►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
That
this
meeting
can
help
guide
some
of
that
conversation
so
for
this
meeting,
just
to
give
you
a
rundown
of
where
we're
going
to
go.
First
I
have
a
short
presentation
of
the
bond
itself
and
specifically
getting
into
the
definitions
of
passive
Recreation
lands
and
then
we're
going
to
pause
for
some
larger
discussion
around
that
and
finally,
we
do
have
an
activity,
as
you
can
see,
there's
posters
around
the
room
that
we'd
love
to
have
you
guys
engage
in
to.
C
E
C
C
E
B
A
A
A
Each
of
these
project
types
conservation,
easements
actually
had
their
criteria
adopted
by
the
Commissioners
last
week,
so
we
can
start
moving
into
the
project
review
phase
for
them
the
Greenways.
We
just
had
the
criteria
approved
by
the
recreation
Advisory
Board
and
we
anticipate
going
to
the
Commissioners
for
adoption
in
June
and.
C
D
F
E
F
A
To
start
talking
with
stakeholders
and
talking
with
the
public
working
with
our
advisories
board
to
start
figuring
out
what
this
is
going
to
look
like,
as
I've
said
towards
the
beginning
of
the
presentation
we
are
using
this
month
or
so
to
really
engage
around.
What's
the
vision
for
Passive
Recreation,
what.
C
A
E
A
A
A
Well
as
to
the
stakeholders
to
get
additional
input
and
feedback,
and
then
finally,
we
hope
to
bring
a
final
set
of
criteria
to
our
advisors,
board
and
Commissioners
for
adoption
later
this
time,
and
then
we
will
be
able
to
open
an
application
window
for
project
proposals.
Ideally,
this
fall
and
go
into
project
selection
in
the
spring
next
year.
E
A
Yes,
thank
you
so
as
dinner
just
leaving
too
so
we
had.
We
had
each
component
at
the
bond
that
is
responsible
for
reviewing
these
projects,
helping
guide
the
process
of
Designing
criteria
and
application
process
for
Greenways.
It's
the
recreation
Advisory
board
for
conservation,
easements,
It's,
a
combination
of
the.
A
A
F
D
F
A
D
A
Goals
for
this
Bond,
it's
important
that
we
really
get
these
boundaries
around
defining
this
component
and
as
such,
our
definition
is
that
passive
Recreation
lands
are
land,
outdoor
space,
water
bodies
and
corridors
or
past
with
recreational
activities,
Place
minimal
stress
on
a
site's
resources,
designated
area,
and
so
the
pretty
heavy
definition,
but
the
way
that
we
are
thinking
about
it
is
this
is
kind
of
a
combination
between
conservation
projects
and
Recreation
projects.
Most
of
these
eligible
projects
will
include
conservation,
easements
and
those
easements
are
there
to.
D
A
A
In
order
to
put
in,
there
also
tend
to
be
fairly
maintenance
intensive,
and
these
can
also
include
activities
that,
while
they
might
not
have
a
specific
infrastructure,
are
just
pretty
destructive
to
the
landscape,
so
like
motorized
biking
would
be
one
where
it's
more
likely
to
to
cause
destruction.
So
those
are
all
things
that
are
not
passive.
A
C
A
Go
through
these
Meadows
and
they
have
lots
of
sink
views
this
project
and
includes
activities
like
hiking
or
nature,
viewing
there's
very
other
than
a
small
parking
lot,
and
some
signage
there's
very
little
like
built
improvements
on
the
land,
so
it's
very
compatible
with
kind
of
that
conservation
goal
and
as
Thomas
alluded
to
in
his
introduction,
a
lot
of
these
passive
Recreation
projects
are
commonly
known
as
nature
preserves,
and
so,
if
you
think
of
major
disturbs
you
might
have
seen
in
other
areas,
they
might
very
well
fall
into
this
category.
I.
B
C
C
A
F
A
Third
example
is
actually
a
fairly
different
from
the
other
two,
it's
a
very
large
project.
It's
called
turnips
Nature
Preserve
in
Whiteville,
North
Carolina
and
that
one's
over
260
Acres,
it's
a
pretty
expansive
piece
of
land
and
some
of
the
Well
it
has
the
same
general
natural
features.
It's
the
other
two.
Some
of
the
activities
that
we
place
there
are
more
focused
on
educational
opportunities
and.
A
A
A
A
G
A
Evaluating
future
projects
a
little
bit
more
common
recruitment,
yeah
I
I
mean
I've
done
more
of
these
kind
of
estimates
of
these
types
of
projects
that
I
have
but
I
think
that's
a
great
idea
for
going
to
these
other
communities,
and
that's
one
thing
we've
been
trying
to
do
as
well-
is
reach
out
to
other
counties
and
cities
who
do
passive,
Recreation
and
learn
how
they
approach
it.
