►
Description
Cartwright Meet & Confer Meeting Wednesday, October 5, 2022
A
There
we
go
ready,
okay,
we'll
go
ahead
and
call
the
meeting
to
order
I,
think
Teresa's
coming.
She
might
just
be
running
late,
but
we'll
go
ahead
and
get
started.
This
Ferrar
will
not
be
here
this
evening,
she's
in
attendance
at
a
conference.
So
let
me
go
ahead
and
start
notice
of
the
meeting
was
given
October
5th
2022
at
4
pm
starting
the
meeting.
It
is
405.
A
Copy
of
the
agenda,
you
should
have
a
hard
copy
of
the
agenda.
It's
also
available.
If
you
ever
wonder
it's
I,
don't
know
if
you
have
I,
don't
think
you
all
have
like
access
rights,
but
you
can
see
the
agenda
and
prior
agenda
and
stuff
on
board
docs
public
view.
So
Heidi
and
I
try
to
make
it
active.
24
hours
in
advance.
A
A
The
meeting
minutes
actually
have
an
item
to
talk
about
that
on
our
on
my
specific
items,
but
I
think
I
mentioned
last
meeting.
If
we
have
digital
means
of
audio
and
visual
recording,
so
we'll
use
that
primarily
for
the
meeting
minutes
and
also
try
to
keep
things
in
board
docs
as
well,
because
that
software
archives
stuff
as
well
too.
B
No
new
proposals,
but
we
are
submitting
our
topics
list,
which
is
a
result
of
the
survey
data
that
we
sent
out
to
the
staff
earlier
this
year,
I
have
provided
the
sheet
to
Heidi
for
you,
I,
don't
know
if
she's
passed
it
up
yeah
she
has
perfect
yeah.
So
if
you
want
to
take
a
second
go
ahead
and
review,
if
you
have
any
questions,
let
us
know.
A
Heidi,
do
you
have
access
to
keep
minutes
in
the
items
on
on
board
Docs?
Can
you
do
that
start
to
do
that,
just
so
we
have
that
like,
like,
for
instance
here.
You
might
just
note
that
CAA
presented
topics
of
discussion
from
their
survey
and
then,
if,
if
we
can
afterwards
we'll
scan
this
in
and
attach
it
what
they
presented
today,
just
so,
we
have
a
record
of
it.
B
The
next
request
we'd
like
to
make
is,
if
I'm,
let
me
see
if
I'm
saying
this
correctly,
the
cash
analysis
or
a
you
know,
fund
allocations
just
to
see
where
everything
is
going.
So
we
know
again
just
to
help
us
properly
prepare
for
proposals
that
we'd
like
to
submit,
and
the
last
thing
is
the
start
dates
for
certain
committees
and
these
committees
are
as
follow.
They
are
the
insurance
committee,
the
ESP
committee,
the
safe
committee
and
caring
committees,
the
curriculum,
slash
textbook
committees,
the
override
committee,
the
maps
committee
and
calendar
committee.
A
B
C
C
A
A
B
E
Be
beneficial
for
us
that,
when
we're
making
proposals
like
prep
time
and
specials,
because
that
doesn't
there's
always
a
cost
tied
to
everything
things
like
class
size,
standardizations
things
like
substitute
protocol,
those
all
are
tied
to
cash,
so
it
just
so
that
we
are
prudent
in
not
doing
anything
extreme
or
exorbitant.
We
just
would
like
to
have
that
information
so
that
we
can
make
good
decisions,
fiscal
decisions.
B
D
D
B
B
A
E
We
want
to
tighten
up
and
standardize
and
make
sure
look
at
allocation
and
whether
or
not
how
many
are
allocated
possibly
even
create
more
for
our.
You
know
for
our
school
sites
just
to
see
what
more
we
can
do,
but
to
better
our
students,
education
and
that's
why?
One
of
the
reasons
why
we
need
the
financial
information,
because
we
wouldn't
want
to
add
her
to
because.
D
C
D
E
Reasonings
or
given,
given
there
are
multiple
examples
that
were
given
or
provided
that
was
one
of
them
through
anecdotal
record
people
had
concerns
with
with
XYZ,
and
some
of
them
were
different,
so
we're
looking
at
again
we're
still
crafting
some
of
these,
which
takes
time
and
research,
and
so
that
we'd
also
have
to
reach
out
to
our
members
and
ask
them
specifics
before
we
go
forward.
But
these
this
is
a
flexible
list
of
possible
ideas
from
the
survey
and
we
didn't
want
to
exclude
and
we
wanted
to
be
completely
transparent.
So
that's
why?
E
E
A
E
No
one
of
the
concerns
too
and
speaking
to
Dr
Lawler
about
this
was
the
fact
that,
with
a
new
legislation,
our
Behavior
Matrix
language
needed
to
change,
and
so
let's
look
at.
