►
From YouTube: CHAOSS Common Working Group 4-1-21
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
D
A
C
A
A
A
C
A
nice
iteration
on
that
yeah
yeah,
another
one
was:
what
room
does
the
ghost
nut
need.
D
A
No
no
editing
whatsoever,
but
so
I
have
some
news
about
the
value
group
that
I
thought
I
would
announce.
A
Right,
I
have
some
news
about
the
common
okay
and
we
talked
about
it
in
the
general
meeting
and
we've
decided
to
change
the
name
to
uncommon.
C
A
Our
agenda
for
this
week
is
posted
at
the
top
of
the
meeting
minutes
which
have
been
added
and
they
begin
with
metrics
to
release
in
this
cycle,
which
I
think
I
don't
recall,
the
extent
to
which
we
identified
those
last
time.
I
think
last
time
we
spent
a
good
deal
time
finishing
editing,
one
metric
so
and
I
don't
know,
if
has
the
group
been
through
the
metric
tracking
sheet?
Oh-
and
I
will
share
this-
I
don't.
The
group
has
been
through
the
metric
tracking
sheet
recently
to
see
the
status
of
a
value.
A
A
So
I
will
so
how's
sean
doing
sean's
doing
terribly.
He
keeps
thinking
this
is
the
value
working
group,
but
we
don't
know
what's
wrong
with
the
guy,
so
this
is
the
actual
link
to
the
common
minutes.
I
believe.
E
Common
chaos
comment,
so
it
could
be
over,
go
for
it.
I
So
so
I
think
don
we'll
be
back
in
two
weeks,
but
I
think
it
might
be
useful
to
set
a
facilitator
for
the
next
meeting.
So
would
anybody
if
don
isn't
here
would
be
willing
to
facilitate
the
next
week
meeting?
I.
H
I
All
right:
well,
I
don't
think
he
got
a
second
chance.
No,
so
they
kill
this
dog
yeah.
So
all
right,
so
action
items
from
prior
and
see
if
we
have
any
action
items
from
the
prior.
I
don't
think
we
did
I'll
even
go
back
to
march
4th.
Maybe.
I
E
I
A
I
What
ritac
had
put
in.
A
Did
somebody
and
it
looks
like
somebody
inserted
html,
like
tags
in
some
cases.
I
I
I
I
H
A
A
Yeah
and
I
think
what
we
I
just
think
what
we
clean
it
up
too,
if
there
is
a
difference
in
what
happens,
when
kevin
creates
the
website,
we
should
go
with
whatever
that
is
yeah.
I
need
to
clean
it
up
into
something:
that's
not
useful
to
kevin,
or
it
makes
kevin's
job
even
harder
and
more
labor-intensive,
but
yeah.
I
suspect
either.
A
I
A
I
C
The
so
we
will
have
multiple
images:
folders,
there's,
not
a
single
images,
folder
right,
every
focus
area
has
its
own
yep
and
by
having
the
relative
paths,
everything
will
work,
fine,
both
on
the
markdown
in
github
and
on
the
website.
C
Okay,
okay,
so,
and
one
change
that
kevin
I
made
on
the
last
release
is
that
we
are
pulling
all
metrics
from
master
always
because
we
were
switching
back
and
forth
to
pulling
only
released
versions.
And
then
things
were
going
under
review
and
change,
and
we
didn't
know
about.
It
was
so
much
overhead
that
we
just
moved
it
to
always
pulling
from
master.
I
C
I
A
No
we'll
have
to
that
can
be
okay,
okay,.
C
I
Okay,
all
right,
thank
you
for
that.
I
So
there's
another
another
issue,
another
issue
and
it's
actually
102..
So
the
release.
I
I
So
this
is
just
what
it
says.
It
is
standardized
structure.
A
I
For
us
from
her
from
yash,
it
might
be
so
is
there
there
is
no
template
document,
I'm
looking
at
uk
org.
Is
there
that
kind
of
says
this
is
how
repositories,
at
least
for
working
groups
should
look?
There
is
actually?
Where
is
that
it
is.
A
Referenced
in
the
notes
from
the
last
community
meeting,
I
believe.
I
Worth
dropping
into
an
issue
in
each
of
the
metrics
work:
yeah
metrics
working
groups.
I
Okay,
well,
I
got
nothing
to
say,
then
he
got
everything
done,
maybe
while
we're
here
sean,
what
are
the
comments
in
this
document
that
currently
are
there
comments
in
this
document
that
won't.
A
A
Some
questions
about
hyphenation,
github
actions,
implementing
github
actions
was
a
suggestion.
