►
From YouTube: July 15, 2019 COTW Policy and Personnel Committee
Description
July 15, 2019 COTW Policy and Personnel Committee
B
D
C
E
C
E
C
Understand
you
go
my
native
what
mechana
wearing
so
because,
if
ones
who
can
do
this-
and
this
creep
adheres
kind
of
have
a
phone
here,
the
other
group
and
have
a
beer
and
to
be
you
know,
really
have
a
policy
when
you
put
me
to
do
it
that
way,
but
something
consistent
across
the
board
you
know,
for
everybody
should
be
the
same
to
me,
is
better
I.
Think.
B
You
know
I
mean
if
it
becomes
a
problem,
I
think
it's
something
we
would
revisit,
but
you
know
because
I've
kind
of
battled
with
that
as
well,
especially
with
elementary
kids.
Why
do
you
know
why
do
they
even
need
a
home
period,
but
I
think
we
should
allow
the
principal's
to
have
some
feedback
and
have
some
say
about
what's
going
on
on
their
campus
and
so
I
think?
If
we
can
do
that,
then
we
could
monitor
and
see.
What's
going
on,
you.
C
E
E
C
B
D
I
think
my
answer
is
embedded
in
here,
because
if
and
I
do,
I
actually
applaud
you
for
allowing
the
schools
to
make
some
of
these
decisions.
I
think
the
board
has
said
over
and
over,
and
certainly
the
public
has
said,
our
schools
know
what's
best
for
their
students.
So
this
is
a.
This
is
a
step
in
that
direction.
I
just
want
to
make
sure,
because
we
have
a
lot
of
movement
in
certain
areas.
It's
going
to
be
in
the
student
handbook
at
the
beginning
of
the
school
year
and
it'll
be
a
policy.
D
E
D
C
C
C
B
C
F
So
students
do
not
lose
their
constitutional
rights
inside
of
a
school
building
and
I.
Think
that
may
be
what
the
sentence
regarding
law
enforcement
he
their
guidelines
refers
to
and
that
they
still
have
to
fall
within
the
same
parameters
of
Miranda,
for
example.
So
if
they're
interrogating
a
student
regarding
the
situation
which
may
lead
to
implicating
themselves
about
a
criminal
matter,
then
the
same
Miranda
rules
would
apply
either
the
child
or
the
student.
F
If
they
are
of
appropriate
age
and
sound,
mind
would
have
to
waive
their
rights
and
or
a
parent
would
have
to
be
solicited
to
the
scene.
That's
we
present
that
interview
depend
on
that
Department
guidelines.
I,
think
what
the
policy
intends
to
address
is
the
idea
of
school
resource
officers
regarding
school,
related
matters,
and
their
question
of
students
is
not
currently
addressed
in
the
policy.
So.
G
F
C
So
if
it's,
if
it's
a
school
related
matter,
that
would
go
first.
What
to
the
teacher,
something
like
that
teacher
or
principal
looking
diverse
in
other?
In
other
words,
why
does
it
go
to,
while
the
teacher
and
the
police
officer
involvement
like
the
wild
wild,
that
police
officer
brought
in
the
scene
immediately?
What
am
I
seeing
bothers
policy
sure.
F
I
would
say
that
progression
does
go
that
an
administrator
or
a
school
staff
member
initiate
some
sort
of
action.
That
then
requires
yes
erode
to
become
involved,
but
I
think
that
there's
a
lot
more
informal
scenarios
that
happen,
for
example,
an
SRO
monitoring
the
hallway
during
class
exchanges
and
sees
two
students
running
down
the
hall,
one
chasing
the
other,
and
one
of
them
has
another
half
the
other
students.
They
want
to
stop
and
say:
whoa
what's
going
on
here?
What
do
you
want?
F
What
y'all
doing
that
there
is
them
quick
student
about
something
involving
the
school,
and
so
not
speaking
to
that
type
of
question
in
the
policy
was
something
that's
created.
Some
question
I
just
want
to
clarify
that
it
is
okay
for
an
SRO
to
speak
with
a
student
if
they
observe
something
or
if
they're
involved
with
a
student
about
something
related
to
school.
