►
Description
This is a recording of the Boston Zoning Board of Appeal Subcommittee Hearing held on July 22, 2021. The Zoning Board will hold a vote on whether to approve or reject the subcommittee recommendations at its next full-Board hearing.
A
A
A
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
public
notices
pages
page
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
we
will
hear
meetings
from
elected
officials,
representatives
of
elected
officials
and
then
community
members.
A
A
To
raise
your
hand,
click
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click,
that
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
raised.
Virtually
click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
3.
To
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
A
A
A
Good
evening
miss
barraza
good
evening
manager
good
evening,
so
why
don't
we
get
started.
B
B
The
first
case
calling
voa
115
8994
296
princeton
street.
This
is
adding
a
green
roof
to
a
playroom
area,
basement
completing
bathroom,
finishing
space
for
additional
storage
and
relocation
of
the
existing
kitchen
bathroom
on
any
existing
footprint.
Second
floor
bedroom
and
bathroom
remodel
violations.
Article
2017-5:
this
is
in
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
52,
the
root
structure,
restrictions,
article
53,
section
9,
the
fourier
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
side
yard's
insufficient
and
article
53
section
9.
The
rare
yacht
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
E
Sorry
about
that
my
name
is
andrea
villanova
and
I'm
the
homeowner
for
296
princeton
street.
I
have
I'm
trying
to
renovate
the
house
doing
some
repair
work
and
adding
some
square
finish
floor
area.
I
am
not
changing
the
footprint
of
the
existing
structure,
it's
basically
the
footprint
staying
the
same
is
I'm
just
changing
the
roof
structure
and
therefore
it's
it's.
Basically,
it
triggers
the
roof
structure,
restrictions
and
the
floor
area
ratio.
E
As
if
you
go
to
the
section,
so
this
is
the
existing
roof.
Currently
there
it's
the
so
it.
On
the
first
floor,
the
dining
area
is
in
the
back
and
on
the
second
floor,
the
left-hand
side
bedroom
it's
about
seven
feet.
So
I'm
trying
to
add
to
that
dining
area.
A
second
story
so
that
the
bedroom,
the
smaller
bedroom
can
it
can
be
bigger
and
actually
usable
and
that's
by
changing
the
roof.
The
roof.
E
Want
to
add
bathroom
and
a
possible
area
for
my
mom
to
sleep
in
she
has
she
uses
a
wheelchair,
and
since
this
is
a
three
level
house,
the
bedrooms
right
now
are
you
have
to
go
three
flights
of
stairs
so
there's
currently
an
entryway
there.
You
see
that
under
that
main
window
and
the
plan
is
to
have
her
be
able
to
enter
through
that
door
and
have
a
space
in
the
bottom
area
to
to
stay
in
okay,.
A
E
The
floor
ceiling
height
is,
I
think,
it's
a
little
bit
over
eight
feet.
It's
I
don't
it's
written
there.
I
don't
know.
Okay,.
A
E
E
I
did
I
had
a
buttons
meeting
and
I
had
two
presentations
to
the
eagle
hill
civic
association
and
I
had
a
34-1
vote
of
support.
Okay,
thank.
A
You
thank
you,
miss
barraza.
How
are
the
plans?
The
plans
are
adequate
and
you're
comfortable
with
having
a
possible
bedroom
in
that
basement.
Actually,.
F
I'm
not
on
the
plans,
it's
labeled
as
storage
and
where
I'm
assuming
there's
going
to
be
a
bedroom
at
the
rear,
there's
really
no
windows.
It's
there's!
There's
there's
windows.
A
No,
we
will,
we
are
referencing
it
and
we
will
get
to
it
on
the
screen.
You
know
when
we,
we
are
not
a
big
fan
of
bedrooms
in
the
basement,
especially
if
there's
a
handicapped
person
in
that
space.
A
We
need
to
very
very
much
make
sure
that
there
is
a
way
that
that
person
can
get
out
of
the
space
cleanly
and
without
any
issues.
If
there
should
there
be
a
fire
or
any
other
emergency,
and
that's
why
we
look
very
carefully
to
see
that
there
are
bedrooms.
I
mean
there
are
windows,
so
we
know
that
it's
livable
yeah,
so
so
those
are
here
right
here
on
4.0,
if
you
can
see.
So
these
are
the
issues
we're
talking
about.
A
E
F
A
Okay
now
hold
on
so
ma'am.
We
have
the
drawing
up
yeah.
Where
is
you
so
we
see
the
so.
The
entrance
I
assume
is
through
the
mud
room
and
then
on
the
right
hand,
side,
there's
a
storage
room
and
then
from
the
mud,
room,
there's
a
door
to
the
bathroom
and
then
in
the
rear.
There's
a
large
storage
space
yeah
hold
on,
which
is
the
proposed
bedroom.
E
E
So
there's
no
there's
no
foundation
wall
to
the
left
of
that.
Of
that
there's
a
there's,
a
there's,
there's
the
full
almost
of
those
full
height
windows
on
at
the
bottom
of
that
mudroom
that
you
know
it's
it's
it
all.
Those
doors
can
be
fully
open.
F
C
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
dina
tremeli
with
the
mayor's
office
of
netherlands
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
for
this
proposal
during
the
community
process.
This
proposal
receives
strong
support
from
eagle
hill
civic
association
and,
as
well,
will
receive
24
letters
of
support
from
our
parents
and
residents
of
eagle
hill.
Thank
you.
G
Thank
you.
I
do
have
one
raised
hand
caller
six,
six,
one,
seven,
eight
nine
nine
you've
been
unmuted.
Are
you
here
to
give
testimony
for
this
case.
G
Okay,
so
there
you
go,
this
is.
G
A
Okay,
so
may
I
have
a
motion,
please,
yes,
ma'am.
A
B
This
is
the
correct
and
existing
code
violation
of
a
basement
unit
by
removing
the
basement
kitchen
and
door
unit
separations
between
unit
1
and
basement,
and
then
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
area
from
unit
one
to
connect
directly
into
the
first
floor
unit
and
remove
the
rear
second
floor,
interior
stairs
and
construct
a
new
exterior
stair
from
the
existing
rear,
porch.
The
violation,
article
53,
section,
9,
excessive
far
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
G
B
B
I
At
ryan,
potterson,
89
russell
street,
I'm
the
homeowner
okay.
A
So
please
so
tell
us:
is
this
a
one
family
or
two
family.
I
So
we're
we're,
basically,
we
moved
in
here
just
over
a
year
ago.
