►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing 9-10-19
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
A
A
B
B
If
you
are
a
member
of
the
media,
except
for
Adam
over
there
find
a
space
in
this
corner
because
that
that
spot
is
very
active
and
we
want
to
make
sure
there's
an
ability
for
people
who
are
at
the
table
to
be
able
to
make
their
way
here
as
efficiently
as
possible
and
as
safely
as
possible,
in
conformance
with
with
the
Open
Meeting.
Law
I
am
informing
you
that
this
meeting
is
being
live-streamed.
B
If,
if
you
are
here
to
speak
on
its
support
or
in
opposition
to
a
project,
please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
and
tell
us
the
reason
for
your
support
or
your
opposition.
If
somebody
else
has
already
stated
of
what
what
you
intended
to
say,
either
in
support
or
in
opposition
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record
now
we
Craig
Galvin
has
resigned
from
the
board
and
we
offer
him
our
thanks
for
his
years
of
service.
B
On
behalf
of
the
city
of
Boston
and
after
residents
of
the
city,
as
a
result,
we
have
a
five-member
board
today.
So,
as
many
of
you
know
that
you
need
all
of
us
to
concur
to
get
your
project
approved,
administrative
deferrals
are
available
if
you
so
desire.
So
please
make
your
request
when
you're
immediately
up
at
the
at
the
at
the
podium,
rather
than
go
through
the
process
and
then
ask
for
the
deferral.
B
C
D
C
Call
the
first
order
for
extensions
for
9:30
calling
boa
five:
seven:
five:
seven:
zero
zero
65
273
East,
Cottage,
Street
they're,
also
companion
cases
boa
five:
seven:
five:
seven:
zero
267,
East
Cottage
Street,
boa
six;
one:
six:
nine,
eight,
zero,
nine
to
11
Hillsborough
Street,
boa
six;
one:
seven:
zero
one:
seven
13
to
15
Hillsborough
Street,
boa
six;
one:
seven:
zero:
three:
zero;
twenty
one
to
twenty
three
Hillsborough
Street
and
boa
six
one:
six,
nine,
seven,
seven
twenty
five
to
twenty
seven
Hillsborough
street
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
mine,.
E
We'd
like
to
request
the
extension
to
give
us
more
time
to
go
to
construction,
closing
we're
in
the
middle
of
construction
closing
on
our
financing,
and
we
expect
to
start
to
break
ground
sometime
late,
October
or
early
November.
This
is
an
ad
unit,
affordable
housing
and
workforce
development
project.
We
get
a
lot
of
public
subsidies
from
different
lenders,
so
the
timing
of
when
the
lenders
came
in
really
pushed
out
our
own
timeline.
F
F
H
J
J
B
B
K
B
C
B
L
C
B
M
C
This
is
a
change
of
occupancy
occupancy
from
a
two-family
dwelling
to
a
one-family
dwelling
with
a
full
interior
innovation
in
the
existing
brownstone
work
includes
new
finishes:
MVPs
fire
alarm,
fire
protection,
the
violations,
article
32,
section
9.
This
is
in
the
ground,
water
conservation,
overlay,
district
applicability,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
D
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
marks
Lacasse
Lacoste's
law,
75
Arlington
Street
in
Boston
attorney
for
the
applicant
180
West
Canton
Street,
Realty
Trust.
This
is
a
change
of
occupancy
from
a
two-family
to
a
single-family
that
involves
the
substantial
rehabilitation
and
therefore
requires
a
conditional
use
permit
for
the
installation
of
a
groundwater
recharge
system,
and
we
have
our
article
32
compliance
letter
from
Boston,
Water
and
Sewer
Commission.
We.
O
M
C
C
P
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Tomomi
with
wilson
stores
for
100
Atlanta
calves
anew
with
me,
is
Mike
Fitzpatrick
from
the
appellant
fenway
enterprises,
120
Pro
client
ever
LLC.
This
matter
relates
to
G
Cod
conditional
use
permit
receive
the
BW
SC
compliance
letter
and
letter
from
the
civil
engineer
of
record.
Those
were
included
in
the
in
the
application
and
we
have
copies
available
today
happy
to
address
any
questions.
B
O
B
C
C
Q
H
B
Q
B
C
R
Tim
Johnson
architect,
one
ninety
Old
Colony
have
Boston.
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board.
It's
been
a
long
approval
process,
but
after
five
redesigns
we
have
about
a
support
for
this
East
Boston
project.
However,
this
coming
monday
night
is
the
Orion
Heights
neighborhood
council
meeting
and
we'd
like
to
present
the
final
design
to
them.
S
T
H
U
M
C
C
B
W
C
X
B
B
B
Y
Z
C
Z
M
M
C
AA
B
H
C
Is
addition
to
change
oxygen
from
a
one-family
to
a
two-family
dwelling
and
extend
living
space
into
the
basement,
the
violations
article
2070
five-
this
is
in
the
East
Boston
iPod
applicability,
an
article
53,
section,
nine,
insufficient
side
yard
setback.
10
feet
is
required
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
AD
AE
AD
A
B
AD
AD
S
AE
F
B
F
AF
F
H
H
AH
AJ
C
Case
calling
VOA
nine
six
five,
seven,
two
five
42
to
44
South
Russell
Street:
this
is
the
removal
portion
of
the
roof
to
installing
he
dormer
from
the
rail
wall
and
the
roof
deck
with
new
stair
and
hatch
access
installed,
new
bathroom
and
interior
finishes
and
install
associated
no
mechanical
electrical
work.
The
violations
article
15
section
1,
the
flow
ta
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
19,
section
1,
the
side
yard
setback
requirement
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
Luisa.
B
J
A
42
and
44
or
to
traditional
Beacon
Hill
row
houses
that
were
combined
many
years
ago
into
one
for
family
unit
and
Louise
has
lived
there.
All
her
life
and
she's
looking
to
make
the
top
floor
a
little
more
useable
on
the
rear
of
this
whole
row
along
the
South
Russell
Street,
almost
every
other
house
has
added
a
dormer
to
get
that
extra
Headroom.
So
we're
asking
permission
to
do
that
dormer.
That
would
give
a
much
more
usable
space
on
the
third
floor.
J
AL
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
shanece
Pimentel,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
the
applicant
completed
a
successful
community
process
and
received
no
opposition.
The
Beacon
Hill
Civic
Association
also
submitted
a
letter
of
support
for
this
proposal.
We
asked
the
applicants
continue
working
with
the
abutters,
but
at
this
time
we
have
no
questions.
And/Or
concerns
and
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
proposal.
Thank
you.
AM
AM
B
C
The
next
two
cases
calling
it
VOA
nine
six,
seven
three,
eight
one
83
to
89
Queens,
very
Street,
there's
a
companion
case,
VOA
nine,
six,
seven,
three,
eight
six,
ninety
five
to
101
Queensbury
reading.
This
is
for
83
to
89
Queensbury.
This
is
to
construct
an
eight
story:
building
395
units,
amenities
offices,
retail
restaurant
spaces
with
subsurface
parking
garage,
the
violations,
article
6
section,
0-3,
a
additional
conditions
in
a
restricted
parking
district
article
32
section
9,
that,
just
as
in
G
cod
enforcement
article
66
section
8
restaurant
is
a
conditional
MF.
C
Our
height
equals
66,
section
8
accessory
parking.
None
residential
is
conditional
article
66,
section
42
velocity
parking
and
loading
parking
design.
Article
66
section,
42,
Osprey,
binding
loading
requirement.
Street
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
66
section
9,
the
phylidia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
66
section
9,
the
Haida
success
of
article
66,
section
9,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
in
article
66,
section
9,
the
rear
yard
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
95
to
101
Queensbury,
just
to
construct
an
eight-story
85
unit,
residential
amenities
with
underground
parking
garage,
the
violations,
article
32,
section
9.
C
This
is
G
code
enforcement,
article
66,
section
42,
R,
Street
Viking
is
insufficient.
Article
66
section
42
66
42.5
parking
design,
article
66
section
I
on
the
Floyd.
A
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
66
x9,
a
height,
is
excessive
in
article
66,
section
I'm,
useable,
open
space
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
Thank.
B
AN
We
are
aware
of
that
and
we'd
like
to
proceed
with
me:
is
jay
dougherty
from
Cavett
Cavett
and
Forbes
and
Phil
Casey
from
CB
t
architects.
The
project's
architect,
as
you
mentioned,
we're
here
on
two
separate
Appeals
for
two
components:
the
same
residential
project.
It
includes
the
development
of
buildings
on
either
side
of
Kilmarnock
Street
along
Queensferry
Street
in
the
Fenway
neighborhood.
AN
AN
So
this
is
the
first
site.
I'll
talk
first
about
the
each
site
project.
