►
A
Welcome
everyone:
I
am
Tamara
Blake,
Wallace,
Planning,
Commission
administrator,
welcome
to
the
September
20th
2023
Planning
Commission
regular
meeting.
This
meeting
will
be
conducted
as
a
hybrid
meeting,
allowing
for
both
virtual
and
in-person
participation
serving
as
moderator
tonight
is
Christine
Goldsmith.
B
Good
evening
my
name
is
Chris
Goldsmith,
Planning
and
Zoning
development
review
coordinator
and
I
will
be
your
Zoom
moderator
this
evening.
This
meeting
is
being
recorded
on
both
video
and
audio
for
record-keeping
purposes.
For
those
of
you
attending
virtually
via
Zoom.
Please
keep
yourself
muted
to
ensure
no
interruptions
to
the
evening.
B
If
you're
attending
virtually
with
a
computer
or
smart
device,
you
can
mute
and
unmute
using
the
microphone,
slash,
mute
button
on
the
zoom
toolbar
or
by
using
keyboard
shortcuts.
You
may
press
alt
a
on
a
Windows
device
or
command
shift
a
on
a
Mac
when
the
floors
open
for
public
comments
or
questions.
Those
attending
in
person
will
be
asked
to
speak
first
and
then
those
attending
virtually
is
speaking.
Please
identify
yourself
for
the
record
first
and
then
speak
if
attending
by
telephone,
and
you
wish
to
ask
a
question
or
make
a
comment.
B
A
C
C
D
E
F
F
C
D
C
A
A
We
have
will
Hager
planner
3.
and
we
have
Becky
Parkinson
our
Planning
Commission
Clerk
from
public
works.
Tonight
we
have
Tom
Jones,
deputy
director
of
General
services
and
serving
as
our
legal
counsel.
Tonight
we
have
John
Mattingly
moving
on
item
number
six
Planning
Commission
work
session
reference,
the
County,
however,
the
Calvert
County
zoning
update
item
a
the
zoning
ordinance
update.
G
I'm
will
Hager
and
to
my
left,
I
have
Rachel
O'shea
and
to
my
right
we
have
Ron
Marney
and,
as
was
just
stated,
Ron
Marney
is
our
environmental
planning
regulator
and
he
is
really
the
subject
matter
expert
on
all
the
topics
that
we'll
be
addressing
tonight
and
before
we
get
into
the
focus
of
tonight's
work
session.
I
just
want
to
go
over
a
brief
timeline
of
where
we
are
in
the
process
and
how
we
got
here.
G
So
to
begin,
we
had
a
joint
work
session
on
April
19th,
which
gave
an
overview
of
the
zoning
ordinance
and
the
purpose,
strategies
and
goals
of
this
update.
The
draft
zoning
ordinance
was
made
available
to
the
public
on
May
10th.
We
had
a
joint
work
session,
June
21st,
where
the
drought,
zoning
districts
and
Sony
map
were
introduced.
G
The
first
public
forum
took
place,
June
22nd
and
the
focus
that
night
was
the
draft
zoning
districts
and
zoning
map,
and
we
had
a
second
flip.
We
had
a
second
public
forum,
August
24th
and
the
focus
that
night
was
the
critical
area.
Marine
and
water,
dependent
facilities
and
floodplain
articles
we'll
be
reviewing
tonight.
G
So
since
the
first
public
forum,
Planning
and
Zoning
staff
have
met
with
a
number
of
representatives
from
several
organizations,
as
well
as
individual
citizens
to
discuss
the
proposed
changes
to
the
zoning
update
and
we'll
continue
meeting
with
groups
and
individuals
throughout
this
process.
When
requested
and
since
close
to
the
beginning
of
this
process,
we've
been
receiving
written
public
comments
via
emails
to
the
zoning
ordinance
update,
email
address
and
those
comments
were
packaged
and
delivered
to
the
Planning
Commission
prior
to
today's
work
session,
with
any
personal
information
included
in
those
emails.