Now
we
want
to
renovate
the
building
and
part
of
that
renovation
is
finishing,
the
basement
to
include
a
living
area
and
a
bedroom
down
there
with
an
ensuite
bathroom
to
sort
of
just,
I
guess,
to
accommodate
our
future
family
and
family
visiting
from
overseas.
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
about
the
basement:
tell
us
what
the
floor
to
ceiling
height
is
what
the
floor
to
sill
height
is
and
let's
and
it
and
let's
just
start
there.
I
Sure,
right
now
the
ceiling
height
is
plus
or
minus
seven
feet.
It's
slow,
there's
a
difference
of
about
an
inch
as
you
move
from
the
back
to
the
front
and
that's
from
the
current
floor
to
the
underside
of
the
joist.
My
hope
is
to
get
down
to
eight
foot,
six
adequate
height,
this
cell
height,
sorry.
I
I
Right
now
is
around
two
and
a
half
feet.
I
think
so.
The
sill
height
at
the
very
front
will
be
increased
by
that
extra
foot,
foot
and
a
quarter
and
then
the
sill
height.
I
can't
recall
the
sill
height
of
the
egress
window
at
the
back,
but
obviously
that
will
be
code
compliant
or
you
know,
dependent
on
code.
A
Okay
tom,
can
you
just
check
to
see
if
that
deck
had
come
to
this
board
in
the
past
or
if
it
was
just
if
it
just
appeared
on
the
building?
If,
if
that's
possible,
okay,
miss
miss
browser,
tell
us
a
little.
How
are
the
plans.
A
And
you're
comfortable
with
what
they
show
in
the
basement.
F
I'm
not
comfortable
with
the
bedroom
at
the
rear,
just
with
the
fact
that
the
window
well
is
the
only
source
of
light
in
that
bedroom.
The
sill
height
is
noted
on
the
plans,
which
is
you
know,
correct
to
code
is
less
than
44
inch
height
from
the
floor
to
the
sill,
but
the
proposed
egress.
Well,
it's
very
tall.
So
it's
about
five
foot
six
from
grade,
so
I'm
not
comfortable
with
the
bedroom
at
the
rear,
but
at
the
front
there
is
adequate
light.
Adequate
access
to
the
to
to
the
front
exit.
A
Okay,
okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?.
K
Members
of
the
board-
this
is
john
romano
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
have
received
a
significant
number
of
letters
to
support
for
this
project
and
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
it.
A
Okay,
miss
barraza.
What
do
you
think.
A
So
this
is
a
note
to
the
applicant.
Please
make
sure
that
you
work
very
closely
with
the
bpda
so
that
in
fact,
if
you're
having
family
over
they're
in
the
best
and
the
safest
place
in
that
in
that
basement,
okay,
good
luck.
B
L
A
Thank
you.
How
are
the
plans,
ms
barraza?
The
plans
are
adequate
anybody
here
to
speak,
either
in
support
or
in
opposition.
K
Ma'am
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
john
armando
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We've
seen
received
one
letter
of
opposition,
but
we
received
four
letters
of
support,
including
director
butters
and
those
support
letters,
and
at
this
time
our
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
project.
B
Mountain
chair
look
at
what
I
can
see:
they're
opposed
to
the
roof
deck,
obviously
sunlight
blocking
their
view
into
their
bedrooms.
The
normal
deck
situations
that
we
use.
Okay,.
G
A
G
I
do
have
two
raised:
hands
call
of
five
you've
been
unmuted.
That's
five,
eight
five!
Seven!
Three
seven.
Would
you
like
to
give
testimony
for
this
project.
A
No,
we,
mr
mr
sheen,
is
representing
you,
so
we
we
will
defer
to
him
miss
miss
ambassador.
May
we
go
to
the
next
raised,
hands.
Sure.
G
Yep
caller
six
you've
been
unmuted
from
617.
H
That,
madam
chair,
I
am
the
director
of
butter
to
number
six
wall
street,
I'm
at
number.
Seven
wall
street,
madam,
during
the
office
of
neighborhood
services,
meeting
the
owner
of
attorney
brian
bartlett
and
his
agents
have
stated
bluntly
that
if
there
was
all
or
nothing
for
this
project
and
as
we
can
see
with
62.25,
they
violate
the
setback
which
says
the
pertinent.
H
H
A
Ken
thank
you,
mr
mr
shin.
Can
you
respond
to
the
issues
that
you've
heard
about
viable
from
the
street
and
the
setback.
L
Sure
you
won't
see
it
from
the
street
because
it's
only
going
to
be
four
and
a
half
feet
high
and
I've
got
it
six
feet,
ten
inches
back
from
the
parapet
edge.
Okay,
the
requirement
is
that
you
know
we
hold
it
back
a
foot
for
every
foot,
it's
above
the
roof
service.
So
I
know
I
mean
I've
lived
on
the
street.
My
whole
life.
You
won't
see
it
from
the
street.
I
don't
know
what
the
other
issue
was
blocking.
I
don't
I
don't
know
how
it's
going
to
block
anybody's
light.
A
Got
it
okay,
so
anybody
else
to
speak
on
this
proposal?
B
Much
the
next
case
calling
voa
116
4273
to
lonwood
place.
This
is
for
a
new
private
roof
deck
for
unit
2
access
to
a
hatch
and
a
new
set
of
stairs
the
violations.
Article
62
section
8,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
feet.
Proposed
roof
deck
exceeds
the
allowed
building
height
and
article
62
section
section:
8,
the
building
height
is
excessive
in
feet,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
L
Again,
this
is
timothy,
shannon
I'm
the
architect
for
this,
for
this
roof
deck.
This
is
a
two
family
house.
This
is
for
the
people
who
live
on
the
top
two
floors
unit.
Two,
they
have
no
outside
space.
They
would
like
to
build
a
roof
deck
accessed
by
a
hatch.
The
roof
deck
would
be
355
square
feet,
that's
essentially
it
our
neighborhood
process
was
was
not
attention.
No
one
showed
up
in
the
neighborhood
meeting
and
I
believe
we
have
support
from
mr
romano
from
neighborhood
services.
L
You
won't
see
it
from
longwood
place,
you
won't
see
it
but
we're
exposed
to
main
street
and
we
have
a
restaurant
to
the
right
of
the
building
when
you're
looking
at
it
from
the
from
the
street.
So
you
will
see
it
from
main
street
there's
just
no
way
around
that.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans
miss
barraza.
K
A
B
Thank
you.
