►
From YouTube: Burbank City Council Meeting - May 23, 2023
Description
Burbank City Council Meeting - May 23, 2023
A
B
C
D
Good
evening
welcome
to
a
joint
meeting
of
the
Burbank
City
council,
with
successor
agency,
Housing
Authority
parking
authority,
public
financing,
Authority
and
youth
endowment
Services
fund
board
Tuesday
May
23
2023.
Please
join
me
in
a
moment
of
reflection.
This
moment
is
intended
to
begin
our
meetings
with
a
positive
and
Collective
support
for
our
Beloved
Community
city
council
welcomes
everyone
joining
us
this
evening
and
we
encourage
you
to
take
a
moment
to
reflect
on
our
community
and
the
work
we
will
be
doing
tonight.
D
Although
each
of
us
has
our
own
unique
reasons
for
being
here,
we
are
united
in
our
passion
for
a
wonderful
city.
As
we
pause,
let
us
consider
our
individual
contributions
and
what
they
mean
to
those
around
us.
Let
us
find
solace
in
knowing
that
by
working
together
with
the
shared
Spirit
of
Community
Partnership,
we
will
always
act
responsibly
for
the
betterment
of
Earth.
D
D
E
D
Have
a
quorum
I'd
like
to
advise
the
community,
there
will
be
seven
periods
of
public
comment
tonight.
Members
of
the
public
May
comment
in
person
or
by
telephone
during
the
general
public
comment
period
and
the
public
comment
period
for
the
public
hearing
callers
will
be
placed
in
the
queue
until
all.
In-Person
comments
have
been
received.
Additional
in-person
public
comments
will
be
available
after
each
of
the
reports
later
in
the
evening.
This
first
period
is
for
general
public
comment.
D
You
can
fill
out
a
yellow
comment
card
and
give
it
to
the
city
clerk
or
call
in
now
818-238-335.
There
will
be
a
second
public
comment
period,
it's
a
different
colored
salmon
card
and
then,
if
you
want
to
call
in
for
that,
you're
gonna
have
to
wait
till
after
all.
Right
so
first,
we
have
four
announcements
this
evening,
it'll
be
on
a
short
little
video
here.
F
F
Did
you
know
Burbank
has
a
free,
mobile
app
that
makes
it
easier
than
ever
to
request
city
services
available
for
download
on
the
Apple
and
Google
Play
stores
the
our
burbank311
app
streamlined,
how
you
can
obtain
City
information
and
Report
issues
such
as
Wastewater,
Street
repairs
and
Fallen
trees.
You
can
also
request
services
with
ease
such
as
bulky
item,
pickup
graffiti
removal
and
so
much
more
download
it
for
free
today
or
visit
311.burbankca.gov
for
more
information.
F
City
council
unanimously
adopted
a
resolution
to
initiate
a
transition
from
our
current
at-large
elections
to
elections
by
district
and
now
city
council
wants
to
hear
from
you
to
determine
where
neighborhoods
and
communities
are
grouped
together
for
the
purpose
of
electing
future
members
of
the
council.
We
are
hosting
public
hearings,
Community
forums
and
providing
two
interactive
mapping
tools
to
gather
people's
vision
for
how
District
boundaries
should
be
drawn.
F
Paper
maps
are
available
at
the
city
clerk's
office
in
your
local
library.
You
may
also
draw
your
neighborhood
using
the
digital
mapping
tool
on
the
project
website
join
us
for
the
third
public
hearing
on
Wednesday
June
14th
at
6
PM
in
the
council
chamber
for
more
information.
Please
visit
www.burbankcounseldistricting.com.
F
The
city
clerk's
office
is
accepting
applications
for
23
upcoming
vacancies
on
the
following
board:
commission
and
committees,
Burbank
culture,
arts,
commission
infrastructure
oversight,
board
Park,
Recreation
and
Community
Services
Board
Planning,
Commission,
police,
commission,
sustainable
Burbank,
commission
and
Transportation
Commission.
The
deadline
to
apply
is
Tuesday
May
30th
at
5
pm
applications
are
also
being
accepted
for
one
vacancy
on
the
Community
Development
goals
committee
for
an
unexpired
term,
ending
July,
31st
2024.
The
deadline
to
submit
an
application
is
Monday
June
5th
at
5
pm.
D
We
have
four
Council
presentations
on
the
agenda.
First
is
the
presentation
of
a
proclamation
declaring
May
21st
to
the
27th
2023
Public
Works
week
in
the
City
of
Burbank
and
I
want
to
welcome
Mr
Ken
Berkman
director
of
the
public
works
department
to
join
me
up
here,
give
him
a
round
of
applause.
He
does
a
good
job.
D
Now.
There
are
therefore
I
Constantine
Anthony
may
have
the
mayor
of
the
City
of
Burbank.
Do
hereby
proclaim
the
week
of
May
21st
to
the
27th
2023
as
National
Public
Works
week
in
the
City
of
Burbank,
and
call
upon
all
citizens
and
Civic
organizations
to
acquaint
themselves
with
the
issues
involved
in
providing
our
Public
Works
and
to
recognize
the
contributions
which
Public
Works
employees
make
every
day
to
our
health,
safety,
comfort
and
quality
of
life
signed,
23rd,
May,
2023.
H
H
Thank
you
so
honorable
mayor
and
vice
mayor
council
members.
Thank
you.
We
appreciate
this
Proclamation.
It's
it's
so
cool
to
have
Public
Works
week
follow
last
week's
budget
presentation
because,
while
they
highlighted
our
large
scale
programs
and
protests
and
responsibilities,
there's
so
much
more
that
happens
behind
the
scenes
that
people
don't
see
but
do
get
to
experience
here
in
Burbank.
It's
pretty
amazing
when
you
think
that
we
are
a
full
service
department,
including
a
solid
waste
company
that
does
it
all
from
collections
to
the
landfill
to
the
recycle
center.
H
We
operate
and
maintain
our
own
treatment
plant
and
then
almost
any
time.
Somebody
calls
to
ask
for
service
about
a
pothole
or
a
sidewalk
issue.
It's
handled
within
24
hours
and
and
almost
always
the
same
day,
and
we
came
through
a
heavy
rainy
season.
Without
any
issues,
I
mean
I
can
go
on
and
and
on,
but
we
have
plenty
of
other
proclamations
to
get
to
from
the
folks
that
have
taken
the
phone
calls
and
reviewing
the
3-1-1
app
requests
issuing
thousands
of
permits,
you
know,
see
them
on
the
street.
H
D
And
the
last,
the
last
thing,
I
would
say,
is
Public.
Works
is
the
one
department
where
the
better
they
do
their
job,
the
less
you
think
about
it.
So
we
definitely
have
to
highlight
this,
because
what
I
don't
want
to
do?
Is
you
guys
thinking
about
what
they're
doing
in
the
middle
of
the
year,
because
they're
not
doing
their
jobs
correctly?
We
have
an
amazing
Public,
Works
team,
because
the
fact
that
most
people
here
have
no
idea
who
these
guys
are
is
a
good
thing.
D
D
Next
is
a
presentation
of
a
proclamation
declaring
June
2nd
2023
National
Gun
Violence
Awareness
Day
in
the
City
of
Burbank
joining
us
this
evening
to
accept
the
proclamation
Mr
Jared
cabaniolo,
Ms,
Ruth,
Kennedy,
mountjoy
and
Ms
Laura
petite
members
of
the
Moms
Demand
Action
Movement
San
Fernando
chapter
welcome.
Please
come
on
up.
D
With
more
than
half
of
all.
Firearm
related
gun
deaths
in
the
nation
occurring
in
127
cities
and
whereas
cities
Across
the
Nation,
including
Burbank,
are
working
to
end
the
senseless
violence
with
evidence-based
Solutions
and
whereas
protecting
Public
Safety
in
the
communities
they
serve
is
a
mayor's
highest
responsibility
and
whereas
support
for
the
Second
Amendment
rights
of
law-abiding
citizens
goes
hand
in
hand
with
keeping
guns
away
from
people
with
dangerous
histories
and
whereas
Mayors
and
law
enforcement
officers
in
partnership
with
local
violence,
intervention
activists
and
resource
sources
know
their
communities
best.
D
D
And
whereas
the
idea
was
inspired
by
a
group
of
hadea's
friends
who
asked
their
classmates
to
commemorate
her
life
by
wearing
orange,
they
chose
this
color
because
Hunters
wear
orange
to
announce
themselves
to
other
Hunters
when
out
in
the
woods.
An
orange
is
a
color
that
symbolizes
the
value
of
human
life
and
whereas
anyone
can
join
this
campaign
by
pledging
to
wear
orange
on
June
2nd.
D
Now,
therefore,
I
Constantine
Anthony,
mayor
of
the
city
Burbank,
declared
the
first
Friday
in
June
June,
2nd
2023,
to
be
National.
Gun
Violence
Awareness
Day
in
the
City
of
Burbank
I,
encourage
all
citizens
to
support
their
local
community's
efforts
to
prevent
the
tragic
effects
of
gun
violence
and
to
honor
and
value
human
lives
signed
23rd
of
May
2023.
D
Q
Thank
you
if
there
was
a,
whereas
contest,
we
probably
won
right.
Thank
you
so
much.
My
name
is
Ruth
Kennedy
Mount,
Joy
I'm
joined
here
by
Jerry
cavinola
and
Laura
Pettit.
We
are
all
volunteers
with
the
San
Fernando
Valley
Moms
Demand
Action
chapter,
and
we
wear
orange
to
simply
because
we
want
to
demand
a
future
free
from
gun
violence.
Q
As
the
mayor
announced
orange
is
the
color
that
Hunters
use
to
say,
don't
shoot.
It's
also
the
color
that
minigun
violence
activists
have
adopted
to
symbolize
peace,
so
we
wear
orange
to
honor
those
who
have
been
killed,
injured
and
impacted
by
gun
violence
and
to
demand
it
into
this
Public
Health
crisis.
Q
So,
as
many
of
you
know,
2022
was
a
very
deadly
year
in
our
gun.
Violence
epidemic
2023
is
not
looking
much
better
we're
only
halfway.
Through
the
year
we've
had
over
200
mass
shootings,
nearly
17
000
people
have
already
been
shot
and
killed,
but
here's
the
thing
as
these
incidences
of
gun
violence
increase.
Q
So
too
does
the
movement
to
stop
them
and
Mom
said
man.
Action
as
well
as
groups
all
over
the
country.
We're
going
to
continue
to
educate,
raise
awareness
rally
organize
for
safer
communities,
because
together
we
can
build
a
future
free
from
gun
violence.
So
now
I'm
going
to
turn
it
over
to
Jared.
For
some
comments.
R
R
Thank
you
for
coming
to
our
Mother's
Day
rally
and
March
just
about
a
week
ago.
It
was
really
nice
to
see
you
there
and
really
just
thank
you
to
all
of
council
and
staff
for
your
work
on
putting
in
place
things
like
the
the
moratorium
on
Firearms
retailers
to
chief
of
Albanese
and
all
your
staff
staff
for
the
gun.
Buyback
event
that
you
put
on
I
know
you
plan
on
doing
another
one
of
those
this
year
and
also
just
your
continued
work.
R
Your
Department's
work,
the
city
attorney's
work
at
letting
people
know
about
gun
violence,
restraining
orders
as
well.
I
think
it's
important
to
note
that
you
know,
based
on
reports
we've
seen
given
at
Council
meetings
like
this
burbank's
actually
quite
safe
in
terms
of
gun
violence
incidents,
especially
for
a
city
that
is
second
in
the
nation,
in
per
capita
gun
stores.
Sorry
yeah
I
don't
mean.
R
Is
it
joke,
but
you
know
I,
think
that
is
a
testament
to
just
the
responsibility
of
the
citizenry,
both
gun,
owning
and
non,
certainly
again
to
the
work
of
the
BPD
and
even
to
our
our
you
know,
Proprietors
of
our
gun
stores
for
being
that
first
line
of
defense
and
determining
whether
somebody
should
walk
out
the
door
with
a
deadly
weapon.
I
also
know
that,
like
all
of
you
want
to
do
more
on
this
issue,
I
know
vice
mayor
Schultz,
you
proposed
looking
into
like
adopting
parts
of
the
Giffords
law
ordinance.
R
The
way
Culver
City
did
councilmember
Mullins
I
want
to.
Thank
you
for
suggesting
and
for
bpd's
support
of
bringing
gun,
violence
prevention
into
the
schools
again
and
mayor
Anthony
want
to
thank
you
for
signing
up
to
be
part
of
the
Mayors
against
illegal
guns
program
and
for
adding
your
support
to
a
letter
from
California
Mayors
supporting
assembly,
Bill
28,
the
gun,
violence,
prevention
healing
and
Recovery
Act
by
assembly
member
Jesse
Gabriel
just
down
the
road
a
bit.
R
This
is
a
bill
that
will
fund
sustainably,
gun
violence,
prevention
programs
throughout
the
state.
It's
coming
before
a
full
assembly
vote
very
soon.
Call
your
lawmakers
please,
and
just
also
want
to
offer
that,
in
my
role
with
the
chapter
I'm,
currently
the
lead
of
a
program
that
we
call
be
smart,
it's
our
Secure,
Storage
education
program,
I
have
information
about
it.
We
can
do
presentations
at
any
Community
venue.
R
R
D
Our
third
presentation
is
a
proclamation
declaring
May
1st
through
the
31st
2023
older
Americans
month
in
the
City
of
Burbank
I.
Welcome,
Mr
Bruce
Oldham,
chair
of
the
Burbank
senior
citizen
board,
to
accept
a
proclamation.
Welcome
Bruce
very
much
and
I'll
go
through
this
first
and
then
we'll
invite
the
crew
up.
D
By
not
limiting
our
thinking
about
aging,
exploring
and
combating
stereotypes.
Emphasizing
the
many
positive
aspects
of
Aging
inspiring
older
adults
to
push
past
traditional
boundaries
and
embracing
our
community's
diversity.
Now,
therefore,
I
constantinity,
mayor
of
the
City
of
Burbank,
do
hereby
Proclaim
May
2023
as
older
Americans
month,
and
urge
every
resident
to
celebrate
our
older
citizens
help
to
create
an
inclusive
society
and
accept
the
challenge
of
flexible
thinking.
Around
aging
signed
the
23rd
of
May
2023..
D
P
P
I
will
I'll
introduce
them?
Okay,
oh
okay,
yeah
yeah,
yes,
I
want
to
first
thank
our
staff
members
who
help
us
in
park
and
rec
deal
with
guiding
us
around
along
the
line.
The
right
lines,
but
I
did
want
to
introduce
the
board
members
that
are
here.
Arab
boyajian
and
you
want
to
come
up
come
on
yeah
come
on.
If
you
don't
mind,
come
on
up
Michael
Johnson,
who
did
who
did
wasn't
able
to
make
it
John
Medici
Marva
Murphy
is
also
on
the
board.
P
I
think
the
only
thing
I
wanted
to
remind
everybody
is
that
our
meetings
are
are
every
when's,
the
last
Wednesday
of
every
month,
and
the
public
is
invited,
so
any
any
seniors
that
are
interested
in
learning
more
about
what
the
the
board
is
all
about
and
learning
what
we're
trying
to
do
to
help
the
senior
citizens
of
Burbank
you're
certainly
welcome
to
attend
the
meetings
and
make
comments.
If,
if
you
decide
to
do
that,
but
that's
basically
it
I
think
so.
Thank
you.
Thank.
D
D
S
Good
evening,
mayor
Anthony
and
council
members
May
has
been
exciting
and
it
is
older.
Americans
month,
I
am
honored
to
be
here
today
to
announce
that
this
year's
Peter
McGrath
older
Americans
volunteer
service
awardees
this
award
was
renamed
in
December
2019
in
honor
of
Peter
McGrath
Mr
McGrath
was
a
respected
member
Community
member
who
dedicated
his
time,
volunteering
on
various
Community
or
city
boards,
commissions
and
committees.
S
These
very
deserving
individuals
were
selected
by
an
evaluation
committee
composed
of
three
Representatives
each
from
the
Burbank
senior
citizen
board,
the
supporters
of
Senior
Services
senior
services
and
the
Jocelyn
Center
house
committee,
the
qualifications
being
nominated.
You
must
be
at
least
60
years
of
age,
a
resident
of
Burbank
and
have
volunteered
a
significant
amount
of
time
for
the
betterment
of
the
community.
S
The
community
was
the
committee
was
charged
with
the
responsibility
of
making
the
selection
based
on
the
information
provided
only
on
the
application,
a
different,
a
difficult
task.
Indeed,
this
award
is
designed
to
honor
and
encourage
older
adults
to
continue
to
be
actively
involved
in
their
Community.
The
following
awardees
certainly
reflected
the
national
older
Americans
month
theme
for
2023
aging
Unbound.
S
S
I'll
be
in
the
middle
over
the
past
30
years,
Don
has
volunteered
tirelessly
for
our
community.
He
continues
to
organize
car
club
drives
thanking
First
Responders
car
shows
donating
to
Burbank
Charities,
not
to
mention
the
50th
Anniversary
events
throughout
the
2023
season.
As
president
of
the
Burbank
Historical
Society,
he
has
served
as
president
of
the
burbanka
historical
study
in
2006-2007
and
again
2022-2023
and
is
still
on
the
board
of
directors,
president
of
the
nationally
known
car
club,
Burbank,
Road
Kings
from
1997
to
1998
and
is
currently
the
board
of
directors.
S
As
community
relations
representative
for
Burbank
Road
king's
car
club,
he
became
an
ambassador
in
1987
for
the
Burbank
Chamber
of
Commerce,
chair
of
the
Ambassador
committee.
You've
done
a
lot
of
things
committee
for
the
chamber
in
92
in
1993,
and
served
as
the
chamber
board
of
directors
in
1992
through
97..
S
He
still
serves
as
an
ambassador
committee
on
the
Ambassador
committee.
Don
is
also
a
member
of
the
Burbank
Elks
Lodge
for
46
years.
Don
will
help
anyone
he
anyone
and
everyone
he
meets
and
without
need
for
recognition.
He
loves
people.
He
has
been
described
as
giving
selfless
and
supportive.
As
you
can
see,
Dawn
is
definitely
an
outstanding
volunteer.
T
Thank
you,
Kim
I,
guess
when
I
reached
29,
oh
yeah,
it's
after
60
right
now,
and
it
hadn't
seen
60
from
15
years
ago,
but
anyway
I
really
appreciate
this
award.
You
know
a
lot
of
people
might
not
remember
Peter
Peter
McGrath.
He
is
just
a
fantastic
person.
I'd
go
to
several
City
functions
and
all
we
talk
about
is
66
Mustang
he
has
and
how
he
wants
to
fix
it
up
and
everything.
He
was
a
great
guy.
T
T
The
Burbank
Historical
Society
is
obviously
very
high
on
my
list.
This
is
our
50th
year
in
Burbank
and
I
urge
everyone
in
TV
Land
here.
If
you
give
three
hours
a
month
over
at
the
Museum
as
a
docent,
that's
all
you
need
to
do
and
we'll
teach
you
and
the
history
of
Burbank
is
just
unbelievable.
The
mayor
can
attest
to
that.
You
know
we
just
had
a
tea
last
weekend
and
he
attended
and
we
had
a
great
time.
Also
the
Burbank
I
mean
you
open
it
up
all
right.
T
We
have
a
car
show
on
June
11th
and
invite
everyone
here
and
you'll
see
everything
that
Christie's
going
to
come
from
the
fire
department
and
the
49
Ford
is
coming
from
the
police
department
and
we
have
the
1923
Moreland
bus
from
the
museum
is
going
to
be
over
there.
It
is
Road
worthy
right
and
anyway,
come
on
over
we'll
have
plenty
of
food.
Vendors,
music
and
you'll
have
a
great
time
and
it's
free
to
General,
Public,
okay,
but
anyway,
I
really
appreciate
it.
T
S
Douglas
is
a
is
dedicated
to
giving
the
gift
of
literacy
to
kids.
He
has
personally
built
165
little
community
libraries,
15
of
which
are
here
in
Burbank
and
which
are
located
in
front
of
the
YMCA
Burbank
Boys
and
Girls
Club,
the
VFW
and
the
Burbank
Housing
Authority,
just
to
name
a
few
four
are
also
built
in
our
Burbank
Parks
and
Recreation
Department
for
Burbank
Parks
and
Recreation
Department.
S
This
was
all
done
in
the
past
seven
years.
Douglas
has
also
helped
get
over
300
000
books
to
kids.
He
manages
the
book
Depot
at
the
YMCA,
which
is
a
library
full
of
brand
new
books,
which
he
orders
curates
ships
and
delivers
to
organizations
and
Kids
in
Need.
He
works
with
several
organizations
to
get
donated
supplies
for
kids
as
well.
S
Douglas
is
the
president
of
the
Kiwanis
literacy
Club,
the
executive
director
of
the
Kiwanis
literacy
Club
Foundation,
the
vice
president
of
the
Qantas
Rose
float
Club,
lieutenant
governor
for
the
California
Nevada
Hawaii
Kiwanis
district
10
and
a
member
of
the
Kiwanis
International
young
children's
committee,
which
is
dedicated
for
to
Literacy
for
kids
around
the
world.
He
is
also
the
co-advisor
for
K
Kids,
a
leadership
and
community
service
club
for
elementary
school
kids
through
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
at
the
Thomas
Jefferson
Elementary
School.
His
former
position
includes
president
vice
president.
S
Second,
vice
president
of
the
Qantas
Club
of
Burbank.
Well,
Douglas
is
a
fairly
new
official
Burbank
resident.
He
has
been
very
active
in
our
community
for
over
a
decade,
Douglas
dedicates
his
life
to
service
to
to
the
community.
He
is
passionate
about
literacy
and
providing
the
gift
of
reading
to
kids.
His
community
service
work
is
full-time
and
even
with
a
bad
back,
he
is
unloading.
Packing
shipping
and
delivering
books
to
those
in
need.
He
is
passionate.
Caring,
loving
individual
will
give
you
the
shirt
off
his
back.
S
S
U
I
might
need
this
later.
Let's
see
so,
oh
thank
you
very
much
for
that.
When
they
called
and
told
me,
I
won
the
Peter
McGrath's
older,
American,
volunteer
service
award
I
had
to
ask
older
than
what
how
old
do
you
have
to
be,
but
Hage
but
hey
age,
just
a
number
right,
so
I
want
to
express
my
deepest
gratitude
to
all
those
that
have
supported
me
in
everything.
U
I
do
we
have
almost
20
people
that
have
supported
me
over
the
years
are
here
tonight
in
our
support
and
I
couldn't
have
done
all
this
without
all
of
them
and
more,
my
focus
has
been
getting
books
to
kids
into
the
hands
of
kids,
who
need
them.
The
most,
my
friends
in
the
amazing
community
of
Kiwanis
and
Burbank.
You
have
my
been
my
backbone,
my
cheerleaders
and
some
even
my
mentors
to
all
the
volunteers
out
there
who
make
a
difference
every
day.
U
Let's
keep
challenging
those
stereotypes
and
providing
improving
that
age
is
no
barrier
to
kindness,
compassion
and
it's
a
whole
lot
of
fun.
Thank
you,
Burbank
for
the
incredible
honor.
Let's
continue
spreading
love,
laughter
and
joy,
no
matter
how
many
candles
are
on
your
birthday
cake,
but
my
Burbank
Journey
doesn't
start.
My
Burbank
Journey
starts
in
1961
when
my
folks
moved
from
Michigan
out
here
and
my
dad
worked
right
here
in
Burbank
in
1961
at
ierc.
U
D
Absolutely
I
didn't
realize:
Doug
was
winning
the
county
award
too.
That's
great!
Obviously
you
get
to
a
certain
point
where
you
can't.
You
can't
stop
yourself
from
giving
back
when
you've
been
in
Burbank
long
enough,
I
first
moved
here
in
2004.,
you
get
to
a
point
where
you
realize
that
this
community
has
given
you
so
much
you're
compelled
to
serve
and
I
felt
it
I
felt
it.
D
You
know,
years
back
when
I
joined
a
commission,
I
felt
it
I
served
I
served
on
a
commission
with
Peter
McGrath,
and
he
would
talk
about
this
all
the
time
you're
just
compelled
so
the
folks
that
are
here
doing
the
work.
These
are
the
these
are
like
the
top
of
the
top,
the
guys
who
put
in
all
the
time
and
effort.
D
There
was
a
whole
host
of
folks
who
put
in
anywhere
from
10
to
20
to
30
hours
a
week,
just
volunteering
different
service
organizations,
different
Community
organizations,
committees,
commissions
boards,
you
name
it.
People
are
out
there
and
they're
they're,
propping
up
the
city
and
they're,
doing
real
hard
work
to
make
sure
that
every
one
of
us
is
taken
care
of,
and
so
thank
you
thank
you
to
Donald
and
to
Douglas
and
to
all
of
their
support
teams
and
all
of
the
their
friends
and
family
and
neighbors.
D
D
D
V
L
Yes,
Mr
Mayor
vice
mayor
members
of
the
council
and
for
for
the
benefit
of
the
public
city
council,
met
this
afternoon
at
4
pm
to
discuss
four
items
in
closed
session.
The
first
item,
a
matter
of
personal
injury,
lawsuit
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54,
956.9,
D1
Cabrera
versus
City
of
Burbank
City
Council
took
no
reportable
action.
Second
premises,
liability
case
existing
litigation
under
government
code,
section
54,
956.9
D1
in
the
case
of
Collegian
versus
City
of
Burbank
City
Council
took
no
reportable
action.
L
Another
existing
litigation
case
pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54,
956.9
D1,
the
matter
of
Los
Angeles
water,
keeper
versus
State,
Water,
Resources
control
board
with
the
City
of
Burbank
as
a
real
party
in
interest.
This
is
an
administrative
writ
case.
The
city
council
gave
the
City
attorney
direction
to
enter
into
a
Joint
Defense
agreement
with
the
city
of
Glendale
who's,
also
a
real
party
in
interest,
in
this
case,
to
defend
the
case
on
behalf
of
the
City
of
Burbank.
L
Finally,
city
council
met
on
a
matter
of
Labor
negotiations
concerning
International
Brotherhood
of
Electrical
Workers,
with
the
city's
Management
Services
director
and
labor
negotiator,
Ms
Betsy
McClinton.
Pursuant
to
government
code,
section
54
957.6
city
council
took
no
reportable
action
on
that
item.
D
Thank
you,
Mr
City
attorney.
Now
is
the
time
for
joint
general
public
comment.
Please
fill
out
a
yellow
public
comment
card.
If
you'd
like
to
speak
in
person
and
anyone
watching
at
home,
dial
818-238-3335,
you
will
be
put
into
queue
until
we're
done
with
the
general
public
comment.
Let
us
begin.
First
up,
I
have
Joel
schlossman,
followed
by
Roy
simozian.
M
M
This
is
April
16,
1991.,
I'm
concerned
mayor
and
vice
mayor
with
your
desire
to
bring
mentally
ill
people
to
Burbank
I'm
concerned
with
your
desire
to
bring
transients
to
Burbank
I'm
concerned,
with
taxpayer
dollars
being
used
to
fund
parking
for
an
RV
park.
I've
read
all
those
dozens
and
dozens
of
letters
that
our
citizens
sent
in
and
they
are
against.
It
I'm,
of
course,
talking
about
number
20
on
your
agenda.
M
I
wish
that
you
would
talk
to
the
police,
the
chief
of
police
and
ask
him
if
there's
a
likelihood
of
crime
increasing
with
this
population
and
when
you
increase
the
crime
you're
going
to
have
Crime
Victims,
and
that's
us,
everybody
in
this
room,
there's
consequences
to
what
you
do
and
it's
a
we're
we're
a
compassionate
people
Americans
and
we
should
be
and
there's
plenty
of
safety
nets
already
it's
redundant.
What
you're
doing
I
don't
need
to
go
down
the
list
of
all
the
all
the
compassion
that
we
have
to
help
the
down
and
out.
M
W
W
Is
this
going
to
be
our
response,
the
destruction
of
neighborhoods,
to
accommodate
this?
We
didn't
ask
for
it.
We
worked
all
our
lives
to
build
a
neighborhood
in
a
great
City
and
speaking
of
which
you
might
take
that
and
go
with
the
fact
that
there's
a
history
of
Burbank
and
it
all
started
in
the
Rancho.
W
W
X
Mr
Mayor
vice
mayor
council
members
you'll
have
to
wait
a
couple
of
weeks,
probably
for
the
next
episode
of
review
of
the
April
2022
Citywide
survey,
because
I
feel
I
need
to
respond
to
the
gentleman
that
followed
me
last
week.
That
claimed
my
presentation
was
a
farce.
I
did
not
say
there
was
not
a
current
problem.
I
agree
with
the
city
attorney
that
there's
very
little
the
city
can
do
about
it.
X
I
recommend
that
the
tenants
get
with
their
lower
owners
and
ask
them
why
they
have
to
be
displaced
because
ab1482,
which
is
more
likely
or
more
called
civil
code.
1946.2
B
.2
d,
says
that
it
has
to
be
that
they
cannot
be
reasonably
accommodate
and
accomplished
in
a
safe
manner,
with
a
tenant
in
place
and
requires
the
tenant
to
vacate
the
residential
property
for
at
least
30
days.
I,
don't
know
what
short
of
raising
the
building
would
require
that
a
senate
be
displaced
for
30
days.
X
X
Ab1482
started
this
problem
by
blindsiding
blindsiding
us
owners
that
had
kept
rents
low
after
the
Great
Recession
covid,
compounded
that
by
extending
that
we
could
not
exercise
our
rights
for
1482
for
two
to
three
years.
Okay,
then
proposition
19
came
in,
which
is
going
to
make
generational
wealth
very
difficult,
because
it
puts
my
errors
in
the
same
position
as
somebody
coming
in
off
the
street
and
wanting
to
buy
their
property.
X
The
problem
with
1482
and
which
you're
contemplating
by
zero
to
seven
percent
rent
cap
is
that
those
owners
that
are
hurting
that'll
continue
to
get
harder
nobody's
going
to
come
in
nobody's,
going
to
be
able
to
come
in
and
buy
their
property
from
them
with
the
rent
rolls
they're
stuck
with.
If
I
can't
make
it
work
a
business
work.
X
Y
Good
evening,
I'm
Michael
Hastings,
the
president
of
the
Burbank
police
foundation
and
I,
am
here
tonight
to
ask
you
to
please
consider
the
item
that
is
on
your
agenda,
to
accept
our
donation
of
nineteen
thousand
dollars
to
erect
a
flagpole
in
the
memory
of
Officer
Matthew
pavelka,
who
it'll
be
20
years,
November
15th
of
this
year,
who
gave
the
ultimate
sacrifice
to
all
of
us
here
in
Burbank,
which
was
giving
his
life.
We
have
been
through
the
Journey
of
this
flagpole.
Y
When
we
first
met
with
Staff
last
November,
we
figured
it
was
going
to
cost
us
about
ten
thousand
dollars.
We
put
the
word
out
to
the
community.
People
came
forward
and
money
just
kept
flooding
in
to
make
a
very
long
story
short
of
our
journey.
We
are
now
at
nineteen
thousand
dollars,
as
you
can
see,
because
things
changed
and
as
things
changed,
we
had
to
obviously
tap
into
more
of
the
funds
that
the
foundation
raises.
That
normally
goes
towards
scholarships
for
our
young
children,
which
you
saw
here
about
three
weeks
ago.
Y
We
started
out
with
a
flagpole
with
a
solar
light,
which
is
where
we
thought
we
were
going
with
the
sustainability
and
we're
told
no,
you
can't
do
a
solar
light
after
we
already
had
the
permit,
so
we're
now
doing
an
electric
light,
so
we
are
going
to
have
an
electric
light
up
there.
