►
From YouTube: CHAOSS.Value.March.12.2020
Description
CHAOSS.Value.March.12.2020
A
B
A
A
A
B
B
A
A
A
B
Honest
I
don't
have
a
particular
matrix
at
hand,
but
what
I
was
good
when
I
was
going
through
the
different
working
group
I,
just
I
was
just
inspired
to
see
that
there
are
a
lot
in
common
that
we
can
try
to
see
from
a
higher
level.
At
this
point
we
can
look
out.
Some
of
the
matrixes
relates
to
form
connects
a
body
like
to
represent
different
perspective
of
open-source
projects.
I
think
we
have
green.
We
agree
towards
some
sort
of
maturity
right
now
that
not
only
one
particular
set
of
project.
B
B
A
A
A
B
A
B
For
example,
for
example,
the
diversity
and
inclusion
working
group
they
have
is
set
of
like
that
aspect,
I've
already
looked
into
it
in
my
research
I'm,
actually
currently
working
on
opinion,
a
paper
on
that
that,
hopefully,
by
the
end
of
lets
in
anytime,
soon
I'll
be
public.
Are
we
submitting
not
obviously
submitting
that
paper?
B
How
that
diversity,
inclusion
of
also
used
concepts
in
the
evolution
of
working
group,
so
I've
actually
combined
in
my
studies,
I'm
really
combining
these
two
working
group
at
this
point
to
see,
especially
how
genders
you
know
the
agendas
like
gender
diversity.
I
am
also
looking
at
something
like
what
I
call
like
technical
diversity.
B
B
A
B
So
how
did
how
the
the
coordination
is
done
at
the
ecosystem
level
is
very
it's
complex,
okay,
yeah
and
the
only
way.
Well.
Not
only
do
we,
but
one
possible
way
that
can
facilitate
us
to
understand,
is
when
we
look
into
those
individual
matrixes
that
we
haven't
tried
to
see
higher
level,
then
we
can
understand
a
day,
an
ecosystem
level,
how
things
can
be
codes,
knitted.
A
A
B
B
B
A
A
B
For
the
letter,
I
did
I
did
a
lot
of
well
I'm.
My
research
is
mixed
method
as
I'm,
using
both
qualitative
and
quantitative
method.
For
example,
I
did
observational
studied,
which
is
a
qualitative
method
of
don't
interview
which
is
still
qualitative
I'm
doing
so
V
and
I'm
also
doing
like
mining
software
repositories.
These
are
empirical.
B
Method
in
like
in
quality,
quantitative
analysis,
so
the
thing
is
I
observe.
First
of
all,
I
try
to
observe
to
find
out
certain
reasons
why
things
are
happening.
The
way
they
happen
because
quantitatively
we
can
only
produce,
we
can
only
say
the
what
the.
Why
is
always
lacking
and
to
go
deeply
to
know
the
why
you
really
need
to
a
balance
method
of
research,
okay,.
A
B
B
B
So
this
kind
of
method-
and
that
is
where
the
the
diversity
and
inclusion
working
group
was
very
helpful
to
know
things
that
you
know
related
to
diversity
and
inclusion.
Then
we
do
evolution
our
working
group
talking
about
it.
The
technical
aspect
of
we
like
what
we
are
defining
matrixes
on
different
forms
of
community
contributions,
and
things
like
that
I
was
able
now
to
evaluate
how
you
know
different
genders.
A
B
B
B
A
B
A
About
the
background
of
your
study,
what
would
let's
see
if
P
submission
look
like
and
I'm?
Also
I'm
asking?
Is
this
something
that
you
just
want
to
do,
and
you
just
wanted
to.
Let
us
know
you're
doing
this,
or
did
you
actually
want
to
create
the
submission
together
as
a
working
group,
submission
well.
B
I'm
open
to
create
it
as
a
working
group
and
I
am
well
it's
something
that
I've
been
doing.
I
can
still
all
depends.
If
we,
you
know,
it's
always
good
to
have
collaborations,
because
two
is
better
than
one
and
when
people
come
together,
they
have
different
way
of
thinking
additional
knowledge
that
really
broadened
the
scope.
One
person
can
be
limited
in
one
direction:
yeah.
A
B
A
A
A
B
B
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
B
B
A
B
When
we
see
the
difference
of
doing
a
mixed
method
at
this
point,
then
we
can
now
pick.
Let's
say
by
the
way
now
just
have
to
ask
one
question:
do
you
know
any
kind
of
common
phenomenon
it
might
not
be
on
body?
It
can
be
something
else
that
we
really
want
to
pick
as
something
that
can
be
liked,
but
the
community
is
looking
for
a
solution
towards
I'm.
Just
asking
do
we
know
anything
of
hand
that
most
eco
system
or
any
project
can
really
be
looking
a
solution?
What
is
it
can
it
be
contribution?