York
made.
I
I
don't
disagree
with
that.
I
would
suggest
that
that
be
a
phase
two
after
we
actually
implement
it.
Unless
can
you
make
that
comment?
Yeah?
Let's
see,
I'm
sure
they
don't
violate
these
guidelines,
so
unless
it's
super
easy
to
implement
that
github
action-
and
I
haven't
tried
to
do
that
yet.
C
J
I
I
A
This
will
require
the
most
cleanup
because
for
any
group,
that's
been
for
any
group
so
like
in
evolution,
we've
sort
of
kept
a
stable
of
metrics
that
are
partly
developed
that
we
want
to
develop
someday
in
markdown.
So
we
just
have
to
have
those
all
the
google
docs.
So
just
deleting
them
doesn't
accomplish
the
goal.
It
throws
away
actual
work,
although
we
could
get.
We
certainly
could
get
back.
I
So
this
is
ultimately,
this
is
just
basically
saying
anything.
We're
tracking,
like
in
our
minds,
should
just
be
in
the
spreadsheet.
Yeah
use
the
repository
for
tracking
random
thoughts
right.
A
A
I
A
Looks
like
inconsistency
referring
to
images,
but
that's
not
what
we
were
looking
at.
We
were
looking
at
x,
just
click
the
pull
request
thing
yep.
A
C
I
think
common
is
the
first
one
that
is
fully
following
it.
Diversity
and
inclusion
and
value
are
close
and
then
risk
and
evolution
are
the
furthest.
H
G
I
I
We
can
take
a
look
really
anywhere
at
this
point.
I
think
the
first
one
is
the
most
well
developed,
so
I
could
be
wrong.
I
D
C
A
F
I
Cool,
so,
based
on
that,
could
we
take
a
look
at
this
metric
going
in
with
that
mindset,
knowing
because
lots
of
times
we
go
into
the
metric,
I'm
afraid
and
we
start
doing
edits,
and
we
have
five
different
mindsets
doing
edits
on
the
metric.
Yes,
it
happens
and
then
we're
all
editing
and
it's
it
creates
a
fairly
divergent.
I
I
A
If
we
want
to
incorporate
some
indication
of
the
amount
of
conversation
but
that
because
it's
an
interesting
piece
of
information,
first
like
if
your
average
goes
way
up,
it
could
in
a
month
it
could
literally
be
because
one
pull
request
had
a
ton
of
discussion
before
the
submitter
decided
to
act
on
it.
And
perhaps
you
could
add
that.
I
A
Well,
if
you,
if
there
is
a
good
onboarding
process,
then
the
submitter
is
unlikely
to
submit
a
pull
request
using
a
style,
scope,
dependency
or
other
factor
that
the
community
already
recognizes
it
will
be
rejected
or
requested,
or
changes
will
be
requested
on
it.
So
so
how's
that
different
than
the
first
bullet.
B
For
me,
it
means
that
the
the
critique
or
the
requested
changes
have
been
provided
in
a
way
that
makes
sense
and
is,
is
more
of
a
guiding,
they're
communicated
well
and
in
in
a
guiding
sort
of
way,
and
not
just
like
change
this.
You
know
like
they're,
clear
and
they're
they're,
more
of
like
a
mentor,
would
tell
you
exactly
kind
of
what
you
need
to
do
to
fix
it,
and
so
that
would
reduce
the
time
taken.
If
you
just
say
change
this
and
don't
give
them
any
guidance
or
or.
I
I
All
right
thanks
so
I'll
suggest.
Would
anybody
like
to
take
this
on
as
an
action
item
and
bring
this
to
the
group
in
two
weeks
kind
of
as
a
apology,
yeah
you're
near
completed?
I
mean
george
kind
of
doing
it
right
now,
just
by
accepting
all
things
which
is
part
of
the
part
of
the
fun
of
being
the
person
who
has
the
action
item,
you
just
get
to
look
like
you're
doing
a
lot
of
work.
I
A
Based
on
what
we
accomplished
today,
and
I
always
find
it
helpful
to.
I
A
Just
you
name
it
if
you
name
a
version
and
then
go
ahead
and
make
edits,
people
can
make
a
direct
comparison
between
so
whatever
what
is
exists
right
at
this
moment
can
be
compared
to
what
I
end
up
with.
If
people
want
to
know,
if
you
know
create
any
kind
of
mysterious
or
national
security,
anything
that
threatens
national
security
by
the
changes
that
I
make
it'll
be
visible,
sounds
good.
That
sounds
really
really
good.
Thank
you
sure.