue's
vision.
Zero
effort
strives
to
eliminate
serious
injury
and
fatal
collisions
on
city
streets
by
2030
and
whereas
spring
is
a
time
when
people
begin
to
log
more
miles
on
the
road.
And
it
is
imperative
to
focus
attention
on
motor
vehicle,
injury
risks
and
preventions.
A
Thank
you,
okay.
So
before
we
approve
the
agenda,
we
need
to
amend
it
to
include
the
city
managers
report
so
deputy
mayor.
Could
you
do
that?
Please.
C
A
B
Thank
you
mayor
this
evening.
There
are
ten
pre-registered
speakers.
However,
six
of
those
speakers
have
all
signed
up
with
concerns
regarding
homelessness,
so
we
will
only
be
able
to
hear
from
the
first
three
of
those
speakers,
and
with
that
I
will
call
our
very
first
speaker,
which
is
charles
landau.
H
Okay,
great,
thank
you,
so
my
name
is
charles
lando,
I'm
a
resident
of
bellevue,
and
I
wanted
to
thank
the
council
for
allow
giving
me
time
a
few
minutes
to
speak
this
evening.
The
reason
why
I
asked
to
speak
to
the
council
is
I've
been
concerned
about
the
increase
in
camping.
That's
been
going
on
in
city
property
here
in
bellevue
over
the
last
few
months.
H
H
I
was
informed
separately
by
the
police
department
and
by
the
city
government
that
bellevue
ordinance
6385,
which
prohibits
camping
on
public
property,
had
been
suspended
for
the
time
being,
I've
not
been
successful
in
getting
information
about.
H
You
know
exactly
why
the
ordinance
has
been
suspended,
although
it
seems
to
be
related
to
covid
and
some
concerns
about
the
safety
of
public
shelters
which
are
available
for
homeless
people
to
use
potentially,
and
so
I
I
I
guess
you
know-
have
not
been
able
to
get
confirmation
about
whether
in
fact
the
ordinance
is
has
been
suspended,
and
if
so,
you
know
what
what
the
criteria
is
that
the
city
is
using
to
determine
whether
the
homeless
shelters
are
safe
enough.
H
I
it's
not
clear
to
me
why
it's
contained
safe
enough
for
my
kids
to
go
back
to
the
classroom,
but
it's
not
safe
for
someone
to
reside
in
a
in
a
shelter.
It's
not
clear
to
me
what,
whether
there's
new
cdc
guidance
about
physical
distancing
is
being
used
to
determine
whether
the
homeless
shelters
are
safe
and
the
reduction
by
the
cdc
of
six
to
three
feet
in
guidance
in
terms
of
physical
distancing.
H
It's
also
not
clear
to
me
whether,
if
the
homeless
person
is
eligible
for
a
coveted
vaccination
as
based
on
her
age,
this
camper
would
appear
to
be
whether
they've
been
offered
a
covert
vaccination
and
if
they've
declined
it,
how
that
affects
the
city's
criteria
for
determining
whether
the
shelter
would
be
safe
for
that
person.
H
My
my
most
immediate
concern
is
that
you
know
this
particular
situation
be
addressed.
Although
I
know
it's
not
the
only
one
in
bellevue,
I
know
this
particular
camper
spent
several
has
spent
at
least
a
few
months
camping
on
140th
avenue
before
moving
to
the
present
location.
B
J
Yeah
I'll
be
probably
a
little
shorter
here.
I
live
in
the
area
near
a
northeast
24th
there
and
north
of
my.
My
main
concern
is
similar.
I
kind
of
want
to
take
the
homelessness
part
out
of
it
and
just
keep
it
to
what
this
is
and
that
raw
equal
we're
all
supposed
to
be
abiding
by
the
same
rules.
So
I'm
just
want
to
get
waste
out
there.
That
there's
concerns
I've,
seen
not
just
the
last
several
months,
but
I'd
say
the
last
two
to
three
years.
J
You
know
east
of
405,
really
in
bellevue
here
there's
been
an
increase
in
illegal
camping,
some
of
those
areas.
I
know
I've
always
concerns
on
I've,
pointed
them
out.
I
filed
police
reports.
J
There
has
been
some
action
which
I
appreciate
there
on
on
everyone's
part,
but
most
of
it,
the
majority
of
it
in
the
the
home
questions
almost
but
the
illegal
camping
people
that
I've
spoken
with
they've
all
said
many
of
them
voices
they've
been
giving
housing
options
but
they're
making
a
choice
to
not
utilize
those,
but
yet
they
still
continue
to
be
in
those
same
areas
that
they've
been
camping
in
the
trash
continues
to
build
up
the
drug
paraphernalia.
J
J
So
I'm
just
really
curious
of
what
the
plan
w
has,
I
think
kind
of
like
charles
spoke
there,
I'm
just
curious
what
what
is
the
path
or
what
is
the
plan
that
buildings
laid
out?
It's
clear
that
we're
lacking
the
enforcement
and
we're
reluctant
to
do
that,
and
it's
not
just
a
little
illegal
camping,
but
it
could
be
the
littering
it
could
be
the
defecating
the
store
in
your
on
the
steam
shopping
carts.
J
I
mean
these
are
all
things
that
any
one
of
us
on
this
call,
I
think,
would
expect
there
to
be
repercussions
if
we
were
to
go
and
do,
and
so
I'm
just
with
light
rail
coming
we've
seen
things
continue
to
escalate,
I'm
just
really
concerned
for
about
you.
I
mean
we
all
work
hard.
We
open
a
lot
into
this
city.
This
is
growing
developing.
J
I
just
think
we're
all
equal.
We
should
all
follow
the
same
rules
and
show
the
same
repercussions
what's
building's
plan
moving
forward,
because
this
is
kind
of
a
highlight
right
now
with
this
northeast
24th
person,
it's
kind
of
on
the
front
of
everyone's
doorstep
here
and
so
we're
kind
of
watching
to
see
what
what
is
bellevue
going
to
do,
because
this
is
going
to
kind
of
paint
the
path
forward.
I
think
so.
J
That's
the
concern.
That's
a
concern,
I'm
hearing
from
others
around
me.
If
we
don't
advocate
for
ourselves,
I
just
can't
expect
you
know
you
to
know
or
advocate
for
me
without
me
speaking
up
on
it.
So
thank
you
guys
for
your
time.
B
B
K
K
I
had
an
incidence
where
I
was
a
victim
of
an
assault
and
I
had
to
call
9-1-1
and
the
bellevue
police
department
had
responded
and
after
immediately
experiencing
a
traumatizing
event,
I
was
re-traumatized
by
one
of
our
own
bellevue
police
department
officers.
K
K
I
Thank
you
very
much
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
My
name
is
chris
cole
and
I'm
with
the
crossroads
shopping
center.
I
really
want
to
thank
the
mayor
and
council
for
their
feedback
on
january
25th.
Regarding
the
developer
agreement,
we've
been
really
working
for
the
last
two
and
a
half
months
on
the
concerns
that
you
brought
up
with
the
developer
agreement,
and
I
also
want
to
assure
you
that
the
philosophy
of
crossroads
being
community
minded
is
as
strong
as
ever.
I
talk
with
rancher
all
the
time.
I
I
I
also
want
to
thank
matt
and
trisna
and
sally
for
working
with
us
for
the
last
two
and
a
half
months
on
a
solution.
It's
been
a
very
collaborative
process
and
we're
really
pleased
that
the
city
is
open
to
extending
the
mfte
program
onto
the
crossroads
development
site,
where
right
now
it
ends
on
our
northern
border.
I
That
decision,
along
with
us,
owning
the
land
for
such
a
long
period
of
time,
really
allowed
us
to
come
up
with
the
solution.
That's
a
part
of
the
revised
developer
agreement
that
you'll
be
looking
at
this
evenings,
so
I
truly
appreciate
your
feedback
and
we
look
forward
to
hearing
your
comments
this
evening.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
B
L
David
bowling
with
congregations
for
the
homeless,
I
want
to
thank
mayor,
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newinghouse
and
the
honorable
honorable
bellevue
city
council
members
on
behalf
of
cfh.
I'm
pleased
to
provide
our
support
for
the
proposed
permanent,
supportive
housing,
which
will
will
be
owned
and
operated
by
plymouth
housing
within
the
planned
eastgate
housing
campus.
L
L
L
First,
we
want
to
ensure
adult
men
and
women
experiencing
homelessness
on
the
east
side,
have
increased
housing
and
services
options
within
the
east
side.
Second,
people
who
access
our
services
and
housing
are
met
with
support,
rather
than
hostility
by
us
and
the
broader
community.
Third,
we
live
into
our
commitments
of
ongoing
community
engagement
and
responsiveness.
L
L
B
M
You
city
council,
for
your
consideration
of
our
crossroads
development
agreement,
which
is
at
the
end
of
today's
meeting.
We
appreciate
the
city
council's
commitment
to
affordable
housing
and
to
creating
other
usable
public
benefits
in
the
crossroads
neighborhood,
and
we
appreciate
the
opportunity
to
work
with
you
to
provide
these
in
this
project.
M
So
we
wound
our
way
to
what
we
think
is
a
really
great
solution.
This
project
is
able
to
provide
affordable
housing
in
exchange
for
a
property
tax
exemption
versus
the
mfte
program,
and
we
are
so
pleased
to
have
worked
with
staff
to
this
outcome,
matt,
sally
and
trisman.
I
know
chris
gave
them
a
shout
out
earlier.
They
were
so
great
to
work
with
and
we
believe
that
we've
arrived
at
an
appropriate
win-win
for
the
development
team,
the
community
and
the
city.
M
B
F
N
F
I
understand
that
the
people
involved
in
old
lady
she's
been
offered
assistance
by
stephanie
someone
that
is
part
of
the
employee
of
the
city
and
she's
refused
it,
and
at
that
point
I
would
ask
that
the
city,
you
know
they
use
a
carrot
and
a
stick
approach
offer
a
carrot.
You
know
here's
some
shelter,
but
if
they
refused,
then
you
know
they'd
made
a
decision
and
at
that
point
I
would
ask
that
the
city
enforce
their
existing
ordinances
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
B
Okay,
thank
you,
mr
wickrath.
At
this
point,
that
was
our
third
and
final
speaker
on
home
concerns
around
homelessness.
The
final
two
speakers
are
signed
up
for
the
same
topic,
so
we
will
not
be
able
to
hear
from
them
this
evening.
There
are
still
a
few
minutes
left
in
oral
communications.
If
there
is
anyone
else
connected
to
this
meeting,
who
would
like
to
provide
oral
communications,
please
use
star
9
if
connected
with
the
phone
or
use
the
raise
hand
function
again,
we
cannot
have
any
more
speakers
regarding
concern
on
homelessness.
B
At
this
point,
mrs
osterberg,
I
do
see
you
I've.
Have
you
signed
up
for
the
public
hearing?
Did
you
intend
to
speak
at
the
public
hearing
or
oral.
O
O
Okay,
thank
you.
My
name
is
ann
osterberg,
I'm
a
resident
of
bellevue
at
10435,
northeast
15th
street,
I'm
now
retired,
but
spent
over
30
years
in
affordable
housing
development
and
have
served
on
committees
for
the
sofia
way.
Imagine
housing
and
at
st
thomas
episcopal
church,
when
we
hosted
congregations
for
the
homeless.
O
O
Their
97
percent
success
rate
at
keeping
people's
house
is
exemplary
by
partnering,
with
the
sophia
way
and
congregations
for
the
homeless,
for
referrals
will
ensure
that
they
will
meet
bellevue's
urgent
need
for
housing.
The
homeless,
shelter
without
permanent
supportive
housing
is
not
a
viable
solution.
O
A
shelter
is
only
a
first
step.
The
next
best
step
is
permanent,
supportive
housing
with
services
and
rent
subsidies,
the
shelters
get
in
gets
the
shelter
gets
individuals
off
the
street,
but
where
do
they
go
next
to
work
through?
Whatever
issues
landed
them?
On
the
street,
in
the
first
place,
where
do
they
go
that
they
can
afford,
having
both
the
shelter
and
permanent
supportive
housing
on
the
same
site
is
the
most
effective
way
to
ensure
there
is
a
next
step
up.
B
P
Good
evening,
mayor
robinson
and
council
members,
as
council
mentioned
up
front,
I
have
one
item
under
the
report
of
the
city
manager
to
report
on
this
evening.
As
council
is
aware,
there
have
been
a
number
of
public
inquiries
about
the
city's
approach
on
outreach
and
enforcement,
as
it
relates
to
homelessness
in
the
city
as
well
as
hearing
from
a
number
of
members
from
the
community
this
evening
joining
us
this
evening
is
stephanie
martinez.
The
city's
homelessness
outreach
coordinator
provide
the
council
on
the
viewing
public
with
information
on
efforts.
P
Q
Good
evening,
everyone
thank
you
brad
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
members
of
council.
Thank
you
for
having
me
briefly
here
tonight.
There
really
has
been
a
broad
interest
in
understanding
the
city's
approach
to
homelessness,
and
tonight
I'm
going
to
provide
you
all
with
an
overview
of
the
city's
response
to
homelessness
and
what
we
do
to
provide
support
to
those
unsheltered
and
housed
in
bellevue.
Q
I
do
want
to
start
by
saying
that
the
city
of
bellevue
is
not
alone
in
finding
ways
to
address
the
complex
issue
of
homelessness
and
in
the
challenges
it
faces
related
to
homelessness.
The
issue
of
homelessness
is
a
growing
concern
nationally,
regionally
and
locally.
There
really
is
no
one-size-fits-all
solution
to
solve
the
homelessness
crisis
that
the
county
and
city
are
facing.
Q
Q
I
build
rapport
with
individuals,
develop
a
plan
of
action
to
specifically
address
their
unique
needs
and
barriers.
I
then
connect
them
to
the
services
they
need
oftentimes.
Sometimes
that
means
shelter
other
times.
It
means
mental
and
behavioral
health
support
access
to
social
security,
access
to
services
that
help
with
domestic
violence
and
so
forth.
Community
partners
are
really
key
in
helping
me,
get
individuals
housed
and
or
address
their
unique
barriers
and
needs
to
housing.
Q
I
partner
with
agencies
across
the
east
side
in
south
king
county
in
seattle,
in
order
to
ensure
that
the
individual
is
really
getting
the
most
appropriate
supportive
services
they
need
to
get
housed.
I
get
referrals
for
homelessness
support
and
addressing
issues
related
to
homelessness
from
the
greater
community,
such
as
community
residents,
businesses,
property
owners.
Q
I
also
receive
a
lot
of
self
referrals
now
that
I've
been
with
the
city
since
september
of
2019.
A
lot
of
folks
have
heard
word
of
mouth:
go
talk
to
stephanie,
so
that's
been
a
big
one
as
well,
but
there
really
is
a
balance
between
all
of
this
right.
There's
a
balance
between
supporting
individuals
on
their
path
towards
stability,
while
also
maintaining
the
city
and
making
sure
that
we're
addressing
the
public
health
and
safety
issues
related
to
homelessness
and
the
city
really
does
take
a
cross-departmental
approach
to
addressing
homelessness
issues.
Q
This
is
because
homelessness
impacts,
every
part
of
the
city
from
parks,
police
utilities,
transportation
and
so
forth.
We
also
do
have
a
fire
cares
team
housed
within
the
fire
department,
that
is,
a
team
of
social
workers
and
student
interns
that
support
those
in
immediate
crisis
and
they're
dispatched
by
the
bellevue
police
department
and
fire
department.
Q
So
if
an
encampment
is
on
public
property,
for
example,
is
on
parks
or
right-of-way
property,
we
have
a
standard,
encampment
protocol
that
we
follow.
As
in
the
city,
we
will
post
a
notice
of
violation
or
provide
it
to
the
individual,
and
this
violation
is
contingent
upon
shelter
availability.
But
as
my
role,
I
find
the
shelter
availability
and
services
for
that
individual,
and
this
is
really
where
those
networks
and
connections
across
the
east
side
and
across
king
county
are
really
key
and
important.
Q
During
coven,
19
shelter
capacities
have
been
limited
or
reduced
capacity
because
of
social
distancing
requires
required
in
the
shelters.
Some
shelters
are
also
not
accepting
any
new
clients
at
the
time
we
have
not
suspended
using
our
encampment
protocols,
but
it
just
may
take
additional
time
to
find
shelter
and
again
that
could
be
shelter
across
the
east
side
or
crosston
county.
But
once
shelter
is
confirmed,
we
will
post
the
notice
of
violation,
and
we
will
allow
no
more
than
seven
days
for
the
individual
to
remove
their
belongings
from
that
particular
site.
Q
If
the
individual
does
comply
and
move
from
that
location
and
moves
to
another
location
and
decline,
shelter
or
just
doesn't
go
to
shelter.
The
process
then
starts
all
over
again
for
the
city,
so
we
will
then
repost
and
again
that
posting
is
contingent
again
upon
shelter,
availability
and
we
restart
just
as
just
an
example
of
sometimes
how
much
time
it
might
take
to
move
somebody
into
housing
or
the
amount
of
coordination
that
it
might
take.
Q
We
did
have
an
individual
that
kept
going
from
washington,
state
department
of
transportation,
property
and
city
property,
and
it
took
coordination
between
washdot
and
to
two
community-based
organizations.
The
fire
cares
team,
bellevue,
police,
hospitals
and
so
forth
to
get
him
into
housing
and
we
did
get
him
into
housing,
but
it
took
about
three
months
for
that
to
happen
and
several
cleanups
in
between
that
time
as
well,
and
so
that
goes
to
saying
that
it
really
does
might
take
a
little
bit
more
time
than
intended.
Q
But
sometimes
that's
all
all.
We
really
need
in
order
to
build
that
rapport
and
then
figure
out
who
has
housing
and
get
folks
into
the
right,
shelter
or
permanent
housing
location.
And
lastly,
the
city
does
support
a
wide
range
of
services,
including
funding
towards
facilities
such
as
shelters,
day
centers.
And
what
have
you
across
the
east
side
that
support
single
men,
women,
families,
youth
and
young
adults?
But,
as
we
know,
homelessness
really
does
require
a
proactive
and
strategic
approach.
Q
If
you
and
the
community
would
like
to
find
ways
to
support
those
experiencing
homelessness
in
bellevue
community
members
can
really
do
this
by
supporting
our
local
agencies
through
food
donations,
whatever
it
might
be,
that's
really
helpful
to
shelters
across
the
community
or
the
east
side,
as
well
as
continuing
to
getting
educated
around
homelessness
understanding
why
it
occurs
why
it's
so
prevalent
and
have
your
voices
be
heard
through
voting.
P
No
man
not
at
this
time.
That
concludes
the
city
manager's
report
this
evening.
P
Yes,
yes,
mayor,
we'll,
certainly
program
that
into
a
future
council
meeting.
A
Okay,
that
would
be
great
and
stephanie.
Thank
you
for
your
work.
I
just
want
to
underscore
the
need
to
be
communicating
to
the
community
right
now,
because
I
keep
getting
emails,
that
people
aren't
getting
any
answers
about
their
questions
and
there's
a
lot
of
inquiries
and
it's
hard
for
us
to
give
the
correct
answer
when
you're
the
expert
on
it.
So
I
hate
to
put
that
on
your
lap,
but
I
appreciate
you
communicating
with
the
community
for
us.
D
C
A
Opposed
okay,
we
do
have
a
public
hearing
tonight,
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce
us.
