►
From YouTube: Bothell Planning Commission Meeting - February 15, 2023
Description
0:04:00 - Public Comments
0:08:15 - Approval of Minutes
0:09:05 - New Business
0:09:55 - Study Session: Downtown Transition Affordable Housing Overlay (DTAHO) – postponed to a later date
0:12:15 - Study Session: Introduction to the 2024 Imagine Bothell... Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update
0:59:30 - Unfinished Business
0:59:45 - Reports from Staff
1:01:35 - Reports from Members
1:01:55 - Items to Report to Council
A
A
Welcome
everyone
I
call
the
February
15th
Planning
Commission
meeting
to
order.
The
main
purpose
of
tonight's
meeting
is
a
study
session
on
the
2024.
Imagine
Bothell
comprehensive,
planned
periodic
update.
Please
note
that
this
session
on
downtown
transition,
affordable
housing
overlay,
has
been
postponed,
so
we
will
not
be
discussing
that
tonight
before
the
meeting
before
we
move
on
to
agenda
items,
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
our
hybrid
meeting
format,
the
city
of
Bothell
is
providing
an
option
to
attend
this
meeting,
either
in
person
or
remotely
via
Zoom
for
those
who
participate
via
Zoom.
A
A
Public
comment
and
hearing
testimony
will
be
allowed
both
in
person
and
Via
Zoom.
Those
wishing
to
comment
via
Zoom
were
asked
to
submit
an
online
form
by
3
pm.
Today.
People
wishing
to
submit
written
comments
were
also
requested
to
submit
those
comments
by
3
pm.
Email
was
encouraged
as
well
and
will
be
acknowledged.
A
A
The
Imagine
waffle
notice,
City
website
and
tonight's
agenda
all
provided
information
to
the
public
for
providing
comments.
The
video
this
meeting
will
be
streamed,
live
as
well
as
recorded
and
available
for
later
viewing
on
the
city's
YouTube
channel.
A
call
and
number
was
provided
on
the
meeting
agenda
for
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
call
in
by
phone
and
listen
live
to
the
meeting
for
our
call-in
members
for
for
a
phone
and
callers
during
staff.
Presentations
staff
will
make
every
effort
to
specify
which
materials
they
are
referencing,
so
that
everyone
can
follow
along.
B
B
A
C
A
Oh
well
welcome
I'm
sure
Steve
is
glad
to
have
the
help
nice
to
meet
you.
Lastly,
before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
reiterate
some
meeting
guidelines
for
all
meeting
attendees,
please
speak
clearly
and
pause,
frequently
state
your
name
each
time
before
speaking,
mute
your
microphone
when
not
speaking,
if
you
are
also
streaming
the
live,
video
feed.
Please
turn
the
sound
off
as
there
is
a
delay
for
Commissioners
at
specific
breaks
in
the
presentation.
A
I'll
be
calling
on
members
who
wish
to
speak
or
ask
a
question
if
you
want
to
speak,
please
indicate
this
by
raising
your
hand
and
I
will
call
you
as
I
see
you.
This
will
help
avoid
the
problem
of
having
two
people
speaking
at
the
same
time.
Identify
yourself
before
you
ask
a
question:
make
a
motion,
second
emotion
or
participate
in
debate,
and
please
mute
your
microphone
when
not
speaking
so.
The
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
public
comment.
A
The
city
has
accepted
visitor
comment
in
writing,
as
well
as
accepted
sign
up
sheets
for
those
who
wish
to
speak
at
tonight's
meeting.
Written
comments
submitted
to
staff
no
later
than
3
pm.
Today,
we're
forwarded
to
all
Commissioners
and
are
part
of
the
record
and
I
do
not
believe
we
received
any
written
comments.
A
D
E
A
E
E
Right
now,
I
live
on
Northeast,
186th,
Street,
right
next
to
a
large
building
that
they're
putting
up.
At
that
time.
I
didn't
know
there
was
a
meeting
for
zoning.
An
apartment
structure
up
next
to
Northeast,
186th
Street,
where
we
live
I,
do
want
to
say
that
it
has
had
detrimental
effects
to
us
since
its
buildings
gone
up
and
during
the
build
time
the
past
three
years
has
been
pretty
complicated.
Working
with
the
builders.
I've
talked
with
with
actual
people
here
at
the
city
about
what
was
zoned
and
what
was
permitted
during
that
time.
E
But
we've
had
a
lot
of
problems
with
Street
traffic.
It's
blocking
the
sun,
that's
coming
into
our
yard.
I
used
to
use
our
backyard
as
a
refuge,
I
used
to
be
a
wildlife
sanctuary
for
birds
and
other
animals.
All
the
birds
are
disappearing,
but
anyway,
I
just
want
to
put
out
there.
The
real
thought
should
be
put
into
allowing
this
type
of
structure
to
go
next
to
residential
buildings.
It
adds
a
great
impact
on
people's
lives.
It's
been
on
our
street,
you
know
traffic.
E
Finally,
they
had
to
put
up
20
mile
an
hour
things
turning
out
on
104th,
it's
been
very
difficult
for
us,
so
I
just
want
to
put
for
people.
Who've
lived
there
for
many
years.
We've
lived
there
for
over
30
years.
Paid
taxes
and
I
know
that
it's
a
it's
great
for
bringing
in
taxes
to
Bothell,
but
it's
been
very
detrimental
to
us
in
our
life.
So
I
just
want
to
put
that
forward.
F
G
A
A
A
G
A
G
Thank
you
really
I,
don't
have
much
to
add,
be
on.
What's
in
the
in
the
memo,
we
are
going
to
wait.
We've
tentatively
scheduled
this
to
come
back
to
you
on
March
15th,
but
we
want
to
hear
from
Council
in
their
discussion
on
the
2023
docket
and,
and
there
are
some
options
open
to
them,
so
it
will
be
in
the
imagine.
