►
From YouTube: Boulder County Regional Opioid Council (December 2022)
Description
Third Meeting of the Boulder County Regional Opioid Council (BCROC). Recorded Dec. 13, 2022
For more information on Region 6 Opioids Abatement activities, visit: https://boco.org/Region-6-Opioids-Council
A
A
Claire
levy:,
I'm
going
to
do
what
I
always
do,,
which
is
to
turn
the
meeting
over
to
robin
to
run.
ah,,
and
I
think
everybody
hopefully
has
the
agenda
in
front
of
you..
We're
going
to
be
reviewing
the
additional
information
that
we
got
on
the
programs
that
we.
A
A
A
B
B
C
C
Kelly
veit:,
all
right.,
so
just
a
quick
recap
of
our
agenda
for
today.
um!,
so
again,,
seeing
virtual
meeting
guidelines
that
we've
had
for
the
last
two
needs.
um!.
This
is
open
to
the
public.
however,
we
do
have
um..
We
do
ask
that
any
public
comments
or
members
comments
from
members
of
the
public
are
put
into
the
chat
and
know
that
the
deliberations
of
this,
the
discussion
will
be
mainly
contained
to
the
council,
members.
uh:.
So
in
terms
of
our
agenda
today,.
C
Kelly
veit:
we're
going
to
start
with
a
quick
recap
of
our
progress.
Today.
review
of
the
shovel
ready
project..
So
specifically
we're
going
to
be
pulling
forward
a
presentation
from
members
of
the
older
county
sheriff's
office
in
the
da's
office
to
speak
to
some
of
those
specific
tj.
focus
investigative
equipment
that
council
members
pulled
out
in
our
last
meeting,
as
you
know,
wanting
to
have
a
little
bit
more
information
on,
and
then
we're
going
to
pull
time
for
council
members
to.
C
Kelly
veit:
project-specific
information
that
was
sent
out
earlier
this
month.,
that
was
a
pretty
robust
document..
So
thanks
for
everyone,,
taking
the
time
to
kind
of
look
through
those
additional
project,
information
pieces,
and
we
will
just
be
letting,.
You
know
if
there
are
specific
kind
of
for
me
questions
that
we.
C
C
C
Kelly
veit:
um.,
we
have
had
an
opioid
operations
group
which
is
really
advisory
in
nature
convenience.
Since
may,
the
roster
of
this
group
is
comprised
of
subject:
matter.
experts
across
the
sort
of
five
approved
purpose
areas,
secure
continuum
from
harm,
reduction
prevention,
all
the
way
through
to
criminal,
justice,
treatment
and
recovery.
C
Kelly
veit:
that
group
did
put
forward
twenty-five
projects
as
our
initial
set
of
recommendations
for
this
first
funding.
Drop.
those
again
our
shovel.
ready
projects
are
really
projects
that
are
already
across
those
five
approved
purpose
areas
and
in
need
of
additional
funding..
So
they're
already
standing
and
able
to
take
these
funds
and
put
them
into
operations
very
quickly.
C
C
C
C
C
C
Kelly
veit:
uh,,
commander
gilberger,
can
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
how
this
might
affect
the
funding.
ask.,
but
we
also
want
to
use
this
opportunity
to
queue
up
a
vote
that
we're
going
to
have
later
in
our
conversation
today.
to
see
if
council
members
are
comfortable,
allowing
a
ten
percent
amendment
in
some
of
these
requested
funds
to
account
for
some
of
these
changes
that
have
happened
in
terms
of
inflation
costs
to
products
or
staffing
adjustments
that
have
taken
place.
C
C
Kelly
veit:,
so
with
that
we
have
three
presenters,
commander:
nico
goldberger,
from
the
boulder
county
sheriff's
office
in
the
boulder
county,
drug
task,
force,
ken
kufner,
from
the
boulder
county,
da's
office,
and
sergeant
jeff
pelletier
from
boulder
county,
sheriff's
office,.
And
I
will
go
ahead
and
stop.
D
Nico
goldberger:
pretty
that
nico,
goldberger:,
good
afternoon,,
council
members
and
nico
goldberger:
folks
in
the
public
out
there,
listening.
ah,,
my
name's
nick
goldberger.
I'm.,
the
commander
of
the
boulder
county,
sheriff's
office.
I'm.,
the
commander
for
the
board
county
drug
task
force..
I
want
to
give
you
a
little
lay
of
the
land
with
a
good
foundation
of.
D
Nico
goldberger:,
starting
of
what
we
have
going
on
here,
and
then
I'll,
give
a
real
quick,
brief
uptake
of
what
this
equipment,
the
titles
of
equipment,
and
then
sergeant
pelletier
will
really
go
into
some
of
the
questions,
or
hopefully
answer
some
of
the
questions.
Some
of
you
had
from
the
council.
D
Nico
goldberger:,
so
what
nico
goldberger:
make
up
the
drug
of
the
drug
task?
force
is
representation
from
the
sheriff's
office
or
the
police
department.