P
Sure
mayor
tonight,
council
is
being
asked
to
hold
a
public
hearing
to
extend
an
interim
official
control
that
was
done
in
response
to
the
covet
pandemic
and
that
it
provides
relief
for
applicants
and
holders
and
use
permits.
P
Just
by
way
of
background
on
october,
12th
of
2020
council
adopted
this
ordinance
on
number
6530
imposing
this
interim
official
control
for
certain
temporary
use
permits,
given
the
interim
control
is
good,
though
only
for
six
months,
extending
this
inter
official
controls
necessary
to
continue
to
mitigate
the
impacts
and
limitations
of
kova
19
and
the
safe
start
program
in
washington.
P
Once
the
public
hearing
is
concluded,
staff
is
seeking
formal
action
to
extend
their
interim
official
control
joining
us
this
evening
is
mike
brennan
director
of
development
services,
as
well
as
chris
natanna's,
consulting
attorney
for
brief
staff
report.
With
that
I'll
turn
it
over
to
you
mike.
R
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
new
and
house
and
council
members,
as
mr
miaki
mentioned,
we
are
here
this
evening
requesting
that
the
council
hold
a
public
hearing
to
extend
the
interim
official
control
ordinance
for
temporary
use
permits.
R
Temporary
use
permits
provide
some
flexibility
under
the
land
use
code
for
a
limited
period
of
time.
It
gives
businesses
flexibility
to
do
things
that
would
not
otherwise
be
outright
permitted
under
the
code
under
certain
conditions.
R
In
this
particular
instance,
the
temporary
use
permit
has
become
a
very
important
tool
during
the
pandemic,
allowing
businesses
the
flexibility
to
expand
their
their
footprint,
so
to
speak,
the
area
where
they're
serving
their
customers
to
outside
areas,
which
has
been
very
helpful
in
helping
them
really
weather
the
storm
of
the
pandemic.
The
economic
impacts
to
their
businesses
with
outside
dining
even
have
some
instances
where
medical
services
are
being
provided
outside
under
temporary
use
permits,
specifically
for
providing
services
for
pandemics.
R
So
this
evening
again,
we
are
here
to
request
the
council
hold
that
public
hearing
and
then
following
the
public
hearing,
take
action
to
extend
the
interim
official
control,
because
the
can
the
impacts
of
the
pandemic
are
still
very
much
being
felt
by
this
community
and
the
business
community,
and
this
has
been
a
very,
as
I
mentioned,
a
very
helpful
tool.
So
with
that
I
will
hand
it
over
to
trisna
who
will
walk
through
the
process
and
a
little
bit
more
background
on
this
particular
ordinance.
S
Thank
you
mike
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
council
members,
city
manager,
miaki
and
those
attending
tonight.
Thank
you
again
for
having
us
this
evening
for
our
presentation.
We
will
briefly
explain
the
process
for
the
interim
official
control
and
talk
about
the
components
of
that
official
controls
ordinance
number
6530.
S
We
will
talk
about
the
types
of
temporary
use
permits,
as
mike
mentioned.
We
have
a
number
of
these
kinds
of
permits.
Also
explain
the
decision
criteria
that
we
use
in
order
in
reviewing
these
permit
applications
and
conclude
with
asking
council
to
hold
that
public
hearing
and
approve
the
extension
of
this
interim
official
control.
S
So,
as
a
recap,
council
adopted
this
ordinance,
an
interim
official
control
on
october
12th,
tolling
time
limitations
for
temporary
use
permits
under
the
growth
management
act.
The
ioc
is
effective
for
six
months,
but
may
be
renewed
for
additional
six-month
periods
if
a
public
hearing
is
held.
So
if
council
does
hold
a
public
hearing
tonight,
the
interim
official
control
may
be
extended
for
an
additional
six
months.
S
S
So
successive
permits
we
also
this
ordinance,
also
suspends
the
restriction
for
successive
applications.
Currently,
the
temporary
use
permit
section
of
the
land
use
code
does
not
allow
for
successive
applications,
but
this
particular
interim
official
control
ordinance
has
suspended
that
restrictions.
Applicants
may
apply
for
successive
permits
as
needed
to
adjust
for
new
circumstances
that
this
restriction
will
then
resume
after
completion
of
all
phases
of
safe
start
washington.
S
So
we
are,
of
course,
in
the
middle
of
the
coveted
pandemic.
Still
last
year,
governor
inslee,
in
collaboration
with
washington,
state
department
of
health
put
in
place
a
four-phase
reopening
plan
or
safe
start
washington.
S
The
interim
official
control,
as
mike
nodon,
responded
quickly
to
mitigate
the
limitations
of
the
pandemic
and
safe
start
washington.
We
saw
that
applicants
and
permit
holders
relied
on
temporary
use
permits
to
operate
their
businesses
and
services
while
following
social,
distancing
and
other
requirements.
S
While
we
are
now
in
phase
three
of
safe
start
washington,
there
continues
to
be
a
need
that
we
are
seeing
from
potential
applicants
as
well
as
permit
holders
to
have
this
time.
Flexibility
provided
by
the
interim
official
control,
as
you
all
have
seen,
these
temporary
use
permits-
have
allowed
restaurants
to
use
their
outdoor
spaces
and
parking
lots
for
outdoor
dining
retail
stores
to
operate
after
in
outdoor
spaces,
entertainment
companies
for
driving
movies,
as
well
as
educational
institutions
to
bring
in
portables
as
classroom
spaces.
S
It
is
important
to
note,
though,
that
we
still
maintain
the
same
decision
criteria
for
approving
temporary
use
permits
so
that
we
are
not
injuring
or
damaging
other
uses
from
these
permits.
The
use
must
be
compatible
with
other
uses.
That's
in
the
vicinity
of
this
of
the
property
that
has
the
application
and
the
has
to
be
compatible
in
intensity
and
appearance.
S
If
council
does
approve
the
extension,
we
will
go
to
the
ebcc
to
ask
them
to
hold
a
public
hearing
and
make
an
approval
disapproval
decision
on
the
extension
within
their
jurisdictional
area
in
may.
So
with
that.
That
concludes
our
presentation.
We
are,
of
course,
available
for
questions.
Thank
you.
A
C
A
B
You
mayor,
there
is
one
speaker
signed
up,
however,
that
may
have
been
a
mistake,
but
ann
osterberg.
Mr
osterberg,
did
you
intend
to
make
a
comment
at
the
public
hearing
as
well.
B
Okay,
no
worries.
Thank
you
at
this
point.
That
is,
we
do
not
have
any
pre-registered
speakers
then.
So,
if
there
is
anyone
else
connected
to
this
call
who
would
like
to
make
a
comment?
Please
use
the
raise
hand,
function
or
star
nine.
If
you're
connected
with
a
phone.
E
On
thank
you
mayor.
You
know
I
support
this
ordinance.
I
did
have
a
question
though,
and
maybe
I'm
just
I'm
not
quite
understanding
the
presentation,
one
of
the
slides
that
talks
about
time,
beginning
on
the
first
day
after
completion
of
the
phases
and
the
other
one
talks
about
restrictions
resuming
30
days
after
completion.
So
I
just
wanted
to
understand
what
this
ordinance
when
it
ends
and
what
what
that
meant
in
the
presentation.
S
Yes,
absolutely
so
we
have
two
different
kind
of
restrictions
on
time
in
the
land
use
code.
Now
so
one
is
in
the
duration
of
the
temporary
use
permit.
So
we
have
a
90-day
duration
and
it
would
not.
The
90-day
duration
would
not
start
until
the
end
of
because
the
19
and
this
completion
of
safe
start
washington,
so
it'll
start
on
that
first
day
after
that
completion.
S
So
that's
the
duration
aspect
of
also
immigration
on
successive
application,
that
is
in
the
land
use
code,
so
this
would
also
kind
of
suspends
that
restriction
for
successive
applications
and
you
that
would
not
start
until
30
days
after
the
end
of
the
safe
start
washington.
So
you
you,
after
that,
30
days
is
up.
Then
you
you're
off
you're,
again
limited
by
the
being
able
to
apply
for
successive
temporary
use
permits
on
that
same
parcel,
same
property.
S
E
Okay,
great
well,
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
I
fully
support
this.
I
think
it's
an
important
piece
of
policy
that
enables
businesses
to
be
able
to
operate
a
lot
more
safely
outside.
Thank
you.
A
A
P
Thank
you
mayor.
You
you
pretty
much
summed
it
up.
I
just
would
give
you
a
little
bit
background
that
the
with
respect
to
the
resolutions
of
what
they
stand
for
you
know
the
arch
executive
board
annually
reviews
and
recommends
funding
applications
for
affordable
housing
and
bellevue
as
a
member
city
contributes
to
the
projects
recommended
for
funding
some
of
those
in
front
of
you
this
evening
and
as
a
result,
the
council
must
approve
the
city
of
bellevue's
share
of
funding
for
each
one
of
these
projects.
P
So
tonight
staff
are
seeking
formal
council
action
on
the
three
resolutions
that
you
just
referenced
near
joining
us
this
evening
for
staff
report
are
emile.
Keem
assistant,
director
of
community
development
lindsay
masters
executive
director
of
the
executive
manager.
Excuse
me
of
art,
as
well
as
tim
parham
and
yi
zao
representatives
from
the
plymouth
housing
group.
With
that,
I
will
turn
it
over
to
you
and
you.
T
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki
good
evening,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
members
of
council
on
behalf
of
the
community
development
department.
I'd
like
to
offer
a
few
opening
comments
tonight,
council
will
be
considering
funding
allocations
as
part
of
the
2020
arch
trust
fund
recommendations.
T
T
U
Great
thanks
emil,
I'm
happy
to
be
back
here
and
speak
to
you
again
about
these
projects
that
we're
recommending
for
funding
this
year.
We
are
really
appreciative
of
your
interest
to
engage
a
little
bit
deeper
with
plymouth
housing
and
so
welcome
the
opportunity
to
bring
their
team
here
to
share
a
little
bit
more
about
their
organization.
U
The
work
they're
doing
here
in
bellevue,
just
as
a
reminder
as
your
housing
staff
arch,
is
going
to
be
continuing
to
work
closely
with
plymouth,
as
well
as
with
congregations
for
the
homeless,
to
ensure
that
this
development
is
going
to
be
a
model
for
the
east
side
and
is
going
to
be
successful.
U
We
are
pleased
to
welcome
tim,
parham
who's,
the
plymouth
director
of
real
estate,
I'm
going
to
ask
you
tim
to
walk
through
some
slides
that
plymouth
has
prepared.
He
will
also
introduce
some
other
members
of
the
clinton
team.
The
direct
action
that
you
are
considering
tonight
is
a
request
for
500
000
total
in
funding
of
which
bellevue's
portion
is
around
thousand
dollars.
U
V
Well,
thank
you
lindsay
and
mayor
and
council,
everybody
we're
just
really
excited
to
be
a
part
of
your
community
and
thanks
for
the
opportunity
for
the
funding
and
thanks
for
the
opportunity
to
explain
a
little
bit
about
plymouth
tonight,
we'll
keep
it
brief.
I'm
joined
by
isao,
plymouth's
chief
asset
management
officer,
as
well
as
dennis
sills,
our
director
of
strategic
initiatives
and
government
relations
and
elizabeth
murphy.
V
V
A
lot
of
other
folks
in
the
region
do
housing
for
families
or
for
youth
experiencing
homelessness,
but
we
stick
to
folk
folks
that
are
adults
singles
and
our
model
is
housing
first,
as
you
can
see
on
the
slide
here,
we
offer
residents
a
home
without
asking
them
to
prove
that
they're
ready
for
it,
and
the
reason
is,
is
because
you
can't
address
many
of
the
challenges
that
you
may
have
faced
on
the
street
without
having
an
address
and
a
safe
place
and
go
to
the
next
one,
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
e
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
who
we
serve
and
what
plymouth
does
yeah.
F
W
Hi
everyone,
I'm
e,
as
you
can
see
from
our
slide
when
we
say
that
we
serve
people
who
have
experienced
chronically
homeless.
What
does
that
mean?
What
does
that
population
look
like
so
of
our
1100
residents
that
we
serve
97?
W
Have
some
form
of
disability
and
58
have
had
or
have
mental
health
conditions
that
they're
currently
experiencing,
and
this
is
a
very
purposeful
model
for
us
that
we
do
low
barrier
for
entry,
because
this
is
who
this
is
what
the
homeless
population
looks
like,
and
for
us
to
be
able
to
reach
them
and
be
able
to
serve
them.
We
have
to
have
low
barrier
of
entry
for
them
to
be
able
to
get
into
housing.
W
So
what
is
permanent,
supportive
housing,
which
is
our
next
slide
here
so
by
permanent?
Our
housing
program
functions
like
any
other
multi-family.
Our
residents
have
a
lease.
We
act
as
landlords,
so
that
means
there
is
no
time
period.
There
is
no
time
limit.
They
have
housing
for
as
long
as
they
need
and
by
supportive.
What
we
do
is
we
have
more
case
managers
on
site
and
they
work
to
either
provide
services
directly
to
our
residents
or
to
be
able
to
connect
them
with
the
services
they
need.
W
Where
we
have
been
very
successful
in
is
in
all
of
our
community
partnerships,
we
work
with
harborview.
We
work
with
swedish.
We
work
with
who
is
in
our
communities
to
be
able
to
provide
the
services
our
resident
need,
as
you
can
see,
from
the
slide.
97
of
our
residents
succeed
in
maintaining
housing.
So
that
means
for,
as
people
move
into
our
housing
they're
able
to
maintain
housing,
either
through
plymouth
or
being
able
to
move
on,
and
they
don't
re-enter
into
homelessness,
and
where
do
we?
W
Where
are
we
looking
for
our
referrals
and
I'm
going
to
actually
kick
this
back
over
to
tim?
Who
talks
about
how
we
are
planning
to
serve
the
bellevue
community?.
V
Thank
you
so
we'll
have
as
long
as
lindsay
mentioned,
95
apartments
at
eastgate
right
across
the
parking
lot
from
congregations
for
the
homeless's
new
hundred
bed,
men's
shelter
and
of
those
95
units.
Three
are
for
staff
that
will
need
places
to
live
near
work
and
we
provide
those
in
the
building.
92
of
the
units
will
be
for
folks
experiencing
homelessness
and
we
hope
to
get
them
100
of
those
92
units
from
congregations
for
the
homeless
and
sophia
way.
V
You
heard
in
stephanie's
presentation
one
of
the
challenges
to
getting
those
folks
off
of
the
streets
that
you
know,
callers
were
talking
about
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
is
shelter
availability
and
if
there
was
another
arrow
that
led
up
to
cfh
and
sofia
way,
that's
where
folks
are
coming
from
is
is
from
the
streets
into
shelter
and
we're
giving
them
a
place
to
to
grow
and
to
stabilize
and
to
remain
permanently
housed
at
97
success
rate.
Like
you
mentioned,
you
go
to
the
next
slide.
V
Please
david
bowling
actually
mentioned
this
from
cfh
we've
been
working
over
the
last
six
months,
or
so
with
cfh
surrounding
businesses
and
engaged
members
of
the
eastgate
community.
V
V
It
also
shows
some
of
the
community
engagement
that
we've
participated
in
throughout
2020,
as
well
as
we
just
held
a
community
meeting
in
march
and
we're
holding
another
one
next
week
and
a
final
one
in
may,
where
we
can
really
engage
the
community
and
we'll
talk
on
the
next
slide.
V
We've
been
a
part
of
that
eastgate
advisory
group
that
congregations
for
the
homeless
has
been
meeting
with
for
a
couple
of
years
to
really
get
in
touch
with
the
community.
We
partnered
with
the
eastgate
community
association
who
advertised
our
public
meetings
and
we've
sent
letters
to
the
neighbors
met
with
nearby
businesses
and
we've
become
a
member
of
the
alliance
of
east
side
agencies
go
to
the
next
one.
What
have
we
learned?
V
This
is
not
seattle
and
we
heard
that
and
we've
heard
the
specific
concerns
about
how
we
can
improve
upon
our
model
and
really
be
innovative,
with
this
great
partnership
with
congregations
for
home
for
the
homeless
on
site,
and
so
that
means
we
talked
about
local
preference
for
bellevue
population
to
live
in
our
building,
close
partnership
and
coordinating
coordination
with
our
campus
partners
at
congregations
for
the
homeless
and,
as
emil
mentioned,
improved
safety
and
security.
At
this
building,
we've
heard
a
lot
of
questions
and
comments
about
that.
V
V
You
know
we're
developing
a
more
robust
program
across
our
whole
portfolio,
we're
also
in
hoping
to
come
to
you
all
with
an
ask
in
coordination
with
congregations
for
the
homeless,
for
your
new
1590
funding
to
support
really
robust
behavioral
health
services
at
this
project,
and
with
that,
I'm
going
to
kick
it
back
over
to
e
to
talk
about
property
management.
W
Yeah,
so
this
is
who
we
are
as
neighbors.
Our
buildings
are
staffed,
24
hours,
seven
days
a
week,
365
days
a
year,
so
tim
and
I
mentioned
cameras.
We
monitor
our
cameras,
we
monitor
our
security
feeds,
we're
monitoring
what's
happening
both
within
our
building
and
what's
happening
around
our
building,
to
be
good
neighbors
and
to
be
able
to
provide
a
level
of
safety
and
security
to
everyone.
If
we
go
into
the
next
slide
here,
yeah
for
what
this
looks
like
is
so
we
do
have
three
living
staff.
W
Our
living
staff
are
expected
to
be
able
to
respond
if
something's
happening
in
the
building
or
snow
days
or
anything
else
that
happens.
Our
living
our
living
staff
are
amazing
and
they
are
always
willing
to
jump
in.
We
do
have
mandatory
check-ins
for
our
guests,
so
we
know
who's
in
our
buildings
and
who's
coming
and
going
tim.
I
mentioned
a
lot
of
cameras,
yeah
just
a
lot
of
cameras
and
we
keep
all
the
feeds
there
and
we
store
our
footage
and
we.
W
W
O
W
Regular
coordination
with
bellevue
pd:
this
is
something
that
we
currently
do
at
our
properties
in
terms
of
working
with
the
different
precincts
in
seattle.
We
have
properties
in
west,
west
precinct
and
north
precinct,
and
we
do
reach
out
and
talk
with
them
about
happenings
at
our
buildings.
Plymouth
is
a
long-term
owner,
neighbor
we're
not
just
a
developer
group.
We
also
manage
our
buildings
ourselves
so
with
the
escape
project.
W
Once
we
build
it,
we
will
still
be
here
and
we'll
still
be
engaging
with
the
community,
we'll
still
be
engaging
with
everyone
who
wants
to
engage
with
us
to
talk
about
our
building
to
talk
about
what's
happening
and
we
try
to
be
active
members
of
the
community
in
different
community
groups,
both
before
and
after
we
developed
the
building
most
recently
we've
developed
in
the
international
district
and
we're
still
actively
involved
with
little
saigon
there,
so
we'll
still
be
around
we're
not
going
to
develop
and
leave
we'll
still
be
part
of,
and
with
this
building
will
be
part
of
the
neighborhood
we'll
be
part
of
the
community.
V
So
with
that
just
a
summary
of
key
takeaways-
and
you
know
some
response
to
some
of
the
conversations
in
your
meeting
in
february.
