►
Description
A recording of the Greater Cambridge Local Plan Webinar: Introduction to the Plan and Consultation which was held on 4 November 2021 by members of the Greater Cambridge Shared Planning Service.
A
Hey
everybody
welcome
to
you
all
and
I'm
just
going
to
stop
square
and
share
my
screen
and
show
you
all
of
our
faces.
I
think
you
can
see
them
already
so
welcome
along
to
our
first
session
of
this
consultation,
welcome
back
for
those
who
have
previously
been
along
to
some
of
these
webinars
and
for
different
different
pieces
of
work
that
we've
been
doing
and
welcome
to
all
of
the
you
people
who
haven't
it's
lovely
to
have
you
here.
We've
got
an
hour
today
to
talk
through
the
forthcoming
consultation
or
the
consultation.
A
That's
live
now
for
the
going
to
cambridge
local
plan,
and
this
is
a
bit
of
an
introduction
to
the
plan.
It's
a
little
bit
about
how
to
comment,
how
to
get
involved
and
and
some
of
the
dates
and
some
of
the
events
that
we're
going
to
be
doing.
We've
got
a
team
here
today,
some
of
the
panel
to
talk
to
you
about
different
things,
we're
going
to
try
and
make
it
a
little
bit
interactive.
A
We've
got
some
new
technology,
so
I
say
that
we're
going
to
try
out
this
time
so
bear
with
us,
as
always
we'd
like
to
try
a
few
new
things
to
make
it
a
little
bit
less
of
us
just
talking
at
you
and
you
guys
more
being
involved
and
what
I'm
going
to
do
is.
I
am
going
to
just
run
through
our
panel
and
introduce
them
to
you
first
and
then
we'll
do
a
little
bit
of
housekeeping
and
then
we'll
crack
on.
So
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna,
I'm
gonna
introduce
them
one
by
one
and
hannah.
A
Hey
john
and
behind
the
scenes
I'm
going
to
introduce
the
two
we've
got
two
two
of
our
colleagues
behind
the
scenes
running
all
the
technology
and
without
this
they
without
them
this
wouldn't
be
working.
So
we've
got
will
smeaton
and
tim
cliff
who
are
running
the
technology,
so
we
can
either
be
thankful
that
they
get
it
all
right
or
we
can
blame
them.
A
No,
I'm
joking,
I'm
joking,
and
so
for
me,
I'm
paul
freyno,
I'm
assistant
director
for
strategy
economy,
so
part
of
the
team
who
helped
me
to
prepare
the
plan
and
so
about
the
session,
just
to
reassure
it's
being
recorded
and
there
isn't
any
chat
facility
on
here.
But
there
is
a
q
a
and
what
we'd
encourage
you
to
do
is
put
any
questions
into
the
q,
a
as
we
go
through
slides
or
we
go
through
the
the
interactive
sessions
and
we'll
try
and
answer
as
many
as
we
can
as
we
go
through.
A
But
we
will
have
some
time
at
the
end.
Hopefully,
15-20
minutes
to
do
some
questions
and
answers
as
well,
and
I
think
that
you
can
post
anonymously
or
I
think
you
can
use
your
name
or
try
not
to
mention
names.
So
without
further
ado,
I'm
going
to
share
my
screen.
We've
got
a
few
slides
to
present
to
you
just
on
the
stack
page
of
where
we
are
at
at
the
moment,
and
I'm
going
to
hand
over
to
john
dixon
who's
going
to
start
walking
through
those
lines
with
you
now,
oh
actually,
just
before.
A
A
Those
who
don't
know
what
plan
is
about
and
that's
going
to
be
interactive
and
then
we're
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
consultation,
how
to
participate
and
outline
some
of
the
next
sessions,
including
further
webinars
and
some
of
our
in
real
life
sessions
as
well.
So
john,
I'm
going
to
hand
over
to
you
and
you
can
start.
D
So
as
a
reminder
of
where
we
are
in
this
process,
this
isn't
very
much
not
the
beginning
of
the
process.
We
started
plan
making
as
far
back
as
2019.
I
think
we
started
you
might
remember
in
early
2020
we
did
our
first
conversation
and
we
held
many
events
just
like
this
one,
and
we
generated
an
awful
lot
for
feedback
over
eight
and
a
half
thousand
comments,
all
of
which
have
been
published
on
our
website.
You
can
find
all
the
information
we've
also
since
then
published
some
further
research
on
the
plan.
D
So
back
in
november
last
year,
we
published
a
series
of
studies
that
we've
done
to
inform
the
plan
and
some
of
the
testing
we've
done
on
the
choices
that
will
be
available
to
the
plan
and
since
then,
we've
been
working
up.
What
the
first
proposals
for
the
plan
should
be
for
this
consultation
after
we'd
worked
those
up
as
as
officers.
Clearly
they
then
go
through
a
democratic
process.
D
We
went
through,
I
think
at
least
four
meetings
with
with
counsellors
who
discussed
agreed,
made
changes
scrutinized
the
documents
to
agree
them
for
consultation.
