►
From YouTube: Burbank City Council Meeting - October 4, 2022
Description
Burbank City Council Meeting - October 4, 2022
A
B
C
D
Well,
thank
you.
Please
pray
with
me.
Oh
God,
we
acknowledge
you
as
creator
of
all
that
is,
and
The
Giver
of
every
good
and
perfect
gift.
We
are
grateful
for
the
privilege
and
the
blessings
of
living
and
working
in
the
City
of
Burbank
and
for
those
who
govern
the
city,
the
employees,
the
various
boards
and
commissions
and
for
this
city
council
as
they
meet
tonight.
We
pray
for
your
discernment
and
wisdom
to
be
with
the
council
members,
both
individually
and
collectively,
as
they
deliberate
discuss
and
make
decisions
in
your
holy
name.
We
pray
amen.
D
E
C
F
C
You
thank
you.
We
would
like
to
advise
a
community
that
there
will
be
five
periods
of
public
comment
tonight.
Yes,
you
heard
it
right.
Five
periods
of
public
comment,
members
of
the
public
make
command
in
in
person
or
by
telephone
during
the
general
public
comment
period
and
during
the
public
hearing
public
comment
period.
Public
comment
for
the
reports
to
council
will
be
taken
in
person.
Only
the
first
period
is
for
general
public
comment
on
any
matter
concerning
City
business
and
or
any
agenda
item
except
the
public
hearing.
C
C
C
H
Following
our
announcements
for
October
4th
2022.,
the
California
High-Speed
Rail
Authority
has
released
the
draft
environmental
document
for
the
more
than
30
mile
segment
between
Palmdale
and
Burbank.
The
project
section
will
connect
two
key
population
centers
in
Los
Angeles
County,
the
Antelope
Valley
and
the
San
Fernando
Valley
by
linking
future
multimodal
Transportation
hubs
in
Palmdale
and
Burbank.
The
public
is
invited
to
the
online
open
house
on
October
6
from
5
PM
to
7
30
pm.
H
The
public
is
also
invited
to
the
public
hearing
on
October
18th
from
3
pm
to
8
PM,
more
information
about
the
project
and
events
are
available
on
the
city's
website.
Under
news,
the
Burbank
City
Clerk's
Office
is
accepting
applications
for
one
vacancy
on
the
planning
board
for
an
unexpired
term,
ending
July
31st
2025..
The
deadline
to
submit
an
application
is
Friday
October
14th
at
5
pm,
the
Burbank
City
Clerk's
Office
is
accepting
applications
for
two
vacancies
on
the
Transportation
Commission,
both
for
unexpired
terms,
ending
July,
31st
2025..
H
H
C
C
No
Burbank
domestic
violence
task
force
is
comprised
of
committee
Partners,
including
the
Family
Service
Agency
of
Burbank
zonta
Club
of
Burbank
area,
Burbank,
YMCA,
social
impact,
Center,
Burbank,
Unified,
School,
District,
home
again,
Los
Angeles,
Burbank
boys
and
girls,
club
Burbank,
human
relations
Council
and
the
Los
Angeles
LGBT
Center.
Vice
mayor
Anthony
and
council
member
Springer,
our
the
council
appointed
liaison
to
the
domestic
violence
task
force.
So
thank
you
all
for
participating.
C
J
One
in
four
women
and
one
in
six
men
will
be
victims
of
domestic
violence
in
their
lifetime,
with
women
at
greater
risk
of
repeat,
victimization
and
serious
injury
as
well,
and
89
percent
of
those
suffering
four
or
more
incidents
are
women.
On
average,
two
women
a
week
are
killed
by
a
current
or
former
male
partner.
C
C
Thank
you
now,
therefore,
I
just
say,
tele
Montes,
mayor
of
the
City
of
Burbank,
do
hereby
proclaim
the
month
of
October.
Is
domestic
violence,
Awareness
Month
in
the
City
of
Burbank,
and
encourage
all
citizens
to
learn
more
about
this
issue
and
support
programs
that
offer
services
to
victims
of
domestic
violence
signed
the
fourth
day
of
October
2022
GSA
telemontes
mayor.
K
C
C
Let's
see
here
moving
on
to
next
presentation,
next
is
a
presentation
of
a
State
Legislative
update
by
Daniels,
Jones
and
Associates.
Joining
us
tonight
are
Kira
Ross
and
David
Jones
from
Emmanuel
Jones
and
Associates
welcome
Miss,
Ross
and
Mr
Jones.
It's
great
to
see
you
in
person
once
again
in
this
beautiful
downtown
Burbank.
M
Thank
you,
Mr,
Mayor
and
and
council
members.
It's
great
to
be
here,
I'd,
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
say
we
just
cure
and
I
just
have
a
delightful
morning
afternoon
we
had
15
total
meetings
with
your
department,
heads
and
staff.
You
have
a
very
you're,
very
fortunate.
You've
got
a
very
talented
group
of
department,
heads
and
staff
working
for
you,
and
it
was
very
impressive
and
we
represent
a
number
of
cities
and
you
are
very
blessed
in
the
quality
of
Staff.
You
have
second
I'd,
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
say.
M
M
M
What
there
it
goes,
second
slide:
okay,
it's
kind
of
hard
to
read:
it's
pretty
small
up
there,
but
basically
the
state
has
been
blessed.
This
year
we
started
off
with
a
shocking
97.5
billion
dollar
Surplus,
meaning
the
state
anticipated
about
200
million
plus
revenues,
and
we
ended
up
with
303,
so
so
a
shocking
amount
of
money
to
to
overshoot.
So
that's
that's!
That's
the
good
news.
We
did
do
a
couple
of
things.
M
I
mentioned
there
in
the
slide
we
extended
covid
coverage
for
paid
sick
leave
extended
out
to
the
end
of
the
year
till
December
31st,
so
employees
that
have
sick
leave
between
now
and
December
31st
get
two
two
weeks
paid.
Housing
remains
and
we're
gonna
have
talk
a
little
bit
further
about
housing
and
specific,
but
the
state
budget
continues
to
recognize
housing
and
homelessness
as
a
as
a
big
priority.
2.5
billion
dollars
was
part
of
this
budget
for
housing,
infill
grants,
Etc,
low-income
housing,
tax
credits
and
other
housing
related
funding,
homeless.
M
Encampment
removal,
good
news
for
all
of
our
lower
income
residents
in
the
state
9.5
billion
dollars
as
the
state
budget
went
back
in,
is
going
to
go
back
in
rebates,
so
people
making
less
than
75
000
will
get
a
full
thousand
dollars
that
will
automatically
appear
from
the
state
of
California
in
their
checking
account,
and
it
goes
up
to
250
250
000
people
making
250
000
will
get
a
check
coming
up
in
the
next
two
weeks.
So
so
that's
going
to
be
good
news
for
some
of
us
to
get
some
relief
from
inflation.
M
Gas
prices,
Etc
180
million
dollars
for
local
governments
to
deal
with
the
Organics
there's
been
a
a
piece
of
legislation.
That's
been
on
the
books
delayed
for
a
long
time,
but
we're
going
to
try
to
get
the
Organics
out
of
our
waste
stream,
which
is
a
good
thing
so
we'll
end
up
having
less
methane
gas
produced
in
our
landfills.
M
Okay,
specifically
more
good
news
from
Sacramento,
if
which
sounds
oxymoronic
but
good
news
for
Burbank,
is
we
were
successful
with
your
legislative
team
in
giving
you
some
direct
funds
out
of
that
9.5
9.7
billion
dollars,
specifically
Burbank
Glendale
and
Pasadena,
will
receive
23
million
dollars
to
fund
our
Housing
Trust
Fund,
that's
just
for
those
three
cities
so
that
money
should
arrive
sometime.
This
fall.
M
A
M
N
N
We
really
think
that
this
is
a
pathway
forward
and,
frankly,
we
think
it's
a
model
for
the
rest
of
the
state
to
really
look
at
some
of
the
great
things
we're
doing
and
what
can
be
done
also
wanted
to
mention
sb6
and
ab2011,
and
these
were
big
headliner
bills
in
the
housing
world,
because
for
the
first
time
this
is
going
to
allow
residential
housing
and
commercially
zoned
areas,
and
so
I'm
just
going
to
do
a
quick
jump
whoops.
What
happened
there?
It
is.
These
are
two
really
dense
bills.
N
There
are
a
lot
of
details
in
them,
I'm
just
going
to
do
a
little
quick,
30,
000
foot
view
of
these
two
bills.
To
give
you
a
sense
of
what
this
may
mean
in
the
communities
generally,
ab2011
provides
a
buy
right
approval
for
a
hundred
percent,
affordable
and
mixed
income,
housing
that
is
exempt
from
sequa
and
must
be
approved
within
90
or
180
days,
depending
on
the
size
of
the
project.
N
The
projects
under
AB
2011
are
required
to
have
a
55-year
deed
restriction
for
rental
units,
and
they
require
require
skill
to
train
labor
for
projects
over
50
units.
It's
skilled
and
trained,
plus
there's
an
additional
Health
Care
coverage
requirement
for
developers.
So
it's
a
very
high
standard
to
get
to
get
the
buy
right.
Approval
for
affordable
housing,
sb6
does
not
provide
buy
right
approval
but
also
doesn't
require
100,
affordable
housing.
It
authorizes
a
project
that
is
at
least
50
residential
to
be
an
allowable
use
in
an
existing
commercially
zoned
area.
N
It
also
requires
skilled
and
trained
labor,
but
not
the
enhanced
health
care
benefits
and
of
no
under
the
new
law
is
that
developers
will
be
able
to
combine
the
benefits
of
both
SB
35
and
sb6
on
on
an
sb6
project,
so
they'd
have
to
qualify
under
sp-35
and
then
they
could
also
qualify
potentially
under
sb6,
and
it
I
don't
know
if
I'm
using
the
right
terminology
but
potentially
sort
of
stacked
the
two
to
do
a
development.
Existing
commercially
zoned
area
both
of
the
bills
go
into
effect
on
July
2nd
of
next
year.
N
That's
a
10
second
overview
of
an
extraordinarily
complex
set
of
laws.
We've
been
talking
to
your
staff
there
and
much
smarter
and
know
much
more
of
the
details
in
terms
of
what
exactly
this
will
mean.
But
this
is
a
big
step
forward
from
the
state
and
in
many
ways
it
at
least
ab2011
overrides
a
lot
of
the
local
planning
process,
because
it
is
a
streamlined
by
right
approval.
N
So
what
remains
to
be
seen
is
whether
or
not
developers
will
use
these
two
Pathways
to
get
to
commercial
to
get
to
commercial
residential
housing
within
a
commercial
area.
There
is
a
provision
I'll
just
note
very
quickly
that
local
governments
can
opt
out
individual
properties,
but
there
are
a
number
of
restrictions
that
go
with
that.
So.
M
O
N
Is
the
state's
doing
so
to
go
back?
Let's
see
there,
we
go
so
a
couple
of
other
bills.
We
just
wanted
to
touch
on
ab2097
by
assemblyman
Friedman
assemblyman
Friedman,
which
is
significant
new
law
related
to
parking
minimums.
This
is
another
big
bill
by
the
state,
prohibits
cities
from
opposing
or
enforcing
parking
minimums
on
developments
within
a
half
mile
of
a
major
Transit
stop,
and
if
note
on
this
bill,
the
governor
doesn't
typically
do
a
signing
message.
N
He'll
up,
you
know
when
he
vetoes
a
bill
to
a
veto
message
on
a
few
ability
to
assigning
messages.
He
did
win
on
this
bill
and
it
was
very
specific
that
he
wants
hcd,
Housing
Community
Development
to
really
watch
for
unintended
consequences
on
this
bill,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
that
a
number
of
cities
have
used
parking
minimums
as
an
enticement
to
a
developer.
N
To
say:
if
you
want
to
go
bigger,
hey,
we
could
talk
about
parking
and
so
they're
a
little
bit
nervous
at
the
state
level
about
what
are
the
unintended
consequences
of
a
bill
like
this
and
what
what
happens?
How
is
that
going
to
work,
and
so
they
want
hcd
to
pay
particularly
close
attention
to
this
one.
The
other
couple
bills,
I,
think,
are
just
worth
noting
SB
897
by
Senator
wykowski.
This
is
a
bill
that
deals
with
adus
of
note.
N
This
bill
does
rate,
raise
the
height
allowances
for
a
to
use,
depending
on
whether
or
not
the
Adu
is
attached
or
detached.
You
could
go
up
to
25
feet
or
in
some
cases
it's
the
lower
of
whether
the
local
standard
versus
going
higher.
So
it's
another
one
to
to
know
that's
out
there
that
from
the
state
and
then
then
he
also
did
care
Court,
Bill,
1338
I,
believe,
which
is
the
new
program
for
severely
impacted
homeless
people
in
the
community.
N
That
would
have
to
work
with
the
court
system
in
LA
county
you're
in
the
second
round
of
counties
that
are
going
to
be
implementing
this
bill,
and
that
wouldn't
happen
until
the
end
of
2024.
