►
From YouTube: Bisq growth call 2018-07-12
Description
If you want to help Bisq grow, then this is the meeting to attend!
Everyone is welcome, and there's no need to RSVP or register, but if you do plan to attend, **please add a 👍 above** so we have an idea how many people will be there.
Note also that you can subscribe to the Bisq DAO Google Calendar to get notifications about this call and other Bisq events. See https://bisq.network/calendar.
You'll find more details on this call in following GitHub issue: https://github.com/bisq-network/growth/issues/64
A
In
hello
and
welcome
to
this
week's
best
growth
call
for
anyone
who's
new.
This
is
the
only
decentralized
Bitcoin,
the
Fiat
and
crypto
to
crypto
exchange.
That's
a
fully
decentralized
network
where
other
users
are
always
in
control.
They
custody
their
own
funds
and
they
they
run
their
own
note
and
they
keep
their
own
private
data
without
anyone
without
maintaining
their
privacy
and
control
of
their
funds
and
private
keys.
At
all
times.
We
are
going
to
be
talking
a
bit
today
about
last
week's
liquidity
weeks.
A
We're
also
going
to
be
talking
about
how
to
kick-start
new
markets
see
if
we
can
come
up
with
any
ideas.
It's
a
recurring
topic
and
we're
also
going
to
be
talking
about
a
survey.
That's
been
done
with
version
zero
point,
seven
point,
one
where
users
were
able
to
give
their
opinion
about
how
to
improve
bisque
and
finally,
we'll
talk
about
China,
and
we
might
talk
about
some
of
the
new
things
coming
up.
A
The
Swiss
franc
market
had
almost
no
trades
whatsoever,
so
volume
was
not
changed
at
all
by
the
liquidity
we
compared
to
previous
weeks,
and
we
certainly
did
not
manage
to
reach
the
stated
goal
of
5
users,
placing
at
least
2
offers
each.
So
you
know
we
never
saw
more
than
more
than
5
offers
on
the
on
the
order
book
at
anytime,
Manero
was
different
Pinero.
We
there
was
some
volume
there
were
offers.
There
were
some
trades,
but
no
significant
change
compared
to
previous
weeks,
so
we
haven't
seen
any
increase
in
volume.
A
A
We
also
normally
try
to
do
the
cootie
weeks
for
currency
pairs
where
there's
critical
mass,
or
at
least
you
know
enough
people
asking
for
it
that
that
we
can
expect
the
people
who
asked
for
it
to
actually
participate
in
the
case
of
the
Swiss
franc.
We've
never
had
any
significant
volume
or
a
very
populated
order
book,
but
we
did
have
the
poll
and
what's
the
quickie
week
to
do
next
and
the
Swiss
franc
won
over
some
other
options.
So
I
don't
know.
Maybe
it's
easy
to
vote
on
a
Twitter
poll
than
it
is
to
us.
A
They'll
run
your
best
client
and
he
was
running
especially
when
the
weather's
nice
head
side,
Manero,
I,
guess
I'm
a
bit
less
familiar
about
if
I
didn't
participate,
I
was
I
was
getting
to,
but
in
the
end,
I
didn't
find
the
time
so
I
can't
say
much,
but
we
were
expecting
some
he
uses.
A
A
For
example,
if
we
get
five
people
asking
for
liquidity
week
and
saying
that
they
will
participate,
then
we
launch
it
or
maybe,
if
for
a
certain
currency,
there's
not
enough
people
to
do
the
quickly
week,
we
might
be
able
to
do
something
smaller.
Like
say
one
hour
one
day,
which
brings
me
to
the
next
topic,
which
is
we're
seeing
new
markets
such
as
the
Vietnamese
dong
and
the
Thai
bat
suddenly
appear
in
the
offer
book,
with
hardly
any
trades
being
done.
A
So
it
makes
us
think
you
know,
there's
not
enough
participants
actually
cross
orders,
but
they,
but
there's
always
some
interest
there,
so
if
you're
in
Vietnam
or
if
you're
in
Thailand-
and
you
want
to
try
at
Fisk
now's
a
good
time.
But
again,
this
brings
me
to
the
fact
that
there's
a
coordination
problem
we
we
normally
have
we've
seen
this
before
in
other
markets,
where
we
have
say,
for
example,
Mexico
or
Argentina.
A
We
have
a
couple
of
people
trying
it
out,
but
they
don't
do
it
at
the
same
time,
which
means
that
you
know
in
their
trades
actually
take
place
and
I
always
say
it
takes
two
to
trade.
So
maybe,
if
we
say,
if
we
see
this
happening,
we
can
say:
okay,
guys,
we've
seen
two
people
on
two
different
locations
try
to
buy
or
sell
with
Vietnamese
dong.
A
Why
don't
you
both
try
to
come
together
on
next
Monday?
At
this
specific
time,
for
example,
that
way
is
a
minimum
of
opportunity
cost
as
a
minimum
of
time
wasted.
You
just
you,
know,
turn
on
you'll
know
that
that
time
turn
on
you
of
this
client,
and
if
you
see
it,
there's
anyone
there
and
all
you
wait
five
minutes
and
live,
not
there's
nobody
else
interested
but
yeah.
