►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 7-27-21
Description
Zoning Board of Appeal Hearings 7-27-21
A
The
city
of
boston,
zoning
vote
of
appeal
hearing
for
july
27th
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
provisions
of
an
act
extending
certain
covert
19
measures
adopted
during
the
state
of
emergency
that
was
signed
by
governor
baker
on
june
16
2021.
A
A
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unneeded.
When
asked
to
comment,
as
with
our
in-person
meetings,
comments
and
support
will
be
followed
by
comments
and
opposition.
A
A
To
raise
your
hand,
click
the
participant
information
icon
from
there
find
your
name
and
on
the
lower
right
hand,
side,
you
should
see
a
hand
raising
icon
click,
that
icon
and
your
hand
will
be
virtually
erased.
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down
if
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone.
A
Please
press
start
three
to
raise
your
head.
Let
me
repeat
that
again:
if
you're
connected
by
telephone,
please
press
star
three
to
raise
your
hand,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
Please
raise
your
hand
as
soon
as
mr
fortune
reads.
A
The
address
into
the
record
do
not
raise
your
hand
before
the
relevant
address
is
called
all
the
meeting
hosts
will
not
know
to
call
on
you
at
the
appropriate
time.
So
just
a
reminder,
please
raise
your
hand
exactly
when
the
address
is
called
and
please
lower
it
when
you're
done
putting
your
name
and
address
and
putting
any
information
on
the
record.
A
A
Good
morning,
so
let
me
remind
all
board
members,
please,
when
you
make
a
motion,
put
your
name
on
the
record,
if
you
second
emotion,
put
your
name
on
the
record,
if
you
are
opposed
to
a
motion,
also
put
your
name
on
the
record.
Okay,
this
is
just
so
that
we
are
meeting.
We
are
meeting
open,
meeting
law
requirements.
E
E
A
E
F
E
G
G
The
board
had
granted
a
variance
to
erect
a
six-unit
dwelling.
The
we
anticipate
that
the
permits
for
this
should
be
pulled
no
later
than
the
end
of
the
year,
so
we're
just
asking
for
a
one-year
extension
so
that
we
are
able
to
finish
the
construction
drawings
and
get
those
uploaded
to
inspectional
services.
E
A
I
E
H
E
K
J
Yes,
this
this
project
is
part
of
the
indigo
block
project,
which
is
one
of
six
buildings,
the
prior
to
extensions.
We
were
waiting
for
finance
and
on
an
affordable
housing
unit
project.
We
actually
closed
on
that
in
around
september
of
2020
and
started
construction
in,
I
think
I
believe
was
november
2020.
J
L
E
E
E
A
E
All
right
so,
madam
chair,
this
is
what
I'm
going
to
do
for
styling
and
toucan.
I'm
going
to
call
all
the
styling
voa
number
from
the
beginning
to
the
end
and
then
I'll
go
to
two
cans,
and
then
we
can
go
for
from
there.
So
calling
your
next
case
is
calling
doa,
942,
7902
styling
street
to
boa
942
815
17
starling
street,
which
is
16
cases
and
then
go
to
voa
942
816
to
phuket
road
to
in
case
voa
942-2825-14210
road,
which
is
17,
which
is
seven
cases
name
and
address
for
the
record.
E
E
E
M
E
N
Good
morning,
madam
chairman
and
members
of
the
board,
this
is
homeowner
james
sigmont
for
53
tindale
street
420.
In
roslindale,
we
filed
an
application
for
a
building
permit
in
december
to
convert
our
one
car
garage
to
an
artist
studio.
We
received
approvals
from
the
zoning
board
in
the
planning
department,
after
which
inspectional
services
directed
that
would
change.
N
The
project
address
is
presented
on
the
architectural
plans
from
53
to
53
r
tyndale
street,
given
that
the
project
involves
an
accessory
building,
the
zoning
board
directed
us
to
issue
a
written
request
to
the
board
final
arbiter
for
a
change
for
a
change
of
address
which
we
did
and
to
attend.
Today's
hearing
for
the
purpose
of
receiving
formal
approval
for
an
address
change
to
our
project.
E
P
Tim
johnson,
architect,
599,
east
broadway,
boston
massachusetts.
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
This
project
was
originally
presented
to
the
subcommittee
on
november
19
2020..
Among
other
variances.
A
change
of
use
was
granted
from
a
one
family
to
a
two
family
in
this
one
f-7000
zoning
sub-district.
P
Q
E
A
E
Okay
for
the
record
calling
case,
voa,
942,
7902
starling
street
to
boa
942
815
17
styling
street,
which
is
16
cases
and
boa
942
816
to
toucan
road
to
boa
942,
825,
14,
toucan
road,
seven
cases
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
all
the
first.
This
will
be
their
first
extension.
All
the
decisions
will
expire
on
august
12th
of
2001.
name
and
address
for
the
record
clip.
R
Great
thank
you
so
chris
tracy
from
o'neill
and
associates
with
a
business
address
of
18
tremont
street
in
boston,
we're
here
respectfully
seeking
an
extension
on
the
29
homes
subdivision
being
built
by
cad
builders
in
west
roxbury
and
that's
starling,
toucan
road.
So
there's
29
homes,
23
needed
zva
relief,
we're
doing
two
idp
standalone
homes
on
the
site.
This
was
supported
by
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
and.
A
C
E
Q
E
U
E
R
E
Y
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
matt
eckel,
with
gregor
scano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
on
behalf
of
14
skylar
street.
We
are
requesting
a
deferral.
This
morning
we
met
with
the
community
association.
Approximately
two
weeks
ago.
We
made
some
final
changes
and
submitted
those
plans
to
isd.
However,
they
have
not
been
finally
reviewed,
yet,
of
course,
you
can
get
deferral.
Z
AA
P
Z
P
A
AB
AB
A
S
AB
E
E
E
G
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
laurence
cattino
from
richard
lindsay's
office,
2
245,
sumner
street
in
east
boston,
we're
here
today.
I'm
requesting
relief
to
erect
a
rare
roof
deck.
If
you
can
just
scroll
down
a
little
bit
more
you'll
see
what
I'm
talking
about
the
roof.
Deck
is
not
set
to
be
on
the
top
most
portion
of
the
building.
It
would
be
on
the
level
that
the
third
unit
comes
directly
out
of
so
essentially
a
rare
debt.
G
G
G
C
G
A
A
AC
AC
AD
AE
A
E
Follow
your
next
case
calling
voa
117-1725-25
isabella
street.
This
is
a
converted
existing
church
to
26
unit
residential
bill,
the
violations
article
32,
section
4.
This
is
because
applicability,
article
63
section
8,
the
border
area.
Florida
area
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
63,
section
8,
the
height,
is
excessive.
E
Three
stories:
maximum
allowed
article
63
section
8,
the
height
is
excessive
35
feet
maximum
lob
article
63,
section
8
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
63,
section
8,
the
rare
yard
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
63
section
20
respect
to
restricted
district
article
63
section
24.
Our
street
parking
is
insufficient.
E
AF
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
mr
secretary
attorney
joe
hanley,
mcdermott,
quilty
miller,
28
state
street
in
boston
here
on
behalf
of
the
proponent,
whose
principal
is
also
with
us
at
doherty.
Also
with
me,
is
the
project
architect
rebecca
berry
from
feingold
art
and
associates,
michael
d'alexander,
architects.
AF
T
AF
AF
It
was
built
as
a
church
back
in
the
late
1800s
for
our
lady
of
victories
parish,
and
it
occupies
essentially
most,
if
not
all,
of
the
lot,
which
is
a
14,
536
square
foot
structure
that
exists
today.
You
have
in
your
packet
a
survey
that
shows
this
asymmetrical
shaped
property
as
well
as
renderings
of
the
existing
site.
The
maris
and
the
parish
has
long
since
vacated.
AF
AF
Yes,
so
the
the
idea,
the
concept
is
for
a
residential
conversion
of
the
building
to
residential
home
ownership.
Madam
chair
and
the
reason
the
project
was
changed
from
26
to
18
units
was
part
of
the
community
outreach
and
also
what
we've
heard
from
this
board
on
other
projects,
and
that
is
to
provide
large
family-sized
units
in
the
downtown
area
and
also
deliver
affordability.
So
of
the
18
units.
Madam
chair,
that
are
proposed.
AF
AF
N
AF
Yep,
so
the
envelope,
obviously,
when
you
change
the
density
right,
the
parking
requirement,
as
well
as
the
floor
area
ratio
or
the
the
percentage
per
unit
for
open
space
change
and
you'll
see
on
the
zoning
regulations
chart.
If
I
could
speak
to
that,
so
minimum
useful,
open
space,
which
would
be
required
under
the
code
is,
is
3
900,
which
is
150
square
feet
per
dwelling
unit.
AF
We
have
1922
and
we're
accomplishing
that
by
the
private
small
roof
deck
areas,
as
you've
noted
before
madam
chair
to
give
these
residences
the
ability
to
have
open
space
and
not
be
confined
into
small
units.
That's
also
a
common
characteristic
throughout
the
district
for
roof
terraces
and
private
roof
decks
so
that
open
space
requirement
obviously
was
reduced
by
virtue
of
150
per
unit.
The
parking
we
are
proposing,
18
parking
spaces,
which
is
the
code,
requires
0.7.
AG
A
S
AF
AF
What
you're
getting
is
an
addition
of
sixteen
thousand
three
three
hundredths
gross
square
feet
onto
the
main
church
structure,
which
is,
as
I
indicated,
14
536,
so
that
gets
repurposed
internally
and
then
the
addition
puts
the
total
building
madam
chair
at
39
785
square
feet
and
because
it
is
located
on
a
lot
that
is
essentially
takes.
You
know,
the
existing
building
footprint
is
essentially
the
entire
lot.
We
need
far
relief
and
there
are
a
series
of
setbacks
that
relate
to
the
existing
non-conformity
of
the
building.
AF
O
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
AH
Does
that
answer
your
questions
regarding
access,
big
rock,
okay,
excellent?
Thank
you
so
to
move
on
to
second
question
had
to
do
with
sustainability
and
our
approach
to
that
for
the
project.
So
two
very
important
things
to
note
this
is
an
all-electric
building.
We
are
planning
on
a
heat
pump
system
for
hvac
provision.