G
B
G
G
A
A
A
I
D
I
All
right
so
tonight,
I
was
wanting
to
bring
just
kind
of
a
higher
level
overview
of
what
is
the
comp
plan.
Why
do
we
do
it?
Why
do
we
have
to
do
it
where
we're
at
in
the
process
and
where
we
have
to
go
still
so
Baseline?
What
is
a
comp
plan?
I
pulled
this
quote
from
mrsc.
If
you
haven't
been
familiar
with
that
website,
it's
a
really
great
resource
for
planning
information
in
Washington,
but
pretty
much
what
it
does
is.
I
It
sets
out
a
series
of
goals
and
objectives
with
Associated
policies
and
actions
that
will
Implement
what
happens
in
the
city.
What
do
we
want
to
see
happen
on
the
ground
in
development,
and
it
is
a
the
goal,
is
also
to
help
guide
the
decisions
of
staff
and
officials
and
Commissioners,
so
in
the
infographic
I
put
together
here
is
just
to
kind
of
show
from
the
comp
plan
to
what
we
see
on
the
ground.
What
goes
in
between
those
things,
so
three
of
the
main
things
that
the
comp
plan
influences
is.
I
It
has
to
be
consistent
with
our
bottom
Municipal
Code.
So
that's
all
the
things
in
The
BMC,
including
zoning,
our
capital
budget,
the
design
and
construction
standards
that
come
out
of
Public
Works
and
all
those
come
together
to
create
both
private
development
on
the
ground
and
public
development.
So
a
lot
of
our
capital
projects.
I
The
basis
for
all
this
is
the
growth
management
Act
passed
in
1990.
The
big
thing
that
that
did
was
establish
the
urban
growth
boundary
simple
terms
is
growth
goes
into
it.
Growth
stays
outside
of
it.
So,
within
the
urban
growth
boundaries,
where
we
really
want
to
drive
more
of
our
dense
Urban
Development
outside
of
the
urban
growth
boundary
things
like
agricultural
uses,
rural
uses,
resource
lands,
Forest
lands
things
like
that.
Not
all
states
are
required
to
do
comp
planning.
I
We
are
within
not
States
within
counties
that
are
required
to
plan
under
the
RCW,
some
choose
to
anyway,
some
don't
within
the
GMA
goals.
There
are
14
of
those
I've
listed
out
the
14
themes
of
those
goals.
They
have
longer
descriptions
that
kind
of
go
into
what
about
these
themes
were
supposed
to
be
following.
I
And
then,
when
it
comes
down
to
who
we
plan
under
so
Puget
Sound,
Regional
Council
is
the
regional
planning
body
that
we
plan
under
it's
for
four
counties:
that's
the
homish
king
Pierce
and
Kitsap
County.
They
also
developed
the
regional
plan
for
growth,
which
is
Vision
2050
and
they
draft
and
adopt
what
are
called
multi-county
planning
policies
which
I'll
get
into
in
a
little
bit
later.
I
This
slide
is
really
just
to
give
you
an
idea
of
how
everything
kind
of
fits
together
all
the
different
agencies
that
work
within
the
state
and
how
that
filters
down
to
what
we
have
to
do
so.
The
basis
is
the
GMA
that
I
mentioned
a
bit
earlier,
and
the
office
of
financial
management
is
really
who
was
tasked
with
creating
projections.
These
are
both
population
projections
as
well
as
employment
projections,
and
then
they
assign
a
certain
Target
to
psrc
as
our
regional
body
and
then
psrc
assigns
targets
to
all
the
counties
within
psrc.
I
We
have
the
lucky
distinction
of
planning
under
two
counties,
so
we
get
two
of
everything
which
is
fun
a
fun
Challenge
and
within
the
county
there
is
a
segments
of
different
types
of
jurisdictions
based
on
size
and
a
number
of
other
factors,
the
biggest
ones
being
the
Metros.
So
that's
like
Seattle
Bellevue,
some
of
the
larger
cities
we
are
in
the
next
bracket
down,
which
is
core
cities.
We
have
that
distinction
because
we
have
a
regional
growth
Center
and
are
of
a
certain
size
and
So.
I
Within
the
core
cities
group,
we
speak
amongst
ourselves
to
figure
out
what
the
fair
Target,
based
on
size
capacity
resources.
Things
like
Transit
come
up
in
those
discussions.
So
there's
a
number
of
cities
with
us
in
King
County
and
in
Snohomish
County.
It's
us
in
Linwood
and
then
the
Department
of
Commerce
has
an
interesting
role.
They
kind
of
come
along
for
the
ride
throughout
the
process
and
help
develop
guidance
for
different
things
and
help
answer
questions
and
provide
data
and
different
analysis,
so
they're
sort
of
a
helpful
partner
throughout
this
whole
process.
I
One
of
the
first
things
that
we've
done
as
a
part
of
this
whole
process
is
the
buildable
lands
report
work.
We
started
that
in
2019
and
2021
again
we
get
to
do
two,
which
is
fun
within
that
work.
We
work
with
the
counties
to
look
at
what
have
we
built
since
the
last
buildable
lands
report?
How
did
we
do?
How
are
we
on
track
for
or
not
on
track
for
the
targets
established
by
the
last
comp
plan?
And
what
do
we
have
left
based
on
our
current
zoning
capacity?
I
I
The
other
big
thing
it
does
is
establish
targets
for
both
population
and
housing.
So
how
much
County
does
population
King
County
does
housing,
so
we
kind
of
convert
in
between
the
two
and
as
well
as
for
employment,
and
these
targets
are
for
the
planning
window
ending
in
2044.
That
will
go
into
how
we
go
about
determining
our
land
use
assumptions
and
things
like
that
in
our
comp
plan.
I
Growth
targets
I
won't
get
into
the
nitty-gritty
on
the
numbers
too
much,
but
you
can
see
we
have
for
King.
