►
From YouTube: CHAOSS DEI Working Group March 1 2023
Description
Minutes from this meeting can be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MzDk84BL7FfHDxbFxJz39M72V2Hfc5Y6oCPhOl6woxo/edit#heading=h.n3rh3l1y6dv7
A
B
B
A
A
B
A
Like
instantly
swimming
around
all
right,
so
let's
go
ahead
and
get
started.
I
think
we
have
a
couple
things
to
take
a
look
at
today.
So
I,
just
I
was
curious.
Elizabeth
I
know
you're
having
a
hard
time
talking,
but
if
there
were
any
kind
of
project
badging
updates
that
you
wanted
to
provide
I,
don't
know
that
we've
talked
about
this.
C
B
B
B
B
B
Talking
about
yeah
yeah
so
effectively,
so
we're
getting
started.
We're
kicking
this
project
off
now
and
there's
a
part
that
roots
that
Cass
Africa
is
working
on
and
the
part
that
we're
working
on
here
at
the
University
of
Missouri
and
so
in
between
at
the
granting
of
each
badge.
There's
a
test
of
the
dei.md
Award
badge.
B
So
we'll
look
for
tone
of
communication
inclusivity
in
communication,
but
we'll
be
very
careful
to
provide
English
language
recommendations
as
opposed
to
what
would
be
potentially
arbitrary
rankings.
We
don't
want
to.
We
don't
want
to
say
you're
this
good
or
this
bad.
We
want
to
provide
concrete
feedback
on
that's
qualitative
based
on
what
we
learned.
B
So
what
we're
developing
on
the
Missouri
end
during
that
time
are
is
that,
but
what
I
characterize
as
an
ethical,
thoughtful
human
in
implementation
of
machine
learning
to
to
help
Advance
Dei
in
open
source,
and
so
then
that
information
is
part
of
you
know.
Those
recommendations
will
be
part
of
what's
checked
at
the
next
badge
level.
A
C
Is
let's
forget,
if
it's
all
in
opensource.org
or
com
and
get
it
wrong
whatever
I
think
it
is
too
yeah
and
I?
Think
like
one
of
the
goals
of
the
the
whole
initiative
is
not
necessarily
to
just
give
out
badges
like
one
and
done
it's
to
help.
Maintainers
progress
along
the
path,
so
I
know
all
in
wants
to
help
them
through
resources
and
tooling
and
whatever
they
can
do
to
help
maintainers
attend
to
these
things.
In
that
you
know,
make
it
a
little
easier
for
them
to
do
that.
Yeah,
foreign.
C
Ers
the
ideas
the
maintainers
will
have
to
attend
to
more
and
more
Dei
metrics
kind
of
like
how
our
event
badging
is
so
like,
instead
of
us,
giving
the
whole
list
at
once,
we're
gonna
help
like
hand
hold
them
a
little
more
and
say
Here's.
These
four
things
do
these
and
now
next
level.
Let's
hear
some
more
things.
C
A
I
think
we
need
to
to
net
comment,
then,
okay,
so
just
so
people
kind
of
understand.
What's
going
on
here,
is
we're
asking
for
projects
to
include
a
dei.md
file
in
their
respective
repository
that
Dei
dot.
Md
file
is
a
self-report
on
how
a
project
attends
to
project
burnout,
newcomer
experience,
recognizing
contribution
and
inclusive
leadership,
at
least
that's
the
four
metrics
we
have
started
with
at
the
moment,
based
on
the
presence
of
that
yeah
Kevin
go
ahead.
Where.
A
A
A
Okay,
so
the
test
of
the
dei.md
file
is
really
just
testing
to
ensure
that
the
the
file
is
not
like
gibberish
or
Garbage
or
bad.
That
there's
actually
some
some
response
to
those
four
metrics.
The
one
thing
that
I
haven't
really
thought
about:
Elizabeth
Sean,
we
do.
We
have
talked
about
providing
community
members
an
opportunity
to
respond
to
that
yeah.
We
probably
want
to
formalize
like
how
that
would
occur.
B
B
That
that
is
that's
what
we
have
in
mind
with
looking
at
the
recommended,
so
the
recommendations
will
come
from
machine
Learning
Place
without
providing
a
machine
learning
score
and
we'll
be
testing
to
see.
If
those
things
change
over
time-
and
you
know
candidly-
we
have
to
do
a
little
trial
and
error
to
make
sure
that
you
know
we're
we're
giving
feedback.
That's
having
having
impact.
A
A
A
C
Really,
really
that's
the
only
way
that
we
can
validate
that
what's
in
the
dei.md
file
and
actual
truth
is
we're
going
to
have
to
rely
on
the
communities.
We
had
also
talked
about
doing
random
sampling
just
like
to
verify
through
reviewers,
but
that
might
be
something
that
we
try
to
get
all
in
to
do
personally.
I
think,
because
just
that
would
be
a
lot
like
if
you
want
right.
