►
From YouTube: Bothell Planning Commission Meeting - June 21, 2023
Description
0:00:05 - Call to Order
0:04:30 - Public Comments
0:09:55 - Public Hearing: Downtown Transition Affordable Housing Overlay (DTAHO) amendments
1:35:35 - Study Session: Imagine Bothell Comprehensive Plan update on Racial Equity Analysis and Toolkit, engagement work, and the draft climate element
2:59:50 - Reports from Staff
3:00:15 - Reports from Members
A
Before
we
move
on
to
the
agenda
items
I'd
like
to
acknowledge
our
hybrid
meeting
format,
the
city
of
Bothell
is
providing
the
option
to
attend
this
meeting,
either
in
person
or
remotely
via
Zoom
for
those
participating
via
Zoom.
The
chat
and
question
functions
are
not
available
for
use
to
ensure
compliance
with
the
open
public
meetings
act.
We
have
a
public
comment
agenda
item
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting.
This
time
is
for
comments
not
on
tonight's
agenda.
A
If
you
are
here
specifically
to
comment
on
the
downtown,
affordable
housing
overlay
amendments,
I
would
ask
you
make
those
comments
during
the
public
hearing
when
there
is
a
specific
time
for
public
comment
on
that.
Please
limit
your
comments
to
three
minutes
and
we
will
be
using
our
little
lights
up
there
to
let
you
know,
as
we
count
down
those
three
minutes.
A
Please
note
that
the
city
of
Bothell
does
not
tolerate
verbal
harassment.
Please
remember
this
during
your
comments.
Public
comment
and
hearing
testimony
will
be
allowed
both
in
person
and
Via
Zoom.
Those
wishing
to
comment
via
Zoom
were
asked
to
submit
an
online
form
by
3
pm.
Today.
People
wishing
to
submit
written
comments
will
also
requested
to
submit
those
by
3
pm.
A
A
A
On
the
meeting
agenda,
or
a
call-in
number
was
provided
on
the
meeting
agenda
for
members
of
the
public,
who
wish
to
call
them
by
phone
and
listen
live
to
the
meeting.
The
video
of
this
meeting
will
be
streamed,
live
as
well
as
recorded
and
available
for
later
viewing
on
the
city's
YouTube
channel
for
our
phone
in
callers
during
staff
presentations
staff
will
make
every
effort
to
specify
which
materials
they
are
referencing
so
that
everyone
may
follow
along
at
this
point,
we'll
take
a
moment
to
acknowledge
the
attendance
of
Commissioners.
A
Lastly,
before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
reiterate
some
meeting
guidelines
for
all
meeting
attendees,
please
speak
clearly
and
pause,
frequently
state
your
name
each
time
before
speaking,
mute
your
microphone
when
not
speaking,
if
you
are
also
streaming,
the
live,
video
feed.
Please
turn
off
the
sound
as
there
is
a
delay
before
we
begin
I'd
like
to
remind
commenters
that,
while
you
may
speak
to
whatever
Top
com
topic,
you
choose,
we
ask
that
if
you
are
a
council
candidate,
you
do
not
use
this
time
to
speak
to
your
own
campaign.
A
A
Moving
on
the
first
item
on
the
agenda
is
for
public
comment.
The
city
has
accepted
visitor
comment
in
writing,
as
well
as
accepted
sign
up
sheets
for
those
who
wish
to
speak
at
tonight's
meeting.
Written
comments
submitted
to
staff
no
later
than
3
pm
today,
we're
forwarded
to
all
Commissioners
and
are
part
of
the
record.
This
time
is
for
items
not
on
tonight's
agenda.
Deputy
director
Winchell,
please
let
us
know
if
there
are
any
comments
received.
B
C
B
B
D
I'm
not
going
to
form
a
narrative
I'm
just
going
to
go
going
to
go
down
a
list
of
topics.
You've
heard
me
talk
about
these
things
before
The
Brookings
Institute
evaluated
the
2020
census
and
realized
that
the
U.S
population
growth
rate
is
0.12
percent.
You
plug
that
into
a
calculator
2044
at
0.12.
We
should
have
slightly
over
51
000.
population
total.
D
Now,
if
you
want
to
go
at
the
high
end,
the
Central
Intelligence
Agency
has
a
higher
number.
They
say
we're
growing
at
0.68
percent
when
we
go
to
2044
that
puts
about
7
500.
On
top
of
our
forty
eight
thousand
fifty
five
thousand
fifty
five
thousand
population
we're
going
to
hit
that
next
summer.
After
these
apartments
open
up.
D
Similarly,
you
don't
impact
population
density
against
the
most
ecological,
sensitive
piece
of
land,
between
Lake,
Sammamish
and
Lake,
Washington
and,
of
course,
I'm
talking
about
the
tire
dust
as
long
as
we're
on
that
they
had
a
webinar
today.
I
hope
you
guys
listen
to
the
Department
of
ecology's
webinar
very
instructive,
got
good
links.
D
D
The
bottom
line
is:
is
that
Metro
buses
only
at
25
full
capacity?
That's
never
going
to
work
when
you're
increasing
traffic
and
reducing
parking
spots
for
these
apartments.
This
is
insane
it's
like
the
Seattle
City
outlawing
fossil
fuels
for
new
restaurants,
no
natural
gas
heat
when
the
electricity
is
produced
by
heat
engines
that
turn
generators.
The
heat
engines
operate
at
40
percent,
carnal
efficiency
and
then,
once
you
create
the
electricity
there's,
a
25
drop
off
again
to
just
deal
with
EV
Vehicles.
We're
going
to
have
we're.
D
Gonna
have
to
put
twice
the
amount
of
copper
over
our
heads
amperage
times,
for
instance,
amperage
squared
time
resistance,
equal
line
power
losses,
you
guys
have
got
to
start
paying
more
attention
to
the
science
and
reducing
Urban
straw.
Thank
you.
Your
three
minutes
are
up
I
know.
Thank
you.
Reducing
urban
sprawl
doesn't
cover
your
bases.
B
A
E
E
So
the
Drew's
application
was
received
along
with
another
application
from
Brett
Carlson
at
the
South
End
of
the
downtown
transition,
affordable
housing
overlay,
and
we
initially
move
forward
considering
both
of
those
together
and
together
they
did
public
notice.
We
did
a
courtesy
mailing
to
Property
Owners
within
500
feet
of
the
of
the
overlay
notice.
E
A
little
bit
of
background,
the
original
proposal
for
the
downtown
transition,
General
downtown
Corridor
and
sr522
Corridor
districts,
which
all
could
be
considered
transitional
districts
within
the
downtown
sub-area.
Those
were
studied
in
the
environmental
impact
statement
originally,
and
the
original
proposal
was
for
a
height
of
four
floors
and
54
feet
then
stepped
down
to
the
30
35
foot
Heights
in
the
surrounding
residential
zones.
E
The
density
limit
was
removed
for
the
orange
areas
on
the
map
and
and
kept
for
the
orange
with
white
cross
hatch
in
the
on
the
map
there
and
that
and
it
was
removed
from
the
area
with
later
was
removed
from
the
area
with
the
orange
with
black
cross
hatch
and
affordable
housing
requirements
were
added
there.
So
that's
all
prior
to
to
this.
These
actions.
E
The
Drew's
application
asked
to
rezone
five
properties
that
they
had
acquired
at
the
North
West
corner
of
96th
Avenue,
Northeast
and
Thor's
Street.
They
asked
to
add
a
provision
to
allow
additional
height
through
voluntary
incentives.
The
primary
incentive
would
be
a
requirement
that
at
least
half
of
the
units
in
this
project
be
affordable
at
a
at
a
rate
of
well.
Actually,
they
didn't
recommend
an
affordability
level
in
their
application,
and
then
they
also
asked
for
conditions
relating
to
the
special
setbacks
and
height
limits
in
the
Downtown
Development
regulations.
E
The
Drew's
rezone
in
this
map
here
that
would
basically
eliminate
the
a
few
of
the
zoning
boundaries,
including
the
boundary
between
the
downhill
and
downtown
sub
area
and
the
West
Hill
sub
area.
So
where
you
see
the
yellow
X
that
boundary
would
be
removed
and
and
the
downtown
transition,
affordable,
housing
overlay
would
continue
from
the
south
to
the
Drew's
Parcels,
where
you
see
the
blue
X.
E
That
would
also
be
removed
as
a
as
a
boundary
of
the
downtown
sub-area
and
but
it
would
still
be
a
boundary
between
the
regular
downtown
transition
district
and
the
affordable
housing
overlay.
The
blue
lines
on
the
map
outline
the
Drew's
Parcels,
and
so
those
those
would
be
the
map
changes.
That
would
be
comprehensive
plan,
amendments
that
are
included
in
your
in
your
packet
and
then
I'm
just
going
to
quickly
as
a
kind
of
refresher
go
over
the
Drew's
application.
E
These
are
the
conceptual
plans
that
they
submitted
with
their
application
and
and
then
I'm,
also
going
to
show
some
revised
plans
or
or
that
that
have
further
developed
lands
that
they've
submitted
along
the
way.
So
the
proposal
was
to
build
a
structure
up
to
five
stories
on
the
Eastern
portion
of
the
of
the
land
due
to
the
topography.
This
is
a
parcel
that
the
only
reasonable,
feasible
access
to
this
parcel
is
from
96th
and
thorsk.
E
E
E
The
front
part
of
the
building,
the
East
part,
would
be
a
two-level
lobby
with
other
uses
looking
down
on
the
on
the
lobby
below
and
then
above.
That
would
be
four
floors
of
essentially
micro
apartment,
housing,
small
apartments
with
small
efficiency,
kitchens
and
a
bathroom,
and
then
a
common
Kitchen
on
each
floor.
E
These
are
just
some
schematic
sections
of
the
building,
and
the
section
in
the
middle
demonstrates
the
one
issue
that
they
that
they
encountered
as
they
were
working
on
these
schematic
plans
and
looking
at
our
retaining
wall
regulations
that
would
essentially
prevent
them
from
doing
a
even
the
minimal
sized
building
footprint
and
still
provide
adequate
fire
access.
Given
those
retaining
wall
regulations.
E
The
Drew
has
also
did
a
parking
study
to
test
whether
our
parking
regulations
and
we
do
have
parking
regulations
that
allow
for
reduction
in
parking
levels
for
senior
and
special
needs
housing.
The
Drews
are
proposing
that
this
significant
portion
of
this
building
be
for
individuals
with
developmental
disabilities,
and
so
they
would
qualify
for
those
parking
reductions,
at
least
for
those
units
and
did
a
study
based
on
on
that
and
the
proximity
to
frequent
Transit.
E
The
future
bus
Rapid
Transit
line
stops
near
the
library
which
determined
that
the
current
code,
which
allows
a
reduction
down
to
0.3
spaces
per
unit,
recognizing
that
for
those
populations,
most
of
the
tenants,
won't
have
cars
of
their
own.