County
was
a
5800
housing
unit,
growth
Target,
and
this
is
the
net
growth.
We
had
a
conversion
in
order
to
show
that
in
population,
so
we
could
kind
of
speak
between
Snohomish
and
King
County.
We
do
have
a
deficit
in
just
sort
of
the
Baseline
gross
Target
numbers,
and
these
are
what
were
established
prior
to
the
passing
of
HB
1220,
which
I'll
get
into
in
a
little
bit
later.
I
The
only
place
we
didn't
have
sort
of
a
baseline
net
deficit
was
in
housing
units
in
King
County,
but,
like
I
mentioned
with
HB
1220,
that
doesn't
really
tell
the
full
story
so
HB
1220.
It
requires
a
lot
of
things,
but
in
just
the
discussion
for
growth
targets,
it
now
requires
that
that
growth
Target
be
allocated
amongst
different
levels
of
what
are
we're,
calling
affordability
need.
It
doesn't
change
our
Baseline
Target.
It
just
changes.
How
that
has
to
get
allocated.
I
A
couple
of
the
acronyms
I
wanted
to
point
out
here
are
psh,
which
is
permanent,
Supportive
Housing.
Essentially,
it
provides
housing
to
folks
permanently
that
may
or
may
not
be
able
to
pay
a
very,
very
small
amount,
or
maybe
anything
at
all.
It
also
has
a
number
of
Supportive
Services
that
go
along
with
that
that
are
supposed
to
help
tenants
with
housing.
Stability
Ami
is
a
sort
of
a
more
generic
term
for
area
median
income
that
gets
used
a
bunch
of
different
ways.
Hud
calls
it
mfi
median
family
income
and
then
the
breakdowns
of
the.
I
What
how
you
calculate
out
the
segments
kind
of
varies
depending
on
the
group
and
that's
something
I
know:
Mike
Stanger
from
Arch
has
a
lot
more
knowledge
on,
in
terms
of
which
county
agencies
calculate
it.
One
way,
HUD
calculates
it
another
way,
so
that
can
be
something
that
he
speaks
to
probably
a
little
later
on.
I
In
terms
of
how
this
is
going
to
break
down
for
us,
it's
still
a
little
bit
up
in
the
air,
the
counties
are
still
trying
to
figure
out
how
they
want
to
assign
these
allocations.
King
County
does
have
a
recommendation
from
their
affordable
housing
committee
to
the
gmpc
or
the
growth
management
board
for
King
County,
and
then
Snohomish
county
is
still
trying
to
wait
on
some
of
our
more
finalized
ofm
numbers.
I
So
ofm
is
the
one
determining
what
the
affordability
need
is
for
each
of
these
segments,
and
so
we've
been
had
a
couple
of
postponed
meetings
with
them
to
discuss
further
how
we
want
to
allocate
these,
since
they
don't
know
for
sure
what
the
numbers
are
so
still
kind
of
up
in
the
air.
A
lot
of
questions.
It
gets
very
complex
and
we're
hoping
to
have
a
much
more
in-depth
discussion
about
this.
I
When
we
know
more
and
then
I
wanted
to
just
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
update
framework
in
terms
of
what
we're
required
to
do
and
why
so
like
I
mentioned
earlier,
there's
the
multi-county
planning
policies
and
then
the
counties
develop
their
own
planning
policies
that
have
to
be
consistent
with
the
multi-county
planning
policies.
Our
comp
plan
has
to
show
consistency
with
all
of
those,
as
well
as
our
regulations,
and
all
of
that
is
what
filters
down
into
the
projects
that
we
get.
I
I
think
you've
seen
this
slide
before
when
Ashley
was
talking
a
bit
about
the
docket,
but
just
kind
of
reiterating
the
areas
of
focus
we
see
is
really
key
for
the
update.
These
aren't
all
of
the
elements
in
sub
areas
that
are
going
into
it,
but
just
some
of
the
really
key
components.
The
first
being
we
have
to
meet
our
GMA
requirements,
that's
kind
of
the
Baseline
of
gotta.
Do
it
we're
going
to
do
it
same
kind
of
thing
with
the
growth
allocations?
I
I
We
want
to
make
sure
we're
undertaking
a
really
robust
and
inclusive
engagement
and
visioning
process.
That's
going
to
be
a
bulk
of
the
year
in
the
spring
and
the
summer
time,
along
with
working
on
developing
land
use
assumptions
is
kind
of
the
visioning
process
getting
out
into
the
community
talking
to
folks
about
this
stuff
and
making
sure
we're
doing
it
as
equitably
as
we
can.
One
thing
that
Steve's
going
to
mention
a
little
bit
more
is
we're
looking
at
adopting
a
new
Transportation
level
of
service.
I
This
would
be
a
multimodal
level
of
service
rather
than
what
we
currently
have
and
then
a
couple
areas
of
emphasis
that
have
been
a
big
part
of
the
new
vision,
2050
plan,
as
well
as
the
mpps
and
cpps,
is
an
increased
emphasis
on
diversity,
Equity
inclusion
and
racial
equity
and
climate
change.
So
those
are
going
to
be
two
big
pushes
as
well
for
what
the
work
we're
doing.
I
We
also
we
want
to
make
it
prettier
for
lack
of
a
better
term.
We
want
to
make
it
really.
You
know
more
more
of
a
functional
usable
document
right
now,
it's
a
little
dry,
if
I'm
being
generous,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
it's
something
that
the
community
feels
like
they
can
pick
up
and
look
at,
and
it
means
something.
So
that's
something
that
we
we're
really
looking
forward
to
kind
of
working
through
and
then
finally,
right
now,
the
way
the
plan
reads:
we
have
action
items
in
each
element.
