►
From YouTube: 2022 Negotiations Thursday 06-16-2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
B
Mr
davis,
I
would
go
back
in
time
because
there
are
certain
like,
like
I'd,
love,
to
see
my
grandparents
as
teenagers
dating
and
I'm
really
just
kind
of
a
go
with
the
flow
girl.
So
I
don't
really.
I
like
the
excitement
of
what's
to
come.
C
Oh
left,
you
I
too
would
go
back
in
time
and
for
me
it's
really.
I
would
like
to
have
been
in
some
areas
where
certain
decisions
were
being
made,
how
certain
things
were
being
formed
and
be
aware
of
what
was
going
through
different
people's
minds.
I
mean
I
couldn't
tell
you
exactly,
but
I'm
I
don't
know
how
far
back
I
would
like
to
go,
but
I
just
know
I
don't
have
any
interest
in
going
to
the
future
just
in
the
direction
we're
going
this.
You
know
the
past
feels
so
having
seen
so
many
shows.
C
D
F
A
Answer
it
would
actually
be
the
past.
A
C
It's
pretty
good,
I
was
thinking
I
would
probably
go
well,
I
would
go
to
the
past.
I
was
thinking
I
I
family
history.
I
think
that's
so
interesting.
So
just
family
history,
my
family,
is
from
the
netherlands
in
that
area.
Just
how
did
they
even
get
here?
You
know
what
was
that
like
for
them,
but
also
I
have
you
like
read
the
word,
the
dead,
wig
or
the
boys
in
the
boat.
C
That
author.
I
think
it's
dave
brown,
but
just
how
he
has
gone
back
and
pulled
together
journals
of
these
individuals
who
were
on
the
lusitania
and
piece
together,
a
story
and
it's
just
so
fascinating.
Just
the
individual
individual
lives.
So
we
had
lusitania,
sunk,
okay,
but
just
those
impacts
of
all
those
people
that
it
mattered.
You
know
it's
like
I
think
past
our
history
is
fascinating.
C
C
C
A
All
right
and
to
start
off
tonight,
we
just
would
like
a
little
more
clarification
on
the
insurance
proposal
that
you
guys
presented
last
tuesday.
C
I
was
just
I
looked
a
door
and
I
was
just
a
little
confused
whether
these
were
two
separate
or
whether
these
were
supposed
to
be
the
same,
because
some
of
the
numbers
excuse
me
in
the
top.
The
savings
part
didn't
match
between
the
two,
and
so
I
wasn't
sure.
B
B
So
you're
correct
on
article
three,
for
example,
employee
only
at
six,
forty
and
eighty
cents,
which
should
equate
to
the
column,
570,
250,
close
to
68
30
and
then
go
on
down
the
columns.
Okay,.
C
That's
why
excuse
me,
I
wasn't
sure
how
they
went
together,
so
I
had
that.
I
just
needed
a
clarification
yeah.
This
is,
can
I
just
so?
This
is
what
would
be
in
the
master
agreement.
This
has
been
would
be
the
language,
and
this
is
the
result
of
the
language,
if
that
makes
sense.
Yeah,
because
remember
we
talked
about
how
we
looked
at,
that
total
dollar
amount
and
made
it
equitable
between
the
hsa
and
the
ppo.
So
that's
how
we
get
to
that
contribution.
C
D
Could
you
highlight
again
how
you
took
care
of
the
the
al
savin's
account.
B
Yes,
sir,
mr
davis,
mr
ghost,
so
there
were
two
cohort
groups
that
you
had
identified
specifically
in
play,
plus
spouse
and
family.
I
believe
in
your
counter
proposal.
Each
of
those
homework
groups
had
an
additional
contribution
of
171.72.
B
Yes,
so
specific
to
that
group,
we
maintained
your
counter
proposal,
language
or
family
of
171.72
cents.
B
We
maintain
and
play
plus
spouse
at
71.72
cents,
and
we
retained
that
one
hundred
dollars
which
at
the
time,
I
believe-
and
there
was
four
in
that
column-
that
row
excuse
me
to
put
in
reserve,
because
we
would
anticipate
that
there
would
be
some
movement
with
the
decrease
in
employee
contribution.
B
C
And
I
I'm
just
and
melissa
had
calculated
the
percent
of
decrease
for
each
of
those
four
categories
that
would
have
been
decreased
contribution
and
the
employee
spouse
hsa
was
at
33
decrease,
while
the
others
were
in
the
20s.
So
if
we
only
reduced
it
by
71.72,
it
then
fell
in
line
with
the
others,
and
the
percent
decreases
more
equitable.
D
B
Yes,
sir,
so
mr
davis,
mr
co,
all
of
the
health
savings
account
contributions
for
everyone
in
that
group
is
83.30,
plus
what
the
district
pays
just
to
have
that
policy.
However,
the
employee,
only
the
health
savings
account
contribution
is
68.30.
B
A
difference
of
15
and
the
reason
that
that
came
to
fruition
is
because
of
that
15
plus
the
10
employee
monthly
deduction
that
would
come
for
that.
One
line
item
would
fall
in
line
and
be
the
same
as
the
employee
contribution
in
the
ppo
plan:
okay
and
so
the
the
buffer,
the
hundred
dollars.
