►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
D
C
D
A
A
G
H
A
B
Yeah,
so
when
we
had
that
discussion,
we
agreed
that
we
would
try
to
kind
of
take
a
first
stab
at
this
with
the
draft
criteria
and
the
key
thing
that
I
took
away
from
that
conversation,
was
we
really
wanted
it
pretty
focused?
We
didn't
want
this
to
be
brought
so
this
we
specifically
went
for
limiting
criteria
because,
right
this
is
a
pilot
program.
We
have
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
and-
and
we
also
agree
that
this
committee
would
be
the
ones
breaking
it
and
all
of
that,
and
so
we
wanted.
D
B
Pretty
much
everything
already
pre-ved
in
a
way,
and
so
hence
that
was
why
we
said
we
would
do
the
approved
or
adopted.
This
is
number
three
in
the
criteria
but
got
approved
or
adopted
watershed
management
plans
and
where
we
will
actually
list
the
plan.
So
it
is
very
clear
people
what
plans
will
be
eligible
right,
so
that
is,
is
purposefully,
narrow
and
what
we're
doing
there
so.
C
B
Was
one
of
the
key
things
and
then
you
you
can
see
here,
you
know
things
around
public
benefit
all
the
things
that
we'd
have
to
have
there,
the
pathway
to
require
permits
all
of
that
type
of
stuff
in
the
criteria.
So
hopefully,
then,
with
that
type
of
criteria
it
does
really
limit
which
ones
we
get.
So
we
get
very
good
projects
proposals
and
then
the
below
part
here
is
in
the
rubric
the
criteria
for
them,
ranking
those
that
we
do
get
and
when
I
did
I
just
try
to
go.
B
You
know
very
simple
and
straightforward
with
it.
The
two
specific
areas
I
felt
I,
know
I
I,
sent
it
to
Maggie
and
I
got
some
feedback
from
Maggie
and
some
Parker
and
the
two
areas
that
I
felt
like
we
definitely
needed
to
discuss.
Is
the
parts
I
put
in
red
there?
One
is
so
with
that
funding
I
had
just
put
up
to
a
hundred
thousand
dollars.
Do
we
do
we
just
want
to
say
that
or
do
we
want
to
provide
a
very
specific
range
with
the
projects?
B
And
so
we
need
to
decide
on
that
part
and
then
the
other
one
around
the
number
seven
Around
The
Leverage
must
leverage
funds
with
that.
Or
do
we
want
to
include
in
kind
and
just
kind
of
that
part
with
those
leveraging
funds
making
sure
that
we're
on
the
same
page
of
what
we're
what
we
mean
by
those
leveraging
funds
with
that
part?
Those
are
the
two
that
I
just
wasn't.
B
You
know
didn't
feel
like
I
had
enough
to
say
the
specificity.
What
specificity
there
so
I
feel
like
I
need
to
have
a
discussion
on
this
and,
of
course,
if
there's
something
else
on
there,
that
votes
have
comments
or
whatever
about
as
well,
but
I
guess
for
me
like
starting
with
that
range
I
feel
like
we
probably
need
to
say
the
range
of
the
projects
because
I'm
guessing
we
don't
want
like
a
request
for
a
500
project,
right
yeah,
so.
E
G
H
G
B
H
G
A
E
C
B
E
H
G
G
C
D
E
E
The
timing
is
maybe
a
little
challenging
on
that,
because,
usually,
if
you
don't
have
the
match
and
then
it
can
limit
you
from
getting
the
grant
to
begin
with,
but
sometimes
we
have
wiggle
room
to
be
able
to
find
it
after
which
could
mean
that
we
could
see
bigger
projects
with
a
smaller
investment
on
our
side
that
so
I
know,
there's
many
ways
that
this
could
go
really
and
there's
certainly
plenty
of
need
out.
There.
B
G
B
D
A
G
E
E
G
Mean
there
is
a
flux,
of
course,
but
a
non-profit
can
typically
get
a
project
up
and
running
with
30
000.
It
really
depends
upon
the
requirements
like
if
you
are
going
to
require
construction
drawings,
that
money
is
going
to
be
gone
as
soon
as
you
say
that
you
need
that
environment
so,
but
I
think
30
feels
safe,
especially
to
your
points
of
wanting
to
create
some
data
points.
To
help
tell
a
story
for
the
pilot
to
move
forward
for
permanent
funding.
G
We
could
also
say
something
like
we
would
like
to
see
one
to
four
projects
just
to
see,
because
that's
the
other
thing
I'm
going
to
do
this
applicant
is
I'm
going
to
go.
Here's
the
pot
size
how
much
of
it
can
I
get
in
the
signal
that
you
want
to
spread
it
around
yeah
might
give
them
a
more
a
strategic
data
point
for
them
not
all
to
just
shoot
within
us.
Get
15
proposals
for
100
grand
each
and
then
be
kind
of
in
a
tough
spot.
G
F
F
An
idea
of
the
impact
or
scale
of
the
project
that
it
wants
to
be
implemented
is
it
is
it
twenty
six
thousand
dollars
per
acre
to
implement
or,
like
our
stream
project,
is
300
foot
buffer
off
of
a
stream?