That's
now
started
and
we're
now
just
into
the
six-week
consultation
we're
carrying
out
just
an
early
reminder
of
where
we
are.
This
is
not
the
final
plan.
D
This
is
very
much
the
proposals
we
would
use
to
develop
the
plan
before
we
then
consult
you
on
it
next
year.
So
what
you
can
see
at
the
bottom
of
the
screen
is
our
overall
timeline,
which
shows
we
would
consult
next
year
on
the
draft
plan.
That
would
then
lead
to
a
plan
that
we
would
want
to
submit
for
adoption.
D
So
our
final
plan
that
we
want
to
adopt,
and
then
that
would
then
be
sent
off
to
the
secretary
of
state
and
there'll,
be
an
independent
examination
with
an
independent
planning
inspector
to
scrutinize
the
plan
and
listen
to
all
the
representations
that
come
in
at
that
point
before
a
report
would
come
to
us
as
to
whether
the
plan
is
sounded,
we
can
go
on
to
adopt.
We've
got
more
on
this
later
in
the
presentation.
I
think
next.
C
D
Please
so
what
does
it
do?
Hopefully,
you
may
have
had
a
chance
already
to
look
on
our
website
and
have
a
look
at
the
consultation
for
yourselves,
but
it
tries
to
set
out
the
vision
and
the
aims
for
our
plan.
What
do
we
think
this
area
should
look
like
over
the
next
20
30
years,
and
how
should
we
guide
what
that
should
look
like
through
our
proposals
in
the
plan?
D
D
It
sets
out
where
we
think
that
development
should
take
place
and
clearly
seeks
your
views
on
those
proposals,
but
also
the
key
policies
that
would
drive
how
that
development
takes
place.
What
should
be
like
what
standards
should
it
meet?
For
example,
and
again
it's
not
a
full
plan.
You
will
see
when
you
look
at
that
consultation.
It
sets
out
what
we
proposed
to
prepare,
not
the
full
detailed
policy
wording
and
site
details
that
we
would
have
in
a
final
plan.
D
The
other
thing
to
point
out
is
that
all
the
evidence
we've
used
to
help
us
prepare
this
plan
is
available
on
the
website.
There
are
many
studies
and
topic
papers
where
we've
tried
providing
great
detail
the
background
to
those
proposals,
not
just
our
proposals,
it's
why
and
the
evidence
behind
them.
So
you
have
that
available.
Should
you
choose
to
comment
as
well
and
I'll
come
back
to
paul.
A
You
can
see
now,
and
hopefully
you
can
all
see
that.
So
what
we're
going
to
do
is
I'm
going
to
move
to
the
first
question
on
mentimeter
and
which
is
this
so
for
everybody
and
hopefully,
when
you
start
putting
your
answers
up,
you
should
be
able
to
see
them
come
up
on
on
the
screen.
So
in
three
words,
what
do
you
think
that
a
local
plan
actually
plans
for?
So
you
can
see
our
little
diagram
on
the
side
there.
That's
part
of
our
infographics
that
you
know
we
think
this
is
what's.
A
This
is
what
we're
trying
to
plan
for-
and
this
is
what
goes
into
the
local
plan,
and
I
appreciate
that
lots
of
you
have
seen
some
of
the
documents
already
and
there
is
a
a
lot
of
stuff
in
there
already
and
a
lot
of
information,
a
lot
of
evidence,
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
wording.
So
what
are
the
things
that
we're
thinking
of
and
don't
just
copy
the
ones
on
the
side
on
the
tree?
So
we've
got
some
new
homes,
not
seeing
a
huge
amount
coming
through
employment,
yeah.
A
I
think
employment
and
homes
are
obviously
really
really
key,
and
growth
is
an
interesting
word,
because
obviously
growth
means
lots
of
different
things.
You
know,
population
growth
requires
new
development
use
housing
and
we
need
to
you
know
we
need
to
plan
for
the
future
for
the
future
generations
to
ensure
that
they
have
got
houses
and
they've
got
places
to
work,
and
you
know
new
homes
to
live
in
and
nice
places
definitely
and
as
you'll
see
from
some
of
our
documentation.
A
A
I
mean
that's
a
really
good
one,
and
I
think
one
of
the
things
for
us
that
we've
really
tried
to
be
thinking
about
in
this
plan
is
how
that
we
try
and
as
we've
got
in
this
in
this
slide,
is
demystify
the
process
of
planning.
So
actually
we
can
get
people
involved
and
get
people
to
understand
that
it's
not
just
kind
of
dry,
boring.
Stuff
john
will
frown
at
me
about
you
know
putting
houses
in
places,
but
actually
it's
really
about
place
making,
and
it's
really
you
know
it's
a
really.
A
History
is
a
really
a
really
important
one
as
well,
because
we
build
you
know,
plans
are
an
iterative
process.
You
know
each
plan.
We've
got
currently
got
two
adopted
plans
for
south
carolina
and
cambridge
city
and
we're
going
to
try
and
build
on
those
as
well.
You
know
we
don't
want
to
throw
out
good
stuff.
We
want
to
improve
on
on
that
and
move
it
forward.
So
it's
really
important
that
we
have
lots
of
diversity.