Let's
bring
that
back
and
make
it
up
to
date.
You
know
with
all
the
with
a
lot
of
the
teachers
and
principals
and
esps,
and
just
so
that
we
are
all
on
the
same
end.
So
we
have
buy-in
parents
too,
as
well.
Okay,.
F
Sorry
I've
been
seeing
you
guys
struggle
with
these
mics
and
I
did
too
so
that
would
be
easier,
no
actually
Jeff
kind
of,
or
you
guys,
Melanie
kind
of
hit
on
that
is.
This
is
just
kind
of
the
a
whole
full
gamage
of
things
that
will
go
into
so
because
I
was
gonna,
start
asking
specifics
too,
but
it
sounds
like
you
just
need
more
time
to
find
specifics.
But
this
is
the
topics:
okay,
correct.
B
C
D
A
You
know
I,
don't
think,
there's
any
intention
right
now
to
move
the
four-day
student
instruction
week
back
to
a
five-day
week.
It's
really
discussion
about.
Okay.
Do
we
now
that
we
are
on
a
four-day
instructional
week?
Is
there
a
way
to
move
some
of
our
employees?
And
it's
not
even
really
a
none
of
the
discussion.
I've
been
involved
in
at
the
upper
level
is,
is
cost
savings
at
all.
It's
really
about
Employee,
Engagement
recruitment
retention,
having
people
available
work
at
the
most
efficient
time.
A
You
know
looking
at
things
like
teacher
prep
time
and
availability
with
principals
and
so
forth.
Would
that
work
easier
if
it
were
a
four
day
week,
rather
than
coming
in
for
half
day
on
Friday,
though
those
kinds
of
things
are,
what
we're
talking
about
I
want
to
be
clear,
because
we
were
having
some
discussions
about
trying
to
Pilot
some
of
that
potentially
for
next
spring,
but
we've
decided
there's
just
too
much
planning
to
cover.
A
So
we
are
looking
at
that
at
the
administrative
level
to
have
that
discussion,
but
it
would
be
starting
July
1st
so
to
allow
us
time
to
to
try
to
talk
about
all
those
things
that
we
don't
think
about
at
our
level.
That
yeah,
but
did
you
think
about
this
at
this
particular
individual
at
this
particular
job
and
what
that
means
those
kinds
of
things.
So
we
just
want
to.
We
want
to
work
through
that
through
whether
it's
this
process
or
another
I
would
anticipate
another
full
standing
committee
or
task
force
to
get
involved
with.
B
E
Speak
to
that
as
well,
I
think
when
we
were
discussing
four-day
five-day
school
week,
we
had
we
had
members
Express
issues
of
both
the
school
work
week
and
a
four-day
work
week
for,
and
that
would
include
both
teachers
and
our
and
our
ESP
staff.
How
would
that
impact
their
jobs
and
their
duties
and
vice
versa?
E
So
what
I'm?
What
I
am
interested
in
is
having
those
some
people
at
the
table
representative
of
those
work
groups
in
the
task
force.
Is
it
possible
I'd
like
to
have
two
of
each
of
those
representing
the
task
force
just
in
case
one
of
one
person
has
to
be
absent
for
the
day
or
has
called
away
for
emergency.
At
least
we
can
have
one
voice
in
the
room,
so
at
least
two
certified
into
classified,
maybe
even
more,
maybe
even
more
because
I
would
like
it
to
be.
C
E
Including
classified
staff
as
well
as
some
in
the
district
office,
they
might
see
things
that
we
don't
see
if
possible
and
I
think
that
was
one
thing
that
may
have
been
a
little
bit
lacking.
That
I
think
we
could
have
done
a
better
job
me
included,
because
I
went
on
the
set
I
went
on
the
site
visit
to
Saddle
Mountain
when
we
were
trying
to
figure
out
what
we
were
doing.
Moving
forward
is
having
a
little
more
buy-in
and
feedback
from
our
educators.
A
A
F
Would
it
be
possible
and
I
don't
know
because
I'm
new
to
so?
This
is
a
broad
list,
obviously
and
you're
going
to
get
more
feedback,
and-
and
so,
if
we
come
to
the
next
meat
and
fur-
and
you
say
these
are
the
three
or
four
that
we're
going
to
really
focus
on.
Is
that
possible?
Instead
of
so,
you
know
to
help
us
prepare
too
to
make
sure
that
we
can
give
us
the
best
responses
as
well?
F
One
more
time,
just
since
this
is
a
this
is
obviously
a
lot.
You
know,
and
just
for
us
to
be
prepared
for
myself
too,
to
come
to
the
right
frame
of
mind,
have
a
have
a
like
a
two
or
three
or
four
that
we're
going
to
talk
about
at
the
next
meet
and
confer
instead
of
like
being
prepared
to
talk
about.