So
if
I
did
the
math
that
comes
that
came
out
to
maybe
twenty
five
thousand
dollars
per
acre
on
that
project
and
then
oh,
if
there's
an
idea
of
what
that
money
would
actually,
you
know,
actually
pull
off.
F
E
I
think
that's
a
little
bit
the
challenge
of
this.
The
way
this
is
designed
is
it's
really
kind
of
open
to
you.
What
is
water
quality?
What's
the
water
quality
improvement,
it
could
be
storm
water.
You
know
it
could
be
some
kind
of
it's
fencing
and
buffer
establishment
or
it
could
be
whole
stream,
Bank
restoration,
so
I,
that's
what's
hard
here,
I!
Think
it's
good
I'm
not
advocating
shrinking
the
scope,
but
I
think
in
terms
of
guessing
on
costs.
I
think
that's
kind
of
what
makes
this
difficult,
yeah.
E
E
G
Section
so
kind
of
geographically
Limited
limits,
which
is
we've
talked
about
this
there's
a
strategy
of
this
work
in
general
of
like
do.
We
do
a
little
bit
everywhere
or
do
we
have
targeted
Watershed
improvements,
and
so
that
function
helps
us
with
the
targeting
like
we've
done,
we've
talked
about
it's
not
so
smart.
E
And
I
think
the
other
thing
that
we
need
to
remember
is
that,
even
if
we
get
three
projects
going
in
the
same
Watershed,
we
likely
are
not
gonna,
monitor
that
and
see
some
big
change,
especially
if
it's
in
like
the
French,
if
the
projects
are
along
the
French
abroad.
So
we
have
to
be
reasonable
in
what
we
think
our
outcomes
are
going
to
be
and
we
have
to
trust
the
science
that
says
all
of
these
things
contribute
to
improved
water
quality
over
time.
E
So
when
we
think
about
in
the
in
the
grant
piece,
we
think
about
what
are
our
measurables
and
what
are?
How
do
we
have
a
successful
outcome
and
in
here
the
successful
outcome
may
be
completing
to
design
and
not
having?
You
know
water
quality
samples
for
the
next
10
years
to
show
some
kind
of
treatment.
G
B
And
let's
see,
let's
look
at
that
number
seven
if
we
can
around
the
leveraging
the
funds
I
just
want
to
make
sure
we're
on
the
same
page
with
that,
so
we
definitely
expected
leveraging
a
funds
and
then
I
think
you
would
ask
that
question.
Are
we
counting
in
kind?
So
let's
have
that
conversation
around
what
that
looks
like?
Are
we
saying
that
it's
just
other
funding
coming
in
or
can
it
be
in
kind
as
well
thoughts
around
that.
A
A
G
The
only
thing
I'd
say
and
I
don't
have
a
strong
opinion,
but
again
from
running
funds
before
required.
Match
sets
a
threshold
for
who's
going
to
apply.
Obviously
right-
and
you
know
small
non-profits,
who
are
how
many
creep
Greenway,
for
example
like
they
are
hustling
right
now,
to
figure
out
how
to
be
a
board
and
how
to
fundraise
like
they're,
not
going
to
be
sophisticated
enough
to
have
actual
dollars
in
here
and.
G
That
sense
of
like
Equity
limitation
on
who
could
apply
and
like
that's,
not
a
big
deal.
You
just
want
folks
who,
like
have
a
lot
of
experience,
know
how
to
mail
this
and
knock
it
out.
Then
that's,
then
that
gives
us
what
we
want,
yeah,
which
is
fine,
but
it
could
come
up
in
the
conversation
that
they
create
some
exclusivity
to
access
the
phone
with
dollars.
So
it
gets
pretty
philosophical
pretty
quickly
but
I.
Think
in
a
pilot
just
be
aware,
like
that
conversation
might
evolve
over
time
and
you
might
want
to
think
differently.
H
G
We
just
want
to
like
knock
out
some
projects
with
really
interested
experience
partners
then
I
think
that
wouldn't
be
necessary.
Okay
is
the
bottom
line
for
number
seven,
just
to
show
that
there's
partnership
and
collaboration
like
what's
the
bottom
line,
reasoning
for
including
that
type
of
paper
projects
well
and
just
for
bigger
projects
and.
G
E
G
H
D
E
C
C
B
E
D
C
G
H
G
E
I
feel
really
confident.
The
only
thing
that
gives
me
pause
is
just
the
timeline,
I
I
think
in
terms
of
what
we're
outlining
and
the
work
that
we're
trying
to
do.
We
absolutely
have
partners
that
will
be
interested
in
this.
It's
just
a
question
of
what
we
can,
what
we
can,
what
they
can
reasonably
do
in
the
amount
of
time
and.
G
D
D
B
And
I
guess
somebody
mentioned
oh
I
think
Samantha
mentioned
construction.
What
was
that
part?
The
construction
drawings
that
I
mean?
Is
that
realistic?
Is
that
yeah?
Let's
look
at
that
number
eight
there,
because
I,
just
kind
of
was
trying
to
think
of
like
everything
that
we
would
want
right.