They
are
two
separate
deals:
the
site
spans
to
zoning
sub
districts.
It's
located
partially,
a
man
apart
OS
and
partially
in
the
MFR
to
residential
use
is
allowed
in
both
sub
districts.
The
East
site
component
will
contain
approximately
365
residential
units,
a
combination
currently
planned
as
as
some
apartments
and
some
for
sale
condominium
units,
along
with
amenities
such
as
a
roof
deck
and
a
fitness
center.
AN
There's
a
one-level
subsurface
garage
parking
garage
for
approximately
150
to
200
and
ten
spaces
on
the
ground
floor.
There's
a
marginally
3300
square
foot
commercial
space
which
is
currently
planned
is
about
2200
square
feet
of
retail
or
restaurant
space
and
approximately
1,100
feet
of
space
that
the
developer
is
committed
to
lease
to
a
community
organization
called
the
K
Street
Clubhouse,
which
hosts
support
group
meetings
for
members
of
the
LGBTQ
community
for
addiction.
Okay,.
B
AO
AN
B
AN
Neighborhood
so
over
the
course
of
our
lady
week,
the
project,
mentoring,
design,
evolution,
substantially
reduced
the
size
of
the
project
and
what
we
were
requesting
approval
for
today
for
the
BPD,
a
approved
building,
our
variances
from
height
the
maximum
building
height
of
75
feet.
The
project
is
90
feet
to
the
top
of
the
highest
occupied
floor
and
then
there's
a
rooftop
penthouse
enclosing
some
of
those
rooftop
amenities
that
I
mentioned,
which
rises
to
a
height
of
about
104
I'm.
AN
AP
B
A
AN
We're
also
requesting
relief
from
FA
are
the
zoning
maximum
at
both
of
his
owning
stuff
districts,
that
the
project
spans
us
for
this
for
and
we're
requesting
if
they
are
of
approximately
four
point.
Seven.
We
view
that,
as
as
modest
relief
in
order
to
a
little
bit
in
order
to
mask
the
building.
Among
all
these
different
constraints,
there
is
a
rear
yard
requirement,
we're
complying
with
front
yard
setbacks
along
both
the
streets,
which
is
so
the
existing
of
building
alignment
of
the
block.
AN
AN
AN
H
AN
A
bit
of
a
vestige
of
old
zoning
people
or
developers
are
finding
that
less
parking
is
is
necessary
that
the
minimum
requirement
is
3/4
of
a
space
for
dwelling
in
it.
That
would
require
about
273
parking
spaces,
which
we
think
is
more
than
the
project
needs,
and
so
we're
requesting
relief
to
offer
between
150
and
200.
B
AN
Space
approved
Welling
unit
is
another
aspect:
relief.
The
total
underlying
design
requires
100
square
feet
per
unit.
That's
approximately
thirty
to
thirty
six
thousand
five
hundred
square
feet
for
a
project
this
size.
The
project
is
providing
twenty
five
thousand
eight
hundred
square
feet
of
space,
there's
still
significant
open
space
on
the
site,
and
it's
really
designed
we
think
in
harmony
with
the
neighborhood.
AN
AN
The
dimensional
relief
is
very
much
similar,
although
that
project
complies
with
all
of
the
art
requirements.
The
building
is
a
ganymede
story,
residential
building
on
the
ground
floor,
no
commercial
space
just
accessory
to
the
residential
use,
approximately
75
residential
units,
again
with
with
the
roof
deck
and
rooftop
infinity
space.
There's
a
one
level
parking
garage
with
somewhere
between
33
and
59
parking
spaces.
O
AL
Madame
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
shanece
Pimentel
with
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services.
This
proposal
has
received
approval
from
the
BPD
a
at
this
time.
I
have
we
have
no
questions
or
concerns,
and
the
mayor's
office
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
I
would
also
like
to
note
that
the
Fenway
Community
Development
Corporation
has
also
submitted
a
letter
of
support.
Thank
you.
AQ
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Tim
Czerwinski
I'm,
a
senior
project
manager
with
the
Boston
Planning
and
Development
Agency,
the
60km.
Our
extra
project
was
subject
to
article
80
large
project
review,
the
BPD,
a
hosted
three
public
meetings
and
four
meetings
of
the
impact
advisory
group
to
review
the
project
under
article
a
DB
and
the
BPD.
A
board
voted
to
approve
the
project:
On
January
7,
2019,
Thank,
You,.
AR
AR
The
cabin
cabin
Forbes
or
the
60
kalanick
group
is
committing
a
substantial
sum
of
their
inclusion
or
development
policy
money
to
an
expiring
news
project,
thereby
saving
97
units
of
affordable
housing.
In
addition,
the
community
benefits
and
mitigation
are
outstanding,
they're,
preserving
a
recovery
Clubhouse,
that's
currently
operating
on
the
site.
It's
probably
the
only
LGBTQ
recovery
clubhouse
in
the
city.
It's
also
doing
all
sorts
of
good
things
on
transportation
and
street
improvements,
they're
doing
community
benefits
for
Rambla
Park
for
operation,
piece,
etcetera,
etcetera,.
AS
AS
AK
Morning,
Carla
Monahan
from
Sharon
and
lajjun
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
84/100
Peterborough
Monte
Gold's,
here
he's
the
owner
of
restaurant
row,
which
is
the
immediate
of
butter
onto
the
front
of
this
project.
On
the
east
side
portion
of
the
project,
we
have
a
number
of
concerns:
Monte's
owned
restaurant
row
for
30-plus
years
we
have
a
shared
passageway
between
the
projects,
that's
being
temporarily
closed
during
construction
of
the
east
side
as
well
as
concerns
about
the
building.
Over
of
that
passageway
that's
been
proposed.
AK
For
the
first
time
we
received
an
actual
a
butter
shared
party,
well
agreement.
Last
Wednesday.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
we've
tried
to
quickly
work
through
that,
with
all
due
respect,
I
think
that
it
would
behoove
the
board
to
continue
the
public
hearing,
move
it
over
to
the
next
meeting,
give
us
an
opportunity
to
be
productive
and
to
accomplish
that.
AK
If,
for
some
reason,
you're
not
inclined
to
do
that
and
you're
inclined
to
go
forward
and
take
a
vote,
we
would
at
least
minimally
ask
that
there
be
a
condition
added
to
any
such
approval
of
this
decision
mandating
or
requiring
other
that
the
developer
negotiating
good
faith
for
such
an
agreement.
Thank
you.
AT
C
B
C
This
is
to
construct
a
third
floor
addition
with
roof
deck
on
existing
footprint,
extend
living
space
to
basement
full
renovation
to
an
existing
single-family
dwelling.
The
violations
article
27
s,
section
section
five:
this
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section,
29,
roof
structure,
restrictions
in
article
68,
section
8,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
Michael.
C
A
AC
B
AC
AC
AU
AM
AV
AW
B
C
This
is
to
confirm
oxy
as
a
two-family
dwelling
change
of
our
key
coming
to
family,
to
a
four
family
work
to
include
a
complete
interior
innovation,
Apollinaire
addition
on
third
floor
with
new
roof,
decks,
new
red
decks
and
roof
deck
extend
living
space
to
basement
for
additional
dwelling
unit.
Exterior
renovation
to
include
new
windows,
siding
trim,
entire
building
will
be
fully
sprinkled
and
proposed.
5R
street
parking
the
violations
article
27s,
section
5.
C
This
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section
29,
roof
structure
restriction,
radical
68,
section,
33,
aa,
Street
parking,
loader
requirement,
article
68,
section,
7.2,
basement
units
are
forbidden,
article
68,
section,
8,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient
in
article
68,
section
8
to
side
yard
is
insufficient
name.
It
had
just
further
ethically.
AX
B
AX
Terrible
at
posing
here
isn't
it
existing
building,
converted
changing
a
use
from
an
existing
to
family
attached
on
the
left
side
to
a
four
unit
dwelling
unit
with
five
parking
spaces
in
the
rear.
There
is
existing
parking
access
via
driveway
on
the
right
side
and,
additionally,
there's
a
small
vertical
addition
proposed
on
the
rear
part
of
the
building
on
the
third
and
fourth
level,
or
rather,
which
would
be
second
in
third
level
but
fourth
living
level.
The
building
will
consist
of
four
one-bedroom
units.
AX
AX
Certainly,
the
first
violation
restricted
roof
structure:
article
68,
section,
29,
the
the
roof
deck
in
this
in
this
proposed
project-
meets
article
68
29.
However,
because
it
is
an
existing
structure,
any
change
to
the
profile
of
the
building
it
requires
a
conditional
use
permit,
which
is
what
we
were
seeking
today.
AX
Bob
Street
loading
and
parking
was
cited,
I
believe
that
was
cited
incorrectly.
