►
From YouTube: CCSD Audit and Finance Committee Meeting | June 7, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Well,
good
afternoon,
everyone
we're
going
to
go
ahead
and
get
started.
Mr
gabrowski
is
on
his
way,
but
I'm
gonna
go
to
get
everything
started.
He
should
be
be
here
by
the
time
we
start
executive
session.
So
we're
going
to
start
by
calling
this
meeting
to
order.
It
is
202p
and
you
cannot
entertain
the
motion
to
adopt
the
agenda
so
moved.
Second,
all
right.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
I,
don't
believe,
there's
any
discussion
on
this.
A
Do
we
all
right,
let's
go
ahead
and
take
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye
opposed
all
right,
I,
believe
that
is
everyone
and
I
as
well,
but
we
have
the
adoption
of
the
agenda.
Let's
go
forward
with
the
approval
of
the
minister.
We
have
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
to
move
a
second
all
right.
We
have
a
motion
in
a
second
any
discussion
on
the
minutes,
all
right
hearing,
none,
let's
go
ahead
and
pick
a
vote
all
in
favor,
say
aye,
aye
and
I
as
well.
A
The
eyes
have
it
any
opposed
and
hearing
none.
The
promotion
moves,
let's
go
ahead
and
take
a
vote
to
go
into
executive
session.
A
Any
we
have
a
motion
to
go
into
executive
session
motion.
Second,
you
have
a
motion
in
a
second
any
discussion
hearing,
none,
let's
take
the
vote,
all
in
favor,
say
aye
aye,
aye
aye
as
well.
The
eyes
have
it.
We
are
now
and
executive
session
at
bird
of
the
committee
about
we'll
call
you
back
in
shortly.
B
B
B
Are
there
any
objections
to
this
hearing?
None
the
motion
passes.
We
will
move
on
to
item
5B,
which
is
the
union
peer
tax,
increment
financing,
Tiff
proposal.
B
B
Are
there
any
objections
to
this
motion
hearing
none
the
motion
passes
and
we'll
move
on
to
item
five
C,
which
is
contractual
matter.
District
20
facility
lease
agreement,
CCS
MS
and
there
is
a
motion-
I
mean
I-
need
an
emotion
to
recommend
to
the
board
to
approve
a
facility
lease
agreement
with
the
Charleston
Charter
Math
and
Science
to
run
concurrent
with
their
Charter
card
and
tract
I
have
a
second
second.
B
B
5D
is
a
contractual
matter
with
District
c
community
academics,
Fitness
Academy,
there's
a
motion:
you
have
this
motion
move
recommended
to
the
board
to
approve
a
facility
lease
agreement
with
the
community
academic
Fitness
Academy,
once
verification
of
funds
has
been
determined,
do
I
have
a
second.
Second,
any
objections
to
this
motion
hearing
none.
The
motion
passes.
B
C
D
Hello,
everybody
I'm
Carol
Clark
from
Haynesville,
Central,
Boyd,
Bond,
Council
I.
Think
most
of
you
have
seen
me
many
many
times
before
and
also
with
us
is
Jay
Glover
from
pfm,
who
is
the
financial
advisor
to
the
district,
and
we
just
wanted
to
brief
you
for
on
an
issue.
That's
out
there
on
the
horizon
that
we're
trying
to
gear
up
and
get
ready
for
in
the
event
that
the
market
cooperates.
But
these
are
what
we're
looking
at
doing
is
the
refinancing
of
the
remaining
outstanding
2013
installment
purchase
revenue
bonds.
D
These
are
the
bonds
that
were
issued
by
C5,
the
Charleston
educational
Excellence
financing
corporation.
On
behalf
of
the
school
district
and
the
original
bonds.
We
issued
back
in
2004
5006
to
finance
the
school
district's
2005
to
2009
building
program,
and
then
some
of
you
may
have
been
around
in
2013.
D
We
refinanced
all
of
the
2005
bonds
and
then,
a
few
years
ago,
2020
we
refinanced
a
portion
of
those
2013
bonds
with
some
taxable
bonds,
because
Market
was
so
strong,
then
that
we
were
able,
even
with
taxable
bonds
to
generate
a
substantial
savings.