G
G
So,
as
previously
stated,
the
the
focus
of
tonight's
work
session
is
going
to
be
draft
articles,
22,
23
and
24
critical
area,
marine
and
water,
dependent
facilities
and
floodplain,
and
for
this
presentation
we're
going
to
begin
with
the
critical
area.
G
G
The
requirements
for
vegetation
include
that
there
must
not
be
any
net
loss
of
force
within
the
critical
area
and
the
minimum
amount
of
vegetation
cover
is
required,
typically
15
percent
for
each
Lottery
parcel
and
before
I,
move
to
the
the
next
slide.
I
just
want
to
note
here
we
received
some
public
comments
that
Protections
in
the
critical
area
aren't
enough
to
protect
the
bay
that
storm
water
in
Prince.
G
Frederick
doesn't
stay
in
Prince
Frederick,
so
I
just
want
to
note
that
there
are
also
regulations
that
protect
streams,
forests
and
sensitive
environmental
features
outside
of
the
critical
area.
But
those
regulations
are
located
in
different
articles,
draft
articles,
20
and
21
natural
resources
and
Forest
conservation.
G
So
the
critical
area
functions
as
an
overlay
district
and
the
critical
area
of
regulations,
if
more
restrictive
than
the
underlying
zoning
district
will
supersede
the
regulations
of
the
zoning
District
and
within
the
critical
area.
There
are
several
different
land
classifications
which
have
their
own
regulatory
standards
and
criteria,
the
characteristics
of
which
are
dependent
on
the
intent
and
purpose
of
the
classification.
G
The
intensely
developed
area
or
Ida
are
areas
of
20
or
more
contiguous
Acres,
where
a
mix
of
land
uses
predominate.
Idas
are
areas
of
concentrated
development
where
little
natural
habitat
occurs.
An
example
of
an
Ida
location
in
the
county
is
Solomon's,
Town,
Center,
Solomon's,
Island
and
most
of
the
land
adjacent
to
Back.
Creek
is
located
within
the
Ida
The
Limited,
Development,
Area
or
LDA
are
areas
characterized
by
low
or
moderate
intensity
development,
but
that
also
contain
areas
of
natural
plant
and
animal
habitats.
G
The
lda3
is
a
sub-category
of
the
LDA.
It
was
created
for
large
lot
subdivisions
that
existed
prior
to
the
adoption
of
the
critical
area
law.
It
has
the
same
regulatory
requirements
as
the
LDA,
with
the
exception
that
there
there
is
a
minimum
lot
size
requirement
of
three
acres
unless
the
lots
are
part
of
a
clustered
subdivision.
G
G
The
land
use
regulations
are
the
most
restrictive
in
the
RCA,
including
permitted
residential
density.
The
maximum
residential
density
permitted
in
the
RCA
is
one
dwelling
unit
for
20
acres,
and
there
are
also
special
buffer
Management
areas,
sometimes
called
a
modified
buffer
area.
This
is
where
it
has
been
sufficiently
demonstrated
that
the
existing
pattern
of
development
prevents
the
critical
area
buffer
from
fulfilling
its
water
quality
and
habitat
functions
and
work.
Development
in
accordance
with
specific
Provisions
can
be
permitted
in
the
buffer
without
a
variance
it.
It's
so
small.
G
G
G
A
critical
area
of
variance
from
the
board
of
appeals
is
required
for
disturbance
within
the
buffer.
If
the
critical
area
of
variance
criteria
are
met
and
the
variance
is
granted
mitigation,
plantings
are
required
for
the
disturbance
and
the
mitigation
required
if
a
variance
is
granted
is
at
a
rate
of
three
square
foot,
three
square
feet
of
plantings
for
every
one
square:
foot
of
disturbance.
What
we
would
call
three
to
one
mitigation.