But
there
still
is
a
need
for
staff
and
guest
parking
that
that
what
they
were,
what
they're
proposing
in
their
schematics
would
work,
and
it
is
just
above
the
0.3
spaces
per
unit
requirement
and
that's
that's
a
requirement
that
they
can
get
to
with
a
parking
study.
So
this
is
a
kind
of
a
truth
testing.
E
So
there
they
built
an
engineered
retaining
wall,
just
off
of
the
property
line,
and
then
there
they
have
the
same
special
setback
and
special
Landscaping
requirements
that
the
Drew's
property
would
have
adjacent
to
the
residential.
Only
zoning
that
requires
a
25-foot
setback
and
a
10
with
a
10
foot,
landscape,
buffer
and
they're,
providing
the
10-foot
landscape
buffer
in
a
planter
that
that
sits
against
the
retaining
wall
and
mitigates
the
height
of
the
retaining
wall.
E
So
the
first
figure
in
the
in
the
proposed
amendments
deals
with
a
non-engineered
retaining
structure
such
as
a
rock
re.
So
that's
not
a
vertical
wallet
set
back
at
an
angle
and
in
that
in
those
kitchen
situations,
the
base
of
the
retaining
wall
needs
to
be
as
far
away
from
the
property
line
as
as
the
height
the
overall
height
between
the
base
of
the
wall
and
the
property
line.
So
it
it
basically
allows
for
a
one-to-one
slope
behind
the
prop.
C
E
The
retaining
wall,
the
second
figure-
shows
an
engineered
retaining
wall
similar
to
the
one
that
we
just
looked
at
at
the
Ross
Road
Townhomes,
whereby
an
engineered
retaining
wall
can
be
built
within
a
foot
of
the
property
line.
This
one
shows
that
that
the
10-foot
required
landscape
buffer
can
be
provided
in
up
to
two
Planters
up
against
that
wall
and
that
a
10
foot,
a
minimum
10
foot
access
space
is
needs
to
be
allowed
for
fire
access
and
other
access
to
the
building.
E
E
Then,
when
it
comes
to
the
special
setback
requirements.
Currently,
all
of
the
transition
zones
require
a
25
foot,
special
setback
from
adjacent
residential,
only
zones
with
a
10-foot
landscape
buffer,
as
shown
in
these
diagrams,
and
then
they
also
require
a
an
upper
level
setback
that
above
three
stories
building
needs
to
be
set
back.
Another
65
feet,
as
shown
whether
it's
directly
adjacent
or
across
the
street,
from
residential
only
zoning.
E
So
what
we're
proposing
in
the
in
the
code
amendments
that
you've
received
tonight
is
to
allow
an
exception
to
those
special
setback
and
height
limits
only
for
projects
that
are
getting
a
voluntary
incentive
for
that
additional
height
and
providing
that
50
percent,
at
least
50
percent
of
the
units
as
affordable
units
and
we're
proposing
that
those
be
affordable
at
an
average
of
50
percent
of
the
area.
Median
income
get
into
that
a
little
bit
more
later.
E
But
basically,
the
idea
is
that
we
take
the
elevation
at
grade
of
the
nearest
adjacent
residence
and
and
then
take
the
average
grade
plane
of
the
proposed
project
and
allow
that
that
difference
in
additional
height
up
to
19
feet,
which
takes
them
from
35
feet.
The
current
35
feet
to
the
Eis
studied
54
feet.
E
E
So
affordable
housing,
Provisions
I,
already
touched
on
this
there's
already
in
this
affordable
housing
overlay.
What
is
known
as
a
mandatory
program
that
when
we
remove
the
density
limit,
we
put
in
place
a
requirement
that
for
developments
of
five
units
or
more
but
Planning
Commission
is
already
indicated
a
desire
to
change
that
to
10
units
or
more
in
their
middle
housing
deliberations.
E
So
we're,
including
that
here
that
that
applies
to
10
of
the
units
need
to
be
affordable
and
for
the
mandatory
program,
the
affordability
level
is
80
percent.
It
needs
to
be
affordable
to
households,
earning
80
percent
of
the
area,
median
income
for
ownership,
housing
and
60
percent
of
the
area
median
income
for
rental
housing.
E
The
voluntary
incentive
in
this
case
would
allow
up
to
five
floors
and
54
feet
of
height
that
meet
a
certain
affordability
requirements.
So
in
this
case
at
least
half
of
the
units
would
have
to
be
affordable
and
we
are
proposing
that
the
affordability
level
be
an
average
of
50
percent
of
area
median
income.
The
the
other
voluntary
incentive
program
that
we
have
in
the
city
applies
to
the
sr522
corridor.
E
E
Parking
reductions,
initially,
the
Drew's
application,
included
some
additional
parking
reductions,
but
as
we
applied
the
parking
reductions
that
have
already
been
adopted
into
the
code
that,
through
a
state
mandate
in
in
2019,
that
allows
a
parking
reduction
to
0.3
spaces
per
unit
for
senior
and
special
needs
housing
as
justified
by
a
parking
study.
And
the
Drew's
parking
study
does
indicate
that
that
that
they
will
need
about
that
amount
and
they
can
provide
that
amount
of
parking.
So
we're
not
proposing
any
other
parking
reductions
or
parking
amendments
at
this
time.
F
It's
making
the
market
smaller
for
within
the
General
market,
so
essentially
there
will
be
a
lot
of
people
competing
for
General,
like
for
the
reduced
affordability
and
who
wouldn't
otherwise
be
looking
in
this
area,
while
reducing
the
General
Market
and
therefore,
maybe
not
reducing
the
cost
of
Apartments
overall.
Does
that
make
sense,
yeah.
E
I
think
I
understand
so.
We've
received
comments
and
testimony
that
there
is
a
demand
for
this
type
of
house
in
the
special
needs.
Housing
in
this
area,
so
I
think
I
think
there
will
probably
be
certainly
be
adequate
demand
for
this.
This
housing,
one
of
the
comments
we've
received,
was
from
the
Alyssa
Burnett
Center,
that
that
service
provides
services
for
this
population
and-
and
we
think
the
proximity
to
that,
and
they
they
indicated
that
that
this
would
be
a
a
great
location
for
this
kind
of
housing.
E
The
Drews
are
proposing
a
mix
of
affordable
and
market
rate
housing
and
a
mix
of
special
needs
and
and
general
population
housing
in
their
projects.
So
it
will
add
also
to
the
the
supply
of
of
General
needs
housing,
albeit
in
a
particular
form
of
micro
housing,
that
we
also
think
there
is
a
demand
for
in
this
market.
So
it's
true
that
it
won't
provide
as
much
of
that
as
as
it
would
otherwise
as
a.
E
F
F
I
was
just
looking
at
the
the
bigger
picture
about
how
in
general
affordability
rates
so
just
to
clarify
we,
when
we
are
talking
about
these
kinds
of
modifications
to
the
code,
we're
not
talking
about,
including
this
is
downtown
within
the
downtown
area
and
then
applying
this
to
every
new
construction
within
the
downtown
area.
We're
kind
of
talking
about
this
site
with
this
topography
and
this
well
affordability.
Essentially,
it
would
have
to
be
sort
of
co-sponsored,
Living,
Spaces
and
not
just
all
the
way
downtown
anybody.
F
E
I
would
be
surprised
to
see
that
there
may
be
a
couple
of
other
sites,
there's
the
Kane
County
Housing
Authority
site
next
to
it
that
the
Housing
Authority
has
been
approached
and
asked
if
they
would
be
interested
in
this-
and
they
say
they
have
no
plans
to
redevelop
that
site
in
the
in
the
near
future.
But
you
know
down
the
road
that
it
might
be
something
that
would
be
appropriate
there.
E
And
then
there
are
other
portions
of
this
of
the
overlay,
where
the
topography
wouldn't
really
provide
as
much
of
a
of
a
opportunity
to
increase
the
heights
without
impacting
the
surrounding
residential.
So
so
it
will
be
limited
in
that
regard.
We
the
reason
we
didn't-
and
this
is
in
response
to
some
of
the
comments
we
received.
G
Westerbeck
thanks,
commissioner
westerbeck
Dave
I
know:
we've
talked
a
bit
as
this
is
developed
about.
Have
we
have
staff
started
to
develop
what
sort
of
topography
changes
would
be
required,
or
are
we
going
to
sort
of
codify
that
or
measure
that,
or
you
know,
detail
that
somehow
because
I
know
there's
been
a
lot
of
talk
about?
C
H
Do
you
want
me
to
know
okay,
Commissioners?
Thank
you
Dave
and
Connie
Drews.
Here
we
just
wanted
to
just
give
a
quick
brief
overview
of
the
project
and
the
first
place
that
we
wanted
to
start
is.
How
did
we
get
here
in
the
in
the
first
place,
and
so
we
have
a
wonderful
24
year
old
daughter
who
does
have
special
needs,
and
when
we
were
looking
around
at
options,
there
are
very,
very,
very
limited
options.
H
In
fact,
a
recent
study
showed
that
in
the
last
decade
only
so
this
is
for
a
population
of
37
000
individuals
with
idd
in
Washington
state.
In
the
last
decade,
only
28
units
per
year
were
built
in
Washington
state,
so
the
the
need
is
staggering
and
the
the
number
of
new
units
coming
online
is
very,
very
limited.
So
so
that's
how
we
got
here.
We
actually
unintentionally
got
here
also
because
we
started
by
trying
to
buy
one
lot
in
order
to
develop
on
that
lot.
H
H
And
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
with
these
code.
Amendments
is
to
make
it
possible
to
have
this
project
move
forward.
So
in
order
for
it
to
move
forward,
the
essentially
the
simplified
way
that
I
think
about
it
is
there
has
to
be
enough
money
coming
in
to
cover
the
money
that's
going
out,
and
so
just
to
sum
it
up.
We
believe
that
this
project
is
an
asset
for
the
entire
Bothell
community
and
for
the
families
and
individuals
with
idd
anything
to
add.
I
I
think
you've
heard
us
say
this
I
feel
like
it's
kind
of
a
repetitive
thing,
but
there
is
a
great
great
need
here
for
this
and
also
it's
a
very
different
as,
as
we
heard
David
boydshare,
it's
a
very
different.
There
is
not
this
type
of
housing
in
Bothell,
you
know,
so
it's
it's
not
only
for
the
individuals
with
developmental
disability,
but
also
there's
a
population
of
students
and
young
professionals
and
people
that
I
mean
I.
Think
about
our
typical
developing
young
adults
that
can't
even
afford
places
in
Bothell.
A
B
K
Hi
I'm
Katie,
inquist
and
I'd
like
to
start
out
by
saying.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
listening.
I
appreciate
that
the
current
code
proposals
are
somewhat
representative
of
the
thoughts
and
feedback
from
the
community.
I
assume
this
is
never
an
easy
process.
So
I
appreciate
your
efforts
when
I
first
heard
about
this,
any
pushback
from
the
community
was
seemingly
Shrugged
off.
K
I
was
told
from
some
members
of
City
leadership
that
it
must
just
mean
that
I
don't
want
to
welcome
more
people
into
my
neighborhood,
and
this
was
so
off
base
and
made
me
pretty
upset.