It
would
be
wonderful
if
the
city
could
do
the
hookup
for
us,
which
would
save
us
a
lot
of
money,
because
they
had
already
dug
up
the
properties
to
fix
the
lights
that
were
there.
Y
Z
Good
evening
council
members
mayor
staff,
Mr
Ramirez,
we
gotta
stop
meeting
like
this
Chris
resided
with
the
Burbank
police
foundation.
I'm
here
to
talk
about
item
number
11.,
it's
with
great
honor
that
we
present
this
project
to
you
on
the
anniversary,
20th
anniversary
of
officer
pavelka
having
a
monument
at
the
defender
of
constitution.
Memorial
site
is
very
fitting
for
one
of
our
own.
Z
AA
Thank
you
good
evening,
honorable
mayor
vice
mayor,
City,
Council
Members,
my
name
is
Christy
Malouf
I'm
a
26
year
resident
of
the
City
of
Burbank,
with
the
last
10
years
as
a
landlord
of
a
family-owned
five-unit
apartment
building
which
I'm
proud
to
say.
I
have
had
the
pleasure
and
still
have
the
pleasure
of
some
long-term
tenants.
I
love
living
in
the
City
of
Burbank,
a
place
I
call
home,
I
am
retired,
with
40
Years
of
dedicated
service
to
the
city
of
Los
Angeles.
AA
As
a
result,
I
was
a
first-hand
witness
to
the
deterioration
of
several
residential
neighborhoods
due
directly
to
programs
La
initiated
to
help
persons
experiencing
homelessness.
The
areas
where
homeless
people
congregate
become
virtual
wastelands
filled
with
all
sorts
of
trash,
including
human
waste
places
where
crimes
occur
from
the
worst
crime
of
homicide
to
selling
and
using
narcotics
to
petty
theft.
Etc
I
am
proud
of
our
Burbank
Police
Department.
Under
the
leadership
of
Chief
Albanese,
his
Command
Staff,
the
officers
patrolling
the
streets,
civilians
inside
and
volunteers.
AA
They
do
not
need
to
worry
about
RVs
in
a
parking
lot
with
permits
for
homeless
people
to
monitor
for
more
crime.
There
are
plenty
of
resources
out
there:
let's
try
to
add
more
affordable
housing
in
these
multi-units
that
are
being
developed
all
over
the
City
of
Burbank.
Let's
make
this
a
priority.
I
do
support
ab1482
I
feel
it
works.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
AB
We
are
here
to
thank
you
for
your
continued
support
for
the
Youth
task
force,
funding
for
our
after
school
middle
school
programs
at
Luther,
Dolores,
Huerta
and
Muir.
These
three
programs
continue
to
be
vital
to
the
Youth
of
Burbank,
providing
valuable
Services
during
the
time
that
young
people
need
us.
AB
The
most
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
provides
a
safe
and
caring
environment
where
middle
school
students
can
get
their
homework
done,
provide
get
are
provided
with
mentoring,
Services,
engage
in
athletic
activities
and
also
have
the
opportunity
to
participate
in
programs
such
as
Vex
robotics,
microscope,
science,
chess
Visual
and
Performing
Arts,
and
much
more.
We
currently
have
over
230
Middle
School
age
youth
grades.
Six
through
eight
from
these
three
schools.
The
club
helps
young
people,
succeed,
academically,
nurtures,
Healthy,
Lifestyles,
encourages
good
character
and
citizenship.
AB
Our
unit
directors
work
with
school
counselors
and
many
youth
refer
to
the
program
or
continue.
They
continue
to
connect
with
the
counselors
so
that
no
young
person
falls
through
the
Crux.
Using
our
three
priority
outcomes.
The
club
is
able
to
use
survey
data
from
our
National
Youth
outcomes
initiative
survey
to
determine
how
well
it
is
helping
youth
accomplish
our
goals.
We
track
academic
success,
good
character
and
citizenship
and
Healthy
Lifestyles.
All
these
survey
results
are
all
shared
with
the
City
of
Burbank
each
year.
AB
AC
Hello
again,
Mr
Mayor
vice
mayor
collected
city
council,
other
officers,
I,
haven't
introduced
myself
these
last
couple
of
weeks,
because
I've
been
emotionally
rattled
every
time.
I
would
like
to
fix
that.
My
name
is
John
Fisher
and
today
is
the
day
for
me
and
my
neighbors
in
60
days.
I
do
not
have
a
home,
I
will
have.
I
will
surely
find
another
unit.
AC
I
would
like
to
address
two
comments
from
last
week's
meeting,
the
first
being
from
the
city
attorney
saying
that
there's
nothing
that
we
can
do
to
help
the
people
who've
already
been
served,
a
60-day
notice.
Well,
that
may
be
true.
We
can
still
do
something
to
help
people
who
haven't
gotten
their
notices.
Yet
when
someone
lies
bleeding
before
you,
you
don't
moan
and
pine
over
how
you
can't
prevent
the
injury.
That's
already
happened.
AC
R
AC
People
are
losing
their
homes,
members
of
the
community,
long-standing
members
of
the
community,
we're
hearing
tonight
from
property
owners
who
have
had
stable
tenants
for
years
and
decades
who
feel
privileged.
We
have
heard
from
the
homeowners
and
property
owners
in
this
town
who
are
worried
about
the
turnover
in
who
makes
up
this
town,
and
we
are
actively
expelling
people.
AC
AC
AD
Honorable
mayor
Anthony
and
vice
mayor
Schultz
and
council
members
and
talented
staff,
my
name
is
David
Donahue
I'm,
a
resident
business
owner
here
in
the
great
community
of
Burbank.
Two
things
I
want
to
talk
about
for
my
first
opportunity
to
address
the
dice.
One
is
that
I
was
had
the
opportunity
to
attend
the
Los
Angeles
Department
of
Water
and
Powers
lineman
Rodeo
and
Mr
Rion
slayman
sent
me
an
invitation.
I
had
was
not
aware
that
it
existed
and
I
would
encourage
anybody
who
lives
in
the
area
to
witness
this
event.
AD
The
talent
and
skill
exhibited
by
these
teams,
which
Burbank,
Water
and
Power
had
four
is
just
incredible.
I
happen
to
witness
them
lowering
down
a
dummy
who,
as
in
the
as
to
replicate
somebody
who
touched
an
electrical
wire
and
was
unconscious,
it
was
a
pleasure
to
meet
Mr
slayman
and
his
wife
and
his
kids
there
and
again
I
encourage
people
to
go
and
witness
it
themselves
next
year.
AD
The
other
part
I
like
to
comment
now
is
when
I
was
commenting
about
the
districting
maps
and
the
difficulties,
because
it
is
tremendously
difficult.
I
was
very
happy
to
say
that
the
public
information
officer,
Jonathan
Jones,
reached
out
to
me
at
the
last
council
meeting
and
since
then
has
been
incredibly
helpful,
highly
responsive
and
being
able
to
provide
all
of
the
information
that
I
have
requested.
AD
As
representative
of
the
major
tenets
of
which
the
law
is
asking
to
do,
and
so
I
was
fortunate
to
be
able
to
get
the
PowerPoint
presentation.
So
we'll
be
able
to
include
that
if
the
board
says
it's
okay,
I
would
urge
people
to
take
the
time
to
go
to
the
city
of
burbank's
website
and
look
into
the
district
information.
There
was
a
lot
there
and
it
is
very
important
to
understand
it
because
it's
in
front
of
us
in
just
a
short
number
of
months.
Thank
you
very
much.
J
J
So
I've
talked
a
lot
about
keeping
people
whole
and
I
just
want
to
remind
the
City
attorney
and
anybody
else
who
has
any
kind
of
law:
knowledge
that
going
back
to
the
12
tablets.
What
remains
of
them
most
of
those
were
about
returning
people
back
to
all
or
keeping
people.
I
mean
it's
not
a
new
idea
that
civil
law
is
about
protecting
people
and
not
them
not
losing
what
they
work
have
worked
so
hard
to
build.
Jane
Goodall,
I
believe
was
asked.
J
You
know
what
was
the
beginning
of
civilization,
and
she
said
it
was
proof
of
the
first
mended
bone
right,
and
that
is
the
first
time
that
another
human
being
said:
hey
we're
not
animals
here
when
somebody
gets
hurt
at
no
fault
of
their
own
I'm,
sure
I'm
gonna
make
sure
you're
okay.
Why
well
I'm
a
big
part,
because
when
I
get
hurt,
I'm
there
for
you're
going
to
be
there?
For
me
right,
it's
a
this
is
what
civilization
is
based
on
the
idea
that
helping
people
is
like
some
kind
of
saintly
thing.
J
I
think
is
completely
astonishing.
Helping
people
should
just
be
the
norm,
it
should
just
be
obviously
right
and
anything
less
based
on
Jane.
What
good
Jane
Goodall
was
saying
is
the
law
of
the
Jungle
like
if
people
are
not
helping
people
in
need
when
they're,
when
they
end
up
there
at
no
fault
of
their
own
right,
then
what
do
you
have?
You
have
the
law
of
the
jungle,
so
where
am
I
at.
J
So
a
storage
unit
in
Burbank
about
the
same
size
as
250
a
month
so
effectively
I'd
be
paying
to
live
in
a
storage
unit
cramped
with
all
my
stuff,
there's
no
window
right,
which
cannot
be
code
and
seven
hundred
dollars
to
be
able
to
live
there
and
have
a
shared
bathroom
and
yeah.
So
I
think
what
we're
seeing
is
everyone
seems
to
have
their
piece
of
the
pie
and
they
just
don't
care.
J
AE
I'm
Karen,
Thornton
and
I
live
in
the
Rancho
and
we've
got.
We
heard
at
your
last
meeting
that
you
wanted
to
spend
some
money
on
the
Rancho
and
do
some
investigating.
So
thank
you
very
much.
We
have
some
issues
that
need
investigating
and
we're
very
appreciative
that
you
want
to
jump
in
and
do
that.
AE
What
worries
a
lot
of
us
is
that
there's
a
lot
of
talk
about
a
trail,
that's
going
to
be
going
from
Maine
and
Riverside
to
Mariposa
by
the
bridge,
which
is
ostensibly
for
horses
to
use
and
a
bunch
of
us
who
ride.
Horses
and
I
have
two
in
my
backyard.
Many
of
us
do
I,
wouldn't
ride
my
horses
down
Riverside
Drive
for
anything
in
the
world.
AE
That
goes
around
the
equestrian
center.
That
is
already
built
maintained
by
Griffith
Park
I'm
on
The
Advisory
Board
to
Griffith
Park.
The
trail
is
going
nowhere.
It's
the
trail
is
static.
It's
well
maintained.
It
goes
from
Maine
and
Riverside
to
the
Mariposa
Bridge.
It
parallels
the
trail
you're
thinking
of
spending
millions
of
dollars
of
Burbank
money
on
and
a
lot
of
us
horse.
People
think
you
shouldn't
be
spending
the
money
there.
AE
We
have
other
priorities
like
Circle
K,
which
I'm
sure
you've
heard
a
lot
about
the
rental,
stables
and
the
boarding
stables
that
are
near
the
bridge
if
we
don't
have
access
from
Burbank
to
the
bridge
safe
access
and
we
don't
have
access
from
our
neighborhoods
to
the
equestrian
center
and
the
equestrian
center
to
the
bridge.
We
have
no
connectivity
between
our
neighborhoods
for
the
horses.
We
won't
have
horses
in
Burbank
anymore,
because
we
can't
get
to
where
we
need
to
get
to
if
they're
condos,
all
the
way
down
to
the
river.
AE
So
if
you're
thinking
of
spending
millions
of
dollars
on
us
think
about
Circle
K.
So
when
the
four
or
five
of
us
were
sitting
around
talking
about
this,
we
thought
well,
maybe
we're
the
only
horse,
people
thinking
about
this
and
we
weren't
sure.
So
we
did
a
little
form
and
we
went
up
and
down
the
streets
to
people.
We
knew
to
people,
we
didn't
know
and
we
started
saying:
do
you
want
a
trail
down
Riverside?
AE
Would
you
ever
use
it
and
people
said
well
sure,
because
it's
kind
of
like
asking
someone
do
you
want
a
cupcake
sure
I
want
a
cupcake?
Well,
what?
If
that
cupcake
costs
all
the
money
Burbank
has
to
spend
on
the
Rancho
and
we
end
up
losing
our
connectivity
to
the
bridge
and
nobody
wants
to
trade
that
so
here
are
the
signatures
for
you
to
look
at.
AF
Urell
Jim
Lane
Burbank
resident
23
years
last
week,
I
brought
I
came
here
and
I
called
everyone's
attention
to
the
clause
in
the
city
managers,
employment
agreement,
which
states
that
the
city
council
acknowledges
the
tradition
of
Lakeside
Golf
Club,
offering
a
quote-unquote
courtesy.
Membership
to
the
city
manager
I
have
brought
this
up
in
the
past
as
well,
but
not
to
this
new
city
council.
Here
I
I
watched
the
response.
There
was
little
response
from
city
council
and
nothing
from
staff.
I
Then
followed
up
with
an
email
the
following
day
and
I.
Just
said.
AF
AF
I
think
you
are
the
appropriate
people
to
ask
this
question
of
I.
Don't
know
why
Bob
even
got
involved
in
this,
but
he
did
samala
I'm.
Sorry,
Tamala
did
did
email
me
and
said
she's
interested
in
this
and
is
waiting
for
staff.
I'd
also
brought
out
the
history
of
women
not
being
allowed
to
be
members
at
Lakeside,
and
that
has
been
the
case
for
you
know
forever.
AF
Even
when
Lakeside
was
of
course
established
it
didn't
let
anybody
in
but
Caucasians
back
then,
but
anyway,
so
I
don't
know
the
answer
to
that
question.
Maybe
we
could
ask
a
Lakeside
member
if
there's
any
here,
I,
don't
know
so
I've
look,
I've,
headed
bureaucracies
at
mostly
in
higher
education.
I
know
that
there's
a
natural
tendency
to
Circle
little
Wagons
at
times
when
questions
are
asked
to
people
a
little
unsured
of.
Can
we
not
make
this
into
something
like
that?
Please,
okay,
this
is
a
pretty
straightforward
thing.
AF
I
suspect
the
delay
here
probably
might
have
something
to
do
with
privacy.
If
that's
the
case
say
so,
just
say
it
ask
the
City
attorney.
Can
we
talk
about
this,
or
is
this
A
Private
Matter?
It
isn't
a
public
contract
to
not
answer
the
question
when
directly
asked
I
asked
the
city
manager
didn't
get
a
direct
answer
and
I
asked
all
of
you.
It
didn't
get.
A
direct
answer
is
a
very
poor
look.
This
is
a
gift
worth
tens
of
thousands
of
dollars.
AF
That's
given
to
the
person
who
runs
our
city
and
we
don't
know
if
he's
accepted
it
or
not.
That
makes
absolutely
no
sense
to
me.
We
need
a
straight
answer.
Every
citizen
in
this
city
is
is
owed
a
straight
answer
on
this
one.
Finally,
what's
going
on
here
with
the
tenants
is
utterly
ridiculous.
It's
horrible
is
a
Burbank
tradition.
Yeah
and
I
would
appreciate
it,
especially
when
Mr
Fisher
was
speaking
if
staff
to
my
right
could
actually
listen
to
him
and
not
chat,
chat
back
and
forth,
while
he's
talking
and
crying
by
the
way.
AG
Good
evening,
mayor
council
members
here,
I
am
once
again:
I
represent
the
Maui
Apartments
Martha
urell
I've
made
notes,
but
I
got
thrown
off
because
tonight,
surprisingly,
was
the
seniors
night
and
back
in
2012,
14
I,
also
volunteered
at
the
Jocelyn
Center
and
I
was
able
to
work
with
Peter
McGrath.
So
I
was
so
sad
to
hear
of
his
passing
but
I'm
happy
to
know
now
that
there's
something
that
is,
you
know,
honoring
what
he
has
done.
AG
Okay
next
thing,
I
just
found
out
that
in
South
Pasadena
they
passed
an
emergency
moratorium.
Eviction,
moratorium
and
Burbank
is
not
the
only
place
that
this
is
happening.
It's
happening
all
across
the
country.
Even
Canada,
I
read
that
Canada
is
having
a
problem
with
people
being
evicted
from
their
homes
because
of
these
renovations.
AG
AH
She
currently
lives
in
Burbank
and
is
being
evicted
wrongfully
by
new
owners
of
the
building
she
lives
in.
She
is
currently
paying
1100
a
month
for
a
studio.
She
told
me
she
makes
about
1600
a
month.
The
irony
is
this
person,
while
I
don't
know
the
poster.
I
do
know
the
person
she's
talking
about
she
lives
in
Maui
she's,
one
of
my
mother's
Neighbors,
and
this
is
just
to
show
how
much
Burbank
tenants
are
feeling
squeezed
I.
Have
another
posting
saying
Psy?
Do
we
ever
get
a
word
around
here?
AH
AI
Thank
you,
sorry
I'm,
just
a
little
confused
millions
of
dollars
on
a
trail
and
I'm,
just
looking
for
a
place
to
live.
My
name
is
Linda.
Grenieren
I
have
been
here
week
after
week,
hoping
to
move
you
to
action
so
that
we
are
not
left
on
the
street.
I
have
reached
out
to
all
of
the
resources
that
you
have
sent
my
way
only
to
be
told
that
I
don't
qualify
that
I'm
just
outside
the
parameters
of
their
program
or
that
there
is
nothing
available
for
me.
AI
You
know
any
or
any
other
number
of
things
that
don't
really
help
me.
I
have
paid
application
fees
and
seen
as
the
days
countdown
AS
application
after
application,
I
submit
for
rentals
are
rejected
because
I
don't
make
the
required
three
times.
Income
landlords
not
require
I,
have
attended
countless
meetings,
hoping
that
there
will
be
someone
who
who
can
help
us,
since
it
has
become
painfully
obvious
that
the
city
that
I
call
home
has
turned
its
back
on
me.
AI
I
hear
in
this
belief
as
other
cities
like
Pasadena,
it's
a
enact
moratoriums
on
no
fault
evictions,
so
an
ordinance
can
be
developed
to
protect
its
renters
and
what
is
burbank's
answer
a
city
clerk
emailed
me
today,
stating
that
the
Section
8
program
for
the
City
of
Pasadena
will
be
opening
soon.
It
is
obvious
that
there
is
no
place
for
me
or
other
honest
working
people
in
the
City
of
Burbank.
AI
Instead
of
providing
the
same
old
emails
with
the
taxing
resources
that
don't
work,
why
can't
the
city
clearly
Define
what
a
substantial
renovation
is,
so
that
I
may
help
myself
in
court?
This
is
a
call
to
action
if
the
city
is
unwilling
to
enact
a
moratorium
to
stop
the
Norfolk
evictions.
If
you
are
unwilling
to
protect
the
most
vulnerable
within
the
city,
then
you
must
clearly
and
unambiguously
Define
what
a
substantial
renovation
is.
You
are
our
elected
officials.
You
know
what
the
problem
is.
Now
you
must
act
to
protect
your
constituents,
I
think.
A
AJ
Good
evening
mayor
vice
mayor
council
members
staff,
following
up
what
everyone's
been
saying,
I
want
to
bring
a
couple
of
considerations.
Last
night,
the
city
of
Alhambra
passed
an
emergency
ordinance
in
order
to
put
a
moratorium
on
Renovations.
They
are
the
third
City
in
the
recent
couple
of
months
between
order
to
do
something
like
this
South
Pasadena
and
Claremont
have
also
done
something
like
this.
AJ
The
reason
for
that
is,
you
know
what
we
keep
saying
is
that
this
is
not
just
something
that
is
happening
in
a
couple
of
buildings.
This
is
something
that
is
happening
Nationwide,
which
also
means
it's
happening
right
here.
Right
now
displacing
you
know,
displacing
citizens.
So,
oh
by
the
way,
my
timer's
not
going
cool
any
here
so
pointing
that
out
anyhood.
All
this
is
just
to
bring
into
awareness
that
this
is
a
really
big
problem.
That
requires
immediate
action
and
there
are
some
cities
that
are
taking
immediate
action.
AJ
AK
Hi
sorry
I'm
not
good
at
public
speaking
anyway
hi
my
name
is
Stephanie
Clinton
and
I've
lived
in
Burbank
for
19
years
and
I
would
love
to
continue
to
do
so.
Unfortunately,
I'm
being
evicted
from
my
apartment,
along
with
my
neighbors
I've
written
to
a
few
of
you
individually,
and
have
not
received
a
response.
The
people
who
bought
my
building
did
a
cash,
quick
sale
to
speed,
escrow
and
evicted
us
two
days
after
escrow
closed.
These
are
not
Mom
and
Pop
landlords
and
have
no
ties
to
this
city.
AK
I
am
now
trying
to
pack
up
19
years
of
my
life
and
do
not
have
a
place
to
go
on
top
of
this
I'm
being
harassed,
lied
to
and
intimidated
by
these
new
owners.
I
have
had
zero
help
with
this
matter,
and
these
tactics
to
get
me
out
or
after
the
last
landlord
tenant
commission
meeting
and
I
still
have
to
wait
until
June
5th
before
I
can
ask
remediation
on
this
matter.
AK
What
other
means
do
I
have
as
long
as
time
as
a
longtime
tenant
of
Burbank
to
help
me
I,
don't
think
the
landlord
tenant
commission
has
the
means
to
help
us
with
these
problems.
They
may
have
been
able
to
help
with
the
mom
and
pop
landlords
in
the
past
that
had
ties
to
the
community,
but
the
new
landlords
that
are
kicking
us
out
do
not
live
here,
and
they
are
real
estate,
sharks
that
are
just
coming
after
us,
and
they
see
us
as
keeping
keeping
us
from
getting
their
investment
right
away.
AK
AK
Until
they
took
over
the
account-
and
at
the
time
it
you
could
say,
it
was
just
an
oversight,
but
they
they
told
me
that
the
people
who
stay
longer
will
have
these
interruptions
take
place.
So
I
don't
think
this
was
an
oversight.
I
think
this
was
an
intention,
letting
me
know
the
things
that
were
gonna
start
happening
around
where
I
live.
AK
R
R
You
know
how
we
treat
marginalized
populations,
but
I'll
just
stick
to
one
fact
that
the
only
time
gun,
violence
and
mental
illness
should
be
brought
up
in
the
same
sentence
is
regarding
suicide.
It's
the
only
the
only
instance
in
which
we
actually
have
empirical
data
to
show
a
linkage
there
moving
from
one
soapbox
to
a
next
to
speak
kind
of
on
behalf
of
all
the
the
tenants
you've
you've
heard
here
and
at
previous
meetings.
R
I
first
want
to
start
by
thanking
vice
mayor
Schultz,
for
your
proposed
plan,
I
believe
last
meeting
to
increase
the
amount
of
rental
compensation
for
relocation.
I
think
that's
a
great
gesture.
I
also
would
love
to
know
more
about
the
timeline
of
that
and
I.
Think
that
everyone
here
yourself
included
vice
mayor
is
would
say
that
it's
not
enough.
R
It's
my
understanding
that
not
every
tenant
who
has
been
affected
up
to
this
point
has
even
gotten
to
that
point
of
the
process,
yet
I
believe
they've
received
notices
of
eviction
which
are
not
the
same
as
unlawful
detainers,
and
to
my
knowledge,
from
talking
to
people
more
educated
on
this
than
I,
am
you
may
not
even
be
able
to
take
legal
action
until
that
unlawful
detainer
is
put
into
place?
I?
R
Also,
just
would
like
to
point
out
that
you
know,
after
this
body
directed
tenants
to
go
to
the
landlord
tenant
commission,
which
then
directed
tenants
to
come
back
here.
Only
to
hear
that
you
can't
do
anything
for
them.
The
solution
of
well
fight
it
in
court
comes
across
as
a
little
bit
Hollow
just
because
I
get
it.
It
may
be
the
law,
but
it's
not
like
that's
an
easy
or
necessarily
accessible
option
for
every
tenant
out
there.
R
My
second
question
just
is
regarding
when
it
comes
to
pass
that
these
intended
Renovations
that
landlords
are
are
kicking.
People
out
for
do
not
actually
happen.
What
is
the
city's
recourse
there?
What
can
we
do
to
kind
of
hold
these
landlords
and
Property
Owners
accountable
for
unlawfully
kicking
out
tenants,
and
with
my
last
few
seconds
I'll
just
say
you
know:
I've
heard
a
lot
about
concern
and
with
increased
homeless
population
in
Burbank
be
nice.
If
we
could
do
something
about
that,.
AL
AL
I
have
three
horses
in
my
backyard
and
I
would
never
ride
on
a
trail
down
Riverside
Drive,
and
neither
would
my
neighbors
that
signed
the
petition
against
it.
Keep
in
mind.
We
have
collected
hundreds
of
voting
Burbank
residents,
signatures,
saying
they.
They
do
not
want
this
Trail
down
Burbank
or
with
Burbank
funding.
AL
We
want
to
preserve
the
land
and
the
horse.
Community
not
build
down,
not
build
a
trail
down,
Riverside
Drive.
Nobody
will
ride
on.
Please
hear
us
the
community
rather
than
one
loud
voice,
pushing
this.
We
all
want
to
save
the
land,
help
us
be
proactive
and
utilize
funding
to
do
so
to
help
Save
the
Last
sliver
that
we
have
left
in
Burbank.
AL
AM
AM
It
would
be
fabulous
yeah,
it
would
be
a
cupcake.
We
talked
about
doing
it
decades
ago.
It
was
part
of
the
original
work
that
was
done
with
the
Rancho
master
plan,
and
we
just
never
did
it
and
it's
unfortunate,
but
as
an
equestrian
Community,
the
key
thing
is
for
a
horse
and
a
rider
to
be
able
to
travel
safely
through
the
community.
In
most
cases
where
they're
headed
to
is
acts,
they
need
access,
safe
access
to
the
bridge
at
the
end
of
Mariposa,
which
takes
us
all
into
Griffith
Park.
AM
So
we
can
exercise
our
horses,
that's
the
main.
Yes,
we
can
walk
on
the
streets,
but
that's
the
main
thing.
So,
as
you've
heard
here,
the
two
block-
Trail
doesn't
it
that
doesn't
solve
that
problem
yeah.
It
will
be
a
marker,
it'll
say:
hey
you're
in
the
Rancho
now,
but
it
doesn't
solve
the
problem
because,
as
you've
heard,
there's
nobody
that's
going
to
actually
use
it.
Nobody
would
get
on
their
horse
go
down
Riverside
on
a
on
a
trail
cross.
AM
All
of
those
driveways
get
to
the
light
cross
at
the
light
deal
with
the
cars
then
cross
more
driveways,
because
if
you
think
about
the
businesses
and
everything
that's
along
there,
they're
not
going
to
do
that
when
they
can
hop
on
the
protected
existing
perimeter
horse
trail.
That
goes
in
the
exact
same
direction,
to
get
you
to
the
exact
same
place,
so
they're
not
going
to
use
the
trail,
so
the
ultimately
spending
millions
of
dollars
on
it.
AM
So
we
can
have
something
that
looks
great,
like
hey
you're
in
the
Rancher.
Now
is
just
a
horrific
waste
of
money.
So
that's
my
point.
Yes,
it
would
be
great
to
have
it
throughout
the
Rancho,
but
to
have
this
piece
at
the
amount
that
it's
going
to
cost
just
has.
No,
it
doesn't
make
any
sense.
So
thank
you.
D
AN
AN
AN
Not
only
do
you
see
horses
and
hear
the
steps
of
horses
walking
through
our
community
safely,
but
you
see
strollers
upon
strollers
upon
strollers
walking
through
the
streets
of
our
Rancho
and
when
I
think
about
the
construction
that's
about
to
take
place
because
of
SB
35
on
Mariposa
and
the
loss
of
one
of
our
last
historic
properties
that
represents
our
Rancho
and
our
horse.
Community.
It's
not
about
I.
Just
want
to
preserve
I
want
to
preserve
the
safety
of
my
community
for
all
the
parents
and
children
that
walk
their
children
through
the
streets.
AN
I
cannot
imagine
how
we're
going
to
and
I
would
love
to
hear
more.
If
someone
can
direct,
how
are
we
going
to
keep
that
part
of
our
community
safe?
The
connecting
of
the
horses
are
not
going
to
stop.
We
need
to
be
able
to.
You
know,
continue
our
way
of
life
and
I,
don't
think
it
should
be
held,
especially
the
safety.
It's
all
about
the
safety.
It's
not
I
just
want
my
horse
to
be
it's.
AN
AN
How
are
we
going
to
get
the
children
walking
through
that
Community
bikes,
strollers
horses,
dogs,
let
alone
getting
onto
that
swinging
bridge?
That
is
blocked
because
we
have
people
coming
into
our
community
and
I.
Imagine
the
people
moving
into
those
21
town
homes
are
not
schooled
in
the
equestrian
neighborhood
to
drive
safely
around
that
bend.
You
know
how
is
it
going
to
be
safe?
How
can
you
promise
us
that
you
know
horses?
Are
they
get
spooked
easily?
AN
How
can
you
help
us
help
us
understand
how
that
property
being
under
construction
for
two
and
a
half
some
odd
years
is
going
to
keep
our
community,
which
is
what
you
have
been
trying
to
do
so
well
for
so
many
years.
Thank
you.
How
are
we
going
to
remain
safe
because
I
guarantee
you
have
you
ever
seen?
35
rental
string
Riders
getting
tossed
from
one
horse
and
then
they
all
go
running
home.
I
can
guarantee
you
that
someone
is
going
to
get
thrown
from
their
horse
and
they're
going
to
die
because
of
that
construction.
E
B
B
B
People
need
help.
They
don't
need
to
live
on
the
street
in
any
fashion.
The
only
chance
of
helping
homeless
people
get
off
the
streets
and
not
live
in
a
cardboard
box,
a
tent,
a
car
or
an
RV,
because
this
lifestyle
just
leads
to
Crime.
Our
crime
rate
is
going
to
go
up
in
States
crazy.
If
we
allow
City
Vehicle
dwellers
to
get
into
Burbank,
it's
not
fair
to
the
homeowners,
it's
not
fair
to
the
business
owners.
It's
not
fair
to
the
people.
B
Paying
taxes
talk
about
Public
Works,
we're
going
to
need
more
people
working
there,
we're
going
to
need
more
police
officers,
we're
going
to
need
more
fire
personnel
and
more
paramedics,
because
these
people
take
up
these
resources
still
even
waste
waste
somebody's
got
to
clean
this
up
and
the
taxpayers
are
going
to
have
to
pay
for
it.
Talk
about
gun,
violence,
I
worked
downtown
a
long
time,
and
let
me
tell
you
drug
dealers
pose
as
homeless
people
all
the
time.
That's
what
they
do.
B
B
It
was
insane
when
La
did
it,
and
now
they
are
working
crazy
to
make
it
stop.
People
need
help
to
get
off
the
street
help
to
get
off
drugs.
Mental
Health.
You
know
it's
this.
This
idea
of
allowing
this
in
Burbank
is,
is
kind
of
like
starting
a
forest
fire
and
then
not
calling
fire
resources
for
help.
D
AO
Hello
I
I
just
want
to
say
that
first
off,
my
wife
and
I
are
long-time
residents
of
Burbank
between
the
two
of
us.
We've
got
almost
140
years
of
being
here
in
Burbank,
and
we
really
don't
think
that
what's
the
city
council
is
thinking
about
doing
with,
relaxing
RV
regulations
on
the
streets
is
going
to
be
any
good
for
the
City
of
Burbank.
It's
going
to
be
a
big
problem.
The
City
of
Burbank
already
doesn't
have
resources
for
the
homeless.
AO
We
already
have
camped
under
bridges
in
the
Parks
and
everywhere
else
they
can
put
a
tent
putting
homeless
RVs
all
over
the
place.