Da's
office.
erie
police
department
in
lafayette.
eerie
is
leaving
the
drug
task
force
july
of
twenty
three,
and
then
there's
of
course,
all
the
other
law
enforcement
entities
in
bulgar
county
to
include
me.
D
D
Nico
goldberger:
take
in
a
lot
of
the
evidence
or
phones
or
electronics
from
all
of
our
jurisdictions
in
the
county
to
help.
D
Nico
goldberger:
this
ah,,
the
project!.
This
is
actually
the
only
one
of
the
twenty
plus
projects
that
is
directed
at
stemming
the
flow
of
the
influx
of
narcotics
coming
into
into
our
community..
So
wonderful
is
that
as
well,.
D
D
D
Nico
goldberger:,
meaning,
if
we're
trying
to
find
out
how
somebody
perished,
and
knowing
that
a
phone
is,
is
the
primary
communication
medium
to
go
between
another
person
or
multiple
people.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
Nico
goldberger:
jeff
will
talk
to
all
the
equipment
that
is
used..
I
will
talk
to
one.
That
is
not
that
he
will
not
talk
to
you,
and
that's
called
truman.
D
D
D
E
E
E
E
Jeff
pelletier:
uh.,
so
the
only
way
to
access
that
data
is
through
a
product
like
grain
key
or
a
premium.
The
flip
to.,
that
is
a
suspected
dealer..
We
have
a
cert
for
for
their
phone.
they're,
unrolling
to
provide
the
pass
code
or
spike
pattern.
now,.
This
would
allow
us
to
get
that
data
that
we
again
otherwise
would
not
be
able
to
access.
E
E
E
Jeff
pelletier:
and
premium
is
the
specializes
in
more
of
the
android
platform,
and
that's
limited
access
to
ios
devices..
So.
E
E
E
Jeff
pelletier:,
plus
the
messages
with
potential
other
victims
which
I'll
talk
about
here
in
a
second.
E
E
Jeff
pelletier:
so
nighthawk.
the
best
way.
I
can
explain
it
is,.
It
is
an
analysis
tool.
My
heart
will
take
data
from
an
android
phone.
E
Jeff
pelletier:,
an
apple
phone
plot
of
data
returns
from
any
sort
of.
E
E
E
Jeff
pelletier:,
I
can
also,
maybe
point
out
other
potential
victims
that
are
buying
the
same
drug,
that
someone
was
an
overdose
victim
of.
E
And
those
sorts
of
things.,
so
jeff
pelletier:,
basically
in
the
assembly
line
process,,
and
that
we
have
to
be
able
to
get
the
data
out
of
the
lock
device
that
without
these
points
we
wouldn't
get..
We
have
to
be
able
to
process
this,
so
we
can
look
at
it,
and
then
we
put
it
all
together
in
a
product
like.
D
B
F
F
F
Nuria
rivera
vandermyden:
activities.,
it's
not
necessarily
related
to
knowing
what
the
substance
abuse.
you're,
trying
to
track
back
the
income
and
the
flow
right
like
I
don't
I
haven't
heard..
Yet
there
are
limitations
on
the
use
of
that..
I
presume
there
are
not.
once
you
have
this
equipment,,
you
can
use
it
for
any
type
of.
F
F
D
D
D
D
B
Robin
bohannan:
commissioner
levy
and
sheriff
kelly.,
I'm
not
sure
who
had
their
hand
up
first.
A
A
A
Claire
levy:,
but
I
wonder,
with
you,
know
all
the
other
law
enforcement
tools
that
the
sheriff's
department
and
the
various
police
departments
use
where
the
funding
for
that
comes
from,,
because
I
think
I'm
having
the
same
kind
of
concern
as
questions..
I
guess
I
don't
even
want
to
say
concerns
that
maria
is
expressing
about.
G
Joe
pelle:
hi!,
so
joe
pelle:
try
to
answer
this.
The
best,,
I
think
I
can.
G
B
B
C
Kelly
veit:
yeah,.
I
can
say
that
they
were.
they
were
kept
in
the
criminal
justice
bucket..
When
we
had
the
five
approved
purpose
areas
in
terms
of
where
they
were
entered
into
the
cost
system,.
I
might
ask
sucker
behind
the
scenes
to
do
a
little
bit
of
digging.
um,,
but
I
would
imagine
they
were
probably
put
into
the
prevention
bucket
um,
since
they're,
not
treatment.,
so.
um,.
I
think
it
was
just
prevention,
treatment
and
then
other.
so
um!.
I
might
ask
tucker
if
he
could
dig
around
for
that
and
validate
that.
H
G
D
Nico
goldberger:
certainly.,
nico,
goldberger:
yes,,
our
forensic
lab,
does
have
a
few
of
these
tools.
however,
we
have
a
backlog,
and
jack
can
speak
to
this..
We
have
a
backlog
of
so
many
phones
that
are
associated
with
overdoses
that
are
still
in
in
line,
because
of
the
limited
number
of
equipment..
That's
what.
D
Nico
goldberger:,
the
other
thing
is
nico
goldberger:.