Everybody
calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
118
4808
10
clem
on
park.
This
is
a
constructing
new
steel
balcony
off
the
third
floor
level
and
the
at
the
kitchen
of
unit
2,
the
violations,
article
64,
section,
9.4,
townhouse
row,
house,
extensions
into
the
rear
yard
name
and
address
for
the
records.
Please.
P
This
is
a
rear
balcony
at
the
top
level
of
the
building
here
shown
on
the
section
you
can
see,
it
is
off
the
top
floor
in
the
rear
of
the
building,
and
it
is
the
standard
six
feet
projecting
from
the
rear
facade
of
the
building
under
article
64,
section,
nine
balconies
above
the
first
floor
are
considered
a
conditional
use
and
therefore
we
are
seeking
a
conditionally
used
permit
for
this
balcony.
A
Okay,
and
is
that
deck
brackets
supported.
P
A
Okay,
and
is
that
roof
head
house
in
place
already.
P
Yep,
that
was
the
building
was
previously
owned
by
the
new
england
conservatory
of
music
and
before
that
was
owned
by
a
homeowner
for
30
years
and
during
our
claremont
park
neighborhood
association
process.
It
was
confirmed
that
that
was
an
existing
head
house
and
we
went
to
southland
landmarks
commission
for
repair
and
replace
portions
of
what's
up
on
the
roof
and
it
has
been
substantially
improved
and
has
been
approved
by
the
southern
landmarks
commission.
Q
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman,
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services,
let
go
record
supporters
proposal
counterpart
conducting
the
butters
meeting
on
may
19th.
The
applicant
went
on
to
the
claremont
neighborhood
association
on
may
27th.
The
civic
association
chose
not
to
oppose
the
proposal,
meets
the
design
review,
standards
of
the
bpda
and
the
south
end
landmark.
Commission,
we
received
five
letters
of
support
and
one
letter
in
opposition.
The
opposition
was
based
off
of
privacy
concerns.
Our
office
feels
that
this
proposal
fits
in
with
the
character
of
the
neighborhood.
Q
G
G
Yeah,
there's
still
an
echo,
but
are
you
on
two
devices.
R
Yeah
this
is
a
privacy
concern
to
me.
I
feel
that
this
deck
is
encroaching
of
my
condo.
There
was
no
deck
there,
and
now
there
there
seems
to
be
another
deck.
That's
being
put,
you
know
this
deck
and
they
already
have
a
deck
below
so
not
too
sure
why
they
need
two
decks
when
they
already
have
plenty
of
outdoor
space.
R
I
have
one
deck
one
bedroom,
one
bathroom
and
this
deck
will
sit
directly
kind
of
you
know
adjacent
to
my
deck
and
then
you
know,
I'm
not
sure
if
they
plan
on
having
noise
or
or
people
sitting
out
there,
but
you
know
could
usually
be
peeking
into
my
bedroom
and
my
in
my
bathroom,
in
addition
to
my
deck.
So
those
are
my
concerns.
You
know,
I
definitely
don't
want
this
deck
put
there
and
really.
A
G
Thank
you
all
right.
Let
me
just
check
what
call
is
six
six
one,
seven,
eight
nine.
G
H
A
Excuse
mid-1800s,
sir,
we
are,
we
are
done
with
that
project,
so
we
appreciate
your
input
and
your
comments.
Thank
you.
We
are
now
looking
at
any
comments
for
10
clermont
park.
B
A
Sorry,
thank
you,
mr
fortune.
Miss
barraza.
What's
the
design
review
to
focus
on
on
the
exterior
okay
is-
and
I
I
too
am
in
support,
so
you're
set
with
that
proviso.
B
S
S
Certainly,
this
is
a
revision
of
a
as
you
can
see
there,
the
right
side
of
this
property
to
expand
the
existing
two
units
which
already
exist
on
the
property.
The
only
zoning
violation
which
has
been
triggered
is
a
time.
A
For
before,
can
you
please
take
the
time
and
tell
us
what's
being
proposed?
What
are
the
proposed
additions.
S
Certainly
the
first
floor
existing
unit
will
be
expanded
into
the
basement,
where
you
will
have
a
bedroom
at
the
rear
of
the
property
and
a
bedroom
at
the
front
of
the
property.
It
is
a
sloping
property
that
goes
to
the
back.
There
will
be
a
family
room
in
the
interior
section
of
the
first
floor.
A
A
Okay
and
then
it
then
the
other
work
is
so
so
that's
takes
care
of
the
understanding
of
the
basement.
What
is
the
other
addition
that
you're
proposing.
S
So
the
other
addition
is
to
enclose
the
decks
which
appear
to
be
on
the
driveway
side
of
the
building
and
also
expand
the
living
space
on
the
second
and
third
floor
going
towards
the
rear
of
the
property.
However,
those
expansions
on
the
rear
of
the
property
will
not
exceed
the
existing
setbacks,
except
for
the
deck
extensions.
I
believe
there
was
a
comment
earlier
about
some
trees
at
the
rear
of
the
lot.
They
will
not.
A
Hold
up,
can
you
please
stop?
It
looks
like
this
building
is
an
attached
building?
How
will
it
look
from
the
street?
Is
there
a
rendering?
Is
it
going
to
mirror
the
other
side
or
is
it
not.
S
A
Okay
and
then
the
other
question
is
what
will
be
the
sizes
of
each
of
the
units.
S
So,
as
you
can
see
from
this
picture,
the
upper
level,
which
is
shaded
blue,
will
be
built
along
the
interior
shared
lot
line
and
therefore
encroaches
on
the
setback
of
three
feet
by
three
feet:
extending
along
the
existing
non-conformity-
and
that
is
the
only
violation
on
this
property.
A
Okay,
how
was
the
plan
of
miss
barraza.
U
G
V
I'm
just
a
little
confused.
I
met
with
bob
the
other
day.
I
just
found
out
about
the
project,
I'm
directly
behind
him.
I
have
the
garage
I
just
wanted
to
make
it
clear.
I
brought
my
plot
plans
to
bob
that
my
property
plot
plans,
two
of
them
go
back
three
feet
so
as
long
as
he
understands
that
and
there's
he
understands
where
my
property
line
is
so.
A
Hold
on
mr
tardo,
we
are
just
here
to
prove
the
the
or
or
review
the
proposed
additions,
the
decks
any
property
line
issues
you
will
have
to
sort
it
out
in
some
other
format,
because
that
is
not
something
this
board
is
equipped
to
address.
Okay.