And
so
now
what
we're
looking
at
doing
is
refunding
the
remaining
outstanding
2013
installment
purchase
revenue
bonds
for
again
for
for
savings,
and
the
difference
this
time
around
is
that
the
2013
bonds
are
callable
in
on
December
1
of
this
year.
D
And
so,
if
we
issue
Bonds
on
or
after
September
1st
of
this
year,
that
will
count
as
a
current
refunding.
So
these
funds
will
be
able
to
be
issued
as
tax
exempt,
and
we
started
this
process
a
couple
of
months
ago
with
pfm
and
Wells
Fargo,
who
is
the
underwriter
of
of
these
types
of
bonds,
because
the
market
was
really
strong
and
Jay
will
talk
more
about
this.
D
The
Market's
moved
away
a
little
bit,
but
this
is
a
process
of
it
takes
a
few
months
to
get
from
the
starting
point
to
being
able
to
sell
the
bonds,
and
so
what
we
want
to
do
right
now
is
get
this
geared
up,
get
it
approved.
If,
if
the
board
agrees
and
then
have
our
documents
prepared
so
that
beginning
about
Late
Late
July,
we
will
be
in
a
position
to
to
price
these
bonds.
D
When
we
have
a
have,
hopefully,
a
good
run
in
the
market,
I
know
Jay
has
prepared,
or
we've
actually
worked
jointly
on
the
first
part
of
this,
a
presentation
which
kind
of
goes
through
the
structure.
D
In
part,
we
met
with
the
finance
incorporation
back
on
May
16th
to
to
kind
of
fill
them
in
on
all
of
this
and
I
see
approved
their
resolution
at
the
time
that
was,
that
was
approving
this
whole
transaction
and
we
brought
them
up
to
speed
kind
of
where
the
market
was
at
that
point
and
did
kind
of
a
quick
run
through
in
the
structure
of
these
funds.
You
may
recall
that
this
is
a
little
unusual
in
that
the
school
district
leases.
D
The
land,
the
site
for
the
schools
to
the
financing
Corporation,
the
financing
Corporation
issued
the
original
bonds
back
in
the
mid
2000s
to
provide
the
proceeds
to
to
build
the
new
schools
and
they're
leasing
them
back
to
this
school
district
and
the
school
district
is
buying
them
over
time,
sort
of,
as
it
says,
an
installment
purchase,
Jay
and
I
met
with
Mr,
Grabowski
and
Mr
Calhoun
I
guess
it
was
about
a
week
ago
just
to
talk
through
the
structures.
D
Since
so
far,
the
board
has
really
only
seen
General
obligation
debt,
and
this
is
just
a
completely
different
animal.
So
Jay
do
you
want
to
bring
up
the
presentation?
E
B
E
E
Okay,
perfect,
can
you
all
see
my
screen?
Yes,
great,
so
Carol
you
want
to
just
I
know
we,
the
first
few
slides
here
we
went
through
with
Mr
Grabowski
and
Mr
Calhoun
pretty
in
depth.
Talking
about
the
structure.
I,
don't
know
that
we
need
to
necessarily
go
through
all
of
that
again,
unless
the
other
committee
members
would
want
to.
You
know,
hear
that
again.
We
also
provided
just
as
history
some
information
about
the
projects
that
were
originally
financed
back
in
2004.
E
As
you
can
see
here,
2005
was
the
large
list
of
projects
that
were
done
here
and
then
in
20
2006.
We
did
another
list
of
projects
really
to
fund
the
majority
of
the
capital
program
prior
to
when
the
current
sales
tax
program
was
put
into
play
so
and
then
this
next
slide,
as
Carol
mentioned,
we've
been
very
proactive
with
your
help.
The
school
board's
help
and
obviously
the
School
District
staff
to
refund
a
number
of
financings,
as
we've
been
in
kind
of
a
favorable
Market
position,
with
declining
interest
rates
really
over
the
last.