F
Even
if
it's
that
student
reporting,
their
cell
phone
was
stolen
or
that
student
reporting
a
crime
to
the
school
resource
officer,
definitely
this
policy
gives
them
the
cover
to
to
speak
with
them
about
that,
but
a
lot
of
the
same
time
requiring
them
to
adhere
to
their
own
law
enforcement
guidelines.
If
you
do
need
to
get
a
parent
involved,
because
you
do.
H
C
So
you're
going
to
be
saying,
is
just
what
I'm
getting
at
we'll
see
what
this
is
doing.
It
you're
saying
the
police
officer
can
get
involved
in
school,
related
matters
made
behaviors
or
incident,
or
maybe
two
kids
pushing
each
other
talking
out
loud
with
what
it
is
putting
there.
Let's
put
in
there,
that's
right
the
police
department
in
charge
of
behavior
in
the
classroom
in
the
hallway,
and
that's
really
not
with
us.
C
I
was
there
for
is
there
to
provide
a
level
of
security
and
safety,
but
but
this
is
putting
him
a
part
of
our
discipline
process
and
that's
my
problem
with
this
policy.
What
you're
writing
that
you
involve
the
police
officers
in
matters
that
may
not
necessarily
have
ever
escalated
to
literally
show
up
at
all
sure.
F
F
May
be
called
in
to
wear
your
trusted
adult
hat,
so
you
might
be
a
trusted
adult
in
that
school
who
a
student
has
a
very
positive
relationship
with,
and
you
were
being
asked
to
get
involved
because
you
might
be
able
to
speak
to
them
to
deescalate
a
situation
or
get
them
to
voluntarily
comply
with
a
situate
of
them.
But
if
you're
unsuccessful
wearing
your
trusted
adult
hat.
But
it's
not
something
that
would
require
you
to
take
law
enforcement
action.
The.
A
F
F
F
C
F
A
So
so
I
have
some
deep
concerns
about
the
existing
policy
in
a
ways.
Written
I
have
to
agree
with
some
of
what
Reverend
Collins
just
stated,
and
but
you
and
I
both
know
that
police
officers
are
trained
to
be
police
officers,
no
matter
what,
when,
where
there,
that
hat
is
always
on
so
it's
it
may
be
a
thin
line,
but
it's
a
line
that
a
police
officer
will
always
walk
so,
but
there
are
some
room
for
some
improvement.
Some
improvements
here
in
this
existing
policy
is
something
that
we
do
need
to
visit.
A
A
D
And
I
I
kind
of
have
to
echo
we've
had
a
couple
of
very
you
but
know
better
than
anybody
else,
the
last
couple
of
years
with
the
role
of
SRO.
So
it's
kind
of
a
seismic
shift
to
wake
up
and
find
something
that
says
school
resource
officers
may
question
students
about
any
matter
pertaining
to
the
operation
of
a
school
and
or
enforcement
of
its
rules.
It
does
look
like
we're
opening
the
door
to
have
SROs
talking
to
students
about
why
they're
not
obeying
the
rules
of
the
school,
it
does
look
like
we're.
D
Having
SRO
is
being
allowed
to
be
asked
by
teachers
to
discuss
things
that
are
totally
legal,
but
are
misbehaving
and
it
I
think
it
does.
It
certainly
raises
a
red
flag,
given
the
shift
that
we've
been
trying
to
make
to
say
that
our
staffs
and
our
student
concern
specialists
and
the
the
definite
need
for
mental
health
and
wraparound
support
services.
I
have
to
agree
with
with
Reverend
Mac
and
Reverend
Collins
that
the
wording
may
be
may
be.
The
intention
sounds
different,
but
the
words
say
they
can.
B
D
I
When
I
pull
some
information
down
from
my
road
trip,
we
did
a
couple
of
months
ago
and
what
they
do
with
their
police
officer.
The
SOR
and
I'm
gonna
see
her
there's
ago.
They
put
them
to
a
particular
training,
little
to
use
them
in
the
same
manner
as
what
we're
describing
now
so
I'm
just
curious
to
see
how
just
them
you
know
can
reveal
it
and
seal
it
could
be
added
to
it
or
everyone
can
do
to
make
it
better.
That's
all!
Okay,.