This
is
for
one-bedroom
units
each
requiring
one
parking
space
per
unit,
excluding
the
existing
spaces.
We
have
five
proposed,
so
I
believe
that
compliance
management
units
are
forbidden.
There
is
an
existing
unit
in
the
basement.
Now
is
likely
an
undocumented
unit,
but
nonetheless
it
is
there
so
I
believe
that
would
not
of
that
being
there.
AX
B
AX
B
F
AX
AX
F
AD
F
F
AX
AU
The
board
Haley
Villa
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
late
to
America
in
support,
we
held
the
abutters
meeting
on
July
29th.
We
do
have
nothing
but
support
letters
on
record
in
the
city
point
Neighborhood
Association
is
in
support.
We
know
that
there
is
one
of
butter
who
is
opposition.
We
just
ask
that
they
work
with
them
to
solve
their
problems.
Thank
you.
AM
AV
AY
AY
Butters
of
this
project
and
I
am
in
strong
support
of
it.
There
are
three
specific
reasons
why
I
support
this
project.
The
first
is
that
the
project
proponent
is
planning
to
live
in
the
building.
I
think
he
will
be
a
good
neighbor
to
the
rest
of
us.
In
City
point
number
two
he's
been
immensely
accommodating
to
the
requests
of
the
neighbors
and
the
city.
AY
B
AW
K
K
K
It's
a
horrible
safety
issue
because
of
have
children,
elderly,
disabled
people
going
and
coming
from
work,
skateboarders,
bicycle
yeah
right
across
the
street.
You
have
Peter
Street
and
then
five
houses
down
you
have
Mott
Street.
Then
you
have
and
going
to
the
beach
and
Street
because
of
that
child
being
killed
on
L
Street.
A
lot
of
that
traffic
goes
up
at
end
Street.
Now
they
don't
have
the
things
for
the
speed
of
anything.
You
know
yeah,
so
this
traffic
is
a
big
issue.
Safety
is
a
big
issue.
K
There's
no
cooler
feel
vision
from
my
side
of
the
house.
I
mean
I
do
feel
that
as
the
senior
citizens
with
disabilities
day
I
got
issues,
I
helped
this
yesterday,
I
can't
deal
with
the
noise
and
the
banging
and
I
will
deal
with
it.
For,
like
nine
I
mean
I
know
things
have.
It
has
to
be
fixed,
something
something
and.
K
B
H
B
B
K
B
B
H
F
F
C
This
is
the
erect
a
new
mixed-use
building
with
retail
store
on
the
first
floor
for
dwelling
units
above
the
violation,
article
27
s
section
five:
this
is
in
the
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
six
to
thirty
three
off
street
parking
is
insufficient,
equals
sixty
eight
section.
Eight,
the
Floyd,
a
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
68
section,
eight,
the
building
height
is
excessive
and
T
equals
sixty
eight
section.
Eight,
the
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
68
section,
eight,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
68,
section
eight
side
yard
is
insufficient
and
equals
sixty
eight
section
8.
AZ
H
AG
U
AZ
Is
beautifully
Desai
house
developer
and
the
building
where
my
offices
on
the
stove,
a
cyclist,
owns
the
property
next
toward
346
348,
which
is
currently
a
two
and
a
half
story.
Building
contains
ground-floor
commercial
space.
It's
a
barbershop
with
two
12
units
above
the
proposal
is
to
demolish
the
existing
building
and
to
erect
a
new
building,
with
the
revised
plan
submitted
to
the
board,
showing
ground-floor
commercial
space
and
three
dwelling
units
above
I'm,
not
sure.
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
Y
AZ
AZ
F
AZ
F
And
I'm
sorry
don't
mean
to
interrupt,
but
on
the
cover
sheet
on
both
for
the
big
set
of
drawings
and
as.
BB
A
AZ
AZ
Yeah
I'm,
sorry
that
that
is
just
incorrect
off
on
the
cover
sheet.
The
plans
do
in
fact
show
ground-floor
commercial
space
of
housing
18
square
feet.
The
unit
residential
unit,
one
is
on
the
second
floor-
is
13
or
11
hundred
square
foot
two-bedroom
residential
dwelling
unit
number
two
of
the
second
on
the
third
floor
is
a
1311
square
foot
two-bedroom
unit
and
then
residential
unit.
3
is
a
bi-level
unit.
Ok,.
AZ
AZ
If
they
thought,
okay,
it's
a
bi-level
unit,
the
one
that
did
a
full
fifth
floor,
the
front
part
that
was
taken
off
so
that
the
resulting
unit
3,
is
its
three-bedroom
2578
square
feet.
There
is
that
setback
on
the
fifth
story,
the
building
next
door
at
350,
that
is
a
9
unit
building
it
rises
to
the
same
height
for
storage
on
West
Broadway.
There
is
the
same
setback
where
there
is
a
front
patio
front
deck
and
in
front
of
the
unit,
which
is
the
same
as
on
what
is
being
proposed.
AZ
There
is
no
deck
on
the
roof
of
the
building,
that's
being
proposed.
As
for
violations,
there's
an
FA,
our
violation
that
we're
above
4.83
there's
a
height
violation.
This
building
would
be
50
feet
with
maximum
height
the
fifth
story
level,
but
again
on
the
plane,
that's
facing
West
Broadway.
It
would
be
a
four
story,
as
perceived
from
West
Broadway
matching
the
building
left
and
right.
The
building
on
the
left
has
no
windows
on
this
lot
side
and
the
rear
of
this
building.
AU
H
AM
Chair
members
of
the
board
on
a
Calderon
from
cancer,
a
shrinks
office,
the
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
opposition
to
this
proposal.
They
were
concerned
some
parking,
high
and
think
tank
city
at
their
borders
meeting,
and
there
were
concerns
on
high
density
and
markings.
Are
there
bothers
meetings
and
the
same
thing
since
lower
an
association
is
also
in
opposition
to
this
project?
Thank
you.
B
C
The
last
case
for
9:30
calling
VOA
eight
nine
six,
seven,
seven,
nine
seven
seventy-nine
to
seven.
Seventy
nine,
eight
Dorchester
Avenue.
This
is
a
proposed
rear
and
vertical
addition
and
add
a
roof
deck
to
expand.
Existing
storage
to
the
first
floor,
dwelling
unit
relocate
first
floor
dwelling
unit
into
the
second
floor
and
the
second
dwelling
unit
into
the
third
floor.
No
change
in
occupancy
the
violations.
Article
9
section,
one
extension
of
it
in
existing
non-conforming
local
retail
use.
C
AZ
My
name
is
george
marino,
an
attorney
with
the
business
address
at
350,
West,
Broadway,
South,
Boston,
I'm
joined
by
my
client
in
the
property
owner
join
the
win
and,
if
you
remember,
the
description
is
somewhat
awkwardly
phrased.
Simplify
the
existing
building
is
two
and
a
half
story.
Building
that
contains
ground
for
convenience,
store
use
and
also
with
Welling
unit
with
second
dwelling
unit
in
the
building
as
well.
AZ
It's
a
two
and
a
half
story
building
the
proposal
is
to
essentially
I
can
convert
it
by
means
of
vertical
and
lateral
additions
film
in
additions,
but
to
create
three
Dec
3
story
building.
This
is
a
three
story
as
a
three
F,
but
the
district.
It
is
a
three-decker
zoning
district.
What
would
happen
with
the
units?
We
simply
the
the
convenience
store
will
be
expanded
and
would
occupy
the
entirety.
J
AZ
So
that
would
be
growing
inside
the
ground-floor
retail.
It's
currently
about
618
square
feet
after
this
is
completed
with
the
very
faint
square
feet,
and
then
the
two
units
above
would
grow,
there's
currently
a
quite
a
small
apartment
of
the
first
floors
of
a
460
square
feet,
and
then
the
second
residential
unit
is
about
9:30,
the
new
numbers.
There
would
be
approximately
1400
square
feet
for
the
each
of
the
resulting
two-bedroom
units.
The
height
of
the
building
will
actually
stay
the
same.
AZ
AZ
AZ
AZ
B
AZ
N
F
H
AZ
F
AZ
F
BC
Madam
chairman
support
patrick
van
del
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
There
was
a
butters
meeting
held
on
site
by
the
previous
coordinator
for
this
area,
and
the
applicant
has
worked
extensively
with
an
informant
Civic
Association
that
came
to
accommodate
all
concerns.
We'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project
proposal,
as
well
as
the
expansion
of
a
great
local
business.
T
I
B
BD
C
B
AQ
AJ
C
BF
C
B
BG
C
B
B
C
BG
M
C
N
AZ
C
H
AZ
C
B
F
B
BH
BH
BH
BH
BH
A
A
A
B
Morning,
the
Board
of
Appeals,
what
you
say:
September
10,
is
back
in
session
just
to
remind
to
please
make
sure
that
your
cell
phones
are
off
and
if
you
need
to
have
conversations,
peace,
take
them
outside
of
the
room,
in
conformance
with
the
Open
Meeting.