The
question
of
how
to
kick-start
new
markets
is
always
on
our
minds.
We
keep
talking
about
China.
We
keep
talking
about
many
countries
in
Latin
America.
A
We
talk
about
Nigeria
India,
especially
with
all
the
news
we've
had
this
week
of
further
restrictions
on
Indian
exchanges
and,
of
course,
like
every
week,
and
it's
worth
reminding.
Every
week
we've
had
a
couple
of
exchanges
being
hacked
even
why
that
was
purportedly
a
decentralized
exchange.
The
bank
wall
got
hacked
and
had
withdrawals
and
funding
blocked,
and
obviously,
if
you're
not
full
control
of
your
funds,
it's
not
a
decentralized
exchange.
If
funds
can
be
blocked
by
the
exchange
operator,
it's
not
decentralized.
It's
easy!
A
If
they
can
stop
you
from
withdrawing
your
funds,
it's
not
be
centralized.
So
that's
the
reason
why
bisque
is
so
important
and
why
decentralized
exchanges
are
so
important
because
they
are
sensitive
resistant
and
they
cannot
be
hacked
or
blocked
or
regulated
out
of
operations
by
called
the
centralized
exchanges
in
China,
for
example,
right
so
yeah.
So
we
were
talking
about
how
to
kick-start
new
markets
one
of
the
ways
we've
discussed
this
with.
B
A
Makers
right
so
if
your
interest
in
the
market
in
your
country
is
starting,
you
are
taking
this
and
you
already
trade
on
the
OTC
markets
or
you
trade,
on
local
bitcoins
on
other
platforms,
and
you
think
you
know
you
might
be
able
to
get
some
volume
on
bisque
a
good
way
to
do.
A
It
is
to
be
a
market
maker,
which
means
you
place,
buy
and
sell,
offers
and
wait
and
then
try
and
attract
people
to
take
those
office,
and
we
we
have
seen-
and
some
people
have
mentioned,
that
first
time
is
like
to
do
small
trades.
So
it's
probably
a
good
idea,
especially
now
that
Bitcoin
fees
are
very
low
and
you
can
do
you
know
one
Satoshi
per
byte
confirmations
in
the
next
block,
sometimes
or
maybe
in
the
next
two
blocks.
A
It
might
be
a
good
time
to
try
this,
and
if
you
place
small
office,
you
know
worth
0.01
or
0.001
Bitcoin
on
both
sides
will
be
offered
off
the
offer
book.
That's
a
way
to
test
the
waters
and
see,
if
there's
anything,
interesting
and
once
you've
placed
those
two
offers.
The
next
step
obviously
is
to
do
scaling
up.
A
So
you
can
do
three
on
each
side
and
then
people
who
who
come
will
see
a
bit
of
liquidity,
a
bit
of
depth
to
the
market,
and
so
after
you
place
those,
but
and
then
you
go
on
contact
the
local
communities
talk
to
the
meetup
groups.
You
talk
forum
of
the
what
I've
ever
had
people
in
your
local
community
meet
to
talk
about
Bitcoin
and
cryptocurrencies
and
whatever
they
need
to
trade,
and
but
before
that
you've
created
a
market.
A
You
created
something
bets
to
be
off
a
book,
so
that
would
people
you
talk
to
it
come
to
bisque.
They
have
something
to
do.
They
have
some
offer
there
to
take
whether
it
is
to
buy
or
to
sell
Bitcoin
and
of
course,
once
you
started
a
minimum
of
an
activity
and
you've
managed
to
get
two
or
three
people
to
trade.
Then
the
next
step
is
to
you
know,
try
and
get
us
to
add
your
favorite
payment
methods.
Try
and
get
the
best
team
to
try
and
get
translations
done.
A
B
Nothing
specific
but,
as
you
mention
already
I,
think
we're
running
slowly
into
two
markets
where
we
don't
have
such
an
active
community
already,
so
it's
hard
to
put
strapped
to
market.
From
our
perspective,
of
course,
we
we
didn't
do
so
much
marketing
for
these
these
two
liquidity
weeks,
but
I'm
personally,
I'm
not
sure
if
it
would
have
changed
a
lot.
Regarding
that
what
we
can
do,
what
we
have
already
in
the
growth
repository.
B
We
do
have
issues
for
a
couple
of
markets
which
are
not
put
strapped
already,
for
example,
Chinese,
yen,
I,
think
and
Russian
rubles.
So
if
people
just
show
up
and
put
their
like
there-
and
let's
say
if
we
have
five
people
willing
to
participate
in
a
liquidity
week
or
to
put
stop
a
market
will
do
as
suggested
yeah,
but
in
general
SSS
we
are
not
based
in
most
of
these
markets.
It's
really
hard
to
to
support
in
market-making
in
this
in
this
sad
market.
So
we
do
need
local
support
and
we
pop.
A
Them
up
right,
it's
got
to
be
demand
for
it
and
it's
got
to
be
people
willing
to
volunteer
I'm
I'm
in
China
next
week,
I'm
gonna,
try
and
drum
up
some
interest,
but
but
yeah
we
have
to
have
someone
local
who's
interested,
creating
a
market
coming
to
diskens.