You're
going
to
do
just
like
the
city
of
La
did
and
last
night
on
the
news.
If
you
saw
it,
the
city
of
L.A
was
using
bulldozers
down
the
sidewalks
to
clear
the
trash
that
all
of
these
rvers
just
threw
out
onto
the
sidewalk,
and
they
had
to
use
bulldozers
to
push
it
down
to
the
end
of
the
street
and
load
it
into
pickup
or
I
mean
into
dump
trucks.
AP
AO
AO
AO
D
AQ
AQ
I
was
speaking
on
two
items
tonight.
The
first
one
was
the
safe
parking
program
which
I'm
asking
the
council
not
to
support
from
what
I've
read
the
ramifications
of
a
safe
parking
area.
That's
really
just
the
spending
of
a
staggering
amount
of
money.
The
staff
report
indicates
eight
areas
where
monies
would
be
spent
needed
for
the
program
to
function.
One
of
them
would
be
to
create
and
fund
a
new
Department
to
oversee
such
an
operation
and
liaison
between
police
funding,
Services
legal
counsel,
towing
companies,
auto
repair
companies,
insurance
companies
and
personal
liability
agencies.
AQ
I
think
the
money
that
would
go
or
the
efforts
would
go
into
something
like
this
are
better
off
stream,
running
the
approval
process
for
apartment
construction
to
provide
needed
housing
as
well
as
partnering,
with
both
state
and
local
agencies
for
a
moderate
low
income
housing.
The
other
item
I,
wanted
to
speak
on,
was
agenda.
Item
number
13.
AQ
ab1482
is
doing
exactly
what
it's
meant
to
do,
and
it's
having
a
significant
and
positive
impact
for
tenants,
really
don't
believe.
Spending
fifty
thousand
dollars
to
an
outside
firm
is
where
money
should
be
spent.
Burbank
spent
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
for
a
law,
firm,
rent
study
back
in
2007,
and
that
conclusion
was
that
kind
of
work
just
really
was
not
going
to
achieve.
Burbank's
goals
for
lower
rents
in
Burbank,
more
Apartments
would
and
partnering.
Both
state
and
local
agents
would
be
better
I'd
like
to
see.
AR
AR
The
more
they
keep
pushing
out
the
mom-and-pop
landlords
and
owners
of
Burbank,
which
is
what
Burbank
was
founded
on
and
before
all
of
this
regulations
and
stuff,
the
tenants
of
Burbank
didn't
even
get
rent
increases
and
as
often
as
they
are
doing
now
and
you're,
pushing
the
the
land,
the
mom-and-pop
landlords
out,
and
they
want
to
sell
their
buildings,
and
these
big
companies
or
speculators
are
buying
the
buildings
and
pushing
out
these.
My
neighbors
I
I
think
it's
sad
to
see
that
this
is
happening
in
Burbank
since
AB
1482.
It's.
AR
It's
more
regular
because
they're
putting
so
many
restrictions,
the
city
should
just
let
the
free
market
flow
let
supply
and
demand
meet
because
it
will
work
itself
out
and
if
the
city
allowed,
you
know
lots
of
restrictions
on
actually
building
more
units.
You
know
I
I,
remember
a
time
when
you
could
build
10
units
on
a
lot
and
now
you
can
build
three
I
mean
that's
not
making
housing
affordable.
AR
These
rent
evictions
just
wouldn't
be
happening.
If
you
know
they
didn't
put
any
more
restrictions
and
I
also
just
wanted
to
mention
that
I
am
opposed
to
relaxing
the
RV
restrictions
and
I
agree
with
the
gentleman
that
called
in
just
a
few
moments
ago
that
it's
bad
for
Burbank
and
I
think
that
we
should
keep
Burbank
safe
and
clean,
and
that's
all
I
have
to
say.
AS
Good
evening,
mayor
vice
mayor
and
city
council
members
and
City
staff,
I'm
a
30-plus
year
resident
of
Burbank
I'm,
calling
to
speak
to
you
about
agenda
item
20..
The
first
step
report
on
the
safe
parking
program
for
vehicle
dwellers,
which
has
proposed
at
the
Hollywood
Burbank
Airport
parking
lot
at
first
blush.
The
initial
request
for
additional
information
appears
to
be
a
good
one.
I
have
read
and
evaluated
staff
subsequent
report
and
have
the
following
comments.
AS
AS
AS
AS
AT
Hi
you've
all
been
hearing
from
me
over
the
past
few
weeks
about
the
renovation
crisis.
That's
been
happening
across
Burbank
I'm,
a
renter
I'm,
a
member
of
the
Burbank
Tenants
Union
I've,
been
a
part
of
this
community
for
over
four
years
and
I
just
I'm,
calling
in
to
say
that
South
Pasadena
and
Alhambra
they've
passed
the
temporary
no-fault
eviction
moratorium.
The
City
of
Claremont
has
also
cost
an
ordinance
addressing
Renovations
I'd
like
to
address
what
the
City
attorney
said
last
week.
AT
The
tenants
that
Burbank
Tenants
Union
have
been
speaking
with
have
not
received
unlawful
detainers,
yet
they
have
not
been
served
with
with
an
eviction
notice,
so
we
can
still
pass
a
law
that
requires
landlords
to
have
permits
at
every
step
of
the
eviction
process
like
they
did
in
Santa
Barbara
County,
and
we
can
still
require
landlords
to
pay
for
relocation
fees.
When
a
vague
law
is
being
exploited
in
bad
faith,
then
it
needs
to
be
fixed.
AT
Please
look
at
what
other
cities
are
doing
across
Southern
California
and
stand
up
for
renters
against
predatory,
Corps
and
landlords.
We
are
sixty
percent
of
the
community,
so
Burbank,
please
stand
up
with
us
and
if
we
truly
care
about
addressing
homelessness,
then
all
of
these
homeowners
who
are
calling
in
about
RVs
tonight
should
be
out
here
speaking
up
for
tenants
rights
to
stay
in
their
homes.
Instead,
thank
you
have
a
good
night.
AU
Hello:
it's
it's
tragic
that
so
many
people
are
being
forced
to
leave
their
home,
but
I,
don't
think
the
City
of
Burbank
is
getting
enough
blame
for
the
underlying
supply
and
demand
problem.
I've
lived
in
Burbank
for
a
long
time
and
although
I
own,
a
home
I've,
always
been
told
that
building
one
is
just
too
difficult
there
and
it
is.
The
City
of
Burbank
should
offer
incentives
to
home
builders
so
that
more
people
can
afford
to
live
here.
If
there
were
more
homes,
available,
landlords
wouldn't
dare
a
bit.
AU
AU
Lastly,
I
noticed
that
there
are
two
open
seats
on
the
Planning
Commission.
If
you
only
receive
two
applicants
that
doesn't
mean
that
they
should
automatically
fill
the
position.
Instead,
you
should
re-advertise
the
position
for
a
longer
period
of
time
in
order
to
attract
a
more
diverse
pool
of
candidates.
AU
AV
Yes,
hello.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you
for
allowing
me
to
address
this
council
tonight.
We
are
sympathetic
with
those
tenants
who
are
involved
in
the
renovation
issue,
but
let's
be
clear,
this
is
an
isolated
issue
in
nature.
It
is
not
a
city-wide
problem.
It
is
just
one
two
or
three
buildings
that
are
causing
this
issue
and
those
landlords
or
new
owners
are
not
taking
the
proper
steps
to
to
handle
their
tenants.
There
should
be
more
notice
time.
There
should
be
some
more
relocation.
AV
There
should
be
certain
restrictions
on
substantial
renovation
and
so
forth.
I
think
that
perhaps
in
the
interim,
the
city
could
provide
some
moving
assistance
with
some
of
those
cents
to
get
relocated,
but
this
is
not
a
city-wide
problem.
This
is
just
a
few
new
owners
or
existing
landowners
who
don't
know
how
to
handle
tenants.
This
does
not
reflect
the
landlords
of
Burbank
in
general.
Also
I
support
a
study
session
to
discuss
ab1482
and
the
benefits
to
tenants.
AV
AW
Thank
you
mayor
and
vice
mayor
and
city
council.
This
is
Jenny
Barnett
and
I
have
a
number
of
points
to
make,
and
hopefully
I'll
make
them
quickly.
I've
been
a
resident
here
for
over
40
years
and
number
one
we're
putting
up
affordable
units,
I,
think
close
to
Empire,
Center
147
and
there's
only
seven
parking
spaces.
AW
Do
these
developers
feel
that,
because
their
affordable
units,
these
people
won't
have
vehicles,
I
think
that's
horrible
number,
two,
the
units
that
are
going
up
on
I-5
at
First
Street,
there's
only
eight
affordable
units
going
in
there
who
told
the
developers
they
get
to
make
that
decision
and
I
understand
that
they're
all
studio
apartments?
How
does
that
help
a
family
in
Burbank
number?
Three:
the
monstrosity
that
they're
planning
to
put
up
on
the
prize
property?
AW
How
did
that
cat
get
past
the
planning
board
when
we
have
a
three-story
restriction
and
who,
in
the
world
is
going
to
want
to
swim
in
a
pool
on
the
top
of
the
building
when
there
are
planes
flying
over
every
10
minutes,
dropping
fuel
stuff
on
them
and
number
four
I
have
had
horses
in
the
past.
I
do
not
now,
however,
I
support
the
Rancho
driving
on
Riverside
is
like
a
racetrack.
These
people
take
advantage
of.
AW
They
go
around
you
on
the
middle
of
the
street
if
you're
not
going
fast
enough
and
I
do
the
speed
limit
and
I
would
no
more
put
my
horse
on
a
street
like
that,
then
I
would
put
a
child
out
in
the
middle
of
the
street.
This
needs
to
to
stop
that
money
needs
to
be
utilized
in
a
much
better
situation.
Thank
you.
AX
AX
And
the
only
long-term
solution
to
the
housing
prices
is
going
to
be
comprehensive
reform
where
the
city
gets
serious
about
solving
the
housing
crisis
instead
of
applying
a
Band-Aid
and
pandering
pretending
like
you're
doing
something
when
really
you're,
not
all
you're
doing
is
putting
a
Band-Aid
on
the
issue.
What,
if
you
really
push
this
too
far?
Okay,
then
you're
going
to
drive
a
wedge
into.
AX
Scare,
the
only
people
that
could
solve
the
housing
crisis
out
of
the
community,
for
example,
you
can
impose
a
restriction
on
real
estate,
but
you
cannot
prevent
people
from
reinvesting
their
money
in
other
communities
or
in
other
types
of
Investments.
So
now
what
what's
happening
is
that
by
scaring
the
people
who
could
solve
the
housing
crisis,
the
people
that
are
the
builders,
the
people
that
buy
into
Burbank
the
people
that
have
owned
here
and
the
people
that
I
believe
in
this
city
by
scaring
them
away
now
we're
making
the
housing
problem
worse.
AX
Okay
and
now,
if
Burbank
is
going
to
have
a
bad
reputation,
you're
going
to
make
the
problem
worse,
all
right
ab1482
is
okay
and
the
reason
why
is
that
it
doesn't
make
Glendale
more
desirable
than
burbanks
they're,
both
subject
to
ab1482,
and
if
the
California
legislators
think
that
there's
a
bigger
issue
that
needs
to
be
solved,
they
could
do
so
in
an
even-handed
manner,
but
by
alienating
the
people
that
are
loyal
to
the
community,
I
think
that
that's
a
bad
idea.
Okay,.
AQ
AX
Is
for
certain,
it
is
a
bad
experience
to
go
through.
We've
all
moved
before.
Okay
people
move
voluntarily
every
day
of
the
week,
and
especially
if
they
want
to
cut
their
living
expenses,
sure
they
move
to
a
place,
that's
more
affordable.
Maybe
they
downsize
from
two
bedrooms
to
one
bedroom.
Maybe
they
move
in
with
a
roommate.
Okay.
Those
are
those
are
things
that
we
have
to
go
through,
that
is
The,
Human
Experience,
but
now
to
take
anecdotal
evidence
and
to
extrapolate
it
to
impose
a
regulation
city-wide.
Is
that
really
going
to
solve
the
housing
crisis?
O
A
O
When
Pickwick
sold
a
group
rallied
and
began
to
fight
Pickwick
too
much
traffic,
everyone
said
all
the
traffic
will
make
horses
Crossing
Riverside
at
Maine
will
be
very
dangerous.
This
Trail
helps
this
problem.
This
is
the
protracted
trail
with
rails.
This
is
not
loose
horses
running
down
Riverside,
it's
worth
horses
being
ridden
in
a
possessive
trail
with
fencing
to
protect
us
on
them,
they're
also
the
inside
Trail
and
there's
the
parkway.
The
bike
trail
parking
all
that
is
between
the
horses
and
the
actual
roads.
O
The
problem
of
approximately
a
hundred
horses
live
above
Riverside
Drive,
and
that's
who
we'll
be
using
this
Trail
for
safe
passage.
Two
of
the
speakers
live
below
Riverside
and
do
not
need
the
trail,
and
you
know
if
you
do
not
finish
the
sale,
you
will
have
only
the
short
trail
that
goes
nowhere
and
that
is
very
stupid.
O
Looking
and
why,
after
two
years
are
the
neighbors
speaking
out
now,
there
will
always
be
horses
in
the
Rancho,
because
we
surround
the
Los
Angeles
equestrian
center
and
the
trails
of
FIFA
Park,
and
we
are
the
center
of
the
Horse
World,
the
Los
Angeles.
There
will
always
see
horses
here,
so
please
continue
to
believe
in
this
Trail
for
the
duration
and
the
safety
of
the
horses.
Thank
you.
AY
Hi,
thank
you
for
taking
my
calls.
I
just
wanted
to
say
that
I'm,
a
manager
for
over
20
years
in
Burbank
the
landlord
that
I
work
for
gets
along
very
well
with
all
of
his
tenants,
he's
very
helpful
to
them.
They
love
him.
They
adore
him
and
you
shouldn't
punish
every
landlord,
because
one
or
two
buildings
are
doing
the
Renault
fiction.
Who
should
be
fair
to
everybody,
and
especially
the
third
of
the
landlords
and
the
tenants.
You
should
find
an
equal
balance
that
makes
both
parties
happy
and
fair.
AY
You
shouldn't
just
victimize
the
landlords,
because
a
lot
of
mom
and
pop
landlords
do
a
very
good
job.
They
work
day
and
night
24
hours,
seven
days
a
week,
they're
never
off
the
clock
to
make
sure
other
people
are
comfortable
in
their
homes,
so
don't
paint
all
landlords
as
being
bad.
Just
because
two
buildings
or
three
buildings
are
doing
the
renovation.
You
guys
have
to
be
fair
for
everybody,
landlords
and
tenants.
Thank
you
so
much
for
your
time.
Thank
you.
Bye-Bye.
D
D
AZ
AZ
I
did
reach
out
to
Mr
Albert
Hernandez
he's
the
executive
director
of
home
again
La
I
actually
talked
to
him
today
to
see
if
they
have
reached
out
to
any
of
you
and
if
there's
any
programs
that
are
available,
he
did
tell
me
and
I
hope
he's
watching,
because
that's
exactly
what
he
told
me
that
they
were
very
successful
in
obtaining
housing
for
one
individual
who
lost
their
home,
they
were
evicted
and
to
to
refer
everyone
else,
who's
in
need
to
please
contact
home
again.
La
he's
happy
to
work
with
all
of
you
again.
AZ
N
Mr
Mayor
I'll
briefly
respond.
So
thank
you
again
to
everyone
who
came
out
and
called
in
for
the
sake
of
time.
I
won't
go
through
everybody,
but
to
our
general
manager
of
Burbank,
Water
and
Power.
It
sounds
like
Mr
Hastings
had
a
question
about
assistance.
With
the
light
pole,
that's
planned
so
I'm
not
going
to
ask
you
now,
but
maybe
maybe
we
could
chat
about
it
offline
and
follow
up
with
Mr
Hastings
Mr
city
manager.
Do
you
have
any
response
you
want
to
make
to
Mr
Lane's
comments.
V
N
And
Mr
Mr
Mr
Lane
I,
don't
see
you
here,
but
what
I
would
say
is
that
there
are
very
limited
options
once
an
employment
agreement
is
in
place
to
abridge
the
agreement.
However,
the
issue
that
you've
drawn
my
attention
to
is
certainly
on
my
radar
and
I'll,
save
that
for
another
day
when
we
revisit
the
agreement
to
Mr
cabaniolo
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
see
you
still
here
but
I
would
just
add
that
I
completely
agree.
I
wish
I
had
more
tools
and
I
wish.
N
BA
Really
quick
did
you?
Thank
you
just
really
quick.
Thank
you
again
for
coming
out
and
speaking
and
for
those
who
called
in
and
speak
about
your
concerns.
I
Echo,
the
sentiments
of
my
two
colleagues
who've
already
spoke
I'm
on
those
issues
and
we
will
discuss
it
further
for
some
of
the
items
that
were
discussed
tonight.
Two
two
things
I
wanted
to
point
out,
though,
are
Miss
Shaw
from
Boys
and
Girls
Club
I
wanted
to
thank
you
for
coming
out
tonight.
BA
If
you're
still
here
there,
you
are
and
for
all
the
work
that
that's
done
at
the
boys
and
girls
club,
and
please
extend
our
appreciation
to
miss
Warren
for
her
service
as
well,
and
then
just
really
quick.
I
know
this
is
small,
but
it's
really
cool
is
Mr.
Donahue
mentioned
the
lineman
rodeo
and
I
would
like
to
underscore
the
the
awesomeness
of
the
lineman
Rodeo.
If
you've
never
seen
it,
I
haven't
actually
seen
the
whole
thing,
but
I've
seen
Snippets,
it's
so
cool
next
year
we
all
have
to
go.
BB
Thank
you
to
everyone
to
the
tenants
who
came
to
speak
and
their
supporters.
Thank
you,
I
agree.
We
need
to
do
something
as
soon
as
possible
and
that's
what
I
will
say
on
that,
because
I
know
it's
pending
to
those
who
are
calling
about
our
last
agenda
item
I
will
address
your
comments
when
we
get
there,
but
I
do
want
to
save
your
time
if
you
are
calling
about
RV
parking
on
our
streets,
that
is
not
on
the
agenda,
and
that
is
not
what
we
will
be
discussing.
BB
D
E
item
two
is
approval
of
the
successor
agency.
Minutes
of
the
joint
meetings
of
May,
9th
and
May
16
2023
item
3
is
approval
of
the
Housing
Authority
minutes
of
the
joint
meetings
of
May,
9th
and
May
16
2023
item
4
is
approval
of
the
parking
authority
minutes
of
the
joint
meetings
of
May,
9th
and
May
16
2023
item
5
approval
of
the
public
financing
Authority
minutes
of
the
joint
meeting
of
December
13
2022
item
6
is
approval
of
the
youth
endowment
Services
fund
board
minutes
of
the
joint
meeting
of
February
28
2023.
E
item
7
is
update
on
the
procurement
plan
for
Burbank
bus,
fixed
route
transit
services.
Item
8
is
adoption
of
a
resolution
approving
the
filing
of
an
application
for
Grant
funds
from
the
Los
Angeles
County,
Regional,
Park
and
open
space
district
for
measure.
A
funding
for
the
Santa
Anita
play
lot
playground
project
and
authorizing
the
city
manager
to
accept
and
administer
Grant
funds
for
the
Santa
Anita
play
lot.
BC
AZ
I
do
want
to
make
a
quick
comment
and
I
was
waiting.
Thank
you
vice
mayor
for
bringing
it
up
sooner
during
the
discussion.
I
do
want
to
add
to
the
item
11
for
the
acceptance
for
the
police
foundation
and
the
nineteen
thousand
dollars
that
we
I'm,
hoping
that
staff
is
able
to
work
with
the
foundation
to
help
out
with
the
installation
of
the
electricity.
V
AZ
D
V
BC
Good
evening,
mayor,
Anthony,
council
members,
Marissa
Garcia,
Parks
and
Recreation
Department,
so
yes,
I've
already
connected
with
a
police
foundation,
and
we
have
a
couple
of
options.
One
is
they
certainly
can
go
back
and
install
solar,
a
flagpole
with
solar
for
the
lighting
or
we
can
City
can
subsidize
the
cost
for
the
electrical
which
is
anticipated.
It's
estimated
at
fifty
eight
hundred
dollars
and
that
we
can
either
work
internally
and
see
if
our
internal
resources
through
bwp
are
able
to
do
that
work
or
we
can
pay
an
outside
contractor
to
do
that.
D
BC
V
D
D
E
D
23-000-1258
concerning
introduction
of
an
ordinance
to
amend
titled
10
chapter
1,
zoning
of
the
Burbank
municipal
code
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
mixed
use
and
residential,
only
projects
in
non-residential
zones.
Before
we
begin
any
disclosures
relating
to
this
hearing
from
Council
no
yeah,
okay,
Madam
city
clerk
of
the
notices,
as
required
by
law,
been
given.
Yes,.
E
D
BD
Good
evening
Mary
Anthony
vice
mayor
Schultz
and
members
of
the
council,
my
name
is
Greg
mirzavakin
associate
planner
with
CDD
planning
tonight,
you're
being
asked
to
consider
a
Zone
tax
amendment
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
mixed
use
and
multi-family
residential.
Only
projects
in
non-residential
zones
may
have
the
presentation
please
there.
It
is.
BD
BD
One
back,
please
I
think
we
went
too
far.
There
are
many
eligibility
and
project
requirements
that
need
to
be
met
in
order
for
a
development
project
to
qualify
for
the
process
mandated
by
AB
2011.
among
these
requirements.
The
project
development
must
be
a
multi-family
project
of
five
or
more
units.
It
must
be
located
in
any
Zone
where
office,
retail
or
parking
or
principally
permitted
use.
BD
So
this
opens
up
a
significant
area
of
land
that
is
zoned
for
non-residential
use
to
these
kinds
of
developments,
and
the
project
site
may
not
be
within
500
feet
of
a
freeway.
The
housing
units
may
not
be
within
500
feet
of
the
freeway.
In
addition,
there
are
several
other
eligibility
criteria
and
project
requirements
that
limit
the
potentially
available
sites,
such
as
the
location
of
the
project
on
the
site
or
a
joining
a
site
that
is
currently
or
most
recently
was
used
for
industrial
uses.
BD
The
potentially
eligible
sites
are
depicted
in
purple
and
on
the
next
slide,
the
map
shows
the
potentially
eligible
sites
for
mixed
income
development
projects
along
commercial
corridors,
which
could
qualify
for
a
streamlined
ministerial
review
per
AB
2011
and
the
potential
sites
are
depicted
in
blue
next
slide.
Please,
regardless
of
whether
the
city
approves
the
proposed
ordinance
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
multi-family
and
mixed-use
development
in
non-residential
zones,
these
projects
will
continue
to
be
submitted
for
streamline
ministerial
review
under
state
law.
BD
However,
as
noted
before,
the
discretion
and
review
process
is
no
longer
available
to
the
city
for
these
types
of
projects,
and
although
there
are
three
specific
plan
efforts
underway
currently,
which
will
result
in
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
for
multi-family
and
mixed-use
projects,
they
will
only
apply
to
those
specific
plan
areas
and
not
to
all
the
areas
of
the
city
where
such
streamline
ministerial
projects
are
are
available
pursuant
to
ab2011
and
and
sv35,
and
any
future
law
that
invokes
streamline
ministerial
review
next
slide.
Please.
BD
The
applications
that
were
submitted
are
subject
to
standards
that
were
in
place
at
the
time
of
submittal,
so
anything
that
is
considered
tonight
would
not
apply
to
the
Past
projects
for
those
applications.
The
city
can
apply
only
few
if
any
significant
development
standards,
as
they
were
not
objective
or
they
did
not
exist
so
where
such
standards
do
exist,
they
were
not
created
with
residential
development
in
mind,
mostly
commercial
standards.
BD
BD
Although
there
is
now
a
sense
of
urgency
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards,
the
goal
of
the
zt8
is
to
establish
standards
that
will
apply
to
any
future
applications
for
administrative,
streamlined
reviews,
while
maintaining
local
control
to
the
extent
possible
and
long
established
standards
or
concepts
that
are
Burbank
specific
but
will
comply
with
State
mandates
as
well.
Significant
effort
was
taken
to
replicate
or
reflect
the
intent
of
the
existing
measures
in
the
Burbank
Municipal
Code,
intended
to
protect
existing
residential
neighborhoods
next
slide.
BD
BD
BD
These
project
types
are
now
mandated
in
multi
multiple
family
zones,
with
the
passage
I
apologize.
These
types
of
projects
are
now
mandated
in
multiple
zones,
with
the
passage
of
SB
35
and
ab
2011,
so
this
is
reflected
by
the
addition
of
the
letter
S
on
the
use
table
as
for
state,
whether
a
project
is
allowed
on
a
particular
site
will
be
subject
to
the
planning
director's
review
for
consistency
with
all
eligibility
requirements
upon
submittal
next
slide.
Please.
BD
Using
the
general
approach
to
the
ZTA
process
of
focusing
on
established
standards
or
concepts
that
are
Burbank
specific
but
will
also
comply
with
State
mandates,
significant
effort
was
taken
to
reflect
the
intent
of
the
existing
measures
intended
to
protect
residential
neighborhoods.
A
set
of
multi-family
residential,
only
objective
design
and
development
standards
were
crafted
taken
into
consideration
that
additional
refinement
was
needed,
as
these
developments
would
be
built
in
commercial
contexts
and
neighborhoods.
BD
So
while
they
largely
reflect
the
existing
multi-family
residential
standards,
they
also
address
building,
building
Frontage
design,
buffering
requirements
from
lower
skilled
residential
zones,
open
space
flexibility
and
parking
structure,
location
visibility
and
screening
requirements.
Next
slide:
please,
the
existing
code
does
not
include
any
regulations
for
multi-family
development
in
non-residential
zones.
Some
standards
that
are
being
introduced
are
law
coverage,
uses
in
buffer
areas,
modulations
and
step
backs
and
facade
open
space
regulations.
BD
Etc
a
special
consideration
was
needed,
as
these
projects
will
be
built
in
existing
commercial
corridors
and
neighborhoods
adjacent
to
residential
uses.
In
many
cases,
the
city
needs
regulations
so
that
we're
not
forced
to
approve
projects
that
are
not
compatible
and
on
the
next
slide,
you
will
see
an
illustration
of
a
simplified
example
of
a
bare
minimum
of
what
can
be
built
under
the
current
development
standards
that
would
be
on
the
left
under
streamline
ministerial
review.
So
we
could,
we
could
see
a
project
like
this.
BD
Potentially
the
the
image
on
the
left
illustrates
what
is
possible
for
a
multi-family
Residential
Building
in
a
commercial
Zone.
So
you
see
here
that
the
building
has
no
facade
modulation
at
all.
It
has
no
step
back.
The
bulk
of
the
ground
floor
is
taken
on
by
a
parking
structure
and
the
parapets
create
a
sense
of
mass
and
bulk
at
the
top.
The
image
on
the
right
shows
the
kind
of
design
elements
required
under
the
proposed
standards,
so
the
building
has
a
requirement
for
plane
break,
has
transparency
requirements.
BD
Also.
This
means
that
windows
and
visibility
into
the
building
at
the
ground
floor
and
limits
the
amount
of
parking
garage
visible
from
the
street.
This
makes
a
superior
for
a
superior
pedestrian
experience
and
a
more
interesting
design.
The
new
standards
propose
a
70
square
foot
private,
open
space
requirement
for
each
unit,
so
the
balconies
here
served
this
purpose
for
open
space.
BD
BD
BD
The
current
code
requirements
can
result
in
a
flat
facade
with
no
development
standards
to
address
amenities
or
open
space.
In
addition,
there
is
no
regard
for
privacy
considerations
for
adjacent
properties
on
the
right.
The
proposed
standard
result
in
a
facade
that
is
modulated
with
a
variety
of
materials,
in
addition
to
requirements
for
site
setbacks
and
residential
amenities.
BD
BD
BD
On
the
left
side,
the
existing
standards
would
allow
balconies
and
rooftop
amenities
that
directly
Overlook
any
residential
area
affecting
privacy.
The
new
standards
shown
on
the
right
would
require
a
minimum
six
foot
opaque
barrier
for
any
balconies
or
decks
directly
facing
a
residentially
zoned
property.
Creating
a
visual
and
noise
barrier
between
the
uses.
BD
BD
This
image
depicts
a
street
view
with
the
building
models
built
per
the
existing
and
proposed
development
standards.
The
proposed
standards
are
depicted
on
the
left.
The
proposed
standards
result
in
additional
modulation
and
variation
in
materials
and
create
a
superior
pedestrian
experience
at
the
ground
floor,
with
greater
setbacks,
shade
and
visual
interest.
BD
BD
These
standards
are
meant
to
ensure
contextually
appropriate
design
that
is
also
sensitive
to
adjacent
residentially,
Zone
properties,
development
standards
specific
for
mixed-use
developments
include,
but
are
not
limited
to
unbundled
parking
loading
requirements,
public
accessible,
open
space,
screening
for
equipment,
performance
standards
related
to
the
combination
of
residential
and
Commercial
uses
like
ventilation
and
requiring
a
more
and
requiring
more
robust
architectural
details
slide.
Please.
BD
The
proposed
mixed-use
standards
allow
for
greater
flexibility
in
design
of
the
building
by
allowing
horizontal
and
vertical
mixed
use.
Currently,
the
code
only
allows
mixed-use
buildings
with
commercial
on
the
ground
floor
and
residential
on
top,
the
proposed
standards
protect
future
residents
of
mixed-use
projects,
as
well
as
adjacent
Properties,
by
identifying
and
prohibiting
uses
that
are
deemed
incompatible
with
residential
use.
Next
slide,
please.
BD
BD
The
proposed
on
text
amendment
is
consistent
with
at
least
28
of
the
Burbank
2035
General
plan,
land
use
and
Mobility
related
goals
and
policies,
and
these
can
be
found
in
attachment
3
on
pages
13
through
18.
of
your
packet
The
Zone
text
Amendment
will
promote
context-sensitive
design,
adjacent
to
single
family
and
multiple
family
residential
zones.
BD
The
Planning
Commission
consider
the
item
on
April
24
2023
and
voted
2-2
on
the
proposed
ordinance
with
a
limited
time
before
the
effective
day
of
ab2011
on
July
1st
of
this
year,
the
planning
division
made
the
effort
to
discuss
the
proposed
changes
to
the
code
with
the
community.
A
community
meeting
was
held
on
May
10,
2023
and
planning
staff
heard
concerns
from
residents
about
the
state
law
and
how
it
impacts
the
allowable
Heights
of
buildings
adjoining
residential
areas,
as
well
as
impacts
of
commercial
uses
on
residential
areas
and
parking
requirements.
BD
The
proposed
Zone
tax
amendment
also
includes
a
reference
to
a
future
Council
consideration
of
a
city-wide,
objective,
design
and
development
standards.
That
would
apply
to
streamline
ministerial
view
project,
as
well
as
all
development
projects,
and
it
is
anticipated
that
the
first
part
of
this
document
will
include
objective
standards
that
are
consistent
with
complete
our
streets
plan
related
to
sidewalk
improvements
and
also
question
standards,
and
we
have
assistant
community
development,
director
of
Transportation
Planning
David
Christie,
to
answer
any
questions
related
to
that.
BD
BD
Next
slide,
please,
as
previously
noted
ab2011
will
take
effect
on
July
1st
and
as
a
result
of
this
imminent
deadline.
There
is
an
urgent
need
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
streamline
ministerial
reviews
in
non-residential
zones.
Planning
staff
has
developed
a
comprehensive
set
of
objective
design
and
development
standards,
where
the
City
previously
had
little
to
no
such
standards
with
the
intent
to
better
protect
the
city's
vision
for
the
commercial
neighborhoods
that
may
house
these
multi-family
projects,
as
well
as
any
residential
neighborhoods
that
abut
them.
