►
From YouTube: Burbank Planning Board Meeting - May 9, 2022
Description
Burbank Planning Board Meeting - May 9, 2022
A
B
B
Department
of
public
health
officer
order
went
into
effect
which,
among
other
things,
removed
the
requirement
to
wear
a
mask
indoors.
On
april
12
2022,
the
burbank
city
council
moved
to
return
in
person
public
meeting
beginning
on
may
3rd
2022
consistent
with
council
action,
and
the
planning
board
has
also
moved
to
return
in-person
public
meeting
beginning
on
may
9th
2022.
B
Before
we
begin
our
meeting,
there
will
be
one
general
period
of
public
comment
tonight
during
the
oral
communications.
Persons
speaking
during
the
general
public
comment
period
may
provide
the
planning
board
oral
communication
on
any
matter
concerning
city
business,
members
of
the
public
make
comment
in
person
or
by
telephone
during
the
public
comment
period.
B
If
you'd
like
to
participate
in
public
comment
period
by
making
an
in-person
comment,
please
present
a
completed
speaker
card
to
the
planning
division
staff.
If
you'd
like
to
participate
in
the
public
comment
period
by
phone,
please
call
818
238
three,
three:
five.
We
will
announce
when
the
phone
lines
are
open.
B
C
As
we
begin
this
meeting,
we
ask
that
you
guide
our
thoughts
and
give
us
the
wisdom
to
engage
in
sound
deliberation.
May
our
conduct
create
an
environment
of
cooperation
and
exhibit
kindness
for
all.
Thank
you
for
the
opportunities
you
give
us
to
serve
you
and
this
great
city,
and
please
help
us
accomplish
our
goals
in
your
name.
We
pray,
amen.
E
E
D
B
22-0020204,
a
request
to
recommend
city
council
approve
a
zone
text
amendment
for
proposed
updates
to
fees,
standards,
definitions
pertaining
to
community
facility
fees,
as
noted
in
title
10,
zoning
regulations,
chapter
1
zoning
article
22
community
facility
fees
of
the
burbank
municipal
code
in
order
to
accommodate
a
comprehensive
update
to
the
city's
development
impact
fee
program.
Before
we
begin
do
any
planning
board
members
have
any
legal
or
other
conflict
of
interest.
B
E
B
G
F
H
H
H
In
order
to
impose
impact
fees,
the
city
must
adopt
a
nexus
study
to
show
that
a
reasonable
connection
or
nexus
exists
between
the
impacts
caused
by
new
development
and
the
capital
improvements
needed
to
needed
to
address
those
impacts.
Additionally,
the
discharge
to
each
project
must
be
proportional
to
that.
Project's
share
of
the
impact
diff
revenue
collected
can
only
be
used
to
address
needs
from
new
development
not
to
address
existing
deficiencies.
H
H
The
city
currently
charges
the
community
facility
diff
for
police,
fire
library
and
parks
on
all
development
and
the
transportation.
Diff
is
only
charged
on
non-residential
development
and
these
fees
have
been
used
to
pay
for
projects
such
as
the
police,
fire
headquarters,
library,
equipment
park
facilities
and
several
transportation
improvements
and
projects.
H
We
are
proposing
an
updated
diff
program
because
the
city's
current
diffs
are
based
on
studies
completed
in
the
1990s.
Since
that
time,
several
projects
identified
in
the
original
study
have
been
built
or
evolved
and
impacts
and
development
patterns
have
changed.
Therefore,
a
new
nexus
study
is
needed
to
support
fees
that
pay
for
new
infrastructure.
H
Plus
we
have
newer
growth
and
development
assumptions
from
the
birming
2035
general
plan,
the
city
hired
a
consultant
economic
and
planning
systems,
otherwise
known
as
eps,
with
support
from
fear
and
peers
for
the
transportation
analysis
to
conduct
a
nexus
study
and
update
the
city's
gift
program.
The
next
study
provides
the
necessary
technical
documentation
to
support
a
diff
program
update
pursuant
to
state
law.
Any
updates
and
changes
to
the
diff
requires
amending
title
10
chapter
1,
article
22
of
the
municipal
code.
H
H
As
mentioned
earlier,
the
current
diffs
are
based
on
the
original
study
with
projects
forecasted
in
the
1990s,
so
several
projects
have
been
built
or
evolved,
and
this
update
will
allow
us
to
charge
a
fee
to
find
an
up-to-date
list
of
anticipated
infrastructure.
