►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 7-9-19
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
Good
morning
the
Court
of
Appeal
for
Tuesday
July
9th
is
now
in
session.
Just
a
reminder,
please,
if
you
are
in
the
middle
of
a
conversation
in
the
back
of
the
room,
please
take
it
outside
and
if
you
have
cell
phones,
please
make
sure
they
are
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting
Law.
This
meeting
is
being
live-streamed,
so
you
can
access
it
later.
Should
you
have
the
desire
to
just
a
reminder,
please,
when
you
speak
in
support
or
an
opposition
to
a
project,
please
give
us
new
information.
A
We
are
here
on
a
voyage
of
discovery
from
you
to
really
understand
what
your
concerns
are
or
why
you're
supporting
a
project
so
give
us
new
information,
and
if
somebody
has
already
stated
you
are
the
reason
for
your
support
or
your
opposition
put
your
name
and
address
for
the
record
mr.
fortune.
Thank.
B
C
C
Lock,
Dale
Road
is
an
existing
two-story
self
storage
facility
on
July
25th
2017,
the
Board
granted
zoning
relief
to
allow
for
a
proposed
three-story
addition.
The
existing
facility,
due
to
recent
changes
to
the
project
the
project
has
been
delayed
as
a
result
of
these
changes
were
requesting
a
one-year
extension
of
the
existing
zoning
away.
B
E
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
the
Catholic
house
law,
75
Arlington
Street
in
Boston,
an
attorney
for
the
applicant
to
seventy
Dorchester
Ave,
was
approved
by
this
board
on
July
14,
2017
and
request
is
hereby
made
for
a
one-year
extension
subsequent
to
the
approvals.
The
project
was
purchased
by
a
new
owner
who
then
filed
a
notice
of
project
change
with
the
BPD,
a
switching
the
form
of
the
units
approved
from
rental
to
ownership,
and
they
are
nearing
completion
of
a
full
set
of
construction
drawings
with
construction
expected
to
commence.
A
B
F
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Linz
2:45,
Sumner
Street.
He
sponsored
on
behalf
the
petitioner
madam
chair,
this
board
granted
relief
to
allow
the
subdivision
and
the
construction
of
two
to
family
dwellings
at
two
to
eight
Ward's
Ward
Street
in
East
Boston.
That
was
back
in
August
of
2017
August
15th
we've
been
in
the
process
of
finalizing
the
construction
plans
and
have
received
design
review
approval
from
the
BPD
a
for
this
project.
The
delay,
essentially
as
a
result
of
an
encroaching
neighbor
on
the
property
that
we've
been
dealing
with.
So
once
that's
resolved.
A
B
G
In
Boston
with
me
is
David
Sullivan
project
architect,
as
well
as
developers
representative
Joe
Hennessy.
You
should
have
revised
plans
that
were
provided.
This
is
a
nine
unit,
new
residential
condominium
development
by
the
board
by
decision
on
August
17th
last
summer
since
that
time-
and
it
was
approved-
with
a
proviso
of
her
BPD-
a
design
review
as
part
of
that
process
and
as
directed
by
the
VP
da,
we
have
been
asked
to
make
some
modifications
to
the
main
entry
lobby,
which
results
in
removing
one
of
the
contact
parking
spaces
of
which
we
got
relief.
H
A
F
B
This
is
amendment
who
removed
the
construction
of
a
stair
tower
associate
associated
with
the
rear,
decks,
the
revised
level
floor
floor
floor,
framing
plan
at
construction
2
and
steering
closure
between
floors,
3
and
4,
and
the
replacement
of
stairs
and
change
sprinkler
design
to
an
NFPA,
13
partial
installation.
The
violation
of
the
eighth
edition,
780
CMR
1021
number
of
exits
and
contendere
continuty
1020
1.2
stories
with
one
exit
subject
to
the
building
is
not
equipped
fully
with
the
Col
compliant
sprinkler
system
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
J
J
J
A
J
Gonna,
do
a
plan
of
you
front
the
back
of
the
building
section
here
through
the
building
and
an
11
and
a
half
by
17,
drawing
that
shows
the
layout
of
each
of
the
floors
in
the
building,
giving
you
some
before
and
after
pictures
that
show
the
building
before
the
addition
of
the
fourth
storey
and
after
weight,
improvement,
I
think
giving
you
a
copy
of
an
email
from
Tom
O'donnell
at
ISD
to
the
project
architect,
which
is
pertinent
to
this
matter.
I've.
J
J
A
J
Okay,
well,
the
the
present
in
the
best
way
I.
Can
the
project
that
we're
here
before
I
started
some
time
ago.
As
you
know,
it's
under
the
8th
edition
of
the
building
codes
and
the
approval
was
granted
to
add
the
fourth
floor,
and
originally
there
was
a
stair
tower
on
the
back
of
the
building
was
intended
to
serve
as
the
second
exit
for
the
third
floor
unit.
It
was
in
pretty
tough
shape
at
some
point.
The
plan
was
was
made
to
remove
it.
J
J
I
I
That-
and
that
is
yes
you're
right,
that
is
the
contention
of
ISD.
But
if
you're
saying
that
that's
not
a
violation
of
the
building
code,
then
you
don't
need
building
codes
relief
because
you're
arguing
that
it's
compliant
with
the
building
code
yep.
So
if
it
doesn't
need
building
code
relief
and
there's
no
need
for
this
board
to
grant
you
building
code
relief
and
I
would
make
a
motion
that
we
deny
building
code
relief
for
this
project.
So.
A
B
B
F
And
address
bill
erected.
Please
morning,
madam
chair
members,
the
board
Richard
lens
245
Sumner,
Street,
East
Boston
on
the
application,
are
requesting
a
deferral
for
this
matter.
There
will
be
update
to
the
plan
and
we
do
need
to
file
that
with
ISD
determinate.
There
are
no
further
violations
with
respect
for
the
updated
plan
requested
referral
for
that
matter.
F
L
B
F
Richard
Lin's
245,
Sumner,
Street,
East,
Boston,
I'm
sure
we'd
have
a
chance
to
have
a
conversation
to
evoke
the
district
city
counselor,
as
well
as
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services
on
this
one.
This
is
one
of
those
cases
where
a
new
community
group
was
formed.
We
have
presented
to
the
community
group
that
originally
had
jurisdiction
over
this
area.
The
new
community
group
has
now
taken
over
that
area.
We've
not
had
a
chance
to
present
to
them.
A
A
A
B
A
M
Requesting
a
deferral
for
this
review
for
another
meeting
based
on,
we
have
some
updating
of
plans
to
do
as
a
result
of
site
design
by
the
engineering
by
the
engineer
which
we're
currently
analyzing.
Now
it
will
affect
the
site
design.
Ultimately,
the
proposed
site
design
and
possibly
the
proposed
front
elevation,
which
was
part
of
our
community
process.
A
B
B
This
is
seeking
to
confirm
the
oxy
as
a
two-family
dwelling
in
store
and
then
changed
the
occupancy
to
a
three
family
dwelling
also
to
a
DS
two-story
addition
and
renovate
the
building.
The
violation
is
article
2075.
This
is
in
the
he
spots
an
iPod
applicability,
article
53,
section
56
street
parking
loading,
insufficient
parking
article
53,
section
8,
the
uses
of
the
regulations
is
forbidden,
article
53,
section,
9,
excessive
fa,
our
article
53
section
9.
B
N
Board
attorney
Matt
Echols,
with
draggled
Toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
15
Broad
Street
here
in
Boston
with
me,
our
manager,
the
owner
46
Utah
Street,
as
mentioned
we're
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
from
a
two
family
and
a
store
to
a
three
family
at
a
two-story
addition
to
even
out
the
building
and
renovate
the
structure,
even
those
classified
as
a
store.
It
hasn't
been
used
as
such
in
a
number
of
years
throughout
our
community
process.
No
one
could
even
remember
it
being
used
as
a
store
and
have
been
used.
N
This
kind
of
an
illegal
studio
apartment
so
we're
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy.
The
lot
size
is
just
over
1,100
square
feet
and
the
zoning
districts
A
to
F
2,000.
All
the
violations
that
were
mentioned
are
pre-existing
with
the
existing
structure,
as
mentioned
use
is
a
violation.
It's
a
two-family
district.
However,
this
is
pre-existing
because
it's
a
two-family
at
a
store
and
we're
seeking
to
change
it
to
a
three
family.
The
Farr
allowed
this
point
date
we're
about
3.0.
N
The
height
allowed
is
two-and-a-half
stories
and
35
feet,
we're
proposing
three
stories
and
37
feet
which,
on
the
second
page
you
can
see,
is
the
existing
height
of
the
tallest
part
of
the
structure,
as
it's
currently
constituted
off
street
parking.
We're
trying
to
have
one
new
space,
however,
because
we're
taking
away
the
storefront,
that's
negated,
because
it's
a
1
we
need
one
and
we're
taking
away
one
essentially
for
that
store
use.
Finally,
we
are
in
the
iPod
and
the
side
and
rear
yards
are
not
changing.
Those
are
pre-existing
valuations
as
well.
N
A
N
Were
not
cited
for
roof
structure
restriction,
there
is
a
roof
deck
proposed,
which
would
be
exclusive
to
unit
3,
which
is
on
the
third
floor
in
the
basement.
There'd
be
common,
mechanicals
and
storage.
Those
will
be
accessed
separately
from
Marian
Street,
which
is
this
is
on
the
corner
of
Marian
a
Utah
and
the
remainder.
N
Remainder
of
the
lower
level
would
be
unit
one
with
two
bedrooms
and
a
bath
with
a
ceiling
height
of
seven
six,
as
you
go
up
to
the
first
floor,
that's
the
rest
of
unit,
one
which
contains
another
bedroom
and
one
and
a
half
baths.
The
second
floor
contains
unit
2,
and
the
third
floor
contains
unit
3,
both
of
which
are
two-bedroom
units.
At
about
950
square
feet.
N
We
did
go
through
a
lengthy
community
process,
with
particular
attention
to
the
design
of
the
building
to
make
sure
it
fit
in
with
historic,
Eagle
Hill
again,
as
you
see
the
existing
picture
on
page
2,
it
doesn't
really
fit
in
with
anywhere
right
now.
So
we
worked
with
the
Eagle
Hill
Civic
Association
to
really
get
a
design
that
works
for
everyone
and
we
were
able
to
ultimately
get
the
sport
of
the
Eagle
Hill
Civic
Association,
with
that
I'll
pause
and
take
any
further
questions.
A
I
O
P
A
B
Boa
9200
1
174
Everett
Street.
This
is
a
king
of
Archer
from
a
three
to
a
four
unit,
residential
dwelling
construct,
a
rare
addition
and
rare
deck
construct
a
fourth
floor,
vertical
addition
on
an
existing
footprint
and
extend
living
space
to
the
basement
for
unit
one
violations:
article
2075,
it's
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
33,
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling,
this
of
avenues,
article
53,
section,
52,
roof
structure,
restrictions
in
article
53,
section
56,
Osprey
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9
additional
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
53,
section
9,
the
Floyd.
B
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
9,
the
building
height
is
excessive.
Its
stories,
article
53
section
9,
the
villain
height,
is
excessive
and
feet.
Article
53,
section,
9
usable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
53,
section
9
front
yard,
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9
side
yard
is
insufficient.
An
article
53
section
9,
the
rear
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
other
X.
Please
good.
F
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Lin's,
245,
Sumner,
Street,
East
boss,
on
the
behalf
of
the
petitioner
with
me,
is
Michael
Raab
who's,
the
property
owner
along
with
Triola
raya
from
joy
street
design,
who's
the
architect
for
this
project.
This
is
a
exist
pre-existing
tree
family
dwelling
semi-detached
located
at
Jeffrey's,
Point
neighborhood,
section
of
East
Boston.
It
is
in
I,
guess
marginal
condition
requiring
a
substantial
investment
in
rehabilitation.
F
F
F
So
the
process
actually
started
in
earnest,
maybe
about
eight
months
ago,
to
get
this
through
the
community
process
to
come
up
with
a
plan
for
upgrading
rehabilitation.