G
So
there
are
a
few
proposed
changes
to
the
critical
area
regulations
in
this
draft
which,
as
I
stated
previously,
were
developed
by
environmental
planning
staff
and
called
and
consultation
with
the
state
critical
area
Commission
and
for
those
who
are
listening.
Who
aren't
aware
we
have
made
available
documents
which
compare
the
draft
zoning
ordinance
articles
with
the
current
zoning
ordinance
and
which
highlight
proposed
substantive
changes,
and
that
is
available
on
the
zoning
ordinance
update
website.
If
you
have
not
taken
a
look
at
that
yet,
but
some
of
these
proposed
changes
are
found
in
draft
section
22-6d3.
G
These
are
projects
that
require
expertise
from
engineering,
The,
Soil,
Conservation,
District
and
planning,
and
zoning
rather
than
a
labor
board's
approval.
A
variance
from
the
board
of
appeals
requires
three
to
one
mitigation.
These
projects
will
require
two
to
one
mitigation
or
in
the
case
of
septic
systems,
one-to-one
mitigation.
If
clearing
is
required,
so
these
projects
would
be
less
expensive
and
the
process
less
time
consuming
for
the
property
owner,
and
it
also
allows
the
department
to
respond
more
expeditiously
to
slides
and
other
emergency
type
situations.
G
The
draft
also
proposes
to
revise
how
the
critical
area
buffer
is
expanded
for
contiguous
steep
slopes
under
the
current
zoning
ordinance
in
the
case
of
contiguous
slopes
of
15
percent
or
greater,
the
buffer
is
expanded
four
feet
for
every
one
percent
of
slope
or
to
the
top
of
the
slope.
Whichever
is
greater
and
there's
a
consensus
that
this
methodology
is
both
cumbersome
and
looks
arbitrary
when
delineated
on
plans
in
the
draft
zoning
ordinance.
G
G
The
draft
critical
area
article
also
includes
regulations
which
protect
the
cliff
areas,
the
cliff
areas
along
the
shoreline
from
development.
These
primarily
include
building
setbacks
from
Cliffs,
which
generally
range
from
100
feet
to
300
feet,
depending
on
the
location
and
characteristics
of
existing
development
in
the
area.
G
And
a
section,
that's
new
to
the
zoning
ordinance
and
included
in
this
draft
addresses
criteria
and
conditions
for
the
development
of
solar
energy
generating
systems
in
the
critical
area.
The
section
comes
directly
from
recent
revisions
to
State
critical
area
regulations
and
it
establishes
permissions
criteria
and
conditions
for
a
permitted,
major
minor
and
accessory
solar
energy
generating
systems.
G
So
the
next
article,
we're
going
to
cover
is
draft
article
23,
marine
and
water
dependent
facilities,
draft
article
23
includes
location
of
established,
Harbor
lines
and
shorelines
permitted
and
prohibited
Waterfront
uses
and
conditions
defines
and
regulates
the
usable,
Waterway
area,
conditions
for
private
peers,
Community
peers,
commercial
peers
and
marinas
conditions
for
water,
dependent
facilities
and
activities,
public
beaches
and
other
public
water,
oriented,
Recreation
and
criteria
for
short
erosion,
protection
works
and
there's
a
lot
of
overlap
with
the
critical
area.
In
this
article.
G
And
another
example
of
Revision
in
the
section
addressing
non-uh,
addressing
non-water
dependent
facilities
that
are
associated
with
a
water,
dependent
facility
or
activity.
The
revision
strengthens
the
regulation
by
removing
the
statement
in
so
far
as
possible
from
the
beginning
of
the
sentence
so
that
non-water
dependent
facilities
like
parking
are
required
to
be
located
outside
of
the
critical
area
buffer,
and
there
were
a
number
of
relatively
minor
revisions
made
to
this
article,
including
some
based
off
recent
revisions
made
at
the
state
level,
many
of
which
aren't
necessarily
policy
changes.
G
But
revisions
made
for
clarification
purposes
and
again.