There's
some
great
stuff
coming
through
here.
C
B
I
think
it's
really
interesting
to
see
transport
really
central
here,
because
actually
transport
is
one
thing
that
the
local
plan
doesn't
actually
plan
for
itself.
We
take
account
of
transport
plans,
but
it
isn't
the
transport
plan,
which
is
something
that
I
think
is
planners.
We
do
struggle
with.
I
think
you
know
we
have
a
system
that
we
work
within
and
transport
sits
at
the
level
of
different
authorities.
B
So
in
our
area
we've
actually
got
a
lot
of
different
levels
of
local
authorities
that
have
transport
roles,
so
we
have
the
combined
authority
at
the
macro
level,
we
have
the
county
council
sort
of
in
between
and
we
also
have
the
greater
cambridge
partnership
and
they'll
be
consulting
on
some
really
important
transport
proposals,
starting,
I
believe
on
monday.
Now,
in
actual
fact,
so
we
we
work
really
closely
with
those
transport
authorities,
but
we
aren't
the
transport
planners
ourselves.
B
A
Yeah,
you
know
I'd
agree
with
that
and
so
some
fantastic
stuff
coming
through
and
just
to
let
you
know,
obviously
the
the
you
know
the
you
know
the
stuff
that
you're
putting
in
here.
We
all
capture
that
we
are
capturing
all
of
this
stuff
and
we're
trying
to
get
inside
because
actually
we're
even
going
to
try
and
build
in
some.
You
know
conversations
that
are
going
to
feed
into
the
next
webinars
and
the
next
session.
A
So
we
can
actually
consider
a
lot
of
the
stuff
and
part
of
the
process
of
consultation
is
listening
to
this
and
you
know
hearing
some
voices
in
different
ways.
So
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
the
next
one
now,
so
we
have
got
another
another
slide
for
you
to
interact
with
another
one
to
get
you
thinking,
and
so
this
is
the
next
one.
So
this
is
always
a
question
that
we
get
asked
quite
a
lot
and
and
gets
a
lot
of
a
lot
of
questions
around
it.
A
A
The
officers
who
write
the
plan
is
is
essentially
us
and
all
the
people
in
front
of
you
now
so
we've
got
some
of
our
plan
policy
planning,
team,
john
and
the
raid
and
mark
and
and
and
all
of
us
who
are
involved
in
making
a
plan.
The
implanting
inspector
in
government
are
part
of
mhclg
and
they
inspect
plans.
That's
correct
and
our
elected
council
members
and
you've
got
to
remember.
C
A
Have
a
little
complicated
system
here,
because
we
work
for
two
councils,
so
we've
got
lots
of
elected
members,
so
both
councils
and
both
council
processes
and
they
make
the
decisions
on
behalf
of
the
council.
So
we've
got
one
saying
that
developers
decide
to
plan
as
well
so
anymore,
coming
through
at
the
moment.
So
I
think
this
is
a
bit
of
a
trick
question,
but
I
think
you've
got
it
right.
Broadly
most
of
you
voted
and
it
is,
it
is
decided
essentially
adopted
by
elected
members.
A
I
mean
we
will
draft
the
plan
and
we
will
make
out.
The
plan
is
drafted
on
our
evidence,
base
and
consultation,
and
the
process
in
which
you
know
we
have
been
going
through
for
the
last
18
months
will
continue
to
go
through
for
the
next
18
months
when
we
have
a
plan
that
we
believe
is
that
you
know,
as
john
described
in
in
the
previous
slides
as
the
final
final
submission
that
we've
got
to.
I
think
that
will
be
in
two
years
time.
A
Certainly
that
doesn't
happen
so
moving
on
to
the
final
slide
before
we
go
back
into
a
few
more
sessions,
this
isn't
interactive,
but
it's
something
we
really
wanted
you
to
think
about
as
we
go
through
this
consultation
and
feedback
to
us
and-
and
you
know,
you'll
have
details
of
how
to
contact
us.
How
to
give
us
comments.
A
Unless
we
know
those
things,
we
can't
try
and
integrate
them
into
the
plan
and
so
yeah,
if
you
can
think
about
that,
while
you're,
while
you're
commenting
and
that'll,
be
really
really
useful.
So
I'm
going
to
come
out
of
this
now,
thanks
for
that
interaction,
hopefully
that
did
work
okay
and
what
I'm
going
to
do
now
is
I'm
going
to
move
back
over
into
into
just
our
view.
I
think
this
is
a
bit
more
of
a
dry
technical
view
and
what
is
kind
of
legally
considered
and
a
statutory,
sound
local
plan.
A
D
So
this
is
a
rather
technical
wordy
slide
about
what
a
plan's
got
to
achieve
before
it's
considered
sound.
So
sound
is
the
word.
That's
used
in
national
government
guidance
as
to
what
an
adoptable
plan
must
be
if
it's
suitable
ready
to
go,
does
all
it
needs
to
do
and
that
that
is
then
defined
in
national
planning
policy
about
what
sound
means
with
those
four
criteria,
so
that
planning
inspector
mentioned
we
mentioned
on
the
earlier
slide.