So
there
is
some
time
there's
about
six
counties
that
are
going
to
go
first,
so
the
hopefully
we'll
learn
from
implementation
on
those
and
then
finally,
oh
whoops,
there
we
go
and
then
finally
av-452
there
was
a
whole
Wrath
of
a
package
of
gun
bills,
and
one
of
them
was
one
that
we
supported,
which
was
AB
for
452.
N
That
requires
public
and
private
schools
to
educate
parents
about
the
state's
safe
gun,
storage
laws.
Great
Bill,
we're
very
excited
to
see
that
that
was
was
signed
and
part
of
the
part
of
the
grouping
of
gun
bills
that
went
forward
this
year,
so
vetoed
legislation,
two
very
important
bills
that
were
vetoed
this
year,
the
first
one
was
ab1685
and
this
is
by
assemblyman
Brian
and
it
would
have
required
cities
to
forgive
at
least
1500
annually
and
parking
ticket
and
fee
relief
for
homeless.
N
You
know,
cities
are
already
required
to
work
with
people
that
have
parking
fines
and
fees,
and
we
go
to
Great
Lakes
to
make
sure
that
we
make
that
affordable
and
we
work
with
them.
Even
if
it's
long
term,
this
bill
would
have
sort
of
undermined.
All
that
and
said
you
have
to
give
at
least
at
least
fifteen
hundred
dollars
a
year
to
an
into
a
certified
homeless
person
for
any
parking,
fines
and
fees.
The
other
one
is
ab1951
by
Mr
Grayson,
and
this
was
a
big
one
for
local
governments.
N
Cities
and
counties
would
have
cost
us
two
billion
dollars
over
the
five
years
and
a
half
billion
dollars
a
year
in
Revenue
loss
to
cities
and
counties
broadly,
and
it
would
have
expanded
the
existing
manufacturing
sales
and
use
tax,
and
they
already
have
one
this
expanded
that
for
an
additional
five
years
it
would
have
been
a
real
hit
to
local
government
and
the
governor's
veto
a
message.
He
did
note
that
this
would
have
been
a
pretty
significant
Revenue
hit
to
local
government.
M
Excuse
me
there
yeah,
the
takeaways
from
the
session.
The
governor
did
have
a
theme
in
his
veto
messages
that
there
is
a
possible
economic
downturn
coming
we're
not
going
to
have
a
97
billion
dollars
or
plus
two
years
in
a
row.
In
fact,
cash
receipts
so
far
for
the
first
two
months
of
the
state
fiscal
year,
which
is
July
and
August,
are
down
8.4
percent
over
what
they
projected.
M
So
two
months
do
does
not
make
a
year
of
as
far
as
Revenue
goes,
but
certainly
it's
not
a
very
Happy
Trend
to
see
that
revenues
are
down
by
8.4
percent.
State
revenues
come
in
in
a
very
lumpy
fashion.
There
are
certain
months
that
are
just
huge,
obviously
April.
When
people
pay
their
taxes,
sales
tax
used
to
be
you
know,
January
we'd
get
the
holiday
sales
tax,
we'd
know
what
that
is,
and
that's
now
pretty
much
year
round,
but
anyway,
a
cautionary
note.
M
Governor
did
look
at
this
and
say
revenues
are
down,
so
he
did
included
a
number
of
veto
messages
saying
we
can't.
We
should
be
prudent,
like
Jerry
Brown
and
say
we
can't
afford
any
ongoing
Revenue
expenditures.
They
should
be
included
in
the
state
budget
and
going
forward.
If
you
want
to
do
some
of
these
programs
legislatively,
you
should
come
and
and
get
into
the
budget.
The
reason
why
the
governor
likes
things
in
the
budget
is,
he
controls
the
budget
process.
He
proposes
it
in
January
of
the
legislature.
M
You
know,
does
their
job
of
putting
something
on
his
desk
and
then
he
can
sign
it
and
he
can
blue
pencil
any
amount
down
to
whatever
level
he
wants.
So
he
loves
the
budget
process
and
wants
to
shove
things
more
to
the
budget
process.
There
is
also
a
trend
of
referenda,
so
the
legislature
is
super
majorities
in
both
houses
of
Democrats,
and
it
will
continue
to
be
that
way.
M
For
a
long
time,
industry
and
business
have
figured
out
they're
not
going
to
win
on
a
a
piece
of
legislation
in
the
in
the
legislature,
so
this
November
we'll
see
one
of
the
first
referendas
of
a
piece
of
legislation,
something
that
this
Council
supported
was
in
the
state
legislature
copied.
You
is
a
ban
on
flavored
tobacco
products
to
Youth
and
that
went
through
was
signed
into
law
and
the
industry.
The
tobacco
industry
has
got
this
put
on
the
ballot
for
November
to
decide
whether
we
keep
that
state
law
or
not.
M
Okay,
looking
forward,
obviously
the
state
of
the
economy
and
the
budget
are
going
to
be
tantamount
and
that's
going
to
shape
a
lot
of
what
will
happen
next
year.
Clearly,
climate
resilience
and
the
grid
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
discussion
about
transmission
and
the
grid
and
the
state
heavily.
Actually
they
they
told
us
to
go
up,
go
and
fire
up
all
art
during
the
last
power
crisis.
We
came
this
close
to
going
losing
power
and
having
rolling
blackouts.
M
The
state
came
to
all
the
Public
Power
agencies
and
really
encouraged
us,
which
we
did
to
provide
more
power
to
the
grid,
to
keep
the
state
from
going
into
blackout.
So
I
don't
know
exactly
what
the
figure
was
500
megawatts
from
LA
County
region
that
different
agencies,
including
Burbank,
provided
to
help
the
state
from
not
going
going
going
dark.
So
that
was
fabulous.
The
governor
continues
to
you
know.
M
Lastly,
to
make
everything
even
more
fun
in
Sacramento
is
we'll
have
30
at
least
30
new
members
of
the
legislature,
out
of
120
will
will
be
sworn
in
in
December,
which
is
a
huge
amount
of
people
that
are
going
to
be
new
from
different
backgrounds,
and
on
top
of
that
we
have
a
speakership
fight.
So
somebody
tried
to
challenge
the
speaker,
speaker,
Rendon
Mr,
Rivas
from
Hollister
area,
and
that
fight
will
resume
after
we
get
a
brand
new
legislature
sworn
in
as
to
who
will
be
the
speaker.
M
C
G
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
thank
you
for
your
presentation
and
that
button
makes
you
look
awesome,
going
back
to
the
governor's
proposal
that
he
was
talking
about
homelessness,
meaning
I,
don't
know
the
terminology,
but,
as
I
was
following
it
empowering
law
enforcement,
local
cities
that-
and
it's
really
hot
in
this
community
right
now,
especially
what
happened
in
Studio
City,
where
you
had
city
was
aware.
You
had
homeless
people
on
their
property.
G
The
husband
goes
out
and
tries
to
hey.
Can
you
move
was
willing
to
bring
services
and
bottom
line?
Is
he
gets
hurt
he's
in
the
hospital?
Where
is?
Is
it
moving
forward
where
local
will
give
local
municipalities
The
Authority,
that
hey
for
the
safety
of
the
community
and
the
individual
not
arresting,
but
putting
them
in?
You
know
literally
off
the
street,
giving
them
the
care
humanely,
treating
him
to
get
him
back
on
his
feet?
Where
are
we
at
with
that?
So.
N
There's
a
couple
of
things
going
on
at
the
state
level,
the
first
and
all
dealing
with
homelessness
on
a
sort
of
a
range
of
a
spectrum.
So
the
first
one
was.
We
talked
about
a
little
bit
the
care
Court
proposal
that
impacts
severely
people
with
very
severe
mental
health
issues
going
on
that
are
so
incapacitated.
They
really
cannot
care
for
themselves
at
all
and
so
that
we
think
you
know
the
data
we've
been
we've
seen.
N
We
think
it's
about
eight
to
fifteen
thousand
people
Statewide,
so
it's
a
small
portion
of
all
the
homeless
and
it's
really
the
most
severe
and
those
people
will
get
intensive
treatment
for
two
years,
they're
going
to
get
housing
they're
going
to
be
Court
supervised.
So
that's
one
group
in
addition
to
that
there
was
a
package
of
eight
bills
by
Senator,
Susan,
Eggman,
who's,
actually
a
social
worker
by
trade,
and
they
were
looking
at
addressing
homelessness
on
a
number
of
fronts.
N
N
There
were
bills
on
a
couple
bills
on
day
data
and
what
you're
going
to
do
and
then
at
the
the
other
end
of
the
spectrum,
they
were
a
couple
of
bills
dealing
with
conservatorships
and
trying
to
change
the
definition
of
gravely
disabled
to
try
to
get
people
who
maybe
are
on
the
street.
Maybe
they
can
get
a
meal
here
and
there
and
they're
kind
of
surviving,
but
at
the
same
time
they
really
need
a
long-term
solution
and
staying
on
the
street
is
not
the
answer.
N
In
addition
to
that,
there
have
been
funding
for
home
key
and
home.
You
know
the
governor's
got
a
couple
of
different
programs
that
he's
really
been
pushing
and
funding
in
the
budget
that
would
allow
you
know
flipping
over
hotel
rooms
into
long-term.
You
know
places
so
there's
been.
You
know,
they're
addressing
this
on
so
many
different
fronts.
N
The
challenge
is,
it's
not
all
working
I
mean
you're
still
seeing
numbers
rise,
and
so,
whether
or
not
you
know
care
courts
is
trying
to
get
it
the
most
severe
cases
that
are
out
there
and
we
couldn't
get
of
the
eight
bills.
We
only
got
four
through
this
year,
so
there's
the
four
dealing
with
conservative
up
and
Gravely
disabled.
N
Those
did
not
go
through
so
I
think
we'll
see
another
attempt,
because
I
think
that's
one
answer
that,
although
it's
it's
the
last
resort,
when
you
can
do
nothing
else,
when
you've
got
someone,
that's
been
on
the
street
for
three
four
five
years
that
you
are
working
with
daily
and
you
you
know
the
family's
been
trying
to
help.
There
comes
a
time
when
you
need
to
look
at
some
of
these
more
drastic
options
so
that
there
are
things
going
on.
G
Then
my
follow-up
still
dealing
with
homelessness
is
the
last
time
I
was
up
in
Sacramento
I
participated
in
a
round
table
discussion
and
dealing
with
I
believe
and
please
correct
me
for
the
benefit
of
the
Pope.
If
I
got
it
wrong,
Alameda
County,
Fire
Services
was
working
kind
of
a
a
unique
model
to
see
if
it
worked
throughout
the
state
where
paramedics
would
be
responsible
to
follow
up
with
the
homelessness
within
their
District.
G
So
when
they
got
discharged
from
a
hospital-
and
they
would
say
hey,
this
person
needs
this
medication
that
the
firefighters
within
that
District
or
the
specifically
the
paramedics
would
do
a
welfare
check
to
go
to
that.
Homeless
Camp
make
sure
that
they
got
their
meds.
If
not,
they
were
able
to
follow
up
on
them.
Is
that
moving
any
forward
or
did
it
die
any
update
on
that
I'm.
G
N
N
You
know
in
the
budget,
but
that's
not
to
say
you
know,
we'll
follow
up
and
see.
What's
out
there.
I
certainly
think
you're
gonna,
we'll
continue
to
see
proposals
and
based
on
local
models
and
what's
worked
in
different
places
and
homelessness
is
one
of
those
extraordinarily
difficult
issues
to
try
to
work
through,
because
every
person
is
slightly
different,
they're
all
going
to
have
different
cases,
and
so
the
funding
that's
out
there.
You
know
some
people
we
can
get
into
a
shelter
some.
We
can't
some.
We
can
get
into
certain.
G
Electric
vehicle
rebates
is
there
anything
within
the
state
budget
to
encourage
motorists
to
get
rid
of
their
fossil
fuel
burning
Vehicles
via
the
rebates
or
between
the
federal
government
and
hopefully
the
state
government?
Is
there
any
conversation
for
from
the
budget
to
encourage
people?
Hey
we'll
give
you
a
a
rebate
of
X
number
of
dollars
to.
N
C
N
The
state
will
stop
selling
yeah
and
in
between
now,
and
then
there's
fleets.
You
know
The
Fleets,
we're
gonna
have
to
turn
over
and
a
couple
of
other
things.
There
certainly
has
been
funding
in
the
past,
especially
for
low-income,
to
help
offset
the
cost
of
an
electric
vehicle.
I
haven't
seen
new
funding
this
year.
N
There
has
been
there's
a
lot
of
funding.
That's
come
down
from
the
federal
government
in
terms
of
EV
charging
stations
and
specifically
public
infrastructure
that
they're
working
through,
but
I
haven't
seen
direct
funding
for
Ev.
You
know
electric
vehicles
and
and
funding
for
individuals
to
offset
the
cost.
That
said,
as
we
get
closer
to
2035,
we
probably
will
see
that,
because
there
there
is
going
to
be
a
certain
percentage
of
the
population.
That's
going
to
need
help
in
getting
these
cars.
J
N
It's
a
tax
on
the
wealthy
and
that
funding
would
go
to
offset
you
know
for
different
programs
at
the
state.
Air
Board,
one
of
the
requirements
coming
forward
is
by
I
think
I'm
going
to
get
it
wrong,
but
20
30
I
believe
that
fleet
vehicles
of
companies
like
uber
and
Lyft
have
to
have
to
upgrade
their
fleets
to
be
clean
to
be
green
or
clean,
or
you
know
EVS.