If
anyone
listening
would
like
more
details
on
and
specifics
on
those
revisions
and
other
revisions,
we
don't
have
time
to
cover
in
this
presentation.
Please
see
the
document
which
Compares
our
draft
articles
22
through
24,
with
the
current
zoning
ordinance,
which
is
available
on
the
zoning
ordinance
update
website.
G
Article
24
of
the
draft
sending
ordinance
contains
the
floodplain
regulations.
This
is
another
article
that
isn't
just
County
requirements,
but
these
are
regulations
required
by
FEMA.
Floodplain
regulations
include
things
like
regulations
to
ensure
proposed
development,
does
not
increase
flooding
or
create
a
dangerous
situation
during
flooding,
including
on
another
individual's
property.
If
a
structure
is
involved,
it
must
be
constructed
to
minimize
damage
during
flooding
and
in
the
floodplain
article.
G
There
are
different
regulatory
standards
depending
on
whether
the
location
is
considered
a
coastal
or
non-costal
flood
plain,
since
the
flooding
that
occurs
in
these
areas
has
different
characteristics
in
Calvert
County.
The
the
vast
majority
of
development
located
in
the
flood
plain
are
the
older
Waterfront
communities
like
Broome's
Island,
breezley,
Point,
Cove,
Point
Etc
that
were
developed
decades
prior
to
zoning.
G
So
when
government
agencies
use
the
term
floodplain,
what
they're
typically
referring
to
is
what's
also
known
as
the
regulated
floodplain,
these
are
areas
with
at
least
a
one
percent
annual
chance
of
flooding
and
are
subject
to
federal
state
and
County
regulations.
It's
also
sometimes
called
the
100
Year
floodplain
or
special
flood
Hazard
area.
These
all
essentially
mean
the
same
thing.
G
G
The
areas
within
the
a
zone
are
vulnerable
to
Coastal
or
tidal
flooding
by
high
tides,
hurricanes,
tropical
storms
or
steady,
onshore
winds.
What
difference?
What
differentiates
a
v
Zone
from
an
A
zone
is
that
the
V
Zone
has
an
additional
additional
Hazard
associated
with
high
velocity,
wind
and
wave
action,
so,
as
you
can
see,
hopefully
down
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen,
the
base
flood
elevation
for
the
a
Zone
in
Long
Beach
is
four
feet
above
sea
level
and
within
the
V
Zone.
It
is
a
little
higher
at
six
feet
above
sea
level.
G
So
in
Long
Beach
there
is
a
flooding
risk
within
the
V
Zone
on
lots
and
a
few
structures
directly
adjacent
and
exposed
to
the
bay
and
there's
also
a
flooding
risk
within
the
a
zone
that
encompasses
portions
of
the
Lots
on
both
sides
of
Long
Beach
Drive,
and
for
structures
that
are
partially
located
within
a
special
flood
Hazard
area.
The
floodplain
requirements
apply
for
the
entirety
of
the
structure.
G
An
important
part
of
the
national
flood
insurance
program
is
the
community
rating
system
or
CRS
program.
The
CRS
program
is
voluntary,
is
a
voluntary
incentive
program
that
rewards
participating
communities
by
giving
discounts
to
Residents
and
businesses
on
their
flood
insurance
premiums.
Communities
are
rewarded
credits
for
certain
activities
and
enacted
regulations
and
are
designated
a
class
ranking
which
determines
your
premium
reduction.
Calvert
county
is
currently
a
Class
8,
which
allows
for
a
10
percent
reduction
in
flood
insurance
premiums
and
just
as
a
PSA,
the
CRS
discount
is
now
applicable
to
anyone
who
gets
an
NFI
fee.
G
G
Building
elevation
is
a
technique
that
involves
raising
a
building
above
the
base
flood
elevation
so
that
water
can
flow
under
the
building
during
the
flood
event.
Freeboard
is
the
additional
amount
of
height
above
the
base.
Flood
elevation,
at
which
a
structure's
lowest
floor
must
be
elevated
to
become
to
be
in
accordance
with
regulations.