D
That's
one
of
their
core
roles
to
see.
If
the
plan
is
sound
and
the
plan
can
be
moved
on
to
be
adopted
by
the
councils,
so
the
first
test
of
soundness,
is
it
positively
prepared,
and
in
summary,
that
means:
does
it
respond
to
the
needs
of
the
area
or
the
issues
facing
the
area
positively?
Does
it
does
it
meet
those
needs?
And
in
some
cases,
does
it
also
even
meet
the
needs
of
surrounding
areas
that
couldn't
meet
their
own
needs?
D
And
these?
These
are
really
issues
so
part
of
our
process.
We
have
to
very
much
talk
to
our
neighbours
and
understand
what
the
issues
facing
surrounding
areas
well
as
well
are
not
just
our
own
areas
to
demonstrate.
We've
positively
responded
to
the
challenges
and
issues
and
opportunities
facing
our
area.
D
D
Have
we
considered
the
alternatives
that
are
available
to
us
and
the
choices
that
were
available
to
us
through
plan
making
and
part
of
that
is
demonstrating
that,
through
a
proportionate
evidence
base,
so
we've
got
a
document
library
we've
published
as
part
of
the
consultation
which
documents
all
the
evidence
base.
We've
prepared
up
to
this
point
to
show
what
what's
behind
our
thinking
at
the
moment
and
it
and
it
is
extensive,
we
do
live
in
a
complex
part
of
the
world.
D
D
So
one
of
the
things
we
do
when
we
get
further
than
the
line
is
to
document
how
we've
responded
to
national
policy,
almost
line
by
line
or
paragraph
per
paragraph
israelis
to
show
we
have
effectively
responded
to
government
policy,
so
we
need
to
effectively
pass
all
these
tests
and
show
the
inspector
at
the
end
of
the
process
that
we've
done
this
and
in
responding
to
comments.
Something
we'd
recommend
to
people.
Responding
to
do
is
have
these
in
mind
when
we
get
to
those
more
formal
stages
of
the
plan.
D
Making
progress
late
down
the
line
inspectors
will
want
to
know
from
people
making
comments.
Well,
which
sounds
test.
Do
you
think
the
plan
hasn't
achieved
or
which
has
it
achieved
if
you're
supporting
the
plan?
So
these
do
become
important
further
down
the
line,
we're
getting
sort
of
most
more
technical
phases,
but
it
doesn't
mean
they're
not
useful,
now
to
have
in
mind
when
you're
making
comments
at
this
stage.
A
Thanks
very
much
john
and
yeah
really
really
useful
to
consider
those
and,
as
usual,
john
you've
done
an
excellent
job
of
explaining
some
incredibly
complex
stuff
in
in
good,
simple
terms,
and
it's
always
the
battle.
So
I'm
going
to
hand
over
to
hannah
now
he's
going
to
he's
going
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
why?
Why
are
you
going
to
get
involved
and
why
people
would
like
to
get
involved
bearing
in
mind
this
is
recorded?
If
there's
people
who
haven't
been
able
to
make
it
today,
you
think,
might
be
interested
in
this.
B
Some
of
you,
if
you're
nerds
like
me,
will
be
familiar
with
the
what's
known
as
the
gunning
principles,
and
these
were
actually
a
series
of
principles
that
were
established
about
consultation
through
actually
a
court
case
where
a
case
was
brought
to
say
that
a
public
authority
had
not
done
what
was
felt
to
be
by
the
complainant,
proper
consultation,
and
it
was
actually
really
interesting
because
it
was
the
first
time
that
anyone
had
been
asked.
What
makes
a
consultation.
B
What
actually
is
consultation,
what
makes
a
legitimate
consultation
and
and
the
qc
who
was
presiding
over
the
case.
Stephen
sadley,
essentially
summed
it
up
in
these
four
principles
that
these
are
what
makes
a
consultation,
a
kind
of
a
reasonable
consultation,
a
a
consultation
that
is
meaningful,
so,
firstly,
that
the
consultation
must
take
place
when
the
proposals
are
still
at
a
formative
stage.
So
you
can
actually
you
know,
they're
not
set
in
stone
whatever
it
is
that
you're
consulting
on
changes
can
be
made.
B
But
secondly,
we
must
put
forward
enough
reasons
for
the
people
who
are
being
consulted
to
actually
respond
with
the
with
enough
information.
So
you
can't
just
be
asked
kind
of
questions
to
say:
well,
do
you
like
this
or
that
on
the
other
and
have
no
background
or
no
information
for
you
to
be
able
to
understand
those
proposals?
B
Thirdly,
adequate
time
for
consideration
and
response.
So
you
know
it's
no
point
in
consulting
on
something
and
then
a
week
later,
coming
out
with
the
final
plans.
Clearly,
you
haven't
given
enough
time
for
those
consultation
responses
to
be
thought
about,
and,
fourthly,
that
the
product
of
the
consultation
must
be
conscientiously
taken
into
account,
and
I
think
for
us.