They
can
do
with
that.
You
know
without
asking
for
the
permission,
but
without
asking
for
help,
but
obviously
you
know
they
ask
for
help,
because
we
can
do
something
to
help
them
like
I've,
been
methods.
Translations
I
said
yeah.
B
Yeah
I'm
also
not
sure
if
you
really
need
someone
so
many
local
translations.
We
do
there's
a
lot
of
activity
at
the
moment
in
our
translation,
repo
tool,
a
transfer
feedback.
So
if
you're
interested
translating
bisque,
it's
really
easy
and
I
think
we
have
nearly
a
hundred
percent
ready
for
Vietnamese
and
also
they
started
to
clean
up
the
Russian
translation,
a
group
of
people
and
also
tackling
at
the
moment
person.
So
there's
lots
of
stuff
going
on,
but
in
general
in
general,
all
translations,
like
sometimes
so.
B
The
English
English
version
is
very
good
and
before
we
started
they
called
Manfred
mention
already
at
the
moment.
Most
of
our
arbitrator's
mainly
speak
English,
or
maybe
a
1
another
language
like
chairman
or
Spanish.
So
actually
people
who
want
to
trade
at
the
moment
need
to
understand
English
at
a
certain
extent,
at
least
so,
but
yeah
everyone,
everyone
control
trade,
especially
on
krypter,
krypter
trades.
There
I,
don't
know
if
we
had
any
arbitration
issue
at
all.
So
it's
it
shouldn't
work
seamlessly
seemed
a
simple,
seemingly
and
seamlessly
yeah.
B
C
I
just
want
to
say
from
my
experience
from
my
past
experiences
have
a
great
there
with
of
it
without
quince.
There
are
very,
very
few
cases
in
general
and
when
and
it's
usually
a
technical
problem
that
the
Explorer
is
not
working
on
some
Alcuin
or
whatever,
but
yeah.
There
are
things
I,
don't
remember
that,
but
that
there
was
any
real
dispute,
I
think,
maybe
with
money
or
some
time
when
they
had
a
hard
work
or
whatever
that
it
was
not
displayed
on
the
other
user.
So
but
yeah.
B
C
One
or
two
already,
but
somehow
google
doesn't
allow
me
to
is
posted
yeah.
The
atomic
swap
stay
I
think
they
are
a
little
bit
overhyped
topic.
I
mean
they're
cool
technically,
but
the
problem
in
a
decentralized
manner,
at
least,
is
the
resource
and
engineering
effort
for
the
interesting
points
I
mean
you
can
do
it
with
not
super
huge
effort.
Even
then,
it's
quite
a
lot
of
effort,
of
course,
but
with
something
like
litecoin
or
other
clones
of
pitfalls,
which
are
very
similar
to
bitcoin.
C
C
Yeah,
which
I
think
it
would
probably
also
make
more
sense,
but
also
you
are
with
lightning
I,
can
give
a
little
bit
update.
I
was
at
this
conference
in
Lisbon
and
was
fantastic
conference
and
I
spoke
with
a
few
lightning
developers
and
so
and
the
question.
The
main
question
is
for
the
current
rate
protocol,
which
is
based
on
Bitcoin
both
the
second
and
the
main
question
is:
if
something
like
multisig
is
possible
with
lightning.
The
short
answer
is
not
at
the
moment.
C
There
are
some
ideas
to
do
it
basically
to
mimic
multisig
by
by
multiple
commitments.
So
you
not
have
only
one
a
hash,
time-locked
commitment,
but
you
have
several
and
then
you
combine
it,
but
that's
just
rough
ideas
and
nobody's
implemented
this
yet
enlightening,
and
it's
questionable
whenever
this
would
come
so
at
the
moment
there
would
be
probably
technically
not
a
way
to
as
far
as
I
understood
from
the
feedback.
What
I
got
with
people
to
implement
the
trade
protocol
on
lightning?
C
But
the
good
news
is:
we
have
an
alternative,
probably
much
better
solution
anyway,
with
the
psq
that
we
are
securing
the
great
pipe
in
coupons
and
we
have
a
back
to
the
atomic
swap
yeah.
The
main
problem
is
the
interesting
coins
like
money
arrow
in
that
area,
if
they're
possible
at
all
I
mean
at
least
it
should
be
possible.
Money
arrow
has
also
normal
to
6.
C
So
technically
it
should
be
possible
to
have
all
the
features
of
the
time-lock
transactions
and
multi-sig,
but
then,
with
such
coins,
it's
a
huge
effort
because
you
have
to
implement
the
whole.
This
whole
infrastructure
into
trade
protocol
for
another
and
the
whole
infrastructure
in
Java
that
you
are
getting
the
transactions
from
on
the
air
and
so
on,
and
so
I
would
expect
from
on
the
air.
C
Think
when
atomic
swap
will
we'll
be
successful
than
in
the
server-side
model,
we're
honest
wherever
you
run
old,
you
don't
have
to
pursue
limitations.
You
run
just
more
service
to
handle
this,
but
then
you
don't
gain
anything
on
the
decentralization
and
on
the
security
side,
I
mean
a
little
bit.