We
will
also
encourage
mr,
mr
weisenberger
and
and
his
representative
to
have
a
true
sit
down
with
miss
otardo
and
solve
this.
This
problem,
okay,
and
in
the
meantime,
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
F
A
B
B
N
Hi
this
is
ben
gallagher.
Mark
lacasse
is
my
representing
attorney.
It's
just
on
previously
I'm
the
veteran
resident
of
707
east
4th
street.
It's
a
two
family
building,
I'm
on
the
top
level.
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
sorry
about
that
it
cut
out,
just
as
you
were,
introducing
the
case-
mark
lacasse,
lacasse,
75,
arlington
street
attorney
for
the
homeowners
ben
gallagher
and
caitlin
burke
perfect.
If
we
could
hold
it
at
that
screen
right
there.
P
P
A
A
U
Hi,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
haley
dillon,
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services
like
to
go
record
and
support
for
this
proposal.
We
also
want
to
recognize
that
a
few
hours
ago
we
did
receive
two
letters
of
opposition
just
based
on
the
noise
that
those
decks
create,
but
we
did
have
that
about
his
meeting
back
in
may
and
we
haven't
seen
received
any
complaints
since
then.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
W
Office
the
counselor
sent
in
a
letter
in
opposition
earlier,
and
the
letter
is
as
follows.
Please
know
that
my
neighbors
on
both
east
forestry
and
emerson
s3,
including
our
seniors
and
our
daughters,
who
were
not
able
to
attend
the
virtual
zoo
meeting,
have
contracted
my
office
regarding
their
opposition
to
the
project.
As
a
result,
the
gate
of
heaven,
neighborhood
association,
has
made
their
own
position
known
to
me
as
well.
W
A
W
Well,
I,
that
is
that
I
wouldn't
know
that
this
particular
location
has
been
a
problem
property,
but
it's
just
an
issue
happening
throughout
south
boston
in
general,
and
it
is
a
concern
for
the
councilor
to
have
roof
decks
in
south
boston.
W
A
Thank
you.
Anybody
else.
G
This,
I
do
have
a
raised
hand
caller
11..
G
H
Madam
chair
again,
I'm
here
to
say
that
the
building
is
19.6
feet
wide
and
20
feet
long.
H
A
G
P
P
Madam
chair
and
the
owner
ben
gallagher
is
on
and
may
wish
to
speak
for
himself,
but
ben
and
his
new
wife
caitlin
are
new
purchasers
of
this
property
last
year.
They
have
not
had
any
problems,
they
actually
submitted
a
letter
of
support
from
their
fellow
condo
owners
in
the
unit
below
them.
They
are
looking
forward
to
making
this
their
long-term
home
and
just
would
really
appreciate
the
160
square
foot
of
additional
space.
They
are.
They
are
not
a
problem
property,
they
are
not.
P
They
are
not
adverse
residents
in
the
neighborhood
and
if
ben
would
like
to
chime
in
on
his
own
behalf,.
F
B
The
violations,
article
65
section
9,
insufficient
radioactive
setback,
article
65
section
on
the
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded:
article
65,
section
9
in
suspicion,
usable
open
space,
article
65,
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
job
setback
and
article
65,
section
9,
excessive,
far
name
and
address
for
the
records.
Please.
X
Yes,
madam
chair
members,
chris
drew
rcaalc
the
project,
architects,
I'm
representing.
A
Can
you
hold
on
for
a
minute
there's
some
echo?
Can
you
just
check
if
your
your
systems
are
all
set?
Do
you
have
an
additional
electronic
device
or
anything.
X
So
I'm
representing
the
current
owners,
jim
and
katie
murphy,
their
intention
is
to
expand
their
existing
single-family
house
to
add,
there's
an
attune.
It
was
a
two
and
a
half
story,
building
to
add
a
full
third
third
floor
building.
I'm
sorry
third
floor
addition
for
additional
bedrooms,
as
well
as
a
side
garage
for
storage
and
in
including
additional
living
space
in
the
basement
itself.
X
We
will
end
up
lowering
the
basement
height
about
a
foot
so
that
we
have
a
nice
clear,
eight
foot
ceiling
down
there,
but
their
intention
is
to
enlarge
larger
house
for
their
growing
family
and
stay
in
the
neighborhood
we
did
go.
We
did
have
a
ons
and
buttons.
A
Hold
on
chris
hold
on
tell
us
about
that:
roof
deck.
X
So
it's
a
it's
a
small
roof
deck
on
the
top
floor.
Obviously
it
is
it's
about
16
by
13
access
from
a
roof
hatch
itself,
just
so
for
some
additional
living
space.
As
you
can
see
from
the
existing
plot
plant,
the
lot
itself
is
is
kind
of
tight
to
begin
with,
they
do
have
an
existing
rear
deck
that
is
staying
in
place,
but
ultimately,
that's
really
their
only
kind
of
like
private
outdoor
space.
A
Okay,
I'm
sorry
if
I
missed
it,
but
tell
us
about
the
use
of
in
the
basement
what
is
proposed
in
the
basement.
X
It's
just
gonna
be
a
fam
and
a
family
room,
a
home
office
again
because
of
the
pandemic.
They
found
they're
working
from
home
and
they
realize
that
you
know
working
out
of
the
kids
bedrooms,
isn't
so
effective.
Okay
and
what's
the
floor
to
ceiling
height
down
there.
Apparently
it's
about
six
foot.
Ten.
We
are
going
to
be
lowering
it
to
eight
foot,
zero.
F
X
Do
have
a
letter
of
support
as
well
from
that
butter,
and
he
understands
you
know,
there's
no
windows
or
anything
anything
like
that
in
that
wall.
Q
Z
Thanks
good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
karen
foley
council,
wasabi
george's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
D
Madam
chair,
it's
jeff.
Yes,.
D
I'd
like
to
offer
the
bpda
strong
support
on
this
proposed
project
and
I'm
gonna
switch
hats
and
give
a
personal
support.
The
murphys
and
my
family
are
very
close
friends.
The
kids
play
hockey
together.
This
is
going
to
keep
a
great
family
in
the
neighborhood.
So
I'd
like
to
go
on
record.
My
address
is
15
glide
street
in
dorchester,
and
I
offer
my
full
support
for
them.
A
G
O
O
A
I
two
I'm
in
support,
so
the
motion
carries
hey.
A
Yes,
but
but
jeff
please,
I
know
I
know
you
have
a
personal
interest
in
this.
A
A
You
got
it,
but
you
know
I
I
we
have
to
respect
miss
miss
barraza's
opinion
on
this.