B
So
some
of
the
things
that
we
really
value
from
what
we
get
from
consultation
and
engagement,
so,
firstly,
really
it
is
that
insight
that
you
bring
us.
So
we
really
need
to
know,
and
we
we
need
that
information
that
only
you
have
that's
a
really
valuable
part
of
the
insight
that
we
bring
to
the
plan.
B
B
Building
on
that
insight,
you
know
that
insight
is
in
a
way
part
of
evidence,
but
there's
other
evidence
that
you
may
hold
that
can
help
us
either
prove
or
disprove
the
hypothesis
that
we
come
with,
because
what
we're
trying
to
do
here
is
really
test.
Our
thinking,
we've
used
the
evidence
that
we
have
that's
available
to
us.
B
That
could
be
some
reports
or
some
other
things
that
we
might
not
be
aware
of.
You
know.
We've
talked
about
the
role
of
local
history
and
how
some
of
that
information
is
really
valuable.
Very
you
know
there
are
limits
to
how
much
we
have
been
able
to
you
know.
We
only
have
a
team
of
certain
people
to
be
able
to
do
to
bring
on
that,
and
so,
if
there's
information
that
you
know
there's
very
different
archives
somewhere
that
we
might
not
have
realized.
Please
bring
that
to
the
table
and
that's
really
helpful.
B
So
you
can
tell
us
whether
you
think
those
policies
are
actually
going
to
work,
whether
they're
going
to
achieve
the
aims
we
hope
them
to
achieve.
And
you
can
also
just
tell
us
whether
you
think
you
understand
the
plan.
Is
it
clear
enough?
Is
it
something
that
people
are
going
to
be
able
to
unambiguously
use
and
interpret
that's
really
important
to
us?
We
want
it
to
be
as
simple
to
understand
as
it
can
be.
B
We
know
we
can't
avoid
all
of
the
technical
jargon,
but
you
know
fundamentally
if
it's
got
ambiguities
or
it's
got
things
that
are
not
clear.
It's
not
going
to
be
as
effective
as
it
should
be
in
terms
of
being
that
tool
to
create
great
places
and
to
create
a
great
environment
for
you
going
forward
next,
one
so
yeah
I
mean
this
is
just
a
little
bit
of
a
example
of
kind
of
improvement.
B
We're
trying
to
do
things
like,
for
instance,
use
more
digital
mapping,
use
better
maps,
better
graphics
that
are
better
more
explanatory
help.
People
understand
what
we're
doing
so.
Please
feedback.
It
is
a
tool
and
we
want
to
know
how
we
can
improve
it,
improve
on
what
our
last
local
plans
have
done
to
make
this
one,
a
more
streamlined
and
more
effective
part
of
the
planning
system.
B
Next
so
and
then
the
last
is
you
know,
obviously
this
question
of
opinion:
do
you
like
it,
but
I
think
it's
really
important
to
stress
that
consultation
is
not
a
referendum
and
it's
interesting
to
see
some
some
questions
in
the
chat
or
some
comments
in
the
chat
here
about
who
gets
to
decide
and
the
role
of
the
citizen
planning
is
a
process
of
making
really
difficult
trade-offs
between
different
priorities
and
different
aspects
of
the
world
that
we
live
in
and
consultation
isn't
a
referendum.
Thankfully,
probably
for
many
of
us.
B
I
think
we
might
have
had
enough
of
them
for
a
bit
and
it
is
about
justifying
and
understanding
why
you
have
the
views
that
you
have
about
parts
of
the
plan.
So
when
you
do
comment,
please
let
us
know
why
you
think
what
you
think,
not
just
what
you
think,
but
actually
why?
Because
that's
that
insight
that
helps
us
to
understand
how
to
make
the
plan
better,
how
to
make
it
fit
with
your
priorities.
B
What
do
we
need
to
adjust?
How
do
we
need
to
adjust
it
in
order
to
to
make
it
as
robust
and
and
to
balance
those
trade-offs?
As
best
as
we
possibly
can,
so
it's
really
important
to
tell
us
please
what
you
like,
as
well
as
what
you
don't
like.
So
you
may
like
some
policy
ideas
and
not
others,
you
may
think
some
sites
are
appropriate
and
not
others.
B
It's
just
as
important
to
tell
us
the
bits
that
you
think
we
should
keep
and
hold
on
to
as
well
as
the
bits
you
think
we
should
chuck
out
and
start
all
over
again
on.
So
I
think
when
what
I'd
really
just
like
to
sort
of
end
by
saying
you
know
it
really
matters
what
you
say,
but
it
is
definitely
the
reasons
behind
it
that
insight
that
we're
really
seeking
from
you.
B
I
might
just
take
the
opportunity
to
answer
a
few
of
the
of
the
questions
I
can
see
in
the
chat
that
deal
with
some
of
this
question
around
consultation,
because
it
is
really
interesting
and
one
of
the
one
of
the
questions
that
is
about
giving
a
consultation
allowing
for
the
kind
of
none
of
the
above,
and
I
think
that
is
a
really
good
point
to
be
raised,
and
we
absolutely
welcome
comments.
That
kind
of
are
none
of
the
above.