You
gain,
but
I
think
the
trade-off
that
it's
still
on
chaining.
It
costs
more.
It's
lower,
I
think
it's
at
the
end
of
good
enough.
Trade
of
the
people
will
move
over
from
centralized
exchanges
to
such
centralized
atomic
drop
exchanges.
C
I
have
not
followed.
No
no
I
followed
her
in
one
or
two
years
ago,
and
I
gave
up
in
the
mean
time,
because
so
there
they
got
too
much
money
to
ever
launch,
but
maybe
I
was
wrong
and
I
didn't
at
times.
You
look
good,
very
ambitious
project
when
it
works
out,
could
be
cool,
but
I
think
chances
for
a
blow
up
quite
high
here
on
several
areas
on
the
legal
side,
probably
also
but
the
interesting
interesting
to
watch
at
least
what
happens,
and
hopefully
it
goes
good.
We
could
approach
it
when
it's
successful.
B
B
Yes
or
a
man
for
that,
if
you
want
to
ask
no
no
I
guess
I
would
say
the
same
like
you,
sir,
at
the
moment,
to
to
an
able
growth
within
the
client.
It's
it's!
It's
not
so
much
about
the
markets
where
we
can
push
it
from
our
side,
but
more
from
from
technical
perspective,
to
make
it
easier
to
be
able
to
trade
on
risk
and
taught
to
automate
trading
and
to
make
it
more
comfortable
to
trade
in
and
think
you
want
to
mention
one
of
the
side
projects
that
were
that
are
a.
C
Moment,
yes,
that's
one
developer
working
on
a
mobile
notification
application
and
it's
getting
already
close
to
completed
state
I've
implemented
there.
The
best
part
is
its
integrated
already
in
a
branch
in
bisque,
so
that
you
have
a
few
where
you
can
make
the
pairing
with
your
mobile
device
and
and
set
up
which
notification
you
want
to
receive
implemented
at
the
moment
is
for
office,
because
when
you
all
forget
stating
you
get
them
notification
to
your
mobile
when
or
when
you're
in
a
trade.
C
All
the
important
treatments
such
as
you
get
a
notification
and
in
a
dispute.
When
you
get
the
dispute
message,
there
could
be
more
like,
for
instance,
price
alert
or
not
get
alerts
when
you
can
define-
let's
not
implement
the
moment,
but
would
not
be
very
hard
to
implement
this
later
that
you
define,
which
Christ
range
in
which
currents
in
which
payment
method.
C
You
are
interested
to
get
notifications
and
then,
when
there
is
a
new
offer
posted
with
euro
trade
in
by
trade
by
Bitcoin
trade,
with
a
certain
price
in
the
certain
payment
method,
you
would
get
the
notification
itself
and
similar.
We
could
have
a
price
alert.
So
when
the
euro
dollar
price,
or
whatever
price,
moves
in
a
over
certain
range
or
whatever,
that
you
get
a
notification-
and
we
can
extend
this
to
anything
but
users
demand
technically
works.
C
That
will
be
a
real,
a
note
similar
to
the
price
note
where
the
bisque
use
of
the
first,
you
have
to
sync
with
your
mobile
on
the
mobile
app
you're,
creating
a
private
key
for
the
encryption,
and
you
have
your
mobile
token
app
ID
and
your
with
a
QR
code.
You
are
handing
this
over
to
your
biscuit
location.
Then
the
bisque
application
knows
your
key,
so
we
can
encrypt.
It
can
encrypt
the
messages
to
you
and
with
the
token
ID
that
gets
sent
to
this
relay
server
and
the
relay
server
is
sending
this.
C
C
Of
course,
your
application
need
to
run
so
you
have
to
still
leave
your
application
running
on
a
computer
and
I
said
yeah
it's
on
there
of
the
service
impatiently
implemented,
and
the
integration
on
disk
is
nearly
complete,
just
fine-tuning
a
little
bit
more
testing
needed
and
your
team
is
working
under
on
the
Android
application
at
the
moment.
That's
also
close
to
complete.
So
it
could
be
that
at
least
in
two
weeks
or
something
like
this,
we
could
be
already
ready
to
launch
it.
But
what
to
sync
up?
C
C
With
the
dow
it's
also
we've
implemented.
Basically,
nearly
all
the
missing
features,
or
one
feature
was
to
change
parameters
like
or
whatever
trading
fees
or
any
important
value,
which
is
normal
mental
health
code.
It
can
be
changed
over
boating
them
that
I've
implemented
and
tested
the
bonding
works
already.
C
The
only
small
missing
things
is
to
confiscate
the
pond
to
like
an
arbitrator
who
have
set
up
ponds
and
when
we
would
confiscate
this
ponds
by
voting,
that's
a
smaller
missing
feature
which
isn't
not
implemented
yet,
but
probably
in
a
few
days
and
I'm
trying
to
get
now
the
UI
to
a
complete
state
and
go
on
with
such
thing,
and
we
will
probably
split
it
a
little
bit
as
soon
as
it's
from
our
side.
What
you
can
do
on
the
on
the
that
we
think
it's.
