►
From YouTube: 2022-10-11 Township of Central Frontenac Regular Council and Public Meeting - Zoning by-Law Review
Description
2022-10-11 Township of Central Frontenac Regular Council and Public Meeting - Zoning by-Law Review
C
A
A
A
The
roads
department
has
moved
into
their
new
digs
at
the
former
barber
shop.
I
went
in
today
and
just
had
a
quick
walk
through
beautiful
little
spot
nice
and
clean.
We
got
furniture
from
the
county,
so
thank
you,
County
good
that
they
were
moving
and
just
at
the
time
they
were.
It
was
an
advantage
to
us.
So
if
you
get
a
chance
over
the
week,
stop
in
and
have
a
look
other
than
that
we're
getting
close
to
election
day.
The
letters
and
the
PIN
numbers
are
out.
A
A
A
Okay,
seeing
none
we'll
move
on
to
any
deferred
items,
nope
no
staff
reports
and
our
first
is
finance,
and
treasury.
Michael
and
Aaron
is
with
him
as
backup
today
to
say.
Our
first
motion
is
moved
by
Tom,
Dewey
and
seconded
by
Sherry
one.
The
council
received
this
tax
sale
report
prepared
by
the
treasurer
for
information
purposes,
questions
or
comments
on
the
tax
sale
go.
E
B
F
F
E
E
Two
amount
of
Mayor
through
Madam
mayor:
it
is
a
property
that
has
been
identified
by
impact
that
was
not
before
and
they've
taken,
whoever
they
can
find
through
the
registry
office.
My
understanding
of
whoever
was
the
last
potential
owner
of
it,
which
is
I
believe
in
this
case,
was
Walmart
Forest,
which
was
the
development.
So
that
may
be
part
of
why,
in
all
that,
confusion,
that
this
particular
piece
was
not
assessed.
E
C
You
mad
mayor
to
Michael
Michael.
Some
of
these
land
tax
sales
here
have
been
on
the
books
for
what
two
three
years
before
you're,
actually
putting
them
up
for
sale,
and
you
know
let
you
answer
that
and
then
I'll
I'll
and
if
they
do
sell,
do
we
then
have
to
refund
the
portions
that
go
to
education,
for
example,
back
to
the
county
or
to
the
Board
of
Education.
Thank.
E
How
many
years
so
four
to
five
is
the
average,
because
we
can
start
after
two
and
one,
so
each
one
is
going
to
be
bare
minimum
three
and
a
half
years
worth
of
taxes
before
so.
Some
of
them
are
five
if
we've
tried
to
work
with
the
property
owner
and
it
hasn't
panned
out,
but
most
of
them
are
four
to
five
years
and
we
don't
have
to
give
the
education
like
so
throughout
the
year
when
we've
charged
the
taxes
we
have
given
the
education
and
the
county
money
to
them.
E
If
we
have
to
write
it
off,
we
will
then
pull
it
back,
which
of
course,
would
be
five
or
six
years
later.
If
it
ends
up
going
to
failed
tax
sale
and
it's
under
ten
thousand
dollars
minimum
tender
at
that
amount,
then
we
get
to
keep
that
money.
We
don't
instead
of
right
now,
our
in
process
of
writing
off.
We
don't
have
to
get
that
back.
A
E
G
A
And
I
have
a
motion
moved
by
Bill
McDonald
seconded
by
Sherry
one.
The
council
received
the
construction
details,
report
September
2022
for
information,
and
we
there
was
a
correction
of
the
number
from
366
000
to
36
000..
We
didn't
know
how
you
could
do
that
Andy
any
questions
or
comments
for
Andy
Phillip.
Thank.
A
Certainly
has
been
a
rough
season,
though,
trying
to
get
everything
done
and
the
volume
that
has
come
in
you're
to
be
commended
for
sticking
with
it
and
all
the
long
hours
that
you've
worked.
We
do
appreciate
it
thanks.
Okay,
any
other
questions
or
comments.
All
those
in
favor
of
the
motion
carried.
J
C
Through
you,
madam
mayor
I've,
got
several
questions
and
comments.
Some
I've
already
mentioned
to
you,
was
about
the
township
signed
on
the
other
approach
down
and
you're
going
to
react
to
that.
But
can
you
comment
on
the
work
on
road
38
and
the
second
part
of
my
question
is
I'm
wondering
if
you
could
move
the?
C
Is
it
possible
to
move
the
speed
limit
reduction
sign
on
road
38
south
of
Charlotte
like
a
little
bit
further
south,
because
I'm
getting
all
kinds
of
calls
in
regard
to
people
not
starting
to
slow
down
until
they
get
to
the
40
or
50
speed
of
them
to
sign
what
it
is
and,
generally
speaking,
they're
still
going
through
there
they
don't
slow
down
until
they
get
to
the
bridge.
Can
you
give
us
an
update
on
that,
whether
that's
possible
or
not?
Thank
you,
madam
mayor.
Okay,.
K
Here
you,
madam
mayor
to
councilor
McDonald
sign
on
rdoc
road,
was
discussed
recently
about
replacing
that
sign
and
several
others
we'd
like
to
permission
to
reach
out
to
the
Frog
Mac
County
to
collaborate
with
them
on
some
a
little
bit
more
decorative
signage
update
on
road
38
you'll
see
the
work
in
the
Godfrey
area.
Culvert
failed
in
front
of
LD
Powersports,
luckily
failed
in
the
shoulder
of
the
road
that
was
a
last
minute
replacement.
That's
done
camel's
sand
and
gravel
helped
us
with
that.
Did
an
excellent
job.
K
K
I
was
hoping
that
I
could
just
shift
that
sign
without
a
bylaw
Amendment,
because
I
think
it
just
I
think
the
bylaw
currently
States,
just
the
village
of
titchburn
50.,
as
for
sherbet
Lake
I
I,
know
for
sure
that
that
is
going
to
require
a
bylaw
Amendment,
because
the
locations
are
very
specific
and
I'm
open
to
it.
If
Council
provides
Direction
I'm
open
to
shifting
that
South
to
to
a
new
location
and
making
that
bylaw
Amendment.
A
A
C
A
L
K
M
Okay,
Nikki
Tyson,
thank
you
for
the
the
titch
burn.
One
and
I
forgot
that
I'd
had
a
call
about
the
speed
one
up
by
St
James.
So
thank
you,
councilor
McDonald
for
refreshing,
my
memory.
So
the
school
we
changed.
The
school
speed
for
greck
the
parents
at
St
James
would
like
the
same
done
to
the
entrance
of
their
school,
going
north
on
38,
for
it
to
be
a
50
Zone
straight
through
up
to
St
James.
K
K
M
K
K
We
could
first
of
all
I
I,
do
ask
for
council's
direction
on
which,
on
on
how
to
proceed
and
I
wouldn't
make
a
suggestion
that
Vanessa
Skelton
and
the
engineering
firm
that
we
just
worked
with
on
Matthew
Street.