As
I
said,
this
upon,
completion
would
be
intended
for
home.
Ownership
is
to
create
four
separate
new
condominium
units
in
the
neighborhood.
The
unit
sizes
range
are
three
of
those
units
would
be
two
bedrooms,
one
would
be
a
one-bedroom
plus
the
RIC,
the
size
of
the
units
range
from
945
square
feet
at
the
smallest
to
about
1370
square
feet
for
the
larger
two-bedroom.
F
The
fourth
level
that
we
are
proposing
is
set
back
from
the
street
line,
both
in
the
rear,
the
roof
deck
that
is
sited
or
a
rooftop
restriction.
That's
cited
in
the
refusal
letter
refer
to
the
actual
roof
deck.
That
is
part
of
that
fourth
level
unit.
There
is
no
roof
deck
proposed
above
the
fourth
level,
so
no
head
house
and
no
roof
deck
above
the
top
of
the
building.
With
respect
to
the
zoning
relief,
that's
necessary.
This
does
lie
within
the
three
f2000
districts.
Therefore
proposed
multi-family
use
would
require
a
variance.
F
There
are
a
number
of
multifamily
uses
within
this
particular
section
of
average
Street,
and
it's
consistent
with
the
types
of
uses
in
that
area.
This
does
have
a
conforming
lot
size.
It
does
have
the
minimum
lot
size
of
2,000
excess
of
2,000
square
feet
and
we
do
meet
the
requirements
for
frontage.
We
were
excited
for
front
yard.
However,
I
would
point
out
that
the
modal
setback
for
the
row
houses
on
this
street
district,
as
well
as
the
side
yard.
We
are
attached
on
one
side,
therefore
no
requirement
for
a
side
here.
F
On
that
side,
the
only
side
yards
violation
that
we
would
trigger
involves
the
vertical
addition
at
the
fourth
level,
because
that
would
be
within
two
and
a
half
feet
of
the
lot
line.
I
would
point
out
there
is
a
passageway
to
the
left
of
the
building,
so
that
would
allow
for
a
sufficient
amount
of
buffer,
as
if
a
side
yard
was
present.
A
F
The
pre-existing
condition
is,
is
a
three
unit.
Building
with
no
parking,
the
proposed
unit
would
only
trigger
a
violation
for
one
required
parking
space
under
Article
53.
So
we
aren't,
we
aren't
proposing
the
parking.
But
again
this
is
one
of
those
situations
that
assuming
we
even
could
put
the
parking
on
site.
We
would
be
sacrificing
one
and
a
half
parking
spaces
on
the
street
to
cut
a
driveway
to
bring
a.
A
O
P
B
Calling
vo
a
nine
four,
two:
nine
six,
four
three
Morton
place:
this
is
daddy
front.
Andrea
dormice
by
expanding
the
existing
small
shed
dormice
the
violations
article,
twenty
seventy
five:
it's
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section,
nine,
the
hi
uncle
fifty-three
section,
nine,
hooray
yard
setback,
article
53,
section,
nine
front
yard
setback,
an
article
53
section
I
on
the
side,
yet
setback
name
and
address
for
the
record
later.
A
Q
On
the
second-floor
unit,
so
this
is
a
two
to
family
unit,
so
on
the
the
second
unit,
we're
essentially
just
interested
or
looking
forward
to
adding
dormers
right
now,
I
mean
I'm
six
feet,
so
the
usable
space
is
probably
about
seven
or
so
feet.
Pretty
much.
The
pitch
of
the
roof
is
to
the
point
where
the
two
bedrooms
for
the
second
floor,
which
are
on
this
the
second
floor
unit,
aren't
fully
usable.
So
they
don't
have
the
walking
space
it's
more
like
walking
into
an
attic.
A
A
Q
B
Boa
955
733
95
Prescott
Street.
This
is
a
construction
of
six
residential
dwelling
units
with
three
of
the
nine
existing
celery
off
street
parking
spaces
located
at
370
remonstrate,
a
three-story
structure
with
two
dwelling
units
per
floor
and
exterior
combined
two
Lots
into
one
want
to
be
known
as
93
95
Prescott
violations,
article
25,
section
5.
This
flood
has
a
district
article
53
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
unit
is
the
forbidden
news.
Article
53
section
9,
the
Lord
additional
dwelling
unit
is
insufficient.
B
53
section
9,
the
phylidia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53,
section
unusable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
of
the
front
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient
and
article
53
section
I
on
the
side.
Yeah.
The
setback
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
9,
the
rayon
setback
requirement
is
insufficient.
Article
53
section
56
off
street
parking
ancillary
existing
off
street
parking
three
spaces
located
a
lot
across
the
street
at
370.
Berman
Street
is
less
than
400
feet
of
distance.
B
R
Thank
you.
Yes,
we
returned
to
the
board.
We
were
here
last
year
regarding
this
project
and
we
come
in
with
a
change.
It
is
a
project,
as
you
indicated,
that
proposes
to
a
demolish
to
existing
dilapidated
one
family
homes
like
Prescott
Street
in
East,
Boston
and
construct
in
its
place,
combine
the
two
lots
and
constructing
this
place
a
building
with
six
units.
Now
this
is
these
two
lots
of
sheer
two
different
districts.
93
is
in
a
neighborhood
shopping.
District
in
95
is
in
a
three
family
district.
You
know
by
right.
A
R
Lar
properties
owns
a
an
existing
license
parking
lot
at
370,
Bremen
Street,
that
was
approved
by
the
city
in
2015
and
received
its
use
of
premises
and
of
January
of
2016.
At
the
time
there
are
nine
spaces
in
that
law,
at
six
of
which
are
allocated
for
a
building
at
365
Chelsea
Street.
So
this
lot
is
in
the
back
of
365
Chelsea
Street.
R
However,
there
are
three
unassigned
spots
in
that
parking
lot
and
the
family,
which
is
that
lar
properties
of
rbirtle
family
I
determined
that
they
could
assign
those
spaces
or
three
of
those
spaces
to
the
units
on
Prescott
Street,
which
I
think
is
being
crossed.
95
Prescott
Street.
Now,
in
addition
to
that,
as
the
plans
indicate
that
there
are
lots
of
alternate
options
for
public
transit
as
well
as
private
transit,
it's.
A
At
365,
Chelsea,
Street,
all
370,
I'm,
sorry,
3,
370,
bremen,
yes,
then,
should
should
not
have
an
appeal
process
to,
because
that's
for
ancillary
just
to
make
sure
that
it's
it's
documented,
and
that
is
on
the
record.
That
and
because
you
know
buildings
are
here
for
a
long
period
of
time.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
that
should
should
there
be
a
proposal
for
370
Bremen
Bremen
Street,
that
there
is
something
on
record
that
speaks
to
the
fact
that
this
actually
accommodates
ancillary
parking.
With
this
address
and
an
N
a
second
address
well.
R
Madam
Kia
I
had
this
discussion
with
the
plains
of
salmon
abut.
They
insisted
that,
since
it's
a
pre-existing
lot
its
populations,
there
are
three
assigned
spots.
Are
there
three
spots
in
of
it
or
not
assigned?
What
we
could
do
is
go
back
into
ISD
change
and
correct
the
use
of
premises
to
include,
even
though
the
original
plan
of
which
we
have
a
copy
was
stamped
for
nine
spaces.
Six
spaces
are
allocated
to
that
first
project
and
that's
in
the
decision
that
was
written
about
365,
Chelsey,
so
I
believe
on
the
use
of
premises.
R
I
could
say
three
spots
allocated
for
the
other
property.
We
know
quickly.
The
Prescott,
Street
and
now
I
think
there
is
a
reference
to
it
as
ancillary
parking.
In
any
event,
you
know
it's
I
think
it's
ancillary
parking
for
for
365
Chelsey
anyway,
so
the
Lord
itself
is
has
been
approved.
It
was
actually
pre-existing
for
twenty
years
with
those
spots
it
was
just
never
legalized,
so
I
mean
I
think
there's
a
way
to
protect
it.
You
can
put
it
as
a
proviso
on
this
decision.
R
A
The
goal
is
not
to
it
is
to
make
sure
that
you
that,
if
you've
done
everything
right
that
this,
that
that
this
works,
however,
we
just
need
to
make
sure
that
the
long-term
viability
of
the
community's
maintained,
because,
all
of
a
sudden,
you
know
365,
370
Bremen,
gets
constructed
and
as
a
loss
at
nine
spaces,
which
makes
a
difference
to
our
community
so
figure
that
out.
But
in
the.
I
S
I
T
I
R
Practice
at
this
point
in
time
this
is
the
Roberto
family.
They
have
a
business
called
Spinelli's
banquet
hall
in
pastry
shop
in
East
Boston,
and
they
they
have
been
very
involved
in
the
community
and
they
have
been
basically
providing
rental,
housing,
very
upgraded
rental,
housing
and
really
reasonable
rates
for
the
community.
So
at
this
point
that
that
is
the
plan
is
that
it
will
be
rental.
I
might
also
say
that
the
city
of
Boston
assess
has
assessed
this
law
as
commercial
and
parking
lot.
So
it's
it's
on
the
books
as
they
have
to
end.
R
In
addition
to
that,
like
I,
said
the
use
of
premises,
I
guess
what
I
would
just
ask
madam
chair
before
you
take
any
motions,
is:
are
you
suggesting
that
the
motion
with
the
motion
would
cover
us
for
today,
and
then
we
just
work
it
out.
Administrative
ly,
with
is
d
as
to
the
new
use
of
premises.
If
you
were
to
approve
this
project.
O
P
A
You
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
opposition
motion,
please
and
I
think
as
I.
Think
this
through
should
see
370
Bremen
as
ancillary
parking,
and
it
should
mention
both
dresses.
So
what
would
that
entail?
That
would
entail
a
low-level
appeal
because
that
could
even
come
to
subcommittee
because
you've
already
done
the
process.
Okay,
but
in
the
meantime,
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
I
U
N
Board
sturdy
metal,
dragon
stove,
15,
Broad,
Street
Boston
with
me,
stands
leather
on
behalf
of
50,000
Street.
As
always,
people
to
do
this
morning
is
to
legalize
the
existing
space
in
the
basement
for
unit
1.
This
unit
was
originally
purchased
with
the
basement,
completely
renovated
and
with
the
thought
that
it
was
already
legalized
space.
It
was
then
discovered
that
it
hadn't
been
properly
permitted.
So
we're
trying
to
rectify
that
this
morning.
Again,
there's
no
work
to
be
done.
The
zoning
districts
of
3f
mm
it's
an
existing
three
family.
N
The
basement
will
be
comprised
of
excuse
me,
a
common
utility
room
which
has
separate
access
for
all
the
residents
and
unit
ones,
the
lower
level,
which
will
be
approximately
300
square
feet
of
living
space
and
a
bathroom.
The
ceiling
height,
is
8
feet
in
this
living
space
and
there'll
be
an
interior
stairwell
that
connects
this
space
directly
to
unit
1
on
the
upper
level
as
well
as
that
second
means
of
egress
I
mentioned
to
access
the
utility
room.
The
only
violation
is
that
they
are
allowed
a
1.0
apparently
without
this
space
we're
at
a
1.9.
N
N
O
P
U
A
B
Five:
two:
nine
nine
four
seven.
Oh
four
Saratoga
Street.
This
is
a
confirm:
Marcus,
Dixon,
single
family
and
change
to
two
units.
By
erecting
addition.
In
Dec
on
to
an
existing
structure,
the
violation
is
article
2017
fire.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section
56
Osprey
parking
Lord
and
none
is
proposed.
Article
53,
section
9,
excessive
fer
article
53,
section,
I,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
radical
33,
section,
9,
insufficient
rail
yard,
setback
in
article
53,
section,
52,
alteration,
reconfiguration
of
a
route
profile
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
morning.