V
You
know
we
feel
like
permanent
supportive
housing
is
the
most
cost
effective
solution
to
addressing
homelessness
long-term
and
that
the
places
people
end
up
like
jails
or
hospitals
are
not
equipped
to
house.
People
like
we
are,
and
we
keep
those
folks
off
the
street,
like
you
mentioned
our
97
percent
stability
rate
for
housing
and
keeping
people
housed,
which
I
think
is
a
shared
vision
that
plymouth
and
the
city
of
bellevue
have
for
those
experiencing
homelessness.
V
In
our
community,
like
I
said
we're
committed
to
providing
behavioral
health
services,
which
goes
hand
in
hand
with
the
next
bullet
point
around
investing
in
safety
of
our
residents,
our
staff
and
our
neighbors,
and
all
the
cameras
and
other
things
that
you
mentioned,
and
you
know.
We
hope
that
you
see
a
visible
impact
when
these
92
units
open
and
cfh
and
the
sofia
way
are
able
to
take
more
folks
off
the
streets
and
their
facilities,
and
with
that
we're
all
done
and
appreciate
your
time.
U
Great
with
that,
I'm
going
to
move
to
the
next
two
projects,
the
you're
probably
familiar
with
these-
we
presented
on
them
back
in
february.
This
is
a
recap.
This
is
a
second
project.
We
are
recommending
funding
for
total
arch
funds
of
million
dollars.
This
will
help
to
create
a
significant
mixed
income
project
in
the
totalmic
neighborhood
in
kirkland
and
next
slide,
and
then
the
final
project
is
the
sama
senior
apartments
developed
by
imagine
housing
in
the
city
of
bothell
on
property,
that
city
of
bothell
is
being
available
for
this
development.
U
T
A
Okay,
seeing
none
can
I
take
a
motion.
We'll
have
three
separate
motions,
so
we'll
start
with
9920.
C
C
A
All
those
in
favor
say
aye
aye
any
opposed
and
that
passes.
I
want
to
thank
you
for
the
very
good
presentation.
I
know
that
for
myself
you
answered
every
question.
I
would
have
asked
in
your
presentation
and
I
have
a
feeling
you
did
that
for
all
of
us.
So
thank
you
and
good
luck
with
these
projects.
We're
we're
excited
to
see
move
forward.
A
P
Yes,
thank
you
mayor
and
council
members.
This
evening
the
council
will
receive
a
briefing.
This
is
the
first
study
session
item.
I'm
briefing
on
the
king
county
executive
best
starts
for
kids
levy
just
being
proposed
for
renewal
on
this
year's
august
ballot.
Just
by
way
of
background,
the
existing
levy
was
approved
by
king
county
back
in
2015
and
the
six
year
levy.
This
particular
six-year
levy
expires
at
the
end
of
this
year.
P
Tonight's
briefing
is
informational
and
no
formal
action
is
being
requested
of
the
council.
Although
all
comments
would
be
unwelcome
and
accepted
this
evening.
Joining
us
this
evening
is
joyce
nichols
our
assistant
city
manager,
as
well
as
sheila
kavistani,
strategic
advisor
and
director
of
the
vision
of
children,
youth
and
young
adults
in
king
county.
With
that,
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
joyce
for
for
the
presentation.
X
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
and
I
see
that
sheila
kapistani
from
the
county
is
with
us.
She
has
years
of
experience
working
with
the
best
arts
for
kids
levy
and
on
children
and
youth
programs
in
general.
She
is
what
I
would
call
an
expert
and
in
any
presentation
I've
ever
seen
her
provide.
She
gives
a
wonderful
value.
Y
Thank
you,
I'm
glad
to
be
here
good
evening,
mayor
deputy
mayor
and
council
members.
I
would
love
to
talk
to
you
about
best
starts
for
kids.
I've
got
a
powerpoint
to
share
with
you,
and
I
understand
that
that's
been
shared
ahead
of
time.
One
of
the
things
I
just
want
to
say
to
begin
with,
my
powerpoint
has
a
lot
of
information
in
it.
I
am
going
to
go
briefly
over
the
top
of
that
information
so
that
you
have
that
to
reflect
on
later,
not
necessarily
that
I'm
going
to
go
over
all
of
that
tonight.
Y
So
we
are
in
the
fifth
this
the
final
year,
the
six
year
best
starts
for
kids
levy.
So
I
thought
tonight
that
I
would
go
over
take
a
few
minutes
to
talk
about
what
we've
done
sort
of
what
have
some
of
our
results
been
and
then
what
we're
hoping
to
put
on
the
ballot
coming
this
august
and
then
be
able
to
field
any
questions
that
folks
have.
Y
So
whenever
I
do,
presentations
on
best
starts
for
kids.
I
always
like
to
start
with
what
our
vision
is,
so
that
everything
that
we
talk
about
with
best
starts
everything
that
we
do
is
really
aiming
towards
this
goal
for
happy
healthy,
safe
and
thriving
children,
babies,
youth,
young
adults,
families,
communities,
we
really
are-
are
trying
to
turn
a
corner
on
saying
not
just
the
absence
of
issues
for
people,
but
really
the
presence
of
health
and
well-being
so
happy,
healthy,
safe
and
and
thriving
is
what
guides
all
of
our
work
with
our
current
levy.
Y
Y
Y
What
we
know
is
that
when
you
invest
early,
you
get
a
lot
of
returns
and
really
good
foundation
for
young
people,
but
if
you
do
not
sustain
the
gain
at
key
developmental
times
over
the
life
childhood
of
a
young
person
that
you
can
actually
lose
some
of
those
gains
that
you've
made
so
investing
early,
sustaining
the
gain
and
then
wrapping
community
around
young
people.
We
call
that
our
communities
matter
it's
about
10
of
our
funding.
Y
I'm
not
going
to
go
deeply
over
this,
but
I
really
wanted
you
to
be
able
to
see
that
that
bsk
is
really
based
on
a
theoretical
framework
that
comes
from
what
the
science
and
research
tells
us,
our
important
needs
and
developmental
needs
of
young
people
and
what
we
learned
in
our
community
and
what
communities
all
over
king
county
told
us
was
important
to
them
about
children
and
young
people,
and
we
put
those
two
things
together:
those
two
bodies
of
knowledge
and
came
up
with
the
theoretical
framework.
Y
If
you
were
so
inclined,
you
could
look
at
every
single
program,
area
strategy
area
that
I'm
about
to
go
over
and
you
can
map
it
back
to
this
framework.
So
in
essence
this
says:
if
we
increase
the
good
things,
protection
and
promotive
factors
for
young
people
and
we
decrease
the
bad
things.
We
reduce
those
risk
factors.
Y
So
we
do
our
public
health
services
for
healthy
births.
We
do
some
in-home
home-based
services
looking
at
developmental
health
and
making
sure
that
we
intervene
early
if
we
identify
young
people
who
might
be
having
some
degrees
looking
at
community-based
and
peer
support,
and
then
that
circle
around
child
care,
consultation
and,
finally,
our
systems
support
which
is
about
workforce
development.
Y
Our
five
to
24
investments
are
really
all
a
part
of
these
strategy
areas.
So
we
look
at
youth
development,
our
school
partnerships,
family
and
community
connections,
transitions
to
adulthood
and
then
a
very
focused
strategy
area
that
we
call
stopping
the
school
to
prison
pipeline,
which
is
really
focused
on
a
group
of
young
people
who
really
need
a
lot
of
additional
supports
and
looking
at
the
system
and
how
we
can
break
some
of
these
things
that
are
leading
young
people
into
the
prison
system
with
best
starts
for
kids.
Y
With
that
five
percent,
we
were
very
committed
to
being
able
to
measure
what
it
was
that
we
would
be
achieving
a
lot
of
best
starts
for
kids
programs
are
evidence-based,
and
so,
as
a
matter
of
replicating,
what
we
knew
from
the
research
would
work
and
a
lot
of
our
investments
were
really
innovative
and
very
community
specific,
so
our
community
design
programs
in
particular.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
were
evaluating
to
assure
that
they
were
really
getting
to
the
outcomes
that
we
were
all
going
for.
Y
Y
So
we
based
it
on
a
national
model,
called
results
based
accountability,
and
there
are
three
questions
that
we
ask
in
essence:
how
much
did
we
do?
How
well
did
we
do
it
and
is
any
bet
anybody
better
off
and
we
are
in
the
process
of
measuring
at
each
of
those
areas,
since
it
is
the
first
time
for
this
levy.
Y
We
really
are
looking
at
about
three
full
years
of
investment
for
the
entire
levy,
other
things
rolled
out
sooner,
but
really
about
three
years
worth
of
data
that
we
are
right
now
in
the
midst
of
analyzing
and
we're
looking
at
three
different
measurement
levels,
headline
indicators
which
is
population
based.
Did
we
change
anything
in
general
in
our
communities
secondary
indicators,
which
are
ways
that
we
can
see
more
in
specific
communities?
Y
We
have
impacted
over
half
a
million
children,
youth
parents
and
caregivers,
and
we
have
provided
training
for
about
24,
000
health
care
providers,
child
care
providers
and
community
health
workers.
When
we
look
at
training
that
has
been
done
within
the
communities
of
opportunity
about
200
000
leaders
have
gone
through
their
programs
and
their
communities
of
opportunity
piece,
and
then
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
some
of
our
partners
in
bellevue.
Y
These
are
programs
and
partners
that
we
have.
We
partnered
with
the
bellevue
school
district
for
the
first
year
of
a
program
called
screening,
brief
intervention
and
referral
to
treatment
or
expert
I'm
going
to
rename
that
for
this
next
coming
levy,
because
that's
not
a
very
good
name
program
that
we
have
in
our
middle
schools.
Y
That's
just
very
early
screening
to
make
sure
that
middle
schoolers
are
doing
okay
and
if
they're
feeling
like
they're,
not
that
they
have
an
adult,
they
can
talk
to
and
figure
out.
What
comes
next.
We
worked
with
bellevue
for
one
year
and
then
bellevue
decided
to
use
a
different
screening
tool
than
the
one
that
the
county
was
using,
but
we
remain
in
good
partnership
with
them.
Just
sharing
information
and
sort
of
results
we
have
a
program
with
bellevue
schools
foundation
with
our
trauma-informed
systems.
Y
Strategy
with
lifewire
has
two
programs
that
are
bsk
programs,
one
along
the
homelessness
prevention
and
the
other
for
youth
development.
The
indian
association
of
washington
is
kaleidoscope,
play
and
learn,
which
is
a
parent
child
play
group
and
then
international
community
health
centers
with
school-based
health
centers.
So
we
have
a
new
health
center
in
bellevue.
Y
That's
what
we've
been
doing
it's!
What
the
current
levy
is.
Our
proposed
levy
has
really
three
parts
we
are
proposing
to
maintain
what
we're
doing
so.
We
we
are
investing
early,
sustaining
the
gain
communities
matter
and
our
homelessness
prevention.
We
are
proposing
to
build
upon
what
we're
doing
so.
In
particular,
we
heard
from
the
community
that
we
needed
to
deepen
our
investments
in
school-aged
children,
young
adults
and
youth,
so
that
five
to
24
we're
deepening
our
investments
in
out
of
school
time
to
better
serve
the
five
to
12
year
olds.
Y
Y
And
then
we
would
like
to
have
some
new
investments,
and
this
is
the
largest
part
of
the
new
proposal,
for
the
levy
is
that
we
would
like
to
create
a
new
child
care
subsidy
program
that
we
can
make
child
care
available
to
more
than
3
000,
low-income
families.
So
that
would
be
the
biggest
chunk
of
what
we're
looking
at
that's
new
for
best
starts
for
kids.
Y
The
additions
were
made
in
part
because
I'm
going
to
show
you
in
a
minute
projections
went
up
for
the
economic
forecast,
so
it
looked
like
we
had
a
little
more
money
to
be
able
to
allocate
for
programming.
So
the
first
is
to
take
what
what
will
be
the
additional
funds
and
put
it
towards
a
capital
investments.
Y
This
again
is
very
detailed,
and
so
I'm
not
going
to
go
over,
but
you
have
the
information
of
what
this
amendment
is,
and
it
essentially
says
if
the
levy
projections
continue
to
go
up,
that
that
extra
dollars
after
we
we
fund
the
base,
go
towards
capital
projects
around
youth,
serving
organizations
around
child
care
and
youth
housing,
the
sorts
of
places
that
are
places
that
are
buildings
that
need
to
be
there
for
young
people
and
then
the
second
amendment
that
I
want
to
highlight
tonight,
there's
a
few
other
ones
that
were
technical
changes.
Y
But
these
are
the
two
big
ones.
The
other
one
was
that
best
starts
for
kids,
begin
to
report
data
report,
total
expenditures
by
program
area
by
zip
code,
and
that
we
report
number
of
individuals
receiving
services
by
program
area
by
zip
code
and
essentially
the
desire
behind
this
is
that
then
we
will
be
able
to
have
data
and
be
able
to
report
at
more
of
the
city,
level
or
community
level
where
best
starts
for
kids
dollars
are
going.
Y
We
can
do
that
pretty
well
by
district
by
county
district
right
now,
but
being
able
to
divide
that
up.
Even
more
so
that
people
are
able
to
access
what's
happening
within
their
community
for
best
starts
for
kids,
so
those
are
the
two
major
amendments
that
have
come
through
and
those
have
been
passed
now
by
the
committee
of
the
whole
at
king
county
so
overview.
Then
what
the
new
levy
proposal
looks
like
is
continuing
to
be
a
six-year
property
tax
levy.
Y
It
would
be
19
cents
per
thousand
assessed
value,
which
is
for
the
average
home
in
king
county
at
600.
000
is
about
114
dollars
and
that
we
transmitted
the
executive
transmitted
his
plan
based
on
the
august
uefa,
which
was
811
a
million
when
the
new
economic
forecast
came
out
in
march.
It
said
that
at
that
19
cents,
that
collections
would
be
about
872
million.
Y
This
current
projection
doesn't
necessarily
account
for
what
may
or
may
not
happen
within
our
commercial
real
estate.
It's
really
sort
of
happening
property,
personal
property,
so
we'll
see,
if
there's
some
impact
on
that,
and
this
one,
we
decided
to
be
able
to
show
you
both
the
the
variance
there
is
between
different
parts
of
the
county
and
how
much
the
average
cost
of
homes
are
in
different
parts
of
the
county.
Y
But
then
also
what
would
be
the
cost
to
the
average
taxpayer
in
that
particular
area
and
you'll
see
that
bellevue
with
an
average
home
price
of
961
000
for
2021,
it
would
be
about
182
for
a
home
of
that
amount,
but
everywhere
from
the
62
to
264.
As
you
see
the
averages
throughout
the
county
that
was
very
fast
on
my
information.
A
Thank
you,
sheila,
that's
great
presentation,
so
I'm
going
to
go
to
gallery
mode.
So
I
can
see
everybody
there.
We
go
and
I
see
councilmember
lee's
hand
raised
I'm
going
to
count
on
and
I
see
others
as
well,
but
I'm
going
to
start
with
council
member
stokes
because
he
has
been
working
with
this
for
a
number
of
rules
years.
Actually,
council,
councilmember,
stokes.
Z
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor,
robinson
sheila.
It's
really
good
to
see
you.
We've
been
working
together
on
this
for
back
to
what,
five
years
ago
now
we
got
the
first
bsk
going
and
it's
really
exciting
and,
as
you
know,
from
the
regional
policy
committee,
we
were
very
very
pleased
with
the
increased
emphasis
and
and
things
and
it's
a
great
program
and
the
additions.
Z
I
think
we
agree
across
the
the
whole
county
with
you
know,
sca
input
and
all
this
is
that
this
is
a
very,
very
important
program
and
it's
worth
it's
worth
increasing
this
and
and
making
it
go
because
it's
such
a
foundation
for
everything
we
do
in
our
city.
Z
So
and
personally,
of
course,
I
get
a
real
push
on
this
from
my
daughter
genevieve,
who
works
with
the
with
ross
hunter
at
the
children's
families
and
youth,
and
particularly
on
the
early
childhood
and
education
piece,
and
I
think
that's
that's
really
great
we're
increasing
that
too.
You
know
we
had
these
discussions
and
I
was
glad
to
see
your
highlighting
this,
that
of
trying
to
get
some
more
information
about
the
program
where
it
is
what
the
successes
are.
Z
How
much
is
going
in
certain
places
and
not
not
for
reasons
of
monitoring
or
are
you
know,
trying
to
come
in
and
say?
Well,
you
should
be
doing
this
or
that,
but
really
knowing.
So
we
can
mold
and
meld
that
into
our
programs
and
really
work
together
and
just
see
where
it's
going
and
also.
I
think
it
helps
in
going
out
to
the
public
and
saying
you
know,
this
is
a
really
great
levy
to,
and
you
know
best
starts
for.
Kids
is
really
important,
and
this
is
what
it's
doing.
Z
This
is
what
it's
doing
in
bellevue.
So
I
think
those
are
the
kind
of
things
that
we're
working
together
and
it's
it's
really
good
to
see
a
program.
That's
been
very
successful,
taken
and
made
even
more
important
and
and
more
ambitious,
and
I
think
that's
that's
a
good
thing
to
do
as
well.
So
it's
been,
it's
been
a
really
great
pleasure,
working
with
the
staff
and
and
the
cities
together
on
this
and
we're
gonna
work
real
hard.
I'm
gonna
work
real
hard.
Z
I
think
we
will
too
I'll
do
this
to
get
this
passed
this
time
around.
Even
even
it's
even
more
important
in
this
time
than
it
was
five
years
ago
and
so
you're
focusing
on
things
that
are
really
going
to
help
us
get
out
of
this
whole
pandemic
situation
and
go
forward
because
there's
so
many
more
kids
that
need
help.
So
I'm
just
really
excited
about
it
and
really
waiting
ready
to
get
going
on
it
and
get
it
passed
and
again.
Z
Thank
you
very
much
for
all
you
do,
and
it's
just
a
pleasure
working
with
you.
Thank
you.
C
Thank
you
mayor
and
thank
you
sheila
for
the
great
presentation
and
thank
you,
councilmember
stokes,
for
the
great
work
that
you're
doing
here
as
well.
On
this,
I
I
couldn't
agree
more
it'd
be
great.
I
think,
on
some
of
these
metrics
to
really
understand
the
successes
or
the
broader
successes
and
specifically
as
it
relates
to
how
much
of
this
money
actually
comes
back
and
how
much
of
this
money
is
actually
helping.
C
Families
and
individuals
in
the
city
of
bellevue,
obviously
something
we
always
that
we're
curious
about
and
want
to
make
sure
it's,
it's
they're,
getting
the
help
that
they
need
and
as
a
board
member
of
lifewire
as
well,
really
appreciate
all
the
great
work
and
the
great
partnership
you
have
with
with
livewire
so
very
familiar
with
that
and
appreciate
all
the
great
work
there.
This
was
a
very
quick
presentation.
C
I
would
just
love
if
you
could
just
give
a
a
few
examples
on
some
of
the
areas
where
right
now,
you're
saying
you're
having
the
greatest
success
and
maybe
a
little
bit
on
a
couple
of
the
areas
where
maybe
covent
has
had
a
a
bigger
impact
and
where
you
see
that
there
might
need
further
investment
in
order
to
really
hit
the
goals
that
you're
looking
to
to
achieve.