I
We
would
really
like
to
create
rather
an
implementation
plan
or
an
income
implementation
element
that
looks
at
more
of
kind
of
like
a
three
to
five
year
basis,
so
we're
really
able
to
reevaluate
at
a
more
higher
frequency
where
we're
at
what
are
we
doing?
How
are
we
going
to
make
it
happen?
It
also
will
align
with
some
new
reporting
requirements.
I
We
have
to
do
some
additional
reporting
every
five
years,
moving
forward,
so
it'll
kind
of
help
set
staff
up
for
Success
that
we're
not
kind
of
scrambling
at
the
four
and
a
half
year
mark
of
like
we
have
to
do
this
report
and
then
a
little
high
level
overview
on
engagement.
This
is
still
something
we're
developing
with
our
consultant
team,
but
we
have
an
idea
of
kind
of
the
main
types
of
work
we
want
to
do.
I
We
do
want
to
do
some
more
targeted
engagement
through
focus
groups.
The
two
main
topics
of
those
will
probably
be
climate
change
and
racial
equity,
and
so
we're
working
on
reaching
out
to
the
community
right
now
and
figuring
out,
cbo's
different
residents.
We
want
to
make
sure
we're
targeting
our
renter
Community.
We
have
a
number
of
manufactured
home
communities,
a
couple
of
which
we
know
have
some
pretty
robust,
HOAs,
so
we're
working
in
on
who
can
we
get
to
talk
to
us?
I
We
want
to
try
and
get
as
wide
of
a
group
of
people,
but
also
understanding
that
we've
got
to
meet
folks
where
they
are
and
figure
out
how
they,
how
they
talk
to
us
and
we're
also
hoping
to
do
just
public
events
where
and
when
we
can.
We
know
throughout
the
summer.
We
have
a
lot
of
great
activities
that
we
can
leverage
summer
nights
is
one
that
we
know
will
be
one
where
we
can
come
down
set
up
a
booth.
Maybe
have
some
activities
talk
to
people
so
anywhere
we
can
get.
I
You
know,
staff
out,
or
maybe
some
of
our
Consultants
out
at
some
of
these
events.
We
already
have
that's
something
we're
looking
at
doing
as
much
as
we
can
and
then
we
do
have
a
new
online
engagement
platform.
So
that's
going
to
be
a
way
for
us
to
be
really
flexible
with
our
engagement
and
continue
that
process
throughout
the
next
year
and
a
half,
and
we
can
always
adjust
things
as
we're
going,
come
up
with
new
ideas
and
really
add
that
nice
component
to
everything
else
and
I
will
say
too
from
the
current
team.
I
Moving
to
hybrid
meetings
has
allowed
for
more
folks
to
come
to
public
hearings
and
that's
been
really
great
to
have
them.
You
know
added
engagement,
so
we're
hoping
to
see
the
same
thing
with
this
as
well
and
then
in
terms
of
updates
right
now
we're
hoping
to
do
monthly
check-ins
with
you
folks,
it'll
probably
get
more
topical
as
we
start
to
do
more
of
the
actual
drafting
of
the
elements,
but
for
the
first,
probably
six
months
or
so
on.
I
We're
just
kind
of
these
kinds
of
discussions
asking
questions
getting
feedback,
giving
you
updates
on
what
we've
done
and
how
that
went,
and
then
for
Council.
We're
at
this
point
proposing
probably
quarterly
in-person
check-in
meetings
and
maybe
with
some
more
sort
of
Staff
report,
tied
up
staff
report,
type
updates
at
a
more
frequent
rate
than
that
just
to
make
sure
that
they
know
what's
going
on
and
we
can
get
feedback.
I
And
then
the
last
slide
for
me
is
just
a
quick
discussion
about
the
scope
of
work
we
have
with
our
Prime
consultant
Burke.
We
have
a
couple
of
Subs
from
them.
This
is
just
the
list
of
the
10
overall
task
items
that
we
have
in
our
scope
with
them
and
then,
with
that
I'm
going
to
turn
over
to
Steve
and
then
we'll
take
some
questions.
C
If
you
want
more
information
about
that,
I
think
we're
scheduled
to
go
to
the
February
28
council
meeting
with
contracts
large
amendments
to
each
contract
to
get
us
through
at
least
the
next
year
of
work.
For
that
so
one
of
the
first
things.
This
is
a
list
of
key
elements,
kind
of
like
the
overall
plan,
but
more
focused
on
Transportation.
Probably
the
most
important
thing
that
we're
talking
about
is
multimodal
level
of
service,
and
what
that
means
is
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
not
just
looking
at
a
vehicle-based
system.
C
Our
current
adopted
plan
essentially
measures
our
transportation
system
by
Harmony
vehicle
trips
and
how
many
vehicle
trip
capacity
that
we
have.
What
we
want
to
do
is
take
that
and
look
at
vehicles,
but
we
also
want
to
look
at
Transit.
We
want
to
look
at
bicycles.
We
want
to
look
at
pedestrians,
even
micro,
Mobility,
like
scooters
and
things.
C
The
reason
you
want
to
do
that
is
you
want
to
focus
on
the
whole
system,
not
just
Vehicles.
You
want
an
integrated
system
and
right
now,
when
we
have
transportation
impact
fees,
they
can
be
used
for
vehicle-based
projects,
not
necessarily
multimodal
projects.
So
we
want
to
get
that
multimodal
look
at
everything,
so
we
have
started
looking
at
that
and,
like
Kirsten,
said
we're
going
to
be
coming
back
and
checking
in
with
you.
C
We
will
be
doing
in
existing
conditions,
analysis
pretty
much
up
front
in
Spring.
Essentially
that
says
what
does
it
look
like
on
the
ground
today?
It
also
helps
calibrate
our
projection
models.
You
got
to
look
at
something
to
make
sure
your
model
in
it
and
it
comes
out
with
the
right
result.
So
we
do
that
first
and
then
we
start
developing
our
modeling
efforts
for
land
use.