Does
that
all
sound
reasonable?
What
I
put
in
there
construction.
E
Your
question
your
number
six
Pathway
to
permits
is
going
to
require
at
least
a
50,
drawing
to
get
your
permax
so
I,
don't
think
I
think
the
question
here
is:
if
you've
already
invested
that
much,
do
you
have
the
money
you
need
to
get
this
project
moving
forward.
If
you
haven't
solidified
all
your
funding
I'm,
not
sure
that
you
make
it
that
far
and
if,
if
this
is
the
piece
that
gets
you
there
I'm
worried
that
the
permits
and
the
work
won't
be
able
to
be
completed
in
the
truncated
timeline.
E
I'll
give
an
example:
our
we
had
an
ewp
project
out
in
towards
barnardsville,
and
it
took
us
for
a
myriad
of
reasons.
Coven
being
one
of
them.
It
took
us
two
and
a
half
years
to
get
the
funding
in
place.
The
project
was
finished
in
four
days,
but
to
get
the
funding
and
the
permit,
because
we
needed
no
rise
and
we
needed
all
this
stuff.
It
was
two.
It
was
two
and
a
half
years.
C
E
H
B
B
I
Ahead,
Ronnie
yeah,
so
yeah
it
does.
You
know,
since
this
is
new
I
mean
it
does
seem
like
we're
making
this
like.
Well,
I
guess:
could
someone
reiterate
why
it
has
to
be
done
in
one
year,
because
that
does
seem
like
a
real
problem
for
a
lot
of
good
projects,
I
mean
if
we
impose
that
same
standard
on
ourselves
as
Government
like
we
would
never
do
anything
so.
E
G
I
I
So
I
I,
I,
I,
would
advocate
for
that,
and
I
would
also
advocate
for
greater
flexibility
in
the
use
of
funds
like
on
item
number,
eight
I
mean
it
may
be
that
they
need
to
spend
the
money
to
do
a
site
plan
or
do
construction
drawings,
and
that
may
be
like
really
like
the
valuable
where
our
funds
can
be
very
valuable
to
basically
like
develop
a
really
good
plan
for
a
high
priority
project.
That's
identified
in
one
of
the
Watershed
plans,
so
I
don't
think
we
should
make
those
things
a
requirement.
G
I
You
know
it's
Government
funding,
I
mean
if
somebody
comes
in
I
think
these
should
all
be
things
that
like
are
incentivized.
If
somebody
comes
in
and
we're
like,
we
have
a
shovel
ready
plan
and
we
just
need
thirty
thousand
dollars
to
literally
go
build
this
thing,
and
we
can
do
it
in
six
months.
Obviously,
and
it's
a
high
impact
project.
That
would
be
the
thing
we
would
fund
compared
to
somebody
else
who
comes
in
and
just
wants
to
do
some
planning
work
but
I,
just
I.
I
Guess
I'm
just
concerned
that
if
we
make
the
criteria
too
stringent
and
we've
never
done
this
before,
are
we
actually
going
to
get
enough
really
excellent
projects
in
the
door
and
I?
Just
if,
if
we
do
it
for
a
year
or
two,
and
we
find
out
there's
tons
of
shovel
ready
projects
that
just
need
the
funding
to
literally
pay
a
contractor
to
go?
Do
it
then
I
think
we
could
tighten
it
up?
I
B
G
E
H
C
E
While
we
got
millions
of
dollars
to
do
ewp
work,
we
were
limited
in
the
engineering
money
that
we
had
and
they
make
it
two
separate
buckets
and
we
had
to
go
out
and
raise
more
money
from
the
state
in
order
to
get
our
projects
moving
and
so
I
think
it
is
a
true
need
and
a
roadblock
for
some
of
these
projects
to
get
off
the
ground
again.
It
depends
on
the
where
you're
working
and
the
type
of
project
it
is.
You
know
how
how
much
that
plays
into.
C
G
C
G
E
G
G
Well,
I
feel
at
the
point
that
this
is
right.
Now
it's
going
to
take
at
least
a
month
to
get
it
stitched
up
in
the
final
version,
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
just
walking
into
this,
so
I
don't
have
a
really
stable
foundation
in
front
of
me.
But
then,
once
you
have
your
final
version
in
front
of
you,
you
advertise
the
RFP
for
typically
two
weeks
to
a
month.
G
It
really
depends
upon
what
kind
of
RFP
and
what,
how
detailed
the
questions
are,
that
you're
trying
to
get
answers
to
so
anywhere
from
two
weeks
to
a
month.
I
would
lean
more
on
a
month
if
you're
having
to
have
drawings
submitted
in
case
people,
don't
quite
have
those
on
hand.
Yet
so,
if
you're
looking
at
a
decision-
and
then
it
takes
a
month
to
like
rally
the
Review
Committee.
E
B
C
E
G
C
E
C
G
G
We're
good
I
do
want
to
clarify
one
thing
and
so
in
our
minds,
what
we
typically
do
for
Grants
is
when
we
get.