You
know,
exit
survey
right
away.
B
A
A
A
I've
explained
before
what
I'm
trying
to
do
is
I
see
a
well,
let's
go
into
my
next
item,
because
it
kind
of
parlays
into
some
of
this.
So
I'll
close
this
out.
Unless
anybody
has
anything
else
on
the
cea
proposed
list
and
we'll
move
to
the
next
item
on
the
agenda,
which
is
the
district
or
board
team
proposals.
A
A
So
there
are
and
I
emailed
my
team
as
well,
so
the
first
item
is
related
to
section
one
in
the
handbook
and
I
had
a
few
things
there.
These
are
not
formal
proposals.
They're
here
for
discussion,
I
can
put
them
in
the
form
of
formal,
proposes
proposals.
You
know
I
just
wanted
to
throw
these
out
there.
Some
are
pretty
simple
and
so
section
1.3
B
that
basically
defines
the
the
bargain
or
not
the
bargaining
teams,
the
the
negotiation
teams.
It
mentions
the
district
team
and
the
cea
team.
A
It
identifies
how
the
district
team
will
be
structured.
What
this
five-person
membership
team
will
look
like
I'm,
just
proposing
a
simple
change
that
it
may
look
like
that.
Rather
than
will
look
like
that
to
give
us
a
bit
more
flexibility,
because
this
year
our
team
doesn't
match
exactly
what
that
says
it
identifies.
You
know
that
there's
somebody
from
Business
Services,
there's
somebody
from
HR
there's
somebody
from
operations
or
somebody
from
whatever
so
I
I'm,
just
proposing
that
we
just
changed.
A
The
will
word
to
a
May
word
that
oftentimes,
it
will
have
a
similar
structure,
and
but
this
year
we
chose
to
have
two
principles
for
feedback
and
involvement.
So
we
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
language
was
allowed,
that
flexibility,
not
anything
Earth
shattering
I,
don't
think
there
that
should
cause
too
much
concern
section,
1.3,
J
or
proposing
language
to
modernize.
A
We've
already
talked
about
this
one,
but
the
handbook
and
the
meet
and
confirm
agreement
language
in
section
one
talks
about
keeping
meeting
minutes,
and
so
I'd
already
talked
about
this
a
little
bit
at
the
last
meeting.
It's
a
very
cumbersome
process.
I
would
rather
use
our
Technologies
to
Archive
meeting
minutes
just
by
keeping
the
digital,
audio
and
visual
recording
and
then
also
using
board
docs,
which
is
I,
mean
it's
built
to
keep
meeting
minutes
so
to
try
to
use
those
Technologies
to
track
stuff
a
little
bit
easier
and
better
and
how
we
archive
it.
A
So
I'm
just
proposing
language
to
change
in
the
handbook
that
we
will
use
those
Technologies
of
audio
visual,
recording
and
board
docs
to
keep
meeting
minutes
and
that
we
would
just
do
writ
hard
copy
written
meeting
minutes
whenever
those
Technologies
aren't
functioning
right.
Basically,
if
we
get
here
and
we
can't
get
get
it
to
work
right,
we'll
start
taking
notes.
So
that's
my
proposed
change.
There
section
1.30.
A
In
the
handbook,
the
more
proposing
modified
language
to
the
publication
and
distribution
of
the
meet
and
confer
agreement
just
to
modernize
those
practices
of
publication,
it
talks
about
providing
hard
copy,
bound
copies.
You'll
learn,
as
you
start
to
work
with
me
here,
especially
the
ministry
of
team
I'm
kind
of
a
digital
person.
A
I
prefer
to
use
digital
archiving
digital
processes
whenever
practical
to
do
so,
rather
than
hard
copy
print,
so
I'm
proposing
our
team
is
proposing
that
we
change
a
little
bit
language
just
to
take
out
that
we're
going
to
provide
hard
copies.
If
anybody
wants
a
hard
copy,
they
can
always
request
one
we're
not
going
to
give
too
much
grief
about
doing
that
or
you
can
take
the
digital
copy.
I
sent
you
and
you
can
actually
hit
print
and
print
it
out.
A
That
I
think
applies
legally,
whether
we
state
it
or
not,
but
I'd
prefer
to
State
it
so
that
it's
clarified
that
the
order
of
precedent
s
if
there
is
contrary
language,
contrary
terms
is
first
state
law.
State
law
takes
precedence
over
any
board
policy
or
anything
we
do
here.
We
can't
we
can't
meet
and
confer
and
agree
ourselves
out
of
state
law
provisions.
A
A
The
reason
I'm
suggesting
it
is
I
really
would
like
to
see
us
get
in
the
practice
of
trying
to
reduce
what
we
can
to
policy
and
regulation
whenever
possible
and
to
make
sure
when
we
make
proposals
that
we
are
cross-checking
it.