The
updated
diff
is
proposing
to
add
an
information
technology
fee.
Additionally,
the
current
fee
does
not
charge
the
transportation
fee
on
residential
projects,
and
this
would
change
with
a
proposed
diff
program.
H
H
State
law
is
specific
on
the
process
and
analysis
that
must
be
conducted
to
update
diffs.
The
methodology
used
provides
a
necessary
technical
analysis
to
support
a
diff
fee
and
program
update
in
general.
Each
feed
category
use
the
following
steps
to
calculate
the
nexus
supported
maximum
fee
amounts.
H
First,
stephen,
the
consultant
referred
to
the
burning
2035
general
plan,
which
is
a
blueprint
for
the
future
development
of
the
city
to
estimate
existing
and
future
population
and
employment.
Second
staff
provided
a
list
of
their
department's
new
capital
improvements
needed
to
serve
both
existing
and
future
residents
and
employees.
H
Fifth
consultants
distributed
the
cost
further
among
different
residential
and
non-residential
uses,
including
retail
industrial
and
the
other
land
uses
six.
The
consultants
calculated
the
cost
per
unit
of
development.
This
calculation
provides
the
maximum
fee
per
square
foot
or
unit
that
can
be
justified
by
the
nexus
study
and
finally,
the
city
added
a
five
percent
administrative
fee
which
reflects
the
cost
of
administering
the
diff
program.
H
H
Transportation
improvements
include
transit,
complete
streets
and
roadway
improvements.
Some
examples
are
bus
services,
new
bikeways
and
pedestrian
safety
improvements.
The
new
diff
also
proposes
to
add
an
information
technology,
or
it
fee
under
community
facilities,
to
account
for
the
need
to
expand
the
city's
it
infrastructure.
H
H
As
discussed
earlier,
the
nexus
study
calculates
the
maximum
fee
levels
that
can
be
justified
based
on
total
infrastructure
needs
and
its
expected
cost
divided
by
the
expected
development
growth
in
units
and
square
footage.
The
highest
maximum
fees
do
not
mean
we
necessarily
have
to
use
them
or
that
they
are
the
best
fees.
The
updated
maximum
fees
calculated
by
the
new
nexus
study
are,
in
some
cases
significantly
higher
than
the
current
fees
for
these
land
uses.
Imposing
the
maximum
fees
would
conflict
with
other
city
goals
and
policies.
H
H
H
First
align
fee
levels
with
the
city's
larger
goals,
such
as
facilitating
housing
production
and
ensuring
that
new
fees
are
consistent
with
city
fiscal
policies
and
maintain
the
city's
market,
competitiveness
for
new
growth
within
the
region.
Second,
balance
fees
with
building
neighborhoods
diffs
mitigate
the
impacts
of
new
development
and
fund
needed
public
facilities
and
infrastructure.
H
Looking
at
the
city's
cost
recovery
policy
pyramid
staff
determined
that
gifts
fall
under
the
important
services
category
that
provide
individual
and
public
benefit,
it
is
an
important
service
because
it
provides
important
infrastructure
and
gives
the
city
the
ability
to
provide
for
and
sustain
the
added
capacity.
The
infrastructure
that
these
fees
pay
for
do
offer
a
public
benefit.
But
since
the
fees
are
only
covering
the
added
capacity
from
new
development,
diff
revenue
delivers
a
higher
benefit
to
the
user
or,
in
this
case,
to
the
new
development
than
to
the
general
taxpayer.
H
The
maximum
fee
attributable
to
retail
development
is
relatively
high
compared
to
other
fee
categories,
primarily
due
to
the
transportation
impacts.
However,
retail
uses
provide
recurring
annual
general
fund
revenue
in
the
form
of
sales
tax.
Above
and
beyond
the
one-time
fees
provided
by
diffs.
Because
of
this
recurring
revenue,
staff
recommends
the
diff
fee
be
charged
at
a
lower
rate
to
balance
the
need
to
mitigate
impacts
with
a
desire
for
the
city
to
continue
to
to
attract
retail
uses
for
hotel
and
lodging
use
south
recommends.
H
The
city
imposed
diffs
on
hotel
developments
at
a
level
of
67
percent
of
the
maximum
fee
level,
like
retail
uses,
hotel
uses,
uses,
provide
recurring
annual
general
fund
revenue
in
the
form
of
transient
occupancy
tax.
