►
From YouTube: Belton Planning Commission Meeting - July 18, 2023 - 6pm
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
C
C
Come
here
second,
thank
you,
commissioner.
We
do
have
motion.
Second,
any
anything
else.
All
those
in
favor
of
approval
say
aye
aye
any
opposed.
Thank
you.
We
do
have
on
the
agenda
for
this
evening.
A
couple
of
public
hearings
and
I
will
just
note
that
the
first
one,
which
is
public
hearing
RZ
2023-02
application
for
rezoning
from
a
agriculture
to
R1
single
family
for
a
proposed,
1.23
plus
or
minus
acre
lot
at
1208,
South
Cedar
Street.
We
have
been
asked
to
continue
this.
C
E
We
are
still
waiting
so,
along
with
us
rezoning,
there's
a
preliminary
and
final
plot
that
run
concurrently
with
that
we're
still
working
through
some
things
on
the
platting
process
with
them,
since
it
is
along
South
Cedar,
it's
MoDOT
right-of-way
and
as
part
of
that,
there's
some
right-of-way
dedication
and
there's
some
questions
about
the
encroachment
of
the
existing
home.
And
if
we
need
to
do
an
encroachment
agreement
with
that
and
how
that
will
tie
in
with
the
final
plot.
E
C
Opposed
in
queue,
I
will
call
to
order.
We
do
have
a
second
public
hearing
this
evening
and
we
will
call
that
to
order.
This
is
for
the
UDC
2023-04
request
to
consider
unified
development
code,
UDC
text
amendments
related
to
permitted
land
use
in
the
old
town,
Belton
overlay,
District,
permit
and
plan
review
fees
and
Rental
inspection
fees
director
all.
E
Right,
thank
you,
chair
McPherson,
before
this
evening.
Our
UDC
tax
amendments,
four
amendments
to
the
Old
Town
belt
and
overlay,
which
would
permit
drive-through
restaurants
along
East,
North
Avenue,
as
well
as
updates
to
the
ud
schedule,
UDC
schedule
of
fees.
The
first
set
of
updates
is
to
three
sections
of
the
UDC
and
to
amend
the
Old
Town
belt
and
overlay
District,
which
would
permit
drive-through
restaurants
on
properties
that
have
Frontage
on
East
North
Avenue.
When
this
overlay
was
adopted
in
2011,
it's
specifically
prohibited
all
drive-through
facilities
from
the
overlay
District.
E
Most
of
the
overlay
District,
which
is
shown
in
the
map
in
the
packet
as
C1
or
in
the
pink
color,
is
concentrated
along
Main
Street
and
Commercial
Street,
which
makes
sense
prohibiting
drive-throughs
on
those
locations,
because
those
have
a
historic
building
pattern
where
typically,
the
buildings
are
built
up
to
the
street
and
it's
a
lot
more
pedestrian
oriented
in
nature.
However,
there's
one
block
here
that
is
contiguous
with
East
North
Avenue,
which
is
a
more
Suburban
Corridor
in
nature.
E
E
Along
with
that,
there
would
be
an
amendment
to
the
land
use
table
in
section
40-1,
which
would
amend
where
currently
in
the
C1
zoning
District
No
drive-through
facilities
are
permitted.
It
would
allow
that
as
an
accessory
use
subject
to
the
conditions,
and
then
the
conditions
would
specifically
state
in
section
40-4
that
drive
through
facilities
would
be
limited
only
to
the
front
to
John
East
North
Avenue,
no
other
drive-through
facilities
would
be
permitted
elsewhere
in
the
old
town
Belton
overlay
District,
which
would
include
the
Main
Street
and
Commercial
Street
blocks.
E
E
Staff
is
proposing
to
strike
part
one
an
appendix
a
currently.
The
UDC
includes
both
fee
schedules.
Part
A
is
for
or
sorry
part,
one
is
for
the
code
of
ordinances
and
part.
Two
is
for
the
UDC
we're
proposing
to
remove
part
one,
as
those
fees
do
not
apply
to
applications
in
the
UDC,
so
that
would
include
business
licensing
fees,
Public,
Works
fees,
other
fees
that
are
referenced
in
the
code
of
ordinances
and
not
in
the
UDC.
