►
From YouTube: Zoning Board of Appeal Public Hearings 5-24-22
Description
Zoning regulates the use and dimensional boundaries of privately owned buildings and land. The Zoning code is in place to protect the neighborhoods from the construction of buildings or structures that do not fit into the context of a neighborhood. The Zoning Board of Appeal hears appeals for varying the application of the Zoning Code and determines when it is appropriate to grant deviations from code restrictions.
A
Appeal
hearing
from
may
24
2022
is
now
in
session.
This
hearing
is
being
conducted
in
accordance
with
the
applicable
provisions
of
the
open
meeting
law,
including
the
updated
provisions
enacted
by
the
legislature
last
year.
The
new
law
allows
the
board
to
continue
its
practice
of
holding
virtual
hearings
until
july
15
2022.
A
A
The
information
for
connecting
to
this
hearing
is
listed
on
today's
hearing
agenda,
which
is
posted
on
the
public
notices
pages
of
the
city's
website.
Boston.Gov
members
of
the
public
will
enter
the
virtual
hearing
as
attendees,
which
means
you
will
not
see
yourself
on
the
screen
and
you
will
be
muted
throughout
unless
administratively
unmuted.
When
asked
to
comment
board
members,
applicants
and
their
attorneys
or
representatives
will
participate
in
the
hearing
as
panelists,
and
they
will
appear
alongside
the
presentation
materials
when
speaking
panelists
are
strongly
encouraged
to
keep
the
video
on.
A
If
you
wish
to
comment
on
an
appeal,
please
click
the
raise
hand
button
along
the
bottom
of
your
screen
in
the
zoom
webinar
platform.
Click
it
again
and
your
hand
should
go
down.
When
the
ambassador
sees
your
hand,
you
will
receive
a
request
to
unmute
yourself.
Select,
yes,
and
you
should
be
able
to
talk.
A
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
please
press
star,
9
to
raise
and
lower
your
hand.
You
must
press
star
6
to
unmute
yourself
after
you
receive
a
request
from
the
ambassador,
again
press
star
9,
to
raise
your
hand
and
star
6
to
unmute
yourself.
If
you
are
connected
to
the
hearing
by
telephone,
those
called
upon
to
comment
will
be
asked
to
state
their
name
and
address
first
and
then
can
provide
their
comment
in
the
interest
of
time
and
to
ensure
that
you
have
enough
time
to
do
so.
A
A
Let's
just
take
a
quick
roll
call,
so
we
know
who's
on
and
the
missed
the
fortune
good.
A
Morning,
mr
ruggiero.
A
Good
morning
mr
erlich
miss
dong
good
morning,
madam
chair
good
morning,
mr
legris.
A
To
see
you
miss
better
good
morning
manager
good
morning
so,
mr
fortune,
oh
yes,
mr
hampton.
A
A
Okay,
I'm
not
worried
okay,
mr
fortune,
thank.
B
F
B
G
Hi,
my
name
is
lauren
shirtlef
cronin
border
street,
near
east
boston,.
B
6567
border
street
the
board
originally
granted
this
relief
on
march
29th
of
2019,
and
it
would
have
expired
on
march
29th
to
2021,
but
covert
tolling
applies
to
this
release.
With
calling
the
relief
expires
on
july
4th
2022,
I
recommend
that
the
board
confirm
for
the
record
that
the
relief
remains
valid
until
that
date.
The
applicant
now
also
requests
an
additional
extension
until
july
4th
2023.
D
I'm
sure
a
motion
to
confirm
that
relief
remains
valid,
with
all
applicable
tolling
through
july,
4th
2022
and
further
move
that
an
extension
for
relief
is
granted
through
and
including
july,
4th
2023,
which
of
course
includes
any
and
all
applicable,
total.
C
C
H
B
B
D
I'm
sure
a
motion
to
confirm
that
relief
remains
valid
through
may
8,
2023,
inclusive
of
any
and
all
applicable
tolling.
C
J
I
am
jeff
pfeiffer
15
rocking
up
terrace
unit
3.
J
Absolutely
so
we
have
been
I'm
a
homeowner.
My
partner,
molly
is
here
also
on
the
call
my
architect,
austin
drake
is
also
here.
We
bought
the
unit
in
2015.
We've
been
living
in
jamaica,
plain
for
about
11
years
we
had
when
we
bought
the
unit
known
that
it
needed.
Some
upgrades
was
what
allowed
us
to
purchase
it,
given
how
high
prices
are
in
the
neighborhood.
J
Sure
yep,
I
can
tell
you
so
we
were
approved
by
the
zba
in
july
of
2021,
with
the
proviso
that
the
pitch
and
scale
of
the
dormer
project
be
reviewed
by
the
boston
planning
and
development
agency.
J
We've
had
over
the
course
of
a
number
of
months
had
a
number
of
meetings
with
them
and
we
sent
in
you
know
a
bunch
of
stuff
to
apply
for
this
final
orbiter
thing.
So
you
should
be
able
to
see
our
correspondence
with
them
and
some
of
the
meetings.
J
A
Okay,
okay,
hold
on
hold
on
ms
better
did
you
have
a
chance
to
review
the
plans?
Madam.
A
K
So
I
was
fine
with
leaving
the
width
at
one
third
of
the
roof.
I
thought
it
was
reasonable
in
terms
of
its
size,
and
the
applicant
did
make
a
case
structurally,
why
it
wasn't
financially
feasible
to
basically
lower
the
dormer
below
the
ridge
and
the
applicant
is
meeting
the
7.5
feet
requirement
of
height.
So
I
also
made
an
argument
for
the
pitch
at
512
performing
better
and
if
they
were
to
lower
it
to
the
rich
size,
the
lower
to
the
ridge.
K
A
D
A
Yes,
excuse
me,
mr
pfeiffer.
This
board.
E
A
Show
what
exactly
is
being
about
so
design
review
continues.
However,
I
think
miss
miss
better
clarify
that
we
are
okay
with
the
pitch
changing
and
the
ridge
line
for
this
particular
project.
It's
not
an
across-the-board
decision.
E
A
Okay,
was
there
a
second
to
miss,
miss
better's
motion
high.
J
B
M
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
ryan,
adam
zamaransi,
with
the
business
address
of
350
west
broadway.
This
was
a
proposal
that
was
approved
for
four
units
and
six
parking
spaces
by
this
board
on
february
2nd
2021
and
the
decision
was
signed
off
on
on
april
12
2021..
A
So,
mr
smith,
why
are
you
here?
So
I
have
one
of
the
outstanding
violations
that
still
hold,
because
you
are
deep
freezing
you're
decreasing
the
unit
count
from
four
to
two.
So
please
tell
us
precisely:
okay,
okay,.
M
So
precisely
the
violations
that
will
stand
now
would
be
lot
width,
minimum
frontage,
far
inside
yard,
a
lot
of
changes.
So
the
lot
width
currently
is
40
feet
on
the
left,
50
feet
on
the
right
and
the
minimum
front
at
just
40
feet.
Those
didn't
change
from
the
original
crew
set
of
plans.
Those
will
still
remain.
Existing
far
was
decreased
from
a
1.05
to
now.
87.
M
A
Spitz
you're
throwing
us
off
schedule
here
with
your
thoroughness,
so
so
you're,
essentially
requesting
a
change
from
four
units
and
six
parking
to
two
units
and
four
parking
miss
miss
better.
Have
you
had
a
chance
to
look
at
the
plans?
That's.
D
B
B
Marks
from
this
ninety
five
thousand
three
hundred
first
square
foot
building
to
include
forty.
Seven
thousand
nine
hundred
fifty
six
square
feet
of
research,
laboratory
and
used
for
46.74
square
feet
of
office
used
to
remain
the
corporate
shell
renovation
to
include
new
service
elevators
and
the
rooftop
mechanical
penthouse
and
updates
of
rear
loading.
N
O
Good
morning,
members
of
the
board
in
madam
chair,
my
name
is
david
lindhardt,
with
coulson
in
stores,
400
atlantic
ave,
and
this
project
at
3341.
Farnsworth
is
essentially
retangenting
an
existing
office
building
within
the
existing
building
envelope,
it'll
remain
half
office
use
and
then
the
other
half
will
be
converted
to
latins.
A
C
R
B
B
Hearing
none
I'll
call
the
first
case
calling
case
boa
131
8150
278
summer
street.
This
is
direct,
a
four-story
edition
of
rare
decks,
the
four-story
addition
to
the
red
and
red
decks
and
change
of
art
from
a
three
to
four
unit.
Residential
dwelling,
the
violations,
article
27g.
This
is
in
the
east,
boston,
ipod,
article
53,
section
56,
plus
street
loading
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section,
56,
osprey
parking
and
loading
is
insufficient.
B
Article
53,
section
8,
use
and
regulation
article
53,
section,
9
floating
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
53
section
9
the
bill,
enhanced
successors
and
stories,
article
53,
section
9,
the
building
height,
is
excessive.
In
peak
article
53,
section
9,
usable
open
space
is
insufficient.
Article
53,
section
9
side
yards
insufficient
and
article
53
section
9.
The
rare
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record
good.
S
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
richard
linz,
with
the
business
address
of
245
summer
street
east
boston,
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
alvandro
disilva,
who
was
with
us
this
morning.
We
can
probably
jump
right
to
slide.
F
S
Non-Conforming
structure
located
in
the
jeffries
point
section
of
east
boston
on
summer
street
closest
to
maverick
square.
Our
proposal
would
reprogram
the
entire
building
change
the
legal
occupancy
from
three
units
to
four
units
and
propose
a
vertical
addition,
as
well
as
a
rear
addition
to
change
the
living
space
in
the
entire
building.
The
units
would
consist
of
three
three
bedrooms
and
one
two
bedroom.
The
average
size
is
about
a
thousand
square
feet
per
unit
up
to
about
1100
square
feet
total.
S
What
we're
looking
at
here
is
the
rendering
of
the
finished
product
proposed
finished
product.
I
would
point
out,
and
unfortunately,
different
architects
for
the
project
immediately
next
door,
but
this
is
identical
to
the
project.
It's
the
building
on
the
immediate
right
of
our
building,
where
we're
actually
under
construction
for
a
similar
proposal,
we're
not
proposing
any
roof
deck
above
the
fourth
level.
So
what
we
see
is
the
stepped
back,
fourth
level
with
a
front
balcony
only
in
the
layout
of
the
units.
S
If
we
jump
down
to,
I
believe
page,
seven
or
eight,
that's
the
existing
condition.
We
could
just
jump
one
more
existing
condition.
One
more
here
we
go.
So
we're
showing
the
first
baseman
plan,
showing
storage
and
utilities
only
no
living
space
first
floor
would
be
a
flat
style
unit
as
well
as
the
same
similar
layout.
S
On
the
second
floor,
if
we
go
to
the
next
page,
we
are
creating
bi-level
units
on
both
the
third
and
the
fourth
for
the
third
and
fourth
unit,
so
you
would
enter
in
the
third
level
and
have
an
internal
stairwell
to
access
the
living
area.
On
the
fourth
level,
as
you
can
see
from
the
addition,
we
do
scale
the
building
in
a
bit
to
respect
some
of
that
side,
yard
setback
that
presently
exists,
while
the
front
portion
of
the
building
remains
attached
on
both
sides
as
a
sort
of
rowhouse
style.
S
S
S
Increasing
the
height
of
the
building
allowable
as
35
feet
would
be
increased
at
about
seven
feet
to
about
a
little
over
42
feet
as
well
as
the
number
of
stories
would
go
from
three
to
four
we're,
not
making
any
modification
of
the
front
of
the
building.
So
therefore
the
existing
modal
would
apply.
S
We
do
require
relief,
however,
for
the
side
here
for
the
portion
of
the
extension
that
would
be
within
the
two
and
a
half
feet
on
the
left
side
of
the
building.
We
do
have
a
setback
about
1.8
feet
at
its
closest
point,
so
we
are
requiring
variance
for
that
our
rear
yard,
although
we
don't
but
another
property
directly
behind
us,
we
do
have
a
private
way.
That's
about
12
feet
in
width,
but
our
rear
to
our
rear
property
line
is
measured
at
about
22
feet
where
the
30
foot
required
step
back
is
necessary.
S
Last
but
not
least,
is
parking.
Article
53
requires
that
you
only
are
required
to
add
parking
for
the
additional
unit
being
proposed
in
this
case,
because
this
is
a
pre-existing
condition
with
no
parking,
we're
only
required
to
add
one
parking
spot.
I
know
consistent
with
the
city's
policy.
Even
if
we
could
create
a
curb
cut
on
this
site.
We
would
not
be
able
to
it
wouldn't
make
much
sense
to
add
up
one
private
parking
spot
to
the
detriment
of
the
surrounding
neighborhood
and
on
street
parking.
That
would
be
available.
S
There
is
access
to
the
back
portion
from
emmett
place.
Madam
chair.
We
do
maintain
that
as
open
space
and
we
will
continue
with
creating
a
courtyard
in
the
back.
We
we
could
access
the
rear.
However,
we
do
that,
while
sacrificing
some
open
space-
and
there
is-
you
know
at
least
a
decent
size
buffer
between
the
back
of
our
building
and
and
other
place.
U
Yeah
there's
an
addition
of
a
fourth
story
in
the
rendering
it
looks
like
it
is
higher
than
the
neighboring
buildings
and
mr
linz.
You
said
that
the
one
the
building
on
the
right
has
the
same
feature.
S
That
that
is
correct
through
the
championship
early,
this
board
approved
the
building
next
door.
272
maverick
street
coming
up.
Sunder
street
is
of
the
same
design,
so
it
is
a
setback.
Fourth
level
no
roof
deck,
and
this
is
also
consistent.
S
A
So
this
is
zoning
by
appeal,
mr
alec.
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
and
support
by
this
on
this
proposal?.
W
W
The
applicant
met
with
the
jeffress
boy
neighborhood
association
in
late
2021,
the
association
voted
in
opposition
with
10
residents
in
favor
and
18,
opposing
those
opposing
felt
that
the
building
would
be
too
tall
and
that
that
they
would
they
should.
There
should
not
be
a
fourth
floor.
At
this
moment,
our
office
would
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
A
Just
a
quick
question:
this
this
vote
was
made
despite
the
fact
that
there
were
other
such
proposals
on
the
street
or
other
such
construction
on
that
street.
A
W
A
Give
thank
you,
given
that
we've
had
a
change
at
ons,
mr
linz.
You
want
to
summarize
quickly.
S
Sure-
and
thank
you
natalia
for
for
adding
that
information,
so
I
can
attest
to
the
board
that
there's
been
sort
of
a
mixed
reaction
depending
upon
jeffrey's
point.
Makeup
of
you
know
the
voting
meeting
makeup.
I
think
it's
critical
that
director
butters
were
in
favor
of
this
renovation.
This
building
is
in
deplorable
condition
and
needs
upgrades,
and
we
certainly
expressed
to
them
that
we
are
trying
to
maintain
some
of
the
character
for
change.
S
What's
happening
along
that
that,
so
I
think
it's
been
sort
of
a
mixed
bag
on
what
has
been
supported
at
jeffrey's
point
and
what
has
been
opposed,
but
in
this
particular
case,
especially
that
there's
no
roof
deck
head
house,
etc.
This
is
pretty
consistent
with
the
building
immediately
to
its
right.
I
know
that's
not
finding
upon
the
zoning
board,
but
thank
you
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
A
B
A
Thank
you.
Anybody
here
from
the
city
councilor's
office,
the
district
city
council's
office,.
F
E
E
That's
okay!
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jeff
hampton
senior
zoning
planner.
We
recommend
it
to
now
without
prejudice.
For
the
fourth
floor
edition,
we've
been
consistent
on
our
recommendations
for
the
fourth
story:
editions
along
this
stretch
of
sumner
street,
especially
while
we're
doing
the
pleiades
boston
so
to
be
consistent,
our
recommendation
is
denial
without
prejudice.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
given
that
information
may
have
a
motion
place.
B
Y
A
Okay,
so
have
you
do
you
have
experience
with
take
out
use
in
the
city
of
boston.
A
Z
Hi
good
morning,
g'day
good
morning,
madam
sheriff
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
chuvan
fung
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services
and
a
mother's
meeting
was
held
by
my
office
on
april.
4Th
2022..
Z
AA
U
AB
A
B
This
is
this-
will
be
a
total
renovation
in
addition
of
a
new
rare
egress
stairway,
a
tower
with
roof
penthouse
and
an
elimination
of
the
existing
fire
escapes
violations.
Article
section
29,
except
that
they
are
article
50,
section
29,
insufficient,
open
space
per
unit,
article
50,
section
29,
insufficient
gray
and
setback
article
56
and
29
insufficient.
Additional
lottery
per
unit,
article
50,
section,
43,
osprey
facts
sufficient
and
article
50,
section
26
the
mfr
used
for
bid
through
the
residential
sub-districts
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
AC
My
name
is
rebecca
platt
mountner,
I'm
the
director
of
real
estate
for
the
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood
development
corporation,
which
is
through
our
subsidiary
lorenzo
vest
holdings.
The
owner
of
the
parcel
our
business
address
is
31
germania
street.
In
jamaica
plain,
we
are
a
neighborhood-based
group
based
in
jamaica,
plain,
so.
A
A
Go
directly
to
the
prop
project
to
understand,
understand
the
size
of
the
units
and
and
the
core
of
this
proposal.
AC
Terrific
I'll
turn
it
over
to
fernando
down
the
natural
architect.
AD
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
of
fernando
dominic
dhk
architects
at
54
canal
street,
we're
here
looking
for
relief
on
the
listed
number
of
issues
that
was
raised
at
the
beginning
of
the
introduction
of
the
project.
This
is
an
existing
building
that,
until
it
had
an
occupancy
permit
in
2015
how
17
units
were
working.
A
AE
F
AE
AD
The
project
entails
nine
dwelling
units,
three
three
bedrooms:
three
two
bedrooms
and
three
one
bedroom
units,
all
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
dnd
for
size,
etc;
we're
preserving
the
exterior
of
the
building,
we're
preserving
the
the
the
the
building
envelope
or
adding
an
egress
stair
to
the
back
of
the
unit.
AD
In
fact,
if
you
show
me
the
previous
slide,
and
now
the
one
be
before
before
that
this,
this
actually
illustrates
you
on
an
an
existing
non-conforming
building
in
in
the
in
the
red
line,
and
it
shows
you
in
the
blue
line,
how
we're
modifying
the
perimeter
of
the
building.
So
a
series
of
these
require
of
these
relief
issues
are,
are
really
essentially
pre-existing.
Non-Conforming
situation
we
need.
We
have
extensive
far.
A
So
tell
about
the
rear
yard,
because
it
looks
like
you're
adding
a
a
storage
facility
in
the
rear.
Can
you
tell
us
what
the
violation
what's
required
under
zoning
and
what
would
be
proposed
under
this.
AD
Yes,
under
zoning,
we're
required
a
30
foot
rear
backyard.
This
addition,
which
includes
the
the
eager
stairs
from
the
third
floor
all
the
way
down
to
great,
also
include
a
one-story
element
that
is
an
enclosure
for
trash
containment
and
and
and
the
like.