N
So
Lyft
is
one
of
the
major
backers
of
prop
30
they're,
not
the
only
one
they're
a
whole
host
of
backers
on
that
proposition,
and
there
is
some
reason
to
believe
if,
if
you're
listening
to
the
governor,
because
the
governor's
argument
could
use
the
public
funds
to
often
to
cover
the
cost
of
their
upgrade
to
their
fleets
so
yeah.
So
this
is
an
ongoing.
It's
an
ongoing
battle
between
the
governor
and
Lyft
in
the
media.
Prop
30,
we'll
see
how
it
goes.
I
mean
it's
always
interesting.
J
N
N
J
Right
if
he
asked,
for
it
usually
comes
back
to
him,
I
will
say
he
did
sign
assembly
Bill
1663,
which
is
another
another
conservatorship
bill,
but
that
deals
with
probate
conservatorship
and
that
is
an
extension
of
what
came
out
of
the
the
free
Brittany
movement
over
the
last
couple
years.
Fixing
a
lot
of
the
problems
with
conservatorship,
so
I
am
thankful.
He
signed
that
thank
you
for
coming
today.
P
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
and
thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
won't
cover
any
of
the
ground
that
my
colleagues
did.
I
just
wanted
to
ask
you
about
one
topic
that
would
be
Senate:
Bill
6,
an
assembly
Bill
2011
related
to
new
housing
and
commercially
commercially
zoned
areas.
If
I
caught
it
correctly
in
your
presentation,
you
were
mentioning
that
the
the
legislation
does
incr
include
certain
criteria
to
opt
out
specific
properties.
I
was
wondering
if
you
could
dive
a
little
bit
into
more
detail
about
what
that
criteria
is
and
are.
P
N
So
I
kick
it
too
far
into
the
detail
right
now,
but
cities
can
opt
out
in
the
process.
So
when
a
developer
brings
the
project
to
the
city,
the
city
can,
on
an
individual
parcel,
opt
that
parcel
out
in
order
to
do
that,
they're
going
to
have
to
offer
up
a
comparable
property
that
the
developer
could
develop
same
density,
similar
sort
of
characteristics,
and
it
has
to
be
done
on
an
individual
basis.
So
you
couldn't
do
a
stretch
of
a
street.
N
You
couldn't
do
multiple
buildings,
it's
an
individual
parcel
that
that
they
could
opt
out
on
so
and
it
has
restrictions.
And
so
there
are
some
additional
restrictions
that
that
I
won't
get
into
right
now,
but
get
into
things
like
density,
and
you
can't
change
the
density
of
the
area
and
that
kind
of
thing.
But
it
is
a
it's
a
pretty
narrow
provision
and
it's
the
key
is
that
it's
an
individual
parcel.
I
N
N
Lucky
job,
video
yeah
right,
but
as
I
understand
the
process,
it
would
be
when
during
the
process,
as
the
developer
brings
the
project
to
the
city,
that's
where
they
could
opt
out.
It's
not
you
don't
do
it
as
an
ordinance
that
would
cover
a
whole
bunch
of
different
properties.
It
would
be
on
an
individual
basis,
as
the
project
comes
forward.
I
C
M
R
Mr
Mayor
Mr
vice
mayor
members
of
the
city
council
and
for
the
benefit
of
the
public.
The
city
council
met
in
closed
session
this
evening
to
discuss
four
matters.
City
council
met
with
the
labor
negotiator,
Ms
Betsy
McClinton,
our
Management
Services
director
to
discuss
negotiations
concerning
Burbank
management
association
and
Burbank
City
Employees
Association
Council
took
no
reportable
action.
R
City
council
also
met
to
discuss
a
number
of
matters
of
existing
litigation
in
the
case
of
yimbi
law
versus
City
of
Burbank
City
Council
took
no
reportable
action
regarding
the
Housing
and
Community
Development
notice
of
violation
with
the
picnic
Pickwick
denial
city
council
took
no
reportable
action
with
regard
to
Pickwick
Investments
LLC
versus
City
of
Burbank.
The
city
council,
unanis
unanimously
approved
a
settlement
agreement
this
evening,
which
is
a
reportable
action.
It's
rare
that
the
council
receives
a
signed,
written
settlement
agreement.
It
did
so
this
evening
in
this
matter.
R
The
city
successfully
brokered
a
settlement
agreement
with
the
developer
Pickwick
Investments
LLC
and
parties
known
as
the
intervener,
the
friends
of
the
Rancho
for
equestrian
safety.
The
agreement
calls
for
an
amended
project
consisting
of
92
units
which
incorporates
an
equestrian
Trail
and
other
pedestrian
and
question
safety
measures.
It
preserves
the
existing
width
of
Main
Street
and
provides
other
measures
to
mitigate
construction
impacts
to
nearby
residents,
such
as
installation
of
sound
blankets
on
chain
link
fencing
during
construction.
R
These
project
improvements
will
be
described
in
the
developers,
amended
application,
which
has
not
yet
been
submitted,
and
it
will
be
scheduled
for
consideration
by
the
city
council
during
a
notice
public
hearing
on
Tuesday
October
25th
2022
later
this
month
and
the
city
appreciates
and
recognizes
the
efforts
of
the
developer
and
Friends
of
the
Rancho
equestrian
safety
in
reaching
the
settlement.
The
residents
that
make
up
the
friends
of
the
Rancho
were
at
the
heart
of
the
negotiations
and
were
indispensable
in
reaching
agreement
and
resolution
of
this
matter.
C
J
C
Great
thank
you.
Now
is
the
time
for
general
public
comment
for
members
of
the
public
who
are
here
in
person
and
wish
to
speak.
Please
present
a
completed,
yellow
general
public
comment
card
to
the
city
clerk
any
person.
Speaking
during
general
public
comment,
May
address
the
Council
on
any
matter
concerning
City
business
except
the
public
hearing.
C
If
you
speak
to
the
public
hearing
item,
your
comments
will
not
be
included
in
the
public
hearing
record
purses
may
choose
to
use
the
first
period
of
public
comment
to
address
an
agenda's
report,
but
will
not
be
able
to
speak
on
that
item.
Following
this
segment.
Comments
are
limited
to
three
minutes
per
person.
In
order
to
promote
fairness,
please
stay
within
your
maximum
allotted
time
of
three
minutes.
A
timer
is
available
on
the
podium
to
help
the
speaker
keep
track
of
how
much
time
is
left.
C
Please
state
your
name
for
the
record
for
those
wishing
to
call
in
during
the
general
public
comment
period.
Please
call
now
at
818-238-3335
callers
will
be
placed
in
a
queue
until
all
in-person
comments
have
been
received.
Venom
city
clerk,
I
believe
we've
got
several
cards
here
already.
Yes,
you
do.
Thank
you.
Our
first
speaker
is
Mr
Smith,
followed
by
Francesca
ficchetti.
S
You
know
I'm
glad
about
this
Pickwick
settlement
deal.
You
know,
I've
been
talking
to
you
about
gerarden,
Peterson
and
every
day,
I
learned
something
new
on
this.
I
have
the
contract
here
and
it
Bears
the
signature
of
Miss
Alvord
and
Mr
Hess
Miss
Wilkie
over
there.
They
all
thought
there
was
nothing
wrong
with
this
contract,
the
city
we
get
nothing
out
of
it
and
I
learned
tonight
from
the
chief
that
we
in
fact
paid
Gerard
and
Peterson
six
thousand
dollars
a
year.
S
Can
you
imagine
that
yesterday
I
went
over
there
and
counted
the
cars
in
the
parking
lot,
I
counted
in
the
storage?
I
didn't
I
can't
see
what's
inside,
obviously,
but
in
the
lot
there
was
over
60
cars
and
at
66
dollars
a
day.
It's
you
know
over
a
million
it's
about
a
million
five
a
year
over
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
a
month
in
just
storage
fees.
Now,
if
any
of
us
any
of
us
citizens
here
in
Burbank,
get
our
tarco
car
towed
we're
going
to
pay
300
to
get
it
back.
S
Okay,
so
this
contract
is
a
windfall.
If
you
do
the
math
and
extend
it
out
over
the
years,
it's
you
know:
they've
been
the
exclusive
tow
company
for
50
years.
It's
like
you,
know,
70
million
dollars
or
more.
Did
you
ever
wonder
why
they're
driving
all
those
brand
new
tow
trucks
we're
getting
robbed?
The
city
is
getting
nothing
now
I'm
asking
you
all
as
politely
as
respectfully
as
I
can
agendize.
This
do
a
deep
dive
into
it.
S
Understand
more
about
this
contract
and
ask
questions.
It's
not
enough
to
get
a
staff
report.
You
have
to
be
experts,
just
as
the
vice
mayor
cares
about
taxing
the
rich
he
mentioned
it
tonight.
He
should
also
care
about
protecting
our
citizens.
This
is
wrong
and
it
begs
the
question
how
many
other
contracts
are
no
bid
in
the
City
of
Burbank?
S
You
know
I
want
answers
that
the
chief,
the
chief,
was
saying:
how
can
it
be
that
you're
so
interested
in
this?
That
was
the
focus.
You
know
the
meat
and
potatoes
wasn't
a
no-bid
contract.
It
was
why
am
I
interested
in
this
I'm
interested
in
it,
because
it's
wrong,
it's
not
Kosher.
It's
it's
rancid
and
the
when
you
look
at
it.
S
You
learn
little
things
like
this
one
of
these
guys
Gerard
and
Peterson,
two
men,
I
guess
one
of
them
was
a
Burbank
police
officer
and
when
he
got
done,
his
son
was
a
Burbank
police
officer
and
that's
how
the
fix
got
in
that's
how
this
started.
With
this
exclusive
no
bid
contract
now
I
talked
to
rolitz
I
talked
to
gay
towing
in
Glendale.
The
SE
folks
are
interested
they're
salivating.
The
bid
and
they'll
pay
money
we'll
get
something
out
of
it.
So
something's
amiss.
S
How
can
you
accept
it?
You
know,
obviously
the
city
manager
signed
off
on
it.
You
heard
the
chief
say
how
am
I
doing
chief,
better
okay,
you
heard
the
chief
say:
you
know
it
was
kind
of
a
you
scratched,
my
back
and
I'll
scratch.
Yours,
the
chief
says.
Well,
we
get
something
out
of
it.
They
tow
our
cars
for
free
when
our
city
Vehicles
break
down.
When
I
ask
the
question:
well,
how
many
toes
did
we
receive?
He
couldn't
answer
and
this
cozy
scratched?
S
T
Hello
mayor
vice
mayor
and
council
members,
I
came
this
evening
to
get
an
update
on
the
parking
lot.
Expansion
at
4301,
Riverside
Drive
Patrick
approached
me
earlier
tonight
gave
me
a
brief
update,
but
maybe
if
he
can
speak
later
to
let
also
the
rest
of
the
community
also
know
what
the
status
is
since
there's
other
buildings
also
that
a
butt
next
to
us
second
I
wanted
to.
Thank
you
guys,
thank
you
guys
for
listening
to
the
concerns
of
the
community.
O
O
C
Q
You
good
evening,
Mr
Mayor
vice
mayor
council
members
and
the
city
staff.
Actually
we
have
a
great
City
staff
here
in
Burbank
and
I
just
want
to
thank
you
actually
for
taking
up
this
agenda
item,
which
is
agenda,
item
six
for
issuing
recommendation
photos.
You
can
get
a
letter
to
the
President
Biden
and
the
U.S
Congress
about
the
waiver
of
section
907
that
the
president
has
actually
that's
section.
Q
907
was
designed
by
Congress
to
stop
any
military
aid
from
U.S
tax
dollars
actually
to
to
the
country
of
Azerbaijan,
which
in
a
few
weeks
ago,
actually
they
attacked
not
only
arsa
but
Armenia
itself
and
they
took
positions
in
Armenia
and
they
committed
war
crimes.
Actually,
if
you
see
videos
on
YouTube,
you
can
see
how
they
are
executing
prisoners
of
War
actually
and
it's
very
graphic
video
and
we
can't
display
it.
Q
Sadly,
but
it's
happening
with
our
tax
dollars
and
why
this
is
a
it's
important
to
Burbank,
because
your
residents,
actually
they
have
relatives,
they
have
friends
and
family
members
and
these
countries
actually.
So
if
you
think
about
it,
your
tax
dollars,
it's
going
to
Azerbaijan,
that's
hurting
your
residence
in
Burbank.
So
issuing
this
letter.
Actually
it's
a
service
to
your
community,
not
just
just
the
Army
and
committee,
because
if
this
happens
with
other
Vision,
it's
going
to
happen
with
other
communities
too.
Q
U
Good
evening
Mr
Mayor
Mr
vice
mayor
council
members,
I
stand
here
in
support
of
the
Burbank
cities
effort
to
condemn
the
azerbaijani
attack
on
Armenia
on
September
13th
and
the
war
crimes
that
they
have
committed.
During
that
war
and
activities.
Their
cruelty
has
no
limit,
they
have
killed,
pows,
tortured
them,
plucking
their
flesh
and
to
top
it
off
they're
making
videos
of
it,
and
in
one
case
they
send
the
video
using
the
victim's
telephone.