That's
for
people.
B
Or
yeah
mr
davis,
mr
coe,
yes,
but
it
could
also
it
could
also
be
moving
into
employee
plus
spouse
under
ppo
or
a
family.
Ppl
like
it's,
it's
not
it's,
not
it's
not
within
the
health
savings
account
group
that
retention
could
be
applicable
to
anybody
moving
in
any
from
any
road
to
any
row
and
that.
C
It's
approximately
nineteen
thousand,
so
we
could
use
that
to
for
a
cushion
for
people
moving
that.
I
think
we
also
need
to
remember
that
employee
plus
one
child
is
a
decrease
from
last
year
to
this
year.
Okay
and
then
the
employee
plus
children
was
in
a
it
increased
by
nine
dollars
a
month.
So
it's
not
a
significant
increase,
so
we
anticipate
that
we
will
have
individuals
moving
to
employee
plus
spouse,
one
child,
children
or
family,
because
the
plan
is
better
really.
C
B
And
mr
davis,
with
all
of
that
said,
we
I
mean
we
would
anticipate
and
we
would
hope,
but
some
of
our
employees
would
feel
like
it
was
more
economically
feasible
for
them
to
be
able
to
bring
on
their
spouse
or
to
bring
on
their
family
or
maybe
otherwise,
as
as
you
and
your
team
pointed
out,
might
have.
Otherwise
it
might
not
have
otherwise
been
feasible.
B
Given
the
fact
that,
with
the
additional
increase
of
roughly
10
percent,
is
that
what
it
was
that
it's
at
or
above
mortgage
cost,
which
really
didn't
put
it
in
the
ballpark
for
some,
especially
our
classified.
B
For
whether
you
are
an
employee
covering
your
family
or
in
either
category
health,
savings
or
ppo.
C
Based
on
this
plan,
what
would
the
employee
pay
for
family
family
based
on
our
proposal,
the
family
with
the
ppo
is
6
39
88.
C
D
G
C
C
C
B
B
So,
mr
davis
we've
provided
you
two
documents
that
we'd
like
to
sort
of
share
the
narrative
to
thank
you
and
taking
a
look
at
your
counter
proposal
language.
We
took
a
look
to
see
how
close
together
we
were
compared
to
our
proposal.
B
We
also
took
into
account
your
you
know,
genuine
care
and
concern
about
the
amount
of
inflation
that
all
of
caldwell
america
is
experiencing,
and
so,
with
all
of
that
said,
in
addition
to
all
of
that,
we
also
have
sort
of
our
next
task
to
to
raise
classified
staff
salaries
significantly,
based
on
conversations
that
you
know
you're
already
aware
of.
In
addition
to
that,
we
as
a
district
team
are
very
aware
of
the
need
for
leadership
stipends
as
you'll.
B
B
Our
experience
has
been
is
that
that
it's
equal
and
sometimes
greater
than
300
000,
but
that's
about
the
ballpark
range
300
000..
You
still.
B
So
with
that
said,
to
address
the
very
significant
comment,
very
significance
of
the
comment
associated
with
inflation.
If
you'll
take
a
look
at
the
colored
long
guy.
E
B
The
two
dollar
signs
reference
the
salary
schedule
proposal
that
was
in
your
other
document,
plus
the
increase
with
the
estimated
government,
the
governor's
stipend,
which
it's
our
understanding,
that
it
could
be,
I'm
not
speaking
for
governor
little
brad
if
you're
out
there,
it's
good
to
see
it
of
fifteen
hundred
dollars.
B
However,
if
we
were
to
stay
with,
it's
not
even
hope,
with
high
higher
probability,
that
were
the
case
that
1500
stipend,
that
we
hope
and
expect
to
see
in
addition
to
our
salary
schedule
would
then
be
reflected
in
the
percentages
that
came
across
on
this
table.
B
We
also
balance
that,
with
the
very
real
impact
that
the
lack
of
leadership
stipends
specific
to
that
cost,
as
well
as
the
additional
cost
that
we
know
will
be
unhappily
occurring
for
our
classified
staff,
to
raise
them
to
more
of
a
living
wage
brought
us
back
to
the
place
of
in
this
context
that
we
would
swing
it
back
to
our
original
language.
D
I
ask
a
couple
questions
yes,
mr
go.
So
is
this
the
same
salary
proposal
of
last
time
and
then
you
added
1500
as
a
statement.
B
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
code.
No,
yes,
and
no,
so
this
is
the
same
language
that
we
brought
back
or
that
we
proposed
prior.
This
is
not
an
additional
fifteen
hundred
dollars;
it
is.
It
is
information
only
of
what
we
have
already
ta
on
with
addendum
a
of
what
of
the
governor's
stipend
and
how
that
will
be
a
direct
pass-through.
B
Mr
code,
this
is
saying
that
if
the
stipend
equates
to
fifteen
hundred
dollars
that
this
is
how
it
would
be
reflected
in
the
paychecks
and
pockets
of
staff,
as
it
puts
in
response
to
the
conversation
we've
had
in
the
past,
about
the
cost
of
inflation.
Okay,.