I,
wasn't
being
heard
and
I
think
we
do
need
more
housing
and
more
housing
options
and
we
need
more
community
space,
more
public
transportation,
opposite
options.
So
do
I
oppose
new
neighbors
in
my
neighborhood.
Absolutely
not
do
I
oppose
a
five-story
building
as
opposed
to
a
three-story
one
in
my
literal
backyard.
K
Yes,
I
do
I
I
five
stories:
it's
not
a
high-rise
by
any
means,
but
it's
much
taller
than
the
three
stories
currently
allowed.
It
is
bordering
single-family
neighborhoods
and,
while
single-family
zoning
May
soon
be
a
thing
of
the
past
to
go
from
three
stories
to
five
stories
in
a
transition
zone
in
an
area
where
individuals
who
are
adjacent
to
the
Zone
believed
that
their
homes
would
be
protected
from
buildings.
This
size
of
those
that
are
similar
to
the
downtown
core.
K
Please
maintain
the
requirement
that
any
additional
height
within
this
zone
is
only
permitted
when
the
proposed
development
is
topographically
lower
than
adjacent
single-family
homes.
I
can't
emphasize
enough
how
much
this
will
lessen
the
detrimental
impact
on
surrounding
homes
if
there's
room
for
misinterpretation,
the
city
and
the
community
are
at
risk
for
many
future
issues
with
development
within
this
Zone
in
the
affordable
housing
overlay.
K
While
we're
at
it
I'd
like
to
request
that
additional
requirements
for
parking
and
infrastructure
be
added
to
code
amendments,
there
must
be
more
sidewalks
traffic
calming
devices
and
there
has
to
be
more
parking
enforcement.
If,
if
developments
are
allowed
to
provide
less
parking
for
residents,
we
need
more
parking
enforcement,
we
don't
have
enough
parking
for
patrons
and
visitors
downtown
the
residents
who
live
in
all
these
buildings.
Here
they
park
on
the
street
as
much
as
we'd
like
that
they
they
didn't.
K
L
L
Disability
find
a
safe
and
affordable
apartment,
so
she
can
live
independently
and
feel
successful.
Recently,
I
have
looked
at
a
minimum
of
25
one-bedroom
apartments
in
the
Bothell
area
and
so
far
the
shockingly
expensive
rental
prices
have
made
that
impossible
with
her
limited
income
from
SSDI
and
her
part-time
job.
L
Are
you
aware
I'm
sure
you
guys
are
that
a
one
bedroom
apartment
near
Bothell
costs
anywhere
from
fifteen
hundred
forty
dollars
to
eighteen
hundred
dollars
per
month,
and
that
does
not
include
any
utilities
and
as
far
as
Section
8
housing
is
concerned,
there
is
a
four
to
six
year.
Wait
list
we're
hopeful
in
the
future
for
the
Drew's
proposal,
in
that
our
daughter
may
possibly
be
able
to
live
independently.
L
M
Hi
I'm
Rachel
ogerko,
you
did
pretty
good
I'm
a
pediatric
nurse
in
the
North
Shore
School
District
I've
lived
in
Bothell
my
whole
life
and
I
have
a
sister
Amy
who's,
an
adult
with
intellectual
and
developmental
disabilities
and
I'm
sure
there's
a
lot
of
people
in
the
room
representing
that
population,
as
we've
talked
about,
because
that
population
may
not
be
able
to
represent
themselves
so
I'm
here
to
advocate
in
the
next
couple
of
minutes
for
that
population,
adults
with
intellectual
and
developmental
disabilities.
We
call
it
idd
according
to
the
National
Institute
of
Health.
M
Idd
are
differences,
people
with
differences
that
usually
present
at
birth
and
that
uniquely
affect
the
trajectory
of
the
individual's
physical,
intellectual
and
or
emotional
development.
My
sister
Amy
was
born
with
a
genetic
condition
called
vcfs.
You
don't
need
to
bother
with
what
that
is.
It's
actually
quite
common.
When
it
comes
to
genetic
conditions,
she
has
had
to
overcome
many
obstacles,
including
several
surgeries,
learning
challenges,
social
struggles
and
recently
she
developed
a
seizure
disorder.
M
M
It's
her
Mantra
is
to
be
able
to
be
independent
and
live
by
herself,
she's
41,
and
she
has
the
cognitive
and
social
emotional
development
of
someone
much
younger,
which
makes
it
really
hard
to
live
independently
and
really
hard
to
be
an
adult
in
a
society
that
runs
a
lot
faster
than
she
does
she's
very
vulnerable
and
at
risk
of
physical
and
emotional
harm.
She
has,
over
the
past
20
years,
tried
a
lot
of
different
living
situations.
M
Much
like
many
other
people,
she's
lived
with
her
parents
lived
with
an
uncle
she's
rented
a
room,
she's
had
a
roommate
and
she
was
married
for
eight
years,
and
so
she
owned
a
home
with
her
ex-husband.
Unfortunately,
she
endured
emotional
hardships
and
abuse
in
those
some
of
those
situations
and
she's
temporarily
back
home
with
my
parents.
M
N
Good
evening,
Melinda
Davies
I'm
a
resident
in
the
landing
Townhomes,
which
is
kitty
corner
to
the
proposed
Drew's
development.
I
understand
that
change
is
inevitable.
The
development
where
I
live
was
a
change
for
the
neighborhood
several
years
ago,
I'm
here
today
to
express
my
concern
not
over
the
potential
change,
but
the
terms
by
which
the
city
could
allow
it
specifically,
if
the
only
way
the
Drew's
project
Works
financially,
is
to
allow
a
taller
building
with
less
setback
and
very
minimal
parking
as
a
reasonable
person.
N
D
D
D
D
A
C
O
Hi,
my
name
is
Cameron
Hilton
and
I'm
here
to
speak
on
the
proposal
to
amend
the
downtown
transition
overlay,
as
was
discussed
earlier
and,
as
was
mentioned
in
the
packet,
the
Amendments
that
we're
discussing
will
apply
to
the
entire
downtown
transition,
affordable
housing
overlay,
not
just
the
Drew's
proposal,
so
I
think
it's
disingenuous
to
say
we're
just
talking
about
the
Drew's
proposal
tonight.
If
separating
proposals
is
a
distinction
in
a
name
only
I
reviewed
the
the
code.
O
Amendments
and
I'm
I'm
pleased
that
there
has
been
some
listening
to
the
community
feedback
and
the
progress
that's
been
made,
but
I'm
very
concerned
that
issues
of
traffic
safety,
walkability
and
parking
still
aren't
addressed
anywhere.
While
these
may
not
be
a
big
concern
in
the
Drew's
proposal,
they
are
in
other
areas
of
the
downtown
transition
overlay.
O
It's
important
that
traffic
safety,
road
conditions
in
parking
get
addressed
alongside
the
other
code
amendments
that
have
already
been
outlined
and
discussed
the
way
that
the
code
amendments
are
currently
written.
Proposals
in
the
downtown
transition
overlay
with
the
scope
and
location
similar
to
the
one
that
was
previously
proposed
in
the
Carlson
proposal
would
be
able
to
move
forward
with
limited
minor
modifications.
O
O
This
neighborhood's
roads
are
already
incredibly
hazardous
for
vehicle
cyclists
and
pedestrians
and
contain
multiple
points
where
the
street
Narrows
to
one
lane
at
intersections
has
several
blind
spots
and
many
sections
of
incomplete
sidewalk.
So
again,
while
the
proposals
proposed
amendments
may
make
a
lot
of
sense
for
the
Drew's
proposal,
they
don't
make
sense
for
a
lot
of
other
areas
in
the
downtown
transition.
O
My
neighborhood
has
had
to
live
with
the
consequences
of
decisions
that
the
city
made
many
decades
ago,
and
the
city
should
have
to
live
with
the
consequences
of
those
decisions
as
well,
unless
they're
prepared
to
make
commensurate
investments
for
additional
development,
please
add
language
ensuring
that
any
upzoning
in
the
transition
overlay
that
increases
traffic.
Thank
you
here.
This
requires
roads
to
be
brought.
P
P
P
Perhaps
there
will
be
an
increase
in
rental
prices
and
taxes
and,
of
course,
maybe
that
makes
affordable
housing
less
affordable,
I
support
the
growth
management
act,
I
voted
for
it
several
years
ago,
however,
I
urge
you
to
move
forward
cautiously
and
be
deliberate
in
your
process.
In
your
in
your
consideration
of
these
proposals.
Q
Q
Basically,
on
one
side,
you
got
single
family
homes
and
the
other
side
in
the
very
top
corner,
there's
a
five-story
building
and
what
what
missing
middle
is
proposing
is
that
we've
got
this
middle.
That's
missing
right,
but
here
today
what
we're
trying
to
discuss
is
how
we
can
get
that
five-story
building
right
up
next
to
those
single-family
homes.
Q
We
want
to
cut
out
the
middle
today.
So,
okay,
let's
consider
this.
How
can
we
do
this
in
a
way?
How
can
we
justify
this?
A
60
foot
tall
apartment,
complex
next
to
a
single
family
home
and
the
main
issue
at
hand,
is
the
extra
height
blocking
the
sight
line
of
those
homes
and
just
generally
being
unsightly
when
it's
just
juxtaposed
next
to
the
small
houses
around
it.
So
one
idea
that
came
up
today
that
I
think
is
very
fair,
is
the
topography.
Q
If
a
lot
is
lower,
that's
changing
the
sight
lines,
the
shadows
as
Mark
brought
up
all
that
sort
of
stuff.
I,
think
that's
a
very
fair
thing
to
incorporate
I
think
there's
a
couple
of
others
that
haven't
been
mentioned
and
we're
jumping
to
this
voluntary
incentive
instead
and
I.
Think
what
another
possible
mitigation
is
to
have
such
a
thick
and
wide
Green
Belt
that
you
can't
see
the
building
but
getting
a
60
foot
tall
green
belt
like
that
is
going
to
take
20
years
worth
of
Evergreen
growth.
Q
Q
B
R
Hi
Whitney
Holliday
here
so
I've
been
kind
of
listening
and
I'm
familiar
with
these
proposals,
but
I.
You
know
one
thing
that
I
was
wondering
you
know.
A
lot
of
this
is
just
predicated
on
the
affordability
aspect
of
this
I
mean
it
seems,
like
that's
the
Cornerstone
of
what
we're
doing
here
and
I,
just
wondering
how
you
know
we're
gonna
enforce
the
affordability.
Is
there
going
to
be
a
deed
restriction?
R
You
know
what
is
to
stop
somebody
from
just
raising
the
rents
whenever
they
want
to,
and
then
you
know
the
other
thing
you
know
specifically
with
the
Jerusalem
proposal
that
I'm
trying
to
understand
is
you
know
what
what
makes
this
Development
Special
Needs
and
you
know
what
what
ensures
that
it's
going
to?
Does
it
have
a
specific
build
out?
Does
it
have
special
services
in
there
that
are
part
of
this
building?