G
It's
also
known
as
the
flood
protection
elevation.
These
two
terms
freeboard
and
flood
protection
elevation,
are
sometimes
used
interchangeably
in
Calvert
County
free
board
is
two
feet
above
base
flood
elevation
under
the
current
regulations
and
the
draft
zoning
ordinance
update,
it
is
proposed
to
be
increased
to
four
feet
above
the
base.
Flood
elevation,
the
floodplain
regulations
also
require
electric
and
mechanical
systems
to
be
located
above
freeboard,
and
one
of
the
proposed
changes
in
the
draft
regulations
includes
requiring
the
surface
of
subdivision
access
roads
in
the
floodplain
to
be
at
the
flood
protection
elevation.
G
Instead
of
the
base
flood
elevation
according
to
FEMA,
according
to
a
FEMA
commission
costs
benefit
comparison.
Incorporating
freeboard
into
new
building.
Construction
can
range
from
a
quarter
per
a
quarter
of
a
quarter
of
a
percent
to
one
and
a
half
percent
of
the
total
construction
costs
for
each
foot
of
freeboard.
G
Sometimes
you'll
see
Property
Owners,
elevating
even
higher
than
freeboard,
so
areas
within
the
floodplain
are
also
located
within
the
critical
area
commonly
and
within
the
critical
area.
There
are
impervious
surface
lot
coverage
restrictions.
So
if
you
elevate
high
enough
to
fit
your
vehicle
underneath
the
house,
you
don't
need
a
garage,
you
create
less
impervious
surface,
and
so
that's
also
an
advantage
to
the
property
owner.
G
Floodplain
regulations
like
meeting
the
flood
protection
elevation
are
required
for
new
buildings
and
structures
and
they're
also
required
for
when
an
existing
structure
undergoes
a
substantial
Improvement
under
the
revision.
Under
another
revision
proposed
in
the
draft
zoning
ordinance
update
is
in
the
definition
of
substantial
Improvement
that
you
see
here
in
the
red
text.
G
What
this
does
is
more
clearly
Define
the
scope
and
time
period
for
when
the
substantial
Improvement
requirements
would
kick
in
the
proposed
new
definition
of
substantial
Improvement,
and
the
draft
makes
it
clear
that
a
substantial
Improvement
is
any
combination
of
repairs,
reconstruction,
Rehabilitation
addition
or
any
other
Improvement
of
a
structure
taking
place
over
a
10-year
period,
the
cumulative
cost
of
which
equals
or
exceeds
50
percent
of
the
market.
Value
of
the
structure
before
the
start
of
construction
of
the
Improvement.
G
So,
in
summary,
article
22
critical
area
revised
how
the
expanded
critical
area
buffer
for
steep
slopes
is
delineated.
Some
disturbances
of
the
critical
area
buffer
propose
a
require
administrative
variance
approval.
Instead
of
having
to
go
through
the
board
of
appeals,
variance
process,
article
23
revised
to
clarify
that
private
peers
are
allowed
on
undeveloped
properties
with
a
with
a
riparian
right
that
are
contiguous
with
the
property
lacking
a
repairing
right
that
has
a
dwelling
article
24,
revised
definition
of
substantial
Improvement
and
the
flood
protection
elevation
raised
from
two
feet
to
four
feet.
A
H
It's
going
to
come
down
to
the
design
of
the
project,
which
would
have
to
be
addressed
at
that
time,
anytime,
you're
doing
any
type
of
major
subdivision
or
anything
along
those
lines,
FEMA,
along
with
all
our
policies
in
a
court
that
have
to
match
up
with
that,
have
a
no
adverse
impact
policy.
So,
in
other
words,
when
you
do
something,
you
can't
dump
the
water
on
your
neighbor's
property.
D
G
H
And
so
the
thousand
foot
is
what
actually
delineates
where
the
critical
area
law
applies.