E
You
know
10
plus
years,
so
you
can
see
here
on
this
slide,
that
between
the
general
obligation,
bonds
and
the
installment
purchase
revenue
bonds,
we've
done
a
number
of
refundings
that
have
equated
to
about
90
million
dollars
worth
of
Debt
Service
savings
on
a
Net,
Present
Value
basis
and
as
Carol
mentioned
back
in
2020,
which
is
the
last
line
here.
We
refunded
the
most
efficient
maturities
of
the
2013
B
bonds
and
got
about
15
million
dollars
worth
of
savings,
and
we're
here
today
to
request
your
permission
to
actually
refund
the
remaining
balance
of
those
bonds.
E
Now
that
we're
in
the
current
call
window
and
can
do
a
tax
exempt
current
refunding
the
next
few
slides
really
demonstrate
why
this
opportunity
is
able
to
be
taken
advantage
of
here
today
and
what
this
shows
is
the
tax
exempt
AAA
Geo
yield
curve.
So
it's
where
the
highest
credit
quality
tax
exempt
borrowers
can
borrow
in
today's
market
and
you
can
see
by
the
blue
lines.
E
We
have
a
very
oddly
shaped
yield
curve
whereby
you
have
you
know
High
rates
on
the
very,
very
shortest
in
the
yield
curve
at
one
year
and
then,
as
you
get
out
to
two
years
through,
say
maybe
10
years,
you
have
a
dip
in
the
yield
curve
which
results
in
low
borrowing
rates,
which
is
where
our
bonds
are
maturing.
So
we're
getting
the
benefit
of
that
dip
in
the
yield
curve
that
we've
seen
to
actually
take
advantage
of
an
opportunity
that
presents
itself.
E
E
That
shows
taxable
interest
rates
when
we
actually
do
this
refunding
we'll
get
the
proceeds
and
we'll
actually
put
them
into
an
escrow
account
for
a
90-day
period
before
the
bonds
are
paid
off
and
we
can
actually
invest
those
proceeds
taxably
at
a
three-month
yield
and
the
way
the
yield
curve
is
shaped.
E
Now,
actually,
three-month
rates
are
higher
than
even
one-year
rates
or
ten
year
rates
or
even
30-year
rates,
because
the
three-year
yield
right
now
is
about
a
5.3
percent,
so
we're
going
to
be
borrowing
at
a
very
attractive
tax,
exempt
interest
rate
and
we'll
be
investing
those
proceeds
at
over
five
percent,
which
allows
us
to
earn
positive
Arbitrage
in
the
escrow.
So
there's
a
dynamic
about
low
borrowing
rates
and
high
investment
rates
that
makes
this
opportunity
present
itself
in
today's
market
in
terms
of
historical
perspective.
E
E
These
beige
bars
show
the
range
of
where
rates
have
been
over
the
last
10
years,
and
you
can
see,
on
the
left
hand,
chart
this
dark
blue
line
here,
where
we're
actually
borrowing
for
this
loan
we're
pretty
much
near
the
10-year
historical
averages,
maybe
a
little
higher
than
that,
but
still
a
very
attractive
level,
whereas
on
the
investment
side
we're
borrowing
within
one
year,
we're
investing
within
one
year
we're
really
at
the
all-time
highs
in
terms
of
where
those
rates
have
been.
E
So
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
unique
circumstance
with
this
inverted
yield
curve
that
actually
allows
us
to
take
advantage
of
this
opportunity,
and
it
so
happens
that
it's
when
we're
in
our
current
call
window.
So
that's
really
the
dynamic
that
makes
this
opportunity
available
to
us
in
today's
market.
This
slide
shows
what
we're
projecting
in
terms
of
savings
and
I
will
mention
that
this
slide
was
actually
put
together
for
the
Charleston
educational
Excellence.
E
Financing
Corporation
meeting
rates
have
changed
a
little
bit
since
then
I
think
we're
all
aware
of
the
debt
ceiling
issues
that
the
market
faced
over
the
last
several
several
weeks,
that
made
rates
increase
some.
Since
that
issue
has
been
resolved.
We've
seen
rates
retract
back
down
some
we're
hoping
that
they
will
continue
to
do
so.
So
when
we
put
this
presentation
together,
we
were
looking
at
about
seven
million
dollars
of
Net
Present
Value
Debt
Service
savings,
or
about
five
percent
of
the
refunded
bonds
par
amount.