R
Because
you
know
I
wonder
if
the
you
know
we
have
the
the
Drew's
owners
now
if
they
sell
the
building
to
a
commercial,
real
estate
investor
who
just
says
I,
don't
care
about
special
needs
or
anything
like
that,
I'm
just
going
to
rent
it
as
an
apartment
building,
so
I'm,
just
I,
guess
I'm
trying
to
understand
how
these
societal
Goods
that
are
being
presented
right
now
are
going
to.
We
know
that
they're
going
to
stay
with
this
property,
and
then
you
know
I
also
kind
of
want
to
bring
up.
R
You
know,
I.
Think
trojan
horse
is
like
kind
of
a
good
analogy
that
I
heard
earlier,
but
you
know:
I
have
a
background
in
commercial
real
estate
and
these
small
efficiency
dwelling
units
rent
for
the
highest
price
per
foot
and
I.
Don't
think
you
need
to
be
a
math
genius
to
understand
that
if
two
buildings
that
have
10
000
square
feet
total
that
one
that
rents
for
five
dollars
a
foot
makes
more
money
than
the
one
that
runs
for
two
dollars
a
foot.
R
So
I
can
see
why
developers
want
to
build
as
many
of
these
small
units
as
they
can,
but
I
start
to
question
how?
How
great
is
that
for
for
anybody
or
their
affordability?
You
know
otherwise.
I've
got
a
500.
You
know
a
month,
cardboard
box
that
I
can
rent
for
you.
You
know
yeah,
it's
great,
because
it's
affordable,
so
I
I,
I,
I,
guess
I
just
wondering
are:
is
there
going
to
be
a
minimum
square
square
footage
for
units
like
this
or
is
it
just
we're
just
saying
it's
affordable
and,
and
we
don't
really
care?
S
S
T
Thank
you
Commissioners.
My
name
is
Michelle
hollowichuk
and
I've
been
a
long
time
resident
of
Bothell
with
deep
roots
here.
I
also
have
a
son
with
intellectual
and
other
disabilities,
and
I
am
strongly
in
supporting
the
Drew's
projects.
My
support,
changing
the
zones
and
building
it
five
stories
and
the
setback
and
the
whole
the
whole
bit
I
think
they've
been
very
thoughtful
about
the
issues
such
as
parking
and
the
other.
T
You
know
issues
related
to
the
lot
that
have
been
brought
up
by
the
other
citizens,
living
nearby,
I,
think
again,
I
would
say
like
to
Gary
and
some
of
the
other
naysayers.
We
we
have
these
people
in
our
community.
Now
we
have
to
house
them.
That's
the
compassionate
thing
to
do.
That's
the
right
thing
to
do,
and
and
we
need
to
increase
housing
density.
That's
that's
the
way
to
avoid
sprawl
that
destroys
our
Earth.
Okay,
that's
pretty
well
documented.
T
So
a
couple
of
issues
that
haven't
people
haven't
spoken
to
that
I'll
just
mention
I
mean
the
housing
crisis
for
people
with
disabilities
is
growing.
This
District
itself
has
graduated
I,
don't
know
how
many
kids
graduated
from
North
Shore
this
year,
1500
2,
000
kids
somewhere
in
that
range
13
to
14,
of
those
people
grad
graduate
with
with
intellectual
disabilities,
and
they
need
housing.
They
need
a
place
to
be.
This
is
their
Village.
T
They
need
access
to
Services,
they
need
access
to
all
the
things
we
choose
when
we
want
to
be
citizens
and
we
choose
to
live
downtown.
Okay.
This
is
a
great
site
for
this
project
and
this
is
my
son's
Village.
This
is
where
his
people
are,
and
this
is
where
he
needs
to
be-
to
access
the
kind
of
quality
of
life
that
we
all
desire.
T
So
I
want
to
mention
like
about
there's
this
bill,
1628
right,
that's
in
front
of
the
committee
right
now,
and
it
deals
with
modifying
local,
real,
real
estate,
excise
taxes
and
stuff,
like
that
and
I.
Think
that
that's
something
you
know
that
that
would
be
useful,
that
you
know
that
I'm
sure
the
city
could
benefit
from
that's
that's
trickling
down
to
communities,
that's
something
that
might
be
helpful,
but
the
rather
also
indirect
economic
benefits.
T
You
know
our
people
need
with
intellectual
and
developmental
disabilities,
need
that
support
in
the
space
that
they're
living
in
typically
that
brings
in
you
know,
caregivers
and
therapists
and
people
who
Supply
equipment
for
them.
You
know,
and
it
increases
demand
for
other
services
that
we
use
as
well
and
I.
Think
that's
healthy,
I
think
that's
part
of
a
Vibrant
Community.
We
need
this
diversity
and
you
know
and
I
think
that
this
is.
This
is
the
way
to
go,
and
that's
it.
That's
all
I
wanted
to
say.
Thank
you.
T
B
U
But
there's
some
other
areas
of
this
overlay
that
the
infrastructure
isn't
as
developed,
and
it
wouldn't
be
as
favorable
for
our
communities
that
have
comorbidities
or
have
health
conditions.
It
wouldn't
really
be
walkable
to
go
down
some
of
these
Hills
to
where
the
bus
routes
are
for
a
majority
of
Americans
who
walk
two
to
three
thousand
steps
a
day,
especially
those
with
health
conditions.
U
V
Sorry,
it
was
a
little
late
there,
Brian
enquist
here,
I
just
have
a
short
comment.
I
just
want
to
remind
everybody
that
when
we
write
code,
it's
not
specific
to
a
particular
development,
whether
it's
a
great
case
like
the
Drews
or
where
a
house
directly
next
to
a
proposed
project.
We
have
to
remember
the
codes
written
for
an
entire
area,
and
so
when
we
look
at
the
wording,
we
have
to
pull
ourselves
back
from
you
know,
maybe
that
awesome
case
and
remember
that
this
could
potentially
be
somewhere
else.
V
W
X
Thank
you
Commissioners
for
hearing
us
today.
My
name
is
Maxine
Walker
and
I
too,
am
a
long
time
resident
of
Bothell
originally
from
Canada,
and
both
my
kids
were
born
here
and
raised
in
the
North
Shore
school
district
and
as
Jeanette
stated,
our
kids
became
friends
and
we
became
friends.
We
have
a
a
special
ed
moms
group
that
meet
once
a
month
and
our
kids
go
to
a
class
from
a
special
ed
teacher
with
30
years
of
experience.
X
So
while
there
is
different
views
about
I,
don't
understand
all
the
coding
and
the
building,
and
it
was
kind
of
abrasive,
the
one
lady
that
made
the
comment
about
well,
what
if
the
Drews
decide
to
sell
it,
they
have
a
child
with
a
disability.
We
have
children
with
disabilities
and
a
lot
of
the
pushback
seems
to
be
coming
from
people
that
don't
know
what
that
feels
like
have
never
experienced
to
have
someone
in
your
home
that
from
the
day
they
were
born,
they've
had
disabilities.
My
son
is
25
and
my
other
one
is
18..
X
They
both
have
learning
disabilities
and
mental
illness.
They
both
have
IEPs
just
like
Jeanette,
just
like
Connie,
and
unless
you
you
live
that
life,
it's
not
accessible,
as
that
gentleman
had
stated
that
the
pricing
of
housing
that
they
can
just
go
out
there
or
the
different
comments
that,
if
they're
living
in
a
cardboard
box,
she
can
just
rent
them
a
cardboard
box,
there's
different
criteria
and
requirements
for
someone
with
disabilities.
They
don't
need
a
mansion
to
live
in,
but
they
do
need
a
form
of
independence
with
the
proper
support
and
with
the
proper
care.
X
I
hope
that
this
can
be
worked
out,
but,
as
I've
lived
in
Bothell
for
years,
Bothell
has
gone
from
a
little
mom-and-pop
city
and
developed
into
so
much
more
and
I've
only
heard
push
back
the
entire
time.
This
is
essential
and
I
do
support
the
druze
and
I
hope
it
happens,
because
my
son
is
at
home
and
my
hope
is
either
if
the
two
of
them
can't
live
together,
that
a
development
like
this
happens,
so
they
can
live
independently
with
support
so
I,
don't
support
all
the
naysayers
and
I
hope
this
happens.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
No,
no
one
else
with
with
that
I
think
we'll
close
the
public
comments.
This
hearing
will
be
continued,
so
there'll
be
another
opportunity
to
comment.
Watch
your
email,
so
we
will
now
move
on
to
commission
discussion
from
what
we
heard
and
I.
Might
one
of
the
things
we
want
to
talk
about
is
findings
I'll
just
say
for
the
audience's
benefit.
The
commission
has
consistently
commented
on
the
need
for
parking
enforcement
and,
in
fact
made
written
comments
to
the
Council
on
that.
So
that
might
well
be
a
finding.
Y
F
E
The
planters
that
well,
the
special
setback
landscape
buffer,
isn't
specifically
related
to
Planters
or
retaining
walls.
The
example
that
I
showed
you
under
construction,
Ross,
Road
Apartments,
is
using
a
planter
to
provide
that
10
foot,
and
so
we
I
tried
to
draft
the
code
in
a
way
that
would
allow
that
sort
of
treatment
or
that
would
allow
planters
that
were
adequate
inside
sized
to
provide
the
type
of
landscape
buffer.
E
That's
that
would
be
required
which
requires
a
a
mix
of
of
Evergreen
and
deciduous
trees,
so
it
has
to
be
at
least
five
feet
wide
and
the
the
buffer
isn't
entirely
intended
to
mitigate
the
additional
height
it's
required,
also
for
even
for
three-story
developments.
So
it's
it's
more
just
required
intended
to
provide
a
bit
of
a
separation
and
a
visual
buffer
between
the
denser
development
and
and
the
less
dense
development.
Okay,.
F
Z
G
Our
single
family
zones
right
now
are
all
regulated
to
30,
to
35
feet,
30
with
a
flat
or
low
slope,
roof
35
if
you've
got
a
Gable,
more
or
less
peaked,
roof,
and
and
yet
our
transition
zone
is
also
35
feet.
So
it's
not
really
a
true
transition.
The
setback's
actually
another
issue
you
actually
can't
have.
You
can
have
fewer
windows
on
of
the
five
foot
setback
and
it
transitions
on.
You
can
in
a
single
family
Zone,
which
is
very
incongruous
to
me
as
well,
but
it
feels
like
a
transition.
G
I
mean
if
you
look
at
the
definition
in
the
in
the
dictionary
transition,
I
wrote
down
earlier
the
process
or
period
of
change
from
one
state
or
condition
to
another
really
seems
like
the
DT.
Zone
should
be
more
than
35,
but
not
65.
The
next
zoned
up
from
DT
is
DN
downtown
neighborhood
because
I
live
in
it.
So
I
know
it
it's
65
feet.
We
go
up
30
feet
in
one
jump,
because
we
really
don't
have
a
transition
in
DT,
so
it
really
probably
should
have
been.
Maybe
instead
of
54
or
40.
