►
From YouTube: CHAOSS Weekly Hangout: May 29, 2018
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
C
C
B
C
B
So
I
messed
I'm
asking
why
that's
the
question
and
I'm
sure
we
found
a
wire
in
Portland
prata
router,
so
that
would
be
our
our
worst
location
Aereo,
but
might
be
pretty
sure
because
I've
been
to
that
campus
before
this
is
just
a
regular
guest
network,
but
I'll
confirm
it
I'll
make
sure
that
we
have
Wi-Fi
and
then
it's
on
my
to-do
list
this
week.
You
perfect.
A
Chaos
calm,
so
we
have
the
submission
still
open,
I
think
we
had
set
them
up
until
the
end
of
the
month
and
I
was
just
looking
at
it.
We
have
seven
submissions
so
far,
so
they
started
coming
in
the
last
couple
days.
So
if
anyone
is
still
planning
something
please
do
submit
this
is
it?
Is
it
the
end
end
of
the
month
I?
For
some
reason,
I.
B
Know,
hey
Susan
I
actually
put
something
in
just
as
a
in
case.
Nobody
else
put
something
and
we
have
some
place
to
start,
but
I'm
hoping
when
we
see
the
list.
We
did
get
promoted
a
lot
of
this
so
he'll
workshop
here
at
XT,
and
we
have
to
attach
take
a
lot
of
my
comments
on
social
media
with
chaos
and
I
made
one
today
they're
the
keynote.
B
B
C
C
A
A
What
else
maybe
don't
have
an
agenda
so
anything
else?
Anyone
wants
to
talk
about
its
per
game.
I
can
give
an
update
on
the
metrics.
We
have
a
pull
request
open.
That
is
just
changing
the
image
on
the
readme
because
it
was
still
from
before
me
switch
to
the
goal.
Question
metric
approach,
so
I'm
waiting
on
a
review
before
I
can
merge
it
you
another
pull
request
on
the
metrics
repository
that
comes
from
the
growth
maturity
decline,
workgroup
and
Sean.
Did
you
author
that
do
you
want
to
talk
about
that
briefly?
Yeah.
B
I
did
it's?
Basically,
there
were
semantic
and
I
think
I
explained
this.
In
the
floor
request,
there
were
some
activity,
metrics
that
are
clearly
growth,
maturity
and
decline,
activity
that
inside
of
the
activity,
metrics
folder
that
didn't
get
linked
to
any
of
the
four
working
groups
and
the
search
West,
just
as
I
think
referred
to
thing,
they
called
the
Lee
orphanage
I
just
said
this
is
this
is
full
request.
A
B
B
B
There
there
is
I,
don't
think
there
are
any
changes
between
them
in
the
growth
maturity
of
the
client
area
and
and
but
I
did
that
I
did
it
in
both
because
I
was
just
trying
to
get
them
like
herbs
so
that
we
were.
We
were
starting
from
an
even
jumping-off
point
that
in
my
mind
that
wasn't
the
work
of
the
working
group
that
was
just
as
sort
of
yet
the
work
of
setting
it
out
working
groups.
That
was
my
logic.
A
A
A
We
started
out
with
that
long
list
and
then
we
filtered
it
down
to
the
to
the
categories
with
the
very
few
comparatively
few
metrics
that
were
the
most
common
ones
or
the
most
widely
used
or
I.
Don't
I,
don't
know
what
the
criteria
actually
that
is,
but
putting
the
metrics
back
in
is
that
step
forward,
or
is
that
going
to
the
state
that
we
were
in
before,
where
it
becomes
fluttered
or
less
focused?
That
is
just
something
I'm
not
quite
for
I
have
a
question.
B
That's
and
I
think
that
I
can't
answer
that
without
discussion,
I
think
there's
a
little
bit
of
zooming
in
zooming
out
that
happens.
So
when
we
zoom
it
when
we
zoom
out
I
think
we
can
say:
okay
like
there's
some
things
like
pull,
requests
that
are
largely
specific
to
like
github
and
get
lab,
and
so,
if
you're,
using
either
of
those
repository
platforms
than
the
polar
West
is
Atlantic.
B
C
B
For
understanding
what
our
repos
at
and
then
there's
a
bunch
that
are
maybe
secondary
and
then
there
are
probably
another
set
that
is
platform
specifically
but
important.
So
if
I'm,
if
I'm,
managing
a
new
web
framework
repository,
pull
requests
is
a
really
important
indicator
of
you
know:
number
for
X
number
of
law
requests
for
lost
acceptance,
rates
or
post
acceptance
rates,
in
particular
on
github,
which
is
a
deal
in
repositories.
Now
it
helps
you
understand
how
welcoming
the
community
is
outside
like
stuff,
so
I
mean
these.
Are
I
think
these
are
working
your
questions?
A
B
B
So
there
are
these
common
filters
that
people
apply,
and
so
the
definition
of
those
metrics
and
what's?
Why
would
I
think
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
we're
getting
some
input
from
people
who
are
community
managers
who
are
looking
at
those
kinds
of
things
and
yeah
I'm
just
thinking
out
loud
here
that
may
require
some
retail
recruitment
of
people
to
give
feedback,
and
maybe
it's
not.
That
is
coming
meeting,
because
I
still
think
we're
figuring
out
how
to
communicate.
Okay.
A
B
B
C
B
That
works
or
yeah
that's
what
that
seems
off
kind
of
feedback
if
we
don't
give
them
something
concrete,
yet
I
think
between
the
Jupiter,
notebooks
and
augur.
We
have
ways
of
doing
that
and
we
just
need
to
get
that
new
order
low,
which
you
know
we're
going
on
our
third
reading.
So
it's
not
likely
don't
feel
by
buying
it,
but
like
kind
of
being
candid
about
where
we're
at
yeah
I'm
optimistic
as
well
yeah,
there
are
a
lot
of
good
there
like
that
things
happening.
Yeah,
yeah,.
A
C
A
B
B
C
B
About
is:
is
there
do
you
have
you
know
we're
trying
to
work
towards
these
working
groups
instead
of
separating
software
and
metrics,
but
I
guess
are?
Is
there
adequate
software
group
participation
or
you?
Do
you
all
feel
like
they're,
in
position
to
building
simpler
metrics
at
this
point?
Is
there
is
there's
the
dog
reflection,
a
zoom,
our
that
you
think,
is
neither
helpful
and
I
guess
if
there
is
let
let
us
know,
yeah.