We
work
all
these
details
out
like
it's
application,
so
that's
kind
of
refuse
them,
and
then
we
bring
them
to
to
this
group,
okay
to
kind
of
make
the
final
recommendation,
but
we
would
kind
of
do
this
scoring
and
all
that
and
then
present
to
you
all
y'all
can
choose
whichever
ones
you
want.
You
have
to
pick
the
ones
that
explore
the
highest,
but
I
just
want
to
clarify.
B
G
So
I
think
we
we
kind
of
got
enough
information
to
take
a
step
at
I
shared
this
with
commissioner
Wells
and
commissioner.
This
template,
that's
stretching
different
partnership
uses
for
their
granting
program,
and
so
we're
basically
going
to
scale
this
template
from
the
information
that
we've
talked
about
today
into
this
and
we'll
bring
this
back
to
you
all
at
your
next
and
then,
if
you
all
approve
at
that
meeting,.
H
G
D
A
That
could
in
here,
maybe
more
before
they
actually
even
see
those
dollars
if
they're
approved
for
that
fund.
So
my
update
is
more
about
what
we're
doing
yeah
yeah
yeah
the
commitments
yes
we've
made
and
we're
working
with
that.
In
fact,
I
was
in
Charlotte
all
day
yesterday
for
the
All.
America
is
all
in
tour
that
the
Bible
Administration
is
doing,
and
it
was
Cash.
D
A
Clean
energy
and
I
picked
up
Jen
Weiss
at
the
train
station
in
advance
so
that
we
can
chat
for
an
hour
or
two
before
we
got
going
on
that,
so
that
I
could
have
as
much
up-to-date
information
on
the
on
where
we
stand
with
the
Remake
stuff
before
today.
So
obviously,
we've
approved
the
funding.
We've
got
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
at
this
point,
sort
of
next
step
for
us
or
to
initiate
that
contract
with
the
energy
fund.
To
start
with
an
online
register
we're
a
bit
of
a.
C
A
A
There
have
been
talk
about
using
this
platform
called
smart
meeting.
We
may
or
may
not
still
do
that.
Smarty
has
sort
of
seen
the
big
pie,
that's
coming
and
decided
that
they
don't
want
to
work
on
small
Pilots.
They
just
want
to
do
Statewide
program
or
nothing
and
we're
not
Irreplaceable
we're
ready
to
roll
out
a
Statewide
program,
so
we're
working
on
whatever
that
back-end
solution
will
potentially
be
too
and
basically
what
that
is.
A
They
do
and
that's
you
know
they
were
in
town
a
couple
weeks
ago,
meeting
with
all
the
cdfs
that
are
in
town
as
well
as
Bank
of
America,
a
few
others
they
feel
like
they
have
one
partner
for
sure.
But
it's
not
their
preferred
partner.
It's
a
Florida
fund,
so
they're,
you
know
I,
think
they're
trying
to
sort
of
cast
a
wide
net
they're
their
preferred
partner,
I
think
is
self-help
right
and
that's
a
small,
incredible
worshipers.
It's
their
sustainability,
director,
they're,
hoping
that
that
relationship
can
get
self-help
on
board.
A
That's
that's
where
that's
where
things
are
right,
isn't
it
creating
that
moral
and
getting
that
back
in
system
set
up
and
then
setting
up
the
actual
loan
loss
Reserve
with
a
you
know,
traditional
lender
of
some
kind.
It
is
sort
of
Priority
One
for
us
in
parallel
staff,
the
county
is
working
to
make
sure
that
there's
going
to
be
acute
projects
at
the
end
of
the
day.
D
A
Technologies
and
we're
thinking
specifically
about
heat
pumps,
probably-
and
you
know
again-
without
getting
into
the
Weeds
about
what
a
solarized
model
is
it's
it's
sort
of
a
boat
purchasing
campaign.
Again,
that's
not
Apple
status.
So
there's
a
lot
sweetly
modified
and
that's
part
of
what
we're
going
to
be
discussing
later
this
afternoon
is
how
do
we
do
that?
A
A
C
G
A
A
A
That's
essentially
that
made
a
lot
of
sense
to
me
to
reach
out
to
them
first,
because
Duke
already
has
this
network
of
contractors
to
do
this
exact
work
and
are
already
sort
of
trained
up
on
leveraging
utility
rebates
and
things
of
that
nature,
which
I
think
layer
in
with
priority
incentives
and
tax
incentives.
Itc,
although
this
great
stuff,
you
know
we
want
to
leverage
as
much
of
that
as
possible
right.
C
A
At
me,
but
you
know
we,
we
dedicated
both
the
city
and
the
county
to
specifically
HVAC
replacement
and
I.
Think
that
there's
the
potential
there
we
can
again
just
make
sure
these
relationships
are
established
that
as
we
get
residents
potentially
that
can
afford
it.
Whether
they're
I
mean
has
to
go
away
from
them
to
take
on
data
benefits.
A
At
that
point,
right,
like
I,
want
to
see
that
happen,
but
it
does
it's
one
more
component
right
that
makes
everything
complicated,
but
we're
very
excited
about
that
as
a
possibility
for
sure,
because,
like
like
with
solarize,
you
know
it
was
great,
but
when
they
came
to
me
and
missed
it
to
me
initially
I
said:
that's
awesome.
