►
From YouTube: Bothell Planning Commission Meeting - July 5, 2023
Description
0:00:10 – Call to Order/Roll Call
0:04:10 - Public Comments
0:09:10 - Approval of Minutes
0:09:55 - Study Session: Imagine Bothell Comprehensive Plan Land Use and Transportation Element
1:47:45 - Reports from Staff
1:49:11 - Reports from Members
A
Before
we
move
on
to
the
agenda
items
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
our
hybrid
meeting
format,
the
city
of
Bothell
is
providing
an
option
to
attend
this
meeting,
either
in
person
or
remotely
via
Zoom
for
those
participating
by
a
zoom.
The
chat
and
question
functions
are
not
available
for
use
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
open
public
meetings.
Act.
A
We
have
a
public
comment
agenda
item
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
This
time
is
for
comments
on
issues
not
on
tonight's
agenda.
Please
limit
those
comments
to
three
minutes.
We
will
be
using
lights
to
Signal
the
available
time
and
when
the
yellow
light
appears,
commenters
will
have
20
seconds.
To
conclude,
when
the
red
light
appears,
your
time
is
up.
Please
note
that
the
city
of
Bothell
does
not
tolerate
verbal
harassment.
Please
remember
this
during
your
comments.
A
Public
comment
and
hearing
testimony
will
be
allowed
both
in
person
and
Via
Zoom.
Those
those
wishing
to
comment
via
Zoom
are
asked
to
submit
an
online
form
by
3
pm.
Today.
People
wishing
to
submit
written
comments
will
also
ask
to
submit
those
comments
by
3
pm.
Email
was
encouraged
as
well
and
will
be
acknowledged
and
I.
Don't
believe
you
got
anything
this
meeting.
Did
we.
A
A
The
call-in
number
was
provided
on
the
meeting
agenda
for
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
call
on
by
phone
and
listen
live
to
the
meeting
for
phone
and
callers
during
staff.
Presentations
staff
will
make
every
effort
to
specify
which
materials
they
are
referencing
so
that
everyone
may
follow
along
at
this
point,
take
a
moment
to
acknowledge
the
attendance
of
the
commissioners.
A
Andrews
is
also
abstinent
excused
and
commissioner
Gustafson
here
all
right
and
in
addition,
we
have
attending
Deputy
Community
direct
development,
director
Ashley
windshield,
Deputy,
Public,
Works,
director
Steve
murakawa,
that's
right!
Yes,
Transportation
supervisor,
raid,
turini
senior,
planner,
Chris,
Kirsten
Mand,
all
in
attendance.
So
thank
you
all
for
being
here.
A
A
Thank
you
at
specific
breaks
in
the
presentation
I'll
be
calling
on
members
who
wish
to
speak
or
ask
a
question
if
you
want
to
speak,
please
indicate
this
by
raising
your
hand
and
I
will
call
on
you
as
I,
see
you.
This
will
help
avoid
the
problem
of
having
two
people
speaking
at
the
same
time.
Identify
yourself
before
you
ask
a
question:
make
a
motion,
second
emotion
or
participate
in
debate,
and
please
mute
your
microphone
when
not
speaking
so.
The
first
item
on
our
agenda
is
public
comment.
A
The
city
has
accepted
visitor
comment
in
writing,
as
well
as
accepted
sign
up
sheets
for
those
who
wish
to
speak
at
tonight's
meeting,
written
comments
submitted
to
staff
in
the
late
in
3
pm,
we're
forwarded
to
all
Commissioners
and,
as
indicated
earlier,
we
did
not
receive
any.
So
this
time
is
for
items
not
on
tonight's
agenda.
A
E
It
takes
40
trees
to
offset
26
000
miles
of
commute,
given
the
average
commute
gas
vehicle,
so
the
average
house
burns
up
1200
kilowatt
hours
of
electrical
energy
a
month,
so
they're
tearing
down
this
beautiful
house,
one
point
to
me:
I
think
they're
tearing
it
down.
It
was
sold
back
in
March
of
2022
and
they're
tearing
down
this
thing
and
they're
putting
seven,
and
we
know
how
that's
going
to
go.
Don't
we
so?
E
E
That's
another
at
least
four
or
five
hundred
now
one
of
the
things
I
want
to
talk
about
before
I
get
too
long
here
and
I've
told
you
guys
this
I
put
up
wind
turbines
in
2000,
Mariah,
Energy
Group.
Look
it
up
Google
it
first
operating
electrical
engine,
energy,
wind
turbine
company,
in
the
state
of
Washington,
so
I'm
familiar
with
this
stuff.
E
E
E
E
E
In
a
one-on-one
kind
of
thing,
but
here's
one
thing
you
need
to
ask
the
transportation
Improvement
planning
committee.
They
should
be
able
to
come
up
simple
deal.
Kevin
knows
this
come
up
with
a
simple
tons
of
carbon
aversion.
Thank
you
that
your
plans
are
going
to
to
save
because
it's
not
you're
putting
it
up
in
the
air.
Thank
you
ask
him
come
up
with
that.
It's
simple
an
Excel
spreadsheet!
All
you
need.
A
A
A
Seeing
none
all
in
favor
of
approving
the
June
7th
of
the
minutes,
all
right,
it
is
unanimous.
The
June
7th
minutes
are
approved.
That'll
bring
us
to
our
next
item
the
principal
item
on
tonight's
agenda.
The
study
session
around
the
Imagine
baffle,
comprehensive
Plan,
update
land
use
element
and
the
transportation
element,
so
we're
going
to
start
with
land
use
for.
G
G
So
I
will
take
it
away,
so
I
don't
want.
Do
you
want
to
introduce
Andrew
Bjorn
from
Burke?
He
is
an
associate
principal
there
and
he's
been
helping
us
with
the
land
use
map
and
all
of
that
work
that
we've
been
doing
so
just
as
a
reminder,
the
goal
tonight
is.
We
really
want
to
go
over
the
methodology
and
the
workshop
work
that
staff
has
done.
That's
gone
into
the
proposed
draft
that
we
have
right
now
and
as
well
as
the
designations
themselves,.
G
And
as
a
reminder
of
our
2023
timeline,
this
is
the
one
you
see
every
time
we
have
moved
into
quarter
three,
so
big
amount
of
the
work
for
us
this
summer
is
going
to
be
the
engagement
work
that
we
do
with
the
community.
That
will
include
affirming
The,
Guiding
principles
and
then
also
beginning
of
the
drafting
of
the
elements
and
some
of
the
preliminary
draft
Eis
work
as
well.
But
the
big
push
is
going
to
be
summer:
engagement
through
July
and
August.
Wrapping
up
in
September.
G
So
an
overview
of
what
I'll
be
talking
about
with
you
I
really
wanted
to
give
a
really
high
level
overview
of
what
even
is
a
land
use,
designation
versus
a
Zone.
What
are
sort
of
the
intent
of
those
two
different
things?
What
are
existing
land
use
map
looks
like
and
what
we
feel
like
it
doesn't
doesn't
do
some
best
practices
around
land
use,
they're
generally
accepted
as
well
as,
like
I
mentioned,
the
staff
workshops
that
we
held.
G
We've
had
two
staff
workshops
that
includes
both
Public
Works
and
CD
staff,
including
our
development
review
team
and
both
of
our
consultants
for
the
whole
project,
and
then
the
draft
map
and
I'll
hand
it
over
to
Andrew
and
he'll,
get
into
all
of
the
work
that
we
did,
how
that
was
synthesized
into
the
map.
Some
of
the
things
we
still
have
some
questions
on
and
still
kind
of
want
to
do
and
get
some
feedback.
G
So
land
use
designations.
The
goal
of
land
use
designations
in
terms
of
comp
planning
is
to
look
at
a
very
high
level:
division
of
the
land
within
a
jurisdiction
and
Within
These
divisions,
they'll
establish
a
range
of
densities
and
intensities,
as
well
as
a
range
of
the
types
of
development
that
are
envisioned
for
the
area.
The
kind
of
things
we
want
to
see
for
the
area
in
the
future.
The
other
important
thing
they
do
is
create
a
framework
for
implementing
zones,
so
the
zones
are
actually
what's
implementing
the
vision
within
those
land
use
designations.
G
That's
the
intent
of
what
those
are
so
an
example
would
be
a
low
density,
residential
designation
that
would
include
zones
that
could
potentially
provide
densities.