G
four
floors,
40
feet
and
I
say
that,
because
if
we
also
were
more
flexible
about
parking
for
a
place
which
I
wonder
if
this
garage
would
be
full
and
very
often
at
the
Drew's
project,
you
could
Lop
out
a
layer
of
parking,
bring
it
down
a
floor
and
you'd
really
have
a
four-story
instead
of
a
five-story
and
then,
if
that's
propagated
all
over
the
city,
a
four
four-story
true
transition
zone
might
be
a
more
acceptable
option.
So
I
know
that's.
G
You
know,
turning
everything
upside
down,
but
I
I
mean
think
about
this
for
months
actually
years
so
I'm
glad
we
get
to
at
least
talk
about
it
a
little
bit.
So
you
know
going
from
35
to
65.
The
transition
will
be
something
in
between
I
understand.
We
can't
do
spot
zoning.
It's
more
or
less
illegal
in
our
code,
so
that
does
mean
if
we
did
something
on
this,
it
requires,
as
Mr
inquist
said,
something
that
will
possibly
happen.
Other
places
it
will
happen.
G
So
so
I
wonder
if
you,
if
we
propose
you
know
in
the
future
something
like
or
amend
this,
so
that
if
you
because
you've
got
the
topography
we're
talking
about
and
you
got
a
35
foot,
30
or
35
foot
high
limit
in
a
single
family
Zone,
which
will
soon
be
residential
Zone,
which
will
still
be
the
same
height
limit
as
long
as
the
new
building
and
the
DT
Zone
doesn't
exceed
that
30
to
35
feet
to
the
measured
average
height
you'll
be
fine.
That
could
be
something!
That's
measurable,
that's
surveable!
G
By
a
surveyor!
It's
something!
That's!
You
know
codifiable,
so
just
something
to
consider
if
you're,
because
I
don't
think
that
anybody's
guaranteed
a
if
they
have
a
single
family
home
that
they're
not
going
to
build.
We've
all
experienced
someone
building
a
three-story
building
next
to
us
in
a
single
family
Zone.
So
this
happens
all
the
time
and
to
say
that
a
multi-family
building,
if
they're
otherwise
following
code,
should
never
be
taller
than
your
single
family
home.
G
It
kind
of
tends
to
make
you
feel
like
multi-famil
is
inferior
and
the
people
living
in
urban
figure
and,
as
we
all
know,
we
really
need
this
kind
of
housing
for
all
kinds
of
people.
My
daughter's
idd
also
so
she
might
live
in
this
building
if
it
got
built,
so
I'll
probably
have
a
little
bias
there,
but
this
just
goes
for
all
the
DT
Zone.
G
So
I
just
think
that
the
fifty
percent
too
it's
true,
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna,
remove
a
lot
of
people
from
developing
because
it's
maybe
some
people
know
this.
There
was
a
Transit
oriented.
Development.
Bill
had
died
in
the
legislature
this
year
and
part
of
that
was
because
they
were
requiring
20
inclusionary
zoning,
and
that
means
60
60
to
80
percent
average
median
income
I
think
was
required
and
a
lot
of
developers
were
weighing
in
with
their
numbers
saying
you
know,
that'll
make
a
lot
of
projects
not
to
pencil
out
they.
G
You
can't
build
something
without
either
subsidy
or
has
to
make
enough
money
for
the
bank
to
be
happy
and
you
can't
break
even
they
won't
allow
that,
so
it
just
means.
Basically,
people
are
trying
to
make
the
bill
not
happen
and
that's
understandable.
It
happens
when
we
say
50,
it
does
knock
out
an
enormous
number.
Almost
everyone
would
not
be
able
to
do
that,
and
the
way
it
gets
done
is
by
extra
height,
reduced
parking.
You
know
subsidy
things
like
that.
G
A
So
we
will
be
continuing
this
hearing,
July
20.,
July,
19th,
July
19th,
we'll
discuss
this
again.
Thank
you
for
your
work
on
this
senior
planner
Boyd
and
Mitch
clearly
been
listening
through
the
process
and
have
made
some
modifications,
while
not
satisfying
everyone,
I
think
that's,
probably
not
possible,
but
clearly
there
has
been
some
change
based
on
feedback.
So
thank
you
for
that
and
with
that
we'll
continue
this
hearing.
You
have
comments
just.
E
Wanted
to
touch
on
a
couple
of
points
that
we
will
be
coming
back
to
you
with
the
the
comments
we
heard
tonight
about
requiring
sidewalk
improvements,
parking
enforcement
within
outside
of
the
frontage
of
of
the
individual
project.
That's
a
notion
that
just
came
up
today
in
some
of
the
comments
that
we
received
and
I've
passed,
those
on
to
our
public
works
department
to
to
comment
on
on
the
viability
of
of
those
sort
of
things.
E
So
as
long
as
the
building
stands,
those
contracts
hold
and
those
are
monitored
on
an
annual
basis.
So
we
understand
there's
going
to
be
turnover
and
in
fact
the
applicants
have
asked
you
know
how
much
flexibility
do
they
have
in
terms
of
you
know,
year
to
year
assigning
those
affordable
units,
and
it
is
something
that
can
be
done
on
a
on
a
on
a
periodic
basis.
A
Y
Sarah
Gustafson
here,
first
of
all,
lots
of
gratefulness
to
both
the
community
and
City
staff
for
slowly
working
towards
a
solution
that
might
fit.
And
then
my
question
is
about
the
timeline
of
future
public
hearings.
Do
we
anticipate
one
or
more
public
hearings
and
for
all
the
folks
who
are
here
who
might
be
interested
in
when
this
gets
to
council?
What
might
be
the
next
six
months
on
the
docket?
If
we
can
look
into
the
crystal
ball.
E
And
if
Planning
Commission
does
make
a
recommendation
on
July
19th,
we
are
I,
don't
know
if
we've
actually
put
it
on
the
agenda
yet
or
the
projected
agenda
yet,
but
we're
targeting
the
first
meeting
after
the
August
break
on
September
5th
for
a
council
study
session
and
then
most
likely
a
council
public
hearing
at
the
first
meeting
in
October.
So
that's
that's
when
we
would
hope
to
have
adoption
of
these
amendments.
A
A
All
right,
we
are
reconvening
the
June
21st
meeting
of
the
bottle,
Planning
Commission.
It
is
7
50
and
we
are
coming
back
with
a
study
session
on
the
Imagine
Bothell,
comprehensive
Plan,
update
on
the
race,
racial
Equity
analysis
and
toolkit
the
engagement
work
and
the
draft
climate
element
so
senior
planner
mint.
Will
you
lead
us
through
this?
Yes,.
AA
Thank
you
so,
as
was
mentioned,
we're
going
to
mostly
be
talking
about
the
climate
element
and
the
assessment
and
Analysis
work
that
went
into
that
draft
and
it
is
very
much
in
a
draft
form.
We
had
a
deadline
for
our
climate
Grant
through
the
Department
of
Commerce
to
have
that
draft
ready.
So
that's
what
we're
going
to
be
focusing
on
tonight.
We
will
be
touching
on
the
racial
Equity
component
in
the
context
of
the
climate
assessment
analysis
and
the
element
as
well.
AA
So
what
we're
just
asking
tonight
is
to
review
the
draft
climate
change
element
that
we
provided
the
goals
and
policies
in
there
that
we
at
least
have
drafted
at
this
point,
and
then
we're
also
going
to
provide
a
quick
update
on
the
engagement
efforts
that
have
happened
since
the
last
meeting,
as
well
as
what's
going
to
be
happening
throughout
the
summer.
We
have
some
more
concrete
information
there
and
then,
as
a
quick
reminder,
we're
just
wanting
this
is
a
slide.
AA
You'll
see
a
lot
as
we're
going
through
just
to
remind
what
we've
done
where
we're
at
where
we're
going
we're
at
the
very
tail
end
of
Q2.
So
we
have
our
draft
climate
change
plan,
we're
working
on
a
draft
racial
Equity
analysis
and
toolkit
we'll
have
in
the
next
couple
weeks
and
then
continuing
engagement
and
working
on
our
land
use
Alternatives,
which
will
be
the
next
meetings.
Focus
in
July
that'll,
be
July
5th,
we'll
be
focusing
on
land
use.
AA
AB
AB
So
I
think
this
slide
represents
the
topics
we'll
cover
on
the
next
few
slides,
and
so
first
is
the
purpose
and
the
background
and
under
the
growth
management
act
for
the
climate
element
and
then,
as
Krista
mentioned,
we'll
share
some
early
engagement
results
and
also
climate
vulnerability.
Analysis
that
we've
conducted
thus
far
and
that
will
lead
into
the
goals
and
policies
that
you've
had
in
your
packet
and
our
next
steps,
which
will
be
that
we'll
continue
to
refine
this.
But
we'll
we'll
Circle
back
to
that.
At
the.
C
AB
And
and
I
guess
before
we,
we
give
you
more
of
the
the
regulatory
side,
just
some
definitions.
They
are
in
the
U.S
climate
toolkit
and
referenced
in
the
Washington
department
of
Commerce
Min
model,
climate
element,
but
climate
resilience
being
the
capacity
of
a
community
business
or
natural
environment
to
prevent
withstand
respond
to
and
recover
from
a
disruption
and
adaptation
is
to
reduce
risk
to
valued
assets
and
mitigation
is
to
try
to
reduce
the
amount
of
greenhouse
gas
emissions
or
remove
them
from
the
atmosphere.
AB
AB
So
there
are
other
hazards
the
city
will
address
and
has
addressed
in
its
emergency
plans,
but
tonight
we're
focused
on
hazards
relevant
to
climate
change
or
most
relevant.
The
element
also
needs
to
identify,
protect
and
enhance
natural
areas
to
Foster
resiliency.
That
would
be
critical
areas
and
treat
canopy
and
things
of
that
nature
identify
protect
and
enhance
Community
resiliency
factors
such
as
social,
economic
and
built
environment
factors
and
address
natural
hazards
that
are
aggravated
by
climate
change,
landslides,
flooding,
drought,
heat
smoke
and
wildfire.
AB
First,
on
the
climate
change
and
risk
side,
the
University
of
Washington
climate
impacts
group
developed
a
tool
that
followed
from
a
legislative
Proviso
State
Legislature.
They
created
a
climate
resiliency
tool
that
is
at
a
county
level
and
in
some
cases,
is
more
granular
than
that
and
that
that's
been
helpful
for
overall
Trends
there's
information
from
the
Federal
Emergency
Management
agency,
FEMA
National
Risk
Index
in
Snohomish
County
has
been
working
on
a
vulnerability
assessment.
AB
The
report
is
out
there.
The
mapping
tool
is
still
in
production
to
share
with
the
community
later
and
our
firm
was
supporting
that
effort.
So
we're
somewhat
familiar
with
the
findings
to
date
on
the
environmental
and
social
side,
we're
looking
at
critical
areas,
landslides
and
flooding.
In
particular,
we've
used
U.S
census
data
about
population
and
we've
looked
at
the
Washington
environmental
health
disparities
mapping,
as
well
as
other
mapping,
tools
that
that
get
at
environmental
disparities
so
tree
canopy
and
urban
heat
Islands
or
the
trust
Republic
lands
has
a
park
serve.
