►
From YouTube: Burbank Planning Board Meeting - August 22, 2022
Description
Burbank Planning Board Meeting - August 22, 2022
A
Welcome
to
the
regular
planning
board
meeting
for
the
planning
board
on
monday
august
22nd
2022
to
help
slow
the
spread
of
covet
19.
city
council
adopted
an
emergency
proclamation
on
tuesday
july
19th,
requiring
face
coverings
to
be
worn
while
in
attendance
at
all
city
of
burbank
public
meetings,
including,
but
not
limited
to,
meetings
of
the
city
council
and
its
boards
and
commissions.
A
A
A
A
B
C
B
B
A
Okay,
there
are
two
public
hearings
tonight
on
the
agenda
item
number
one
now
is
the
time
and
place
for
the
hearing
to
receive
public
comment
for
the
recirculated
draft
environmental
impact
report
for
the
proposed
2021
and
2020
through
2029
housing
element,
safety
element
and
environmental
justice
general
plan
updates.
The
public
hearing
is
to
be
held
during
the
47
day
review
period
that
started
on
july
22nd
2022
and
will
end
on
september
6.
2022
no
decision
will
be
made
by
the
planning
board.
F
A
E
G
Good
evening
vice
chair
risotti
and
members
of
the
board,
my
name
is
shipra
rajesh
senior
planner
in
the
community
development
department
during
tonight's
presentation,
staff
will
provide
a
brief
overview
of
the
housing
and
safety
element
update
and
a
summary
of
the
revised
draft.
Eir
sections,
as
well
as
draft
eir
findings
and
receive
public
comments
on
the
revised
sections
of
the
draft.
Eir
planning
board
will
not
be
deliberating
or
making
a
decision
on
the
project
at
this
time,
and
the
discussion
is
limited
to
receiving
public
comments
on
the
revised
sections
of
the
draft.
G
G
G
The
housing
element
is
made
up
of
six
major
components.
These
include
review
of
effectiveness
of
existing
housing
element,
assessment
of
existing
and
projected
housing
needs
identification
of
financial
land
and
administrative
resources,
evaluation
of
constraints
to
the
development
of
housing
and
housing
plan,
which
provides
programs
for
implementation
of
the
goals
enlisted
in
the
housing
element.
G
G
The
buffer
is
intended
to
offset
the
unfulfilled
development
of
projected
dwelling
units
on
the
opportunity
sites
noted
in
the
housing
element
update,
inclusive
of
the
buffer
and
the
under
required
arena
allocation.
The
city
has
undertaken
a
planning
and
environmental
assessment
process
that
accounts
for
a
total
of
10
011
dwelling
units.
G
G
G
G
The
proposed
update
of
the
city's
housing
and
safety
element,
as
well
as
the
incorporation
of
environmental
justice
policies
within
the
general
plan,
is
deemed
as
a
project
that
is
subject
to
sequa
to
fulfill
the
review
requirements
of
sequa.
The
city
prepared
a
program
environmental
impact
report.
Pursuant
to
section
15168
of
square
guidelines,
the
draft
eir
was
released
for
a
65-day
public
review
period
on
january
26,
2022.
G
G
H
H
The
three
main
purposes
for
sequa
are
to
to
one
disclose
the
significant
environmental
effects
of
a
project
to
the
public
and
the
agency's
decision
makers
to
identify
ways
to
support
to
avoid
or
reduce
potential
environmental
impacts
through
mitigation
measures
or
alternatives,
and
also
to
enhance
public
participation
in
the
planning
and
environmental
review
process.
The
purpose
of
tonight's
meeting
is
to
present
the
findings
of
the
draft
eir
and
recirculated
draft
eir
and
receive
public
comments.
H
So
this
is
the
standard
timeline
for
the
eir
process,
which
begins
with
a
distribution
of
the
notice
of
preparation
of
the
eir
and
a
30-day
scoping
period.
We
prepared
and
circulated
the
draft
eir
in
january
for
a
65-day
public
review
period
and
please
note
that
the
standard
review
period
for
an
eir
is
45
days.
H
We
received
143
public
comments
during
the
the
first
review
period
and
based
on
those
comments,
we
recirculated
the
biological
resources
and
utilities
and
service
systems
sections
of
the
draft
eir
on
july
22nd.
So
we
are
still
currently
in
the
public
review
period
for
the
recirculated
draft
eir,
which
will
end
on
september
6th.
H
H
Based
on
that
initial
analysis,
we
determined
that
eight
of
these
issues
would
not
result
in
potentially
significant
impacts,
so
the
eir
focused
on
the
other
12
issues,
because
the
housing
element
addresses
citywide
development.
The
eir
was
prepared
at
the
programmatic
level,
which
means
the
the
analysis
does
not
focus
on
the
individual
projects
included
in
the
housing
element.
Rather,
this
program
eir
serves
as
a
first
tier
environmental
document
that
focuses
on
the
effects
of
implementing
the
housing
element
at
the
city-wide
level
and
in
the
future.
H
Each
section
includes
the
setting
for
the
existing
conditions,
also
referred
to
as
the
baseline
conditions
and
determine
if
impacts
will
be
below
sequa's
significance
thresholds
for
most
of
the
potentially
significant
impacts.
We
included
mitigation
measures
to
reduce
those
impacts,
but
we
did
find
that
there
are
a
couple
impacts
that
are
significant
and
unavoidable,
which
leads
to
the
our
findings.
H
The
eir
includes
measures
to
protect
any
identified
historic
resources
on
a
project
site
for
archaeological
and
tribal
cultural
resources.
Their
mitigation
measures
provide
requirements
during
the
construction
period
if
resources
are
discovered
on
a
project
site
and
projects
would
be
required
to
also
to
retain
monitors
to
minimize
potential
impacts
to
these
resources.
H
Property
site
assessments
must
be
conducted
prior
to
the
start
of
construction,
and
if
contamination
is
identified,
there
are
additional
measures
for
cleanup
of
the
site
prior
to
construction
for
noise
and
vibration
impacts.
The
eir
includes
multiple
mitigation
measures
to
minimize
potential
impacts
during
the
construction
period
of
the
individual
housing
projects
under
the
housing
element.
H
H
A
project
is
analyzed
based
on
the
reduction
of
empty
under
three
metrics,
the
average
total
vmt
per
service
population
per
capita
and
per
employee
under
full,
build
out
of
the
housing
element.
The
vmt
per
capita
would
be
reduced
beyond
the
required
15
percent,
but
the
percent
for
the
per
service
population
and
employee
employee
vmt
would
not
be
reduced
beyond
the
required
fifteen
percent.
H
H
The
analysis
found
that
full
build
out
under
the
housing
element
would
increase
wastewater
generation
beyond
the
treatment
capacity
that
is
available
at
the
burbank
water
reclamation
plant.
The
in
the
draft
eir
included
a
mitigation
measure
for
a
service
sewer
service
constraints,
analysis
for
individual
projects
which
reduced
impacts
at
the
project
level.
H
H
Because
of
these
additional
measures,
this
section
was
included
in
the
recirculated
draft
eir,
but
due
to
the
timing
of
the
upgrades
and
master
plan,
these
measures
will
not
be
completed
or
available
by
the
time.
Development
under
the
housing
element
will
begin.
So
this
is
still
a
significant
and
unavoidable
impact.
H
An
eir
requires
analysis
of
a
reasonable
range
of
alternatives,
as
well
as
the
no
project
on
alternative
under
the
no
project
alternative.
The
city
would
continue
with
implementation
of
the
existing
housing
element
and
the
growth
rate
predicted
by
skag
for
2029,
which
is
3591
units.
Overall.
This
no
project
alternative
results
in
fewer
environmental
impacts
in
comparison
to
the
to
build
out
under
the
housing
element,
but
it
would
not
fulfill
the
state
requirements
under
the
city.
Buildout
alternative.