F
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
Lin's
245,
some
nurse
treating
spots
on
behalf
of
petitioner
with
you
with
me,
is
matthew
kramer,
who
is
the
property
owner
and
homeowner
along
Woodley
Dearborn
from
Derby
Sparrow
architects
chair.
This
property
is
located
in
the
I
guess
for
lack
of
a
better
description
these
days
and
the
Harbor
View
neighborhood,
which
is
lower
orient
heights
portion
of
East
Boston.
This
is
an
existing
single-family
dwelling
that
we
proposed
to
completely
renovate
preserve
most
of
the
existing
structure
and
convert
to
a
two-family
dwelling.
Mr.
F
Cramer
intends
to
occupy
this
property
with
his
family
on
the
upper
level
and
would
continue
to
rent
out
the
lower
level
as
a
separate
unit.
This
is
not
intended
to
be
for
home
ownership.
This
property
is
located
in
a
2f,
4,000
district
and
would
already
be
preexisting
non-conforming,
based
on
the
minimum
lot
size.
Our
proposal
would
not
change
much
with
respect
to
the
existing
lot,
rather
than
just
the
vertical
addition
of
the
building
and
the
complete
renovation
of
the
existing
building.
F
By
way
of
relief,
we
would
require
no
relief
for
the
use
as
to
family
is
allowed
in
the
district.
So
we
are
proposing
a
conforming
use.
The
pre-existing
lot
size
of
2500
square
feet
again
is
not
being
altered.
Although
we
are
proposing
a
two-family
dwelling
on
a
pre-existing
lot
and
the
boat,
the
frontage
of
the
property
is
in
25
feet.
The
required
is
40
feet.
However,
this
is
again
a
pre-existing
condition
for
the
existing
use.
We
do
require
a
variance
for
on
the
right
side.
F
We
do
comply
with
the
floor
area
ratio,
which
is
an
80%
threshold
in
the
2f
4000
district,
we're
just
slightly
below
that
and
we
wouldn't
be
within
the
height,
both
the
height
by
way
of
stories,
as
well
as
the
actual
height
of
the
building.
Our
open
space
would
also
be
compliant
with
about
1200
square
feet
and
last
but
not
least,
would
be
the
parking,
although
we
could
look
at
the
possibility
of
adding
one
parking
space
again.
F
This
is
one
of
those
conditions
where
it
does
not
make
sense
to
cut
the
curb,
take
away
1
to
1/2
parking
spaces
on
the
street
in
order
to
make
accommodation
to
one
single
spot.
We
did
have
an
opportunity
to
present
this
extensively
through
the
neighborhood
process,
including
the
harbor
view
Neighborhood
Association,
who
I
believe
is
supplied
a
letter
to
the
board
indicating
their
support
for
this
project.
Based
upon
the
changes
we
made
with
that
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
of
the
board,
so.
A
F
V
I
O
M
Morning,
madam
chairman,
members
of
the
board
I'm
the
resident
neighbourhood,
127
129,
Byron
Street,
how
the
view
neighbourhood
associate
Network
so
I
would
speak
in
favor
of
this
project.
I
went
to
the
meetings
for
the
community
meetings
and
we
think
it's
in
enhancing
the
neighborhood
and
considers
the
context
of
the
neighbourhood.
I
B
Boa
nine
four
five
one,
two
seven
one
sixty
four
to
one:
seventy
Sumner
Street:
this
is
an
addition
of
a
fifth
floor
residential
unit,
the
building
building
to
be
a
commercial
on
first
floor
with
seven
residential
units,
above
violation,
article
9
section:
one
increase
from
six
dwelling
units
to
seven
twelve
twelve
units
is
conditional,
article
2070
five.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section
12.
R
R
This
project
really
seeks
to
add,
in
addition
to
the
already
approved
four-story
building
in
East
Boston.
That
will
comprise
the
seventh
unit
for
this
building.
The
reason
we're
back
is
because
mr.
Bruno
has
secured
financing
when
they
first
filed
for
this
project
and
it
was
approved.
There
were
four
floors,
6
units
two
on
each
floor
and
they
really
wanted
to
go
with
a
seven,
but
they
couldn't
so
now
they
have
secured
financing
and
are
able
to
do
so
and
Doug
will
walk
you
through
the
plans.
R
But
let
me
just
say
that
we
did
go
through
an
extensive
process
with
the
community
we
had
in
a
butters
meeting.
There
was
no
opposition.
We
also
met
two
times
with
the
maverick
central
Neighborhood
Association,
and
you
see
there
is
a
letter
in
that
packet.
I,
just
handed
in
that
indicates
that
they
are
in
agreement
with
this
proposal
with
some
conditions
that
they
have
asked
and
requested
that
we
comply
with,
and,
secondly,
is
there
are.
R
There
are
signatures
from
all
of
the
closest
to
butters
to
this
project,
and
let
me
just
say
that
this
particular
stretch
of
some
ministries,
the
first
two
blocks
of
some
Street
right
in
the
middle
of
all
the
development
that's
happening
on
the
waterfront.
However,
it's
only
more
on
the
community
side
of
the
waterfront
and
that
particular
block
is
interesting
because
it
has
a
lot
of
old
maritime
buildings
that
are
actually
quite
tall
for
the
neighborhood,
and
so
this
is.
R
This
is
consistent
not
only
with
some
of
the
older
buildings,
and
there
are
pictures
in
our
plans
that
show
you
the
number
of
taller
buildings
that
exist
in
the
area,
but
also
it's
it's
actually
not
as
high
as
some
of
the
existing
new
projects
that
are
occurring
on
the
waterfront
across
the
street,
from
it
so
I
mean
in
that
respect.
Article
27
I
thought
it's
consistent
in
terms
of
scale
and,
of
course
it
has
community
support.
Let.
A
A
Y
A
Y
A
Y
O
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
world,
in
a
drama
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services
I,
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
the
developer
with
the
community,
and
there
were
was
no
opposition
from
the
Abarth
&
Go
support
from
maverick
central
Neighborhood
Association
I'm
from
the
direct
abiders.
Thank
you.
P
T
Y
B
Filing
vo,
a
nine
three
four,
eight
eight
three
two:
seventy
two
Sumner
Street.
This
is
a
change
of
oxygen
from
3
to
a
4
unit,
dwelling
renovate
erect
and
addition
and
added
a
parking
to
the
rift.
The
violations
out
of
53,
section
8,
Emma
fires
live
in
use
and
a
3f
2000
sub-district
nautical
53
section
I
on
the
floor.
The
a
ratio
is
excessive
medical
2017.
B
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPhone
article
53,
section
9
additional
lot
areas,
insufficient
article
53,
section
9
the
bill
and
high
success
event
stories:
article
53,
section,
9,
the
building
height
is
excessive
and
feeding
article
53,
section
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
An
article
53
section
9
of
the
rail
yard,
is
insufficient.
Namin
addressed
other
regulate
morning.
F
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Richard
Lin's
245
Summer
Street,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
with
me,
is
really
a
so-called
a
property
owner
along
with
Owen
Thomas,
who
is
the
property
architect.
I
haven't
shared.
This
property
is
located
in
the
Jefferies
Point
section
of
East
Boston
in
a
series
of
row,
houses
which
have
fortunately
gone
under
significant
renovation,
one
by
one
as
you
go
down,
Sumner
Street
heading
further
into
Jeffrey's
point.
F
This
particular
building
is
the
pre-existing
three
family
dwelling
that
we
are
proposing:
complete
renovation
with
upgrade
to
life
safety,
as
well
as
a
vertical
addition
for
a
fourth
level
to
create
two
duplex
units,
a
total
number
units
before
we
are
proposing
to
add
to
a
free
parking
spaces.
Unlike
the
previous
proposal,
we
do
actually
have
access
off
of
a
private
way
that
would
allow
for
the
acts
access
to
the
rear
of
the
property
and
to
provide
two
off-street
parking
spaces
without
the
need
to
add
a
curb
cut
asunder.
Street.
F
With
respect
to
the
zoning
overview,
this
project,
the
site,
is
located
at
three
f2000
district.
Again,
a
variance
for
multifamily
used
because
we
are
proposing
four
units
would
be
required.
We
do
require
a
variance
for
the
lot
size,
although
this
lot
appears
to
have
been
part
of
a
larger
scheme
of
Lots.
There
were
some
subdivisions
done
prior
to
ownership
that
has
reduced
this
lot
size
down
to
1,800
square
feet.
However,
it
is
pretty
consistent
with
the
adjoining
Lots
locate
on
that
side
of
Sumner
Street.
F
F
However,
that
is
by
way
of
an
easement
that
will
offer
parking,
so
no
structure
could
ever
be
proposed
to
be
located
to
the
rear
of
this
property,
so
you
would
have
again
well
you
wouldn't
have
the
setbacks
on
the
rear
of
the
buildings,
the
property
line.
You
would
have
the
experience
of
a
rearguard
that
would
be
sufficient
for
article
53
in
this
neighborhood.
This.
F
F
The
maximum
height
allowed
is
35
in
the
neighborhood
I
believe
this
side
of
Sumner
Street
has
seen
repeated
proposals
for
upgrades
and
renovations
of
the
housing
stock,
and
this
would
be
consistent
with
a
number
of
the
projects
that
have
been
approved
in
that
section
of
Sumner.
Street
I
know
that's
not
binding
upon
the
board,
but
just
to
provide
context
for
the
area
and
the
changing
design
of
the
structures
that
exist.
In
that
section
of
Geoffrey's
point
and
as
I
indicated,
this
would
require
only
one
additional
parking
space.
F
F
F
I
O
Z
Good
morning
my
name
is
Margaret
farmer
and
I'm,
representing
the
Jefferies
point
Neighborhood
Association.
We
reviewed
this
project
on
several
occasions
and
had
a
very
close
vote
with
12
residents
voting
in
opposition
11
voting
in
favor
the
major
concern
being
the
access
through
Emmett
place,
as
it
is
a
private
way,
and
trash
removal
in
particular
needs
to
be
taken
out
through
Emmett
place
on
to
Everett
streets,
and
there
are
a
number
of
residents
who
are
already
affected
by
trash
removal
through
Emmett
place.
F
F
A
B
Voa
nine
one
four
four
three
541
Sumner
Street,
this
is
to
confirm-
is
a
three
family
and
a
renovate
the
existing
structure
and
extend
living
space
into
the
basement.
Erecting
new
roof
deck,
the
violation,
article
2017.
This
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
article
53,
section
I
and
excessive
FAO
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
F
Morning,
madam
chair,
the
board
Richard
Lin's,
245
son
this
week,
he's
lost
to
be
on
the
petitioner
with
me,
is
Chris
lento,
who
is
the
homeowner
found
she
had.
This
involves
the
complete
rehabilitation
of
an
existing
three
family,
we're
proposing
to
maintain
the
occupancy
as
a
three
family
because
of
the
extent
of
the
renovations
that
we're
proposing
there
will
be
upgrades
to
both
the
Life,
Safety
and
egress
for
the
building.
We
are
also
proposing,
in
addition
to
the
renovations
that
that
will
take
place
in
the
interior.
This
will
also
include
a
roof
deck.
F
The
roof
deck
would
be
accessed
only
by
the
upper-level
unit.
Only
so
it's
not
common
to
the
building
and
we
are
not
proposing
to
access
the
roof
deck.
By
way
of
my
weight
of
head
house
with
respect
to
compliance
under
Article
53,
we
pretty
much
comply
with
all
the
requirements.
The
relief
necessary
was
the
floor
to
area
ratio.
We
do
have
pre-existing
if
they
are
about
1.96.
F
1.96,
our
new
FA
RV,
two
point
four:
three
with
the
renovations,
the
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basin.
We
do
also
have
a
permitted
setback
that
we're
showing
with
for
the
design
of
the
roof
deck,
to
the
extent
that
it's
non-compliant,
we
intend
to
comply
through
BPD
a
design
review
if
that
board
requires
that,
for
purposes
of
this
decision,.
O
P
A
B
B
Call
the
next
case
for
9:30
calling
BOA
9
to
8
8
3
6
28,
Monument
Square.