AH
We
are
also
looking
at
achieving
better
than
code
as
far
as
the
envelope,
which
is,
we
will
note
rather
tricky
in
the
existing
building,
because
we
have
an
existing
mass
masonry
building
and
one
has
to
approach
that
very
carefully
in
terms
of
insulating
the
wall.
So
we
are
in
the
midst
of
finalizing
that
approach.
AH
We
are
in
consultation
with
groups
such
as
simpson
gumpertson
hager
to
ensure
that
the
building
is
treated
properly
for
this,
and
so
that
we
can
ensure
that
the
existing
masonry-
you
know
the
restoration
of
that
will
be
appropriate,
in
other
words,
and
then
all
of
the
new
envelope.
As
noted,
we
are
planning
to
insulate
you
better
than
code
and
we're
in
the
midst
of
finalizing
all
of
our
calculations.
For
that
now,
under
the
new
iecc
2018
code
and.
A
Z
AH
A
AH
Oh
certainly,
yes,
so
all
of
the
existing
masonry
will
be
completely
cleaned
and
restored.
All
of
the
existing
windows
are
being
replaced,
however,
they're
replicating
historic
mullion
patterns,
which
can
be
actually
quite
elaborate,
particularly
facing
isabella
street.
So
we
are
planning
to
install
you
know
monumental
aluminum-clad,
wood
windows
that
mimic
the
existing
patterns.
Again,
this
project
has
been
reviewed
a
couple
of
times
with
landmarks
and,
of
course,
we
will
be
proceeding
with
them.
Following
this
hearing.
A
You
know
the
only
model
I
have
that
looks
something
like
this
is
the
rehab
in
the
south
end,
and
I
thought
it
took
a
very
handsome
building
on
the
rear
of
the
building
and
kind
of
remodeled
it,
and
so
I'm
hoping
that
this
will
really
be
supportive
of
the
neighborhood
which
looks
like
it's.
You
know
primarily
brick
and
you
know,
will
support
it
in
that
way.
AI
Oh
yes,
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
kim
crusoe
from
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
The
pda
did
an
extensive
community
outreach
for
this
and
they
received
support
from
the
inventors
and
from
the
bay
village
chambers
association.
Thank
you.
AJ
Good
morning
modern
pleasure
members
of
the
war
anna
calderon
from
capitola
philly's
office,
the
councillor
provided
a
support
letter
on
this
proposal.
The
council
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
based
on
a
talk
throughout
community
process
and
the
proponent
working
closely
with
the
bay
village
neighborhood
association
in
english,
on
toefl
modifications
to
the
project
based
off
their
feedback.
As
a
result,
the
cv
group
required
no
concerns
with
the
proposal.
Thank
you.
U
AC
W
Good
morning
sarah
earlie
54
piedmont
street
in
boston,
I'm
the
co-chair
of
the
planning
committee
for
the
bay
village,
neighborhood
association.
You
received
our
letter
on
this
project.
The
neighborhood
association
voted
to
strongly
support
this
project.
This
is
the
third
developer
we
work
with.
We
believe
that
this
developer
was
very
sensitive
to
the
concerns
raised
by
the
neighbors.
We
actually
feel
very
strongly
that
the
issue
you
address
with
the
lucas
building
in
the
south
end
is
something
that's
been
avoided
here.
W
There
are
significant
setbacks
and
the
kind
of
the
former
impact
of
the
church
structure
itself
really
feels
to
us.
What
is
what's
going
to
be
left
of
this
project
when
it
is
done
again,
we
appreciate
that
this
developer
is
going
to
be
transforming
what
is
currently
an
abandoned
and
decaying
building
into
a
place
for
new
residents,
and
we
welcome
the
additions.
AC
AC
AK
AK
Thank
you
very
much,
madam
chair.
My
name
is
william
bernard
gucci.
My
address
is
136
arlington
street,
I'm
a
resident
of
bay
village
in
boston.
I
am
in
a
butter
to
the
project.
The
proposed
project
is,
is
to
be
built
in
a
boston,
historic
district.
It
takes
an
existing
peaked
roof
church
and
creates
an
eight-story
box-like
condominium.
AK
It
violates
the
bay
village,
historic
district
voting
violations
that
were
imposed
to
protect
against
excessive
developments
with
height
and
density
violations.
It
detracts
from
the
design
and
scale
of
the
bay
village,
historic
district.
It
causes
detrimental
and
it
will
cause
improve
detrimental
traffic
density
parking,
light
blue
sky
impacts,
as
in
a
butter
that
is
across
the
street
project.
Our
views
of
the
city,
which
you
know
from
our
building
will
be
negatively
and
detrimentally
impacted.
AK
A
A
A
E
Z
E
You,
madam
chair,
calling
your
next
case
calling
doa
one
two:
zero:
seven,
four,
seven:
zero
603
massachusetts
avenue.
This
is
a
change
of
lock
from
office
to
one
retail
and
three
residential
units
to
one
office
and
four
residential
units.
The
violations,
article
50
section
43
austrian
parking-
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
G
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
lauren
scitino
from
richard
lindsay's
office,
with
the
business
address
of
245
sumner
street
in
east
boston.
Also
with
me
on,
the
call
are
the
two
corners
of
the
building
to
reek,
siam
and
anthony
rossi.
As
you
can
see,
this
is
a
pre-existing
building
at
603
mass
ave.
It's
actually
a
corner
lot.
G
That's
been
recently
rehabbed
to
fit
with
the
more
historic
nature
of
the
area,
and
today
we're
just
seeking
to
change
the
office
to
change
the
occupancy
from
one
office,
one
retail
in
three
units
to
one
office
with
four
residential
units.
The
resident
the
new
residential
unit
would
actually
be
at
the
ground
level
where
the
retail
unit
was.
It
would
be
a
three
bedroom
unit,
just
about
1200
square
feet
and
our
only
violation
is
for
off
street
parking.
We
would
be
required
one
parking
space
for
the
additional
unit.
A
AI
Good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
kim
crusade
from
neighbor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal
and
a
butters
meeting
was
held
by
our
office
on
may
12th
and
no
opposition
was
shown.
They
also
met
with
the
chester
square
neighborhood
association
and
they
did
not
host
the.
E
Calling
your
next
case
calling
voa
four
seventy
hobbit
street.
This
is
constructing
two-story
wood
frame
of
two
thousand
eighty
eight
square
feet:
four
family
dwelling
on
a
70,
800
square
foot;
lot
the
violations,
article
60
section,
11,
a
multi-family
residential
as
conditional
use
in
an
enterprise
protection,
subdistrict
name
and
address
for
the
record.
AL
Sorry,
pardon
me
I
I'm
five
feet
away
from
my
computer
good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
john
lyden.
My
office
address
is
512
gallon
boulevard,
suite
205
in
dorchester
massachusetts;
zero,
two
one,
two
four,
the
proposed
project
before
you
is
a
four
unit.
Four
unit
structure,
comprised
of
two
one
bedrooms
and
two
studio
apartment
dwelling
units.
A
AL
The
that
agreement
necessitates
the
certain
percentage
of
the
development
on
site
be
reserved
for
mental
health,
well,
state
health
issues.
These
units
are
to
be
designated
at
sixty
percent
they're
100,
affordable
at
sixty
percent
of
their
immediate
income
and
they're
designated
for
patients
that
are
identified
by
the
massachusetts
department
of
mental
health
and
that.
A
O
C
A
N
AM
Members
of
the
board
don't
take
people
here
from
the
marathon
input
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
support
of
the
proposal.
A
community
meeting
was
held
on
june
15th
2021,
where
questions
were
addressed.
Questions
concerns
were
addressed
by
the
applicant
and
we
would
like
to
go
on
recommended
report
again
for
the
reason
or
on
affordable
housing
being
available
to
the
affordable
units
being
available
to
the
community.
Thank
you.
A
E
Madam
chair,
I
don't
know
how
we
want
to
handle
this
because,
from
the
next
nine
cases,
they're
different
addresses,
they
have
different
violations,
but
the
purpose
is
pretty
much
the
same.
So
what
I'd
like
to
do
is
maybe
call
the
first
three
ballon
rossiter
and
then
some
photos
I
can
call
after,
if
you'd
like
to
do
it
that
way.
E
AG
E
Okay,
we
can
do
that
by
calling
the
first
case
calling
boa
116
6821
27
malin
road.
This
is
sub
divide.
The
lot
into
two
lots:
direct
new
semi-attached
single
family
dwelling,
townhouse
style
and
propose
one
off
street
barking.
The
violations
article
65
69,
the
lard
area-
is
insufficient.
Article
6569,
the
lock
width-
is
insufficient.
E
AG
AG
A
A
AF
A
A
X
Okay,
I'm
directly
across
the
street.
My
number
one
concern
is
about
10
years
ago.
The
city
promised
the
residents
that
when
they
got
ready
to
sell
this
lot,
they
would
come
to
the
residence
I
had.
My
residents
take
home
buying
courses.
They
took
all
the
courses
that
were
necessary
and
10
years
later
it
was
not.
We
were
not
provided
a
chance
to
buy
the
lot.
As
you
can
see,
it
is
not
even
ready
to
be
for
homes
to
be
built
on.
X
X
A
AM
I
apologize
I'm
donating
people
from
the
mayor's
office
services
again.
The
proposal
was
supported
by
mount
bouldin
betterment
association
with
multiple
meetings,
community
meetings
and
the
department
of
neighborhood
development
has
been
able
to
discuss
with
them
parking
on
issues,
density
issues
and
they've
been
addressed
on
me
paul.
Thank
you.
AN
AN
Madam
chairman
of
the
board
dustin
gardner
behind
the
city
council,
andre
campbell's
office,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support,
but
also
but
take
into
consideration
ms
patterson's
concerns
and
that
the
development
team
would
really
help
local
residents
find
a
pathway
to
ownership.
This
home.
E
A
A
O
Madam
chair,
is
it
okay?
If
I
ask
a
question
to
the
applicant
since
we're
going
to
see
a
couple
of
very
similar
projects,
this
is
for
the
applicant
are
any
of
the
proposed
units
that
we're
going
to
see?
Are
they
accessible
or
are
they
all
you
know?
Are
they
all
inaccessible,
the
ones
that
we're
going
to
sit
before
us.
AO
AO
E
Following
your
next
two
cases,
calling
doa
one
one,
six,
six,
eight
one,
seven
one,
fifty
four
ross
to
the
street
there's
a
companion
case,
voa
one
one,
six,
six,
eight
one:
six,
twenty
nine
ross
of
the
street.