That
range
from
let's
say,
one
to
eight
units,
is
kind
of
about,
what's
accepted
for
what's
considered
low
density,
and
then
zoning
like
I
mentioned,
are
the
implementing
component
of
the
underlying
land
use
designations,
and
these
are
the
regulatory
framework
within
which
our
planning
staff
and
other
development
review
staff
review
projects.
G
Now
our
existing
land
use
map
is
gonna,
look
really
familiar,
because
it
looks
almost
exactly
like
our
zoning
map,
because
our
land
use
association's
map
one
to
one
our
zones
and
that
it,
the
only
additional
thing
that
is
really
on
here
is
some
of
the
proposed
public
facilities,
utilities
and
open
space
areas.
Those
are
kind
of
the
only
other
changes,
but
other
than
that.
G
So
what
are
some
of
the
considerations
around
our
existing
land
use
map?
The
way
that
our
land
use
map
is
currently
set
up
doesn't
really
serve
that
intended
purpose
of
having
those
higher
level
designations
within
which
the
zones
are
grouped
and
because
of
this,
any
requests
for
rezone
also
requires
a
comprehensive
plan
Amendment,
which
can
be
a
little
bit
cumbersome.
G
It
makes
it
a
little
bit
tricky
to
determine
when
a
rezone
makes
sense,
because
the
comp
plan
designations
are
kind
of
supposed
to
set
up
the
rationale
for
why
you
would
or
would
not
approve
a
rezone.
It
also
means
that
any
reason
request
because
it
triggers
a
comp
plan.
Amendment
would
also
go
to
council,
which
again
has
added
process
and
can
be
a
little
bit
cumbersome,
especially
for
staff.
G
Another
component
of
the
way
that
our
zones
currently
work
is
because
it's
the
way
that
our
zones
work.
We
don't
have
a
colored
map,
so
it
can
kind
of
be
difficult
to
look
at
the
map
and
get
an
idea
of
where
is
the
residential?
Where
is
the
mixed
use?
How
are
these
patterns
kind
of
working
together?
G
So
some
best
practices
for
land
use
designations
number
one
is
just
kind
of
Simplicity.
You
want
it
to
be
really
easily
digestible,
so
limiting
the
number
of
designations
to
the
extent
that's
possible.
We
also
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
covering
everything
that
we
want
to,
so
we
don't
want
to
be
overly
simplistic,
but
also
that
the
descriptions
of
those
designations-
they
really
need
to
be
clear.
G
They
shouldn't
be,
they
should
be
concise
and
to
the
point,
and
the
goal
of
that
is
to
make
it
really
clear
what
the
relationship
is
between
the
implementing
zones
and
the
comp
plan
designations.
Part
of
that
is
just
to
make
sure
that
it
makes
sense.
Part
of
that
is
also
if
we
do
get
a
reason
request
that
the
rationale
for
why
we
would
or
would
not
approve.
It
is
very
clear
in
the
language
that
we
have.
G
Another
one
like
I'm
sort
of
alluded
to
before
is
that
relationship
to
zoning.
We
need
to
look
at
the
land
use
designations
with
our
Targets
in
mind.
Our
growth
targets
are
calculated
based
off
of
the
zones,
but
obviously
the
zones
need
to
correspond
to
the
land
use
designation.
So
we
do
need
to
keep
in
mind
those
density
and
intensity
ranges
in
regard
to
the
zone.
G
So
when
we
go
to
look
at
our
zoning
after
we
do
our
land
use,
then
we
can
make
sure
everything
is
consistent
and
it's
getting
to
us
where
we
need
to
go
and
then,
like
I,
mentioned
the
clarity
on
the
basis
for
approving
rezone
requests
as
well
and
then
in
terms
of
some
other
best
practices,
I'd
like
to
think
about
existing
in
future
facilities
and
development.
So
keeping
in
mind,
where
are
the
schools
within
the
community,
jobs
Transit
both
facilities
and
the
connectivity,
Network
or
lack
thereof?
G
So,
one
being
so
points
of
importance,
the
other
being
when
we're
looking
at
designations
themselves
and
where
they're
located
as
well
as
what
they're
adjacent
to
what
are
some
of
the
important
factors.
A
big
one
is
transitions.
What
are
some
of
the
adjacent
designations?
How
do
those
work
together?
G
Are
there
complementary
uses
or
uses
we
wouldn't
want
next
to
each
other,
which
is
kind
of
the
original
intent
of
land
use
and
Zoning
in
the
first
place,
and
then
connectivity
both
existing
future
connectivity
transit
services,
existing
plans,
like
our
bike
plan,
talking
with
the
transit
agencies,
about
where
they
have
future
routes
planned
like
we
know
that
might
be
coming
down,
Bothell
ever
Highway
and
then
also
working
with
adjacent
communities.
So
you
know
we
have
we
border
a
number
of
adjacent
jurisdictions
and
making
sure
that
those
areas
make
sense
as
well.
G
Another
important
factor
is
the
natural
environment.
We
know
we
have
a
lot
of
critical
areas
in
the
city,
both
wetlands
and
streams.
We
also
have
some
pretty
significant
Landslide
Hazard
areas.
That's
the
map
I,
provided
there
that's
one
of
the
reasons
we
have
a
big
swath
of
that
portion
of
the
city
zoned
for
our
40
000,
for
example.
Just
because
we
know
it's
a
hazard
area,
it's
not!
That
makes
it
less
of
an
appropriate
area
to
want
to
try
and
concentrate
development.
G
That
also
includes
flood
zones
that
are
established
by
FEMA
and
then
there's
also
priority
habitat
and
species
zones
that
Department
of
Fish
and
Wildlife
establishes.
So
these
are
some
of
the
factors
that
go
into
deciding
right.
Where
does
it
make
sense
to
put
more
intensity
or
does
it
make
sense
to
kind
of
let
things
lay
a
little
bit
more.
G
And
then
color
seems
like
a
simple
thing,
but
it
does
really
make
a
big
difference
when
again
trying
to
really
visually
digest
the
way
that
the
city
is
organized
and
the
patterning
within
the
city.
So
it
creates
that
visual
guide
to
looking
at
the
city
and
following
kind
of
similar
practices
that
all
jurisdictions
use
for
what
colors,
usually
residential,
what
colors,
usually
mixed
use
or
commercial.
G
G
So
our
first
meeting
was
really
high
level.
It
was
just
kind
of
Staff
getting
together
and
talking
about
what
are
some
of
the
major
values
that
we've
sort
of
gleaned
from
both
the
community
from
our
electeds
from
our
boards
and
commissions
but
and
staff.
That's
specially
staff!
That's
been
here
really
long
time
and
what
are
some
of
those
values
that
would
be
important
in
informing
how
we
assign
land
use
designations
and
create
them.
G
G
G
G
And
then,
as
I'd
have
mentioned
a
few
times,
streamlining
so
making
the
land
use
map
much
more
simple,
simple
and
keeping
with
the
intent
of
why
we
have
land
use
designations
in
comprehensive
planning
and
then
also
simplifying
process
when
it
comes
to
rezoning,
which
isn't
always
an
exciting
topic.
But
it
is
very
important
for
both
the
city
and
for
the
community
that
we
work
with
and
for
customers.
G
That's
what
that
second
acronym
is
there
and
that's
downtown
and
then
the
Snohomish
County
portion
of
what
is
currently
referred
to
as
Canyon
Canyon,
Park,
Country
Village,
and
so
we've
been
talking
a
lot
about
wanting
to
build
off
of
the
existing
policies.
We
have
related
to
Neighborhood,
centers
and
centers
in
general,
and
where
can
we
leverage
the
existing
designations?
G
G
What
are
the
big
ticket
items
that
the
community
wants
to
see
and
how
do
we
look
at
integrating
that
into
the
city
when
it
comes
to
the
land
use
designations
and
then,
lastly,
but
not
leastly,
Environmental
Quality
so
again
addressing
what
are
our
really
key
critical
areas
and
also
natural
resources,
Beyond
just
critical
areas,
things
like
Sustainable
Building
practices?
How
do
we
kind
of
build
that
into
what
we're
doing
with
the
land
use
designations
and
then
also
the
implementing
zones
and
development
regulations.
H
Kirsten,
so
this
is
the
draft
land
use
map
in
color.
This
was
designed
as
a
larger
format
map.
So
there
are
some
elements
that
on
the
screen
may
be
a
little
bit
difficult
to
pick
out,
but
we
do
you
know
even
simply
seeing
the
elements
here,
I
think
can
show
some
of
the
major
features
that
we're
looking
at
here
in
some
of
the
major
considerations
that
we
have
in
going
forward
with
the
land
use
map.