This
is
a
constructing
new
single-family
four-story
building
to
replace
the
building
torn
down
the
1962
on
the
same
location.
The
violation
is
article
62,
section
8.
The
number
of
allowed
stories
has
been
exceeded
in
article
62,
section
8
of
the
maximum.
The
height
is
been
exceeded.
AA
AB
It's
an
RH
mm
which
is
35
feet
and
three
storeys.
The
budding
buildings
are
all
in
the
you
know
above
50
feet
in
height,
and
we
are
proposing
to
match
the
roofline
height
of
the
immediate
of
budding
buildings
and
I
approximate,
that
at
about
50
1.75
of
feet
from
the
average
grade
around
Monument
Square
at
Concord,
Street.
A
I
AC
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
put
them
off
with
the
mayor's
office
in
Neighborhood,
Services
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
and
brothers
meeting
was
held
back
in
April
was
widely
attended.
There
were
very
few
concerns
about
the
hype,
walk
in
view
corridors,
but
a
lot
of
people
actually
likes
the
fact
that
the
height
was
staying
consistent.
What
the
rest
of
the
neighborhood
it
is
a
historic
area
next
to
the
Bunker
Hill
Monument.
For
that
reason,
we
like
to
recommend
PVD
a
designer
thank.
A
P
AD
A
I
I
B
B
The
BOA
nine
four
one,
three,
nine
five
33
to
35
Bowen
Street.
This
is
to
change
our
cue
from
five
residential
units
and
office
spaces
to
six
residential
units
and
office
space.
The
violation
article
23
section,
one
off
street
parking
is
insufficient.
The
residential
name
and
address
for
the
record.
G
Also
with
me
Regan's,
who
is
the
architect
from
Feingold
Alexander,
passed
out
for
the
board
memo
outlining
the
minor
relief
requested
here,
as
well
as
the
floorplan,
showing
the
subject
change
quickly.
Just
to
give
you
some
background,
this
is
a
project
that
was
approved
by
the
Zoning
Board
in
2015
for
a
historic
tax
credit
renovation
of
a
church
of
former
church
on
Bowdoin
Street
Beacon
Hill,
North
Slope
of
Beacon
Hill
change
of
audience.
Ii
was
improved
to
five
residential
units,
which
included
both
the
church
and
the
abutting
vicars
residence.
G
We
had
support
from
the
neighborhood
group
at
the
time.
What
we're
coming
here
for
now
is
simply
to
reconfigure
the
basement
unit,
which
is
the
fifth
unit
and
make
it
into
two.
It
is
a
currently
it
was
approved
as
a
4514
square
foot,
five
bedroom
unit,
which
is
too
large
and
not
currently
appropriate
from
a
market
standpoint,
so
we're
seeking.
V
G
A
G
I
L
AE
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
shanece
pencil
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
both
my
predecessor
and
I,
aided
and
conducting
the
community
process
for
this
proposal,
and
we
appreciate
the
applicants,
cooperation
and
collaboration
with
the
community.
At
this
moment
we
have
no
questions
or
concerns,
and
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you,
madam.
AF
AD
A
B
Four:
six:
five:
eight
zero
one
Merrimack
Street
the
applicant
is
seeking
the
extension
of
a
conditional
use
permit
to
provide
16
for
a
fee
open-air
parking
spaces
granted
by
the
board
of
appeal
by
a
decision
granted
on
May
23rd
2017,
attaching
a
two-year
proviso
to
reappear
before
the
board
violations,
article
6,
section,
4,
other
protection
or
conditions.
The
restrictions
are
required
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
morning.
AG
Charlie,
madam
chairman,
excuse
me
madam
chairwoman,
versus
the
board.
My
name
is
Jonathan.
Burke
have
a
business
address
of
44
Gloucester
Street
in
Boston
Massachusetts
we're
here
seeking
an
extension
of
a
conditional
use,
variance.
We
were
granted
two
years
ago
from
the
board
for
the
existing
parking
at
one
Merrimack
Street.
There's
no
changes
to
be
made.
We're
just
sickening.
An
extension
of
the
use
were
given
two
years
ago
with
a
proviso
to
reappear
before
the
board.
In
two
years
we
met
with
the
downtown
North
Association
a
West
End
Civic
Association
have
support
from
both
organizations.
AG
A
AG
Were
no
conditions
attached,
it
was
just
to
come
back
to
reappear
before
you
to
get
the
extension
after
checking
with
the
neighborhood
groups,
to
see
if
we
had
support.
There
is
a
new
owner
in
place,
and
we
did
work
with
green
of
eight
two
years
ago
to
install
a
new
electric
vehicle,
signage
and
clean
up
some
of
the
spacer
on
the
bike
racks
on
the
site.
AH
Morning,
madam
chair
members,
that
the
board
Maria
Lanza
mayor's
office
in
Neighborhood
Services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support
the
applicant
did
meet
and
have
the
support
of
both
neighborhood
groups
in
the
last
and
the
downtown
north
association
in
the
West
End
Civic
Association.
So
with
that
on
record,
we
would
like
to
thank
you,
madam.
AF
AD
A
AI
B
A
L
L
A
AE
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
shanece
Pimentel
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
In
regards
to
the
proposal
to
legalize
an
exit
in
an
existing
six-six
unit
into
98
Marlboro,
which
requires
no
work.
My
predecessor
worked
with
the
community
to
determine
the
appropriate
process.
There
are
concerns
on
record
how,
however,
we
do
not
believe
the
concerns
expressed,
provide
enough
grounds
for
opposition
objects,
objection
on
the
basis
of
this
hearing.
At
this
moment
we
have
no
questions
or
concerns.
AE
W
For
Neighborhood
Association
back
Bay,
normally
for
a
time
someone
has
four
variants
for
FA
our.
We
would
oppose
it,
but
this
is
an
existing
case
that
has
been
there
longer
than
I
have
and
I
thought
I'd
been
there
since
they
filled
in
the
Back
Bay.
So
we
are
not
in
opposition.
This
is
just
cleaning
up
paperwork.
AI
AI
B
Vo,
a
nine
three
two
four
six
785
pick
nice
treat
this
is
to
construct
the
roof
top
addition
and
second-floor
bay
window
expansion,
expend
living
space
to
the
basement
violation,
article
13,
section
1
the
floor.
The
aeration
was
successive
article
13,
section
1,
the
building
had
his
excessive
and
feet
in
article
13,
section
1
of
the
Reyat
isn't
sufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
AL
A
AK
There
was
a
water
damage
in
the
prior
winter,
and
the
house
is
being
renovated.
What's
proposed
is
additional
living
area
in
the
existing
footprint
of
the
basement,
a
bay
window
for
the
kitchen,
which
is
about
23
square
feet,
which
will
allow
room
for
a
an
eating
table
in
the
kitchen
and
on
the
sixth
floor,
it's
a
backfilled
corner
to
allow
for
a
bathroom
as
there's
no
bathroom
at
this
level.
A
A
AK
AK
A
AK
There's
not
a
roof.
Deck
proposed,
there's
an
existing
deck
off
the
sixth
floor,
so
it's
you
could
call
it
a
terrace
or
a
deck,
because
it's
walkout,
there's
no
bathroom.
On
that
level.
We
weren't
able
and
we're
very
grateful
for
the
support
of
the
Beacon
Hill
Civic
Association
for
the
basement
and
the
bay
window.
While
we
weren't
able
to
get
their
support
for
the
bathroom
on
the
top
floor,
we
did
get
the
support
of
the
immediate
abutters,
who
were
very,
very
kind
and
understanding
it's
very
important
to
mr.
wood
who's,
73.
A
L
AE
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
shanece
Patel
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
my
predecessor
conducted
a
community
process
for
the
proposal.
We
acknowledge
the
community's
concerns.
The
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support,
given
the
applicants
continued
efforts
with
the
community
in
regards
to
noise
and
debris
mitigation
and
enforcement
of
trade
'men
trade
men's
work
hours.
Thank
you
is.
A
AM
B
Boa
nine
five,
four
six
one
one,
seven
twenty
two
East
Fourth
Street:
this
is
the
confer
market,
is
a
single-family
dwelling,
changed
to
a
two-family
dwelling
form
alterations
and
existing
residents,
maintaining
bedroom
count,
adding
secondary
front
entry
for
ground
floor
unit,
an
additional
kitchen,
new
deck
and
second
means
of
egress
on
the
existing
rear
addition
roof
to
renovate
it
and
accommodate
a
ramp
required
loading
and
protecting
violations.
Article
68
section
33
off
street
parking
requirement,
is
in
submission
article
68,
section
8,
the
height
requirement
is
excessive
and
article
27
in
section
5.
AN
Members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
George.
Moran,
see
an
attorney
with
business
address,
350
West
Broadway
in
South
Boston
to
my
far
right
is
Chris
McDaniels,
a
property
owner
and
fish
there.
That's
in
between
us
is
Mark
Landsberg
project
architecture.
Madam
chair
members,
this
is
an
application
to
take
an
existing
single-family
building
with
the
present
record
of
legal
occupancy.
Why
the
application
recites
a
confirming
occupancy
as
a
single.
D
AN
AN
Renovations
to
the
building,
essentially,
a
reinforcement
of
existing
gross
floor
area
within
the
building.
The
there
will
be
no
parking.
The
use
ileum
refusal
letter
cites
two
violations,
as
well
as
flip
ability
of
the
South
Boston
in
from
Planning
overlay
district.
One
of
the
cited
violations
is
for
excessive
building
height.
This
is
actually
an
erroneous
citation.
The
building
is
just
under
40
feet
at
its
maximum
height
level.
AN
This
is
an
MFR
zoning
sub
district
under
Article
68,
with
the
maximum
height
he's
40
feet
is
not
increased
above
the
existing
height
there
is,
as
I
mentioned,
the
citation
for
insufficient
off
street
parking,
which
is
really
the
only
violation
before
the
board
and
a
quenelle.
With
respect
to
that
at
the
present.
AN
It's
6,
built
by
six
bedrooms,
which
can
be
verified
through
the
assessing
Department's
website
information.
The
proposed
reapportionment
of
the
space
within
the
building
and
the
creation
of
a
second
unit
would
result
in
two
three
bedroom
and
so
no
increase
in
bedroom
count.
Despite
the
additional
unit
mark
Leesburg
is
here,
as
they
say,
he's
the
architect.
He
can
take
any
questions
if
any
members
have
questions
about
building
the
architectural
plans.
Otherwise
any
questions
on
zoning
night
and
be
willing
to
answer
those
now.
AF
AD
B
B
AP
W
A
So
do
you
have.
L
A
AO
A
B
The
next
case
calling
boa
nine
four
eight
four
one
115
Vicksburg
Street.
This
is
an
install
that
curve
cut
but,
for
instance,
Hillary
parking
space
to
be
using
school
civilly
for
five.
Seventy
system
set
576
East;
second
Street
the
violations,
article
68
section
7
and
Tillery
marking
for
four
spaces
to
be
used
exclusively
off
street
parking
by
the
adjacent
building
of
the
same
ownership
in
the
residential
zone.
As
a
conditional
use,
article
68,
6,
section,
33
off
street
parking
location
off
street
parking
cannot
be
located.
AN
AN
AN
There
is
a
diamond
cut
on
it.
Proposal
is
to
turn
this
into
four
parking
spaces,
so
two
tandem
spaces
for
a
total
of
four
vehicles.
It
is
a
separate
law.
Two
spaces
would
be
for
the
use
of
the
building
at
576,
the
second
Street,
which
of
course,
makes
it
ancillary
parking,
which
is
a
conditional
use
in
terms
of
the
refusal
letter.
There
is
a
citation
here
for
all
street
parking
locations,
no
luck
and
located
in
the
front
yard.
This.
AN
There
is
no
front
parking
here,
because
there
is
no
building
on
the
lot
if
anything
is
to
the
rear
of
the
building
at
576.
But
again,
a
lot
of
question
is
15
bits.
Vicksburg,
there
is
no
building.
You
can
never
enter
a
building.