AB
AB
So
these
are
percent
differences
from
historic
information
and
it's
a
median
sort
of
mid-range
prediction.
So
15
change
in
the
magnitude
of
the
25-year
storm
and
similarly,
a
15
change
in
the
magnitude
of
the
two-year
storm
and
those
are
notable
for
helping
us
understand
what
implications
there
could
be
to
storm
water
systems
and
then,
in
terms
of
flooding,
anticipated
increases
in
Peak
stream
flows.
AB
More
areas
could
be
flooded,
and
here
we
have
a
little
bit
more
granular
information
up
to
11
increase
in
Sammamish,
River
and
14
in
north
and
swamp
creeks,
and
then
in
Winter.
It's
anticipated.
There
would
be
less
stored
water
in
snow
and
the
snow
melt
would
happen
sooner
than
it
has
been
historically
so
that
could
change
the
flows
in
the
summer
time
and
have
historic,
lower
flows.
AB
Considering
those
changes
that
are
broadly
indicated,
you
can
then
kind
of
look
at
it
in
the
context
of
on
the
ground
conditions
and
in
Bothell.
So
where
would
be
more
vulnerable
if
those
Trends
were
happening
so
heat
islands,
where
there's
more
pavement
and
less
trees
which
are
in
that
speckled
Orange?
AB
And
this
is
from
the
trust,
Republic
land?
You
could
expect
to
see
the
temperatures
being
more
intense
there
than
intrigued
places
and
then,
as
we
were
mentioning
with
extreme
precipitation,
Trends
the
flood
Plains,
there
could
be
changes
to
the
current
mapped,
floodplain
boundaries
and
then
with
extreme
precipitation
events.
You
could
also
anticipate
the
potential
that
there
would
be
more
frequent
risk
of
landslides.
AB
Getting
information
about
how
to
evacuate
persons
of
color
may
have
more
pre-existing
health
conditions
and
have
less
ability
to
recover
after
an
event
or
those
that
speak
English.
Lesson
very
well
may
also
need
more
attention
in
terms
of
the
kinds
of
information
that's
available
before
during
and
after
an
event,
and
then
outdoor
jobs,
so
construction
jobs
would
be
a
category
of
jobs.
There
are
other
jobs
that
are
tend
to
be
outdoors
as
well:
Park,
maintenance
and
and
others
that
that
would
be
falling
in
that
category.
AB
So
we've
done
some
mapping
and
and
took
in
some
information
for
the
Buffalo
area,
for
a
community
profile
and
so
on
the
left
hand,
side,
you'll,
see
a
population
density
that
shows
by
race
and
ethnicity,
sort
of
different
concentration
areas,
and
that
just
could
be
useful
to
take
a
closer
look
at
more
specific
information
that,
if
there's
folks
that
speak
other
languages
or
that
have
additional
risk
factors
such
as
persons
of
color,
you
could
similarly
look
at
maps
of
lower
income.
That
is
also
a
risk
factor.
AB
AB
AB
Then
we
have
the
help
disparities
map
as
well
from
the
Washington
State
Department
of
Health,
which
also
looks
at
different
exposures
to
different
air
quality
and
noise
and
and
socioeconomic
factors
similar
to
what
we
described
for
climate
change
and
then
the
map
on
the
right
is
a
displacement
risk
map.
So
this
would
be
risk
of
displacement,
loss
of
housing,
essentially
of
housing.
AB
AB
Communication
practices
and
education
focuses
on
compact,
affordable
and
complete
communities
emphasizes
tree
canopy
and
green
infrastructure
Solutions
and
addresses
energy
conservation,
clean
air
and
cooling.
You
can
see
some
of
the
quotes
from
from
those
those
early
events
about
promoting
walkability,
focusing
on
elderly
children
and
unhoused,
and
looking
at
building
codes
to
support
people
installing
air
conditioning.
AB
So
that's
a
lot
of
the
background
information
that
informed
us
and
then
we
use
the
model
climate
element
Guidebook
to
do
our
policy
screen
across
11
different
sectors,
and
so
through
these
lenses.
We
look
at
at
your
current
policies
and
and
thought
of
potential
suggestions
or
high
performing
strategies
from
a
few
different
sources.
The
Commerce
guidebook
is
suggesting
and
doing
this
review,
that
between
your
existing
policies
and
maybe
amendments
or
new
policies
that
you
you
try
for
two
to
four
goals
and
policies
in
each
sector
as
a
guide.
AB
So
we'll
walk
through
some
of
these
sectors
and
our
approach
was
first
to
identify
assets
and
that's
people,
places
and
infrastructure
that
are
important
to
consider
and
explore
the
hazards
and
then
review
existing
plans
for
gaps
and
opportunities.
So
our
Focus
was
on
the
comprehensive
plan,
but
we
also
took
a
look
at
natural
hazards.
Plans
in
emergency
plans
that
the
city
will
be
amending
over
the
same
time
period
as
the
comprehensive
plan
and
then
looking
at
areas
of
sensitivity.
AB
How
well
the
community
or
built
environment
can
adapt
to
climate
vulnerability
and
how
vulnerable
are
people
and
places
and
then
identifying
potential
draft
goals
and
policies
that
could
then
be
folded
into
the
comprehensive
Plan
update.
And
so,
as
was
mentioned
earlier.
We
see
this
as
a
very
early
step
and
we
can
continue
to
refine
and
enhance,
as
we
move
along.
AB
So
we
considered
those
and
some
of
them
that
are
in
The
Sweet
Spot,
that
that
help
both
with
greenhouse
gas
reduction
and
with
adaptation
or
things
like
Urban,
the
ones
in
green.
In
the
middle
of
the
diagram,
there
Urban
Forest
renewable
energy
working
with
nature,
which
would
be
like
the
green
infrastructure,
storm
water
solutions
having
complete
and
connected
communities
and
retrofits.
AB
Those
were
those
are
sort
of
The,
Sweet
Spot.
The
other
source
that
we
looked
at
was
k4c,
which
is
the
county
and
City
collaborative
around
climate
change
and
Bothell
is
a
member
of
that
and
they
put
out
a
climate
tool
kit
a
couple
of
years
ago.
That
also
looks
at
high
performing
measures.
So
those
those
are
the
sources
we
we
were
looking
at
so
far
for
strategies.
AB
And
just
to
try
to
connect
things
for
examples.
When
we
were
looking
at
vulnerabilities,
we
were
looking
at
assets,
the
hazards
that
could
affect
the
has
assets
which
again
are
people
places
or
infrastructure,
vulnerabilities
of
of
the
assets
and
risks
and
gaps
and
opportunities,
and
just
to
give
you
a
couple
of
examples
on
the
chart
on
the
right
in
terms
of
increased
demand
for
cooling
in
the
summer
on
the
third
line
there.
AB
Some
of
the
example
strategies
are
ways
to
design
buildings
and
sites
for
Passive,
Cooling
and
renewable
energy,
or
down
at
the
bottom,
two
rows.
There
degradation
and
loss
of
habitat
and
trees.
The
strategies
would
be
around
protecting,
enhancing
and
restoring
ecosystems,
or
if
there
was
damage
to
housing
and
risk
of
displacement
due
to
climate
events
that
that
damage
the
housing
stock,
looking
at
ways
to
weatherize
the
units
or
other
adaptation
measures
that
could
be
considered.
AB
AA
AB
AB
Z
I
know
that
there
have
been
regulations
that
have
been
proposed
at
the
state
level
for
like
passive
house
or
other
architectural
improvements
and
incentivization
of
cross-laminated,
Timber
and
other
kind
of
forward
thinking
for
at
least
Washington
development
standards
and
practices,
and
is
this
climate
element,
something
that
we
could
incorporate
some
of
those
more
more
specific
building
practices
into
or
is
low
development
or
low
impact
development
kind
of
a
broad
reaching
reaching
term
in
in
the
use.
Throughout
this
document,.
AB
But
what
you're
describing
in
terms
of
green
building
techniques
and
passive,
Cooling
and
cross-laminated
Timber
I,
think
are
another
category
of
measures
that
I
think
are
worth
considering
so
I
think
we're
interested
in
in
the
types
of
strategies
that
that
come
to
mind
for
you
and
then
we
can
integrate
them
into
our
our
draft
language.
I
think
those
are
great
ideas
that
you've
mentioned.
We
do
mention
passive
cooling.
We
don't
talk
a
lot
about
cross-laminated
Timber.
AA
AA
So
it's
clear
that
while
we
do
have
a
standalone
element,
we're
making
sure
that
it's
very
well
integrated
throughout
the
plan.
So
some
of
maybe
those
more
specific
strategies
could
be
spoken
to
in
a
more
General
policy
in
the
climate
element,
it
may
be
more
explicit
elsewhere,
where
it
makes
sense
too.
So
those
might
be
some
of
the
things
we're
considering
is
we
continue
to
detract
the
language.
G
Yeah,
thank
you,
for
this
is
great
and
I
I
read
the
packet.
It
took
a
little
while,
but
I
looked
at
all
of
it.
It's
fantastic
I
glad
we're
doing
this
I'm
trying
to
understand
more
broadly.
So
this
is
something
that
was
handed
down
legislatively
and
I
see
we're
going
to
have
an
implementation,
implementation
plan
goals
and
policies.
AB
G
How
okay,
that's
what
I
was
curious
about
the
sort
of
teeth
behind
it
at
the
state
level,
for
each
City
or
or
whatever
the
jurisdiction?
Obviously
it's
the
city
here
in
this
case,
so
I'm
it
sounds
like
this
will.
The
idea
is,
this
is
going
to
be
shaping.
Our
policy
is
Planning
Commission
and
councils,
and
as
a
city
we
we
we
each
time
we
kind
of
open
up
our
code
and
develop
policies,
and
things
like
that.
G
AB
Sure,
well,
certainly,
the
climate
element
is
a
new
requirement,
and
so
the
city
will
integrate
it
as
Christian
mentioned
into
a
chapter,
as
well
as
as
show
how
it's
related
to
other
elements.
But
in
terms
of
monitoring
that
that
came
into
being
when
the
state
went
at
went
from
eight
years
Cycles
to
for
the
comprehensive.
C
C
G
G
G
G
I
was
just
curious
about
like
that
overall
idea,
I
say
that,
because
you
know
we
all
see
City
plans
and
goals
and
visions
and
everything
and
there's
the
old
cliche.
Then
we
put
it
on
a
shelf
and
I
know
this.
This
is
not
that
because
we
have
to
swim,
reporting
and
and
some
benchmarks
and
stuff
to
hit
so
I
was
just
trying
to
understand.
G
E
G
A
C
A
F
AB
F
I
just
want
a
second
commissioner
Kiernan's
point
that
it
does
seem
like
a
lot
of
bullet
points
as
an
overview.
I
know
that
we
are
going
to
go
in
and
get
more
specific
in
other
places,
and
this
is
my
first,
you
know
when
you
do
use
bullet
points.
It's
best
idea
to
like
limit
it
to
like
a
few
to
make
that
impact,
and
you
know
we
want
to
come
out
with
the
bank,
so
that
would
be
my
first
thought
too
sure.