H
H
Based
on
the
comments
received,
we
recirculated
two
of
the
sections
that
review
period
will
end
on
september
6th
and
the
final
eir
will
be
completed
by
september
17th
after
tonight's
meeting.
The
housing
element
and
draft
eir
will
be
presented
to
the
city
council
on
september
27th
and
we
anticipate
filing
the
notice
of
determination
in
early
october.
H
Again,
the
purpose
of
tonight's
meeting
is
to
get
the
public's
comments
on
the
proposed
project.
Well,
while
we
take
note
of
your
comments
well,
we
will
take
note
of
the
comments
tonight.
Please
also
provide
written
comments
that
will
be
part
of
the
public
record.
Please
send
comments,
comments
to
shipra
rajesh,
either
by
email
or
mail.
A
We
will
now
open
the
meeting
to
hear
from
many
persons
who
wish
to
speak
on
this
matter.
Each
person
may
address
the
planning
board
for
a
maximum
time
of
three
minutes
for
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
comment
in
person.
Please
present
a
completed
speaker
card
to
planning
division
staff.
If
you
wish
to
speak
for
members
who
are
at
home,
wish
to
comment
by
telephone,
please
call
818
238-3335
to
address
the
planning
board.
Callers
will
be
placed
in
the
queue
until
and
all
in
person.
Comments
have
been
received.
A
A
D
J
Good
evening,
how's
everyone
doing
today,
my
name
is
joshua
christensen,
I'm
a
representative
with
the
southwest
regional
council
of
carpenters
and
we're
talking
about
these
these
plans
and
just
want
to
bring
you
guys
attention.
You
know
when
we
build
these
these
houses
and
these
these
required
housing.
You
know
we're
going
to
make
sure
we
have
responsible
contractors,
there's
a
a
stream
that
came
out
last
year
in
june
of
2021
from
cal
berkeley,
it's
how
the
burden
of
the
taxpayer
in
the
construction
industry,
the
construction
industry
is
separated
into
two
parts.
J
We
have
commercial
and
residential
about
90
percent
of
the
commercial
is
union
union
workers
which
get
paid
a
fair
standard
wage.
What
we
call
a
mortgage
paying
job
and
then
the
about
five
percent
of
the
residential
is
a
union,
but
that
95
of
the
residential
side
is
not
under
any
kind
of
union
and
that
of
those
95.
J
Most
of
them
are
on
some
kind
of
public
assistance
where
they
receive.
You
know:
public
assistance
for
health
care,
public
assistance
for
for
child
support
or
such
child
support,
but
child
care.
You
got
public
assistance
for
food
stamps
and
that's
the
type
of
construction
that
there
is
in
the
residential.
J
It
amounts
to
about
three
billion
dollars
a
year
in
the
state
of
california
alone,
that
the
taxpayers
have
that
burden
to
pay
for,
and
that's
just
a
construction
alarm,
not
including
any
other
any
other
type
of
of
industry,
and
so
what
we're
asking
today
is
when
you
guys
approve
or
make
changes
to
these
plans
that
you
add
in
there
that
all
workers
will
receive.
You
know
a
fair
wage.
All
workers
will
receive
health
care.
J
All
contractors
that
are
that
are
bidding
projects
in
this
city
that
they
might
be
able
to
be
able
to
provide
a
background
of
wherever,
where
what
jobs
they've
been
on
before
and
what
violations
that
they've
had
in
their
in
their
past
and
where
does
their
manpower
come
from?
Another
thing
is
we
gotta
hire
local
workers?
They
gotta
make
sure
that
workers
are
not
on
the
road
driving.
J
J
For
a
job
where
they're
working
14
hours
a
day
and
only
making
100
bucks
for
that
day,
that's
what
we're
seeing
and
that's
the
type
of
instances
that
we're
talking
about
in
the
study
that
we
reflect
upon
we're
asking
that
you,
you,
you
and
the
city
make
some
recommendations
that
the
city
won't
get
affected
by
this,
that
they
might
be
able
to.
They
might
be
able
to
retire.
D
K
Planning
commission
thanks
for
giving
me
the
opportunity
to
speak
tonight.
My
name
is
barrett
lankford,
I'm
a
representative
with
the
southwest
regional
council
of
carpenters.
We
represent
nearly
5
000
working
men
and
women
in
and
around
the
burbank
area.
Just
to
piggyback
on
what
my
colleague
josh
christensen
talked
about.
You
know:
we've
been
real
hungry
for
something
in
burbank
I
mean
you
guys
have
seen
the
member
outreach.
K
You
know
our
members
are
happy
to
drive
further
and
further
and
further
to
downtown
la
to
lax,
to
places
like
that
even
further,
just
to
make
a
livable
wage
mortgage-paying
job
with
healthcare
benefits.
You
know,
there's
tons
of
housing,
that's
supposed
to
be
built
under
this
housing
element
and,
like
you
heard
josh
said,
the
residential
housing
market
for
construction
workers
is
a
is
a
real
bad
market.
K
They're
not
good
things
that
are
going
on
and
you
know
we
could
build
all
this
housing
and,
at
the
same
time,
that
we're
building
this
housing
thinking
we're
doing
good
things.
We're
pushing
construction
workers,
families
right
into
poverty
they'll
never
be
able
to
afford
those
houses,
even
if
you
make
them
affordable
because
they're
getting
exploited
by
these
contractors
and
these
developers
don't
want
to
do
anything
about
it.
They
just
want
to
hire
the
cheapest
get
away
with
it.
K
Try
to
say:
oh,
it's
not
our
fault,
it's
on
the
gc,
but
they're
ultimately
responsible
for
making
these
decisions.
So
I
think,
like
we're
at
a
dire
point
where
we
need
some
sort
of
worker
protection
for
workers
that
are
in
and
around
the
burbank
area.
We
interview
tons
of
workers,
and
you
know,
there's
cash
pay,
there's
guys
traveling,
all
the
way
from
you
know,
50
60
miles
away
just
to
work
there
and
they're
not
receiving
any
health
care
benefits,
or
anything
like
that
and
they've
got
to
rely
on
government
subsistence.
K
So
I
wanted
to
bring
up
one
thing.
I
know
you
guys,
I
see
in
section
2.5.1
of
the
housing
element
update.
There's
a
line
item
that
says:
housing,
plan
goals,
policies
and
programs,
including
programs,
10
and
11,
that
provide
for
updates
to
local
density,
bonus
and
inclusionary
housing
regulations
that
require
an
economic
feasibility
analysis
to
evaluate
the
potential
impact
of
adding
workforce
training
and
prevailing
wage
requirements
to
new
housing
development.
K
We
really
appreciate
you
know
you
guys
inserting
this
language
and
I
think
it's
a
very
good
start.
It
shows
that
you
guys
care
and
and
want
to
do
something
for
the
workers.
I
would
just
suggest
you
know
that
that
sentence
is
a
little
cloudy
and
if
we're
going
to
do
this,
let's
do
this
right.
So
I'd
like
to
make
a
recommendation
to
strike
out
that
line
and
instead
read
goals,
policies
and
programs
has
been
reached.
D
L
How
do
you
planning
board
hope
you
guys
were
having
a
great
great
afternoon?
My
name
again
is
chuck
powell.
I
am
a
35-year
member
of
the
southwest
regional
council
of
carpenters
and
also
to
piggyback
a
little
bit
on
mr
lankford
and
mr
christian,
my
my
biggest
ask
is:
is
the
affordable
housing
and
what
how
that
has
affected
me
is.
L
L
You
know
implemented
into
the
system
here,
because
the
people
that
live
in
the
city
aren't,
even
when
we
have
our
kids
and
I'm
sure
everybody
on
the
board
has
children
and
watching
them
have
to
be
forced
to
move
away
and
not
be
able
to
see
your
grandkids
because
of
the
housing,
the
housing
costs
and
also
before
they're,
having
a
nice
paying
job
affordable
job
that
they
can
afford
to
buy
these
houses.