They
were
very
easy
to
work
with
too,
and
they
could
give
us
outside
opinions
too.
So
it's
not
all
us
trying
to
decide
those
speeds,
if
that's
interests,
Council
good
budget
for
the
next
year
also.
B
A
L
Sherry,
thank
you
through
your
mad
America
Tyson
I
was
just
curious,
Tyson
in
the
discussion
and
looking
at
just
to
see
if
it
was
a
possibility
or
something
to
consider
I
noticed
in
Westport
in
the
summer
they
have
posts
in
the
center
lane
of
the
school
zone
and
I
know
that
wouldn't
be
something
in
the
winter,
but
also
bring
to
mind
the
village
of
crow
lake.
Is
that
something
that's
possible
or
through.
K
The
amount
of
Meredith
counselor
one
I
I
would
really
support
that
idea.
I've
said
it
before:
in
Council,
signage
paint
lines,
no
parking
signs,
speed
signs,
it
only
goes
so
far
and
then
forcement.
We
can't
we
can't
control
the
enforcement
traffic
calming
and
making
people
uncomfortable
driving
so
fast
through
such
a
wide
Corridor
that
we
have
on
38
as
the
only
way
to
slow
traffic
down.
A
H
K
Through
Madame
mayor
to
councilor,
Smith
I
reached
out
to
CP
Rail,
the
only
response
I've
received
so
far
is
that
they
will
look
into
it.
I
saw
they
took
action
and
noted
a
defect
like
a
pothole,
but
that
doesn't
and
people
were
relieved
because
they
thought
they
were
out
there
looking
at
it,
but
they
were
only
looking
at
that.
One
pothole,
the
CP
Rail,
has
not
indicated
they're
interested
in
correcting
that
grade
at
all.
Their
stats
so
far
is
that
if
you're
driving
the
speed
limit,
then
it's
it's
manageable.
C
The
mayor's
huge
Tyson,
if
you
in
regard
to
slowing
people
down
if
you
travel
the
road
from
harrismith
out
towards
Wilton,
at
what
I
call
the
star
Corners
there
they've
embedded
in
the
highways
just
like
it's
where
you
you
were
hitting
something.
It
really
causes
your
vehicle
to
rumble
and
it
would
not
affect
the
ability
to
snow,
plow
or
sand,
or
anything
like
that.
C
I'm
wondering
if
we
could
see
what
the
cost
of
those
would
be
to
embed
those
into
the
into
the
highway
road
38
coming
into
these,
these
slower
zones
I'm
wondering
if
we
can
investigate
the
cost
of
doing
stuff
like
that,
because
it
wouldn't
be
like
putting
a
in
some
small
towns
and
lower
speeds.
You'll
see
these
bumps
that
they
put
in
the
road
which
become
a
real
problem
when
you're
trying
to
snow
plow.
But
these
things,
just
if
you
happen
to
be
dazing,
you
hit
one
of
those
you
immediately
wake
up.
B
A
A
A
Yeah,
okay:
we
have
a
motion
moved
by
Tom,
Dewey
and
seconded
by
Sherry
Juan,
whereas
the
municipal
act
2001
so
2001,
chapter
25
as
amended,
the
municipal
Act
and
the
fire
protection
and
prevention
act,
1960
1997,
so
1997,
chapter
4
as
amended.
The
fppa
authorized
a
municipality
to
establish
a
fire
department
to
provide
firefighting
and
Fire
Protection
Services
and
for
participating
in
an
emergency
services
program
and
where
is
Section.
A
Now,
therefore,
it
be
it
resolved
that
Council
received
the
report.
Titled
established
fire
and
Emergency
Services
fees
in
central
Frontenac
for
information
and
consider
passing
the
established
fire
and
Emergency
Services
fees
in
central
Frontenac
bylaw
later
in
the
meeting
and
further
consider
passing
a
bylaw
to
amend
bylaw
2022-25.
F
F
J
C
J
J
B
A
G
Your
worship
Chris
couple
questions.
First
of
all,
with
respect
to
the
transitioning.
What
about
the
island
naming
I
know
that
we're
in
the
process
of
doing
this
is
that
going
to
have
any
impact
on
the
transitioning
or
will
that?
How
is
that
going
to
be
worked
in
later,
and
the
second
thing
was
is
with
regards
to
the
charges
that
you've
listed
here?
How
do
we
compare
with
other
municipalities,
other
rural
municipalities,
with
respect
to
these
charges?.
J
Through
counselor
sorry,
mad
America,
as
far
as
the
fees
go,
I've
I
haven't,
don't
know
what
the
fees
are
in
the
surrounding
municipalities
that
this
is
one
that
I've
I've
used
from
a
previous
municipality.
I
worked
at
I'm,
just
trying
to
collect
on
the
costs,
I
guess
for
doing
the
inspections
and
and
all
the
other
duties
that
are
signed
to
the
prevention
department.
J
G
Sorry
sorry
Chris
with
regards
to
the
transitioning
I,
was
asking
about
what
about
the
island
naming
is
that
going
to
have
any
impact,
because
I
know
that
we're
you
know
we're
upgrading
our
911s
and
all
that
sort
of
thing,
but
the
islands?
To
my
knowledge,
we
haven't
named
all
the
islands.
So
how
is
that
going
to
impact
the
transition
going
forward.
J
Sorry
about
America
Council
Julia
that
that
will
take
some
time.
There's
no
question
that
the
naming
of
the
of
the
islands
has
to
be
in
agreement
with
all
the
residents
that
are
on
the
islands.
If
there
are
residents
and
then
it
has
to
go
to
a
board
in
an
Ontario
board
in
Toronto
to
approve
that
so
I
see
this
process
is
going
to
be
taking
like
quite
some
time,
and
then
we
have
to
do
the
Civic
dummering
as
well.
So
it's
going
to
be
well
over
a
year
at
least.
A
B
D
B
C
B
L
A
Next
is
change
in
Council
and
Committee
of
adjustment
meeting
schedule
motion
moved
by
sherry
wine
seconded
by
Bill
McDonald.
The
council
received
the
report
entitled
change
in
Council
and
Committee
of
adjustment
meeting
schedule
prepared
by
the
deputy
Court
Deputy
clerk
for
information
and
further
that
the
prope
proposed
change
in
dates
to
accommodate
the
election
of
the
new
Council
and
the
training
requirements
for
Council
and
Committee
of
adjustment
are
hereby
accepted
and
confirmed.
D
I
can
just
add
a
few
items
to
the
report.
We
did
receive
an
email
from
the
county
clerk
Jeanette
to.
Let
us
know
that
the
county
inaugural
meeting
is
scheduled
for
November
30th
at
7,
30
PM.
So
that's
not
on
this
list,
because
we
just
found
out
about
the
date
and
time
so
that'll
impact
whoever
is
put
on
to
County
Council.