Thank
you.
Thanks.
Y
AA
The
way
that
the
comprehensive
plan
is
currently
put
together
is
in
separate
elements
as
PDS.
That
doesn't
necessarily
mean
that's
how
we're
going
to
format
it.
That's
part
of
the
discussion
is
what
is
the
best
format
for
how
this
is
going
to
look,
but
it's
basically
a
chapter
within
the
book
of
the
comprehensive
plan.
So
that's
this
would
be
in
the
first
page
or
two
of
that
chapter
of
the
entire
comprehensive
plan
is
sort
of
the
Preamble
or
sort
of
setting
the
stage
for
the
goals
and
policies
that
will
come
after.
A
AB
Sorry
so
the
the
state
provisions
and
the
in
the
law
were
to
have
a
mitigation
sub
element,
and
you
have
some
existing
language
in
your
current
comprehensive
plan
that
gets
at
mitigation
of
greenhouse
gas,
and
so
the
top
paragraph
we've
basically
broken.
What
is
a
very
long
policy
into
a
couple
pieces?
One
is
sort
of
a
preamble
to
the
mitigation
sub
element
and
then
a
goal
that
that
would
be
made
out
of
current
policy
to
participate
in
greenhouse
gas
emission
reduction.
Z
These
are
all
the
elements
of
the
vision
in
this
Climate
Change
chapter
or
element.
They
are
all
providing
multiple
benefits,
regardless
of
the
the
cause
or
the
the
element
behind
climate
change.
I
think
that
each
one
of
these
actions
and
our
vision
is
it
can
stand
on
it.
They
can
stand
on
their
own
and
so
I
just
encourage
that
the
language
crafting
and
and
wordsmithing
that
goes
on
for
this
portion
allows
each
element
of
the
vision
to
stand
on
its
own.
That's
all
I'll
say.
F
You
I
want
a
second
commissioner.
Kurtz
call
to
be
bold
with
this
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
we
need
to
placate
flat,
earthers
I.
Don't
think
that
we
need
to
like
dance
around
I
really
feel
like
the
science.
Is
there
we
we
don't
need
to
accommodate
every
Viewpoint
when
when
we
have
the
facts
and
we
can
be
bold
and
if
it
needs
to
be,
you
know
if
the
Council
feels
like
they
want
to
fudge
it
a
little
bit.
That's
okay,
but
experts
theorize.
This
could
lead
to
experts.
F
Agree
experts
know
that
whether
climate
change
is
caused
by
human
activity
is
or
natural.
Why?
Why
are
we
putting
that
in
like,
or
maybe
it's
caused
by
owls
I
mean
do
any
of
us
know?
Yes,
actually
we
do.
We
know
we
don't
need
to
you
know.
Maybe
it's
a
maybe
it's
a
wizard.
We
we
know
we
don't
need
to
go
through
every
case.
It
might
be.
Let's
just
take
that
out.
F
The
Prudent
approach
is
to
establish
policies
again,
the
I
mean
I
I
get
what
they're
trying
to
say
is
to
be
open
to
all
residents,
but
I.
Don't
think
we
need
to
be
quite
as
diplomatic
when
it
comes
to
science
we
can
just.
We
can
just
say
things
that
are
true
and
then,
if
people
want
to
you
know
soften
the
language
and
counsel
they
can,
they
can
soften
it
as
necessary,
but
I
I
support
the
idea
to
be
bold,
speak
the
truth.
F
AA
F
A
A
C
AB
AB
I
wanted
to
mention
we're
referencing
the
goal
on
Transportation,
but
we
didn't
bring
all
the
policies
and
there's
quite
a
number
of
them
that
are
in
your
packet,
because
it's
been
my
understanding
that
you
had
a
a
session
on
Transportation
a
couple
weeks
back
that
covered
a
lot
of
that
territory.
So
we're
gonna
focus
more
on
other
topics.
But
I
wanted
to
call
that
out.
AB
So,
in
terms
of
then
goals,
cc2
energy
reduce
community-wide
energy
use
and
infrastructure
emissions
and
promote
green
building
practices.
So
when
we
have
the
parentheses
there
k4c,
that's
that's
some
recommended
language
from
that
County,
City
collaborative
that
I
mentioned
earlier,
and
then
some
of
the
policies
we
couldn't
fit
on
the
slides
all
of
the
policies
for
all
topics.
So
we
thought
we'd
hit
some
highlights.
AB
So,
if
you've
made
notes
in
your
packet,
let
us
know,
but
here
are
just
a
few
things
about
encouraging
and
incentivizing
Energy
Efficiency
conservation
methods
and
sustainable
energy
in
public
and
private
development.
That
is
part
of
a
current
policy
encouraging
or
incentivizing
new
development
to
use
low
emission
construction
practices,
low
or
zero
net
lifetime.
Energy
and
Green
Building
part
of
an
existing
policy
and
increasing
and
encouraging
the
use
of
low
emission
Vehicles,
such
as
electric
vehicle
neglect
Vehicles.
AB
What
we
were
seeing
in
your
current
policies
is
there
was
more
attention
being
paid
to
some
topics
and
you'll
see
as
we
progress.
There
are
more
suggestions
from
these
other
sources
that
this
happened
to
be
an
area
where
you
had
quite
a
quite
a
number
of
policies
around
energy
conservation
and
reduction.
Y
C
AA
But
right
so
currently
do
have
a
natural
environment
element
and
the
existing
policies
that
we've
made
note
of
notabing
you'll
continue
to
see
specifically
rated
related
to
climate
change
or
within
our
current
natural
environment
element
it,
and
we
at
this
point
we
could
combine
them.
If
that's
something
that
would
be
of
interest,
we
could
keep
them
separate
to
have
more
of
the
specific
Focus
between
climate
and
environment.
So
that's
still,
those
options
are
still
there.
Y
Thank
you
discussion
to
have
because,
on
the
one
hand,
we
really
want
to
highlight
climate
as
a
top
priority.
On
the
other
hand,
it's
so
integrated
with
everything
else
we
would
do
for
our
natural
environment
I'm.
The
reason
why
I
asked
this
is
because
I'm
looking
through
here
and
I'm
like
why
isn't
there
anything
about
Tire
dust
in
here,
because
that's
something
our
constituents
are
very
concerned
about
and
then
I
realized.
Well,
this
is
climate.
AA
Yeah
and
that
relates
back
to
what
we
were
mentioning
about
having
climate
related
policies
throughout
the
plan,
so
it's
possible
if
we
want
to
continue
to
have
a
natural
environment
element
that
speaks
to
things
separate
from
climate
change,
related
goals
and
policies.
There
might
be
some
climate
change,
related
goals
and
policies
that
may
be
more
specific
to
something
like
conservation
or
more
specific
natural
environment,
related
policies.
So
that's
a
way
we
could
think
about
integrating
it
throughout
the
plan,
too,.
F
It
doesn't
need
to
be
more
of
a
sentence,
but
so
that
when
people
go
seeking
this
information,
anybody
who
does
I'm
sure
there
have
to
be
at
least
a
few
people
they
can.
They
do
have
that
guarantee
and
sort
of
it
directs
them
a
little
bit
more
to
be
like
okay,
that's
not
going
to
be
addressed
here,
but
it's
it's
part
of
their
vision,
yeah,
so
I
think
that
would
be
helpful.
AA
And
that
also
brings
up
some
of
our
discussions.
We've
had
about
formatting
of
the
document
and
kind
of
how
to
cross-reference
between
sections,
so
people
know
how
to
navigate
it
better
and
it's
more
easily
navigatable,
because
right
now,
because
it's
in
separate
PDF
forms
it's
not
as
easy
as
some
of
the
other
formatting
that
we've
seen
and
talked
about
at
our
previous
meetings.
F
I
think
they've
become
synonymous
with
a
lot
for
a
lot
of
people.
They
go
climate,
they
think
broad,
overall
environment,
which
is
not
wrong.
Frankly,
so
I
think
some
and
the
more
ways
we
can
direct
people
to
what
they're
looking
for
and
give
them
a
sense
of
the
overall
goals.
I
think
would
be
super
helpful.
AB
So
continuing
on
the
mitigation
side,
we
have
a
goal
on
waste
reduction,
two
of
them
reducing
community-wide
consumption
and
waste
emissions
and
supporting
recycling
of
construction
waste.
So
a
couple
of
examples
by
2030
achieve
zero
waste
of
resources
that
have
economic
value
across
commercial
households
and
construction
sources
and
then
another
example,
incentivized
recycling
of
construction
and
demolition
debris
and
developing
a
program
to
enable
recycling
of
all
construction
and
demolition
debris.
Z
Yeah
in
this
section,
when
I
think
of
waste
reduction
in
terms
of
climate
action,
a
lot
of
education
and
Outreach
programs
around
Puget
Sound
are
geared
towards
food
waste
reduction
and
I'm
wondering
if
that
could
be
plugged
into
this.
Somehow
too,
it's
not
yeah.
It's
not
even
on
the
same
order
of
magnitude.
AB
A
I
think
that's
a
good
opportunity
for
a
cross-reference,
because
when
you
look
at
greenhouse
gas
emissions
from
disposed
of
food
waste,
there's
a
significant
amount
not
to
give
away
my
past
life,
but
and
the
other
thing
I
would
say.
As
far
as
again
from
past
experience,
incentivizing
recycling,
construction,
demolition,
debris,
one
fairly
easy
step
is
requiring
that
a
building
permit
application
includes
a
construction
waste
recycling
plan.
C
AB
All
right,
so
this
would
be
the
last
part
of
the
mitigation
side
of
things,
so
a
goal
on
Community,
Development
and
conservation
and
fostering
a
sustainable,
affordable
and
prosperous
community
and
just
a
couple
of
examples.
There
encouraging
growth
within
your
activity
center
to
support
mass
transit
and
reduce
commute
trips.
Z
AB
And
then
here
we
get
into
food
systems
and
so
some
goal
a
goal
with
some
parts:
enhanced
bothell's,
Food
Systems
to
increase
Community,
Food
security,
support,
local
and
traditional
foods
and
advance
and
Equitable
local
economy
and
then
so.
Some
of
the
measures
here
from
the
high
performing
examples
identifying
suitable
locations
for
Community,
Gardens,
encouraging
and
supporting
farmers
markets
and
supporting
food
banks
and
neighborhood
food
pantries.
Y
Hi
Sarah
Gustafson
here
I
do
have
a
comment
about
the
Food
Systems,
which
is
of
course
one
of
my
favorites,
because
we
all
like
food
and
it
revolves
around
food
and
exploring
zoning
to
allow
small
groceries
in
residential
neighborhoods,
and
this
comes
from
discussion
with
Commissioners
and
community
members,
because
this
is
both
mitigation.
It
decreases
trips,
our
trip
length
and
it
could
also
be
related
to
resilience
if
there's
a
smoke
event
or
a
snow
event,
then
it's
much
easier
to
get
to
a
place
to
get
food.
If
you
can
walk
there
so.