E
As
we
sit
here
today,
that
savings
is
just
a
little
over
six
million
dollars
or
about
four
percent
of
the
refunded
bonds
par
amount.
So
we've
lost
a
little
bit
of
that,
but
still
a
good
savings
level
and
the
Hope
over
the
next
several
weeks
is
that,
as
the
debt
ceiling
issue
gets
further
behind
us,
that
rates
might
settle
down
even
further.
But
the
one
thing
to
note
for
your
consideration
is
the
resolution
that
the
sief
approved
and
that
we're
requesting
the
school
board
to
approve.
E
If
you
all
move
this
forward
requires
at
least
a
four
percent
savings
parameter.
So
if
rates
deteriorate
further
and
our
savings
are
diminished,
we
will
not
move
forward
with
the
financing
and
if
we
don't
move
forward,
there's
no
cost
to
the
district
for
the
preparation
of
the
of
the
documents
and
everything.
So
we
only
move
forward
if
we
meet
our
savings
parameter
and
if
we
don't,
then
there's
no
cost
to
the
district.
So
again
with
that
happy
to
address
any
questions
you
all
might
have
about
the
market
or
the
transaction
being
contemplated
here
today.
B
Hearing
no
questions
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
that
we
recommend
to
the
board
for
them
to
make
a
motion
to
adapt.
The
resolution
authorizing
the
issuance
of
installment
purchase
revenue
refunding
bonds
in
one
or
more
series
to
run
refund,
all
or
portions
of
the
outstanding
callable
maturities
of
the
Charleston
educational
Excellence
financing,
Corporation
installment
purchase
revenue,
refunding
bonds
series
2013
B
at
such
times
that
marking
conditions
exist
to
provide
a
Net,
Present
Value
Debt,
Service
Savings
of
at
least
four
percent
can
I
have
a
second.
F
B
Before
we
vote
any
discussions,
I
would
like
to
say:
I
I
appreciate
the
education
you
gave.
This
is
a
an
extremely
wonderful
opportunity.
I
will
explain
it
to
the
board.
You
know
that
this
window
only
opens
up
every
10
years.
It's
just
bizarre
that
we
can
drop
long-term
debt
and
then,
at
the
same
time,
during
the
period
of
closing
on
the
make
money,
I
mean
it's
just.
It
was
an
amazing
presentation.
I
I
just
had
to
go
home
and
try
to
figure
this
one
out.
B
Why
not
me,
but
anyway,
I'd
like
to
take
a
vote.
Are
there
any
objections
to
this
motion?
Hearing
none
the
motion
passes
and
we
will
move
on
to
item
6B.
Thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
H
H
Many
many
years
ago,
back
in
1962,
the
South
Carolina
passed
a
state
code
that
allowed
boards
to
be
able
to
determine
how
schools
were
used
in
the
after
hours.
So
that's
where
our
facility
use
program
actually
generated
many
years
ago
by
our
Board
of
Trustees,
because
they
wanted
to
open
up
our
facilities
after
hours
to
the
community.
So
just
to
give
you
a
little
history
on
that,
but
this
is
what
this
guide
is
about.
We
actually
came
before
the
board
back
in
2000
fiscal
year
2016
with
some
significant
changes.
H
We
did
a
market
analysis
of
our
facilities
and
how
they
were
being
used
and
compared
them
to
other
facilities
across
the
southeast
to
determine
if
the
rates
we
were
charging
for
our
facilities
were
in
line.
We
determine
when
we
look
at
those
rates
that
we
needed
to
adjust
those
those
rates
are
based
off
of
what
we
call
three
different
categories.
We
look
at
Cost
recovery.
We
look
at
what's
considered
a
non-commercial
rate
for
our
non-profits
and
we
also
look
at
a
commercial
rate,
so
what
we
did
is
we
determined
and
presented
to
the
board?
H
Those
were
the
significant
changes
that
we
had
at
that
time.
We
did
not
adjust
any
other
parts
of
that
other
than
our
rental
rates.
We
came
back
to
the
board
and
in
2021
the
board
we
had
to
bring
the
regional
stadiums
online,
so
we
came
back
to
the
board.