Y
Thank
you,
so
I
think
for
the
first
one,
what
I
would
say
you
know
numbers
off
the
top
of
my
head.
One
of
the
most
successful
programs
was
really
the
youth
and
family
homelessness
prevention
program,
and
we
were
able
to
determine
that
actually
because
we
partnered
with
an
organization
that
could
help
us
do
a
deep
evaluation
of
that.
Since
it
was
a
pilot
project,
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
really
were
being
good
stewards
of
the
public
dollar
and
having
a
huge
impact
for
the
families
we
were
serving.
Y
So
with
that
program,
we
found
that,
at
the
end
of
a
year
after
working
with
our
caseworkers,
that
the
families
that
we
worked
with
95
of
them
stayed
housed.
That
program
was
really
offering
counseling.
Will
we
call
partnership
but
but
deep
work
with
families
that
that
are
on
that
edge
of
imminent
homelessness
and
flexible
funding?
Sometimes
they
needed
just
a
few
dollars
so
that
they
could
pay
for
this,
and
that
would
keep
them
from
being
homeless.
So
those
two
things
paired
together
with
that
program
really
successful
fantastic.
Y
And
organizations
like
livewire
doing
that
deep
work
with
with
families
and
with
young
people,
so
I
was,
I
was
actually
very
proud
of
that
and
also
heart,
proud,
but
that
program
worked
as
well
as
it
did.
We've
also
had
some
really
good
outcomes
with
our
home
based
services,
and
some
of
that
is
because
we
replicated
evidence-based
programs,
but
we
were
very
excited
about
some
of
our
community
design
programs
and
communities
really
coming
together
and
deciding
for
themselves.
Y
What
would
it
look
like
to
support
new
babies
and
new
parents
in
their
homes
when
they,
the
babies
first
up
to
it
two
years
after
they're
born
so
some
really
powerful
outcomes
there,
as
well
for
health
and
outcomes
and
well-being
for
young
people
covid?
You
know
the
pandemic
again
had
an
impact
on
everybody.
Y
It
was
quite
remarkable
how
quickly
best
starts
for
kids.
Partners
came
to
us
as
staff
and
said
we
need
to
do
something
we
have
to
do
something
differently.
We
need
you
to
allow
us
to
respond
to
our
communities
in
the
way
that
we
see
needs
to
happen.
So
we
actually
at
the
very
beginning
of
the
pandemic.
We
managed
to
change
all
of
the
contracts
to
broaden
what
people
could
do,
what
their
their
work.
Their
deliverables
were
as
long
as
we're
still
hitting
the
same
outcomes.
So
we
had
people
in
youth
development.
Y
Switching
to
how
do
we
provide
online
support
to
young
people?
How
do
we
provide
tutoring,
whereas
maybe
before
they
were
doing
mentoring
sessions?
We
there
is
the
whole
knock
and
drop
became
a
big
thing.
People
in
bringing
supplies
knocking
and
backing
up,
and
you
know,
speaking
new
individuals.
So
we
we
saw
an
incredible
amount
of
community
caring
and
innovation
and
creativity
coming
out
of
the
communities
so
really
as
a
county.
Y
What
we
had
to
do
was
just
be
flexible
and
get
out
of
their
way
and
partner
when
they
needed
us
to
and
provide
lots
and
lots
of
opportunities
for
ppe
and
all
of
those
things
that
were
really
needed.
We
have
an
evaluation
of
what
this
year
was
like,
in
particular,
with
our
covert
response
and
have
talked
with
all
of
our
community
providers.
So
I'm
really
going
to
be
happy
to
be
able
to
share
that
with
people
in
a
month
or
two.
Once
we
finalize
that
analysis,
terrific.
D
Thank
you
very
much,
for
this
is
a
great
program,
very
important
program
and
sounds
to
me
that
you
know
your
program
has
been
very
well
executed.
Very
successful,
and
one
thing,
of
course,
is
that
you
know,
since
you
are
still
studying
the
the
matrix,
you
know
you
are
just
getting
all
the
data,
so
we
don't
know
exactly
what
it
you
know
means
because
it's
such
a
great
program
and
it's
for
kids
and
kids
everywhere.
It
would
benefit
from
it.
D
So
I
think
it's
important
that
we
know
how
and
where
the
money
is
being
spent,
whether
all
regions
or
cities
or
areas
in
the
country
benefit
from
this
program.
So
I'm
glad
that
this
amendment
you
know
8b
is
giving
us
some
additional
data
information
to
make
sure
that
you
know
all
the
kids
throughout
the
country
are
being
covered.
You
know,
because
it's
very
good,
so
I
guess
we
will
have
to
wait
until
we
get
the
numbers
and
you
you
know,
then,
within
snipperware,
going
where
you
have
the
zip
code.
D
So
you
also
know
you
know
that
everybody's
being
abandoned.
From
from
this,
I
do
have
a
question.
You
know
you
have
a
new
program-
childcare,
which
is
also
very
good
and
the
new
program
you're
doing
plus
the
other
old
programs.
So
I
really
like
to
know-
and
that
I'm
sure
you
would
like
to
know
too
whether
you
know
all
the
cities,
all
the
regions
in
the
counties
being
you
know
equally
benefiting
from
it.
D
So
I
think
numbers
would
be
very
important
because
you
know
we're
all
paying
for
it
and
we
would
like
to
receive
some
of
the
benefit
proportionately.
So
I
think
those
numbers
would
be
important.
Those
data
those
matrix
will
be
very,
very
good
to
have
so
that
you
know
we
can
have
the
adjustment
we
make.
If
we
need
to,
then,
if
we
know
how
what
areas
are
lacking
right,
then
we
can
make
adjustments
to
do
all
those
things.
So
I
really
think
going
forward
with
this
new
additional
amendment.
D
It's
going
to
give
us
a
lot
more
information
and
to
make
a
lot
more
easy
for
us
to
enough
to
sell
to
our
taxpayers
that
we
are
actually
getting
the
benefits
of
the
program,
because
all
kids
are.
Y
D
E
Council
members
on
yes,
thank
you
mayor,
thank
you
for
coming
and
providing
this
information.
I
really
support
this
regional
holistic
approach,
because
this
is
truly
going
all
the
way
back
from
the
prevention
and
being
proactive
to
focus
on
prenatal
all
the
way
to
24
year
old.
Is
that
right?
Yes
in
terms
of
young
adults,
and
I
I
appreciate
hearing
about
the
pilots
and
and
the
successful
program,
so
hopefully
the
ability
to
portability
of
those
programs
to
other
communities.
I
think
will
be
important
I
was
thinking
about.
E
I
know
you
didn't
specifically
mention
these
things,
so
I
just
want
to
validate
that
these
are
in
here.
But
when
we
talk
about
well-being
and
thriving
of
of
the
community
and
the
and
the
kids,
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
it
is
also
including
kids
with
different
cognitive
abilities
and
our
lbgtq
community.
E
So
when
I
think
about
up
to
24
year
olds,
does
the
workforce
development
component
include
supportive
employment?
And
so
that's
one
of
the
things
that
I'm
curious
about
mayor.
E
And
then
one
of
the
things
we
learned
in
the
king
county
board
of
health
is
that
if
we
want
to
get
reduce
the
amount
of
youth
violence
in
the
community
that
the
ability
to
have
community
centers-
and
so
I
appreciate
the
the
capital
side
of
that
ad.
But
I'm
wondering
if,
within
the
sa
the
best
start
for
kids.
E
Y
Okay,
let
me
start
at
the
end
of
at
the
end.
What
I
would
say
is
one
of
the
things
that
has
been
really
amazing
about
best
starts
for
kids
is
being
able
to
leverage
the
other
things
that
are
happening
in
the
county.
So,
yes,
we
have
done
a
deep
dive
into
the
violence
prevention
work,
but
we're
leveraging
that,
with
the
zero
youth
detention
work
and
with
the
gun,
violence
group,
that's
going
so
best
starts
for
kids.
Y
Y
I
caught
that
in
the
very
beginning
for
our
transitions
to
adulthood
work
that
is
partly
what
we
want
to
be
deepening
and
we're
working
with
our
our
developmental
disabilities
and
educate
early
childhood
supports
division
ddex
to
actually
provide
more
support
for
the
support
of
work
for
young
people
who
have
delays
or
disabilities.
Y
The
language
access
has
been
a
huge
issue
for
us
throughout
best
starts
for
kids,
and
so
not
only
does
it
permeate
all
of
our
our
strategies,
but
we
actually
have
a
language
access
ambassadors
program,
and
so
we
have
folks
who
are
multilingual
who
we
can
utilize
throughout
bsk
for
different
events
for
connections
to
community
and
those
sorts
of
things.
So
that's
been
a
really
big
focus
of
ours,
around
language
access
and,
in
general,
the
idea
around
reduction
of
youth
violence.
Y
A
lot
of
the
levers
that
we
have
for
health
and
well-being
are
also
the
same
levers
for
creating
situations,
circumstances
and
environments
where
you
are
reducing
youth
violence,
so
that
has
been
a
really
really
big
part
of
our
work
but,
more
importantly,
it's
a
big
part
of
our
partnership
with
community,
and
so
we've
taken
direction
from
our
communities
on
what
we
need
to
be
doing
in
a
lot
of
these
areas
for
doing
this
work.
Y
If
we
get
a
renewed
levy,
we
will
deepen
our
connections
around
mental
health
and
emotional
well-being
for
young
people,
just
because
we
know
that
this
is
going
to
be.
This
is
going
to
be
with
us.
This
after
time
is
going
to
be
with
us
for
a
few
years,
and
we're
prepared
to
begin
to
address
that
with
deepening
our
investments.
Here.
Y
A
That
was
good
to
hear.
Thank
you
sheila.
So
I'm
going
to
make
a
comment
and
to
know
if
council
member
barksdale
had
any
comments
or
questions.
G
Yeah,
thank
you
mayor.
Should
I
go
now
or
yeah
go
ahead.
Okay,
thanks!
Thank
you
for
the
work
that
you
all
are
doing
with
death
starts
because
I'll
keep
my
comments
short
well,
one.
It
sounded
like
there
was
maybe
a
natural
opportunity
to
partner
with
inside
pathways.
So
I
don't
know
if
that's
already
a
partner
for
you
all,
but
I
just
want
to
mention
that
in
terms
of
child
care
providers
just
curious
about
maybe
how
you're
thinking
about
that
a
little
more
deeply.
I
think
it's
awesome.
G
I
I
guess
I'm
what
I'm
thinking
about
is:
how
do
we
make
it?
Make
childcare
more
accessible
like
having
more
child
care
providers
spread
throughout
the
community
versus
just
in
the
business
centers,
so
maybe
mom
and
pop.
You
know,
as
we
think
about
the
15-minute
city
and
just
wanted
to
say,
I'm
glad
to
see
the
allocation
of
funds
to
support
evaluation,
so
dedicating
some
funds
toward
that.
Thank
you.
A
Did
you
have
any
other
comments,
sheila
to
councilmember,
barksdale,
okay,
I'll
I'll,
be
really
quick?
I
mean
you
cannot
overstate
the
value
of
this
program
in
so
many
ways
and
I'm
so
grateful
that
we
have
the
funding
and
hopefully
we'll
have
it
again
to
continue
these
programs
with
all
the
restorative
and
preventative
work
that
you're
doing
I.
I
really
believe
that
anything
we
invest
in
children
is
going
to
pay
dividends
for
our
future,
and
so
I'm
very
supportive
of
this
program
being
renewed.
A
Y
You
know
I
would
have
to
do
that
math
really
quickly,
because
I've
never
thought
of
it
as
a
percent.
It
will
in
the
next
levy
that
was
for
for
this
levy
in
the
next
levy.
It'll
be
closer
to
about
28
million
just
because
of
the
changes
that
are
happening
within
there,
but
it's
a
small.
It
would
be
a
small
percent
20,
28
million
out
of
800
million
for
youth
and
yeah
most
people.
It's.
A
So
yeah,
so
I
I
mean
I'm
all
for
that
being
having
as
much
as
we
need
to
spend
on
programs
for
that
and
then
I'm
very
curious
to
see
you
looking
at
what
what
is
the
need
and
then
who's,
and
where
is
the
money
going
based
on
the
need
so
hoping
to
see
that
all
true
up
there,
but
anyway,
looking
forward
to
voting
for
this
when
we
get
announced
as
individuals.
A
Okay,
I'm
going
to
it's
7
48,
I'm
going
to
take
a
break
until,
let's
just
say,
8
o'clock,
and
we
will
come
back
and
finish
up
our
meeting.
Thank.
A
A
A
P
P
Joining
us
this
evening
is
nathan
mccommon
our
deputy
city
manager,
as
well
as
represent
representatives
of
the
office
of
independent
review.
With
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
to
nathan
mccommon
to
to
offer
up
some
introductory
comments
and
introduce
our
guests
tonight.
Nathan.
AA
Muted,
am
I
on
now
there
you
go
all
right.
Thank
you,
city
manager,
miyaki.
Just
before
I
start
charming.
If
I
would
ask
you
to
look
into
the
waiting
and
see
if
mr
tarrant
is
there
and
you
can
move
him
over
as
a
presenter
and
while
she's
doing
that
I'll
I'll
move
right
into
it
so
good
evening,
again,
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
noon,
house
and
council,
as
city
manager,
miyake
highlighted
the
presentation
this
evening
comes
as
a
result
of
a
culmination
of
several
months
of
work.
AA
That
was
prompted
by
the
council's
pledge
to
take
a
hard
look
at
bellevue's
police
use
of
force
policies.
That
pledge
was
published
june
11
2020
on
next
slide.
Please,
the
council
city
managed
miyake
and
police
chief.
My
lad
all
welcomed
the
scrutiny
recognizing
that
bellevue
is
not
exempt,
and
it
is
our
common
practice
to
seek
continuous
improvement
and
look
for
better
ways
to
serve
the
bellevue
community.
AA
AA
AA
AA
Next
slide,
please
so
before
I
introduce
the
consultant,
I
want
to
state
clearly
for
the
public
audience
that
this
evening's
presentation
and
conversation
is
intended
for
the
council
to
get
a
good
understanding
of
the
consultant's
report
and
recommendations.
So
no
action
will
be
taken
tonight
in
the
coming
weeks.
The
conversation
will
continue
between
the
council
and
professional
staff
about
the
consultant's
recommendations.
AA
The
report
is
now
in
our
hands.
We
take
it
very
seriously
and
we
have
a
commitment
to
the
council
and
the
public
to
bring
this
back
with
us
this
evening.
Our
team
members
of
the
office
of
independent
review
group
mike
michael
gennako,
is
oyr's
founding
principal
and
will
open
for
the
group
and
introduce
his
team.
Mr
ginaako,
I
turn
over
the
presentation
to
you.
N
Mr
mccommon,
thank
you
very
much
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor,
newinghouse,
council
city
leadership.
It's
my
privilege
to
begin
this
presentation
on
behalf
of
oir
group.
We
look
forward
to
sharing
with
you
the
the
findings
that
we
obtained
as
a
result
of
the
work
that
we
did
consistent
with
the
mayor's
pledge,
as
endorsed
by
all
of
city
leadership.
N
We
had
a
a
great
opportunity
to
engage
with
a
number
of
your
residents
about
this
important
issue
of
policing
and
particularly
how
use
of
force
issues
are
to
be
trained
policies,
developed,
etc,
and
we
again
look
forward
to
spending
some
time
with
you
at
least
giving
you
a
50,
000
foot
level
of
of
our
review.
I
want
to
introduce
to
you
the
members
of
our
team,
so
what
I'll
do
is?
N
I
will
turn
it
over
to
one
of
my
colleagues
who
will
then
turn
it
over
to
our
third
and
fourth
colleague
as
we
go
through
our
powerpoint
presentation,
so
first
of
first
off
first
off
for
us,
is
julie
rulin.
Who
will
talk
to
you
about
our
engagement
with
your
city
residents
in
more
detail?
Julie.
Do
you
want
to
say
hello.
AB
Yes,
hello
good
evening,
council.
Thank
you
for
this
opportunity
to
address
you
tonight
we
did
spend.
We
did
spend
a
lot
of
time
with
members
of
your
community.
It
was
a
key
piece
of
our
assignment
was
to
listen
to
and
engage
with
the
bellevue
community
on
this
issue
of
use
of
force
policies
and
to
hear
about
their
experiences
and
their
priorities
and
what
they
would
like
to
see
with
regards
to
their
police
department,
and
so
to
do
that
there
were.
There
were
various
ways
that
we
engaged.
AB
We
conducted
three
virtual
listening
sessions
that
were
open
to
the
entire
community
and
we
had
over
across
those
three
sessions.
We
had
206
people
register
and
a
bunch
of
people
who
spoke
up
and
and
shared
their
experiences
and
their
observations
with
us
during
those
meetings.
We
also
did
nine
targeted
listening
sessions
with
specific
groups
and
those
were
not
recorded.
They
were
not
publicly
broadcast.
AB
They
were
confidential
in
that
way
by
the
request
of
those
who
were
engaging
in
those
conversations
and
my
best
estimate
is
we
had
80
to
90
people
participating
in
those
nine
targeted
listening
sessions.
AB
AB
In
all
it
was
an
impressive
now
there
might
have
been
some
crossover
and
certainly
some
people
who
emailed
us
also
responded
to
the
survey.
So
I
can't
say
exactly
how
many
people,
but
it
was
an
impressive
level
of
engagement
from
people
in
your
city
who
live
and
work
and
we're
interested
in
these
issues.
AB
My
my
best
estimate
is
about
1400
contacts
we
received
over
the
course
of
our
our
work
on
this
project.
So,
as
I
said,
it
was
impressive.
It
was
impressive
by
the
numbers,
but
also
the
level
of
thoughtfulness
and
preparation
of
people
who
came
to
these,
who
took
the
time
to
write
comments,
but
also
who
came
to
the
listening
sessions.
AB
They
had
reviewed
policies
and
really
thought
about
what
they
wanted
to
say,
and
we
were
grateful
for
that
level
of
engagement.
AB
I
also
want
to
thank
the
city
for
its
excellent
facilitation
of
these
efforts,
coordinating
the
listening
sessions
for
us
and
working
on
the
website
and
making
sure
that
we
got
all
of
those
comments
back
in
a
way
that
was
very
easy
for
us
to
use.
So
I
am
grateful
for
that
as
well.
All
of
this
engagement
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
perry
in
just
a
second
to
to
talk
about
sort
of
what
we
heard
from
people.
AB
This
is
sort
of
how
we
heard
it
perry's
going
to
talk
about
what
we
heard
and
but
I
did
want
to
say
that
all
of
these
recommendations
ultimately
really
did
help
us
have
a
good
understanding
of
the
concerns
and
priorities
of
the
people
of
bellevue,
and
that
was
an
important
backdrop
to
our
review
of
all
of
the
policies
and
the
recommendations
we
made.
So
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
and
introduce
perry
if
you
want
to
take
it
away
on
this
next
slide.
AB
AC
Thank
you
julie,
good
evening,
mayor
council
and
city
manager
and
deputy
city
manager.
First
and
foremost
again,
I
want
to
echo
julie's
statement
and
thoughts
about
the
quality
of
folks
from
the
city
of
bellevue
that
were
working
behind
the
scenes
to
facilitate
this
doing
this
during
a
pandemic
during
a
pandemic
has
presented
challenges.