D
D
It'll
be
KPMG
to
cover
Financial
overview
for
Council
and
then
after
dinner,
there'll
be
presentations
from
Tony,
Fleming
and
Greg
Dabney,
and
they
will
cover
legal
issues
for
Council
employment,
labor
law
planning,
act,
101
and
conflict
of
interest,
and
then
at
eight
o'clock,
it'll
be
Brian
Anderson
from
intact
public
entities,
a
road
specialist
dealing
with
joined
several
liability
related
to
roads.
So
that's
the
agenda
for
the
first
joint
session
on
November,
the
9th
and
that's
in
Verona.
That's
the
one
in
Verona,
yes
and.
L
A
Okay,
moved
by
Sherry
one
and
seconded
by
Tom
Dewey,
whereas
this
matter
was
deferred
at
the
September
13th
meeting,
to
allow
time
for
staff
to
work
with
the
applicant
to
resolve
concerns
relating
to
the
force,
trespass
Road,
and
whereas
the
deputy,
Clerk
and
Public
Works
manager
have
met
with
the
applicant
now.
Therefore,
it
be
it
resolved
that
Council
authorized
staff
to
proceed
with
the
road
closure
request
on
the
basis
that
the
force
trip,
trespass
Road
will
remain,
as
is
with
no
land
exchange
contemplated
and
further
that
staff
be
directed
to
prepare
the
road
closure
bylaw.
G
A
Next
is
early
moved
by
Tom
Dewey
seconded
by
Bill
McDonald,
that
Council
approved
in
principle
the
recommendation
of
the
CAO
clerk
to
close
part
of
the
unopened
Road
allowance
between
concession,
10
and
11
Kennebec,
as
applied
for
by
David
Christopher
erdley,
and
that
we
proceed
to
a
public
meeting.
To
close
the
said,
Road
allowance
before
passing
said
bylaw
any
discussion.
A
Moved
by
Phillip
Smith
seconded
by
Victor
Hayes,
whereas
there
is
confusion
as
to
the
intent
of
resolution,
349
2022
passed
on
the
September
13th
council
meeting
due
to
the
amended
resolution,
wording
being
different
than
how
it
was
read
out
in
the
meeting
and
where
a
staff
are
recommending
that
Council
rescind
the
resolution
and
reconsider
the
matter
now.
Therefore,
it
be
it
to
resolve
that
Council.
Rescind
motion
349
2022
and
reconsider
the
matter
discussion.
That
was
my
fault
for
not
reading
what
was
written
there.
A
She
has
detailed
with
respect
to
her
situation.
Now,
therefore,
it
be
it
resolve
that
staff
proceed
with
a
road
closure
and
conveyance
with
Ms
Drucker,
on
the
basis
that
she
pays.
The
appraisal,
appraised,
value
of
five
thousand
two
hundred
dollars,
plus
HST
and
all
legal
survey
and
administrative
costs
associated
with
the
closure
and
further
that
Miss
Drucker
agrees
to
proceed
with
the
road
closure
and
conveyance.
A
The
council
agree
to
Grant
an
easement
for
hydro,
1,
Network
incs
for
an
underground
buried
Hydro
service
along
the
KMP
Trail,
provided
that
the
township
shall
not
be
responsible
for
any
costs
associated
with
the
easement
and
that
the
terms
of
the
easement
be
satisfactory
to
the
county
of
Frontenac,
which
manages
the
trail
and
further.
If
the
applicant
does
not
wish
to
proceed
with
the
road
closure
and
conveyance,
the
staff
may
proceed
to
notify
Hydro
1
networks,
Inc
that
it
may
proceed
with
an
above
ground
easement
on
the
road
parcel,
as
originally
requested.
A
B
B
D
So
through
you,
madam
mayor
to
counselor
he's
so
what
we've
done
is
set
it
up
that
if
she's
going
ahead
with
the
purchase
that
the
estimate
will
go
on
the
KMP,
so
that's
the
the
second
last
part
of
the
motion
is
that
Council
agrees
that
the
the
hydro
easement
would
go
there.
If
she
doesn't
proceed,
then
the
hydro
easement
would
go
on
the
Lance.
D
F
A
J
A
L
A
G
I
on
the
last
item
there
number
three
I
I
agree
with
the
municipality
of
pawassan
and
support,
sending
a
letter
to
omafra
regarding
the
administration,
Phoebe
increase
to
help
offset
the
additional
costs
pertaining
to
staff
time
and
increased
investigator
time.
I
see
other
municipalities
done
the
same
thing
and
I
I
would
I
would
recommend
that
we
bring
this
forward
and
next
Council
and
support
the
the
motion
that
was
put
forward
at
the
municipality
of
pawassen.
B
No,
what
they're
looking
for
is
any
of
the
wildlife
damage
I
think
like,
for
instance,
with
wolves,
wolves
and
stuff
like
that.
I
would
have
to
ask
Michael
how
many
we
actually
have
you
know
had
sent
out
like
any
of
the
livestock
evaluators.
I.
Don't
know,
there's
been
that
many
here
in
our
municipality,
whether
or
not
you
know
it's
count
up
to
council,
certainly
to
support
someone
else's
resolution.
B
G
Because
when
I
read
it
I
they've
increased
the
fees
for
the
the
person
that
does
the
investigation
substantially,
but
they've
only
increased
the
fees
to
the
municipality
from
thirty
dollars
to
fifty
dollars.
I
believe
it
was
so
there's
only
a
20
increase
in
that
and
I
well
I
understand
what
you're
saying
that
it
may
not
be
a
big
problem
here,
but
in
other
areas
in
Ontario,
probably
is
a
big
issue.
G
A
C
Actually,
a
few
years
ago,
if
you
recall,
people
who
were
raising
sheep
were
infestated
with
coyote
the
population
increased
tremendously.
There
was
a
tremendous
amount
of
of
killing
of
sheep
by
coyote,
because
when
they
get
into
a
sheep
pen,
they
don't
just
kill
one
either
they
they
kill
as
many
as
they
can
in
a
period.
So
the
ministry
doctor
did
look
at
possibly
changing
because
a
lot
what
the
municipality
can
change
is
from
the
the
dog
license
that
they
pay.
C
They
collect
to
pay
the
farmers,
depending
on
who
the
stock
evaluates,
vote
and
they'll
give
a
price
as
to
what
the
the
animal
that
was
killed
and
I.
Don't
think
the
peas
will
ever
arrive
at
the
full
amount
of
the
value
of
the
animal
that
was
killed,
but
I
have
no
problem
supporting
a
letter.
If
you
want
to
bring
a
motion.
G
A
A
All
right,
we
are
at
bylaws,
my
goodness,
443
we're
going
to
have
a
quite
a
break
between
now
and
six
o'clock,
moved
by
Phillip
Smith
seconded
by
Nikki
Gowdy,
that
bylaw
2022-58
being
a
bylaw
to
establish
fire
and
Emergency.
Services
fees
in
central
Frontenac
be
read
a
first
second
and
third
time
and
finally
pass
this
11th
day
of
October
2022.