Basically,
there
are
no
problems
and
no
anymore.
C
We
probably
will
start
on
test
net.
There
could
be
already
in
a
few
weeks
or
at
least
end
of
August,
so
the
the
booting
and
the
focus
will
probably
happen
already
over
the
real
towel
over
the
application.
Maybe
we
can
do
it
in
parallel
just
for
safety
and
in
the
time
when
we
have
launched
it
already
on
main
that
on
on
test
net,
we
will
continue
with
writing
more
tests
and
make
it
really
battle.
Proof
and
yeah.
C
A
C
Yeah
I
will
not
take
too
much
effort
on
the
on
the
usability
and
UI
because
it's
basically
intended
for
a
piss
contributor.
So
we
will
not
lose
users
because
it's
a
little
bit
more
complicated
or
whatever
I
mean
and
I
think
the
voting
we
see
it
already,
but
maybe
that's
another
discussion.
I
think
it
has
to
be,
and
it's
already
becoming
more
clear
when
you're
doing
voting
under
on
the
pistol.
It's
a
management
job.
It's
it's,
it's
time-consuming!
C
You
have
to
verify
if
what
you're
working
on
was
really
valuable
work
and
so
on
and
a
sinker
yeah
initially
most
people
think
I
should
cool
it.
Something
like
democracy,
you
can
vote
there
and
every
every
bisque
user
should
should
use
this
for
voting.
But
that's
relays
doesn't
make
sense
and
it's
not
the
intention.
It's
free.
C
A
Liquid
democracy
experiments
fail
because
most
people
can't
be
bothered
to
vote,
but
even
so
it's
got
to
be
something
that
can
scale
the
hundreds
of
dial
participants.
I,
don't
think
it's
ever
going
to
scale
to
millions,
but
you
know
if
you're
just
gonna
do
it
for
10
managers,
10
stakeholders,
then
you
don't
need
it
that
yeah
it
has
to
be
able
to.
C
Yeah
I
mean
for
scaling
larger.
It
will
be
then
required
to
have
something
like
delegation
that
you
can
delegate
your
vote
to
somebody
else,
because
one
problem
what
we
already
have
now,
when
you
have
20
contribution,
requests
and
some
require
to
really
verify
that
work.
You
need
to
spend
some
time.
You
will
need
to
check
out
what
this
person
has
done
really
and-
and
it
doesn't
really
scale
that
every
contributor
is
doing
this
verification
for
every
other
contributor.
I
mean
it's
usually
like
in
normal
companies.
C
C
It
doesn't
mean
that
you
don't
trust
this
person,
it's
just
that
you
don't
have
their
the
information
to
make
a
meaningful
decision
here
and
then
it's
usually
one
or
two
persons
who,
with
whom
somebody
else
is
working
like
I'm
working
with
his
cube,
the
other
people
don't
basically
know
what
he's
doing
much
and
of
course
he
can
post
all
the
github
commits
and
whatever
and
you
can
watch
all.
But
even
then
you
really
need
to
understand
the
code.
C
It's
not
only
to
see
you
out
there
2450
commits
or
whatever
that
doesn't
mean
anything
that
something
like
voting
on
lines
of
codes.
We
don't
want
this
I
mean
the
quality
of
one
commit
could
be
higher
like
twenty
commits
and
ten
thousand
lines
of
code
can
be
much
less
well.
You
like
five
lines
of
codes
and
quality,
can
only
be
value.
C
Eight
verified
by
really
understanding
everything
that
takes
quite
a
lot
of
time,
and
not
everybody
will
have
this
time
so
I
think
the
solution
is
that
only
those
people
who
actually
work
with
the
other
they
are
doing
the
working,
and
that
might
be
only
one
or
two
or
three
everybody
can
do
it.
It's
of
course
open
and
everybody
can
invest
this
time
and
be
able
to
participate,
but
I
think
natural.
It
will
evolve
in
this
direction
that
or
those
are
working
so.
A
C
It's
like
in
a
company,
you
have
a
department
and
the
head
of
the
department
make
basically
the
decision
if
the
freelancer
get
paid
or
not,
and
here
anybody
can
become
this
head
of
department.
It
can
be
twenty
head
of
departments
who
are
doing
independently
their
decisions
and
with
the
state
with
stake
and
reputation
based
voting
and
that's
the
difference,
but
I
think
it's
just
they're
not
really
feasible
and
it
would
add
a
lot
of
work
that
are
ahead
is
already
the
last
time
yeah.
C
This
is
a
good
contribution
and
it's
an
basically
by
delegation
that
and
it
to
have
implemented
as
a
to
implement
delegation
would
be
cooling
it
out,
but
that's
quite
complex
and
we
don't
want
to
work
another
half
here
and
without
but
later
in
a
later
phase.
That's
for
sure,
a
feature
which
probably
is
needed,
but
I
think
at
the
moment
you
get
the
same
effect
when
you
just
don't
vote
because
then
in
the
percentage
of
the
one
or
two
persons
who
are
voting,
they
have
them
basically
hundred
percent
of
the
influence.
C
Content
is
encrypted
that
will
only
get
revealed
or
running
decrypted
when
the
vote
phase
is
over.