E
That
would
also
eliminate
the
need
or
the
confusion
that
currently
exists
as
to
whether
or
not
when
a
fee
is
updated
in
the
code
of
ordinances.
If
that
requires
a
UDC
text,
Amendment
we're
proposing
just
to
remove
that
entirely,
as
those
fees
are
not
necessary
to
be
amended
through
the
UDC
tax
amendment
process.
E
Most
cities,
actually
no
cities.
No
other
cities
in
the
metro
area
base
their
signed
fees
on
that,
and
so
it
creates
some
confusion
and
complication
in
terms
of
calculating
those
fees
and
so,
rather
than
doing
that,
we're
proposing
just
to
have
a
flat
fee
for
all
new
permanent
signs
of
fifty
dollars.
So
it
doesn't
matter
if
it's
illuminated
or
not
or
the
number
of
sides.
E
So
a
monument
sign
whether
or
not
it's
a
monument
sign
would
be
permitted
at
the
same
fee
as
a
wall
sign
and
then
a
change
of
sign
face
would
be
an
additional
sign
permit
type
and
we
would
charge
ten
dollars
for
that
fee.
That
an
example
of
that
would
just
be
if
a
cabinet,
if
a
business
new
business
is
going
in
and
they're
just
changing
out
the
sign
face
in
an
existing
cabinet.
E
E
Those
fees
are
already
have
been
established
in
our
fee
schedule,
so
since
at
least
2016
just
for
whatever
reason
they
have
not
been
established
in
the
code,
so
we
are
adding
those
and
then
the
last
fee
in
this
part
of
the
code
that
is
being
changed
would
be
the
vacation
fee.
Currently,
that
is
listed
as
zero
in
the
schedule
of
fees
and
we're
proposing
a
150
dollar
fee.
For
that,
the
reason
for
that
is
that
that
matches
both
the
special
use
permit
and
the
variance
fee.
E
The
vacation
fee
is
a
very
similar
process,
similar
amount
of
staff,
time
review,
and
it
also
has
a
public
notice.
So
right
now
we
are
covering
the
cost
of
those
public
notice
fees
without
any
kind
of
reimbursement
from
the
applicant,
so
that
150
will
help
cover
both
the
staff
time
and
the
public
noticing
for
that
process.
E
The
last
item
in
the
fee
update
is
a
rental
inspection
fee.
When
we
published
this,
we
had
added
a
ten
dollar
fee
per
inspection.
However,
after
some
additional
conversations
with
staff,
we're
proposing
to
modify
that,
so
what
we
are
proposing
to
change
that
to
and
to
present
to
city
council
would
be
instead
of
a
rental
inspection
fee.
E
We
think
that
that's
an
easier
way
of
handling
the
in
the
both
the
registration
and
inspection
fee
rather
than
having
to
have
a
separate
inspection
fee.
Every
time
a
unit
is
inspected.
So
it's
a
lot
more
convenient
to
the
the
landlord
at
getting
those
inspections
scheduled.
It
also
generates
rough
just
so
it
does
generate
a
little
bit
more
Revenue,
but
it's
not
significantly
more
than
the
current
licensing
fee
at
seventy
dollars,
plus
ten
dollars
per
inspection
for
the
smaller
landlords.
E
E
So
that
concludes
the
staff
presentation
for
the
text.
Amendments
and
I'll
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
C
E
A
temporary
sign
would
be
so
we
don't
charge
signs
for
construction
signs,
but
a
temporary
sign
would
be
a
special
event
or
a
fireworks
permit.
A
fireworks
tent
permit
a
band
like
a
banner
for
a
a
sales
event.
D
Temporary
sons
and
I
can
see
where
this
is
going
going
to
go.
If,
if
someone
has
a
feather
sign
that
they
put
in
and
out
each
night,
why
do
they
need
a
permit
to
do
that?
Where
are
we?
What
what's
our
angle
on
that.
E
So
that
that
is
something
that
we've
talked
about
a
little
bit
internally
is
we
know
that
overall,
the
sign
code
probably
needs
an
overhaul.
There
are
a
number
of
temporary
signs
that
are
listed.
That
currently
say
they
need
a
permit
that
we've
not
been
enforcing.