They
send
the
video
to
her
family.
U
Imagine
the
cruelty
of
it.
We
cannot
stand
for
this.
We
cannot
remain
silent.
We
have
to
do
something.
The
freedom
support,
Act
of
1992
prevents
any
military
aid
going
to
Azerbaijan,
except
when
section
907
is
waived
by
the
president,
and
that
has
happened
too
many
times.
164
million
dollars
have
gone
to
Azerbaijan
and
every
time
they
get
some
Aid,
they
turn
around
and
attack
Armenia
and
Arthur.
U
U
V
One
of
the
council
members
excuse
me
the
mayor
said
in
some
cities
they
only
have
one
minute,
comparing
us
to
the
city
of
Los
Angeles,
who
is
4
million
people?
How
can
you
compare
the
City
of
Burbank
to
4
million
or
a
city
of
4
million
people?
Are
we
not
supposed
to
be
better?
Is
that
we
want
to
compare
ourselves
to
a
city
of
that
size?
Do
we
compare
our
Police
Department
or
our
fire
department
to
that
or
our
educational
system
to
the
city
of
Los
Angeles
say
well
we're
better.
We
should
be
better.
V
V
It
boggles
my
mind:
it
was
sold
as
oh
we're
going
to
eliminate
final
orals
and
reduce
it
to
three
minutes
and
we're
going
to
add
more
time
and
there'll
be
more
opportunity
to
speak
and
no
one
asks
a
question.
Why
were
final
orals,
so
important
and
I
get
it?
Mr
Schultz
is
shaking
his
head
and
he
I'm
sure
he
heard
it
from
the
residents,
because
I
saw
the
meeting
the
marathon
meeting
last
week.
V
V
If
you
guys
step
in
it
and
someone
catches
it
or
like
Mr
Schultz
said,
if
there's
a
point
of
view,
That
You,
Don't,
See
final
orals
are
important
because
it
doesn't
have
to
come
back
at
a
one
step.
Three
months
from
now
when
people
have
already
forgotten
what
the
type
of
conversation
was,
it
can
be
addressed
at
that
meeting
reopened
back
up
in
the
same
meeting
do
not
play
with
public
common.
It
is
an
insult
to
the
residents
and
all
those
that
sacrifice
so
much
for
us
to
have
that
freedom.
W
W
Good
evening
City
Council
last
week,
I
came
before
you
to
announce
a
debate
between
all
the
candidates
running
for
City
Council
and
since
then
my
team
has
been
tirelessly
working
to
complete
and
to
perfect
our
design
for
what
we
hope
is
the
most
Fair
structure
and
topic
set
for
this
event.
But
recently
I've
been
approached
by
a
few
community
members
with
reservations
about
our
debate.
While
not
many
of
these
few
reservations
come
from
great
great
leaders
who
rightly
command
my
respect.
W
Council
I
stand
before
you
and
before
the
community
in
hopes
of
assuaging.
These
fears.
It's
been
pointed
out
to
me
that
many
of
you
and
as
many
of
you
might
have
observed
that
this
year's
candidates
are
substantially
more
cordial,
respectful
and
friendly
than
in
years
past.
This
is
a
fantastic
Improvement,
but
yet
there
is
fear
that
if
one
were
to
State
an
ideological
disagreement
with
another,
this
would
damage
this
rare
standing
on
the
contrary.
W
And
in
doing
so,
we
will
have
demonstrated
to
our
city
to
our
country
into
the
world
that
civil
discourse
is
Alive
and
Well
in
America
that
our
national
political
system
does
not
reflect
the
America.
We
all
know
and
love,
but
it
does
not
reflect
the
good
honest
people
who
run
for
public
office
all
across
this
country
to
the
candidates
into
the
community.
I.
Ask
that
you
take
this
leap
of
faith
that
you
take
the
sleep
of
Faith
with
us
place
your
trust
in
each
other
place.
W
Your
trust
in
the
people,
trust
that
the
promise
of
America
one
of
pluralism,
one
of
fierce
disagreements
and
yet
steadfast
Unity
is
still
alive
and
living
with
each
and
every
one
of
us.
Council
I
beg
of
you
to
vocally
support
this
endeavor
left
right
and
Center.
We
all
benefit
from
a
country
that
believes
in
itself
again.
Let
us
start
the
fight
to
restore
that
belief
on
October
23rd
at
7
pm
at
the
colony
theater
for
more
information
follow
all
of
our
socials
at
civic
duty
media.
Thank
you
for
your
time.
C
P
You
Mr
Mayor,
thank
you
to
everyone
for
your
comment
tonight.
I'll
be
brief.
Mr
Gehan
I
believe
you
left,
but
I
agree
with
you,
sir
and
I'll
continue
to
push
for
the
return
of
final
orals
Mr
city
manager.
With
regards
to
Mr
schlossman's
point
I'd
like
to
take
a
look
at
that
contract.
Would
it
be
possible
to
have
that
included
as
part
of
our
take
home
report
on
Friday.
X
Good
evening
Mary
Tyler
Montez
members
of
the
City
Council
planning
staff
has
worked
diligently
to
come
up
with
a
revised
plan
for
the
parking
lot
at
Riverside
and
Rose
and
they've
indicated
to
the
property
owner.
What
that
plan
should
look
like
and
we're
just
waiting
for
it
to
be
resubmitted.
When
we
have
that
plan
submitted
we'll
let
the
residents
know
yeah,
the
plan
will
not
involve
the
removal
of
the
wall
adjacent.
J
R
The
city
council
approves
the
budget
departments
have
authority
to
spend
money
in
the
budget.
The
purchasing
code
sets
forth
different
thresholds
for
competitive
bidding
in
some
circumstances
a
if
a
contract
is
either
enumerated
in
the
budget
or
below
a
certain
dollar
threshold.
Competitive
bidding
doesn't
have
to
be
done,
but
the
original
contract
was
approved
by
Council
and
has
been
before
Council
twice
with
the
10-year
term
in
it
and
with
the
options
to
renew
those
are
available
on
granicus.
R
If
you
search
Gerard
and
Peterson
on
the
city's
web,
page
I
actually
pulled
those
up
at
the
last
meeting.
While
we
were
talking,
the
annual
the
the
first
contract
had
no
dollar
value
in
it
at
all.
The
Burbank
was
just
selecting
Gerard
and
Peterson.
The
2008
agreement
and
the
more
recent
extension
actually
had.
J
J
You
know
not
personal
attacks
of
any
nature,
ad
hominem
attacks
or
anything
like
that,
but
I
mean
where
would
we
be
as
a
country?
Without
you
know
the
Lincoln
Douglas
debates,
the
Kennedy,
Nixon
debates,
right
and-
and
those
are
those
are
the
things
that
we
we
need
to
see.
We
need
to
see
folks
stand
for
what
they
believe
in
and
and
back
it
up
back
it
up
with
a
solid
argument.
So
anyway,
thank
you
for
coming
down
tonight.
I
G
C
C
F
Thank
you.
Mr
Mayor
consent.
Calendar
item
number
one:
adoption
of
a
resolution
approving
a
Second
Amendment
to
the
existing
operating
agreement
with
clean
energy,
a
California
Corporation
related
to
the
compressed
natural
gas
station
at
810,
North
Lake
Street
item
two
adoption
of
a
resolution
approving
a
First
Amendment
to
existing
lease
with
clean
energy
at
California.
Corporation
related
to
time
fail
compressed
natural
gas
station
at
Public,
Works
Yard
at
124,
South,
Lake
Street,
and
that
concludes
the
two
items.
P
F
P
G
G
C
22-0005215
concerning
consideration
and
Adoption
of
an
interim
emergency
ordinance
establishing
a
moratorium,
a
new
and
replacement
restaurants
with
drive-throughs
and
the
conversion
of
businesses
with
drive-throughs
into
drive-through
in
restaurants,
Citywide,
which
requires
a
four-fifth
vote
for
approval.
Before
we
begin
are
there
any
disclosures
relating
to
this
hearing?
Colleagues
nope,
seeing
none
Madam
city
clerk
of
the
notice,
as
required
by
law,
been
given.
C
F
C
Y
Y
For
your
consideration
tonight
is
an
interim
urgency
ordinance
establishing
a
moratorium
on
new
and
replacement
restaurants
with
drive-throughs
and
the
conversion
of
businesses
with
drive-throughs
into
drive-through
restaurants
Citywide.
The
proposed
interim
urgency
ordinance,
would
prohibit
the
processing
of
any
application
for
new
and
replacement
restaurants
with
drive-throughs
the
conversion
of
existing
businesses
to
drive
through
restaurants
and
prohibit
any
expansion
of
hours
of
drive-through
operations
city-wide
for
a
period
of
45
days.
Y
A
shift
in
consumer
Behavior
has
recently
become
more
apparent
in
an
increase
in
restaurants,
with
smoke
with
smaller
building
Footprints,
which
offer
limited,
or
in
some
cases
no
on-site
dining.
However,
these
new
restaurant
prototypes
have
longer
vehicle
queuing
lanes,
for
which
the
city's
current
development
standards
have
not
been
updated
to
address.
Y
The
result
is
that
during
high
and
demand
periods,
customer
vehicle
traffic
can
spill
over
into
busy
thoroughfares
and
can
negatively
affect
the
surrounding
residential
neighborhoods
and
businesses,
who
subsequently
face
increased
vehicular
traffic
block,
driveways,
litter
and
unruly
or
disrespectful
patrons
the
urgency.
Interim
ordinance
would
allow
staff
time
to
thoroughly
research
potential
solutions
that
would
continue
to
facilitate
responsible
development
while
protecting
and
preserving
existing
neighborhoods.
Y
This
map
shows
all
the
known
drive-through
sites
in
the
City
of
Burbank.
The
red
dots
highlight
the
drive-throughs
that
are
residentially
adjacent,
while
the
green
highlights
those
that
are
not,
as
can
be
seen
on
the
map,
there
are
a
significant
number
of
drive-throughs
that
are
concentrated
along
San
Fernando
Boulevard.
There
are
also
a
large
number
of
drive-through
sites
located
within
Magnolia
Boulevard's
commercial
corridor.
Y
Y
Burbank
municipal
code,
10-1-1608
and
1-6
and
10-1-1609
contains
separate
standards
for
the
approval
of
restaurants
with
drive-throughs.
These
standards
can
currently
require
an
on-site
vehicular
queuing
Lane
that
is
160
feet
at
minimum,
as
measured
from
the
point
of
entry
to
the
furthest
service
window.
Y
This
would
mean
that
the
stacking
space
must
accommodate
at
least
10
cars
on
average.
Further
Part
D
of
10-1-1609
allows
the
modification
of
any
business
with
an
existing
drive-through
into
a
drive-through
without
a
cup
once
the
modification
has
been
evaluated
by
a
building.
Official
BMC
sections,
10-1-150
and
10-1-154
specifically
contain
requirements
for
residentially
adjacent
commercial
and
Industrial
properties
to
ensure
that
these
residential
communities
are
not
negatively
affected
by
traffic
generation,
parking,
light
noise,
litter
or
the
cumulative
impact
of
these
demands.
Y
Now
staff
has
started
to
review
the
development
standards
for
a
drive-through
restaurants
of
nearby
and
comparable
cities
of
Glendale
Pasadena,
Long,
Beach
and
Santa
Clarita
to
determine
how
drive-throughs
are
permitted
and
what
development
standards
apply
to
the
use
staff
has
compiled
the
table,
which
you
see
in
front
of
you
here,
which
indicates
preliminary
research
that
we
have
conducted
to
this
point.
Based
on
this
initial
research
staff
is
looking
into
development
standards
that
address
the
design
of
the
drive-through
facility,
including
queuing
length,
Lane
width
and
or
the
minimum
number
of
vehicles.
Y
At
this
time,
I
would
like
to
bring
the
council's
attention
to
the
supplemental
memo
that
was
provided
to
Council
on
October
3rd,
which
addresses
changes
to
this
ordinance.
For
the
record,
I
will
read
the
specific
language
that
was
changed
page
one
of
City
attorney
synopsis
staff
added
the
following.
This
ordinance
also
prohibits
expansion
of
business
operations
for
residentially
adjacent
restaurants
with
drive-throughs
past
10
pm
during
the
moratorium
period
on
page
three
of
paragraph
2
of
attachment
one.
Y
This
now
reads:
no
permits
may
be
approved
for
new
and
replacement
restaurants
with
drive-throughs,
as
well
as
the
conversion
of
existing
businesses
with
drive-throughs
to
a
restaurant
with
drive
through
Citywide
page
four
of
new
paragraph
three
of
attachment.
One
now
reads:
existing
legally
established,
residentially
adjacent
restaurants
with
drive-throughs
shall
not
expand
business
operations
between
the
hours
of
10
pm
to
6
a.m.
Residentially
adjacent,
as
defined
by
BMC,
section
10-1-203,.
Y
And
finally,
page
four
of
new
paragraph
five
of
attachment.
One
now
reads
any
restaurants,
with
the
drive-through,
with
a
conditional
use
permit
previously
approved
by
the
city
and
not
residentially
adjacent,
as
defined
by
BMC.