The
intended
ask
here
is
actually
to
cover
all
the
law
enforcement,
or
as
many
as
you
can
law
enforcement
agencies.,
because
um,,
if
I
didn't
state
it
before,
is
if
somebody
has
a
phone
that
needs
to
be
looked
at,.
It
comes
to
the
forensic
lab,.
D
D
E
E
Jeff
pelletier:,
when
you
get
the
overdose
case
like
commander
gilbert
was
talking
about..
A
time
is
of
the
essence
to
try
to
get
the
data
again,
like
I
mentioned,,
find
other
potential
victims
that
bought
from
the
same
dealer.
That
time
is
of
the
answer.
Essence:
there,.
What
happens?
Is
we
have
limited
equipment,.
E
Jeff
pelletier:
and
when
an
overdose
phone
comes
in.,
that's
an
asap..
We
need
this
right
now.,
but
there's
usually
a
line
of
other
homicide
or
other
major
investigation,
phones,
waiting,,
and
we
can't
just
we
have
to
figure
out
a
way
to
prioritize
that.
and
sometimes
those
overdose
ones
get
trump..
Essentially,.
H
H
Harold
dominguez:
and
still
have
the
phone
because
you
can't
get
to
it,,
because
obviously
the
priority
issues
and
the
and
the
other
components
on
this.,
and
so
I
think,
understanding
that
piece.
H
H
Harold
dominguez:,
I
think.
also,,
harold
dominguez:,
there's
a
host
of
articles
about
how
dating
back
to
two
thousand
and
fifteen
or
so
about
how
the
world
of
dealing
and
trafficking
has
shifted
to
the
online
portals.
um.
and
you
know,
in
terms
of
what
we're
seeing
real
world..
It
is
a
real
issue.
H
A
A
A
Claire
levy:
criminal
justice
under
that
was
law,
enforcement,,
community
corrections,,
jail-based,
addiction,,
treatment,,
post-compressure,,
operation,
social
and
then
I
have
a
little
thing
here
that
doesn't.
Let
me
see
the
last
word
on
there
and
then.
um.,
and
I
think
this
is
from
our
september
meeting
that.
A
Claire
levy:
the
weaknesses
and
needs
that
were
identified
in
criminal
justice
were
workforce,
shortages,
and
lack
of
sustainable
funding
for
medication,
assistant,
treatment,.
A
Claire
levy:
jail,
diversion,
opportunities
to
provide
upstream
intervention
and
avoid
criminal
system
entry,
the
re-entry
services
ah!
during
it.
This
little
thing
keeps
coming
up.
A
Claire
levy:
paris
peer
supports
basically
testing.
A
A
Claire
levy:
law
enforcement
versus
the.
A
A
C
Kelly
veit:
yeah.,
so
I
I
mean,.
What
I
would
say
is
you:
there
is
no
requirement
to
spend
across
the
five
or
three
of
those
areas..
Those
are
just
the
parameters
within
which
we
are
allowed
to
spend
our
dollars
in
terms
of
the
strengths
and
weaknesses
that
were
identified
in
the
criminal
justice.
Category.
um,,
I
would
say
there
was
maybe
just
less
awareness
of
these
types
of
tools..
I
think
this
was
maybe
the
first
kind
of
introduction
to
um,.
You
know
interjection
tools
more
broadly
to
the
group,
to
the.
C
Kelly
veit:
operations:
group.
and
so,
um!.
There
was
a
fair
amount
of
discussion
about
what
these
tools
can
accomplish
in
terms
of
opioid
statement,,
and
the
last
thing
I'll
say
is
that
I
think
these
are
potentially
viewed
as
a
prevention,
effort,,
and
so
prevention
is
an
additional
sort
of
category
across
the
five
of
purpose
areas
so
really
trying
to
frame
this
as
something
that
does
potentially
prevent
proliferation.
F
F
F
Nuria
rivera
vandermyden:
data-wise,.
How
would
that
actually
elevate?,
because
otherwise,,
I
don't
have
entry
into
knowing,
will
that
actually
address
the
backlog.?
Will
it
really
help
in
prevention
efforts,,
or
will
it
just
help
sort
of
law
enforcement
continue
to
catch
up
from
that
backlog?,
and
I
just
don't
know.
F
F
Nuria
rivera
vandermyden:,
perhaps
it
could
pinpoint,
as
new
drugs,
are
coming
into
our
system
as
they're
changing,,
because
certainly
they
change
over
time.
they're
mixed
over
time..
Maybe
that's
when
a
quick
one
to
be
like.
well,
that
will
enable
us
to
quickly
adjust
and
adapt
new
forms
of
treatment..
If
we
know
exactly
what's
coming
into
our
community,,
so
I
can
sort
of
stretch
and
see
where
that
one
looks
into..
But
I
don't
have
insight
onto
what
acquiring
more
equipment
will
do
to
these.
G
Joe
pelle:
and
with
drugs
like
fentanyl,,
that
kind
of
thing.
ah,
the
the
chemical
now
can
cause
explosions..