Law
of
this
meeting
is
being
live-streamed.
B
You
may
have
noticed
this
is
a
five-member
board
today
and
so
for
your
project.
If
you
decide
to
go
forward,
you
need
all
five
members
to
be
in
support
of
your
project.
We
have
offered,
and
others
have
accepted
the
offer
of
an
administrative
deferral.
So
if
anybody
is
interested
in
that,
please
come
forward.
C
W
There
was
a
space,
there
are
three
spaces
in
the
building.
What
happened
was
in
the
past
is
when
they
restaurant
went
in
some
years
ago.
I
wasn't
aware
of
it,
they
applied
for
their
use
and
when
they
did
so,
they
dropped
off
of
space
downstairs.
So
I
came
back
a
couple
of
years
ago
in
2016
got
the
approval
and
then
it
expires
today.
W
W
F
F
BI
BB
B
F
D
C
The
next
case
calling
vo
a
981
for
eight
to
twelve
glowing
screen.
This
is
building
a
new
single-family
home.
What
kind
of
an
existing
house
violations
article
50
section
29
the
large-sized
directed
dwelling-
is
insufficient
50,
section
29
in
the
front
yeah
it
said
setback
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
side
yard
setback
is
insufficient
in
article
50
section
43,
our
street
parking
is
insufficient
name
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BD
AB
BD
So
we're
here
today
propose
that
you
construct
a
single-family
home
at
12
ministry.
This
is
a
single
home
that
will
actually
take
the
place
of
an
existing
structure
that
is
currently
in
the
dilapidated
state.
As
part
of
that,
the
applicant
dr.
Flo
has
gone
through
the
article
85
process,
which
included
an
extensive
community
process.
BD
On
March
20th
2019,
as
well
as
March
26th
artists,
commission
also
had
baby
that
demolition
delay
I
was
lifted.
That's
why
we're
here
today
there
are
four
variances,
actually
mostly
historical,
since
the
new
structural
exact
same
printer,
relatively
the
expert
of
the
structure
being
demolished
and
then
note
that
parking
was
cited,
do
satisfy
the.
BD
H
BI
C
A
next
three
cases
calling
vo
vo,
a
nine
four
four
nine
one,
zero
eight
two,
eight
a
Valentine
Street.
There
are
two
companion
cases:
vo
a
94,
491
152,
Thornton,
Street
and
Bo,
a
944
9000
154,
Dolphin
Street.
This
is
for
eight
in
a
day,
Valentine
Street.
This
is
subdivide
this
already
newly
build
for
unit
townhouse
style,
building
into
three
independent
row,
house
type
type
style
on
a
three
assigned
subdivided
distinct
Passos.
C
This
building
is
a
two
family
and
to
be
known
as
eight
made
a
Valentine
Street
and
its
lot
size
as
opposed
of
3951
square
feet.
This
was
approved
as
a
six
unit
building
by
the
CBA
later
change
to
a
four
unit,
townhouse
style
dwelling
by
the
owner,
approved
by
the
board
final
Hobbiton.
There
are
also
two
other
separated
properties,
152
and
154
Thorton.
The
violations,
article
50
section
29,
the
Elat
area
for
additional
dwelling
unit-
is
insufficient.
This
is
for
152
Thornton's
Street,
subdivide
this
building
from
8
8a.
C
C
BJ
B
F
BJ
Y
F
F
Y
BJ
B
This
is
so
any
any
questions
from
the
board.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
BI
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jessica
Thomas
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
we
conducted
in
a
butters
meeting
on
June
24th,
and
it
was
very
successful.
There
was
an
overwhelming
amount
of
support,
especially
considering
that
they
scaled
it
back.
They
also
met
with
the
Highland
Park
neighborhood
coalition
several
times.
C
Following
vo
vo,
a
about
95
nine
zero
to
seven
27th
only
Street,
there
is
a
companion
case,
boa
956
to
75
27th,
only
Street,
the
only
Street
Hill.
This
is
okay
to
fire
protection,
new
rear,
exterior,
steer
to
replace
the
inside
static,
restart
area
and
basement
not
to
be
living.
Space
change.
Second,
floor
Pantheon
to
open
porch,
create
a
third
floor,
rear
deck
change,
the
first
and
second
floors
to
open-concept
kitchen/living,
a
three-bedroom
two-bath
the
violations,
article
65
section
9,
the
rail
yard
is
insufficient.
C
Section,
a
tradition,
780,
CMR,
1027
exit
discharge,
10.2,
seven
point
five
point:
one
location:
minimum
fire
separation,
distance
of
ten
feet
from
the
exterior
stay
away
to
an
adjacent
lot
line
things
that
discharge
exits
daily
shall
be
separated
from
interior
of
the
building,
as
required
by
ten
twenty
three
point.
Two
and
the
opening
shall
be
limited
for
those
necessary
for
he
graphs
from
normally
occupied
spaces,
name
and
address
for
the
record
place.
BK
B
F
H
BK
BK
So
so,
and
in
his
mind,
he
didn't
think
that
there
was
going
to
be
a
building
code
issue,
given
that
providing
a
second
egress
would
increase
the
safety
and
then
he
also
wanted
the
the
open
floor
concept
for
the
first
and
second
floor.
The
way
the
stairs
used
to
work
for
the
two
family
is
the
second
floor
and
third
floor
had
a
single
egress
down,
and
so
he
moved
the
egress
to
the
rear
of
the
building.
B
The
other
hand,
you
know
this
sounds
like
my
thought
is
that
this
is
for
that
that
the
architect
should
have
dealt
with
this
to
begin
with.
Yes,
that
should
not
have
put
you
in
this
position,
so
I
don't
know
what
the
best
response
is
to
come
in
and
walk
us
around
it
or
basically
we
say
no
to
this
request
for
relief.
BK
B
H
B
C
The
next
case
calling
VOA
nine
seven
two
zero
six,
three
three
ninety-two
Seaver
Street
Seba
Street.
Okay,
this
is
to
make
the
right
side
of
the
proposed
driveway
for
two
vehicles:
the
violation
article
10
section
1.
The
proposed
parking
is
within
5
feet
of
the
side,
lot
line,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AQ
Z
BL
BL
B
BL
BL
AN
F
H
B
C
Seven:
six:
six,
seven,
six
140
141
Westville
Street.
This
is
a
new
construction
of
14
studio
apartments.
Under
the
contact
living
guidelines
violations,
article
65
section
41,
a
street
parking
is
insufficient
article
65
section
8,
the
multi-family
dwelling
units,
the
bid
news,
article
65
section
I
in
the
minimum
lot
width
is
insufficient
radical
65-69.
The
minimum
lot
frontage
is
insufficient.
Radical
65,
section
9,
the
fluid
ei
ratios
excessive
article
65,
section
9,
the
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
Article
65
section
9,
the
height,
is
it's
excessive
and
feet.
B
BH
BM
BM
BM
BM
In
use
in
this
district
insufficient
off
street
parking,
where
no
parking
is
proposed
for
this
project,
in
keeping
with
their
compact
living
guidelines,
we're
encouraging
non
car
based
transportation.
So
we
have
the
indoor
bike,
storage,
there's
a
bike
repair
station
and
then
it's
also
walking
distance.
B
F
BM
BN
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
choir
fan
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhoods
and
services
were
like
go
on
record
and
support.
The
product
project
has
been
approved
by
the
BPD.
A
under
small
project
review,
Vivian
and
ELISA
has
been
received.
A
tremendous
support
from
the
neighborhood
as
well
as
fuels,
corner
civic
association
and
greater
bola
Bowden
Geneva.
Thank
you.
BO
AO
AV
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Karen
Foley,
comes
from
sabe
George's
office.
I
have
been
to
the
units
and
I
was
just
saying:
I
could
live
there.
So
that
says
a
lot
to
me,
but
we
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you
very
much
morning.
AQ
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
the
141
Western
Street
project
was
subject
to
article
80
small
project
review,
Czerwinski
senior
project
manager,
BPD
eh.
Sorry
about
that
the
BPD
a
hosted
a
public
meeting
on
May,
2nd
2019,
the
BPD
a
voted.
The
BPA
board
voted
to
approve
the
project
on
July
11th
and
also
voted
to
recommend
that
the
CBA
prove
the
necessary
zoning
relief
for
the
project,
with
the
proviso
that
it
be
subject
to
ongoing
BPD.
A
design
review.
AQ
Minh
up
for
me
answer
that
question
specifically,
but
I
do
know
that
the
the
compact
guidelines
do
privileged
projects
that
have
minimal
parking,
especially
when
they're
transit
oriented.