You
know
if
we're
building
them,
we
should
be
able
to
to
buy
them
again.
L
A
C
E
I
believe
we've
received
all
the
comments.
There
was
also,
as
we
mentioned
before,
a
packet
of
comments
that
were
received
outside
of
tonight's
meeting.
All
those
comments
collectively
will
be
incorporated
into
the
record
and
will,
since
it
is
a
received
comment,
it
will
also
be-
and
it's
considered
during
the
public
comment
period
of
the
document-
that's
being
recirculated.
B
E
E
E
F
E
I'll
speak
in
general
terms,
and
then
I've
got
my
subject.
Subject
matter
experts
here
to
my
left,
so
what
the
environmental
document
that's
before
you
is
intended
to
do
is
to
analyze
the
project
that
ms
rajesh
presented,
and
that
is
the
update
to
the
general
plan
regarding
the
housing
element,
the
safety
element
and
the
environmental
justice
policies
that
are
going
to
be
incorporated
in
the
various
sections
of
the
general
plan.
E
E
What
this
does
is
it
provides
it's
intended
to
provide
clarity
on
full,
build
out
of
the
project
and
what
the
impacts
are,
so
that
decision
makers
in
this
case
the
city
council,
would
be
able
to
evaluate
the
project,
evaluate
the
potential
impacts
under
sequa
and
then
make
a
determination
based
on
that
on
the
project
and
then
also
on
the
impacts
and
some
that
are
identified
as
significant
and
unavoidable
for
them
to
be
able
to
approve
something
of
that
sort.
They
would
do
what
they
call
make.
E
Findings,
a
fact
and
they'd
have
to
also
adopt
the
statement
of
overwriting
consideration
as
to
and
there's
a
process
that
you
go
through
in
doing
that,
and
the
intent
of
that
is
to
be
able
to
determine
if
they
were
to
approve
a
project
like
that.
What
the
impacts
of
the
project
are
and
do
the
benefits
of
the
project
outweigh
the
potential
impacts
to
the
environment.
So
all
that
kind
of
gets
packaged
together.
Part
of
that
narrative
is
also
responding
to
public
comments.
E
Excuse
me
during
this
period
that
then
get
packaged
in
what
they
call
the
final
environmental
impact
report.
So
so
the
whole
purpose
of
this
is
really
it's
a
public
disclosure
document
that
analyzes
the
project
and
that's
what's
being
forwarded
at
some
point
to
the
decision
makers,
I.e.
The
council
since
they're
the
ones
that
have
the
final
say
in
approving
general
plan
amendment.
They
would
be
looking
at
that
at
that
environmental
assessment.
E
With
that
said,
individual
projects
that
come
forth
at
a
future
date
would
have
to
look
at
what
mr
rajesh
was
referencing
mitigation
measures
that
are
incorporated
into
different
areas
where
they
may
be
impacting
it.
So
the
example
of
we
were
talking
about
biological,
so
if
there's
potential
for
us
to
impact
nesting,
birds
or
the
bats
or
the
butterflies,
and
it's
found
out
that
they're
within
that
particular
location,
we
would
have
to
take
on
mitigation
measures
to
reduce
the
impact
to
those
particular
species.
Same
thing
with
cultural
resources.
E
If
we
identify
that
there's
a
potential
cultural
resource
on
the
site
that
would
require
or
trigger
certain
mitigation
measures
and
there's
others
for
air
quality
and
it
kind
of
goes
on
from
there.
So
it
would
affect
projects
in
the
future
if
adopted,
because
there'd
be
a
plan,
what
we
call
a
mitigation
monitoring
reporting
program
that
we
would
have
to
go
back
to
and
check
the
project
against
and
make
sure
that
anywhere
where
those
particular
mitigation
measures
apply,
that
they
would
be
applied
to
the
project.
M
E
Is
a
disclosure
document
for
the
council
to
understand
what
the
impacts
are
and
then
also
accompanying
that
mitigation
measures
that
would
be
applied
to
future
projects
under
the
under
the
housing
element?
If,
if
built
and
are
subject
to
the
housing
element
like
the
opportunity
sites,
build
out
or
housing
projects,.
M
M
E
M
M
M
A
Moving
on
to
item
number
two:
now
is
the
time
and
place
for
public
hearing
on
the
city's
proposed
2021
through
2029
six
cycle,
housing
element,
safety
element
and
environmental
justice.
General
plan
updates
before
we
begin
to
any
planning
board
members,
have
any
financial,
legal
or
other
conflict
of
interest.
Regarding
this
hearing.
B
G
This
slide
provides
the
outline
of
the
presentation.
I
will
begin
the
presentation
by
elaborating
on
the
importance
of
maintaining
a
state
compliant
housing
element
before
talking
about
the
process
and
schedule
for
the
housing
element
update,
including
the
public
participation
involved
in
the
process.
Thereafter,
I
will
provide
details
on
the
proposed
updates
to
the
housing
element.
Safety
element,
as
well
as
environmental
justice
policy
updates
that
have
that
have
been
incorporated
throughout
the
general
plan.
G
This
is
the
right
presentation.
This
was
the
presentation
overview
that
I
just
went
over
and
on
this
slide
I
talked
about
the
burbank
2035
city's
general
plan,
which
is
a
state
required
policy
document
made
up
of
different
elements
that
provide
guidance
in
shaping
the
future
physical
growth
and
development
of
the
city.
G
Burbank
2035
includes
the
following
elements:
housing
land
use,
mobility,
safety,
noise,
air
quality
and
climate
change,
open
space
and
conservation
and
plan
realization
every
eight
years.
The
housing
element
of
the
general
plan
must
be
updated
and
reviewed
by
the
california
department
of
housing
and
community
development
or
hcd.
G
G
In
addition,
a
number
of
state
laws
taking
effect
in
recent
years
trigger
other
general
plan
updates
upon
revision
to
any
element
of
the
general
plan,
which
in
this
case
is
the
housing
element.
This
includes
required
revisions
to
the
safety
element
and
revision
revisions
throughout
the
general
plan
to
incorporate
goals
policies
regarding
environmental
justice.
As
defined
in
the
state
law,
currently,
the
city
city
is
in
the
process
of
updating,
burbank,
2035,
general
plan,
housing
element,
safety
element
and
environmental
justice
for
the
2021
2029
planning
period.
G
Maintaining
a
state
compliant
housing
element
is
very
important
for
numerous
reasons
that
are
listed
on
the
slide.
If
the
city
fails
to
adopt
a
compliant
sixth
cycle
housing
element
by
october,
15
2021,
it
will
be
subject
to
a
range
of
penalties
or
consequences,
including
potential
litigation
from
housing
rights
organizations,
developers
and
the
state
attorney
general.
G
G
This
slide
provides
a
snapshot
of
the
overall
schedule
and
where
we
are
in
the
process,
the
process
began
in
july
2020
with
a
city
council
study
session.
Subsequently,
the
city
staff
conducted
community
workshops
for
the
public,
including
developers,
housing
service
providers
and
housing,
advocacy,
advocacy
groups
in
the
august
and
october
of
2020
and
february
of
2021.
G
G
The
city
released
draft
eir
for
the
proposed
general
plan
updates
in
january
of
2022,
and
two
public
hearings
were
conducted
in
march
and
april
of
2022
to
receive
public
comments
on
the
draft
eir.
The
city
released
recirculated
draft
eir,
addressing
the
public
comments
received
on
the
draft
eir
in
july
of
2022.
G
This
slide
provides
an
outline
of
the
community
outreach
efforts
for
the
project.
A
project
web
page
was
created
to
serve
the
information
hub
to
serve
as
the
information
hub
for
the
updated
for
the
update
process,
and
the
draft
housing
element
was
made
available
for
public
review
starting
april
2021.
G
Four
study
sessions
took
place
two
with
city
council
in
july
and
october
of
2020,
and
two
with
planning
board
in
january
and
may
of
2021,
as
mentioned
before.