What
are
we
going
to
do
for
the
people
us
right,
because
it's
still
a
premium
product
from
where
the
other
s.
C
G
F
C
A
A
With
most
of
these
contractors,
there's
typically
a
couple
of
different
companies
that
they
work
with,
that
they're
not
always
happy
with
they
sort
of
pay
in
to
have
an
option
to
have
the
product
to
have
that
product
so
that
they
can
say
hey,
we've
got
a
financing
option
for
you
and
if
you
can't
afford
to
get
over
it,
so
this
would
be
another
option
for
them.
Yeah,
preferably
you
know,
hopefully
a
better
one
that
they
could
use.
G
H
A
A
C
G
Yeah,
so
yeah
part
of
what's
really
different
with
solarized,
is
like
a
major
part
of
what
like
uses.
Government
money
to
stimulate
the
economy
is
purchasing
is
where
you
just
buy
down
the
cost
of
the
product
in
general.
That's
right
it!
It
seems
unlikely
that
that
type
of
Market
intervention
will
work
here,
because
my
heat
pump
is
going
to
be
different
than
your
heat
pump.
It's
going
to
be
different
than
your
heat
pump
and
their
sizes
and
then
all
the
components.
G
C
G
Have
a
financing
tool?
That's
so
I
think
that
we'll
see
really
different
types
of
results
and
solarize,
because
solarize
just
came
out
with
like
a
huge
sale,
essentially
which
made
the
product
deeper
and
I.
Don't
think
that
that
will
happen
here.
It
would
be
more
about
like
Mass
marketing
and
a
financing
product,
but
that's
that's
going
to
get
your
difference
to.
A
Mental
design,
100
I
I,
couldn't
agree
more.
We've
talked
a
lot
about
the
technology
itself.
The
fact
that
what
makes
it
so
different
in
my
mind
is
that
a
solar
developer
can
give
you
a
cost
estimate
about
it
or
even
going
to
your
house
right.
They
can
do
it
on
Google
Earth
and
they
can
tell
you
yes,
your
electric
bills
and
we'll
give
you
everything
you
need.
That
is
it's
not
how
this
works.
They
got
to
get
in
your
house.
C
A
A
A
C
D
G
A
A
A
And
like
that,
home
probably
needs
electrical
panel
upgrade
and
like
various
electrical
work,
just
to
like
install
any
sort
of
heat
pump
right
and
so
like.
That's.
That
would
be
a
success
story,
there's
probably
like
eight
other
homes
in
West
Ashley
on
that
street.
That's
fine
and
I
know
an
elderly
retired
woman
who
has
lived
in
her
same
house
since,
like
the
60s
had
a
gas
furnace
whose
gas
burner
is
broke
and
she
called
up
the
only
person
she's
ever
talked
to
about
her
first
yeah
ever,
which
is
the
gas
company.
A
G
G
C
A
I
could
agree
more.
We
are
trying
to
find
this
Google
Cloud.
Yes,
because
yeah,
it's
I
think
you
make
a
great
point
that
people
don't
think
about
that.
You
want
good
stuff's
working
or
until
it's
time
to
cut
that
pretty
expensive
check.
Yeah
oil
gets
filled
up
yeah.
You
know,
that's
what
you
start
thinking
about.
H
A
C
A
A
Like
there's,
there's
a
campaign
to
be
launched
right
and
there's
contractors
on
board
and
there's
a
back-end
Marketplace
that
we
created
to
help
you
know
with
when
projects
do
start
to
queue
up
to
get
these
things
done,
but
boy,
you
know,
I'm,
like
super
excited.
It's
just
freaked
out
at
the
same
time,
about
alcohol.
A
It's
there's
so
many
lessons
to
be
learned
over
the
next
few
months.
I
think
that
it's
so
worth
it
to
try
this
and-
and
you
know
when
we
decided
to
sort
of
work
with
solar
eyes,
the
the
solar
Crafters
books.
It
was
less
about
you
know
again
the
technology
and
the
bottle
in
that
way
and
more
about
the
community
campaigning
Outreach
and
education
to
Residents,
and
that
sort
of
thing
they've
got
a
lot
of
experience
with
that
sort
of
thing.
Plus,
frankly,
you
know
two-thirds
of
their
sort
of
three
quarters
of
their
workforcements.
A
Still
that
doesn't
hurt
as
well,
so
they
are
mostly
local
residents.
So
we
feel
good
about
the
decision
to
work
with
them
and,
of
course,
partner
with
our
other
local
cbos
on
this,
as
well
again
with
books
that
we've
already
given
funding
team
to
do
some
of
this
type
of
work
and
hopefully
mesh
those
things
together.
So
again,
I
feel
like
I
could
just
keep
going
this,
but
oh
I'll
stop.
G
I'd
like
to
add
that
some
of
the
EPA
messaging
that
they're
cutting
out
about
electrification
and
promoting
any
more
efficient
heat
pumps.