You
know
which
this
project
is
with
this
proximity
to
fields.
Corner
I
do
know
that
BPD,
a
transportation
planners,
BTD
transportation
planning
and
the
disabilities
Commission
have
all
reviewed
this
project
and
and
that
issue
hasn't
really
didn't
really
come
up
during
our
review.
So,
unfortunately,
I
don't
have
a
better
answer
to
that
question.
B
B
H
S
S
X
Good-Morning
member
chairwoman
and
the
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Jack
Lew
of
283
Ashmont,
Street
and
I
called
home
step
bakery
and
cafe
in
fields.
Corner
I
do
want
a
voice
of
support
for
the
project.
A
proposed
project
could
be
a
new
model
of
affordable
workforce
housing
and
a
many
of
our
staff
at
the
cafe
has
seen
a
Prada
property
and
feel
comfortable
living
in
it.
Essentially
as
a
model.
X
B
BH
B
C
B
B
B
C
O
deed
of
October
29th
at
10:30.
Thank
you.
Are
there
any
other
deferrals
with
Charles
for
11:30?
Madam
chair?
We
do
have
case
boa
eight,
eight,
nine
five
one
for
343
345,
Chelsea
Street
as
its
deferral
due
to
an
updated
refusal
letter.
So
they
are
scheduled
to
be
on
1029
2019
at
10:30.
So
I'm
gonna
make
a
motion
for
deferral.
B
C
B
BP
BP
BP
F
H
F
BC
Madam
chair
members,
the
board
Patrick
fennel
mayor's
office,
Neighborhood
Services
this
one
through
a
full
community
process,
including
an
on-site
of
butter's
meeting
and
extensive
meetings
with
the
st.
mark,
Civic
Association.
In
order
to
approve
this
project,
we'd
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
the
project
proposal.
Madam.
BO
F
B
C
The
next
case
calling
boa
9
4
5
7
8
7
41
to
43
Alabama
Street.
This
is
direct.
A
two
storey
building
for
nutrit
new
to
family
violations.
Article
60,
section
8,
a
2
to
family
dwelling
unit,
is
a
forbidden
use.
Article
60,
section
9,
the
lardy
area
to
erected
dwelling
unit
is
insufficient.
Article
60
section
9,
the
minimum
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Nickel,
60,
section
I
and
the
minimum
frontage
is
insufficient.
C
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
AB
F
AB
The
existing
within
frontage
of
the
lot
is
3840.
The
required
is
sixty
feet
and,
as
we
know,
with
most
projects
in
Boston
that
is
going
to
be
based
on
symmetrical
ones,
and
while
there
is
a
front
yard
setback
that
was
set
forth
in
the
as
a
as
a
violation,
we
contend
that
we
have
the
twenty
P
for
the
front
yard
setback.
AG
AB
AB
One
is
proposed
rendering
of
the
of
what
the
project
would
look
like
before
for
this
development
and
you're
going
to
hear
opposition
from
the
neighborhood,
which
will
speak
to
the
fact
that,
because
the
two
family
is
not
allowed
in
this
particular
district,
but
the
interesting
part
is
that
there
are.
There
are
other
three
family
excuse
me.
Two
families
on
the
property.
B
AB
A
year
about
within
a
year
ago,
yes,
what
what
we?
What
we
have
is
that
there
are
other
two
families
on
it
as
one
to
film
in
eighteen
to
twenty
Alabama,
Street,
19,
Alabama,
Street
and
there's
one
at
25,
Alabama
Street.
There's
also,
if
you
notice
that
there
is
no
height
violation
decided
here,
because
the
proposed
project
is
consistent
at
the
height
of
the
neighborhood.
B
F
AB
AB
F
F
BQ
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
void,
my
name
is
Whitney
Celestine
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
This
is
our
second
round
of
community
process
for
this
project.
We
held
an
on-site
abutters
meeting
where
many
of
the
neighbors
showed
up
on
June
10th,
and
they
had
very
expressive.
Concerns
about
that
lot
itself
on
the
side,
neighbor,
the
one
that's
right
on
the
right
expressed
that
his
basement
would
get
flooded
with
water
there's
a
big
street
on
the
property.
BQ
B
BQ
AF
BR
It
is
a
single-family
residential
community.
We
have
family
members
who
I
have
to
Ana
cousin.
We
are
live
on
the
street.
This
family.
Aren't
it's
single
families.
Only
there's
a
school
we
get
multiple
buses
coming
through
parking
is
most
of
us
have
office.
We
try
to
drive
home
but
parking
on
the
street.
BR
BR
BR
B
BS
I
am
on
the
other
side
of
her,
so
I
am
the
property
directly
if
you're
standing
in
front
of
it
to
the
right,
so
their
driver
will
be
directly
next
to
my
driveway
and
regards
to
the
tree
issue.
There's
a
massive
tree
on
that
lot
and
there's
wetlands
that
run
behind
these
houses
and
next
to
the
cemetery,
and
if
that
tree
is
going,
that's
probably
going
to
cause
a
massive
flooding.
AB
They
get
the
in
order
to
erect
this
particular
project.
That
tree
will
have
to
be
a
little
work.
We're
not
aware
of
the
issues
that
have
been
raised
by
this
to
Thomas
about
in
terms
of
the
law
in
terms
of
the
water.
Madam
chair,
that's
there
I
think
this
is
an
appropriate
side.
Enough
I
might
be
able
to
speak
to
a
number
of
things
if
I
can
amplify
on
what
this
project
is
proposing.
Consistent
some
of
the
housing.
B
BT
B
AB
It's
certainly
no.
The
the
chair
is
encouraging
that
people
I
see
is
very
astute
at
these
types
of
things
for
sure.
We've
had
two
goals
at
this
with
with
the
neighborhood
I.
Don't
think
that
it
will,
it
will
change
their
particular
views.
They've
been
pranks
frightening
with
regards
to
that,
and
certainly
would
welcome
that
overture.
If
I,
you
know
if
I
thought,
that
would
be
the
case.
AB
Why
I
want
at
least
put
on
directed
some
additional
things
which
the
applicant
is
prepared
to
do
to
address
some
of
the
things
that
would
make
it
particularly
by
the
director
butters
with
regards
to
the
park
as
I
know,
this
point
is
very
much
in
favor
of
aggressive
screening
of
buffering
when
you
have
those
situations
that
that's
certainly
something
which
the
applicant
is
prepared
to
do
with
respect
to
where
the
parking
will
be
in
the
rear
of
the
property.
The
the
unit
sizes
are
going
to
be
eleven
hundred
and
seventy
seven
square
feet.
AB
Three
bedrooms:
two
bathrooms
large,
open
kitchen
living
room
and
dining
room,
three
stores
in
the
basement.
That
makes
two
parking
spaces,
as
is
my
practice
of
always
willing
to
have
a
conversation,
because
I
know
that
residents
who
are
in
neighborhoods
they
have
been
there
for
many
many
years.
They
feel
the
character
of
their
particular
neighborhood
I
once
lived
in
Mattapan
myself,
so
I
certainly
understand
that,
so
we're
more
than
happy
to
have
that
conversation.
AB
AB
F
BU
C
The
next
two
cases
calling
VOA
nine
six,
nine
eight
five
six.
Seventy
one
Davison
street
there's
a
companion
case,
boa
ninety
six,
nine,
eight
five
five
BDS
three.
This
is
for
a
71
Davis,
and
this
is
subdivide.
71
David
Davison
at
8832
square
foot
into
Lots.
The
new
lot
471
Davison
Street
lot
would
consist
of
3269
the
other
lot.
488
ps3
would
consist
of
5500
563
square
feet.
C
He
was
made
for
a
new
trainer
for
construction
of
a
new
to
family
dwelling
violation
of
article
9,
section,
1
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
article
68,
section
8.
The
phylidia
ratio
is
excessive,
equals
68,
section,
8,
useable,
open
spaces,
insufficient
article
68,
section
8.
The
Reyat
is
insufficient
article
69,
section
9.
The
lot
area
is
insufficient.
C
This
is
for
88
PS
constructing
new
to
family
dwelling.
On
the
new
lock
created
by
subdividing
71
Davison
to
8832
square
into
2
Lots.
The
new
lauded
88
PS
would
consist
of
5566
63
square
feet.
The
new
lot
471
Davison
would
consist
of
3261
269
square
feet.
The
violations,
article
69
20
Section
29
hockey
fission
article
69
section
9
lot.
Width
is
insufficient.
Article
69
section
9
lot,
frontages
insufficient
article
69,
section
9,
northern
height
is
excessive
in
stories.
C
B
AE
BV
BV
B
BV
B
BV
Some
of
the
Davis
Street
is
owned
by
centaur
jet.
He
lives
there.
He
renovated
this
building,
maybe
five
six
ten
years
ago,
he
lives
on
the
second
floor.