It
can
cause
fatal.
fumes
and
be
a
really
very
high
risk
for
our
cops..
The
tunard,.
G
E
E
E
E
Jeff
pelletier:
and
we're
trying
to
supplement
the
capabilities
we
have
here,
but
also
add
devices
in
the
drug
task
force
in
the
drug
investigative
unit
within
the
city
of
longline,,
so
that
there
is
no
conflict..
If
the
drug
task
force
works
in
overdose,,
they
can
bring
the
phone
straight.
Back,
go
into
their
own
office,
grab
the
data.
One
hundred
and
fifty.
D
D
D
Nico
goldberger:
and
that's
just
the
drug
task,
force.,
I'm
not
speaking
to
longmont
or
lewisville
or
cu.,
but
that's
just
us,
and
those
are
lives,,
and
this
equipment
will
help
us
do
a
quality
investigation.
D
D
Nico
goldberger:
um..
We
also
have
current
investigations
out
going
with
the
da's
office
that
are
looking
very
fruitful
for
prosecution
on
the
same
type
of
charges,
as
well
as
working
with
the
dea
on
one
for
multiple
suspects,
doing
drug,
trafficking
in
our
community,
as
well
as
the
us.
postal
service,
working
on
the
case
with
them..
So.
D
D
Nico
goldberger:,
that's
a
lot
of
stuff
that
can
kill
you..
You
look
at
the
numbers..
That
was
enough
to
kill-
maybe
ten
million
people.,
but
that's
the
thing
where
we're
trying
to
use
these
devices
to
investigate,
to
stop
those
people
from
bringing
it
in,
or,
at
the
very
least,
just
seizing
those
problems.
I
I
I
Susan
caskey:,
so
I
know,
for
our
hostile
two
fifteen
funds,,
the
marijuana
funds
that
come
down..
We
have
to
be
able
to
show
that
every
dollar
went
directly
to
supporting
prevention
or
intervention
of
substance.
use.
C
I
Susan
caskey:,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
not
getting
in
a
situation
where
we're
broadening
the
scope
of
something
that
we're
paying
for
that..
It's
going
to
be
used,
certainly,
for
in
this
case,
for
prevention
of
you,
know,
drugs
coming
into
boulder
county..
But
is
it
also
going
to
be
used
for
a
lot
of
other
things
where
we
we
could.
C
Kelly
veit:
tools
are
identified
in
the
approved
uses.,
so
in
the
cost
system.
in
terms
of
the
direct
recording
and
monitoring,,
I
don't
have
a
ton
of
clarity
from
the
state
yet
on
whether
or
not
we
need
to
do
sort
of
a
dollar
to
dollar
match
to
really
validate..
You
know
the
extent
to
which
every
dollar
incent
was
used
for
um.,
but
it
is
my
understanding
that
this
would
be
an
approved
area
to
spend
the
dollars,
and
that
we
would
be
able
to.
I
Susan
caskey:,
great
thanks
that
that's
helpful.
and
again,,
I
think,
just
from
my
perspective,.
I
know
we're
not
voting
on
this
right
now..
I
just.
I
think
it's
important
that
we
think
about
a
full
continuum,
and
whatever
tools
we
can
put
in
place
to
try
to
prevent,.
I
I
think,
is
really
important.
B
B
Robin
bohannan:
an
opportunity
to
move
on,
to
ask
questions
or
have
concerns
about
the
other
projects.
um,
so,
kelly,.
If
you
wanted
to
take
us
in
a
different
direction,,
I
apologize.
C
J
Jim
adams-berger:
go
in
that
direction
as
much
as
possible.,
but
recognizing
that
these,
the
use
of
these
substances
overlap
in
different
environments,,
and
so
it's
appropriate
to
look
at
this
as
an
interdiction
tool
that
will
be
used
for
opioids,,
perhaps
primarily,,
but
also
that
it
would
be
beneficial
for
other
substances.
As
well.
K
Ken
kupfner:
thanks,
kelly.,
I
I
mean
I
would
bring
the
da
perspective..
If
I
can
just
have
a
few
minutes.,
I
would
say
that
one
of
the
greatest
frustrations
that
I've
had
in
trying
to
respond
to
these
cases
is
the
inability
to
quickly
test
these
devices
and
identify
where
the
drugs
are
coming
from,.
What
the
drugs
are
being
marketed.
as.
K
K
Ken
kupfner:,
the
way
that
we
have
ken
kupfner:
to
get
that
information
is
through
these
devices,.
The
level
of
frustration
that
I
have..
I
receive
a
call
from
the
corners
office
on
every
single
overdose
or
poisoning
death
that
they
respond
to.
if
they
suspect
that
it
is
something
involving
substances,.
I
receive
a
notification
on
every
one
of
those
responses
from
the
coroner's
office.
K
K
K
Ken
kupfner:
unfortunately,
too
often,
the
response
is,.
We
can't
process
that
device..