So
when
you
cannot
vote
anymore
and
I
mean
most
of
the
features
or
most
of
the
advanced
features
like
bonding
and
so
on
will
be,
and
the
parameter
change
will
be
deactivated
in
the
first
launch
because
they
are
not
really
required
and
we
want
more
time
for
better
testing
and
so
on,
and
we
don't
want
to
delay
the
launch
because
we
need
more
time
to
test
those
parts.
C
Well,
so
those
pads
own
they
implement
it
in
a
kind
of
like
prototype
type
quality,
to
be
sure
that
it's
basically
works
from
the
concept
and
yeah
they're
just
lacking
more
sophisticated
tests.
But
the
voting
and
all
the
the
basic
features
like
paying
the
trading
fees,
making
normal
transactions
and
trading
and
you're
making
the
computation
requests
with
voting
that
will
be
implemented.
B
Cool
just
one
one
more
thing:
I
wanted
to
add
to
the
notification
service
plans,
but
to
make
it
a
little
bit
harder
to
to
track.
Will
it
make
sense
to
just
delay
the
the
messages
on
the
server
randomly
and
send
it
out,
because
not
all
messages
are
time
critically
as
a
like
collect
price
alerts.
So
if
you
have
arbitration
messages
or
trade
messages,
if
they
arrive,
20
minutes
later
might
not
make
a
huge
difference
or
what
yeah
I.
C
Mean
I've
not
saw
too
much
about
this
I
mean
Apple
would
need
to
observe
the
bisque
Network
and
the
blockchain
to
find
kind
like
correlation,
and
even
then
I
mean,
of
course
when
when
it
all
forgets
taking
it
gets
removed,
but
it
can
be
also
get
removed
by
that
the
user
cat
offline.
So
when
you
observe
the
bisque
Network,
you
see
it
all
forget
removed,
but
you
don't
know
if
it
was
taken
or
not
only
the
users
will
notice.
So
it
don't.
You
learn
too
much
of
this.
C
It's
basically
the
the
main
thing
with
privacy
in
basic
I
mean
when,
when
Bitcoin
or
usage
of
bisque
is
illegal,
you're
anyway
on
high
risk,
because
anybody
could
trade
with
you
and
be
on
the
color.
So
that's
not
recommended
at
all
when
you
live
in
a
country
where
this
is
becomes
illegal,
I'm
not
aware
of
any
country
at
the
moment,
but
in
the
pastor
have
good
time
where
some
countries
rent
a
little
bit
stupid,
went
stupid
and
so
I'm,
not
so
sure.
If
you,
if
you
really
I,
mean
the
main
privacy
lost
you.
C
So
what
you
get
back
from
one
trade
we
might
be
used
as
input
for
the
next
trade,
so
those
traits
are
connected
and
it's
when
you
trade
and
when
one
of
those
input
or
unspent
transaction
outputs
or
whatever
get
connected
with
your
real
life
identity,
because
you
use
it
at
some
ik
centralized
exchange
or
wherever.
Then
you
are
dealing.
Let's.
C
A
C
When
you're
real
special
e
with
al-quwain
traits
or
you
are
not
leaking
any
privacy,
a
real-life
identity
privacy
to
even
the
out
of
here,
we
fear
the
court.
The
Ariat
appear
at
least
note
and
your
name
depending
on
the
payment
method.
But
with
most
it's
the
case
but
and
with
Alcuin
see
you
don't
have
this
problem.
It's
still,
it's
happens.
A
Usually
not
inside
you
start
even
for
fiat
trades
say
you
get
a
future
phone
and
pacer
both
feature
phone
in
kenya
and
and
you
trade
with
your
phone
number,
and
that
phone
is,
you
know
rechargeable,
but
anywhere
it
doesn't
have
to
be
tied
to
any
identity.
Obviously
you
know
the
money.
Is
there?
So
you
know
you
can
move
it
to
another,
and
pay
cell
counts
very
quickly.
It's
you
can
do
fiat
the
bitcoin
with
a
lot
of
privacy.
If
you
yeah.
C
I
just
want
to
say:
I
mean
you
get
quite
a
lot
of
privacy,
of
course,
in
bisque
and
the
main
the
weakest
point
at
the
end.
Is
this
Bitcoin
part?
So
when
you're
not
really
taking
care,
how
you
are
funding
your
wallet
and
when
you
are
sending
out
or
from
bisque
or
the
money-
and
you
are
spending
this
somewhere
where
get
identified?
Yes,
then
it
could
be
traced
back
and
your
droids
could
be
connected.
C
Even
then,
it's
blurry
because
of
course,
there's
no
hundred
percent
guarantee
it's
difficult
to
and
yeah
and
the
other
things
like
making
yeah
with
with
timing
behavior
to
observe
the
piston
Network
and
then
say
yeah
that
might
be
the
offer
of
this
user
and
he
received
therefore
not
a
recognition.
Of
course,
there
is
some
risk
there
as
well,
but
I
think
those
people
who
who
are
worried
about
this
dish
just
shouldn't
use
the
notification
service,
because
probably
they
don't
want
to
have
her,
have
it
away,
Apple
anyway
and
or
Google,
and
it's
yeah.