B
A
B
A
So
and
the
way
that
I
understand
the
challenge,
they
are
asking
people
to
come
up
with
ideas
and
they
still
need
to
release
the
details
of
what
they're
looking
for
and
then
you
can
submit
your
idea
and
they
have
a
stipend
if
your
idea
gets
elected
to
actually
work
on
that
idea
and
implement
it.
Okay,.
B
Okay,
okay,
so
in
a
way,
okay,
let's
say
this
might
be
too
specific
for
the
genome
community,
but
you
are
metal.
Your
approach
can
be
generalized.
For
example,
let's
see
when
you
observe,
let's,
if
you
interview
10
people,
any
kind
of
open-ended
interview
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you
will
try
to
regroup
those
ideas.
You
put
them
together
and
try
to
four
to
do.
B
Let's
say
it's
kind
of
transcription
when
you
try
not
to
from
common
patterns
on
what
people
now
said,
you
put
those
key
terms
and
try
to
inform
meaning
at
a
higher
level.
So,
at
the
end
of
the
day,
you
come
up
with
an
idea
that
is
concrete,
where
represented
and
from
the
Pico,
because
you'll
be
having
different
things.
B
So
when
we
build
this
kind
of
abstraction
well,
only
let
me
see
like
what
the
genome
is
doing,
that
they
sell
like
one
particular
person,
one
person's
idea
this
year
there
is
no
one
person.
I'd
say
that
is
winning
you
understand
what
I
mean
we
take
the
best
idea
of
every
person.
We
try
to
form
those
ideas
into
because
we
structure
those
ideas
and
from
hierarchy
were
a
structure
of
higher
level.
B
B
B
Approach
in
the
sense
that
at
this
point
we
either
go
with,
let's
say,
and
we
tell
people
how
the
methods
that
we
are
using
is
it
interview.
Is
it
observation
we
try
to
do
some
free
because
I
think
interview
be
very
practical
at
this
point
of
view,
since
we
can
simulate
a
kind
of
to
three
minutes
interview,
you
understand
also.
A
B
B
A
B
B
A
A
B
B
A
A
B
B
Now
I
think
when
we
have
this
section,
we
now
introduce
the
amount,
because
we
are
talking
about
mixed
meter
this
one.
Now
we
have
been
talking
about
qualitative
matter.
We
now
points
them
now
the
kind
of
information
that
we
end
up
extracting
from
this
method
and
how
qualitative
method
we
come
out,
points
them
now
how
people
have
been
doing
lately,
mining
software
repositories
to
find
other
forms
of
information.
B
A
B
B
We
want
to
see-
let's
say
the
highest
contributor
of
this,
something
like
that.
We
can
formulate
something
like
that.
Maybe
keep
what
we
have
done.
At
least
it's
handy.
We
keep
the
first
thing
that
we
have
written
here.
Then
we
can
just
you
know
also.
Alternatively,
we
can
also
ask
them
to
go
like
we
choose
any
project
that
is
common
and
ask
people
to
look
for
the
highest
contributor
in
a
given
period
of
time.
I
know
in
a
git
repository
and
things
like
that.
B
For
sure,
by
the
time
we
are
doing
this
now
the
the
end
point
now
we
each
method
will
have,
as
I
said,
to
have
one
message
it
is
passing
on.
But
when
we
put
both
methods,
the
qualitative
and
quantitative,
we
see
a
bigger
picture,
so
the
aim
now
is.
We
want
to
see
a
bigger
picture
that
one
method
alone
cannot
give
the
true
representation
of
that
knowledge.
So
people
will
not
appreciate
to
answer
the.
Why
and
the
what.
A
A
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
To
compare
what
to
compare
the
results
and
just
be
like
something:
two
minutes:
can
you
can
walk
in
that,
comparing
the
results,
because
something
we
do
SH
one
group
was
doing
this.
Other
group
was
doing
that.
We
just
highlight
and
say:
okay,
this
is
the
result
and
we
show
them
the
strength
and
the
weakness
of
each.
B
A
A
B
B
B
A
A
B
A
A
B
B
B
B
Like
we
said,
we
give
a
one
page
of
qualitative
interview.
At
least
we
should
start
walking
towards
that
now.
The
project
that
with
we
can
refer
people
to
for
the
book,
the
qualitative
and
quantitative
analysis
so
that
they
could
contain.
We
should
have
those
one
pages
do
for
one
pages
handy.
We
should
start
looking
how
to
come
up
with
those.
B
Also
in
our
working
groups,
even
the
might
might
be
we
we
introduce
the
working
group.
Then
we
speak
some
key
matrixes.
That
will
really
be
useful
for
this
kind
of
analysis
and
just
points.
Then
we
are
not
going
like,
let's
say
to
detail
in
it
baby.
We
just
presented.
We
release
this
matrix
this
and
many
others.
We
just
highlight
those
using.