They
are
focusing
on
some
time
and
air
conditioning
and
trying
to
make
a
point.
That
like
say,
if
you
have
multiple
oil
furnace,
that
you
don't
even
have
our
air
conditioning
and
you
get
a
heat
pump.
And
then
you
automatically.
D
H
D
A
G
I
know
that
we're
kind
of
exploring
up
into
the
state,
as
part
of
their
plan,
about
the
possibility
of
trying
to
get
a
grant
for
your
agency
to
maybe
replace
some
older
wood
stoves
with
some
heat
pumps.
Many
splits
things
of
that
nature
and
so
definitely
interested
in
making
sure
that
that's
in
the
state
CPR
plan,
so
that,
if
we
wanted
to
apply
when
that
next
year
to
see
money,
it
will
be
going
to
the
states.
C
G
A
A
G
G
G
A
Yeah,
that's
a
great
question.
Well,
you
know
at
the
end
of
the
day
the
product
funding
we
have
to
do
all
this
work
is
the
same
right,
and
so
we
want
to
do
new
work.
It
means
that
we're
gonna
have
to
shift
resources
around
and
so
in
order
to
contract
for
solar
crowdsource
as
a
part
of
the
overall
sort
of
scope
of
community
work.
We're
trying
to
do.
A
We
had
to
reduce
the
amount
of
funding,
we're
giving
bills
alignments
and
they
are
a
part
of
this
organization
work
and
essentially
you
know
part
of
that
decision.
Making
process
was
number
one.
Social
resource
had
a
good
proposal
and
Greenville
Alliance
will
really
get
into,
even
though
it
was
it
was
in.
The
RFP
really
did
not
get
into.
A
So
they
had
an
opportunity
to
to
address
it,
and
their
proposal
really
did
they
mentioned
like
potentially
doing
a
keep
pump
hot
water
heater
idea,
but
it
wasn't
flushed
out
at
all.
It
just
said
literally
was
just
that
hey,
we
could
potentially
do
it.
You
pop
hot
water
yeah,
go
without
any
physicals
or
any
adult.
You
know
sort
of
thought
evidence
of
that.
A
A
So,
given
that
they've
gotten
a
half
a
million
dollars
in
other
funding,
you
said
you
know,
like
our
priority.
Honestly-
is
our
they're
starting
to
shift,
because
these
opportunities
are
presenting
themselves,
and
so
we
did
reduce
the
amount
of
funding
that
the
city
and
the
county
combined
are
giving
degree
level
lines
for
the
localization
again.
Of
course,
you
know.
A
Closer
to
weatherizing
about
100
homes
a
year
give
or
take
is
as
close
to
the
200
pounds
a
year,
but
I
I'll
lean
on
the
fact
that
I
honestly
think
the
work
that
we're
shifting
into
as
the
potential
abuse
has
been
impactful
and,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
that's
the
highest
priority.
For
us.
This
is
the
most
impactful
work
we
work.
We
can
do.
We
have
been
doing
weatherization
for
a
number
of
years,
they've
gotten
over
a
million
dollars
Trust
and.
A
G
I'll
just
add
I
personally
spent
I
was
overlapping
at
professional
Retreats,
with
ve
of
greenbuilt
alliance
or
like
six
business
days,
where
I
like
sat
next
in
the
meals
and
carpool
to
Atlanta,
and
so
the
opportunity
to
seize
this
day
was
extremely
explicit
and
then,
ultimately,
in
their
proposal.
They
put
like
ten
thousand
dollars
to
this
program
and
it
wasn't
flushed
out
so
I
feel
like
they
had
significant
opportunity,
but
I've
like
since
talked
to
their
EV
I've
talked
to
several
of
their
board.
H
G
Find
really
actually
shocking
that
that
it
caught
them
off
guard,
so
I
do
feel
like
there
has
been
significant
signals
that
we
wanted
to
see
some
Innovation,
but
just
in
case
you're,
hearing
stuff
in
the
community.
It's
good
to
be
aware
of,
and
I
really
support,
staff's
Direction
I
think
we
need
to
pursue
impact
and
I
think
this.
This
is
a
better
bet
than
where
that
happened
and
Greenbelt
will
be
able
to
modify
their
budget
with
the
arpa
funding
to
help
make
up
some
of
that
loss.
G
So
they
should
be
okay
in
terms
of
means.
Their
bottom
line
requirements
for
the
weatherization
project,
we're
just
pending
them.
Coming
back
to
us
with
that
budget.
Modification
and
questions
writing
so
that
so
they
they'll
have
run
room
if
they
ultimately
don't
come
up
with
another
funding.
Source
they'll
still
have
a
good
chunk
of
time
to
not
have
to
likely
be
the
loss
which.
A
H
B
A
A
G
So
since
we
don't
have
the
funding
for
weatherization
anymore,
or
at
least
not
the
whole
part
of
it,
can
we
modify
the
budget,
so
we
can
keep
doing
the
weatherization,
get
the
house
ready
for
the
hbase
replacement,
so
that's
kind
of
where
they're
angling
it
and
to
be
honest,
like
they
had
such
an
opportunity.