A
Thank
you
right
motion
moved
by
Nikki
Gaddy
seconded
by
Philip
Smith
that
bylaw
202259
being
a
bylaw
to
amend,
2022-25,
being
a
bylaw
to
establish
and
require
payment
of
fees
and
charges
for
certain
Services
provided
by
Central
front
neck.
Fire
be
read
a
first
second
and
third
time
and
finally
pass
this
11th
day
of
October
2022..
D
B
A
So
this
number
20
would
be
the
public
meeting
so
and
I
don't
adjourn
right,
not
yet.
Okay,
so
we're
recessing,
yes
between
now
and
our
public
meeting
starting
at
six.
What
I
would
ask
Council
to
do
is
in
the
next
hour
that
we
have
is
have
another
look
at
the
zoning
Maps,
especially
the
areas
that
you
know
best
around
your
property
and
your
relatives
and
families
and
friends,
and
see
if
there's
anything
there.
That
doesn't
look
right
because
now
is
our
time
to
make
those
changes.
If
we
find
something.
C
L
B
A
A
Look
at
it
perfect,
excellent.
All
right,
we're
going
to
start
again
we're
going
to
call
this
public
meeting
to
order
and
I
want
to
welcome
everyone
here
tonight.
Tonight's
meeting
is
the
statutory
public
meeting
held
under
the
authority
of
section
34
of
the
planning
act.
This
meeting
was
also
advertised
in
accordance
with
the
requirements
of
the
planning
Act.
The
purpose
of
the
meeting
is
to
consult
with
the
public
on
the
draft
of
an
update
to
the
Township's
comprehensive
zoning
bylaw.
A
The
township
has
worked
on
preparing
a
draft
Amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw
for
several
months
now.
The
draft
bylaw
reflects
input
and
recommended
changes
from
the
county
of
Frontenac,
several
agencies,
Council
and
members
of
the
public.
The
update
is
a
requirement
of
the
planning
act
and
follows
from
the
recent
approval
of
the
official
plan
for
the
township
of
central
Frontenac.
B
A
Open
house
is
public
meeting.
Oh
sorry,
the
format
of
the
public
meeting
is
as
follows:
Glenn
tonic
our
planning
Consultants
will
make
a
presentation
on
the
draft
zoning
bylaw
members
of
the
public
may
ask
questions
during
or
after
the
presentation.
Any
member
of
the
public
may
also
make
formal
presentation
after
the
consultant's
presentation
before
you
ask
a
question
or
make
presentation.
I
would
ask
that
you
state
your
name
and
address
so
that
this
could
be
recorded
by
the
clerk.
This
will
protect
your
appeal
rights
under
the
planning
act.
A
I
am
required
by
the
planning
act
to
advise
you
that
if
you
do
not
make
an
oral
presentation
or
submit
written
comments
before
the
amending
bylaw
is
passed,
you
will
not
be
entitled
to
appeal.
The
decision
of
the
Council
of
the
township
Central
front
and
act
to
the
Ontario
land,
Tribunal
and
I
will
now
ask
Mr
tunnic
to
make
his
presentation.
I
Thank
you
very
much
Madam
mayor
members
of
council
members
of
the
gallery
and
those
online.
It's
certainly
a
pleasure
to
be
here
and
to
to
talk
about
your
new
zoning,
vile
or
the
amendment
to
the
zoning
bylaw
I
would
be
remiss
if
I
didn't
at
the
very
first
thank
your
staff,
who
have
worked
many
many
hours
to
help
make
this
bylaw
a
a
a
very
good
bylaw.
I
I
The
final
product
is
an
update
to
a
bylog
2011-52
and
all
of
the
schedules
will
be
replaced
by
new
schedules.
The
revised
bylaw
is
a
consolidation
of
all
the
amendments
to
2011-52,
and
it's
also
incorporates
a
lot
of
input
from
the
the
public.
As
mentioned
by
the
mayor,
we
have
prepared
a
planning
report,
September
30th,
which
reflects
or
provides
comments
and
responses
to
many
of
the
the
comments
and
submissions
that
were
made
at
the
open
houses
that
were
held
by
the
municipality.
I
The
appeal
process
is
set
out
in
the
planning
act.
As
indicated
by
the
mayor,
you
have
to
participate
in
the
planning
process.
If
you
want
to
appeal
the
the
document
or
part
of
the
document
appeals
only
apply
to
the
amendment
that
don't
apply
to
anything.
That's
not
changed
in
the
the
bylaw
and
any
appeal
goes
to
the
Ontario
land
tribunal
and,
ultimately,
it's
their
decision
on.
What
should
be
approved
or
not,
if
there's
an
appeal,
but
only
on
those
elements
that
are
appealed
and
if
anybody
appealing
the
bylaw
must
provide
planning
rationale.
I
Moving
on
to
the
structure
of
the
bylaw,
it's
fairly
common
across
Ontario
to
have
a
structure
such
as
you
see
before
you,
the
administration,
compliance
definitions,
General
provision
zones
and
the
schedules
themselves.
The
administration
section
really
says
this:
bylaw
applies
to
throughout
the
municipality.
I
It
provides
the
provisions
for
applications
to
enable
your
building
official
to
know
whether
the
Development
question
complies
with
the
the
bylaw
or
not
the
compliance
section
section
two
is
probably
the
most
important
section
of
the
bylaw
in
this,
in
the
sense
that
any
development
occurs
in
the
municipality
must
comply
with
the
Sony
bylaw.
That's
what
that
section
says.
I
The
definition
section
is
a
fairly
extensive
and
it
contains
words
that
are
not
typically
defined
in
the
dictionaries,
words
or
phrases,
as
the
case
may
be,
so
those
are
defined.
We
have
added
new
definitions
again
to
reflect
the
reality
of
today's
circumstances
in
the
municipality
and
the
move
towards
a
more
energy
efficient
society
as
well,
such
as
adding
a
definition
for
an
electric
vehicle
charging
station.
I
I
The
general
Provisions
do
provide
new
Provisions
for
adapting
to
to
climate
to
change
by
providing
or
for
permits
or
alternative
and
renewable
energy
systems.
Solar
collectors,
geothermal
systems,
wind
turbines,
providing
exemptions
for
such
things
as
Air
Force
heat
pumps,
Net
Zero,
Energy
buildings,
which
is
once
you
want
to
encourage
electric
vehicle
charging
stations
and
encourages
such
things
as
local
food
production,
one
Community,
Community,
Gardens
and
backyard
domestic
livestock
moving
on
to
affordable
housing.
I
The
the
bylaw
provides
for
what
are
known
as
aru's
additional
residential
units,
which
means
that
if
you
have
a
single
detached
dwelling
as
an
example
in
in
downtown
Charlotte
Lake,
you
would
be
entitled
to
have
an
extra
unit
in
that
principal
dwelling,
as
well
as
the
unit
in
the
rear
yard,
again
subject
to
having
a
the
Lost
size.
That's
large
enough
for
parking
for
that
unit
and
for
a
servicing
of
that
particular
unit.