BD
Next
slide,
please,
therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
city
council
introduce
an
ordinance
to
the
city
council
of
the
City
of
Burbank
amending
title
10,
chapter
1
of
the
Burbank
municipal
code
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
mixed
use
and
residential.
Only
projects
in
non-residential
zones.
BD
D
Thank
you
very
much.
We
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
to
hear
from
any
persons
who
wish
to
speak
on
this
matter.
Each
person
may
address
the
council
for
up
to
three
minutes
on
this
public
hearing
item
only
for
members
of
the
public
who
are
here
in
person,
please
present
a
completed
salmon
colored
public
hearing
card
to
the
city
clerk.
If
you
wish
to
speak,
and
please
state
your
name
for
the
record,
if
you
wishing
to
call
in
at
this
time,
818-238-3335
I
have
Joel
schlossman.
As
my
first
speaker.
M
Mr
Anthony
I'm
troubled
that
you
go
during
these
meetings
and
go
and
whisper
in
the
year
of
the
City
attorney,
and
then
you
stepped
out
of
the
room
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
city
attorney.
It's
I
feel
it's
against
Robert's
Rules
and
it's
definitely
a
violation
of
the
brown
act
and
don't
tell
me
that
you
we're
talking
about
item
nine.
M
You
should
have
read
this
agenda
and
had
this
conversation
privately
or
in
public
before
the
meeting
now
regarding
this
item,
everything
that
you
folks
do
in
previous
councils
do
is
put
up
impediments
to
the
creation
of
Housing
and
make
it
harder
for
developers
and
more
expensive
for
developers.
You
get
people
coming
here
asking
for
your
help
for
affordable
housing,
but
you're
busy,
dreaming
up
new
standards
that
cost
developers
money
and
must
be
passed
on.
M
If
any
of
you
were
serious
about
doing
any
of
this
you'd
have
a
conversation
about
micro,
Apartments,
meaningful
incentives
to
create
housing.
A
special
meeting
just
to
talk
about
meaningful
incentives
such
as
some
examples
or
waiving
fees
and
I,
have
to
wonder.
If
any
of
you
know
what
it
costs
to
build
a
unit
per
unit,
just
in
fees,
Before
You
Stick,
the
shovel
in
the
dirt
I,
just
wonder
if
you
have
a
clue,
I
know
you
don't
mayor
with
your
high
school
diploma.
M
I
know
you,
don't
you
don't
own
anything
and
you're
just
clueless
how
about
waving
arts
in
public
places
per
unit
fees,
the
cost
for
water
meters
and
fire
meters
to
hook
up
to
the
water
system?
Tree
removal.
Remember
that
one
from
a
few
meetings
ago,
where
you
were
busy
making
it
more
expensive
for
Developers
if
they
have
to
take
out
a
tree
plan,
check
fees,
and
so
many
others.
M
You
know
regarding
the
what
the
speaker
earlier
said
here,
your
presenter
here
he
talked
about
protections
from
State
mandated
projects,
the
key
words
there
are
State
mandated
all
of
you
get
cute
when
the
state
comes
along
and
you
want
to
put
in
the
impediments
to
spin
it
stay
out
of
it.
They're
State
mandated.
M
M
Perez
you're
a
renter
right
just
have
no
clue
what
people
go
through.
What
developers
are
our
friends
we're
trying
to
do
things
we're
trying
to
create
the
housing
and
you
have
the
power
to
help
them
to
solve
these
problems
and
I'll
tell
you
something
thousands
of
units
are
coming
to
Burbank
things
are
changing
I'm
going
to
talk
about
the
next
I'll
save
my
comments
for
the
next
one
about
the
next
item.
Thank
you.
AP
As
you're
aware,
these
State
initiatives
have
not
shown
any
validity
in
their
objectives
in
solving
any
affordable
housing
problems
or
homelessness
and
there's
more
evidence
to
show
that
it's
contributing
to
it.
But
nevertheless,
ab2011
is
the
same
and
we'll
put
all
Neighbors
in
neighborhoods
in
Burbank
at
risk,
but
specifically
in
the
Rancho.
We
are
not
against
housing,
but
with
proper
planning.
AP
Ab
2011
will
also
have
a
drastic
impact
on
in
question
any
non-equestrian
businesses
and
children
programs
resulting
in
economic
losses
and
tax
revenue
to
the
city.
You've
honored
The
public's
work
week
this
evening,
but
as
a
result
of
these
initiatives
that
will
bring
millions
of
people
into
these
new
housing
projects
without
proper
planning
measuring
future
impacts
will
put
a
strain
on
state
of
resources,
utilities,
public
services
such
as
fire,
police
and
environmental
impacts,
I.
Ask
that
you
deny
or
delay
voting
on
this
ordinance
and
join
the
City
of
Huntington
Beach
against
the
state
of
California.
AP
BE
Hi
I
am
a
realtor
and
a
developer
developers
are
not
your
friends.
These
measures
are
developers,
trade
and
these
measures
are
chipping
away
at
ownership
rights
and
changing
the
way
that
our
residential
communities
are
all
in
the
name
of
affordable
housing,
which
is
a
myth
and
will
not
be
obtained,
no
matter
how
many
neighborhoods
are
destroyed,
the
Rancho
is
unique
treasure
and
to
be
protected.
Your
questions
need
to
be
put.
This
building
frenzy
does
not
take
into
consideration
the
safety
and
protection
of
equestrians,
the
horses
or
the
pedestrians
who
are
near
them.
I
BE
K
K
I
think
the
things
that
disturb
me
about
this
is
it
seems,
like
we
have
five
weeks
to
this
deadline.
I,
don't
know
how
long
Steph's
been
working
on
this.
It
was
just
brought
to
my
attention
recently,
and
so
it
really
looks
like
we're
we're
clamoring
to
slap
something
together
as
quickly
as
possible
in
the
presentation
it
was
brought
up
that
there
are
concerns
about
height
restrictions,
parking
and
density.
I,
didn't
hear
anything
addressed
in
the
presentation
to
to
handle
those
issues.
K
I
I,
agree
and
I
have
been
saying
for
a
long
time
with
the
Advent
of
adus
that
are
popping
up
faster
than
than
we
can.
We
can
keep
track
of
them.
There
don't
seem
to
be
any
particular
design
guidelines
applied
toward
those
they're,
just
basically
following
height
restrictions
and
minimum
setbacks.
So
it's
good
to
see
that
we're
we're
attempting
to
do
something
here,
I
wonder
how
much
of
it
will
actually
hold
up.
K
K
We
are
the
state
and
we
are
the
people
who
elect
these
officials
and
I
think
if
we
lose
control
at
the
local
level,
we're
just
going
to
be
steamrolled
and
California
seems
obsessed
with,
with
making
our
lives
more
and
more
dense
compacted.
The
parking
issues
in
Burbank
are
already
getting
to
be
ridiculous,
with
people
having
to
put
their
trash
cans
on
the
other
side
of
cars
in
order
to
get
them
out
to
the
curb,
because
there's
so
many
cars
Now
parking
on
the
streets
as
a
result
of
80
use.
K
So
I've
heard
that
there's
going
to
be
a
reduced
parking
requirements
on
some
of
these
I,
don't
know
what
the
density
requirements
will
be,
but
all
I
know
is
every
apartment.
Building
I
drive
by
seems
to
be
lacking
in
parking
spaces,
which
is
seems
to
be
California
in
a
nutshell.
So
I
appreciate
what
you're
putting
into
this
and
I
hope
you'll
consider
pushing
back
and
and
putting
dedicating
some
resources
to
possibly
joining
what
Huntington
Beach
doing
Bank.
Thank.
AV
A
BF
Fan
of
efficient
mixed-use
development
I'm
excited
about
where
it's
planned
to
go
in
our
city.
That
is
the
total
opposite
of
what
is
about
to
happen
to
Burbank
I'm
here,
to
ask
that
if
you
are
unwilling
to
join
my
city
council
spirit,
animal
of
Huntington
Beach
and
fighting
to
get
their
Democratic
right
to
self-governance.
Back
that
you
please
answer
the
following
question
and
I'll
use
mag
Park.
As
my
example,
can
you
guarantee
that
there
won't
be
10
or
20
or
30
story,
buildings
on
Magnolia
Park
in
Magnolia
Park,
on
Magnolia
Boulevard?
BF
And
if
not,
can
you
guarantee
that
all
the
current
working
class
residents
who
live
on
this
street,
who
need
their
car
to
be
able
to
spend
as
much
time
with
their
family
as
they
want
they'll,
not
be
competing
for
parking
spaces
with
new
residents?
Every
time
they
have
to
move
their
car
doesn't
seem
like
there
could
be
enough
permits
if
there
are
20
story,
Towers
like
in
Chicago,
where
parking
spaces
go
for
500
to
3
000
a
month?
How
will
you
make
sure
that
the
high
rises
built
in
mag
Park?
BF
Don't
profit
by
selling
a
limited
number
of
parking
spaces
to
the
low-income
voucher
receivers,
trapping
them
in
an
endless
cycle
where
access
to
a
car
is
the
key
to
being
able
to
to
get
to
a
potential
job
opportunity
for
economic
advancement.
And
what
will
you
do
if
hunting
can
be
just
successful?
But
you
do
allow
these
developments
outside
the
areas
that
our
staff
has
carefully
planned
to
accommodate
infrastructure.
You
know
growing
class
sizes,
traffic
and
so
on
to
all
grow
together.
We've
been
banded
by
Laura
Freeman
and
Anthony
portentino.
BF
D
L
Mr
Mayor,
if
I
could
there
were
both
public
comments,
as
well
as
a
number
of
written
correspondents
that
were
submitted
to
the
public
record
heralding
Huntington
Beach's
lawsuit,
Huntington
Beach
did
not
initiate
the
litigation.
Huntington
Beach
actually
lost
a
challenge
to
SB,
35
and
SB
1333.
Several
years
ago
the
current
litigation
I'm.
L
L
Huntington
Beach
has
since
started
that
the
AG
amended
their
lawsuit,
because
Huntington
Beach
refused
to
adopt
its
housing
element.
So
there's
a
lot
of
things
going
on
in
Huntington,
Beach
Huntington
Beach
subsequently
filed
an
action
against
the
state
that
its
constitutional
rights
are
being
violated
by
the
state
overreach.
But,
however,
no
city
has
prevailed
yet
in
challenging
the
states.
The
Statewide
interest
that
preempts
local
charters
in
all
of
these
housing
production
issues,
whether
it's
sb9,
whether
it's
adus,
whether
it's
SB
35
No
city,
has
yet
won.
L
D
BD
Mayor,
yes,
I
do
have
a
few
responses
to
some
of
the
questions.
We
heard
a
question
about
costs
of
tree
removal
that
is
not
part
of
the
on-site
requirements.
So
at
this
time
it
is
not
part
of
this
ordinance.
There's
nothing
about
tree
removal,
there's
no
reference
to
it
either.
So
I
I
think
that
would
be
reserved
for
a
future
date.
When
we
talk
about
objective
development
standards
in
the
public
right
away.
BD
L
L
L
Well,
he
was
responding
to
the
question
about
whether
this
new
ordinance
applies
to
existing
projects.
It
doesn't
because
whether
a
developer
submits
and
some
have
a
quote-unquote
preliminary
application
under
SB
330
or
whether
they
submit
an
noi
under
SB
35.
At
that
moment,
they
vest
to
all
the
rules
in
place
at
the
time
they
submit
their
notice
of
intent,
of
which
there
are
seven,
one
of
which
is
been
found
consistent.
The
the
Pickwick
project,
all
of
the
others
which
have
not
completed
processing,
are
vested
to
the
rules
in
place.
L
At
the
time
they
submitted
their
notice
of
intent,
any
developer
who's
who
has
submitted
a
preliminary
application,
vest
to
the
rules
in
place
at
that
time
and
gets
180
days
to
then
submit
an
application
demonstrating
they
comply
with
the
objective
standards.
In
effect,
at
the
time
they
submitted
their
preliminary
application.
L
BD
BG
The
first
chapter
of
that
document
is
anticipated
to
be
related
to
the
complete
our
streets
program,
which
will
include
some
references
to
equestrian
design
and
again
we
have
our
assistant
director
for
transportation
planning
here
with
us
tonight.
If
you
have
questions
specific
to
that
equestrian
issue,
and
then
we
had
I
think
that's
the
only
thing
I
wanted
to
add
to
Greg's
comments.
L
Before
Mr
Ramirez
speaks,
there
was
a
question
about
parking
because
they'll
probably
fill
in
details
I'll
miss
there
was
a
bill
called
ab2097..
It's
codified
in
government
code,
section
65863.2,
the
very
first
paragraph
reads:
a
public
agency
shall
not
impose
or
enforce
any
minimum
automobile
parking
requirement
on
a
residential,
commercial
or
other
development
project.
If
the
project
is
located
within
one
half
mile
of
public
transit,
so
that
is
a
very
challenging
provision
that
the
city
is
is
facing.
L
There
is
an
option
to
be
able
to
enforce
a
minimum,
but
it
requires
the
city
to
make
findings
within
30
days
of
receipt
of
a
completed
application
of
a
project
and
then
staff.
If
those
findings
are
made,
then
there's
the
possibility
of
enforcing
minimum.
Basically,
it
would
amount
to
Neighborhood
protection
and
type
findings
and
all.
G
So
there
was
quite
a
bit
of
comments
that
were
received
and
I
think
one
thing
that
we
could
have
probably
done
a
better
job
at
explaining
this
or
just
clarifying
for
the
public
is
that
the
regulations
that
are
being
proposed
by
City
staff
and
by
the
way
I
want
to
commend
the
two
planners
that
are
to
my
right,
because
they
took
basically
what
was
a
Year's
worth
of
work
and
compressed
it
into
a
three-month
period
which,
which
is
very
significant.
It's
unheard
of
and
I've
been
doing
this
for
20
plus
years.
G
So
thank
you
for
doing
that
and
getting
it
in
front
of
you
at
least
for
the
purpose
of
discussion
beyond
that,
as
Mr
mirzavakia
noted.
The
important
thing
to
understand
here
is
our
current
regulations
are
inadequate
to
address
not
mixed
use
and
100
residential
projects
in
non-residential
zones,
and
that
means
that
we
don't
have
enough
standards
that
we
could
apply
to
have
the
result
of
a
well-designed
residential
building.
G
As
an
info
project
along
these
corridors,
I
think
you
heard
it
you're
well
aware
of
what
happened
with
Pickwick
and
the
question
was:
why
are
we?
Why
can
we
only
apply
a
certain
amount
of
Standards
to
a
project?
And
the
point
is
that
we
can
only
apply
those
objective
standards
that
were
specifically
in
place
at
the
time
we
did
not
have
residential
standards
that
apply
to
the
project.
G
Okay,
what
kind
of
exceptions
concessions
waivers?
Are
you
going
to
ask
for
versus
having
a
conversation
of?
We
only
have
these
limited
standards
to
apply
to
you:
they're,
not
really
appropriate.
For
residential,
we
really
wish
you
would
design
the
building
like
this
and
then
have
have
them.
Tell
me
and
invoke
the
provisions
of
the
law.
That
say
we're
only
going
to
do
what
is
an
objective
standard
on
the
books
at
the
time
of
our
application,
so
I
think
it's
really
important
to
bring
that
to
the
attention
of
the
community.
G
I
know,
there's
concern
that
things
are
being
rushed,
but
I
would
agree
with
them.
I
feel
the
same
way
the
state
has
put
in
place
new
requirements.
Some
are
pending
on
July
1st,
but
I
would
say
we're
constantly
dealing
with
this
issue
that
this
code
would
also
address,
and
that
is
other
mixed
use
projects
and
non-residential
zones,
as
well
as
SB
35
projects.
So
I
think
it's
important.
There
are
a
lot
of
things
when
we're
looking
at
these
regulations.
Sp
35
is
exempt
from
sequa
if
they
comply
with
certain
requirements.
G
G
Second,
AB
2011
to
you
that
at
least
we
can
all
be
having
the
same
conversation
of
where
did
you
start?
What
did
they
ask
for,
and
it
was
it
warranted
under
the
laws
that
they're
applying
so
I?
Think
that's
really
important.
So
I
wanted
just
to
make
sure
we
emphasize
that,
because
I
think
that
was,
we
could
have
done
a
better
job,
myself
included
to
communicate.
That
I
mean
that
may
have
been
some
of
the
confusion
too.
During
the
commission
meeting
when
we
were
discussing
the
same
issue.
G
Think
the
planners
that
wrote
the
code
would
tell
you
more
specifically,
but
I
would
say
that
there's
those
are
high-rise
buildings,
not
mid-rise
buildings
and
the
way
the
standards
are
written
and
the
allowable
density
I
I
would
find
it
really
hard-pressed
that
you're
going
to
see
anything
above
a
wood
frame,
construction
building,
which
typically
those
are
two
over
six
or
six
over
two.
So
maybe
a
seven
story
at
the
maximum.
G
But
it's
really
driven
by
the
amount
of
density
and
the
building
envelope,
that's
necessary
to
accommodate
those
units
and
they
vary
as
the
planners
can
discuss
under
AB
2011
and
SB
35.
It's
really
what's
the
Baseline
density
in
some
instances
and
in
some
others
under
AB
2011.
It
has
to
do
with
things
like
roadway
dimensions
and
size
of
lots,
but
they
can
speak
more
specifically
to
that.
BD
Mayor
absolutely,
the
ab
2011
has
prescribed
height
height
minimums
that
are
different
from
the
standards
that
we
have
in
in
the
ordinance
they
supersede
it
and
again,
as
Mr
Ramirez
mentioned,
there
will
be
other
types
of
projects
coming
in
such
as
SB
35
projects.
Those
would
only
be
limited
to
our
what
is
in
in
the
ordinance
tonight,
but
for
for
ab
2011.
Specifically,
there
are
several
tiers
of
heights,
and
I
could
read
them.
It's
not
that
much
information
so
for
sites
on
a
commercial
Corridor
of
less
than
100
feet
in
width.
BD
The
maximum
height
is
35
feet,
four
sites
on
a
commercial
quarter
of
100
feet
and
width
or
greater
it's
45
feet,
and
notwithstanding
paragraphs
two
and
three
that
I
just
read:
65
feet
for
sites
that
meet
any
of
the
following
criteria.
So
they're
within
half
a
mile
of
major
Transit
stop.
They
are
within
the
city
of
where
the
population
of
greater
than
a
hundred
thousand
and
they're,
not
within
a
coastal
zone,
so
the
maximum
height
for
an
AB
2011
project
is
65
feet.
G
And
just
to
tie
it
all
together,
just
to
show
you
how
complicated
this
jigsaw
puzzle
is
that
they
still
have
the
ability
to
invoke
density,
bonus
law
and
so
if
to
meet
the
units,
they
need
to
request
a
waiver
concession.
That
is
something
that
we'd
also
be
looking
at.
If
you
correct
me,
if
I'm
wrong
yeah,
so
so
we
have
those
kind
of
established
Heights
in
tiers
under
AB
2011,
but
under
density
bonus.
If
they
need
more
height
to
provide
the
units,
then
they
can
request
a
height
exception.
BG
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
the
Burbank
2035
General
plan
and
the
most
recently
adopted
housing
element
have
looked
and
studied
infrastructure
impacts
related
to
the
development
of
Housing
and
we're
also
studying
those
very
same
issues
as
part
of
the
three
ongoing
specific
plan
updates.
So
those
issues
are
being
very
carefully
studied
and
then
we
had
other
questions
related
to
Traffic
impacts
that
are
addressed
through
measures
that
the
city
does
take
through
neighborhood
protection
plans,
the
city
recently
the
council
recently
considered
one
for
the
Golden
State
specific
Pine
area.
D
D
D
BG
D
BG
Well
tonight
the
council
is
considering
introducing
the
ordinance
sure.
So
if
that
happens-
and
it
comes
to
a
second
reading,
the
ordinance
will
not
come
into
effect
for
another
31
days,
okay,
which
is
a
little
bit
after
the
July
1st
sure
later
on
in
the
agenda.
There's
an
urgency
ordinance
for
the
to
put
this,
in
effect
immediately,
so
we'll.
D
Get
to
that
later
so,
but
I'm
saying
that's
what
I'm
saying
so.
Theoretically,
if
we
pass
this,
the
2011
projects
that
come
through
instead
of
being
able
to
do
the
cheapest
easiest
simplest
slap
together
box
on
the
left,
they
would
actually
have
to
follow
some
design
guidelines,
some
residential
construction
design
guidelines
that
don't
currently
exist
in
our
code
in
in
commercial
zones.
BG
Correct
and
if
they
were
not
able
to
they'd,
have
to
demonstrate
to
us
or
as
Mr
Rivera's
likes
to
say,
prove
up
why
they
cannot
comply
with
those
standards
so
that
the
burden
of
proof
is
down
on
them
and
they
have
to
to
put
a
little
bit
more
effort
into
their
design.
In
addition,
any
sp-35
project
that
is
submitted
today,
because
they
are
some
they
can
submit
at
any
time
around
I
know
for
SB.
35
projects
would
be
subject
to
these
regulations
as
well.
So.
D
I,
don't
want
to
leave
this
slide
just
yet.
Let's
go
back
to
the
slide
real,
quick,
because
I
want
to
make
one
quick
comparison.
I
notice
that
the
bottom
part
of
the
building
on
the
left,
which
is
commercial,
is
actually
engaging.
Has
some
windows
and
trees?
Is
that
because
we
currently
have
commercial
design
guidelines
in
commercial
zones.
D
BB
For
starters,
I'm
sorry,
you
had
to
answer
that
for
followers.
Thank
you
so
much
for
the
presentation,
I
I,
think
this
is
wonderful
and,
like
Mr
Ramirez
said,
I,
absolutely
commend
you
for
doing
this
in
the
amount
of
time
that
you
did.
But
really
it
is,
you
know
some
might
say.
We
are
reacting
to
State
legislation,
but
it
says
being
proactive.
BB
It
says
trying
to
take
care
of
making
sure
that
we
are
creating
things
that
are
safe,
that
are
viable
with
our
public
works
with
our
fire
department,
with
our
Police
Department,
with
all
of
the
services
that
go
into
this.
It
is
a
lot
that
goes
into
city
services
when
there's
a
development.
So
thank
you
for
making
sure
we
have
standards
that
keep
our
community
safe,
both
the
community
that's
already
there
and
those
that
are
coming
in.
BB
So
that
being
said,
I
had
more
Nitty
Gritty
questions
because
I
went
through
the
whole
thing
reading
it
because
I
just
got
really
into
it.
So
on
attachment
one
page,
six,
you
list
the
development
standards.
For
you
know
residential
only
use
as
a
non-residential
zones.
It
gives
a
development
standard
for
parking
minimums.
Can
you
describe
what
is
1.5
parking
spaces?
What
does
that
look
like.
BD
BB
BD
BB
BD
It
is
very
typical
for
projects
that
come
in
to
be
density,
bonus
projects
also
because
we
have
inclusionary
housing
requirements,
minimum
15
percent,
which
automatically
gives
the
applicant
the
ability
to
invoke
density,
bonus
parking,
and
these
standards
are
more
restrictive
than
what
is
in
ab2011.
So
these
these
would
be
applicable
if
you
came
in
with
a
conditional
use
permit
and
a
Dr
a
development
review
for
mixed
use
projects.
BB
BD
The
yeah
I
can
take
this
one
as
well.
Council
members,
so
the
the
minimum
common
open
space
per
unit
is
100
square
feet.
It
is
slightly
reduced
from
the
current
standard.
However,
we
upped
the
private
open
space
from
the
50
that
is
required
for
multiple
family
projects
in
residential
zones
to
70
to
allow
for
a
greater
amount
of
private
open
space,
such
as
space
provided
on
a
balcony.
So
that's
a
seven
by
ten
balcony
would
meet
the
standard,
I
hope
that
answers
your
question.
BB
BB
Mr
Casey,
one
of
the
callers
touched
on
this
a
little
bit
but
I
think
it's
really
important
that
we
talk
about
this
because
I
know
it's
very
important
to
a
lot
of
our
residents
and
and
I
get
it
listen,
you're
a
homeowner
and
somebody
builds
a
giant
building
next
to
you,
and
even
if
you're,
not
a
homeowner,
I
live
in
a
rental
property
where
there's
a
taller
building
next
to
me,
and
they
can
see
everything
I
do
so
in
that.
Can
you
just
I
know
you
lightly
touched
on
some
of
these?
BD
I
I
can
attempt
to
walk
you
through
some
of
them.
They
are.
Some
of
them
are
kind
of
scattered
throughout
the
the
code,
but
one
of
the
standards
is
when
you
propose
a
project
adjacent
to
a
single
family
property
Zone.
You
have
to
provide
at
least
a
20-foot
buffer.
Where
you
can't,
you
can't
build
any
residential
units
in
that
20-foot
buffer.
BD
BB
BA
I'm
totally
gonna
ask
similar
questions,
but
okay,
thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
and
thank
you
council,
member
Mullins.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
I
agree
with
council
member
Perez
that
this,
even
though
it
may
look
like
we're
rushing,
it
is
a
proactive
effort
and
I
appreciate
the
the
effort
of
the
staff
to
condense.
The
work
into
this
to
make
sure
that
this
proactive
effort
happens.
BA
So
I
was
looking
a
little
bit
at
the
provisions
of
maybe
2011,
and
one
of
them
is
that
the
project
has
to
have
at
least
five
units
right.
That's
what
it
says
on
here
is
that
correct.
Okay,
so
do
these
proposed
standards
apply
to
developments
that
are
for
units
or
less
in
those
commercial
zones
or
are
those
not
allowed?
If
somebody
wanted
to
take
a
small
commercial
property
and
do
a
four
Plex,
for
example,
what
would
be
the?
How
would
that
relate
to
this?
Would
it
relate
to
at
all
well.
BD
A
great
question
council
members,
so
it
would
apply
to
the
project
if,
if
it
is
not
an
ab2011
project,
so
if
you
have
a
sp
35
project,
the
definition
for
multi-family
Housing
Development
is
different
in
the
two
State
statutes
for
sp-35
project.
Anything
more
than
two
units
qualifies
for
ab
2011.
It
is
five
five
units,
so
I
guess
it
depends
on
the
kind
which
law
you
invoke.
When
you
submit
the
project.
Okay,.
BD
Correct
these
would
be
subject
so
in
we
use
the
word
multi-family
housing
developments
throughout
this
document
and
we
actually
added
a
definition
of
multi-family
into
our
definition.
Section
of
the
code,
which
says
multi-family
is
the
same
as
multiple
family
dwelling,
which
is
two
or
more
units.
Okay,.
A
D
A
quick
follow-up
when
we
do
zontext
amendments
and
design
guidelines
in
general,
it
applies
to
everything
that
is
covered
under
it,
regardless
of
a
state
law
that
may
qualify
and
what
you
do.
Is
you
build
it
underneath
it's
a
Zone
text
Amendment
and
then,
if
someone
uses
a
state
law
to
come
in,
they
have
to
start
with
this
and
then
go
above
it,
and
so
I
guess.
2011
starts
at
five
units
and
above
but
everything
else
even
for
and
under,
is
still
on.
The
Zone
tax
amendment
is
that
right.
BG
The
correct
it's
it's
for
all
non-residential
zones,
so
that
could
be
commercial,
industrial
and
so
forth,
and
it
establishes
a
baseline
for
which
we
can
work
with
and
then
anything
that
comes
in
under
any
straight
laws
such
as
SP,
35
or
AB
2011,
we'll
have
to
prove
up
through
those
processes
why
they
can't
comply
with
our
Baseline,
okay.
Okay,
all.
BA
Another
provision
of
ab
2011
is
that
it
cannot
be
located
on
a
site
or
joined
to
a
site
where
more
than
one-third
of
the
square
footage
is
dedicated
to
Industrial
use
and
I
noticed
that
in
the
Golden
State
area,
there's
quite
a
lot
of
sites
that
are
identified,
but
I
was
under
the
understanding
that
many
of
these
areas
are
like
in
light
industrial
or
are
they
so?
Can
you
please
explain
that
a
little
bit.
BD
Absolutely
so
the
the
map
that
you
you're
looking
at
the
exhibit
it
shows
potentially
eligible
sites
so
with
the
keyboard
here
being
potentially
eligible.
So
when
we
do
get
a
submittal,
we
have
to
go
through
a
robust
set
of
Eligibility
criteria
and,
if
it,
if
it
so
happens,
that
the
site
is
where
a
site
where
a
third
of
the
square
footage
is
dedicated
to
Industrial
use
or
is
adjacent
to
a
site
that
has
that
much
square
footage
dedicated
to
Industrial.
It
would
be
disqualified
from
being
able
to
use
that
state
law.
Okay,.
BA
BD
BA
BG
BA
BA
BG
BG
The
specific
plans
are
looking
at
the
the
issues
that
are
particularly
to
those
Geographic
areas,
so
the
standards
might
be
different
from
these.
However,
there
are
large
swaths
of
the
city
that
are
not
in
specific
plant
areas
that
these
will
apply
to.
So
those
specific
plans
will
have
more
targeted
development
specific
to
achieving
the
goals
and
objectives
of
those
specific
plans,
and
this
is
more
broadly
also
going
to
be
applicable
to
the
other
areas.
Uh-Oh.
G
It
mayor
vice
mayor
council
members,
Fred,
Ramirez
assistant,
director
and
planning
Miss
Landry
is
being
modest.
There
are
very
good
Baseline
standards
that
they've
created
that
the
project
planners
of
the
specific
plans
are
looking
at.
So,
like
you
always
tell
us,
you
don't
need
to
reinvent
the
wheel
if
you
have
a
best
practice
already
in
place
so
wherever
it
makes
sense
we're
going
to
want
to
maintain
a
level
of
consistency
so-
and
these
are
all
living
breathing
documents
which
I
think
is
another
important
thing.
G
We
want
to
maintain
consistency
across
we're,
quite
quite
fortunate,
I
I,
though
it's
quite
a
big
task,
a
big
heavy
lift
that
we're
doing
three
specific
plans
at
the
same
time,
but
the
beauty
of
it
is
that
you're
also
sharing
a
lot
of
the
information
and
the
best
practices.
So
that's
the
benefit
of
it.
The
heroin
processes.
What
these
people
have
to
do
is
to
spend
late
hours,
putting
these
things
together,
but
they've
done
quite
a
great
job.
So.
BA
Yes,
thank
you,
and
you
had
mentioned
earlier
that
you
know.
Last
week
we
I
think
it
was
last
week
learning
in
time.
We
voted
to
adjust
the
review
process
so
that
we
will
still
have
an
opportunity
to
review
these
projects
as
they
come
up.
So
can
you
please
speak
to
when,
when
in
the
process
of
these
developments,
we
would
see
as
a
council,
we
would
see
these
projects
and
then
what
would
our
role
be
in
in
that
process?.
BG
Yes,
council
member,
so
the
existing
SB
35
review
process
is
the
same
process
that
would
be
applied
to
AB
2011
projects,
absent
the
notice
of
intent
which,
which
is
not
part
of
the
ab
2011
legislation.
So
if
an
application
comes
in
for
review,
owner
AB
2011,
similar
to
SB
35,
depending
on
the
size
of
the
project,
we'd
have
a
prescribed
amount
of
time
in
which
to
review
it
for
consistency
and
either
tell
the
applicant.
BG
At
okay,
so
the
city
council,
the
role
the
city
council,
is
limited
to
just
the
ministerial
design
review
for
the
verification
of
consistency
with
the
objective
design
and
development
standards
that
are
on
the
books,
which
include
zoning
regulations,
Public,
Works,
fire
and
so
forth.