However,
as
you
heard
from
julie,
there
was
fairly
extensive
participation
in
this
in
the
listing
sessions,
particularly
the
general
listening
sessions.
The
general
listing
sessions
were
very
well
attended.
AC
Ordinarily,
when
we
do
these,
when
we
do
these
they're
done
in
person
and
so
there's
an
opportunity
for
folks
to
raise
their
hands
and
engage.
I
will
say
without
question
that
we
had
engagement
throughout
each
one
of
those
processes
and
then
more
specifically
kind
of
drilling
down
back
to
the
special
listening
sessions
where
we
actually
wanted
to
reach
out
specifically
for
input.
AC
Those
were
again
very
well
handled
by
city
staff,
so
I
do
want
to
commend
them
for
that
in
terms
of
feedback
and
input,
it
was
pretty
much
broad
spectrum
in
that
largely.
There
was
a
significant
amount
of
support
on
behalf
of
bellevue
police
department
and,
more
more
generally,
the
commentary
that
was
a
little
more
divergent,
wasn't
specific
to
bellevue
police
department,
but
more
to
the
national
narrative
that
was
occurring,
and
in
that
realm
there
was
a
lot
of
concern
about
policing
in
general.
AC
You
know
in
america
by
and
large
from
the
comments,
not
only
during
the
live
sessions
via
zoom,
but
also
in
the
written
comments
was
overwhelming
support
for
chief
milan
and
the
police
department
there
in
bellevue
and
again
that
I
want
to
just
kind
of
give
you
that
larger
overview
and
I'm
going
to
turn
it
back
over
to
julie.
AB
Thanks
for
that
perry-
and
I
am
going
to
take
this
moment
to
move
on
to
our
next
slide
and
introduce
samurai
marion
who's
going
to
talk
about
getting
into
the
use
of
force
policy
review.
As
I
said,
the
the
views
that
we
heard
from
your
community
certainly
set
a
great
backdrop
for
us.
Our
recommendations,
though,
are
based
on
our
experience,
and
our
detailed
review
as
sam
is
going
to
tell
us.
AD
AD
AD
We
also
reviewed
some
of
the
police
department's
manuals
for
specialized
units,
such
as
their
canine
unit
and
their
crisis
response
team,
and
we
looked
at
the
police
department's
annual
reports
and
we
also
had
access
to
some
of
their
internal
reports
where
they
can
compile
data
on
use
of
force
and
complaints.
AD
And
then,
during
december
we
didn't
just
do
a
paper
review.
Of
course,
we
wanted
to
meet
with
command
staff
and
members,
especially
subject
matter
experts
that
the
department
had
identified
for
us,
and
we
did
that
through
zoom,
so
that
we
could
understand
how
particular
policies
were
implemented,
especially
in
the
day-to-day
operations.
AD
So
police
department
members
were
very
generous
with
both
their
time
and
their
expertise,
and
they
helped
us
to
understand
the
use
of
force
policies
and,
more
specifically,
how
these
policies,
how
the
department
investigates
and
documents
and
reviews
specific
instances
of
force.
AD
We
learned
during
these
discussions
that
the
department
was
contemplating
changes
in
some
of
their
force
policies
in
areas
such
as
de-escalation
and
duty
to
intervene,
which
were
areas
that
we
were
also
contemplating
recommendations,
and
we
also
learned
through
these
discussions
that
some
of
the
department,
the
department's
important
practices
concerning
use
of
force,
especially
around
documentation
and
review,
were
not
yet
memorialized
in
their
use
of
force
policy.
AD
So
through
our
review
of
the
policies,
the
discussions
with
the
police
department
staff,
our
own
expertise
and
knowledge
of
policing
by
practices
and
also
then,
in
light
of
what
we
were
learning
through
the
listening
sessions.
We
drafted
the
report
and
the
47
tentative
recommendations.
AD
It
was
important
to
us
that
we
be
factually
correct
in
our
report
and
also
equally
important
that
both
community
members
and
the
police
department
and
the
chief
have
the
opportunity
to
review
our
tentative
recommendations
and
our
report.
AD
So
we
provided
the
chief
and
his
staff
a
report
as
well
as
what
julie
explained
the
the
report
was
made
available
to
the
public
and
we
met
with
the
chief
and
and
similarly,
we
were
able
to
look
at
the
feedback
from
community
members
and
have
an
opportunity,
then
to
revise
our
report
based
on
on
this
important
feedback.
AD
Ultimately,
the
feedback
from
both
the
chief
and
the
community
members
have
improved
this
report
and
we're
so
grateful
to
have
this
opportunity
to
have
such
a
participatory
process,
and
now
I'd
like
to
turn
it
over
to
michael,
so
that
he
can
highlight
some
of
our
key
recommendations.
N
Thank
you,
samra.
There
were
47
recommendations
that
we
came
up
with
and
proposed,
as
included
in
our
report.
N
We
are
not
going
to
go
over
every
one
of
those
47
recommendations,
but
we
are
going
to
sort
of
talk
about
some
of
the
recommendations
that
are
particularly,
we
think
are
particularly
important
and
are
are
going
to
be
featured
this
evening.
N
One
thing
I
should
say
is
that
whenever
there
is
a
significant
change
in
police
department
policy
pursuant
to
due
process,
labor
laws
etc,
those
policies
do
require
discussion
and
negotiation
with
the
association
representing
the
officers.
N
So
it's
not
like
these
recommendations
can
be
achieved
overnight,
but
we
did
present
them
as
what
we
think
are
the
recommendations
that
can
improve
the
way
in
which
guidance
is
provided
to
officers
on
the
bellevue
police
department
and
are
consistent
with
many
of
the
things
we
heard
through.
Our
community
engagement
are
also
consistent
with
what
we
believe
to
be
best
practices
and
progressive
policing
practices
based
on
our
experience
and
looking
at
scores
of
policies
throughout
the
country,
so
just
to
go
over
them
in
a
relatively
rapid
way.
N
One
of
the
things
that
we
noted
is
that,
at
least
when
we
reviewed
the
policy,
there
was
no
recognition
of
how
important
it
is
the
sanctity
of
life
issues
and
how
a
force
must
recognize
how
important
life
is
and
that
kind
of
a
preamble
is
more
and
more
be
being
accepted
within
the
police
department
culture,
and
we
think
that
would
be
helpful
to
start
off
the
policy
with
regard
to
a
recognition
of
the
sanctity
of
life.
N
Proportionality
has
to
do
with
recognition
that
force
should
be
used
proportional
to
the
need
for
using
force
and
should
not
exceed
the
need
to
use
force.
Proportionality
is
a
newer
concept
that
is
receiving
growing
acceptance
in
policing
throughout
the
country
and
then
the
duty
to
intervene
by
that
we
mean
that
officers
should
recognize
that
if
they
see
or
are
aware
of
other
officers
exceeding
reasonable
force
that
they
should
intervene
if
they
can
and
report
it
if
they
are
not
able
to
stop
such
force.
N
We
have
also
made
recommendations
on
ways
in
which
the
bellevue
police
department
can
enhance
their
documentation,
investigation
and
review
of
force
incidents
when
force
is
used.
We
believe
that
there
needs
to
be
a
very
robust
investigation,
a
very
robust
reporting
and
a
review
to
examine
the
use
of
force
to
see
whether
or
not
there
are
other
strategies
that
could
have
been
deployed
in
order
to
reduce
the
likelihood
of
needing
to
use
force.
N
Deadly
force,
obviously,
is
the
ultimate
force
that
officers
have
and
should
obviously
be
reserved
for
only
the
imminent
danger
situations
where
imminent
threat
is
presented
to
officers
or
third
parties,
and
so
we
have
suggested
that
again
that
the
bellevue
police
department
expand
its
review
of
deadly
force
to
ensure
that
again,
that
lessons
can
be
learned
from
that
review
and
push
back
into
the
department
through
training,
through
accountability
and
through
other
mechanisms
to
again
reduce
the
likelihood
of
the
need
to
use
deadly
force.
Julie.
If
you
can
go
to
the
next
slide,.
N
We
have
suggested
some
modifications
in
the
policy,
for
example
the
last
time.
I
believe
that
there
was
an
austin
involved
shooting
in
bellevue
it
involved
shooting
at
a
moving
vehicle,
and
so
we
have
suggested
further
guidance
with
regard
to
how
officers
should
approach
moving
vehicles
and
when
they
should
use
force
or
deadly
force
on
moving
vehicles
and
the
potential
downsides
of
using
force
on
moving
vehicles
and
how
ineffective
that
technique
has
often
proven
to
be
consistent
with
what
most
police
departments
are
are
considering
doing.
N
Is
the
prohibition
on
neck
holds
coming
out
of
the
george
floyd
murder?
Our
recommendation
is
to
have
a
policy
that
would
prohibit
neck
holes
within
the
city
police
department
and
advise
that
that
that
that
kind
of
use
of
force
no
longer
be
authorized
by
the
police
department.
N
We
have
suggested
some
modifications
to
deployment
of
canines
and
tasers
in
order
to
be
consistent
with
progressive
practices,
and
it
made
made
recommendations
with
regard
to
that.
Truly.
If
you
want
to
go
to
the
next
slide,
the
crowd
control
policies
are
obviously
things
that
have
been
considered
throughout
the
country
as
a
result
of
the
recent
the
protest
last
summer,
and
we
have
suggested
ways
in
which
those
crowd
control
policies
in
the
city
of
bellevue
can
be
improved.
N
I
would
say
that,
if
the
community
input
and
engagement,
this
is
the
one
that
I
think
received
unanimous
support
for,
and
that
is
the
interest
by,
I
think
virtually
everyone
we
talked
to
about
outfitting
police
department
officers
with
body-worn
cameras,
and
I
think
we
are
interested
to
see
that
the
department
is
supportive
of
that.
The
officers
are
supportive
of
it,
but
most
significantly,
your
community
is
extremely
supportive
of
ensuring
that
bellevue
police
soon
get
body-worn
cameras.
N
A
corollary
to
our
recommendations
is
the
understanding
and
recognition
that,
in
addition
to
equipping
officers
with
body-worn
cameras
that
there
need
to
be
very
good
guidance
with
regard
to
when
body
worn
cameras
are
activated
when
they're,
deactivated
and
other
rules
of
the
road.
If
you
will
that
we
have
learned
the
hard
way
are
important
to
instill
when
if,
in
fact,
body
worn
cameras
become
part
of
the
fabric
of
the
bellevue
police
department.
N
We
also
believe
that
there
can
be
more
transparency
and
community
engagement
on
a
foreign
going
basis,
and
we
have
come
up
with
a
lot
of
strategies
to
ensure
that
there
is
additional
transparency,
that
the
police
department
push
out.
Information
and
data,
for
example,
with
regard
to
uses
of
force,
so
that
its
public
is
of
that
public.
N
That
information
is
available
to
your
public
and
community
engagement,
and
by
that
we
mean
get
a
community
more
involved
in
police
department
decision
making
like
hiring
decisions,
promotion
decisions
and
and
also
be
able,
as
policies
are
considered
and
new
ones
are
being
formulated
that
the
community
not
have
the
full
say
on
what
those
policies
look
like,
but
have
an
ability
to
comment
as
new
policies
are
being
considered
and
developed
and
those
are
on
the
essence
of
our
recommendations
and
we,
I
think,
are
ready
to
end
our
part
of
the
presentation
and
see
if,
if
any,
if
mayor,
deputy
mayor
or
anyone
on
council
has
any
questions
with
regard
to
our
report-
and
we
again
want
to
commend
the
city,
leadership,
city
staff
and
in
particular,
nathan
mccommon,
who
has
been
indispensable
to
our
ability
to
get
this
work
done
without
his
guidance.
N
Without
his
experience
without
his
expertise,
we
would
still
be
working
on
this
darn
report,
so
shout
out
to
nathan,
as
well
as
our
as
our
liaison
and
also
mr
mayaki,
who
also
was
very
helpful
with
regard
to
the
guidance
all
along
the
way.
A
Thank
you
for
your
presentation.
Can
I
see
if
there's
any
questions
or
comments?
If
you
raise
your
hand,
I
can
I
see
a
couple.
I
see
a
few
so
we'll
start
with
council
member
barksdale
go
to
the
deputy
mayor
and
then
council
members
on.
G
All
right,
thank
you,
mayor
and
thanks
to
everyone
at
oar
and
staff,
for
pulling
all
this
together
for
us
for
council
so
and
the
community.
So
a
few
questions
and
I'll
just
ask
the
questions
and
then
maybe
have
you
leave
time
to
respond
so
the
first
one
is
from
from
in
terms
of
the
policies.
G
Policy,
so
if
is
there
any
nuance,
there
are
there
any
policies
that
you
would
say
are
maybe
better
suited
for
council
or
versus
administrative
policy.
Second,
were
there
any
implications
for
tangential
services
such
as
norcon,
you
know
so
in
terms
of
9-1-1
or
other
services
that
are
related?
I
know
this
was
for
use
of
force,
but
I
think
you
know
considering
that
lens
is
important
as
it
influences
it
and
then
I
know
you
mentioned
hiring
training
and
accountability.
G
I
feel
like
you
touched
on
accountability,
can
you
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
hiring
and
training
any
any,
even
if
they
aren't
here
recommendations
or
thoughts,
reactions
related
to
that
two
more,
I
promise
I'm
done.
I'd
be
interested.
G
There
was
some
contrast
in
in
the
earlier
parts,
as
you
were
sort
of
speaking
through
the
facts
from
or
takeaways
from
the
community
engagement
I'd
be
interested
in
your
takeaways
through
an
equity
lens
of
the
impressions
you
had
from
that
engagement
and
then
last
I'd
say
the
recommendation
8
uses
the
term
unreasonable
force.
I
believe
it
was,
and
I
guess,
given
the
recommendation
around
using
proportionality,
should
that
be
proportionate
or
disproportionate.
G
N
With
regard
to
your
your
questions,
let
me
start
by
talking
about
some
of
your
earlier
questions
and
I
may
turn
I
think
I'm
gonna
turn
over
the
equity
lens
and
recommendation
a
question
to
julian
sammer
respectively,
but
with
regard
to
the
the
policies,
the
policies
are
largely
directed
and
I
don't
think
entirely
directed
at
the
police
department.
That
doesn't
mean
that
the
city
will
have
that.
N
The
recommendations,
if
implemented,
won't,
have
an
impact
on
the
city
because
it
will-
and
it
certainly
will
have
an
impact
on
city
residents,
but
the
the
recommendations
were
primarily
directed
in
the
use
of
force
area
and
were
directed
at
the
police
department
with
regard
to
their
current
policy
manuals
and
ways
of
doing
business
that
that
being
said,
the
911
piece,
the
the
other
part
of
the
city
family,
certainly
do
have
a
direct
corollary
with
regard
to
how
these
all
go
down
and
and
should
certainly
be
something
that
I
think
everyone
should
continue
to
examine
to
see
whether
or
not
they
are
functioning
in
a
in
a
good
way.
N
The
hiring
training
was
again
not
within
our
our
our
sweet
spot.
Our
scope,
but
what
we
did
say
about
hiring
and
training
well.
First
of
all,
the
training
piece
is
going
to
be
important
because
you
can
do
all
the
policy
changes
you
want
and
unless
you
train
your
officers
with
regard
to
understanding
these
are
the
new
ways
of
doing
business,
and
unless
you
do
that
effectively,
you
might
as
well
not
change
your
policy.
So
that
is
a
piece
that
should
be
watched
and
there
should
be
some.
N
You
know
continuing
question
asking
of
your
police
chief
about
what
kind
of
training
he
anticipates
doing
in
order
to
advise
his
officers
with
regard
to
the
recommendations
that
eventually
are
implemented
with
regard
to
the
hiring
piece.
Again,
it
was
not
within
our
sweet
spot,
but
what
was
within
our
sweet
spot.
N
Is
this
idea
that,
with
regard
to
these
other
decision
makings
on
who
it
is
that's
going
to
be
a
bellevue
police
officer
who
it
is
that
ends
up
getting
promoted,
that
the
community
should
be
more
involved
in
that
in
that
piece
by
sitting
on
hiring
panels
for
promotional
pattern
panels
and
that's
a
trend
that
we
see
in
progressive
policing,
and
we
would
would
expect
that
bellevue?
Do
the
same?
N
With
regard
to
the
equity
lens,
I'm
going
to
talk
to
I'm
going
to
ask
julie
to
respond
to
what
the
community
was
saying
with
regard
to
equity
lens
and
then
samurai
I'll.
Ask
you
to
address
the
council
members
question
about
recommendation.
Eight.
AB
Thank
you
thanks
mike
and
thanks
councilmember
barksdale
for
your
question.
Yeah
this
this
assignment,
you
know
sort
of
started
from
this
position
of
you
know.
AB
Use
of
force
is
certainly
a
key
piece
of
it,
but
also
kind
of
acknowledging
the
systemic
racism
and,
and
how
do
we
start
to
take
some
steps
to
address
that
our
community
engagement?
We
started
with
these
three
big
come
one:
come
all
everybody's
invited
public
listening
sessions
and
and
what
we
got
from
that,
and
I
think
we
had
always
intended
to
do
some
more
targeted
listening
sessions.
AB
But
we
certainly
heard
that
there
was
a
concern
about
the
very
public
nature
of
that
and
people
not
feeling
particularly
safe
in
sharing
their
views
in
that
kind
of
open
forum,
and
so
the
targeted
forum,
the
targeted
sessions,
really
were
intended
to
invite
smaller
groups,
who
might
have
some
common
interests
and
who
could
talk
in
a
more
confidential
way,
and
that
was
you
know
our
efforts
to
make
sure
that
we
heard
a
diverse
range
of
voices
and
so
that
people,
in
a
way
that
that
made
people
feel
safe
and
felt
like
they
could
share
their
experiences
and
their
views.
AB
And
so
that
was
the
goal
of
our
targeted
listening
sessions
was
to
really
focus
on
creating
that
safe
space,
so
that
we
could
hear
that
range
of
views.
And
again
we
were
very
limited
in
our
in
our
project
and
our
assignment
to
use
of
force
policies.
AB
But
you
know
so
many
people
wanted
to
talk
more
broadly
about
that
and
we
were
open
to
listening
to
to
all
of
those
issues.
You
know
these
broader
issues
of
a
police
department's
relationships
with
its
community
go
well
beyond
use
of
force,
and
so
that
was
an
important
piece
of
our
listening
session,
even
though
it
didn't
necessarily
come
out
in
ways
that
were
directly
related
to
the
policies
per
se.
AD
Great,
thank
you,
council
barksdale,
for
your
question
about
including
perhaps
the
concept
of
proportionality
in
recommendation
eight,
and
we
focused
on
that
duty.
The
duty
to
intervene
and
worked
with
the
current
standard
that
the
department
had
which
really
focuses
on
when
force
is
unreasonable,
but
how
the
department
will
incorporate
the
concept
of
proportionality.
AD
I
I
think,
there's
a
lot
of
latitude
as
to
how
that
concept
would
be
integrated
into
the
actual
use
of
force
policy.
What
kind
of
language
would
be
used?
Would
it
include
something
like
proportionality
in
the
recommendation
around
a
duty
to
intervene?
So
I
think
it's
an
area
to
discuss
the
wordsmithing
as
to
how
to
change
that,
so
that
duty
to
intervene
includes
proportionality.
G
C
Thank
you
mayor.