This
is
for
one.
Fifty
four
rectangle,
two,
a
new
detached
two-family
residential
dwelling,
proposed
one
off
three
parking.
E
That's
the
same
preference
on
the
next
case
as
well.
The
violations
are
different,
though
so
this
is
for
154.
The
violations
of
article
10,
section
1,
the
limitation
of
the
area
of
accessory
uses,
article
65,
section
41.
Oscar
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
41,
possibly
parking
design
and
maneuverability
tandem
parking.
Article
65,
section,
9
side
yards
insufficient
article
65,
section,
9
blog
area
is
insufficient.
Article
6569
walk
with
is
insufficient.
E
E
The
violation
is
different
in
article
65,
section
41.,
obviously
parking
insufficient
article
65,
section
21
costume
packing
design,
maneuverability
tandem,
fogging
article
65,
section
9
log
area
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
9.,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AG
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
again,
my
name
is
ralph
parent,
15,
green
knox,
street
and
dorchester.
I
have
with
me
today
my
architect,
rashmi
ramaswani,
I'm
a
partners
and
I've
been
designated
by
the
department
of
neighborhood
development
to
develop
new
construction,
affordable
homes.
That's
currently
on
their
foreclosed
land.
These
vacant
lots
were
these
vacant
infield
a
lot
once
at
home
that
were
demolished.
A
AG
AA
A
Q
AO
AO
A
AO
AO
I
know
john
farbach
is
on
this
call
and
perhaps
can
respond
to
the
thinking
about
accessibility,
but
the
parameters
that
were
given
to
us
did
not
include
accessibility.
These
are
three
feet:
two
and
a
half
to
three
feet
above
grade.
So
that's
where
the
first
floor
is
so
innately.
Making
them
accessible
is
not
part
of
the
requirements.
In
fact,
we
have
been
required
to
locate
the
first
floor
three
feet
of
upgrade
so
so.
O
Thank
that's.
That's
why
I
put
a
a
little
special
attention,
because
the
intention
is
that
these
are
one-off,
but
because
we're
seeing
like
three
projects
from
the
same
developer,
there
needs
to
be
special
care
that
in
the
offering
to
the
community,
there's
some
consideration
that
one
of
these
three
should
be
accessible.
Dnd
does
have
a
very
good
requirement,
almost
like
20
percent
of
accessible
when
there
are
larger
scale
projects.
A
AM
The
morning
medical
members
of
the
board,
don't
take
people
here
and
then
often
people
like
their
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services,
I'll
move,
like
normally
in
support
of
the
proposal.
Again,
the
african-american,
as
well
as
the
department
of
neighborhood
development,
has
been
in
touch
with
community
to
register
any
concerns.
AQ
AQ
Yeah,
can
you
hear
me
I
don't
chair?
Yes,
please
go
ahead,
yeah
great!
Thank
you,
john
foyerbach
senior
development
officer
at
department
of
neighborhood
development.
I
echo
some
of
the
comments
said
that
it's
d
d
involved
dnd
land
and
an
extensive
with
the
indian
community
process
from
the
start,
where
we
identified.
AQ
E
This
is
subdivided
locked
into
two
lots
of
semi
attached
single
family
dwelling
proposed
one
off
street
barking:
the
violations,
article
10
section
1,
the
limitation
of
area
of
accessory
uses
article
65,
section
9.
The
laundry
is
insufficient
article
65,
section,
9,
lock
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section,
9.
block
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65
69
deployed
air
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
6569
in
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
AR
E
Is
erected
single-family
residential
dwelling
proposed
one-off
street
blocking
the
violations
article
65
section
9,
the
large
frontage
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
20
mile
vote.
Subdivide
bought
into
two
lots
and
record
semi-attacks
single
family
dwelling
proposed
one
off
street
parking.
The
violation
out
of
the
65
section,
41
rsp
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
65
69,
the
floridian
ratio,
is
excessive.
Article
65,
section
9
line
areas
into
fit
lot
area
is
insufficient.
E
Article
65
section,
9,
lock
width
is
insufficient
and
article
65
69
lot.
Frontage
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
for
18
months
both
terrorists.
It
is
the
subdivide
lot
into
two
laws
and
direct
to
semi-attack.
Single-Family
dwelling
proposed
one
off-street.
Five.
The
same
violation
are
for
20
up
for
18
as
well,
so
enough
to
call
that
one
in
for
39
mount
vote.
Instead
of
subdivided.
E
Two
large
directors,
semi-attacked
single-family
dwelling
town
style,
proposed
one
off
three:
five,
the
violation
article
10
section,
one,
the
limitation
of
area
of
excessive
uses,
article
65
section
9
lottery-
is
sufficient
article
65
section
9
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65
69
large
frontage
is
insufficient.
AS
AG
AG
These
properties
again
are
part
of
the
dnd
nhi
program
we've
discussed
in
the
previous
two
cases.
They
seem
to
have
the
same
relief
issues
in
addition,
accessibility
issues,
as
the
previous
matter
changes
there.
Any
specific
questions
that
you
would
have
relating
to
these
that
we
have
not
discussed
on
the
prior
two
cases.
A
AO
So
this
is
the
architect
rashmi
ramaswamy,
studio,
113
hampshire
street
cambridge
mass
zero,
two
one,
three
nine.
So
in
response
to
that
question,
it's
a
really
good
question
and
the
the
articulation
of
this
building.
You
know
you
can
see
in
the
floor
plan
how
there
are
these
various
bay
windows
that
jet
out
are
identical
to
the
other
buildings
along
that
street.
Although
this
is
a
town
home
in,
in
essence,
it
looks
virtually
the
same
as
other
homes
in
the
street.
So
that's.
AO
The
first
thing
is
that
in
massing
and
appearance
it
sort
of
fits
in
the
fabric
and
then
in
the
1820
matt
bowden,
both
1820
and
mount
golden
and
3941
mount
bolton.
Terrace
are
the
same
plan,
so
they're
identical
they
all
look.
They
both
look
like
this
and
they're
both
town
homes,
but
in
the
other
one
we
have
there's
a
very
large,
mature
tree
that
we
have
worked
around.
There
are
also
major
topography
issues.
AO
There's
a
20
there's
like
a
15
foot
grade
change
between
the
front
property
line,
the
rear
property
line,
so
our
location
of
the
building,
the
articulation
of
the
building
and
the
preservation
of
the
tree.
You
know
when,
when
we
did
our
first
walk
through,
we
had
neighborhood
residents,
come
up
and
request
that
we
be
respectful
of
the
trees,
so
we
really
tried
to
work
around
it.
So,
in
all
those
ways
our
effort
has
been
to
build
it
into
the
urban
fabric
rather
than
go
against
it.
So,
okay.
A
AT
AU
AU
Therefore,
any
housing
that
goes
up
they're
listed
as
off-street
parking,
but
that
currently
is
not
even
available
as
it
is,
with
the
current
owners
and
and
folks
who
live
on
this
street,
so
building
any
new
homes
would
take.
There
would
be
no
parking
available
on
mountboating
terrace.
It's
not
possible
for
a
car
to
drive
down
the
street
with
with
cars
parked
on
both
sides.
AO
A
AO
AQ
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
okay,
thank
you,
madam
chair
john
furrier,
about
senior
development
officer
at
the
department
of
neighborhood
development
and
we
support
this
development
through
the
city
of
akka
plan.
One
point
in
response
to
your
your
question:
adam
fair,
regarding
design
is
we
did
a
fundamental
assessment
of
the
streetscape.
Our
assistant
director
looked
at
street
context
and
with
that
in
mind
of
providing
a
number
of
design
options
at
the
start
of
the
rft
process
for
residents
to
consider
and
they
were
included
in
their
cluster
proposal.
AQ
C
Z
E
Only
next
case
calling
dfa
one
one:
six,
six,
seven,
nine
eight
eighty
one
bowdoin
avenue
this
erected
new
detached
two
family
residential
dwelling
proposed
one
off
three
buck:
the
violation,
article
65
section:
41,
are
three
pockets:
insufficient
article
65,
section
90
side
yards
insufficient
article
65,
section
9,
a
lot
of
areas,
insufficient
article
65,
69
log
width
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section.
Nine
lot,
frontage
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
9,
employee
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
65
section
on
the
front
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
records.
AG
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
ralph
parent,
15,
green
street
dorchester
masters,
one
two
four
with
me:
I
have
raja
architect,
rashmi
ramaswani,
from
shed
studios.
This
project
is
a
two
family
or
the
the
to
erect
a
new
construction.
Two-Family
residential
dwelling
through
the
department
of
neighborhood
development,
neighborhood
homes,
initiative
program.
AS
O
Z
A
O
And
now
they
I
think
they
get
it
and
and
again
again.
Madam
chair,
my
comment
is
really
is
to
look
at
the
whole
project.
This
is
really
for
d
d.
To
look
at
the
whole
project
holistically
in
terms
of
the
amount
of
units
are
being
offered
to
the
community
and
to
ensure
that
at
least
one
of
all
of
the
offerings
is
accessible.
C
C
AW
E
AX
AX
E
E
Hearing
none
will
go
back
to
the
930
cases,
calling
bla
there's
four
cases.
Madam
chair,
I'm
going
to
call
them
all
together,
calling
voa
119.287323
industry,
there's
companion
case,
boa
119,
2893,
23
newton
street,
boa
119,
2938
25
street,
boa
119
2843
25
street.
This
is
the
23
newton
street.
This
is
a
chain
document,
two
to
a
three
family
in
renovate
violation:
article
51
section
9
insufficient
lottery
per
unit;
article
51,
section
9
sufficient
open
space.
E
E
This
is
for
25
newton
current
and
proposed
parking
at
the
25th
industry,
pocket
for
five
vehicles;
the
violations,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
the
parking
area,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
pocket
area,
side,
job
buffer
and
rare
yacht
area,
and
article
51,
section
56,
flash
free
parking
loading
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
E
E
AW
AW
Do
sure
so,
first
of
all,
thank
you,
madam
chair
member
of
the
boards,
thank
you
for
letting
me
speak
today.
So
really,
I'm
not
looking
to
change
anything.
Just
bring
them
up
to
codes
so
right
now,
they're,
both
actually
three
families,
25
newton
street
there
are
no
changes
being
made,
should
be
23
newton
street.
There
are
no
changes
being
made
to
either
23
or
25
only
what
is
required
to
bring
the
properties
to
code
which
would
be
to
install
sprinklers
in
a
fire
alarm.