I
So
additional
residential
units
are
permitted
in
the
R1,
rmccrbdr
and
LSR
zones,
and
the
next
diagram
shows
you
examples
of
additional
residential
units
how
they
might
be
configured
in
existing
dwellings.
In
your
municipality,
moving
on
to
affordable
housing
options,
tiny
houses-
these
are
units
that
are
are
permitted
in
a
variety
of
different
zones.
I
Storage
share
containers
are
relatively
new
elements
and
Council
has
agreed
to
permitting
them
in
the
R1
RM,
rwr
and
LSR
zones,
provided
they
don't
exceed
12.1
meters
or
40
meters
40
feet
in
in
length
and
they're
permitted.
Only
in
the
rear
yard
containers
will
be
permitted
in
non-residential
zones
and
the
setbacks
would
apply
in
those
setbacks
for
accessory
dwellings.
Sorry
accessory
uses
would
apply
to
storage
containers
in
in
all
zones.
I
The
general
Provisions
also
provide
for
new
Provisions
for
lot
coverage
that
are
graded
or
graduated
to
the
size
of
the
the
lot
and
the
sizes
are
are
very
generous.
So
it
means
that
effectively
on
a
residential
lot
of
Waterfront
residential
lots,
you
could
have
a
building
of
a
main
dwelling
of
up
to
4036
square
feet
or
375
square
meters,
and
that's
only
15
of
the
the
lot
area.
So
it's
it's
quite
substantial
in
the
same
general
principle
applies
elsewhere,
so
that
you're
not
penalized.
I
I
New
provision
is
with
respect
to
the
general
Provisions
is
live
work
units-
something
that's
set
out
in
your
official
plans.
So
it's
really
an
upscale
or
a
larger
home-based
business
than
so.
It
would
occupy
up
to
55
percent
of
the
the
building
and
the
provision
would
be
made
for
a
residential
component
as
well.
So
it's
it's.
It's
an
opportunity
to
live
and
work
within
the
the
same
unit,
and
it
applies
to
the
R1,
rmccrcl,
bdr
and
LSR
zones.
I
Feature
and
adjacent
development,
so
that
applies
to
significant
Wetlands
areas
of
natural
and
scientific
interests,
and
there
will
there
is
a
provision
for
setbacks
from
unclassified
Wetlands
as
as
well.
So
the
intent
of
the
plan
is
to
still
protect
all
of
the
natural
heritage
features
in
your
municipality
because
of
their
importance
to
sustaining
a
healthy
environment
for
wildlife,
fish,
habitat,
Etc,
foreign,
the
need
for
the
use
of
your
shorelines
along
your
various
lakes
and
river
systems.
Shoreline
buffer
provision
is
in
the
bylaw.
I
It
is
a
reflection
of
past
practice
as
well.
A
30
meter.
Setback
from
the
shoreline
is
vital
to
sustaining
a
healthy
Shoreline,
providing
for
wildlife
corridors
and
also
protecting
fish
habitat.
So
the
provision
does
require
the
the
setback,
but
also
allows
you
to
use
part
of
your
Shoreline
for
Access
purposes
for
constructing
a
Boathouse.
If
you
wish
and
constructing
a
dock
and
the
diagram
here
gives
you
an
idea
of.
I
I
The
general
Provisions
also
list
a
series
of
prohibited
uses
uses
that
we
don't
want
in
in
the
municipality,
such
as
an
adult,
entertainment
and
Body
Rub
parlor.
Any
obnoxious
use
the
stewardship
unlicensed
or
decommissioned
Vehicles
the
use
of
vehicles
for
human
habitation.
The
bulk
storage
of
used
tires
heavy
industrial
uses
and
the
bulk
storage
of
hazardous
materials
foreign.
I
I
The
general
Provisions
other
matters
of
the
minimum
gross
floor
areas
I
had
already
mentioned,
is
permitted
at
300
square
feet
or
27.9
square
meters.
There
have
been
additions
to
the
scope
of
home-based
businesses
and
reflecting
the
broader
diversity
of
home-based
businesses
that
are
provided
for
in
the
world.
Municipalities
there's
been
a
provision
at
the
suggestion
of
one
of
your
citizens
for
control
on
light
glare
across
a
Waterway
you
like
to
enjoy
Dark
Skies
as
much
as
is
possible.
I
So
there's
a
glare
standard,
that's
been
included
so
that
light
player
from
a
commercial
or
residential
use
doesn't
affect
unduly
affect.
Somebody
on
the
opposite
side
of
the
of
the
shoreline
human
habitation
is
is
not
permitted
in
the
storage
container,
except
in
circumstances.
So,
where
you're
building
official
is
satisfied
that
a
converted
storage
container
is
suitable
for
human
habitation
and
meets
the
requirements
of
the
the
building
code.
I
Yeah
section
five
applies
to
zones,
there's
no
change
to
the
number
of
zones
in
the
the
bylaw.
The
scope
of
permitted
uses
and
accessory
uses
has
been
amended
in
many
circumstances.
To
add
uses
that
you
would
expect
to
to
allow
in
the
various
zones.
Again,
modernizing
the
the
bylaw
so,
for
example,
in
the
R1
and
RM
zones,
the
tiny
house
is
added
as
a
as
a
permitted
use
in
the
RW
Zone.
I
Your
Waterfront
Zone
you've
got
a
variety
of
types
of
uses
that
are
permitted
and
I've
noted
here
that,
as
a
result
of
an
amendment
to
your
official
plan,
the
minimum
lot
area
is
reduced
in
the
rural
Zone
from
to
0.8
hectares
from
one
hectare,
and
the
lot
Frontage
is
reduced
to
77
meters
from
91
meters
and
Provisions
are
made.
New
Provisions
are
made
for
increased
frontages
for
narrow
channels.
I
In
the
industrial
zones,
the
M
zones
we've
added
a
commercial
Greenhouse
to
the
M1
and
M2
zones
and
added
Provisions
from
the
aggregate
resources
act
to
govern
setbacks
in
your
extraction
zones.
Your
mineral
extraction
Zone
and
to
distinguish
between
Waste
Management
facilities,
which
are
either
open
or
closed,
as
the
case
may
be,
and
they're
all
Illustrated
on
the
schedules
in
the
rural
Zone,
the
there's
been
an
addition
of
several
new
permitted
uses,
such
as
an
animal
shelter,
Brewery,
Camp,
Communications
facility
conservation,
uses,
construction,
yards,
etc,
etc.
I
I
Quite
a
bit
of
work
done
with
respect
to
reclassifying
the
Environmental
Protection
zones
for
distinguishing
between
areas
where
organic
soils
Prevail
and
therefore
create
a
a
construction
constraint.
If
you
wish
that
in
some
cases
can
be
overcome
by
engineering
practices,
good
engineering
practices,
we
also
distinguish
parks
and
conservation
areas
in
a
separate
type
of
EP,
Zone,
provincially,
significant
and
locally
or
regionalist,
yeah
locally,
a
significant
Wetlands.