At
the
time
he
was
a
single
person.
He
rents
out
the
first
floor
since
then
he
has
gotten
married.
He
has
about
three
kids,
so
he's
essentially
outgrown
the
second
floor
apartment
which
he
lives.
So
his
idea
is
to
subdivide
the
lot,
which
is
about
eight
hundred
eight
thousand
eight
hundred
square
feet.
BV
That
lot
extends
from
fronts
on
70,
with
Davidson
Street,
and
the
back
Internet
lot
is
on
history.
Says
idea
was
to
subdivide
that
lot
in
which,
of
course,
the
suddenly,
when
Davidson
Street
remains
as
a
two-family.
He
would
then
build
a
two
family
on
the
second
lot
we
just
established
which
fronts
on
history,
which
would
be
88
history.
BV
I
think
there's
a
one
bedroom,
I
think
I'm
on
a
two-bedroom
apartment
that
Davidson
Street,
that's
not
sufficient
from
him
to
live,
so
he
needs
a
much
larger
apartment.
So
the
idea
was
to
build
a
two
family
on
88
history,
I
seen
live
on
the
ground
floor
and
the
first
floor
and
rent
out
the
second
floor
and
the
third
floor
as
rentals
maintain
rentals
in
and
at
71
Davidson
Street
also
manage
those
rentals.
He
would
then
be
essentially
an
on-site
landlord
because
he'll
be
living
adjacent
to
the
71
Davidson
Street
properties.
B
BV
B
BV
Also
again
met
with
the
neighborhood
group
a
couple
of
times
and
we
also
met
with
the
director
butters,
the
director
butters.
They
one
concern
was
that
they
wanted
88.
We
have
parking
for
cars
park,
they
said
no.
We
don't
really
prefer
to
have
more
open
space
for
88
part
two
cars,
so
we
made
we
actually
made
that
made
that
change.
F
BA
BA
BV
I
may
there
are
larger
structures
on
that
side
of
the
street
there
Jason
structures,
I,
think
two
and
a
half
stories,
and
in
height
wise,
that
building
we're
proposing
is
actually
similar
to
some
of
the
jacent
buildings
on
that
street.
Not
only
that
the
front
setback,
which
is
a
violation,
is
20
feet.
However,
when
you
look
at
the
modal
setback,
which
is
15
feet,
which
has
been
calculated
at
that
building
also
meets
aligns
with
the
existing
building.
The
setbacks
are
10
feet
10
feet
on
both
sides.
BV
We
can't
do
anything
about
the
the
width
of
the
building,
which
is
I,
think
40
priors,
but
those
are
larger
structures
on
that
side
of
the
the
of
the
building
granted
across
the
street.
There
are
small
instructions,
but
on
that
side
of
the
street,
where
the
building
actually
exists,
our
structure
is
actually
similar
similar.
It
will
be
similar
in
texture
and
turns
architectural
features.
It
will
be
similar
in
terms
of
the
the
roof
structure
as
as
well.
BW
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Brian
Flynn
with
the
mayor's
office
in
Neighborhood
Services,
representing
hi
PAC
and
about
his
being,
was
held
on
July
17th,
and
there
was
there
was
no
opposition
from
the
community.
At
that
point,
mr.
Pratt
also
did
meet
with
the
Pierce
Street
Civic
Association
that
meets
monthly
on
about
three
or
four
different
occasions
and
with
the
new
project
other
than
the
one
from
a
few
years
back.
People
really
didn't
have
an
issue
with
it.
So
that's
why
we
want
to
offer
us
a
boy
today.
BX
BY
C
Calling
the
next
case
calling
VOA
nine
eight
zero
one:
four,
five:
six
metropolitan
circle,
this
metropolitan
circle.
Okay,
this
is
a
convert
current
to
family
into
a
three
family.
By
converting
the
existing
unfinished
basement
into
a
separate
dwelling
unit.
The
violations
are
article
9
section
to
the
changing
from
a
non-conforming
to
a
non-conforming
three
family
article
67
6
+
32
Austria
parking
is
insufficient.
Article
60
7,
section
8,
a
3
family
dwelling
is
forbidden.
You
said
a
1
F
6000
sub-district
Article
67,
section
9.
The
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive.
C
BZ
Chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
Kyle
Smith
business
address
of
359
Newbury
Street
in
Back
Bay
to
my
immediate
right.
I
have
the
project
architect
to
his
right.
I.
Have
the
owner
of
the
parcel
to
the
right
of
the
owner?
Is
the
daughter-in-law
of
the
intended
occupant
of
the
proposed
basement
additional
unit.
BZ
Madam
chair,
presently,
there
is
an
existing
term
family
on
what
would
be
the
first
floor
and
second
floor.
There
is
an
unoccupied
basement
utilized
for
storage.
The
intent
is
to
not
expand
the
envelope
of
the
building.
In
any
way,
only
exterior
changes
would
be
to
accommodate
for
fire,
egress,
ingress
purposes.
Additional
windows,
potentially
enlarged
sliding
glass
door.
B
BZ
Of
a
modulus
to
basically
finish
out
the
basement,
make
a
third
a
dwelling
unit
or
some
more
context.
There
is
good
sloping,
so
the
rear
of
the
building
has
full
access.
We
don't
have
to
dig
out
in
any
way
for
anything
towards
the
rear,
so
we
will
have
a
full
sliding
glass
door
and
means
of
egress
for
safety
purposes.
B
BZ
Rest
of
violations,
madam
chair,
we
have
a
single
office
tree
parking
currently,
and
so
they
will
not
be
increasing.
Keep
in
mind.
We
are
on
a
star
called
a
dead
end.
They
called
the
sack,
so
we
have
not
heard
complaints
from
any
of
the
immunity
butters
regarding
the
additional
parking
our
current
occupants
and
future
occupants
are
all
family
members.
B
AA
BZ
A
B
F
BZ
F
F
BZ
F
BZ
F
H
CA
Boy
Joe
carpenter
from
the
mayor's
office
of
Neighborhood
Services,
we
conducted
an
about
his
meeting
on
July
22nd,
the
neighbors
that
showed
up
we're
able
to
express
their
support
for
the
project
and
the
family.
At
this
time
we
have
no
questions
and
have
not
been
presented
any
opposition.
Therefore,
we
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support.
Thank
you.
BY
B
H
B
C
The
next
case
calling
VOA
nine
three
nine
two
six,
six,
four
thousand
Washington
Street.
This
is
to
remove
the
proviso
the
restaurant
would
take
out
to
this
petitioner,
only
existing
condition,
no
work,
the
violations,
article
6
section,
four
change
to
the
previous
decision
of
the
board
of
the
appeal,
his
name
of
name
and
address
for
the
right
to
claim.
There's.
B
BX
B
C
This
is
a
wreck,
a
single
single-family
home
on
a
vacant
lot,
the
violations,
article
10
section,
one
limitation
of
accessory,
uses
a
five
foot
side,
yard
buffers
quiet;
another
call,
fifty-six,
section,
40.1,
the
conforming
of
an
existing
building
alignment;
article
56,
section,
eight,
insufficient
side,
yard
setback,
an
article
56
section,
8,
insufficient
lot
size;
article
56,
section,
8
insufficient
a
lot
with
minimum
article,
56
section,
8,
insufficient
lot;
frontage
minimum
in
article
56,
section,
8,
excessive
FAA
name;
an
address
for
the
record.
Please.
B
CB
You,
madam
chair
for
that
option,
but
we'd
like
to
proceed
present
this
matter
to
the
board
for
a
vote
and
what
we
propose
is
to
build
a
single-family
home
on
what
is
a
vacant
lot
and
on
the
second
page
of
that.
The
first
page
shows
you
just
in
la
alongside
of
a
rendering.
This
is
a
modest
single-family
home
that
is
consistent
with
the
intent
of
the
code
for
residential
sub
districts,
in
that
it
will
maintain,
enhance
and
promote
this
neighborhood,
both
in
terms
of
density,
housing,
type
and
design.
CB
The
second
page
of
that
packet
attempt
to
show
visually
the
consistency
that
this
point
would
have
relative
to
adjoining
homes
on
Libby
Street,
the
applicants,
the
Sullivans
have
lived
across
the
street
at
11
Libby
Street
for
over
20
years.
Dennis
Sullivan
has
lived
through
up
in
this
neighborhood
three
years
ago.
They
purchased
this
lot
at
the
time
of
purchase,
as
page
3
shows,
it
was
densely
overgrown
and
non
maintained
and
the
Sullivan
purchased
it
cleaned
it
up.
B
B
CB
B
CB
Madam
chair,
well,
the
the
majority
of
violations
flow
from
the
sides
of
the
lot
as
a
pre-existing
lie.