In
addition
to
one-time
gifts,
hotels
also
support
the
city's
larger
employer,
as
well
as
attract
tourists
to
stay
in
burbank
and
patronize.
Other
businesses
setting
this
lower
diff
will
keep
the
city
competitive
in
attracting
new
hotel
uses.
H
Therefore,
staff
recommends
the
proposed
fee
levels
shown
on
this
slide,
which
generally
shows
the
proposed
fees
at
80
percent
of
the
maximum
fee
levels,
in
other
words,
diff,
would
be
paying
80
of
the
total
costs
attributable
to
new
development
for
market
rate
residential
office
studio
and
warehouse.
Industrial
uses,
affordable
housing
units,
retail
and
lodging
hotel
uses
have
slightly
lower
fee
levels.
For
the
reasons
explained
earlier,
when
comparing
the
proposed
fees
to
the
current
fees,
residential
fees
increased
significantly
due
to
applying
transportation
to
the
total
diff.
H
And
here
are
the
proposed
diff
fees
on
market
rate
versus
affordable
units.
This
is
charging
50
percent
of
the
maximum
fee
level
on
affordable
units
compared
to
charging
market
rate
units
80
of
the
maximum
fee.
In
a
mixed,
affordable
and
market
rate
project,
the
regular
fee
would
be
imposed
on
the
market
rate
units
at
80
percent
of
the
max
and
50,
and
the
50
rate
would
be
applied
to
the
affordable
units.
H
The
table
shown
here
shows
the
proposed
burbank
diff,
along
with
burbank
glendale
and
pasadena's
current
fees,
while
glendale
and
pascane
pasadena
charge
dips
on
different
land
use
types
and
collects
funds
for
different
infrastructure
needs.
A
direct
one-to-one
comparison
is
not
possible,
but
a
comparison
can
be
informative
in
showing
how
bourbon's
current
fees
and
new
maximum
fees
are
relative
to
our
neighbors
compared
to
those
of
the
city's
neighbors.
The
proposed
residential
fees
will
still
be
lower
than
glendale
and
pasadena.
Both
glendale
and
pacinia
collect
diff,
primarily
for
acquiring
new
park.
H
Ribbing
also
collects
park
diffs,
but
has
chosen
to
add
park
capacity
by
making
improvements
to
existing
parks
rather
than
buying
and
clearing
property
for
new
parks.
Additionally,
through
other
methods
such
as
the
planned
development
and
development
development
agreement
process,
burbank
encourages
large-scale
projects
to
include
park
space
in
their
developments
at
the
cost
of
the
developer.
H
On
the
other
hand,
burbank's
proposed
non-residential,
diff
fees
will
be
higher
than
glendale
and
pasadena's.
Bourbon
collects
discs
for
a
wider
variety
of
community
facility
infrastructure
than
either
cities.
Only
burbank's,
comprehensive,
diff
fee
program
charges,
impact
fees
for
police
fire
and
I-team
improvements.
H
It
is
important
to
note
that
there
will
be
constant
opportunities
to
re-evaluate
the
diff
program
after
the
fee
is
updated
annually.
The
fee
is
adjusted
based
on
the
construction
cost
inflation
factor.
Additionally,
updated
diff
law
under
ab602
requires
cities
to
update
their
studies.
At
least
every
eight
years.
H
As
mentioned
earlier,
there
were
two
city
council
meetings
held
to
provide
information
to
this
council
about
the
diff
update
and
exit
study
progress.
A
city-wide
virtual
community
meeting
was
also
held
in
april
of
this
year.
Additionally,
direct
communication
was
sent
out
to
interested
parties
and
a
notice
was
published
in
the
newspaper
and
sent
through
the
city's
e-notify.
H
H
Additionally,
if
it
was
a
project,
it
would
be
covered
by
the
common
sense
exemption
under
section
15061b3,
since
the
project
would
not
allow
any
new
uses
and
would
not
charge
the
amount
of
would
not
change
the
amount
of
physical
development
that
is
currently
allowed.
Pursuant
to
the
city's
zoning
regulations,.
H
Based
on
the
analysis
provided
tonight
and
in
the
staff
report,
staff
recommends
that
the
planning
board
adopt
the
resolution
attached
to
the
staff
report,
as
exhibit
a
for
the
update
to
the
city's
development
impact
fee
program.
Staff
proposes
the
ordinance
included,
as
exhibit
b,
which
includes
the
following.