Once
we
get
any
land
use,
changes
that
are
proposed.
C
When
we
look
at
everything
we'll
be
looking
through
lenses
of
climate
change,
we'll
be
doing,
resiliency
I'll
talk
about
a
little
bit
later.
Everything
is
safety,
so
we
look
at
previous
accidents.
We
also
look
at
what
we
build.
You
can
build
things
in
certain
ways
that
typically
have
resulted
in
safer
or
better
facilities,
and
you
look
at
interaction
between
the
different
modes
as
well.
C
We
will
review
and
update
Transportation
policies
of
the
existing
plan
as
necessary,
and
one
of
the
biggest
things
that
will
come
out
of
this
is
a
project
list.
It's
a
20-year
list
and
that's
probably
one
of
the
most
challenging
things
because
we're
going
to
take
all
the
modes
we're
going
to
have
safety
projects,
we're
going
to
have
bike
projects
which
we
already
identified,
we're
going
to
have
pad
projects
we're
going
to
have
vehicular
projects.
We
might
even
have
some
Transit
support
type
projects.
C
Somehow
we
have
to
prioritize
that
because
we
don't,
we
have
limited
funds.
So
there
there
is
going
to
be
a
financial
plan.
How
much
money
can
we
get
grants
outside
sources,
our
own
sources,
to
support
what
we
can
build
in
20
years?
So
that's
the
funding
assessment
part
we
will
participating
in
the
CPA.
We
will
do
our
section
under
the
entire
cipra
process.
C
The
last
two
are
in
a
different
color
because
they're
technically
not
a
comp
plan,
their
standards,
but
any
changes
we
make
in
the
network,
and
that
requires
a
different
standard.
We
will
update
the
standards
and
then
the
concurrency
listing
fees.
Again,
that's
very
important!
So
that's
what?
When
developers
come
in
and
they're
gonna
create
or
contribute
to
growth,
they
need
to
pay
and
help
us
build
our
transportation
to
support
that
and
that's
what
the
fee
is
all
about.
C
Thanks,
so
that's
a
lot
so
I
kind
of
grouped
them
a
little
bit
and
how
I
kind
of
look
at
it
just
to
keep
it
in
my
head.
So
one
of
the
first
things
is
focus
on
the
multimodal
transportation
Network.
Each
of
these
are
different
modes.
You
know
we
have
a
street
Network
Transit
has
a
network
on
the
routes
they
use.
We
have
recently
worked
through
a
bike
plan,
so
that's
going
to
wrap
into
our
comprehensive
plan.
C
We
will
likely
come
back
spring
and
early
summer
to
talk
to
you
about
sidewalk,
prioritization
and
filling
in
gaps,
and
we
want
to
actually
try
to
address
Freight,
which
is
one
of
the
things
we've
been
trying
to
do
for
years,
but
make
sure
we
can
get
our
trucks
through
that
support
local
economy,
so
priorities
so
again,
what's
most
important
to
the
city-
and
these
are
some
of
the
things
we
heard:
Mobility:
climate
change,
environment,
resiliency
safety,
economics,
sustainability,
maintenance
and
equity.
It's
a
lot.
Some
of
them
will
address
in
separate
sections
like
safety.
C
We
will
actually
do
analyzes
and
things,
and
some
of
them
will
be
a
combination
of
looking
through
a
specific
lens.
So
if
we're
looking
at
a
project,
how
does
that
affect
the
environment?
Does
it
put
a
more
a
bigger
footprint
on
the
ground,
which
is
you
know
or
a
smaller
footprint?
So
it's
not
just
the
analysis
itself,
but
how
we
generate
this
list
of
projects.
C
You
guys
are
probably
wondering
what
that
picture
is,
but
it's
actually,
our
seismic
retrofit
of
Sammamish
River
Bridge,
which
is
part
of
resiliency.
So
one
of
the
things
we're
going
to
do
is
figure
out
in
case
of
an
event,
Like
An
Earthquake
we're
at
our
primary
routes
and
make
sure
we
understand
where
the
vulnerable
parts
are
and
those
will
generate
probably
some
projects
as
well.
C
So
the
processes
start
with
the
modes
and
understand
what
networks
you
have
that
you're
going
to
integrate
into
this
multimodal
system
and
then
use
your
priorities
to
support
and
build
and
create
that
Network,
and
we
will
create
policies
and
update
policies
as
necessary
to
make
sure
that
it's
all
in
line
I
think
that's
the
last
one.
Oh,
so
the
transportation
update
in
terms
of
timeline
there's
a
lot
on
there,
but
essentially
we
have
started
scoping
already.
C
Multimodal
level
of
service
like
I,
said
we're
going
to
do
existing
conditions,
probably
the
first
thing
up
and
we're
going
to
start
climate
change
work
in
support
of
a
grant.
I
believe
that
Kirsten's
group
got
that
we
have
certain
deadlines.
We
will
likely
start
at
input
is
up
here
the
safety
analysis
as
well,
because
we
can
start
collecting
the
data
that
we
need
to
work
through
that
process.
C
C
C
So
toward
the
end
of
the
year.
The
comp
plan
would
be
kind
of
complete
in
this
draft
form
and
sipa
will
have
started
in
fall
and
kind
of
move
into.
2024
and
I
believe
we're
going
to
be
coming
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
to
start
talking
and
finalizing
and
adopting
things
in
early
2024
through
spring
and
Council
to
follow
that
so
in
late,
23
and
24
is
about
when
we
can
start
working
on
our
standard
details
that
developers
use
and
we
use
to
build
our
network.
But
that
has
to
follow
all
the
the
process.
C
A
F
Thank
you
chair.
Thank
you
to
the
staff
excellent
presentation
answered
most
of
my
questions
as
well.
I
just
want
to
also
just
call
out
just
it's
wonderful
to
hear
about
the
multimodal
level
of
service
being
addressed
now.