D
B
It
gives
first,
mr
kobe
gives
perspective
okay
of
what
the
overall
percent
increase
would
be,
including
the
what
we
expect
to
be
a
1500
governor,
stipend
that
we've
already
teared
on.
So
it's
not
additional
funds
I'll
be
clear
about
that.
It's
not
additional
funds,
but
the
colored
table
swings
it
back
around
to
the
conversation
we
had
about
the
cost
of
inflation.
B
C
I
don't
feel
I
mean
I
can
tell
you
what's
been
said.
It's
been
in
open
meetings,
it's
been
eighteen
hundred
dollars,
eighteen
ish
plus
benefits.
C
She's,
mr
thank
you,
julie,
overly,
who
is
the
director
of
finance
at
state
public
finance,
public
school
finance
has
said
that
we
would
have
that
number,
possibly
in
august
or
september.
So,
but
as
soon
as
we
would
have
that
information,
we
would
notify
you
and
let
you
know,
and
then.
D
C
No
actually
thank
you
for
that
clarification.
I
believe
it
is
a
reimbursement
only
so
once
we
spend
the
money,
we
would
ask
for
reimbursement
like
that.
Last
thousand
dollar
bonus
that
we
that
we
all
received
from
the
state
we
had
to
pay
that
to
our
staff
and
then
request
reimbursement.
B
And
then
mr
co,
mr
davis,
mr
code
to
go
back
to
that
identity
that
we
agreed
to
that
would
have
two
equal
payments.
So
even
if
we
so
yeah,
we
would
pay
out-
and
I
believe
december
and
june
is
that
what
it
was
and
then
miss
burton
would
ask
for
reimbursement
after
each
payment
after
hp.
B
We,
mr
davis,
mr
co,
we
have
spent
up
until
we
have
one
year
left
sec.
We
have
let
ms.
C
Burton
speak
to
that
now,
thank
you.
We
have
all
of
the
cares.
That's
r1
that
was
spent
last
year
in
2021.
C
C
We
still
have
about
14
million
dollars
for
sr3
that
we
have
until
september
of
24.
2024
to
spend
14
million.
C
Correct
and
part
of
those
funds
are
to
be
spent
on
learning
loss
over
two
million
dollars
of
those
funds
are
specifically
must
be
spent
and
reported
as
such
that
we
use
those
funds
for
learning
loss
the
other
funds,
as
we've
been
so
what
has
been
happening.
We've
used
those
funds
for
various
projects.
Within
the
district
we
retained
22
staff.
C
C
We
are
spending
that
money
on
technology.
We
are
spending
that
money
hvac
on
improving
our
hvac
systems
in
various
schools.
We
have
spent
a
significant
amount
of
those
funds
in
special
education
services
this
past
year,
in
anticipation
of
moving
those
funds
forward
and
making
them
last
as
long
as
they
could
through
2024.
C
Of
the
14
million,
two
million
of
that
absolutely
has
to
be
two
plus
million
has
to
be
spent
on
learning
loss
as
part
of
those
esther
funds
paid
for
coa,
the
caldwell
online
academy
they
paid
for
that
for
two
years
and
then
additional
teachers
so
yeah,
because
that
was
our
risk.
You
know
we
had
the
online
learning
that
we
have
no
other
funding
source
we've
been
using
esri
funds
for
that
program.
D
C
We
did
no,
we
actually
had
until
23
to
spend
the
s
or
two
funds,
but
the
s
or
two
funds
have
been
spent.
Okay,
based
on
all
the
items
that
we
just
talked
about,
stipends
from
last
year
that
were
spent
and
again
when
we
received
certain
funding
for
different
groups,
we
use
those
funds
to
allocate
so.
C
The
thousand
dollars
that
we
received
was
not
sufficient
to
pay
a
thousand
dollars
to
all
of
our
classified
staff,
because
we're
only
funded
for
the
numbers
that
we
are
allocated
or
entitled
to
so
anytime.
There
is
a
discrepancy
we
have
to
make
up
that
make
up
those
payments
to
the
staff,
so
those
those
are
the
funds
that
have
been
available
for
us
to
use
in
there
and
the
one
you're
calling.
C
A
Was
there
any
consideration,
because
I
noticed
that
I
don't
see
it
on
here,
but
when
matt
had
typed
up
steps,
13
a
through
13,
a
being
able
to
move
on
the
professional
advancement
run
versus
moving
over
with
the
masters
and
the
bachelors?
I
didn't
know.
If
you
guys,
I
see
that
it
was.
A
C
A
A
C
D
B
Davis,
mr
code,
yes,
so
there's
the
50
plus
one
the
75
was
plus
one.
That's
one
variable
in
addition
to
that,
the
employee
would
be
categorized
as
distinguished
in
either
domain
two
or
domain.
Three,
yes,
and
then
the
state
has
identified,
I
think,
seven
or
nine
ways
you
can.
Yes.
D
C
Would
hope
you
would
have
that,
but
so
just
for
clarification
right
now,
if
an
employee
has
a
master's
degree
plus
24
units
or
their
doctorate
or
eds,
they
get
to
move
yes,
okay
and
you're,
proposing
that
if
they
have
so,
I
we've
got
bachelor's,
24
and
master.