They
also
have
their
own
EP
zones,
and
then
we
have
an
overlay
for
natural
areas
of
natural
and
scientific
interests.
I
Your
OS
zone
is,
is
a
zone
for
for
open
space,
and
the
community
garden
has
been
added
as
permitted
use
your
heritage
Zone
the
H
zone.
Now
there
are
no
changes,
that's
the
zone
that
applies
to
Heritage
of
buildings
in
your
municipality
and
similar
to
the
the
R
zone.
A
number
of
uses
have
been
added
to
the
LSR
Zone
and
the
minimum
lot
area.
There
has
also
been
adjusted
reduced
to
0.8
hectares
from
one
hectare.
I
I
Where
to
from
here
there
may
be
some
final
revisions
arising
out
of
today's
meeting,
but
I
think
we're
pretty
close
to
having
a
final
product
and
the
way
it
will
work
is
I'll
have
a
an
over
kind
of
a
summary
Byler.
At
the
the
outset
of
your
Amendment,
which
will
say
that
red
script
means
changes
to
the
to
the
bylaw
or
reflects
the
changes
to
the
bylaw,
as
as
the.
I
The
script,
the
the
stroke
through
of
the
the
script
indicating
parts
of
the
bylaw
that
have
been
deleted
now,
your
your
final
bylog
will
be
different
from
what
you
see
here,
because
you
can
appreciate
with
the
deletions
and
so
forth.
It'll
actually
reduce
the
size
of
the
button.
There'll
be
challenges
with
reformatting,
including
summary
numbering
and
whatever,
but
essentially
that's
the
the
document
as
it
stands,
Madam
mayor
and
we're
open
to
any
questions.
A
Thank
you,
Glenn
I
think
as
many
times
as
we
hear
the
presentation,
we
we
see
something
new
or
it
reinforces
what
we
thought
about
something
so
we're
going
to
open
it
up.
If
there's
any
member
of
the
public
I
think
what
we'll
do
is.
Have
you
come
to
the
microphone
up
here?
Tom
will
turn
it
on.
Is
there
any
member
of
the
public
who'd
like
to
come
up?
N
Have
a
cold,
which
is
why
I'm
wearing
a
mask?
Yes,
don't
want
to
give
it
to
you.
My
name
is
Arlene
Gregoire
and
I'm
from
White
Lake
I
represent
the
White
Lake
cottagers
Association
and
my
address
is
1214.
Sport,
Lane
and
I
have
written
I
submitted
a
written
comment
earlier.
There
was
a
loose
end,
so
I
thought
I'd
come
to
speak
to
the
loose
end,
a
last-minute
change.
First.
Thank
you
very
much.
You
have
been
extremely
supportive
and
are
hammering
out
our
best
protection
to
keeping
the
pristine
Waters
of
White.
N
Lake,
pristine
and
I
have
to
commend
this
Council,
as
well
as
the
consultant
Mr
Tana
for
doing
a
lot
to
further
our
goal
to
protect
the
lake.
I've
worked
previously
for
municipality
and
it's
it's
difficult
to
address
everybody's
needs
and,
despite
all
of
that,
difficulty,
you've
managed
to
do
the
right
thing
with
respect
to
White,
Lake
and
I
have
to
thank
you
for
that.
N
There
is
a
last
minute
change
in
the
Provisions,
the
and
the
exception,
and
it
was
the
addition
of
public
utility
as
a
permitted
use
and
I
I
asked
Mr
tonic
as
to
the
rationale
for
that,
and
he
explained
that
Hydro
1
has
requested
that
it
be
inserted
in
order
to
ensure
that
running
their
power
lines
to
the
various
residences.
In
our
case,
Cottages
is
considered
a
permitted
use,
and
my
thought
on
that
was
it's
really
incidental
to
the
dwellings.
I
mean
the
principal
use.
N
The
permitted
use
of
the
lands
within
the
Waterfront
area
is
dwellings
and
how
you
bring
a
service
or
how
you
have
water,
whether
a
well
or
it's
piped
in
from
the
lake.
It's
an
incidental
use
to
the
dwelling.
It's
it's.
It
just
flows
from
having
a
dwelling
so
that
we
don't
really
need
to
have
a
public
utility
listed
as
a
permitted
use
if
they
owned
land
in
the
Waterfront
property
Waterfront
area,
and
they
wanted
to
put
a
substation
on
there.
N
Then
it
being
listed
as
a
permitted
use
would
allow
them
to
do
that,
but
to
string
the
lines
which
is
what
they've
explained
to
me.
It's
an
accessory
use,
if
at
all,
if
it
needs
to
be
in
the
zoning
bylaw
as
a
use,
and
it's
just
driving
here
it
hit
me
it's
an
accessory
use,
because
the
last
thing
we
want
is
to
have
a
substation
established
within
the
Waterfront
area
of
White
Lake,
because
there's
always
a
potential
for
contamination
and
it's
a
trend.
The
people
who
go
in
and
out
would
be
Transit.
N
They
wouldn't
have
an
understanding
of
what
it
takes
to
maintain
the
pristine
Waters
of
that
lake.
So
my
request
is
that
we
change
that
being
that
is
kind
of
last
minute,
can't
really
discuss
amongst
lawyers
as
to
the
appropriateness
of
that
insertion
and
White
Lake.
Being
that
it's
special,
maybe
we
should
make
it
an
accessory
use
as
opposed
to
principal
use,
Let's.
I
I
I
think
exacerbates
response
to
requests
for
for
an
easement
I
also
I
think
realistically
think
that
the
the
likelihood
of
having
an
admin
office
or
a
sort
of
a
transmitter
transmission,
installation,
I,
think
in
or
in
and
around
White
Lake
is,
is
almost
nil.
I
I
just
can't
see
that
realistically
happening
because
I
think
this
the
area
is
well
serviced
right
now,
I
mean
that
the
fact
is
we're
not
looking
at
new
services
at
this
particular
point
we're
we're
looking
at
an
area.
I
That's
that's
serviced
right
now
and
but
I
have
to
say,
I've
asked
Ontario
Hydro
for
for
some
response.
It
may
be
that
we
can
slightly
modify
the
word
public
utility
to
say
to
the
exclusion
of
an
admin
office
or
or
something
of
that
sort
and
I
think
that
would
probably
suffice
to
to
address
your
concern,
something
that
gives
you
the
sense
that
it's
you're
not
going
to
see
the
build
up,
something
that
might
be
I
wouldn't
say
inappropriate,
but
maybe
unusual
for
the
situation.
I
A
M
O
I
attended
the
previous
two
open
houses
and
submitted
some
comments,
and
I
must
say
that
I'm
very
impressed
with
the
amount
of
work
that
Mr
tonic
and
the
township
staff
have
done.
They've
they've
addressed
a
lot
of
my
concerns
and
I
just
had
three
issues
that
I
would
like
to
bring
up
at
this
meeting.