C
It's
a
manager,
mandatory
feature
for
people
who
prefer
usability
and
who
are
not
super
paranoid
with
privacy.
At
the
end,
because
yeah
I
mean
a
small
delay
could
be
implemented
to
have
a
delay
which
is
more
like
20
seconds
or
10
seconds.
I
think
has
the
usability
problem
that
yeah
you
test
it
out
you
you
do
something
and
then
nothing
happens
on
your
phone
and
you
think
it's
a
bug
so
I
think
that's
the
main
issue
to
when
it's
just
one
or
two
three
seconds.
Okay,
then
you
think
it's
a
little
bit
slow.
C
B
B
Seven
one
and
read
through
the
free
text,
form
responses
and
most
of
them
are
about
privacy,
so
so
people
who
trade
on
bisque
a
really
privacy
that
they
want
to
do
it
in
in
a
private
way,
and
maybe
we
could
add
some
more
documentation,
general,
so
more
peep
who
really
want
to
do
a
super
private
trade,
Pitkin
trade,
Pitkin
field
trip,
can
confine
this
information
and
and
then
use
bisquit.
It's
the
best
way
to
do
it
on.
A
C
Action
very
interesting:
it
is
because
I
mean
looking
for
alternatives
to
banking
systems,
because
that's
the
weakest
element
in
bisque
and
we
would
like
to
find
roll
out
notice,
but
beside
face
to
face
trade
and
catch
by
an
email
and
some
exotic
but
interesting
payment
method
like
hell
cash
I
think
that
we
really
should
stop
implement.
Maybe
you
can
say
a
little
bit
more
about
this
Felix.
You
provide
us.
A
It
works
really
well
not
at
this,
but
and
there's
plenty
to
there's
quite
a
few
services
in
Spain
and
some
of
the
European
countries
that
will
allow
you
to
just
with
the
digit
the
four
digit
courage,
I
think
and
a
phone
number
withdrawing
ATM.
So
it's
an
it's
quite
fast,
cheaper,
but
for
small
amounts
it
makes
sense,
but
also
this,
as
you
say,
there's
other
exotic,
Slyke,
Amazon
credit
team
vouchers,
a
bunch
of
stuff
like
that.
B
A
A
The
the
paynus
directive
forces
banks
to
open
the
rate
the
eyes
so
once
you
have
high
instance,
SEPA
like
faster
payments
in
the
UK
plus
an
open
API,
it's
gonna
be
very
easy
to
create
micro,
payment.
Apps
and
the
moment
you
have
you
know
a
million
micro
payment
apps
like
revolute
or
be
some
or
all
these
others
that
are
running
around
it
shouldn't
be
too
hard
to
do.
Combine
that
with
the
trading
mechanism
like
this
right,
maybe.
C
A
C
A
Limit
has
already
run
out
as
usual
government
to
slow
I
mean
SEPA.
Instant
was
supposed
to
be
live
since
April
in
all
of
the
very
few
banks
are
using
it
there
a
year
to
put
it
online.
But,
for
example,
what's
up
is
already
running
thing:
instant
payment
system
in
India
I
think
someone
mentioned
that
they
obviously
they're
thinking
of
bringing
it
to
other
countries.
Well,
once
you
have
just
like
WeChat
in
China
WeChat
pay
in
China.
Once
you
have,
you
know
a
billion
two
billion
watts
of
users
being
able
to
make
micro
transactions.
C
I,
don't
expect
too
much
from
this
thing
there
for
me
for
my
experience
of
farthing
companies
that
even
worth
like
the
bank,
so
they
are
less
secure
and
they
treat
you
even
worse,
like
we
got
some
reports
from
and
26
or
from
other.
It
is
like
when
we
and
so
on,
yeah
you
get
robbed
by
somebody
else
because
of
their
flawed
security,
and
then
they
treat
you
like
a
criminal
confiscate.
Your
funds,
don't
give
you
any
information
and
so
on,
as
it's
really
completely
completely
better.
C
Have
just
closed
your
account
without
telling
you
why,
without
an
explanation
and
so
on
so
I'm
man
and
they
all
get
forced
in
the
cave,
I
see
and
surveillance
regime,
so
I'm
not
sure
if
they
will
add
really
much
and
of
course,
also
such
a
cabinet.
When
I
come
and
will
issue
some
digital
currency,
it
will
be
also
in
the
KYC
regime,
and
so
that
will
that
will.
A
C
C
I
would
not
take
super
easy,
but
we
could
basically
launched
two
new
different
two
color
coin
tokens
like
psq,
but
they
should
be
separated
because
otherwise
be
asked.
You
get
the
risk
of
their
hatching
and
so
on,
and
one
is
there.
Is
there
a
hedging
coin
which
is
not
stable
and
that
that's
wallet
I'll
and
the
people
who
are
who
are
yeah
keeping
other
them?
C
The
main
idea
is
for
what
I
believe
is
that
the
stable
coins
only
work
like
hedging
and
hedging
costs
money
and
the
people
who
want
the
hedge
they
have
to
pay
the
fee
and
most
stable
coin
are
hiding
this
fevered
externalizing
the
fee
to
somebody
else
or
just
make
a
bond
see
and
at
some
point
it
crashes.