B
So
when
we
ask
you
to
comment
on
it,
there's
in
both
the
different
forms
of
comments
that
you
can
leave
there.
There
is
space
for
you
to
do
that.
We
do
welcome
alternative
proposals
that
you
might
come
up
with.
Please
do
tell
us
about
them.
They
are
really
important.
We're
not
just
it's
not
a
multiple
choice.
Answer.
It's
not
saying
you
know,
you
must
choose
this,
that
or
the
other.
B
A
Yeah
absolutely
and
some
of
the
questions
I
think,
and
unfortunately
I
can't
see
the
questions,
because
I'm
only
sharing
my
slides
but
yeah
I
mean
we're.
Hopefully
some
of
them
will
be
answered
in
the
second
part
of
the
session
and
we'll
pick
them
up
thanks
very
much
hannah
and
yeah,
and
we
totally
encourage
it's
really
important
to
get
involved.
I
mean
we
have
tried
really
hard
to
to
try
and
make
it
as
understandable
as
possible,
but
I'm
sure
you
know
you'll
all
understand
that
the
amount
of
work
that
goes
into
it
in
detail.
A
A
So,
hopefully
you
can
see
my
screen
again.
I'm
really
sorry
that
we've
got
two
mentees,
it's
a
different
code
this
time,
so
you
will
have
to
enter
a
different
code
or
scan
that
and
scan
that
qr
code
again,
and
I
apologize
about
that.
That's
just
our
our
naivety
on
mentee
at
the
moment
and
we'll
be
working
on
getting
that
better
for
next
time,
and
so
this
time
first
question
is,
is
just
thinking
about
comments
and
just
kind
of
building
on
what
hannah
was
saying.
A
C
A
Don't
just
comment
and
feedback
on
planning,
and
actually
you
know
actually
planning
has
the
least
feedback
on
it.
Apart
from
other
things,
other
things
get
a
lot
more,
a
lot
more
energy,
but
maybe
they
don't.
You
know
we're
not
as
good
at
presenting
it
in
a
way.
So
you
know
yes,
context
is,
is
absolutely
one
that
is
specific
to
you
know.
A
It's
specific
to
many
things,
but
planning
is
is,
is
is
important
in
that
fact
saying
no
to
something
is
pointless
without
stating
an
alternative,
yeah
and-
and
that
is
true
and,
unlike
I
think
that
others
have
said
you
know,
this
is
not
an
easy
thing
to
do.
Everybody
involved
in
making
plans
has
to
consider.
A
Is
it
pretty
much
touches
everything
that
that
people
do
and
it's
it's
looking
into
the
future,
which
we
know
is
inherently
difficult
at
any
time,
but
especially
in
2021,
clear
reasoning,
constructive
feedback's,
really
important,
you
know
and
and
planning
is
quite
a
divisive
topic.
You
know
we
know
it
is
you
know
we
will
work
in
it.
You
know,
we
all
understand
it,
but
most
of
people
working
in
planning.
A
Certainly,
in
my
experience
are
people
who
you
know
care
genuinely
care
about
making
places
better
for
people
and
and
constructive
think
that's
helpful,
we're
not
always
going
to
agree,
but
you
know
being
able
to
communicate
that
and
then
feed
into
the
plan
or
feedback.
Why
we
haven't
been
able
to
feed
into
the
plan
is
a
really
important
part
of
that
two-way
process
and
anyone.
Anyone
else
on
there
pick
out
any
other
bits,
hannah
or
others
that
you
think
are
interesting
that
are
coming
through.
B
Yeah
and
I
think
that
maybe
scroll
down,
because
I
know
someone
put
one
in
the
chat
which
I
put
in
for
them,
which
I
thought
was
really
nice-
oh,
I
did
type
of
it.
I'm
sorry,
fairness,
honesty,
courtesy,
rationality,
fact
and
relevance.
I
thought
that
was
a
really
great
answer
and
I
think
you
know
that's
the
kind
of
nature
of
the
debate
that
we
really
hope
to
to
have.
Is
that
ability
to
kind
of
disagree
with
each
other
in
a
way?
That
is
also
has
that
courtesy
for
sure.
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
completely
agree
with
that.
I
mean
backed
up
by
evidence
and
I
think
that
you
know
a
lot
of
the
stuff
that
we
see
around
in
in
in
the
media
and
in
general,
not
planning
wise,
but
in
just
in
the
times
that
we
live
in
is
very
much.
You
know
it's
quite
polarized
in
some
some
respects
and
what
we've
tried
to
do-
and
you
know
planning
is
a
process
that
really
works
with
the
basis
of
the
most
current
and
up-to-date
evidence
or
facts
as
much
as
possible.
A
A
That
evidence
is
coming
through
so
strongly
that-
and
you
know
that's
something,
obviously,
that
the
policy
planners
here
on
on
on
the
call
and
those
also
working
in
our
team,
obviously
that's
their
their
life
living
in
in
evidence-based
work.
You
know
a
lot
of
policy
isn't
written,
particularly
evidence-based,
but
planning
policy
absolutely
is
because
it's
examined
at
the
end
of
the
process
and
has
to
has
to
be
so
so
really
helpful.