For
the
design
of
the
project.
Okay,.
AI
AZ
I'm
offering
my
okay
well.
Thank
you
so
much
a
great
job
and
this
presentation
I
have
to
say
having
to
listen
to
it.
For
the
second
time,
I
did
listen
to
the
entire
planning
presentation
and
all
the
questions
that
came
in
and
it
I
had
a
lot
of
questions
after
the
planning
board
meeting
and
thanks
to
staff
clarified.
AZ
AZ
What
would
happen
if,
with
the
density,
bonus
and
and
I'm?
Looking
at
specifically
the
80
dwelling
units,
if
you
are,
if
the
project
is
next
half
a
mile
from
bus
rapid
transit,
what
would
happen
to
our
streets
that
we
decide
that
we
want
to
install
a
bike
lane
and
reduce
the
lanes
of
traffic
with
that
80
dwelling
units
still
under
AB
2011
would
still
be
built,
and
even
though
the
the
streets
are
narrower
and
something
I'm
I
live
close
to
Verdugo.
BG
So
under
AB
2011
there
are
restrictions
on
sites
on
the
density
allowed
on
those
sites
based
on
the
width
of
this
Corridor
in
front
of
it.
So,
depending
on
the
width
of
the
corridor,
the
density
would
be
limited,
so
the
smaller
the
quarter,
the
lower
the
density
would
be
for
public
improvements
in
the
right-of-way.
We
have
a
separate
set
of
regulations
that
are
triggered
for
any
development
related
to
our
complete
our
streets
plan
that
the
council
approved
in
the
last
few
years.
D
G
Learned
fidgeting
is
actually
a
good
health
thing
to
do
so.
Fred
Ramirez
assistant
director,
in
planning
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
everything,
miss
Andrew
said,
is
correct,
but
I
think
the
question
you
had
is
there's
an
existing
right-of-way
Dimension
that
exists.
If
in
the
future
we
add
amenities
within
that
right
away,
including
a
bike
lane
the
dimensional
requirement,
it's
still
going
to
be
the
dimension
of
the
total
right-of-way.
G
So
if
it's
a
hundred
foot,
right-of-way
or
110
foot
right
of
way
and
we
bring
in
amenities
for
bike
and
ped
they're
still
going
to
be
able
to
use
the
80
dwelling
units
per
acre
because
it's
based
on
the
existing
right-of-weight
Dimensions
right
and
that's
so
so
that's
still
the
case.
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure,
because,
because
we
add
things
into
the
right-of-way
and
kind
of
reduce
the
physical
visual
space
of
the
street
versus
the
sidewalk,
it's
all
inclusive
of
the
entire
right-of-way.
L
For
the
public,
because
we
use
these
terms
and
think
we
all
understand
what
they
mean,
the
right-of-way
is
the
entire
city,
ownership
or
easement
for
infrastructure
and
passage
of
people.
So
it
includes
the
sidewalk,
the
parkway
or
grass
area
with
trees,
the
curb
the
bike
lane
the
street.
It
includes
all
of
that
so
to
Mr,
Ramirez
Point.
Whatever
we
put
in
that
space
doesn't
change
the
width,
so
the
math
Remains,
the
Same.
AZ
Which
yeah
thank
you
for
that,
because
that
that
definitely
has
an
impact
on
traffic
and
in
our
future
design
and
plans,
I
think
as
Council.
We
need
to
take
that
in
consideration,
given
that
we
would
have
a
project
proposing
80
units
and
one
lane
going
south
or
north
or
west
or
east,
that
would
have
a
huge
impact
on
our
traffic,
so
I
think
that
might
impact
our
future
designs
and
also
taken
away.
AZ
You
know
planes
to
turn
that
into
bicycle
Lanes
in
order
to
mitigate
traffic
and
make
sure
that
we
have
a
flow
so
I
don't
know
Mr
Chris
key.
If
that
makes
sense
or
that's
something,
you
would
need
directions
from
Council
in
the
future
when
we
have
projects
proposed
on
specific
streets,
so
I
just
want
to
throw
that
out
there
for
everybody,
because
it
would
have
a
traffic
impact.
AZ
BD
I
can
take
this
one
council,
member,
so
anytime,
a
project
proposes
a
height
in
a
certain
tier.
They
have
to
get
certain
clear
clearances
from
from
the
aviation
authorities
and
the
Federal
Aviation
Administration,
if
I,
if
I'm
not
mistaken.
So
that
would
not
the
fact
that
the
project
is
an
AV
2011
project
would
not
preclude
them
from
having
to
get
that
Federal
Authority.
BD
AZ
BD
AZ
Okay,
so
that
only
applies
to
height
I'm.
Also
interested
I
I
was
pleased
to
hear
that
the
same
notification
requirements
that
apply
to
SB
35
would
also
apply
to
these
projects,
but
I
was
wondering
and
it
and
it's
something
I
don't
know.
If
you
need,
we
talk
about
it
now
or
when
you
bring
back
the
objective
development
standard.
AZ
Is
it
possible
that
we
ask
the
developers
to
at
least
put
out
30
days
notice
in
advance
of
Demolition
and
to
let
people
know
that
the
project
is
coming
because
this
I
think
AB
2011
has
a
a
bigger
impact,
giving
that
it's
in
a
commercial
also
area
with
residential
mixed
use?
It
would
have
a
bigger
impact.
So
I
was
wondering,
if
that's
possible,
it
can
be
done.
BG
N
N
The
first
one
I
well
I'll,
just
ask
I'm,
not
quite
sure
who
would
be
prepared
to
answer
it,
but
to
our
first
commenter's
point
about
incentives
to
to
create
more
housing
and
to
reduce
cost.
I
know
that's
something
that
the
council
has
talked
about
before
I
believe
the
appropriate
time
to
talk
about.
That
will
be,
as
we
consider
some
of
these
specific
area
plans.
I
just
wanted
to
know.
If
staff
had
a
response
to
that.
L
A
G
I
will
tell
you
that
is
a
savings
in
money,
so
if
you
can
provide
that
kind
of
clarity,
what
you
do
is
we're
doing
a
couple
of
things
together:
we're
establishing
a
way
for
people
to
understand
at
the
onset
what
the
implications
of
development
are
in
the
city.
So
that
means
that
they
can
now
develop
their
proformas
and
understand.
Do
I
want
to
build
in
the
city
or
not.
The
other
thing
is
by
establishing
these
standards.
G
We're
also
expecting
that
there's
going
to
be
the
ability
to
streamline
processing
of
reviews,
and
so,
instead
of
making
things
discretionary,
they
would
be
buy
right,
but
it
would
be
buy
right,
subject
to
complying
with
all
the
council
standards
that
you
expect.
There
are
other
options
that
we're
looking
at,
where
the
environmental
document
we're
doing
a
very
robust
level
of
environmental
review.
G
Let's
say
in
downtown
and
then
we're
looking
at
another
scenario
where
we
up
all
the
zoning,
including
density,
bonus
and
kind
of
Stack,
the
density
and
intensity
and
we're
looking
at
that
and
that's
ranging
you
know,
north
of
14
000
units
we're
doing
that
in
downtown.
We're
going
to
be
doing
that
in
Golden.
State.
G
If
we
allow
development
as
a
preferred
project,
which
is
a
much
lower
level
of
intensity,
and
it
also
creates
the
impetus
to
start
thinking
long
term
of
how
we
need
to
get
our
infrastructure
ready
to
accommodate
development
and
also
what
that
will
do
is
it
will
help
us
in
developing
future
Capital
Improvement
projects
and
our
development
impact
fees
to
accommodate
infrastructure
with
that
growth?
So
all
that's
going
to
be
looked
at
collectively,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
you
know
kind
of
tying
all
those
pieces
together.
G
A
lot
of
this
work
of
streamlining
a
lot
of
the
work
of
the
environmental
document
having
a
very
robust
analysis,
will
also
create
an
opportunity
to
streamline
the
environmental
review,
and
that
is
significant,
because
that
means
that
if
you
comply
with
all
the
requirements
in
theory,
you
could
be
exempt
or
you
could
there's
a
finding
of
consistency
with
the
original
environmental
document,
and
that
would
mean
your
environmental
review.
Time
would
be
reduced.
G
So
all
the
things
collectively
will
lead
to
shorter
time
frames,
greater
greater
understanding
of
expectations
from
the
developer
of
community
needs,
and
then
with
that
there's
even
opportunities
where
you
can
look
at
Community
benefits
if
you
allow
for
increased
density
through
the
transit,
oriented
development
density,
bonus
or
an
exceptional
project.
So
there
are
a
lot
of
tools
that
will
be
coming
to
you
as
part
of
the
specific
plan
so
that
you
could
look
at
ways
to
incentivize
housing
consistent
with
what
the
community
question
was.
Q
N
You're
the
subject
of
my
last
question,
so
I
Mr
Ramirez
I
had
a
chance
to
watch
the
Planning
Commission
meeting,
not
actually
I
watched
it
live
when
it
happened.
I
often
do
that
and
then
I
watched
it
again
and
so
I'm
going
to
lay
a
little
bit
of
context,
so
Folks
at
home
know
what
I'm
about
to
ask
you
and
then
I
really
just
thought
your
comments
at
the
end
of
that
meeting
were
particularly
spot
on.
So
my
question
is
a
procedural
one.
N
I
have
to
say:
I
was
a
little
dismayed
with
the
planning
commission's
deliberation
and
here's
why
I
thought
there
were
some
good
questions,
although
I
think
the
scope
of
the
questions
that
were
asked
tonight
were
spectacular
and
really
struck
at
the
heart
of.
Are
these
objective
design
standards
sufficient?
Do
they
protect
our
community?
N
My
understanding
is
the
planning
board,
because
there
were
only
four
members
could
not
reach
a
recommendation.
Those
it
was
a
two
to
two
vote
and
from
what
I
could
see
from
a
distance,
you
had
at
least
half
the
commission
making
taking
a
position
that
they
would
not
make
any
recommendation
to
council
out
of
an
emotional
Viewpoint
of
we
don't
like
what
state
law
is
requiring
us
to
do,
and-
and
that
is,
is
good
and
fine
and
they
have
every
right
to
vote
in
accordance
with
their
their
emotion.
N
But
what
I
had
hoped
to
see
was
in
addition
to
that
recommendations.
You
know,
maybe
it
would
have
been.
We
think
these
are
sufficient
standards,
and
yet
we're
not
going
to
recommend
the
council
adopt
them
because
of
X
Y
and
Z,
or
maybe
it
would
have
been
reverse.
We
think
they
could
be
strengthened.
G
Understood
and
I
think
so,
first
and
foremost,
I'd
say
we
have
a
very
good
Planning,
Commission
and
I've
been
very
fortunate
to
work
with
them.
I,
say
collaboration
with
them
as
we
review
projects
so
I.
Think
in
this
particular
example,
as
you
say,
watching
it
in
in
live
and
I
was
participating
in
the
meeting.
G
One
thing
that
I
will
say
is
that
the
vote
is
reflective
of
the
discussion
that
you
heard
tonight
and
that
was
two
very
valid
viewpoints,
one
that
was
looking
at
the
regulations
that
were
being
put
in
front
of
them.
From
a
very
pragmatic
standpoint
and
saying
you
know,
there's
a
lot
of
things:
I
don't
like,
but
I
think
one
of
the
Commissioners
said
we're
better
with
the
ordinance
regulations
than
we
are
without
it
and
I,
and
that
was
one
Viewpoint
I
think
shared
by
two
and
the
other.
G
Half
of
the
commission
deservedly
so
was
concerned
with
the
fact
that,
once
again
they
felt
the
state
was
steamrolling
the
city,
and
here
we
were,
you
know
basically
providing
standards.
Instead
of
you
know
kind
of
making
a
point
as
to
our
concern
or
angst
with
what
the
state
was
proposing.
I
think
both
of
those
were
valid
concerns
to
Vice
mayor's
point
one
thing:
I
think
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
G
If
you
got
to
see
it
was
and
they're
during
city
planner
comments,
I
tried
to
acknowledge
that
all
viewpoints
from
the
Commissioners
are
valid.
We
learned
quite
a
bit
just
from
their
discussion.
Sometimes
they'll
go
through
and
provide
all
the
reasons
that,
during
their
deliberation
as
to
why
they
think
you
know
if
they
had
it
any
other
way,
they
wouldn't
vote
for
something,
and
then
they
vote
for
approve
it
because
they
realize
well
it
complies
with
the
zoning
code.
It
complies
with
the
general
plan.
So
we
have
to
do
that.
I.
G
So
we
have
to
do
it
so
I
think
at
the
end
of
that
meeting,
what
I
mentioned
to
them
is
I
totally
understood
all
those
concerns.
But
one
of
the
things
that
we
have
to
be
mindful
of
is,
as
the
commission
is,
that
the
focus
of
the
commission
continues
to
be
they're
tasked
with
specific
duties.
One
in
particular
when
it
comes
to
zoning
amendments,
is
to
confirm
that
the
zoning
regulations
that
are
being
proposed
comply
with
the
zoning
section
of
the
code
are
either
consistent
with
other
standards.
G
That
would
apply,
as
well
as
the
main
blueprint
for
the
city,
which
is
the
general
plan
and
the
that's
very
important,
because
they
have
to
make
findings,
and
the
hope
is
that
collectively,
when
they
can
come
to
a
consensus,
they'll
make
a
recommendation
to
the
Council
on
that
final
decision.
Nothing
is
more
indicative
or
encapsulating
of
that.
As
to
the
discussion
that
occurred
during
the
housing
element,
that
was
a
3-0
vote.
G
So
that
is
an
example
where
robust
discussion,
even
differences
of
opinion,
still
led
to
consensus
and
a
vote
which
is
kind
of
what
I
would
see,
is
the
ideal
situation
for
the
Commission.
In
this
instance,
for
a
myriad
of
factors
and
I
understand
those
concerns.
We
ended
up
with
the
2-2
vote,
which
isn't
a
recommendation,
but
to
your
point,
we
we
could
have
done
collectively.
I
would
take
this
upon
myself
as
a
liaison
that
we
could
have
communicated
better
to
the
commission,
so
they
understood
kind
of
where
the
focus
would
be.
BA
BD
Good
question:
yes,
no,
no
I,
think
I
I
have
the
answer
for
you,
so
AP
2011
specifically
has
a
is
allows
multiple,
family
and
mixed-use
housing
on
sites
that
allow
parking
as
a
principal,
principally
permitted
use.
So
if
the
zoning
allows
it
without
a
cup,
then
it
would
be
allowed
on
that
on
that
parcel
got.
AB
BG
A
BD
BA
And
more
follow-up
question
to
that.
So
that
said,
if
a
developer
does
develop
a
commercial,
a
site,
that's
on
a
commercial
zone
or
on
a
zone
that
allows
retail
and
decides
to
do
100
residential.
Does
that
zoning
stay
commercial
or
does
that
zoning
turn
into
a
residential
zoning?
Can
commercial
come
back
at
a
later
date?
The.
BG
BA
BG
D
D
D
For
so
long
that
we
have
created
a
a
lack
of
Housing
and
a
lack
of
affordable
housing,
and
one
of
the
main
tools
that
cities
have
used
is
the
design
guidelines,
the
standards
all
of
the
restrictions
that
say
and
barink
has
done
this
for
decades.
If
you
want
to
build
something,
you
gotta
either
apply
for
a
cup
or
go
through
a
plan.
Development
jump
through
some
hoops
come
before
Council
plead
your
case.
Do
this
whole
rigmarole
and
I
would
argue
that
against
Jim
Casey's
point
that
it's
not
Sacramento,
that
is
to
blame.
D
It
is
a
leadership
of
cities
that,
for
lack
of
a
better
phrase,
have
wanted
to
put
their
fingerprints
on
every
single
development
that
has
come
through
their
City
Planning
Department
to
fidget
and
fix
and
say
yes
or
no,
that
to
me
all
of
you
know
what
we've
been
doing
for
so
long.
This
is
before
we
all
got
here,
but
what
the
cities
have
been
doing
so
long
up
and
down
California
is
not
local
control.
D
This
council
is
working
on
to
do
objective
guidelines
and
objective
standards
and
remove
all
of
those
impediments
so
that
we,
as
a
as
a
body,
are
creating
the
designs
that
we
want
to
see
in
our
city
so
that
anyone
who
shows
up
to
build
something
looks
at
our
checklist
and
says.
Okay,
if
this
is
what
the
city
wants,
I'm
going
to
build
this
and
I'm
going
to
build
that,
and
they
don't
want
this.
So
I'm
not
going
to
build
that.
D
So
that
to
me
is
really
what
a
local
municipality
should
be
doing
where
we
craft
the
Zone
tax
amendments,
where
we
do
the
the
specific
plans
where
we
have
an
over-encompassing
General
plan
and
we
go
through
all
of
the
the
far
and
the
height
requirement
and
and
all
of
the
other
affordable
housing
components
so
that
it's
not
this
Patchwork
of
different
sections
of
the
city
and
nobody
knows
what's
going
on
and
they
have
to
file
a
cup
for
everything
or
just
go
through
a
plan
development.
It
makes
it
streamlined.
It
makes
it
quicker.
D
It
makes
it
easier
and
you
don't
get
the
random
projects
showing
up
that
people
are
like
what
is
happening
in
my
neighborhood.
What
is
happening
in
my
city
I
think
the
work
that
we're
doing
now,
whether
or
not
we
are
subject
to
2011
or
SB
35
in
the
future.
We
are
setting
up
a
different
kind
of
process
in
our
city
at
the
planning
level
that
is
going
to
help
further
Generations.
D
D
It
saves
staff
time
I've
been
coming
to
Council
meetings
for
what,
over
six
years
now
the
amount
of
hours
of
Staff
time
where
we
were
doing
cups
and
plant
developments
and
well
maybe
we
want
this,
and
maybe
we
want
that
and
hey
come
back
and
get
the
developer
up
here
and
talk
to
them
and
request.
It
I
mean
that
my
gosh,
it's
a
headache,
it's
a
headache
all
around.
So
obviously,
we're
talking
right
now
about
2011..
This
is
a
state
mandated
bill,
I
think
by
putting
in
the
design
guideline
standards.
D
AZ
AZ
For
example,
that's
a
very
unique
Charming
little
community
on
Magnolia
Boulevard,
where
people
just
like
to
walk
and
enjoy
shopping
and
outdoor
and
then
seeing
an
80
I
believe
they
have
Transit
close
by
so
seeing
even
40
60
units
built
on
that
street
is
also
something
that's
the
impact
of
what
the
state
pushes
on
local
cities.
So
I
do
agree
with
what
you're
saying
I
like
that
we're
putting
our
own
design
but
I.
AZ
N
Yeah
Mr
Mayor
I
I'm
not
going
to
make
the
motion
I
just
wanted
to
make
one
comment:
I
actually
think
the
the
standards
that
staff
did
are
frankly
terrific,
given
the
circumstances
and
especially
when
we
factor
in
the
very
limited
time
that
you
had
to
work
on
it
and
so
I
just
want
to
say
Mr
Ramirez.
You
do
not
need
to
stand
back
up,
you
can
stay
and
you
see
I
just
wanted
to
say:
I
appreciated
the
suffer
the
self-reflection
and
the
Candor
I
guess.
N
If
I
had
any
suggestion
for
staff,
it
would
just
be
to
carry
back
at
least
from
this
Council
member's
perspective.
I
I
understand
for
those
who
voted
no
and
did
not
make
a
recommendation
to
counseling
get
where
they're
coming
from,
but
unfortunately
it
doesn't
serve
us
to
to
stand
on
the
soapbox.
We
have
to
be
live
in
a
world
of
pragmatism
and
I.
N
Think
that,
as
staff
outlined
tonight,
the
requirements
that
you're
put
hoping
to
put
in
place
balance
the
competing
interests
of
meeting
our
state
housing
mandates,
while
also
preserving
what
we
can
about
Burbank
and
I
think
that
to
have
voted
in
any
other
way.
Quite
frankly,
in
my
opinion,
is
not
the
right
outcome.
It's
an
abdication
of
responsibility
and
so
I
appreciate
the
work
that
staff
did
I
get
where
those
Commissioners
were
coming
from
my
encouragement,
my
advice
to
them
would
be
I'm
completely.
Okay,
getting
that
getting
that
recommendation
of.
N
We
want
you
to
fight
it.
We
hate
what's
happening
to
us,
but
if
the
standards
are
sufficient,
we
need
to
know
that
too,
because
in
my
view,
that
is
their
function
is
to
advise
us.
The
standards
are
sufficient
or
they're
not
or
they
could
be
improved,
and
so
it's
I'm
not
trying
to
beat
up
on
anyone.
I
just
I,
didn't
feel
like
I
got
that
in
this
instance
and
I
really
do
Rely
Upon
Our,
Planning,
Commission
and
I
give
great
weight
to
what
they
have
to
say
so
from
one
counts
member's
perspective.
BA
Thank
you
for
those
comments.
Thank
you
for
all
the
comments
so
far
great
points
being
made.
There
is
also
to
the
point
of
you,
know
the
idea
of
pushback
and
and
how
can
we,
how
can
we,
as
a
city
advocate
for
having
our
own
processes
that
are
not
necessarily
in
alignment
with
a
one
size,
fits-all
approach
that
the
state
is
has
has
mandated?
BA
Is
that
I
think
we?
We
also
need
to
think
about
how,
at
this
time
the
the
Attorney
General
was
mentioned
earlier,
the
attorney
general
has
put
together
a
housing,
Strike
Force,
and
if
we
were
to
pushed
back
and
decide
not
to
do
this,
that
that
Strike
Force
is
going
to
each
City,
that's
not
abiding
by
the
rules
and
expanding
the
the
the
the
enforcement
of
it
City
by
City
So
Not.
Only
would
it
be,
you
know
not
working
with
what
we
have.
BA
BA
We
are
part
of
that
active
application,
advocation
and
those
conversations.
So
it's
not
like
we're
doing
nothing,
just
that
there's
just
different
venues
than
saying
no
to
a
law.
So
if
we
don't
like
a
law,
we
want
to
try
to
change
it.
But
if
we
don't
abide
by
the
law,
then
we
could
get
in
trouble,
so
we
gotta
Bye
by
the
law.
While
we
try
to
change
it
and
lastly,
I
wanted
to
say
that
this.
BA
We
can
be
proud
to
be.
You
know,
kind
of
a
model
of
how
that
can
be
moving
forward.
So
I
also
support
this
as
well,
for
the
same
reasons
that
Mr
vice
mayor
said,
even
though,
at
the
same
time,
we
do
need
to
keep
the
conversation
going
about
how
we
can
look
to
make
sure
that
we
are.
We
are
keeping
in
alignment
with.
You
know
the
character
of
our
city
in
a
way
that
also
continues
to
build
housing.
So
in
our
own
way.
Thank
you.
BB
Mr
Mayor
thank
you
and
I
I,
just
want
to
say:
I
I,
Echo,
council
member
takahashi's
comments,
but
I
as
as
always,
I
tend
to
be
the
voice
of
coming
from
the
state
and
and
I
just
want
to
Echo
what
you
said:
Mr
Mayor,
because
this
is
not
on
this
Council.
This
is
not
on
even
a
lot
of
the
current
state
legislators.
BB
This
is
20
plus
years
in
the
making
of
cities
continuously
doing
what
you
mentioned:
Mr
Mayor
and
not
developing
or
not
pushing
projects
forward,
or
you
know
just
that
fear
to
to
move
forward
and
I.
Think
all
of
us
at
the
state
at
the
local
level
are
really,
as
happens
with
Generations,
having
to
track
back
and
fix
the
mistakes
of
our
predecessors,
be
it
in
state
mandates
that
leave
our
staff
scrambling
or
us
trying
to
mitigate
those
mandates
with
you
know,
ordinances
that
work
for
our
city
and
our
people
to
keep
us
safe.
AC
D
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
That
was
the
end
of
the
public
hearing
all
right.
We
have
five
reports
to
council
this
evening.
After
staff's
presentation,
city
council
proceed
to
in-person
public
comment.
Only
the
first
report,
the
adoption
of
an
urgency
ordinance
to
amend
the
city's
zoning
regulations
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
mixed
use
and
residential
projects
in
non-residential
zones.
D
BD
Good
evening,
once
again,
mayor
Anthony
vice
mayor,
Schultz,
I'm
members
of
the
council,
my
name
is
Greg
mirzavakian
associate
planner
with
CDD
planning
and
I
want
to
apologize.
If
there's
any
redundancy
from
the
last
item,
but
not
too
much
tonight,
you're
being
asked
to
consider
an
urgency
ordinance
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
mixed
use
and
multi-family
residential.
Only
projects
in
non-residential
zones.
BD
Earlier
tonight
you
you
held
a
public
hearing
on
a
zontex
amendment
to
amend
the
city,
zoning
regulations
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
mixed
use
and
residential,
only
projects
in
non-residential
zones.
The
effort
is
meant
to
establish
objective
standards
to
address
the
requirements
of
State
Assembly
Bill
2011,
which
goes
into
effect
on
July
1st
of
this
year.
BD
Whether
the
city
approves
the
urgency
ordinance
tonight
or
or
not,
projects
will
still
be
submitted
for
streamline
ministerial
review
per
state
law.
This
includes
both
SB
35
and
ab
2011
projects.
The
Burbank
Municipal
Code
currently
is
lacking
in
terms
of
design
and
development
standards
for
multi-family
uses
in
non-residential
zones.
In
the
absence
of
such
standards,
any
project
submitted
pursuant
to
the
streamlined
ministerial
review
process
is
subject
to
the
underlying
development
standards
which
are
minimal
and
not
well
suited
for
the
multi-family
residential
development.
BD
As
previously
noted,
the
urgency
ordinance
would
establish
standards
related
to,
among
other
things,
privacy,
building,
Frontage
design,
step
back
and
setback
requirements,
buffering
requirements,
open
space
flexibility
and
parking
structure,
visibility
and
screening
to
name
a
few.
The
urgency
ordinance
will
help
to
protect
residential
neighborhoods
through
operational
requirements,
including
prohibited
uses,
residential
buffers
and
screening
requirements
and
open
space
requirements.
BD
The
city
will
be
unable
to
regulate
secondary
impacts
from
such
developments
relating
to
height
Mass,
noise,
privacy,
open
space
lighting
circulation,
Urban,
Design
and
building
operations
related
to
parking
loading,
venting
and
permitted
uses
without
objective
design
and
development
standards
in
place.
The
proposed
developments
with
limited
City
oversight
could
permanently
change
the
fabric
of
the
community,
while
altering
the
pattern
of
development
along
the
city's
commercial
corridors,
will
increase
density
and
intensity,
increase,
building,
Heights
little
to
no
on-site
parking
and
reduced
setbacks
and
privacy
between
development
sites
and
neighboring
land
uses.
BD
Rejection
of
the
urgency
ordinance
could
not
would
not
change
the
mandated
requirements
from
the
state
and
the
city
would
still
need
to
approve
any
projects
that
meet
the
criteria
for
AB,
2011
and
SB
35.
In
this
interim
period,
furthermore,
the
rejection
of
this
urgency
ordinance
would
prevent
the
city
from
being
able
to
impose
objective
development
standards
on
these
projects
and
from
protecting
adjacent
residential
uses.
BD
Therefore,
staff
recommends
that
the
city
council
adopt
an
urgency
ordinance
of
the
city
council
of
the
City
of
Burbank
amending
title
10,
chapter
1,
zoning
of
the
Burbank
municipal
code
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
mixed
use
and
residential,
only
projects
and
non-residential
zones,
and
please
note
that
the
adoption
of
this
urgency
ordinance
requires
a
four-fifth
vote
and
this
concludes
the
staff's
presentation.
We're
available
for
any
questions.
Thank.
M
Boy
I
Miss
Augie
Baker,
probably
only
two
people
in
the
room
who
know
who
that
fella
was
thank
you
for
answering
my
question
about
the
projects
in
the
pipeline.
I
appreciate
that
when
I
see
the
words
urgency,
it
usually
isn't
urgent
and
when
I
see
the
words
objective,
it's
usually
means
restrictive
and
of
course,
in
this
case
it
is
mixed-use.
Projects
are
nothing
new
in
Burbank
we
already
have
a
number
of
them.
M
Tall
buildings
for
residential
are
nothing
new
either
we
have
one
on
Glen
Oaks
across
the
street,
from
the
Sanford
across
from
Burbank
High
School.
It's
a
senior
building
and
I
think
there's
two
of
them
on
San,
Fernando
and
Verdugo
and
I
would
take
a
look
at
those
and
see
if
you
have
problems
with
those.
M
M
And
until
you
can
answer
that
question
I
I,
don't
think
you
should
vote
on
this?
Maybe
it's
not
needed
and
just
very
quickly
Miss
Mullins.
The
idea
of
posting
a
sign
30
days
in
advance
of
what
you're
going
to
do.
Don't
you
think
that's
going
to
stir
up
our
Hornet's
Nest
on
every
single
project
and
it
kind
of
defeats
the
purpose
of
following
the
rules
to
to
do
that.
You've
already
followed
the
rules
and
now
you're
gonna.
M
AD
AD
My
initial
knee-jerk
reaction
is
that
I
was
very
happy
to
see
two
council
members
of
two
commission
members
actually
have
dissenting
opinions
and
it
was
a
2-2
vote.
I
think
that
that
is
more
reflective
of
Burbank
and
reflective
of
my
opinions
than
just
to
kind
of
go
along
the
get
along
attitude
which
I
like
I
apologize
for
paraphrasing.
But
it
seems
like
that.
There's
the
consensus
of
the
of
the
diocese
majority
I.
Think
council
member
Mullins
indicating
an
illustration
which
I
appreciate
her
doing
and
staff
doing
we're
at
Magnolia
Park.
AD
You
can
have
you
know
multi-story
buildings
with
who
knows
how
many
you
know,
residents
I
think
is,
is
a
concern
because
you
then
lose
the
fabric
of
Magnolia
Park
it's
gone
and
if
you're
going
to
sit
there
and
say
we
need
housing,
and
it's
this.
This
thing
that
we
have
to
do,
you
are
changing
Burbank
and
I.
AD
It
is
the
fact
that
I
am
so
worried
by
what
is
happening
with
the
Laura
Friedman
Bill,
the
no
parking
seven
parking
spots
for
146,
Apartments,
260,
200,
262
bedrooms-
that's
happening,
that's
just
one!
There
are
going
to
be
three
more.
Who
knows
how
many
more
are
happening
right
now,
you'll
get
your
housing,
but
what
will
it
do
to
Burbank
I'm
saying?
Yes,
it's
important
to
do
it.
We
need
to
embrace
it.
AD
AD
Staff
does
a
beautiful
job
talking
about
Zone
text
amendments
things
that
are
so
over
my
head
that
I
have
to
call
people
get.
Could
you
please
explain
it
to
me,
and
this
is
horribly,
dense
information
and
I?
Don't
think
any
of
us
can
truly,
except
maybe
staff,
could
understand
what
it's
going
to
mean
to
Burbank
as
a
community
at
the
end
of
the
day,
what
does
it
mean
at
the
end
of
the
day?
That's
what
I'm
worried
about.
AD
AZ
AZ
AZ
L
D
D
N
D
D
BH
BH
If
you
want
to
know,
what's
going
to
happen
to
Burbank,
go
to
Lankershim
Boulevard,
okay,
Lankershim
Boulevard
is
filled
with
multi-use,
which
is
businesses
on
the
bottom,
your
Firehouse
Subs
Pinkberry,
whatever
else
they
throw
in
there
and
then
they're
doing
the
same
thing.
Toluca
Lake
go
across
the
street
from
Bob's
across
rows.
BH
They're
building
one
they
knock
down
famous
restaurant,
a
community
venue
restaurant's
been
there
for
60
years
knocked
it
down.