Adding
an
information
technology
fee
implement
a
specific
fee
for
lodging
use,
adopt
the
capital
improvement
plan
presented
in
appendix
b
of
the
nexus
study
report,
apply
city,
council,
cost
recovery
policies
and
general
plan
goals
to
the
next
study.
H
Maximum
fee
levels
provide
a
fee
reduction
for
affordable
housing
by
setting
the
rates
for
community
facilities
and
transportation
fees
for
qualifying
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing
units
at
50
of
the
rates
applicable
to
other
housing
units
and
provide
a
fee
reduction
for
retail
and
lodging
uses,
which
both
generate
recurring
revenues
to
the
city.
In
addition
to
one-time
diffs,
the
proposed
updates
consider
all
of
the
variables
presented
in
this
report
in
order
to
strike
a
balance
between
generating
important
revenue
for
needed
infrastructure,
while
at
the
same
time
supporting
other
city
goals
required
to
build
and
protect
neighborhoods.
H
The
next
steps
include
city
council,
consideration
of
the
board's
recommendation
on
the
zone
text
amendment
and
the
proposed
draft
ordinance
at
a
notice
public
hearing
on
june,
7th
and
21st
updating
the
city's
diff
program.
If
adopted,
the
fees
will
go
into
effect.
60
days
after
on
august,
6th
2022.
H
B
Thank
you.
Thank
you
for
your
report.
We
will
now
open
up
the
meeting
here
for
any
persons
who
wish
to
speak
on
this
matter.
Each
person
may
address
the
planning
board
for
a
maximum
time
of
three
minutes
for
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
comment
in
person.
Please
present
a
completed
speaker
card
to
the
planning
division
staff.
B
If
you
wish
to
speak
for
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
comment
by
phone,
please
call
818
818-238-3335
to
address
the
planning
board.
Callers
will
be
placed
in
the
queue
until
all
persons
comments
have
been
received.
The
phone
lines
are
now
open.
Please
bear
with
us,
as
we
take
a
couple
of
minutes
for
the
first
few
callers
to
get
in
online.
B
F
J
Thanks
for
taking
up
this
issue,
I
know
it's
been
like
a
popular
issue
for
a
long
time
and
you
forgive
me
if
you
covered
this,
I
caught
the
end
part
of
the
presentation
and
I
just
found
out
about
it
that
perused
the
packet
that
came
out,
but
is
it
legal
or
is
it
possible?
I
didn't
see
a
money
for
schools
in
there
and
it's
really
like
again,
it's
possible.
I
missed
it,
and
then
I
had
a
question
about,
for
instance,
the
police.
B
B
H
Thanks
hello,
okay,
to
answer
mr
hamill's
questions:
the
school
district
establishes
their
own
fees.
It's
a
separate,
it's
regulated
under
a
separate
law,
so
they
yeah.
We,
our
impact
fees,
do
not
include
the
any
school
fees.
Secondly,
multi-family
and
single
family,
the
main
difference.
If
you
look
at
the
the
fee
table,
the
main
difference
are
the
transportation
fees
and
that's
because
multi-family
and
single-family
the
trips
generated
from
single-family
typically
are
much
more
higher
than
multifamily,
and
that's
why
those
fees
are
higher.
H
Single-Family
rates
are
higher
than
the
multi-family
rate
and
then
finally,
plan
review
fees
are
not
covered
under
impact
fees.
Impact
fees
are
only
covering
capital
costs
and
infrastructure
from
new
development,
so
plan
review
fees
would
be
a
separate,
separate
fee
that
would
be
calculated
with
either
the
city
fee
study
or
some
other
fee
plan.
B
H
Yes,
I'll
go
through
them
one
by
one,
okay
thanks.
So
the
first
question
is
aside
from
aside
from
inflation:
how
are
fees
raised
and
discretion
it's
under
whose
discretion
the
fees
are
raised,
so
other
than
adjustments
for
inflation.
Adjustments
to
disks
are
made
by
updating
the
diff
program,
updating
the
diff
program
through
the
process
that
the
city
is
currently
undertaking.
H
This
includes
establishing
the
city's
growth
forecast
identified
in
the
general
plan,
ident
identifying
necessary
infrastructure
needed
to
support
that
growth
and
preparing
a
nexus
study
to
establish
updated
fees
and
show
that
a
reasonable
connection
or
nexus
exists
between
the
impacts
caused
by
new
development
and
the
capital.