A
What
is
the
and
what
is
required,
and
what
are
you
proposing?
What
surrey
you
are
proposed.
A
20
feet:
okay
and
so
I'm
sorry,
so
the
so
the
bedroom.
The
bedrooms
are
meeting
the
affordable
unit.
Tell
us
about
the
fentanyls.
AD
The
actually,
the
the
van
gaal
is
essentially
the
an
extension
of
the
stairwell
to
get
wine
up
to
the
roof,
and
that
that
that's
all
that
we're
that's
all
that's
doing.
That's
the
so-called
penthouse.
A
AC
A
Okay,
and
are
any
of
these
units
handicapped,
accessible.
A
Okay:
okay,
how
are
the
plans
miss
better?
I
don't
care.
The
plans
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AF
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
jason
from
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
While
we
are
not
going
to
be
making
a
formal
decision
on
this
matter,
I
will
be
deferring
to
the
expertise
of
the
board.
I
do
want
to
highlight
the
extensive
community
process
that
the
applicant
has
gone
through
and
also
highlight
the
support
letter
from
rob's
great
path
forward
that
should
have
been
sent
to
the
board
yesterday.
AF
AG
Neighborhood
association,
my
address
is
85
moreland
street
and
we
did
meet
with
the
group
from
jpndc
and
we
did
ask
about
the
trash
as
a
matter
of
fact,
and
so
we're
very
happy
that
they
are
renovating
the
building
and
we
did
insist
upon
home
ownership
units
for
reasons
that
I'm
sure
the
chair
of
the
board
knows
things
that
are
happening
in
roxbury
in
terms
of
affordability,
and
the
last
thing
that
I
will
say
is
that
we
didn't
actually
see
a
copy
of
the
final
plan,
so,
if
possible,
if
the
board
can
ask
for
the
landmarks
commission
and
also
bpda
design
review
for
those
elements
that
we
didn't
really
see.
AG
A
Got
it
is
this
a
historic
district.
A
Right
because
there
was
a
lot
of
confusion
in
the
community
about
that-
I
remember
that
now,
okay,
given
all
that
miss
ambassador
anybody
else
with
a.
K
There
a
second
can
we
just
say
specifically
on
the
choice
of
the
exterior
material,
to
be
complementary,
with
the
masonry.
X
D
Design
review
with
specific
attention
to
exterior
materials
and
masonry.
B
Thank
you
call
in
the
next
case
and
calling
boa
129
5586
27
to
29
browning
avenue,
mr
wreck
new
family
dwelling
on
a
vacant
lot.
This
is
a
dnd
project
violation,
article
60,
section
9.
The
lottery
is
insufficient
article
60,
section
41
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
K
A
AH
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
well
good
morning.
Once
again,
madam
chair
members
of
the
ford
attorney
matt
eckel,
with
drago
and
toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
also
present
this
morning
are
dwayne
boyce
from
norfolk
design
and
construction.
Chris
drew
from
686
architects
and
kirsten
studion
from
the
mayor's
office
of
housing.
AH
AH
So,
as
you
can
see
right
right
there
on
that
page
man,
I'm
trying,
we
are
close,
there's
officially
not
really
an
existing
building
alignment
most
of
the
buildings
along
the
street
and
along
the
next
street
when
we
get
to
that
one
are
between
about
10
and
20
feet.
So
we
are
proposing
a
a
setback
of
18
feet,
which
is
right
around
the
average.
It's
just
not
official.
A
Okay-
and
this
is
the
the
usual
design
from
dnd
the
prototype
that
they
have.
AH
That's
correct
it's
fairly
similar.
It
is
a
two
family,
so
we're
proposing
unit
one
to
be
on
the
first
floor,
be
about
670
square
foot
unit
with
two
bedrooms,
one
bath
and,
as
you
can
see
there,
on
the
site
plan,
a
a
rear
deck
as
well
as
a
front
porch
unit.
Two
would
be
located
on
the
second
and
third
floor,
all
told
just
over
fourteen
hundred
square
feet
at
fourteen
and
fourteen
hundred
twenty
three
square
feet.
AH
A
I'm
so
sorry,
mr
erlich.
U
The
plans
are
fine,
they're,
straightforward,
slav
on
grade
and
they're
fine.
A
AI
AI
Is
the
board
denise
bentzel's
here
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services?
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
state
that
the
applicant
has
completed
the
community
process
they
had
in
the
butter's
meeting
and
met
with
the
association
to
meet
with
the
needs
of
the
community.
At
this
time
we
would
like
to
defer
all
reward.
Thank
you.
H
Vijay
good
to
see
you
raised
hand,
videos
from
the
counselor's
office.
Did
you
go
ahead?
I
sent
a
request
to
mute.
You.
AJ
B
AH
Good
morning,
once
again,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
attorney
matt
eckel,
withdrew
and
toscano,
with
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
once
again
joined
joined
with
they
are
dwayne
boyce
chris
drew
and
kirsten
studion,
as
mentioned
we're
seeking
to
a
wreck
a
single
family
home
here
on
a
vacant
lot.
This
is
part
of
the
same
scattered
sites,
neighborhood
homes
initiative.
AH
This
is
located
in
a
2f
5000.
Zoning
subdistrict
two
violations
noted
again
are
conformity
with
existing
building
alignment.
A
similar
situation
to
the
last
case.
You
can
see
there
how
we
do
essentially
line
up
with
our
a
butter,
we're
proposing
a
15
foot
setback
to
the
deck
and
then
actually
a
21
foot
set
back
to
the
actual,
where
the
structure
actually
begins
as
housing.
AH
In
terms
of
the
layout.
Here
we
are
proposing
a
single
family
home
about
18.
000.
Excuse
me
1800
square
feet.
The
first
floor
would
contain
the
living
area
with
a
half
bath
and
a
rear
deck.
The
second
floor
would
contain
three
bedrooms
and
one
bathroom,
and
then
the
proposed
third
floor
is
really
just
unfinished
attic
space
with
that
I'll
pause
and
take
any
questions
or
comments
from
the
board.
A
U
The
the
plans
are
fine,
similar,
similar
slab
on
grade
design.
AI
Morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
denise
desantos
from
office
and
mayor's
office
of
lawyers
neighborhood
services,
the
the
applicant
has
met
with
the
community
a
few
times
as
well
around
this
project
and
they
met
with
the
director
butters.
Our
office
would
like
to
defer
any
questions
to
the
board
at
this
time.
AJ
Hi
thank
you
performance
from
the
district
for
city
council's
office.
Thank
you,
chair.
The
district
for
city
council
office
wants
to
go
on
record
for
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
C
B
V
F
N
AL
V
H
AM
V
As
one
because
they
are
uncommon,
ownership,
tear
down
the
two
family
home
that
was
recently
damaged
by
fire
construct
a
2,
000
square
foot
footprint
with
four
residential.
AN
V
A
Let's
tell
us
about
the
the
first
of
all.
F
A
These
going
to
lots
going
to
be
combined
at
at
the
suffolk
county
registry
of
deeds.
Are
you
proposing
to
hold
them
separately.
A
AM
A
But
we
always
think
about
this
building,
hopefully,
will
be
around
for
50
years.
Should
it
be
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
future
residents
are
protected.
So
so
so
that's
something
to
think
about
give
us
a
breakdown
on
the
units.
How
many
bedrooms,
how
many
square
feet.
V
Sure
so
the
units,
the
40
units,
are
approximately
900
square
feet
in
the
area.
Each
unit
will
have
two
bathrooms
and
two
bedrooms.
G
AP
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
danielle
fonseca.
With
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
I
hosted
a
butter
is
meeting
for
the
applicants
on
february
23
of
2022,
and
during
this
meeting
there
was
no
opposition
that
was
expressed
director
butters,
who
live
on
albermarle
courtside,
which
is
to
the
back
left
of
the
property.
AP
I
believe,
if
you're
looking
at
the
poncett
valley
side
stated,
they
would
like
to
see
the
inclusion
of
trees
or
fencing
that
would
create
more
privacy,
where
the
applicants
mentioned
they'd,
be
putting
a
grass
strip
at
their
property
line
and
where
131,
the
ponce's
driveway
is
being
proposed.
AP
AP
AB
Hi,
my
name
is
richard
gian
angelo
and
I
live
directly
on
21
water
street,
which
is
next
door
to
131
and
I'm
a
complete
supporter
of
the
program
and
my
neighbor
who's.
Actually,
his
backyard
is
the
rest
of
131,
the
ponson
valley's
parkway's
land
he's
impartial
to
what
I
spoke
to
me
says
he
don't
care
what
they
do.
AB
He
doesn't
have
any
opposition
to
it
and
one
other
thing
is:
I
think
there
was
a
a
neighbor
or
a
butter
that
was
making
phone
calls
to
the
city
about
the
automobiles
on
the
company's
an
absentee
landlord.
But
that's
something
else.
AS
A
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
jeff
hampton
vpda.
We
recommended
approval
with
proviso.
We
want
to
take
a
look
at
the
parking
layout
and
also
because
it
isn't
a
green
belt
they're
to
have
to
go
to
parks
for
design
review
as
well,
but
we
are
in
favor
of
the
project.
That's
just.
I
think
we
want
to
add
some
screening
and
buffering
to
that
back
parking
area.
Thank.
B
On
your
next
case,
calling
six
voa
130
six
thirty
six
rodkin
road-
this
is
a
renovated
one
family
home
by
expanding
the
existing
first
and
second
story
living
space.
Removing
the
existing
rear,
deck
and
wrecking
a
new
red
deck
the
home
will
remain
in
one
family
violation:
article
67,
section
9..
Thank
you
name
and
address
for
the
record.
AT
But
the
scales
are
looking
to
do
is
to
expand
their
existing
single
family
home
to
accommodate
their
family
gerard
and
michelle
scahill.
Both
born
and
raised
in
boston
have
four
children
ages,
currently
11
to
five
and
they're
just
seeking
to
make
their
home
a
little
bit
bigger
to
accommodate
that
family.
As
I
stated,
the
violation
actually
considering.
AT
AT
Right,
the
requirement
is
ten
feet
on
that
side
that
we
see
right
here
on
the
slide
and
the
existing
is
six
feet,
six
inches
and
the
violation,
and
so
that's
a
pre-existing
non-conforming
condition
and
the
violation
is
triggered
because
the
renovation
calls
for
extending
that
side
wall
and
it's
going
to
extend
out
it's
currently
a
31
foot
7
inch
wall.
The
extension
is
going
to
bring
it
to
38
feet.
So
it's
basically
enlarging
that
non-conforming
setback.
A
AU
N
Madam
chair,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
paul
sullivan
city
council
at
large,
michael
flaherty,
jerry
and
michelle,
are
the
great
parkway
family
and
the
council
like
to
go
on
record
and
support.
Thank
you.
B
Thank
you
on
the
next
case
calling
voa
1080,
481,
32,
34,
orkney
road.
This
is
seeking
to
combine
two
lots,
create
one
new
465
square
foot
lot
to
be
known
as
3234.
Orkney
road
also
change
the
occupancy
from
a
two
family
dwelling
to
a
one
two
through
a
seven
unit
dwelling
and
renovate,
including
a
one
story.
Addition
above
the
existing
two
violations:
article
51
section
9.
sufficient
later
per
unit
article
51,
section,
9,
excessive
far
article
51
section,
9.,
the
maximum
allowed
height
has
been
exceeded.
B
A
A
So
see
I
am
counselor,
so
I
need
to
inform
you
that
this
is
a
six
member
board
and
you
need
five
members
and
support.
AK
Thank
you,
madam
chair.
We
will
go
forward
attorney,
jeff,
drego,
withdrego
and
toscano
at
the
business
address
of
11
beacon
street
here
on
behalf
of
the
applicant
and
with
me
I
also
have
adam
glassman
who's,
the
architect
on
the
project.
I
just
want
to
note.
The
description
has
actually
changed
from
what
was
read.
AK
The
proposal
is
to
combine
the
two
lots
and
to
change
the
occupancy
from
two
existing
two
family
residential
buildings
to
a
seven
unit,
residential
building
with
a
one-story
recessed
addition
on
the
top
floor.
This
will
also
include
a
full
renovation
of
the
building.
We
are
proposing
to
add
the
three
additional
units
on
the
top
floor.
AK
That
picture
is
actually
great
if
we
leave
that
for
a
minute,
so
adding
up
one
floor
to
match
slower,
but
to
the
buildings
to
the
right
of
us
and
then
one
floor
in
the
lower
level
that
is
over
95
percent
above
grade
this
particular
zoning
district
is
an
mfr.
A
AK
This
also
does
fall
in
the
aberdeen
historical
district.
We
worked
with
the
conservation
commission
throughout
this
project,
just
to
go
over
the
plans
that
are
shown
so
lower
level
has
would
house
unit,
one
that
is
a
two
bedroom
two
bath
unit
at
twelve
hundred
and
fifteen
square
feet.
It
has
eight
foot
ceiling,
height,
three
means
of
egress
through
the
front
of
the
building
through
the
side
of
the
building
and
through
the
rear
of
the
building.
AK
On
the
other
side,
which
is
now
34,
that
would
just
be
a
gym
in
storage
space
for
the
building
going
up
to
the
first
level
that
would
house
units
two
and
three
that
would
be
those
would
be
two
bedroom
two
bath
units
with
rear
decks
at
1310
square
feet
and
1425
square
feet.
Going
up
to
the
second
floor,
would
house
units
four
and
five.
AK
Those
would
both
be
two
bedroom
two
bath
units
at
1420
and
430
square
feet
with
rear
decks,
going
up
to
the
third
floor
that
has
a
recessed,
12
foot
pullback
on
our
addition
that
would
house
units
six
and
seven.
Those
are
two
bed
two
bath
at
a
thousand
fifty
square
feet
and
a
thousand
forty
square
feet.
They
have
a
front
and
rear
deck
where
those
where
that's
pulled
in
and
just
to
note
right
now,
the
bedroom
count
of
this
building
is
17.
AV
AV
AS
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board,
to
back
our
information
on
the
commuting
process.
It
was
a
long
spirited
one.
The
last
of
butter's
been
butters
meeting
our
office
held
was
december,
7
2020..
AS
Since
then
the
applicant
was
working
with
neighbors
to
try
to
address
some
of
their
concerns.
They
made
the
switch
to
go
home
ownership
with
condominiums.
A
number
of
residents
felt
that
that
addressed
any
concerns
they
may
have
and
looking
forward
to
seeing
more
home
ownership
opportunities
for
that
particular
neighborhood.
However,
there
still
remain
a
couple
of
neighbors
that
were
concerned
about
just
what
they
felt
was
a
lot
of
density
and
potential
on
a
very
narrow
street
to
have
a
lot
of
turnover.
Q
AS
And
they
went
to
the
bright
nelson
improvement
association
received
their
support.
Thank
you.
H
I
I'm
ed
redenberg
and
I
live
at
31
working
road.
I
live
right
across
the
street
from
this
property.
I
had
a
couple
questions
specifically
from
this
presentation.
He
said
the
basement
level
had
three
egresses.
A
Me
at
this
moment
in
time
there
are
no
questions.
We
just
need
to
know
whether
you're
in
support
or
in
opposition.
All
vetting
should
have
occurred
at
the
community
level,
and
we
trust
that
the
applicant
will
be
in
touch
with
the.
I.
A
I
Invited
to
any
of
these
meetings.
A
Okay,
so,
given
what
you've
heard
on
this
presentation
and
that
they
in
fact
have
worked
with
the
community,
tell
us
what
your
thoughts
are
or
maybe
at
this
point
you
may
you
may
not
want
to
go
on
record
either
in
support
or
in
opposition.
I
Oh
I'd
like
to
go
on
record
as
being
opposed
to
this.
I
I
wasn't
invited
to
express
my
opinions
on
it
during
these
letter
meetings
that
they
mentioned
and
the
the
project
has
changed
as
well.
What
was
presented
to
me
last
year
was
much
different.
There
weren't
roof
decks.
I
mean
it's
a
college
area
so
having
a
roof,
deck
is
sort
of
a
recipe
of
you
know
her
accident.
You
know
yeah
this.
This
plan
is
completely.
H
AW
Hello,
I
am
at
15,
orkney,
road,
so
right
on
the
street,
and
I
see
the
product
from
my
windows
and
in
the
batter.
AW
I
have
been
a
long
time,
neighborhood
activist,
and
I
am
generally
opposed
to
rooftop
additions,
but
in
this
case
I
have
to
say
that
the
developer
has
worked
closely
with
the
batters
to
make
sure
that
the
edition
is
properly
designed.
And
although
we
are
reluctant
to
accept
something
like
this,
and
we
hope
that
the
cpa
will
not
allow
rooftop
additions
in
our
neighborhood
and
on
those
older
homes.
AW
This
this
property
is
so
run
down
that.
I
believe
that
the
only
way
to
actually
save
it
and
make
it
useful
to
the
neighborhood
it's
a
nice
building
is
to
have
a
nicely
designed
rooftop
edition.
However,
the
application
for
this
project
describes
the
earlier
version
of
this
project
and
it
doesn't
mention
the
promise
that
this
is
going
to
be
majority
owner-occupied
condos.
So
I'm
very
concerned-
and
my
neighbors
are
as
well
that
if
they
get
approval
for
this
project,
they
can
simply
flip
it
and
sell
it
to
another
developer.
AW
Who
will
not
keep
promises
to
to
to
the
about
us.
So
I
I
would
very
much
like
a
proviso
to
be
added
to
to
this
approval,
stating
reiterating
really
the
promise
that
this
is
going
to
be
a
majority
owner
occupied
condo,
because
there
is
no
room
for
constant.
A
AX
Yes,
brian
bailey,
I'm
a
butter
at
36,
orkney,
I'm
speaking,
an
objection
to
the
project
yeah.
I
this
the
fact
that
it's
changed
is
news
to
me
and
the
roof
deck
yeah.
It
seems
like
a
recipe
for
disaster
and
I've,
seen
pictures
of
the
building
and
they're
they're
beautiful
apartments,
and
I
don't
see
any
reason
to
tear
it
up
at
this
point.
AC
AM
Chairs
yeah,
okay,
members
of
the
board,
annabelle
from
the
brighton,
austin
improvement
association.
There.
This
project
has
gone
through
a
lot
of
changes.
They've
worked
with
the
neighbors
they've
come
to
the
bia
several
times,
and
we
voted
to
support
it
because
it
has
gone
to
owner
owner
occupancy.
AM
The
attorney
has
expressed
that
he
will
put
it
into
the
condo
documents
the
70
owner
occupancy,
and
we
do
like
the
fact
that
it
is
being
changed
from
a
rental
building
to
home
ownership,
and
the
rooftop
should
not
be
a
problem
with
home
ownership
at
70
percent,
so
we
voted
to
approve
it.
Thank
you.
H
Thank
you
and
I
have
one
more
hand
raised
beatrice,
go
ahead.