We
held
stakeholder
meetings
in
august
2020
with
several
local
service
providers
and
non-profits,
as
well
as
developers
and
representatives
from
local
business
community.
G
G
Two
planning
board
public
hearings
were
held
in
march
and
april
of
2022
for
receiving
public
comments
on
the
draft
eir
for
the
project,
which
was
released
for
public
review
in
january
of
2022,
the
city
revised
the
draft
dir.
Based
on
the
comments
received
and
tonight
the
public
was
provided
an
opportunity
to
comment
on
the
recirculated
sections
of
the
eir.
G
For
each
of
these
public
outreach
efforts,
a
number
of
strategies
were
used
to
help
spread
the
word.
The
city's
public
information
office,
assisted
with
announcements
on
the
main
city,
webpage,
e-notify,
email,
blasts,
press
release
and
social
media
posts,
staff
posted
ads
in
the
la
times
created
flyers
and
prepared
announcements
at
city,
council
senior
board
and
landlord
tenant.
Commission
staff
from
the
burbank
housing
corporation
helped
to
notify
all
of
the
bhc
residents.
G
This
slide
provides
an
overview
of
the
major
components
or
chapters
of
the
housing
element.
The
housing
element
includes,
following
six
major
components:
number
one
review
of
effectiveness
of
the
existing
housing
element
that
was,
in
effect
from
2014
to
2021
number
two
assessment
of
existing
and
projected
housing
needs
that
discusses
the
characteristics
of
burbank's
population
and
housing
stock.
To
better
understand
the
nature
and
extent
of
unmet
housing
needs,
it
also
identifies
cities,
rena
allocation
number,
three
evaluation
of
constraints
to
the
development
of
housing.
G
This
can
include
permitting
process
development
standards,
availability
of
appropriately
sized
lots
and
so
on
number
four
identification
of
financial
land,
administrative
resources.
This
section
describes
and
analyzes
potential
resources
available
to
facilitate
the
development,
rehabilitation
and
preservation
of
housing
in
the
city
number
five
housing
plan.
G
Housing
programs
are
specifically
intended
to
be
activities,
actions
or
ongoing
efforts
that
can
be
practically
implemented
during
the
eight
year
planning
period
from
two
2021
to
2029
number,
six
affirmatively
furthering
fair
housing
or
affh,
which
analyzes
the
factors
creating
impediments
to
fair
housing
in
the
city
and
provides
fair
action
programs
to
address
these
impediments
to
fair
housing.
The
next
few
slides
will
provide
more
details
on
each
of
the
major
components
in
the
housing
element.
G
G
The
arena
represents
the
minimum
number
of
housing
units
that
the
city
is
required
to
plan
for
in
its
housing
element
by
identifying
adequate
sites
through
the
burbank
2035
general
plan
and
zoning
residential
capacity
for
the
prior
planning
cycle.
Arena
number
for
the
city
was
2684
units,
as
shown
in
the
table
during
the
2014
eight-year
planning
period,
the
city
issued
building
permits
for
a
total
of
1081
units
representing
40
percent
of
its
total
rena
allocation
of
2684
units.
G
G
G
G
The
buffer,
is
intended
to
offset
the
unfulfilled
development
of
projected
dwelling
units
on
the
opportunity
sites
noted
in
the
housing
element
update,
inclusive
of
the
buffer
and
the
required
rena
allocation.
The
city
has
undertaken
a
planning
and
environmental
assessment
process
that
accounts
for
a
total
of
ten
thousand
and
eleven
dwelling
units.
G
The
third
major
component
of
the
housing
element
analyzes
various
governmental
constraints
such
as
zoning
regulations,
local
ordinances
and
development
fees,
market-related
constraints,
including
price
of
land,
cost
of
construction
and
availability
of
financing
and
infrastructure
and
environmental
factors
such
as
flood
earthquakes
and
wildfires.
That
could
possibly
act
as
constraints
to
housing,
development
and
improvement
in
the
city.
G
Moreover,
this
component
of
the
housing
element
discusses
existing
and
proposed
programs
and
policies
that
have
been
included
to
reduce
impediments
or
constraints
to
development
of
housing,
for
example,
to
enhance
development
feasibility.
The
city
will
be
updating
and
simplifying
its
multi-family
development
standards,
which
is
considered
a
governmental
constraint
to
housing
development.
G
The
sixth
cycle
housing
element
identifies
19
opportunity
sites
to
accommodate,
accommodate
the
projected
growth
in
housing
needed
to
meet
the
city's
rena
allocation
for
the
2021-29
planning
period.
12
of
the
opportunity
sites
are
in
the
downtown
specific
plan
area
and
seven
opportunity
sites
are
located
in
the
golden
state
specific
plan
area.
G
The
opportunity
sites
are
located
near
near
the
city's
major
employment
and
transit
hubs,
which
will
facilitate
residential
development
with
higher
densities,
providing
housing
opportunities
for
all
economic
segments
of
the
community,
as
well
as
addressing
the
three
is
to
one
jobs
to
housing.
Imbalance
within
the
city.
G
G
As
required
by
the
state
law,
the
2021-29
six-cycle
housing
element
update
includes
an
assessment
of
fair
housing
that
is
consistent
with
the
analysis
required
by
federal
affirmatively,
furthering
fair
housing
or
affh
under
the
affh.
All
public
agencies
in
the
state
must
administer
programs
and
activities
relating
to
housing
and
community
development
in
a
manner
that
affirmatively
furthers
fair
housing
and
must
also
take
no
action.
Inconsistent
with
this
obligation,
the
affha
component
of
the
housing
element
analyzes
the
impediments
to
fair
housing
within
the
city.
G
G
G
Some
of
the
examples
of
fair
housing
actions
included
in
the
affha
component
of
housing
element
are
implementation
of
streamlined
approval
process
for
affordable
housing
projects
that
qualify
for
tax
credits
or
other
grants.
The
city
is
planning
on
achieving
this
by
adopting
downtown
specific
plan
and
golden
state
specific
plan
that
will
include
objective
design
standards
and
streamline
approval
process.
G
Another
example
include
updates
to
the
inclusionary
housing
and
density
bonus
ordinance
to
effectively
integrate
affordable
units
in
market
rate
projects
table
b11
that
was
b11
in
appendix
b.
That
is
attached,
as
exhibit
c
to
the
staff
report,
provides
the
list
of
fair
housing
actions
for
the
2021
29
planning
period.
G
G
This
includes
revisions
to
the
city's
safety
element
and
inclusion
of
environmental
justice
policies
and
goals
within
the
burbank
2035
general
plan
per
state
law.
Key
updates
to
the
burbank
safety
element
include
update,
updates
to
the
maps
and
data
identifying
flooding
and
fire
hazards
and
updates
to
cities,
goals
and
policies
for
emergency
response
and
preparedness,
especially
as
they
relate
to
cities
projected
climate
exposure,
vulnerability
and
environmental
justice
issues.
G
The
city
is
also
required
to
address
risk
of
fire
in
state
responsibility
areas.
Enviro
and
very
high
fire
very
high
fire
hazard
severity
zones
by
creating
awareness
among
the
residents,
the
property
owners
who
live
in
the
very
high
fire
hazard
severity
zones
and
by
updating
its
building
code
to
exceed
the
requirements
of
california
building
code.
G
G
The
california
environmental
protection
agencies
use
a
scal
enviro
screen
mapping
tool
to
determine
a
score
for
each
u.s
census
tract
to
identify
disadvantaged
communities
throughout
the
state.
The
cal
enviro
screen
score
for
each
census
track
is
determined
by
combining
indicators
for
pollution,
burden
and
population
characteristics
such
as
income
and
age,
for
each
census
tract
within
the
city.
G
This
policy
has
been
revised
to
include
availability
of
transportation
to
connect
disadvantaged
communities
within
air
quality
and
climate
change
element
of
the
general
plan.