Then
we
added
those
to
our
facility
use
guide
and
at
that
point
it
was
determined
that
we
did
not
need
to
come
back
to
the
board
unless
there
were
significant
changes.
H
So
we
are
back
before
you
all
today,
because
we
have
some
Personnel
changes
for
three
positions
that
are
utilized
extensively
in
the
facility
use
program.
That
is
the
event
manager,
the
event
assistant
and
what
we
call
our
Auditorium
technician.
Those
rates
have
not
changed
since
2014.,
so
you
can
imagine
that
they
are
well
below
Market.
At
least
two
of
them
are
so
when
we
look
at
the
event,
technician
and
the
event
assistant,
the
event
technician
was
getting
paid,
eleven
dollars
and
sixty
cents
an
hour.
H
The
event
assistant
was
getting
paid,
12.52
cents
about
52
cents
an
hour.
We
submitted
all
three
of
these
positions,
including
the
event
manager,
which
is
getting
paid
twenty
dollars
and
88
cents
an
hour
to
our
HR
department
to
do
a
compensation
analysis
that
was
completed,
and
it
was
determined
that
two
of
those
positions
which
are
the
event
Auditorium
technician
and
the
event
assistant,
would
now
go
to
17
an
hour.
H
The
event
manager
will
go
from
twenty
dollars
and
88
cents
to
twenty
three
dollars
an
hour.
So
when
you
look
at
the
facility
use
guide,
that's
attached
just
note,
even
though
those
rates
are
higher
they're,
taking
into
the
fact
that
we
have
benefits
and
other
things
that
we
need
to
cover
in
that
assessment.
So
that
is
why
those
rates
are
even
showing
a
little
bit
higher
so
that
we
can
capture
the
benefit
portion.
H
That
is
the
biggest
reason
that
we
are
here
before
you.
That
is
the
the
the
change
that
we
need
for
the
board
to
actually
determine
and
move
forward
with
approving
these
changes.
We've
also,
of
course,
adjusted
any
prospective
changes
to
new
facilities
that
may
have
come
online
or
if
there
have
been
any
point
of
contact
changes
and,
of
course
another
big
change
has
been
a
new
board,
so
we're
updating
all
of
that
information
also.
H
So
those
are
the
three
that
we
bring
forward
to
you
today.
If
you
have
any
questions,
please
let
me
know.
I
B
J
D
B
J
This
particular
item
is
a
request
within
our
phase
five
sales
tax
program.
Most
recently,
we've
had
a
pmf
assessment
of
the
funding
for
this
particular
program.
They
have
projected
a
revenue
of
160
million.
J
This
request
is
to
use
31
million
of
the
160
million
that
was
projected
and
it
will
go
towards
three
different
projects,
one
being
the
Stahl
high
school
project
for
30
million
dollars,
and
this
actually
is
an
additional
scope
of
work
with
the
increase
in
the
student
population
at
the
school.
There
are
several
we
call
Big
Box
areas
such
as
cafeteria
Auditorium
and
some
teacher
workspaces
that
are
not
sized
to
accommodate
the
growth
there.
Currently.
J
J
Also,
the
remaining
one
million
dollars
would
be
split
between
North
Charleston,
High
School.
This
is
for
their
cafeteria
expansion
and
weight
room
project.
There
were
many
unforeseen
mechanical
issues
that
have
been
identified.
We've
had
an
assessment
done
and
460
million
dollars
would
be
dedicated
towards
this
particular
project.
J
We
plan
this
is
this
is
actually
summer
work
for
this
year,
so
we
plan
to
start
this
work
on
Friday,
but
we
need
this
funding
in
place
in
order
to
make
sure
that
we
complete
these
cafeteria
expansion
and
weight
room
project
also
for
Charleston
Charter,
Math
and
Science.
We
have
540
000,
that's
dedicated
to
providing
updated,
Plumbing
fixture
replacement,
as
well
as
updating
their
finishes.
J
Our
original
project
original
scope
was
to
paint
the
Lockers
in
the
gym,
as
well
as
replace
the
flooring
in
the
walls,
but
this
particular
project
will
make
the
the
whole
project
finish
off
very
nicely.