First
of
all,
I
too
want
to
thank
the
city,
manager's
office
there,
brad
and
nathan,
for
spearheading
this
this
this
project
here
and
thank
you,
oir
group
samara,
michael
perry
and
julie.
Thank
you
all
for
the
great
work
and
really
want
to
thank
the
the
public
as
well
for
being
so
engaged.
It's.
C
It's
really
great
to
hear
how
many
people
did
take
the
time
to
be
involved
in
those
three
listening
sessions
and
sending
in
the
emails
and
and
taking
a
part
of
the
of
the
surveys
as
well,
so
it
was.
It
was
really
great
to
see
that,
and
it
sounds
like
that
was
much
more
than
your
from
your
experience
that
you're
used
to
so
so
it's
something
we
pride
ourselves.
I
think
at
the
city
of
bellevue
to
be
engaged
just
just
like
that.
C
So
one
of
the
questions
that
I
had
so
you
know
as
you're
probably
aware
so
bellevue
police
charge
one
of
those
rare
agencies
that
have
earned
the
national
credit
accreditation
right,
they're
accredited
and
have
been
accredited
for
many
many
years
by.
I
believe
it's
by
kalia.
So
it's
a
commission
on
accreditation
for
law
enforcement
agencies
and
my
question
is
in
your
report.
C
You
cite
numerous
times
about
best
practices,
so
not
being
an
expert
here
in
best
practices,
but
I'm
assuming
that
going
through
that
accreditation.
Certainly
they
have
best
practices
that
the
department
follows.
So
I'm
kind
of
curious
what
how
you
define
best
practices
and
and
and
where
those
best
practices
are
either
sourced
or
referenced,
or
they
want
your
or
is
it
the
oir's
best
practices.
N
Sure,
deputy
mayor
newinghouse
house,
that's
a
great
question,
so
I
wish
that
there
was
a
book
of
police
best
practices
that
you
could
check
out
of
the
library.
N
But
I
I
have
yet
to
write
the
book,
but
maybe
someday
I
will,
but
kalia
certainly
has
a
broader
range,
because
they're
not
just
looking
at
use
of
force.
So
kalia
is
looking
at
all
ways
in
which
police
departments
are
supposed
to
function
consistent
with
their
list
of
best
practices.
N
N
Monitorships
and
federal
intervention,
etc.
Doj
iacp
all
of
the
police
executive
research
forum.
All
of
these
progressive
think
tanks
that
are
really
many
of
them
comprised
of
police
executives
are
starting
to
come
out
with
other
ideas,
and
these
are
where
we
get
the
police
practices
that
we
find
to
be
important
and
to
import
into
your
in
into
various
cities
that
we
receive
assignments
for
in
this
case,
as
I
think
samurai
alluded
to
it
wasn't.
N
It
was
interesting
to
us
that
many
of
the
ideas
that
we
had
been
percolating
were
already
ideas
that
were
already
somewhat
in
process
within
the
organization
itself.
Z
C
Very
good,
and
and
in
general,
so
there's
40,
47
recommendations.
I
wonder
if
you
can
put
that
in
context
a
little
bit
and
I
know
every
police
department's
different
and
you
know
I
want
every
place
tauren
to
be.
You
know
graded
or
judged
on
their
own
on
their
own
merits,
but
in
general
47
you
know
is
that
is
that
a
lot
is
that
a
few
for
you
and
also
the
recommendations
in
general
are
percentage-wise.
How
many
of
your
recommendations
are
usually
implemented?
C
I'm
curious
there
because
you
know,
I
don't
think
that
any
agency,
that's
part
of
again
I'll,
go
back
to
the
accreditation,
because
you
know
less
than
six.
Sixty
percent
of
departments
across
the
country
are
accredited,
so
I'm
wondering
you
know
if
we
did
not
implement
all
these
different
recommendations.
I'm
sure
you
wouldn't
say
that
our
police
department
is
in
no
way
you
know
unprofessional
or
not,
adhering
to
the
highest
possible
standards
in
the
profession.
Correct.
N
Well,
that
is
absolutely
correct,
deputy
mayor
and
so
what
I
would
say
about
the
there's,
nothing
magic
about
the
number
47,
but
I
have
to
say
that
when
we
do
an
assessment
or
an
evaluation
we're
getting
into
the
weeds.
So
that's
why
I
didn't
want
to
spend
you
know
as
much
time
going
to
everyone,
because
these
are
often
very
technical
recommendations.
N
To
your
point
and
to
your
point,
we
weren't
looking
at
this
review.
In
a
way
of
how
do
we
get
bellevue
pd
to
the
absolute
minimum
standards,
we
thought
that
it
would
have
been.
It
was
helpful
to
get
bellevue
pd
to
a
standard.
I
think
that
they
aspire
to,
which
is
the
gold
standard
to
be.
N
You
know
heads
and
shoulders
above
every
other
agency
in
the
in
the
state
of
washington,
so
it
was
with
that
sort
of
perspective
that
with
which
we
conducted
our
review,
and
our
aspiration
was
to
see
whether
or
not
we
could
get
the
police
department
through
the
recommendations
to
the
highest
level
of
performance,
because
I
think,
as
I
think
you
stated
in
your
earlier
remarks,
your
community
expects
that
public
service
in
your
city
be
at
that
highest
level,
whether
it's
public
safety
or
parks,
or
what
have
you
so
we,
I
think
we
recognize
soon
in
our
discussion
with
cd
leadership,
how
how
high
the
expectations
are
of
your
public.
N
With
regard
to
implementation,
we
get
nervous
when
we
have
a
presentation
like
this
and
city
leadership,
where
the
police
chief
says
we're
gonna
re.
We're
gonna
implement
all
of
those
recommendations
tomorrow,
because
that
means
that
they're
not
taking
it
seriously.
So
you
know
whether
they're
you
know
whether
it's
40
or
38
or
43.
N
C
E
You
know
I
too
thank
brad
and
nathan
and
the
chief
and
oir
for
all
of
this
work
as
well
as
the
community,
because
I
think
that
what
you've,
what
we
believe
is
that
public
safety
is
of
paramount
importance
and
that
we
do
aspire
to
our
highest
standards
and
to
be
a
model
across
the
country,
and
yet
with
that
said,
I
can
also
appreciate
the
fact
that
this
is
a
very
hard
topic
to
talk
about
for
our
community,
as
well
as
for
our
our
police,
who
are
always
striving
to
be
their
best
and
to
be
evaluated
with
a
microscope,
can
sometimes
be
a
little
nerve-wracking.
E
So
I
just
appreciate
the
fact
that
we
were
all
in
to
the
pledge
that
we
signed
on
to
and
to
do
this
work
together.
You
know
to
similar
to
the
deputy
mayor's
point.
I
was
also
reading
the
report
about
the
national
best
practices
and
the
progressive
policy
practice
and
also
how
that
plays
into
kalia,
because
I've
come
to
to
understand
that
kalia
is
a
set
of
evaluation
of
a
lot
of
the
what's
and
some
of
the
house,
but
not
necessarily
saying
that
this
is
the
only
way
to
be
to
perform
your
work.
E
So
I'm
I'm
wondering
if
you
can
comment
a
bit
more
about
the
national
best
practice.
Certainly
I
know
we've
talked
about
a
model
of
of
serving
from
a
guardianship
standpoint,
and
so
when,
when
you
use
the
word
progressive
policy
practice
is
that
what
you're
talking
about?
Because
I
I'm
still
a
little
bit
unclear
about
what
the
criteria
is
or
what
that
best
practice
looks
like.
I
know
you,
you
talked
about,
maybe
some
learnings
from
other
places.
E
Are
there
some
police
departments
where
you
are
looking
at
what
they're
doing
now
in
their
journey
as
more
of
the
best
practice.
So
I'd
like
to
understand
a
bit
more
about
that
and
then,
when
I
look
at
the
report,
it
talks
about
83
percent
of
the
people
that
responded
are
homeowners,
so
I'm
trying
to
understand
whether
the
results
we're
getting
is
representative
of
the
whole
community
when
about
half
of
our
community
are
renters.
E
E
You
refer
to
a
professional
standards,
annual
report
and
I'm
wondering
if
that's
the
same
as
the
published
police
annual
report
or
if
that's
something,
different
and
related
to
near
the
end.
There
you
were
talking
about
the
term
rioting
not
being
defined,
and
I'm
actually
thinking
I'm.
My
question
is
more
broad
about
when
we
think
about
writing.
E
Demonstration
protests
and
civil
dis
disturbances
are
those
defined
somewhere,
because
I'm
trying
to
understand
also
that
from
a
definitional
standpoint,
whether
that
is
actually
a
defined
term
in
the
law
enforcement
world
and
then,
lastly,
the
recommendation
about
the
advisory
councils.
I'm
also
curious
about
whether
there
were
some
feedback
you
received
from
the
advisory
council
broader
than
the
police
use
of
force.
That
may
inform
a
broader
conversation,
and
is
that
additional
information
that
you
have
that's
not
in
the
report
or
how
that
engagement
worked.
Thank
you.
N
Regarding
your
the
the
question
about
best
practices
and
the
sort
of
guardianship
which,
by
the
way,
I
think,
is
a
a
term
that
was,
I
think,
a
champion
by
sue
rar.
Who
is
currently
well.
I
think
she
just
retired,
from
the
state
academy
and
before
that
was
the
sheriff
of
your
county,
and
that's
where
I
got
to
know
her
and
have
appreciated
her
as
a
colleague.
N
But
the
the
best
practices
again
is
is
again
comes
from
police
agency.
I'm
sorry,
police
organizations
like
the
international
association
of
chiefs
of
police,
where
the
police,
educational
research
foundation
or
other
organizations
like
that
that
are
usually
consisting
of
executives
of
police
agencies
who
have
started
to
develop
model
policies.
N
The
national
institute
of
justice,
which
is
a
national
organization
that
is
pushing
out
best
practices
for
police
agencies
and
other
agencies,
like
other
organizations
like
that,
and
we
borrow
from
them
as
far
as
devising
these,
these
best
practices
that
then
become
our
barometer
in
evaluating
policies
of
a
police
department.
N
AD
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
council
members,
on
for
your
question
concerning
the
professional
standards
annual
report.
It
is
different
from
the
bellevue
police
department's
I'd,
say
their
more
comprehensive
annual
report.
The
professional
standards
report
has
to
do
with
their
analysis
of
complaints
that
they
receive
and
since
our
recommendations
they
now
publish
on
their
website
some
data
around
complaints.
AD
So
they
were
very
responsive
to
our
recommendation
that
that
information
be
provided
to
the
public,
but
it
is
different
than
the
annual
reports
that
the
department
historically
has
always
posted
on
their
on
their
website
and
concerning
to.
AD
Turning
to
your
other
question
about
defining
terms
that
was
part
of
our
concern
was
that
there
were
specific
terms
that
aren't
defined
and
that
it
becomes
so
important
to
be
precise
about
what
kinds
of
standards
the
department
has
as
to
when
they
will
respond
with
certain
types
of
force,
especially
during
crowd,
control
or
demonstrations.
AD
And
so
our
recommendation
was
to
look
at
that
language
and
be
very
precise
about
what
about
defining
those
terms
and
having
that
discussion,
so
that
there
is
clarity
and
so
that
they
aren't
vague
terms
that
could
be
used
in
ways
that
are
really
problematic
so
that
it
was
an
opportunity
now
to
really
sit
down
and
and
look
at
that
language
and
be
very
conscientious
about
what
the
terms
mean
and
what
kinds
of
force
can
be
used
in
different
situations.
AD
E
AD
In
terms
of
the
department's
crowd,
control
policies,
some
of
the
terms
are
defined,
but
some
concerned
not
just
let's
say
violent
behavior,
but
had
terms
that
could
be
used
for
both
non-violent
and
violent
behavior.
So
we
were
recommending
looking
at
those
terms
and
being
very
precise
and
and
to
have
in
terms
of
the
crowd
control
policy.
The
department
didn't
have
an
online
crowd
control
policy.
They
had
a
crowd
control
policy
that
was
part
of
a
larger
discussion
about
other,
maybe
spontaneous
incidences.
AD
So
we
were
recommending
that
the
department
create
a
crowd
control
first,
like
first
amendment
policy
that
had
so
that
there'd
be
the
opportunity
to
really
work
through
those
different
scenarios.
N
N
I
was
we
were
all
quite
impressed
with
the
fact
that
this
infrastructure
had
been
created
where,
on
a
regular
basis,
not
only
the
chief
of
police,
but
the
city
manager
and
other
leadership
in
the
city
convenes,
these
groups
of
of
concerned
individuals
and
interested
individuals
to
get
their
point
of
view
and
perspective
on
an
ongoing
basis
and
not
just
for
this
project,
and
we
borrowed
heavily
from
that
infrastructure
in
order
to
perform
our
engagement
piece,
and
we
found
that
to
be
extremely
helpful
and
your
specific
question.
N
But
that
being
said,
the
the
councils
are
a
fertile
ground
for
additional
discussion
and
dialogue
about
broader
issues,
and
if
the
city
was
interested
in
in
going
back
on
those
issues,
I
think
the
councils
would
be
a
great
exemplar
to
get
started.
The
last
question
had
to
do
with
the
last
question
I
had
in
my
list.
It's
a
little
out
order
had
to
do
with
renters
versus
homeowners
and
I'll
ask
julie
to
to
respond
to
that.
AB
Yeah,
thank
you
for
your
question.
Council
members
on.
You
know
the.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
none
of
the
the
outreach
that
we
did
then
getting
the
survey
responses
and
and
the
emails
none
of
that
was
intended
as
a
as
a
sort
of
scientifically
accurate
representative
group
of
bellevue.
AB
You
know
people
connected
to
bellevue.
It
was
we
wanted
to
hear
from
as
many
people
as
possible.
The
outreach
the
the
effort
was
to
just
say
we
want
anybody
who
wants
to
tell
us
something
their
views,
their
opinions
to
tell
it
to
us,
and
so
it
was
striking.
I
think
in
the
survey
responses
how
heavily
skewed
it
was
to
homeowners.
I
did
not
I
sort
of
figured
that
wasn't
representative
of
the
entire
population
and
I
think
it
that
it
is
what
it
is.
AB
It
was
nice
that
the
city
gathered
that
that
data
point,
but
it
wasn't
we
weren't
looking
at
these
results
in
a
way
to
say
a
certain
percentage
believes.
You
know
that
this
policy
needs
to
change.
AB
AB
I
almost
said
in-person
listening
sessions,
because
I've
now
come
to
view
zoom
as
being
in
person,
but
this
year
has
changed
us
all
in
so
many
ways,
but
those
those
comments
that
we
got
in
in
these
one
on
you
know
small
group
interactions,
even
the
bigger
listening
session.
Those
comments
were
much
more
nuanced.
Much
more,
you
know
much
more
representative.
I
felt
of
of
of
different
sorts
of
concerns
than
just
what
we
got
in
the
emails
and
the
and
the
survey
responses.
AB
So
it
certainly
didn't
go
unnoticed
by
us
that
that
you
know
the
percentage
of
homeowners,
it's
why
we
included
that
piece
in
here.
But
again
it's
it's
not
as,
though,
that
that
was
an
that
impacted.
The
way
the
recommendations
came
out.
Z
Yeah,
thank
you
very
much.
This
has
been
very,
it's
very
fascinating.
I
think
I
don't
think
we've
ever
gone
through
anything
like
this
on
council
and
the
city.
I
think
it's
these
good
things
in
discussion.
I
was
very
pleased
to
hear
the
emphasis
on
having
the
community
engaged
in
hiring
and
training
and
openness
in
general
for
the
department
and
the
city,
and
I
think
that's
that's
very
helpful
recommendations
on
that
and
acknowledging
that
we're
doing
a
lot
of
that.
Z
But
we
need
we
can
do
a
lot
better
and
that's
that's
very
good,
and
I
you
know
the
the
just
want
to
comment
real
quickly
on
the
accreditation
thing
and
I've
been
involved
in
a
lot
of
different
kind
of
accreditation,
things.
Z
I'm
an
attorney
and
I've
been
involved
in
a
number
of
organizations
and
it's
we
always
love
to
be
accredited
by
these
national
groups
and
everything
and
it's
good
and
it's
good
standards,
but
they're
not
the
same
as
what
you're
looking
at,
and
I
think
we
need
to
kind
of
remember
that,
because
we
don't
want
to
say
well,
we
were
rated,
you
know
really
really
high.
So
why
are
we
being
evaluated,
and
this
is
the
more
drilling
into
more
substantive
things
in
a
sense
they're,
both
important,
I
mean
it's
great,
we're
very
proud.
Z
When
we
get
these
accreditations,
they
really
mean
a
lot,
but
I'm
glad
you,
you
know,
would
be
kind
of
easy
to
say.
Well,
you
know
we're
here
and
we
don't
need
to
do
a
lot,
so
you've
really
really
dug
into
it
and
I
think,
found
things
that
are
very
positive
things
you
need
to
work
on
and
I
I'm
you
know
very
pleased
to
see
that
and
and
see
how
this
whole
thing
goes.
Z
The
question
I
had
is
is
different
and
it
really
gets
to
the
processing
in
this
because
I
think
a
lot
of
good
good
questions
have
already
been
or
comments
been
made
by
my
colleagues,
but
what's
it's
a
little
more
clarity
from
what
you
said
in
terms
of
the
role
of
the
role
of
the
council,
the
role
of
the
city
manager,
the
role
of
the
police
department
and
the
role
of
the
the
union?
And
how
does
that
work?
I
mean
these
are
recommendations
and
how
much
who?
N
Yeah
and
thank
you,
council,
member
stokes,
for
your
comments
with
regard
to
your
question:
it
it
it's
a
little
bit
complicated,
and
you
know
that
sounds
like
a
lawyer
answer,
but
from
a
reform
lawyer
to
another
lawyer,
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
stick
with
that
answer,
at
least
as
a
short
answer.
N
I
will
expand
just
a
bit
to
say
that
ordinarily
police
department
policy
is
ultimately
set
by
the
chief
of
police.
Certainly,
council
can
have
a
role
in
that
and
so
can
city
leadership,
city,
manager's
office,
the
chief
works
for
city
manager,
but
and
the
association
also
has
a
role
there.
So
I
think
that,
as
deputy
city
manager,
mccommon
had
said,
there's
more
to
be
done
with
regard
to
that
piece,
and
I
think
that
you
will
be
hearing
on
a
forward-going
basis
on
how
that
goes
in
the
future.
N
But
unless
nathan,
you
have
anything
further
to
say,
I
think
I'll
leave
it
at
that
for
now.
Okay,.
D
I
attended
two
of
the
three
journal
listening
sessions
and
but
of
course
you
know
I
wasn't
privy
to
being
in
the
smaller
groups,
and
so
you
know
I'm
very
glad
to
see
and
hear
that
bellevue
police
department
is
doing
well
and,
of
course
you
know
there
can
always
be
improvement
and
I
think
that's
one
of
the
reason
why
the
council
is,
you
know,
taking
it
very
seriously
and
to
see
you
know
what
improvements
can
we
make
bellevue
police
department?
D
D
However,
you
know
we
talk
about
how
we
compare
with
others
and
we
are
very
lucky
to
have
a
consultant.
You
know
to
help
us
to
do
some
objective.
Look
at
it
analysis
for
me.
You
know
I've
lived
it.
I
know
how
good
the
bellevue
police
department
is.
I've
lived
here
for
54
years
and
I
came
from
other
countries.