I
say
we
built
this
weatherization
Foundation
here
is
how
we're
going
to
use
this
next
contract
period
to
land,
the
HVAC
products,
and
so
I
think
you
all
are
handling
this
very
well
and
thanks.
G
H
A
D
A
D
A
C
A
A
I
said
we're
the
only
one
who
wants
to
like
committed
any
money,
so
so
I
just
want
to
know
that
we
are
here
top
right
already
right,
yeah,
you
know
when
we
call
we
get.
You
know
you
answer
the
call
it's
like.
We
are
the
only
ones
who
commit
any
funding
from
this,
and
we
need
to
make
this
more
so
and
again.
A
B
C
G
I
just
wanted
to
give
you
guys
an
update
on
the
Wildfire
tonight
from
Canada
we've
had.
As
you
know,
we've
had
several
forecasted
Code
Orange
air
quality
days
and
also
a
few
a
couple
this
week
where
we
were
actually
Code
Orange
and
over
standard
for
24
hours,
and
so
we've
been
getting
a
lot
of
questions.
H
G
C
G
Human
Services
and
safety,
legal
about
and
discussed.
You
know
messaging,
particularly
one
of
those
things
that
comes
up
that
that
touches
all
those
departments
is
what
do
we
do
and
if
the
air
quality
is
Code,
Orange
and
questions
about
n95
respirators
have
come
up,
so
I'm
really
pleased
that
we
were
able
to
all
get
on
the
same
page
and
I
do
have
EPA
fact
sheet
two-pager
on
the
website.
G
D
G
G
C
G
H
G
Been
seeing
anything
from
the
hospitals
or
like
are
releasing
any
health
impact
or
reporting
of
this
triggering
real
medical
challenges
in
the
community.
So
far,
no,
not
that
I'm,
aware
of
I
think
that,
since
we're
kind
of
on
the
lower
end,
if
you
look
at
how
far
away
these
fires
are
we're
kind
of
the
far
end
of
where,
where
the
impacts
are
being
seen,
I'm
hoping
that
won't
get
worse
than
what
it
has
been.
But
the
climate
change.
G
G
D
C
G
B
B
G
Option
right
and
EPA
has
an
activity
guide
and
another
recommendations.
Basically
take
three-point
breaks:
come
inside,
listen
to
your
body,
there's
certain
symptoms
that
you
might
be
having.
If
you
have
to
wear
a
respirator
and
check
with
your
doctor.
That
kind
of
thing
just
it
is
really
challenging
I
think
for
those
people
that
have
to
work
out
workouts
the
symptoms.
Look
like
what
shortness
of
breath
like
long
stuff,
sinus,
headaches.
H
C
G
B
E
B
G
G
C
G
No
sorry
so,
basically
KN
95
we're
not
allowed
the
n95
technically
you're
really
supposed
to
be
respiratory
fit
tested,
and
it
was
just
during
covet
emergency
that
right,
and
so
that's
why
you
know
this.
This
EPA
document
was
last
updated
in
2019.,
and
so
it's
kind
of
hard.
That's.
Why
I'm
really
glad
that
we
had
a
meeting
on
the
same
page
this
week,
we're
saying
be
careful,
it's
better
to
go
inside
and
avoid
the
bad
air
than
it
is
to
just
go
about
your
business,
and
you.
G
That
if
you
start
tipping
into
red
and
purple
Zone
you'll
might
come
out
with
different
advice,
but
right
now,
since
we're
not
there,
the
advice
is
that
some
kind
of
Orange
Is
unhealthy
for
sensitive
groups
and
generally
not
a
good
idea
to
go
outside
and
do
heavy
breathing
strenuous
exercise.
You
know
under
those
conditions
but
yeah,
you
know
like
Mr
Wilson
we've
got
people
that
have
to
work
outside
all
day
every
day,
so.
G
This
is
this
is
a
warning
flag
to
me
like
this
is
going
to
be
the
first
summer
of
many,
where
we
are
looking
at
more
drastic
things
and
like
we're
in
a
very
good
spot
right
now,
relatively
that
it's
not
purples,
but
when
you
start
having
purples,
what
does
that
mean
about
Public,
Works,
Crews
and
stock
work?
What
does
that
mean
about
public
report
like
all
that
type
of
stuff,
and
we
all
just
got
through
covet?
But
this
is
a
morning
play
yeah.
A
G
C
G
C
G
Purple
air
and
we're
going
to
purple
air,
it's
actually
had
a
big
meeting
and
agreed.
We
have
a
correction
factor.
The
purple
air
monitors
are
pretty
precise,
but
they're
not
very
accurate.
So
we,
if
they
read
a
little
high
but
EPA,
has
applied
a
correction
back
to
the
data
because
they
are
very
consistent,
so
they
didn't
work
well
and
so,
basically
now
we've
got
purple
air
on
the
EPA
site
and
okay.
G
So
that's
a
good
amateur
thing.
Yeah
exactly
I
mean
you
like
somebody
might
be
smoking
a
cigarette
next
to
one.
You
know
what
I
mean
it's
not
going
through
all
the
qatc
and
it
doesn't.