This
is
nothing
but
a
way
to
take
over
land
has
nothing
to
do
with
housing.
It's
a
way
to
take
over
land,
they
manipulate
it
to
take
over
the
land
and
they
destroy
communities.
BH
If
you
vote
for
this,
you
will
be
in
North,
Hollywood
you'll
be
in
North
Hollywood.
It's
gonna
happen.
That's
what's
happening
to
this.
That's
what
they've
been
doing.
I
went
to
Council
meetings
in
Toluca
Lake
same
thing.
They
did
the
same
thing.
We
don't
need
more
residential
space,
I
mean
we
don't
we
don't
need
more
retail
space.
You
have
tons
of
retail
space
open
all
throughout
Burbank.
BH
You
don't
need
more,
you
know,
and
Burbank
is
a
city
of
a
hundred
thousand
people.
It's
not
your
job
to
solve
the
the
housing
crisis
in
Los,
Angeles,
Los,
Angeles,
County
of
12
million
people.
It's
your
job
to
take
care
of
Burbank
Burbank
is
what
counts,
not
just
not
just
you
know
some
ambiguous
housing
problem.
BH
D
Yeah
fill
out
a
yellow
comment
card;
they
they
have
them
at
the
front
here.
Jonathan
Jones
will
take
care
of
you.
Real
quick
I
just
want
to
say
for
future
reference.
We
only
do
the
phone
calls
in
the
original
public
comment
period
and
during
any
public
hearing.
So
this
was
not
a
public
hearing
item,
so
it's
only
in
person.
I
appreciate
you
driving
down.
Thank
you
Mr.
Vice
mayor,
you
were.
N
Oh
yes,
thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
I'm,
going
to
be
very
brief.
I
wouldn't
have
commented
except
you
know.
Mr
Donahue
was
responding
to
my
comment.
I
just
wanted
to
say:
Sir
we've
had
many
conversations
and
I,
never
mistake
your
passion
for
the
community
as
anything
other
than
that
and
I
know
you
care
a
lot
about
Burbank
and
so
I'm
I'm
just
going
to
say
this
one
more
time
because
I'm
expecting
that
our
planning
Commissioners
either
are
watching,
live
or
we'll
play
back.
N
The
tape
I
have
no
objection
with
anybody
in
the
position
of
authority
voting
their
conscience,
I.
Think
staff
has
made
a
really
clear
record
that
to
the
last
commenter's
point,
if
we're
really
going
to
do
what's
best
for
Burbank,
what's
proposed
is
the
best
that
we
can
do
given
the
circumstance
stances,
and
so
my
only
feedback
for
our
commission
and
I
know.
This
is
a
little
unconventional,
but
I
think
we
as
a
council
should
do
more
of
that.
N
Giving
guidance
to
our
commissions
is
even
if
you're
going
to
say,
I'm
not
going
to
support
it
because
I
don't
like
State
housing
mandates.
I
still
need
to
see
some
commentary
on
what's
being
proposed,
if
you
think
it's
adequate
great,
if
you
think
there
are
deficiencies
or
it
could
be
improved,
that's
great.
My
point
is
that
standing
on
the
soapbox
might
feel
good
I,
don't
think
it
moves
a
needle
and
gets
us
closer
so
that
that's
my
feedback
for
our
commission.
Thank
you.
D
And
I
would
just
add
one
last
thing
to
the
public
commenter
who
came.
You
know
this
idea
of
protecting
the
quality
in
the
neighborhood
of
Burbank.
If
we
don't
pass
this,
we
actually
create
a
larger
window
of
time
where
anything
can
come
through
anything
that
is
built
in
North
Hollywood
or
to
come
through.
So
from
my
understanding
of
this
passing.
This
tonight
actually
closes
down
a
lot
of
the
guidelines
and
design
and
all
of
that
stuff.
So
for
me,
you
know
moving
forward
with
this.
D
BB
Anybody
why
not?
Let's
read
the
same
thing
again:
okay
I
moved
to
adopt
an
urgency
ordinance
of
the
city
council
of
the
City
of
Burbank
amending
title
10
chapter
1,
zoning
of
the
Burbank
municipal
code
to
establish
objective
design
and
development
standards
for
mixed
use
and
residential.
Only
projects
in
non-residential
zones.
BB
AZ
A
E
D
BA
A
BI
Right
mayor
Anthony
vice
mayor
Schultz,
council
member
Perez,
council
member
Takahashi,
council
member
Mullins
and
my
fellow
Burbank
residents,
my
name
is
Crystal
Palmer
and
I'm.
Your
city
treasurer
tonight
I'm
here
to
present
a
proposed
2023
investment
policy.
This
policy
has
been
reviewed
by
the
two
oversight:
committees,
the
internal
fiscal
and
treasures
review
group
and
external
Treasures
oversight,
Review
Committee
on
to
fiscal
and
treasurer's
review
group.
BI
We
have
mayor
Anthony,
council,
member
Mullins
city
manager,
Justin
Hess
assistant
city
manager,
Judy
Wilke,
Financial,
Services,
director,
Jennifer,
Becker
and
CFO
of
Burbank
Water
and
Power
Joe
lilio
on
the
treasurer's
oversight,
Review
Committee.
We
have
Darren
guggenheimer
CEO
of
gain
Federal
Credit
Union,
norlin
coraz,
former
CEO
of
Cedar
Sinai
Federal
Credit,
Union,
Richard,
Martin,
CPA,
Scott,
Rife
senior,
vice
president
of
Boston
Private
Bank
and
Trust
and
David
Escobar.
BI
First
is
the
addition
of
state
code
under
on
page
three
section
c
under
maturity,
we've
added
language
from
the
California
state
code,
clarifying
that
an
Investments
term
or
remaining
maturity
shall
be
measured
from
the
settlement
date
to
the
final
maturity.
Investments
shall
not
have
a
forward
settlement
date
exceeding
45
days
from
the
time
of
investment,
so
just
as
a
point
of
reverence,
we've
actually
never
had
an
investment
settle
more
than
45
days
after
we've
purchased
it.
But
this
language
just
gives
us
added
protection,
so
it
doesn't
happen
in
the
future.
BI
On
page
six,
under
the
list
of
authorized
Investments,
the
list
of
authorized
Investments
was
updated
to
include
the
joint
Powers
Authority
polls
so
to
be
eligible.
Under
this
section,
The
Joint
Powers
Authority
issuing
the
shares
shall
have
retained
an
investment
advisor
that
meets
the
following
criteria.
First
advisor
should
be
registered
or
is
exempt
from
registering
with
the
SEC
he
or
she
or
the
company
should
at
least
have
five
years
of
experience
and
have
assets
under
management
of
at
least
500
million
dollars.
BI
So
we
are
adding
this
category
because
we're
considering
investing
into
Camp
pool
so
Camp
stands
for
California
Asset
Management
program.
It's
a
15
billion
dollar
fund
that
was
started
in
1989..
It
offers
same-day
liquidity,
stable
net
asset
values
and
it's
rated
AAA
by
the
ratings
agencies.
It
currently
offers
attractive
rates.
The
most
recent
of
it
was,
which
was
5.19
percent,
so
pfm
Asset
Management,
has
run
camp
and
has
renewed
its
10-year
contract
last
year.
BI
However,
in
the
event
that
advisor
changes
in
the
future,
we've
also
added
language
in
our
policy,
stating
that
the
city
would
need
to
re-evaluate
its
investment
in
case
that
happens
so
just
for
point
of
reference.
Other
agencies
that
use
Camp
include
the
cities
of
Pasadena
Carlsbad,
Palm,
Desert,
San,
Mateo
and
Riverside,
among
others.
Counties
also
use
Camp,
including
San
Diego,
San,
Bernardino
and
Kern
counties.
BI
BI
On
page
18,
Exhibit
C,
we've
updated
our
list
of
qualified
Brokers,
so
Susan
Munson
will
be
our
new
contact
at
Canter
Fitzgerald,
instead
of
Ben
Finkelstein.
From
the
same
firm
with
this
change,
she
completed
an
updated
broker-dealer
questioner
from
our
city.
She
also
submitted
her
firm's
most
recent
financial
statements,
which
were
reviewed
by
our
office.
She
has
extended
extensive
industry
experience
and
is
active
in
Industry
education
through
our
participation
in
the
fixed
income,
Academy
California
Municipal,
Treasures,
Association,
California,
Association
of
County
treasurers
and
tax
collectors
and
government
investment,
Officers
Association.
BI
BI
This
year
we
received
applications
from
eight
Brokers
and,
while
all
Brokers
had
something
unique
to
offer,
we
selected
these
two
individuals
and
reference
based
on
their
experience,
working
with
other
local
municipalities
in
California
and
the
financial
stability
of
their
firms.
They
both
provided
comprehensive
answers
to
their
submitted
broker-dealer
questionnaires
and
submitted
their
financial
statements,
which
we
reviewed.
BI
BI
M
Miss
Palmer
is
wonderful
and
we're
lucky
to
have
her
and
she
really
knows
how
to
run
a
meeting
too
she's
very
capable
on
those
list
of
Brokers
I
hope.
None
of
them
are
involved
in
cryptocurrency
that
Miss
Palmer
well
I
asked
that
question
and
I
think
you
should
you
folks
should
be
concerned
with
that,
and
the
other
question
is
it's
either:
it's
either
appropriate
at
this.
For
this
item
or
the
next
item
Miss
Palmer
talked
about
at
her
meeting,
she
talked
about
the
City
of
Burbank.
M
Closing
our
position
with
U.S
Bank
I
think
it
was
two
positions
and
I
I.
She
said
she
was.
She
was
nervous
about.
It
gave
excellent
reasons,
and
at
that
time
we
were
going
to
lose
about
a
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars.
So
maybe
you
could
share
with
us.
Miss
Palmer
could
share
with
us
if
she
did
indeed
close
those
positions
and
how
much
the
city
lost
on
those
trades.
Thank
you.
D
BI
D
D
BI
BI
First
I
wanted
to
go
over
the
historical
market
value
of
the
portfolio.
It
currently
stands
at
549
million
dollars,
which
has
increased
significantly
just
in
the
past
few
months.
If
you
would
look
at
the
graph
in
this
graph,
I
also
wanted
to
highlight
the
45
million
dollars
in
carlpers
payments.
We've
been
making
each
year
give
or
take
to
save
on
our
pension
costs.
BI
BI
So
the
average
duration
of
our
portfolio
is
2.17
years,
just
as
a
point
of
reference.
The
maximum
maturity
that
we
can
purchase
is
five
years.
So,
as
you
can
see
from
the
graph,
we
still
have
a
lot
of
liquidity
with
our
money
market
fund
balances.
This
gives
us
flexibility
to
take
advantage
of
current
higher
short-term
rates,
while
still
locking
in
higher
maturities
longer
maturities
I
mean
foreign,
so
this
shows
how
our
yield
and
our
portfolio
laddering
strategy
allows
us
to
generate
stable
returns.
BI
BI
BI
BI
An
example
of
the
CD
is
the
Latino
Community
Credit
Union,
based
in
North
Carolina.
What's
interesting
about
this
Credit
Union
is
that
97
of
its
loans
are
to
Latinos
and
immigrants.
Even
more
importantly,
65
of
its
members
were
previously
unbanked
and
even
better
is
that
it
has
pretty
high
repayment
rate
of
99.3
percent.
BI
Another
credit
union
we've
invested,
a
CD
in
is
VyStar
Credit
Union,
which
serves
military
families
to
help
them
with
their
transition
and
helping
them
get
flexible
mortgage
options
to
buy
a
home.
Just
as
a
background.
The
City
of
Burbank
invests
245
000
maximum
per
CD,
so
the
deposits
are
fully
insured
by
the
FDIC,
because
the
maximum
is
250
000..
These
CDs
yield
an
attractive
spread
over
treasuries,
depending
on
the
maturity.
It
usually
yields
about
0.5
to
1
percent,
more
than
current
treasury
levels
with
a
banking
crisis.
We
also
like
that.
BI
As
a
brief
background,
these
Bonds
were
both
purchased
by
my
predecessor
in
2019
and
were
highly
rated
at
that
time.
At
that
time,
you
know
they
were
considered
very
stable
with
no
risk,
however,
were
the
banking
crisis.
These
are.
These
are
now
just
rated
A3
for
Moody's
and
a
for
SNP,
which
are
both
still
considered
investment
grade
with
the
higher
interest
rates.
Now,
as
you're
aware,
there's
now
an
asset
liability
mismatch
and
that
higher
rates
have
reduced
the
value
of
these
bank
loans.
Well,
they
have
to
pay
higher
rates
to
depositors.
BI
Banks
also
still
maintain
high
level
these,
but
this
particular
Bank
also
still
need
to
maintain
high
levels
of
uninsured
deposits
and
unrealized
losses.
Unfortunately,
so
I'll
go
for
Olga
over
one
of
the
bonds
as
an
example.
So,
looking
at
the
one
on
the
left,
the
U.S
Bank
bond
that
currently
yields
2.844-
this
was
purchased
back
in
April
2019
and
it
matures
in
February
of
2024..
The
total
cost
that
was
invested
back
in
2019
was
1
million.
Thirty
thousand.
BI
As
of
Friday
last
week,
the
current
sale
price
it
was
about
990
000,
give
or
take.
So
if
we
sell
that
Bond
we'll
lose
negative,
we'll
lose
37
000.,
however,
just
to
keep
in
mind
since
we've
owned
that
Bond
we've
earned
135
000
in
interest.
So
if
you
take
that
into
account,
the
net
gain
from
actually
holding
the
investment
is
97
000..
If
we
reinvest
the
proceeds
from
selling
this
Bond
we'll
actually
also
earn
an
additional
fifteen
thousand
dollars
until
maturity.
BI
Given
that
current
yields
are
now
at
five
percent
versus
two
point,
eight
four
four
percent,
which
the
bond
currently
yields
with
a
total
net
gain
of
113
000..
So
obviously
you
will
lose
money
on
the
just
on
the
sale
of
the
bond.
But
if
you
take
into
account
the
total
gain
from
the
income
you've
received,
as
well
as
the
opportunity
cost
of
now
being
able
to
invest
in
higher
yielding
bonds,
it's
actually
probably
a
net
gain
overall.
So
the
reason
we're
looking
at
this
is
because,
as
I
mentioned
earlier,
these
Bonds
were
recently
downgraded.
BI
If
something
happens
in
the
next
several
months,
and
as
we
know,
the
banking
crisis
is
not
yet
over
and
if
something
happens
so
this
particular
Bank,
we
could
lose
our
entire
investment.
So
that
is
the
reason.
I
wanted
to
highlight
this
one
and
why
we're
actually
considering
swap
swapping
this
holding
for
a
much
safer
treasury
security.
BI
So
now
I
wanted
to
go
over
to
economic
conditions
surrounding
us
today
for
Labor
Market
job
openings
have
actually
declined
in
the
first
quarter
as
employees.
Employers
put
a
freeze
in
hiring
with
all
these
recession.
Fears
they've
taken
the
opportunity
to
cut
labor
costs,
primarily
in
white
collar
workers.
Another
factor
is
that
with
AI
and
increased
automation,
they're
looking
to
save
in
labor
costs,
as
well
with
that
layoffs
in
the
information
sector,
we're
actually
up
88
in
March
tremeir
earlier
and
up
55
in
finance
and
insurance.
BI
In
contrast
for
manufacturing
they're
only
up
25
percent
over
the
same
period,
unemployment
levels
are
now
the
lowest
since
1969
at
3.4
percent.
There
is
still
1.6
job
openings
for
every
unemployed
person
and
the
labor
force
participation
rate
is
now
the
highest
since
2008
for
ages
25
to
54..
So
the
only
reason
we're
lacking
labor
right
now,
primarily,
is
that
a
lot
of
the
folks
who
are
55
and
up
have
decided
to
retire
early.
BI
Are
going
back
to
work
because
wages
continue
to
grow
average
hourly
earnings
increased
4.4
percent
in
April
from
the
previous
year?
Well,
would
recession
fears?
However,
people
are
also
trying
to
save
more
money,
so
the
savings
rate
is
now
5.1
percent
slightly
higher
than
it
was
a
few
months
ago.
However,
this
is
still
below
his
historical
averages.
BI
BI
BI
On
the
one
hand,
consumer
spending
has
become
has
remained
strong
well,
we
saw
some
slowdown
earlier
in
the
year
after
the
holidays,
consumers
continue
to
spend
on
cars
and
particular
experiences
such
as
travel
and
dining
out,
they've
caught
spending
on
Big
Ticket
items
like
furniture
and
appliances.
This
is
an
interesting
graph
on
how
eating
out
has
become
much
more
expensive
than
groceries.
Just
in
the
past
few
years,
if
you
look
at
it
before
eating
out
was
just
slightly
more
than
groceries
in
terms
of
overall
total
spend.
But
more
recently
it's
really
widened.
BI
BI
However
51
who
views
it
have
actually
regretted
using
the
service.
It's
really
hard
to
keep
up
with
the
payments,
and
you
lose
a
lot
of
protection
and
protection,
making
it
harder
to
get
a
refund
or
a
return,
an
item
for
40
of
people
who
actually
have
actually
made
a
late
payment
around
one
of
these
loans.
BI
BI
For
example,
the
other
day
I
was
at
the
Hollywood
farmers
market.
There
were
oranges
that
were
advertised
as
25
cents,
each
so
I
bought
four
oranges.
I
was
like:
oh,
that's,
not
bad,
that's
kind
of
in
line
with
my
budget
and
it
walked
away
15
minutes
later
I
was,
like
you
know,
that's
a
pretty
good
deal.
Maybe
I'll
go
back
and
get
more
oranges,
so
I
got
four
more
oranges,
but,
as
I
was
about
to
leave,
the
guy
gets
the
sign,
exit
and
changes
the
price
to
50
cents.
BI
So
he
still
honored
my
25
cent
price,
which
was
good,
but
anyone
after
me
had
to
pay
50
cents,
so
that
just
goes
to
show
that
people
are
still.
You
know
responding
to
the
strong
consumer,
Demand
right,
they're,
adjusting
their
prices.
A
lot
of
companies
are
choosing
to
take
profit
over
volume,
as
we've
seen
in
news
reports
serving
fewer
customers.
BI
So
you
know
if
you
serve
10
people
and
make
one
dollar
per
person,
you
earn
ten
dollars,
but
if
you
can
charge
more,
maybe
you'll
only
serve
six
people,
but
you
can
earn
two
dollars
per
person,
so
you'll
earn
twelve
dollars
instead,
so
a
lot
of
companies
have
changed
to
that
kind
of
strategy.
Recently.
BI
Another
reason
is
that
most
of
the
inflation
now
is
now
coming
from
Services,
especially
with
high
labor
costs.
So
they've
really
had
to
you
know,
cut
a
lot
of
their
costs
in
other
areas,
so
under
a
graph
on
the
right,
you'll
see
categories
with
notable
increases
such
as
eggs.
Other
grocery
products
have
also
come
down
from
Heist,
but
are
still
up
from
historical
average.
BI
In
addition,
we
also
continue
to
see
Supply
disruptions
like
olive
oil,
so
olive
oil
I,
don't
know
if
anyone
noticed
there's
a
drought
in
Spain
last
year
that
resulted
in
an
olive
oil
shortage
and
prices
are
now
about
46
from
last
year.
So
a
big
difference.
So
when
you
go
to
that,
Italian
restaurant,
that
might
not
be
olive
oil
into
dipping
sauce
for
your
bread.
BI
The
risk
now
is
that
inflation
may
become
in
French,
as
people
have
adjusted
at
higher
prices
and
also
now
expect
that
prices
will
continue
to
go
up
based
on
recent
surveys.
As
we
all
know
that
could
lead
to
wage
price
spiral
in
that
higher
prices
will
will
make
people
ask
for
higher
wages
and
then
and
so
on
and
so
forth,
and
then
it
just
never
ends.
BI
Housing
market
the
housing
market
is
almost
at
a
standstill
now,
as
Supply
is
really
drop.
Sellers
are
not
putting
homes
in
the
market
because
most
of
them
locked
in
lower
rates
in
the
past
few
years.
So
if
they
move,
they
would
now
have
to
pay
over
six
percent
with
a
mortgage
as
opposed
to
the
two
to
three
percent
mortgage
rate,
they
were
locked
in
so
home
prices
have
not
dropped
as
much
because
of
this
lack
of
Supply,
even
though
the
mortgage
rate
is
now
at
6.39,
give
or
take
on
the
bright
side.
BI
BI
So
the
rental
market,
looking
at
the
rental
market
according
to
this,
is
a
study
from
apartment
lists.
Although
La
is
one
of
the
priciest
rental
markets
in
the
country,
ranked
at
18
out
of
100,
rent
prices
in
La
have
actually
moderated
and
are
now
down
0.6
percent
year
over
year
on
the
right,
you'll
see
that
Burbank
is
ranked
21st
out
of
27
LA
Metro
cities
for
median
two-bedroom
rents
in
April,
2023
and
ranked
24th
for
one
bedroom
rents.
Although
that
doesn't
say
much
because
rents
are
still
pretty
expensive.
BI
So
asset
prices,
despite
talks
of
recession,
asset
prices
have
actually
not
come
down
as
much.
The
s
p
is
just
off
13
from
its
all-time
high
and
bond
prices
are
just
down
13
as
well
from
its
all-time
high.
The
Wall
Street
Journal
survey
shows
that
the
recession
probably
is
still
about
61
in
the
next
12
12
months.
BI
BI
However,
with
all
just
talk
about
recession,
the
market
is
now
thinking
the
FED
May
pause
in
June
and
possibly
cut
rates
later
this
year.
There
is
some
Divergence
here,
though,
because
the
FED
has
mentioned
repeatedly.
It
will
need
to
hold
rates
High
for
some
time
to
get
back
to
two
percent
inflation,
as
you
recall,
we're
just
still
at
4.9,
which
is
still
pretty
far
from
2
percent.
BI
This
is
a
recent
survey
of
risks
to
U.S
financial
stability.
So,
as
you
can
see,
people
are
not
as
worried
about
inflation
and
the
Ukraine
war
anymore.
Compared
to
several
months
ago,
however,
people
are
now
more
concerned
about
other
issues.
So
one
of
these
is,
as
we
mentioned,
the
banking
sector
crisis.
A
lot
of
people
feel
that
it
is
not
over
yet
there's
still
a
huge
disconnect
between
Banks
what
banks
are
earning
from
lower
interest
rates
and
higher
interest
rates.
BI
Now
they
run
the
risk
of
having
their
uninsured
deposits,
cause
a
bank
run
and
as
well
as
all
their
commercial
real
estate
loans,
speaking
of
commercial
real
estate.
That's
the
other
issue
that
people
are
worried
about
office
vacancies
are
about
50
right
now
and
because
of
that
commercial,
real
estate,
values
have
really
declined.
BI
BI
So,
given
to
economic
uncertainty,
we
go
back
to
our
investment
policy,
whereas
you,
you
recall
a
safety
of
principal,
is
the
foremost
objective
with
that
to
ensure
that
there's
no
loss
of
principle,
we
take
steps
such
as
evaluating
our
U.S
Bank
holdings.
We
continue
to
monitor
all
our
current
Holdings
and
conduct
due
diligence
whenever
we
make
purchases.
This
is
to
avoid
both
Market
risk
and
credit
risk.
BI
We're
also
maintaining
a
higher
liquidity
as
we
maintain
at
so
we
can
maintain
enough
cash,
so
we
can
ladder
our
portfolio
and
have
regular
maturities
to
meet
our
cash
flow
needs.
There's
still
a
lot
of
uncertainty
where
rates
are
headed,
so
we
want
to
be
able
to
take
advantage
if
rates
continue
to
rise.
BI
D
BI
D
BI
D
BI
With
U.S
Bank,
it's
a
pretty
big
Regional
Bank,
we're
all
aware
of
the
name.
It's
not
considered
top
tier,
like
JP,
Morgan
or
Bank
of
America,
and
there's
some
concern
about
their
uninsured
deposits.
First,
so
they
have
about
50
of
their
deposits
are
uninsured.
So
what
happens?
If
you
have
a
lot
of
uninsured
deposits?
Is
that,
with
any
sign
of
background
people
will
take
their
money
out
because
they
know
they're
not
insured
by
the
FDIC.
BI
BI
BI
D
D
D
If
you
decide
to
to
move
our
funds
out
of
here,
I
would
be
fully
supportive
of
that.
I
think
there
is
a
a
safety
issue,
a
security
issue,
and
that
is
of
top
concern
for
me,
especially
the
fact
that
you
mentioned
four
Banks
already
have
gone
through
it
and
I.
You
know,
I,
don't
want
this
to
be
the
fifth,
but
just
in
case
so
I
don't
know.
If
the
other
council
members
want
to
weigh
in
as
well.
AZ
BI
D
N
Thanks
Mr
Mayor,
so
the
only
question
I
have
Miss
Palmer
is:
it
sounds
like
rental
and
housing
prices
are
holding
steady,
more
or
less,
but
we're
still
seeing
inflation
out.
Outpace
wage
growth
right.
Okay,
the
only
bit
of
feedback
I
have
is
I
love.
The
ESG
investment
Spotlight
and
I
want
to
see
more
of
that
investment
in
in
local
credit
unions,
especially
those
that
are
serving
underserved
populations,
just
like
you've
highlighted
here
so
keep
up
the
great
work.
Oh.
BI
Thank
you
very
much.
Yeah
I
mean
those
CDs
were
definitely
a
no-brainer,
it's
fully
insured.
It
helps
these
Banks
and
we
get
more
yield
than
treasury.
So
why
not-
and
you
mentioned
local
credit
unions-
we
are
considering
investing
in
credit
unions
actually
located
here
in
the
City
of
Burbank
to
help
them
out.
Yes,.
BI
D
A
D
BJ
And
I'm
here
to
provide
an
overview
of
this
year's
comprehensive
update
to
our
Wildfire
mitigation
plan
and
I'll
start
with
a
brief
background.
Then
I'll
hand
it
off
to
our
independent
evaluator
for
their
report,
followed
by
what
is
new
this
year,
are
accomplishments
what
we're
still
working
on
and
the
next
steps.
BJ
The
modifications
require
that,
on
an
annual
basis,
each
publicly
owned
utility
or
Pou
prepare
a
wildfire
mitigation
plan
that
considers
several
required
plan
elements
present.
The
plan
in
a
public
meeting
accept
comments
and
verify
compliance
submit
the
plan
to
the
California
wildfire
safety
Advisory
board
by
July
1st
of
each
year.
BJ
BJ
BK
BF
BK
BK
Oh
I'm,
sorry
Andrew
dressel
from
guide
house
Consulting
I
apologize
it's
a
little
late,
that's
right!
So,
as
Sven
noted,
there
was
a
change
to
the
public
utilities
code.
8387
C
requires
an
independent,
evaluator,
qualified
independent
evaluator
to
review
and
assess
the
comprehensiveness
of
the
Wildfire
mitigation
plan
and
that's
the
term
of
art.
The
standard
by
which
we
are
evaluating
the
plan
guide
house
has
performed
over
15
qualifi
or
independent
evaluator
reports
for
public
publicly
owned
utilities
around
the
state
of
California.
BK
In
our
evaluation
of
burbank's
plan.
We
noticed
several
things
that
are
stuck
out,
one
of
which
was
Burbank
Water
and
Power
really
did
an
excellent
job.
It
identifying
and
tracking
Wildfire
metrics
and
there's
a
few
different
metrics
that
they
track.
Some
are
weather
metrics.
Some
are
the
metrics
of
the
mitigation
measures
accomplished
each
year
and
others
that
affect
the
operations
and
the
Wildfire
safety
Advisory
Board,
which
was
also
created
as
part
of
ab1054
heralded
burbank's
use
of
metrics
as
well.
BK
Also,
the
Burbank
has
done
a
very
good
job
at
system
hardening.
That's
replacing
wood
poles
with
metal
poles
and
blocking
recloser
reclosing
relays
that
re-energize
the
system
after
there's
a
there's
a
fault
during
Red
Flag
Warning
conditions
and
also
set
the
trip
settings
to
the
to
a
more
sensitive
setting.
So
it's
less
likely
that
vegetation
that
falls
on
a
line
would
catch
fire.
BK
They
also
Burbank
also
a
strong
vegetation
management
practices,
comprehensive
asset
inspection,
remediations
and
a
very
good
emergency
response
program.
Based
on
our
evaluation
of
the
13
elements
in
83
87
B2,
we
determined
that
burmeg
water
empowers
Wildfire
mitigation
plan
does
meet
the
comprehensiveness
standard
required
by
the
statute,
so.
BJ
We
are
required
to
comprehensively
update
the
wmp
every
three
years
and
this
year
required
a
comprehensive
update.
We
completed
a
comprehensive
and
in-depth
review
and
verification
of
all
plan
components.
During
this
we
made
updates
to
facts
and
figures
facility
counts,
performance,
metrics
and
our
accomplishments.
We
finalized
three
new
mitigation
activities
this
year,
which
we'll
discuss
later
in
the
presentation,
and
we
also
created
a
new
risk
model
to
validate
our
risk
assumptions
and
to
track
our
progress.
BJ
Here's
a
brief
summary
of
how
we
did
last
year.
We
did
not
cause
any
ignitions
in
the
high
fire
threat
District.
We
had
no
pull
failures
in
the
high
fire
threat.
District
we
completed
all
of
our
inspections,
maintenance
and
operational
activities.
We
modified
our
operational
practices
on
the
five
days
with
Red
Flag,
Warning
alerts
and,
lastly,
we
had
one
risk
driver
event
which
we'll
briefly
review
wrist
driver
events
are
events
that
occur
in
our
Electric
System
that
have
the
potential
to
create
arcs
and
Sparks.
BJ
By
reducing
the
events,
we
reduce
the
risk
that
these
arcs
and
Sparks
ignite
dry
vegetation,
which
could
potentially
spread
into
a
wildfire
bwp
reviewed
historical
risk
driver
events
and
found
that
we
had
65
total
risk
driver
events
in
the
tier
2
area.
Over
the
last
18
years,
and
as
mentioned
in
2022,
we
only
had
one
risk
driver
event,
and
that
was
a
conventional
transformer
fuse
operation.
BJ
As
part
of
our
comprehensive
update,
we
developed
a
risk
model.
Although
there
are
commercial
risk
model
Solutions,
we
determined
they
were
not
viable
for
us.
Due
to
the
limited
size
of
our
high
fire
threat.
District,
we
developed
an
internal
risk
model
that
assessed
each
pool
individually
to
validate
the
risk
level
of
different
regions
of
the
high
fire
threat.
District
and
the
risk
model
reaffirmed
our
Focus
areas
in
the
tier
2.1
Zone,
and
we
will
continue
to
update
the
risk
model
to
track
our
progress
as
mitigation
measures
continue
to
be
implemented.
BJ
BJ
The
third
recommendation
is
to
improve
communication
in
the
event
of
a
preemptive
de-energization
bwp
does
not
plan
to
implement
preemptive
de-energization,
also
known
as
a
public
safety
power
shutoff
for
PSPs
as
a
mitigation
strategy.
However,
our
energy
control
center
does
retain
the
authority
to
de-energize
a
circuit
if
a
situation
calls
for
it.
However,
in
response
to
the
recommendation
that
specific
preparation
be
made
in
the
unlikely
event
of
a
de-energization
in
the
high
fire
threat,
District
Bop
is
doing
two
things:
we're
working
on
pre-identifying
customers
on
electric
Assistance
programs
that
may
need
additional
help
evacuating.
BJ
BJ
We
replaced
one
pole
that
was
identified
through
our
intrusive
inspection
program
and
our
tree
trimming
contractors
completed
all
annual
maintenance
and
clearance
in
the
high
fire
threat
District
over
the
summer.
This
is
a
big
effort
due
to
the
increased
clearances
required
in
this
area
in
2022,
103
trees
were
trimmed
and
one
problem
tree
was
removed
and
problem.