Okay.
AA
AA
Hi
hi,
thank
you.
This
is
this
is
tom.
I
was
just
going
to
clarify
the
proviso
a
little
bit,
so
it's
just
no
second
story
edition
on
the
on
the
left
side,
where
the
side
yard
setback
is.
F
A
Side
yard
setback
not
violated.
Okay.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
have
my
notes
right:
okay,
okay,
so
there's
a
second
i2
in
support.
Some
motion
carries.
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
doa
one
one,
seven
three,
two
3224
169
o
street:
this
is
a
new
decking,
green
roof,
pergola
and
planters
on
existing
roof
deck.
The
violations,
article
68,
section,
29,
root,
structure,
restrictions,
article
68,
section,
8,
front
yards,
insufficient
article
68,
section,
8,
side
yards
insufficient
and
article
68,
section
8.
The
reg
out
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AB
AB
There's
the
proposed
dimension
of
the
roof
deck
itself
right
now
is
a
total
of
2
159
square
feet,
and
what's
proposed
that
that's
well
that
that
is
what's
proposed.
The
the
previous
stack
that
was
in
complete
repair
that
was
removed
because
it
was
becoming
a
hazard,
was
approximately
about
400
square
feet.
A
AB
AB
So
yes,
there's
an
existing
bulkhead
where
you
would
previously
use
that
to
enter
the
previous
roof
deck.
That
was
there
in
existence.
A
Besides
the
roof
structure,
restrictions
and
the
fact
that
this
is
essentially
replacing
a
deck,
is
it
the
pogola
that
sends
it
into
into
into
our
process
here.
AB
So
so
so
I
think
I
think
it's
a
few
things
because
some
of
them
were
you
know
pre-existing,
but
just
for
the
record
too,
madam
chair,
we
went
through
an
extensive
community
process
on
this.
I
just
want.
AB
A
AC
AB
So
so
it's
more
of
like
plantings
and
green,
greener
life,
and
I
believe
that
laura
could
probably
elaborate
a
little
bit
better
on
that
for
us.
AD
Yeah,
if
you
go
to
the
page
with
the
plan,
the
page
before
this,
you
can
see
a
picture
of
what
it
would
look
like.
So
it's
just
a
low
growing
ground
cover.
Okay,.
A
Okay-
and
I
I'm
assuming
yes,
okay,
how
are
the
plans,
mrs
marazza?
The
plans
are
adequate.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?.
U
W
Good
afternoon,
madam
of
the
chair,
members
of
the
board,
anna
caledon
from
councillor
fling's
office,
the
counselor
sent
in
a
letter
in
opposition
earlier,
and
it
reached
a
follow.
The
original
proposal
was
to
include
a
pergola
and
up
implanters
on
the
existing
roof
deck
area.
The
proponent
work
with
neighbors
to
update
the
plants,
removing
the
pergola,
putting
a
proviso
to
run
with
the
property,
as
well
as
pulling
the
project
away
from
the
roofline.
However,
it
is
my
understanding
that
the
neighborhood
association
voted
in
a
close
split
decision.
Regarding
this
matter.
A
Thank
you,
a
quick
comment
from
any
raised
hands.
Miss
ambassador.
G
Okay,
no
luanne
had
her
hand
raised
away.
Can
you
say
your
name
and
I
just
put
a
record
please.
A
Let's,
yes,
can
you
tell
us
briefly
what
your
opposition
is
based
on
anything
that
the
anna
from
the
counselor's
office
has
not
covered
actually.
AE
Madam
chair
city
point
is
supporting
this
project,
with
the
proviso
that
the
pergola
be
removed,
and
that
is
to
go
with
the
property
versus
the
owner,
the
property
owners
having
for
have
worked
with
cpna,
and
they
obtained
a
vote
of
support.
There
were
a
few
abutters
that
were
in
opposition
and
are
still
in
opposition,
so
we
just
kind
of
asked
the
homeowners
to
keep
them
in
mind.
Should
this
be
approved.
AE
B
Great
thank
you
calling
your
next
case
calling
doa
one
one,
seven,
five,
three
one
three
two
to
four
waka
la
street.
I
don't
know
if
I
messed
that
one
up
what
color
this
will
extend
the
first
full
living
space
into
the
basement.
The
violations,
article
50
section
29,
floridia
ratio-
is
excessive
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AF
AF
Is
a
two
family?
We
have
two
floors
on
top
of
ours
that
are
the
second
family.
A
Okay,
so
tell
us
about
the
basement:
tell
us
about
the
floor,
to
ceiling
height
and
give
us
details
about
floor
to
cell
height
and
and
what
would
make
that
basement.
Livable
for
somebody.
AF
Sure
the
ceiling
height
is
seven
foot
from
the
top
of
the
concrete.
That's
there
now
to
the
bottom
of
the
ceiling
joists
of
our
unit.
That's
on
the
first
floor
and
the
sill
height
for
the
large
window.
That's
down.
There
is
39
inches
from
the
top
of
the
floor.
A
So
the
floor-to-cell
height
is
39
inches,
yes
and
so
you're,
having
basically
a
bedroom.
What
does
a
wet
bar
mean?
Is
that
a
kitchen
does
it
have
a
stove
in
there.
AF
It
wouldn't
have
a
stove,
but
we
wanted
to
allow
her
to
have
a
small
sink,
a
plug
where
she
can
plug
in
a
hot
plate
for
tea
and
things
like
that,
a
microwave.
So
she
can,
you
know,
heat
up
food
while
she's
down
there
and
then
a
bedroom
with
a
tv
and
a
bathroom
for
herself
to
use.
AF
We're
we're
unsure
yet
our
family
member
right
now
is
visiting
from
another
country
and
has
a
visa
and
will
be
with
us
for
a
couple
of
months
and
after
that,
we're
hoping
that
one
of
our
mothers,
who's
working
remotely
will
find
out
if
she's
going
to
continue
to
work
remotely
and
they
would
either
be
coming
from
new
york
or
virginia.
A
What
we
want
to
make
sure
is
that
there
is
no
intention
that
this
become
another
unit,
so
the
access
to
this
unit
is
from
the
first
floor
or
the
space
is
from
the
first
floor.
Yes,.
AF
Yeah
they
go
through
my
my
unit
go
downstairs
just
to
be
clear
on
the
record,
madam
chair,
I
don't
intend
on
making
this
a
unit
that
would
then
be
rented
out.
I
know
there's
a
separate
process
for
doing
that.