Section
10-1-203
prior
to
the
effective
date
of
this
ordinance
are
exempt
from
this
ordinance.
Y
In
light
of
the
entire
record
presented
to
you
tonight,
staff
recommends
the
city
council,
adopt
the
proposed
interim
urgency,
ordinance,
establishing
a
moratorium
on
new
and
replacement
restaurants
with
drive-throughs
and
the
conversion
of
businesses
with
drive-throughs
and
to
drive
through
restaurants
Citywide
this
adoption.
The
adoption
of
this
ordinance
requires
a
four-fifth
vote
by
the
city
council,
City
Charter,
section
500
authorizes
the
city
council
to
adopt
an
urgency
ordinance
as
an
emergency
measure
to
preserve
the
public
health
safety
and
general
welfare.
Y
C
You
very
much
we
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
to
hear
from
any
persons
who
wish
to
speak
on
this
matter.
Each
person
may
address
the
council
for
up
to
three
minutes
on
this
public
hearing
item
only
for
members
of
the
public
who
are
here
in
person,
please
present
a
completed
salmon
public
hearing
card
to
the
city
clerk.
If
you
wish
to
speak,
please
state
your
name
for
the
record
for
those
wishing
to
call
in
during
the
public
comment
period.
C
F
C
Okay
so
we've
completed
in-person
public
comment
and
there
is
no
no
one
waiting
to
speak
so
we're
moving
on.
There
will
be
no
further
public
comment.
I,
not
declare
the
public
comment
period
closed
with
the
representative
of
the
Community
Development
Department
I'd
like
to
make
any
further
comments
or
any
response
to
the
public.
No.
J
P
A
comment
actually,
if
that's
appropriate,
Mr
Mayor
I,
just
wanted
to
thank
staff
for
the
report.
I
found
that
attachment
4
was
particularly
helpful
and
just
from
one
Council
member's
perspective,
when
we
looked
at
all
of
the
cities
that
you
did
preliminary
research
on
at
first
blush,
it
seems
like
Long
Beach
has
a
very
good
system
set
in
place.
P
There
are
requirements
for
drive-throughs
that
are
within
150
feet
of
residential
areas,
requirements
related
to
hours
of
operations,
and
it
looks
like
they're
already
in
the
process
of
updating
that
ordinance
again
to
perhaps
make
it
tougher
so
personally,
I'd
love
to
see
a
deeper
dive
on
the
the
parameters
that
they've
put
in
place
and
see,
if
that's
a
structure
that
might
work
well
in
Burbank.
Thank
you.
Mr
Mayor.
G
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor.
My
only
question
for
staff
would
be
in
the
ordinance.
I
didn't
see
it
anywhere,
but
educate
me
if
I
missed
it,
the
speaker,
the
you
know,
when
people
order
the
noise
that
it
emits,
is
there
anything
in
the
future
or
what's
going
to
protect
it
during
this
urgency
ordinance,
because
that
comes
up
a
lot.
R
So
this
ordinance
doesn't
address
existing
operations
of
existing
drive-throughs,
except
preventing
them
from
expanding
their
hours.
In
other
words,
any
operating
drive
through
is
allowed
to
continue
operating,
so
it
doesn't
address
their
speakers.
It
doesn't
address
their
lighting
it.
It
goes
directly
to
the
issue
that
this
community
has
been
concerned
with
preventing
the
conversion
of
drive-throughs
or
the
replacement
of
businesses,
and
you
have
a
supplemental
packet
because
in
our
mind,
staff
was
also
concerned
about
changes
in
operating
hours
during
the
study
period
and
we
had
realized.
R
We
hadn't
addressed
specific
language,
so
we
gave
you
this
late
supplemental
package
to
make
sure
that
the
ordinance
you
adopt
addressed
both
expansion
of
a
use
or
conversion
of
a
use,
but
also
expansion
of
hours,
business
hours,
business
operations
and,
in
particular,
the
term
business
operations,
is
intended
and
I'm.
Sorry
I'm
speaking
for
staff.
R
G
Y
Well,
this
this
does
address
conversion
of
businesses
into
businesses
with
drive-throughs.
So
we
have
accommodated
that
with
this
ordinance,
but
again
in
the
future,
we
will
become
looking
at
how
we
can
address
the
negative
impacts
for
businesses
with
restaurants
or
sorry,
restaurants,
with
drive-throughs
and
like
you
can
go
ahead.
If
you
so.
G
In
other
words,
this
urgency
ordinance
would
basically
prevent
a
different
type
of
business,
say
CVS
as
an
example.
They've
got
a
smaller
window
and
you
get
your
meds
and
that's
it
if
somebody
were
to
buy
a
CVS
building
and
they
wanted
to
put
a
Wazoo
chicken
wings
and
they
needed
to
redo
that
window
to
a
bigger
window
to
accommodate
the
vehicle
drive
through
for
the
restaurant.
This
would
protect
for
that
type
of
development
from
happening
exactly
great.
Thank
you
very
much.
G
I
Some
of
our
Springer
great,
thank
you
very
much
for
your
report
and
thank
you
for
acknowledging
that
the
way
people
dying
has
changed
and
in
during
the
moratorium.
If
we
should
pass
it
does
it
also
look
at
because
there's
very
little
dining
space
in
these
the
impact
on
the
neighborhood
in
terms
of
people
dining
in
the
neighborhood,
because
there
are
there's
not
enough
dining
room
space
for
them
to
go
through
the
drive-through
and
park
and
eat
on
site.
So
would
you
please
look
at
the
impact
on
the
neighborhood
for
people
dining
in
the
neighborhood?
I
Y
C
G
You
didn't
put
the
in
the
notes
right
here,
so
let
me
go
to
this
one
here.
Thank
you.
Adopt
an
interim
urgency
ordinance
of
the
Council
of
the
City
of
Burbank,
establishing
a
moratorium
on
new
and
replacement
restaurants
with
drive-throughs
and
the
conversion
of
businesses
with
drive-throughs
into
drive
through
restaurants,
Citywide.
J
C
G
G
C
C
Please
fill
out
a
yellow
public
comment
card
and
hand
it
to
the
city
clerk
speakers.
Well,
now,
I
have
three
minutes
to
speak
on
the
item
at
the
conclusion
of
the
presentation.
As
long
as
a
speaker
is
not
spoken
on
the
item
during
the
first
period
of
public
comment,
the
first
report
is
the
adoption
of
a
resolution
adopting
a
revised
speed,
hump
policy
Mr
Ken
Bergman
Public
Works
director.
Please
present
the
report
welcome.
Z
Good
evening,
honorable
mayor
council,
members,
traffic
engineering
manager,
Edward
Yu,
is
here
with
me
to
present
the
PowerPoint
happy
to
provide
a
quick
little
overview
of
what
is
really
a
an
expansion
of
our
speed,
hump
policy
that
will
allow
more
streets
to
be
eligible
for
the
program.
I
also
want
to
let
you
know
that
the
policy
was
brought
before
the
infrastructure
oversight
board
back
in
March,
and
we
revised
it
based
on
their
input.
We
brought
it
back
to
them
in
May
and
they
recommended
bringing
before
you
for
your
approval.
AA
You
thank
you
Mr
Berkman,
for
the
the
great
introduction
there
good
evening,
Mr
Mayor
Mr
vice
mayor
and
council
members.
It's
my
pleasure
to
be
here
today
to
present
you,
the
revised
speed
on
policy
staff
worked
hard
on
this
to
make
sure
that
we
get
everything
we
correct
for
the
City
of
Burbank
and
its
residents
can
I.
Have
the
presentation.
Please.
AA
AA
So
it's
been
a
long
time
coming
that
we
need
to
take
a
fresh
look
at
this
and
and
revise
it
to
meet
the
appropriate
standards
for
the
citizens
of
Burbank
on
May
26
29
2022.
As
director
Berkman
stated,
the
infrastructure
oversight
board
recommended
that
staff
present
the
revised
policy
to
the
city
council
for
approval.
AA
So
here
we
are
today
to
date.
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
so.
The
staff
has
been
working
hard
to
put
as
many
speed
humps
in
the
City
of
Burbank
that
are
appropriate
to
date.
We
have
over
280
speed,
humps
have
installed
in
within
the
city.
So
that's
a
lot
of
speed
homes
for
sale.
This
size,
Public,
Works,
can
install
and
we
do
all
the
speed
ups
are
installed
by
Public
Works
staff.
AA
Again
we
can.
We
can
install
approximately
15
to
20
speed
humps
per
year,
and
a
street
segment
may
take
two
or
three
speed
humps
so,
depending
on
the
length
of
this,
the
of
the
segment.
Currently,
what
we're
looking
for
is
speed.
Humps
are
an
effective
traffic
calming
device
designed
to
help
reduce
particular
speeding,
a
low
volume
and
low
speed
roads.
AA
The
City
of
Burbank
will
be
with
this
revised
Freedom
ordinance,
utilizing
three
different
types
of
speed
homes,
a
regular
standard,
speed,
hump,
a
speed
cushion,
which
is
a
pilot
program
on
Bel
Air
and
the
new
one
that
we're
deploying
are
speed,
tables
right
here.
We
have
an
example
of
the
different
types
of
speed
humps
on
the
upper
left.
We
have
a
standards
pre-hub
located
in
Ontario,
they're
about
about
12
feet,
high
three
inches
tall
and
then
on
the
right.
AA
We
have
what
we
call
the
speed
cushion
and
the
speed
cushion
is
designed,
or
some
people
have
different
names
for
it,
but
the
speed
cushion
is
designed
for
emergency
vehicles
and
it's
at
emergency
routes.
So
if
you'll
notice,
that,
in
in
the
middle
of
the
speed
hump
there
are
slots
so
that
the
fire
department
can
go
through
there
safely
and
not
be
impacting
too
much
for
emergency
response,
which
is
very
important
and.
AA
Well,
that
will
really
slow
him
down.
Mr
Mayor.
Thank
you.
So
speed
table
is
the
the
latest
addition
to
the
I'm
calling
the
sputum
family
here
is
basically
24
feet
wide
and
three
inches
tall.
So
it's
it's.
It's
designed
to
have
for
a
higher
volume
roadways
and
for
and
a
lot
of
requests.
We've
gotten
from
the
city
of
citizens
are
steeper
grade
streets.
AA
Year,
no,
no,
no,
the
staff
is,
you
know
one
of
the
the
challenges
that
we've
had
with
the
speed
home
criteria
is
looking
at
all
the
different
criteria
involved
in
making
sure
that
the
speed
humps
are
placed
appropriately
up
here.
We
list
about
12
11,
different
criteria
here:
Street
classification,
Street
width
and
number
of
lanes,
minimum
speed
traffic
volume,
Street
grades,
Street
length,
horizontal
alignment
and
visibility,
truck
or
Transit
routes,
emergency
routes,
Street
condition
and
petition.
A
lot
of
these
were
in
the
previous
criteria,
but
weren't
expanded
and
weren't
explained
appropriately.
AA
So
now
we've.
What
we've
done
in
the
new
package
is
kind
of
give
a
better
definition.
So
the
residents
can
understand
why
we're
looking
at
these
criteria
and
what
we're
looking
for
in
this
to
make
sure
it's
appropriate
to
get
where
we
are
today.
One
of
the
things
that
we
did
is
look
at
the
other
surrounding
cities.
AA
We
looked
at
the
city
of
Glendale
city
of
Los,
Angeles,
County
of
Los
Angeles,
City
of
Pasadena
City
and
the
City
of
Santa
Clarita,
and
then
what
we
call
the
Institute
of
Transportation
Engineers,
which
is
a
national
publication
of
Traffic
Engineers.
So
we
looked
at
all
the
criteria
and
the
evaluations
they
used
to
determine
when
a
speed
hump
is
appropriate,
and
this
is
very
important
for
us,
because
we
wanted
to
see
what
our
neighboring
cities
were
deploying
when
it
was
good
or
bad
or
where
we
needed
to
make
changes.
AA
Now
one
of
the
things
if
this
these
next
couple
of
slides
will
go
over
to
speed
home
criteria
and
eligibility
comparison,
and
what
this
is
is
that
it's
the
differences
that
we
made
from
the
previous
criteria
to
the
revised
speed,
hump
policy
and
a
lot
of
these
criteria
and
a
lot
of
these
revisions
came
about
because
we
were
listening
to
the
residents.
We
were
listening
to
what
other
the
council,
members
and
other
people
have
told
us
that
we
need
to
address
this.
AA
We
need
to
another
way
of
accessing
more
speed,
humps
or
a
way
of
traffic
calming
device.
One
of
the
the
first
class-
the
first
thing
we
looked
at
was
a
street
classification
and
we
wanted
to
make
a
Clarity
on
this.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
there
was
confusion
that
we
were
that
we're.
If
alleys
are
eligible,
we
cannot
make
allergy
Zelda
alleys
eligible
due
to
the
street,
because
it's
Concrete
Street
and
also
there's
a
drainage
in
the
middle
of
the
street,
so
it
wouldn't
make
it
appropriate.
AA
One
of
the
things
that
we
had
before
is
that
we
weren't
allowing
concrete
streets
this
time
around.
We
decided
concrete
streets.
We
we
can
do.