You
know
it's
really
no
point
to
just
do:
painting
and
replace
tile
when
the
fixtures
are
older
and
it
just
wouldn't
cause
for
a
nice
finish
for
this
project,
so
all
in
all
again
31
million
dollars
of
the
160
million.
That
was
projected
for
the
phase
five
program.
A
Mess
with
the
well
with
the
change
of
scope,
correct.
B
B
K
Okay,
yes,
sir,
so
we've
come
to
you
in
the
past
several
months
with
reallocation
for
fixed
cost
of
ownership
fy23
from
program
contingency.
This
will
be.
It
looks
like
the
last
reallocation
to
close
out
the
Year.
This
is
a
51
million
dollar
program.
We
had
money
set
aside
in
program
contingency
in
the
event
of
an
emergency,
we're
at
a
point
now,
where
we
want
to
utilize
those
resources
for
the
highest
and
best
needed
items.
K
We've
got
two
for
facilities,
one
at
Mount,
Zion
and
one
for
stadium
inspections
and
then
funding
for
our
nurses
program
to
prepare
our
immunization
van
for
use,
which
was
purchased
in
fit
with
fixed
cost
of
ownership
as
far
as
coverage
to
identify
it
as
the
immunization
van
and
we're
also
looking
at
cabinets
for
all
of
our
schools
to
add
numbers
of
aeds
in
our
schools
and
also
provide
Cabinetry
for
epipens
and
Narcan
by
author
users.
B
C
I'm
I'm
Jackie,
but
miss
Denny
was
not
able
to
be
here
this
afternoon.
So
I
told
her
if
it
was
okay
with
the
audit
Finance
commitment.
Absolutely
thank
you.
As
you
know,
the
Laura
Brown
special
board
funds
were
created
by
the
Charleston
County
School
District,
to
support
student
participation
in
competitions
at
the
national
level.
Students
who
win
local
and
district
and
state
competitions
are
eligible
to
compete
at
the
national
level
and
are
therefore
eligible
for
funding.
C
We
submitted
this
to
you
earlier,
but
we
are
resubmitting
again
and
including
the
particular
charter
school
and
the
reason
being
is
because
we
went
over
the
50
000
threshold
that
we're
allowed
to
go
over
every
year
and
so
attached.
You'll
see
that
there
are
six
schools
that
applied
and
the
total
requested
reimbursement
was
approximately
sixty
one
thousand
dollars,
but
we
can't
because
we
can't
go
over
the
50
000.
C
We
had
to
allocate
it
between
all
the
all
the
different
schools,
and
so
the
full
award
is
approximately
fifty
thousand
dollars,
and
that
concludes
as
part
of
the
presentation.
B
C
Job
in
a
couple
years,
covid
didn't
help
so
we're
just
starting
to
get
this
back
up
and
running
and
also
making
sure
all
the
different
schools
are
aware
of
it.
B
C
Yes,
because
they
have
to
meet
certain
qualifications,
the
biggest
one
is
the
national
level
competitions.
A
B
C
B
I'm
gonna
make
this
motion
quick
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
recommend
definitely
to
the
board
for
a
motion
to
approve
the
appointment
of
Stephen,
Duke
and
Velma
stamped
to
the
honor
and
finance
committee
for
another
term
through
May
2025.
You
have
a
second
second,
any
objections.
C
Thank
you,
sir.
So
this
was
a
very
long
list.
We
had
several
different
types
of
requests.
This
time
around,
we
had
Roofing
repairs,
HVAC
system,
repairs,
classroom
and
special
ed
contracted
services
for
vacancies,
architectural
and
Engineering,
Services,
2D
tutoring
services
and
then
several
upgrades
of
paging
systems.
I
would
like
to
note
that
we
made
one
change
today
and
loaded
it
up
and
and
uploaded
it
in
board
docs,
because
it
was,
it
was
a
significant
price
decrease
and
that
was
for
item
number
four,
where
basically
it
was
reduced
down
to
293
thousand
dollars.