This
part
of
newton
street
is
a
three-family
vehicle.
AW
A
AW
R
AW
AW
AW
A
AY
Yes,
chair
members
of
the
board,
connor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
enabling
the
services
mayor's
office
conducting
a
butter
meeting
on
june
1st.
There
were
no
concerns
that
that
butters
meeting
the
app
that
went
on
to
forward
10
letters
of
support
from
neighbors
all
on
newton
street
to
the
mayor's
office,
went
on
to
the
brighton,
austin
improvement
association
as
well
and
received
their
full
support.
We
view
this
as
an
opportunity
to
update
existing
housing
stock
and
making
sure
that
it's
code
compliant.
Thank
you.
AZ
BA
AH
U
BB
Very
briefly,
on
the
phone
with
me
today
is
mike
mattis,
president
of
ahsc
and
jim
padowski
of
the
architectural
team.
Our
architect.
We
are
requesting
a
change
of
occupancy
from
66
units
of
assisted
living,
housing
to
48,
100
percent
income,
restricted
senior,
affordable
units
at
zebra,
racing
house
and
charlestown.
BB
The
petitioner
is
an
armed
for
proper
housing
corporation
and
prospective
buyer.
Samuel
zamoraz
office
is
a
distressed,
governmentally
subsidized
property
on
the
verge
of
foreclosure.
Over
the
last
four
years,
malaysia
has
lost
over
four
million
dollars
through
operating
deficits
which
have
been
funded
by
the
current
owner.
Currently
70
of
the
66
units
at
zelma,
lacy
house
of
vacant,
the
assistant
living
while
no
longer
works.
A
BB
BB
A
A
A
BC
Madam
chairman,
mr
board,
this
is
john
romano
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
This
project
had
gone
through
an
extensive
community
process.
We
want
to
recognize
that
they
had
also
received
a
letter
from
the
massachusetts
housing
finance
agency
in
support
of
the
proposal
as
well,
and
we
recognized
that
the
business
has
had
some
financial
concerns
and
constraints
over
the
current
model
and
that
are
hopeful
to
be
able
to
address
those
with
this
new
proposal.
K
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
ricardo
patron
from
the
office
of
city
councilor,
lydia
edwards,
given
the
community
outreach
and
the
need
for
assisted
living,
the
counselor
cannot
support
this
proposal.
However,
given
the
financial
constraints
that
mr
joyce
mentioned
and
the
the
financial
reality
that
the
zama
lacy
house
faces,
she
can't
oppose
this
either.
We
would
like
to
see,
as
many
of
the
current
residents
remain,
at
the
location
as
possible
and
for
the
developer
to
commit
to
working
toward
making
that
a
reality.
K
BD
BD
AC
A
AS
AH
O
E
Four
unit,
dwelling
constructing
four
additional
stories
over
the
existing
structure
violations:
article
nine
section:
two,
a
non-conforming
use
change
article
32,
section
32-4.
This
is
in
the
key
card:
groundwater
conservation,
article
54,
section,
18,
root,
structure
and
building
height
restrictions,
reconstruct
reconfiguration
of
existing
group
profile
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BF
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
stephen
miller,
mcdermott,
quilty
and
miller,
I
have
with
me
in
person
anthony
bazani
who's
architect,
along
with
bill
paquette
who's,
calling
in
and
we'll
do
a
presentation
also
on
the
call
is
nixo
zulo
from
my
office
who
has
worked
on
this
project.
Hey.
T
BF
We
would
have
two
on
unit
on
the
first
floor,
second,
floor,
third,
floor,
two-bedroom,
two-bath
units
plus
studies,
approximately
between
1300
and
1400
square
feet,
and
then
unit
4
on
the
top
is
a
duplex
which
is
two
bed
two
bath
in
the
study
at
1740
square
feet.
I'd
turn
it
over
to
bill
paquette.
Now,
just
to
give
you
a
brief
rundown
on
the
proposal
and
the
plans.
BF
BF
BG
Not
our
right
side
is
a
the
shorter
three
unit
building
and
we're
filling
up
our
building
in
the
space
in
between.
If
we
could
go
to
the
next
slide,
please
well,
we
are.
This
is
again
an
over
an
overview
that
shows
how
we've
tried
to
hold
the
building
and
we
believe,
we've
accomplished
it,
holding
the
building
back
away
from
the
the
windows
of
the
budding
apartment
building
to
try
to,
to
the
extent
possible
not
not
to
appear
with
their
light
in
their
views.
BG
We
haven't
blocked
any
windows,
the
existing
or
the
wall
around
the
perimeter
of
our
lot,
which
goes
right
up
in
an
acute
angle.
To
the
budding
building
is
an
existing
wall.
We
propose
to
remove
its
roof
and
use
the
existing
second
floor
and
build
up
from
there
using
the
new
foundation
next
slide.
Please.
BG
There's
another
view
of
the
of
the
rear
of
our
proposal.
Again,
it's
there
are
decks
for
the
units,
as
required
by
the
zoning
code.
We
require
100
square
feet
per
unit
with
75
of
that
open
sky.
So
we've
provided
that
as
a
minimum
to
each
unit.
As
you
can
see,
we
do
not.
We
do
not
block
the
the
adjacent,
the
windows
and
the
adjacent
property.
BC
Manager,
members
of
the
board-
this
is
john
romano
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We've
received.
This
project
has
gone
through
an
extensive
community
process
throughout
that
process.
They've
received
19
letters
of
support
and,
in
addition,
a
letter
of
support
from
the
north
end
waterfront
neighborhood
council
they've
also
received
a
few
opposition
letters
and
an
opposition
letter
from
the
north
end
waterfront
residents
association.
K
AR
M
A
AR
AC
BH
Yes,
hi,
my
name
is
damian
dipaola.
I
live
on
one
laptop
place
in
boston's
north
end.
I
am
a
a
resident,
I'm
a
business
owner
and
I
also
own
property-
and
I
am
all
for
that
project
and
you
know
I've
been
following
the
process-
I'm
not
just
showing
up
and
I've
seen
how
they've
done
everything
they
can
possibly
do
to
make
their
neighbors
happy,
especially
a
butters
meeting,
and
it
was
very,
very
positive,
the
elected
council
in
the
neighborhood
northern
waterfront
neighborhood
council.
BI
BI
O
O
BJ
BJ
E
Following
your
next
case,
calling
doa
one
two:
zero
three:
nine
nine
four,
three
thirty
one
to
335
a
newbury
street.
This
is
a
change
of
occupancy
from
retail
to
a
candidate
cannabis,
establishment,
recreational,
the
violations,
article
8,
section,
7
of
cannabis,
establishment,
recreational
eucharist
conditional
article,
a
section
7,
a
cannabis
establishment
location
shall
be
cited
at
least
one
half
mile
or
2
640
feet
from
another
existing
cannabis
establishment
payment
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BB
Good
morning,
ma'am
chair
members
of
the
board,
kevin
joyce,
dougherty
lara
office
offices,
50
franklin
street
boston,
representing
the
petitioner
rooted
in
llc
brian
keith
principal
of
rooted,
is
on
the
call
with
me
this
morning
as
well.
We
are
requesting
a
conditional
use,
permit
and
variance
from
the
buffer
zone
requirement
to
operate
a
conventional
recreational
cannabis,
establishment
in
1500
square
feet
of
ground
level.
Retail
space
at
331,
newberry
street.
The
basement
beneath
the
retail
space
will
be
used
for
accessory
non-public
offices
in
storage.
A
BB
BB
A
BK
Well,
first
and
foremost,
we
believe
that
we
are
bringing
forward
a
unique
retail
concept
and
business
model
that
really
differentiates
us
from
any
of
the
other
proponents
in
the
area
and
customers
will
want
to
shop
with
us
because
of
our
core
values.
Additionally,
it
should
be
noted
that
in
this
area,
which
is
one
of
the
highest
revenue
retail
areas
in
the
region
in
new
england,
there
are
multiple
stores
that
are
replicated.
Currently,
there
are
multiple
areas
to
buy
genes.
There
are
multiple
department
stores,
there's
a
tea,
there's
a
tj
maxx,
there's.
A
So
much
honestly,
mr
keith,
I
totally
understand
the
retail
piece
of
it,
but
the
zoning
that
we
are
looking
at
tells
us
that
there
is
a
requirement
for
a
buffer
zone.
We've
always
pretty
much,
not
always,
but
pretty
much
respect
to
that,
and
so
we
still
need
to
understand.
What
is
the
compelling
reason?
BD
Z
BK
BK
A
BK
So
the
establishment
that
was
approved
on
newbury
street
was
this
location,
so
this
location,
331,
newberry
street,
was
actually
the
first
location
to
be
approved
for
cannabis
by
this
zoning
board
under
the
previous.
So
we
are
actually
changing
this
from
medical,
which
was
approved
by
zone
by
the
zoning
board
to
recreation.
A
N
A
A
C
A
BK
A
A
Mass,
oh
yes,
of
course,
and
that's
on
boylston,
okay,
okay!
So
as
far
as
location,
you've,
you've
answered
our
questions
now,
you've
answered
our
question
on
social
equity.
You've
answered
it
on
the
history
of
this
site.
Now
tell
us
about
this.
Is
a
1500
square
foot
facility
tell
us
how
you
plan
on
it
being
operated
your
I
think
mr
joyce
gave
us
the
hours
of
operation,
but
can
you
tell
us
what
the
security
measures
are
and
how
somebody
would
win
their
way
through
the
facility
as
sure
as
a
purchaser.
BK
Sure
the
plans
appear
to
be
on
the
screen
now,
there's
a
hole,
there's
a
reception
area
where
first
of
all,
customers
would
have
their
id
check
at
the
front
door.
Then
they
would
be
allowed
into
the
holding
area
the
initial
holding
area
they
would
go
through
another
security
screen
where
their
ids
would
be
scanned.
BK
BK
BK
BK
BK
BK
It'll
be
ready
for
them
when
they
arrive,
so
that
they
can
come
in
and
pick
it
up.
We
will
not
be
allowing
double
park
and
that's
one
of
the
things
that
we
work
with
the
community
to
make
sure
that
they
were
very
comfortable
with
our
proposal.
We
won't
allow
people
to
double
park
on
newbury
to
run
in
grab
what
they're
looking
for
and
go
back
in.