The
first
is
more
of
maybe
it's
it's
just
to
make.
O
The
text
of
the
bylaw
correspond
to
the
schedules
and
it's
with
respect
to
the
terminology
of
this
well,
the
text
set
calls
them
locally
significant
wetlands
and
the
schedules
call
them
regionally
significant
Wetlands,
so
I
think
one
of
those
terms
has
to
be
picked.
In
actual
fact,
the
minister
of
Natural
Resources
actually
considers
them
regionally
significant,
so
that
might
be
the
more
appropriate
terminology,
but
at
any
rate,
the
two,
the
two
things
have
to
Jive.
I
Can
respond
respond
to
that
Madam
mayor
that
we
will
be
using
the
term
locally
significant
Wetlands?
We
will
not
be
using
the
term
regionally,
and
the
reason
for
that
in
part,
is
that
regionally
implies
something
beyond
the
municipality.
It's
of
significance
to
some
other
organization,
as
opposed
to
locally
significant
means.
It's
significant
to
Central.
Point
lag
okay,
so
if
the
the
schedule
will
be
modified,
if
necessary,
I
thought
the
change
had
been
made,
but
maybe
it
hasn't
so
we
will
be
calling
them
locally,
significant
Wetlands
to
correspond
with
the
the
GOP
okay.
O
So
the
second
point
was
with
respect
to
the
minimum
set
box
for
areas
of
natural
and
scientific
interests.
Now,
in
the
in
Glenn's
presentation,
he
had
mentioned
that
there
was
the
deletion
of
the
deception
on
natural
heritage
features
the
which
was
formerly
4.25,
but
he
stated
that
that
all
of
the
aspects
that
are
required
under
the
provincial
policy
statement
had
been
Incorporated
in
the
existing
bylaw.
However,
I
could
not
find
anything
that
included
the
minimum
setbacks
which
are
actually
required
for
areas
of
natural
and
scientific
interests.
I
O
Well,
you
see,
the
problem
is
the
the
section.
There
was
a
whole
section
deleted,
and
then
you
know
these
setbacks
were
included
in
one
section
and
the
the
stuff
on
natural
heritage
features
is
kind
of
scattered
throughout
and
you
have
to
dig
for
it,
which
is
okay
as
long
as
nothing
is
missing
and,
and
it
like
it's
very
important,
that
the
bylaw
is
not
contrary
to
the
provincial
policy
statement.
Yeah.
I
I
There
was
a
definition
in
the
earlier
version,
but
I
withdrew
the
definition
because
of
the
the
fact
that
Council
had
decided
to
postpone
dealing
with
this
particular
issue,
and
so
that's
why
there's
nothing
in
the
bylaw
this
this
particular
point
and
I
think
I
would
defer
to
you.
Madam
mayor,
based
on
the
earlier
conversation
today
on
what
what
is
transpiring
in
the
county.
Yes,.
A
We
we
are
still
working
on
short-term
rentals.
However,
nothing
has
been
given
to
staff
yet
to
go
forward
with
that
until
after
the
election,
there
is
the
meetings
that
we've
had
with
north
and
south
and
all
of
those
minutes
of
those
meetings
and
recommendations
will
be
coming
to
the
caos
and
they
will
be
working
on
that
over
the
next
year
after
we
get
the
election
out
of
the
way
and
get
new
folks
around
the
table
or
old
folks
around
the
table.
A
A
P
Yes,
good
evening
folks,
Madam
mayor,
my
name
is
Kurt
Levy
I'm,
calling
in
for
Maori
Town
Ontario.
In
previous
conversations
at
the
of
the
August
meeting,
I
expressed
my
interest
in
the
tiny
house
scenarios
that
you're
proposing
in
your
amendments
and
would
like
to
follow
that
up.
Can
you
hear
me
all
right?
Yes,.
P
You
the
you've,
made
mention
Madame
mayor
that
the
council
was
in
agreement
that
300
square
foot
has
a
minimum
requirement
for
any
housing
in
a
tiny
home
category
is
appropriate
and
I
want
to
invite
you
to
reconsider
that
I.
Had
the
opportunity
to
visit
Ancaster
this
in
Hamilton
or
outside
of
Hamilton
for
the
tiny
home
show
this
summer
and
was
impressed
by
the
almost
dozen
manufacturers
that
were
present
there
and
showing
their
their
Pro
production
in
I
would
say.
P
The
the
Amendments
that
you've
proposed
are
now
very
still
very
ambiguous
and
that's
not
that's
not
a
fault,
necessarily
as
the
industry
is
quite
ambiguous
about
what
a
tiny
home
is.
It
would
have
seemed,
though,
that
your
present
view
indicates
more
like
small
houses
rather
than
what
the
tiny
home
movement
is,
is
typically
about
I.
P
Note
that
you're
sort
of
taking
off
the
table
any
tiny
home
on
Wheels
it
has
to
be
anchored,
and
it
has
to
be
any
number
of
other
things
to
make
it
make
it
appropriate
for
your
your
particular
circumstances.
But
going
back
to
the
tiny
home
movement
is
generally
about
affordability
and
of
of
private
residential
buildings,
and
the
proposals
that
you
have,
including
the
300
square
feet
requirement,
makes
tiny
house
not
affordable
in
your
in
your
Township.
P
In
my
opinion,
the
the
average
construction
price
of
a
of
a
residence
in
Ontario,
looking
at
Owen
Sound
as
a
basis,
is
over
315
dollars
per
square
foot
that
puts
a
conventional,
tiny
home
at
near
a
hundred
thousand
dollars
in
new
construction.
Most
of
the
tiny
homes
where
that
were
displayed
in
Ancaster
were
touching
the
200
000
Mark.
Those
are
not
affordable
houses
for
many
people
in
your
Township
or
in
in
Ontario.
P
L
I
I
think
in
in
a
paper
that
I
had
written
on
this
particular
subject,
identified
or
distinguished
the
difference
between
a
tiny
home
and
a
small
house,
a
small
house
in
in
my
research
really
starts
around
500
square
feet
as
opposed
to
the
something
less
so
a
tiny
house
is
classified
anywhere
from
the
160
that
Mr
Beatty
had
mentioned
up
to
about
500
square
feet,
so
I
think
it
still
qualifies
as
a
tiny
host
in,
in
my
opinion.
Certainly,
the
intent
here
is
to
do
a
couple
of
things.
I
One
is
to
ensure
that
when
you
install
a
tiny
house,
it's
intended
to
be
a
permanent
structure,
that's
a
accessible
from
a
property
taxation
standpoint.
So
the
removal
of
the
wheels
and
the
construction
on
or
installation
on
a
permanent
foundation
which
could
be
a
slab
on
grade,
is
what
would
be
required.
We're
not
thinking
about
mobility
in
the
sense
of
moving
something
on
and
off
a
particular
property.
I
The
300
square
feet,
as
was
discussed
with
the
council
before,
provides
a
balance.