F
H
So,
as
Kirsten
was
saying,
there
were
some
elements
that
we
were
looking
at
as
we
were
refining
this
concept.
The
first
really
is
just
making
it
simpler
and
easier
for
staff
for
policy
makers
for
public
other
stakeholders
to
just
interpret
and
digest
it's
it's
it's
a
whole
lot
easier
to
look
at
this,
and
we've
tried
to
make
it
as
colorblind
safe
as
possible,
but
trying
to
present
this
as
a
much
more
direct
map
and
something
that's
a
little
bit
more
straightforward.
H
So,
as
I
noted
you
know,
the
areas
are
now
color
coded
it's
no
longer
black
and
white.
One
of
the
other
things
that
we
looked
to
do
was
to
also
aggregate
the
areas
on
the
basis
of
a
broad
land
use
category.
So
there
are
a
much
more
limited
number
of
large
categories
looking
at
downtown
commercial
employment,
mixed
use,
essentially
public
uses
and
residential
there's
some
differentiation
within
those
categories.
But
it's
it's
a
broad
set
of
categories
that
are
used
so
that
you
can
generally
distinguish
what
the
intent
is
of
these
individual
areas.
H
We
also
took
a
look
at
aggregating
the
residential
areas
on
the
basis
of
just
simple
policy
Direction,
and
we
also
look
to
have
this
guided
by
the
requirements
under
HB
1110.
So
at
a
high
level,
the
single-use
residential
areas
are
now
aggregated
a
little
bit
more
towards
compliance
with
HB
1110.
You
have
areas
where
they're
heavily
encumbered
or
potentially
encumbered
by
critical
areas
where
it
would
be
very
difficult
to
develop
them
out
at
higher
densities,
and
they
would
be
exempt
from
some
of
the
conditions
under
11
10..
H
There
are
areas
that
would
just
be
broadly
impacted
by
1110
and
would
require
higher
densities,
and
then
there
are
higher
density
areas
than
that.
That
would
likely
either
be
currently
that
would
currently
allow
higher
density
or-
and
this
will
get
into
some
of
the
adjustments
that
we're
looking
to
make
on
this
map.
But
it
would
also
be
areas
that
could
support
higher
densities
as
a
result
of
being
close
to
high
capacity
Transit.
H
We
did
include
public
uses
that
wasn't
really
included
in
the
in
the
current
map.
You
have
schools,
you
have
other
public
facilities
that
are
included
in
here
that
are
either
kind
of
classified
differently
or
you
have.
You
know
two
different
Park
designations
under
the
under
the
current
land
use
map.
We
just
worked
to
consolidate
this
and
provide
something
that
was
clearly
defined,
kind
of
with
respect
to
specific
employment
areas.
H
H
H
H
So
that's
kind
of
a
really
quick
overview
of
some
of
the
changes
that
we're
recommending.
We
want
to
be
very
careful
with
this
map
because
for
one
we're
using
this
as
an
input
into
some
of
the
calculations
about
expected
development
densities
as
an
input
into
Transportation
Planning,
but
also
as
a
discussion
about
fulfillment
of
requirements
under
1220
and
the
updated
requirements
under
the
growth
management
Act.
H
However,
the
other
thing
to
note
here
is
that
this
is
a
change,
and
we
want
to
have
this
reflect
what's
currently
on
the
ground,
what
the
current
policy
focus
is
of
the
city.
So
we
want
to
be
very
careful
that
we're
essentially
coloring
in
the
right
colors
into
the
right
spaces
according
to
what
people
in
the
city
want.
H
So
that
being
said,
this
is
still
a
work
in
progress.
This
provides
a
good
understanding
about
where
we're
at
right
now,
but
there
are
certain
areas
where
we
do
want
to
make
a
few
additional
changes.
So
one
is
looking
at
the
residential
areas
and,
like
I
had
suggested
before
we
currently
have
three
levels
that
are
there.
We
essentially
for
the
single
use
residential
areas.
H
There
may
need
to
be
some
refinement
on
the
basis
of
the
provisions
of
middle
housing
policy,
as
well
as
other
considerations
about
what
can
be
supported
in
different
areas
as
well.
This
is
not
necessarily
land
use,
but
we
do
want
to
include
high
capacity
Transit
and
major
Transit
lines
in
this
map
as
reference,
because
it
can
be
useful
to
understand
that
and
it
does
have
certain
land
use
implications
under
HB
1110.
H
H
But
what
we
want
to
do
is
to
expand
it
out
to
include
critical
areas,
not
as
a
means
of
limiting
development
per
se
from
this
map,
but
more
as
a
reference
to
understand
where
critical
areas
and
Shoreline
management
may
come
into
play
like
I
had
mentioned
before,
with
with
residential
areas.
But
this
also
applies
to
other
areas
included
in
this
map
as
well.
There
may
need
to
be
an
expansion
of
some
of
the
areas
that
we're
looking
at
either.
H
To
give
an
idea
about
what
the
city
policy
would
be,
as
certain
areas
are
annexed
in
the
future,
however,
this
does
need
to
reflect
what
Snohomish
County
policy
also
is,
because
that's
what
is
going
to
be
applied
in
the
interim
before
annexation
occurs.
So
we
do
want
to
be
aware
of
that
and
incorporate
any
changes
that
Snohomish
county
is
pursuing
in
those
areas
as
well.
G
The
discussion
point
is
kind
of
just
as
a
way
to
align
what
we're
talking
about
with
our
land
use
discussion
and
the
transportation
discussion.
So
some
of
the
I
just
pulled
a
few
sort
of
key
points
of
Nexus
between
lenders
and
transportation.
When
we're
thinking
about
designation,
one
big
one,
especially
as
we're
discussing
these
things
with
the
actual
agencies
themselves,
is
their
policies
for
where
they
put
certain
service
types.
So
one
thing
I
included
here-
this
is
I,
think
is
from
King.
County
Metro
is
how
they
align
service
types
with
areas.
G
So
one
big
point
of
importance
is
Transit
supportive
densities,
both
with
population
and
jobs.
They
also
look
at
the
types
of
mixed
uses
that
are
there
in
terms
of
thinking
about
frequency
and
type
of
service,
existing
connections
or
potential
future
connections,
and
then
supportive
policies
and
programs.
G
So
in
terms
of
connections
that
also
includes
pedestrian
facilities,
bicycle
routes
and
then
key
land
uses
of
things
like
schools,
employment
hubs,
access
to
areas
where
there
just
tends
to
be
a
lot
of
folks
that
use
Transit.
People
that
need
Transit
senior
living
facilities
tend
to
be
an
important
place
where
people
need
Transit,
so
just
as
a
important
connection
between
why
we've
been
having
a
meeting
tonight,
both
discussing
discussing
land
use
and
transportation.
D
Start,
commissioner
westerbecks
commissioner
westerbeck.
First
of
all,
I
excitedly
read
this
packet.
I
love
this.
This
is
one
of
the
reasons
I
got
on
to
planning.
I
wanted
to
get
on.
Planning
Commission
is
the
sort
of
simplification
and
streamlining
of
land
use
code
because
I
use
code
in
my
work
and
so
I
love
the
removal
of
the
overlays.
Those
can
be
your
best
friend
or
your
worst
enemy
and
this
sort
of
complicate
things.
They
always
feel
like
they're
sort
of
a
Band-Aid.
They
look
like
it
and
they
they're
going
to
work
like
it.
D
When
I
would
do
a
feasibility
study
or
something
for
a
project.
First
thing,
I
do
is
I,
go
look
at
the
code
and
most
cities
do
have
the
color
coded.
So
I
was
excited
about
that
and
I'm
trying
to
understand.
Are
we
also
going
to
keep
the
zoning
code
and
then
overlay
the
land
use
code
or
we're
going
to
get
rid
of
it
because
I
see
we're
adding
little
pieces
of
it
in
the
comp
plan
and
change?
Maybe
it
looks
like
that
I
saw
here,
yeah.
G
So
I
can
clarify
so
the
discussion
tonight
is
on
the
land
use
designations
for
the
comprehensive
plan,
and
so
once
we've
established
those
higher
level
designations
again
with
those
ranges
of
densities
right
then
we
can
go.
Then
we'll
need
to
go
into
the
zoning
code
and
do
that
update
to
reflect
consistency,
for
example,
for
this
one
I
believe
for
the
residential
low
that
includes
r9600
or
8400
and
our
7200,
so
that's
sort
of
the
grouping
that
goes
into
the
low
category,
for
example.