Trees
are
those
trees
that
grow
very
quickly
between
trimming
visits
or
pose
a
risk
of
falling
into
the
lines
we
completed.
BJ
BJ
BJ
We
are
continuing
to
work
on
the
replacement
of
conventional
fuses
with
non-explosive
fuses,
which
do
not
create
Sparks
to
illustrate
why
we
treat
these
conventional
fuse
operations
as
risk
driver
events.
I
have
a
short
video
to
show
here
when
a
conventional
fuse
operates
to
protect
our
wires
or
equipment.
Sparks
are
released
and
have
the
potential
to
fall
onto
the
vegetation.
At
the
base
of
the
pole.
These
fuse
operations
account
for
approximately
42
percent
of
our
risk
driver
events
for
comparison.
BJ
BJ
And
a
quick
review
of
our
ongoing
pilot
projects,
we
completed
the
pilot
installation
of
the
enhanced
system
monitoring,
although
we
did
not
have
any
primary
faults.
During
the
pilot
install,
we
were
able
to
witness
live
testing
of
broken
conductor
and
vegetation
contact
detection
at
the
grid
wear
testing
facility,
and
in
this
picture
you
can
see
a
branch
in
energized
lines.
BJ
The
system
reliably
detected
the
risk
driver
events
both
when
the
lines
were
energized
as
well
as
de-energized
in
collaboration
with
the
vendor
and
other
agencies
were
pursuing
a
grant
opportunity
that
will
allow
us
to
deploy
the
monitoring
devices
on
further
poles
and
the
goal
is
to
integrate
the
system
with
our
energy
control
center.
Once
it's
ready,
we
plan
to
use
this
technology
to
identify
the
causes
of
our
other
or
unknown
risk
driver
events.
BJ
Oilfield
Transformers
are
the
typical
Transformers
used
throughout
the
bwp
system.
They
are
both
reliable
and
cost
effective.
An
overhead
Transformer
failure
resulting
in
a
Transformer
fire
is
an
extremely
low
probability,
but
extremely
high
risk
event.
In
this
type
of
event,
flaming
oil
can
leak
out
of
the
Transformer
from
significant
height
onto
the
vegetation
below
using
a
dry
type
Transformer
without
oil
removes
the
fire
risk
of
the
oil
and
dry
type.
Transformers
are
very
common
in
commercial
applications,
but
are
new
in
utility
distribution.
BJ
BJ
Our
next
steps
are
to
receive
feedback
on
the
plan
and
the
independent
evaluation,
both
of
which
are
also
available
for
the
public
to
view
at
burmakewater
empower.com
and
the
final
plan
will
be
submitted
to
the
Wildfire
safety
Advisory
Board
before
the
deadline
and
we'll
be
back
next
year
for
our
next
annual
update.
Thank
you
and
will
be
available
for
any
questions.
A
AC
D
BJ
BK
N
Thank
you.
One
question
great
presentation:
I
think
this
is
my
fourth
time
looking
at
the
plan
in
like
three
years
so
most
of
my
feedback's
there
I
just
have
one
question.
So
you
talk
about
how
the
utility
is
not
going
to
pursue
Public
Safety
power
shut
off,
but
you
also
talk
about
how
there
could
be
circumstances
where
it
sounds
like
you
would
preemptively
de-energize.
So
could
you
just
give
the
public
and
us
a
little
greater
sense
of
what
kind
of
events
would
occur
where
you
would
be
proactive
in
de-energizing.
BJ
A
common
question
and
a
big
concern:
the
I
think
the
the
important
language
in
the
public
safety
power.
Shutoff
is
the
preemptive
nature,
which
is
specifically
generally
referring
to
what
I,
O
user
doing
or
investor
on
utilities
are
doing.
Where,
based
on
certain
weather
patterns,
they
will
de-energize
a
circuit
completely
until
that
weather
pattern
is
is
over.
So
during
a
Red
Flag
Warning
situation,
they
may
de-energize
a
certain
circuit
every
time,
and
so
it's
a
preemptive
de-energization
event
on
that
circuit.
BJ
That's
intentional,
based
on
certain
weather
factors,
and
that's
not
something
that
we're
doing
so
in
terms
of
when
we
refer
to
the
energy
control
center,
having
authority
to
de-energize
based
on,
and
the
report
goes
into
a
lot
of
detail
on
this
in
in
terms
of
the
different
groups
that
could
call
for
that,
such
as
our
line
Crews
or
the
fire
department.
In
response
to
a
certain
situation,
it's
not
the
same
preemptive
de-energization
that
you
might
see
from
a
investor
on
utility,
where
they're
doing
that,
because
it's
a
Red
Flag
Warning
day.
N
BJ
BJ
So
you're
ready,
okay
in
the
event
of
a
de-energization.
We
still
want
to
reach
out
and
we
still
want
to
keep
that
Communication
channel
open,
which
is
also
the
recommendation
from
our
independent
evaluator
that
we
have
the
plan
in
place
for
that
communication
in
the
unlikely
event
that
it
becomes
necessary.
D
BJ
Our
that
is
a
plan
mitigation,
so
that's
not
deployed
yet
so
we're
in
the
process
of
deploying
that,
but
there
our
lines
do
have
protection
installed.
So,
in
the
event
of
a
fault,
the
protection
is
designed
to
operate
and
de-energize
the
circuit
for
the
section
of
the
circuit
and
and
for
the
protection
of
of
people
that
may
come
into
contact
with
it,
such
as.
If
a
line
falls
to
the
ground.
BB
You
so
much
for
the
presentation
glad
to
hear
we're
doing
things
to
mitigate
wildfires
and
those
pesky
Myler
balloons.
On
that
note
the
covered
conductors.
You
know,
all
of
that.
You
said
that
were
in
the
process.
Can
you
give
me
a
sense
of
a
timeline
for
when
we're
going
to?
You
know,
move
that
along.
BJ
So
it's
there
there's
several
steps
to
deploying
it.
So
we've
we've
gone
through
an
initial
analysis,
which
is
a
high
level,
look
at
the
different
technologies
that
are
available
and
what
would
be
required
to
deploy
those
on
our
system.
We
have
about
600
polls
in
the
high
fire
threat
District.
So
it's
not
a
small
area
that
we're
talking
about.
BJ
There
is
a
significant
effort
to
deploy
something
like
cover
conductor
on
a
significant
amount
of
poles,
and
so
the
initial
steps
for
us
will
be
to
design
the
the
deployment
strategy
and
to
design
the
the
equipment
and
the
materials
that
are
required.
So
beyond
just
the
conductor
itself,
we
have
all
of
the
additional
materials
that
are
required
that
we
don't
currently
stock
for
Bear
conductor,
like
the
the
components
to
attach
the
wire,
how
to
attach
a
Transformer
or
feed
a
Transformer
from
that
wire,
which
is
different
when
the
wire
is
covered.
BJ
Obviously,
and
then,
when
it's
bare,
where
we
can
just
clamp
onto
it,
so
we're
looking
at
probably
within
the
next
two
years
to
finalize
that
design
and
the
deployment
strategy
and
then
move
into
procurement
and
actual
deployment.
There
will
be
a
significant
cost
to
deploying
it
once
it's
ready
due
to
the
and
and
time
due
to
the
amount
of
poles
and
rebuilding.
That
would
have
to
be
done
at
that
time
to
actually
deploy
the
conductor.
BB
BJ
So,
currently,
the
plan
is
only
to
deploy
them
in
the
high
fire
threat.
District,
it's
an
additional
evaluation
to
to
see
if
those
would
make
sense,
Citywide,
dry
type,
Transformers
are
a
new
technology.
So
there's
an
initial
evaluation.
That's
it's
something
that
we
don't
currently
have
deployed
on
the
overhead
system
and
the
non-explosive
fuses
they're
a
lot
harder
to
get
right
now,
because
we're
not
the
only
utility
trying
to
trying
to
deploy
Wildfire
mitigation
strategies.
BA
BJ
The
cover
conductor
solution
that
we
chose
is
different
to
other
solutions
that
require
external
engineering.
So
the
the
cover
conductor
that
that
we
selected
is
something
that
we
can
perform.
The
engineering
and
deployment
design
in-house
as
a
and
and
our
crews
can
install
that
install
similarly
to
the
existing
Vera
wire
that
we
install,
whereas
other
systems
require
external
engineering
that
require
external
certification
to
deploy
those.
BA
BJ
So
that
slide
I
showed
with
the
yellow
and
the
orange
zone,
so
the
orange
especially
Country
Club
Drive
and
wildwood
Canyon
Road.
Those
are
our
high
priorities
zones.
So
that's
what
we're
focusing
on
with
the
initial
deployment
the
38
non-explosive
fuses
we
currently
have
deployed,
are
deployed
in
that
area
and
the
dry
type
Transformer.
We
have
an
initial
order
for
three
test
units.
The
plan
is
also
to
deploy
those
in
that
area.
Well,.
BJ
BA
N
Yeah,
unless
there's
any
other
questions
comments,
okay,
I
move
to
first
verify
that
Burbank
Water
empowers
Wildfire
mitigation
plan,
complies
with
all
applicable
rules,
regulations
and
standard.
The
second,
a
direct
Burbank,
Water
and
Power
to
accept
all
reasonable
and
appropriate
comments
on
the
plan
from
the
public
and
other
local
and
state
agencies
or
interested
parties
that
are
received
prior
to
July
1
of
2023.
AZ
N
D
E
D
BL
BL
So,
at
a
past
city
council
meeting
vice
mayor
Schultz,
thank
you.
Vice
mayor
I
requested
a
first
step
report
to
analyze
a
feasibility
of
creating
a
safe
parking
lot
at
the
Hollywood
Burbank
Airport
information
released
by
the
former
city
of
Los
Angeles
council
member
Mike.
Bonan
prompted
this
request.
BL
BL
This
slide
shows
the
ratio
between
the
estimated
amount
of
unhoused
in
the
County
of
Los
Angeles
and
the
percentage
of
those
living
in
their
vehicles
in
2022
Burbank
has
approximately
264
people
experiencing
homelessness,
which
is
a
9.3
percent
reduction
from
the
2020
point
in
time,
count
which
was
outlined
in
the
Los
Angeles
homeless,
Service
Authority,
which
is
the
Continuum
care
for
LA
County,
2022,
Greater,
Los,
Angeles,
homeless,
count.
In
addition,
a
decrease
can
be
noted
of
24
in
vehicle
dwellers
to
112
compared
to
the
2020
homeless,
count
total
of
146
in
Burbank.
BL
Safe
parking
sites
also
offer
financial
assistance
for
vehicle
repairs
and
benefit
connections.
They
also
offer
site
amenities,
including
meals,
hygiene
kits
and
various
other
incentives,
staff,
reviewed,
multiple,
safe
parking
programs
and
models.
Most
programs
are
24
hours,
excuse
me
or
not
24
hours
and
operate
at
night.
BL
All
vehicle
dwellers
in
a
safe
parking
model
must
be
determined
to
be
homeless
and
adhere
to
program
guidelines
to
use
the
parking
lot.
The
average
day
is
72
days,
although
some
vehicle
dwellers
have
stayed
for
six
to
eight
months
or
longer,
participants
must
have
a
valid
driver's
license
and
a
vehicle
registration
and
possess
liability
coverage
on
their
vehicle.
BL
BL
Very
few
parking
programs
are
available
to
RVs
Spa
2,
which
includes
Burbank,
has
a
total
of
110
spaces
that
are
limited
to
cars
in
2022.
As
mentioned
previously,
the
city
of
Los
Angeles
partnered,
with
Los
Angeles
World
airports
to
allow
overnight
parking
for
homeless
individuals.
In
lot
e
at
LAX
city
of
Los,
Angeles
Los
Angeles
reimburses
Los
Angeles
World
airports
for
Revenue
diversion
due
to
the
removal
of
paid
parking.
BL
BL
Now,
during
our
research,
we've
uncovered
some
key
ramifications
which
are
listed
here.
There
are
eight
of
them
that
are
listed
here
and
like
to
proceed
with
a
brief
key
component
summary
of
each
so
the
first
one.
Here
we
have
enforcement,
which
collaboration
with
local
authorities
to
establish
guidelines
for
parking
enforcement
and
duration
restrictions,
which
should
be
considered
location
in
the
adjacent
neighborhoods,
identify
a
suitable
location
for
designated
safe
parking
as
an
alternative
to
the
ordinary
streets.
BL
If
we
move
forward
to
uncover
all
the
available
funding
resources
for
a
safe
parking
program,
then
we
have
operable
and
non-operable
vehicles,
Towing
and
repairs,
which
are
some
of
the
services
they're
provided
to
the
patrons
and
basically
is
just
establishing
Pro.
Some
protocols
for
towing
abandoned
cars,
opposing
safety
hazards,
violation
of
parking
regulations,
exploring
some
options
for
facilities
that
we
can
provide
vehicle,
repairs
or
maintenance
through
Partnerships
or
local
service
providers,
and
maybe
even
establishing
some
local
designated
repair
facilities
to
help
these
people
maintain
their
vehicles.
BL
BL
BL
There
are
many
considerations
to
think
about,
and
some
of
these
have
been
brought
up
in
this
report
and
by
the
community
to
include
the
types
of
Vehicles
locations,
safety
and,
of
course,
the
expense
of
underwriting
a
safe
parking
program.
These
are
all
items
that
will
be
talked
about
in
a
second
step
report.
Should
city
council
wish
to
proceed
additionally,
a
second
step
report
would
talk
about
the
best
practices,
potential
sites
and
funding,
and
that
brings
my
presentation
to
Anne.
AD
Honorable
mayor
Anthony
vice
mayor,
Schultz,
council
members
and
talented
staff
wow,
it
is
late.
I
really
should
have
probably
done
this
earlier.
The
first
public
comment,
but
hey
I,
want
to
talk
about
the
elf,
the
burbanks
rodeo
and
the
mapping.
So
here
we
are
the
the
idea.
I
think
is
very
commendable.
I
think
I
I
do
want
to
applaud
vice
mayor
Schultz
for
kind
of
bringing
this
up
the
council
for
discussing
this.
The
safe
parking
I
think
is.
It
does
have
a
lot
of
good
merits.
AD
There's
a
couple
things
when
I
first
heard
about
it
that
I
was
concerned
about
I
was
even
here
at
the
diocese
with
a
picture
that
said,
hey
look
at
all
this
stuff,
that's
going
to
be,
you
know,
reminiscent
to
what's
going
to
be
on
the
Forest
Lawn
and
I
go
there
regularly
and
seeing
the
encampments
and
the
of
all
the
RVs
I
know
that
that's
this
is
not
RV
parking.
This
is
not
applied
for
it,
and
I
think
that
council
member
Perez
said
that,
like
Hey,
we're
not
talking
about
that.
AD
So
you
are
correct
in
that
observation.
The
the
part
that
I
think
and
also
too
I
want
to
acknowledge
our
mayor's
comments
that
when
people
say
them
or
those
people
is
completely
uncalled
for,
these
are
people
that,
in
our
compassion,
they
need
our
consideration
and
I
think
that's
an
important
to
be
able
to
call
out.
So
thank
you
for
doing
that
mayor.
AD
The
the
fear
of
it
I
think
is,
is
what
originated
my
first
kind
of
initial
kind
of
oh,
my
gosh.
We
got
to
watch
out
for
this.
We
got
to
kind
of
protect
because
it
feels
like
to
me
that
we're
kind
of
keeping
everything
at
Bay
we're
holding
the
tide
back
of
what
could
potentially
come
over.
Even
when
I
was
talking
to
one
of
the
city
staffers
about
the
Met
program
that
they
always
reach
out
to
the
city
of
Los
Angeles.
AD
If
there's
going
to
be
doing
any
clearing
of
encampments,
because
then
people
trickle
into
the
City
of
Burbank,
it's
just
the
fact
of
what
it
is:
My
Hope
Is
that
you
will
not
consider
a
second
step.
Look
at
it
because
the
City
of
Burbank
has
within
it
and
working
right.
Now
some
really
great
organizations,
you
have
the
the
Burbank
temporary
Aid
Center
that
provides
food
and
you
can
go,
get
a
shower
and
and
a
lot
of
supportive
help
there.
AD
But
you
also
have
something
like
a
home
again
la
which
is
a
way
to
kind
of
help.
People
transition
I
think
that
the
con
component
of
the
presentation
is
that
this
is
could
be
very
transitory
where
people
are
coming
in
and
going
out
and
that
you
know,
and
with
only
about
50
people
living
in
cars
in
the
City
of
Burbank
I,
think
we'd
have
the
resources
to
be
able
to
reach
out
to
them
directly.
Thank
you
very
much
for
staying
so
late
and
the
opportunity
to
speak
on
this.
AC
AC
This
is
going
to
be
strange
for
me
because,
as
somebody
who
has
literally
sacrificed
every
social
opportunity,
the
last
two
decades
to
take
every
opportunity
I
can
to
work
and
make
sure
that
my
housing
situation
is
stable.
I
grew
up
with
unstable
housing,
so
my
driving
force,
my
entire
adult
life,
has
been
work,
get
the
money
make
sure
you
have
a
place
to
stay.
If
there's
time
for
stuff
cool.
AC
BH
Yes,
thank
you,
so
they
wrote
an
email
about
this
earlier
today.
I
just
think,
it's
extremely
important
to
to
understand
I
mean
compassion,
is
a
wonderful
thing
and,
and
nobody
wants
to
wish
on
house
being
unhoused
on
anyone.
However,
there's
a
very
fine
line
between
compassion
and
enabling
okay
and
to
change
situations
and-
and
you
know,
adding
whether
it
be
car
repair,
Medical
Dental,
whatever
else
you
you're
planning
on
that's
enabling
and
it's
not
helping
as
much
as
you
want
to
believe
it
is
it's
not
it's.
It's
it's.
BH
It's
I
mean
as
sad
as
it
is
it's
like
if
you,
if
you
have
an
alcoholic
spouse,
you're
making
excuses
and
you're
not
helping
and
mayor.
As
you
know,
you
said
you
were
unhoused
four
times,
I
believe
so
I
I
believe
you
have
a
great
great
deal
of
understanding
and
the
probably
the
number
one
that
that
is
needed
in
those
situations
is
a
desire
to
get
out,
and
you
have
no
way
to
prove
that
any
of
the
people
that
go
to
this
self-parking
want
to
get
out.
BH
BH
Where
do
you
think
the
people
who
stay
I'm
not
saying
it's
everyone,
but
there's
a
good
portion
that
will
end
up
the
same
way.
You
just
need
to
think
about
this,
the
difference
between
compassion
and
enabling
it's
an
idealized
version.
All
these
things
of
what
great
things
could
happen.
That's
if
they
follow
your
rules.
AJ
The
good
evening
yeah,
it's
still
digesting
what
I
just
heard.
This
sounds
great.
This
sounds
like
a
great
idea,
because
this
sounds
like
an
additional
resource,
just
putting
it
like
that.
Something
like
this
provides
an
immediate
answer
to.
If
you
don't
have
anywhere
to
go
that
day,
you
have
somewhere
to
go.
AJ
Here's
something
that
I've
said
before
and
I'm
going
to
repeat
it
again.
Most
people
only
worry
about
what
they
cannot
afford
as
soon
as
there's
something
you
can't
afford.
That's
when
you
start
worrying
so
going
through
the
scenario
that,
if
you've
just
lost
your
housing,
that's
when
you
start
worrying,
I
have
nowhere
to
go,
and
with
this
that
question
is
answered
immediately.
You
have
somewhere
to
go.
You
have
somewhere
you,
you
can
stay.
We
have
somewhere
where
you
can
be
safe
for
a
little
bit
and
then
reconsider
what
are
your
next
options?
AJ
This
sounds
like
an
excellent
step,
just
for
you
for
people
that
are
going
through
a
distressful
situation
and
then
just
pause
for
a
second,
and
they
have
you
know
as
we're.
Seeing
it's
not
a
24-hour
thing.
It's
7
P.M
to
7
A.M.
You
have
somewhere
to
go
that
night.
That's
an
immediate
answer
that
revert
that
removes
that
concern.
AJ
We
do
we
don't
have
anything
else
to
tell
them.
We
just
have
to
look
them
straight
in
the
eye
and
just
say
sorry:
those
are
all
the
options
you
have
we've
gone
through
all
the
options
that
the
city
has
given.
You
we've
gone
through
all
the
options
that
you
could
consider,
but
now
with
something
like
this,
it's
like
you
know
what
there's
an
additional
one.
AJ
We
don't
have
anything
for
you
right
and
we
don't
have
anything
for
the
next
few
weeks,
but
we
have
something
right
away
where
you
know
where
you
can
take
your
car
and
yourself
and
just
be
there
for,
like
the
you,
can
spend
the
night
think
over
and
then
we'll
take
it
out
after
that.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
Oh
and
just
one
last
thing
with
the
last
30
seconds,
I'm,
not
a
big
fan
of
this
comment
that
I
keep
hearing
that
we
don't
want
to
turn
into
this
other
City.
AJ
AJ
M
Like
that
other
City,
have
you
ever
been
to
Skid
Row?
Have
you
ever
been
to
some
of
these
streets
in
Los
Angeles?
It's
scary,
it's
it's
not!
You
can't
walk
down
the
sidewalk,
I
mean
wow,
look,
you
talked
about
they
and
them
I,
don't
think
me
or
any
of
the
callers
or
any
of
the
letters
letter
writers
we're
using
pejoratives.
M
That's
not
what
this
is
about.
I
think
we're
concerned
about
safety,
I,
think
we're
concerned
about
property
values,
and
if
you
see
these
streets,
where
these
motor
homes
are
lined
up
and
what
it
looks
like
this
is
what
we're
concerned
about
is
going
to
become
Burbank,
because
there's
a
a
saying:
if
you
saw
a
field
of
dreams,
if
you
build
it,
they
will
come
and
that's
kind
of
a
metaphor
for
what's
going
on
here.
If
you
provide
this
stuff,
it's
a
magnet,
they
will
come
and
they're
going
to
go
out.
M
Do
you
think
that
people
are
going
to
want
to
go
out
at
7
00
A.M?
Do
you
think
all
these
vehicles
have
insurance
I
mean
you
gotta?
You
got
to
get
real
on
that
you're,
inviting
problems
into
Burbank.
You
know,
and
if
you
go
on
YouTube,
there's
thousands
of
videos
who
people
who
they
make
videos
about
people
living
in
their
cars
and
how
to
do
it
and
it's
what
they
want
in
many
cases,
not
all
cases
in
many
cases
now,
Mr
Anthony
you've
said
that
you've
been
homeless
four
times.
M
M
You
do
it
to
gain
sympathy
and
you
blame
it
on
all
kinds
of
things.
You're
autistic
and
all
these
other
things
and
everybody
else
didn't
give
you
a
fair
shake.
The
fact
is,
you
were
fired
from
your
jobs
of
managing
apartments
and
you
had
to
go
find
another
job
and
that's
different
from
being
homeless.
D
N
Are
there
individuals
that
you've
encountered
in
your
work
that
you
know
maybe
have
an
attachment
to
their
vehicle?
Maybe
it's
all
they
have
left
I
I,
don't
know
I,
I,
guess
what
I'm
asking
is.
Have
you
seen
in
your
professional
experience
that
getting
them
out
of
that
vehicle
into
some
other
housing
setting
can
compose
obstacles.
BM
N
N
BL
BM
N
BM
N
L
Well,
Martin
versus
Boise,
the
ninth
Circuit
Court,
essentially
held
that
a
city
cannot
criminalize
the
status
of
being
homeless.
In
other
words,
you
can't
if
it's
a
misdemeanor
to
stay
past
park
hours,
if
the
only
violation
is
staying
past
park
hours,
a
homeless
person
couldn't
be
cited.
A
city
instead
had
to
do
their
utmost
to
offer
services
and
housing,
develop
kind
of
a
Continuum
of
Care
and
demonstrate
that
they
had
exhausted
the
resources
and
that
someone
essentially
would
have
refuse
to
take
care
of
services.
L
N
Thank
you.
I
just
have
three
more
brief
questions
and
then
I
really
want
to
turn
it
over
to
my
colleagues.
I
think
you
I
think
you
all
have
an
understanding
of
where
I'm
at
on
this
Mr
Newman
Ian.
You
don't
have
to
pull
up
the
slide,
but
on
slide
seven,
we
were
talking
about
spa2,
that's
the
region
that
we're
in,
and
there
was
reference
to
the
fact
that
we
have
110
parking
spots
for
vehicles
within
that
region.
BB
BN
You
Simone
McFarland
with
Community
Development,
yes,
major
H
would
be
one
funding
source
that
we
would
go
after.
There
could
be
multiple
funding
sources
that
we
would
look
at
and
we
may
may
be
able
to
meet
all
those
needs
or
we
may
be
able
to.
We
may
be
short,
but
we'll
have
to
see
as
we
proceed
forward.
Should
the
council
wish
to.
N
Right
now,
if
I
recall
correctly,
staff
is
looking
at
potential
options
for
future
use
of
the
of
the
current
site
of
the
safe
and
the
Hollywood
piano
location
has
staff,
given
any
thought
as
to
whether
a
small,
safe
parking
component
could
be
built
in
as
part
of
that
location,
or
is
that
something
you'd
be
willing
to
look
at
as
part
of
a
second
step
report?
I.
BN
D
D
BA
Thank
you,
yeah.
Thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
thank
you
vice
mayor
for
bringing
this
item
for
us
to
discuss.
Discussion.
I
I
do
like
that
thought
of
integrating
it
with
our
already
established
plan
in
the
resource
center.
I'm
glad
that
that's
something
we
can
consider
so
you
you
said
that
we
have
approximately
60
to
65
folks
every
night
in
Burbank
who
are
sleeping
in
their
cars.
Is
that
what
your
estimate
is.
BM
BM
BA
BA
L
BA
BA
BN
BA
Right,
thank
you
for
clarifying
that
do
we
have
you
encountered
in
with
folks,
especially
in
cars
in
particular,
not
RVs,
women
or
women,
with
children,
women
with
domestic
violence,
situations
that
they're
trying
to
get
away
from
or
other
vulnerable
populations
older,
seniors
disabled,
who
might
actually
be
at
risk.
If
they're
parking
around
the
city
versus
say
in
a
safe
parking
lot,.
BM
BL
BM
BM
BL
BA
Yeah
the
point
I'm
trying
to
make,
though,
is
I
think
that
there
are
folks
living
in
their
cars
who
I
mean
I,
don't
know
the
numbers,
but
I
get
the
sense
that
a
lot
of
folks
living
in
their
cars
are
folks
that
you
wouldn't
even
know
they
were
living
in
their
cars.
If
you
saw
them
in
the
grocery
store.
Quite.
BN
A
BA
So
they're
folks,
who
you
may
even
know
in
your
you
know
in
one
of
your
churches
or
one
of
your
groups
who
then
they
you
think
they're
going
home
but
they're
actually
going
to
their
car
and
trying
to
find
a
space
in
the
city
to
sleep
right?
Okay,
so
when
I
think
of
the
safe
parking
concept,
those
are
the
folks
who
I'm
thinking
of
of
the
folks
who
are
working
during
the
day
or
their
kids
are
going
to
school
and
they're
trying
to
find
a
place
to
you
know:
they're.
BA
They
don't
have
a
place
to
live
so
then
they
go.
Okay,
let's
go
home.
There
was
one
woman
who,
during
pandemic,
when
we
were
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
get
laptops
to
kids.
She
was
living
in
the
car
with
her
daughter
and
couldn't
get
her
laptop,
couldn't
figure
out
how
to
get
to
her
laptop
connected
to
Wi-Fi.
So
this
is
this
is
a
real
story
of
real
people,
so
I
don't
get
how
to
get
that
kind
of
frame
that
picture
there.
If.
L
I
could,
admittedly,
though,
we
have
had
some
Vehicles
where
they've
owned
pets,
it's
the
Pet's
home
to
the
vehicle,
in
particular
one
vehicle.
The
pets
were
diseased,
the
vehicle
had
an
infestation,
and-
and
this
was
an
ongoing
situation
involving
police
and
met
several
criminal
complaints
related
to
businesses.
L
This
one
in
particular
out
by
the
airport-
and
we
do
have
some
individuals
who
have
multiple
vehicles
and
if
they
stop
for
a
day
or
two,
we
end
up
having
an
encampment
very
quickly.
So
one
or
two
of
these
cases
they
they
have
ended
up
occupying
the
resources
of
2,
3
and
sometimes
four
departments
very
quickly,
and
it
does
become
an
issue
because
they
end
up
taking
up
services
and
facilities
for
people
who
visit
the
library
or
or
other
public.
So
there
is,
there
are
notable
exceptions.
L
BA
I
just
want
to
and
I
think
those
are,
the
ones
that
most
folks
have
seen
in
the
community
that
that
are
being
spoken
of
and
I'm
just
I'm
wondering
too,
with
those
folks
even
qualify
for
these
examples,
would
they
even
qualify
for
the
particular
kind
of
safe
parking
program
that
you
described
with
if
they
were
having
a
you
know
that
disease,
pet
and
they're
having
issues
with
the
police
I
mean,
would
they
even
be
allowed
to
park
in
these
safe
parking
spots?
If.
BN
We
had
someone
like
that
it
would
come
commonly.
They
would
cause
problems
within
the
safe
parking
lot
also,
and
there
are
rules
that
they
have
to
abide
by
and
if
they're
not
abiding
by
those
rules,
then
they
will
be
banned
from
the
parking
lot.
For
specifically
a
number
you
know
number
of
days
if
they
return
and
they
still
don't
abide,
then
they'll
be
banned
for
a
longer
period
of
time.
Okay,.
BA
L
Enforcement
will
be
a
challenge
yeah
once
they're
there.
If
they
become
a
problem,
they
will
require
resources,
yeah
and
and
and
to
the
vice
mayor's
point
about
Martin
V
Boise.
We
will
be
very
challenged
to
prevent
people
that
are
in
that
kind
of
a
crisis.
I
mean
it
is
it's
truly
something
that
all
the
Departments
come
to
with
a
mission
to
help
these
these
people?
L
At
times
they
have
involved
entire
neighborhoods.
We
have
some
organizations
in
this
community
who
have
provided
food
pantries
and
those
food
pantries
have
become
lightning
rods
of
controversy
and
again
involved
multiple
departments
doing
basically
neighborhood
mediation
and
I'm
sure
you're
familiar
with
with
at
least
one
of
those
circumstances.
So,
nevertheless,
the
Departments
are
committed
to
both
the
quality
of
life
and
helping
these
individuals,
but
I
will
make
sure
that
if,
if
a
program
comes
back,
we'll
definitely
need
to
consider
enforcement
resources
as
well.
BA
BM
BA
BL
BA
Me
so
it's
possible
to
have
an
outside
management.
We
don't
have
to
necessarily
create
our
own
in-house
staff.
We
can
work
with
an
organization
like
safe
parking,
LA
or
in
partnership
with
the
homeless.
Resource
Center,
working
together
with
different
organizations,
doesn't
necessarily
have
to
be
us
managing
this
right.
We.
BB
I
might
add
all
that
is
what
most
safe
parkings
do
right.
They,
you
know,
especially
the
county
City
ones.
They
contract
with
the
provider
through
an
RFP
with
lossa
and
that's
how
they
get
their
funding.
That's
how
they
get
connected
to
a
coordinated
entry
system
and
that's
how
they
get
the
service
provision.
Great.
BA
Thank
you
for
that
clarification,
just
because
some
of
the
emails
that
we
received
I
wasn't
sure
if
folks
understood
how
that
works,
so
I
wanted
to
clarify
that
that's
the
the
process,
so
thank
you
and
then
I
was
just
curious
from
a
law
enforcement
perspective.
Currently
right
now,
how
often
do
we
respond?