I
think
that's
something
that
probably
you've
wanted
to
do
for
a
long
time
and
it's
long
overdue.
So
that's
great
also
excited
about
the
climate
change
goals
and
the
racial
Equity
analysis
being
included.
So
thank
you
for
including
those
components.
I
had
two
questions.
F
I
I
One
thing,
I
will
say
is
that
the
Department
of
Commerce
did
Issue
their
draft
guidance
on
how
we
are
to
show
compliance
with
these
affordability
need
ranges,
so
it's
not
necessarily
going
to
be
I
mean
they
understand
that
there
was
no
funding
associated
with
this
bill.
So
without
real
money,
it's
going
to
be
really
hard
to
physically
create
those
units.
I
So
what
the
guidance
has
proposed
at
this
point
is
that
what
we'll
do
as
part
of
our
land,
Capacity
Analysis
for
the
Department
of
Commerce
as
a
part
of
this
work,
is
we
have
to
look
at
of
the
zoning
capacity?
We
have
what
types
of
units
can
come
out
of
that,
whether
that
be
apartments,
low
rise,
walk-ups
things
like
that
and
they've
said
these
different
types
of
Apartments
could
potentially
or
other
types
of
units
could
potentially
handle
x-ray
range
of
affordability
with
subsidies
grant
money
other
things.
I
So
what
they're
letting
us
do
is
do
an
analysis
of
our
existing
zones.
What
kind
of
housing
can
be
built
in
those
zones
and
then
based
on
that
what
levels
affordability
are
feasible
within
those
types
of
housing
units?
So
that's
some
of
the
analysis
work.
We
need
to
do
to
figure
out.
What
do
we
already
have?
I
So
we
know
we're
going
to
have
to
do
we're
going
to
have
to
do
some
things,
but
we
think
that
it's
feasible
and
it's
work
that
we
can
do
and
we
have
a
lot
of
assistance
both
from
Department
of
Commerce.
The
counties
Arch
is
a
really
big
help
and
they're
already
doing
some
of
the
capacity.
The
analysis
work
for
us
too
so
and
we
can
certainly
come
back
and
do
a
much
more
in-depth
discussion
on
that.
Probably
when
we
know
more
about
what
we're
going
to
have
to
do.
I
F
Really
appreciate
the
answer
and
I
think
that
you'll
probably
hear
I've
heard
in
several
of
the
meetings,
just
a
request
to
learn
more
about
how
we're
going
to
meet
the
affordability
targets
and
how
that
impacts.
Some
of
of
what
we're
recommending
so
yeah
I
think
it'll
be
great
to
have
more
information
about
that
at
another
session.
Yeah.
I
And
I
think
the
key
message
there
is
our
Baseline
number
doesn't
change.
The
target's
established
by
the
buildable
lands
report
are
what
they
are.
It's
just
how
they're
allocated,
and
the
methodologies
proposed
right
now
range
between
everyone
has
to
be
assigned
the
same
number
based
on
the
ranges
required
for
the
county.
There's
other
ones
that
talk
about
more
of
what
they're
calling
a
fair
share
methodology
whereby,
by
the
end
of
the
2044
planning
period,
all
jurisdictions
will
have
been
able
to
plan
for
enough
housing
stock.
I
It's
basically
saying
we're
going
to
take
care
of
affordable
housing
with
new
new
growth
and
it's
assigned
equally
every
jurisdiction
gets
the
same
apportionment,
but
then
we're
going
to
look
at
some
local
factors
to
adjust
for
that,
because
it
makes
more
sense
to
kind
of
Target
it
a
little
bit
more
and
so
how
much
county
is
considering
something
similar
to
King
County
a
little
bit
different,
but
they
are
a
little
further
away
from
making
a
recommendation
than
King.
County
is
right
now.
F
F
Have
have
have
you
started
to
consider
the
impact
of
wildfires
as
a
result
of
climate
change,
and
is
that
going
to
be
part
of
some
of
the
climate
change
component
of
the
plan
and
when
I
say
wildfires
I
mean
not
only
the
damage
from
wildfires,
but
also
things
like
increased
Wildfire
smoke,
because
we're
expecting
to
see
that
increase
quite
a
bit
over
the
next
50
years.
Yeah.
I
We've
been
working
with
k4c,
which
is
a
climate
Planning
Group
within
King
County
on
some
draft
policy
language
and
right
now
there
is
a
number
of
different
policies
related
to
Wildfire.
Both
you
know
actual
Wildfire
damage,
like
you
mentioned,
for
some
of
those
communities
that
are
closer
to
where
the
damage
actually
happens,
as
well
as
issues
from
smoke
and
some
resiliency
measures
and
mitigation.
What
kinds
of
community
needs
and
might
we
have
for
people
that
need
to
shelter
someone
where
things
like
that?
I
I
That's
maybe
less
applicable
to
a
wider
range
of
jurisdictions,
but
are
still
important
and
then
what
we
need
to
do
as
a
staff
and
with
you
all
and
with
our
consultant
team,
is
determined
of
those
draft
policies
of
all
the
different
things
you
could
include
in
a
climate
element.
What
are
what
do
we
care
about
the
most,
especially
with
some
of
the
direction
that
we
want
to
go,
maybe
in
future,
with
some
more
actionable
things
so
yeah
there's
definitely
considerations
for
that
in
those
draft
policies.
I
I
H
C
So
I
think
the
sculpting
is
more
of
what
areas
we're
going
to
touch
like
you
know
is
climate
change.
Important
is
resiliency
important
and
large
topics
like
that.
The
project
list
is
very
specific.
It
will
be
something
like
improve,
build
a
multi
like
I,
believe
this
project
will
probably
land
on
the
list,
so
let's
say
9th
Avenue
between
228th
and
240th.