D
Because
most
of
the
simplification
and
the
streamlining
is
wonderful,
I
love
it
and
I
like
what
I've
seen
here,
but
if
we
suddenly
have
a
land
use,
designation
and
then
also
zoning
and
they're
different,
so
I
go
into
like
say,
I'm
looking
at
project,
never
they've
got
the
color
coding.
You
know
this,
you
go
and
you
go
okay,
it's
you
know
lr1
or
something
like
that.
Seattle
of
course,
but
great
and
I
go
look
for
density,
Dimensions,
height
setbacks,
all
that
stuff,
but
then
I.
D
If
I'm
now
going
to
be
like
oh
wait,
a
minute,
that's
in
the
the
so-and-so
land
use
designation.
The
color
tells
me
that,
but
I
have
to
go
to
this
totally
different
section
of
the
code
to
find
out.
You
know
what
setbacks.
That's
just
like
two
things.
Instead
of
one
are
we
gonna
avoid
that
somehow
right.
G
So
that's
why
the
one
of
the
goals
of
this
presentation
was
to
to
have
this
discussion
about
what
is
a
land
use
versus
a
zone.
So
when
you're
going
in
to
do
a
project,
you
do
need
to
be
consistent
with
the
comprehensive
plan,
but
really
for
the
purposes
of
current
development
and
development
review.
It's
the
zoning.
G
B
G
You
we
would
really
only
be
going
into
the
comprehensive
plan
and
looking
at
the
land
use
designations
for
the
most
part,
just
to
ensure
that
the
policies
are
still
consistent
and
or
if
you're,
requesting
a
rezone
and
making
that
work
quest
of
well.
We
want
to
get
change
zones
and
we're
consistent
with
the
associated
land
use,
and
this
is
why.
D
D
But
it's
in
the
service
of
this
larger
comp
plan,
specific
adherence
to
readjusting
how
we
see
Bothell,
the
next
10
or
15
years
and
updated
designations
and
things
because
I
just
tried
to
tease
that
out
a
little
bit
because
it's
going
to
make
it
a
little
more
complicated,
but
so
we'll
look
at
a
Zone,
as
you
might
have.
You
know
like
a
residential
Zone
that
crosses
three
three
areas,
but
you
go:
oh
yeah,
cool
I'm.
You
know
orange
or
yellow,
or
something
like
that.
D
Then
you've
got
to
go
in
and
zoom
in
so
as
long
as
we
make
it
understandable
in
the
code
I.
Just
because
you
do
a
lot
there's
often
the
next
expectation
you're
going
to
find
your
color,
then
you
find
your
section
and
so
someone
works
works
with
with
this.
You
know
for
a
living,
it's
really
frustrating
to
find
out.
You've
got
two
different
pieces
of
the
land
use
code
and
the
zoning
code
that
are
governing
your
project.
Then
you've
got
to
figure
out
how
they,
how
they
apply
so
I.
I
The
land
use
map
may
be
more
basic
and
may
have
more
implementing
zones,
and
so
it
may
actually
facilitate
projects
in
an
easier
way
than
going
through
the
full,
comprehensive
plan,
Amendment
and
rezone
requests.
And
so
that's
one
of
the
other
advantages
that
we're
looking
at
of
this
and
some
things
that
some
surrounding
cities
have
done,
that
that
get
people
through
the
process
quicker,
while
honoring
the
community's
goals
and
desires
for
that
land.
Use
designation.
D
H
What
other
one
other
quick
note,
sorry
is
typically
with
respect
to
how
zoning
works
is
that
it's
almost
a
hierarchical
progression,
where
you're
not
going
to
have
you're
not
typically
going
to
have
one
zone
in
several
different
areas,
so
it
is,
there
is
kind
of
this
categorical
way
that
it
can
work.
One
one
issue
that
can
come
up
is
that
this
is
a
future
Lane
use
map.
There
are
times
when
you
can
get
old
zoning
in
certain
areas,
but
the
intent
of
this
is
to
make
it
more
simple
for
communication,
no.
D
I
think
it'll
work
I
just
it
sounds
like
you're
doing
the
work
to
make
it
when
it's
finally
codified
and
put
down
on
paper
understandable.
If
this,
then
this,
like
the
2009-2010
whatever,
when
we
published
it,
this
sub
area
zone
for
downtown,
it's
pretty
clear.
It
has
a
sort
of
you
know.
This
flow
check
this
first
and
this
and
you
sort
of
know
that
intuitively
as
someone
that
is
at
work,
but
it's
really
nice
that
this
City
said
you
know
this
is
the
order.
D
C
H
H
Yeah
because
typically
commercial
Lane
uses
are
calculated
with
it
with
different
types
of
metrics,
so,
instead
of
housing
units,
it's
square
footage
of
floor
space
instead
of
people
like
residents,
it
would
be
employees,
so
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
different.
It
can
be
Apples
to
Apples
to
oranges
with
some
of
the
calculations,
so
we
just
want
to
be
a
little
bit
more
broad
when
we're
talking
about
it.
H
That
would
primarily
be
with
respect
to
the
underlying
districts
that
this
were
that
this
was
based
on,
but
generally
it
would
be
the
current
and
I'm
using
this
term
again
the
current
intensity
allowed
in
those
zones
where
essentially
the
the
dark,
the
the
more
intense
the
color,
the
more
development
is
allowed
in
those
areas
right
now
now
this
can
change
and
we're
not
necessarily
fixed
on
maintaining
three
different
categories
in
this
area.
If
it
doesn't
make
sense,
however,
this
currently
reflects
the
aggregation
of
the
current
zones
in
that
area.
H
G
J
Commissioner
kurd
thank
you.
First
of
all,
thank
you
for
this
map.
It
is
great.
It
really
paints
a
okay.
It
paints
a
picture.
It's
also
the
colors
distinctly
show
patterns
of
open
space
and
green
space
in
our
in
our
city,
so
I'm
encouraged
about
taking
the
value
discussions
that
staff
had
come
up
with
and
looking
at
Equity
as
a
result
of
this
this
map.
This
is
a
great
tool.
J
J
J
The
other
thing
is
that
I
noticed
there
are
some
public
institutions
that
aren't
shown
in
blue,
so
especially
some
of
the
schools,
Maywood
Hills,
Elementary,
North,
Shore,
Middle
and
Woodmore
are
not
shown
so
that
it's
a
work
in
progress,
but
just
wanted
to
make
sure
we're
capturing
those
as
blue
place
this,
because
they
could
be
used
in
natural
disasters
or
so
forth.
The
other
thing
I
wanted
to
talk
about,
and
this
is
probably
a
longer
discussion
than
we
want
to
have
but
conservation
level.
Zoning.
J
That
is
an
interesting
choice
that
was
made
in
a
different
era
of
environmentalism.
The
steep
slopes
surrounding
that
neighborhood
are
not
going
to
stand
up
in
an
earthquake
So.
Currently,
as
it
stands,
we
are
conserving
a
high
risk,
critical
area
and
the
only
way
that
we
can
reduce
the
risk
of
those
areas
and
add
protection
to
infrastructure
or
houses
that
may
be
affected
would
be
development,
and
that's
just
the
way
that
it
is
right
now,
there's
no
other
mechanism
for
reducing
risk
for
critical
areas,
especially
Landslide
hazards.
J
The
other
thing
transition
areas
we've
been
deeply
involved
with
transition
zones
on
this
commission
recently
and
we
are
noticing
that
there's
not
actually
that
much
of
a
difference
between
the
Transitions
and
the
surrounding
neighborhoods,
so
I'm
interested
in
why
those
areas
are
specifically
called
out
in
very
bright,
distinctive
colors.
If
there's
not
functionally
too
much
of
a
difference,
or
is
that
more
of
a
identifier
for
future
discussions
about
the
intensity
in
those
areas.
J
So
in
the
downtown
land
use
areas,
there's
the
downtown
Gateway,
which
is
a
distinctive,
distinctive
Zone,
but
we
also
have
the
downtown
transition
and
basically
Sunrise
Valley
View,
that
while
they
do
have
their
own
code
for
the
purposes
of
land
use,
they
very
much
match,
if
not
our
exact
copies
of
the
residential
low.
And
so
why?
Why
pull
those
out?
What
was
the
guiding.
H
J
H
Think
I
think
that's
a
good
point.
I
think
that
it's
certainly
possible
that
that
could
be
aggregated
elsewhere
with
respect
to
the
downtown
area.
In
particular,
we
were
very
sensitive
about
not
changing
that
much
given
that
for
one
we
would
be
looking
at
the
area
for
kind
of
a
review
of
the
sub-area
plan,
so
we
in
in
terms
of
making
broad
stroke
changes.