Improvements
needed
to
address
those
impacts,
and
the
city
council
has
the
sole
discretion
to
adjust
these
fees,
provided
that
it
is
supported
by
the
nexus
study.
H
H
The
park,
recreation
and
community
services
department
identified
necessary
capital
infrastructure
necessary
to
address
park
and
recreation
park
and
recreation
needs
needed
to
support
new
development,
primarily
primarily
to
new
new
residents
expected
to
live
in
burbank,
and
they
also
based
their
list
on
council
and
park
board
priorities
and
and
their
unfunded
needs
list.
And
the
next
question
is:
how
old
is
this
nexus
study?
G
Are
these
the
question
is:
has
there
been
conversation
of
new
potential
capital
projects
in
the
last
few
months
that
have
been
added
to
this
nexus?
That
can
be
added
to
this
nexus
study,
for
example,
a
horse
park
in
the
rancho
equestrian
district,
new
parks
in
the
golden
state
district,
as
well
as
maybe
horse
trails.
H
H
But
specifically,
a
horse
park
is
currently
not
included
in
the
infrastructure
list,
but
as
we
discussed,
while
the
city
council
plans
to
consider
updating,
diff
program,
updating
the
diff
program
this
year,
staff
is
recommending
that
the
city
council
may
wish
to
consider
a
subsequent
update
upon
adoption
of
the
three
specific
plans
currently
under
development.
If
those
specific
plans
identify
additional
needed
infrastructure
to
support
those
plans,.
H
Well,
the
new
state
law,
as
we
mentioned,
requires
an
updated
nexus
study
every
eight
years,
so
at
least
every
eight
years
and
stuff
staff
will
be
recommending
that
the
next
study
be
updated
sooner
upon
completion
of
the
specific
plans,
as
we
had
mentioned
earlier,
and
what
the
other
question
next
question
was:
what
is
the
average
inflation
rate
construction
cost?
Is
there
a
cap
on
how
far
fees
can
climb
per
year
based
on
inflation
rate?
In
the
past
few
years,
inflation
rates
for
construction
costs
have
been
approximately
between
two
to
four
percent.
H
It's
been
anomaly
this
year.
It
was
about
16
and
right
now
there
is
no
inflation
cap
but
who's
to
say
that
the
state
might
not
implement
something
later
in
the
future,
but
currently
there
is
no
inflation
cap
and
then
finally,
the
last
question
was
how
are
discounts
being
applied
to
affordable
housing?
Is
the
entire
project
receiving
the
discount
or
just
the
units
set
for
affordable
housing
and
then,
as
we
had
mentioned
earlier,
staff
is
recommending
the
city
impose
a
lower
diffu
level
on
each
affordable
unit
that
is
dd
restricted.
C
H
C
H
Yes,
so
they
would
get
a
credit
for
the
demolished
area,
but
any
any
added
square
footage,
but
this
for
residential
units,
though
it
is
based
on
housing
units.
So
if
they,
if
you're
building
on
a
site
that
already
had
one
unit
and
you're
placing
it
with
another
one
unit,
then
there
is
no
net
increase
in
units.
E
E
So,
in
other
words,
if
I
build
a
15
unit,
multi-family
project,
isn't
that
going
to
be
generating
more
traffic
more
traffic
than
I
I
guess
I
I
don't
understand
how
that
how
that
number
came
up.
I
I
guess
I
look
at
a
multi-family
project.
You
can't
break
it
up
into
individual
units.
It's
a
15-unit
project.
That's
going
to
generate
a
tremendous
amount
of
traffic
in
one
place
versus
a
single-family
house
that
am
I
making
myself.
I
I
Obviously,
if
you
have
15
multi-family
units,
the
per
capita
for
each
is
lower,
but
when
you
take
them
together,
as
you
stated
that
overall
project
is
going
to
have
a
higher
demand
on
the
transportation
network
and
that
project
together,
obviously
would
pay
more
on
the
project
than
a
single
family
house.
But
the
reason
the
single
family
amount
on
the
individual
unit
is
higher
is
because,
if
you
take
a
unit
by
unit
comparison,
traditionally
transportation
trips
generated
by
a
single-family
house
are
more
on
a
per
capita
basis
than
that
single
or
single
multi-family
unit.
B
E
D
I
The
fry
site,
800
plus
units
we
take
that
current
fee
amount
per
unit,
the
2300
2500,
but
you
multiply
by
800
to
get
the
residential
portion
of
the
community
facilities
one
one
big
thing
to
think
about.