C
So
we
didn't
want
the
board
to
approve
the
the
maximum
that
we
had
originally
submitted,
and
so
with
that
we
have
approximately
24
different
projects
on
this
list:
totaling
25.3
million
dollars.
Thank
you.
B
Mr
Calhoun,
are
you
and
me?
First,
there
are
some
items
on
this
Miss
Carlin.
That
I
would
like
to
recommend
that
we
possibly
postpone
until
July
or
when
we
have.
If
and
when
we
have
a
new
superintendent
and
that
would
have
been
items,
four,
seven,
eight
and
eleven.
B
They
all
seem
to
deal
with
educational
Esser
items
which
will
be
discussing
shortly.
B
Yes,
four
seven,
eight
and
eleven.
L
On
all
four
of
those,
those
four
seven,
eight
and
eleven
right
so.
M
L
I,
look
at
those
those
are,
as,
as
you
indicated,
academically
related
and
also
it's
always
a
timing
for
for
for
a
lot
of
this
activity.
So
school
starts
I
know,
schools
just
ended
yesterday.
I
have
a
school
start
in
August
and
we
have
a
window
of
acquisition
time
period
to
make
sure
that
we're
ready
for
the
starting
school
now
I
recognize
that
their
their
decisions
that
need
to
be
delayed
and
so
for
item
number
four.
L
For
an
example
that
was
one
1.3
million
dollars
to
continue
the
work
for
the
acceleration
schools
that
that,
based
on
that
work,
we
have
gotten
tremendous
gains
in
academic
success
of
students,
and
so
we
made
the
reduction
from
1.3
down
to
293
million,
to
cut
cut
out
fiscal
years
25
and
26.
the
only
get
started
for
fiscal
year,
20.
L
four,
so
for
the
acceleration
schools.
If
we
don't
approve
this,
then
that
means
when
school
starts
in
August,
then
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
benefit
from
those
that
support
that
they've
had
for
the
last
two
years
or
so,
and
then
also
in
that
item,
it's
an
increase
of
adding
additional
elementary
schools
to
be
able
to
benefit
from
the
same
structure
that
acceleration
schools,
and
so
these
are
some
of
them
out
when
I
sum,
these
would
be
other
low
performing
schools.
L
So
that's
one
example
for
the
items:
they're,
four,
seven,
eight
and
eleven-
that's
going
to
be
I
would
say
detrimental
to
our
schools.
If
we
don't
move
forward
and
I'll
let
the
bill
you
want
to
talk
about
which
one
item-
seven
yeah,.
N
B
Always
I
understand
your
argument
that
they're
critical
for
the
process
in
providing
Services
for
contractual
purposes
that
you
would
need
to
enter
into
the
agreements
now,
if.
L
If,
if
we
don't,
if
we
don't
position
schools
to
continue
to
work
in
in
in
August,
then
it
is
going
to
be
detrimental
to
to
what
they've
done
in
the
past
and
that
and
that's
the
board,
we'll
see
at
the
at
the
committee
of
the
whole
meeting
on
Monday
we're
going
to
present
to
the
board
the
results
of
the
spring
interim
assessments
that
that
predict,
where
the
kids
will
end,
what
the
games
that
they
will
have
on
the
state
assessment
test,
and
so
there's
there's
some
accuracy
in
those
predictions
and
so
a
lot
of
the
the
gains
that
we're
experiencing
our
kids
are
experiencing.
A
L
Correct,
if
you
take
a
look,
if
you
compare
the
item
number
four,
if
you
compare
the
two,
the
1.3
and
the
this
293
right,
those
those
last
two
fiscal
years
that
have
been
removed.
A
L
So
so
so
item
four
originally
had
Essa
3
gof.
It
may
have
been
another
funding
source.
What
was
it
end
up?
And
so
now
it's
only
after
three
for
this
one
particular
fiscal
year.
O
Seven
I
tutor
is
really
more
of
an
HR
recruitment
type
function
where
we
find
ourselves
in
a
position
right
now
where
we
can't
always
fill
vacancies,
especially
special
ed,
so
they
provide
a
virtual
teacher
that
is
certified
in
these
certain
guidelines.
This
has
been
vetted
through
Anita
Huggins
team.