So
are
you
asking
for
both
categories
both
of
those
categories
to
move
in?
I
just
want.
I
just
want
clarification,
because
I've
heard
one
thing
that
I
heard
another.
So
I
want
to
be
sure
that
I
understand
what
you're
asking
for
they
just
need
those.
C
C
You
know
across
down
whatever,
as
everybody
else
on
the
seller's
schedule.
If
they
meet
the
same
criteria
that
everybody
else
is
expected
to
need
to
make
that
movement-
and
I
I
just
and
the
history
of
this
was
this-
was
this
movement
was
proposed
by
cea
when
taiwan
was
a
leading
negotiations,
so
we
just
honored
that
at
the
time
I
mean
that's
what
he
had
asked
and
that's
what
the
team
had
asked
for,
because
again
you're
similar
comments
that
people
are
frozen,
but
then
it
was.
C
We
understood
it
was
the
cea's
intent
to
also
motivate
those
employees
to
continue
with
their
education,
and
that's
why
it
was
agreed
upon
for
the
masters
24..
But
you
know
if
it
was
me-
and
I
just
you
know-
got
my
bachelor's
24
and
now
I'm
stuck
down
there.
I'm
like
okay,
well
I'll,
go
ahead
and
go
back
to
school
and
go
thousands
of
dollars
in
debt
and
get
my
master's
and
I'm
still
stuck
now.
I
have
24
more
credits
to
get
before.
I
am
unstuck.
There
is
no
motivation.
C
The
people
who
are
in
that
area
are
are
frustrated
and
upset,
and
year
after
year
they
are
asking.
Why
are
we
still
unable
to
move?
Why
are
we
still
stuck?
I
don't
have
an
answer
for
that.
I
don't
personally
feel
that
they
should
be,
and
now
with
inflation
and
everything
else
going
on.
If
the
inflation
keeps
going
they're
going
to
be
stuck
right
there
and
granted,
you
know
stipends
and
and
extra
money
thrown
here
and
there.
C
C
C
I
think
you
know
it's
historically
I
mean
these
cells
have
were
agreed
to
five
or
six
years
ago,
at
least
probably
seven,
because
this
was
considered
a
grandfather,
salary
schedule
because,
as
the
district
transitioned
to
the
career
ladder,
wasn't
here
just
trying
to
recreate
what
we
know,
it
was
agreed
upon
at
that
time
that
there
would
be
no
movement,
because
it
was
a
much
higher.
C
Amount
for
those
different
categories-
and
there
was
a
huge
disparity
between
the
cells
of
the
steps
going
from
a
13a
to
a
13b
there.
It
was
there
was
a
lot
of
disparity
in
the
increases
between
the
cells,
and
so
it
was
just
agreed
to
leave
everyone
who
was
there
and
recognize
that
that
had
been
negotiated?
C
C
Received
additional
24
credits
after
that
masters,
then
they
would,
that
would
be.
It
was
a
negotiated
move
the
incentive
to
get
to
the
24
from
the
masters,
and
I
appreciate
what
you're
saying
I'm
just
saying,
but
that
was
the
thought
process
that
says
right
now:
it's
your
bachelor's
24!
It's
two
thousand
dollars!
C
If
you
get
to
your
masters,
that's
a
fifteen
hundred
dollar
increase
automatically
before
you
take
any
step
consideration
and
to
pl
to
play,
then
if
you
and
same
thing
the
master's
24,
it's
the
same
amount,
but
you
do
have
that
capability
of
moving
down
the
salary
schedule
to
those
grandfather,
sales
and
then,
of
course,
again.
It
was
negotiated
by
cea
that
if
someone
has
an
eds
or
doctorate,
then
they
would
get
the
3
900
right
and
so
and
then
they
too
would
be
allowed
to
move
down.
C
A
I
just
have
one
more
question:
sorry,
so
we've
had
like
44
openings
right
since,
like
november
now,
if
each
of
those
positions
were
a
thousand
dollars
and
then
we
weren't
paying
that
for
the
whole
time,
do
we
know
like
where
does
that
money
go
or
does
that
go?
Is
that
just
held
on
for
those
positions?
What's
what's
because
that
was
like
november
december
january
february
march,
which
adds
up
to
quite
a
bit.
D
C
Classified
right,
I'm
just
thinking
of
how
to
answer
the
question.
So
throughout
the
year
several
times
we
had-
I
don't
know
the
exact
number
today,
but
at
one
point
in
time
we
had
the
44
openings.
Was
it
consistent
every
month?
No,
I
understand
that.
Okay,
yeah
okay,
so
yes,
we
budget
that
money.
It
stays
there
and
because
if
we
hire
someone,
then
of
course
we
will
be
paying
them.
So
when
we
look
at
the
positions
that
are
needed,
the
need
for
the
positions
have
not
gone
away
right.
Does
that
make
sense?
C
Yes,
so
therefore
we
continue
to
look
at
those
positions.
They're
budgeted
in
the
various
program
budgets,
ms
hirosaki.
She
has
budgeted
for
all
of
those
aids
that
she
needs,
whether
they're
in
mmo,
whether
they're
paid
out
of
sped
wherever
they
are
so
those
funds
are
also
allocated
and
in
every
one
of
our
categories.