As
as
ms
ivara
mentioned
earlier,
transportation
fees
are
not
currently
charged
on
residential
projects,
so
the
transportation
portion
there
was
no
transportation
impact
fee
charged
on
fry's.
Only
the
commercial
portion
right-
that
is
one
big
change
that
we
are
proposing
to
make
with
this
updated
program,
is
to
to
charge
residential
projects,
transportation
impact
fees.
E
E
I
So
that's
a
policy,
that's
a
policy
decision
of
ultimately
the
city
council.
So
what
the
in
with
the
nexus
study
prepared,
was
the
maximum
level
of
fee
that
we
can
charge
that's
justifiable
by
the
methodology
and
the
and
the
law.
The
city
council
may
choose
any
level
within
that.
Without
with
that
range
up
to
the
maximum,
for
the
reasons
we
stated,
we
think
we
should
back
off
from
that
maximum,
either
by
20
generally
or
even
further
on
other
fees.
G
H
E
B
I
Yeah,
it
is
a
little
bit
of
a
bookkeeping
thing
and
also
a
little
bit
of
at
least
on
the
transportation
side,
how
some
of
the
studies
and
some
of
the
analysis
that
we
do
for
other
transportation
review.
The
the
kind
of
the
variable
that
we
look
at
is
the
room,
and
so
we
think
charging
per
room,
because
room
is
kind
of
the
ultimate
thing
that
drives
activity
transportation.
Activity
on
a
hotel
is
the
room.
I
We
were
using
square
footage,
which
is
a
more
coarser
measure
of
of
impact
and
so
we're
proposing
to
make
the
change
to
per
room
instead
of
square
foot.
What
we
had
to
do
to
kind
of
give
you
and
the
council
kind
of
an
idea
of
what's
the
before
versus
after
is
we
had
to
kind
of
convert
our
square
footage
rate
to
a
unit
rate
just
for
illustrative
purposes.
I
We
kind
of
took
a
500
per
square
foot
conversion,
that's
not
necessarily
to
say
the
hotel
room
is
500
square
feet,
but
it's
kind
of
the
overall.
When
you
look
at
square
footage
of
a
whole
hotel
versus
the
number
of
rooms,
that's
kind
of
where
we
landed.
It
doesn't
mean
anything
from
the
assessment
of
the
fee.
It's
just
a
way
to
try
and
do
an
apples
to
apples
comparison
of
what
we're
currently
charging
versus
what
we're
proposing
to
change.
You
could
use
us.
E
B
I
So,
generally,
I
would
say
it
would
be
included
in
the
overall
per
room
calculation
if
the
amenity
like
the
restaurant
was
something
that
was
kind
of
incidental
or
included
in
a
typical
hotel.
So
when
we
do
the
calculations
for
hotels
and
generating
the
trips
and
what
ite,
for
instance,
generates
trips
by
room,
it's
looking
at
the
aggregate
of
the
hotel.
So
it's
looking
at
the
employees,
the
the
guests
and
the
traffic
to
the
incidental
uses,
so
we
would
not
charge
it
out
separately.
I
However,
if
the
hotel
on
a
on
a
kind
of
project
by
project
basis,
if
the
hotel
had
a
separate,
intense
use,
that
was
kind
of
up,
could
operate
on
its
own
and
could
a
gener
could
kind
of
derive
its
own
traffic
or
activity.
We
might
split
it
out
if
it
was
if
it
made
sense,
but
generally
it
would
be
included.
B
B
I
That's
a
good
question
and
again
it
is
a
policy
decision
that
ultimately
is
made.
The
council
could
carve
out
circumstances
like
that.
I
want
to
remind
you
two,
though,
because
a
lot
of
folks
have
gone
and
looked
at
that
fee,
particularly
on
the
single
family
set
and
said,
and
looked
and
thought
to
themselves.
Oh
that's
another
fee
on
the
bottom
line
of
a
a
single
family
person
doing
something
with
their
home,
keep
in
mind.
I
Diffs
rarely
applies
to
single
family,
because
even
if
you're
knocking
the
house
down
and
building
it
with
another
one,
it's
a
net
zero,
so
you're
not
charged.
So
just
to
clarify
that
or
to
underline
that,
where
you
would
be
charges,
you
somehow
had
a
single
family
house
but
say
you
were
on
an
r2
or
an
r3,
and
you
were
building
another
unit
that
net
new
unit.