I'm
not
interested
in
that
right
now.
This
is
just
to
quite
frankly,
help
us
with
our
need
for
child
care
and
do
it
in
a
way
that's
respectful
to
our
family
member.
A
Got
it
ms
baraza?
How
are
the
plans.
F
The
plans
are
okay,
I
would,
I
would
have
loved
to
see
elevations.
I
have
a
question
for
mr
lopez,
which
is
what
is
the
grade?
What
is
the
grade
so,
for
example,
in
that
window?
Well,
how
high
do
you
have
to
climb
up
to
reach
grade
or
what
is
the
height
or
what
is
the
height
from
the
floor
basement
floor
to
the
exterior
grade.
AF
The
height
from
the
so
right
outside
of
that
window,
the
distance
from
that
up
until
the
top
top
of
the
grass,
I
believe,
is
about
15
inches.
However,
we
have
a
sort
of
center
block
thing
that
goes
around
it
and
so
to
the
top
of
the
center
block.
I
believe
it's
20
inches.
F
AG
Adam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
jason
gant
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
just
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project,
and
a
butters
meeting
was
held
on
may
10th,
where
the
applicant
answered
all
questions
and
concerns
from
the
abutters
and
local
civic
association
as
well.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
F
Madam
chair
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
approve
the
project,
would
be
pda,
design,
review.
B
D
B
Of
the
portion
of
bearing
wall
of
an
existing
two-family
dwelling
expansion
of
the
third
floor
attic
living
space
with
a
new
roof
and
dormers
in
an
increase
of
approximately
457
square
feet,
the
violations-
article
65
section
9,
the
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
65
section
in
the
billing
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
65,
section
9
in
the
front
yard's
insufficient
and
article
65,
section
9.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AH
This
family
has
owned
the
property
for
65
years.
They
want
to
enlarge
the
second
floor
up
into
already
existing
attic
space
by
putting
a
a
dormer
on
the
on
the
roof.
The
dormer
is
about
sixty
percent
of
the
roof
area.
AH
By
adding
the
dormer,
it
will
allow
floor
area
that
is
already
there
to
become
accessible
and
that's
only
about
457
square
feet.
So
there
are
no,
as
you
can
see
from
the
plan
here,
the
dormer
is
consistent
with
what
we
see
in
dorchester.
AH
There
is
no
exterior
changes
to
the
building
other
than
the
adding
of
the
dormer.
The
violations.
AI
AH
Q
B
This
is
a
change
of
walk
from
an
existing
carriage
house
into
a
single
family
dwelling
construct
a
new
exterior
stairway,
a
new
second
floor
and
new
roof
structure,
the
violations,
article
65,
section
42.13,
two
or
more
dwellings
on
the
same
lot,
so
article
65,
section
9
lot:
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section,
9,
side
yards
insufficient
and
article
65,
section
9.
The
rear
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
L
I'm
timothy
sheehan,
I'm
the
architect
for
the
project.
I
think
the
proponent
david
higgins
was
supposed
to
be
on.
I
don't
hear
him
so
I
can
fill
in
for
him,
but.
A
L
L
B
A
Okay,
so
we'll
see
you
then
mustachioen
and
mr
higgins,
thank
you
very
much.
B
AK
This
is
a
two-family
dwelling
and
it's
a
unit
on
the
first
floor
and
a
unit
on
the
second
floor.
The
third
floor
currently
has
a
small,
bathroom
and
bedroom.
AK
A
A
J
Is
don
jp
with
some
office
neighborhood
services?
We
would
like
to
go
all
on
record
in
support
of
the
proposal.
There
was
an
abutters
meeting
held
by
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
on
may
5th
2021,
where
butters
and
community
members
filled
support
for
the
proposal
and
believed
it
would
have
a
positive
impact
on
the
neighborhood.
Thank
you.
B
G
Tell
me
one
second
he's
on
he's
having
some
connectivity
issues
david
go
ahead.
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
A
Okay
and
so
seven
feet
finished
and
it
is
a
family
room.
AM
Good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
danielle
fonseca
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
our
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
six
warren.
The
applicant's
notified
butters
on
april
15,
2020
and
our
office
has
received
no
letters
of
opposition
for
this
project.
The
applicants
have
also
lived
at
the
address
for
five
years
and
they're,
just
looking
to
add
additional
space
for
their
growing
family.
We
do
not
believe
that
this
project
will
negatively
impact
the
community
and
we
have
no
further
comments
or
concerns.
Thank
you.
A
B
Thank
you
only
next
case
calling
boa
116
7558
22
cedric
street.
This
is
a
constructed
new
dorm
on
the
right
side
of
the
dwelling,
the
violations
article
55
section
9,
the
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive
in
stories
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AN
The
proposal
is
to
renovate
the
attic
finish,
the
attic
space,
the
third
level
and
half
story
better
yet
and
add
a
dormer
on
the
right
side
of
the
dwelling.
A
AO
A
Sorry,
the
domer
size
and
the
I'm
sorry.
A
Okay,
I
have
two
women's
support.
Some
motion
carries
you're
all
set
with
that
proviso.
AN
G
Very
much
I
just
wanted
to
add
really
quickly
that
11
87
saratoga
is
back
on
under
john
durant.
So
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
wait
till
the
very
end
or.
B
AP
Hi
this
is
louisa
santos
address
is
54
danforth
street,
I'm
the
homeowner.
So
is
this
a
single
family
or
two
family?
It's
a
tiny
single
family
that
I
call
the
birdhouse.
AP
So
I
am
proposing
adding
a
dormer
on
the
bathroom,
as
you
can
see
from
the
first
picture,
it's
got
a
slanted
roof
on
both
sides
and
what
happens
when
I
try
to
brush
my
teeth
or
wash
my
face.
I
hit
the
back
of
my
head,
so
it's
really
just
adding
a
bit
of
ceiling
height.
It
was
rejected
because
of
the
side
yard
and
rare
yard,
which
is
insufficient,
but
which
is
not
going
to
be
impacted
here,
because
I'm
building
up
not
sideways.
A
AO
Good
evening,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
tiffany
gallego
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
my
predecessor
conducted
a
community
process
for
the
proposal
and
the
applicant
received
support
from
the
jpmc.
So
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
A
D
B
I
I
might
have
fell
asleep
for
a
second.
No,
I
didn't
no
calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
nine
three
five.
Fifty
fifty
six
laksa
lockstead
avenue.