An
existing
policy
that
focuses
on
educating
the
public
on
measures
to
reduce
the
impact
of
air
pollution
has
been
expanded
to
specifically
include
disadvantaged
communities
within
the
noise
element.
G
Existing
policy
on
monitoring
noise
impacts
in
residential
neighborhoods
to
reduce
noise
exposure
by
implementation
of
neighborhood
protection
plan
has
been
expanded
to
include
disadvantaged
communities
and
under
the
open
space
and
conservation
element
of
the
general
plan.
Existing
policy
that
encourages
public
participation
in
management
and
development
of
open
space.
It
has
been
revised
to
include
seeking
participation
by
disadvantaged
communities.
G
The
proposed
update
of
the
city's
housing
and
safety
element,
as
well
as
incorporation
of
environmental
justice
policies
within
the
general
plan,
is
deemed
as
a
project
that
that
is
subject
to
sequa
to
fulfill
the
review
requirements
of
sequa.
The
city
prepared
a
program
environmental
impact
report.
G
After
the
47-day
public
review
period
of
the
recirculated
draft,
eir
is
completed
on
september
6,
2022
staff
and
the
city's
environmental
consultant
will
review
and
respond
to
the
public
comments.
These
responses
will
be
incorporated
in
the
final
eir,
along
with
findings
of
fact
and
statement
of
overriding
consideration.
G
A
Thank
you.
We
will
now
open
the
public
hearing
to
you
here
for
many
persons
who
wish
to
speak
on
this
matter.
Each
person
may
address
the
planning
board
for
a
maximum
time
of
three
minutes
for
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
comment
in
person.
Please
present
a
completed
speaker
card
to
the
planning
division
staff.
If
you
wish
to
speak
for
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
comment
by
telephone,
please
call
818
238
three,
three
five
to
address
the
plotting
board
callers
will
be
placed
in
the
queue
until
all.
In-Person
comments
have
been
received.
A
D
D
K
A
A
Some
of
these
are
comments.
Some
of
these
are
questions,
so
we've
been
working
on
this
for
quite
a
while,
obviously
for
for
a
number
of
months
and
years,
in
some
cases
you
know
our
our
legislation,
our
state
has
manipulated
the
housing
market
and
now
that
the
housing
crisis
is
over,
what
is
the
next
plan?
A
A
G
Thank
you,
mr
rizzotti.
If
I
understand
your
question
correctly,
the
housing
element
provides
adequate
sites
and
indicates
all
the
opportunity
sites
where
the
future
housing
growth
will
be
accommodated,
in
addition
to
providing
other
programs
and
policies
which
sort
of
creates
a
pathway
for
construction
or
development
of
these
housing
units.
A
A
So
I
was
concerned
about
this
a
while
ago,
because
the
state
was
manipulating
the
housing
market
through
legislation
and
I've
we've
seen
this
at
probably
in
the
80s,
where
we
had
a
glut
of
inventory
when
the
when
the
market
turned
the
market
is
turning
and
will
continue,
is
it
is
on
a
downward
trend.
So
my
question
is:
has
anyone
asked
or
talked
to
the
state
about?
N
Aggressive
monitoring
program
for
meeting
our
arena
this
cycle.
So
while
we
have
all
these
sites-
and
we
have
these
programs
to
help
facilitate
the
city
every
year-
is
going
to
need
to
be
showing
how
the
housing
is
actually
occurring
and
if
you're
you
know
producing
an
abundance
of
housing,
you
will
be.
You
know
one
of
the
few
cities
in
the
state.
A
So
that
leads
me
to
my
second
question
or
comment.
I
I
personally
I've
never
really
believed
in
the
arena
numbers
and-
and
I
don't
think
that
they
were
accurate,
have
been
accurate,
and
now
we
have
cities
that
are
suing
because
they
believe
that
they're
not
accurate.
So
have
we
questioned
our
arena
numbers
that
were
being
allocated
because
others
are,
and
I
I
personally
never
really
thought
that
our
arena
arena
numbers
were
were
accurate.
G
Thank
you
vice
chair
rizotti,
so,
with
respect
to
some
of
the
other
cities
who
have
questioned
the
arena,
I
can
think
of
city
of
irvine.
The
overall
trend
has
been
that
the
skag
assigned
reena
number
they've
been
able
to
justify
and
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
karen
and
these
these
arena
numbers
that
have
been
assigned
are
as
a
result
of
the
lack
of,
as
karen
mentioned,
lack
of
effort
on
our
part
to
provide
housing
for
all
economic
categories
of
the
community
and
people
with
disabilities
in
our
previous
renault
cycle.
G
So
the
current
arena
number
that
has
been
assigned
also
the
situation
of
housing
as
the
state
law
puts
forward,
are
various
state
laws
which
talk
about
how
a
housing
crisis
is
in
is
something
that
all
local
jurisdictions
have
to
address.
To
answer
your
question
directly:
no,
we
have
not
questioned
it
because
the
trends
show
that
more.
You
know
more
often
than
not
the
the
cities
comply
with
the
arena
requirement.
N
N
E
E
So
one
of
the
things
that
I
recall
when
they
were
having
hearings
and
I'm
thinking
back
to
the
city
of
pasadena,
who
was
challenging
some
of
the
arena
numbers
is
they
had
estimated
certain
projection
numbers
for
units
and
I
and
I
think,
and
they
have
actual
they
were
actually
pretty
good
at
building
units
and
they
were
denied
their
request
for
a
modification.
So
I
my
recollection
at
the
time
back
in
the
day
when
that
was
occurring,
is
that
we
had
poor
numbers
to
begin
with.
E
We
have
130
000
employees
and
and
housings
housing's
at
44
000
units
in
the
city.
So
when
we
were
looking
at
all
of
that
and
it
was
presented
to
the
council,
there
wasn't
direction
from
council
to.
You
know,
go
forth
and
appeal
the
arena
number,
but
but
that
was
part
of
the
discussion
at
my
recollection
back
in
the
day.
A
E
E
But
we
have
to
come
back
to
you
through
the
zone
text
amendment
and
then
eventually
the
council,
with
a
new
set
of
regulations
that
would
be
applied
consistent
with
state
law
so
that
we
have
permanent
development
standards
for
sb9
projects,
and
part
of
that
is
going
to
look
at
development
standards
that
address
impacts.
Based
on
that
particular
regulatory
requirement
from
the
state.
A
Has
anyone
ever
questioned
that
and
said
you're
putting
all
these
water
restrictions?
We
got
all
these
water
restrictions,
but
yet
you're
forcing
us
to
build.
I
mean
I,
I
can't
for
a
long
time,
I've
I've
not
said
anything,
but
just
up
until
recent
with
the
recent
restrictions.
I
just
can't
sit
here
and
and
justifiably
say
yeah.
Let's
keep,
let's
keep
building
with
the
deterioration
of
our
water
supply.
A
E
So
I
I
can
start,
but
then
I
believe
we
do
have
subject
matter
experts,
I'm
not
sure.
If
we
have
someone.
Yes,
we
do
rich.
We
have
richard
wilson
from
bwp
water,
so
I
just
want
to
make
sure
when
we
take
when
we're
going
to
take
a
project
of
this
magnitude
with
this
number
of
units,
we're
required
to
do
what
they
call
as
a
water
supply
assessment
and
that's
done
by
the
city
and
it's
a
report.
E
F
Sure
my
name
is
richard
wilson,
I'm
the
assistant
general
manager
for
water
systems
at
burbank,
water
and
power,
very
good
questions.
It's
a
question.
We
get
a
lot
with
the
drought
being
in
the
news.
Obviously,
a
little
bit
of
background,
there's
26
member
agencies
that
make
up
the
metropolitan
water
district.