A
BL
As
you
might
recall,
we
opposed
this
site
when
it
was
approached
medical
marijuana
years
ago.
I
think
the
world
has
evolved
a
lot
since
then
we
opposed
the
site.
The
other
side
was
proposed
on
liberty
street
because
the
location
was
in.
This
is
a
much
better
location.
It's
a
block,
that's
almost
entirely
commercial
and
the
operator
has
agreed
that
no
work
will
take
place
in
the
alley,
their
deliveries
and
pick
up,
including
of
cash
and
product
that
will
be
handled
from
the
front
and
that
will
minimize
impact
on
the
residents.
BM
BM
We
already
reported
this
application.
We
think
it's
an
ideal
location.
The
critical
part
is
for
us
to
have
dispensaries
both
on
boylston
and
newbury
street
and
as
much
as
I'm
sensitive
to
the
discussion
about
the
buffer
zone.
This
is
a
very
well
vetted
proposal.
We've
been
talking
about
this
location
for
many
years.
We
are
absolutely
thrilled
with
this
applicant
and
this
business
moving
into
the
back
bay,
and
we
would
love
to
and
appreciate
your
support.
Thank
you
so
much.
BN
BN
As
the
board
is
aware,
there
are
many
applications
in
this
neighborhood
and
we
understand
that
residents
appreciate
the
proposed
location
and
we
recognize
that
they're,
a
strong
equity
applicant
committed
to
creating
jobs
from
the
community
at
this
time
the
mayor's
office
would
be
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board's
judgment
regarding
this
application.
Thank.
BE
Hi
kennedy
avery
from
counselor
box
office
good
morning,
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
board
counselor
back,
is
in
non-opposition
of
the
applicant.
The
counselor
has
expressed
previously
to
this
board
that
she
has
concerns
about
a
fourth
dispensary
in
the
back
bay
that
violates
the
half-mile
buffer
zone.
BE
Due
to
this
policy
objection,
councilor
bach
is
in
non-opposition,
but
she
does
want
to
highlight
the
superior
qualifications
and
commitments
of
rooted
in
roxbury
as
an
equity
proprietor,
especially
their
proposal
to
build
community
wealth,
address
the
back
bay
community's
concerns
and
its
location
in
a
commercial
district
on
new
berry
street.
Thank
you.
AC
AC
BJ
Please,
thank
you
very
much.
My
name
is
jonathan
napoli.
I
am
the
owner
and
president
of
the
hampist
at
301
newberry
street,
within
a
block
of
this
proposed
operation,
and
I
wanted
to
express
my
firm's
support
for
this
business
and
these
operators,
whom
I
know
personally
to
be
responsible
and
competent
operators
and
I've
been
operating
myself
on
newbury
street
since
1997
with
the
cannabis
themed
business.
BJ
H
C
I
just
want
to
make
a
comment.
This
sounds
like
a
terrific
application
that
got
a
lot
of
community
support.
You
know
this,
I'm
very
disturbed
about
the
buffer
zone
issue
because
it
just
seems
like
there
are
city
policies
being
made
on
the
one
hand
and
being
ignored
on
the
other.
I
mean
I'm
going
to
second
this
because
of
the
support
for
the
applicant,
but
I
feel
like
we
are:
don't
have
much
clear
direction
about
what
is
how
to
follow
city
policy.
A
A
E
T
E
At
5
pm,
which
was
heard
on
july
22nd
at
10,
10
massa
5th
floor
case,
boa
115,
8994,
296
princeton
street
was
an
entry
adding
a
green
roof
and
playroom.
It
was
approved
of
epda
and
no
bedroom.
In
the
basement
case,
boa
eight
114
eleven
eighty
seven
saratoga
street
was
to
correct
an
existing
code
violation
unit
by
removing
basement
kitchen
door
operation.
It
was
approved
with
no
building
code,
violation,
interior,
connecting
stairs
connect
to
all
building
code
regulations,
correct
all
building
code
regulations
case
boa
one:
two:
zero,
two,
six,
four
seven.
E
Eighty
nine
russell
street
was
finishing.
An
existing
basement
basement
created
livable
space.
It
was
approved
at
bpda
no
bedroom
at
the
rear
of
the
basement
case.
Boa
one
one:
six,
six,
six:
three
zero
six
wall
street.
It
was
to
add
a
new
20
by
20
roof
deck.
It
was
approved
case
boa
one,
one,
six,
four,
two,
seven
three
two
longwood
place:
this
was
a
new
private
roof
deck
for
unit
2..
It
was
approved
with
vpa
attachment
setback
case,
boa
118480810
clem
on
park.
It
was
a
constructed
new
steel
balcony.
E
E
Please
boa
1200-790-707
east
4th
street
for
the
proposed
new
roof
deck
built
up
top
1
level
unit
2..
It
was
approved
with
vpda
to
the
rear
setback
of
the
deck
case.
Boa
119,
1538
10
st
margaret
street
to
confirm
an
existing
single
filming.
Then
a
third
floor
of
roof
deck
second
story
edition.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
and
to
eliminate
the
side,
diet,
violation
case,
boa
117,
3224,
6169,
o
street.
It's
a
new
decking
green
roof
pergola.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
attached
to
the
setback
of
the
deck
case.
E
Boa
117
531324
was
extend
the
first
floor
living
space
into
the
basement
to
accommodate
it
was
a.
It
was
approved
with
vpda
case
boa
one
one,
seven,
four,
five,
six
four.
Fifty
nine
chica
tarpon
street
was
a
renovation
of
a
second
floor
unit,
including
relocation.
Kitchen
about
was
approved
at
bpda
on
exterior
hboa,
1184796
12-hour
plane
street.
It
was
deferred
to
the
full
board
of
september
28
2021
at
12
30.
case
boa
1170623,
95
bloomington
avenue,
constructed
gomer
installed
new
windows.
It
was
approved
with
bpa
the
roofline
and
dormer
setback
case,
boa
46156
warren
park.
E
We
have
an
existing
basement.
It
was
approved
case
boa
116,
7558
22
cedric
street,
which
contracted
new
dorm.
On
the
right
side.
It
was
approved
at
bpda
the
size
of
dormer
into
the
ridge,
the
violations
article,
I'm
sorry
kcboa
117
6936
54th
danforth
street.
It
was
a
dormer
with
a
bathroom.
It
was
approved,
hboa,
116,
52,
45,
41
to
41a
green
street.
It
was
a
installing
new
deck.
E
It
was
approved
by
vpda
on
exterior
deck,
boa
118
4652
fort
cuthworth
road
to
construct
a
14
by
20
family
room
was
approved
with
bpa
case
boa
119
1994
49
mark
street
with
the
master
bed
bathroom
edition
above
the
existing
sunroom
is
approved
with
bpda
on
exterior
case
boa
111
118
3614
61
oakland
street.
It
was
a
dorm
on
both
sides.
E
A
A
E
A
I
AV
A
BO
AO
E
E
Ksb0A118304518
trouble
and
boa
zero
eighteen
1183050
string.
This
is
for
sixteen.
This
is
installer
roof
deck
access
from
a
hatch,
the
roof
deck
exclusive
to
the
top
floor
unit.
The
violations
article
13
that
13-1
the
building
height
max
allowed
us
40
feet.
The
proposed
deck
patch
exceeds
40
feet,
article
16,
section,
8,
a
restricted
roof
structure
district,
the
head
house
is
to
be
removed,
roof
deck
area
proposed,
including
the
hatch,
is
371
square
feet.
Allow
is
only
330
330
square
feet.
E
E
V
S
V
Thank
you,
my
clients
own
both
buildings.
These
are
two
separate
buildings.
Sixteen
purple
is
a
seven
unit.
Building.
Eighteen
preble
is
five
unit.
Building
the
applications
are
to
erect
on
the
roof
of
each
building,
one
roof
deck,
which
would
be
a
private
roof
deck
for
one
of
the
top
floor
units
in
each
building.
Only
in
the
case
of
16
preble
that
would
be
for
unit
7
in
the
case
of
18
preble
that
would
be
for
unit
5.
access
would
be
by
hatch.
A
A
A
G
AJ
Good
afternoon
mother
of
the
chair
members
of
the
board
anna
calderon
from
councillor
friends
office,
the
council
would
like
to
go
record
to
support
based
on
the
work
the
proponent
did,
with
their
daughters
and
andrew
square
civic
association
and
good
faith.
Compromises
made
the
feedback
with
resistance
from
the
civic
association
and
neighbors
indicated
they
were
satisfied.
AJ
Their
concerns
would
be
addressed
with
control
controls
in
atlus
related
to
hours.
I
know
it
was
after
10
pm
noise
barriers
limits
on
number
of
occupants
cameras
and
no
use
of
fire
pits
or
drills
in
the
interest
of
public
safety.
The
neighbors
and
civic
association
supports
this
project
based
on
these
measures,
which
they
believe
will
deter
the
type
of
problem
property
behavior
with
witness
during
the
pandemic,
councillor
exclaims
reports
based
on
this
work
and
feedback
from
neighbors
and
the
underscore
civic
association.
Thank
you.
U
C
A
V
B
Z
Z
A
E
Sure,
I'm
out
of
chat
calling
mx2
cases
calling
voa
1209,
559,
1426
columbia,
road,
there's,
a
companion,
ksboa,
120,
9563,
1428,
columbia,
road.
This
is
for
to
1426.
the
house
completely,
including
after
a
fire
evaluation,
article,
nine
section,
one:
a
reconstruction
extension
of
a
non-conforming
building
article
68
section:
eight,
the
fluid
air
ratio
is
excessive.
This
is
for
14
28..
E
V
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address,
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston.
For
the
record,
these
aren't,
strictly
speaking,
companion
cases
they're
two
separate
properties
with
two
separate
owners
in
the
case
of
1426
columbia,
road,
the
owner
and
my
client
is
geraldine
polilowski
in
the
case
of
1428
columbia,
road,
the
owner
and
my
client
is
william
kiley.
V
However,
both
properties
share
the
same
history
in
the
sense
that
they
were
virtually
completely
destroyed
in
a
seven
alarm
fire
in
may
of
2020,
which
involved
seven
buildings
in
total
in
this
area.
These
applications
are
to
reconstruct
the
buildings
as
three
story:
three
family
buildings.
The
key
distinctions
between
what
is
being
proposed
in
what
existed
is
being
replaced
is
that
each
building
had
a
basement
that
was
non-habitable
no
no
living
space
before
the
fire.