C
C
Are
you
asking
me
what
is
my
fund
balance
brian?
I
want
to
know
that
that's
what
you're
asking
well
what's
what's
in
my
general
fund,
I
can
tell
you
it's
a
40
million
dollar
budget.
I
can
tell
you
I
I
want
to
know
I'm
just
asking
for
a
clarifying
question
as
to
what
you're
asking
what's
left
over.
Do
you
have
money.
B
I
think
mr
davis,
mr
coast,
maybe
something
that
could
potentially
clarity,
is
that
a
lot
of
the
positions
that
were
posted
fall
under
the
umbrella
of
special
education
or
title,
and
so
a
variety
of
things
have
happened.
So,
for
example,
with
mrs
lawson
under
title,
she
has
either
said
to
principles.
B
A
B
Sir,
so,
mr
davis,
so
while
miss
lawson
and
principals
budgeted
for
a
position
that
went
unfilled,
then
we
think
all
right
well
we'll
be
making
bank
and
then
we'll
just
you
know,
have
carrie
over
miss
lawson
will
at
the
general
level.
However,
that
was
counteracted
by
the
reduction
in
our
title
budget
for
the
22-23
year
and
so
rather
than
saying.
Well,
we
didn't
pay
for
a
pair
in
2122,
coupled
with
the
dollars
that
we
would
have
allocated
for
22-23.
Now,
let's
hire
two.
B
Actually,
we
have
regressed
in
some
ways
and
as
we
debrief
with
principles
this
spring,
our
conversations
have
been
we'll
need
to
hold
tight
to
the
postings
that
we
currently
have.
Please
don't,
please
don't
follow
through
with
hiring,
because
your
budget
will
see
a
reduction
and
what
that
reduction
is.
There
is
building
to
building,
however,
her
entire
budget,
you
know
the
amount
of
money
that
she
gets
has
reduced.
G
Know
right
because
I
think
brian's
asking
mr
cos
asking.
C
About
general
funds,
yes
and
those
44
postings
were
not
general
fund,
necessarily
they
were
special
education.
So
that's
a
different
funding
source,
the
title
and
then
title
has
been
reduced
from
the
federal
government
level,
so
tamara's
taking
that
into
consideration.
So
there
are
some
schools
who
will
have
to
reduce
their
title
staff
they've
been
made
aware
of
that,
and
then
child
nutrition
is
funded.
They
have
their
own
fund,
they
had
several
openings
all
year.
C
C
Child
nutrition
can
use
that
to
hire
they
may
well
and
they
are
looking
for
people.
So
if
you
know
somebody
in
addition,
remember
we
were
budgeting
at
one
dollar
amount
for
this
year
and
anticipating
of
the
increases
for
the
certified
and
the
classified
staff
that
new
amount
gets
re-budgeted
for
the
next
year.
I
appreciate
the
clarification.
G
So
if
I
could
say
something,
I
know
that
for
the
board,
we
typically
ask
that
there
is
a
cushion
for
the
general
fund.
You
know
just
just
in
case
anything
happens,
and
I
know
I
was
trying
to
look
here
to
see
what
our
cushion
what
the
budget
was
for
the
cushion
on
the
fund
balance
and
there's
a
lot
of
columns
here.
So
I'm
trying
to
look
at
this
available
from
balance,
it
looks
like.
G
Is
like
5.6
million
dollars,
so
that's
that's
a
cushion,
and
so
we
ask
just
in
case
anything
happens,
an
emergency
anything
that
we
have
something
in
there.
So
just
so
you
know,
may's
may's
bills
were
seven
point,
almost
seven
point:
seven
million
dollars,
so
what
we
have
is
a
cushion
wouldn't
even
pay
for
one
month's
bills
of
what
the
school
of
what
the
school
district
pays.
You
know
when
we
talk
about
payroll
and-
and
you
know
everything
that
is
paid
monthly.
G
C
G
Sure
yeah
thank
you
and
yeah,
and
that's
scary.
I
mean
you
know
how
they
say
you
should
have
at
least
three
months
of,
if
anything
happens
at
least
three
months
of
your
payroll
in
the
bank.
Well,
yeah,
I
don't,
but
you
know-
and
we
don't
even
have
a
month
so,
but
you
know
we
do
know
that
we
have
to
have
something
in
there
and
that's
we're
okay
with
that
amount
for
now,
just
because
we
know
it's
what's
going
on.
G
D
Just
so
we
go
when
we
go
on
and
talk
so
this
is.
This
is
no
difference
in
the
salary,
the
percentages
to
the
salary,
but
just
indicating
that
in
december,
we'll
get
a
fifteen
hundred
dollars
type.
B
That
it
would
be
at
least
a
1500
stipend
and
for
the
year,
so
that
would
be
broken
into
two
equal
payments.
Yeah
hypothetically
of
757.50.
A
B
C
D
G
C
Okay
up
in
the
office,
I
didn't
bring
my
computer
down
to
tell
you
what
the
cost
differential
was
to
tell
you
what
to
tell
you
what
the
what
the
total
cost
of
this
would
be
versus
the
total
cost
of
this,
which
was
your
proposal.
Okay,
I
I
don't.
I
can
give
that
to
you.