C
That
would
be
a
multimodal
project,
so
we
would
improve
the
roadway
it's
near
a
school
we'd,
look
at
safety,
we'd,
look
at
the
bike,
Lanes,
which
would
be
protected
there
and
we
would
look
at
the
sidewalk.
So
that's
a
very
specific
project
list.
The
Scorpion
started
earlier
I
think
in
2022
at
a
very
high
level,
to
say
what
is
the
comp
plan
going
to
cover
and
what
it's
going
to
look
like
and
my
suspicion
is
we
go
through
the
public
process.
C
There
will
be
little
pieces
there
that
maybe
none
of
us
thought
about,
and
that's
a
good
thing
to
add
in
one
particular
section
like
something
about
climate
change.
We
didn't
think
about
or
something
about
safety
we
didn't
think
about.
So
then
we
would
probably
want
to
think
about
that
in
our
analysis
in
our
review
it
could
result
in
a
specific
project.
It
may
not.
J
J
J
And
then
love
seeing
the
climate
change
and
Equity
added
an
emphasis,
it's
kind
of
shocking.
We
didn't
weren't
thinking
about
that
as
much
in
2014-15,
but
there
it
is.
This
could
be
really
important
and
obviously,
we've
got
probably
a
pretty
strong
housing
emphasis
in
this
as
well.
It
looks
like
those
seem
like
the
the
the
three
really
really
pressing
problems.
That's
commentary,
another
question
I
know
in
the
last
plan
each
sub-area
I
guess
we
must
have
had
Community
meetings
and
things
like
that.
J
We're
going
to
be
doing
that
again,
I
mean
I,
know,
there's
lots
of
Outreach
and
revisiting
those
neighborhoods,
and
talking
about
you
know,
like
you
said,
like
with
the
buildable
and
lands
report,
what's
appropriate
now
for
those
for
those
areas.
Is
that
part
of
the
process
like
meeting
with
people
seeing
what
they
want,
but
also
understanding
like
okay?
I
We
haven't
spoken
too
much
on
a
sub-area
specific
basis,
except
for
some
of
the
sub
areas.
We
know
we
really
need
to
do
some
planning
a
big
planning
effort
with
one
of
those
being
Country
Village
yeah,
that's
one
of
the
areas
that
has
seen
enough
change
that
the
existing
code
and
the
sub-area
doesn't
do
a
lot
for
what's
really
happening
there
right
now.
So
that's
one.
J
I
We
do
want
to
do
a
pretty
significant
sub
area.
Push
it's
also
a
candidate
county-wide
growth
Center,
which
is
a
new
designation,
I
think
as
of
this
year,
and
we
have
two
of
those
downtown-
is
also
a
candidate,
although
we
know
we're
pretty
much
on
track,
probably
to
meet
those
thresholds,
sure
so
that's
probably
going
to
be
where
the
biggest
sub-areas
specific
Outreach
effort
is.
But
we
are
also
open
to
ideas
about
who
in
the
community
would
be
good
to
talk
to.
J
So
I
was
just
hoping
we'd
crack
open
some
of
those
areas
of
the
plan
and
reevaluate
some
of
those
areas
and
say:
maybe
we
remove
some
of
that
language
and
make
it
a
little
more
open
a
little
more.
You
know
inclusive
and
a
little
less
exclusive,
just
because
for
the
next
10
years
you
know
last
10
years.
A
lot
happened,
so
I
know
looking
through
it.
Some
that
seems
a
little
Antiquated
at
times
so
yeah.
I
I
I
J
I
And
that
is
some
of
the
guidance
from
the
counties
as
well
from
some
of
the
sessions
I've
set
in
on
on
the
cpps.
So
we
will
be
reviewing
Siberia
plans
for
some
of
the
language,
but
again
in
terms
of
the
nitty-gritty
of
like
Big
Planet,
big
sub
area
planning.
Efforts
like
we
did
in
Canyon
Park,
probably
doing
more
of
that
for
the
village
yeah.
No.
J
A
I
What
happens
with
some
of
the
current
ordinances
going
through
the
Pike
and
where
we're
going
to
have
to
potentially
provide
some
more
capacity
and
if
that
ends
up
being
in
certain
areas,
do
we
have
to
make
some
changes
for
the
Siberia
plan?
So
a
lot
of
that's
really
just
really
up
in
the
air,
because
we
haven't
started
to
do
that
analysis.
Yet,
okay,.
K
Thanks
for
the
presentation,
it's
always
interesting
to
hear
how
the
comp
plan
process
has
explained
it's
so
massive
and
overwhelming
at
times.
So
thanks
for
bringing
Clarity
my
question
is
about
Outreach
and
I
know
that
it's
still
up
in
the
air
and
things
are
still
kind
of
far
out
but
I'm
wondering
about
our
role
on
the
commission
is
to
provide
our
own
kind
of
expertise
and
guidance.
K
I
Really
helpful
and
that's
something
we
can
talk
about
internally
and
talk
with
our
consultant
team
to
see
how
have
you
potentially
engaged
planning
commissions
or
similar
bodies
in
the
past,
and
what
have
you
found
useful
and
how
do
you
think
we
should
create
some
of
that
advocacy
that
you're
talking
about.
So
that's.
Thank
you
for
that
comment.
That's
really.
K
Helpful
great
thanks
and
then
my
other
question
is
about
the
Public
Works
element
and
I
appreciate
that
there's
more
capacity
in
the
department
right
now,
but
I'm
also
looking
at
the
schedule
and
seeing
that
there
are
some
pretty
tight
deadlines
and
that's
it's
overwhelming
to
me.
I
can't
imagine
what
it
what
it
looks
like
when
you're
looking
at
calendars
and
so
I'm
wondering
like
if
there's
different
levels
of
prioritization
on
these
different.
K
Timelines
and
different
kind
of
check-ins
in
the
comp
plan
process
and
if
there
are
any
big
consequences
for
delay
or
missing
some
of
those
deadlines.