Each
building
and
each
application
seeks
to
extend,
extend
living
space
to
the
basement.
V
I'm
looking
at
the
the
plants
there.
The
proposed
unit
floor
plan
on
on
the
screen,
which
shows
a
front
bedroom
in
unit
one
which
was
eliminated
on
a
revised
plant
and
I'll
speak
to
that,
in
the
reason
why
there
is
still
proposed
to
be
in
each
building
a
rear
bedroom.
The
rear
of
the
building
because
of
the
gray
change
is
fully
at
grade
and
there's
actually
a
door.
It's
a
full
walkout
sheet.
V
S
V
Yes,
they're
they're
they're
both
are
and
were
three-story
three-family
dwellings.
There
are
three
two-bedroom
units,
as
proposed
in
each
building
for
1426
the
there
would
be
three
two
bedroom
units
of
just
under
1300
square
feet.
Each
1428-
it
would
be
the
same
case
and
also
being
proposed
for
each
building
is
a
a
roof
deck
in
the
case
of
1426.
V
The
access
to
that
roof
deck,
which
would
be
for
the
top
floor
unit,
only
is
from
an
exterior
spiral.
Staircase
off
the
rear,
porch
1428
columbia,
road
had
an
existing
head
house
and
the
reconstruction
involves
rebuilding
that
existing
head
house
to
identical
dimensions
with
also
a
roof
deck
on
1428.
V
Z
V
Yes,
in
fact,
revised
plans
were
submitted
a
couple
weeks
back,
madam
chair,
but
these
these
are
the
original
plans
when
the
plans,
you
know
to
be
perfectly
frank
from
the
board
when
the
plans
were
presented
to
me.
I
believe
that,
because
the
front
bedroom
appeared
to
be
substantially
below
grade
and
required
an
escape
window,
I
did
not
think
it
was
approvable
and
instructed
my
clients
that
that
building
would
need
that
that
bedroom
in
each
case
would
need
to
be
removed.
A
V
Z
O
A
V
O
O
V
O
V
V
O
V
I'm
on
google
earth
as
well
the
buildings
at
1430
and
1432
columbia.
Road
are
right
up
to
a
passageway
and
it
looks
to
be
several
feet.
Maybe
eight
or
ten
feet
distance
between
them,
the
rear
of
those
buildings
in
the
side
of
the
building
at
on
douglas
street,
which
is
at
nine
douglas
on,
which
was
also
part
of
the
fire.
A
AJ
BD
M
chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
of
city
council
at
large,
michael
flaherty.
The
council's
approach
to
article
68
has
been
consistent.
However,
there
are
times
these
variances
sought
to
be
considered
a
substantial
high
trip.
In
this
case
the
homes
were
destroyed
by
fire
and
the
owners
were
seeking
to
rebuild
their
homes.
Therefore,
he
would
defer
to
the
board's
knowledge
and
wisdom
for
understanding
and
interpreting
the
zoning
laws
as
it
pertains
to
unnecessary
and
unintentional
high
choice.
Thank
you.
O
S
V
E
E
O
E
Very
good
for
the
record
calling
voa
119,
1388
11
senator
bowling
circle.
There
are
companion
cases,
boa
119,
1398,
35,
senator
bowling
circle,
boa
119,
1391
senator
bowling
circle
case,
boa
one,
one,
nine
one:
three:
nine
three:
twenty
seven
senator
bowling
circle
and
b
o
a
one,
one,
nine,
two,
three
six
one
thirty
snowden
way.
This
was
for
eleventh
senator
bowling
circle,
constructed
a
two-story
wood
frame,
2088
square
foot,
single
family
dwelling
under
5655
script,
with
lot
violations;
article
60,
section,
11,
detached
single
family
dwelling
as
a
conditional
use.
E
E
It's
for
a
constructed,
two-story
wood
frame,
2,
268
square
foot,
single
family
dwelling
on
a
7,
000
15
square
foot
lot:
the
violation
is
the
same
as
well.
This
is
for
27
senator
bowling
in
a
circle.
There's
a
constructed,
two-story
wood
frame,
2300
square
feet,
single-family
dwelling
on
the
8165
square
foot
lot:
the
violation
is
the
same.
E
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
AL
A
AL
Here,
it's
a
two-story
wood
frame,
288
square
foot,
single
family
dwelling.
There
is
a
proposed
development,
I'm
sorry
a
bedroom
in
the
basement
on
this
unit.
It
is
serviced
by
a
window,
well
a
six-foot
window.
Well,
and
there
is
a
bathroom
as
well
in
that
area,
just
to
walk
back
a
second
all
the
all
the
units
are
similar
in
their
style
and
construction.
They
differ
on
the
nuanced
architectural
elements
in
35,
as
noted,
and
the
11
are
the
only
two
units
that
have
bedroom
area
in
the
basement.
BE
A
AM
AS
AM
A
C
O
C
C
A
S
E
AV
Z
AV
AV
A
O
O
A
BP
BP
AA
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jack
doug
at
mayor's
office,
neighborhood
services-
sorry
about
that
I
had
a
communication
issue,
but
I
just
want
to
go
on
record
support.
The
advocate
went
before
the
west
rocket
neighborhood
council
on
june
22nd
and
receive
their
full
support.
Thank
you.
U
Z
E
C
C
E
E
Residential
dwelling
and
change
to
a
three-family
residential
dwelling
and
renovate
violations,
article
27g
from
the
east
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
56,
packing
loading
article
53
section,
eight
three
family
use
is
forbidden,
article
53,
section:
nine,
the
four-year
ratio
is
excessive
and
article
53
section
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive.
In.
A
Y
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
matt
eckel,
with
drago
and
toscano,
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
also
on
the
call
with
me
today
is
craig
shames
the
owner
of
the
property.
As
mentioned
we're
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
two
family
to
a
three
family
and
complete
some
minor
renovations,
the
renovations
will
include
repairing
the
existing
rear,
decks
and
staircase,
as
well
as
interior
alterations.
Y
In
terms
of
the
floor
plan,
we
are
proposing
three
units.
All
three
would
be
two
bedroom
units
unit.
One
would
be
a
deflection
with
excuse
me
living
space
in
the
lower
level
and
the
first
floor.
The
lower
level
will
have
an
office
media
room,
one
bedroom
and
a
laundry
room.
The
ceiling
height
would
be
seven
feet,
seven
inches
unit.
One
will
also
be
located
on
the
first
floor,
which
will
be
the
two
bedrooms
and
one
bathroom
with
the
rear
deck
unit.
Y
Two
will
be
eight
hundred
and
fifty
fifty
five
square
feet
and
will
be
located
on
the
second
floor
as
mentioned.
This
is
also
a
two
bedroom
unit
with
one
bath
and
a
rear,
deck
and
unit
three
will
propose
to
be
on
the
third
floor
at
879
square
feet,
two
bedroom,
one
with
the
rear
deck
and
the
ceiling
height
for
the
third
floor
ranges
between
seven
foot,
six
and
eight
foot.
Eight
in
terms
of
violations
mentioned,
we
are
seeking
a
use
variance.
It
is
a
two
f
district
and
we're
proposing
a
three
family.
Y
The
allowed
effort
is
0.8
and
we're
proposing
1.22
allowed
height
and
a
half
stories
and
we're
proposing
the
full
three
stories
and
parking
we're
required
to
have
one
additional
space
for
the
additional
unit,
as
this
is
existing
structure
and
there's
currently
no
parking.
There's
no
place
for
us
to
provide
that
we're
also
in
the
east,
boston
ipod.
Without.
O
Y
So,
apologies
for
any
confusion.
There
is
no
bedroom
in
in
the
lower
level,
so
the
floor
to
ceiling
height
is
seven
foot,
seven
inches
we're
proposing
a
media
room
and
an
office
as
well
as
a
laundry
room
and
then
there's
a
full
egress
walkout
in
the
rear,
because
there
is
a
significant
grade
change
and
then
we
do
have.
Y
That
was
in
the
front
of
the
building,
which
you
can
see
right
there
on
the
plans
on
the
left
side,
and
you
can
also
see
our
rendering
in
the
front
there
they're
two
good
sized
windows
they're
not
proposed
to
be
egress
windows,
because
we
do
have
an
interior
staircase.
The
first
floor,
as
well
as
the
full
walk
out
in
the
rear,
and
we
are
not
proposing
any
bedrooms
in
the
basement.
A
And
please
make
sure
that
your
applicant
understands
that,
because
we
are
concerned
about
health
and
safety
issues,
should
there
be
a
fire
or
any
other
or
anything
else.
Okay,
that
I
mean
because
we
just
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
not
presented
as
media
and
office
etc,
and
then
you
know,
becomes
a
bedroom
down
there.
Okay,
it's
understood.
A
BQ
Good
afternoon
and
I'm
chairman
members
of
the
board
lina
drama
live
with
the
mayor's
office
of
negative
services.
We
would
like
to
go
on
the
recording
support
for
this
proposal.
During
the
community
process,
the
office
of
neighborhood
services
held
an
apartment
meeting
on
july,
29
2020,
where
the
applicant
addressed
the
concerns
of
their
virus,
and
we
also
received
16
letters
of
support,
including
four
from
the
director
barracks.
Thank
you.
A
C
E
E
E
BR
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
attorney
john
barry.
With
the
law
office
of
john
d
barry
the
office
is
located
at
porn
at
granite
ave.
In
milton
massachusetts
with
me
on
this
project.
Today
is
rca
llc.
They
are
the
architectural
firm
I'm
presented
today
as
one
of
the
principal
managers
christopher
drew
they're
located
at
1156,
dorchester
ave
in
dorchester
massachusetts,
this
particular
project.
This
proposal
is
at
11
pacific
street
in
the
south,
boston,
neighborhood
of
boston.
It's
an
mfr
district.
BR
BR
The
first
floor
will
have
the
third
bedroom
the
living
room
and
the
kitchen
area
unit.
Two
is
a
two
bedroom
one
bath
that
comprises
the
entire
second
floor,
that
is
943
square
feet
and
unit
number
three
is
a
one
bedroom
one
bath
661
square
feet
unit.
There's
been
an
extensive
community
process.
That
was
conducted
on
this
particular
project,
including.
A
A
A
BO
A
BO
BR
A
O
C
O
They
have
the
sufficient
height
and
in
the
basement
they
were
showing
an
actual
egress
door
to
the
passageway,
so
they
have
currently
two
modes
of
two
means
of
egress
one
going
up
stairs
to
unit
one.