Certainly
I
just
didn't
bring
my
computer.
B
C
D
B
Mr
davis,
mystical,
the
stipend
is
a
standalone,
so
just
based
on
your
salary
schedule
language
compared
to
our
counter
proposal,
language
that
difference,
so
the
stipend
is
a
standalone,
gotcha,
okay
and
then
mr
davis,
mr
ghost
and
ladies
again,
sort
of
opportunities.
I
won't
call
them
barriers,
opportunities
that
are
making
it
that
are
making
it
even
more
difficult,
but
are
relevant
to
the
conversation,
are
the
increases
to
our
hourly
wages
for
classified
so.
If
we
didn't
have
that,
then
maybe
we
would
have
some
wiggle
room
to
discuss
other
things.
B
A
Thank
you
because
I
think
I
understand,
but
so
like
some
of
those
were
like
special,
ed
and
stuff
that
funding
came
from
somewhere
else
and
if
that
funny
wasn't
used,
then
their
budget
shrinks.
Is
that
what
I'm
understanding
like
miss
lawson's?
Is
that
what
you're
saying.
B
So,
to
summarize,
mr
davis,
I
would
say
that,
if
unfilled
positions
on
positions
that
were
posted
were
either
in
under
the
tunnel,
one
umbrella
or
a
special
education
umbrella,
and
so
in
some
instances
they
might
have
been
reabsorbed.
B
C
Accounting
for
the
proposed
salary
increases
of
both
classified
and
certified
staff.
Does
that
mean
so
her
budget
has
shrunk
and
and
with
title
funds?
If
I
could,
we
are
restricted
in
carrying
over
additional
funds.
There
is
a
15
limit,
so
we
have
a
choice
if
we
do
not
spend
all
of
our
title
funds
right
and
if
we
have
more,
we
can
only
carry
over
a
15
balance
amount
of
our
allocation,
and
if
we
aren't
able
to
spend
those
funds,
we
lose
those
funds.
C
So
we
make
every
effort
to
be
sure
that
we're
within
those
guidelines,
because
the
last
thing
we
want
to
do
is
lose
any
funding
that
we're
entitled
to.
So
I
want
you
to
know
it's
not
like.
She
didn't
spend
a
million
dollars
actually,
but
you
know
she
didn't
spend
five
hundred
thousand
dollars
so
that
it
carries
over
to
next
year
to
be
available.
Unfortunately,
the
allocation
instead
of
the
1.3
million
dollars.
It's
now,
maybe
1.1.
B
Mr
davis,
I
would
just
offer
that,
like
clear
back
in
the
day
when
we
were
not
school-wide
title
one
or
district-wide
for
that
matter,
that
we
were
targeted,
then
our
paraprofessionals
were
funded
under
general
funds,
and
so
in
those
instances,
if
we
lived
back
in
that
era,
we
got
in
your
little
time
machine
and
went
back
in
time.
B
D
D
B
Yeah
said
mr
davis,
mr
coe
you're
correct
in
those
numbers,
and
I
think
that
that
was
to
highlight
from
this
burden
now
why
we
would
be
contributing
we,
our
language,
wouldn't
contribute
900
000.
That
bill
is
1.1.2
increase,
so
there's
still
a
deficit
of
300
000
that
we're
going
to
have
to
make
up
from
somewhere
in
the
journal
from
somewhere
in
the
general
environment.
Okay,.
C
And
honestly,
if
I
could
just
interject,
we
really
had
not
even
talked
about
leadership
premiums.
Right
I
mean
that's
really.
So
if
you
were
looking
at
well
of
the
increase,
we
are
spending,
I
think
it's
a
four
hundred
thousand
dollar
ish.
I
don't
know
how
to
work
with
me
right
now,
increase
in
insurance
benefits
for
the
for
the
nine
point,
eight
percent
some
so
I'd
have
to
look
again
and
then
the
cost
of
the
increase
of
classified
salaries
was
around
the
eight
to
nine
hundred
thousand,
but
really
where
we
would
be
looking
at.
A
And
then
on
the
classified,
that's
what
that
was
like
six
hundred
thousand.
That's
what
you're
saying
well.
She
said.
C
C
Of
paper
that
you've
had
on
your
and
I
didn't
bring
my
computer
to,
did
you
have
that
behind
me.
D
D
B
An
across
the
board,
mr
davis,
jacob.
What
we
have
talked
about
is
the
dollar
amount.
Just
because,
given
the
fact
of
what
an
hourly
wage
would
be
for
a
classified.
D
I
just
wondered
if
it
was
if
it
was
tiered
towards
people
that
had
already
been
here
and
and
are
already
here
to
maintain.
C
If
I
could
answer
that,
so
what
we
said,
if,
let's
say
a
position
was
being
paid
at
ten
dollars
an
hour
and
was
that
that's
the.
C
Though,
right
right
right
so
and
within
that
column,
that
category
of
employee,
you
know
step,
one
was
ten
dollars
and
fifty
cents
and
then
they
went
to
you
know
as
they
incremented
down
based
on
the
years
right.
What
we
did
is
if
we
change
that
starting
number,
let's
say
to
13.
C
That
same
amount
would
have
been
added
right,
so
we
would
have
increased
those
salaries
by
three
dollars
right.