F
F
In
addition,
there
are
projects
that
are
at
the
conceptual
or
sql
phase
that
could
bring
on
another
330
000
acre
feet
in
addition,
so
that
is
calculated
into
their
pre,
their
mwds
supply
projections
and
that's
how
they
look
at
whether
or
not
they
can
meet
the
projected
supplies
now,
there's
there's
also
water
use
which
we
we
need
to
limit
water
use.
I
mean
these
developments
that
we're
talking
about
are
going
to
be
the
city's
highest
efficient
developments
and
and
and
water
use
areas
that
the
city
has
we've
got
high
efficiency
fixtures.
F
Irrigation
will
be
predominantly,
if
not
all,
of
it
recycled
water.
They
don't
have
the
landscaping
that
homes
use
and
we
still
have
the
issue
in
burbank
of
people
using
the
majority
of
their
water
for
outside
irrigation,
and
that's
something
on
the
demand
side
that
we
have
to
stop
too
much.
Water
is
being
wasted
on
grass
and
the
old
way
of
doing
things
has
to
stop,
even
even
with
the
projected
supplies
available.
F
We
have
conditions
now
where
we
can't
afford
to
continue
to
use
water
in
the
way
that
we're
using
it,
and
it
really
is
low
hanging
fruit.
I'm
not
saying
that
we
can
conserve
our
way
out
of
this.
It's
a
multi-faceted
approach
in
how
we,
how
we
attack
this
but
outdoor
water
use
is,
is
rife
for
being
able
to
reduce
our
water
demands
and
the
units
that
we're
talking
about
are
very
low
in
terms
of
outdoor
water
use.
A
Why
aren't
we
purple
piping
the
city
when
we
do
road
construction,
like
in
my
on
my
street?
We
just
tore
open
the
whole
street
for
gas
lines.
Why
didn't
we
purple
pipe
that
road
and
then
later
connected
it
to
the
irrigation
system,
or
why
aren't
we
doing
a
test
pilot
program
with
tanks
we
throw
away
50
of
our
recycled
water?
Why
don't?
We
have
a
truck
as
a
as
a
as
a
vehicle
incentive
for
the
city
to
make
money,
deliver
recycled
water
to
the
tank,
and
we
can
irrigate
our
lawns.
A
I
don't
see
our
sustainability
committee.
I
haven't
seen
anything
from
dwp
of
of
a
plan
to
purple
pipe
or
we
have.
We
have
the
reclaimed
water.
We
could
sell
it.
I
know
that
people
would
pay
for
it
and
instead
of
using
regular
water
for
their
for
their
lawns.
So
that
was
going
to
be
an
agenda
item
that
I
was
going
to
break
up
later.
But
since
you're
here
I
just
wonder.
F
Yeah,
there's
there's
there's
a
lot.
There.
You've
hit
on
a
lot
of
different
topics
as
it
relates
to
recycled
water.
So
first
thing
you're
right
about
half
of
the
recycled
water
that
the
city
produces
goes
into
the
la
river
and
that's
a
shame,
because
it's
a
community
resource
that
we
could
benefit
from
now.
What
can
we
do
with
that
recycled
water?
Now,
there's
there's
different
options.
We
have,
and
some
of
them
take
more
planning
and
we're
in
the
planning
phases
now,
but
the
biggest
bang
for
the
buck
and
the
holy
grail.
F
If
that's
what
you
want
to
call,
it
eventually
is
going
to
be
what's
called
direct
potable
reuse,
where
we
can
take
that
water.
We
can
use
in
a
use
an
advanced
treatment
system
and
put
that
water
directly
at
the
head
of
a
treatment
plant
or
directly
into
the
potable
distribution
system
itself,
and
there
is
a
demonstration
plant
they've
changed.
Mwd
has
changed
the
name.
F
F
F
We
do
sell
recycled
water.
Well,
actually,
we
trade
recycled
water
with
the
city
of
los
angeles
for
groundwater
credits.
It's
about
50
acre
feet
a
year.
It's
not
a
lot,
but
we
are
working
with
the
camella
community
development
department
right
now,
as
a
matter
of
fact,
there's
a
pedestrian
bridge.
That's
going
to
go
over
the
la
river.
We
want
to
put
a
pipe
on
that
so
that
we
can
take
this
recycled
water
and
join
up
with
la.
They
have
plans
where
they
want
to
do
their
own
direct
potable
reuse
project
in
the
future
as
well.
F
If
we
don't
do
it,
others
will
la
would
love
to
have
that
water
and
put
it
through
their
their
direct
potable
reuse
plant.
So
we're
looking
ahead
and
we
want
to
have
that
connection
available.
So
we
can
do
that
and
we
would
trade
that
for
groundwater
credits
as
well
far
as
storage
goes,
that
would
be
a
huge
tank
that
would
have
to
be
built
here
in
burbank
to
store
to
store
that
water.
It's
about
how
many
acre
feet!
It's
like.
F
F
F
F
F
It's
part
of
the
potable
system,
then
you
run
the
risk
of
cross-contaminating
the
city's
potable
water
system
with
the
recycled
system,
because
some
guy
decides
to
do
it
himself
or
he
hires
a
plumber,
and
they
don't
know
what
they're
doing
and
they
connect
the
different
systems
and
now
you've
lost
the
integrity
of
the
potable
water
system.
The
last
thing
we
want
to
do
is
get
people
sick
because
of
cross-contamination
issues.
H
F
A
We
better
start
doing
something
we're
running
out
of
water.
I
mean
it's
obvious
that
we're
running
out
of
water,
so
I
mean
I
think
we
got
to
start
doing
something,
but
I
just
just
it
seems
to
make
sense
if
we
have
all
this
recycled
water,
we're
just
throwing
it
in
the
ocean
so
but
anyways.
I
appreciate
it.
Thank
you.
F
E
Vice
mayor,
if
I
can
just
add
one
thing
well
richard's
up
here,
so
you
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
the
greenhouse
gas
reduction
plan
that
was
recently
adopted
by
council
has
requirements
in
it
that
when
new
development
comes
online
as
a
purple,
pipe
is
readily
available.
They're
required
to
connect
for
irrigation
purposes,
and
I
think
if
they
have
water
cooling
systems.
F
E
F
E
The
large
developments
it's
a
different
animal
because
they
have
on-site
supervisors,
they
have
on-site
requirements
and
they
they
plumb
separately
for
both
systems.
So
clearly
the
city
has
to
go
out
and
inspect
it
when
it's
all
set
up,
and
that
assures
that
you
keep
those
two
separated.
So
there's
not
cross-contamination
to
richard's
point.
A
A
A
A
Quality
neighborhoods
and
what
we've
done
is
we've
destroyed,
we're
destroying.
We
have
destroyed
some
neighborhoods
and
we
are
continuing
to
destroy
neighborhoods.
So
I'm
just
wondering
now
that
the
experiment
has
has
happened
are,
are
we
giving
any
feedback?
Are
we
are
we
letting
them
know
that
this
is
not
a
great
place
or
a
great
thing
to
do
to
our
community.
G
G
We
were
mindful
of
selecting
the
opportunity
sites
for
the
projected
growth
to
maintain
the
the
character
of
existing
single
family
neighborhood.
Additionally,
the
programs
within
the
housing
element.
There
are
few
programs
which
focus
on
preserving
and
maintaining
the
existing
single-family
residential
neighborhoods
regarding
adus
and
and
lot
splits.
These
are.
G
These
are
projects
which
the
homeowner
undertake,
knowing
that
there's
going
to
be
additional
unit
in
their
backyard
and
city
has
put
in
place
objective
standards
on
top
of
what
state
recommended
to
ensure
that
there
are,
there
are
building
separation
requirements
and
also
setback
requirements
which,
which
you
know
maintain
privacy.
So
to
answer
your
question,
all
the
projected
housing
that
we
are
you
know,
including
the
housing
element
based
off
of
the
arena,
would
would
happen
in
the
specific
plan
areas
which
are
away
from
the
single
family,
neighborhoods
of
the
city.