We
don't
have
the
resources
to
process
that
I
have
been
begging
the
task
force,
and
our
folks
who
are
responding
to
these
overdoses,.
We
have
to
have
the
ability
to
process
these
devices
quickly
in
order
to
gain
this
information.
K
Ken
kupfner:,
I
have
cheryl.,
I
have
shared
harold's
experience
in
talking
to
the
parents
way
too
many
times,
of
folks
who
are
dying
in
these
instances,,
and
it
is
simply
an
unacceptable
response
for
us
to
say
to
them,.
We
don't
know
where
they
got
the
drugs.
K
Ken
kupfner:
and
it's
it's
three
months
or
six
months
into
the
investigation,,
and
the
reason
that
we
can't
get
that
information
is
at
this
point
in
time..
That
phone
is
sitting
in
a
stack
of
phones
behind
all
of
the
homicide
cases
that
we've
had
in
boulder
county
in
the
last
six
months,
and
unfortunately,.
We
have
to
prioritize
these
devices,.
K
K
K
Ken
kupfner:
there's
a
lot
of
debate
about
it.,
but
a
lot
of
agencies
are
not
willing
to
take
the
risk
to
their
officers
of
opening
up
bags
of
what
is
suspected
to
have
continued
to
making
that
is
suspected
to
contain
fentanyl..
In
response
to
that,.
We
oftentimes
are
not
able
to
have
an
identification
of
those
drugs.
K
Ken
kupfner:,
we
can't
do
anything
with
the
case
unless
we're
able
to
identify
the
drugs
in
a
timely
fashion..
We
cannot
send
the
drugs
to
cbi
and
wait
for
those
results
to
come
back
before
charging
a
case.
and
so
we're
in
a
really
difficult
position..
The
treenark
eliminates
those
dangers.
they.
It
creates
a
scenario
where
we're
able
to
quickly
identify
the
drugs,.
K
K
Ken
kupfner:,
so
I
I'm
a
huge
proponent
of
getting
these
devices
to
the
folks
that
can
utilize
them
in
these
situations..
We
don't
have
that
capacity,
right,
now,
and
and
waiting
months
and
months
for
a
device
to
be
processed
to
try
and
identify
where
the
drugs
came
from
and
what
they
were
marketed
as.
K
Ken
kupfner:,
it
it
just
it's
we're
we're
too
far
behind
the
curve..
If
we
identify
those
things,
three
months,
six
months
down,
the
road,
having
an
ability
to
do
it
quickly
on
scene
is
something
that
we
have
to
have
at
this
point.
K
Ken
kupfner:
um,,
I
will
assure
you
that
our
office
has
two
individuals,
two
prosecutors
assigned
to
the
drug
task
force
and
and
working
with
the
other
drug
enforcement
folks..
Everything
is
done,
legally.,
there's
a
legal
basis
for
every
single
thing
that
we
do..
There
are
court
orders,
search
warrants
that
are
done
whenever
those
are
necessary
from
a
legal
perspective..
These
are
not
like
black
ops,
things
that
the
task
force,
or
any
of
our
law
enforcement
partners
are
out
there,,
utilizing
it
in
an
illegal
manner.
K
Ken
kupfner:
um!
everything
is
done
with
the
da
approval,
and
done
in
a
manner
consistent
with
both
state
and
federal
law,,
and
so
these
are
simply
devices
that
allow
us,
the
mechanism
to
execute
lawful
court
orders..
Even
if
a
judge
orders
a
device
to
be
searched,
or
gives
us
permission
through
a
search
warrant
to
search
a
device.
K
Ken
kupfner:,
unless
we
have
the
ability
to
get
into
that
device.,
that
court
order
means
nothing..
That
search
warrant
means
nothing
unless
we
have
the
ability
to
actually
follow
the
judge's
order
and
and
analyze
that
device..
These
two
tools
give
us
that
ability
to
get
into
devices
when
we
have
a
lawful
right
to
do.
So.
K
F
F
Nuria
rivera
vandermyden:-
I
guess
the
one
thing
I
want
to
just
um,
I
heard,,
and
maybe
that
makes
a
difference
right
to
me.
it's
about
source
of
funds
for
some
of
these
tools.
because,.
If
not,,
why
not
ask
for
them
in
the
regular
course
of
a
budget
process,
or
are
there
other
sources
to
do
that
appropriately?,
but.
F
Nuria
rivera
vandermyden:
again,,
maybe
what
I
heard
from
you,
and
maybe
I
missed
it,
and
it
was
said
before,.
Will
these
tools
be
used,
sort
of
exclusively
for
the
boulder
county,
drug
task
force
and
the
work
that
they
do,?
Because
otherwise
my
concern
is
that
it's
just
another
tool,
generally,
and
I
don't
know
what
nexus
that
will
continue
to
have
on
drug-related
cases
versus
continuing
to
be
subsumed
within
homicides
or
other.
K
D
D
Nico
goldberger:
three
units.
nico
goldberger:
one
is
going
to
longmont
s.
I.
you
at
least,.