We
were
more
thinking
that
that
may
come
later
with
respect
to
transition
zones
from
the
downtown
again.
H
I
I
think
that
it's
certainly
possible
that
you
can
have
greater
identify
densities
on
this
map,
as
you
move
further
out,
I
think
that
one
of
the
major
constraints
that
we'd
be
looking
at
in
addition
to
critical
areas
would
just
be
servicing
in
those
areas
and
if
it's
close
to
downtown
it's
more
likely
to
be
service
than
other
areas
in
the
city.
So
again,
it's
certainly
a
work
in
progress,
It's,
something
that
we
want
to
reach
out
to
staff
about.
We
want
to
continue
the
dialogue
with
you
about,
but
yeah.
J
J
So
I'm
not
saying
just
make
them
yellow
I'm
saying
if
we're
making
these
magenta
areas
and
lots
of
different
colors
around
here
I
mean
we
spend
a
lot
of
time
in
Canyon,
Park
too,
and
not
necessarily
seeing
the
same
level
of
like
distinctions
between
intensities
in
Canyon
Park
that
we
had
in
our
code
or
in
the
that
whole
process.
So
I'm,
just
one
I'm
wondering
the
differences
and
I
know
it's
a
work
in
progress
and
I
know
that
there's
more
time
that's
been
yeah,
so
no
worries.
But
thank
you
thanks
for
that.
F
H
G
Yeah
I
can
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
so
part
of
this
is
meeting
and
talking
with
you
all
we'll
be
presenting
the
city
council
at
the
end
of
the
month.
We've
also
been
working
really
closely
with
our
transportation
team,
their
consultants
and
then
we've
also
been
talking
to
Transit
agencies.
That's
another
important
component
of
this
and
then
as
well
as
the
community
through
our
Outreach
events
of
the
summer.
G
We
also
have
a
working
group
we'll
be
meeting
again
in
July
and
that's
one
part
of
our
community
engagement
strategy
and
then
I'm
sure
we'll
be
creating
some
engagement
strategies
through
the
website
as
well
for
folks
to
see
it
in
common
and
provide
Direction
I
know,
we've
also
been
working
with
the
school
district,
so
some
of
those
other
important
other
agencies
in
the
city
we
always
as
well,
because
we
do
our
Capital
facilities,
Plan
update.
We
talked
to
the
different
utility
agencies,
there's
a
lot
of
different
important
stakeholders
in
the
discussion.
Yeah.
F
F
Of
populations
that
don't
have
the
access
to
large,
for
example
the
internet
or
can't
come
to
Big,
public
Gatherings
or
don't
know
or
have
a
language
barrier
or
are
homeless
and
I
mean
I.
Think
that
and
I
know
that
we
have.
This
goes
across
all
levels
of
government
to
really
seek
out
those
populations
when
we're
trying
to
map
it
out.
F
When
we
make
these
kinds
of
decisions,
when
they
really
should
be
at
the
Forefront
of
these
kinds
of
mapping
plan,
so
I
want
to
get
that
out
there
get
that
right
right
from
the
start,
and
so
thank
you
yeah
if
we
can
bring
that
to
the
Forefront
I
think
it
meets
our
like.
You
said
the
equity
element
that
we're
so
focused
on,
so
thank
you.
A
G
So
and
correct
me
if
this
is
wrong:
I
believe
that
that
is
reflective
of
the
North
Creek
protection
area.
Overlay,
that's
in
place
within
the
Fitzgerald
sub
area,
there's
some
additional
requirements
for
environmental
review
for
new
projects
in
that
overlay.
There's
also
a
low
impact
development,
other
overlay
in
the
Fitzgerald
and
that's
just
reflective
of
we
have
some
critical
Water
Resources.
There
there's
also
I
think
an
animal
crossing
identified
through
the
northern
portion
of
that
sub-area
I
believe.
That
is
why
that
is
there.
A
H
Of
the
so
we
presented
an
earlier
version
of
this
map
to
staff,
and
one
of
the
comments
was
that
the
environmental
overlay
could
be
expanded
to
include
other
types
of
areas
that
would
have
certain
environmental
concerns
or
constraints
with
planning
implications.
So
that
would
be
another
example
of
that.
H
A
H
Yep,
oh
it
trying
to
determine
how
best
to
coordinate
the
colors
with
this
is
a
challenge.
One
thing
that
can
help
is
by
removing
the
underlay
here,
there's
currently
for
the
purposes
of
the
consultation
that
we
were
doing
with
staff.
We
thought
that
having
an
aerial
kind
of
image,
underneath
it
would
be
useful
in
distinguishing
where
certain
things
are,
because
it's
it's
a
whole
lot
easier
to
pick
out
where
schools
are.
H
H
Inevitably,
whenever
you're
doing
consultation,
everybody
that
looks
at
this
map
is
going
to
try
to
figure
out
where
their
house
is
oh
yeah
every
time
it's
the
first
thing
that
people
look
for
so
ensuring
that
there's
enough
way
finding
on
the
map
with
streets
and
with
other
types
of
boundaries
is
essential.
So
thank.
A
D
Not
to
be
a
pedantic,
it's
coming
back
to
my
original
topic,
but
it
seems
like
there's
going
to
be,
of
course,
she's
land
use
designations
and
you've
got
some
of
these
things
like
residential,
medium,
low
Etc
and
then
we're
also
introducing
you're
introducing
some.
We
already
have
downtown
core
DN
downtown
neighborhood
transition,
Sunrise
Valley
View,
but
those
right
now
down
the
sub
area
code.
D
Those
relate
to
zoning
because
of
course
we
have
one
to
one
right
now
so
again,
I
just
kind
of
I,
don't
know
that
I
have
a
solution,
but
it's
going
to
be
a
little
confusing.
If
you
have
oh,
you've
got
land
utilizations
and
they
generally
are
a
little
different
than
the
you
know.
Rm
is
a
lot
different
than
saying
R
9600
right
easy,
but
then
you
you're
going
to
have
situations
where
it's
DM,
but
it's
also
DN,
so
I
just
I
think
that's
fine,
but
it
could
create
a
little
bit
of
confusion.
D
H
B
D
H
It's
a
good
point:
I
think
that
in
our
first
cut
at
this,
we
work
to
aggregate
what
we
could
and
sure
were
a
lot
of
things
that
could
it's
complex,
yeah
and-
and
there
were
a
lot
of
things
that
could
just
be
purple
yeah
when
it
comes
to
looking
at
different
areas
of
the
downtown.
There
was
a
different
intent
behind
each
of
the
individual
current
areas,
so
that
that
was
the
reason
why
we
kept
it
the
way
that
it
is,
but
it
can
be
aggregated
it's
as
mentioned
it's
an
ongoing
process.
H
D
Could
certainly
see
aggregating
like
ddtn
DT,
something
like
that
and
Gateway,
and
what's
it
but
yeah
Sunrise
value,
View
and
I
know
that's
a
little
bit
different,
but
making
maybe
not
just
have
a
core,
and
then
you
have
everything
else
outside
that.
But
then,
within
that,
you've
got
your
designations
that
we
like.
We
have
today
not
to
throw
a
monkey
wrench
in,
but.
D
A
B
H
H
Now.
One
thing
to
note
in
the
map
is
that
the
area
up
on
the
hill
in
the
Canyon
Park
in
the
candy
Park
area
is
a
pretty
distinctive
light
blue,
because
that
is
not
something
that
is
really
what
we
find
in
a
lot
of
other
places.
There
are
certain
development
restrictions
that
are
there.
There
are
ccnr's.
B
F
F
H
D
J
F
B
F
C
H
All
right,
that's
great,
so
yeah
so
I
I
mean,
for
example,
you
notice
that
there
are
a
number
of
different
kind
of
play,
fields
that
are
included
in
here,
but
you
know
one
of
the
elements
of
the
land
use
concept
that
we
want
to
bring
forward
is
that
we
we
want
to
represent
the
green
Network
in
the
city
and
well
the
blue,
green
Network.
I
should
say,
given
that
the
river
should
also
be
incorporated
as
part
of
that,
but
but
yeah
there
are
always
going
to
be
little.
A
A
K
So
good
evening,
everyone
I
have
Carmen
Quan
from
furring
Pierce
she's,
going
to
do
the
bulk
of
the
presentation
tonight
transportation.