So
everything
within
a
thousand
foot
of
tidal
waters
is
the
within
the
critical
area
itself.
Now
the
critical
area
is
made
up
of
multiple
overlays,
it's
not
simply
just
the
Ida,
LDA
and
RCA
that
we
discussed
earlier.
It
also
has
what's
referred
to
as
the
critical
area
of
buffer,
and
this
is
what
they
defined:
comar
defined
habitat
protection
area,
which
is
typically
everything
within
100
foot
of
mean
high
water.
H
This
area
is
a
non-disturbance
area
for
basically
preserving
the
riparian
ecosystem
and
filtering
water
it
before
it
reaches
up
tidal
waters.
D
H
That
right,
that's
correct,
I
actually
had
an
application
and
not
too
long
ago
where
we
were
looking
at
a
prior
permit
where
it
was
not
in
the
buffer,
and
they
were
trying
to
do.
In
addition,
that
addition
will
now
be
in
the
buffer
due
to
erosion
and
sea
level
rise,
so
that
absolutely
can
move,
and
it
would
be
addressed
at
time
of
permit
application.
I
H
So
as
far
as
the
overall
critical
area
that
one
thousand
feet,
that's
typically
done
at
the
state
level,
we
would
not
make
a
a
major
substantive
change,
the
critical
area
maps
without
prompting
from
the
state.
As
far
as
that
critical
area
buffer
line,
that's
basically
done
at
permit
application,
because
it's
not
you
know
a
mapped
feature.
We
basically
look
at
your
individual
property
at
each
application.
We
go
okay.
Where
are
you
at?
H
E
D
A
E
Does
take
a
look
at
the
critical
area
line
of
the
mean
high
water
line
and
they
do
review
that
and
redo
the
maps
on
it
on
occasion.
So
it's
not
done
often,
but
they
do
look
at
that
and
adjust
the
the
boundaries
and
then
we
when
they
send
it
to
the
counties
and
they
get
then
the
account
is
adjust
their
mapping.
D
F
H
So
riparian
rights
refers
to
a
property
that
has
water
Frontage
in
its
ability,
ability
to
utilize,
said
water.
Franches
so
say
you
have
a
property
with
a
100
wide
foot.
Access
to
the
Patuxent
River
that
has
a
riparian
right
and
by
law
was
able
to
utilize
it
by
enjoyment
of
a
peer
and
access
to
said
peer.
That's
why
one
of
the
few
exceptions
where
you
never
need
a
variance
within
the
critical
area
buffer
is
a
four
foot
wide
pedestrian
access,
because
again
it
would
be
illegal
to
deny
that
legal
use
of
their
land.
H
H
H
They
have
to
provide
a
detailed
breakdown
that
includes
cost
labor
design,
removal
of
any
debris.
Those
are
basically
the
FEMA
criteria
so
that
we
have
to
have
a
certain
level
of
detail.
So,
whenever
I
get
an
application,
if
it's
not
already
included
a
comment
that
someone
will
always
see
as
I'll
bounce
it
back
as
a
resubmittal
request
and
say,
look
I
need
this.
It
needs
this
level
of
detail
and
that's
typically
provided
by
the
contractor,
because
it's
very
in
line
with
the
cost
estimates
that
anyone
would
typically
receive
and.
H
Makes
sense
it
does
and
there's
absolutely
mechanisms
in
place
for
that.
You
still
have
to
value
your
work,
you'd,
say:
I.
Believe
it's
going
to
take
x,
amount
of
time.
It
has
to
be,
you
know
reasonable
and
you
would
basically
say
I'm
going
to
work
X
number
of
hours.
It's
going
to
be,
like
you
say
me
and
my
son,
and
you
could
put
it
at
as
low
as
the
current
minimum
wage
for
the
state
of
Maryland
and
for
materials.
H
I
In
reference
to
all
the
comments,
the
public
comments
that
came
in
there
was
some
fascinating
questions
and
comments
in
there.