That's
where
I
would
like
it
to
go
to,,
because
that
is
also
a
drug
task
force
inside
of
larmon
itself..
They
need
that
to
work
on
their
cases
that
we
don't
do
anything
with
unless
they
ask
for
our
system..
The
next
one
is
going
to
the
drug
task
force
itself,.
D
D
D
D
E
E
Jeff
pelletier:,
when
you
go
to
the
general
like
funding
method
of
trying
to
attain
this,,
it's
always
going
to
compete
with
every
other
crime
in
the
county..
That
is
the
difference
here,
in
that
it
is
opioid
money.,
so
essentially,
they're
not
going
to
be
the
ones
that
are
waiting
because
they
would
be
open
for
that
purpose..
If
that
makes
sense,.
E
E
E
C
C
Kelly
veit:
so,,
as
I
mentioned
before,,
we
sent
out
a
packet
of
supplemental
information
for
all
of
our
twenty-five
project
areas..
Some
of
the
questions
that
we
asked
were
reflective
of
your
feedback
and
previous
rock
meetings..
So
we
did
ask
for
additional
project
background
information,
supporting
evidence
on
the
intervention,.
The
intended
impact
and
outcomes.
B
A
A
A
Claire
levy:
health
workers
in
general,
in
the
field
of.
A
Claire
levy:
um,,
but
I
think
I
did
wonder
whether
these
services
really
are
sufficiently
linked
to
addiction,,
prevention,,
treatment,
and
recovery.
um,,
again
sort
of
similar
question..
This
is
the
right
pot
of
money.
C
Kelly
veit:,
I
think,
in
the
information
about
the
project
description..
They
they
said,.
What
the
sort
of
outreach
and
engagement
approach
would
be
around
su.
d.
and
addiction,
and
in
general,,
but
I'm
not
sure.
If
tucker
is
there
any
additional
information
about
the
dedication
of
this
staff
directly
to.
L
L
Tucker
eurman:
provide
training
specific
to
opioid,
use,
disorder
and
substance,
use
disorder
overall
to
the
community
health
workers
and
then
increase
the
community
health
worker
team
by
one
additional
member.
B
L
A
Claire
levy:
request
for
claire
levy:
training
of
existing
community
health
workers,
specifically
on
addiction,
outreach
and
prevention,
and.
A
B
Robin
bohannan:
one:
yeah,,
I
think
community
health
workers
are
sort
of,.
You
know.
the
first
point
of
touch
out
into
the
community
as
an
outreach
effort
and
engagement.
Effort.
claire,
you,
you
started
your
question
with:
what's
the
role
of
community
health
workers
overall?,
one
hundred
and
fifty.
A
B
B
A
Claire
levy:,
that
are
an
investigatory
and
prosecution,
oriented.,
um,
and.
A
A
Claire
levy:
um,,
but
claire
levy:,
I
think
claire
levy:.
You
know
the
interaction.
the
successful
prosecution.
A
Claire
levy:
stops
that
it.
it.
A
A
F
F
F
F
Nuria
rivera
vandermyden:
harm
reduction
strategies,,
knowing
frankly,
that
there
is
a
nexus
between
sort
of
stopping
the
supply
side
that
has
something,
and
prosecuting
those
right.
As
that
moves
forward,.
F
F
Nuria
rivera
vandermyden:
and
I
want
to
be
fair,
too,,
because
we
haven't
asked
that
question
of
every
single
thing
that
has
come
to
this
and
the
package
on
whether
that
process
has
been
followed,
or
whether
this
is
just,.
You
know,
a
great
use
of
these
particular
funds
at
this
time.
right?
we've
got
this
ability,,
but.
F
B
B
Robin
bohannan:
and
um.,
one
suggestion
I
have,
and
it's
it's
up
for
question-
is
whether
or
not
we
want
to
do
a
separate
vote.
B
Robin
bohannan:
on
the
sheriff's
office
project
and
see
if
we
can
move.
the
other
projects
forward,
wanting
just
to
respect
the
process
as
well
as
the
the
time.,
but
I
also
don't
want
to
shut
down
the
conversation..
Let's
see.,
I
think
you
had
your
hand
up
next,
and
then
maria
again.
B
M
C
Kelly
veit:
so
off
the
top
of
my
head.
I
am
not
aware
I
have
not
heard
of
other
regions
that
are
funding
these
types
of
tools..
I've
been
on
a
few
calls
where
learning
collaborative
type
conversations
where
we've
shared
generally,
where
our
funds
are
going.,
um,
but
sort
of
at
a
higher
level..
I
haven't
really
had
any
conversations
about
specific
programs
that
are
being
funded,,
but
it
is
something
I
could
easily
find
out..
I
know
a
lot
of
um..
C
F
F
C
Kelly
veit:
yeah.,
so
I
think
we
were
just
trying
to
to
quantify
what
requests
might
potentially
come
up
in
later
funding
periods,
because,
um,
they're,
going
to
continue
to
to
need
these
resources.
or
otherwise,
are,.
You
know,.