B
I
have
repertoire
of
seven
strategies
that
are
being
used.
Sentiments
analysis
is
only
one
of
those.
We
also
have
a
a
large
set
of
libraries
from
Health
and
Human
Services
in
the
US
government
that
looks
at
inclusive
language
explicitly
so
we'll
be
applying
those
tools
as
well
as
clustering
projects.
You
know,
according
to
the
patterns
of
communication,
that
they
have
looking
for
what
the
topics
are
and
also
examining
patterns
of
discourse
analysis.
So
when
questions
are
followed
by
answers
and
how
conversant
the
project
is
overall,
are.
D
B
There's
a
couple
of
just
as
an
aside
there's
a
couple
of
trained
sentiment
models
that
actually
are
directed
at
software
development,
specifically
because
you
know
a
bug
defect,
those
could
be
interpreted
negatively
and
it's
not,
and
it's
not
to
get
positive
right,
yeah
or
neutral
or
neutral
yeah.
It
should
yeah.
So
we
are
using
software
engineering
specific
models
for
that
part
of
it
right.
You.
A
B
C
A
B
A
B
A
And
so
it's
the
idea
is
yeah.
That
would
help
it
be
ethical
and
so
then,
in
order
to
get
a
silver
badge
to
Elizabeth's
point,
I
think
we'll
have
to
update
this
a
little
bit.
It's
continuing
to
address.
You
know
continuing
to
uphold
that
dei.md
file
as
addressing
those
four
metrics,
and
maybe
a
fifth
one
as
we
build
out
the
metric
set.
Is
that
correct
Elizabeth?
C
A
Sorry,
I
don't
get
it,
but
she
sells
a
lot
of
Records
Matt
so
and
I
think
maybe
in
the
dei.md5
we
have
the
silver
part.
Should
we
also
would
that
be
where
we
would
include
a
request
for
commentary
as
to
how
they
are
responding
to
that
communication
or
I'm?
Sorry,
the
community
inclusivity
report,
so
you
know
they
would
say
here
are
the
five
metrics
that
we're
still
addressing
you
know
what
I
mean
yeah.
B
A
Also
did
receive
a
report.
They
can
choose
to
share
it
or
not.
That's
not
our
responsibility,
but
here's
here's
what
we're
doing
to
improve
communication
inclusivity
within
our
project
as
well,
based
on
the
report
that
we
got,
do
you
think
that
should
be
in
the
dem.md
file,
I,
I
kind
of
do
just
from
a
centrality
perspective,
okay,
yeah.
A
A
Just
keep
it
keep
it
all
centrally
located,
and
then
we
do
another
test
against
that
dei.md
file,
probably
at
this
point.
Looking
for,
for
example,
not
only
the
four
but
that
newly
newly
provided
fifth
metric
along
with
some
way
to
address
the
communication
inclusivity
report
and
this
process
just
continues
on.
So
you
can
kind
of
see
the
dei.md
file
between
a
bronze
badge,
which
only
includes
four
metrics
and
the
Platinum
badge,
which
would
include
whatever
eight
metrics
plus
a
response
to
all
of
the
reports.
A
B
A
C
C
A
All
right
all
right,
thank
you,
everybody,
okay,
all
right!
Moving
on
so
I
think
we
got
that
so
the
with
respect
to
metrics.
We
had
talked
about
a
couple
last
week
and
I
just
wanted
to
bring
up
I
had
right
before
this
meeting
working
on
event,
location,
inclusivity,
trying
to
address
the
comments
that
were
in
there
and
stuff
like
that.
So
I
think
it's
coming
along
real
nicely.
A
A
A
D
What
I
was
that's,
what
I
was
actually
thinking
of,
maybe
edit
the
psychological
safety
metric
to
kind
of
address,
any
confusion
that
may
be
there,
because
I
think
the
original
intent
of
the
psychological
safety
metric
was
to
be
kind
of
inclusive
of
all
these
things,
but
yeah
so
I'm,
fine,
not
having
an
Olympic.
Okay.
B
A
D
D
A
A
C
A
I
did
add
these
just
this
is
pretty
common
right
now
in
our
metrics,
like
where
we're
kind
of
identifying
you
know,
people
that
might
have
a
particular
interest
in
the
metric,
so
I
didn't
organizers,
attendees
and
sponsors.
I
thought
were
the
three
yeah
they
might
care
about.
This
I
did
add
what
I
I
also
added
I
updated
these
images
and
I
added
a
date
for
these,
because
these
do
change.
A
B
The
only
the
only
thought
I
have
about
event
location
inclusivity
is
the
yeah
I
think
when
there
was
a
thing
above
about
conflicting
events
occurring
and
I,
think
the
reality
is
open.
Source
events
are
usually
National
at
least
or
Regional
in
nature,
and
are
planned
farther
in
advance
than
some
of
these
gatherings
of
hate
groups.