On
the
first
floor,
the
other
one
is
a
direct
from
the
proposed
basement
plan.
One
is
going
directly
to
like
a
passageway.
BR
AG
BR
BO
AY
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
worked
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
proposal.
Due
to
letters
we
have
received
from
the
butters
detailing
concerns
with
density
and
characters
in
the
neighborhood.
We
would
like
to
recognize
that
the
applicant
has
worked
extensively
and
received
some
support
from
the
community
at
large.
Thank
you.
AJ
O
BA
BO
A
BO
E
BS
Good
afternoon,
stuart
schreier
with
an
office
of
1005
dorchester
avenue,
dorchester
massachusetts
what's
proposed,
is
a
new
construction.
Three
family.
There
is
absolutely
no
living
space
in
the
basement.
No
bedrooms,
no
living
space
whatsoever
in
the
basement.
There
are
no
roof
decks
and
the
sole
violation
that
we're
facing
is.
This
lot
requires
six
thousand
square
feet.
We
have
5626
with
374
square
feet
short.
AM
Z
AM
Months
and
we
have
not
been
made
any
aware
of
any
of
the
updates,
the
community
and
the
butters
in
the
area
are
wary
of
density
as
well
as
construction
management
with
the
proposal
management.
Sorry
for
the
proposal
and
there's
also
opposition
from
the
greater
matapan
neighborhood
council.
Thank
you.
BS
Q
BK
Q
BT
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
kenneth
mills
68
clarkwood
street,
which
is
directly
next
door
to
the
proposal,
not
to
belabor.
The
point
you've
heard
the
the
statements
of
opposition,
and
I
am
for
the
record
just
stating
my
opposition
again.
This
proposal
has
been
rescheduled
from
march,
9th
and
mace
may
18th,
due
to
inconsistent
information
and,
frankly,
the
absence
of
detailed,
transparent
communication
with
the
abutters
by
the
applicant,
and
so
you
know,
madam
charity.
Z
A
A
E
You're
calling
the
next
case
calling
doa
one
one,
one:
two,
seven,
eight
five,
twenty
one,
forty
nine
to
twenty
one,
fifty
one
dorchester
avenue
this
is
a
change
of
action
from
a
fourth
pillar
to
a
six
unit,
building
adding
two
new
entrances
on
second
and
third
floor.
The
violations
article
65
section
41,
our
street
parking-
is
insufficient.
E
BR
E
BU
E
Me
call
into
the
record
sir
calling
calling
boa
114
3574
449
cambridge
street.
That's
a
companion
case,
voa
114
3565
to
emery
road.
This
is
for
449
cambridge.
Demolish
the
existing
structure,
construct
a
multi-family
dwelling
building
with
127
units
or
approximately
80
parking
spaces
includes
ground
floor
retail
associated
with
two
emery
road
project.
The
violations
article
51
section
17.
The
florida
ratio
is
excessive.
E
Article
51,
section
19,
mfr
forbidden
news
in
an
l
one
one
sub
district
in
article
51,
section
56
off
street
parking
and
loading
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
two
emery.
This
is
demolish
the
existing
construct,
a
new
multi-family
dwelling
building
for
20
with
39
units
associated
with
449
cambridge
trade.
E
The
violations
are
article
51,
section
19,
the
mfr
forbidden
in
l1.
Subject:
sub-district
article
51
section
20.,
the
floating
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
51,
section
20.
building
height,
is
excessive
in
feet.
Article
51
section
20
usable
for
space
is
insufficient
article
51,
section
20
radiation,
sufficient
article
51,
section
56,
oscar
parking
and
loading
is
insufficient
name
and
address.
E
BU
A
So
counselor
can
you
hold
on
for
a
second
may.
I
ask
everybody
whose
hands
are
raised
to
lower
your
hands
unless
you
are
here
to
speak
about
449
cambridge
street
and
to
emery
road
in
in
austin,
brighton,
okay,
so
please
everybody
who's.
I
only
need
raised
hands
for
449
cambridge
street
and
two
emery
road
in
austin,
brighton.
AH
AH
BU
Thank
you,
madam
chair
with
me
today
are
david
lombster
of
anchor
line
partners.
That's
the
petitioner
and
architect,
robert
brown
of
perkins,
and
will
first,
if
I
could
get
you
oriented.
If
we
could,
please
go
back
just
one
slide,
so
this
is
in
austin.
This
is
at
the
easterly
edge
of
the
2012
brighton
guest
street
area
plan
area.
BU
BU
BU
A
BU
BU
BU
BU
Thank
you,
the
next
slide.
This
is
where
I'd
like
to
stop
on
slide
11..
So
to
summarize,
this
is
a
rehearing.
Many
of
you
may
be
familiar
with
the
project.
It
continues
to
be
two
buildings,
but
there
are
no
longer
any
compact
living
units.
That
was
a
deep
concern
of
the
board.
We've
eliminated
all
compact
living
units,
previously
93
out
of
166
units
per
compact,
we've
now
reduced
the
unit
count
by
making
the
demising
walls
move
out,
make
the
units
bigger
152.
BU
As
you
see,
square
footage
has
not
changed,
but
essentially
the
envelopes
of
buildings
are
the
same.
The
height
is
slightly
down
a
few
inches,
so
118
units
at
cambridge
street,
as
you
see
on
the
right
hand,
side,
34
units
on
emory,
road
and
then
divided
by
that
private
way,
which
has
to
be
completely
built
by
the
developer.
BU
The
idp
is
17,
so
17
on-site,
affordable
housing.
I
have
to
slide
later
that
details
how
that
breaks
out.
Eight
of
those
units
are
for
artists
and
there's
a
slide
later
to
explain
what
that
means.
How
they're
designed
specifically
for
artists
they're
spread
throughout
the
two
buildings.
Of
course,
there
are
shared
amenities
for
the
two
buildings,
totaling
10
327
square
feet
about
half
of
that
is
usable,
open
space,
but
it's
inadequate
under
the
zoning
and
I'll
get
into
that,
and
then
half
of
it
is
interior
space.
BU
BU
A
BU
A
BU
Well,
if
you
look
at
the
top
of
this
image,
there's
a
project
that
was
approved,
I
believe
at
40
rug
because
emory
road
terminates
and
it
uses
the
address
on
rope.
But
that's
a
new
project
going
up
and
that's
also
multi-family.
I
don't.
I
don't
have
my
fingertips:
the
width
of
every
road,
but
under
the
2012
bpda
plan
for
this
area.
It's
just
a
local
road.
So
it's
the
smallest
cross,
section
press
robert
you're,
able
to
guess
at
the
width,
but
I
I
doubt
it's
more
than
40
feet.
BU
BU
Previously
we
actually
had
88
studios
and
the
average
size
was
only
382
square
feet.
So
this
is
a
significant
difference.
There
are
46
one
bedrooms,
you
can
see
the
range
and
the
meat
average
of
700
square
feet.
The
mean
average
is
about
the
same
as
before,
but
we
had
58
one
bedrooms
before
the
25
two
bedrooms
is
up.
There
were
only
18
two
bedrooms
before
we
bumped
that
up
to
make
larger
units.
BU
As
I
said,
the
average
square
footage
at
916
is
only
slightly
more
than
the
average
of
the
two
veterans
before
which
was
900..
There
are
two
three
bedrooms
and
working
with
councillor
braden.
Both
of
these
are
idt
units
they're
about
the
same
size
before
we
had
two
three
bedroom
units
before,
but
the
average
size
is
now
1445
before
it
was
13.95.
BU
This
is
the
open
space.
If
you
were
to
multiply
the
normal
50
square.
Foot
per
unit
requirement
for
the
152
units
would
be
7
600,
as
you
can
see,
we
have
5204
and
that
necessitates
the
variance.
There
is
a
good
deal
of
private
open
space,
meaning
it's
only
accessible
by
one
unit
residents.
You
cannot
add
those
together.
So
that's
rare
information.
Most
of
that's
at
emory
road.
You
can
see
in
gray
at
the
ground,
floor,
they're
quite
large
patios,
but
they're
only
seven
units
out
of
the
152
with
that
private
space.
BU
So
that
makes
it
incumbent
on
us
to
make
sure
that
the
open
space
is
usable
and
well
programmed
and
then
most
of
the
open
spaces
in
the
larger
building
at
cambridge
cambridge
street.
You
can
see
shown
there
in
green.
That's
a
second
floor
terrace
which
I'm
going
to
describe
momentarily
next
slide.
Please.
BU
BU
The
board
really
pressed
us
to
make
sure
it
was
programmed
intelligently,
so
at
the
top
is
a
communal,
dining
area
with
a
large
set
of
burners
and
oven,
something
not
just
one
36
inch
oven,
but
something
that
can
really
serve
multiple
people
and
then
there's
a
door
that
opens
to
the
terrace
which
you'll
get
to
in
a
minute.
The
next
space
is
a
community
room.
It's
meant
to
be
really
flexible,
it
could
be
for
working.
There
are
three
cubicles
at
the
bottom.
Those
are
those
spit
workspaces.
BU
You
see
at
the
bottom,
that's
important,
so
people
can
actually
hear
themselves
think
and
have
a
phone
call,
so
those
will
be
built
in
finally,
there's
a
media
room
and
that's
deliberately
vague
as
to
what
kind
of
media
want
the
residents
to
push
it
in
direction.
They
want,
if
they're
old
school,
it
could
be
a
dark
room
or
it
could
be
computer
based
getting
back
to
the
outdoor
space.
That's
about
2
600
square
feet.
So
it's
sizable.
BU
There
are
picnic
tables.
Obviously
this
is
the
link
with
the
kitchen
there's
a
grill
outdoors,
there's
a
living,
a
seating
area,
southeast
corner
with
a
fire
pit,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
the
play
area
because
we
bumped
up
the
unit
sizes.
We
have
significant
two
bedrooms
and
we
really
are
expecting
children
here.
BU
Finally,
in
my
presentation
and
then
take
questions
and
go
through
the
floor
plans
as
you
wish.
We
wanted
to
explain
what
it
means
to
be
an
artist,
so
we
worked
with
artist
impact
alston,
which
is
a
local
group
and,
of
course,
the
city's
department
of
arts
and
culture.
So,
rather
than
just
saying,
oh
they're
artist
units,
what
does
that
mean?