B
AQ
AQ
So
I'd
like
to
take
my
so
I
live
on
a
single,
a
single
family-only
street
in
jamaica,
plain,
except
for
my
house
on
to
the
right
of
me,
is
a
commercial
building.
It's
a
facility
for
the
handicapped
and
there's
buses
and
vans
that
go
in
and
out
of
there
on
a
you
know,
basically
constant
basis
with
beeping
and
so
forth.
There's
employees
that
congregate
and
smoke
outside
so
I'd
like
to
extend
my
deck
over
towards
their
property
line
and
put
a
little
fence
up.
So
I
get
a
little
bit
of
privacy
from
them.
A
F
AQ
AO
A
Wait
wait
hold
on,
though,
without
a
side
yard
violation.
It
just
essentially
means
then
that
the
deck
could
not
be
built
in
the
side
yard
right.
F
A
Okay,
I
two
am
in
support,
so
the
motion
carries.
A
So
so
you
came
to
us,
you
asked
us
and
we
just
we
in
our
wisdom,
suggested
that
in
fact,
this
deck
would
be
too
close
to
the
property
line
and
that
you
have
other
options.
So
the
motion
is
for
approval
with
design
review
without
violating
the
side
yard.
That's
correct!
Okay!
So
good
luck
on
that,
may
I
have
the
next
case.
B
Yes,
calling
in
a
case
calling
voa
116
5245
41
to
41a
green
street.
This
is
at
43
green
street
installing
new
deck,
the
violations,
article
55
section,
9,
the
front
yard
setback
is
insufficient
and
article
55
section
9
on
the
side.
Yet
setback
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AR
A
AR
Tell
us
what's
being
proposed,
okay,
so
what
we're
proposing
here
is
so
elizabeth
has
owned
this
property
for
for
a
few
few
decades
now,
and
there
was
once
a
a
roof
deck
on
the
place
in
which
we're
proposing
she
had
to
take
it
down
to
do
roof,
repairs
and
she
is
seeking
to
have
it
reinstated.
AR
The
new
roof
deck
rebuilt
in
the
same
footprint
that
was
previously
in
place
with
a
design
that
marries
aesthetically
with
the
design
vernacular
of
this
house,
and
we
triggered
the
setbacks,
because
this
used
to
be
a
storefront
prior
to
being
a
home,
and
so
the
home
is.
You
know
right
on
the
the
property
line.
A
So
so
this
is
green
street.
So,
okay,
I
just
need
to
take
a
step
back
because
the
address
is
41
to
41
a
green
street
and
you're
proposing
a
new
deck
on
43.
How
does
that
work.
AR
Yeah,
you
know
that's
a
very
good
question,
we're
not
quite
sure
why
it
is
listed
as
as
41
and
41
a,
but
that
is
how
it
is,
is
deeded
and
it's
it's
in
fact
43,
but
that
is
if
you've,
if
you,
it
was
pulled
as
a
41,
40
and
41a,
because
that
is
how
it's
listed
under
the
the
property.
AR
AR
It
is
it
intersects
with,
is
it
rock
rockview.
A
Rockview
right,
okay,
I
always
thought
that
was
an
interesting
house
with
those
the
side
side.
I
don't
know
what
they
called
eyebrow
windows
or
something.
Okay.
How
are
the
plans
miss
baraza?
I'm
sure
the
plans
are
adequate.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?
Good.
AO
Evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
tiffany
caballero
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
this
proposal
has
undergone
its
community
process
where
it
receives
support
from
the
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood,
council
and
director
butters.
So
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
A
Okay,
itunes
support
so
you're
you're
all
set
with
that
proviso.
Wonderful.
B
B
C
F
Very
it's
a
it's!
A
very
modest,
build
out.
A
Okay,
can
we
get
mr
foley
in.
G
B
AS
AS
What's
being
proposed
is
an
existing
single
family
house
with
a
sun
porch
on
that's
existing
on
the
side,
there's
a
a
second
floor
deck,
that's
existing
that
doesn't
really
get
used
by
family,
with
two
young
daughters,
casey
and
dan
miller.
The
owners
they've
been
there
for
several
years
now,
and
what
they'd
like
to
do
is
get
a
little
more
room
in
their
house
for
a
master
bathroom,
there's
no
room
on
the
second
floor
there
for
an
additional
bathroom.
They
need
it
with
the
family.
AS
So
what
we're
proposing
here
is
a
simple
nine
by.
I
think
it's
about
12
or
13
feet
addition
above
this
existing
sunroom.
So
there's
no
additional
change
in
there's
no
change
in
the
footprint
of
the
building
and
all
we're
looking
to
do.
AS
Yeah,
certainly
it's
the
side.
Yard
requirement
is
10
feet
and
what's
there
right
now
is
8
foot,
six
and
three
quarters
so
we're
not
making
that
any
worse.
We're
extending
a
non-conformity,
though,.
A
AJ
AS
B
B
Yes,
can
you
hear
me
all
right?
Let
me
just
let
me
sir,
let
me
just
call
it
back
and
for
the
record
calling
boa
one
one:
eight
four,
six,
five,
two
four
cuthberth
road
just
to
construct
the
14
by
20
family
room
edition
of
the
rare
four
cupboards
the
violations,
article
56
section
8,
the
radioactive
setback
pack
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please,
yes,.
A
AJ
Good
evening,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
duggan
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I
go
on
record
support.
The
applicant
went
before
the
west
rocks
neighborhood
council
on
may
25th
and
receive
their
full
support.
In
addition,
he
has
support
from
the
immediate
abutter
in
the
rear.
Thank
you.
B
Follow
your
next
case
calling
voa
118
3614
61
oakland
street.
This
is
a
dormer
on
both
sides
at
half
of
the
house
in
the
attic
edition
two
bedrooms,
one
bath
and
a
staircase,
going
up
to
the
second
floor.
The
violations,
article
51
section
9
billing-
has
successful
stories
and
article
51
section
9
in
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and.
AJ
AI
G
M
Yes,
thank
you,
madam
thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
board.
My
name
is
kevin
d.
I'm
the
owner
at
61,
oakland
street,.
M
This
is
an
existing
two
family
up
and
down.
Both
units
are
two
bed
one
bathroom.
M
A
Okay
and
let's
see,
tell
us
about
the
side
yard
on
that
side,
what
is
what
do
you
have
and
what's
proposed.
M
So
after
getting
the
initial
refusal,
I
had
my
architect
redesign
the
layout
so
that
it's
only
dormering
on
one
side
of
the
house.