It
doesn't
have
as
much
rigorous
testing,
but
there
are
people
doing
studies
like
this,
professor
emca,
where
he
is
following
a
quality
assurance
plan,
he's
paying
the
regulatory
monitors
and
he's
taking
all
the
steps
to
make
this
data
more
robust,
but
yeah.
C
G
F
D
F
G
G
We
got
an
update
on
the
city's
citizen
survey,
which
had
nearly
7
000
responses
and
tremendous
amount
of
support.
We
also
looked
at
like
who
responded
to
that
survey
and
is
it
representative
of
the
community,
not
necessarily,
but
the
people
that
are
excited
about
this
are
many
and
they're
very
excited,
and
then
the
advocacy
organizations
just
kind
of
made
the
case
for
its
problems
with
plastic
bags,
really
kind
of
jump
deeply
into
those
challenges
into
the.
G
Why
why
this
is
important
and
I
think
the
risk
of
pursuing
something
that
isn't
crystal
clear
that
doesn't
have
exclusive
allowance
from
the
state
is
a
risk
and
we
have
students
part
of
the
state
for
having
the
state
client
us
when
we
try
and
be
Innovative
with
law,
and
that
would
be
the
summary
I
added.
It
kind
of
seems
like
there's
a.
G
I
I
mean
pretty
much
along
those
same
lines,
but
yeah
I
mean
basic
question:
does
do
County
governments
have
the
legal
authority
to
implement
the
type
of
ordinance
that's
been
proposed.
You
know
yes
or
no.
What
are
the
you
know?
Because
groups
have
basically
said
we
will
sue
local
governments
that
do
this
right,
so
I
think
we
should
hear
from
our
attorney
about
those
issues
and
how
strong
the
case
is
that
local
governments
do
have
the
legal
authority
to
implement
such
an
ordinance.
So
I
think
that's
the
high
level
purpose
for
closed
session.
I
Yeah
we
do
you
know
we
do
do
that.
A
lot
at
the
whole
board,
but
I
did
ask
my
Uncle
whether
subcommittees,
like
energy
environment,
have
the
whether
it's
permissible
for
us
to
go
into
closed
session
on
this
and
Michael
indicated
that
it
is
permissible.
So
if
I
think
you
know
if
this
is
an
area
where
the
Board
of
Commissioners
would
be,
you
know
potentially
looking
to
the
committee
for
a
recommendation.
I
Then,
if
there
is
this
real
legal
question
out
there
that
to
me,
it
seems
appropriate
for
us
to
explore
that
a
little
bit
as
part
of
the
kind
of
due
diligence
we
would
be
doing
on
it
to
make
a
potentially
make
a
recommendation,
one
way
or
the
other
to
the
board,
but
then
they
prevent
they
probably
would
want
to
go
into
closed
session
at
some
point
too,
to
kind
of
understand
that
as
well.
If
there
are
some
real
question
marks
hanging
around
it
from
a
legal
standpoint,.
A
A
G
H
B
A
G
A
Yeah,
that
is
some
just
FYI
yeah,
so
we
are
working
alternatives
to
exactly
to
like
well.
If
we
get
to
this
place,
where
we
decide
that
we
just
don't
have
this
little
authority,
so
we'll
maybe
not
gone,
you
know
try
and
do
this.
What
else?
What
are
the
pivots
like?
What?
What
do
we
have
authority
to
do?
What
can
we
do
that
can
be
impactful
what
resources
might
be
required
in
order
to
do
those
things
right?
That
might
get
more
complete
conversation,
I'd.
G
Ask
too
that
perhaps
you
reach
out
to
City
staff,
because
we
had
a
similar
conversation
in
our
Solar
lease
manager
just
presented
stuff
from
Hey.
If
you
asked
me
to
have
this
as
a
goal
running
your
Solid
Waste
division
to
reduce
this
here's,
what
we
have
to
do
and
her
conclusion
was
essentially
it's
not
feasible
or
realistically
feasible
like
financially,
and
so
she
had
a
tough
time
coming
up
with
alternatives
to
pull
these
from
the
waste
stream.
G
Or
do
this
I
think
that
context
would
be
helpful,
sure
as
well,
and
then
I
is
Susanna
Knox.
Who
is
the
legal
counsel
for
this
campaign
next
week?
If
any
other
commissioner
wanted
to
join
me
that
City,
Bakery
I'm
sure
you'd
be
welcome
that
she
really
wanted
to
make
sure
that
I
heard
kind
of
their
legal
interpretation.
So
the
CLC.
A
A
G
C
I
I
mean
whether
we
want
to
do
the
closed
session
today.
I
mean
it
would
really
be
just
to
hear
from
Michael
about
the
legal
question
like
we.
We
can't
go
into
closed
session
and
debate
all
the
other
pros
and
cons
of
the
issue.
It
would
be
purely
to
hear
This
legal
guidance
on
do
local
governments
have
the
legal
authority
to
do
this,
so
I
guess
in
a
way,
because
I
think
we'll
definitely
need
time
and
other
meetings
to
kind
of
discuss
all
the
other
stuff.
But
Michael.