AO
Yes,
I
would
like
to
say
that
I'm
okay
with
the
project
as
long
as
I
just
close
the
record
please
as
long
as
it
is
a
major
owner
occupied
condo.
H
X
An
address
yeah
yeah,
okay,
so
I
basically
I'm
okay
with
the
developer.
AO
A
A
F
A
We
trust
that
the
developer
will
continue
to
be
in
touch
with
the
neighborhood
and
meet
their
their
commitments.
So
the
motion.
B
R
Hi,
this
is
michael
chavis,
49ers
49-49,
a
linwood
street.
B
R
A
deferral
this
is
basically
it's
just
a
clerical
issue
with
the
address,
so
everything
that
nothing
else
is
changing
on
design
or
zoning,
or
anything
like
that.
So
whenever
we
can
get.
U
Q
AZ
B
B
B
Article
50
section
29
under
bill,
enhanced
accessibility
stories,
article
50,
section
29,
the
building,
hence
accessibility,
fee,
article
50,
section
29.
The
use
of
global
space
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
front
yard
is
sufficient.
Article
50
section
29,
the
side
yard
is
insufficient.
Article
50
section
29,
the
reg
out,
isn't
sufficient
article
50
section
43
austrian
parking
loaning
is
insufficient
in
article
50,
section
44.3.
BA
A
Okay,
let's
hold
on
for
a
minute,
mr
mr
mr
ligas
has
recused
himself.
So
this
is
a
six
member
board
and
you
will
need
five
members
to
be
in
support
for
this
to
carry.
BA
Thank
you,
madam
chair
understood
on
the
the
sixth
member
of
board.
We
would
choose
to
go
forward
on
the
cited
violations
I
I
would
I
would
have
to.
I
would
defer
to
mr
broome
as
to
the
the
advertising
requirement
legal
advertising
requirements.
AB
A
Okay,
and
hopefully
mr
moran,
see
that
gives
you
enough
time
to
get
a
new
refusal
letter.
Okay,
thank.
AZ
A
B
B
S
Morning,
adam
chair
members
of
the
board,
richard
linds,
the
business
address
of
245
sumner
street
east
boston
on
behalf
of
the
petitioner
madam
chair.
If
we
just
jump
to
the
next
slide
and
probably
give
a
little
better
context,
this
is
a
pre-existing
three
family
dwelling
located
in
the
lower
eagle
hill
section
of
east
boston
at
362
meridian
street.
S
The
proposal
would
change
the
occupancy
of
the
existing
structure
by
adding
habitable
space
in
the
lower
level.
It
is
identified
as
a
basement
because
it's
considered
below
the
grade
of
meridian
street.
However,
the
grade
separation
between
meridian
street
and
border
street
located
directly
behind
it
actually
allows
for
there's,
there's
actually
a
sub
basement
under
the
level
for
which
we're
proposing
occupancy.
So
this
is
a
full
walkout
condition
and
not
considered
sub
grade.
If
we
jump
to
the
next
slide,
that
probably
have
a
little
bit
better
perspective
on
this
next
slide.
S
Please,
and
then
we
have
some
elevations
that
show
the
actual
height
so
probably
jump
down
a
few
more.
S
Here
we
go
perfect,
so
the
unit
sizes
would
all
be
generously
sized
about
1500
square
feet
total.
These
are
all
considered
three
bedroom
units,
as
you
can
see
from
the
section
plan
of
the
elevation,
the.
S
Ten
inches
from
the
basement
level
to
the
first
floor,
where
grade
is
about
2
feet
below
the
first
level,
the
condition
in
the
rear
of
the
property
where
we
are
proposing
rear
decks
and
a
stairwell
that
will
access
the
proposed
roof.
Deck,
as
you
can
see,
is
a
full
walk-out
condition
at
that
level
because
of
the
grave
separation
between
meridian
street
and
border
street.
The
neighborhood
is
predominantly
multi-family,
even
though
this.
A
Is
so
mr
lens
is
at
50
percent
above
grade
or
more
than
50
percent.
S
The
roof
deck
would
be
exclusive,
the
upper
level
it
is
accessed
by
stairwell,
not
by
pet
house.
It
is
a
three-story
building,
so
we're
not
required
to
even
propose
a
house,
but
we've
agreed
with
the
community
to
access
by
stairwell
from
the
rear
by
way
of
relief.
We
do
require
relief
for
the
use
again
mentioning
that
this
was
predominantly
multi-family
residential.
That
area.
This
is
on
the
edge
of
the
2f
district.
So
a
change
from
a
304
would
be
a
substituted
non-conforming
use.
T
S
Require
relief
for
the
far
increase
because
we
are
proposed
to
increase
the
livable
space
in
that
lower
level.
The
rear
decks
actually
do
come
within
the
setback.
However,
there's
already
existing
conditions
in
the
rear
that
are
non-conforming
as
well,
so
we're
requesting
relief
with
respect
to
that
our
rear
yard
setback
is
required
to
be
at
30.
Feet
is
already
a
non-conforming
condition
with
the
existing
building,
but
we
are.
We
will
be
at
16.8
feet
with
the
reconstructed
rear
decks,
so
variance
is
necessary
for
that
as
well.
S
Last
but
not
least,
parking
there
is
no
ability
to
access
any
portion
of
this
property
for
the
one
additional
off-street
parking
space.
That's
required
so
therefore
requesting
the
variance,
even
if
we
could
have
the
curb
cut.
That
would
be
again
detrimental
to
the
surrounding
neighborhood
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
S
I
believe
this
should
be
in
the
you
scroll
forward.
S
S
I
do
see
just
see
the
rear
elevation.
I'm
sorry
just
betters.
A
So,
can
you
probably
tell
us
what
what
the
the
height
is
from
street
level
to
to
the
to
the
front
of
the
building.
S
Sure
so
the
grade
of
the
building,
the
greater
the
street
at
meridian
is
goes
from
a
minus
two
feet.
Four
inches
and
the
grade
to
the
rear
of
the
property
is
14
feet.
Four
inches,
that's
with
the
sub
basement
as
well
with
that
nine
foot
somewhere
in
between
the
my
understanding
is
the
nine
foot.
Ten
inches
extends
from
both
the
front
from
the
rear
portion
of
the
building
all
the
way
to
the
front.
S
AZ
F
U
S
S
U
S
Yep,
I
understand
so
what
is
I
can
request
that
the
architect
provide
that
if
the
board
chooses
to
prefer
to
defer
this,
I
can
ask
the
architect
to
provide
the
detail.
B
It's
july
26th
at
11,
30.
S
K
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
129
557
272
high
street,
this
is
an
edition
of
a
new
third
floor
bedroom
bathroom,
as
well
as
a
new
roof
deck.
The
violations,
article
62
section,
25,
brew,
structure,
restriction,
article
62,
section
8.
The
billing
has
accessibility,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
D
D
Ever
accuse
myself
in
this
matter.
That's
licorice.
A
AQ
AA
AQ
AQ
Okay,
so
this
is
an
existing
two-family
residents
in
a
three
f:
three
families
2000
zone,
my
owner,
occupier
clients,
live
in
the
upper
unit
of
the
two
family
and
they've
just
had
the
fourth
child
to
come
into
the
world,
so
they
need
more
bedrooms.
So
this
building
is
three
stories,
but
the
back
l
section
is
only
two,
so
like
many
other
products
in
charlestown,
we'd
like
to
add
some
more
third
floor.
Mass
basically
add
another
bedroom
for
their
new
child.
AQ
A
A
good
news,
what's
tell
us
about
the
the
square
footage
of
the
proposed
edition.
AQ
AQ
Yes
and
would
actually
like
to
do
a
roof
deck
up
on
the
main
portion
of
the
building.
You
know
not
on
the
l,
but
on
the
main
you
know
three-story
section
of
the
building
and.
A
Okay-
and
it
is
only
for
the
top
floor,
how
are
the
plans
miss
better?
I'm
sure
the
plans
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
or
in
opposition
of
this
proposal.
AZ
Good
morning
madam
chair
and
I
remember
word,
my
name
is
yumi
nalashmi
from
senator
edward's
office.
Senator
edward
would
like
to
go
on
the
record
in
support
of
this
project.
She
has
met
with
the
owner
and
has
not
received
any
significant
opposition.
AZ
BB
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
caitlin
stapleton
from
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
our
office
hosted
an
inviter's
meeting
for
this
proposal
on
february
28th
and
any
questions
or
concerns
we're
addressed
by
the
african
at
this
time.
Since
then,
the
applicant
has
continued
to
work
closely
with
the
neighborhood.
I
have
received
13
letters
of
support,
along
with
18
signatures
of
support,
including
those
from
direct
butters
and
the
boys
and
girls
club.
Most
letters
mentioned
how
they
encouraged
this
proposal
to
support
growing
families
in
charlestown.
BB
A
H
BC
Yeah,
how
you
doing
greg
mccarthy,
I'm
directly
next
door
at
74
high
street-
I
didn't
have
a
chance
to
get
a
letter
in,
but
I
am
in
strong
support
of
the
project.
It's
it's
not
really
a
hindrance
or
an
interference
on
on
on.
A
BC
A
Miss
ambassador
can
we
jump
to
coletta's
office?
Oh
absolutely,.
T
H
AL
AL
We
purchased
our
property
about
six
years
ago,
based
on
specific
requirements,
a
lot
of
natural
sunlight
in
view.
We
have
about
1600
square
feet,
most
of
it
in
a
common
living
room.
That's
going
to
be
about
15
feet
from
the
proposed
construction,
so
we
have
views
south
and
west
from
our
room
a
lot
of
natural
sunlight.
The
construction
would
eliminate
our
view
to
the
west
and
reduce
the
amount
the
sunlight,
so
we
feel
the
construction
would
significantly
reduce.
The
value
of
our
property
certainly
would
reduce
the
enjoyment
of
the
property
as
we
lose.
AL
Those
features
we
specifically
sought
out
and
purchased.
We
do
have
additional
concerns
about
the
roof
deck.
This
is
already
the
tallest
structure
on
the
block.
If
they're
granted
a
variance
to
build
up,
I
think
every
owner
on
the
block
will
quite
reasonably
feel
entitled
to
their
own
variance
to
build
up,
and
at
that
point
I
think
the
zoning
code
becomes
pretty
much
pointless
in
the
overall
neighborhood.
It
would
be
changed
for
the
worse
as
a
result,.
H
Person
yeah
jackie,
I'm
sending
a
request
on
you
once
on
muted.
Can
you
stick
your
name
and
address
for
the
record.
AE
H
Follow
your
hands
and
I
have
no
additional
vision.
Oh
sean
riley.
Are
you
looking
to
give
testimony
on
his
proposal?
Sorry,
I
just
sent
a
request
on
you.
H
H
BD
Yes,
my
name
is
lee
eiseman
and
I'm
at
76
high
street.
I'm
the
butter
to
the
abutter-
and
I
am
opposed
mainly
because
of
the
domino
theory
that
every
neighbor
on
either
side
of
us,
including
the
immediate
butters,
will
ask
to
have
extensions
and
roof
decks.
And,
furthermore,
the
family
at
72
already
has
the
4
300
square
feet
and
five
plus
bedrooms,
and
they
have
an
apartment
which
they
could
take
over
if
they
wanted
to
have
even
more
space.
A
Thank
you,
and
just
for
the
record,
I
want
everybody
to
know
that
the
approval
or
the
disapproval
of
what
a
specific
project
or
anything
does
not
set
a
precedent
for
this
board.
We
look
at
each
project
on
its
own
merits,
so,
given
that
and
miss
ambassador
we've
heard
from
everybody,
may
I
have
a
motion.
Please.
BE
B
Following
your
next
case,
calling
doa
131042080
bunker
hill
street,
this
is
a
change
of
occupy
two
family,
two
or
three
family.
The
violations,
article
62
section
29,
ought
to
be
parking
to
sufficient
article
62
section
62-25,
roof
structure,
restricted
article
62,
section
8
and
sufficient
additional
lot
area.
Article
6268
excessive
far
and
article
62,
section
8,
insufficient
radio
setback
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BC
Sure
yeah
so
right
now
we
have
a
two
and
a
half
story
or
2.75
story:
2
family.
BC
It's
located
in
the
row
house
district
in
charlestown
what
we're
proposing
to
make
it
a
full
triple
decker,
so
we
would
be
taking
a
half
story
and
making
it
a
full
story
and
adding
one
additional
unit
right
now.
It's
two
units,
one
units
on
the
first
floor.
The
second
unit
is
the
second
and
third
floor.
A
Three
bedroom,
wow,
okay
and
then
the
other
question
is:
what
is
the
proposed
addition?
How
many
square
feet
is
the
proposed
addition.
BC
AV
AV
A
BB
Morning,
my
own
chair
and
members
of
the
board
katelyn
stapleton
from
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services,
our
office,
hosted
under
butter,
is
meeting
for
this
proposal
on
april.
6.
concerns
by
the
neighbors
were
addressed
by
the
applicant
at
this
time,
and
support
was
shown
as
well.
I
have
since
received
one
letter
of
opposition
from
the
charlestown
preservation
society.
The
opposition
is
in
regards
to
the
architectural
historical
significance
of
the
building,
along
with
sufficient
living
space
and
no
second
egress.
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
defer
to.
A
H
AE
Yes,
I
my
brother-in-law,
I'm
the
executor
of
the
estate
for
78
bucket
hill
street
and
I'm
not
opposed
to
it.
I
did
have
conversations
with
greg.
I
think
we
can
work
it
out
together.
Just
on
the
backside.
Roofline
is
my
concern.
Thanks.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
K
AV
B
G
B
AZ
BH
Here
representing
the
applicant
175
interest
street
llc
also
here
with
me,
is
michael
landfield
project
manager
with
jll
chuck,
izzo
architect
with
daiq
and
claire
durant
from
fenway
sports
group.
In
brief,
we're
here
before
the
board
for
conditional
use
permit
for
the
installation
and
operation
of
electronic
signage
that
will
be
affixed
to
the
exterior
of
the
new
mgm
music
hall
at
the
intersection
of
lansdowne
and
ipswich
streets
adjacent
to
fenway
park.
The
signage
includes
led
boards
and
static
illuminated
graphic
signs.
A
At
right
now
so
tell
us
about
so.
What
we're
looking
at
is
that
coming
soon
graphic
with
the
two
sidebars
yeah
and
those
projections
that
go
down
the
street
is
that
what
we're
looking
at
and
the
and
we're
looking
at
the
color
projections
on
one
side
and
the
mgm
signage
on
the
other
side,.
BH
Yes,
there
are
a
couple
components
here:
you've
identified
most
of
them
there's
the
led
ribbon
board
that
you
can
see
runs
around
the
corners
of
lansdowne
and
ipswich
street
that
marquis
sign,
which
is
that
center
white
panel
and
the
two
side
panels
there,
the
mgm
words
and
the
music
hall
words
that
are
above
and
below
that
marquee
sign.
The
two
blue
mgm
music
hall,
blade
signs
on
either
side
and
then
those
led
animated
panels
that
run
that
there
are
six
of
those
that
are
on
the
side
of
lansdowne
street.
Those
are
the
components.
A
BH
Correct
they
there's
a.
They
are
not
within
150
feet
of
residential
units,
there's
a
commercial
district
that
sits
between
the
property
and
the
nearest
residential
district.
So
we
meet
all
the
design
requirements
for
distancing
from
from
residential
spaces,
we're
located
in
the
lansdowne
street
entertainment
district,
which
is
one
of
the
three
areas
the
city
specifically
designated
for
electronic
signage.
Assuming
you
meet
all
the
special
permit
criteria
which
which
we
do
so
they've
been
designed
to
meet
the
design
requirements
of
section
1
under
11
7
of
the
code,
including
the
citing
dimensional
and
operational
requirements.
BH
The
applicant
will
be
obtaining
an
annual
license
from
the
vpda
and
will
be
paying
the
annual
fee
associated
with
that,
and
the
team
has
undergone
design
review
with
the
vpda
in
accordance
with
the
guidelines
set
out
in
section
five
of
the
code.
Our
final
approval
is
pending
issuance
of
this
permit
and
lastly,
we
did
have
a
community
meeting
on
this
topic.
The
the
presentation
was
given
to.
A
The
community
tell
us,
tell
us,
will
you
this
will
be
purely
static
signage,
it
will
not
have
ads
or
anything
else
on
it.
BH
There
will
be
animation
on
the
signs,
but
it's
all
it's
all
intended
to
be
on
premise
related
to
what's
going
on
in
theater.
At
that
time,.
A
Okay
and
jeff,
I
have
a
question
for
you.
This
does
this
meet
sign
it
requirement
for
the
mgm
logo.
E
Yes,
we've
been
doing
design
review
on
this.
This
was
an
article
80
project
a
little
while
ago,
and
this
is
the
final
component
of
that
article
80
project.
This
actually
did
come
before
the
board
for
your
approval
for
the
theater,
and
this
is
the
final
component.
But,
yes,
we've
been
doing
design
review
and
actually
we
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this.
A
Okay,
any
questions:
how
are
the
plans,
mr
raza,
but
I'm
sure
that
plans
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
U
Will
these
be
24-hour
signs.
BH
BI
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
molly
griffin
from
the
mayor's
office
in
newport
services.
At
this
time,
our
office
would
like
to
defer
to
the
board's
judgment
on
this
matter.
There
was
a
community
meeting
on
april
6
2022,
where
the
applicant
presented
these
plans
to
neighbors,
address
their
questions
and
concerns.
I
have
received
no
emails,
letters
of
support
or
opposition.
F
A
B
H
N
H
BK
Yes,
thank
you
jessica.
Good
morning,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
matt
kieffer,
I'm
an
attorney
at
gulstan
in
stores,
and
my
address
is
7
serena
road
in
jamaica,
plain
and
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
the
ben
franklin
institute
of
technology
with
me,
as
you
just
heard,
is
dr
aisha,
francis
the
president
of
ben
franklin,
institute,
marty
jones
development
advisor
to
the
school
and
also
gail
sullivan
from
studio
g
architects.
BK
Should
they
be
helpful
in
answering
questions,
as
mr
fortune
said,
this
is
about
the
relocation
of
the
school
from
their
long
time
home
in
the
south
end
to
nubian
square
to
a
68
000
square
foot
building
in
nubian
square.
The
college
actually
began
under
the
will
of
ben
franklin
and
the
building
that
they
occupy
in
the
south
end
is
over
100
years
old
and
really.
AN
A
BK
I'm
happy
to
the
project
is
a
three-story
building,
68
000
square
feet
on
approximately
30
000
square
foot,
parcel
of
land
in
nubian
square,
it's
in
an
economic
development
area
and
consistent
with
the
roxbury
master
plan.
It's
also
undergone
large
project
review
from
the
bpda
and
has
had
a
pretty
extensive
review,
including
before
the
roxbury
neighborhood
council
and
the
rosberg
strategic
master
plan
oversight
committee
that
you
can
see
from
the
floor
plan
here.
The
the
the
project
would
have
a
combination
of
classrooms,
tech,
labs
and
offices,
student
gathering
spaces.
BK
It
needs
two
pieces
of
zoning
relief.