As
far
as
what
causes?
That's
probably
something.
C
Thomas
can
speak
yeah
so
yes
and
no,
and
that
you
can
get
kind
of
General
ideas
from
the
other
counties,
but
you
gotta
look
at
geographic
regions
too
right,
so
there's
a
lot
of
houses
comparison.
So
we
need
to
find
like
examples
in
like
a
Mountains
region,
sort
of
kind
of
appeal
to
understand
like
that
type
of
maintenance
cost
as
opposed
to
low
flat
land
yeah.
D
A
general
question
that
we've
had
about
passive
direct
funds
is
where
and
for
what.
Those
funds
can
be
used
for
like
if
it's
primarily
acquisition
or,
if
there's
going
to
be
an
expectation
for
the
funds
that
there
that
either
the
applicant
or
a
partner
or
something
would
be.
You
know,
conducting
a
feasibility
study
and
stuff
like
that.
Just
just
sort
of
like
what
those
funds
would
be
earmarked
for
it.
And
how
broad
that.
A
D
F
A
B
E
A
B
D
B
E
I
think
it's
a
good
idea
to
include
like
the
short-term
maintenance
in
in
an
application
or
in
in
the
funds
that
are
available.
I
mean
that's
what
my
orientation
does
is
maintains
Trails
volunteer
base,
but
we're
like
talking
with
the
city
of
basketball,
for
example,
about
agreements
and
mousse
that
that
have
the
potential.
A
For
especially
for
this
component
of
the
bond,
because
you
know
to
their
point,
the
long-term
maintenance
advancement
is
a
key
piece
of
how
we're
looking
at
these
projects.
But
it's
also
not
something
that
the
bond
is
going
to
fund
so
opportunities
where
we
can
collaborate
with
a
group
like
yours,
yeah.
B
B
C
B
A
A
Very
impressive,
but
so
we
have
been
in
thinking
about
you,
know
next
steps
and
defining
passive
Recreation
events
and
what
these
projects
can
look
like.
We've
identified
these
characteristics
as
like
gold
value
subjects.
This
is
what
the
staff
thinks
you
know
in
looking
at
these
projects.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
they
address
these
values
and
so
I
can
quickly
I'll
clearly
run
through
them,
but.
D
A
First
is
obviously
like
minimizing
the
negative
and
maximizing
the
positive
conservation
environmental
impact.
That's
a
key
component
of
the
conservation
goal
of
this
part
of
the
bond.
We
want
to
see
products
that
promote
equity
and
Recreation
in
Buncombe
County,
as
well
as
that
are
accessible
to
the
county
and
the
people
in
our
County.
A
C
C
A
To
10
years
that
we
have
to
spend
this
money,
and
so
it's
a
project
won't
if
the
project
that
or
the
part
of
the
project,
that
is
asking
funds
can't
be
accomplished
within
the
restrictions
of
the
bond.
Like
that's
something
for
us
to
consider,
obviously,
being
efficient
and
effective
in
how
you
manage
costs,
but
also
leveraging
multiple
funding
sources.
Both
of
these
kind
of
speak
to
our
desire
to
make
these
bond
funds
go
as
far
as
possible
and
to
the
degree
that
we
can
have.
A
For
these
projects
that
will
make
that
happen
and
then
aligning
with
County
plans
and
needs.
So
this
can
be.
We
have
our
comprehensive
plan,
which
is
has
been
into
work.
There's
been
a
lot
of
conversations
around
that,
so
that's
one
plan
that
we
would
probably
look
to
also
the
Greenways
and
Parks
and
Recreations
plans
that
are
attention
in
the
works.
A
Those
are
all
the
types
of
longer
term
and
larger
strategies
that
we
want
to
be
looking
to
in
making
sure
that
these
projects
fall
into
that
we're
trying
to
be
more
intentional
with
how
these
funds
are
spent,
as
opposed
to
just
kind
of
willy-nilly
throwing
money
around
and
not
thinking
how
they
fit
into
the
larger
picture
of
open
space
and
specifically
passive
recreation
in
Buncombe
County.
So,
and
we
leave.
C
A
A
F
A
E
D
A
Frame
so
we
recognize
that
there's
going
to
be
needs
and
privacy
that
have
developed
that
might
not
be
captured
in
those
plans.
So
we
wanted
to
leave
the
flexibility
in
there
to
to
be
able
to
address
those
newer
priorities
and
then
the
final
one
that
our
team
has
come
up
with.
Is
that
plan
for
long-term
maintenance
and
making
sure
that
the
the
project
proposals
are
thinking
about
that?