So
so
it
was
proportionate
to
the
position
and
we
looked
and
what
the
analysis
was
is
to
look
at
the
surrounding
districts
and
see
where
we
where
they
were
to
see
where
we
were,
and
in
some
categories
we
were
quite
even
there
were
some
categories
of
our
classified
staff
where
it
was
equitable.
C
We
were
very
close
in
those
salaries
and
there
were
some
that
we
were
definitely
way
off
and
those
were
the
adjustments
that
we
really
looked
to
make.
So
that's
where
so
it
wasn't.
Everyone
got
at
x,
amount
of
percent,
or
everyone
received
x,
amount
of
a
dollar
per
hour
increase.
It
was
truly
looked
at
and
categorized
based
on
the
positions
and
looking
at
so
most
parties.
C
D
C
G
C
Clarify
back
to
your
question
about
the
1.7.
We
said
that
577
000
at
the
time
and
should
be
the
same
because
our
dollars
really
were
close.
It
was
577
000
increase
in
our
insurance
and
848
000
in
our
classified
salaries,
and
I
can
bring
you
the
dollar
amount
of
what
I
calculated
the
salary
proposal
that
we
made
versus
the
salary
proposal
that
we
received.
C
E
E
E
E
D
D
A
D
The
other
concern
would
be
the
the
inflation
part
since
we've
we've
established
now
an
eight
percent
inflation
for
the
last
three
months.
Those
are
those
are
real
things
and
real
money
to
people.
E
D
The
anticipated
date
of
the
stipend
is
in
december,
that's
six
months
from
now
that
isn't
that
is
probably
gonna
make
up
that
difference
and
it
is,
it
is
quite
a
ways
away
from
people
gas
prices.
I
the
the
other
thing
I
found
out
about
this.
Maybe
I'm
wrong
on
this.
The
cpi
number
also
doesn't
take
into
account
housing.
D
So
that's
another
another
stress
that
we
feel
in
this
area.
D
I
can
just
I
can
say-
and
I
this
person
no
longer
works
here,
so
I
could
say-
and
I'm
not
going
to
name
that
person,
but
there
was
a
person
in
our
district,
fantastic
teacher,
a
first-year
teacher,
but
you
could
tell
that
she
was
going
to
be
an
outstanding
teacher.
D
D
So
so
we're
talking
about
an
eight
percent.
I
don't
know
if
you've
noticed
the
gas
prices
lately,
but
there's
no
slowing
down
of
that.
That's
going
to
probably
continue
because
of
summer.
D
Which
also
puts
a
burden
on
people
that
come
to
come
here
every
day
I
don't.
I
have
to
travel
from
nampa,
but
still
it
it.
It
is
an
increase,
and
I
can
tell
when
you
go
to
the
store
you
can.
You
can
maybe
get
something,
that's
not
as
good
as
what
you
normally
get.
But
when
you
go
when
you
go
to
fill
up
your
tank,
you
cannot
drive
down
to
the
next
gas
station
and
find
any
relief.
There
is
actually
driven
down,
color
boulevard
it
just
once
you
get
past
the
malware
there.
D
It
just
keeps
going
and
going
and
going
so.
I
feel
like
this
increase.
It
actually
comes
in
less
than
than
yours,
the
17
845
and
our
pro
in
our
previous
one.
So
yours
was
18.
C
D
Happened
I
would
like
I'd
also
like
for
tessie
to
go
over
the
the
change
of
the
language.
C
E
C
Movement
in
2223,
if
the
cp
has
achieved
the
advanced
professional
enforcement
as
brian
and
eric
hipple
talked
about
you
know,
those
are
the
state
standards
and
things
that
are
set
for
all
of
us
and,
if
they're
achieving
that,
we
feel
that
they
should
be
moved,
and
I
do
understand
that
compromises
are
made
in
negotiations
and
that
that
formation
of
that
frozen
section
was
part
of
that
negotiation.
C
Six
seven,
eight
years
whatever
ago.
We
just
feel
it's
time
for
us
to
negotiate
it
away.
Now
it's
served
its
purpose,
but
with
inflation
and
everything
else,
those
people
need
to
be
moving
and
keeping
up
with
their
salaries
as
well
and
then
on
number
21
again.
All
I
did
was
strike
out
the
10a10e
and
change
it
to
13a13e,
so
it
wouldn't
match
which
I
just
happened
to
notice
that
one
I
didn't
check
the
whole
thing.
So
no.
E
E
D
C
D
C
C
C
C
The
language
is
here,
so
just
a
just
a
reminder
of
that
in
in
the
number
21,
the
language
is
a
little
different,
but
it
basically
says
the
same
thing
for
the
m8
24
or
the
sdr.
It
says
shall
advance
one
step
if
they
have
met
the
compensation
run
performance
criteria
right.
So
that's
just
saying
it
in
a
different
way.
C
C
I
was
asked
actually
sorry
jesse
I
was
replying
to
brian,
I
could
tell
I
was.
I
was
under
the
impression
if
I
had
the
wrong
impression
I
apologize,
but
that
once
you
received
that
advanced
professional
endorsement,
you
would
continue
to
receive
the
stipend
every
year.