So
I
mean
it
might
be
impossible
to
overcome
that
like
it
may
be
difficult
to
to
to
know
that
and
and
deal
with
in
advance,
simply
because
those
kinds
of
events
are
usually
less
actually
I
heard.
D
I
think
that's
where
Elizabeth's
comment
from
earlier
comes
in,
so
it's
not
just
about
the
selection
of
the
event,
but
it's
also
how
the
event
addresses
situations
like
that
when
it
arises
right
the
event.
If,
if
there
is
something,
that's
happening,
that
could
be
problematic.
How
the
event
communicates
with
the
the
participants
in
the
potential
attendees
is
is
part
of
this
metric
or.
C
A
A
C
C
A
C
D
D
So
that
that
survey
we
could
we
could.
We
could
have
how
inclusive
was
the
event
location
added
to
that
survey
or
ask
them
to
ask
that
so
we
could
get
it
kind
of
on
both
ends.
So
the
the
event
the
event
is
addressing
it,
but
we're
also
surveying
the
participants
to
ensure
event,
location
inclusivity.
A
D
And
I
will
say
this
there.
The
the
reality
of
these
conferences
are
that
I
mean
people
are
going
to
have
conferences
in
Texas.
Texas
is
maybe
a
place
that
is
not
super
friendly
right
now
and
North
Carolina
as
a
North,
Carolina
or
Florida.
So
so
a
big
part
of
this
I
think
is
to
Elizabeth's
Point
earlier
about
how
the
conferences
addressed
that,
even
if
it
is
in
one
of
these
spaces.
A
A
You
know
Public
Health,
measures
that
are
in
place
either
at
the
conference
or
kind
of
in
the
region
and
I.
Don't
I,
don't
have
a
sense
that
that
metric
is
about
the
event.
Organizers
need
to
fix
it,
necessarily
they
just
or
or
they
have
to
do
a
particular
thing.
But
it's
just
about
that
they're
being
clear
about
what
is
going
on
with
respect
to
Public
Health.
C
Too,
for
event:
accessibility,
like
obviously
there
are
things
they
can
do
to
help
with
that,
but
it's
also
about
how
you
communicate
that
to
your
your
attendees
to
let
them
choose
and
I.
Think
that's
what
those
these
three
metrics
are
putting
it
in
the
control
in
the
hands
of
the
attendees
to
make
the
decision
if
they
want
to
go,
given
all
the
information
that
they
have.
D
D
A
D
Lot
of
it
is
about
kind
of
signaling
signaling
to
the
the
event
attendees
and
communicating
your
stance
to
the
event
attendees
that
I,
but
I
do
think
this
metric
is
also
about
selecting
the
location
right
so
having
a
conference
in
Texas,
for
example.
Right
now
is
you
are
making
that
decision,
even
though
you
are
aware
that
that
location
is
maybe
less
inclusive.
A
D
A
D
B
C
C
Yeah
I'm
just
going
to
ask
them
to
check
like
just
have
you
looked
to
see
if
this,
if
you're
you
know
like
and
that's
that'll
get
the
check,
and
if
it
is,
then
how
are
you
communicating
yeah
that
they'll
still
get
the
check,
even
if
it
is
like
you
said
in
a
place,
that's
not
great
as
long
as
they
checked
and
they're
aware
of
it.
That's
that's
enough
for
me.
Yeah.
D
D
I
think
the
way
it's
written
now
is
I
think
it's
coming
along
really
well
and
I
think
it
addresses
both
those
those
issues,
the
the
selection
and
the
and
the
communication
yeah
okay
from
the
actual
badging,
though
I
I
completely
agree.
We
just
you
just
have
to
ask
like,
is
the
I
mean?
Do
you
believe
that
your
event
location
is
inclusive.
A
D
A
D
A
C
A
A
So
so
you
did
that's
good
I,
just
okay!
That's
that's
great!
Thank
you
for
that.
So,
let's
see
my
blessing
I
see
that
you're
on
I
wanted
to
see.
If
you
wanted
to
talk
a
little
bit
about
the
tour
guides,
work
that
you're
doing
or
kind
of
see
where
that's
at
don't
mean
to
put
you
on
the
spot
too,
but
love
to
hear
from
you.
A
A
All
right
great
well,
if
I
guess,
if,
if
we
don't
have
an
update
on
the
tour
guides,
then
I
think
we're
kind
of
done
for
the
day.
I
think
we
just
have
the
to
bring
these
metrics
forward.
Elizabeth
and
kind
of
get
them
published
and
I
think
we're
good
to
go
and
take
a
second
to
look
at
all
of
your
all
of
your
pet
names.
You
have
mayor
stinker,
Huckleberry
bubbles,
raisin
and
Lucy
Nutter
butter,
Wally,
the
cat
and
kitty
love.
It
soggy
bottoms
all
right!
Well,
thank
you!
Everybody!
It's
it's
good
to
see!