BA
If
you
don't
mind
Mr
kremens,
if
he's
back
there,
if
you
don't,
how
often
do
we
respond
to
folks
living
in
their
cars
now
on
a
criminal
level,
because
as
a
concern
in
the
community
about
this
creating
more
criminal
activity,
so
I'm
just
curious
what
our
status
is
now
and
what
we're
looking
at
is.
Maybe
we
could
mitigated
or
what?
What
are
your
thoughts
on
the
responses.
BO
Thank
you,
I'm
captain
Dennis
crimens
I'm,
the
administrative
services,
Captain
I'm,
no
longer
the
Patrol
Captain,
but
in
my
experience
it's
relatively
small.
It's
usually
we're
being
called
there
for
some
type
of
activity
of
a
criminal
nature,
at
least
suspected
criminal
nature.
But
typically,
as
mentioned
before,
a
lot
of
people.
Will
you
know
bed
down
in
the
car.
We
don't
even
know
they're
there.
So
it's
it's
relatively
infrequently
I
can't
give
you
a
quantitative
amount,
but
it's
on
a
scale.
It's
pretty
small.
Okay,.
BB
A
A
BB
BO
The
first
thing
is:
is
with
our
Communications
operators
to
try
and
diagnose
what
the
issue
is
to
try
and
find.
Is
there
a
legal
basis
for
our
response
and
sometimes
it's
just
an
annoyance
or
maybe
somebody's
confused
or
whatever,
and
we
always
ask
well
what
is
the
person
doing?
So
it's
primarily
based
upon
Behavior.
So
we
have
to
have
at
least
a
reasonable
suspicion
to
talk
to
somebody
we'll
respond.
We
can
talk
to
them.
BO
We
can
go
out
there
and
maybe
address
some
meal
personally
and
maybe
educate
them
more
than
we
can
do
over
the
phone.
But
that
are
the
first
line.
Is
the
communication
operators
try
to
screen
the
call
to
say?
Well,
that's
really
not
a
a
police
problem
or
something
that
would
marry
a
police
response,
because
we
don't
want
to
be
used
as
a
tool
to
harass
somebody
cases
that
have
happened
now.
BO
If
there
is
a
Nexus
to
some
kind
of
criminal
activity,
either
being
about
to
occur,
occurring
or
has
occurred,
you
know
we
will
certainly
go
out
and
investigate-
and
you
know
sometimes
there's
there's
wobblers
if
you
will
and
you
go
out
there
and
you
try
to
explain
to
a
person.
You
know
why
we
were
out
there
and
why
we're
contacting
them,
because
the
whole
idea
is
to
investigate
and
make
sure
that
it
isn't
consistent
with
with
criminal
activity.
BO
So
that's,
that's
typically,
it'll
fall
if
it
gets
past
the
communications
operator
and
we
are
dispatched
we'll
go
out
there.
If
there's
still
some
ambiguity,
that's
what
uniform
fuel
supervisors
are
for
to.
You
know
guide
officers
if
they're
they're
unsure
about
it.
So
it's
not
always
you
know,
cut
and
dry.
We
wish
it
were.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
a
generic
answer.
BB
BO
Right
but
sometimes
it's
a
matter
of
just
taking
the
time
to
educate
somebody,
or
you
know
the
person
who
called
or
even
the
person
who
is
the
you
know,
the
the
you
know
causal
Factor.
If
you
will
and
saying
here's
here's
what
you
made
this
person,
why
they
felt
uncomfortable
your
behavior
here
or
just
your
presence,
and
you
did
something
else
that
you
know.
Might
it's
really?
It
goes
to
a
broad
spectrum,
but
a
lot
of
it's
just
taking
the
time
to
to
have
a
dialogue
with
people
I.
AZ
Well,
thank
you,
everyone,
great
questions
and
good
discussion.
This
question
is
from
Mr
Newman.
What
is
the
goal
of
the
staff?
Let's
say
yourself
when
you
apprec
approach
a
homeless
individual
who
happens
to
be
living
in
their
vehicle
or
even
just
on
the
sidewalk?
What
is
your
goal
to
trying?
Why
do
you
approach
this
person?
What
what
is
your
goal
to
trying
to
do
for
this
person?
AZ
BL
The
goal
is
obviously
to
help
them
and
I
know
that
simplify,
but
the
goal
is
really
to
get
to
know
them
and
build
some
trust
and
try
to
help
them
and
and
get
them
to
a
better
place
and
that
and
that
takes
on
a
variety
of
forms.
Right
so
I
mean
there's,
there's
no
cookie
cutter
approach
to
it
and
I
think
you
know
the
Outreach
teams.
BL
Our
goal
is
to
meet
these
people
where
they're
at
and
then
to
find
out,
what's
going
to
be
the
best
situation
or
best
solution,
so
they
get
them
off
the
sidewalks
that
could
be
reunification
with
family.
That
could
be.
You
know
a
bridge
housing,
a
tiny
homes.
It
could
be
a
variety
of
things,
and
so,
but
first
we
get
to
know
them
and
figure
out.
BL
BL
BM
AZ
AZ
BM
AZ
And
some
of
that,
the
assistance
that
we
provide
and-
and
let's
all
be
honest
with
the
type
of
work
that
you
do
in
approaching,
including
put
you
know-
the
police
department
approaching
some
individuals-
sometimes
we're
also
dealing
with
substance
abuse,
sometimes
we're
dealing
with
mental
health.
So
we
also
need
to
provide
assistance
and
to
referring
them
to
specific
organizations
or
individuals
that
would
help
them
overcome
the
issues
they're
facing.
Is
that
correct
that.
AZ
AZ
And
so
my
question
is
I.
Don't
know
how
would
a
case
manager
will
be
able
to
conduct
any
type
of
Outreach
or
investigation,
or
you
know
talk
to
those
individuals
to
see
what
kind
of
assistance
we
would
give
them,
given
that
they'll
be
there
in
the
middle
of
the
night.
I
don't
know
if
this
is
something
that
they
will
be
willing
to
come
out
and
sit
down
and
have
a
table
and
speak
with
you
and
see
a
case
manager
in
the
evening,
even
leaving
at
7
A.M.
AZ
In
your
opinion,
how
would
we
accomplish
that
versus
now,
where
they're
on
the
street
and
you're
able
to
approach
them
on
the
street
when
they're
parked
somewhere
and
you
get
a
call
from
an
individual
or
even
having
additional
staff?
And
you
identify
vehicles
that
are
parked
on
the
on
the
sidewalk
that
you
do
approach.
AZ
AZ
That
is
correct,
but
when
you
were
speaking
of
the
safe
parking,
possibly
being
at
the
Metrolink,
that
would
offer
us
a
very
Pleasant
Advantage
right,
especially
with
the
other
services
that
will
be
nearby
I
I.
Think,
let
me
just
add
it
so,
as
Mr
Newman
just
indicated,
if
the
safe
parking
was
in
conjunction
with
a
homeless,
Services
Center
and
the
council
was
to
choose
Front
Street,
because
we
haven't
chosen
Front
Street,
yet
we're
still
looking
at
options.
AZ
Those
Services
could
could
be
combined
and
leveraged
together,
and
so,
if
somebody
came
in
and
spent
the
night,
then
they
could
go
into
the
service
center
afterwards
and
talk
to
somebody
of
and
of
one
of
the
proposals
that
we're
going
to
be
bringing
back
to
you
on
the
sixth
that
you
asked
for
the
memo
for
another
Outreach
person
it.
We
will
be
talking
about
extending
those
hours
for
a
new
Outreach
person,
and
so
should
the
council
decide
to
fund
that
and
move
ahead.
AZ
AZ
AZ
Thank
you.
We
also
talked
about
the
amount
of
spaces
and
again
I
know
you.
You
mentioned
the
metro
parking
lot
in
I.
I,
don't
want
to.
You
know,
discuss
400
spaces
right
now,
because
I
think
that's
a
little
exaggeration,
because
I
know
we.
We
need
that
parking
lot
for
Metro
as
well,
but
I
know
originally,
when
we're
discussing
50
to
60
Vehicles.
Looking
in
a
placement
would
house
approximately,
let's
say:
70
100
Vehicles.
AZ
Perhaps
what
happens
when
the
site
is
full
and
you
have
individuals
who
have
come
in
that
want
to
stay
there
overnight
and
I
know
in
the
process.
We
don't
have
the
process
written
down
yet,
but
you
did
talk
a
little
bit
about
it
earlier.
So
what
do
you
do
with
individuals?
Do
you
put
them
on
a
waiting
list?
Do
you
just
turn
them
away
and
ask
them
to
come
back
or
how
do
you
process
the
moving
around
of
the
vehicles?
Okay?
Well,
first,
a
couple
of
things:
one:
the
parking
safe
parking.
AZ
Should
we
move
forward
with
that
we
would
look
at
creating
an
parking
for
Burbank
homeless.
So
our
our
residents
that
live
within
Burbank
that
are
homeless
would
be
the
ones
that
we
would
want
to
service
at
that
lot.
So
it
we've
been
told
that
a
minimum
number
to
make
it
financially
a
viable
is
about
25
spaces.
That
doesn't
mean
that
25
is
already
full,
but
it
could
be
somewhere
around
25
to
30
to
make
it
viable.
So
that's
probably
the
number
we
would
look
at.
AZ
We
wouldn't
look
at
trying
to
house
all
65
to
70
people
that
we
have
in
Burbank.
It
would
be
a
percentage
of
those
and
generally
they
come
in
and
they
go
out
and
they
they
spend
some
time
and
there's
always
a
rotation
going
through.
So
that's
kind
of
the
magic
number
is
to
figure
out
how
many
people
you
have
so
that
you
already
always
have
one
extra
spot
to
put
somebody
else
in
and
we
won't
know
what
that
is
until
we
start
incorporating
it
and
and
in
implementing
a
program.
AZ
AZ
How
would
you
know
so
the
way
we
would
probably
propose
this,
and
it's
way
too
early
to
be
talking
about
this,
but
it's
just
kind
of
this
is
what
we
have
been
throwing
up
on
the
wall
is
that
it
would
come
through
a
referral
system,
so
you
would
be
referred
through
somebody,
a
service
provider
that
is
already
in
Burbank,
so
say
it's
btac.
It
could
be
home
again
La,
it
could
be
Street
plus
it
could
be
one
of
those
Outreach
workers
and
more
than
likely
those
out.
AZ
Those
people
that
are
the
service
providers
would
have
an
encounter
with
that
homeless
person
in
Burbank
before
they
got
referred
into
a
safe
parking
area
almost
like
a
pre-screening.
Yes,
so
we
would
accept
those
that
were
pre-screened
or
had
been
referred
as
what
we
call.
It
referred
back
to
a
safe
parking
spot.
AZ
AZ
I
just
want
to
share
with
my
colleagues
what
my
experience
has
been
because,
as
you
all
know,
I
work
directly
with
the
safe
parking
site,
specifically
North
Valley
caring
Services,
which
is
why
I
know
where
it
is,
and
all
that
that
site
in
particular,
is
one
that
also
houses
families.
Personally,
given
that
we
have,
as
Mr
Donahue
pointed
out
much
more
resources
like
home,
again
La
that
serve
Families.
My
suggestion
would
be
that
we
don't
look
at
them.
AZ
We
look
at
individuals
because
this
is
really
to
look
at
a
pipeline
for
folks
who
do
not
have
said
resource,
correct,
and
so
just
in
thinking
about
this
I
I
know
there
was
talk
of
RVs
and
everything
and,
in
my
experience
with
starting
sites
with
all
of
this,
that
is
a
secondary
thing
that
you
want
to
maybe
think
about
later.
So
I
would
100
put
a
pin
in
that
and
I.
AZ
But
again
the
majority
of
our
folks
are
vehicle
dwellers,
and
so
you
know
of
course,
case
management
should
be
or
safe
parking
should
be,
coupled
with
case
management.
Thank
you
to
miss
McFarland
for
pointing
out
that
case
management
is
different
than
Outreach.
It's
a
lot
more.
You
know
as
a
case
manager
and
now
manager
myself
like.
Definitely
it
is
a
lot
more
and
I.
Think
Folks
at
safe
parking
sites
are
the
prime
candidates
first
for
case
management.
What
you
get
with
a
lot
of
folks
out
in
the
street
is
a
free-for-all.
AZ
If
you
will
I
think
everybody
brought
different
examples
today
about
what
kind
of
folks
we
can
encounter
on
the
streets,
some
folks
are
going
to
be
violent.
Some
folks,
our
families
living
in
their
cars
who
are
looking
for
a
safe
place
to
be
it
is
a
spectrum
I
and
I'm
weary
of
folks
that
say
not
all,
not
all
or
some
I
think
it
is
a
spectrum.
It
is
a
mix
right.
So
what
safe
parking
will
often
help
with
is
folks
who
are
maybe
service,
hesitant
or
who
have
been?
AZ
You
know
not
in
the
place
to
go
inside
or
who
haven't
been
offered
that
or
who
are
on
some
wait
list
somewhere
in
the
county,
a
place
to
be
so
that
they
get
the
service
that
they
need.
The
whole
goal
is
that
you
are
eventually
connected
to
a
service
and
that
you
eventually
follow
through
to
housing.
So
additionally,
I
only
would
feel
comfortable
with
this.
AZ
In
my
experience
you
can
have
a
safe
parking
with
say
about
35
spaces.
Half
of
those
are
full
at
any
given
night.
Again,
it's
not
for
everybody.
It
is
actually
for
folks
who
are
ready
to
make
that
transition
I.
Invite
all
of
my
colleagues
to
look
for.
One
example:
NBCS
has
a
very
robust
list
of
what
are
qualifications
to
be
in
the
safe
parking.
For
example,
like
our
City
attorney
mentioned.
AZ
If
you
have
pets
and
those
pets
are
out
there,
you
need
to
have
them
contained,
there's
even
a
leash
length
requirement
right,
it
gets
very
specific
and
an
experienced
provider
will
know
what
these
regulations
should
be
liability
for
your
belongings.
That
is
also
something
included
in
most
agreements
when
you
agree
to
go
to
a
safe
parking.
Most
safe
parkings
require
at
least
insurance
or
license
right
one
of
the
two
that
that
varies
right,
but
there's
some
proof
of
documentation,
and
you
know,
liability
in
the
sense
of
your
belongings
or
we
don't.
AZ
We
don't
take
any
risk
for
for
you
being
here,
we're
just
offering
you
a
spot
with
case
management.
Some
programs
like
North
alley,
caring
Services,
even
go
further
into
the
you,
must
take
the
case
management.
You
must
be
willing
to
work
with
us
and
I.
Think
that's
something
we
could
look
at
again.
This
is
for
folks
who
are
ready
to
take
that
step.
AZ
One
of
our
commenters
Mr
pimento.
You
mentioned
something
that
I
think
is
very
real,
that
we
see
as
well
I
think
a
lot
of
us
on
the
dice
and
in
many
cities
love
to
think
about
the
fact
that
oh
well,
we
have
this
resource
home
again.
L.A
and
heart
goes
out
to
Albert,
just
like
my
staff,
just
like
me,
we
are
full
of
referrals
and
often
I
cannot
find
a
bed
to
put
a
family
in
let
alone
an
individual.
So
this
is
a
nice
mitigation
effort.
AZ
When
that
happens,
so
you
have
an
individual,
that's
ready
and
you
can't
find
them
a
bed.
It's
a
nice
intervention
space
right
so
that
they're
still
getting
some
case
management
in
a
way
that
is
helpful
to
them,
and
when
that
bed
comes
up,
you
can
send
them
in
that
direction
and
again
start
small.
Less
spaces
is
more.
AZ
The
other
thing,
I
and
I.
Think
I
I
mentioned
this
a
little
earlier.
That
I
would
suggest.
After
is
really
start
looking
at
those
rfps
through
the
county
easier
way
to
get
money
per
car
literally,
it
is
per
space
so
easier
way
to
to
apply
to
get
your
funding
and
to
do
it
through
a
provider
who's
ready
to
do
that,
and
we
have
you
know,
providers
both
in
our
city
and
in
in
the
area
that
are
ready
that
have
this
experience
and
that
would
work
well.
AZ
The
last
thing,
I
will
say
is
if
we
were
to
look
at
something
like
this
hours,
one
thing
that
we
mentioned
that
7
A.M
to
7
or
7
P.M
to
7
A.M,
one
thing
that
I've
noticed
that
it
didn't.
This
is
fairly
recent,
that
some
providers
are
kind
of
tinkering
with
is
going
till
11AM
or
something
like
that,
so
that
they
can
intersect
their
hours
between
when
people
have
to
leave
and
when
their
case
manager
comes
in.
AZ
So
it's
not
a
waste
or
you
can
offer
on-site,
but
that's
something
that
I
started
to
see
and
I've
heard
from
my
colleagues
that
it's
starting
to
work
right
with
folks
who
are
there
and
again
I
think
you
know
when
we're
talking
about
myths,
truths
right
there
are
a
variety
of
people
out
there.
Some
will
not
qualify
and
will
not
be
a
good
fit
for
safe
parking.
AZ
Others
will
and
they
will
benefit
from
the
service
from
having
the
service
provision
on
site
and
from
being
connected
to
something
further
and
whatever
this
looks
like
it
should
be.
Next
to
the
other
services
we
are
planning
to
provide
so
that
we
have
a
spectrum
available
on
site,
and
that
is
what
I
will
say.
AZ
AZ
We
have
all
set
in
the
goal
setting
talking
about
reducing
our
homeless
population
by
50
percent.
We've
all
have
a
come
into
an
agreement
that
we
do
need
to
look
at
sites
availability
for
shelter,
and
we
have
asked
staff
to
go
back
and
focus
on
that.
We
approve
funding
to
look
into
that.
My
main
concern
is
number
one
is
how
do
we
get
more
boots
on
the
ground
to
trying
to
approach
individuals
either
in
the
cars
or
on
the
sidewalk?
AZ
It
doesn't
matter
where
they're
at
is
people
our
staff
to
be
out
there
doing
an
Outreach
and
making
sure
that
we
are
referring
them
to
the
right
organization,
we're
referring
them
to
also
you
know
for
our
ment
team
or
whatever
they
need.
This
is
my
focus
and
my
goal
personally
into
trying
to
get
that
accomplished
and
allow
staff
the
opportunity
to
flourish
and
get
this
done
before
assigning
them.
An
additional
study,
additional
responsibility
and
looking
into
another
yeah
program,
where
we
haven't,
got
this
program
off
the
ground.
AZ
Yet
to
trying
to
see
how
we're
going
to
do
it.
How
are
we
going
to
make
it
successful?
It's
a
great
idea.
Great
thoughts
of
everything
you
have
described
with
the
vice
mayor
has
brought
up
here,
but
I
think
we're
we're
dabbling
into
too
many
things,
in
my
opinion,
having
to
look
at
some
other
safe
parking
and
also
speaking
to
other
cities
and
some
folks
in
the
county
that
I
reached
out
to
to
get
just
their
feedback,
because
I
I
keep
an
open
mind
and
I
do
want
to
listen
to
what
others
experience.
AZ
That's
not
what
we're
talking
about,
but
I
think
it's
just
the
idea
of
seeing
that
on
the
agenda,
so
my
personal
recommendation
would
be
I,
would
I'm
100
supportive?
Is
they
allow
staff
to
get
what
we
assign
them
to
do
originally
is
to
look
at
the
site
to
look
at
the
shelter,
allow
them
the
time
and
the
staff
and
maybe
get
that
extra.
Hopefully,
with
the
budget,
everybody
would
be
in
agreement
to
get
that
additional
staff.
AZ
AZ
We
get
them
settled
and
secure
on
that,
so
I
I'm
not
ready
to
move
in
Step
number
two
on
this
issue,
not
that
I,
don't
believe
that
it's
a
great
program,
but
it's
unfair
that
I
give
him
additional
program
additional
assignments
to
look
at
when
we
haven't
even
begun
to
really
tackle
what
we've
assigned
them
already
to
do
so,
not
another
program.
That's
just
my
thoughts
really
quickly
can
I.
Just
one
thing
you
reminded
me
actually
to
bring
up
in
that
and
I
know.
AZ
We
keep
mentioning
a
case
manager
and
here's
my
advice
perspective
as
someone
who
has
been
a
case
manager,
please
do
not
hire
somebody
without
giving
them
the
services
that
they
need
to
provide
right,
because
that
that
creates
it's
great
to
have
boots
on
the
ground.
But
if
I
have
nothing
to
offer,
you
in
my
community
know
where
to
send
you.
AZ
Then
it
gets
really
difficult
so
and-
and
the
other
piece
is
my
understanding
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
is
that
this
would
come
at
the
time
of
our
congregate,
shelter,
I
wouldn't
say
this
comes
before
this
comes.
You
know,
as
we
are
building
that
piece
that
should
come
in
tandem
as
another
effort
that
we're
working
on
in
in
tandem
with
that.
AZ
But
if
there's
a
if
it's
a
low
hanging
fruit
and
it
turns
out
to
be
a
simple
process
so
that
can
apply
to
everything,
not
everything's
little
hanging
fruit
right
well,
okay,
point
being,
we've
actually
talked
about
a
lot
of
components,
and
so,
if
we're
gonna
go
after
people
who
are
already
qualified
through
lhasa
or
that
there's
funding
available,
so
we
want
to
use
a
program
where
there
might
be
some
conduit
to
that.
That's
a
specific
approach,
and-
and
so
we'll
want
to
approach
that
correctly
if
we're
trying
to
look
at
a
continuity
of
services.
AZ
So
that's
a
different
issue:
that's
not
directly
tied
to
the
money,
but
but
our
facilities
to
the
point
of
the
storage,
the
congregate,
housing
and
then
I'm
moving
like
south
to
North.
Well,
then
I
get
Block,
then
the
Park
yeah
I
guess
I
mean
we.
We
really
need
to
come
back
and
look
at
the
funding
too,
because
we
we
are
doing
this
on
pennies
to
the
dollar
since
we're
not
getting
our
measure
H
local
return,
guarantee
well
see.
That
would
be.
That
would
be
my
suggestion.
AZ
AZ
So
so
we
are,
you
know,
we're
we're
hoping
to
get
the
resources
at
least
more
resources
out
of
the
budget,
which
will
help
which
will
help,
but
then
that
funding
component
okay
is
next
and
we
need
time
to
figure
that
out
in
addition
to
how
you
would
restructure
or
structure
our
program
yeah.
Thank
you
so
to
the
point
that
councilmember
Perez
was
saying
about
how
you
know
signing
a
a
case
manager
without
having
the
resources
there.
AZ
I
think
I
really
like
the
idea
of
bringing
in
this
this
program
as
one
of
the
considerations
for
the
entire
homelessness
coordination
program
that
we're
looking
at
kind
of
in
general.
So
this
there's
so
many
components
to
that
that
all
kind
of
work
together
and
I'm,
making
it
an
available
option
to
anybody
who
comes
through
our
system.
AZ
Well,
no
we're
looking
at
like
having
a
coordination
Center
or
like
like
a
synthesis
Resource
Center
homelessness,
Resource
Center
has
a
lot
of
different
resources
available,
and
one
of
those
resources
to
consider
in
the
resource
center
is
a
place
for
overnight
parking
and
looking
at
it
as
a
holistic
way,
rather
than
a
piecemeal
way
and
I.
Think
too,
that
you
know
the
the
overnight
parking
is,
is
kind
of
like
a
a
version
of
a
shelter.
I
mean
it's
it's
an
it's.
AZ
AZ
I
actually
do
want
to
have
a
place
to
attract
these
folks,
so
that
way
they
will
come
for
help
for
services
rather
than
hiding
and
being
afraid
and
think
you
know.
Maybe
we
get
a
call
at
three
in
the
morning,
because
somebody's
parked
in
front
of
somebody's
house
so
I
think
that
I
I,
like
the
idea
of
having
it
as
part
of
our
overarching
homelessness
plan
and
including
it
in
there
with
it,
along
the
timeline
of
everything
that
we're
doing
together,
rather
than
adding
more
work
to
you
to
more
more
work
for
staff.
AZ
It's
just
kind
of
incorporate
into
the
process
as
a
consideration
of
how
we're
going
to
provide
shelter.
What
do
you
all
think?
Well,
I
I
mean
when
I
was
living
in
my
car
on
the
streets
of
Burbank
I
would
have
loved
a
place
to
go
to
know
that
it
was
safe.
So
you
know
which
apparently
I
learned
sleeping
in
your
car
doesn't
make
you
homeless.
Now.
I,
don't
know
is
weird
to
me.
Yeah,
so
I
I
think
it's
great
yeah,
no
I
I.
AZ
Now,
I
really
appreciate
the
comments
of
my
colleagues
and
if
you
told
me
15
months
ago
that
this
would
be
a
possibility,
I
would
have
been
surprised,
but
we
baked
it
into
the
homeless
plan
with
Goal,
4.3
and
I.
Think
tonight
was
a
good
first
step
and
I
just
say:
look
it
it's
the
right
thing
to
do,
not
only
in
terms
of
helping
those
who
really
do
need
a
helping
hand
in
our
community,
but
it
will
improve
quality
of
life.
AZ
Mark
my
words,
but
more
than
that
I
would
just
say
that
please
do
the
other
thing
I
would
say
too,
is
that
we
represent
them
too,
the
folks
that
are
living
unhoused
in
their
vehicles.
We
represent
them
too,
and
they
often
don't
get
the
resources
and
the
attention
that
they
deserve.
Much
like
you
know,
children.
Every
time
we
go
through
budget
process
at
the
state
level,
education
always
gets
cut
because
they
can't
speak
out
or
speak
up
for
themselves
and
I
think
we
need
to
do
a
better
job
as
a
government
and
step
on
this.
AZ
Do
we
need
a
motion
Direction?
What
are
we
doing?
Yeah,
because
we
need
a
majority
vote,
so
we
have
clear,
Direction
I,
move
that
we
advance
it
to
a
second
stop,
based
on
all
of
the
feedback
and
guidance
given
by
the
council
tonight,
I'll,
second,
that
and
based
on
the
feedback
that
we've
given
tonight.
Thank
you,
staff
for
indulging
us
and
all
the
thoughts
that
we
shared
I'm,
very
thankful
to
everything.
AZ
My
colleagues
shared
and
look
forward
to
reading
the
Second
Step
report
that
we
have
basically
written
for
you
in
word,
State,
moved
and
seconded
further
discussion.
The
motion
maker.
Are
you
asking
for
a
separate
report
just
for
this
item
or
Incorporated,
an
entire
entire
homelessness,
Resource
Center
plan?
AZ
My
thought
is
that
we
would
incorporate
it
into
one
ecosystem,
which
is
our
homeless
resource
center.
Now,
whether
that
comes
back
as
a
second,
a
separate
Second
Step,
because
you
need
further
guidance
from
us,
I'll
defer
to
staff
on
managing
that
workload.
But
yeah
can
I
ask
a
question.
So
one
of
the
things
that
would
be
helpful
for
staff
is
if
the
council
would
direct
us
to
proceed
with
moving
ahead
with
the
Front
Street
project
as
part
of
the
this
overall
ecosystem.
That
you're
talking
about
first
project.
AZ
Are
you
talking
about,
because
this
is
an
agendized
for
this?
Isn't
agenda
is
for
any
physical?
That's
what
I
was
wondering.
If
we
could
do
it's
not
agenda,
so
you
would
like
direction
from
us
to
pick
a
location
to
move
forward
with
I
would
but,
according
to
the
city
manager,
will
you
be
more
than
just
parking.
AZ
It
would
be
to
incorporate
the
parking
within
that
ecosystem
at
this
isn't
about
the
ecosystem.
Okay,
that's
Mr,
City
attorney,
I.
Think
maybe
this
is
where
the
clarification
is
being
sought.
My
intent
making
the
motion,
whereas
the
first
report
was
pretty
limited
and
looking
at
the
airport,
my
intent
making
the
motion
is
that
staff
would
look
specifically
at
the
site
where
we're
currently
exploring
options
for
congregate
or
tiny
home
style
housing.
AZ
So
whatever
you
want
to
call
that
yeah
well,
we
are
looking
at
two
sites
right
now
directed
because
we
have
Lincoln
yard
and
we
have
the
piano
store.
I
I
have
a
feeling
which
one's
going
to
make
more
sense,
but
I,
don't
think
I
don't
want
to
limit
staff
at
this
point.
So
if
you're
looking
at
both
of
those
sites,
my
intent
would
be
that
you
include
both
of
those
sites
in
your
assessment
of
what's
possible.
AZ
AZ
I'll
go
quick,
I
attended
the
remotely
the
La
Casa
inaugural
meeting,
the
LA
County,
affordable
housing,
Solutions
agency
and
the
fiscal
and
treasurer's
review
group,
which
we
just
saw
tonight.
Great
anybody
else
have
a
meeting
thing:
no
notification,
police,
commission,
May,
17th,
no
reportable
action.
AZ
Now
we'll
hear
from
Council
Commons,
including
reporting
on
attendance
at
conferences,
Regional
meetings
and
community
events,
I
will
only
say
that
on
Wednesday
of
last
week,
I
had
periodontal
surgery,
so
I've
been
in
a
lot
of
pain
and
not
sleeping.
So
that's
why
I'm
not
keeping
up
tonight
so
I'm
kind
of
jealous
of
all
of
you
other
than
that
the
Historical
Society
you
want
to
take
care
of
that
one
you
got
it
go
for
it.
Yeah
the
mayor
and
I
went
to
the
Burbank
Historical
Society
50th
Anniversary
tea
in
the
garden.
AZ
It
was
very.
Very
cool.
I
also
went
to
the
leadership
Burbank
2023
graduation
ceremony,
Miss
Mullins
was
there
and
vice
mayor
is
there
for
a
short
amount
of
time
too
I
also
went
I
was
having
surgery.
You
were
having
surgery.
Well,
it's
no
excuse
you
should
have.
You
should
have
zoomed
in
and
then
that
same
day
earlier
in
the
morning
very
early
in
the
morning,
I
went
to
the
walk
bike,
breathe
event.
AZ
All
right,
I
attended
on
Saturday
May
20th,
our
Burbank
Family
Service
Agency
care
walk.
That
was
a
lot
of
fun
and
I
was
there
with
our
City
attorney,
who
joined
me
in
power
walking
through
and
congratulations
again
to
the
honorees,
including
very
close
to
me.
Gloria,
Salas
and
Tim
Murphy
very
well
deserved
and
I
just
want
to
say
I'm,
so
sorry
to
dawn
for
not
attending
the
Burbank
Historical
Society
50th
Anniversary
tea
in
the
garden.
Thank
you
for
saving
me.
AZ
I
did
a
bunch
of
stuff
that
you've
all
talked
about.
I
also
just
wanted
to
give
a
nod
to
our
colleague,
councilmember
Perez,
I'm,
probably
going
to
say
it
wrong,
but
I
think
you
got.
Was
it
Pioneer
Woman
of
the
Year
award
for
city
or
county
of
LA?
Yes,
so
for
the
city
of
La
you're,
putting
me
on
the
spot,
I
I
was
on
Friday
I
was
honored
with
a
resolution
from
the
city
of
La
and
I
was
one
of
their
Pioneer
Women
of
the
year.
For
my
work
in
homelessness
should
work.
AZ
Thank
you.
Well
done.
Well
done!
Thank
you
all
right.
She
just
you
skipped
it.
You
had
to
get
him
to
say
it
all
right
anything
else,
yeah
attended
whatever
they
attended,
we're
all
we're
there
right,
we're
all
there
we're
all
there
all
right.
Great
now
is
the
time
for
the
introduction
of
additional
agenda
items
to
members
of
council
have
any
items
to
introduce.
No,
it's
too
no
two
I'm,
sorry
I'm,
sorry,
I,
I'm,
barely
awake
I'll
just
want
a
first
step
report.