I
should
say,
depending
on,
but
thinking
of
these
as
a
bit
of
a
sustainable
funding,
source.
um!,
and
so
there
we
wanted
to
identify
those,,
and
then
we
wanted
to
call
out
the
ones
that
are
true.
um,
one
time
request..
So
maybe
they
just
are
providing
some
bridge
funding,
and
there
is
a
sustainability
plan.
C
Kelly
veit:
um,,
outside
of
the
opioid
abatement
dollars
to
continue
funding
that
program
or
staff
moving
forward.,
so
that's
sort
of
our
our
language
being
used
there,
and
it's
it's
not,.
You
know,
super
defined.,
but
it
was
really
just
to
give
us
an
idea
of..
What
are
we
looking
for,
or
what
are
we
potentially
looking
at
eating,
to
carry
it
forward
with
these
dollars,
as
we
continue
these
eighteen
years
of
funds,.
B
B
H
H
H
H
C
Kelly
veit:
yeah,,
I
will
say
in
terms
of
our
strategic
planning,,
which
is
for
the
the
of
the
work.
um!
moving
forward.
ah,,
you
know,.
A
fair
amount
of
work
needs
to
be
done
around
developing
and
understanding
of
the
impacts
that
we
intend
to
see,
both
from
the
respective
programs.
and
then
more
broadly,.
C
B
C
Kelly
veit:
yeah.,
so
one
of
the
last
things
we
were
going
to
speak
to
is
we're
putting
out
a
request
for
proposal
for
evaluation
assistance.,
and
so
these
sort
of
design
questions
of
how
we're
actually
monitoring
the
programs
moving
forward
are
folded
into
that
contracting
process,.
The
monitoring
and
evaluation
and
ongoing
funding
process.
B
B
B
Robin
bohannan:
attempt
at
moving
investing
these
dollars
into
the
community
um!
and
and
continuing
our
process..
So
I
invite
any
other
specific
project
questions
from
the
packet.
B
C
C
Kelly
veit:,
so
I
will,
you
know.,
kick
it
off
to
robin
to
do
the
formal
vote.,
but
I
did
just
want
to
queue
up
a
little
bit
of
contextual
information
about
point
number
two.,
I'd
sort
of
all
leave
it
to
this
early
in
our
discussion,,
but
some
of
our
projects,
their
their
funding,
asks,
have
changed
a
little
bit.
um,,
mostly
due
to
inflation
costs
of
salaries
going
up
just
in
the
time
since
the
original
asks
for
me.
um!.
Some
of
the
changes
like
nico
and
crew
had
mentioned
around
the
the
licensing.
B
A
Claire
levy:,
the
tuna
claire,
levy:
and
great
key
out
and
vote
on
the
remaining
slate
first,
and
then
vote
on
those
separately.
A
B
A
B
Robin
bohannan:,
so
it
looks
like
we,
the
full
slate
has
been
approved
with
um..
If
I'm
reading
the
screen
correctly
and
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong
with
nrea
a
closed.
B
A
B
A
B
G
Joe
pelle:
and
joe
pelle:
leaving
office
in
a
few
weeks,,
and
so
will
that
transfer
over
automatically
to
the
the
sheriff
elect?
or
how
does
that
work?.
B
Robin
bohannan:
increase
in
project?
asks
relative
to
the
reality
of
our
world
with
inflation
and
staffing
issues.
um!,
and
if
the
board
would
support,
leaving
that
in
the
discretion
of
the
ops
team
and
the
staff.
B
C
Kelly
veit:
so
perspective
of
time.,
I'm
going
to
move
through
this
next
portion,
basically.,
and
this
is
mostly
informational.,
so
spoiler
alert..
We
do
not
actually
have
a
formal
recommendation
on
use
of
the
state
infrastructure.
grant
um!,
but
we
did
want
to
make
council
members
aware
of
it,,
because
there
are
two
funding
opportunities
in
the
next
year.
and
well,.
We
don't
have
a
recommendation
for
this
first
drop
of
funds
for
applications
that
we
do
in
january..
We
did
want
to
make
you
aware
that
this
is
an
opportunity
that
we
can
revisit.
C
C
Kelly,
veit:
and
in
terms
of
eligibility,,
we
can
apply
as
state
entities
any
municipalities,
so
governmental
entities
or
regions,
such
as
boulder
county.
um.
nonprofits,
can
apply
for
some
of
these
funds,,
but
really
they
need
to
be
identified
as
an
implementation
agency.
In
an
application
coming
from
one
of
the
above
entities.
C
Kelly
veit:
priority
criteria..
You
can
see
here,,
I'm
not
going
to
read
through
all
of
them.
however,.
Do
you
want
to
highlight
what
I
had
mentioned,
before,
that
I
already,
for
this
first
year
of
funding
is
really
to
be
given
to
capital,
construction
and
brick
and
mortar
investments
for
regions
that
have
been
underfunded
or
over
impacted
by
the
opioid
epidemic.
C
Kelly
veit:
funding
requirements
and
timelines.
there
are
two
funding
drops
within
each
year.,
so
our
first
funding
drop
again.