Madam
chair,
the
use
the
college
use
and
the
accessory
uses,
the
tech
labs
are
all
conditional
uses
in
the
nubian
square
economic
development
area.
The
college
has
programs
from
auto
engineering
auto
to
opticianry
and
cyber
security,
and
there
are
series
of
labs
inside
the
building
as
well
as
classrooms.
BK
A
Okay,
so
okay,
is
there
any
parking
proposed
on
site.
BK
There
is
no
parking
proposed
on
site.
There
is
parking
available
in
the
neighborhood
a
project
if
you'll
go
to
the
sort
of
zoom
out
jessica,
the
nubian
ascends
there's
a
there's
another
slide
that
shows
it
in
its
location
yeah.
If
you'll
scroll
up
a
little
bit,
there's
ample
on-street
parking
available
and
we've
also
been
in
touch
with
the
owner
of
nubian
ascends
at
right.
There
future
nubian
ascends
development
right
across
the
street.
A
So
will
they,
I
guess
my
question
to
you:
counselor
is
if
there
will
be
dedicated
parking
for
be
fit,
and
if
you
know
if
there
will
be
if
this
this
there
needs
to
be
an
ancillary
parking
permit,
or
I
mean
because
I
just
need
to
be
clear-
that
parking
is
not
not
a
violation
as
far
as
this
project
is.
BK
Correct
there
is
no
parking
violation
as
part
of
this
project
in
this
district
off
street
parking
for
projects
that
are
subject
to
large
project
review,
which
this
was
off.
Street
parking
is
determined
as
part
of
large
project
review
and
through
that
process
we
went
through
that
process
and
were
clear
that
there
is
no
on-street,
no
on-site
parking
proposed
in
connection
with
the
project,
so
the
off-site
parking
in
the
future,
if
there's
an
ancillary
use
for
that,
that
will
be
that
zoning
relief
will
be
obtained
by
the
new
vienna
science
developer.
BK
Well,
it's
a
school.
I
may
ask
aisha
dr
francis
to
answer
the
question
about
after
hours
and
weekend
operation.
Certainly.
BL
We
are
currently
planning
to
have
the
same
schedule.
A
Dr
francis
good
to
see
you
again,
can
you
please
put
your
name
and
address
on
the
record.
BL
AZ
A
BJ
Thank
you,
madam
chair
gail
sullivan.
I
reside
at
56,
yale
terrace
in
jamaica,
plain
and
my
office
studio
g
architects
is
also
in
jamaica
plain.
We
have
a
variety
of
different
labs
and
they
have
different
mechanical
and
technical
requirements.
Their
first
floor
rear
is
all
automotive
and
we'll
be
doing,
for
instance,
oil
separation.
Oil
capture,
for
that
there
are
specific
venting
requirements
both
in
the
auto
labs.
Also
in
a
couple
of
the
other
laboratories,
all
of
which
has
been
addressed
with
cosantini,
are
mechanical
electrical
plumbing
engineers.
AZ
A
BK
Undetermined,
madam
chair,
the
the
short-term
use
is
for
construction
staging
and
we
long-term
use,
but
it
could
well
be
a
resource
for
the
college's
expansion
in
the
future.
But
we
are
not
proposing
any
expansion
today
and
did
not
propose
any
expansion
in
the
article
80
process.
A
So
then,
what
could
we
anticipate
that,
should
there
be
no
longer
term
use,
is
that
once
the
building
is
constructed
that
will
be
open
space.
A
Okay,
how
would
the
plants
miss
better.
K
Adam
jared,
the
plans
are
adequate.
I
I
do
have
a
question
regarding
the
rear.
Access
to
the
car
repair
is
the
open
space
mainly
for
students,
or
do
you
see
it
as
a
as
a
kind
of
little
park
and
then
has
this
been
reviewed
by
btd.
BK
Yes
to
both
it,
we
do
envision
it
also
as
sort
of
an
open
space
and
it
it
has
been
reviewed
by
btd
we're
in
the
process
of
finalizing
a
transportation
access
plan
agreement
with
btd.
Concerning
that
that
space.
BK
Well,
it's
primarily
for
the
school.
It
is
a
way
to
get
cars
in
and
out
of
the
of
the
shop
of
the
lab.
It's
not
like
going
in
and
out
of
a
parking
garage.
Those
movements
are
are
much
rarer,
but
it's
also
envisioned.
As
a
you
know,
an
open
space
plaza
for
students
to
gather
it
will
be
open
to
the
public
during
hours
that
the
school's
in
operation.
K
And
then
can
you
also
comment
on
the
sustainability
sustainability,
measurements.
A
Will
there
be
any
solar
panels
or
anything
like
that.
BJ
That
I'm
happy
to
yes,
madam
chairwoman,
the
we've
actually
got
if
jessica.
If
you
can
scroll
down,
we
have
a
roof
plan
and
site
plan
combination
after
the
floor
plans.
That
might
thank
you
right.
Nope.
You
just
passed
it
right
there,
not
the
thank
you
slide.
The
one
above
thanks
right
there.
So
a
little
hard
to
see
it's
shown
in
white
boxes.
Here
there
are
three
large
arrays
they're
all
number
seven
on
this
plan.
Those
are
the
photovoltaic
solar
electric
panels
and
then,
within
that,
what's
marked
number
eight,
which
is
worth
mentioning.
BJ
Are
labs
there'll,
be
a
live
rooftop
laboratories
here
for
hvac
students
who
will
have
real-time
equipment
to
work
on
on
the
roof,
but
also
for
all
of
the
other
students
and
perhaps
access
to
the
photovoltaic
panels.
So
we're
looking
to
use
the
building
systems
as
much
as
possible
as
learning
opportunities
for
students
who
are
learning,
among
other
things,
construction,
trades,
okay,.
AF
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
this
is
jason
gant
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
While
we
will
not
be
making
a
formal
decision
on
this
matter,
we
do
want
to
defer
this
to
the
board
and
also
highlight
the
fact
that
we
have
not
gotten
any
new
letters
of
support
and
or
opposition
for
this
project.
AF
AA
Good
morning
they
share
members
of
the
board
anna
calderon
from
council
presidents
flink's
office.
The
counselor
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
proposal.
The
original
located
in
the
south
end
in
district
2.
Benjamin
franklin
has
been
planning
to
relocate
to
nobiana
square
to
hell,
expand
and
continue
their
additional
services.
AA
Over
the
past
year
they
have
met
with
roxbury
residents
and
organizations
about
their
plans
and
has
gathered
support
from
the
neighborhood.
The
proposal
project
will
clean
up
a
vacant
site
and
activate
the
important
corner
of
arizona
and
utah
street
and
add
to
the
economic
vitality
of
new
young
sport
with
their
staff
and
students.
G
F
BM
Good
morning
this
is
elaine
from
councilman
anderson's
office.
I
have
a
letter
from
conspiration
dear
madam
chair
and
members
of
the
boston
zoning
board
of
appeals.
I
am
writing
to
support
the
benjamin
franklin
institute
of
technology
be
fed
moving
into
movement
square.
This
is
too
has
long
served.
A
diverse
student
population
and
their
relocation
into
the
heart
of
roxbury
has
potential
to
help
serve
as
an
educational
hub
for
the
community
and
the
economic
anchor
for
look
for
many
local
businesses
at
march.
Moving.
Q
AZ
B
Only
one
we
have
is
mr
flint.
BK
Oh
so
we
can
submit
member
fortune,
I'm
not
sure
why
they
didn't
get
you,
but
we
also
have
letters
of
support
from
representative
john
santiago
from
betty
tony
of
the
roxbury
neighborhood
council
and
from
norm
stembridge,
who
chaired
the
iag
and
is
also
on
the
strategic
master
plan
oversight
committee,
we'll
make
sure
and
get
those
to
you.
E
K
K
I
just
wanted
to
put
it
on
the
record
that
when
you're
dealing
with
automob,
auto
repair
there's
this
kind
of
culture
of
gathering-
and
I
just
want
the
applicant
to
be
careful
with
the
design
of
the
public
space
in
terms
of
whether
it's
a
community
asset
or
whether
it's
a
place
for
students
with
that
said,
I
would
like
to
put
forward
a
motion
of
approval.
AB
A
Yes,
I
do
think
so.
I
like
the
design,
because
I
think
what
what
what
happens
here
is.
Is
that
and
and
I
have
to
admit
that
my
office
was
not
too
far
from
this
project.
Essentially,
you
could
look
at
the
real
window
at
the
project
and
there's
the
old
fire
station
there
that
has
been
converted
by
hbi
and
then
there
is
also
that
development,
that's
at
the
corner
of
melania
and
harrison
that
we've
also
approved,
and
so
there's
like
a
new
context.
A
That's
going
up
for
that
corner,
and
so
I
do
think
there
is
an
opportunity
for
making
it
right
for
for
the
neighborhood.
K
A
To
none,
you
know
it's
it's
hard
when
everybody
has
a
mic,
but
the
board
is
in
discussion.
So
may
any
so!
There's
a
motion.
There's
a
second
by
mr
rajiro
for
design
review.
All
those
in
favor
any
opposed
motion
carries,
and
I
too
would
like
to
echo
this
better
on
them
on
the
potential
value
of
this
project
to
the
community.
B
B
S
BN
S
And
may
I
just
I
know
on
this
particular
case
board
member
allegiance
and
board
member
rajiro
typically
recuse
themselves.
Is
it
possible
to
see
if
we
could
get
this
on
a
date
when,
when
we
have
a
full
seven
member
board,
that
seems
to
be
the
issue
with
this
particular
process?.
A
Mr,
like
mr
licoris,
will
you
be
sitting
on
the
9th
august
9th.
B
B
I
Good
morning
madam
chair,
mr
secretary
attorney
nick
cezula,
mcdermott
quilty
and
miller
28
state
street
in
boston
asking
for
a
withdrawal
of
this
application.
Please.
B
We
met
on
thursday
may
19th
2022
at
5
5
pm
down
at
10
10
mass
ave.
These
are
the
hearing
case.
Boa
126,
6216
134
wordsworth
street
was
adding
more
room
for
additional
kids
was
approved
at
bpda
case
boa
131
0017,
223
commonwealth
avenue.
It
was
a
change
of
arctic
for
five
unit,
drawing
to
one
unit
and
870
square
feet
of
roof
deck.
It
was
approved
case
voa,
128-06379
denison
street
was
denied
without
prejudice
was
no
show
case.
Boa
one:
two:
seven:
zero:
six:
zero,
two
ten
johnston
road.
B
AX
B
In
the
basement
case,
boa
one
two,
seven,
nine
four,
two
one:
sixteen
hopkins
street
to
convert
one
family
home
to
a
two
family.
It
was
approved
with
no
bedrooms
in
the
basement
case,
boa
one:
two:
eight
zero,
four:
nine
four
thirty
eight
summer
street
to
build
up
the
back
of
the
house
with
two
levels
for
a
floor
kitchen
bathroom
two
bedrooms.
It
was
approved
with
bpda
case
boa
one,
two,
six,
three,
two
one:
seven,
nine.
Ninety
six
to
nine
ninety
eight
river
street.
It
was
a
carport
with
cement
slab.
B
AM
B
B
We'll
do
a
mountain
chair
calling
the
next
case
calling
voa
126
0823
76
wyman
street.
This
is
propose
one
oscillatory
parking
existing
three
family
drawing
and
relocating
curb
cut
constructing
apart
from
dad
violations.
Article
10,
section,
1,
offspring
parking
should
not
be
located
less
than
5
feet
from
the
side
lot
line,
article
55,
section,
40
off
street
parking
loading
and
article
55,
section
9
spaces
insufficient
even
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BO
H
BP
Hi
great
so
my
name
is
sarah
ewing,
I'm
one
of
the
residents
here
at
76,
wyman
and
the
applicant
for
this
project.
A
Okay
and
again
so
this
would
be
a
new,
a
new
cub
cut
on
the
other
side
of
the
building.
BP
AZ
A
You
know
there's
something
that
we
need
to
just
inform
you
that,
generally,
this
board
is
not
in
support
of
parking
that
is
proposed
to
where
the
car
could
potentially
walk
into
the
front
yard,
be
in
the
front
yard.
So
I'll
just
put
that
out
there.
U
It
does
yeah
well
it's
hard
to
tell,
but
it
looks
like
the
it
would
not
be
front
yard
parking
it
and
it
would
be
roughly
even
with
the
front
of
the
house,
but
but
it's
just,
but
it
still
is
a
question
of
replacing
one
on
street
on
off
street
right.
Okay,.
A
Mr
d'amico,
can
you
chime
in
please.
BO
I
know
this
is
a
relocation
of
curb
cut,
but
the
old
curb
cut
was
grandfathered
in
first
of
all
and
we're
not
really
supportive
of
a
curb
cut
being
put
in
place
to
take
a
parking
space
off
the
street,
and
I
understand
there's
one
there
now,
but
that
was
put
there
long
ago
and
secondly,
in
my
opinion,
I
think
it's
be
considered
front
yard
parking
because
it's
extremely
close
and
I
think
it
would
fall
under
the
category
of
front
yard
parking
so
representing
the
btd
I'd
like
to
go
in
in
the
opinion
of
to
be
opposed
to
this
request.
BP
I
can
answer
that
so
right
now
our
neighbor
has
a
curb
cut.
So
that's
where
you're
seeing
the
9.8
size
to
the
left
of
the
proposal
most
likely
just
because
the
curb
cuts
would
be
so
close
together.
It
would
seem
like
a
double
curb
cut
in
terms
of
the
overall
21
feet.
It
is
not
a
connection
to
that,
but
but,
frankly,
all
along
the
street,
there
are
similar
parking
pads.
BP
B
I
just
the
secretary
here
I
just
have
a
question:
I'm
looking
at
the
google
maps
as
well
as
mr
ruggiero
was
just
looking
at,
but
if
I'm
looking
at
the
house
and
I'm
looking
to
the
right
of
it,
there's
no
way
you're
parking,
your
vehicle
or
anybody's
parking,
the
vehicle
on
the
right
hand
side.
Are
they.
BQ
BP
Yeah-
and
I
would
like
to
emphasize
that
often
people
on
the
street
will
not
park
in
front
of
that
because
they
think
it's
a
curb
cut
and
they
think
they'll
be
towed,
so
we
often
lose
on
street
parking
because
people
won't
park
in
front
of
that.
If
one
of
the
owners
is
not
there,
so
you're
absolutely
correct,
you
cannot
park
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
the
property.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
let's
just
have
everybody,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
and
support
are
in
opposition.
AS
Yes,
chad,
I'm
sorry,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
partnered
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
I'd
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
This
app
can
did
go
before
the
jamaica,
plain
neighborhood
council
and
receive
their
support.
Thank
you.
H
I
wish
I
do
have
one
raised
camp.
I
don't
know
this
bob
bob,
you
all
said.
Do
you
have
to
give
any
testimony
here.
BO
Yes,
I,
like
request
denial
only
because
there
is
parking
on
their
side
and
when
you
have
a
parking
curb
cut,
put
in
place
for
one
space.
It's
almost
like
private
parking
and
we
don't
usually
support
that
the
front
yard
parking
might
be
debatable,
but
I
still
think
it
is
and
that's
why
I
like
to
go
on
the
market
requesting
denial.
K
Madam
chair,
can
I
can
I
ask
typical
question.
A
Well
hold
on
miss
miss
ambassador,
any
other
raised
hands,
no.
K
Is
there
a
way
that
we
can
ask
the
applicant
to
the
existing
curb
cut
to
repair
that
one
close-off
to
allow
for
the
off-street
parking
that
she
would
then
so
that
then
she
can
put
a
curb
cut
in
the
other
side
so
to
close
one,
but
to
open
the
other,
and
so
there's
an
equal
gain.
BO
Well,
actually,
I'm
not
looking
at
the
the
abutting
property,
I'm
just
looking
at.
K
BO
A
AZ
AV
BP
Yeah,
oh
I'm,
sorry,
no,
that's!
Okay!
So
right
now
there
is
it's
hard
to
see
on
these
surveys,
but
there
is
a
thin
line
with
with
garden,
that's
actually
on
his
side
of
the
property.
So
there
there
is
a
way
where
it
would
be
a
separate,
curb
cut
it's
not
adjoining
with
their
curb
cut.
So
you
can
see
on
the
plans.
BP
A
So
miss
ambassador,
can
you
mute
everybody
just
so
that
the
board
is
can
can
have
their
discussion?
I
mean
I.
C
B
Calling
your
next
case
calling
boa
132
2929
127
washington
street.
This
is
an
existing
two
family
and
chapel
building
renovated
into
three
residential
units
violations.
Article
50,
section
29,
the
use
of
is
insufficient.
Article
50,
section
43,
austria
talking
is
insufficient
in
article
50
section
29.
The
additional
lot
area
isn't
sufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record
clinton.
BR
So
I
can
jump
right
into
it,
but
what
we're
looking
at
is
a
existing
building
that
has
two
residential
units
with
a
first
floor.
What
was
a
residential
unit
but
was
turned
into
a
chapel
20
or
30
years
ago,
and
our
proposal
is
to
renovate
the
existing
building
and
turn
them
into
three
residential
units.
BR
BR
A
AI
Good
afternoon
madam
chair
members
of
the
board
denise
santos
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I
would
like
to
go
on
record
and
state
that
the
applicant
has
met
with
the
direct,
the
butters
and
also
the
community
on
the
civic
association
for
this
area.
They
have
support
from
the
association
at
this
time.
We
would
like
to
defer
any
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
A
You
may
have
emotion,
let's
see,
let's
see.
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
jeff
had
to
be
pda.
We
recommended
that
it
be
sent
to
landmarks,
I'm
not
now
looking
at
I'm,
not
even
sure
that
that's
really
gonna
be
the
threshold
over
there.
If
it's
only
painting
in
windows,
so
straight
straight
approval
will
be
fine
with
us.
AZ
BR
B
117-4170-1677-1679
dorchester
avenue
this
is
a
change
of
occupant
three
family
to
a
three
family
in
office
and
construct
830
square
feet
of
addition,
the
violations
article
65
section
32.
This
is
in
the
in
the
name
of
the
district
of
review
required
article
65,
section
41
on
street
parking
and
loading
article
65,
section
8
office
use
forbidden
in
the
3fd
3000
sub
district
and
article
65,
section
9
front
yard's
insufficient
and
article
6569
side
yard
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
F
AM
A
Okay,
have
you
seen
the
bpda
recommendation.
BF
BF
Because
we
have
extended
family,
I
have
parents
live
with
me.
I
have
two
young
children
and
I
currently
working
from
home.
So
I
I
need
a
spay
for
myself,
because
I
currently
work
in
the
kitchen
table,
and
so
I
will
live
there.
I
will
work
there
and
that
is
this
will
be
my
life,
so
appearing
to
me
is
very
important.
I
like
to
make
it
beautiful
to
for
me
where
I
live.
A
BF
A
BF
BF
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans
must
sell
better.
U
Is
there,
is
there
an
elevation
or
a
rendering,
so
it
it's
just
extending
the
front?
Oh
okay,.