A
I
I
would
agree
with
you,
because
I
voted
on
many
of
those
projects
that
we've
been
smart
in,
where
we're
developing
and
how
we're
developing.
I
would
push
back
in
that.
It's
the
homeowner
that
is
building
the
edu's.
I
think
there
are
homeowners
that
are
building
adus,
but
most
of
it's
investor
driven
and
creating
duplexes
for
for
profit,
and
it's
you
know
from
what
I've
seen
it's
we're,
starting
to
see
the
ramifications
of
that.
We
are
starting
to
see
parking
wars.
A
A
A
You
know
a
thousand
square
foot
adu
and
a
thousand
square
foot
house,
and
now
they
got
eight
people
living
next
door
to
them
and
they're
miserable
the
quality
of
life.
Your
peaceful
enjoyment
is
gone,
so
I'm
just
wondering
if
if
any
of
that
is
being
reported
back,
has
the
state
asked
hey
how's
it
going?
A
Is
there
a
questionnaire
or
anything
given
because
it's
it's
impacting
our
residents?
And
I
just
I'm
I'm
here
to
speak
for
those
residents.
I
was
here
four
years
ago
to
speak
up
for
the
rights
for
people
that
bought
a
home
for
a
million
dollars
and
are
paying
15
000
a
year
in
taxes
that
the
carpet
was
pulled
out
from
underneath
them
and
now
they
they're
they're
living
in
a
multi-residential
neighborhood
when
they
purchase
their
home
to
be
in
the
suburbs
in
on
a
single
family
neighborhood.
A
E
I
think
I
can
speak
to
that
a
little
bit
just
to
answer
the
question
of.
Are
we
communicating
the
concerns
with
new
adu
regulations
which,
by
the
way,
there's
additional
new
proposed
changes
to
the
adu
regs
and
they
just
recently
came
out
with
new
guidelines
which,
which,
in
and
of
itself,
are
like
facilitate
as
much
adu
development
as
possible?
E
E
H
E
E
You
know
some
of
these
things
and
then
we're
having
to
try
to
like
figure
out
how
we
on
one
side,
comply
with
the
state
requirement,
but
at
the
same
time
we're
hearing
the
same
feedback
from
certain
neighbors
that
it's
like
hey,
I
don't
really
have
control
or
I
can't
provide
input,
that's
going
to
somehow
facilitate
a
better
design
right
and,
and
so
that's
the
quantity.
But
to
to
the
immediate
point.
Yes,
the
council
has
communicated
concerns.
E
They
have
an
advocacy
group
that
actually
goes
up
and
talks
to
legislators
regarding
proposed
changes
to
the
adu
wrecks,
but
I
think
the
biggest
one.
That's
still
a
sore
point
and
I've
heard
it
numerous
times
from
council
members
is
the
removal
of
the
owner
occupancy
really
opened
the
floodgates
for
the
type
of
development
that
you're
referring
to
where
you've
got
people
coming
in
and
doing
spec
spec
build-outs,
as
opposed
to
like
a
homeowner
bringing
in
a
family
member
to
live
in
those
units.
E
B
Is
telling
us
that
this
is
what
the
arena
numbers
are
and
that's
why
you
have
to
do
this?
Yes,
clarification.
Okay.
The
second
thing
is,
first
of
all
that
was
a
fascinating
presentation
about
the
water
and
I
honestly
I
would
like
to
know
more
about
it
and
I
think
more
people
in
burbank
should
find
out
about
that,
because
I
think
that's
an
interesting
way
and
an
important
way
of
addressing
this
problem,
but
it
doesn't
sound
like
there's
anything
going
on
simultaneously
with
that.
B
So,
while
you
might
have
a
great
plan,
I
I
think
you're
going
you're
coming
up
with
a
great
plan.
How
does
that
match
with
the
timing
of
the
development
that
we're
talking
now?
So
you
might
take
ten
years
to
implement
that
five
years?
I
have
no
idea,
but
in
the
meantime,
we're
gonna
incentivize
all
this
development
are,
we
gonna
be
chasing
ourselves.
F
F
F
F
F
It's
the
best
information
that
we
have
now
based
on
all
of
the
urban
water
management
plans
that
all
26
member
agencies
have
provided,
we're
pretty
confident
in
what
burbank
has
provided,
but
again
metropolitan
water
district.
They
take
all
of
the
information
that
they
get
and
that's
how
they
come
up
with
demands.
Now
our
demands
compared
to
the
additional
supply
that
that
that
these
projects
might
yield
is
a
is
a
very,
very
small
percentage.
B
You
know,
in
my
experience
with
these
things
it's
like
when
they
widen
the
highway
as
soon
as
they're
finished
with
it
it's
obsolete
and
again
my
concern
is
okay.
You
have
your
you're
implementing
your
plan,
but
the
housing
is
outstripping
that
which
brings
me.
I
guess
to
my
next
point,
which
is
these
and
I'm
sorry,
I'm
finished
with
the
water.
H
B
E
Houses
so
it
in
the
housing
element
there's
a
reference
to
one
of
the
programs
where
we
talk
about
public
private
partnerships
right.
So
there
are
different
scenarios.
There
is
the
market
side
of
it
where
we
want
to
be
very
clear
on
what
the
city's
vision
and
objective
standards
are
right
and
then
facilitate.
E
You
know
private
development,
doing
its
thing
and
building
development,
including
the
number
of
affordable
units
through
our
inclusionary
and
density
bonus
programs,
and
then
there's
other
things
like
the
civic
center
project
that
you
maybe
have
heard
of
recently,
where
there's
a
potential
development
on
a
city
lot
and
that
city
lot.
It's
it's
a
negotiated
thing
where
you
have
both
a
private
developer
in
the
city.
The
city
can
negotiate
certain
requirements,
community
benefits
that
could
include
housing
and
afford
high
levels
of
affordable
housing.
E
So
that's
another
example,
so
there's
and
then
we
can
also
work
with
some
of
our
other
nonprofits,
where
they're
looking
at
acquiring
units,
rehabbing
them
and
then
locking
them
in
as
affordable
deed
restricted
units.
So
I
guess
what
I
would
say
is
it's
multifaceted?
It's
it's
beyond
the
bounds
of
just
saying.
Is
this
a
city-led
effort
in
the
sense
of
housing
production?
It's
the
opposite!
It's
the
reality
of
it
is
the
private
sector
would
be
the
one.
E
You
know
sometimes
it's
tax
credits,
sometimes
it's
home
funds
and
kind
of
mixing
all
that
together
to
help
build
very
heavily
burdened
gaps
for,
for
the
very
you
know,
very
low
and
low
income
unit.
So
it's
multifaceted
and
that's
why
you
know
it
took
us
40
minutes
to
go
through
27
programs
is
because
it
is
as
complicated
and
as
broad
and
vast
kind
of
tentacles
that
you
have
to
go
through
to
look
at
all
the
different
options
to
get
housing
built.
It's
not
an
easy
process
as
you're
all
you.
B
E
And
that-
and
the
reason
that's
important-
is
that
the
state,
this
round
of
housing
element
has
put
a
lot
more
requirements
on
cities
to
prove
up
how
they're
going
to
be
able
to
facilitate
housing,
including
you
saw
how
extensive
the
narrative
was
on
the
opportunity
sites.
It
was
like
basically
give
almost
give
me
a
letter
from
the
developer
that
guarantees
that
they're
going
to
build.
B
I'm
just
there
are
limits
to
growth,
unfortunately,
and
I
think
those
have
to
be
addressed
in,
as
you
say,
a
myriad
number
of
ways,
and
while
it's
absolutely
important
for
housing
and
for
people
who
can't
afford
housing
in
the
immediate
area
to
get
housing,
there
are
limits
to
development,
and
I
think
those
have
to
be
addressed
everything
from
water
to
resources
to
transportation.
I
I'm
not
sure
that
the
state
understands.