We
would
need
to
apply
by
january
of
this
year,
with
the
funds
drop
in
and
spring.
and
then
there's
another
application
period
in
the
spring
for
funds
being
dropped
in
the
summer.
C
Kelly
veit:
applications
that
don't
receive
funding
in
the
first
cycle
can
resubmit,.
I
mean,
can
be
spent
over
to
fiscal
years,
and
there
is
no
maximum
dollar
amount.
as
to
those
requests,
however,,
anything
above
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
or
more
need
to
be
thoroughly
vetted,
and
provide
some
additional
information.
C
Kelly
veit:
pretty
quickly
here.,
so
I
apologize.
um,
oops.
excuse
me..
So
this
is
a
snapshot
of
the
funds
as
they're
available
in
the
timeline
to
submitting
some
of
those
grant
applications,.
So
you
could
see
that
the
first
year
is
fifty
percent
of
the
funds,,
and
then
we
have
each
additional
year.
The
funding
amount
available
will
go
down.
C
C
Kelly
veit:,
so
again,
we
don't
have
a
formal
recommendation
right
now..
This
is
something
that
we're
sort
of
saying,,
aware
of,.
We
wanted
to
make
the
council
aware
of..
Do
you
think
that
just
timing
wise,
because
the
emphasis
is
really
on
brick
and
mortar
investments,
and
cross-regional
collaboration,-
that
it
would
reasonably
take
us
a
little
bit
of
time
to
pull
together.
um!
a
grant
application.?
I
Susan
caskey:
distribution
of
the
one
hundred
and
fifty
million,,
the
the
cbs.
I
C
J
J
A
A
C
Kelly
veit:
yeah.,
so
I
you
know.
what
I
will
say.
Is,
I'd
have
to
look
at
the
information
more
specifically
to
make
sure
that
that's
an
approved
purpose.,
but
I
would
I
had
to
to
guess..
I
would
say
yes
um!,
while
brick
and
mortar
and
infrastructure
is
really
prioritized
in
this
first
round..
They
are
using
that
terms
pretty
broadly,
and
have
ah,.
Let
us
know
that
operational
expenses
and
expanding
programs
that
are
in
the
same
original
five
or
purpose
areas
as
our
general.
B
Robin
bohannan:
so.,
if
members
of
the
council
have
ideas
in
this
arena,
and
kelly,,
I'm
assuming
you'll
send
out
this
powerpoint..
So
they
have
the
detail
that
you
reviewed.
um..
Then
we
we
welcome
your
your
ideas
to
come
forth
in
our
next
meeting
for
that
march
or
april
submission.
A
Claire
levy:
um,
it
it
does.
is
the
advisory
or
the
working
group
also
going
to
be
going
back
to
their
agencies
to
make
recommendations
on
using
these
phones.
C
Kelly
veit:,
so
we
have
talked
about
this.
In
the
operations
group.-
we
did
not
come
up
with
a
formal
recommendation..
We
wanted
to
see
what
the
council
had
to
say
in
terms
of
avenues
to
pursue,
or
a
method,
to
kind
of
approach.,
this
respective
of
the
the
short
funding
timeline.
and
again
that
emphasis,
on
looking
across.
H
C
H
Harold
dominguez:
recovery.
kelly,
veit:
okay,,
excuse
me,
yeah,,
so
they
would
be
your
implementation
partner
within
that,
grant..
But
I
guess
that
would
maybe
be
a
a
question
for
the
group
of
whether
or
not
these
grants
would
want
to
be
reviewed
by
the
council
at
large
to
make
sure
that
we're
coordinating
anything
across
the
region
as
a
whole.
J
H
B
B
C
Kelly
veit:
yeah.,
so
the
only
the
last
thing
we
were
going
to
talk
about
is
our
shift
towards
strategic
planning
and
setting
our
strategic
priorities..
We
talked
about
it
a
little
bit
in
our
operations
group
yesterday,,
so
this
will
be
included
in
this
slide
that
they
can
look
at
what
their
feedback
was.
um..
The
remaining
questions
that
we
had
for
the
group
which
we
can
facilitate
via
email
is
really
just..
You
know,,
if
these
are
the
kind
of
bodies
of
work
in
front
of
us
as
we
set
and
diet
our
strategic
priorities.
C
B
G
Joe
pelle:
thank
you.
I'll
do
my
best
to
catch
curtis
up
on.
B
M
C
M
Lexi
nolen:
my
impression
was
that
that
was
related
to
inflation
related
to
salaries,
which
we
can't..
We
don't
have
any
control
over,,
so
it
feels
like
a
different
pot
of
money
to
me.
M
A
A
Claire
levy:
requests
already
built
in
those
indirect
costs?.
C
J
B
A
A
Robin
bohannan:
yeah,
claire
levy:
yeah.,
but
I
I
guess
I
just
open
it
up
to
any
final
thoughts
on
the
work
we've
done
so
far.
A
Claire
levy:,
it
looks
like
one
of
the.