What
we've
learned
from
other
projects
from
those
groups?
BU
You
have
to
have
dedicated
ventilation,
so
perhaps
some
of
the
artists
would
be
painters
or
they're
working
with
solvents,
so
it
can't
be
the
generic
hvac
for
the
whole
building
they
have
to
have
their
own
dedicated.
You
also
have
to
have
variable
finishes.
If
it's
going
to
be
lit,
work
that
means
wear
and
tear,
we
have
optimized
natural
light
at
some
of
the
units,
not
all
of
them,
and
there
are
eight
of
these
units,
but
some
of
them
do
face
south
and
east
for
some
artists.
They
do
want
that.
BU
Finally,
unlike
the
open
space
and
common
area,
I
showed
on
the
second
level
here
on
the
first
parking
level,
it's
dedicated
just
for
the
artist
smaller,
because
they're
only
eight
artists,
but
the
idea
is
that
this
is
this.
Space
would
belong
to
them
and
we're
looking
to
have
professionals,
so
I
don't
want
to
gloss
over
the
art
displays
that
you
see
it
looks
like
a
very
narrow
area,
but
it's
facing
that
new
street,
and
that
was
deliberately
designed
with
the
groups
I
mentioned
so
that
they
could
market
their
work.
BU
BU
A
BU
BI
AT
A
BU
It's
a
good
point
in
fact
was
raised
by
the
artist
groups
that
we
work
with.
Now
we
have
a
mix.
I
I
remember
when
artist
lived.
Work
was
in
vogue
in
the
90s,
they
were
all
studios,
sort
of
non-demising
walls.
We
have
eight
studios,
but
two
one
bedrooms
and
two
two
bedrooms.
So
actually
two
of
the
art
spaces
are
already
large
enough
to
be
multiple
people
with
children.
We
did.
We
did
expect
that.
A
Z
BU
BV
BV
The
interesting
thing
on
these
two
lower
levels
is,
as
the
attorney
indicated,
we
are
12
feet
lower
than
cambridge
street
and
so
we're
very
fortunate
enough
to
have
a
lower
level
parking
access
and
then
a
second
level
parking
access
off
of
emory
road
at
cambridge
street.
We
have
a
lobby
that
you
can
see
in
the
lower
left
corner,
that's
in
sort
of
orange
and
a
small
retail
environment
that
exists
there.
BV
You
can
see
that
there
is
at
the
bend
of
the
parking
there's
a
set
of
stairs
and
those
connect
to
emery
road
so
that
the
emery
road
building
has
access
to
those
parking
spaces
and
what
we've
tried
to
do
is
indicate
through
color
of
the
studio's
ones,
and
two
bedroom
units
on
the
very
far
side
are
the
townhouse
units
and
those
are
primarily
one
bedroom
and
one
three
bedroom
next
slide.
Please,
sir.
BV
This
is
showing
that
second
level
plan
and
at
the
very
bottom,
where
it
says
open
to
below
or
is
the
area
two-story
space
for
the
retail
and
two-story
space
for
the
lobby,
so
you
can
come
in
the
lobby,
go
up
a
flight
of
stairs
or
use
the
elevator
to
access
the
indoor
amenity
space,
as
well
as
the
outdoor
amenity
space.
And
then,
as
you
see,
the
studios
are
the
lighter
blue.
The
a
indicates
artist
units,
so
we've
spread
them
throughout
the
building.
BV
A
BV
A
A
BU
C
BV
Stop
at
this,
so
this
shows
that
roof
plan.
You
can
see
that
we
have
the
deck
that
the
attorney
I've
identified.
That's
about
2300
square
feet.
It's
only
on
the
cambridge
side.
The
rest
of
the
roof
is
really
is,
is
both
pv
ready
and
also
the
location
for
the
individual
mechanical
units
will
be
for
each
of
the
units.
C
L
C
L
BW
C
BU
Well,
we've
learned
from
other
projects,
so
there
it
is
documented
in
the
article
80..
We
cannot
actually
because
of
fair
housing
laws
put
in
the
same
kind
of
covenant
that
we
would
for
the
parking.
But
we
do
know
how
to
market
away
from
students.
Do
staggered
movements
not
have
the
leases
start
in
rhythm
with
semesters?
That's
that's
how
it's
done.
Oh
god,
discouraged
okay,.
C
I
don't
know
I
understand
that,
though
thank
you.
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
was
being
done.
I
you
know
the
previous
presentation
compact
it
sort
of
is
the
worst
of
both.
It
was
compact
living
units
without
the
shared
community
space
or
without
clarity
on
the
space.
So
this
is
much
better
and
thank
you
for
that.
C
I
BJ
BL
BW
I'm
sorry,
madam
chair,
we
to
completely
clean
up
the
facade
and
we're
working
with
a
group
called
postcards
from
alston
to
do
an
art
installation
during
the
interim
period
because
we
want
we
do
want
the
building
to
look
and
show
much
better
than
it
currently
does.
So
we
take
those
comments
to
heart.
A
A
BV
But
it
is
articulating
both
at
that
third
level.
Where
you
see
some
carve
outs,
the
rhythm
of
the
windows
are
being
somewhat
representative
of
the
buildings
that
are
there,
we're
using
a
metal
panel
to
lighten
up
the
building
again
somewhat
reflective
of
what
is
a
a
triple
decker,
but
not
a
masonry
sense
and
we're
certainly
using
the
ability
to
have
the
lobby
and
the
retail
space.
Almost
a
two-story
high
glassy
area
to
liven
up
and
activate
cambridge.
A
AY
Yes,
venom
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
the
code
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
As
the
board
is
aware,
they've
been
through
an
extensive
bpa
process,
but
the
most
recent
changes
they
went
back
to
the
austin
civic
association,
received
their
support
and
with
changes
regarding
the
micro
units.
They've
still
kept
their
commitment
to
17
for
idp
units
with
variations
in
the
amis.
We
think
this
is
critical
in
keeping
local
families
in
the
area.
Young
artists,
so
we're
in
full
support.
AY
AZ
Afternoon
this
is
more
of
the
creative
and
counselor
breed's
office
to
go
on
record
as
being
supported
this
project.
We
appreciate
the
fact
that
the
proponent
has
continued
to
work
with
the
neighborhood
and
our
office
on
this
project,
and
we
also
appreciate
that
they've
included
multiple
artists
unit,
idt
artist
units
and
two-bedroom
multiple
bedroom
idp
units.
I
we
also
appreciate
the
lower
parking
ratio
and,
as
conor
mentioned,
the
transit
incentives
to
try
to
get
people
to
use
transit
in
the
neighborhood.
AZ
I
did
just
want
to
note
that
that
something
that
is
typical
in
the
neighborhood
is
the
approval
project,
with
the
purpose
of
the
proviso
that
the
program
will
not
rent
undergraduate
students,
and
this
is
something
that
counselor
typically
just
leaves
up
to
whether
whether
that
is
requested
is
the
counselor
typically
leaves
that
up
to
the
neighborhood
association.
So
if
the
aca
does
request
that,
we
would
just
ask
that
the
opponent
agreed
to
that.
Thank
you.
A
A
A
AZ
I
believe
that
the
building
is
has
just
opened,
I
think
so
it
might
still
be
leasing,
but
I
know
that
gallery
space
is.
Greece
is
now
being
operated
by
an
awesome,
brighton
based
arts
organization
called
unbound,
visual
arts.
So
that's
going
to
be
open.
I
I'm
not.
I
don't
think
it's
open
to
the
public
soon,
but
I
know
that
they
they
have
leased
that
space.
Okay,.
BD
You,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
for
city
council
outlash,
michael
flaherty,
echoing
the
sentiments
of
the
mayor's
office,
as
well
as
council
braden's
office,
particularly
with
respect
to
the
17
affordability
as
well.
The
extensive
public
process,
as
well
as
limiting
the
compact
units,
the
council
like
to
join
his
colleague
council
braden
as
part
of
the
project.
Thank
you.
U
U
Q
BX
Q
AE
Q
D
Yes,
my
name
is
edward
beauchess.
I
live
at
75
cronin
shield
in
brookline,
but
I'm
a
working
artist
in
austin.
I
exhibit
there
frequently
and
do
a
lot
of
pro
bono
work
for
the
city
and
for
also
the
village
main
streets,
and
I
would
like
to
say
that
so
far
the
developers
have
been
incredible
partners
and
in
collaborating
with
me
I'll,
be
among
those
who
clean
up
the
whole
front
of
that
building
and
display
an
exhibit
called
postcards
from
austin
they've
been
supporting.
Q
L
Q
X
Q
BY
Sure
I
hope
I'll
go
first,
if
that's
okay
good
afternoon,
madame
cheer
members
of
the
board,
tony
desadoro
representing
the
austin
civic
association,
I
just
want
to
go
on
record
that
we
supported
this
project.
The
last
iteration,
given
that
the
majority
of
the
concerns
of
those
who
did
not
support
the
project
revolved
around
the
compact
living
pilot
and
the
size
of
the
units.
Q
BA
BA
Manager,
members
of
the
board
annabelle,
going
to
the
right
nelson
improvement
association.
We
did
not
vote
to
support
this
project
due
to
the
height
no
green
space,
the
sidewalk
size-
and
this
is
the
density
of
this
building.
It's
a
32
000
square
foot
lot
with
164
000
square
feet
proposed
we're
very
concerned
about
the
micro
units,
I'm
also
having
a
question
on
the
process.
Here
they
did
go
back
to
the
aca,
which
is
great,
but
they
did
not
go
back
to
the
they
didn't
have
a
public
meeting
with
iag.
BA
They
did
not
come
back
to
the
baia,
so
I'm
not
sure
where
the
process
is.
This
is
the
first
time
I've
heard
of
these
changes
and
they
certainly
have
had
plenty
of
time
and
also
they're
not
consistent
with
a
guest
suite
study.
It's
four
stories
away
from
the
guest
street
and
braintree.
That's
proposed
not
six
to
seven.
Thank
you.
A
AP
S
A
S
S
U
S
He
filed
an
official
open
manual
on
the
plane
which
we
discussed
in
session
on
april
27th,
and
I
responded
that
we
don't
believe
we
had
violated
anything.
If
you
feel
that
sitting
to
the
attorney
general's
office,
the
attorney
general
issued
its
decision
on
july
15th,
which
we
received
at
our
office,
the
attorney
general
determined
that
the
board
had
not
violated
the
open
meeting.