D
I
know
how
police
departments
are,
how
they
treat
their
people
and
I've
speak
to
a
lot
of
places
in
this
country.
I've
seen
other
police
departments,
I've
read
about
other
departments
and
we
still
are
reading
about
other
police
departments.
I
live
in
seattle,
I
know
how
they
they
the
police
department.
You
know,
I
mean
no
no
judgment
or
criticism,
but
the
only
thing
I
can
say
is
living
here
in
bellevue.
It's
amazing
place
without
police
department
all
these
years.
You
know
as
an
immigrant
as
a
minority.
D
D
You
know
all
these
things
are
good
just
for
common
practice
and
the
community
engagement.
You
know
it
is
good.
Why
not
we?
We
never,
you
know,
get
to
be
100,
we
can
always
do
better,
and
you
mentioned
a
few
things
like
body
camera
and
so
on.
You
know
I
mean
these
are
the
things
that
definitely
we
appreciate
as
a
recommendation
you
are
making,
but,
as
michael
said,
that
implementation
is
a
it's
a
different
thing.
Implementation
is
a
big
step
and
you
have
to
leave
it
to
the
police
department.
D
D
When,
when
you
are,
let
me
see
how
do
you?
Let
me
see
what
was
the
note
I
put
down
here.
The
results
noted
in
the
detail
from
bellevue
or
outside,
for
example.
Let's
see
the
know
I
got
here
is
participation.
D
You
talk
about
participation
right
because
we
have
all
these
inputs
listening
to
the
public.
We
have
people
writing
to
us
confidentially,
and
so
I
would
like
to
know:
do
you
have
have
we
taken
the
notes
and
in
detail
who
what
comments
they
make?
You
mentioned
body
cameras
almost
unanimous,
but
there
are
other
comments
made
and
what
comments
are
made
by
people
who
live
involved
with
your
residence,
who
have
personal
experience
and
what
comments
are
made
by
other
folks,
maybe
from
the
outside
or
in
the
general.
D
D
P
Win
there
are,
I
think,
what
you're
referring
to
mayor
and
and
michael
jannock-
our
consultant
also
referred
to
it
in
terms
of
who
we
need
to
work
with.
With
respect
to
you
know,
in
terms
of
you
know
some
of
these
recommendations,
some
of
them
will
be
actually
need
to
be
bargained
with
our
our
association,
so
I
believe
mayor,
that's
what
you're
referring
to
and
as
we
start
venturing
off
into
that
territory.
D
N
Oh,
absolutely
so
to
the
degree
that
the
your
public
had
comments
with
regard
to
use
of
force.
We've
attempted
to
cap
encapsulate
those
specific
comments
in
the
report
that
you
have
with
regard
to
the
broader
discussions.
We've
also
encapsulated
some
of
those
themes
as
well.
In
the
report,
and-
and
so
one
thing
I
would
say
to
you,
councilmember
lee-
is
that
this
isn't
our
first
rodeo.
This
isn't
our
first
review
of
use
of
force.
N
You
know
we've
been
at
this
work
for
20
years,
but
in
virtually
all
of
those
reports,
what
we
would
be
doing
is
we
get
an
assignment,
take
a
look
at
our
use
of
force
policies
and
review
them
and
then
come
back
to
us
with
recommendations
on
how
we
might
improve
them,
and
we've
been
doing
that
paradigm
of
scope
of
work,
for
you
know
close
to
20
years.
This
is
one
of
the
first
times.
N
In
fact,
it
might
be
the
first
time
in
which
the
project
morphed
a
bit
in
the
sense
that
as
another
step
as
in
order
to
inform
our
review,
we
are
asked
to
engage
your
community
in
different
ways
so
that
we
could
also
work.
You
know
the
advantage
of
of
us
being
outsiders.
Is
that
we're
outsiders?
We
don't
know
anybody,
we
don't
know
the
chief.
N
We
don't
know
any
of
you
really
other
than
you
know
on
zoom
calls,
and
so
we
do
have
that
independence
for
being
outsiders,
but
that's
also
a
disadvantage
in
the
sense
that
we
don't
know
bellevue.
N
And
so
I
think
the
assignment
was
artfully
created
in
a
way
in
which
we
were
able
to
gain
that
understanding
of
the
city
of
bellevue
from
input
from
from
your
community,
as
we
formulated
our
thoughts
as
we
distilled
what
we
were
hearing
from
the
community
on
use
of
force
and
other
related
issues.
And
I
was
so
pleased
to
hear
that
you
participated
at
least
in
our
sessions.
And
so
that's
what
that
is
all
about.
A
A
To
make
sure
we
have
oversight
in
our
use
of
force
policies
to
make
sure
that
our
policies
protect
the
people
where
our
our
force
is
designed
to
protect
that
we
have
that
oversight
that
we
can
have
repercussions
if
there
is
improper
procedures
going
on
and
that
it's
it's
noticed
and
it
stopped,
and
I
really
appreciate
the
process
that
you've
gone
through.
I
too
participated
by
listening
in
on
these
sessions
and
it
was
very
interesting
to
see
and
read
and
hear
the
comments
that
were
being
made
you're
right.
A
There
were
a
lot
of
positive
comments
made
about
our
police.
I
was
impressed
to
see
that
a
lot
of
the
things
that
you
recommend
we
are
already
doing,
but
we're
not
documenting,
and
it's
not
a
policy,
it's
just
something
that
our
our
police
choose
to
do,
and
so
I
mean
to
be
able
to
be
to
hold
that
up
and
document
it
and
have
it
part
of
the
policy
to
show
the
public
that
these
are
the
values
that
we
are
using
in
our
police
force.
I
think,
is
really
super
important
and
they
have
that
oversight.
A
I
I
know
we
can
always
do
better
and
that's
part
of
the
the
reason
that
we're
all
here
tonight
is
to
make
sure
that
we
are
identifying
ways
that
we
can
continue
to
be
even
better
than
we
already
are,
and
we
are
pretty
darn
good
with
all
the
the
accreditation
that
the
deputy
mayor
mentioned
and
the
report
that
you've
given
back
to
us.
But
there
are
recommendations
in
there.
A
So
obviously
there's
room
for
improvement,
and
my
one
question
is:
when
you
look
at,
I
think
the
chief
milette
has
10
different
community
groups
that
he
consults
with.
That's.
That
seems
like
one
of
those
things
that
isn't
probably
written
down
in
the
police
policy,
but
something
that
he
does,
and
so
I'm
wondering
how
you
going
to
take
something
he's
already
doing
quite
successfully
and
what
your
recommendation
is
to
make
it
even
better
or
if
you,
if
you
have
one.
N
Thank
you
for
the
question
mayor,
robinson
and,
and
I
I
do
want
to
note
how
appreciative
we
were
for
you,
participating
and
sort
of
kicking
off
the
larger
listening
sessions
and
the
impromptu
and
support
that
you
gave
by
your
presence
and
your
initial
remarks,
I
think,
were
very
very
helpful
with
regard
to
getting
that
discussion
going.
So
I
wanted
to
acknowledge
that,
with
regard
to
your
question
about
the
advisory
groups,
yeah
that
was
remarkable
to
us.
N
The
fact
that
chief
milette
had
taken
the
time
to
pull
these
groups
together
and
to
meet
with
them
regularly
well
before
the
floyd
incident,
and
I
do
think
as
a
result
of
that
work,
the
work
that
he
had
done
up
front.
It
put
the
city
in
a
much
better
place
than
they
would
have
been
once
this
tumult
and
national
narrative
and
the
floyd
incident
occurred.
It
put
the
city
in
a
better
place
because
you
already
had
a
coterie
of
individuals
that
you
could
then
seek
feedback
through,
as
the
city
was
going
through
this.
N
This
experience
that
I
think
was
unparalleled.
You
know
in
the
country
and
we're
still
living
it
right
now
with
the
trial
going
on,
but
our
our,
I
guess,
the
one
just
to
to
to
specifically
respond
to
your
question.
N
What
we
did
hear
from
some
of
the
members
of
the
advisory
groups
is
that
the
chief
is
very
good
at
providing
them
policies
as
they
are
developed
and
completed
and
going
online
to
them
and
explaining
to
them
and
and
why
they
were
done,
but
what
some
members
thought
would
be
better
and
I
think
we
we
agreed
with
it.
A
G
So
just
a
couple
of
follow-ups,
one-
and
maybe
this
is
for
staff.
I
would
like
to
know
if
we
could
get
access
to
the
data,
the
raw
data
without
the
personally
identifiable
information,
so
whoever
is
best
suited
to
answer
that
I
had
that
question
and
then
I
guess
I
was
curious
about
how
you
demarcated
between
what
was
directly
versus
indirectly
related
to
use
of
force.
So
when
I
think
about
hiring
and
training,
let's
say
if
you
have
an
officer
who
has
a
history
of
using
excessive
force,
how
does
that?
G
How
is
that
not
directly
related
to
use
of
force
and
the
same
thing
with
training
if
they're
not
trained
appropriately,
then
they
may
jump
to
an
excessive
use?
Of
course,
how
is
that
not
directly
related
to
use,
of
course,
and
then
in
terms
of
recommendation
eight
and
proportionality?
I
don't
think
it
sports
nothing,
because
you're
explicitly
calling
out
these
key
concepts
about
being
using
unreasonable
course
versus
proportionality.
G
So
and
your
recommendation
is
an
ideal,
so
I
guess
I'm
curious
about
why
not
include
proportionality
in
that
ideal
recommendation
versus
thinking
about
it,
as
just
I
mean,
I
think
it
would
make
the
recommendations
more
consistent
with
the
concepts
that
you're
looking
for
throughout
the
report.
Thank
you.
N
Yeah
it
it's
a
point,
well
taken
council
member
barksdale,
and
we.
N
Here's
here's
what
we
think
the
messaging
needs
to
be
if
an
officer
sees
another
officer
doing
something
wrong
with
regard
to
force,
they
need
to
step
in
whether
that's
in
terms
of
proportionality
or
in
terms
of
reasonableness
of
in
terms
of
just
wrong
officers
need
to
be
instructed.
N
You
need
to
step
in
and-
and,
however,
that's
worded,
I
think
you
know
is
subject
to
discussion
and
we're
not
wedded
to
any
particular
language,
but
that's
the
message
that
has
to
be
exported
to
officers
as
part
of
as
part
of
their
responsibilities
as
sworn
police
officers
taking
a
host
to
uphold
the
constitution.
N
N
Regarding
your
second
question,
yeah,
everything
in
some
ways
is
related
to
use
of
force,
and
certainly
the
training
component
is
important.
It
just
wasn't
part
of
our
homework
assignment.
If
you
will
taking
a
look
at
training,
that
doesn't
mean
that
an
important
component
of
any
kind
of
implementation
is
going
to
be
training
and
the
hiring
who
you
hire
and
whether
they
have
a
history
of
excessive
force.
Yeah.
All
that
is
related
to
force
as
well,
but
we
had
to.
N
We
had
to
define
our
parameters
consistent
with
the
scope
of
work
that
the
city
devised
for
us,
and
so
we
did.
The
final
question
with
regard
to
access
to
data,
I
think,
is
a
question
better
directed
to
your
city.
Leadership.
Instead
of
us.
P
I
could
tell
you
I
we
don't
have
a
clear
answer
of
that
council
member
marksdale.
That's
something
we're
going
to
need
to
check
in
with,
obviously
our
legal
folks
with,
but
we'll
get
back
to
you
with
an
answer
on
that.
P
N
C
Thank
you
mayor
and
again
I
wanted
to.
I
didn't
mention
my
opening
comments.
My
first
go
around,
but
I
wanted
to
be
sure
to
thank
the
bellevue
police
department
for
their
willingness
to
go
through
this
process
as
well.
I
think
julie
you
mentioned
it
at
the
beginning
here
and
how
many
great
conversations
you
had
and
the
willingness
to
share
protocols
and
policies
with
you.
So
you
know
this
this.
C
This
report
is
stronger
for
it,
so
I
just
wanted
to
call
that
out
again
and
it's
and
it's
so
great
to
hear
I
mean
I'm
not
surprised
one
bit.
I
think
this
department
from
the
top
down
is
constantly
striving
to
be
the
best
it
possibly
can
be
and
took
this
pro
process
seriously,
which
I
think
the
entire
community
will
appreciate.
C
My
question
is:
is
a
little
bit
similar
to
casper
barksdale
and
I'm
not
sure
you
can
elaborate
a
little
bit
further
on
it
and
that
in
this
report
you
know
you
mentioned
multiple
times
about
the
narrow
scope
of
use
of
force,
and
you
know
totally
get
that,
but
along
similar
lines
with
with
the
hiring
and
the
training,
I'm
thinking
that
there
are
other
policies
within
the
department
that
all
kind
of
intersect
around
use
of
force,
and
I'm
wondering
if
there's
any
way
that
we
can
track
that
or
if
any
additional
notes
that
you
have
about
all
those
different
overlapping
policies
and
training
and
hiring.
C
Because,
as
you
said,
it's
all
interconnected,
but
there's
its
importance
right.
They
are
all
interconnected.
So
I
I
and-
and
I
know
in
some
ways
this
goes
beyond
the
scope
of
of
of
what
you've
been
asked
to
do
here.
But
I
think
that's
also
critical
as
well
to
to
to
make
note
of
that.
And
I
wonder
if
you
have
any
additional
comments
on
that.
N
N
I
cannot
tell
you
again
how
important
it
was
to
have
that
those
candid
conversations
with
command
staff
and
those
responsible
for
developing
policy
within
the
organization
and
the
report
by
all
means
is
improved
as
a
result
of
the
candor
and
the
receptiveness
and
the
help
that
we
received
from
key
members
of
the
police
department
and
I'll
tell
you
you
know
you
can
write
policy
to
the
cows
come
home,
but
it's
the
practice
that
is
as
important.
N
You
know
how
it
plays
out
in
the
field
and
sometimes
that's
not
written
down,
and
I
think
to
the
mayor's
point.
That
was
one
of
our
our
points.
Is
that
you're
doing
a
lot
of
good
stuff
but
you're,
not
it's
not
in
writing,
and
so
how
do
we
know
how?
Whether
the
next
chief
will
continue
to
follow
that
practice?
N
And
so
now
is
the
time
to
get
this
in
writing
so
that
there's
guidance
and
it's
clear
that
this
is
the
way
we're
going
to
do
business
in
the
city
of
bellevue,
and
I
think,
that's
part
of
why
we
came
up
with
our
recommendations
to
ensure
that
there
is
that
framework
and
rubric,
and
it
is
in
writing
so
that
you
know
when
everyone
else
in
this,
in
this
conversation
has
moved
on
those
policies
will
and
and
practices
will
continue
to
live
on.
A
Great
council
members
on.
E
Yes,
thank
you.
I
really
appreciate
my
colleagues
and
and
the
comments
they've
made
so
far.
I
think
that
we
are
in
a
very
good
place
in
bellevue
in
terms
of
the
caliber
of
our
police
department
and
leadership
to
council
member
barksdale's
point
about
training.
E
That's
amazing
1400
contacts,
and
I
was
also
on
two
of
the
public
big
meetings
and
able
to
listen
for
the
hour
and
a
half
to
all
of
the
comments.
I
didn't
necessarily
hear
anyone
that
sounded
like
they
needed
an
interpreter
where
language
was
language.
Access
was
a
concern,
so
I'm
hoping
you
could
help
and
explain
whether
there
were
any
of
the
outreach
to
folks
where
language
access
and
translation
might
have
been
needed
to
gauge.
E
N
Thank
you,
council
members
on.
I
might
ask
mr
mccommon
to
talk
about
the
translation
that
we
did
have
available.
I
think
for
some
of
the
sessions,
but
to
your
point
about
training
being
incorporated
into
the
recommendation
that
you
cited.
N
What
we
are
seeing
in
that
recommendation
is
is
more
having
to
do
with
the
review
of
force.
So
our
our
point
in
that
recommendation
is
that
sometimes,
when
force
is
used,
a
police
department
will
only
evaluate
the
force
to
see
whether
it
lines
up
with
whether
or
not
the
force
is
consistent
with
the
policy
of
the
department
and
that's
it
that's
the
beginning
and
the
end
of
the
inquiry,
and
our
recommendation
is
intended
to
suggest
that
the
inquiry
should
be
broader
than
that.
N
That
should
include
not
only
whether
or
not
the
force
itself
was
in
policy
or
out
of
policy,
but
whether
or
not
there
was
another
way
to
address
the
situation
that
could
have
minimized
or
made
less
likely.
The
need
to
go
to
force
was
the
officer
in
a
position
where
perhaps
she
would
have
talked
to
the
individual
in
a
different
way
or
used
other
strategies
to
slow
the
thing
down
in
order
to
prevent
the
need
to
use
force
and
that
more
holistic
review
should
encompass
training
as
sort
of
an
output.
N
So
if,
if
an
officer
clearly
violates
policy
on
use
of
force,
usually
that
results
in
a
disciplinary
response,
but
sometimes
if
an
officer
uses
force
that's
technically,
okay
or
within
policy
that
doesn't
mean
that
the
officer
could
be
trained
in
a
way
with
regard
to
de-escalation
or
tactics
or
other
ways
other
remediation,
so
that
the
officer
has
a
better
perspective
and
skill
set
through
that
training
to
use
different
skills.
The
next
time
the
officers
confronted
with
a
conflict.
N
AA
Sure
sure
I'm
happy
to
jump
in
here
so
council
members
on
yes,
the
outreach
and
the
invitations
and
such
went
through
various
media
and
included
the
six
most
spoken
languages
in
bellevue.
Just
as
customary
with
all
of
our
prominent
communications,
we
did
get
an
indication
from
some
people
who
were
attending
or
on
the
confirmation,
calls
that
they
might
need
the
service
in
the
end.
Nobody
actually
used
them,
but
we
did
have
interpreters
available.
E
AB
Thank
you.
I
did
I
wanted
to
just
add.
I
know
that
in
the
materials
that
we
got
through
the
engaging
bellevue
site,
there
was
a
designated
file
of
translated
emails,
so
there
were
emails
that
came
in
that
had
been
translated
before
they
were
sent
on
to
our
group
for
review.
Z
You
know,
I,
I
think
a
lot
of
good
questions
have
been
asked
and
comments
and
everything
else.
What
I
wanted
to
say
and
wrap
up
here
is
that
what
I'm
finding
very
heartening
and
fascinating
is
that
your
and
you
mentioned
it
at
the
beginning.
I
just
want
to
really
give
you
applaud,
for
this
is
this
could
have
been
a
pretty
narrow,
dry
review
and
oh-
and
I
really
do
appreciate
you're,
actually
helping
us
focus
on
a
larger
picture
and
I
think
that's
that's
very
important.
Z
One
of
the
things
that
and
we've
all
gone
through
these
and
I've
been
around
long
enough
to
go
through
a
lot
of
them
is
that
we
do
these
kind
of
things.
We
come
up
with
recommendations,
we
put
something
there
and
then
we
go
on
to
something
else.
I
think
what
you've
helped
us
do
and
realize
is
that
this
is
not
a
you
know,
one-time
fix
things
problem
and
that
I
think
you're
that
hopefully
we
can
give
ourselves
and
you've
given
us
direction
to
really
set
things
up
so
that
we
have
continuous
improvement.