Also
violations
cited
for
access
driving
the
new
for
ability
again
this
simply
to
the
fact
that
these
are
two
tandem
spots
for
a
total
of
four
vehicles.
These
are
all
standard
regulation,
sized
parking
spaces
and
there's
a
citation
here,
screening
and
buffering
T,
if
approved
by
the
board.
AN
Right
would
simply
be
four
cars
pulled
into
the
lot.
If
members
look
at
the
photographs
page
of
the
handout,
you
can
see
the
lot
in
question
on
the
left.
You
can
then
see
a
view
down
from
the
building
at
five.
Seventy
two,
seventy
four
into
the
large
showing
the
existing
garden
shed.
That's
where
the
vehicles
will
be
parked
and
then
there's
a
street
view
showing
where
the,
where
the
curb
cut
would
be
in
front
of
the
law
on
Vicksburg
Street,
I,
assume
that
would
be
under.
AN
AN
A
AF
AD
A
A
B
AR
Kelley
Frey
represent
the
owners
of
a
20
Morrissey
Boulevard
from
the
law
firm
mince
11:1
financial
center
athletes,
requesting
a
brief
deferral
of
a
month.
We've
been
through
a
robust
public
process
and
gotten
a
significant
amount
of
public
support,
including
over
500
petition
signatures.
A
hundred
letters
of
support
of
the
project.
AR
T
T
K
B
A
K
A
A
A
B
There
any
other
deferrals
of
withdrawals
for
10:30
hearing
them
go
right
back
to
the
9:30
calling
next
case,
calling
boa
nine
three
eight
nine
one,
two
164
Boston
Street.
This
is
to
extend
living
space
to
the
basement
for
bathroom
and
bedroom
for
unit
one
violations,
article
65,
section,
nine,
the
flu.
A
ratio
is
excessive
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
don.
A
X
Been
living
in
support,
Boston
Street
for
about
14
years
and
the
unit
one
consists
of
the
first
floor
in
the
basement
and
the
basements
been
used
as
partial
living
space,
mostly
storage
and
there's
a
utility
room
down.
There,
I've
been
working
with
ISD,
the
Zoning
Department
Neighborhood
Services
McCormick
Civic
Association.
X
X
X
AS
AT
AT
AU
B
Following
boa
nine
two
eight
zero
two
three
three
26
Dorchester
Street:
this
is
a
got:
a
renovation
of
existing
three
family
to
remain
a
three
family
extension
of
living
space
in
the
basement.
The
unit
one
at
ground
floor
created
duplex
unit
and
portion
of
the
basement
new
systems,
fire
protection
be
added,
no
change
of
use,
they'll
change,
a
footprint
of
the
building
and
no
additional
dwelling
units.
The
violation
is
article
13,
section,
13
1,
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive
in
article
27s,
section
5.
E
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
mark
Lacoste's
Lacasse,
los
75
Arlington
Street
in
Boston
attorney
for
the
applicant
to
my
left,
is
George
Cadis
one
of
the
principals
of
the
owner
of
the
property
and
to
my
right
is
an
RT
from
embarked
studio,
the
architect
for
the
project.
This
is
a
proposal
to
cut
renovate
an
existing
three
family
dwelling
and
it
shall
remain
three
family
dwelling
units
with
extension
of
living
space
into
a
portion
of
the
basement.
E
The
to
zoning
issues
before
the
board
today,
one
is
it's
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
overlay
district,
although
it's
not
governed
by
article
68
and
second,
is
excessive
floor
area
ratio.
With
the
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement.
We
exceed
the
permissible
floor
area
ratio
by
approximately
three
hundred
square
feet.
A
A
E
So
it
is
it's:
it's
both
l1
and
multi-family
residential,
madam
chair,
the
boundary
of
the
zoning
district
literally
cuts
right
through
the
middle
of
the
lot.
So
there
is
article
12
section
1
of
the
code,
which
indicates
that
if
a
lot
is
bisected
by
two
different
code
provisions,
the
less
restrictive
shall
apply,
which
in
this
case
would
be
the
more
generous
one.
If
you
will
so
in
the
MF
are
the
FA
are
is
2.0,
and
the
proposal
here
is
for
2.1
for.
I
AF
AF
AD
B
This
is
a
remove
the
existing
single-family
dwelling
and
build
a
new
four
unit,
residential
building
with
five
indoor
parking
violations,
article
65
section
8,
the
MFR
provision
in
the
3f
d3000
sub
district
article
65,
section
I,
and
the
additional
lot
areas
insufficient
article
65,
section
I
on
the
floor,
the
a
ratio
of
successive
article
65,
section,
9,
a
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
article
65,
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
65
section
I
on
the
side
yard,
is
insufficient
in
article
65,
section
9.
AN
Sure
stewart
O'malley
madam
chair
members,
in
front
of
the
board
members
plans
for
proposed
for
unit
dwelling
building
at
freak
Dorset
Street
in
Dorchester.
The
relevant
zoning
sub
district
is
three
of
d3000.
Under
Article
65
there
would
be
four
units,
so
they
would
all
be
two-bedroom
units
approximately
1,100
square
feet
each.
There
would
be.
AN
A
1.5
in
a
movies
only
for
the
youth
unit,
three
owner
in
the
unit
four
corners,
the
approximately
12
feet
by
13
feet
got
access
to
them
would
be
by
means
of
aquatic
patch.
The
site
violations
are
insufficient
lot
size
excessive.
If
they
are
the
maximum
FA
are
in
the
sub
district
is
1.3.
The
resulting
that
they
are
here
would
be
one
point.
Six
five
three
hundred
square
feet
of
usable,
open
space
required
for
dwelling
unit
would
be
room.
AN
The
proposed
usable
opens
basically
186
square
feet
for
12
unit.
There
are
setbacks
cited
on
the
front
yard
setback.
This
is
a
corner
lot
corner
of
Dorset
in
Dorchester,
Avenue
building
has
been
pulled
back
predominantly
on
the
Dorchester
outside,
but
also
a
bit
on
the
Dorset
Street
side,
and
there
is
cross
cornered
visibility,
there's
actually
a
fairly
large
landscape
area
at
the
corner
there.
The
violations
also
cited
for
us
side
here:
setback
the
minimum
required
is
5
feet,
provided
as
3.5
and
a
rear
yard
setback
with
the
shallow
exception
would
be
10
feet.
AN
AN
One
point
two
of
the
four
units,
so
one
is
in
fact
Group
Report
accessible
unit.
That
would
be
unit.
One
that's
made
accessible,
I
should
say
by
the
body
access
with
pallulah
that
is
provided
with
a
separate
entrance
at
grade
level
for
two
than
one
to
access
that
which
runs
to
the
second
floor
only
into
into
the
interior.
V
I
AS
Madam
chair
members,
the
board
Patrick
Randall
mayor's
obviously
were
the
services.
There
is
no
butters
meeting
held
on
site
in
April.
The
applicant
also
went
through
several
rounds
of
informal
discussions
with
the
abutters
and
nervous
to
accommodate
many
of
their
concerns,
including
the
indoor
parking
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
We
would
just
ask
that
the
applicant
continue
reaching
out
to
the
abutters
and
civic
association.
A
AU
AD
A
AT
AT
Let
me
go
back
one
more
step.
The
petitioner
didn't
attend
the
last
meeting,
which
was
a
vote
in
support
or
opposition
to
the
project.
In
those
informal
meetings
in
here
today,
the
petitioner
has
failed
to
prove
a
hardship,
as
defined
by
the
zoning
code.
There's
no
mention
of
special
or
peculiar
conditions
of
land
such
as
narrowness
lot,
shallowness
of
lot
shape
of
lot
exceptional
topography
conditions,
there's
no
reason
for
a
practical
difficulty
or
substantial
hardship.
AT
A
T
AJ
B
AJ
Attorney
McDermott,
quilty
and
Miller,
representing
the
applicants
here,
unfortunately
requested
to
fall,
but
we
think
for
a
very
good
reason.
We
are
have
been
in
18
months
out
of
communication
and
deliberations
with
community
organizations
in
East,
Boston
I've
had
very
close
working
relationship
with
the
BPD.
A
staff
they've
asked
us
to
come
back
and
conduct
another
series
of
meetings
we
meet
with
them
internally
on
the
16th
of
this
month.
Want
us
to
do
a
community
meeting
following
that.
We're
trying
to
figure
out.
AJ
A
B
This
is
directly
new
seven
unit
residential
building
with
garage
parking,
roof
deck
and
a
newly
created
combine
a
lot
of
3540
square
feet
to
raise
the
existing
one-family
dwelling
violations.
Article
13
section
1
of
the
lotta
areas,
insufficient
article
13,
section,
1,
the
additional
light
areas,
insufficient
article
13,
section
1,
the
phylidia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
13,
section
1,
the
building
height
is
excessive
and
feet.
Article
13
section
1,
the
use
of
open
space
is
insufficient
article
13
section
on
the
front
yard.
Is
it
sufficient
article
13
section
1?
The
rail
yard
is
insufficient.
B
AN
AN
Square
feet
resulting
if
they
are
two
point
one
eight
in
the
yellow
point,
five
point:
five
is,
of
course,
the
maximum
that
they
are
the
rest
of
South
Boston.
Currently,
article
68
ago,
there
are
site
violations
for
women
bill
detective
stories
under
this
selling
the
maximum
price,
a
residential
building
is
two
and
a
half
stories
35
feet.
This
building
is
a
deck,
not
violet,
of
maximum
performance
of
your
feet.
It's
like
33
to
have
a
news
story,
Wehling,
so
there's
a
perspective
story.
AN
Requirement
that
is
Bill
code
or
seven-minute,
building
this
building
at
only
7
units
unusual
and
then
we'll
make
use
of
a
stacking
system
with
respective
parking
the
inspectors
1.1
of
us
attacking
areas
that,
although
there's
six
factors,
these
are
three
trays
each.
In
other
words,
two
peoples
and
that's
always
one
open
trade,
Lucas
backer
so
6
times,
2
is
12,
which
is
the
12
parking
spaces
that
have
been
provided.
7
units.
A
AN
AN
A
AN
A
I
AF
AW
AD
I
I
AX
B
This
is
the
renovate
an
existing
one
filled
one-family
dwelling
and
changed
legal
actions
through
family
dwelling
it
had
to
read
decks
and
egress
tis
the
violations,
article
68
section
33
Austria
parking
is
insufficient.
Nautical
68,
section,
8,
side,
yard
setback
weight
is
insufficient
and
this
is
27
s.
Section
5
it's
in
the
south
clause
that
I
bought
name
and
address.
AN
On
moving
into
this
building
after
it
is
converted
to
the
two
family
well
like
sexually
we're
talking
about
reapportionment
of
the
existing
space
within
the
building,
there
is
a
slight
uptick
some
areas
that
would
not
count
it
as
gross
for
area
become
gross
pool
area
because
they
get
included
as
living
space.
So
it's
currently
1.1
the
result
would
be
one
point.
Eight
eight
client
there's
no
change
with
respect
to.
Obviously
the
block
size
are
with
the
building
height
usable,
open
space
is
met
by
this.
Other
firm
is
200
square
feet
per
dwelling
unit.
AN
AN
One
deck
is
being
removed
an
existing
one,
and
then
there
will
be
essentially
a
four
level
rear
porch
structure,
approximately
16
feet
by
7
feet
deep
in
this
wide
open
space
and
will
also
provide
egress
from
the
building
breast,
the
other
violation
is
or
a
sight
of
violation
is
called
rear
yard
insufficiency.
This
I
do
believe
is
an
error
with
the
Galant
applying
section,
there's
only
a
15-foot
rear
yard
setback
requirement.
Here
we
met
with
the
rear,
decks
and
finally,
in
his
sighting
or.
I
AD
A
B
The
first
case
for
10:30
calling
VOA
nine
two
eight
nine
six,
six,
seventeen
Chestnut
Avenue.
This
is
seeking
to
change
the
offense
here,
a
commercial
to
a
three
family
residential
building,
also
renovate
the
building,
including
a
one-story
addition.