C
A
AB
AB
AC
Z
AB
AB
A
C
A
Z
Yeah
I
would,
second
that
there's
some
overlap
and
it
would
be
good
to
either
distinguish
between
What,
specifically,
is
meant
to
be
an
adaptation
versus
a
mitigation.
That's
not
the
point
of
my
comment,
though.
One
of
the
things
that
I
work
on
extensively
is
I
help.
Households
who
have
homes
that
were
developed
before
modern
stormwater
codes
and
laws
were
implemented
to
retrofit
their
homes,
and
so
that's
something
that,
with
climate
change,
we're
expecting
more
frequent
and
more
high
intensity.
Z
Z
Aspects
too,
because
you
know
older
homes
might
require
kind
of
a
lot
more
work,
but
I
think
that's
something
that
could
be
easily
included
in
a
policy
in
online
153
and
four.
It's
talking
about
new
development
requiring
green
infrastructure,
but
I
think
retrofits
of
certainly
there
are
some
old
homes
in
Bothell
that
probably
aren't
ready
for
climate
change,
and
so
that's
something
that
I'd
suggest
adding
sure.
AB
AA
Yeah
we
have
contact
information
for
all
of
the
tribes
that
are
recognized
to
have
some
relationship
to
the
lands
within
the
city
of
Bothell
and
they're.
Part
of
our
our
contact
list
and
part
of
the
ongoing
engagement
will
include
tribes
and
I
know.
We've
talked
about
that
with
our
consulted
team
and
our
Outreach
team,
so
that'll
kind
of
be
an
ongoing
point
of
discussion,
particularly
as
we
get
into
the
drafts
as
well.
That's
also
going
to
be
a
component
of
the
history
work
that
we
do
with
our
historic
preservation
consultant,
particularly
the
Italian.
I
AA
AB
And
we
have
on
the
following
slides
some
policies
that
are
relevant
to
this.
So
I
guess:
there's
two
aspects:
there's
the
opportunity
to
grow
businesses
that
that
help
the
economic
resilience
of
the
community
and
then
and
then
the
design
and
connectivity
to
those
businesses
and
and
recognizing
that
that
commuting
is
also
an
aspect
of
what
you
know:
people
that
live
in
Bothell
and
commute
out
and
vice
versa.
F
AB
Yeah
I
think
that's
related
more
to
you
know
the
community
having
outdoor
events
like
long
Sammamish
River,
and
you
know
it
brings
in
visitors
and
there
might
be
you
know,
related
sort
of
economic
considerations
so
or
or
in
major
Parks.
Other
events
that
you
would
hold
that
that
bring
in
basically
our
boost
to
the
local
economy
with
those
events,
so
that
that's
the
connection
there
and
we
can
try
to
work
on
the
language
to
make
that
more
explicit.
F
AB
F
G
Where
shares
something
with
zoning
and
development,
but
we've
had
a
lot
of
conversations
the
past
few
years,
with
Council
and
with
the
local
Chamber
of
Commerce,
which
is
really
active
about
more
building
diversity.
We
get
a
lot
of
five
over
one
buildings
which
are
great
they're.
We
need
we
need
them,
but
a
lot
of
businesses
don't
have
places
to
land
here
which
affects
you,
know:
small
businesses
and
business
continuity
and
everything.
So
anyway,
I'm
saying
sort
of
a
building
stock
diversity.
G
Jane
Jacobs
used
to
talk
about
how
you
need
old
buildings,
for
new
businesses
and
on
entrepreneurs.
We
don't
really
have
much
of
that
here.
So
I
kind
of
wonder
if
that's
something
that
we
can
encourage
or
codify
or
you
know
put
down
and
I'm,
so
I'm
sorry
challenging
you
because
I
don't
know
what
that
would
be
yet.
G
But
you
know:
I
I
just
wrote
down,
encourage
Community
or
sorry,
commercial
building,
stock
diversity
and
variety,
and
so
again,
I
don't
know
if
we
slip
that
into
zoning
and
planning
more
or
if
it,
but
it
affects
Economic
Development,
which
is
why
I
bring
it
up.
So
sorry
to
give
you
something.
So
abstract,
but
it's
just
something
the
community's
talked
about.
Oh
quite
a
bit.
AB
AB
G
G
A
Y
Gustapson
here
I
am
feeling
very
uncertain
about
line
172
about
promoting
green
jobs
through
zoning
allowances
and
incentives.
I,
don't
know
if
we
know
what
a
green
job
is.
I
also
don't
know
if
we
want
to
put
so
much
on
our
zoning,
which
is
already
very
difficult
to
achieve,
I.
Think
in
our
discussions
about
Canyon
Park,
we
said
we
would
Reserve
zoning
allowances
and
incentives
for
affordable
housing,
first
and
affordable
commercial
space,
second
and
I'm
afraid
to
put
in
something
here
which
might
not
be
achievable
because
we
are
putting
so
much
on
ourselves.
AB
AB
Resilience,
energy
conservation
and
but
then
there's
like
small
businesses
that
that
offer
services
that
are
that
are
green
or
sustainable,
that
help
promote
sort
of
individual
individuals
to
kind
of
you
know
have
choices
in
in
like
it
could
be
salons
that
offer
you
know:
hair
salons
that
offer
natural
all-natural
products
or,
like
there's
a
lot
of
scales
and
different
examples.
So
we
could
bring
that
back
and
you
can
see
if
that
works,
for
you
to
have
sort
of
a
different
scale
of
definition
and
give
more
meaning
to
it.
Y
Yeah,
that
sounds
great.
Thank
you.
I
think
that
would
mesh
really
well
with
what
commissioner
westerbeck
was
saying
about
providing
spaces
for
small
businesses,
which
is
something
we've
already
discussed
about
incentivizing
through
the
zoning
code.
I
think
we're
getting
to
a
common
combined
idea
that
expresses
both
of
those.
A
And
and
it's
probably
a
detail
well
below
the
policy
level,
but
when
I
look
at
supporting
adaptation
of
parks
and
trails
to
be
resilient
to
extreme
heat.
The
first
thing
I
think
about
is
water
and
I.
Look
at
the
pop-up
dog
park,
which
is
a
big
open
area
with
minimal
shade
and
no
water
so
and
again,
that's
kind
of
in
the
weeds.
But
it's
a
very
important
weed
to
think
about
bottle
filling
stations.
A
AA
C
B
AA
One
and
two
based
on
deputy
director
Winchell's
recommendation,
perhaps
maybe
we
could
finish
the
presentation
and
then,
if
there's
any
major
topics
that
people
want
to
discuss,
we
can
do
that
and
then
any
other
sort
of
smaller
questions
that
come
up.
You
can
email
us
and
we'll
get
some
responses
back.
Okay,.
AA
AB
AA
AB
AB
AB
So
Emergency
Management,
the
city
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
is
working
on
updating
some
of
its
Emergency
Management
plans
over
the
same
time
period.
So
we've
been
coordinating
with
that
staff
and
we
anticipate
this
might
morph
a
bit
as
well,
but
we
have
a
goal
there
to
increase
government
capacity
to
provide
effective,
Emergency
Management,
ensure
it's
culturally
competent
and
providing
Capital
investments
in
critical
facilities.
AB
AB
One
idea
creating
or
identifying
resilience
hubs
were
a
central
point
of
resources
when
we
get
to
the
policies
on
the
next
slide,
I'll
go
into
that
a
little
more
reducing
Community
exposure
to
extreme
heat,
expanding
Partnerships
in
education
to
protect
Community,
Health,
against
adverse
air
quality,
investing
in
community
and
Workforce
resilience
efforts
and
reducing
exposure
to
vectors.
So
that
would
be
like
mosquitoes
and
things
like
that.
AB
AB
So
I
mentioned
earlier,
the
humanax
information
and
just
wanted
to
mention.
There
was
a
study
done
by
the
University
of
Washington
that
looked
at
King
County
information.
That
said
above
88
degrees,
humadex
that
heat
and
humidity.
There
was
a
increase
in
calls
for
basic
life
service
and
then
above
92
degrees.
There's
an
increase
in
calls
for
advanced
life
safety
service,
so
they've
documented
that
in
in
King
County,
and
so
that
was
the
reason
why
the
University
of
Washington
climate
impacts
group
was
showing
the
humidex
information.
AB
And
then
ecosystems
you'll
see
a
lot
of
this
is
adapting
language
you
already
have
in
your
natural
environment
element
to
add
in
resilience
and
I.
Think
some
of
these
get
at
some
of
the
comments
earlier
about
ensuring
we
address
the
environment
more
broadly
so
here
we
have
a
general
policy
and
one
on
Fish
and
Wildlife
you'll
see
one
on
Wetlands
and
that
memo
that's
in
your
packet
from
The
Watershed
company
gives
they're
on
our
team,
along
with
other
folks
and
they're,
suggesting
these
changes
to
to
build
resilience
into
the
good
policies.
AB
And
then
we
get
into
Waste
Management.
So
this
is
the
resilience
side
of
Waste
Management
when
we
covered
so
that
the
mitigation
side
earlier.
So
this
is
managing
debris
during
and
after
disasters
and
coordinating
roads,
storm
water
and
sewer
improvements,
so
implementing
a
strategy
to
expedite
degree
management
work
and
then
identifying
opportunities
for
joint
planning
of
Roads
storm
water
and
sewer
infrastructure
and
areas
subject
to
extreme
precipitation
and
flooding.
AB
And
then
Water
Resources.
This
is
a
section
that
the
Watershed
company
also
weighed
in
on
with
goals
around
implementing
an
integrated,
Water
Resource
Management
approach
that
would
be
surface
and
groundwater,
improving
water
quality
and
quantity,
conserving
reuse
and
retaining
water
supply
and
creating
a
Water
Resource
climate
action
committee.
Where
ideas
and
goals
that
are
represented
in
the
more
detailed
policies.
AB
So
we
obviously
had
some
measures
in
the
mitigation
section
that
were
at
reducing
vehicle
miles
traveled
here
we're
doing
it
from
the
angle
of
providing
redundancy
in
the
way
you
move
around
a
community.
You
know
connectivity
for
sort
of
evacuation
and
Recovery
type
activities,
so
I
think
the
next
slide
has
some
example
policies
so
at
so.
AB
This
goes
to
the
green
infrastructure
side
of
things
that
was
mentioned
in
the
goal:
adding
parks,
open
spaces
and
non-motorized
trails
to
connect
the
various
destinations
across
Bothell,
limiting
parking
near
transit
to
encourage
use
of
Transit
and
decrease
single
occupancy
vehicle.
Ensuring
public
transit
stops
are
located
near
shopping
centers
and
protecting
enhancing
natural
resources
that
provide
multiple
benefits.
A
AA
A
AC
AC
A
Y
AA
So
that
does
conclude
our
presentation.
So
thank
you
all
for
being
here
with
us
tonight
and
thank
you
to
Lisa
and
Adam
for
attending.
It's
really
exciting
to
start
getting.
You
guys
have
get
to
meet
our
Consulting
team
that
are
really
fantastic.
I
will
have
a
bunch
more
of
them
in
person
at
the
July
5th
event,
so
that'll
be
great.