It
is
a
four
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
square
foot
lot
and
this
is
the
6,000
square
foot
zone.
It's
a
fairly
traditional
rectangular
a
lot,
although
the
front
is
just
it's
about
forty
nine
point
five
feet
and
the
back
is
about
realize
about
42.5
with
a
hundred
yards
on
either
side.
CB
So
with
respect
to
the
violations
lot
area
lot
width
in
front
today,
I'd
suggest
sort
of
run
together
in
the
pre-existing
form
at
the
FA
are
is
a
point
for
zone
proposed
is
plenty
six
and,
and
then
I'd
like
to
speak
to
that,
but
just
momentarily
the
setbacks.
The
only
setback
violation
runs
to
the
property
on
the
right.
That's
a
six-foot
setback
in
a
ten-foot
required
zone,
the
abutting
property
owner.
Next
to
that
setback,
miss
O'brien
is
here
and
she
will
be
speaking
in
support
of
that
of
this
project.
B
CB
W
CB
A
13
foot
front
porch
setback,
whereas
the
the
face
of
the
home
is
19
feet.
We
have
two
feet
in
the
rear
to
maneuver,
because
we're
short
we're
within
this
rear
setback
code
by
two
feet.
So,
theoretically
we
can
move
the
building
to
get
rid
of
that
front
yard
setback
because
we're
at
13
where,
as
mortals
14.5.
But
that's
what
paper
says.
The
eyeball
tests,
which
you
know
the
Sullivans
have
reformed
diligently,
really
shows
that
the
more
appropriate
alignment
visually
is
that
13
feet.
It
just
looks
better.
CB
Be
to
the
left
that
you're
facing
the
lock
and
the
abutting
property,
where
the
driveway
would
be
adjacent
to
already
has
fairly
say
some
fiction,
but
some
natural
screening
and
buffering
there's
a
fence
line.
There's
also
a
lot
of
trees
that
have
been
planted,
that
of
what
that
neighboring
properties
shed.
B
CB
For
madam
chair
and
we're
at
point
six
one,
but
if
I
can
mitigate
what
that
would
what
what
that
number
is,
because
that
they
are
the
massing
is
significantly
mitigated
and
here's
why
the
height
is
35
feet
required
we're
at
26
feet
so
we're
well
below
that
usable
open
space
is
using
the
local
spaces.
1800
we're
providing
2300.
B
B
CC
Afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
Jack
Duggan
mayor's
office,
the
neighborhood
services
just
like
to
go
on
record
support.
We
held
in
the
butters
meeting
on
June
25th
over
20
neighbors
came
out.
The
majority
were
in
support.
There
were
a
few
that
were
in
opposition.
We
then
went
to
the
West
Roxbury
Neighborhood
Council
on
July
16th,
again
majority
neighbors
weren't
support.
There
were
a
few
opposed
and
the
Neighborhood
Council
ultimately
decided
to
vote
for
two
in
opposition.
CC
AG
AV
G
CD
H
CE
Good
afternoon
my
name
is
Janine.
Devlin
I
live
at
four
Libby
Street.
As
you
face
the
lot.
My
house
is
the
directly
to
the
left.
I
share
a
property
line.
The
whole
neighborhood
has
opposed
building
in
this
lot.
For
years,
it's
only
4,200
square
feet.
He
wants
to
put
in
a
2600
square
foot
house,
that's
gonna,
be
at
least
1400
square
feet,
bigger
than
Marian's
house.
We're
very
worried
about
the
density
in
the
neighborhood.
My
husband
passed
away
a
few
years
ago.
The
ambulance
and
the
fire
truck
could
not
get
in
the
street.
CE
They
had
just
Park
on
the
adjoining
street,
and
that
was
in
the
summer
and
in
Federalist
Oh
snow.
At
the
time.
It's
it's
too
dense
and
we
we
have
been
here.
I,
don't
know
how
many
times
about
this
lot,
Dennis
leading
the
charge
not
to
build
now,
all
of
a
sudden.
He
owns
it
and
he
wants
to
build
and
he
wants
to
put
a
McMansion
in.
CF
Morning,
Madame,
chair
and
Matthew
Anderson
I
live
at
seven,
all
right,
which
is
behind
eight
Livy
and
my
mother
lives
at
three
all
right
with
my
aunt,
which
is
directly
a
butting,
the
rear
of
the
property,
and
we
are
opposed.
The
prevailing
standard
is
six
thousand
and
the
minimum
standard
is
six
thousand,
and
this
is
four
thousand
two
hundred
fifty
square
feet
so
they're
jamming
and
enjoy
an
enormous
house
into
this
tiny
little
lot
and
it'll
impact.
All
of
you,
brothers,
I
mean
all
the
four
letters
that
you
got
in
opposition
are
the
flora.
B
BU
Sorry,
my
name
is
violet
and
this
my
house,
just
in
connected
who
is
this
went
I
am
little
bit
nervous
because
I
can
take
this
lie
anymore,
I
wanna
just
say
for
if
he
built
this
house,
he's
gonna
be
four
five
houses
people,
so
so
bad
situation,
because
we're
so
small
house
is
huge
and
first
will
things
was
first
against
he's
not
on
a
bill.
This
house
never
he's
always
teachers
for
rent,
so
small.
We
can
build
this
house
now
when
he's
by
this
length,
he's
gonna
make
just
a
garden.
BU
He
always
promised
us
for
his
wanna
do
garden,
but
he
didn't
now
this
huge
house,
if
he
bill,
will
go
to
have
a
lots
of
lots
of
problem,
and
please
know
this
family
not
homeless,
right
in
cross
the
street
to
this
land.
You
have
huge
house
where
he's
lived
together.
Many
many
years,
I
have
five
bedrooms
and
people
they're,
just
the
father,
mother
and
two
teenagers.
Please
just
a
chat
very
well
everything,
because
many
people
who
only
have
big
big
problem
if
he
built
this
huge
house.
Please
thank.
B
You,
okay,
so
we've
always
maintained
and
we've
always
seen
in
the
years
we've
been
exploring
Hill
is
that
the
hardest
thing
is
the
brother
one
family,
home
and
a
wife
and
a
neighbor
I
know:
West
Roxbury
has
four
years
I.
Remember
the
discussions
going
back
to
the
early
90s
about
the
six
thousand
square
foot
lot,
even
though
they
were
a
lot
of
existing
non-conforming
blocks,
which
makes
them
unlivable
and
takes
away
a
person's
building
power
rights
so
from
where
gather.
B
CG
F
C
Following
the
next
case,
calling
VOA
955
271
to
petrol
Street,
this
is
to
construct
a
new
single-family
dwelling.
The
violation
is
the
ethical
56
section
8.
A
lot
of
here
is
insufficient
article
56
section
8
lot
width
is
insufficient.
Article
56,
section
8
lot
of
frontage
is
insufficient
out
of
the
56
section.
8,
the
phylidia
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
56
beside
God
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please
good.
CH
CH
So
to
Petrov's
feet
is
in
a
1f
6,000
zone
in
West
Roxbury
the
proposes
to
build
a
new
single-family
house
in
a
vacant
lot,
that's
5,400
square
feet.
The
lot
it's
worth
noting
that
it
also
currently
has
a.
If
you
look
at
the
packet
that
I
handed
out
has
a
curb
cut
existing
in
the
lot
I
highlighted
in
yellow.
So
you
guys
could
see
it.
CH
I'll
address
the
violation,
so
it's
f1
6000
were
at
5400
wet
with
the
width
and
the
frontage
would
be
the
60
we're
at
50
2.08
at
5.4,
we're
0.63
side
yard
is
10.
We
are
10.5
on
one
side,
9.5
on
the
other
I've,
given
you
aboard,
which
I
think
I'm
the
second
page
of
what
I
handed
to
the
board.
It's
a
map
of
the
neighborhood
and
you'll
see
the
square
footage
of
the
abutting
properties,
but,
most
importantly,
you're
gonna
see
a
check
mark.
That's
placed
on
those
properties.
CH
CC
Good
morning,
good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members,
Laborde
jack
duggan,
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
just
like
to
go
and
rector
support.
We
own
the
butters
meeting
on
June
26
7a
butters,
came
to
the
meeting
floor,
of
which
lived
on
petrol
Street.
They
were
all
in
support.
It
then
went
to
the
neighborhood
council
I,
don't
believe
on
July
16th
I,
don't
think
anyone
any
neighbors
attended
the
neighborhood
council
meeting,
but
the
neighborhood
council
decided
to
vote
for
two
in
opposition.
CC
AG
AV
C
This
is
a
change
to
to
family
for
to
a
for
family,
a
violation
of
Article
51,
section
56
of
free
parking
loading
requirement,
article
51,
section
8,
the
use
is
forbidden,
Article,
51,
section
9,
the
fluidity
ratio
is
excessive,
not
equal,
51
69.