The
violations,
article
55
section
of
audio
street
parking-
is
insufficient,
not
equal,
55
section
on
a
lot
of
areas:
insufficient
article
55,
section
9.
In
addition,
a
lot
of
areas
insufficient
article
55,
section
9
the
floor.
Their
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
55,
section
9,
the
building
height
is
excessive
and
fees.
B
N
Board
attorney
Matt
echo,
with
draggled
Toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
15
Broad
Street
here
in
Boston
with
me
at
the
table,
is
Thomas
south
to
achieve
the
owner
of
17
chessmen
Ave,
we're
seeking
to
change
the
occupancy
of
the
structure
from
a
commercial
space
to
a
3
family
dwelling,
also
to
renovate
the
building
and
include
a
one-story
addition.
The
structure
has
been
abandoned
for
a
number
of
years,
as
mentioned
a
previously
housed
commercial
use.
However,
the
neighborhood
is
predominantly
residential.
N
The
zoning
sub
district
is
a
3
F
5,000,
so
the
uses
and
allowed
use
and
the
total
lot
size
is
just
over
2,000
square
feet
in
terms
of
the
floor
plan
floors.
One
through
three
will
each
contain
one
unit:
they'll
have
an
average
unit
size
at
1,130
square
feet
and
they're
all
be
two-bedroom
units.
The
basement
will
be
used
for
common
storage
and
utilities.
There
won't
be
any
living
space
there
in
terms
of
violations.
N
We
are
seeking
variances
for
minimum
lot
area,
your
quiets
f3000,
as
I
mentioned,
we
have
just
over
two
thousand
floor
area
ratio,
you're
allowed
of
0.6
we're
at
two
point
one
eight.
This
is
a
pre-existing
violation,
however,
we're
increasing
it.
With
the
third
floor.
Building
height
you're
allowed
to
go
up
to
35
feet,
we're
at
37
feet,
9
inches,
open
space,
we're
required
to
have
1200
square
feet.
We
have
54
suite
for
54
square
feet
per
unit
and
that's
based
on
new
proposed
decking,
because
it's
already
an
existing
structure
there.
N
We
really
can't
get
any
more
open
space
and,
finally,
parking
you're
required
to
have
one
space
per
new
unit
for
a
total
of
3
parking
spaces.
We
have
the
one
existing
parking
space,
the
other
dimensional
regulations,
front,
side
and
rear
yard
are
all
pre-existing.
We're
not
increasing
the
footprint
of
the
building
at
all.
The
remaining
structure
is
staying
and
we
had
a
very
positive
community
process
with
both
in
a
butters
meeting
and
appeared
before
the
Jamaica
Plain
Neighborhood
Council.
N
I
AY
AZ
A
B
L
AI
Place
warning
rec
games
next,
vid
Studios
architects,
here
in
Boston,
working
with
Jake
art
and
Irene
climb.
They
have
on
the
Jake's
living
neighborhood
since
submit
70s
they've
owned
the
property
since
1994
it's
to
family
a
lot.
They
need
to
move
down
to
the
ground
floor,
so
they're
proposing
to
build
a
three
family
building
on
the
existing
lot
fully
accessible
unit
for
spots.
We
actually
still
believe
this
is
an
out
of
write
project,
but
because
of
street
alignment,
we
are
needing
to
get
a
variance
to
set
the
house
back
far
enough.
AI
AI
The
diagram
before
that
shows
the
what
we're
proposing
to
do.
So,
it's
really
instead
of
the
13
foot
modal
setback,
which
we
Santana
has
a
great
plan.
Reviewer
I
understand,
is
urban
perspective.
This
part
of
Jamaica
Plain
is
sort
of
pretty
loose
in
its
streetscape
and
we're
proposing
to
set
it
back
to
keep
those
two
Oaks
which
I
think
the
community
process.
There
is
pretty
universal
support
of
doing
that.
A
AI
A
A
I
AY
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board-
and
he
was
Henrique
Pepin
for
the
mayor's
office
and
they
were
her
services.
We
would
like
to
go
record
a
support.
They
have
the
support
from
all
of
you
butters.
They
had
the
abutters
meeting
back
in
back
in
May
and
they
have
the
support
also
from
the
local
Neighborhood
Association.
AZ
AI
B
On
the
next
case,
calling
VOA
94
362
for
118
Marcella
Street,
this
is
a
three
family
associate
apakah
nominal
fee
requesting
pending
a
board
approval,
combine
two
Lots
into
one
to
be
known
as
118
Marcella
violation,
article
32,
section
9.
This
is
a
t-pod
enforcement
article,
50
section
28
and
3
family
detached
dwelling
that
an
I
raged.
Awning
is
forbidden,
article
50,
section
29,
the
building
height
is
accessories.
Nautical
50
section
20
and
the
building
height
is
excessive
and
beat
an
article
56
to
29.
The
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
BA
BA
Not
as
long
in
the
city
as
chairman
to
Cambria,
he
D
from
our
Banneker,
who
was
a
principal
here
and
next
to
him,
is
Stephen
Chung.
Who
was
the
architect
knowing
what
the
board
wants
to
know
early
on
in
the
process?
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
and
I
just
gave
to
the
secretary
a
copy
of
we're
cited
for
the
g-code
G
Cod
in
this
particular
matter.
We
don't
believe
that
it
is
necessary
and
complete.
BA
And
we
don't
think
we
have
a
map
which,
on
the
constant
ground
water
conservation
bill,
a
district,
we
don't
see
that
their
properties
included.
However,
what
I've
advised
my
client
that
we
will
accept
a
variance
in
that
regard
in
any
event,
but
I
wanted
to
at
least
provide
a
copy
of
the
map
to
the
to
the
board,
just
to
give
some
information
on
the
project.
This
is
a
project
which
was
part
of
the
RFP
process
by
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development.
The
project
went
through
an
extensive
community
involvement
and
received
the
support
of
the
community.
BA
BA
That's
the
reason
why
it's
forbidden
under
the
uses
forbidden
to
here
in
this
particular
under
this
circumstance,
madam
chair
stories,
are
three
stories
is
what
is
allowed.
We
of
proposing
for
the
height
of
the
building
that's
allowed
as
35
feet.
We
are
we're
at
39
and
the
side
yard
the
because
of
the
positioning
of
where
the
D
and
the
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development
wanted
to
house
speed
next
to
a
connected
to
the
building
on
one.
BA
A
V
A
BB
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
and
they
did
go
through
an
extensive
community
process
and
there
was
a
lot
of
support
for
the
project.
They
also
like
to
see
a
much
needed
housing
stock
in
the
area.
BC
BD
BA
Market
Radian
is
this,
was
part
of
the
process.
Department
of
Neighborhood
Development
had
a
number
of
parcels,
madam
chair
in
that
neighborhood,
and
they
designed
it
to
meet
the
neighbors
concern
to
have
a
mixture
of
incomes
in
which
we
allow,
which
would
be
allowed
this.
So
there
are
several
other
and
larger
fossils
which
which
provided
the
affordability.
So
these
are
all
market
rate.
A
A
B
A
BE
The
project
is
a
triplex
three
row
house
that
was
just
recently
built
and
on
one
of
the
units,
the
front
units,
the
owners
unit.
They
want
to
build
a
roof
deck
with
a
the
actual
protrusion
is
not
the
roof
deck
itself.
It's
the
access
from
inside
of
the
building
with
the
stairs
that
goes
up
to
the
roof,
and
the
reason
why
it
looks
big
is
because
the
building
is
very
small
and
narrow
on
the
picture.
A
I
BE
BF
BG
B
Boa
nine
one,
four
two
one:
two:
seventy
nine
Devon
Street
this
is
a
change
of
Oxford
at
three
family
to
a
four
family,
build
a
staircase.
In
the
first
floor
to
the
basement,
big
basement,
12
inches
to
meet
the
ceiling
height
requirement,
the
violation
does
not
equal.
Eight
section,
7
is
uses
forbidden
article
50,
section
29,
excessive
FAI,
radical
50
sex
between
number
of
allowed
habitable
stories
has
been
exceeded
in
article
50,
section
29,
insufficient,
open
space
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
H
L
A
BH
Is
in
the
basement?
Yes,
so
it'll
be.
It
was
at
one
point
used
illegally
as
a
residential
space
and
I
when
I
renovated
the
building
boated.
Now
for
five
or
six
years
I,
it
hasn't
that
space
has
been
vacant
for
that
time
and
then
there's
there's
plenty
of
space
there.
It's
kind
of
like
half
above
grade
and
we're
going
to
sprinkle
the
building
and
there's
plenty
of
ceiling
height.
We
have
to
change
a
little
bit
of
there's
one
spare
here.
BH
A
A
A
BH
BB
Mana
mana
chair
members
of
the
board.
My
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
and
we
like
to
go
on
record
to
support
the
project
he
met
with
the
abutters
and
also
the
Neighborhood
Association
in
May,
who
had
no
objections
and
the
space
seems
to
be
consistent
with
some
of
the
units
on
the
street.
B
Video
a7
three
four
one:
five:
four
14
Gleason
Street.
Okay:
this
is
a
change
of
Archie
from
fortified
residential
unit,
an
additional
dwelling
unit
in
the
basement
and
Tara
renovations
to
all
units
of
violations.
Article
60
section
40
insufficient.
Our
street
parking
article
60
section
8,
a
multi-family
dwelling
is
forbidden,
use
article
60,
section
I
on
additional
lot
areas:
insufficient
article
60,
section,
9.3,
the
location
of
the
main
entrance
and
article
9
section;
2,
a
change
in
the
non-conforming
youths
name
and
address
renan.
H
BH
When
I
purchased
this
property,
it
was
the
basement
was
used
as
an
illegal
Church,
and
so
it
was
it's.
The
ceiling
height
is
quite
high.
It's
actually
a
very
large
space
and
it's
been
vacant
now
for
quite
some
time
as
well.
No
use
and
the
other
units
are,
I
renovated
those
units
and
they're
all
performing
nicely
and
and
and
everything's
going
well.
A
BH
A
BH
This
so
the
way
we're
it
will
actually
be.
It
will
come
off
the
side,
but
there
it
will
have
its
and
never
walk
away.
That'll
come
around
to
the
the
gleason
street,
so
it'll
come
off
the
side
of
the
building,
but
actually
it's
a
little
be
located
right.
Neck
and
street
it'll
have
like
a
paved
area.
That'll
go
to
a
right
to
Gleason
Street
and
there
will
be
the
other.
Egress
will
be
on
the
other
side.
A
BH
Gonna
we're
gonna
have
to
pave
an
area
to
add
space.
There
is
there's
enough
footage
there,
but
there's
a
right
now,
there's
presently
a
garage,
a
space
to
the
left,
the
garage
and
then
we'll
have
another
two
spaces
that
are
that
are
to
the
left
of
that.
But
there
is
there's
quite
a
bit
of
area
and
that
for
parking
we.
H
BB
I
BF
I
I
V
B
Filing
boa
nine,
four,
two,
two
four
four:
thirty
six
rare
Parkman
Street.
This
is
the
sub
divide,
36
rear
park.
We
now
have
lot
b1
b2,
contain
five
thousand
three
hundred
ninety
four
square
feet
and
have
a
two-family
dwelling
erected
on
it.
With
thirty
from
thirty
six
Bachman
Avenue
lot
one
eight
to
contain
six
thousand
square
feet
and
have
an
existing
one
family
dwelling
on
it.
The
violations,
article
65
section
64,
41.4
la
street
parking
location,
is
front
yard.
Article
65,
665,
41.5,
hospice
design,
access
drive
in
manoeuvrability,
article
65,
section.
Nine.
B
The
lot
size
to
erect
a
new
dwelling
is
unit
is
insufficient.
Article
65,
section
9
a
lot
area
for
additional
dwelling
unit
is
insufficient
article
65
section
9.
The
lot
frontage
requirement
is
insufficient
particle
65-69.
The
Floria
ratio
is
excessive
in
article
65
6
9,
the
height
is
excessive.
It
stories
name
and
address
for
the
record
was.