How
you
plan
to
staff
and
and
build
capacity
to
to
get
those
in
I'm.
Just
wondering.
I
know
that
some
processes
take
a
long
time
just
because
of
coordination
with
consultants
and
and
so
on.
But
I'm
wondering
what
you're
doing
as
part
of
Public
Works
to
kind
of
set
the
stage
for
moving
the
comp
plan
step
forward.
C
So
from
a
transportation
element,
side,
yeah,
okay,
just
making
sure
you
said
public
works.
So
that's
a
big
part
of
the
gentleman's
sitting
behind
me.
No
pressure
yeah,
it
is
very
quick.
I
mean
we
counted
the
months.
It
was
something
like
11
months.
We
got
to
do
this
entire
comp
plan
and
which
is
extremely
quick,
but
we
did
sit
down
with
both
consultants
and
work
out.
A
timeline,
so
part
of
their
contract
is
assuring
us
that
that
timeline
is
sufficient.
C
Now
that
doesn't
mean
anything,
we've
done
certain
things
we're
teaming
up
with
them.
Not
the
consultant
in
our
case
is
not
doing
everything
we're
doing
things
like
resiliency
in
the
house.
Resiliency
often
means
knowing
where
the
weak
points
of
your
system
are.
It
also
means
working
with
our
emergency
group
that
has
already
developed
some
routes
and
everything,
so
a
lot
of
it
would
be
coming
from
us
anywhere
and
that's
to
me
is
not
very
productive
with
the
consultant,
so
we
will
team
and
do
certain
things.
C
The
other
thing
we
are
doing
is
as
an
example
on
the
sidewalk
Rita,
who
is
our
sidewalk
program?
Engineer
talked
to
the
council
once
and
essentially
briefed
them
and
I
think
they
came
to
Planning
Commission
once,
but
how
we
do
prioritization
so
she's
going
to
refresh
that,
because
it's
been
a
few
years,
there's
going
to
be
a
public
component
to
that
and
that's
actually
running
a
little
separate
than
the
comp
plan
process.
It's
going
to
be
almost
like
a
mini
version
of
the
bike
plan
process
because
we
went
through
the
bike
plan
process.
C
C
So
we
have
several
things
going
on
concurrently
and
we
hope
that
will
help
us.
We
are
doing
things
as
early
as
possible
that
we
can
like
I,
talked
about
the
safety
part.
Safety
is
yes,
it's
dependent
on
a
new
network,
but
it's
also
dependent
on
historic
places
where
things
have
occurred.
It's
also
looking
at
typical
ways.
You
build
things
and
whether
there's
higher
risk
or
lower
risk.
C
So
some
of
those
things
are
not
dependent
on
the
plan
being
further
along,
so
to
speak,
so
some
things
we
can
get
done
a
little
bit
earlier,
so
we'll
relying
that
on
as
well
I
think
the
last
thing
is
Community
Development,
you
know
really
did
put
together
an
aggressive
timeline
to
try
to
get
everything
done
as
quick
as
possible.
So
there
may
be
a
little
bit
of
wiggle
room
there,
but
we're
not
counting
on
that
right
now.
C
K
Yeah
things
I
know
that's
a
hard
question
to
answer:
I'm,
just
seeing
about
the
bike
plan
and
knowing
how
valuable
that
document
is
because
of
how
much
time
was
spent
on
it,
but
also
knowing
that
there
are
deadlines
for
essentially
20
more
bike
plans
to
get
wrapped
up.
And
that's
that's
a
big
deal.
So
I'm
encouraged
and
best
of
luck.
A
And
and
speaking
to
sidewalks,
I'd
urge
you
to
to
State
the
obvious,
keep
in
mind
the
use
of
the
sidewalks
and
go
beyond
simply
the
pavement,
but
the
crossings,
the
signals
you
know
everywhere
you
go
is
don't
walk.
Should
it
be
walk
first,
I
mean
some
some
pretty
basic
things
that
go
beyond
just
the
pavement
there
when
we
look
at
how
a
pedestrian
will
use
those
those
routes.
So
I'd
look
forward
to
that
of
the
commissioner
comments
or
questions.
A
Looking
at
our
Zoom
participants,
seeing
none
and
on
the
table
so
I
want
to
thank
you
for
this
presentation.
It
is
a
huge
amount
of
work
and
a
very
compressed
timeline,
as
it
has
has
been
said
several
times,
and
we
appreciate
that
and
wish
you
the
best
of
luck
on
it
and
we
hope
to
be
helpful
to
you
getting
through
that
process.
So
thank
you
for
coming
to
us
tonight
with
this
and
look
forward
to
hearing
more
with
that.
We'll
move
on
to
our
next
agenda
item
and
that
would
be
unfinished
business.
D
I
can
provide
a
quick
update
on
middle
housing,
so
we've
been
working
really
closely
with
the
city
manager's
office,
with
project
manager
Boyd
with
and
with
our
consultant
otac,
to
come
up
with
a
plan
for
moving
forward
with
the
project,
a
timeline
for
adoption,
a
timeline
for
more
Community
engagement
and
are
hoping
to
have
all
of
that
pulled
together
for
a
presentation
to
Council
on
March
7th.
So
that
is
moving
forward
and
things
are
happening
to
get
that
before
Council
and
meet
some
of
their
desires
for
additional
engagement.
D
A
D
A
A
A
Right
all
in
favor:
oh,
is
there
a
second
for
that
motion?
Yes,
it's
been
moved
and
seconded
that
we
adjourn
all
in
favor,
aye
aye.
All
right
tonight's
meeting
is
adjourned
at
702.
Perhaps
a
record
quick
meeting.
Our
next
meeting
will
be
March
1st,
we'll
look
forward
to
seeing
you
then
thank
you
all
foreign.