And
but
when
you
fill
the
system
where
the
stable
coin,
our
users
have
to
pay
a
small
fee
for
their
hedging
and
which
it's,
depending
on
the
market.
C
It's
basically
a
little
bit
like
a
side
chain,
but
they
are
technically
not
side
chain
they're,
just
at
its
color
coins
and
you
can
burn
so.
Let's
say
you
buy,
let's
call
the
one,
that's
the
hedge
token
and
the
other
is
the
favorite
coin
token,
so
you
are
buying
on
the
market
or
some
hedge
tokens,
whatever
it's
a
market
price
against
Bitcoin,
and
then
you
can
burn
this
hedge
token
and
by
burning
you
get
the
right
to
issue
new,
stable
coin
tokens
in
there.
C
The
stable
coin
is
one
dollar,
let's
see
so
you're
calculating,
let's
Seder,
the
hedge
token
is
also
one
dollar
at
the
moment.
One
token
is
one
dollar,
and
then
you
go
from
the
hedge
token
tutor
stable
token
by
burning
or
so
that's
a
trustless
exchange.
You're
burning
on
the
one
side,
and
with
that
you
can
prove
that
you
have.
C
C
C
You
could
abuse
this
with
manipulation
and
try
to
trick
the
system,
but
when
the
token
holders
of
this
hedge
token
they
are
basically
the
ones
who
are
taking
the
risk
and
who
need
to
carry
there.
They
are
basically
interested
that
they
avoid
such
manipulation
and
that
avoids
that
it's
super
volatile
and
people
are
buying
at
this
moment
and
when
they
go
out,
they
yeah
an
important
feature.
To
avoid
this
manipulation.
C
Risk
is
when
you
go
back,
that
you
have
a
comparison:
no
I,
just
sorry,
I
just
adopted
the
idea
hey
if
you
week
ago,
now
you
also
when
you
are
buying
their
stable
tokens,
you
you
get
the
fee
determined
what
you
have
to
pay
when
you
go
out
again
and
that's
depending
on
the
current
market
price.
It's
like
you,
make
a
hedge
contract
and
at
the
moment
or
the
risk
of
the
market
will
determine
the
price
of
your
hedging
and
then
or
whenever
you
go
back.
C
If
it's
a
month
later
or
a
year
later,
you
are
paying
this
fee,
so
your
fee
is
calculated.
You
can
calculate
with
this,
even
if
the
market
risk
would
have
changed,
and
maybe
the
current
fee
in
half
a
year
would
be
much
higher,
but
you
can
calculate
with
this
and
you
have
a
fixed
fee
and
I
think
that
should
avoid
most
of
those
possible
with
manipulation
and
with
trying
to
abuse
this.
C
B
C
Tried
in
the
past
a
few
time
of
this
project
from
Daniel
arena
to
understand
and
they're
all
super
complex
and
yeah,
and
also
carry
always
something
for
me,
not
very
sympathetic
with
get
rich
scheme
and
us
to
think
is
also
on
his
shoulders
and
there
it
was
never
I
was
never
willing
to
invest
more
time
in
this
in
this
project.
I
think
Technica
is
pretty
interesting
and
for
sure
some
interesting
ideas
about
marin
looked
really
familiar
with
it
right.
B
B
So
so
we
don't
mix
people
who
really
finished
rates
and
give
feedback
and
people
who
maybe
are
just
interested
in
the
platform,
but
still
it
might
be
interesting
to
not
only
get
a
input
of
real
traders,
but
also
for
everyone
who
is
within
the
bisque
kind
of
community
or
interested
in
a
bisque
platform
itself.
Very
so
very
good
idea.
Yeah,
it's
quite
easy
to
do
in
India,
it
was
quiet,
I
was
classically.
B
C
A
quick
question
I
mean
what
would
you
think
that
if
we
try
to
invite
for
the
next
or
one
of
the
upcoming
grows,
called
some
bisque
uses
and
make
a
little
bit
account
like
a
feedback
session?
What
do
you
think
should
be
improved
a
question
whatever
and
any
anybody's
in
welcome
to
join?
It
should
be
just
a
little
bit
organized
that
we
know
in
advance.
If
there
is
somebody,
I
have
no.
A
C
Anybody
who
is
watching
the
call
is
interested
to
join
and
yeah
any
question.
Any
feedback
you
want
to
give
everything
is
welcome,
open
format,
whatever
we
talk
and
can
be
able
to
a
little
bit
off
topic
of
bisque
or
whatever,
when
you
want
to
talk
about
whatever
stuff
going
on
at
the
Bitcoin
space
Gus,
because.
B
Yeah,
maybe
maybe
it
also
could
could
get
our
questions
up
front
already,
and
so
we're
not
just
having
having
questions
at
at
the
call
but
already
kind
of
a
portfolio
of
questions.
We
could
then
answer
during
the
call.
If
some
people
can't
come
to
chance
and
still
want
the
questions
to
be
answered
so
yeah.