A
K
A
I
know
I
get
it,
you
know,
so
the
question
is,
you
know:
do
we
help
get
it
back
to
the
3d
or
the
three
family
scene,
or
do
we
continue
it
in
the
way
that
it
is?
Is
anybody
here
to
speak
and
support
are
in
opposition
of
this
proposal.
A
AN
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
george
hwynn,
with
the
mayor's
office
of
naval
services,
our
office
hosted
in
the
butter's
meeting
for
the
project
on
november
9th
of
last
year.
There
were
no
concerns
there.
However.
The
applicant
was
unable
to
answer
technical
questions
at
the
saint
mark's
area,
civic
association,
leading
to
a
letter
of
opposition
from
them.
AN
E
Thank
you,
madam
chair
member
support,
jeff
hampton
bpda,
the
front
yard
edition
just
completely
changes
everything
on
that
block.
It's
not
a
big
block
to
begin
with,
and
it's
all
residential,
but
the
addition
is
completely
inappropriate
for
that
residential
zoning
district,
so
we're
on
record
it's
denial.
Thank
you.
A
Okay,
may
I
have
a
motion
please.
BA
B
On
your
next
case,
calling
voa,
129,
8430
717-721
american
legion
highway
is
the
cannabis
establishment
co-located
at
the
american
medical
marijuana,
dispensary
recreational
marijuana,
retail
dispensary,
marijuana,
cultivator
and
marijuana
product
manufacturer
erected,
8
900
square
foot,
one
to
two
story:
building
violations:
article
29
section:
four:
the
green
belt
protection
overlay
district,
article
67,
section
11
cannabis-
establishes
conditional
use
in
the
cc-1
sub-district,
maybe
not
just
for
the
record.
Please.
AR
D
A
Okay,
so
this
is
mr
list
has
recused
himself,
okay,
so
so
counselor,
you
need
five.
Five
of
the
six
members
in
support
of
your
proposal.
A
AR
AR
The
reason
why
we're
here
is
because,
during
construction,
the
structure
became
very
compromised
and
needed
to
come
down
and
with
it
effectively
remove
the
entitlement
we
received
from
the
zoning
board.
So
we
are
now
back
here
with
an
ert
permit
seeking
to
reapprove
the
exact
project
that
you
saw
as
before.
AR
Just
to
refresh
your
recollection,
as
the
secretary
mentioned,
this
is
a
cannabis
establishment
that
will
have
medical
retail,
adult
use,
cultivation
and
product
manufacturing
on
site
slide.
Five
is
jessica,
has
a
good
slide
to
to
kind
of
start
with.
This
is
the
site
plan
that
I
can
just
walk
you
through
kind
of
the
program.
It's
actually,
I
think
the
next
one
there
you
go,
that's
good!
AR
So
what
you
see
here
is
the
facility
with
19
parking
spaces
on
a
large
lot
of
twenty
thousand
square
feet.
The
facility
itself,
as
mentioned,
is
just
almost
nine
thousand
square
feet
with
a
retail
floor
of
around
nineteen
hundred
square
feet,
twelve
point
of
sale
stations
as
well
as
a
cultivation
small.
BN
AR
Site
intended
to
teach
folks
how
to
grow
from
the
boston
area
of
approximately
2500
square
feet.
If
you
go
to
slide
six,
just
the
next
slide,
there's
a
good
floor
plan.
It
is
two
floors
with
a
basement,
but
the
main
floor
is
that
middle.
You
know
first
floor
where
the
activity
occurs.
As
you
can
see
on
the
left
kind
of
back
left
there
upper
left
of
your
screen.
There's
a
man
trap
to
enter
the
facility.
AR
There
will
be
a
security
person
at
that
man
trap
location
in
the
main
entrance.
You
can
just
scroll
up
just
a
teeny
bit
and
then
security
wall
or
id
check
will
also
occur
at
the
point
of
sale
stations.
As
you
see,
in
kind
of
the
center
area
of
the
of
the
floor
plan,.
AR
Yeah
you're,
remembering
the
greenhouse
mountain
chairs
up,
if
you
go
up,
go
up
a
bit,
if
you
just
jessica
that
it's
that
it's
that
rectangle,
that
unimpeded
rectangle
that's
2500
square
feet
where
the
cultivation
work
will
occur,
that
has
its
own
separate
entrance
for
employees.
Only.
You
can
see,
there's
a
side
entrance
on
the
side
of
the
building
on
the
right
hand,
side
of
your
screen
and
then
there's
also
an
employee
only
entrance
at
the
bottom
of
your
screen
really
at
the
front
of
the
building.
The
entrance
to
this
facility
is
in.
AR
AR
There's
also
34
cameras
on
the
inside
of
the
facility,
with
eight
cameras
on
the
outside
here
you're,
seeing
an
elevation
that
red
barn
like
structure
is,
is
really
the
original
structure
being
rebuilt
and
then
the
gray
is
really
the
the
really
all
new
construction
for
the
rest
of
the
facility.
At
this
point,
it's
all
new
construction,
but
that
red
barn
is
is
still
similar,
almost
identical
in
original
dimensions.
AR
A
And
so
is
the
footprint
the
same
as
it
was
in
the
previous
application,
or
has
it
changed
in
any
way.
AR
It
is,
it
is
the
same,
madam
chair.
U
Yeah
I
mean
that
it
matters,
I'm
just
a
little
confused
if
it's
a
if
it's
the
same
plan
same
footprint,
because
the
building
was
compromised.
Why?
Why
are
you
back.
AR
Well,
it's
a
hard
lesson
in
construction,
mr
like,
but
once
they
knock
down
the
the
structure,
that's
there
there's
nothing
to
retain
the
the
rights.
If
you
will
of
the
entitlement
that
we
receive
from
the
zoning
board.
Repeal
there's
there's
nothing
left
when
you
keep
something
up
and
it's
an
alt
permit
you,
you
still
have
those
rights,
but
once
it's
taken
down
it's
it's,
you
know
there
are
ways
to
to
handle
it,
but
in
this
case
it
wasn't
handled
it
was
kind
of
an
emergency
situation.
AR
Yeah
I
mean
we're
going
to
reset
it
now.
We
would
reset
it
because
of
that
there
were
some
other
things
we
had
to
do,
but
this
is
really
the
biggest
hurdle
was
just
the
waiting
to
get
back
here
in
front
of
the
board
and
do
this
again.
Okay,.
AS
Yes,
management
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
This
time
we
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
The
ops
neighborhood
services
ran
a
community
process
for
this
proposal
back
in
2019
under
a
different
administration.
AS
AS
H
And
bj
go
ahead.
AJ
Hi
bjo
swag
room
from
district
4
city
council's
office.
We
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank
you.
H
BS
BS
We
discussed
some
compromises
to
the
plan
and
there
were
this
different
opinions
on
supporting
or
not
supporting.
So
we
took
an
online
vote
of
the
membership
to
get
a
larger
vote
account.
It
was
counted
by
the
account
was
tabulated
by
councillor
andrea
campbell's
office
and
a
large
majority
voted
in
support.
A
Thank
you,
okay,
miss
ambassador.
That
covers
everybody.
A
A
It
doesn't
matter,
it's
just.
Is
there
a
second
okay.
A
Yeah,
all
all
those
in
favor.
BE
B
BT
Yes,
sir,
is
not
muted
as
well.
BT
BE
BT
BQ
BQ
Sure
it's
a
single
house
in
rosendale
and
we're
actually
demolishing
one
story,
addition
on
the
side
of
the
house
and
instead
putting
a
two-story
addition,
so
we
are
violating
the
rep,
I'm
sorry!
BQ
A
So
basically,
you're
building
your
proposal
is
contextual
from
what
I
can
see
from
the
drawing
from
the
above
to
the
abutter.
BQ
And
if
you
just
on
the
side
site,
planet
actually
you'll
see
where
it's
a
corner
lot.
If
you
scroll
down
a
little
bit
and
stay
on
the
area
pan,
just
a
little
bit
down.
Okay,
perfect!
No
go
down,
go
up
again!.
F
BQ
Yeah
just
stay
there.
Thank
you,
okay!
So
the
if
you
see
the
house
on
the
right
on
the
left
we're
proposing
an
addition
with
rear
deck.
The
addition
is
pretty
much
the
same
footprint
of
as
the
previous.
It's
the
same
length
it's
about
26
feet
and
the
actual
depth
to
the
rare
yard
is
less
as,
as
was
before.
BQ
Aligned
with
the
exit
house,
so
this
is
a
corner
lot
it
it's
a
has
a
16
close
to
60
feet
long,
so
definitely
a
hardship
and
the
red
line
that
is
crossing
the
middle
of
the
building
is
literally
our
rare
setback.
That
is,
is
shallower
than
the
required.
BT
I'm
just
gonna
interrupt
for
a
second
I'm
sorry,
it's
derek
rubinoff,
the
the
required
setback
is
23
feet
and
what's
proposed,
looks
to
be
from
what
I
can
see
on
the
screen
there
that
looks
about
18
feet
or
so
is
that
right
or
not,.
BT
BQ
A
AU
Good
afternoon,
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
nuchi
with
the
men's
office
of
neighborhood
services.
We
conducted
a
meeting
for
this
project
and
they
did
reach
out
to
the
bellevue
and
the
greater
belgrade,
ave,
neighborhood
associations
and
my
office
received
four
letters
of
support
for
this
project
and
the
meeting
was
conducted
on
april
13th.
I
B
You
following
your
next
case,
calling
doa
131,
0281
119
harbor
a
road.
Let's
confirm
officer
one
family,
it's
going
to
be
including
extension
of
a
raised
patio
or
deck
in
addition
to
ground
level
deck
that
stands,
the
violations,
article
67
section
9,
the
side
yards
of
submission
article
67,
section
9,
the
rare
yacht-
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
A
My
goodness
you're
on
a
roll
today,
okay,
please
name
an
address
from
the
applicant.
H
BU
We
currently
have
an
existing,
what's
called
the
upper
level
deck,
which
is
right
in
the
backyard
of
our
home
due
to
the
grade
it's
first
level,
but
in
the
back
it's
kind
of
elevated,
so
we're
proposing
is
to
extend
that
across
the
back
of
the
house
to
have
a
new
exit
which
is
from
the
center
there,
that
you
can
see
in
the
middle
and
then
there's
essentially
what
we
would
like
to
construct
as
a
ground
level
deck,
and
that
is
the
setback
issue
that
says
lower
deck.
You
can
see
in
the
bottom
left
there.
A
So
is
this
at
this
19
arbor
hit
on
the
commuter
rail
is
that
it.
BU
So
I
believe
it
looks
like
this
set
back
and
to
tell
you
there's
actually
already
a
structure
there
and
planting,
so
I
believe
we
are
kind
of
keeping
the
same
side
yard
setback,
which
is
around
seven
and
a
half
feet,
and
I
am
sorry
I
am
the
owner
and
I
actually
did
not
get
the
exact
step
back
from
the
architect.
BU
I
had
to
come
to
the
meeting,
so
I
apologize
for
being
unprepared
regarding
that
what
that
requirement
is,
but
essentially
it
will
be
kept
or
proposing
to
something
like
seven
and
a
half
feet
from
the
side.
A
Okay,
how
are
the
plans
miss
better?
I'm
sure
the
plants
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board
is
anybody
here
to
speak
in
support
of
this
proposal.
AU
Members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
mayor's
office
of
maintenance
services.
We
conducted
a
meeting
on
april
11th
for
this
project
and
my
office
has
received
no
letters
of
support
for
opposition.
We
did
have
one
neighbor
who
attended
that
meeting,
but
they
did
seem
to
be
in
support.
We
just
didn't
receive
any
statements.
A
Thank
you,
miss
ambassador
anybody
else
with
a
raised
hand,
I'm.
E
X
BU
B
B
This
is
that
200
square
feet,
200
square
feet
of
ancillary
sheds,
12
new
oxford
parking
spaces
and
a
new
storm
water,
recharge
system
violations,
article
51,
section,
8,
use
and
regulations,
animal
hospital,
catery,
kennel,
aborting,
animal
shelter,
use
is
forbidden
and
article
51,
section
8
accessory
uses
from
to
the
main
use
is
forbidden,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
BG
Good
morning,
madam
chair
excuse
me
good
afternoon
and
good
afternoon
to
the
rest
of
the
board.
My
name
is
jed
ruccio.
I
am
an
attorney
at
mario
nishana
cnuty.
Our
business
address
is
at
two
battery
march
park
in
quincy.
We
are
here.
The
shelter
is
here
seeking
relief
solely
as
to
use
specifically
we're
seeking
a
variance
to
expand
a
legally
existing
non-conforming
use.
That
would
be
a
cat
shelter
and
that
use
has
previously
been
confirmed
by
this
board
as
a
legally
non-conforming
use.
BG
A
We
honestly,
you
know,
we
hear
all
the
good
stuff
about
the
about
catch,
shelters
and
all
kinds
of
good
stuff,
but
we
have
to
recognize
that
this
is
a
one
f,
five
thousand
district.
A
BG
I
I
understand
it
to
be
all
on
the
same
lot
and
in
terms
of
the
the
residential
structure
in
front.
It
is
a
residential
structure
and
is,
as
I
understand
it,
currently
rented
out
to
tenants.
BG
Well,
the
the
tenants
space
is
not
being
infringed
upon
and
you
know
there.
There
is
no
objection
from
the
tenants
if
you
would
like
supporting
letters
from
the
things.
A
BG
Understood-
and
I
think
before
turning
things
over
to
mr
mitchell,
to
give
you
a
bird's-eye
view
of
the
project
which
will
help
answer
some
of
your
questions.
I
think
it's
important
to
understand
the
history
here.
A
Now
we
want
to
go
directly
to
the
use,
because
this
looks
like
it's:
an
expansion
of
the
use
from
1550
square
feet
to
3
650
square
feet,
so
that's
close
to
a
doubling
of
huge,
correct
and
plus
ancillary
sheds
and
street
parking.
So
just
please
talk
to
us
about
everything
together,
so
we
can
understand
how
those
residential
uses
and
the
abutting
residential
uses
will
be
protected
and,
of
course,
tell
us
about
the
about
this
shelter.
BG
Of
course-
and
I
guess
what
I'm
trying
to
say,
is
a
picture's
worth
a
thousand
words,
I
think
what
will
best
answer.
Your
question
is
to
run
through
what
the
some
project
renderings
and
and
that
will
show
you
how
little
an
impact
excuse
me
how
there's
only
a
positive
impact
on
the
neighbors
outside
the
law,
as
well
as
on
the
residential
structure.
That
is
on
the
lot.
BG
BV
I
am
a
member
of
the
owners
project
management
group
that
is
assisting
gift
fair
on
this
project,
with
the
business
address
of
152
middlesex
turnpike,
really
to
mass,
as
jet
had
talked
about
the
you
can
see
on
this
side
that
we
are
currently
on
the
rendering
you
can
see
how
the
perimeter
of
the
site
we
are
proposing
to
incorporate
a
new
fence
to
help
shield
some
of
the
parking
that
is
going
to
be
increased
on
the
site.
BV
In
addition,
this
front
area
of
parking-
I'm
sorry,
you
can't
see
anything
else,
but
that
is
right
directly
next
to
the
existing
house,
building
up
front
that
is
going
to
be
dedicated
for
the
tenants
of
the
house
in.
BV
BV
Oh
yes,
on
this
site,
you
can
see
there's
two
spaces.
Next
to
that
existing
house
remain
on
the
plan
left
side.
BV
Yes,
I
believe
there
are
two
units
in
that
building.
Do
we.
BG
Madam
chair
lisa
cicchetti
may
be
better
positioned
to
answer
these
questions.
Do.
Does
she
have
panelist
status
or
could
she
be
unmuted.
BG
T
We
are
okay
yeah,
this
is
lisa
cicchetti
at
my
address
is
101
north
beacon
street,
so
the
building
up
front
has
one
unit
in
it
and
that
is
rented
out
and
also
used
by
people
that
are
helping
us
just
oversee
the
shelter
property.
A
AO
A
Wait
so
that
existing
house
that's,
there
is
one
unit
with
two
bedrooms.
T
We
use
there's,
so
let
me
back
up.
There's
one
there's
two
bedrooms
being
used
as
bedrooms.
We
actually
use
it
as.
T
A
Okay,
so
then
describe
to
us
the
new
building.
BV
Yep,
I
can
jump
back
in
if
we
could
go
back
to
that
bird's
eye
view
plan
at
the
top.
Please
so
yeah
you
can
see
the
existing
buildings
in
the
dashed
area,
I'll
focus
on
the
proposed
building.
That
is
where
you
see
the
proposed
one-story
building
3650
square
feet.
BV
The
shelter
the
new
proposed
shelter
is
going
to
maintain
a
similar
height
of
the
existing
shelter
of
not
being
higher
than
15
feet.
Additionally,
you
can
see
there's
the
shed
located
towards
the
right
side
of
this
plan
and
the
left
both
remain
fairly
well
hidden
from
the
street
if
you
were
standing
on
undyne
road.
BV
Additionally,
there
is
the
mechanical
equipment
in
the
back
of
the
shed
that
will
be
fenced
off.
That
is,
that
small
square
towards
the
rear-
and
that
is
also
hidden
from
the
street,
and
it
will
be
even
more
hidden
with
the
increased
fencing
and
then,
additionally,
you
can.
If
you
zoom
in
you,
can
see
the
setbacks.
BV
The
average
of
the
building
is
greater
than
the
40
foot
setback.
However,
you
can
see
on
the
bottom
right
corner
of
the
shelter
that
is
at
30
feet,
so
it
meets
the
setback,
requirements
for
the
zone.
A
So
since
this
is
a
commercial
use
in
a
residential
subdistrict,
please
talk
through
what
the
hours
of
operation
are.
What
the
hours
of
operation
are.
T
T
A
Seven
days
a
week
monday
through
sac
sunday,
wow,
okay
and
tell
us
how
many
volunteers
and
how
many
staff
so.
T
We
have,
I
believe,
five
on-site
staff
members
and
five
full-time
equivalent
on-site
staff
members,
and
we
have
I'd,
say
probably
two
volunteers.
A
day
coming
to
the
shelter
two
to
three
volunteers,
a
day
come
to
the
shelter.
A
Okay
and
tell
us
about
how
you
propose
that
the
butters
are
not
affected
by
by
the
by
the
cats,
so
that
there's
sound
or
some
kind
of.
T
Oh,
we
yeah,
so
we've
been
in
the
neighborhood
for
since
1888
and
as
far
to
my
knowledge
and
I've,
I've
run
the
board
for
about
17
years.
We've
never
had
a
complaint
from
any
neighbor
about
sound
or.
A
But
you
are
expanding
your
facility,
so
I'm
assuming
there's
an
expansion
in
the
number
of
of
cats
that
you'll
have
there.
BG
K
BG
T
A
AZ
BG
Madam
chair,
if
I
could
in
in
relation
to
the
hours
of
operation,
I
just
wanted
to
stress
that
those
those
are
open
hours,
but
on
average
the
facility,
I
believe,
has
four
adopters
or
visitors
per
day.