Comments
and
it'd
be
really
fantastic
to
capture
these
actually,
as
we
as
we
feed,
and
you
know,
feed
them
back
into
the
plan.
A
These
are
really
interesting.
Okay,
I'm
going
to
move
on
to
the
second
one.
Now
everybody
thank
you
for
sharing.
I
think
this
has
been
really
good
to
use
women
to
meet
I'm
quite
enjoying
such
it's
really
good.
It's
really
good
to
see
people
engaging
so
just
a
bit
more
broad,
a
bit
more
of
a
broad
question
to
you
all,
and
this
is
kind
of
kind
of
helpful
iterate.
I
mean
you'll
know
that
we've
been
trying
to
bringing
forward
a
digital
plan.
A
This
one
is
moving
forward
to
that
process,
but
you
know
that
includes
kind
of
the
way
that
people
like
to
engage
with
stuff
now,
so
we're
really
interested
in
how
you
like
to
leave
feedback,
and
that
doesn't
mean
in
terms
of
how
you
need
feedback
on
this
consultation,
but
you
know
any
kind
of
feedback.
How
do
you
consult
with
stuff?
You
know
I
mean
we've
all
had
pretty
horrific
experiences
or
pretty
good
experiences.
A
A
But
actually
you
know,
we
want
to
give
a
broad
range
of
people
because
not
everyone's
got
the
same
preferences,
but
we
want
to
try
and
reach
as
many
people
as
possible
and
take
those
into
consideration.
So
I
think
that
we
do
need
to
have
a
swathe,
a
broad
swathe
of
ways
to
do
that
and
anything
else
in
there.
Anyone
else
picked
up
anything
from
the
panel
on
there
that
they're
thinking
unstructured.
A
Yet
unstructured
is
interesting
because
you
get
so
much.
This
is
one
of
the
things
that
you
know
we're
constantly
trying
to
work
out,
how
we
really
how
we
get
that
breadth
and
richness
of
information
that
you
get
in
unstructured
comments.
You
know
and
also
then
get
the
quantitative
stuff
as
well,
because
there's
a
real
mix
there
and-
and
I
think
that
that's
a
really
important
honey.
This
is
really
your
above
your
stream,
but
you
know:
what's
your
views
on
that.
B
Yeah,
I
think
we
actually
really
welcome
unstructured
comments
as
well
as
structured
comments
and
there's
a
couple
of
reasons
for
that,
and
I
think
this
is
really
learning
from
how
human
beings
work
that,
even
if
you
ask
people
to
to
be
structured,
sometimes
they
are
unstructured
anyway.
So
half
the
time
you
know
in,
I
think
previous
sort
of
more
traditional
formats
trying
to
sort
of
get
people
to
be
too
structured,
can
just
lead
to
just
almost
as
much
workers
as
just
allowing
people
to
be
unstructured
in
the
first
place.
B
Other
social
research
techniques,
other
other
analysis
techniques
which
are
quantitative
so
involving
numbers
but
also
kind
of
qualitative
sentiment.
Analysis
and
things
like
that,
and
it
is
a
constantly
evolving
field.
But
we
do
try
to
find
the
right
ways
to
allow
people
to
do
things
and
and
make
it
as
easy
as
possible.
I
think
that's
really
interesting
to
see
that
coming
through,
like
the
fact
that
people
want
to
do
it
simply
quickly,
not
expensive
concisely.
Those
all
really
resonate
with
us.
A
And
I
think
that
that's
yeah
yeah,
absolutely
and
actually
some
of
the
stuff
that
goes
on
behind
that
the
use
of
kind
of
research
work
is
really
important
in
designing
things
with
as
few
clicks
as
possible.
There's
some
certainly
some
different
skill
sets
coming
into
play
here,
and
so
thank
you
very
much
again
for
for
all
of
your
comments
on
on
on
that
and
I'm
gonna
hand
over
just
before
we
go
to
questions.
We're
just
gonna
have
a
quick,
a
quick
run
through.
A
A
B
Thank
you
so
yeah,
so,
firstly,
how
can
you
explore
the
proposal?
Well,
you've
already
found
us
here
today,
so
you've
definitely
managed
that
in
some
way
or
other,
this
is
an
online
and
offline
method
as
well.
So
there
are
hard
copies
at
local
libraries
and
also
actually
at
the
two
council
offices,
although
they
are
only
still
open
by
appointment.
Only
and
then
we've
worked
quite
hard
to
try
and
revamp
our
digital
plan
and
our
interactive
mapping
as
well,
and
we
really
do
welcome
all
feedback
on
this
as
well.
B
So
please
do
let
us
know
what
you
think,
but
we're
hoping
to
try
and
make
that
relatively
intuitive.
So,
for
instance,
if
you
click
on
something
on
the
interactive
map,
it
will
bring
up.
Actually
I
wonder
if
I
could
almost
do
a
little
demo
of
this
now.
I'm
sorry,
I'm
springing
this
on
on
paul.
Who
might
say?
No,
don't
we
didn't
do
this
in
our
practice.