Yes,
would
be
charged
a
multi,
a
new
multi-family
unit
rate,
because
you
are
now
two
units
on
one
parcel.
I
F
F
B
C
And
it's
important
that
we
have
looked
into
this
and-
and
I
think
I
I
was
vice
chair-
rosario
alluded
to
it,
and-
and
that
was
one
of
my
concerns
where
a
single
family
would
absorb
this
type
of
a
transportation
fee,
which
is
tremendous.
I
mean
I
can
understand
where
developers
would
be
able
to
work
that
into
their
financing
or
equations
in
calculations
and
so
forth,
and
so
on,
whether
it
be
retail,
multi-family,
industrial
and
so
forth,
but
for
a
single
family
to
absorb
that
transportation
with.
G
I'd
like
to
also
say
that's
a
great
idea
as
well.
I
agree
that
it
needs
to
be
looked
at,
because
when
I
asked
what
the
inflation
rate
was,
you
said
it's
16
in
the
last
year,
whereas
before
it
was
three
to
four
percent
and
fees
can
get
astronomically
high,
if
we
don't
revisit
that
at
a
sooner
time.
I
also
wanted
to
make
a
recommendation
to
council
to
also
talk
about
putting
in
a
horse
park
at
the
equestrian
district
new
parks
at
the
golden
state
district.
E
F
C
I'll
make
them
I'll
make
the
motion
to
adopt
a
resolution
of
the
planning
board.
The
city
of
burbank
exhibit
a
recommending
the
city
to
the
city
council,
adopt
an
ordinance
of
the
city
council
of
the
city
of
burbank
amending
title
10
chapter
1,
article
22
of
the
burbank
municipal
code,
exhibit
b
to
update
community
facility
fees
for
project
number
22-0002020.
B
D
B
Motion
passes
oral
communications.
Now
is
the
time
for
oral
communications
from
the
public.
Any
persons
speaking
during
this
period
may
address
the
planning
board
on
any
matter
concerning
city
business.
Each
person
may
address
the
planning
board
for
a
maximum
time
of
three
minutes
for
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
comment
in
person.
Please
present
staff
with
the
completed
speaker
card
to
the
planning
staff
and,
if
you
wish
to
speak
for
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
comment,
please
call
818-238-3335.
B
B
C
B
B
B
B
F
The
other
items
yeah
the
the
as
it
comes
to
golden
state.
I
will
say
this
for
border
member
ulrich
and
the
rest
of
the
board.
You
will
be
looking
at
the
specific
plan
for
golden
state
yeah
and,
as
part
of
that
discussion,
we
we
can
have
a
very
robust
discussion
about
new
opportunities
for
new,
open
space
and
parks.
There
same
thing
with
media
district,
same
thing
with
downtown
yeah.
B
F
Just
one
and-
and
that
is-
and
I
apologize
we-
we
didn't
do
it
at
the
beginning
of
the
meeting,
but
we
wanted
to
welcome
board
member
michael
elric
to
the
board.
Thank
you.
We
now
have
five,
even
though
board
member
heiner
was
out
today,
we
look
forward
to
working
with
you.
Thank
you
for
the
input.
I
really
wanna
recognize
and
appreciate
the
board
member
for
submitting
questions
to
us
earlier
on
today
that
we
could
prepare.
So
we
encourage
all
the
board
members
when
they
have.
F
I
know
you
all
are
busy,
but
when
you
get
an
opportunity,
if
you
send
those
our
way,
that
might
be
helpful
and
then
thank
you
for
staff.
Our
colleagues
here
beverly
and
david
for
coming
and
presenting
tonight
they've
worked
on
it.
I've
been
here
five
years
and
they've
been
working
on
an
iteration
of
this
in
more
ways
than
one
over
the
last
couple
of
years
and
there's
been
changes
and
updates.
So
what
you
have
in
front
of
you
is
a
culmination
of
a
lot
of
hard
work
with
the
consultant.
F
B
Great
yeah
and
it
looked
like
it
was
very
complex.
So
thank
you
for
your
hard
work.
We
now
adjourn
to
the
next
regular
planning
board
meeting
on
monday
may
23rd
2022
at
6
pm.
This
meeting
will
be
held
in
person
in
the
city
chambers
at
2,
275,
east
olive
avenue.
The
public
is
invited
to
attend
the
meeting
in
person
or
view
the
meeting
online
or
on
television.