So
we
are
creating
less
contradiction
in
policy
versus
handbook,
language
and
so
forth,
so
it
gets
us
in
the
habit
of
making
sure
that
we
understand.
A
A
A
A
A
That
requires
somebody
to
make
sure
you
change
that
each
and
every
year
I'm
just
proposing
language
that
says
it's
kind
of
legal
terminology
the
year
following
the
meet
and
confer
negotiations
beginning
July
1
is
when
they
take
effect,
instead
of
just
defining
a
year
certain
that
you
then
have
to
continually
update.
So
again,
most
of
these
are
just
simple
kind
of
clean
up
things.
B
C
B
E
Sure
that
we're
all
on
the
same
page
and
that
the
audience
knows
as
well,
that
any
exact
changes
to
verbiage
from
last
year
need
to
be
made
at
the
table
this
year
and
not
to
the
not
to
the
current
book
that
we
that
we
approved
last
year
and
we
love
the
idea
of
moving
everything
to
policy
we're
absolutely
on
board.
Thank
you.
E
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
If
not
I'll
move
to
the
next
item,
which
is
F2
and
it
is
a
specific
proposal-
okay
and
you
should
have
a
hard
copy
of
what
is
being
proposed
here,
and
it
is
a
proposed
change
to
policy
gcba,
professional
staff,
salary
schedules
and
the
proposed
language
to
this
policy
is
essentially
changing.
Certified
individuals
placement
when
they
come
in
as
new
employees
to
the
district
I
understand
our
current
practice
to
be
20
years.
We
are
placing
people
at
up
to
20
years
of
experience,
but
that
is
not
what
our
policy
says.
A
So
the
rationale
for
this
is
to
align
our
current
practice
to
our
policy.
In
addition,
I
think
that
practice
is
good
practice
as
we're
trying
to
recruit
new
people
to
come
to
our
district
so
for
financially
able
and
willing
to
offer
that
on
our
step,
salary
schedule,
I
would
like
to
to
continue
to
do
that.
So
it's
two
things:
one
allowing
us
the
opportunity
to
align
what
I
think
we're
doing
with
what
policy
language
says
so
that
we're
fully
aligned
and
and
two
I
think
it
is
good
practice
that
we
actually
offer
20
years.
A
If
we
have
the
financial
ability
to
do
that,
so
it's
essentially
just
changing
some
verbiage.
In
one
paragraph
of
the
of
the
policy
that
says
we
can
offer
up
to
10
years
on
the
salary
schedule
for
a
new
hire
if
they
have
a
bachelor's
degree
and
up
to
15
years
if
they
have
a
master's
or
doctorate
degree,
and
so
I'm
told
by
the
HR
team,
we're
actually
offering
20.
so
I
I
proposed
20,
because
I
think
that's
what
we
did
this
year.
A
And
this
one
I
do
I
would
recommend
if
this
is
approved
and
ratified
and
so
forth.
I
I
would
like
to
take
this
to
the
board
at
the
first
available
opportunity
that
we
have
to
do
that
rather
than
waiting
for
a
later
adoption
and
process
for
next
year,
because
I
believe
we're
already
doing
this
understood.
B
B
A
I
did
send
some
information
too
about
principal
survey.
I
was
going
to
have
Craig
speak
to
that,
but
we
actually
had
a
request
from
Dr
Lawler
to
table
that
until
we
have
some
further
internal
discussions
on
our
team,
I
don't
mind
just
giving
a
little
bit
of
introductory
on
that
Craig
had
done
a
survey
with
with
our
principles.
I
appreciate
that
sort
of
like
you
guys.
A
We
had
generate
a
list
of
here
some
of
the
priority
topics,
some
of
them
a
lot
a
couple
of
them
might
align
with
what
you
have
and
so
we'll
bring
that
at
the
next
meeting.
Okay
for
discussion,
so
the
biggest
priority
you
have
on
here,
you
may
have
it
on
here
for
a
different
reason,
but
you
know
principles
concerned
about
getting
the
the
time
they
need
with
their
staff.
For
you
know,
PD
opportunities,
staff
meetings,
those
kinds
of
things
that
was
I
think
the
highest
priority
item.
A
And
there
were
a
few
other
things
on
there
as
well,
but
that
was
I.
Think
Craig.
Correct
me.
If
I'm
wrong
was
that
kind
of
the
the
big
theme
with
most
the
principles
with
the
change
from
last
year
to
this
year
on
how
the
four-year
instructional
week
and
how
the
teacher
schedule
is
and
trying
to
get
people
together
for
all
those
opportunities
that
you
need
to
have
your
school
site
function
right,
so
definitely
no
I.