So,
while
they're,
the
the
hours
of
operation
are
10
to
6,
there's
very
little
traffic.
T
We
have
once
a
week
when
we
have
a
vet
that
comes
in
those
rounds.
Generally,
we
take
our
cats
out
to
vets.
AZ
A
I'm
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
the
traffic
impact
is
going
to
be
on
undyne,
because
then
you
say
you
have
five
stock.
You
have
two
volunteers,
you
have
ways
to
pick
up
and
then
you
have
a
doctors
coming
through
and
that's
and
then
you
have
the
vet
coming
in.
So
just
trying
to
figure
out
what
that
impact
is
going
to.
A
I
understand,
but
if
you're
doubling
your
capacity,
that's
going
to
be,
you
know
a
different
impact
on
a
essentially
a
residential
neighborhood.
You
know
so
so
anyway,
how
are
the
plans
miss
better
mad?
I'm
sure.
AS
Yes,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
conor
newman
with
the
mayor's
office
neighborhood
services.
At
this
time,
the
mayor's
office
likes
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board
the
mayor's
office
held
in
the
butters
meeting
on
march.
7Th
no
serious
concerns
were
raised.
We
did
have
a
resident
reach
out
to
the
applicant
about
some
landscaping
plans.
AS
You
know
this
facility
has
been
in
use
in
that
neighborhood
for
a
long
time.
They
also
went
to
the
bryan
austin
improvement
association
received
their
support
as
well.
The
ai
asked
that
they
promote
a
robust
rodent
control
program.
There
are
some
rat
issues
in
that
neighborhood
not
related
to
this
facility,
but
hoping
that
it
would
exasperate
things
and
also
request
them
to
continue
to
work
with
neighbors
and
keep
them
informed
of.
What's
going
on.
BG
Madam
chair,
I
would
like
to
note
that
we
do
have
letters
of
support.
A
AU
The
council
would
like
to
go
on
record
in
support
of
this
project.
Thank.
AM
Madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
the
bia
voted
to
support
the
project.
I
I
do
live
on
undyne
and
we
did
have
some
concerns.
It's
it's
really
unclear
with
this
presentation.
AM
Are
they
having
one
residential
unit,
two
residential
units
and
how
big
it
is
because
it
was
never
a
mention
of
a
residential
unit.
If
there's
someone
living
there
now,
they
haven't
caused
any
problems
if
they're
related
to
it.
I
usually
don't
see
any
cars
parked
there
at
nighttime,
so
I
guess
a
little
confused
on
that.
AM
But
what
the
bia
did
ask
was
that
they
reach
out
to
the
neighbor
directly
next
door,
38
undyne,
which
I
believe
they
have
not
done
and
that
they
really
do
have
a
robust,
rodent
over
what's
required
from
the
city,
because
we
have
been
being
dug
up
by
national
grid
and
that
water
and
sewer
for
the
last
two
years,
and
it's
going
to
be
probably
two
more
years
wrote
it
there's
a
huge
rat
problem,
the
condos
in
newton,
which
are
right
next
to
it
as
well,
have
a
huge
rap
problem,
and
they
ask
that
as
well.
AM
A
Okay,
so
what
I
would
like
the
applicants
to
to
respond
to
is
the
residential
use
and
and
what
the
plan
is
for.
Upgrading,
that
residential
property,
the
screening
and
buffering
and
and
if
you
responded
to
the
butter
and
any
rodent
control
issues
or
responses.
BG
Madam
chair,
I
believe
there
is
no
change
to
the
residential
use
that
the
one
tenant
would
would
remain
the
same
in
terms
of
buffering
aspects.
Is
there
something
billy?
Would
you
be
able
to
bring
up
a
slide
that
shows
the
any
buffering,
such
as
landscaping
or
fencing
between
the
the
new
facility
and
the
residential
structure?.
A
Okay,
let's
actually,
let's
just
hold
off
here's
my
question,
man.
AZ
A
A
Let
us
move
directly
to
a
motion
because
it
sounds
like
it
needs
to
be
for
this
petitioner
only
so
that
should
anything
happen
to
them.
This
is
that
the
residential
structure
will
provide,
will
move
to
purely
residential
use,
no
accessory.
A
Accessory
storage
office,
etc
that
the
residential
use
will
be
upgraded,
sounded
sounds
like
there
needs
to
be
screening
and
buffering
plan
so
that
the
whole
place
looks
is
upgraded
and
it
looks
like
it
needs
to
also
have
rodent
control
plan
to
be
and
that
they
would
need
to
continue
to
be
in
touch
with
neighborhood,
with
the
neighborhood.
K
Mediterranean
trek,
we
also
have
a
proviso
that
talks
about
occupancy
so
that
you
know
up
to
80.
A
A
And
so
is
everybody
comfortable,
though,
with
this
you
know
basically,
seven
day
a
week
ten
to
six
operation
or
should
residents
just
be
comfortable
that
on
sundays
or
whatever,
that
they're
not
going
to
have
commercials.
C
AZ
D
C
AZ
A
Yes,
and
is
that
neighborhood
average
is
that,
does
that
cover
everything.
F
A
Hoping
that,
through
design
review,
that
we
will,
we
will
make
sure
that
that
residential
building
in
the
front
stays
as
purely
residential
use,
whether
it's
because
and
they've
they've
represented
that
it's
one
unit
that
it's
not
two
units
in
that
building.
A
Okay,
just.
K
A
Okay,
okay,
so
let
me
see
if
I
get
this
right,
so
it's
the
this
petitioner
only
capped
its
approval
for
design
review
to
this
petitioner
only
tapped
at
80
animals
that
the
residential
used
to
be
upgraded
and
confirmed
as
a
one
one
unit
that
there
will
be
screening
and
buffering
there
be
a
neighborhood
plan.
A
A
Okay
motion
carries
so
please
we
ask
you
to
be
continue
to
be
good
neighbors
with
your
expansion.
Okay,
good
luck.
Thank.
B
Call
your
next
case
calling
voa
122
4194
200
high
street.
This
is
a
change
of
occupancy
to
a
cannabis
establishment
violations.
Article
45,
section,
14,
cannabis,
establishment
use
this
conditional
article
45
section
14,
the
location
for
ben
buffer
zone
conflict
proposed
within
thousand
six
hundred
and
forty
feet
of
another
cannabis
establishment
name
and
address
for.
AR
F
AR
Relief,
we're
seeking
today
is
for
an
adult
use,
cannabis
establishment,
which
is
a
conditional
use
within
this
particular
location
of
the
city,
as
well
as
a
variance
for
the
buffer
zone,
half
mile
that
was
just
referenced.
Let
me
just
start
with
the
actual
dispensary.
If
I
could
madam
chair
and
I
do
believe,
there's
an
updated.
Madam
ambassador,
more
updated
version
of
the
plans
I
mean
we
could
make
this
work,
but
the
the
latest
ones
might
be
more
yeah.
AR
That's
all
right,
we'll
we'll
make
this
work
members
of
the
board.
What
what
so?
What
we
have
here
is,
if
you
know
the
the
other
image
was
gonna
show
you
that
if
you
can
think
about
this
location,
the
green
way
is
at
the
bottom
of
your
screen.
But
it's
not
it's
there's
a
giant
block
of
retail.
I
think
it's
a
panera
bread.
That's
there
right
now
between
us
and
and
the
greenway.
So
you
can't
see
this
from
the
greenway.
AR
It's
the
main
entrance
is
on
the
right
on
high
street
and
through
that
community
process.
Well,
this
does
span
all
the
way
across
to
broad
street.
We've
shut
down
the
broad
street
entrance
on
the
left
of
your
screen,
so
what
you
have
is
the
more
narrow
high
street
street
that
shows
access
to
this
facility,
not
even
at
the
main
entrance
of
the
building,
but
a
secondary
entrance
to
this
building,
no
residential
on
high
street.
AR
There
is
residential
on
broad
street
broadcasting
will
remain
as
a
an
area
for
just
delivery
for
delivery
and
personnel
entrance
only
but
will
be
shut
off.
You
can
see
a
little
hatched
area
over
there
on
broad
street
on
the
left
side.
That
now
is
going
to
be
a
little
area
for
community
use,
the
local
non-profit
that
wants
to
use
that
for
an
office
that
will
have
its
own
distinct
entrance
and
it
will
not
be
part
of
the
cannabis
establishment.
AR
Just
returning
to
that
high
street
entrance
there
there's
a
man
trapped
to
get
in.
There
will
be
security
at
the
man
trap,
so.
AR
It's
ground
floor.
There
is
a
basement,
the
updated
plan
that
I
had
for
you
removed
that
little
note.
That
said
stairs
going
to
the
basement
for
overflow.
This
this
is
employee
area.
Only
this
will
be
used
for
lockers
bicycles,
that
kind
of
stuff
the
the
basement
is
not
open
to
the
public,
the
public
facing
area
it
all
in
is
1500
square
feet.
It's
a
smaller.
AR
You
know
it's
not
a
giant
area
at
all
and
then,
if
you
go
up,
though,
to
the
next
to
this
to
the
slide
above
that,
you
can
see
what
I'm
talking
about
it.
Can
it's
comprised
of
that
check-in
area
that
you
see
that
box
kind
of
by
the
door
on
high
street
and
then
just
behind
that
check-in
area,
which
has
its
own
separate
entrance
separate
exit?
Is
the
we
see
the
points
of
sale
systems
along
the
side
of
the
wall
and
you
see
the
just
the
showroom
area
so
yeah,
that's
really
the
main.
AR
The
proposed
hours
of
operation
are
monday
through
sunday,
nine
nine
pm
it's
at
nine
a.m,
to
nine
pm
about
12
to
15
employees
per
shift.
I
I
did
want
to
talk
if
I
could,
because
I
know
that
it
comes
up
in
other
conversations
about
the
buffer
zone.
If
I
could
it's
the
last
slide,
and
it's
just
four
very
quick
points,
if
I
may
it's
the
last
slide,
madam
ambassador,
there
you
can
zoom
out
it
comes
down
to
four
reasons:
one
would
be
population
downtown
boston
is
the
one
of
the
busy
components.
AR
Yeah
in
the
wharf
district
council
there
are,
there
are
two
other
in
the
wharf
district
area.
AR
Rather,
there
are
two
other
dispensaries,
150
state
street,
which
is
1584
feet
away
from
us
and
then
21
broad
street,
which
is
1500
feet
away
from
us,
21
broad
street,
rather
small
footprint,
600
square
feet,
150
state
street,
rather
small,
a
thousand
square
me
neither
are
open
today,
and
the
point
we
were
making
is
that
the
demand
of
this
part
of
the
city
will
well
exceed
the
certain
the
resources
that
are
there
and
similar
to
what
you
see
with
the
hotel
market
there
on
that
slide,
and
even
the
on-premise
liquor
licenses
there
on
that
slide,
there
is
a
concentration
of
commercial
activity
in
the
downtown
area
that
will
support
multiple
dispensaries,
in
this
case,
we're
taking
a
nod
from
the
legislation
of
both
the
state
and
the
city
which
refers
to
the
public
need
in.
A
This
case,
so
if
I
can
backtrack
for
a
minute,
so
your
argument
is
that
there
are
two
facilities
in
proximity
within
this
20
2600
2640
square
feet.
I
mean
feet
but
they're,
both
small
small
facilities-
and
this
too
is
a
small
facility
and
that
there
is
enough
of
a
demand,
given
that
it
is
our
downtown.
Q
AR
Then
there
were
just
kind
of
three
other
really
quick
ones.
Public
need
is
it's
an
enshrined
in
the
legislation.
It's
meant
to
look
towards
the
liquor
legislation,
so
public
need
is
something
that
should
be
considered.
Equity
equity
is
not.
I
mean
marie
st
fleur
is
on
this
call.
She
can
do
a
better
job
of
explaining
that,
but
the
legislation
was
intended
to
not
relegate
equity
applicants
to
the
edges.
Of
that
you
know.
That's
why
we've
seen
back
bay.
That's
why
we've
seen
fenway.
That's
why
we've
seen
downtown.
F
AR
This
board,
on
a
case-by-case
basis,
not
everyone,
goes
through,
but
case-by-case
basis.
We've
seen
that
and
then
finally,
is
the
uniqueness
of
this
location
on
the
call
with
us
today
is
one
of
the
owners.
His
name
is
gosdar
chairlist
he's
a
former
professional
nfl
football
player.
He
more
than
anyone
has
experienced
how
cannabis
has
helped
him
in
recovery
and.
AR
It's
going
to
be
recreational,
madam
chair,
but
the
analogies
are
the
same.
In
order
to
provide
wellness
support
to
our
customer
base.
Gaza
chairless,
you
know,
comes
from
being
banged
up
in
the
nfl,
has
learned
from
treatment
using
the
cannabis
and
so
he's
going
to
send
that
kind
of.
A
U
U
You
have
clearly
demonstrated
there's
a
public
need
for
dunkin
donuts
in
the
area
and
for
liquor
stores,
yeah,
look
at
stores-
and
I
I
this
just-
I
just
throw
my
hands
up
at
this
point.
The
buffer
zone
discussion
is
utterly
pointless
at
this
point.
A
L
A
Okay,
is
anybody
here
to
speak
either
in
support
or
in
opposition?
No
applicants,
please
just
or
or
whatever
so,
let's
just
get
to
the
testimony.
AS
G
AS
AA
AA
They
are
committed
to
work
with
the
neighbors
and
the
work
district
council
as
they
operate
and
will
work
to
maintain
their
character
of
the
community.
They
have
also
indicated
that
they
are
committed
to
ensuring
that
the
neighborhood
that
they
are
in
continues
to
be
safe,
healthy
and
inviting
to
residents
and
visitors
alike.
Moreover,
the
work
district
council
and
the
high
street
canalis
group
have
has
entered
into
a
good
neighbor
agreement
with
which
will
remain
in
effect
if
the
business
were
to
be
sold
or
transferred
within
the
five-year
period.
AA
As
such,
the
counselor
is
offering
his
support
for
the
proposal.
It
should
be
also
noted
that
the
high
street
cannabis
group
is
an
equity
applicant
that
is
well
respected
in
boston,
and
it
is
critical
to
continue
working
closely
with
equity
applicants
in
this
field,
along
with
women
and
minority
owned
small
businesses.
Thank
you.
H
Okay,
one
second,
I'm
sorry,
sorry,
okay,
michael
sorry,
I
sent
a
request
to
unmute
you.
Can
you
state
your
name
and
address
to
the
record?
Please.
BX
Pearl
street
in
boston,
we've
been
a
property
owner
and
a
business
owner
of
bitty
early's
restaurant
for
25
years,
I'm
in
strong
support
of
the
applicant
at
this
location.
It's
a
really
densely
populated
area
in
the
downtown
area,
and
we
feel
like
multiple
cannabis
businesses
could
would
drive
more
foot
traffic
into
the
area.
Thank
you.
AO
Suzanne
lavoie
85
east
india,
row
executive,
director
of
the
wharf
district
council.
The
council
voted
to
support
this
cannabis
location
and
the
council
speaks
for
the
residential
condominium
associations
and
businesses
surrounding
the
dispensary.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
AL
BY
BY
C
Motion
to
approve,
with
the
usual
proviso
for
this
applicant
only
and
do
we
need
design
review
on
this
jeff.
No,
no
right.
A
And
so
this
applicant
only
is
there
a
second
second
all,
those
in
favor.
B
Thank
you
follow
the
next
case
calling
poa
125
2505
166
to
168
salem
street.
This
is
a
change
of
art
from
eighteen
in
a
residential
and
one
store,
building
to
a
nine
unit,
residential
dwelling
and
extend
living
space
into
the
basement,
construct
new
rear
decks
violation,
article
54,
section
10,
the
fluid
air
ratio
is
excessive.
Article
54,
section
21,
our
street
parking
is
insufficient
name
and
address
for
the
record
boards.
BC
Sure
we
have
an
existing
nine
unit
building.
That's
currently
eight
eight
residential
units
in
one
commercial
unit,
the
commercial
unit
used
to
be
a
club
which
hasn't
been
used
in
some
time.
So
we
are
proposing
to
change
it
from
eight
residential
one
commercial
to
nine
residential.
A
Tell
us
the
square
footage
of
this
proposed
additional
unit
and
whether
or
not
it's
in
the
basement.
BC
It's
94
inches
minus
another.
Sorry,
nine
foot,
four
inches
minus
another
10
inches.
So
it's
going
to
be
right
about
eight
and
a
half
feet.
A
Okay
and
okay,
how
the
plants
miss
better.
AS
D
BE
BC
B
X
Well,
I
got
plugged,
I
never
got
called
for
it.
I'm
sitting
here
said
the
blades,
but
talking
about
clap
street
now
I
guess
it
got
approved
right.
So.
A
AB
A
AR
Really,
no
control
over
that,
but
here
to
speak,
are
you
ready
for
me
this
secretary
read
it
all
into
the
record.
B
AR
Sure
so
this
is
mike
ross,
I'm
here
with
diane
linski
who's,
our
security
consultant.
This
is
50
clap
street
again.
This
might
look
familiar
as
well
to
the
board
in
that
in
2018,
the
board
granted
medical
approval.
That's
a
picture
right
there
of
it
today
medical
approval
for
the
for
the
facility.
We
are
now
here
for
a
use
only
designation
by
the
board
to
allow
for
the
adult
use
component
at
50
clap
street.
AR
AR
AR
AR
There
is
also
a
side
entrance
on
the
way
to
the
back
that
you
can
see
in
the
left
side
of
that
plan,
and
that's
ex.
No,
I'm
sorry
on
the
left
side
of
just
that
plan,
yeah
on
the
right
and
that
door
right.
There
is
an
accessible
door
that
our
security
person
could,
you
know,
could
access
and
go
through
as
well
or
you
could
go
through
the
bottom.
The
bottom
of
the
screen
deliveries
will
be
made
random
at
the
time.
The
proposed
current
hours
of
operation
today
and
going
forward
are
monday
through
saturday.
AR
AR
That
is,
you
know
you
kind
of
walk
around
and
you
get
over
there
from
there
there's.
Also
two
public
restrooms.
As
the
board
might
know,
medical
does
require
restrooms
to
be
on
site,
it's
not
required
for
adult
use,
but
those
will
remain,
as
I
mentioned,
there's
no
actual
changes
to
the
work.
It's
just
that
you
can.
AR
Yep,
there
are
nine
parking
spaces
on
site.
The
site
plan
above
is
actually
a
better
image
right
there
on
the
left.
These
are
nine
parking
spaces
that
are
available
to
our
customer
top
customers.
Clap
street
also
has
currently
undesignated
parking
along
clap
street.
We
have
a
commitment
for
none
of
our
employees
to
park
in
any
of
the
parking
spaces
on
site
or
on
even
clap
street
itself,
and
we
incent
our
employees
to
use
public
transit
to
get
to
get
there.
AR
A
Are
you
finding
that
you're
weak?
Is
there
a
difference
between
your
weekend
and
your
weekday
visits.