The
reason
we
weren't
doing
concrete
streets
before
is
because
asphalt
did
not
adhere
to
the
concrete
well
as
well,
but
with
the
robust
resurfacing
project
that
we
have
with
this.
The
public
works
is
implementing.
We
feel
that
all
the
streets
will
eventually
be
asphalt
and
then
the
the
speed
humps
could
adhere
to
the
con
as
fall
streets,
better
Street
width.
AA
AA
Street
grades:
this
is
a
one
of
the
ones
that
we
had
a
lot
of
conversation
about,
especially
in
the
hillside.
Communities
close
by
what
we
did
was
before
the
limitation
was
six
percent
grade,
so
we
were
only
putting
speed
humps
on
six
percent
grades
with
standard
speed
humps,
which
is
what
most
cities
and
most
agencies
do.
AA
However,
with
the
Advent
of
the
speed
table,
we
can
allow
installation
of
a
speed
table
on
some
of
those
Hillside
communities,
so
areas
like
Harvard
and
those
streets
and
in
that
area
may
be
eligible
for
Speed
tables,
horizontal
alignment,
which
is
basically
primary
about
visibility.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
see
the
speed
hump
well
in
advance
before
it
was
a
stopping
site.
That's
about
300
feet.
AA
Now,
we've
reduced
it
to
150
feet,
which
is
more
appropriate
for
a
speed
up
installation
traffic
volumes
and
speeds
before
the
requirement
was
meeting
both
volume
or
speeding.
Since
these
are
speed,
this
traffic
calming
device
designed
for
speeding,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
address
volume
and
speeding.
So
we
you
have
to
meet
both
the
volume
and
speed
and
speeding
speed
thresholds
to
meet
the
speed,
hump
criteria,
emergency
routes.
AA
AA
Number
eight,
the
minimum
of
speed
posted
speed
limit
with
critical
speed
or
greater
than
30
miles
per
hour
or
more
so.
The
street
must
have
a
posted
speed
limit
of
25
miles
per
hour
or
less,
and
then,
when
we
do
our
speed
threshold
study,
the
85th
percentile
has
to
be
30
miles
per
hour
or
more
so
we
want
to
install
speed
humps
in
an
area
where
we've
they're,
appropriate
and
they're
addressing
the
right.
AA
There's
a
speeding
issue
so
30
miles
per
hour
is
the
threshold
that
we
look
at
and
that's
common
amongst
most
cities
and
agencies,
traffic
volume,
vehicular
valves,
more
than
40
000
vehicles
per
day.
Look
five
thousand
cars,
5
000
vehicles
per
day.
Anything
we
feel
that
any
that
Vehicles,
Beyond
5000
Vehicles
a
day
would
be
cause
con
issues.
AA
5000
Vehicles
a
day
is
a
heavy
traveled,
Street
and
speed.
Thomas
would
probably
be
caused
more
of
a
problem
than
a
solution
in
those
areas.
Street
condition.
This
is
something
that
we
looked
at
carefully:
no
drainage
or
flooding
issues.
Again.
The
speed
is
designed
to
solve
a
problem
and
not
create
more
problems.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
the
speed
humps
are
designed
appropriately
and
will
not
cause
drainage
or
flooding
issues,
and
the
roadway
must
be
in
Fair
or
better
conditions.
AA
So
again,
I
talked
about
the
robust
resurfacing
project
that
the
city,
the
Department
of
Public
Works,
is
undergoing.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
if
a
street
is
going
to
be
resurfaced
within
a
year
that
we
don't
put
speed
some
speed
humps
in
there
and
then
they
get
removed
with
the
resurfacing
project.
AA
AA
If
you
look
at
the
previous
criteria,
which
is
one
of
the
attachments
it's
one
page,
if
you
look
at
the
new
package,
it's
several
Pages,
it
may
be
daunting,
but
again,
I
think
that
it's
better
to
provide
as
much
information
as
possible.
So
all
the
residents
and
the
petitioners
are
well
aware
of
what's
going
to
be
installed
in
their
area,
so
we
improved
the
format
and
information
and,
most
importantly,
we
get
this
question
a
lot.
What
are
the
advantages
and
disadvantages
of
installing
speed?
AA
Humps,
the
the
one
of
the
last
things
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
the
residents
were
aware
of
are
the
steps
of
of
targeting
speed,
humps
and
so
I
made
it
clear
and
forced
out
process
number
one
make
a
request
via
phone
email,
City
website
or
our
brand
new,
our
burbank31
app.
The
traffic
section
was
just
launched
yesterday
so
that
you
can
there's
many
ways
to
apply
for
Speed
humps
step
number
two
we're
going
to
do.
AA
A
preliminary
field
survey
is
conducted
to
determine
if
a
location
meets
the
criteria
and
again
we
went
back
if
the
other
slide,
you
saw
all
the
different
11
different
criteria.
We're
looking
at
we
want
to
make
sure
before
we
have
someone
go
out
there
and
canvas
the
the
street.
We
want
to
make
sure
they
even
meet
the
criteria.
So
we
want
to
do
a
preliminary
engineering
study
to
make
sure
they
can
meet
the
criteria
step
number
three.
If
they
meet
the
preliminary
criteria,
they
will
be
provided
a
petition
to
circulate.
Now.
AA
So
at
this
time
again
we
are.
This
is
a
long
process
that
my
section
has
worked
on
and
the
revised
policy
is
going
to
update
the
criteria
to
current
standards,
provide
more
information
and
certainty
about
eligibility,
eligibility
requirements,
tongue
twister,
sorry
and
allow
the
opportunity
for
more
residential
Road
rates
to
be
eligible
for
the
program.
We're
recommending
that
the
city
council
approved
the
revised
speedup
policy
by
adopting
the
resolution
again,
Edward
U
traffic,
engineer
manager,
I'd
take
any
questions.
If
you
have
you.
C
C
C
C
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
Mr
City
attorney
he's
always
keeping
us
in
line
so
once
again,
obviously
long
overdue
maker,
more
user
for
more
more
understandable.
If
it's
not
user
friendly.
Like
you
said
it
went
from
one
page
to
several
pages,
but
at
least
it
outlines
it.
What
are
the
requirements
instead
of
having
more
questions
before
you
refer
the
public
to
FAQs?
You
know
as
far
as
all
that's
concerned,
but
I
think
it's
more
user
friendly.
Thank
you
for
doing
that.
Of
course,
more
that
you,
you
know.
C
J
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
yeah,
thank
you
24
years
and
we
need
an
update,
so
real
quick.
If
you
can
pull
up
slide,
eight
I
just
wanted
to
run
through
something
real
quick.
So
this
the
first
step
is
to
make
the
requests
and
there's
a
number
of
ways
to
make
the
request.
Is
it
free
to
make
a
request
or
how
much
does
it
cost
like?
Do
we
have
anything
we.
J
So
I
mean
we
give
them
pages
and
pages
of
criteria,
but
at
the
end
of
the
day,
they're
just
going
to
submit
it
and
we're
going
to
have
to
figure
out
if
it
meets
anyways,
so
right
I
mean
but
you're
not
wrong,
you're,
not
wrong
the
more
information
we
give
it.
Maybe
somebody
will
be
like
oh
I,
totally
don't
qualify,
but
I'll
tell
you
most
people
just
I
it
we
totally
qualify.
We
do
one
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
ask
you.
J
AA
So
we
evaluate
the
so
that
everybody
has
an
equal
vote
on
the
roadway
we
look
at.
We
go
by
addresses
so
for
apartment
building
has
one
address.
We
take
the
representative
of
the
manager
of
the
building's
signature
or
we
take
the
owner
of
the
building,
and
one
of
the
comments
that
we've
had
in
the
past
is
that
a
petitioner
would
go
door-to-door
and
some
people
won't
be
home
right
or
it's
very
cumbersome
and
it.
AA
You
know,
the
petition
process
is
probably
one
of
the
most
daunting
tasks
for
someone,
because
they
have
to
go
to
door
door
and
again
with
kovid
and
people
concerned
about
their
safety.
You
don't
want
to
knock
on
people's
doors,
so
we
wanted
to
make
sure
that
they
went.
We
just
needed
one
representative
of
that
unit,
so.
J
It
makes
it
easier
to
just
have
the
address,
but
there's
a
bunch
of
people
with
a
bunch
of
kids
who
are
driving
on
that
street
in
those
apartment,
buildings
and
so
I
I
would
be
more
comfortable.
Getting
an
accurate
count
of
households
and
I.
Don't
know
if
it's
possible
to
do
that
or
if
it's
completely
prohibitive
for
the
permitting
process
I
mean
what
did
you?
What
are
your
thoughts
on
that.
Z
Councilmember,
thank
you
for
your
question
through
the
mayor.
I.
Think
one
thing
to
be
cognizant
of
is
that
in
a
situation
like
that,
I
don't
know
if
that
would
meet
the
actual
local
residential
street
criteria.
So
when
we
have
the
smaller
streets,
the
smaller
volume
streets
compared
to
the
situation
that
you're
describing
that's
that's
more
of
a
secondary
or
or
a
higher
volume,
local
that
wouldn't
be
eligible
for
the
speed,
humps
installation
anyway,.
J
AA
Well
again,
there's
the
volume
threshold,
if
they're,
beyond
5
000
vehicles
per
day,
that
may
be
prohibit
them
from
an
insulation
with
speed
tops.
Okay,
we
may
look
at
speed
tables,
something
that
can
handle
a
higher
volume
but
again
speed.
Humps
is
just
one
of
the
tools
that
we
have
in
our
traffic
calming
toolbox
right
right,
we're
going
to
look
at
one
of
the
things
that
I
emphasize
is
that
we
want
to
know
what
your
issues
are,
the
problems
and
not
I,
just
don't
want
to
I.
AA
Just
want
you
to
give
me
a
solution.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we
analyze
and
look
at
different
ways
of
doing
providing
traffic,
harming
we're
going
to
look
at
signage,
we're
going
to
look
at
striping
we're
going
to
look
at
different
aspects,
different
traffic
control
devices,
to
maybe
alleviate
some
of
those
issues
and
to
address
your
petition
on
apartment
buildings.
One
of
the
challenges
that
we
have
is
that
again
A
lot
of
times,
that's
one
of
the
most
daunting
tasks
and
petitioner
sometimes
will
not
return
to
petition
for
a
couple
of
years.
AA
So
one
of
the
limitations
we're
putting
on
this
is
that
it
has
to
be
returned
within
one
year
and
a
lot
and
the
other
challenges
we
have
is
that
someone
sign
in
an
apartment
building?
They
signed
a
petition
but
they're
no
longer
living
there.
So
the
resident
that
wanted
it
is
no
longer
there
and
again
the
apartment
residents
are
usually
they
can.
They
can
be
transient,
they
move
around.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
we
get
the
people
that
are
having
ownership
industry.
AA
J
AA
J
So
in
theory,
if
whatever
process
I'm
describing
could
happen
where
a
group
of
residents
gets
voted
down
or
whatever
those
residents
can
come
and
petition,
Council
directly
and
say,
hey
look,
we
got
close,
we
were
at
60
or
65
or
whatever,
and
we
had
a
hard
time
getting
petition.
It
was
hard
to
get.
They
can
come
to
us
directly
and
say:
hey
Council
we'd
like
you
to
agendize
this
and
propose
speed
humps
directly,
like
we
have
that
process.
Yeah.
Z
J
Gotcha,
okay,
great,
that
that
alleviates
a
lot
of
the
concern
of
what
I
was
talking
about
just
real
quick.
The
last
thing:
I
had
one
thing,
just
a
little
note
personally,
I
noticed
in
the
report
that
it
said
iob
unanimously
recommended
I'm
kind
of
a
stickler
for
this
I
like
it
when
they
vote
on
stuff
I
assume.
That
means
they
voted.
Can
we
just
put
voted
in
the
staff
report?
Just
so
I
I
feel
comfortable,
knowing
that
they
voted
unanimously
to
recommend
of.
J
And
then
one
last
thing,
totally
sidebar
under
our
current
ordinance
or
under
this
new
ordinance
are
we
is
it
are
raised.
Crosswalks
permitted.
Is
that
something
that
a
resident
can
come
forward
and
say,
hey,
there's
a
crosswalk
here,
I'd
like
to
do
a
raise
crosswalk.
Do
we
have
anything
on
the
books
for.
AA
That
so
we
don't
have
anything
to
books
for,
say
again,
I've
been
a
traffic
engineer
for
almost
29
years
and
so
I've
kind
of
seen
a
little
bit
of
everything
and
raise
crosswalks,
it's
kind
of
a
new
thing.
It's
basically
a
speed
up
at
a
crosswalk
and
we
haven't
there,
aren't
that
many
cities
I
know
La
is
implemented
a
couple.
One
of
the
challenges
with
the
raised
crosswalk
is
it's
located
at
an
intersection
most
normally
and
that
can
cause.
AA
AA
So
we
want
them
to
as
they
approach.
So
as
you
approach
the
speed,
if
you
notice
you'll,
have
a
sign
and
you'll
have
striping
you'll
have
as
much
warning
as
possible.
So
one
of
the
goals
is
that
we
make
sure
that
the
speed
humps
are
very
visible
and
at
a
crosswalk
enter
intersection.