So
that
would
be
the
right
right
side
facing
the
front.
So
there
would
be
no
side
yard
setback.
A
Q
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
and
neighborhood
services,
local
records
supported
this
proposal.
The
mayor's
office
conducting
a
butters
meeting
on
may
4th
butters
were
pleased
to
see
a
family
moving
into
the
neighborhood
and
that
there
would
be
owner
occupied.
Q
On
the
second
floor,
there
was
some
concerns
about
possibility
weekend
work,
so
we
just
asked
that
the
applicant
worked
with
residents
to
make
sure
that
he's
informing
them
of
construction
plans
and
being
respectful
on
the
weekends
and
furthermore,
they
went
on
to
the
bright
nelson
improvement
association
received
full
support
from
them
as
well.
Thank
you.
U
G
F
Madam
chair
I'd
like
to
put
forward
a
motion
of
approval
with
the
pda
design
review,
taking
special
attention
to
the
size
of
the
dormer.
AA
B
AA
B
You
on
the
next
case
calling
boa
119
7685
111
arlington
street.
This
is
an
addition
to
the
rail
of
the
house,
a
new
master,
suite
kitchen
and
new
roof
siding
the
violation
is
article
51,
section,
9
side
yards
insufficient
and
article
51,
section
9.
The
rare
yacht
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AI
We're
proposing
to
add
a
two-story
addition
off
the
back.
The
first
floor
would
be
a
new
kitchen,
and
our
existing
kitchen
would
become
a
play
room
for
our
three
children,
and
the
second
floor
would
be
a
master
bedroom
and
bathroom
again,
just
to
give
an
extra
bedroom
give
you
breathing
space
got
it.
A
Miss
madam
chair,
the
plans
are
adequate.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal?.
Q
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
mayor's
office
like
to
offer
its
full
support.
This
is
an
opportunity
to
keep
a
family
in
the
area
and
as
well
as
an
owner-occupied
household,
we
had
the
applicant
flyer,
the
neighborhood,
and
we
received
multiple
letters
of
support.
Indication
from
state
rep,
kevin
holden's
office
that
they
were
in
support
and
also
the
applicant
went
on
to
the
brighton
austin
improvement
association,
received
their
full
support
as
well.
Thank
you.
U
G
Madam
chair
of
the
philip,
had
his
hand
raised
for
the
previous
case,
but
he's
all
set
so
that
I
have
no
additional
hands
raised.
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
B
A
B
B
Calling
the
last
case
of
the
night
calling
boa
one
one,
four
one:
seven,
eight
eight
eleven,
eighty
seven
saratoga
street.
This
is
the
correct
existing
code,
violation
of
a
basement
unit
by
remove
by
removing
the
basement
kitchen
and
door
unit
in
separation
between
unit
1
and
basement,
and
then
extend
living
space
into
the
basement
area
from
unit
1
to
connect
directly
into
the
first
floor
unit
and
remove
this
rear
second
floor
interior
stairs
and
construct
a
new
exterior
stair
from
the
existing
rear
ports.
AT
AT
I'm
the
general
contractor,
I'm
the
young
contractor
of
the
property
right
now
I'll
be
trying
just
to
make
the
basement
part
of
the
living
space
in
the
first
floor.
So
it's
an
omni
occupy
in
the
first
floor,
we're
just
trying
to
remove
the
kitchen,
as
the
gentleman
said
before.
So
we
just
try
to
add
a
little
bit
more
space
for
a
growing
family.
A
It's
an
existing
two
family,
okay,
and
so,
with
this
plan
that
I
have
up,
do
you
have
any
bedrooms
proposed
in
the
basement.
AT
AT
AT
Is
over
seven
feet
high
in
the
basement
is,
I
think
it's
over
50
on
the
ground,
less
than
50
of
them.
A
Okay,
miss
perez.
I
need
your
help
on
that
on
this
one.
F
I'm
sorry,
can
you
can
you
repeat
again,
what
is
the
bedroom
window
height
to
the
cell.
F
And
what's
the
weight
of
the
exterior
grade
from
the
interior
along
the
bedroom
wall.
AT
I'm
not
quite
sure
with
the
dimensions,
that's
what
I
know.
I
don't
need
the
current
code.
We
don't
need
to
do
a
big
hole
for
the
well.
F
AT
AT
It
will
be
removed,
that's
part
of
the
proposal,
because
it's
not
gonna
be
any
kitchen
in
the
basement.
Just
the
two
bedrooms
are
living
room.
You
know
you,
our
existing
bible.
A
Okay,
and
where
is
this
project,
this
is
in
east
boston.
You
know
that
yes,
but-
and
you
know
that
no
more
than
four
unrelated
individuals
can
live
in
this
space.
So
unless
you
yes.
AT
I
know
it
is
currently
a
family
is
mr
chair
chairman,
mr
cherpa.
I
know
his
wife
a
couple
of
his
kids
and
I
think,
he's
smaller
modern
love.
It's
just
related
everybody's
related,
okay,.
A
Okay,
I
miss
and
the
floor
to
ceiling
height,
you
said
was
seven
foot
plus,
but
you
don't.
AT
Is
just
in
the
back,
which
is
basically
taking
that
living
room
and
the
mechanical
rule
which
is
separated
from
there.
AT
Basically,
the
front
bedroom
is
going
to
be
more
high
to
the
middle
bedroom.
The
more
on
the
ground
level
is
going
to
be
the
mechanical
which
is
not
living
space.
Okay,.
Q
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
infant
services,
my
counterpart
conducted
in
a
butters
meeting
on
february,
4th
21,
and
they
received
support
from
the
orient
heights
neighborhood
council
as
well.
I
think
this
is
an
opportunity
to
keep
a
family
in
the
boston
area.
Thank
you.
B
Madam
chair
secretary,
here
we
have
one
letter
of
support
from
the
sorry
laureen
heights
neighborhood
council,
but
we
also
have
four
letters
of
opposition
in
regards
to
being
a
legal
basement
and
their
concerns
that
the
people
that
are
living
there
are
not
realistic.
A
Will
get
the
community
to
a
better
point?
Okay,
anybody
else,
miss
ambassador.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
F
A
I
two
I'm
in
support,
so
you
are
approved
for
the
proposal,
but
just
make
sure
that
you
meet
all
building
code
requirements.
Okay,
correct.
AC
A
Okay,
so
the
meeting
is
now
with
joan
that
was
the
last
project.
Thank
you,
everybody
and
mr
fortune
and
miss
barraza,
see
you
on
tuesday.