B
I
just
wonder
whether
I
could
just
do
a
little
demonstration
to
show
people
how
that
works,
because
it,
I
think,
it's
great
sorry
to
speak
for
the
team,
but
tim
actually
who's
on
the
doing
technical
behind
the
scenes
today
has
worked
really
really
hard
on
this.
Would
that
be
okay?
Paul
if
I
just
shared
my
screen
of.
B
This
is
really
exciting.
I
mean
it
sounds
like
baby
steps,
but
we,
you
know
this
is
all
kind
of
an
improvement
on
what
we've
had
before.
So,
if
you
click
on
more
information
that
will
take
you
straight
through
to
the
digital
plan,
where
you
can
read
the
whole
of
the
kind
of
policy
direction
for
that
particular
site
or
initiative.
B
B
And
then
we
have
a
number
of
different
ways
that
you
can
comment
as
well.
So,
oh
yeah,
if
you
go
to
the
one
before,
maybe
oh
sorry,
yeah
next
one,
I
think
I've
got
a
lag
on
my
my
thing.
So
yeah.
If
you
go
to
our
local
plan
web
page,
that
map
is
embedded
there.
You
can
also
use
the
view
the
map
link
to
view
that
kind
of
full
screen
explore.
The
plan
takes
you
to
the
full
digital
plan
document
and
then
we
have
two
basic
ways
to
comment.
B
So
the
reason
we
have
those
two
means
is
because
we
have
such
a
diverse
range
of
people
who
want
to
comment
so
everybody
from
just
regular
people,
normal
members
of
the
public,
young
people,
old
people,
residents,
people
who
might
work
in
the
area
students
through
to
our
for
more
formal
consulties.
So
they
might
be
our
parish
councils.
B
They
might
be
our
neighboring
local
authorities,
historic
england,
the
environment
agency,
there's
a
lot
of
bodies
who
also
get
kind
of
involved,
with
commenting
on
a
plan
who
aren't
just
people
and
all
of
their
views
are
really
important
and
valuable.
Too.
And
of
course,
then
there
are
landowners,
developers,
agents,
professionals
of
different
thoughts
who
also
want
to
put
in
their
comments.
So
it's
important
that
we
do
kind
of
cater
for
everyone
as
much
as
we
can
next,
please
so,
the
quick
questionnaire.
B
B
Obviously,
it's
not
possible
in
12
or
13
questions
to
cover
or
400
pages
of
the
plan.
So
we've
tried
to
focus
on
the
bits
where
we
think
people
will
have
the
most
to
say
and
be
most
interested.
Then
the
next
way
of
commenting
is
the
more
detailed
comment
facility.
So
that's
I
think,
shown
on
the
next
page.
B
So
that
does
require
us
youtube
to
log
in
and
register,
and
the
reason
for
that
is
because
this
is
really
aimed
at
those.
If
you
like,
more
detailed
technical
answers
that
people
may
have
so,
for
instance,
if
you're,
a
parish,
council
and
you're
commenting
on
a
site,
it's
actually
quite
important
that
we
get.
B
We
can
track
that
response
back
to
you
as
a
parish
council,
because
you
come
with
a
particular
role
in
the
process
and
a
particular
perspective,
and
if
we
want
to
follow
up
on
your
questions,
we
obviously
need
to
know
that
it's
you
that's
put
them
in
and
how
to
get
hold
of
you
and
so
forth.
So
we
would
encourage
people
to
use
whichever
way
they
think
is
best,
and
we
do
are
asking
people
to
respond
online
if
at
all
possible
and
because
it
does
make
our
life
a
lot
more
consistent.
B
B
We
think
you're
commenting
on
so
we
need
to
kind
of
read
them
and
say
well,
we
think
this
comment
is
relevant
to
climate
change,
but
maybe
this
person
actually
means
this
comment
in
the
context
of
some
other
plan,
and
it
is
quite
complicated
for
us
to
do
that
analysis
and
it
helps
us
interpret
your
comments
correctly
if
they
are
left
against
the
right
page
or
the
right
policy
in
the
plan.
It
really
does
help
a
lot
now.
B
I'm
really
aware
that
we've
got
we're
getting
to
the
end
of
time,
so
I'm
going
to
just
skip
to
a
few
of
the
questions
that
are
in
the
the
chat
which
relate
to
this
question
about
how
we,
how
we
comment
and
so
forth.
So
someone
said
I'd
like
to
leave
for
feedback
by
email
at
whatever
length
is
needed
to
make
the
points
and
to
receive
feedback
from
the
content
of
the
in,
but
also
via
email
with
a
paper
trail.
That's
a
really
great
point,
and
I
think
we
love
we.
B
We
want
to
get
that
thoughtful
feedback.
Last
consultation,
however,
we
did
get
about
eight
and
a
half
thousand
comments,
so
it
isn't
possible
for
us
to
comment
back
to
each
person
individually
about
the
answer
that
they
give.
However,
we
do
publish
our
consultation
statement
and
the
consultation
statement
does
tell
you
how
every
comment
has
been
taken
into
account.
They're
grouped
so
when
comments
raise
a
similar
issue.