That
building
height
is
excessive
and
stories.
Article
51,
6
9,
the
villain
height,
is
excessive
and
feet
article
51
section
9,
the
front
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
51
section
9,
the
Ray
got,
isn't
sufficient.
C
B
C
B
N
Mr.
Bligh
has
owned
this
property
for
over
20
years,
so
it's
to
each
address
has
one
single
you
have
to
make
the
two
units.
Each
unit
is
approximately
3,000
square
feet,
which
consists
of
kitchen
living
room,
dining
room,
one
and
a
half
bath,
five
bedrooms
and
three
other
rooms
that
people
to
sleep
and
so.
N
AT
N
N
Big
massive
as
a
party
house,
and
so
what
we
look,
what
they
want
to
do
was
divide
it
up
to
make
it
impossible
to
stuff
a
lot
of
people
in
there
and
make
it
more
affordable
for
a
family.
So
what
they're
doing
is
converting
it
into
two
each
side
into
two
units
consisting
of
a
three
bedroom
and
a
two
bedroom.
Three.
B
N
Yes
and
they're
decreasing
the
amount
of
living
space
that
could
be
used
with
German
extra
people
and
because
now
there's
one
kitchen,
one:
a
half-assed
one
living
with
one
dining
room
there
changing
that
space
into
two
kitchens,
four
baths,
two
dining
rooms
and
two
living
rooms,
so
not
only
so
they're
maintaining
the
actual
five
bedrooms,
but
they
decreasing
the
empty
space.
People
in
the.
N
Blocking
is
in
the
night
air
driveway,
and
now
they
have
four
spaces
and,
depending
on
the
size
of
the
cars
that
the
rent
does
have,
they
can
sometimes
squeeze
six
in
you
know:
I'll
piggyback
two
lanes
of
three
cars,
usually
a
four
or
five
and
the
new
proposal.
The
only
increase
to
the
footprint
is
to
provide
egress
from
the
third
floor
and
that
comes
into
the
bath
hoses
on
the
back
side
back
about
six
feet
which
reduces
it
to
a
maximum
of
five
spaces.
B
H
CG
Chair
members
of
the
board
von
Neumann
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
like
over
the
support
of
this
proposal,
we
conducted
a
butters
meeting
on
July
8th.
They
went
on
to
go
on
to
the
BAI
a
the
bright
Nelson
Improvement
Association
received
their
support
as
well.
We
support
the
property
owner
renovating
this
property
and
we
believe
this
will
address
some
of
the
concerns
that
the
butters
had
in
previous
years.
Thank
you
good.
AW
CI
B
C
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
C
B
BT
I
think
I
think
I
think
that
issue
III
wasn't
that
the
last
hearing
I
didn't
get
to
present,
and
so
my
contractor
presented
on
my
behalf
and
I.
Think
at
issue
was
a
sketch
that
was
done.
That
I
think
failed
to
portray
the
head
house,
which
was
looking
at
an
inaccurate
manner,
and
so
what
I
was
hoping
to
do
was
to
have
an
accurate
depiction
for
you,
because
I
think
that
was
the
issue.
What
the
last
thing.
B
C
Mad
at
you,
I'm
gonna,
call
the
next
case,
then
for
11:30,
I,
actually
I'm.
Sorry
I
just
got
handed
from
console
here.
Horror
Street
is
going
to
be
withdrawing
so
I'm
gonna
call
into
the
racket
and
then
make
a
motion
calling
boa
nine
one.
Nine
two
one:
three
sixty
three
horror
Street.
There
is
a
companion
case,
boa
nine
one,
nine
two
one:
five
sixty
three
horror
Street.
We
did
get
a
letter
from
counsel
that
were
throwing
the
project
so
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
denial
without
prejudice.
B
C
I'll
call
the
first
case
calling
boa
nine
three
four
zero
one:
nine
one,
fifty
four
to
156
Babel
Bayswater
street
name,
an
address
for
the
rat
Holmes
David
I'm.
Sorry,
this
is
the
change
to
family
status,
to
a
three
family;
very
renovating
the
basement
space
for
additional
pollen
unit,
the
violations,
article
53
section,
8,
a
3
family
structure
is
forbidden
in
a
to
F
4000
sub
district,
an
article
53
section,
9
and
excessive
FA
are
not
equal,
53
section
9.
C
CJ
CJ
B
CJ
B
CJ
CJ
Basement
the
basement
unit
is
essentially
right
now
is
at
grade
with
the
sidewalk,
and
the
height
of
the
basement
unit
is
7
feet
4
inches.
Currently
we
will
be
excavating
to
get
utilities
in
under
and
to
bring
that
grade
down
and
at
the
front
yard,
where
the
main
entry
to
the
basement
will
be
will
be
sloping.
The
front
yard
from
grade.
F
Looking
at
them
now
they
look.
Okay,
the
access
to
you've
got
the
drawings
with
you.
Yes,
okay,
my
new
basement
floor
plan.
The
lower
left
is
the
electrical
room
with
the
set
of
stairs
going
up
and
then
the
top
of
the
drawing
is
an
equipment
room.
Does
that
mean
mechanical,
or
does
that
mean
like
gym
equipment?
One
of
that
mechanical.
F
CJ
H
CJ
CJ
F
CJ
AH
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
Lena
Trammell
with
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I,
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
during
the
appearance
meeting.
The
applicant
addressed
the
concerns
of
the
up
barriers
and
there
was
not
opposition
during
the
community
process.
Thank
you.
B
C
141
West,
2nd,
okay:
this
is
a
rooftop
private,
sax
installation,
rooftop,
common
deck
installation
and
a
rooftop
penthouse
and
steer
installation
violations.
Article
68
27
s
5.
This
is
in
the
iPod
I
a
South
Boston
iPod
article
68,
section
29,
the
roof
structure,
restrictions,
article
68,
section,
29,
the
roof
structure,
restrictions
a
12
inch
above
main
roof
the
roof
platform,
article
68
section,
29,
the
roof
structure,
restrictions
access,
an
article,
68
section
8,
the
maximum
allow
the
height
has
been
exceeded
at
40
feet
is
the
max
name.
An
address
will
directly.
Y
AD
AZ
H
AZ
H
AZ
First
came
before
the
board
in
December
of
2018
I
was
actually
not
involved
in
it
at
the
time
and
but
I've
become
involved,
assisting
the
the
unit
owners
and
applicants.
The
last
time
when
we
would
defer
it
a
couple
of
months
ago
was
because
there
had
not
been
a
decision
rendered
by
the
architectural
access
board.
AZ
Originally,
there
was
a
building
code
refused
letter
that
was
appealed
to
this
board,
grant
access
relief,
the
last
time
that
this
was
deferred,
I,
think
I
abandoned
the
Indian
applications
of
the
building
code
relief
and
in
July
after
the
last
time.
This
was
here.
The
architectural
access
board
actually
gave
granting
necessary
barians,
but
this
to
proceed
on
on
the
selling
issue.
So
this
is
a
proposal
for
roof
roof
deck
system
consisting
of
an
employed
would
turn
it
a
101
on
the
handouts.
AZ
The
areas
highlighted
in
violet
private
group
decks
the
areas
of
copper,
common
roof
deck
areas,
which
was
the
issue
with
the
architectural
access
board,
because
elevator
access
is
not
provide
it
to
the
roof
and
then
the
lime
green
areas
are
common
passage
passages
again
to
the
various
decks
in
2018.
This
went
through
a
community
process
which
resulted
in
the
decks
being
pulled
back
from
the
edges
of
the
building.
I
was
not
involved
in
that
process,
but
for
the
language
that
I
had
been
involved
with
this.
My
understanding
is
that
the
community
was
okay.
H
AZ
B
AU
AW
C
C
B
CK
We
are
requesting
a
reconsideration
of
your
prior
hearing
and
determination
of
whether
the
application
should
be
granted
a
variance
and
the
reconsideration
is
because
it
is
our
view.
My
legal
view
that
the
original
citation
and
turned
down
from
ISDN
was
for
the
wrong
release
that,
because
this
is
a
billboard,
exists
now
and
has
existed.
That
used
since
1921
should
have
been
considered
under
article
9.2
of
the
zoning
code
and
therefore
also
article
6
for
a
conditional
use
permit,
and
so
we
are
hoping
is.
CK
A
C
Your
next
case,
following
VOA,
nine,
four,
six,
two,
nine
five,
three
two
seven
cottage
court:
this
is
a
rooftop
deck
and
head
house
for
unit
one
the
violations,
article
7,
section:
four
roof
deck
head:
I'll,
submit
it
there's
other
protection
or
conditions
in
article
fifty
section
38.
This
is
in
design,
review,
name
and
address
for
the
record
place.
Danielson.