It
will
be
a
challenge.
Okay,
okay,.
I
AA
I
AA
In
the
package
there
is
a
the
minimum
threshold
is
500
cars
per
day
and
the
maximum
is
five
thousand
so
500
cars,
where
you
have
a
minimum
criteria,
is
because
a
lot
of
times
we
get
a
requests
from
people
that
live
in
cul-de-sacs
and
that's
less
than
500
cars
per
day
and
in
a
cul-de-sac,
It's.
Usually
the
the
residents
within
that
cul-de-sac
that
are
that
are
speeding.
So
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we
use
our
resources
in
the
best
way
possible.
AA
Because
they're
still
speeding,
of
course,
of
course,
I
mean
again
I
know
what
I
talked
about
in
previous
past
about
the
traffic
calming
toolbox,
Enforcement,
Education
and
Engineering.
We
could
look
at
different
signage
that
we
can
put
up
there.
We
can
work
with
law
enforcement
to
encourage
people
to
slow
down
and
we
can
try
to
do
an
educational
campaign
in
area.
We
can
do
I'd
be
happy
to
attend.
I
I
Thank
you
and
about
15
years
ago
we
had
a
speed
problem
on
my
street
to
hunger
above
Sunset
Canyon
and
the
the
slope.
The
grade
is
too
high,
but
I
learned
then
that
there
are
some
people
just
rabidly,
opposed
to
speed,
humps
anywhere
and
so
in
terms
of
the
multi-family.
You
know
on
one
multi-family,
high
density
on
one
side
and
lower
density
on
the
other.
I
P
You
know,
generally
speaking,
the
the
5
000
maximum
volume
per
Street
makes
sense
to
me,
but
the
one
outlier
is
our
our
neighbor
Glendale,
who
has
a
10,
000
vehicle
maximum
and
so
I'm,
just
wondering
in
your
research.
Looking
at
that
Community
are
there
distinct
features
of
Burbank
roads
that
you
feel
that's
not
a
doable
number
in
our
community
that
10
000
would
create
problems.
AA
Ten
thousand
again,
five
thousand
is
Extreme.
Normally
a
residential
street
has
about
three.
The
threshold
we
look
at
is
three
to
four
thousand
cars
per
day,
and
that
could
be
too
much
we're
trying
to
tailor
this
speed.
Hump
policy
to
Burbank
I
know
Glendale
has
different
criteria
different
the
ways
of
their
they
want
to
manage
their
traffic
in
the
area.
AA
In
fact,
I
just
talked
to
the
city
traffic
engineer
over
there
and
we
talked
about
our
criteria
and
he
actually
wanted
a
copy
of
our
new
revised
speed
on
policy,
because
they're
looking
at
revising
theirs.
Also
so
10
000
from
our
experience
is,
is
too
much
because
of
the
fact
that
it
could
cause
rear
end
accidents
could
cause
more
problems
with
more
noise.
If
you
look
at
them,
there's
a
a
good
table
about
advantages
and
disadvantages
in
the
package.
One
of
the
disadvantages
is
noise.
AA
G
G
AA
I
Some
people
said:
oh,
you
know
our
property
values
are
going
to
go
down,
so
we
did
a
study
to
check
streets
that
had
speed
humps
against
values
of
those
who
didn't
and
because
they
existed
in
Burbank-
and
there
was
no
difference
in
there
was
no
impact
on
value
of
a
speed
hump
and
in
some
cases
the
residents
felt
that
it
enhanced
you
know,
especially
if
they
had
small
children,
they
welcomed
them.
So
just
FYI
there
was
no
reduction
in
value.
That
was
a
fear
that
some
people
I'm.
C
J
So
speed
hump
requests,
yes,
that
we
deny
so
I
want
to
keep
a
running
tally
of
which
one,
how
many
we
deny,
because
if
we're
getting
a
bunch
of
requests
in
areas
where
they're
getting
you
know,
it's
5500
or
6,
000
or
7
000,
and
that's
the
denial
and
people
keep
asking
for
it.
But
we're
like
well,
it's
5
000.
Sorry
I
would
like
to
be
able
to
have
city
council.
Look
at
those
numbers
and
say:
look
there's
an
entire
group
section
here:
I'm,
not
saying
it's,
those
three
specifically,
but
maybe
in
the
future.
J
Z
AA
A
lot
of
times
what
that
is
correct,
director,
Berkman
and
one
of
the
challenges
we
have
is
not
necessarily
the
criteria
not
meeting
a
criteria
that
we've
discovered
it's
the
petition
process
and
that's
in
a
very
important
process.
As
council
member
frutos
brought
up.
Some
people
may
not
want
a
speed,
hump
in
front
of
their
house,
a
sign
or
or
de-escalation
of
property
values.
So
again,
this
this
is
the
speed
on
process
and
what
I've
talked
with
other
cities.
AA
This
is
it's
an
evolving
process
and
those
exact
thoughts
that
you
have
brought
up
have
been
discussed
and
again
we
we
we
do,
give
you
the
opportunity
to
bypass
petition
process.
I
would
call
it
where
you
can
represent
the
community
on
the
petition
process,
but
that
we,
the
eligibility,
the
criteria
again.
We
and
I
keep
on
going
back
to
this.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
installing
something
that's
beneficial
and
not
a
problem.
G
Know
that
same
topic,
maybe
a
little
bit
different
I,
know
one
neighbor,
that
down
by
the
Morrison
restaurant
right
off,
Magnolia
she's,
a
long-term
apartment,
dweller
and
she's
been
constantly
wanting
speed,
bumps
parking
restrictions,
you
name
it
and
she
tried
the
petition
and
she
failed
twice.
So
I
went
there
to
talk
to
some
of
the
neighbors
coming
to
find
out
that
the
one
neighbor,
because
every
neighborhood
has
got
their
own
uniqueness,
their
own
neighborhood
watch
their
own.
G
You
know
and
it's
okay,
that's
part
of
living
in
a
community
and
you
know:
I
went
there
and
you
know.
I
was
looking
at
some
of
the
reasons
why
the
city
said
no
and
then
I
started
just
randomly
just
stopping
at
different
neighbors,
just
a
door
knocked
them
and
hey.
You
know
tell
me
about
this
and
it
basically
came
down
and
says:
no,
we
don't
have
a
problem
here,
she's
the
problem,
because
she
wants
the
front
of
her
house
kept
free
from
anybody
parking
in
front.
G
So
I
just
take
a
different
Viewpoint
that
you
know
I
mean
there
are
trained
professionals.
That
is
a
for
one
council.
Member
only
I
try
to
weigh
it
in
and
understand
the
uniqueness
of
individual
neighborhoods,
because
sometimes
we
don't
get
the
full
story.
They'll
say:
hey
I've
been
rejected
four
times
and
I
want
the
council
to
you,
know,
overrule
City
staff
and
make
a
decision
decision
and
tell
them
no
I'm
on
speed
bumps
there
whoa
each
neighborhood
is
very
unique
and
you
know
they're
neighbors
and
you
know.
C
J
I'm,
saying
is
I
would
love
if
a
resident
did
that
for
us,
I
would
love
to
be
able
to
go
and
say
well
how
many
other
people
filed
a
permit
and
if
that's
the
only
person
and
they
file
every
time,
then
it's
like
it's
obvious,
like
okay
you're
on
your
own,
but
if
everybody
in
that
neighborhood
is
trying
to
do
it
and
there's
a
common
thing,
that's
different
right
and
I.
Think
thank
you
for
saying
that
you
record
all
these
because
that
can
be
used.
I'm,
sorry,
hey!
They
look
you're
the
only
one.
That's
it.
P
AA
P
P
Commission,
I,
don't
know
if
it'd
be
more
appropriate,
iob
or
Transportation
I'm,
not
a
liaison
to
either
of
those
bodies,
but
I
would
imagine
any
of
those
board
members
or
commission
members
could
certainly
ask
about
that
information
and
you'd
be
able
to
provide
it.
Is
that
right,
sir?
That's
correct
okay,
so
that
would
just
be
maybe
my
suggestion
to
my
colleagues
who
are
Liaisons
to
that
body
that
maybe
that's
something
they
could
do
if
you
want
to
know,
for
example,
how
many
applications
on
Sixth
have
been
denied.
P
C
F
C
Thank
you
very
much,
so
the
next
report
is
the
introduction
of
an
ordinance
amending
section
6-1-1501
of
the
Burbank
Municipal
Code,
relating
to
rheumafatia
speed
limits
on
certain
segments
of
the
San
Fernando
Boulevard
between
north
city
limits
and
Lincoln
Street
Mr
Bergman.
Please
bless
you
Public
Works
director.
Please
present
the
report
welcome.
Z
Sir
good,
to
see
you
again,
Mr
mayor
council
members,
speed
limits
are
set
in
accordance
with
the
California
vehicle
code
burbanks
municipal
code
and
in
accordance
with
the
guidelines
of
the
manual
of
uniform
traffic
control
devices.
The
California
supplement
every
seven
years:
Public
Works
hires,
licensed
professionals
to
conduct
field
studies
and
produce
an
engineering
and
traffic
study
survey
to
set
speed
limits
on
our
roadway
system
and
the
last
one
was
completed
and
approved
by
Council
on
July
27th
of
last
year.
Z
However,
at
council's
Direction,
a
couple
of
Northerly
segments
of
San
Fernando
Boulevard
were
excluded
from
the
ordinance
due
to
concerns
with
the
study's
recommendations
to
increase
their
speed
limits.
Five
miles
per
hour
subsequent
to
council's
action.
Last
summer,
assembly
Bill
43
was
enacted,
which
amended
the
vehicle
code
to
allow
jurisdictions
to
establish
speed
limits
based
upon
immediately
previous
surveys,
which
brings
us
to
the
action
before
you
tonight.
Z
So,
given
that
no
Lanes
have
been
added
to
these
segments
and
the
reduction
is
no
more
than
five
miles
per
hour
from
the
speed
limits
of
the
2021
Study
last
year's
study
and
it's
consistent
with
the
immediately
prior
speed
limit.
The
council,
May
introduce
and
add
a
subsequent
meeting
approve,
adopt
the
ordinance
in
your
packet.
That's
attachment
one
to
re-establish
the
previously
adopted
speed
limits
and
allow
enforcement
staff
respectfully
recommends
that
the
city
council
introduced
the
proposed
ordinance
and
consider
its
adoption
at
a
future
meeting.
AC
Good
evening,
Mike
Hollis
I'm
here
on
behalf
of
walk
bike
Burbank,
as
you
know,
walk
bike.
Burbank
is
the
local
chapter
of
the
Los
Angeles
County,
Bicycle
Coalition,
so
I
had
the
opportunity
to
speak
back
in
July
of
21
when
you
were
considering
the
speed
limits
along
this
section,
happy
to
be
here
in
person
by
the
way
I
brought
up.
Some
concerns
that
walked
by
Burbank
has
along
this
section,
and
there
were
some
information
that
passed
in
in
the
course
of
that
discussion.
That
was
helpful.
AC
Mr
Berkman
pointed
out
that
you
know
with
now
with
AB
43
or
at
that
time
he
said,
ab43
will
allow
us
allow
agencies
to
be
more
flexible
in
setting
speed
limits.
So
that's
one
of
the
real
advantages
here
in
my
eyes
and
that
and
Mr
Berkman
also
said
that,
once
this
is
law,
we
will
have
the
opportunity
here
in
Burbank
to
look
at
at
other
section,
Street
sections
that
may
need
lowering
and
that's
what
I'm
here
to
talk
about
tonight
in
particular
I
feel.
AC
Like
you
know,
a
year
ago,
you
were
all
ready
to
keep
the
speed
limits
down
and
not
move
them
up
and
I
know
that
you're
going
to
go
ahead
and
do
that.
I
feel
confident
in
that.
But
I
would
like
to
ask
that
it
not
be
the
end
of
the
speed
limit
reductions
that
you
look
at
in
the
City
of
Burbank
cities,
with
streets
with
schools,
streets
with
Parks
streets
that
have
bike
lanes
that
don't
have
enough
room
already
and
we're
re
and
we've
raised
speed
limits
up
higher
than
they
should
be.
AC
AC
Also
back
in
July
of
21
I
commented
that
the
Burbank
bike
master
plan
calls
for
a
class
one
bike
lane
upon
that
section
of
San,
Fernando
and
Mr.
Berkman
was
happy
to
point
out
that
that
particular
project
is
in
design,
which
prompts
a
couple
of
questions
for
me.
How
long
has
it
been
in
design,
I'd,
love
to
know,
and
then
also
he
said
that
it
should
be
ready.
Design
should
be
complete
in
Spring
of
23..
That's
coming
up,
so
I
would
ask.
Are
we
on
schedule?
AC
AB
Evening
mayor
vice
mayor,
council,
members
and
staff
I
come
here
tonight
as
a
resident
driver,
cyclist,
pedestrian
I'm,
also
a
transportation
commissioner.
Needless
to
say,
I
get
my
use
out
of
our
streets,
but
tonight
we've
heard
many
sides
of
a
Common
Thread,
problematic
car
traffic.
The
solution
we've
identified
is
slower
speeds
and
I'm.