If
you
wish,
between
a
tiny
home
construction
and
what
other
dwellings
we
see
in
the
municipality,
we're
talking
generally
about
a
house
starting
in
and
around
a
thousand
to
1200
square
feet
as
as
kind
of
an
average
area,
so
in
terms
of
a
reasonable
compatibility
in
in
terms
of
lot
sizes
or
sorry
floor
area
sizes,
the
300
square
feet
is,
is
more
compatible
than
something
less
than
that.
I
I
haven't
really
given
any
consideration
to
to
the
minimum
lot
area
for
for
a
tiny
home.
But
as
Council
knows,
the
minimum
lot
area
was
reduced
this
time
around
in
the
rural
area
of
the
LSR
area,
and
the
intent
is
to
still
ensure
that
a
lot
is
sustainable
from
a
sewage
treatment.
Standpoint.
You've
got
because,
as
you
well
know,
there
are
areas
within
this
municipality
where
there's
a
lot
of
rock,
which
makes
it
very
difficult,
even
at
0.8
hectares
to
service
that
particular
unit
I've
actually
experienced
in
this
municipality.
I
A
lot
of
one
hectare.
There
was
Solid
Rock
and
this
question
of
you
know:
where
do
you
put
servicing?
So
a
tiny
home
will
require
servicing.
It
may
be
less
of
a
demand
than
a
conventional
dwelling,
but
will
still
require
servicing
and
I'm
sure
the
council
wants
to
ensure
sustainability
of
lots
from
one
to
the
other.
F
Thank
you,
madam
Aaron.
Another
thought
that
I
have
about
the
minimum
lot.
Size
is
if
we
start
severing
lots
that
are
smaller
and
then,
if
we
allow
them
to
have
wheels,
they
pull
their
trailer,
their
tiny
house
off
and
now
what
do
we
do
with
this
undersized
lot
and
it
now
becomes
unusable
for
a
conventional
structure,
yeah,
so
I
I
think
we
need
to
maintain
our
minimum
lot
size
and.
I
The
the
answer
is
yes,
Madam
mayor
I
mean
certainly
this
document
is
not
etched
in
stone.
It's
a
it's
a
document,
that's
designed
to
control
development
and
the
document
can
be
amended
as
the
circumstances
require.
It's
not
to
say
it's
going
to
be
arbitrary.
It's
going
to
be
based
on
good
planning
principles.
A
And
and
I
think
that's
important
to
note.
I
think
Council
looked
at
the
quality
of
life
for
people
who
are
going
to
be
invested
and
be
living
in
these
homes.
160
square
feet
is
not
very
big
to
call
home
so
300
feet.
I
think
we
felt
was
something
that
would
certainly
be
more
livable,
more
comfortable
and
just
a
better
thing
for
our
residents
than
160
square
feet.
That's
pretty
small
we've
got
lots
of
space,
and
certainly
300
square
feet
would
fit
on
the
size
of
properties
that
we're
talking
hey.
A
P
A
Well,
I
I
guess
I
would
say
if
if
I
can
build
a
house
for
a
hundred
thousand
in
this
climate,
we
have
right
now,
that's
pretty
affordable
compared
to
500,
000,
600,
000
properties.
So
again,
I
think
we're
looking
at
something
that
is
reasonable
for
ninety
thousand
I,
don't
know
that
three
hundred
fifteen
dollars
a
square
foot
for
a
tiny
house
is
in
fact
what
the
cost
would
be.
A
P
I
I
think
in
terms
of
affordability,
I
think
it
depends
on
who's
building
the
unit
and
what
materials
that
are
are
being
used.
I
mean
there
are
innovative
ways
of
building
even
smaller
homes.
That
would
be,
in
my
humble
opinion,
less
than
315
dollars
per
square
foot,
so
I
think
it's
the
end.
There's
there's
there's
an
opportunity
in
the
industry
and
and
I
guess.
A
Okay,
no
one
else,
anyone
else
in
the
audience
tonight:
okay.
Well,
thank
you
all
very
much
for
your
inputs
and
again
this
has
been
a
good
process
in
that
people
have
been
giving
us
their
ideas
and
are
not
afraid
to
come
and
say
this
needs
to
be
something
different,
and
we
thank
you
for
that.
It's
not
an
easy
job.
To
put
something
in
place.
That's
going
to
make
everybody
happy
or
we'll
do
everything
that
needs
to
be
done.
A
I
On
that
very
comment,
as
council
members
who've
been
around
for
a
while
remember,
even
with
re
respect
to
the
last
document
that
we
prepared
a
decade
ago
or
more
about
10
or
11
or
12
years
ago,
there
was
a
housekeeping
Amendment
that
was
what
roughly
a
year
after
and
that
was
to
make
some
adjustments.
Some
fine
tuning
based
on
the
practice
and
I
think
the
same
will
occur
here
is
that
you've
got
to
work
with
the
document
and
see
how
it
applies
on
a
day-by-day
basis.
I
So
there
may
be
some
some
issues
that
might
have
to
be
dealt
with
and
I
I.
Don't
think
that
the
fact
that
a
housekeeping
Amendment
might
be
required
is
any
different
from
any
other
municipality
after
after
a
short
period
of
time.
So
it's
it's
a
it's
a
comprehensive,
it's
a
lengthy
document,
so
you
can
never
have
an
absolutely
perfect
document,
because
you,
you
don't
know
what
circumstances
may
arise.
That
may
say
that
may
trigger
a
question.
I
Well,
how
does
the
bylaw
apply,
or
did
the
bylaw
really
anticipate
this
kind
of
a
a
development?
So
it's
so
it
I'm
not
making
excuses.
I'm
saying
that
the
reality
is
is
that
you
can
never
anticipate
in
advance
everything,
that's
going
to
happen
in
your
municipality
and
and
whether
your
bylaw
is
going
to
be
able
to
deal
with
that.
Yes,.
D
A
Very
much
for
working
with
us,
it's
been
great
to
have
you
back
and
to
get
through
and
get
the
answers
that
are
very
understandable
and
the
reasons
behind
why
things
are
the
way
they
are
so
I
have
a
motion
moved
by
Victor
Hayes
seconded
by
Nikki
Gowdy.
The
council
received
the
planning
report
prepared
by
Glenn
tonic
and
the
public
comments
from
the
public
meeting.
A
Now
is
there
anything
else
to
come
before
Council
before
we
have
our
adjournment,
seeing
none
I
have
a
motion
moved
by
Phillip
Smith
seconded
by
Nikki
Gowdy
that
bylaw
202260
being
a
bylaw
to
confirm
the
proceedings
of
the
regular
council
meeting
held
October.
The
11th
2022
be
read
a
first
second
and
third
time
and
finally
passed
this
11th
day
of
October
2022
and
for
this
meeting
be
adjourned
until
the
25th
of
October
2022,
said
meeting
to
be
held
at
the
surges,
Memorial
Hall
Garrett,
Street
Charlotte,
all
those
in
favor
Carriage.