BI
BI
In
going
through
the
process
of
design,
mr.
Crowley
desire
was
to
propose
a
structure
which
would
meet
the
size
and
massing
and
the
shape
in
general
aesthetics
of
the
buildings
which
surround
the
property
itself.
Is
it
posed
to
be
a
three-story
structure,
with
a
full
basement,
with
siding
and
roofing
to
match
again
in
keeping
with
the
surrounding
properties,
see
from
the
sides
and
rear
elevations
that,
in
fact,
the
aesthetics
are
being
maintained
there
with
some
rather
liberal
plantings
and
green
space
to
be
maintained
on
the
property?
BI
A
BI
No
MBR,
it
would
be
our
anticipation
that
we
will
have
that
matter
resolved
we
just
at
this
time
of
hearing.
We
had
not
resolved
that
quite
yet,
and
that's
something
that
area
our
intentions
are
to
do
so.
You
know
likely
that
will
be
supplemental
if
only
the
structure
itself
has
mentions
three
stories:
full
basement,
the
basements
to
utilize
historic
mechanical
purposes,
only
there'll
be
no
habitable
space
down
there
first
floor,
kitchen,
bathroom,
living
room,
the
second
and
third
floor
spaces,
primarily
bedroom
and
bath,
with
a
master
suite
and
I
decide
above
the
unit's
themselves.
BI
Three
bedrooms:
two
and
a
half
bathrooms
1829
square
feet
per
unit.
In
going
through
the
process.
Mr.
Crowley
did
solicit
the
approval
of
his
abutters,
which
has
been
introduced
as
evidence
at
today's
hearing,
as
well
as
securing
the
approval
of
the
fields
cornice
Civic
Association,
which
has
also
been.
A
A
BJ
AW
B
Beach
PDF,
this
is
to
remodel
existing
rooms,
bathrooms
attic
area,
build
a
new
dormer
and
add
them
to
the
living
space.
The
second
floor
unit
remove
a
section
of
the
attic
that
was
affected
by
fire
and
rebuild
the
violations.
Article
67
section
I
and
the
ploidy
ratio
is
excessive.
A
man
addressed
further
actively.
A
Did
you
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
racket?
Oh
I'm,
sorry,
it's
having
a
retiree
hearing
today,
so
tell
us,
what's
being
proposed,
see
proposing
to
build
a
new
dormer
for
second
floor
at
the
okay
and
Doug.
What's
the
change
in
if
they
are
a,
how
many
square
feet
is
this,
is
this
new
shoulder
addition.
AU
I
BL
L
A
B
Boe,
nine
three:
eight
zero
zero
one.
Four
two
eight
lakeside
Avenue.
This
is
to
combine
two
fossils
under
the
same
ownership
and
erect
III
townhouse
style
residential
unit.
The
violations,
article
69
section
18
the
lot
size
to
erect
an
INT
is
insufficient
by
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
Garnett.
BN
A
A
BM
Is
the
footprint
what
we're
going
to
build
with
the
units
yeah?
This
is
lakeside
right
here.
This
is
the
smaller
piece
of
land.
This
is
the
bigger
one.
So
what
that
game
said
went
over
that
with
over
an
acre
of
space,
we'll
have
50
foot
from
the
curve
on
the
street
50
foot
from
the
pond
50
foot
from
the
side
and
then
well
over
50
feet
that
size
so.
A
L
BM
A
BO
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members,
the
board
Ryan
Flynn
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
representing
Hyde
pack
when
about
his
meeting,
was
held
on
April
29th,
and
we
didn't
count
in
the
opposition
from
the
community
regarding
the
proposal.
So
we
want
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
A
Was
on
streets
and
West
Roxbury
lately,
which
you
know
does
not
really
truly
reflect
the
intent
of
the
CPS.
Is
there
anything
that
VRA
staff
can
do
at
an
earlier
stage
to
kind
of
guide
the
developers
about
the
intent,
the
real
intent
of
that
CPS
sub
district
and
I
just
put
that
out
there,
because
I
don't
think
there
are
very
many
of
these
parcels
left
in
the
city.
No.
D
A
A
So
obviously
you
can
something
that's
near
and
dear
to
my
to
my
heart,
but
you
know,
because
that
was
really
the
intent
of
it
initially
so
I
just
throw
it
out
there
just
to
see
that
and
I'm
an
impression
about
the
footnote,
but
if
there's
anything
else,
that
can
be
done
to
that
to
ensure
that
this
is
that
that
more
open
space,
someplace
else
or
a
more
extensive
swath
as
it
is
allowed
on
these
developments
in
the
meantime
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
I
B
Next
case,
calling
boa
nine
four,
eight
two
four
two
six
six,
six
sixty-six
Metropolitan
Avenue.
This
is
the
converting
existing
three
family.
Drawing
into
a
six
family
dwelling,
the
violation,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
parking
air
friendly,
add
location,
article
sixty
nine
section,
nine.
The
lot
size
requirement
is
insufficient
article,
sixty
nine
section
unusable
open
spaces,
insufficient
article,
sixty
nine
section,
twenty
nine
off-street
parking
requirement
is
insufficient
in
article
sixty
nine
section.
Eight,
a
multi-family
dwelling
unit
is
a
forbidden
youths
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BP
Six-Six-Six
metropolitan
have
zoning
here
is
to
F
5000
the
location
as
far
as
violations
I'll
go
through
those
quickly
limitation
of
parking
area,
front
yard.
That
is
an
existing
situation.
There's
one
parking
spot,
that's
located
in
the
front
left
of
the
property
lot
size
requirement
and
sufficient.
It's
a
again
because
it's
a
2,
F,
5,000
zone
use
a
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
They're.
BP
Actually
part
of
this
process
is
we're
taking
down
a
garage,
and
some
sheds
to
Creek
parking
in
the
rear
street
parking
is
insufficient
requirement
in
highpockets
6
we're
at
5
and
multifamily
forbidden,
because
it's
a
2
F
5,000,
by
the
way
of
where
this
property
is
located.
It's
directly
across
from
the
old
high
five
high
school
extreme
in
high
school
right
now,
Street
is
all
threes
with
some
six
families,
as
well
as
we
have
Gary
associates,
has
their
commercial
property
located
there
as
well.
How.
BP
Existing
it's.
This
is
basically
legalizing
to
use.
This
has
been
I've
included
in
the
package
that
you
I
have
given
to
the
board
city
blots,
assessing
records.
You'll,
see
this
I
think
33
years.
This
has
been
a
six
family
assessed
as
such
by
the
city
of
Boston.
So
we're
really.
He
came
into
ownership
about
I
think
eight
years
ago.
So
it's
just
to
legalize
the
use.
As
a
six
family,
we
had
the
butters
meeting,
no
opposition,
there's
been
no
opposition
today,
provided
I.
BP
BP
The
three
better,
the
three
units
of
all
five
room:
three
bedrooms,
those
are
1,500
square
feet,
and
then
there
are
three
smaller
units
too,
which
are
584
square
feet
there,
one
bedrooms
and
then
one
is
490
square
feet
which
is
one-bedroom
again.
These
are
all
existing
part
of
this
would
be
to
legalize
the
use,
as
well
as
sprinkle
the
building
and
build
a
bring
it
up
to
building
code.
L
I
BO
I
BP
B
Case
calling
boa
ninety
five
one:
eight
zero
341
Rex
Rex
Finch
street.
This
is
converted
attic
to
an
apartment
with
Doris
violations.
Article
60,
section
8,
the
three
family
is
forbidden
juice
and
a
2f
6000
sub-district
article
60,
section
9,
the
proposed
building
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
60,
section,
9
usable
four
spaces
insufficient
an
article
60
section
eye
on
the
side.
Yacht
isn't
sufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
call.
BQ
A
BR
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
wouldn't
a
lesson
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
held
a
nut
butters
meeting
back
in
May
for
this
property.
The
owner
has
also
been
in
contact
with
the
Neighborhood
Association,
the
Wexford
group,
and
they
have
no
concerns
about
this
project.
Thus,
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
supports.
I
B
You
have
a
good
day
calling
the
next
case
calling
VOA
nine
four
five
one:
five,
nine
forty
two
twenty
eight
to
forty,
two
thirty
Washington
Street.
This
is
a
change
of
occupancy
language
from
the
restaurant
to
be
a
garden.
Nowhere
to
be
done.
The
violations,
article
67th
section
11,
bara
Bhagat,
as
a
conditional
use
in
a
cc
one
sub
district
name
and
address
for
the
record,
please
my.
A
BG
A
I
BL
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Joe
Coppinger
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
John
and
the
turtle
swamp
team
have
been
an
asset,
some
sense
coming
into
the
substation
temporarily,
and
we
look
forward
to
hopefully
seeing
them
there
permanently.
Thank
you.
I
even
have
letters
of
support.
AW
BG
I
A
B
Calling
boa
9
4
4
7
0
1
76,
Quint
Avenue.
This
is
changing.
Existing
4
bedroom
basement
apartment
into
a
one-bedroom
apartment
and
a
two-bedroom
apartment
in
the
change
of
August
from
11
apartments
to
12
apotres.
The
violations,
article
51
section
56
off
street
parking
is
insufficient
and
ethical
51,
section
unusable
open
spaces.
Insufficient
may
be
that
dress
for
the
record.
Please
Jonathan.
BS
BS
BS
A
A
A
BS
How
long
do
they
stay
2
to
3
years,
sometimes
four,
maybe
really
longer
fairly
transient?
The
proposed
project
involves
taking
an
existing
four
bedroom
apartment
and
converting
into
two
smaller
units,
a
two-bedroom
apartment
and
a
one-bedroom
apartment.
The
existing
four
bedroom
is
in
need
of
renovation
and
is
a
rambling
layout.
The
proposed
project
involves.
BS
A
BT
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Connor
Neiman
with
the
mayor's
office
Neighborhood
Services
later
on
record
supporting
this
proposal.
We
had
an
abundance
meeting
on
May
13th
and
they
went
on
to
receive
support
from
the
Austin
Civic
Association.
There
should
be
a
letter
from
the
president
Tony
DC
d'oro,
on
file.
Thank
you
afternoon.
A
B
You
very
much
he's
for
10:30
boa
9
4
1
4
9,
7,
88,
Wallingford
Road.
This
is
a
change
from
a
2
to
a
3
family,
convert
an
unfinished
third-floor
attic
space
into
a
habitable
unit
and
construction
of
an
exterior
stay
of
new
unit
to
the
ground.
As
the
second
means
of
egress
violate
Article
51,
section
8,
3
family
have
submitted
a
2f
5000
sub
district
and
article
51
section
on
the
building
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
A
A
AQ
AQ
BT
Chair
members
of
the
board,
Connor
Newman
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
like
colorectal
support
of
this
proposal
we
held
in
the
butters
meeting
on
May
6th,
it
was
well
attended,
no
concerns
from
the
neighbors
with
the
parking
example.
They
also
received
support
from
the
Brighton
Austin
Improvement
Association
as
well.
Thank
you,
madam.
AX
A
A
B
AN
AN
AN
AN
A
B
A
B
That
case,
calling
vo
eight
seven,
four,
nine
three
eight
one
97
to
201
Green
Street.
This
is
seeking
to
consolidate
Possible's,
to
create
one
new
lot
and
also
to
raise
the
existing
structure
and
erect
a
four-story
mixed-use
building
with
23
residential
units,
one
retail
space
and
six
parking
spaces.
The
violation
is
article
55
section,
19
multifamily
is
forbidden,
article
55,
section
20
the
floor
day.
Ratio
is
excessive.
Medical
55,
section
20,
the
height
is
excessive.
B
N
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
Matt
echo
with
drag
on
Toscano
business
address
of
15
Broad
Street
here
in
Boston.
My
immediate
right
is
Josh
Federman
from
City
Realty,
the
project
proponent.
My
far
right
is
the
NRT
just
the
project
architect
from
embarked.