You
heard
a
little
bit
about
Kirsten
talking
about
transportation
and
land
use,
how
it's
intertwined
tonight,
I
think
you're
going
to
have
a
little
harder
time
seeing
that,
but
what
I
tried
to
do
in
your
packet
and
your
memo
was
describe
some
of
the
things
we
do.
I
mean
there
are
opportunities
where
we're
going
to
work
closely
with
land
use
we
can
advocate
for
Transit.
K
We
have
been
advocating
for
a
long
time
and
we
know
in
the
future
we're
going
to
get
bus,
rapid,
transit
in
certain
locations.
So
we
will
continue
to
do
that.
Coming
up.
We
have
an
opportunity
to
sit
down
with
the
transit
agencies
and
we
will
talk
to
them
about
land
use
and
what
their
plans
are.
So
we
can
make
sure
we're
best
aligned.
So
those
that's
an
example
of
where
we
have
an
opportunity
to
align
it
very
well.
Middle
housing
is
a
little
different.
We
have
been.
K
The
legislature
basically
told
us
how
this
is
going
to
happen,
and
it's
kind
of
more
of
a
guess
or
estimate
of
how
much
we're
going
to
see
in
what
locations
and
it
might
be
generally
throughout
neighborhoods
as
an
example.
So
that's
something
that
Transportation
will
have
to
more
like
react
to
less
than
try
to
work
with
it
so
much
tonight,
regardless
of
which
way
it
goes
whether
we
can
influence
it
or
not.
K
Transportation
we're
moving
toward
multimodal
level
of
service,
because
Citywide,
we
think
that's
the
best
route
and
Carmen's
going
to
tell
us
a
little
bit
more
and
dive
a
little
bit
deeper
into
multi,
to
model
level
of
service
and
in
the
second
topic
that
she's
going
to
cover
is
Project
priorities
which
will
do
in
the
fall
and
again
regardless
of
whether
we
can
interact
it
or
can't
interact
it.
We
still
have
to
come
up
with
projects
as
well,
so
both
of
these
topics
will
occur
regardless
of
how
well
we
can
coordinate
everything.
L
Sorry
so
Steve
had
already
mentioned
we're
here
to
provide
an
update
on
how
staff
are
feeling
about
multimodal
level
service
and
some
of
the
policies
that
they're
leaning
towards
and
the
second
item,
we'll
be
discussing.
One
of
the
key
outcomes
of
a
transportation
element
update
is
the
20-year
project
list
to
support
growth
in
the
city
over
the
next
20
years.
L
So,
as
we
previously
mentioned,
a
level
of
service
is
the
promise
of
how
the
transportation
system
will
perform
and
under
our
current
policies,
the
city's
mainly
measures
Auto
delay
along
key
concurrency
corridors
by
switching
it
up
to
multimodal
level
of
service
and
having
policies
for
walking,
biking
and
riding
Transit
as
well.
We're
able
to
identify
other
Improvement
projects
to
support
growth
over
the
next
20
years,
so
not
just
focus
on
improving
Auto
delay
within
the
city.
L
There
were
a
couple
internal
workshops
that
staff
had
and
they
discussed
various
options
that
neighbor
neighboring
jurisdictions
currently
have
adopted
how
what
kind
of
date
is
needed?
How
do
they
manage
that
over
time
and
right
we're
here
today
to
give
you
an
update
on
where
staff
are
leaning
towards?
So
specifically,
we
did
provide
more
information
in
the
Planning
Commission
memo,
but
what
we
have
right
now
is
for
the
auto
mode
we're
looking
at
maintaining
the
city's
current
standards
of
looking
and
evaluing
at
Corridor
level
of
service.
L
The
city
is
leading
towards
a
pedestrian,
Gap
and
connectivity
analysis,
so
this
is
part
of
City
staff's
current
ongoing
task
to
evaluate
where
there
are
gaps
in
facilities
for
people
walking
across
the
city,
and
there
will
also
be
a
review
of
how
new
connections
might
improve,
improve
access
between
destinations
as
well
for
the
bicycle
mode.
The
city
very
recently
adopted
the
Citywide
bike
plan,
and
so
the
policy
would
be
looking
at
building
a
low
stress,
bicycle
Network.
L
Sorry
I
realize
there's
a
typo
on
that
slide,
but
that
really
speaks
to
the
city's
commitment
to
building
out
the
bicycle
Network
in
the
city's
plan
and
then
for
Transit.
This
one's
a
little
bit
more
tough
because
the
city
doesn't
operate
Transit
within
the
city,
but
what
they
can
do
is
have
policies
to
support
improving
Transit
service,
so
one
of
those
items
could
be
facilitating
speed
and
reliability.
Improvements
along
major
corridors
of
the
city,
also
improving
access
to
Transit
stops.
L
So
typically,
that's
walking
and
biking
to
bus
stops
and
then
also
advocate
for
tiered
service,
and
that's
really
speaking
to
looking
at
given
the
different
densities
across
the
city.
Maybe
there
is
on-demand
service
shuttle
service
that
would
be
more
appropriate
than
fixed
route
service
in
more
dense
areas
of
the
city.
L
L
So,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
we
are
evaluating
how
growth
allocated
across
the
city
may
need
additional
Transportation,
Improvement
projects
or
programs
to
support
that
growth.
This
initial
process
is
look
is
developing
this
large
bucket
of
projects
for
us
to
consider
so
part
of
that
large
list
of
projects
that
we
develop
will
be
based
on
our
multimodal
level
service
policies,
but,
along
with
that,
there
are
other
things
that
can
be
considered
for
that
project
list.
L
So
if
there
are
projects
currently
in
adopted
City
plans
or
programs
such
as
a
Canyon
Park
sub-area
plan,
those
projects
would
be
put
into
the
mix,
we're
also
updating
the
city's
current
safety
plan.
So
if
there
are
potential
projects
to
improve
safety
within
the
city
that
gets
included,
there's
also
Transportation
resiliency
task
as
well,
so
anything
to
support
our
emergency
evacuation
routes.
L
That
gets
added
as
well,
and
we
are
also
going
out
to
the
community
to
understand
their
feedback
as
well,
and
that
relates
to
a
online
website
and
then
also
a
survey
and
web
map
to
collect
the
community's
feedback
on
where
they
may
see
areas
for
improvements.
It
could
be
Mobility
barriers,
safety
or
near
Miss
crashes
that
they
have
experienced
all
that
information
gets
fed
into
our
project
development
process,
foreign.
L
Once
we
have
this
long
list
of
projects
to
consider
to
support
future
growth,
we
do
have
to
prioritize
those
projects.
We
have
a
20-year
planning
Horizon
and
we
also
have
limited
resources
over
that
20
years,
so
we
will
be
going
through
and
developing
a
prioritization
criteria,
this
fall
and
then
we
will
be
evaluating
each
of
these
projects
against
those
criteria
to
see
which
ones
move
to
the
top
and
would
benefit
the
community.
The
most.
L
We
can
figure
out
what
seems
reasonable
to
be
able
to
fund
over
the
next
20
years,
and
that
creates
our
final
20-year
Transportation
element
project
list,
which
is
at
the
bottom
of
that
list,
and
this
is
where
we
would
also
plan
to
have
our
third
touch
point
with
the
community
to
go
back
to
them
and
share
kind
of
the
final
results
of
this
process
and
to
make
sure
that
we
can
share
that.
Their
feedback
has
also
been
incorporated
into
this
planning
process.
B
B
Have
two
questions:
Sarah
Gustafson
here
and
I'll
start
with
my
first.
This
is
really
exciting.
It's
very
tangible
and
I
I
do
Wonder
with
public
engagement.
What
kinds
of
activities
are
planned?
Are
we
going
to
perhaps
have
people
in
a
room
and
have
them
rank
potential
projects?
Are
we
going
to
do
surveys
and
so
forth?.
L
That's
a
great
question,
so
I
Envision
later
in
the
fall
we'd
be
holding
a
type
of
Transportation
element,
open
house,
and
so
that
would
be
a
way
for
us
to
not
only
gather
public
feedback
throughout
the
online
webpage
but
also
have
hopefully,
if
it
all
works
out
roll
plots
of
the
map
and
the
projects
we've
come
up
with
and
then
the
Opera,
the
city,
the
public,
would
have
opportunities
to
vote
for
what
they
feel
like
would
be
most
beneficial.
So
they
could
be
like
a
sticker
dot
exercise.
L
L
I
think
we
would
work
with
City
staff
to
figure
out
how
we
can
approach
that
and
if
there
isn't
an
opportunity
to
have
more
than
one
event,
we
can
certainly
try
and
advertise
this
type
of
events
more
broadly
so
not
just
on
the
project
website
online.