AR
That's
a
great
question:
I
I
do
have
members
of
the
team
who
could
answer
that
in
terms
of
what
they're
seeing
I
don't
know,
if
either
joseph
could
raise
his
hand
or
if
david
could
raise
his
hand,
they
can
answer
that
question
for
you.
I
think
the
busiest
days
are
friday.
Madam
chair,
there
is
activity
on
the
weekend,
but
you
know
it's
spread
out
throughout
the
course
of
the
day.
So
it's
really
not
at
any
one
at
any
one
time,
friday,
friday
after
work,
it's
probably
the
busiest
for
the
facility.
A
K
K
AR
Yeah
yeah,
the
the
ada
site
is
that
number
one
on
the
plan
there
and
it's
closest.
As
I
mentioned,
the
actual
entrance
is
at
the
rear
of
the
building,
so
it
is
the
closest
to
the
to.
AR
A
AN
AN
AN
Including
a
robust
community
benefits
package
and
the
bcb,
the
boss,
candice
board,
voted
in
january
of
this
year
to
grant
the
petition
for
the
addition
of
recreational
cannabis
sales
and
our
office
has
received
letters
of
support.
At
this
time,
we
would
like
to
defer
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
AY
Hi
travis
stewart,
eight
st
margaret
street
dorchester,
I'm
part
of
the
mccormick
civic
association,
the
john
john
w
mccormick
civic
association
and
the
neighbor
they've
been
a
great.
A
great
neighbor
and
they've
lived
up
to
everything.
They've
said
they
would
do
in
our
when
we
approve
them
at
the
association
for
medical,
so
we
are
in
a
support
of
them
doing
the
recreation.
BW
A
A
AO
D
N
F
P
B
A
Thank
you:
are
these
temporary
technical
difficulties?
In
other
words,
do
we
need
to
defer
all
the
other
campuses
to
the
next.
A
A
C
Right
call
in
case
boa
one:
two:
four:
nine
zero:
two
four
eight
norton
street
there's
a
companion
case,
boa
one
three,
one:
nine
six,
eight
one:
ten
norton
street
for
8
norton
street
violations;
article
65
section
2
conformity
with
an
existing
building
alignment;
modal,
not
provided
to
verify
compliance;
article
65,
section,
41,
off-street
parking
requirements;
article
65,
section,
9,
lottery;
lottery
ratio;
insufficient
article
65,
section,
9
law
with
insufficient
article;
65,
section;
9;
lot;
frontage,
insufficient
article
65,
section,
9,
floriary
rate,
floor
area
ratio;
excessive
article
65,
section,
9,
building
height,
excessive
in
stories;
article
65,
section,
9,
side
yard
insufficient
and
for
10
norton
street
article
65,
section
41,
our
street
parking
requirements.
BA
Good
afternoon,
madam
chair
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
george
marantzy,
I'm
an
attorney
with
the
business
address,
350
west
broadway
in
south
boston,
madam
chair
members,
the
property
owner
here
is
sullivan
echols
who
lives
in
unit
one
at
10,
norton
street
and
owns
the
lot
at
eight
norton
street.
I
was
retained
by
mr
eccles
agent
and
contractor
for
the
purposes
of
today's
hearing.
BA
The
I'd
like.
BA
BA
Sure
I'd
like
to
start
with
10
norton
street
because,
as
I
say,
this
went
through
community
process.
I
wasn't
participating
in
that
so
that
the
current
plans
do
show
an
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement
which
has
proposed
would
include
a
bedroom.
I've
explained
the
board's
position
with
respect
to
basement
living
space,
and
my
client
understands
what
that
means
in
terms
of
a
possible
board
proviso.
Should
this
be
approved.
BA
The
unit
in
question
is
the
owner's
unit,
but
again
there
is
basement
living
space
as
opposed
including
a
bedroom.
The
two
zoning
violations
attend
norton
street
owe
simply
to
the
shared
driveway
and
the
dimensions
of
the
three
parking
spaces
proposed
in
the
rear,
which
are
seven
feet
by
18
feet
again:
they're
in
the
in
the
in
the
rear
yard.
Behind
the
building,
a
new
three-story
three-family
building
is
being
proposed
for
eight
norton
street.
BA
BA
BA
But
I
think
that
that
proposed
side
entry
would
need
to
be
eliminated
owing
to
its
impingement
on
the
shared
driveway.
Otherwise,
the
driveway
width
would
be
just
over
12
feet.
There's
an
existing
curb
cut.
That
is
somewhat
oversized.
That
would
be
relocated
to
a
standard
wood,
with
curb
cut,
serving
both
properties
with
that
I'll
pause
and
take
any
questions
that
members
may
have.
A
BA
That
I'm
not
certain
madam
chair,
I'm
looking
at
the
plans.
As
I
said
when
I,
when
I
did
review
the
plans,
it
was
my
assumption
that
the
board
would
certainly
strike
any
proposed
bedroom
and
there
would
be
no
building
code
relief
granted.
Of
course,
if
any
of
the
proposed
living
space
down
there
were
to
were
to
survive,
should
the
building
be
approved.
K
Madam
chair
there's
there,
the
rear
elevation
doesn't
really
show
the
access
to
the
basement
door.
It
only
shows
the
first
floor.
A
Got
it
is
any
questions
from
the
board.
U
Wait
so
miss
miss.
Are
there
there's
two
means
of
access
egress
in
the
basement.
K
Yeah
so
there's
one
going
to
the
first
floor
on
the
interior,
stair
and
then
there's
one
supposedly
leading
out,
but
what
you
just
saw
in
the
rear
elevation.
It
doesn't
show
it's
almost.
It
must
be
like
excavated,
but
it's
not
showing
on
this
rear
elevation.
A
AI
Good
afternoon
member
chairs
and
members
of
the
board
denise
de
santos
from
the
mayor's
office
of
neighborhood
services,
I
would
like
to
put
on
record
that
the
applicant
has
met
with
the
association
a
few
different
times
and
met
with
the
butters
back
in
october
of
last
year.
The
community
anna
butters
did
support
this
proposal.
The
community
did
want
to
see
more
ownership
in
the
neighborhood.
At
this
time,
our
office
would
like
to
defer
any
judgment
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
B
Secretary
here
looks
like
we're
back.
Thank
you,
mr
rogerio,
for
stepping
in
we
do
have
those
letters.
The
mayor's
office
spoke
up.
A
Okay,
mr
master,
does
nobody
else?
May
I
have
a
potion
on
eight
norton,
please.
A
N
A
BA
BA
If
I
may,
on
10
norton
street,
it's
actually
two
purposes
to
the
actually
sort
of
three
more
than
one
purpose
to
the
to
the
application.
Shared
driveway
is
part
of
that
application.
The
parking
in
the
rear
is
part
of
that
application
and
the
confirmation
of
of
three
family
occupancy
as.
A
Sorry
for
10
norton,
so
I
think
the
so
the
so
okay
so
for
10,
morton,
sorry
10.
U
Madam
chair
can
I
can
I
would
withdraw
the
motion
I
made
and
make
a
new
motion
which
is
for
approval
for
the
for
the
application,
but
a
denial
on
the
extension
of
living
space
into
the
basement.
A
Okay
got
it.
Is
there
a
second.
C
B
Following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
one
two
one:
two:
seven:
five:
zero
seven
fifty
high
park
avenue
this
is
a
razor
roof,
ten
feet
installing
underground
sewer,
demo
and
interior.
This
is
the
change
of
arc
from
a
repair
shop
and
tow
lot
to
a
car,
wash
the
violations.
Article
67
section,
8
use
and
regulations
conditional,
article,
67,
section,
9,
insufficient
side
guard
setback.
B
H
B
Yep
hold
on
following
the
next
case,
calling
voa
126
1958-59
dunboy
straight.
This
is
an
extension
of
living
space,
the
renovation
of
a
two
family.
In
addition,
an
extended
living
space
into
the
attic
violation,
article
9
section,
1,
extension
of
non-conforming
use
and
article
51,
section,
9,
insufficient
side,
judge,
setback,
name
and
address
for
the
record.
Please.
P
P
Good
afternoon,
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
andrew
faulkenstein,
I'm
a
registered
architect
with
a
business
address
at
seven
kent
street
in
brookline
massachusetts.
We
are
here
today
to
request
relief
on
two
items:
number
one
extension
of
a
non-conforming
use
and
number
two
insufficient
side
yard
setback.
P
A
Let's
backtrack
for
a
minute,
what's
the
zoning
district
that
this
is
in
this.
A
P
P
Yes,
this
attic
air,
if
you
right
there,
if
you,
if
you
zoom
in
that's
the
area
right
there
on
that
sheet,
this,
as
you
can
see,
is
the
rear
section
of
the
house.
It's
actually
the
rear,
23
and
a
half
feet
of
the
house,
and
it
stepped
back
27
feet
from
the
from
the
front
from
the
front
gable
elevation.
P
A
And
so
this
unit
would
be,
the
sec
would
be
a
three
bedroom
unit,
all
together.
Okay,
how
are
the
plants
miss
better
and
I'm
sure
the
plans
are
adequate.
Any
questions
from
the
board.
AS
AS
The
applicant
worked
to
reduce
that
number
of
parking
spaces
in
the
rear
down
to
three.
I
believe
also
agreed
to
work
with
neighbors
on
screening
and
buffering
that
was
amenable
to
them
and
proposed
putting
in
a
french
ditch
to
prevent
any
water
runoff
from
impacting
neighbors
in
the
rear.
They
went
on
to
the
brighton,
austin
improvement
association,
which
gave
their
support
the
bai
wanted
to
request
a
bpda
design
review
and
we've
not
heard
from
neighbors
since
those
conversations.
AS
E
Yes,
madam
chair,
we
did
hold
on
just
a
second.
This
went
to
thursday
night.
So
let
me
just
pull
up
my
records
here.
E
I
believe
it
was
approval
with
design
review,
but
don't
hold
me
to
I'm
almost
positive.
It
was
okay
hold
on
just
a
second,
please.
E
Because
I
think
we
were
concerned
with
the
the
ridgeline.
A
Okay,
given
that
information,
it
sounds
like
it's.
The
the
concern
is
the
ridgeline,
the
screening
and
buffering,
and
that
the
parking
lot
be
there
might
there
must
be
some
pervious
materials
used
to
prevent
flooding.
Does
that
seem
to
cover
everything.
K
K
BD
A
Any
opposed
motion
carries:
let's
go
please,
mr
fortune
back
to
hyde
park.
Yep.
B
BE
A
Sorry
you'll
be
a
better.
Are
you
the
applicant.
B
B
You
have
case:
voa,
129,
5864,
6r,
ericsson,
the
companion
cases,
eight
r
case,
boa
one:
two,
nine
five,
eight
six,
seven
eighteen
r,
erickson
and
boa
one:
two,
nine
five,
eight
seven
zero
twenty
r
erickson
at
the
hearing
on
this
matter.
The
applicant
satisfied
the
board
that
it
had
met
the
requirements
to
receive
the
necessary
zoning
relief
for
this
project.
However,
the
board
felt
the
public
benefit
from
further
information.
B
The
applicants
turned
its
plans
to
public
access
amenities
at
the
waterfront,
as
well
as
further
information
about
parking
and
transportation
on
the
site
to
satisfy
the
provisional
included
when
the
board
rendered
its
decision.
The
applicant
is
returning
to
the
board
solely
to
rep
to
present
this
additional
information
to
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
learn
more
about
the
project.
CA
CA
We
submitted
a
letter
and
keyed
to
that
letter
are
several
slides,
so
I'll
I'll
go
to
those
maybe
go
to
the
first
exhibit
please.
CA
Yes,
thank
you,
this
one's
quite
dry,
but
this
is
about
the
transportation
and
the
trip
generation
just
to
get
you
to
get
the
board
oriented
on
the
order
of
magnitude.
In
the
weekday
worst
case
scenario
am
peak
you're,
looking
at
about
76
vehicles
in
and
out
and
in
the
pm
88.
What's
driving,
that
are
to
remind
you,
120
rental,
residential
units,
a
small
local
retailer,
3
600
square
feet
and
then
there's
about
36
000
square
feet
of
office,
and
much
of
that
is
community
space.
CA
But
in
the
course
of
the
last
five
years,
we've
already
made
many
commitments
and
we
already
know
what's
going
to
go
into
that
agreement
and
I'll
summarize
them,
as
I
did
in
the
letter.
CA
In
addition,
we're
obligated
to
pilot
a
shuttle
service,
I
think
we
mentioned
that.
I
mentioned
that
in
march,
shuttle
service
is
going
to
run
for
at
least
a
year
in
order
to
collect
sufficient
data
on
demand
in
the
neighborhood,
not
just
our
project,
but
in
the
neighborhood,
and
that's
going
to
run
weekdays
both
morning
and
evening,
and
the
idea
is
to
go
to
the
jfk
umass
red
line
station.
CA
CA
Yes,
ma'am
peak
hours,
okay
hours
morning
and
evening
on
weekdays
peak
hours,
another
important
requirement
is
there's
going
to
have
to
be
improvements
to
six
intersections.
CA
You
can
see
three
of
them
on
the
screen
here
so
along
ericsson
street,
at
the
intersections,
with
lolli
port,
norfolk
and
walnut,
and
then
off
the
screen
where
they
hit.
I
believe
it's
water
street,
so
in.
BG
CA
Intersections
the
developer
is
going
to
have
to
put
in
stopper
yield
control
signage
as
needed,
make
sure
all
the
crosswalks
are
re-striped
handicapped
ramps,
and
there
may
be
areas
where
the
sidelines
can
be
improved
so
with
city
approval
and
input
from
the
neighborhood
that
may
change
the
parking,
get
some
cars
away
from
the
approaches,
but
that's
not
been
determined
yet
that's
another
responsibility.
CA
CA
So
we're
going
to
have
to
scope
that
with
staff
collect
data,
take
input
from
the
neighborhoods,
so
there
will
be
neighborhood
outreach,
and
the
purpose
of
the
slow
street
study
is
to
see
whether
there
are
additional
improvements
that
can
be
made.
For
example,
lolly
and
walnut
are
two-way.
Right
now
are
expected
to
continue
to
be
two-way.
A
CA
A
CA
CA
I
don't
need
to
go
over
all
of
that,
but
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
25
of
all
the
parking
spaces,
and
there
are
115
indoor
spaces
will
be
electric
vehicle
charging
and
then
the
rest
of
them
have
to
be
ev
ready
if
it
in
the
future,
there's
sufficient
demand.
CA
Okay,
now
I
can
stay
on
this
slide
and
warranty.
We
can
talk
about
the
open
space.
The
site
itself
is
outlined
in
purple.
The
the.
What
shows
up
as
a
yellow
line
is
the
historic
shoreline,
so
about
half
of
the
site
actually
is
historic,
upland
and
so
is
not
subject
to
chapter
91..
CA
So
as
the
as
the
board
asked
last
time,
is
the
open
space
going
to
be
limited
to
harbor,
walk
along
the
perimeter
and
what's
important
is
to
note
that
the
open
space
is
going
to
be
much
more
than
that
you'll
see
in
the
cross,
hatch
in
white?
CA
That's
the
water
dependent
used
zone
that
is
regulated
by
state
law,
and
that
is
where
harbor
walk
is
going,
but
the
purpose
of
focusing
you
on
this
purple
area
is
to
show
that
the
open
space
that
will
be
required
for
the
project
is
the
entire
site,
not
just
the
perimeter
along
water.
If
we
go
to
the
next
slides,
please.
CA
Yes,
so
the
yellow
line
there
was
this
essentially
the
center
of
the
site,
where
buildings,
b
and
c
are
shown
here,
buildings,
a
b
and
c
that
is
historic
upland.
That
was
not
it's
always
been
dry
land,
so
it
is
not
subject
to
chapter
91.
However,
in
order
to
get
into
the
site,
the
public
will
have
the
access
along
that,
what's
at
the
bottom
of
this
slide
the
easterly
side
towards
the
national
restaurant
and
then
we'll
be
able
to
enter
the
site.
This
color-coded
one
is
helpful
too.
CA
To
give
you
the
sort
of
activity
areas,
the
pink
that
you
see
is
the
entry,
so
there'll
be
a
dedicated
pedestrian
path.
Coming
lined
up
right
with
port
norfolk
open
to
the
public.
At
all
times
there
are
no
gates
and
also
cars
will
enter
in
that
pink
entry.
Then
the
cars,
if
they
wish,
can
turn
left
into
you
see
a
red
area
called
community
wharf
I'll
get
back
to
the
minute.
CA
The
arrival
plaza
is
really
the
area
where
the
cars
can
have
drop
off
and
there
will
be
10
visitor
spaces
there
again
open
to
the
public,
and
then
they
could
also
enter.
If
they're,
if
they're
residents
or
office
users
there's
a
parking
garage
within
building
a
and
a
small
one
within
building
c,
so
that's
where
the
arrival
plaza
distributes
the
cars,
the
green
area.
CA
Again,
that
is
chapter
91
jurisdiction,
that
is
the
water
dependent
use
area,
and
most
of
that
is
greened
up,
but
it
has
to
be
carefully
designed
in
order
to
deal
with
sea
level
rise,
be
salt,
water
tolerance.
So
on.
Finally,
let's
talk
about
the
two
wars,
the
working
wharf,
as
we
call
it
is
what
leads
to
the
marina
so
most
of
the
people
accessing
that
will
be
folks
that
are
members
of
the
marina.
There
are
75
slips.
There
will
be
some
transient
tie-ups
for
members
of
the
public.
CA
I
don't
think
it's
been
pinned
down
how
many
that
will
be
subject
to
the
chapter.
91
license
so
remember,
some
members
of
the
public
would
go
on
the
working
work,
the
community
worth
area.
That
is
meant
to
be
open
all
the
time
to
all
of
the
general
public
voters
or
not
so,
for
example,
it
lines
up
with
that
pink
area,
the
entry
experience
and
the
fort
norfolk
street.
So
people
simply
can
just
walk
out
and
enjoy
being
on
the
deposit
river.
CA
There
will
be
some
programming,
as
described
in
the
in
the
letter
in
the
community
wharf
area,
on
the
land
side,
the
more
rectangular
area,
but
that's
that
will
have
to
be
worked
out
through
community
meetings.
The
idea
is
to
have
activities
that
neighborhood
residents
and
other
bostonians
are
interested
in
their
their
analogs
for
this
in
downtown
boston,
I'm
thinking,
for
example,
at
the
intercontinental
hotel
and
that
that
will
be
subject
to
chapter
91
of
jurisdiction.
A
I
I
will
just
I
will
just
put
on
the
record
only
because
I
happen
to
know
that
there
are
issues
and
intercontinental
may
not
be
the
best
example.
So
I
would
suggest
that
you
know
there
must
be
a
way
of
you
guys,
and
I
want
to
put
this
on
the
record
for.
BM
A
Sure
that
this
wharf
is
accessible
to
people
at
all
different
levels
of
income,
so
that
it
doesn't
end
up
being
so
that
this
there's
a
true
equity
component
to
this
access.
Somebody
could
possibly
come
down
from
the
naponzit.