That's
what
I
believed
his
understanding
was,
and
maybe,
if
I
misspoke
mr
coe,
it
might
have
been
my
understanding.
D
F
C
D
C
Because
you
know
there
could
be
possibly
maybe
there's
somebody
already
in
that
grandfathered
area
that
is
not
advanced,
professional,
very
possible
they've
been
meeting
the
performance
criteria
of
the
50
plus
one
and
they're
proficient
or
they
score.
They
have
a
three
on
their
overall
summative
evaluation.
C
That
person
is
still
meeting
that
criteria.
They
don't.
There's
no.
We've
been
passing
through
the
advanced
professional
you
and
I
want
to
make
sure
that
we
know
what
we're
saying
so
if
they
don't,
if,
if
they
don't
meet
that,
there's
no
funding
for
them,
even
on
the
make
sure
I'm
saying
this
right
on
the
professional
on
the
profi
on
the
allocation,
yeah,
that's
correct,
so
they
would
not
move
so
we
would
be
funded.
Do
we?
C
We
have
some
people
who
met
the
criteria
two
years
ago,
but
they
didn't
mean
it
so
they're
still
being
funded
at
an
advanced
placement
one.
Even
though
this
is
the
second
year
we
have
an
ap
one
and
a
b
two.
So
we
have
people
who
met
at
the
first
year.
There
were
ap
ones,
then
they
moved
over
to
ap2
and
we
have
some
people
who
met
it.
F
C
That
if
they
get
that
advanced
professional,
the
70,
whatever
75,
plus
one
that
there
was
funding
and
if
they,
if
we
went
because
if
we
asked
for
the
other
one
where
it's
only
50
plus
when
there
wasn't
funding
and
where
they
are
in
a
higher
paid
range,
you
know.
Oh
okay,
we
felt
he
felt
in
our
discussions
that
to
support
the
district
in
doing
this,
then
we
would
ask
for
that,
because
then
the
money
support
would
also
be
there.
G
C
G
C
C
Yes,
you
are
correct.
They
that
is
so
there's
it's
not
an
automatic,
but
it's
an
opportunity.
It
gives
them
the
opportunity
to
move
if
they
need
the
requirements,
but
and
then,
with
this
understanding
that
they
may
move
one
year,
they
may
not
move
again
right,
but
if
they
don't
move,
let's
say
it's
me
and
I
don't
quite
make
it.
I
only
had
69.
You
know.
C
C
I
do
so
just
I
wanted
my
point.
I
pointed
this
out
to
matt
after
he
sent
the
salary
schedule
last
friday
gosh
here
we
are
friday,
tuesday,
yeah
on
friday,
so
the
salary
schedule
that
had
been
submitted.
So
we
have
step
13
right
and
then
we
have
a
second
step.
13.
C
C
F
C
And
my
understanding,
when
that,
when
we
talked
to
matt
that
it
was,
it
was
not
trying
to
it,
it
was
just
really
I'm
multiplying
it.
Like
yes,
a
one
point
well,
this
would
be
one
point.
Four,
five.
Yes,
one
point,
zero
four,
four,
five,
two,
the
cell.
It
wasn't
trying
to
get
the
cells
equal
in
the
steps
and
steps
right.
C
D
C
I,
I
would
say
we
probably
have
had
different
amounts.
I
think
you're
correct
on
what
again
again
going
back
to
what
we've
talked
about.
The
district
is
just
trying
to
get
the
steps
equal
so
that
when
each
step
represents
the
same,
has
the
same
value,
a
percent
and-
and
we
talked
about
that-
we
all
appreciate
and
see
where
what
you're
trying
to
do
and
where
you're
going
with
it.
C
C
You
know
13
15,
18,
20
years,
that
they're
getting
less
than
a
person
who's
only
been
here
five
or
six
years,
and
and
some
some
areas
on
your
proposal
were
like
really
high
and
big,
and
but
some
of
them
you
know
how
do
you
tell
somebody
they're
only
getting
a
1.8,
but
someone
else
is
getting
five
six
seven.
You
know
it
just
with
inflation
and
everything
else.
Everybody
needs
the
same
boost
and
equalizing
everything
and
making
every
step
be.
The
same
would
be
awesome.
C
C
B
Good,
thank
you,
so
I
believe
we
will
convene,
we
will
head
to
caucus
and
how
long
would
you
I.
A
C
C
D
C
C
That
we
would
not
you
know,
do
you
remember
back
in
the
day
I
mean
I
don't
who
all
has
been
negotiating
back
in
the
day
I
used
to
take
all
day.
You
did
it,
it
wasn't
a
public
meeting.
You
said
in
a
room,
you
did
it
all
day
long
subs
were
obtained.
You
got
your,
you
know
you.
Instead
of
going
to
your
classroom.
E
C
C
C
E
G
G
Here's
the
thing
monday
is
yeah,
we
would
need,
is
being
celebrated
by
the
a
lot
of
the
government.
Offices
is
juneteenth,
oh
sure,
okay,
so,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
people
that
are
out
and
they've
asked
me
to
be
the
one
that
stays
in
the
office,
I'm
like
yeah,
sure
I'll
stay
in
the
office.
What
about.