But
we
could
print
out
flyers
and
hand
them
out
at
senior
senator
senior,
centers
or
apartment
complexes.
That
type
of
thing.
F
Thank
you,
I,
actually,
just
want
to
double
down
on
what
commissioner
gusterson
said
and
I
want
to
express
my
concern
for
strictly
leaving
things
to
a
new
come
to
us
or
go
online
for
this
kind
of
up,
and
this
isn't
just
like
an
issue
with
the
transportation
department
or
the
public
works
department.
Is
a
government-wide
International
issue
that
people
on
the
margins,
who
are
isolated,
often
don't
hear
their
voices
heard,
but
people
like
the
homeless
people
with
disabilities,
people
non-english
speakers
and
the
elderly.
F
These
are
the
people
we
need
to
be
prioritizing
when
it
comes
to
Transportation,
they
are
not
able
to
I
mean
I
mean.
Obviously
there
are
some
of
them
who
are
not
able
to
navigate
the
internet.
Who
would
have
no
idea
where
to
find
that
kind
of
information
or
how
to
get
on
a
browser
or
find
the
url?
If
you're
talking
to
my
mom.
F
K
So
let
me
talk
to
that
a
little
bit
more,
so
our
public
Outreach
is
kind
of
coming
in
layers
like
I.
Don't
know
how
best
to
describe
this,
but
you
can
see
our
projects
are
kind
of
in
silos,
safety
projects,
vehicle
capacity
projects,
pedestrian
projects,
bike
projects.
So
as
an
example,
we
went
out
for
our
pedestrian
program
specifically,
and
we
do
a
couple
things.
We
did
the
online
thing,
but
we
also
did
interviews
with
key
stakeholders,
one
of
which,
were
you
know:
disabled
persons
Representatives,
not
necessarily
the
actual
person
but
Representatives.
K
One
other
exercise
that
we
want
to
do
is
not
just
get
input
but
also
see
what
comes
out.
So,
let's
say
we
come
out
and
we
have
a
map
and
you
can
put
the
projects
on
the
map.
You
want
to
look
at
that
to
make
sure
the
projects
aren't
in
one
area
of
the
city
or
this
area
of
the
city
and
they're
broadly
spread
out
and
where
their
disadvantaged
communities
you
see
projects
basically
in
those
areas
as
well.
K
J
That's
a
city
policy,
not
necessarily
something
that
sound
transit
has
control
over,
and
so
there
are
other
other
ways
that
the
city
can
be
a
better
partner
in
in
terms
of
Transit
and
I.
Think
that
we
can
think
more
holistically
about
that
too.
So
encourage
well
I
know
that
people
are
going
to
have
lots
to
say
during
the
feedback
and
so
I'm
encouraged
to
dive
into
Transit
a
little
bit
more
and
and
learn
what
people
would
like
to
hear
on
that.
J
K
So,
depending
on
the
color
of
funding,
so
the
funding
we're
gonna
account
for
is
all
the
funding
that
Transportation
has
available
to
her.
There
are
certain
uses
of
funds
that
we
we
can't
use
for
certain
things
as
an
example,
TDM
Transportation
demand
management.
Traditionally
they
would
not.
You
cannot
use
transportation
impact
fees,
unfortunately,
so
those
Transportation
impact
fees
would
likely
go
more
toward
capital
projects
with
the
multimodal
level
of
service
there.
We
go
not
just
toward
vehicle
projects,
but
there
we
go
toward
pedestrian
projects
and
bicycle
projects
which
are
now
recognized
as
capacity.
K
So
that's
good.
We
would
have
to
look
for
other
sources
for
transportation
demand
management,
but
this
is
one
of
the
things
I
think
I'm,
trying
to
tell
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
council.
Don't
just
think
projects,
think
programs,
so
we
will
have
to
try
to
find
ways
to
fund
those
programs
that
we
want
to
fund,
because
the
way
we
want
to
look
at
this
is
let's
look
at
our
needs.
K
Let's
look
at
programs
that
we
can
reduce
our
Capital
project
needs
and
the
capital
projects
would
be
the
last
things
that
we
have
to
do
to
meet.
Our
requirements,
essentially,
we
will
have
to
find
ways
to
fund
that,
and
you
know
at
Canyon
Park.
We
did
the
same
thing.
We
had
a
TDM
program,
we
couldn't
use
Tiff
funds,
but
we're
able
to
get
legislative
funds.
K
We
were
able
to
get
Regional
Mobility
Grant
funds,
which
are
are
becoming
more
and
more
available
for
these
things,
which
is
very
good,
but
the
city
council
also
applied
read
two
funds.
Just
in
case
we
didn't
get
the
legislative
match
funding,
so
we
will
have
to
be
creative
and
we
will
look
at
all
the
different
parts
of
funding.
J
J
K
So
the
so
the
list
that
we're
using
again
think
of
the
silos-
let's
start
with
the
bicycle
plan,
so
the
bicycle
plan
has:
what
did
I
tell
you,
200
million
dollars
worth
of
projects,
we're
not
going
to
get
that
done
in
20
years.
I
I
can
tell
you
that
okay,
so
we
do
have
a
long
list
and
after
we're
done
with
our
prioritization
across
the
silos,
some
of
those
projects
will
be
identified
in
the
20
years.
Again
we're
gonna.
K
K
That
is
because,
if
you
go
through
all
our
criteria
and
you
match
them
up
with
the
other
silos,
you
either
get
the
best
bang
for
your
buck
or
it
that
particular
project
where
that
particular
bike
facility
is
also
happens
to
be
where
we
need
pedestrian,
where
we
need
vehicle
capacity.
There's
a
safety
issue
as
well.
It
checks
all
the
boxes.
K
So
that's
kind
of
how
it's
going
to
be
put
together,
so
my
suspicion
is
each
of
those
silos,
except
Vehicles
will
have
far
more
than
20
years
worth
of
projects
and
we're
only
going
to
get
a
certain
amount
of
them.
The
vehicle
projects
are
probably
going
to
start
from
where
we
started
before
those
don't
go
away,
some
of
them
we're
already
working
on,
they
haven't
been
built
and
we
will
have
to
keep
them
in
the
plan.
K
J
K
A
Give
you
my
particular
pet
peeve
I
know
how
Frontage
improvements
are
happen
with
development
and
I've
got
a
couple
places
where
I
walk,
where
Frontage
developments
end
on
one
side
of
the
street
and
start
on
the
other
in
a
simple
crosswalk
would
go
a
long
way
towards
connectivity,
and
it's
simply
not
there.
How
are
you
going
to
look
out
for
those
sorts
of
fairly
minor
things
which
I
could
think?
Oh
I
think
could
have
a
big
impact.
K
So
that's
a
great
question:
that's
one
we're
struggling
with
in
terms
of
resources
and
time
and
what
we
want
to
get
done.
So
let
me
tell
you
where
we
are
so
Rito,
who
is
our
sidewalk
program
manager
and
she
has
for
the
last
I.
Don't
know
seven
to
ten
years,
been
the
program
manager
and
they
literally
have
cataloged
every
Gap
they
can
find
in
this
city
in
the
winter,
when
we
don't
have
as
many
projects
to
oversee
we
have
some
inspectors
going
out
literally
to
inspect
and
do
gaps.
K
So
as
far
as
gaps
go,
we
think
we
have
a
pretty
good
list
like
bikes.
That's
probably
in
100,
200
million
dollar
range
to
do
all
the
gaps.
The
connectivity
part
is
the
hard
part,
because
that's
where
you
literally
have
to
spend
a
lot
of
time
and
look
at
the
street
and
go
I.
Have
a
sidewalk
here.
I,
don't
have
I,
have
a
sidewalk
on
this
side.
K
K
Would
be
through
Carmen
and
we
have
Sarah
in
Community
Development
that
are
doing
their
online
portal
and
they're
developing
that
mapping
system
and
pin
system
that
will
come
up.
I.
Think
it's
going
to
be
probably
mid
to
late
July
and
through
August
that
we're
going
to
have
that.
Okay,
I!
Think!
If
you
look
at
pedestrians
we
will
be
solid
in
the
Gap
analysis.
K
We
will
be
doing
our
best
for
connectivity,
so
I
think
part
of
the
policies
we
will
have
to
include
in
The
Pedestrian
section
is
continue
to
work
on
connectivity,
which
means
in
the
next
few
years.
We
will
try
to
do
more
surveys.