An
engineer
as
well
and
I
know
that
these
engineering
Solutions
take
time
and
money,
but
they
save
lives
and
money
and
perpetuity
speed
limits
are
one
tool
that
should
be
used,
but
it's
not
the
only
one.
AB
We've
done
Master
planning
for
how
getting
how
we
get
people
to
work
and
now
we're
trying
to
master
plan
in
real
time
of
how
we
get
consumers
to
businesses.
We
should
do
what
we
can
to
support
all
the
stakeholders
properly
designed
roads
make
the
best
use
of
our
public
rights
of
way
when
everyone
is
safe
and
included
wide
straight
long,
roads
invite
speeding
and
dangerous
driving.
We
should
be
making
Burbank
the
city.
People
come
to
to
slow
down
in
and
spend
time
and
money.
Here
we
are
a
city
that
is
nearly
surrounded
by
freeways.
AB
Everyone
is
a
short
drive
from
a
65
mile
per
hour
trip
out
of
our
City
Limits.
We
should
consider
narrowing
our
traffic
Lanes,
including
roundabouts
and
traffic
circles.
Our
Public
Works
director
can
educate
us
on
the
difference
between
the
two
we're
not
just
making
it
harder
to
drive
we're,
making
it
easier
and
more
accessible
for
people
on
foot
on
bike
and
wheelchairs,
skateboards
roller,
skates,
Etc
and
finally,
finally,
I
will
close
by
saying
we
have
great
First
Responders
in
this
city
and
they
do
their
job
well,
but
they
respond
to
a
collision.
That's
already
occurred.
C
J
P
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor,
it's
nice
to
see
some
of
our
commissioners
here:
Mr
Hollis
and
Mr
Lewis,
so
Mr
Berkman
Mr,
you
I,
did
have
two
questions
so,
first
of
all,
just
to
boil
down
what
we're
doing
here
tonight.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
getting
any
of
this
wrong
about
a
year
ago,
with
our
latest
traffic
study
right,
we
were
required
under
law
to
raise
the
speed
limits
on
these
segments
that
we're
talking
about
tonight.
P
We
were
not
inclined
to
do
that
and,
as
a
result,
we
haven't
been
able
to
enforce
use
radar
enforcement
on
those
stretches
of
roads
and
by
updating
the
ordinance
tonight
we'll
be
able
to
resume.
That
immediately.
Is
that
correct,
that's
correct,
okay,
so
I
am
in
favor
of
that,
but
both
of
the
commenters
spoke
about
something
that
I
know:
we've
all
shared
over
the
course
of
the
last
year,
and
that
is
a
desire
to
talk
about
measures
to
mitigate
traffic
and
pedestrian
fatalities
on
our
roads.
P
I
know
that
we
have
a
future
agenda
item
coming
up
with
regards
to
Vision
zero
I
won't
touch
on
that
further,
but
I
do
have
one
question:
Mr
Hollis
was
absolutely
correct.
Assembly
Bill
43
could
make
a
significant
impact
on
other
stretches
of
Road
in
our
community.
So
if
not
tonight
is
that
going
to
be
part
of
that
discussion
when
it
comes
back
Vision
zero
and
if
not,
when
can
we
talk
about
it?.
Z
Council
member,
we
are
already
looking
at
other
streets
that
we
can
Implement
AB
343
and
we're
doing
that
with
Community
Development
departments,
Transportation
Planning
and
our
Traffic
Engineers.
So
it's
an
active
internal
assignment.
If
you
will-
and
it's
part
of
our
complete
our
streets
plans
to
see
where
we
can
Implement
that
effectively
and.
P
Properly,
thank
you.
Mr
Berkman
and
just
one
more
follow-up,
I
wouldn't
be
doing
my
job.
If
I
wasn't
pressing,
you
is
there
some
sort
of
a
timeline
that
you
can
provide
with
the
community.
You
know
some
estimate
of
when
it
could
be
coming
back
for
either
discussion
before
the
council
or
some
sort
of
public
comment
period
on.
Z
J
I
Z
Z
I
A
I
I
just
have
another
comment:
I
mean
I,
think
it's
just
real
appropriate
since
one
you
know,
one
of
our
goals
is
traffic
and
transportation
and
safety
and
Mr
Lewis
brought
up.
The
important
points
of
you
know:
designing
our
streets
so
that
First
Responders
never
need
to
come.
So
I
think
that's
just
a
good
goal
for
Burbank
to
have
thank
you,
but.
C
G
J
C
F
G
G
I
C
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
The
final
report
this
evening
is
a
request
to
consider
writing
a
letter
to
President
Biden
in
the
United
States
Congress,
to
suspend
the
section
907
waiver
to
no
longer
provide
United,
States
military
assistance
to
Azerbaijan
Mrs
VV
on
the
Viviana
garzona
Ministry
of
analysts
and
the
city
manager's
office.
Please
present
the
report
welcome.
H
Good
evening,
mayor
telemantes
vice
mayor
Anthony
and
members
of
the
city
council,
Viviana
garzona,
administrative
analyst,
two
in
the
city
manager's
office
per
vice
mayor
Anthony's,
request
at
the
September
13th
city
council.
Meeting
I
am
here
tonight
to
present
a
first
step
report
for
Council
consideration
of
writing
a
letter
to
President
Biden
in
the
United
States
Congress,
requesting
the
suspension
of
section
907
waiver
to
end
to
end
U.S
military
assistant
to
Azerbaijan
on
September
13th
of
this
year,
fighting
flared
up
between
Armenia
and
Azerbaijan.
Approximately
286
people
were
killed
on
both
sides.
J
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor.
Thank
you,
Mr
grazon
for
that
report,
just
some
quick
background
for
the
people
watching
at
home
that
keep
asking
about
907.
You
know
over
30
years
ago,
Congress
and
the
president
at
that
time.
Under
their
you
know,
wartime,
Powers,
Act
and
whatnot
passed
in
military
spending
budget,
and
there
was
a
section
907.
J
J
J
So
I
would
like
to
move
straight
past
the
second
step
and
direct
a
city
manager
to
write
a
letter
directly
asking
Congress
asking
the
president
to
suspend
that
section:
907
waiver
to
to
stop
sending
that
military
aid
to
Azerbaijan,
and
if
we
could
please
reach
out
to
Ann
CA
and
get
some
language
from
them.
There
they've
been
great
Partners
in
the
community
with
us
before
we
send
that
letter
off.
P
Thank
you,
Mr
Mayor
I
am
in
agreement
with
the
spirit
of
the
motion.
I
would
just
add
that
I
did
a
little
research
on
this
and
look
the
the
Administration
has
declared,
among
other
things,
that
they've
waived
section
907,
because
it's
quote
necessary
to
support
United
States
efforts
to
counter
International
terrorism.
It's
kind
of
difficult
for
us
to
really
weigh
in
on
the
Merit
of
that,
because
they
would
never
share
that
information
publicly.
P
The
only
suggestion
I
would
have
to
the
maker
of
the
motion:
I'm
assuming
you're,
not
going
to
send
the
letter
to
all
535
members
of
Congress.
So
maybe
we
could
Target
Congressman
Schiff
I
believe
is
advancing
house
resolution,
1351,
speaker,
Nancy,
Pelosi,
Senate,
Majority,
Leader
Schumer
and
the
president
I
think
those
four
would
be
the
most
reasonable
recipients
of
the
letter.
V
G
C
L
G
G
I
C
P
P
The
following
night:
I
saw
councilmember
Springer
and
the
vice
mayor
at
burbank's,
first
family
Pride
event
and
I
just
wanted
to
give
a
special
thank
you
to
Burbank
Police
Department.
That
was
a
very
tough
situation
and
for
what
it's
worth
I
thought
they
handled
themselves
professionally
and
made
sure
that
those
in
attendance
at
the
event
were
able
to
safely
enjoy
it.
P
G
Be
real
short
back
on
Wednesday
September
28th
I
attended
the
Burbank
Chamber
of
Commerce
and
the
leadership
Burbank
candidate
Forum
at
Woodbury.
University
I
want
to
congratulate
all
candidates
for
stepping
up
and
wanting
to
get
elected
to
public
office
and
I.
Do
appreciate
their
thoughts
and
whoever
gets
elected,
I
honestly
believe
our
city
is
in
good
hands
and
on
Thursday
September.
The
29th
I
also
attended
the
Employee
Appreciation
breakfast
and
I
kind
of
worked
the
room
or
in
this
case
the
outside
area.
G
There
just
thanking
employees,
because
you
know
there's
a
lot
of
folks
that
are
just
behind
the
scenes.
You
know
they
they've
got
their
executive.
You
know,
department,
heads
and
we
always
say
thank
you
to
them,
but
I
wanted
to
take
that
opportunity
to
thank
the
individual
employees
for
all
their
commitment
to
the
people
of
Burbank
to
try
to
make
us
the
best
great
city
to
live
in.
That's
it
very
short.
Thank
you,
madam
city
clerk.
It
was
short.
I
Yes,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
I
participated
in
the
Burbank
Chamber
of
Commerce
and
Leadership
Burbank
forum,
and
also
the
League
of
Women
Voters
forum
and
serving
breakfast
to
the
employees,
was
very
nice
I'm
really
grateful.
I
had
the
opportunity
to
do
that
and
I
had
a
zoom
with
Molly
boyke
who's,
editor-in-chief
of
the
boroughs
School
newspaper,
and
that
was
nice
and
yesterday
I
met
with,
along
with
our
city
clerk,
three
Senior
Communities
and
learned
some
issues
very
important
to
them,
and
the
unveiling
of
the
pink
Cruiser
this
morning
was
very
nice.
C
C
So
that
was
fun
sausage
every
now
and
then,
while
I
was
serving
I
had
to
you
know,
keep
my
strength
up
and
then
today
was
the
unveiling
of
the
police
department,
print
Cruiser
breast
cancer
awareness,
so
the
people
that
are
listening
to
us
I
encourage
you.
If
you
have
the
time,
take
your
family
out
to
the
in
front
of
the
police.
Fire
building
they've
got
the
cruiser
out
front
and
take
some
pictures
with
it.
It's
very
nice
we're
very
nicely
done
by
a
local
Merchant
here
in
Burbank.
C
J
J
Their
old
food
needs
to
be
donated
in
certain
percentages
as
well,
so
for
us
to
start
sort
of
be
proactive
on
that
I
think
is
going
to
be
a
a
great
idea.
A
lot.
A
lot
of
cities
and
localities
are
doing
that
and
then,
of
course,
that
later
that
night,
the
League
of
Women
Voters
right
here
in
this
chamber,
held
a
number
of
council
forums
and
and
and
school
board
and
Clerk
and
State,
Senate
and
Congress.
J
So
it
was
great,
it
was
great
to
watch,
sat
and
watch
those
and
I
really
enjoyed
it
really
enjoyed
it
and
then
on
Friday
night
I
did
attend
the
the
the
family
Pride
event
and
it
was
a
great
turnout,
great
music.
The
people
were
out
in
force
and
the
the
food
trucks
and
everything
and
I
want
to
give
a
special
shout
out
to
the
folks
who
showed
up
to
stand
in
solidarity
with
the
the
members
attending
the
family.
Pride.
J
These
folks
didn't
come
to
attend
the
event,
but
they
stood
as
sort
of
a
barricade
between
what
was
going
on
across
the
street
and
the
folks
who
were
having
fun
at
the
the
the
pride
event.
It
was
nice
to
see
community
members.
Take
that
stand
and
and
and
and
hold
the
line
there.
So
I
appreciated
those
folks,
council.
I
C
C
The
southern
section,
CIF
Southern
section
approved
it.
Now
it's
going
up
to
the
northern
section
for
the
Statewide
approval.
So
that's
that's
waiting
for
that.
But
it's
going
to
be
a
seven
on
seven
flag
football
for
girls.
That's
amazing
I
mean
it's
yeah,
so
I
just
wanted
to
share
that
because
it
is
it's
a
it's
a
good
thing
for
the
the
ladies
at
the
high
school
level.
You
know
and
and
people
have
asked
well
so
what's
how
do
they
move
up
or
what's
the
next?
What's
the
next
level
up?
C
G
You
Mr
Mayor
Mr
city
manager,
I'd
like
to
put
on
the
agenda
based
upon
the
concern
from
the
Community
member
publicly
at
the
podium
regarding
the
impound
issue.
I,
don't
know
too
much
about
it,
but
I
was
wondering
just
for
The
public's
information
on
this
one
I'd
like
to
put
that
on
the
agenda
for
a
public
review
of
that
a
discussion
with
the
council
members
weighing
in
versus
we
get.
You
know
the
the
weekly
city
managers
information
just
because
of
the
nature
of
it.
I
I,
don't
know
something.
G
C
Okay,
anyone
else
all
right.
We
now
join
the
meeting
to
Tuesday
October
11th
for
a
joint
meeting
in
the
council
chamber.
The
public
May
view
the
meeting
online
or
on
television
and
we'll
be
able
to
provide
public
comment
in
the
following
four
ways:
in
person
for
general
public
comment,
public
hearings
and
reports
to
council
by
calling
in
directly
to
the
council
meeting
by
leaving
an
e-comment
of
the
city
web
page
or
by
emailing
the
city
council
directly.
Thank
you
and
good
night
be
safe.
We're
adjourned.