Some
of
those
we've
also
looked
at
possibly
making
exceptions
for
you
know
like
on
Main
Street,
where
somebody
puts
one
of
the
little
A-frame
signs
or
chalkboard
signs
out
for
the
day
or
a
feather
flag
out
during
the
day,
and
they
bring
it
in
at
night.
E
F
Just
add
that
currently
we
charge
thirty
dollars
for
temporary
signs
for
feather
Flags
banners.
Any
sort
of
you
know
temporary
thing
that
they
would
like
to
add
to
the
building,
so
this
would
actually
be
lowering
what
we're
currently
doing
in
the
interim
before
we
actually
update
the
sign
code.
So.
B
A
Thinking
of
churches
that
do
that
mine
being
one
of
them
for
sure
St,
Mary,
Magdalene
Episcopal,
which
is
on
homes,
it's
still
Belton.
Well,
technically,
it's
Village
of
walk
away,
but
whatever.
B
F
Currently,
you
know
for
like
for
lease
signs
or
banners
advertising
special
promotions,
or
things
like
that.
We
typically
require
30
days
only
for
those
types
of
temporary
signs
or
banners.
We
have
worked
out
a
deal
with
businesses
using
feather
Flags,
where
they're,
if
they're
taking
in
the
feather
flag
at
night,
then
they
can
keep
it
up
perpetually
as
they're
open.
But
it's
just
that
one
thirty
dollar
fee
for
each
of
those
signs
so
feather
flags
are
only
paid.
One.
F
Typically,
we
are
told
by
code
enforcement
okay,
if
they
see
a
banner
up
for
a
long
period
of
time.
They
typically
let
me
know
and
then
I
can
reach
out
to
the
business
owner
and
just
make
sure
that
they're
keeping
up
temporarily
and
to
make
sure
that
we
can
get
it
permitted
and
just
to
make
sure
we
don't
have
a
lot
of
banners
out
for
long
periods
of
time
because
they
do
get
tattered
over
time.
So
just
making
sure
we
know
what's
going
on.
Okay,.
C
A
A
C
G
Yeah
I
think
that
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
just
make
sure
that
we're
not
getting
these
temporary
signs
being
put
up
in
the
place
of
permanent
signs
for
a
long
period
of
time
and
that's
the
intent
of
of
trying
to
enforce
this
type
of
I
mean
obviously
we're
trying
to
be
as
business
friendly
as
we
can,
and
so,
if
folks
are
like
downtown,
are
putting
out
a
sign
every
day
and
then
bring
it
back.
We're
not
going
to
be
banging
down
their
door.
Saying
no
you're,
not
following
the
letter
of
this.
G
C
And
what
about
like
garage,
sale,
signs
and
things
like
that.
E
So
those
just
can't
be
in
the
right-of-way
they
are
allowed
to
be
on
private
property,
but
obviously,
after
the
garage
sale
is
over,
they
should
be
taken
down
if
they
are
in
the
right
of
way
they
do
get
pulled
by
code
enforcement,
okay,.
C
A
A
D
C
C
E
Yeah
the
June
2023
development
report
is
on
the
community
Planning
and
Building
web
page.
We
issued
50
permits
last
month,
totaling
a
little
over
two
million
dollars
in
total
valuation,
the
largest
of
which
was
final
tenant
finish
for
Factory
Motor
Parts,
which
is
the
Last
Tenant.
That's
going
in
building
four
at
South
View,
Commerce
Center,
so
South,
View,
Commerce
Center.
All
four
buildings
are
fully
leased
great
and
then
our
next
meeting
will
be
August
1st.
E
We
do
have
a
couple
of
public
hearings
on
that,
including
the
one
that
was
continued
this
evening,
but
we
will
also
have
a
public
hearing
for
Autumn
Woods
preliminary
development
plan
and
a
final
development
plan
that
comes
along
with
that.
So
that
did
come
before
the
Planning
Commission
back
in
March
and
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
approval
of
that.
The
city
council
had
some
concerns
regarding
parking
and
did
deny
that
application.
So
they've
made
some
modifications
to
that
and
we'll
come
back
before
Planning
Commission
on
August
1st
to
present
that.