Z
So
we
can
look
at
things
and
look,
and
this
this
is
focused
on
one
area,
but
I
think
it's
going
to
open
us
up
to
looking-
and
I
know
the
chief
is
very
interested
in
this
too.
Is
you
know
how
do
we?
How
do
we
address
these
other
issues?
And
so
I
really
appreciate
that,
and
I
think
that
you
know
looking
at
at
things
such
as
the
skills
and
and
getting
us
to
think
about
and
getting
the
police
department.
Z
I
think
this
is
what
is
really
important,
getting
the
police
department
to
look
at
things
they've
been
talking
about,
but
not
necessarily
acknowledging
just
what
you
said
earlier
about
the
example
of
use
of
force
and
how
how
it
may
fit
into
some
parameters
of
okay,
it's
okay,
the
way
you
did
it,
but
you
didn't
have
to
do
it
that
way,
there's
a
better
way
and
it's
and
it's
it's
it's
broadening
the
outlook
and
the
way
which
will
make
them
and
make
us
much
much
better.
So
I
really
appreciate
that.
Z
I
think
that's
been
the
value
one
of
the
big
values
of
this
and
plus
getting
you
know,
a
lot
of
validation
and
questioning
from
the
community,
but
I
just
want
to
say
I
I
feel
very
good
about
this.
We're
at
a
time
of
great
change
and
and
the
opportunities
to
make
changes
are
so
big,
and
this
is
a
help,
something
I
think
is
giving
us
the
opportunity
to
really
take
great
steps
and
not
just
say,
had
ourselves
on
the
back.
We
did
some
work
but
really
make
a
change.
So
thank
you.
D
D
You
know
a
few
things
you
mentioned:
proportionality,
for
example,
one
of
which
you
know
in
the
k-9
policies
and
the
numbers.
I'm
just
happened
to
pick
them
up.
You
know,
as
you
also
said
before,
one
thing
affected,
the
other
they're
all
interrelated
right.
So
it's
not
that
simple!
You
don't
just
say:
let's
do
it
and
then
yeah
we
do
it
right.
No,
it
depends,
unlike
you
back
to
what
you
said
before.
D
So
it's
up
to
the
the
police
department
and
the
police
chief,
how
to
implement
it
right
because
it's
interrelated,
and
so
I
think
your
experience
helps
a
lot
and
so
that's
why
I'm
asking
we
are
asking
all
these
questions.
D
So
from
your
experience,
when
you
recommend
things
like
that,
such
as
proportionality,
you
know
it's
to
me,
I'm
learning
first
time.
What
does
that
mean-
and
you
explained
it
as
well
as
you
can,
but
what
is
interrelatedness
to
other
things?
How
does
this
affect
the
police
officer's
action
and
judgment
when
you
have?
We
have
to
make
those
decisions?
That's
why
training
is
important.
Now
what
that
stops,
and
so
before
you
train.
Well,
I
want
you,
a
trainer
or
whatever
human
being
behave
differently.
That's
why
I
use
the
the
example
canine.
D
You
know
you
can
train
people,
but
I
don't
I
you
know
the
people
can
probably
understand,
but
I
don't
think
dog
understand
that.
Well,
you
know.
So
it's
it's
very,
very
challenging.
So
I
want
to
ask
you
a
question
is
what
is
your
experience
when
you
propose,
when
departments
adopt
somebody's
policies?
D
D
You
know
the
process
will
be
work
with
our
police,
chief
or
policy
problem.
How
do
you
do
it
in
such
a
way?
We
are
actually
getting
the
benefit
we
are
looking
at.
We
are.
We
want
not
just
a
theoretical
pastor.
You
got
to
do
this.
Hey
good
luck,
devil
is
in
detail.
I
always
said
that
right.
I
hope
you
do
so.
Please
answer
that
and
then
I
have
another
question
for
for
just
a
brief
info.
Yeah.
A
D
D
Ahead
and
ask
your
second
question:
let's
take
a
question
for
it's
brad.
I
agree.
We
need
to
have
some
more
data
on
our
community
engagement
just
to
find
for
I
I
would
like
to
know
you
know
who
are
the
people
expressing
the
satisfaction
decision,
what
areas
they
are
interested
in
so
so
that'd
be
useful
to
us.
So
I
want
to
support
that
request.
Thank
you.
That's
it.
A
Great
well,
thank
you,
everybody
and,
and
thank
you
michael
julie,
perry
samara.
A
Did
I
get
everybody
for
all
your
good
work
and
for
the
presentation
and
discussion
tonight
really
appreciate
it.
Looking
forward
to
see
where
we
go
with
this
okay
more
study
session
item,
mr
miyake,
would
you
like
to
introduce.
A
AE
C
P
There
we
go
sorry
I
apologize
for
that
american
council
members.
This
next
item
is
this
is
where
the
staff
will
be
presenting.
You
heard
about
this
under
oral
communication,
a
revised
development
agreement
for
the
crossroads
multi-family
project.
This
revised
agreement
comes
at
the
direction
the
council
gave
to
staff
back
in
the
january
25th
study
session.
Where
we're
taking
this
this
matter
up
and
part
of
council's
direction.
The
agreement
now
includes
an
affordable
housing.
P
Enhanced
public
benefit
this
evening
staff
is
seeking
council
direction
to
prepare
the
development
agreement
as
well
as
set
up
for
public
hearing
and
final
approval.
So
joining
us
this
evening
is
mike
brennan
development
service
director,
as
as
well
as
tristan
tannis,
consulting
attorney
that
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
turn
it
over
to
michael.
R
Thank
you,
mr
miyaki,
good
evening
again,
amir
robinson
councilmember,
our
deputy
mayor
newman
house
and
council
members,
so
real,
we'll
seeing
the
late
hour
we'll
try
to
move
quickly
through
the
presentation
materials
this
evening
and
get
to
any
questions
the
council
may
have
on
this
on
the
crossroads
area
in
the
what's
called
planning.
District
e
requires
a
a
development
agreement
for
multi-family
housing
developments.
R
The
council
also
recognized
this
as
an
opportunity
to
add
affordable
housing
to
the
project
and
to
the
neighborhood
and
ask
staff
to
work
with
the
the
property
owner,
teronomics
crossroads
and
the
developer
to
accomplish
affordable
housing
within
the
project.
You
heard
from
a
couple
of
members
of
teranomics
this
evening.
R
As
mr
miyaki
mentioned
at
the
end
of
the
presentation
this
evening,
we
will
be
asking
the
council
for
direction
to
prepare
the
final
development
agreement
for
a
public
hearing
and
final
action
at
a
later
date,
but
for
a
little
bit
more
information
on
the
project
and
development
agreement,
I
will
hand
it
over
to
president
tanis
also
want
to
note
that
assistant
city
attorney
matt
mcfarland,
is
also
joining
us
here
this
evening.
For
this
topic,
prisoner.
S
Thank
you
mike
good
evening,
again
mayor
deputy
mayor
council
members
and
those
attending
tonight
for
staff's
presentation.
We
will
begin
by
briefly
explaining
the
crossroads
multi-family
project,
recalling
the
original
draft
agreement.
That
council
was
introduced
to
and
considered
in
the
first
study
session.
S
We'll
recap:
the
direction
that
we
were
given
at
that
study
session
explain
the
revisions
that
include
affordable
housing
units
in
the
draft
development
agreement
that
is
now
before
you
we'll
talk
about
the
required
public
hearings
and
then
explain
the
public
process
and
next
steps.
Lastly,
recalling
again
the
direction
that
is
being
asked
from
council
tonight,
just
a
quick
recap:
the
crossroads
multifamily
project
is
located
on
15600
northeast
8th.
S
This
is
just
north
of
the
existing
michaels
store
and
south
of
stone
gardens
in
the
crossroads
mall,
which
is
currently
improved
as
a
surface
parking
lot.
We
are
processing
an
application
for
design
review
for
this
project.
It's
a
six-story
mixed-use
development
comprising
of
224
residential
units,
14,
000
square
foot
or
so
of
ground
level,
retail
space
and
a
parking
garage
with
253
parking
stalls.
S
So
the
project
site,
as
you
know,
is
in
crossroads
planning
district
e,
which
requires
council-approved
development
agreement,
as
otherwise
multi-family
development
would
not
be
allowed
on
this
site.
S
Additionally,
a
couple
of
transit
plan
policies
that
I
want
to
mention,
which
are
at
play
here.
First
crossroads:
79
requires
multi-family
developments
to
be
high
quality
to
avoid
conflict
with
commercial
uses,
also
complementary
to
both
commercial
and
residential
uses
and
to
provide
certain
public
benefits,
which
is
also
illustrated
in
this
figure
on
the
left
side
of
the
screen,
as
you
can
barely
can
tell
from
this
figure.
S
Correspondingly
crossroads,
81
lists
those
public
benefits
of
pedestrian
connections,
open
space
and
other
activity
areas
to
support
site
residents,
as
well
as
visitors
and
users
of
the
of
the
spaces.
Here,
as
you
may
recall,
from
our
presentation
in
the
first
study
session,
this
project
does
in
fact
provide
for
those
public
benefits,
a
park
interface
area
to
connect
crossroads
park,
an
open
space
opportunity
area,
a
mid-block,
connector
or
urban
trail,
as
well
as
pedestrian
improvements.
S
All
these
public
benefits
remain
in
the
revised
development
agreement
and
they're
unchanged
from
what
you
had
seen
before.
So
in
the
last
study
session.
I
want
to
also
mention
that
council
did
ask
about
whether
there's
enough
parking
for
the
project,
so
we
wanted
to
provide
a
an
explanation
about
parking
and
to
respond
to
that
question.
Yes,
there
is
adequate
parking.
There
will
be
151
dedicated
space
for
residents.
S
The
applicant
did
submit
a
parking
analysis
to
support
their
proposed
parking
and,
as
as
I
noted
earlier,
this
project
is
under
review,
and
so
the
city
staff
will
review
and
ensure
there
is
enough
parking
for
the
project
as
well
as
the
remaining
uses
in
crossroads.
Small
with
that,
I
am
going
to
turn
it
over
to
matt
mcfarland.
To
go
through
in
a
little
bit
more
detail
the
development
agreement,
matt.
AE
Thank
you
trisna
and
mayor
robinson,
deputy
mayor
newinghouse
and
council
members.
AE
This
is
planning
district
e
and
it's
a
unique
and
specific
area
in
crossroads,
and
the
easiest
way
to
think
about
this
is
that
multi-family
housing
could
not
be
built
in
this
planning
district
sub-area
this
planning
district
d,
but
for
a
development
agreement,
and
just
so
the
council
understands
a
development
agreement
is
a
mechanism
that
the
city
uses
through
its
both
his
police
power
and
also
through
its
contracting
authority.
AE
AE
So
as
mike
and
trishna,
both
mentioned
at
the
january
25th
study
session
council
looked
at
the
public
benefits
that
are
required
by
the
comprehensive
plan.
AE
These
are
public
benefits
that
are
memorialized
in
the
land
use
code
for
the
crossroads,
sub-area
planning
district
guidelines
for
this
district
d
that
I
just
mentioned,
those
include
the
open
space,
the
park
interface,
the
mid-block
connector
and
the
pedestrian
improvements,
and
I
do
want
to
point
out
with
council
that
this
revised
development
agreement
hasn't
changed
any
of
those
public
benefits.
Those
public
benefits
still
remain
attached
to
the
project.
AE
What
has
changed
is
per
council's
direction:
the
development
services
department
and
the
city
attorney's
office.
We
went
back
and
we
negotiated
further
with
the
applicant
to
try
to
include
the
affordable
housing
component,
which
we
refer
to
in
the
development
agreement
as
an
enhanced
public
benefit.
So
we
have
two
layers
of
public
benefits.
Here
we
have
the
public
benefits
that
are
required
by
the
comp
plan
and
memorialized
in
the
land
use
code,
and
then
we
also
have
the
affordable
housing.
Enhanced
public
benefit
that
we
negotiated
per
council's
direction
next
slide.
AE
Now,
as
I
mentioned,
the
development
agreement
authority
that
the
city
has
is
partially
based
in
the
contracting
authority
that
the
city
has,
and
I
think
everyone
knows
that
it
takes
two
parties
to
contract
and,
as
you
heard
mr
cole,
and
also
miss
clawson,
say
during
the
oral
communications
we
we
did
work
very
hard
with
the
applicant
and
the
applicant
was
very
cooperative.
AE
The
affordable
housing
units
would
include
80
of
I'm
sorry
20
of
the
units
at
80
percent
ami
within
the
project,
with
a
just
additional
component
of
45
ami
for
any
units
that
are
small
units
or
studio
units
and
in
exchange
or
as
consideration
in
the
contract
negotiations
for
the
applicant,
including
the
affordable
housing
units.
The
city
would
agree
to
include
the
project
site
in
the
city's
mfte
program.
AE
AE
So
as
a
legal
requirement,
there
are
two
separate
but
parallel
public
hearings
that
the
city
would
require
to
move
to
in
order
to
move
forward
with
finalizing
the
development
agreement
and
also
including
the
project
site
in
the
mfte
program.
AE
AE
So
the
I
think
the
best
way
to
think
about
this
is
the
development
agreement.
State
statute
requires
a
public
hearing
for
the
development
agreement.
The
mfte
enabling
statute
also
requires
a
public
hearing
to
add
the
project
site,
as
does
city
code,
to
add
the
project
site
into
the
mfte
program.
AE
There
there's
a
procedural
matter
of
council
having
a
resolution
of
its
intention
to
set
the
public
hearing
to
provide
notice
to
the
public,
but
if
council
does
decide
to
go
forward
with
finalizing
the
development
agreement
and
the
mfte
component,
then
we
could
certainly
bring
back
the
resolution
to
set
the
public
hearing
on
consent
calendar.
It
wouldn't
require
another
study
session
next
slide.
AE
So
this
is
this
is
the
public
process
that
we've
undertaken
thus
far
kind
of
culminating
in
this
second
study
session,
with
the
amended
and
revised
development
agreement
per
council's
direction.
As
I
mentioned,
we
we
would
like
to
come
back.
If
council
believes
that
the
development
agreement
has
captured
the
previous
direction,
then
we
would
come
back
with
a
finalized
development
agreement,
consistent
with
attachment
b
that
we
provided
in
the
agenda
materials,
and
we
would
also
set
the
two
public
hearings
on
the
same
city
council
date.
AE
AE
R
R
I
said
that
completes
our
presentation,
so
so
we
are
available
for
any
questions
that
the
council
may
have.
I'm
sorry,
no.
A
No
not
yet
we're
going
to
discuss
it
first.
Thank
you.
So
I'm
just
going
to
say
that
I
I
just
can't
say
enough
good
about
this
whole
process
that
you've
gone
through.
You've
really
followed
the
council
direction.
I'm
so
pleased
that
the
developer
is
agreeable
to
work
with
the
city
and
make
this
a
community
asset
with
the
full
potential
that
it
has
on
that
site.
A
I'm
just
so
excited
happy
to
work
with
them
and
happy
to
support
this
public
hearing
and
and
moving
this
forward
quickly
at
the
next
opportunity
that
we
have,
but
I'm
just
very
pleased
to
see
the
community
asset
with
the
pathways
the
connection
to
the
park,
they're
going
to
be
right
by
dick's,
drive-in
or
dick's,
whatever
walk-up
it's
a
great
location,
and
to
have
that
affordable
housing
there
as
well,
is
an
amazing
asset.
A
So
I'm
really
pleased-
and
I
want
to
thank
the
staff
for
working
with
the
developers
as
well-
I'm
going
to
go
to
the
gallery
view
here.
So
I
can
see
everybody,
sir.
If
you
have
a
comment
or
question,
go
ahead
and
raise
your
hand,
but
you
don't
have
to
make
a
comment
or
ask
a
question:
councilmember
don
go
ahead.
E
Yeah,
I
too
am
excited
about
this
project
and
I
thank
mr
cole
and
miss
claussen
for
making
their
remarks
about
supporting
this.
So
I
did
have
a
question
about
the
the
less
than
300
square
feet
at
the
45
ami.
Do
we
have
a
sense
for
how
many
of
those
units
there
might
be
in
this
development?
So
I
saw
initially
there
were
224
units,
but
were
there
enough
details
to
ascertain
how
many
of
those
might
be
in
the
in
the
300
square,
feet
kind
of
micro
unit.
AE
I
I
I
can
field
that
question
council
members
on
currently
the
the
project
that
is
proposed
does
not
have
any
units
of
that
size,
so
there's
no
smaller
units
in
the
in
the
current
project.
AE
One
thing
I
do
want
to
point
out
is
we
took
that
term
from
the
city's
mfte
code,
which
is
it
has
that
lower
and
deeper
level
of
affordability
for
the
smaller
units
and
this
development
agreement
does
run
with
the
land.
It
is
even
though
it
is
to
facilitate
the
construction
of
this
per
specific
project.
AE
It
would
run
with
the
land
and
and
stay
attached
to
the
property
for
the
life
of
the
development
agreement.
So
we
don't
anticipate
that
this
specific
project
will
have
those
small
units,
but
we
left
the
term
in
the
agreement
through
the
negotiations
and
it's
not.
It
does
have
value
because
it
is
actually
there
and
would
run
with
the
land.
E
Okay,
so
then,
based
on
the
20
were
saying
that
there
would
be
44
units
the
20
and
are
there
some
two
three
bedroom
units
that
would
be
part
of
this
20
or
are
they
I
know
in
the
past
when
we've
talked
about
percentages,
we've
also
asked
about
the
size
of
the
units
that
go
into
the
affordable
housing
versus
the
market
rate.
R
So
I
think
some
of
that
will
still
need
to
be
worked
out
in
the
in
the
permit
review
when
we
finally
get
through
this
step
and
can
move
on
to
the
the
entitlement
and
then
ultimately,
the
building
permit
process.
So
I
don't
know
that
we
can
answer
that
question
this
evening,
since
we're
not
quite
to
that
place
in
project
approval.
E
Okay,
well,
my
hope
is
that,
as
you
walk
through
the
process
and
if
they're
listening
that
to
the
degree
that
we
can
have
some
of
the
two-bedroom
units,
it
would
certainly
be
helpful
because,
as
the
mayor
said,
you
know,
this
is
such
an
area
for
children,
it's
right
next
to
the
youth,
bellevue
theater
and
the
community
center
and
the
in
our
amazing
park.
So
hopefully
we
are
able
to
get
some
of
the
larger
units
that
would
accommodate
families.
E
So
I'm
very
supportive
of
this,
and
also
the
the
both
the
development
agreement
and
the
mfte
so
that
we
don't
have
to
have
multiple
public
hearings.
If
we
could
do
that
in
one
and
come
back
and
consent
that
would
certainly
move
things
along
much
more
rapidly.
Thank
you.
D
R
R
Really
it
depended
upon
what
is
the
overall
mix
of
the
project
because
they
they're
shooting
for
a
certain
market
type
here,
and
I
think,
as
councilmember
zhan
mentioned,
you
know
this
is
a
location
that
certainly
could
support
family
residents
etc
in
in
this
building
in
this
in
this
project.
But
at
this
point,
as
far
as
the
specific
assignment
of
unit
types,
we
may
have
to
follow
up
on
on
that.
If
you
want
some
additional
details,.
J
Z
I
move
to
extend
the
meeting
to
10
15.
A
I
think
we
maybe
there
maybe
there's
a
motion
to
direct
staff
to
prepare
the
development
agreement.