As
mentioned,
we're
seeking
to
combine
two
Lots
raise
the
existing
structure,
that
is
on
one
of
those
Lots
and
erect
a
four-story
mixed-use
building
with
one
retail
space,
720
square
feet
and
23
rental
units
they'll
also
have
six
accompany
parking
spaces.
A
N
Not
my
friends
now
for
the
23
units
will
be
live.
Work
units
on
the
first
floor
and
for
the
units
will
be
affordable
of
those
affordable,
three
will
be
at
70%
AMI
and
one
will
be
at
40%.
Sonique
sub-district
is
a
local
industrial.
In
the
total
block.
Size
is
eleven
thousand
seven
hundred
and
thirty
six
square
feet.
N
This
project
is
fully
compliant
with
the
Jaypee
rocks
guidelines
and
is
located
less
than
a
quarter
of
a
mile
away
from
the
Green
Street
MBTA
station
in
terms
of
the
plan
will
be
the
six
exterior
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
of
the
property
first
floor,
along
with
the
one
retail
space
a
lobby
trash,
grow,
sprinkler,
room
and
bike
room
levels.
Two
and
three
will
each
have
seven
units
per
floor
and
the
fourth
floor
will
have
five
units
in
terms
of
the
zoning
as
I
mentioned,
BR
JP
rocks
compliant.
N
However,
under
the
underlying
zoning
we
will
be
seeking
a
few
variances.
The
first
is
use.
Mfr
in
a
local
industrial
is
forbidden,
the
floor
area
ratio
allowed
is
1.0
where
at
one
point,
six,
eight
height
you're
allowed
three
storeys
and
35
feet.
We're
at
four
and
forty
six
feet:
eight
and
a
half
inches
and
parking
you're
required
to
have
1.5
spaces
per
dwelling
unit.
We
have
the
six
total
space.
As
I
mentioned,
this
project
went
through
the
full
BPD
a.
A
N
So
we
actually
through
the
community
process.
We
we
handled
that
question
with
the
community,
there's
a
basically
a
driveway
and
we
created
a
spot
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
That's
not
a
designated
parking
space
that
could
be
used
for
off
street
loading,
because
the
on
street
unloading
was
an
issue
with
the
community.
So
we
did
work
to
resolve
that,
even
though
it's
not
an
official
loading
station,
this
project
did
go
through
the
BPD,
a
small
project
review
process
and
was
approved
by
the
BPD
Thor
back
in
March.
N
Since
then,
we've
had
continuous
conversations
and
discussions
with
both
the
Union
after
abutters
and
members
of
the
community
at
large
and
we've
agreed
to
continue
to
work
with
them
on
pedestrian
safety,
which
was
a
major
issue
as
well
as
any
redesigns
of
the
building
which
may
be
necessary.
However,
we've
already
redesigned
it
multiple
times
for
great
street
trees,
as
well
as
screening
and
buffering
and
fencing
with
our
director
butters.
A
N
A
A
A
N
Is
true
based
on
size,
there
are
a
few
bigger
ones
with
one
in
the
rear
is
790
square
feet.
The
design
was
to
have
this
walkway
to
promote
some
some
foot
traffic.
So
the
idea
would
hopefully
to
think
bring
some
people
in
based
on
the
size
once
they're
built
out
that'll
be
tailored
by
what
kind
of
artists
they
are
and.
A
I
BU
BU
AY
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Enrique
Pepin
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
understand
that
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
We
understand
that
the
City
Realty
has
had
previous
issues
with
the
community
and
attendance,
but
we
believe
that
City
Realty
will
continue
to
work
with
the
community
in
good
faith
to
reach
an
MoU.
Also
City
Realty
has
worked
with
the
Union
Avenue
Association
to
adhere
to
the
request.
If
the
project
is
approved
other
than
that,
there's
not
have
any
further
questions.
BV
Sorry
I'm,
actually
not
speaking
in
support
opposition
at
this
time.
My
name
is
George
Lane,
but
the
group
keep
it
100
and
I
guess
just
asking
you.
My
name
is
George
Lee
aid,
Woodrow,
eV
and
I'm
with
the
group.
Keep
it
104
in
Dorchester,
but
I
work
with
the
group,
keep
it
on
drew
from
real,
affordable
housing
and
racial
justice
and
Jamaica
Plain
and
I.
BV
Guess
I
would
ask
the
board
if
you
would
indulge
us
with
maybe
another
20
minutes
to
talk
to
City
Realty,
because
we
just
had
some
conversations
in
the
hallway
to
try
to
resolve
a
few
issues,
and
our
understanding
was
that
we
would
get
an
email
confirming
yes
to
some
of
those
issues,
but
the
email
he
got
was
very
vague
and
short,
and
we
would
love
to
support
this
project,
but
just
want
some
more
clarity
in
writing.
So
we've
just
asked
for
a
20
minute.
A
BU
Had
a
couple
of
issues
that
they
wanted
to
ensure
our
future
discussions
included
and
the
response
was
we
look
forward
to
meeting
you
and
working
together
to
find
a
common
ground
on
these
issues
and
I've
mentioned
to
these
folks
in
the
hallway
that
I've
met
with
them
in
the
past
and
we're
committed
to
continue
meeting
with
them
and
through
the
process.
Everything.
BU
BV
BV
BH
A
A
BV
BV
If
that's
something
you
could
ask
them
directly,
if
they're
stopping
those
lawsuits
and
all
Jamaica
Plain
a
Roxbury,
it
would
be
helpful
just
to
hear
that
outlet
out
here
and
then
the
final
issue
was
for
them
to
keep
bring
back
a
written
proposal
before
September
explaining
how
they
plan
to
keep
tenants
in
their
buildings
for
more
than
a
one-year
lease
after
they
buy
a
new
building.
Again,
they
told
us
in
the
hallway
they
would
be
willing
to
do
that,
but
we
thought
they
were.
BV
Writing
haven't
yet
so
we're
just
asking
if
it's
possible
for
the
board
to
confirm
those
two
things.
If
that's
true,
when
Josh
already
spoke
to
the
list
of
issues,
then
our
group
is
in
support
of
the
project
because
of
those
positives
around
affordability
stabilization.
But
if
they're
not
an
agreement
with
the
lawsuits,
stopping
them
in
Jamaica
Plain
in
Roxbury,
and
if
they
don't
confirm
they'll
bring
a
proposal
back
before
September,
then
we
have
reservations
about
the
project.
Thank
you.
BW
Hi
good
afternoon,
my
name
is
Helen.
Matthews
I
live
at
190
Green
Street
across
from
197
Green
Street
and
I'm,
a
member
of
the
Green
Street
renters
Association,
which
is
an
association
of
renters
primarily
around
this
project
and
I,
want
to
say,
on
behalf
of
our
association
that
we
have
expressed
consistently
through
the
community
process
around
this
project
that
we,
our
support,
for
it
is
contingent
upon
the
upon
City
Realty
partnering,
with
a
mission
based,
affordable
housing
developer
for
the
land
at
3371,
Washington,
Street
and.
A
A
BW
Honestly,
this
is
a
complex
situation.
I'm,
not
speaking
in
opposition,
I
want
to
say
that
we're
thrilled
about
the
acquisition
of
the
adjacent
land
by
the
j-pin
DC,
where
they
plan
to
build
all
affordable
units
there,
and
this
is
an
area
where
there's
a
lot
of
residents
who
are
in
what
you
call
naturally
occurring
affordable
housing
that
are
a
great
risk
of
displacement,
low
income,
folks,
many
folks
of
color
and
it's
wonderful
to
see
affordable
housing
being
built
there.
So
we're
certainly
very
very
happy
with
that
outcome.
BW
I
want
to
echo
what
George
Lee
just
said
that
we
did
have
a
discussion
just
before
this
meeting,
where
some
agreements
were
made
verbally
around
around
the
continuing
negotiations,
around
anti
displacement
policy
and
around
the
scope
of
the
cessation
of
these
aggressive
legal
tactics,
and
we
would
like
to.
We
would
like
to
see
some
answers
to
those
questions
in
writing.
So
that's
my
comment.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
BX
My
name
is
Lisa
Thompson
I
live
at
10
for
still
Street
and
Jamaica.
Plain
I
agree
with
everything
that's
been
said
by
George,
Lee
and
and
Helen
here.
The
new
information
that
I
have
is
you
know
there
isn't
anything
new,
but
we
really
need
the
city
to
support
what
we
are
trying
to
do.
We're
trying
to
partner
with
City
Realty.
With
all
of
this
new
development,
there
is
displacement.
They
can
help.
Stop
that
in
this
particular
way.
We
just
need
it
in
writing.
Okay,
thank.
BX
T
U
B
Calling
the
Oh
a
nine
two:
two:
nine
zero
four
239
Norwell
Street.
There
are
three
companion
cases:
vo
a
nine
two:
two:
nine
zero
seven,
two
forty
one
Norwell
street
case,
boa
two:
nine
two,
two:
nine
zero,
eight
two,
forty
three
normal
street
case
bo
a
nine
two,
two,
nine
one,
one
two,
forty
five
Norwell
street,
so
I'm
going
to
call
two
cases
at
a
time
they
have
the
same
violations
and
I'll
give
the
address
so
I'm
going
to
read
into
the
racket.
This
is
239
Norwell
Street.
B
B
The
project
shall
be
known
as
239
lot
for
among
the
proposed
for
two
family
buildings
from
Lots
floor
Lots
attached
to
family
1655
square
foot,
the
violations,
article
10
section,
one
to
five
foot
buffer
required
article
65,
section
41,
insufficient,
hawking
tandem,
equal
to
0.75,
article
65,
section,
41,
access
and
maneuver
in
areas
to
tandem,
an
article
65
section
41
honestly,
packing
loading
requirements,
the
size
article,
65,
section,
9,
insufficient
lot
size.
Article
65,
section,
9
insufficient,
along
with
article
65
section,
9
insufficient
a
lot
with
frontage,
article,
65
section
and
excessive
fa.
B
Our
article
65
section,
9
number
of
allowed
stories,
has
been
exceeded:
radical
65-69,
insufficient,
open
space,
article
65,
section,
9,
insufficient
front
yard,
modal
alignment
setback.
This
is
the
same
violations
for
245
normal
streets.
I'm
not
going
to
read
that
whole
purpose
and
violation,
241
and
242.
B
41
and
243
are
going
to
be
the
same,
so
I'm
going
to
read
the
violations.
Those
are
the
only
difference
of
the
violations.
Article
65
section
41,
access
to
the
memory
area,
10
feet,
article
65,
section
21,
the
size,
article
65
section,
9
insufficient
a
lot
size,
article
65
section
9,
insufficient
web
article,
65
section
a
insufficient
on
frontage
equals
65
section
and
excessive
fa.
B
BY
A
BY
A
BY
In
the
City
of
Austin
honored
family
for
at
120
would
be
roughly
about
a
hundred,
thirty
thousand
or
so
the
exact
numbers
in
front
of
you,
but
that's
roughly
then-
and
this
is
intended
really
for
kind
of
work
force
out.
You
know
people
talk
about
workforce
housing,
you
really
just
intended
for
folks
who
are
living
I
want
to
live
in
a
city
and
work
in
the
city.
The
units
are
there
to
family
units.
Like
I
said
one.
The
first-floor
unit
will
be
a
one-bedroom
apartment
and
I
think.
BY
BE
BY
A
BF
Christine
Mandel
mayor's
office
enables
services
we
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Developer
has
been
working
with
the
community
for
quite
some
time,
even
prior
to
me
getting
here
and
has
been
extremely
helpful
in
understanding
of
the
community's
concerns
and
is
continue
to
working
with
them.
Thank
you.
Thank.
BW
BK
Chair
members,
the
board,
Dustin
Gardner
behalf
of
city
council,
president
Andrea
Campbell's
office.
We
would
also
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
They've
received
the
support
of
the
west
of
Washington
coalition.
He's
done
a
lot
as
the
mayor's
office
said,
to
work
with
community
to
try
and
focus
on
locating
local
home
owners
for
these
these
new
opportunities
and
so
excited
to
work
with
them.
Moving
forward.