A
C
A
D
G
Private
organization
applies
for
funding
for
a
random
acquisition
and
access
to
the
public,
but
they're
in
possibly
a
few
years
of
maintenance,
but
it
is
a
non-profit
entity
that
doesn't
have
any
donors
back
in
it
like
in
my
mind,
the
only
place
that
money
is
going
to
come
from
is
from
user
fees.
Like
do
we
have
a
way
to
prevent
because,
like
as
a
County
resident
and
taxpayers,
I've
already
paid
to
use
this
piece
of
land?
Is
there
a
way
to
like
I,
wouldn't
want
to
say
like
disqualify?
E
A
G
F
B
Have
we
had
a
good
track
record
with
Zach
or
with
river
lake,
or
with
conserving
Carolina
and
that's
rated,
and
that
impacts
their
their
ranking
in
projects
moving
forward
and
I?
Think
again,
this
is
all
to
be
determined.
You
know
through
a
process,
a
public
process,
it
seems
to
me
like
we
would
want
to
qualify
organizations,
and
maybe
there
is
a
minimum
of
endowment
or
a
minimum.
You
know
I
I,
don't
know
what
it
how
we
would
qualify
them,
but
we're
we
need
success
here.
You
know
one
idea
for
that:
that's
relevant
to.
G
E
A
A
Of
these
questions,
I
I
write
so
many
Grant
applications
and
unfortunately
you
don't
have
to
read
them
and
to
that
point
we
have
already
that
talking
with
different
counties
and
municipalities
who
have
similar
programs
and
looking
at
their
Grant
application
processes.
Looking
at
the
evaluation
criteria
they
use,
and
that
has
definitely
informed
how
we've
been
thinking
about
it
as
well
in
the
next
step.
I
won't
go
all
the
way
back
to.
E
C
F
G
Into
accessible
to
all
yeah
on
that
note,
I
really
want
to
treat
a
project
that
could
potentially
fall
within
the
Greenways
master
plan.
Say
it's
going
to
be
a
nature
preserve
with
the
Environmental
preservation
component.
It
seems
like
we
have
these
different
buckets
and
they're
not
capped
on
them.
Yeah.
The
funds
from
this
could
technically
be
used
to
preserve
a
piece
of
land
and
give
the
easement
for
the
room
and
through
purposes.
How
would
we
want
to.
A
A
A
G
G
G
A
A
A
A
Something
we're
talking
about
internally,
too,
is:
do
we
need
potentially
to
look
at
a
bigger
picture
of
what
open
space,
Not,
Just,
Parks
and
Rec,
and
not
just
for
United,
but
open
space,
throttling
looks
like
and
conservation
has
their
own
plans
as
well.
So
what
is
the
bigger
picture?
Look
like
across
these
different
aspects
of
open
space.
B
Desert
or
open
space,
Recreation
desert
I
think
that's
a
really
good
question
about
size
of
a
project
I
mean
so
we
talk
about
location
because
we
want
excess.
What
we
want
people
using
it
and
if
you
put
it
out
where
people
are
have
to
have
a
car
in
order
to
get
there
or
drive
30
minutes
or
whatever
maybe
doesn't
check
the
accessibility
box.
But
what
about
a
20
acre
parcel
versus
a
300
acre
parcel
or
you.
F
B
B
B
C
C
And
I
think
that
I
couldn't
I
couldn't
work.
This
distribution
of
the
funds
is
going
to
have
to
be
looked
at
as
like
kind
of
a
whole
plot,
just
because
you're
done
you're,
just
not
going
to
have
certain
project
types
in
certain
areas
of
accounting,
like
you're,
going
to
see
a
huge
conservation
meeting
in
downtown
Nashville,
so
you're
going
to
have
to
look
at
it
kind
of
the
three
separate
pots,
but
making
sure
we're
like
Distributing
them
kind
of
throughout
it.
I
mean
not
just
just
every
corner
of
the
county
have
a
couple
passive
Recreation.
F
Enough
all
of
our
corners,
yeah
I
think
it
will
be
tricky
with
the
application
to
balance
that
connectivity
piece
because
that's
come
out
so
much
yeah
and
everything
you've
heard
with
the
addressing
the
desert
and
making
some
point.
Values
are
canceling
each
other
out,
and
so
maybe
it
sort
of
makes
like
a
flow
chart
from
either
it's
either
addressing
a
desert
or
it's
addressing
connectivity
and
there's
ways
to
get
points
for
both.
But
but
one
doesn't.
F
F
A
Opportunity
to
continue
the
conversation
as
well
in
on
your
seats.
We
have
a
flyer
for
our
public
meetings
for
next
week,
which
is
gonna,
be
their
similar
conversation,
but
with
the
general
public
and
then
additionally,
we
have
a
flyer
for
an
online
survey
that
you
can
complete.
That
gets
into
some.