I
think
one
of
the
Visions
the
council
has
in
their
priorities,
is
connectivity
of
neighborhoods.
So
that's
a
similar
thing.
That's
not
an
easy
exercise,
especially
in
Bothell
we're,
not
a
grid
system,
so
to
get
connectivity
between
neighbor
neighborhoods.
K
Sometimes
you
have
to
look
pretty
detailed
and
be
pretty
creative,
and
that
takes
time
and
effort.
So
I
think
those
are
the
kinds
of
things
I'm
sharing
with
the
Planning
Commission
and
the
council
is.
We
may
not
be
able
to
get
to
everything
and
Implement
everything
in
inventory
everything,
but
we
should
put
the
policy
in
there
so
that
over
the
next
few
years,
those
are
some
of
the
things
we
do
and
that's
what
that's,
how
we
task
the
staff
to
do
those
things.
A
K
K
Okay,
so
we
have
very
specific
things
like
Vehicles,
we're
going
to
measure
it
similar
how
to
how
we've
done
it,
but
that's
not
the
only
measurement,
we're
going
to
measure
pad
and
we're
going
to
measure
bike.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
we're
clear
on
how
we're
approaching
this
some
of
the
things
like
pedestrians.
We
are
doing
Gap
analysis,
I'm,
trying
to
be
very
clear,
we're
going
to
do
as
much
connectivity
as
we
can,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
complete.
K
There
are
some
other
things
that
might
not
be
measured
as
level
of
service
that
we
might
look
at
either
through
guidelines
or
through
design
standards
like
if
you're
on
a
certain
type
of
arterial
at
a
certain
volume.
Then
you
need
to
have
this
much
this
type
of
Crossing
every.
So,
however
long
those
are
better
suited,
probably
for
guidelines
and
standards
versus
level
of
service,
again
we're
trying
to
be
reasonable
and
practical,
we're
a
20-year
cycle,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
we.
We
can't
have
everything
we
do
have
to
prioritize
things.
A
Well,
in
previous
meetings,
the
the
commission
has
expressed
a
strong
interest
in
transit
connectivity
and
you
know
really
focusing,
for
instance,
in
our
discussions
on
parking
relaxing
parking
requirements
near
Transit,
so
that
we
are
encouraging
that
Transit
use
and
measuring
Transit
Service
as
as
a
significant
issue
as
well.
So
yes
we're
there
and
commissioner
Westpac
did
I,
see
yeah.
D
Yeah
sorry
I
kind
of
jumped
in
I,
wrapped
you
and
you
didn't
even
see
his
I
appreciate.
You
did
see
me
as
part
of
the
prioritizing
looking
at
the
most
inexpensive
kind
of
low-hanging
fruit,
things
kind
of
make
a
crosswalk
costs
money
just
to
to
put
in
I
know,
but
maybe
it's
one
of
the
less
expensive
things
or
the
leading
interval.
I
know
that
some
council
members
asked
about
that,
for
which
would
have
saved
me
tonight.
I
actually
almost
got
hit
by
a
car,
Crossing
Bothell
a
happens
every
couple
weeks.
D
The
guy
literally
stopped
just
five
feet
from
me,
but
didn't
see
me,
but
it
seemed
like
there's.
You
know
a
small,
faster,
cheaper
things
is
that
part
of
the
priority
was
a
set
of
guidelines
at
all
that
we
kind
of
say
hey.
We
could
do
these
and
we
should
be
looking
at
opportunities
to
do
these.
It's
not
a
sidewalk,
it's
not
a
capital
project.
K
I
would
say
those
are
former
programs
and
I
think
those
can
be
discreet.
In
other
words,
put
to
me,
the
policy
you
just
said
would
be
make
downtown
more
pedestrian
friendly,
especially
Crossings
and
things
so
that
kind
of
the
policy.
And
then
how
do
you
achieve
that
policy?
You
probably
don't
want
to
identify
project
by
project,
well,
183,
Crossing
and
five.
You
know
author
whale
185th,
Crossing
they're,
not
large
enough,
but
you
could
identify
a
program
that
addresses
those
right.
D
K
G
D
K
And
I
think
those
would
be
annual
programs,
some
of
which
you
already
have
and
I
think
I
told
the
council
the
other
night.
The
same
questions
came
up.
Those
are
things
this
fall,
we're
going
to
be
starting
to
look
at
yeah.
We
just
had
adaptive
signal
put
in
and
there's
a
break-in
period
that
sure
they
have
to
have
certain
requirements
yeah,
but
that's
kind
of
over.
K
D
K
And
things
like
that,
so
we
look
at
every
intersection.
We
try
to
make
sure
we
understand.
What's
going
on,
there
may
be
some
tools
that
work
better
than
others,
for
that
particular
intersection,
not
every
single
two
applied
to
that
particular
one,
but
that's
a
process
and
a
program
that
we
can
go
through.
Okay,
because.
D
D
All
these
things
or
whether
it's
working
with
watchdot
to
talk
about
you
know,
staff
time
on
on
lights,
whatever
there's
always
a
money
component
but
I
know,
there's
got
to
be
some
that
our
those
programs
that
cost
less
and
just
hope
we
have
those
on
our
radar
as
it
does
seem
like
you,
can
get
a
big
bang
for
your
buck
out
of
some
of
those
at
least
yes
and
I
know
you've
thought
about
those
in
the
past,
and
this
is
ground.
You've
tried
before
so
appreciate.
A
Well,
even
just
to
walkability
downtown
all
of
those
signals,
my
experiences
default
to
don't
lock
and
if
you
walk
up
both
away,
if
you
get
there
and
it's
green,
it's
going
to
say,
don't
walk
and
you
have
to
hit
it
and
wait
a
whole
cycle
and
you
get
people
walking
through
so
even
going
to
default.
Walk
would
I,
think,
have
a
safety
issue,
but.
D
K
Yeah
yeah
it
does,
but
it's
an
ongoing
program,
so
I
think
again.
We
address
it
as
a
policy
on
what
we
want
to
see
and
then
we
figure
out
how
we're
going
to
accomplish
that
and,
like
you
just
said,
there's
several
ways
of
doing
it:
I,
don't
think
we're
going
to
look
at
every
single
intersection
as
a
project,
but
we
will
look
at
a
program
for
walkability
and
then
our
job
is
kind
of
figure
out
where
that
priority
is
and
where
we
want
to
start,
because
you
have
a
whole
city
to
take
care
of
them.
K
A
A
A
I
We
did
want
to
let
you
all
know
that
there
have
been
changes
made
to
the
Planning
Commission
recommendation,
because
I
think,
as
you
all
know,
HB
1110
was
passed
after
the
recommendation
was
made,
and
so
there
were
some
things
that
didn't
align
in
that
code.
We've
been
working
with
our
legal
counsel,
Department
of
Commerce
and
talking
internally
about
what
we
could
put
together.
That
would
at
least
create
the
framework
for
Middle
housing
in
Alliance
compliance
with
HBA
1110,
so
that
packet
will
be
published
this
Friday.
I
D
This
is
not
a
report,
but
it
ties
into
the
conversation
we
had
a
minute
ago
about
transportation.
Of
course,
I
mentioned
that
I
had
a
scare
tonight
with
the
crossing
road,
but
it
also
ties
into
I
met
someone
for
a
piece
of
business
this
afternoon
who
he
lives
in
Canyon
Park,
and
he
was
talking
about
whether
we
go
to
Buffalo
Landing
very
often
or
whatever,
and
he
said
he
essentially
said
he
was
scared.
He
thought
it
was
scary
to
cross
527
or
522.
D
D
Like
me,
you
know
six
foot
two
or
something
and
he's
scared
of
5
22
for
obvious
reasons,
so
I
just
thought
that
was
kind
of
impactful
like
and
where
you
know
we
hear
a
lot
of
stories
about
522
and
527,
and
it's
dangerous
and
I've
been
almost
hit
there
a
number
of
times
as
well,
because
I
cross
it
all
the
time.
So,
anyway,
the
work
we're
doing
matters
it'll
matter
to
a
person
like
that
as
well,
and
so
all
this
all
these
little
tweaks
just
makes
me
think
about
it's.
D
A
D
Was
what
happened
tonight
yeah?
He
was
just
not
even
paying
attention
and
he
stopped
just
barely
in
time
and
I
think.
That's
probably
the
probably
let's
face
it.
The
biggest
culprit
when
people
are
worried
about
Crossing.
Those
is
the
right
on
red
yeah,
which
I
know
we're
starting
to
try
to
look
start
to
look
at
Council
has
to
start
looking
at.