B
What
the
limitations
are
here
in
this
city
and
our
immediate
environment-
and
I
know
I
I
very
frustrated
about
it,
but
I
I
think
that
we
need
to
address
those
the
question
of
limited
of
limits
to
development.
I've
gotten
us
into
trouble
with
the
water,
and
I
think
it's
going
to
get
us
into
more
trouble,
especially
since
water
levels
continue
to
drop.
My
understanding
is
that
we're
not
going
to
have
electricity
because
the
water's
not
going
to
meet
the
generators
or
the
turbines
or
whatever
it
is.
B
E
So
during
public
comment,
you
heard
the
carpet
southwest
regional
carpenters
union,
submit
public
comments.
They're
they're
allowed
to
like
any
other
stakeholder
to
provide
comments.
They
have
expressed
through
the
letters
that
you've
received
in
interest
to
try
to
facilitate
living
wages
for
workers
that
are
building
these
types
of
developments
and
they
want
the
city
to
look
at
that
through
this
process.
E
We
added
language
in
there
that
says
that
we
would
undertake
a
economic
feasibility
analysis
to
look
at
what
it
would
actually
cost
to
incorporate
prevailing
wage
and
workforce
training
type
of
requirements
on
housing
projects.
Some
cities
have
done
that
and
what
we
want
to
do
is
go
through
and
and
conduct
that
level
of
analysis
to
look
at
what
best
practices
have
been
put
in
place
in
other
cities
and
how
effective
they've
been
to
facilitate
housing,
because
the
overall
goal
is
to
facilitate
housing.
All
these
other
things
are
are
great
and
they're
commendable.
E
We
have
updated
development
impact
fees,
we
have
other
fees
that
are
charged
on
the
developer,
to
produce
the
units
and
then,
if
we
now
add
prevailing
wage,
which
does
cost
more
money
to
pay
for
that,
we
have
to
weigh
all
that
and
does
it
still
is
it
still
financially
feasible
to
produce
housing?
So
we
need
to
know
what
those
thresholds
are,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
the
council
is
informed
of
that
if
they
were
to
undertake
that
as
future
policy,
so
part
of
it
is
acknowledging.
E
If
we
can't
produce
the
units
we're
not
complying
with
state
law.
So
we
we're
going
to
look
at
that.
We're
going
to
recommend
council
and
that's
what's
in
front
of
you-
recommend
the
council
that
they
look
at
that
as
well,
and
then
have
a
vetting
process,
actually
go
out
and
do
community
meetings
and
stakeholder
meetings
and
then
bring
that
back
to
council.
With
the
report.
M
E
M
E
M
E
E
We
would
be,
we
would
be
encouraging
and
the
state
actually
encourages
those
to
actually
build
that
type
of
housing
and
proximity
to
the
station
and-
and
you
would
be
seeing
that
through
the
specific
plans,
you
have
the
downtown
specific
plan
golden
state,
specific
plan
and
then
we're
even
looking
at
the
media
district.
Specific
plan
update
in
within
a
year.
E
There's
other
forms
of
transit,
not
just
rail,
so
there's
a
mobility
center
near
where
talaria
is
at
that
needs
to
be
built
out
and
part
of
that
is
bus
connections
and
high
frequency
bus
connections
in
that
area.
So
both
rail
as
well
as
wheel
and
then
other
forms
right,
ped
and
bike,
but
those
transit
oriented
projects
near
employment,
centers
are
going
to
be
a
key
component.
A
O
A
C
E
If
advice
vice
chair,
if
I
can
just
maybe
just
throw
this
out
there
real
quick,
I
just
want
to
make
sure
you're
aware
we
we
understand
that
there's
a
lot
of
things
with
the
state
that
you
know
do
go
against
local
control,
but
I
just
want
to
be
clear:
what's
in
front
of
you
is
effectively
after
three
rounds
with
the
state
is
a
housing
element
that
includes
policies
and
programs
that
ensure
that
we
have
a
compliant
housing
element
with
the
state.
Is
it
perfect?
E
E
E
E
E
But
the
actual
document
in
front
of
you
and
the
policies
and
programs
included
therein
are
consistent
with
the
city's
regulations.
The
city's
general
plan
and
for
that
reason
could
be
recommended
to
the
council,
however,
incorporate
within
that
a
clear
understanding
that
the
board
has
concerns
with
the
state
mandated
requirements
because
of
the
concerns
with
its
impacts
to
resources
both
now
and
in
the
future.
E
And
the
concern
from
the
board
is
that
you
want
to
acknowledge
that
those
things
need
to
be
vetted
and
we
need
to
voice
those
concerns
to
the
state
through
this
process
and
be
mindful
that
we
need
to
be
proactive
to
make
certain
improvements
to
support
that
growth.
If
we're
going
to
facilitate
it,
and
I
would
leave
it
at
that,.
A
A
M
O
B
E
O
C
B
O
M
A
A
I
think
they're
aware
so,
hopefully
our
hopefully
our
meeting
is
is
well
received.
Okay,
so
now
is
the
time
for
oral
communications
from
the
public.
Any
person
speaking
during
this
period
may
address
the
board
on
any
matter
concerning
city
business.
Each
person
may
address
the
planning
board
for
a
maximum
time.
Three
minutes
for
members
of
the
public
who
wish
to
to
comment
in
person.
Please
present
a
completed
speaker
card
to
the
planning
division
staff.
If
you
wish
to
speak
for
members
of
the
public
that
wish
to
comment
by
telephone
818-238-3335.
A
A
I
C
A
A
A
E
So
no
there's
there's
actually
a
lot
more,
but
the
these
all
have
to
be
noticed
before
we
bring
them
forth
to
you.
So
there's
there's
a
handful
of
upcoming
items,
we'll
populate
the
agenda
forecast
with
more
information.
Just
touching
back
real
quick,
I
don't
know
if
sounds
like
you're
interested
in
it.
I
talked
to
mr
wilson
outside
and
what
I
can
do
in
coming
meetings
is.
Have
him
give
you
the
presentation
that
he
gave
to
council
because
I
think
it'd
be
informative.
E
E
I
just
want
to
take
the
moment
to
thank
you
guys.
This
was
a
pretty
big
thing
to
have
to
deal
with
both
public
comment
and
then
consideration
of
this.
So
I
really
understand
how
it
weighs
on
you
all.
I
really
respect
you
as
residents
of
the
city
and
everything
you
said
was
on
point
collectively.
As
a
group,
it
does
not
go
unnoticed.
E
So
I
I
think
I
wanted
to
say
that
to
you
is
that
the
decision
that
you
made
tonight
and
and
just
the
discussion
is
very
helpful.
It's
informative
to
the
community
because
they
also
understand
that
you're,
not
rubber,
stamping
things,
you're,
really
vetting
these
things
through
and
looking
at
them,
with
all
the
different
perspectives
and
skills
that
you
bring
with
your
expertise,
both
in
what
you
work
and
just
your
personal
experience
in
the
community.
E
And
so
I
just
wanted
to
commend
you
all
for
the
work
that
you
did
tonight
and
then
just
kind
of
setting
that
high
standard,
we're,
hopefully
we'll
have
barbara
kenny,
was
unable
to
come
tonight.
But
hopefully
we'll
also
have
a
new
board
member
in
the
coming
months,
and
they
can
be
part
of
this
very
cohesive
group
of
individuals.
E
E
A
Will
now
adjourn
to
the
next
regular
planning
board
meeting
on
monday
september,
12
2022?
The
meeting
will
be
held
in
person
in
the
city
chambers
here
at
275,
east
olive
avenue.
The
public
is
invited
to
attend
in
person
or
view
the
meeting
online
or
on
tv.
The
public
will
be
able
to
provide
public
comment
in
the
following
ways
in
person
at
the
appropriate
time
in
the
meeting
by
leaving
an
e-comment
on
the
webpage
at
burbankc8.gov
ecomments
or
by
calling
directly
to
818-238-3335.