I
don't
know
you
know
and
paddle
up
or
or
something
like
that.
So
it's
not
so
it
is
purely
accessible
to
boston
residents.
CA
I
understood
that
chair.
Yes,
one
advantage
we
have
here,
there
was
at
one
time
a
hotel
component
that
was
proposed
as
part
of
this
project
five
years
ago.
There
isn't
any
more,
I
say,
that's
an
advantage,
because
what
happened
with
the
intercontinental
hotel
is
management.
There
were
making
some
members
of
the
public
feel
that
they
had
to
be
hotel
guests
in
order
to
use
the
public
space,
and
we
happily
don't
have
that
conflict
here.
CA
So
I
understand
exactly
what
you're
talking
about
if
we
could
go
forward,
I
want
to
take
through
some
more
slides.
I
don't
want
to.
This
is
a
helpful
one
to
show
you
areas
that
are
green
versus,
not
green.
CA
Most
of
the
site
today
is
is
impervious
it's
basically
black
top
you're
covered
with
with
boat
sheds,
so
we'll
we
will
be
able
to
improve
that
quite
a
bit.
As
I
said
earlier,
most
of
the
green
space
is
on
the
northwesterly
corner
at
the
top
of
your
screen,
and
that's
where
the
harbor
walk
snakes
through,
as
you
can
see
next
slide,.
CA
Please
this
is
the
public
entry,
I'm
talking
about
so
you're,
looking
directly
north
due
north
from
port
norfolk
street
into
the
site.
That's
the
existing
condition.
Keep
going
the
key
here
in
dealing
with
public
access.
Is
you
have
to
have
visual
cues
so
that
the
public
knows
they're
welcome,
so
it
may
seem
like
a
minor
thing,
but
by
by
actually
painting
crosswalks
and
and
the
way
you
design
the
vegetation,
and
it
will
be
way
finding
that's
how
the
public
knows.
They're
welcome,
they're
not
shut
out,
I
mentioned
before
there
are
no
gates.
CA
This
shows
the
vegetation
and
it's
trying
to
show
how
we're
accommodating
multiple
paths
so
another
way
to
discourage
pedestrians
is
not
that
sideways.
So
there
is
a
pedestrian
zone,
as
it's
called
here.
That's
been
accounted
for
to
make
sure
it's
not
just
cars,
we
need
it
out.
If
we
could.
Please
continue.
CA
So
this
is
showing
you
what
I
have
called
the
pink
area
so
now
we're
along
the
edge
of
the
site
itself.
Buildings
b
and
c
are
shown
on
the
left
there
with
the
peaked
roofs.
You
see,
the
pedestrian
path
has
vegetation
on
either
side
of
it,
so
that
you
don't
have
to
mix
with
the
cars
the
the
stanchions
that
you
see
with
the
chain
on
it,
that's
a
property
line
that
goes
to
the
venezia
and
as
I,
as
I
think,
we've
mentioned.
CA
We
have
easement
agreements
with
that
owner
and
this
will
all
be
done
in
cooperation
with
them.
Of
course,
if
we
continue.
CA
Future
slides,
let's
see
okay,
now
we're
in
the
site.
This
is
the
retail
area.
Although
the
venezia
is
a
long-standing
public
accommodation,
there
isn't
any
retail
today.
So
there
is
this
3600
square
feet.
I
know
it's
not
a
lot
of
square
footage,
but
that
is
another
way
to
welcome
people
in
so
that
there's
a
destination
when
they
they
walk
in
that
entry
area.
CA
You
know,
obviously
it's
not
been
programmed
yet
what
the
retail
tenant
would
be
most
likely
would.
It
would
be
something
with
beverage
service
so
that
people
are
spending
time
in
this
open
space
they
can
at
least
get
a
soda
or
a
bottle
of
water
and
so
on.
But
the
point
is
it's
not
just
something
an
amenity
for
the
residents
alone.
It
will
be
open
to
the
general
public.
That's
an
important
part
of
our
program.
CA
CA
And
so
this
is
what
we
were,
calling
the
arrival
report
so
now
you're
looking
vaguely
westerly
towards
building
building
a
the
big
mixed
use
building.
So
it's
between
buildings,
b
and
c.
The
trick
here
is
again
with
limited
width.
We
don't
want
a
big
boulevard
and
it's
private
property,
but
that
is
open
to
the
public.
CA
And
that's
along
that,
where
you
see
that
white
car
going
is
to
the
parking
garages,
but
again
there
will
be
10
public
spaces
and
it's
not
chapter
91
jurisdiction,
but
I
can
tell
you
that
they
are
very
interested
in
visitor
parking
as
well.
So
it's
likely
to
be
regulated
not
just
by
the
city
of
boston,
but
also
by
chapter
91
regulators
to
make
sure
there
are
reasonable
hours
that
these
spaces
are
not
privatized.
L
Sure
this
is
kind
of
you
are
rudy
architects.
The
bike
path
would
be
actually
there
would
be
a
a
different
path
for
bikes
that
are
shown
in
a
different
slide.
L
That
would
would
likely
go
out
on
a
wider
path
so
that
we
could
have
bikes
and
vehicles
and
pedestrians
a
different
path.
So
the
big
blue
line
here
is
a
is
a
pathway
that
building
c
in
that.
That
previous
view
showed
that
the
bike
room
for
that
building
would
end
there,
but
to
sort
of
bike
around
that,
it
would
be
on
this
blue
path,
which
is
a
much
wider
accommodation
for
pedestrians
and
bicyclists.
CA
So
to
answer
the
question:
if
you
go
back
to
the
previous
rendering,
the
bike
path
is
not
actually
shown,
the
the
bike
path
is
on
the
outside
the
water
side
of
building
c
to
the
right.
It's
it's.
They
could,
of
course,
walk
their
bikes
on
the
sidewalk,
but
there's
not
a
dedicated
bike
path
in
this
image.
CA
CA
So
if
you
look
to
the
right
hand,
corner
lower
right
hand,
corner
you'll,
see
a
red
triangle,
that's
showing
the
view
that
this
depicts.
Obviously
this
is
a
view
from
the
sky,
but
it's
to
show
this
area.
Those
are
planters
and
the
idea
is
that
the
planters
are
removable.
So
we,
I
guess.
CA
It
flex
space
we'd
like
it,
it
could
be
greener
than
this.
This
is
something
that
would
be
worked
out
in
design
review,
but
it's
the
space
between
the
boathouse
and
building
a
the
mixed
use.
A
building
and
the
idea
is
there
may
be
times
where
the
marina
needs
additional
parking,
and
so
maybe
you
would
remove
some
of
those
planters.
CA
There
may
be
times
where
more
visitors,
maybe
there's
an
event
at
that
community
wharf
that
we're
talking
about
programming
and
you
would
need
to
optimize
parking.
But
the
idea
is
that
you
can
put
the
planters
on
and
off
and
this
paid
these
pavers
are
not
necessarily
where
it's
going
to
end
up.
We
could
do
more
like
pervious
pavement,
where
it's
greener,
so.
CA
Not
all
of
it
now
there
is
a
later
slide
where
we
show
the
different
materials.
Madam
chair,
okay,
if
we
could
go
forward,
please.
CA
This
is
a
view
out,
so
the
water
just
turning
to
the
east,
so
just
just
to
show
you
what
it
would
feel
like
for
the
public
again,
no
gates,
it's
meant
to
be
inviting
people
can
can
walk
through
the
entire
site.
Please
go
forward.
CA
CA
CA
L
Ahead
also,
when
would
add
you
know
some
of
these
questions,
we
will
make
make
it
clear
that
we
we
met
with
the
boston,
civic
design,
commission
five
times
over
the
course
of
the
development,
the
most
recent
or
latest
meetings
with
them.
This
pathway
was
increased
so
that
the
feeling
of
its
width
was
memorable
so
that
you
know
that
you
can.
You
can
always
come
here,
and
this
is
a
safe
path.
L
We've
been
trying
to
sort
of
strike
this
balance
between
natural
environment,
and
there
are
a
lot
of
comments
regarding
the
plantings
with
our
landscape,
architects,
on
our
team
and
the
landscape.
Architects
on
this
design,
commission
and
part
of
this
is
also
a
restored
salt
marsh
again
to
create
more
of
a
softer,
edge
and
mix
the
kinds
of
developments
that
have
occurred
on
this
over
time,
and
this,
this
message
of
openness
is
something
we
actually
are
not
going
to
have
a
sign
on
the
on
the
building
like
this.
L
But
it's
it's
really
meant
to
be
a
a
space
that
everyone
can
see
even
from
93.
This.
This
view
right
here
will
be
very
visible
to
people
coming
in,
and
this
this
pathway
is
meant
to
accommodate
people
as
well
as
be
a
natural
environment.
A
L
I
I'm
not
sure
exactly
about
the
term
wetland
restoration,
that
salt
marsh
restoration
is
the
more
specific
term
that
our
civil
engineering
landscape
architects
have
been
using.
I
don't
quite
know
the
difference
on
that,
obviously
with
salt
marsh,
it's
more
tidal
environment,
but
this
is
a
zone
and
obviously
boston
is
very
exposed
to
the
tides.
So
the
idea
that
this
will
look
different
at
different
times
of
the
tides
is
something
of
a
design
feature,
as
well
as
an
actual
softening
element
here
for
a
wave
action,
etc.
CA
This
is
showing
the
seating
areas
and,
and
so
on,
at
that
at
the
at
the
edge
we
can
keep
going
running
short
on
time.
CA
This
is
a
view
from
the
community
wharf.
Looking
back
at
the
buildings
next
slide,
please.
CA
CA
CA
CA
More
images
showing
exemplars
of
what
will
be
proposed
and
there's
still
a
lot
more
review
that
has
to
be
done:
conservation,
commission,
chapter,
91,
etc,
etc.
Next
slide,
please.
CA
This
is,
we
thought,
an
important
view
because
it
it's
it's
from
tenian
beach,
essentially
to
show
that's
already
a
public
area.
What
the
public
will
see.
Again,
it's
not
meant
to
be
a
forbidding
view.
It's
meant
to
be
an
inviting
view.
People
could
be
curious
about
it.
Turn
the
corner
come
into
port
norfolk
and
visit
next
slide.
Please.
CA
Now
this
was
an
important
question
by
the
board
about
how
the
parking
is
going
to
work.
So
if
we
could
linger
on
this
one
just
a
little
bit
so
the
main
paths
of
travel
of
the
vehicles
are
shown
in
red
and
we
talked
about
that
entry
area
where
there
will
be
visitor
parking.
CA
But
in
the
summer
time
the
boathouse
can
empty
out
that's
the
top
right-hand
building
and
that
there's
additional
parking
possible
in
the
boathouse,
because
there
aren't
boats
in
there.
So
that's
going
to
open
things
up
where
marina
patrons
can
park
in
the
building,
and
that
opens
up
more
of
the
surface
parking
for
the
public.
So.
A
Let
me
just
ask
you
a
question
say
I
was
a
canoeist.
Yes,
just
stay,
I'm
not,
but.
X
A
L
I
think
you
would
have
two
options.
You
would
have
two
options:
either
the
public
here
or
the
commercial
pier
or
the
working
wharf,
as
we
call
it
as
a
as
an
occasional
kayaker.
L
I
think
the
you
you
sort
of
like
know
that,
where
you
can
go,
you
would
probably
be
more
aligned
to
the
public
here,
which
would
be
away
from
some
of
the
larger
boats
and
the
faster
moving
power
boats
right
there,
so
that
that
public
fear,
which
is
an
extension
of
fort
norfolk
street,
would
allow
for
that.
CA
That
would
be
the
logical
place
to
put
in,
but
to
answer
the
question
say
you
have
a
canoe,
you
know
tie
to
the
roof
of
your
car.
I'd,
say:
they're
they're,
two
options:
if
you're
by
yourself,
you
would
make
that
left-hand
turn
and
park
in
the
yellow
area,
marked
with
six
visitor
parking
spaces
and
have
to
carry
your
canoe
to
the
to
that
pier
to
the
right,
the
other.
If
you
have
someone
with
you,
those
are
drop-off
areas
further
in
in
between
the
two
yellow
areas,
so-called
arrival
court.
CA
CA
The
community
room
we're
working
on
on
the
programming,
but
that's
not
something
that
we
can
do
unilaterally.
There
need
to
be
community
meetings
on
that,
because
it's
a
community
room
so,
for
example,
as
detailed
in
the
letter,
we
have
an
idea
that
there
is
a
need
during
heat
waves
for
cooling
centers.
CA
This
came
up
during
review.
The
boston
centers
for
youth
and
families
has
a
shortage
of
these
cooling
centers,
where
people
who
don't
have
air
conditioning
in
their
home
can
essentially
take
shelter.
That's
something
we
want
to
explore
here,
because
the
nearest
one
is
over
three
miles
away,
but
that
needs
to
be
talked
over
with
the
with
the
immediate
neighborhood.
So
it's
an
idea:
it's
not
something
unilaterally.
We
would
do
next.
CA
Yes,
if
I
think,
if
you
go
forward,
we'll
be
able
to
find
a
drawing
that
yes
here,
we
go.
It's
the
building
to
the
largest
building
to
the
top
left
in
building
a
the
community
room
is
a
building
a
and
next
to
the
resilient
landscape.
Where's
the
engine.
L
Well,
yes,
and
the
this-
maybe
not
the
best
slide,
but
really
that
that
sort
of
rectangular
space
is
above
the
sort
of,
I
guess,
the
parking
spaces.
L
Let's
say
30
office
spaces
you
could
get
to
that
by
this
lobby,
which
is
open
but
but
what's
more,
probably
drawing
people
to
that
space
is
the
fact
that
there's
a
landscape
deck
wrapping
that
that
entire
space,
so
it
will
appear
as
a
space
that
you
would
want
to
be
in
and
you
would
be
sort
of
drawn
to
it
through
that
residential
lobby
and
which.
F
K
Keep
going
it's
in
building
a
correct,
yeah.
L
Yeah
here
this
one,
that's
the
landscape,
deck
building
a
from
afar
or
from
above,
would
appear
to
be
broken
up
into
two
forms
so
that
the
podium
supports
two
buildings
and
structures
above
it.
So
the
rectangular
building,
which
is
more
kind
of
industrial
and
more
dwarf
language,
would
have
that
completely
open
second
floor
for
these
community
uses,
including
the
landscape
deck
and
the
arrival
plaza,
really
kind
of
connects
all
the
public
spaces,
including
the
the
lobby,
an
elevator
floor,
which
is
epic
foreigner
and
sort
of.
L
I
guess,
gives
you
that
vision
of
how
you
get
up
to
that
that
second
floor
space
so.
CA
AZ
L
And
this
this
project
has
changed
in
its
course
of
of
the
development
and
obviously
eliminating
the
hotel
use
rise
together.
Their
offices
are
their
construction
development
firm
based
in
this
in
this
neighborhood.
They
would
be
occupying
that
building.
So
it's
really
a
mixing
place
for
some
of
that
commercial
space
which
an
office
space
which
we
feel
is
is
a
more
I
guess,
sort
of
day-to-day
place
where
people
would
feel
like
they
can
come
and
occupy
and
use
that
space
in
that
gallery
and
community
space.
So.
K
CA
Yes,
yes,
it
is,
it
is,
it's
stated
as
36
000
for
purposes
of
zoning
and
trip
generation,
but
yeah,
but
you're
absolutely
right.
CA
Well,
I
I
didn't.
I
was
just
speaking
to
the
boston
zoning
code.
I
you
I
I
defer
to
you
on
the
occupancy.
I
didn't
analyze
it
for
state
building
code,
but
you're
right.
It's
probably
different.
K
My
my
only
my
only
concern
is
if
this
is
to
be
a
resource
for
the
community,
it
might
be
missed
by
the
community,
because
it's
so
internal
and
also
might
be
used
by
the
office
by
the
office.
Tenants
that
that
would
be
my
feedback
like
it.
It
doesn't
feel
like
it's
for
the
community
in
terms
of
its
publicness.
CA
Well,
the
there
will
be
a
cooperation
agreement
again,
it's
not
going
to
be
subject
to
chapter
91
jurisdiction,
so
won't
be
part
of
that
license,
because
the
footprint
of
the
building
is
on
historic
upland,
but
the
cooperation
agreement
with
the
city's
bra.
CA
K
CA
Right
well:
okay,.
A
Recommendations,
yeah
and
part
of
it
is
going
to
also
depend
on
your
programming,
because
you
know
there's
some
some
models
out
there,
where
programming
really
does
attract
the
activity
that
one
would
want
in
these
community
spaces.
CA
I
I
we're
we're
essentially
finished.
We
can
flip
through
the
rest
of
the
slides,
but
I
think
we
we're
we're
complete.
L
And
that
community
space
you
know,
and
some
of
the
needs
are
these
workspaces,
where
multiple
people
can
come,
and
so
I
think
that
its
proximity
to
office
space
is
a
way
of
again
sort
of
mixing
the
those
uses
that
this
community
and
the
future
community
will.
BN
Will
utilize
yeah
and
madam
chair,
if
I
may,
you
know,
rise,
wants
to
occupy
this
office
building.
We
want
to
be
here
we're
currently
in
the
community
and
want
to
stay
in
the
community
and
we'll
be
operating
and
managing
this
community
space
as
well.
So
we
plan
to
make
sure
that
this
is
open
for
the
community
to
use.
We
will,
more
than
likely
be
working
through
the
cooperation
agreement
on
how
things
are
scheduled
in
this
space,
how
people
have
access
to
it
advertisement
things
of
that
nature.
A
Excellent,
any
other
questions
from
the
board
or
any
other
thoughts
from
the.
K
Board,
if,
if
you
can
tell,
I
have
one
last
question,
which
is
in
terms
of
your
total
gross
square
footage.
CA
It's
the
grand
total
of
gross
area
is
about
203
000
square
feet
to
round
the
multi-family
dwelling,
which
is
the
120
units,
is
about
109
000..
We
already
spoke
about
the
general
office.
The
retail
is
only
3
600
3
600.
22
000
is
so-called
waterfront
service.
That's
what
you
have
to
qualify
the
boat.
The
boathouse
has.
CA
The
parking
garage
is
also
counted
because
it's
a
shared
parking
garage
and
that
area
is
31.
000.
K
K
Yes,
three
thousand
two
hundred
thousand
plus
of
square
footage
for
residential.
I
I
this
this
the
project
in
terms
of
the
aesthetics.
It's
it's
great,
it
wants
to
be
a
neighborhood.
It
wants
to
be
a
community
resource,
so
I'm
just
kind
of
commenting
on
anchor
programs
that
can
support
your
project.
It
can
be
enhanced.
I
understood.
BN
K
A
Okay,
well,
thank
you
so
much
for
your
presentation
and
thank
you
thank
you
for
members
of
the
public
who
are
still
watching
this.
Thank
you
for
your
interest,
because
I
do
think
that
this
gives
us,
as
the
board,
a
clearer
picture
on
how
how
this,
how
the
construction
works
with
the
open
space
and
the
soft
edges
and
makes
the
project
more
welcoming
to
the
community.