I
really
had
some
good
quality
reading
going
over
them
and
I
want
to
thank
all
the
people
that
sent
those
comments
and
questions
in
because
it
made
me
think
about
a
lot
of
new
stuff
as
well.
I
D
H
G
We
we
do
respond
to
those.
We
didn't
include
our
responses
to
those
in
in
the
the
package,
but,
yes,
we
do
reach
out
and
and
respond
to
direct
questions
and,
like
I
mentioned
previously,
we
put
together
an
FAQ
section
on
the
website
where
we
figured
you
know
these
questions
that
are
coming
in
are
probably
not
going
to
be.
G
You
know,
they're,
probably
more
people
with
questions
like
these
out
there,
and
so
we
created
that
FAQ
section
in
part
based
off
of
some
of
the
questions
that
we
were
hearing
that
were
coming
in
via
email
and
also
some
of
what
we
were
hearing
at
the
public
forum.
F
I
Someone
asked
in
reference
to
the
industrial
park
on
231
being
allowed
to
have
or
being
up
zoned
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
to
be
able
to
allow
to
have
drive-through
restaurants,
taverns
nightclubs
bars,
Home,
Improvement,
centers
shopping
centers
and
adult
entertainment,
Enterprises
I'm,
going
to
throw
the
question
out
there
simply
because
the
dog
chemical
got
put
in
with
it
was
part
of
the
package
on
this.
So
at
some
point,
I'd
like
and
I
guess
married
bathroom,
whatever
I'd
like
some
kind
of.
I
E
G
Well,
if
there
are
no
other
questions
and
and
are
there
any
I,
I
think
in
closing,
we
just
wanted
to
mention
that
we
mentioned
we've
mentioned
previously,
that
our
schedule
is
going
to
be
fluid,
that
we're
going
to
make
revisions
to
it
down
the
line,
and
we
have
made
revisions
to
it.
I
checked
the
website
today,
I
didn't
see
it
updated
yet,
but
it
will
be
updated
soon.
G
On
the
website,
we've
made
some
revisions
to
the
schedule,
and
so
the
next
open
comment
period
and
cycle
in
terms
of
public
forums
and
work
sessions,
the
Articles
to
be
in
Focus
during
that
period
are
going
to
be
articles,
draft
articles,
30,
32
and
33,
which
is
zoning,
approvals,
variances
and
appeals,
non-conformities
and
enforcement.
G
B
A
A
A
J
The
property
gives
an
opportunity
for
the
county
to
provide
improved
Improvement
of
Public
Safety
at
The
Barstow
convenience
center
and
provide
Prince
Frederick
wastewater
treatment.
Plant
number
one
with
additional
discharge
area
in
Penn,
Treasury
title
III,
3,
3-205
of
the
land
use
article
of
the
Maryland
and
annoted
code
specifies
that
certain
types
of
projects
may
not
be
authorized
or
constructed
in
local
jurisdictions
or
in
a
geographic
section
of
the
local
jurisdiction.
Until
the
Planning
Commission
has
approved
the
location,
character
and
extent
of
the
development.
J
J
The
property
is
zoomed
EC
for
employment
center
and
C.
Excuse
me
rcd
for
Royal
Community
district
and
is
located
within
one
mile
radius
of
the
Prince
Frederick
Town
Center
conclusion
recommendations.
The
Department
of
Public,
Works,
General
Services
recommends
that
the
Planning
Commission
finds
a
proposed
acquisition
at
255
JW
Williams
Road
Prince
Frederick
Maryland,
consistent
with
the
adopted
Calvert
County,
comprehensive
plan,
chapter
10
government
and
Community
facilities
goal
one
objective:
3
10.1.3.4.
I
D
D
D
Is
it
planned
for
spray
irrigation
or.
F
F
A
Item
12b,
we
have
on
the
agenda
the
site
plan
and
subdivision
application
list.
These
are
for
informational
purposes.
Only
if
you
have
any
questions
I'm
here
to
answer
those.