So
it's
so
it
isn't
a
partnership,
but
it
is
if
we
have
vacancies.
So
that's
why,
right
now
we
can
pay
for
that
out
of
s
or
dollars.
It
would
include
a
classroom
Proctor
in
the
classroom
to
to
manage
students.
P
Yes,
I'm
happy
to
to
expand
on
any
clarification
you
need
for
any
of
those
items.
I
think
Miss
Simmons
may
have
joined
us
or
is
watching
before,
as
Mr
Kennedy
said.
Is
the
contracted
services
with
UVA
Jackie
Haynes
is
here
she
can
answer
any
questions
about
the
support
that
the
acceleration
schools
have
received
from
that
work.
Seven
again
replace
support
students
directly
because
it
gives
us
access
to
teachers
where
we're
not
able
to
fill
vacancies.
P
Likewise,
you'll
see
in
line
item
eight
from
our
special
education
department
managed
services
that
provide
contracted
services
for
our
special
ed
teachers,
interpreters,
speech,
language
Pathologists.
All
of
these
Services
directly
impact
students
and
student
achievement
in
the
line
item.
11
is
a
line
item
that
has
been
reduced
from
past
years.
B
Thank
you
for
those
explanations,
the
only
other
question
I
had,
and
this
really
goes
to
the
I.T.
You
know
side
of
it.
It
just
seemed
on
items
12
through
18..
B
When
you
looked
at
the
bids,
there
were
four
responses
and
when
you
look
at
the
12
through
18,
therefore
companies
distributed
through
the
same
it.
It
just
didn't
make
any
sense.
It
was
b320
or
23
24.
Is
that
just
a
line
item
or
is
it?
Was
that
the
actual
bid.
Q
So
the
beat
2324
was
the
actual
solicitation
we
put
out
because
of
the
sheer
number
of
projects
that
we
have
and
the
limit
time
that
we
have
in
order
to
spend
these
by
next
spring.
We
wanted
to
distribute
the
work
among
multiple
vendors
and
equally
distribute.
You
know
the
cost
of
that
or
the
the
invoicing
across
those.
So
we
would
get
multiple
vendors
that
were
quicker.
B
Q
Q
So
that
that
vendor
lost
their
only
certified
engineer,
he
left
to
go
to
another
company
and
we
can
procure
this
under
State
contract.
But
because
of
the
sheer
volume
we
wanted
to
do
a
solicitation
to
be
able
to
have
it
competed.
B
B
M
Q
B
I
B
C
Thank
you,
sir.
Just
to
bring
the
online
finance
committee
up.
To
date,
the
Board
of
Trustees
approved
a
motion
on
May
22nd
for
a
continuing
resolution
that
would
allow
our
district
to
operate
on
the
current
budget,
FY
23
operating
budget
until
the
board
approves
and
passes
the
fy24
budget.
This
will
include
any
legislative
mandated
District
pay
increases
that
may
result
from
the
current
legislative
session.
C
The
Board
of
Trustees
also
approved
a
motion
on
May
22nd
to
have
the
proposed
FY
24
budget
that
was
provided
to
the
Board
of
Trustees
on
Thursday
May
18th,
along
with
any
additional
documentation
requested
by
the
board,
referred
for
further
review
and
recommendation
by
the
audit
and
finance
committee.
Today,
June
7th
District
staff
created
a
Google
Drive
for
the
additional
requested
items
on
May
25th
and
provided
the
link
to
the
board.
C
C
The
first
one
was
one
without
a
millage
increase,
we're
referring
that
to
as
as
scenario
28.
It
would
take
the
teacher
step.
Excuse
me,
it
would
provide
a
teacher
salary
increase
of
twenty
five
hundred
dollars,
plus
a
step,
so
that
would
take
the
teacher
beginning
salary
schedule.
Excuse
me
that
would
take
the
beginning
teacher
salary
from
forty
three
thousand
one
hundred
forty
six
to
forty
five
thousand
six
hundred
forty
six
by
not
having
a
millage
increase.
The
funds
available
for
allocation
are
approximately
20
million.
C
Our
required
increases,
which
include
the
teacher
step,
teacher
salary,
increase
retirement,
increase
health
and
dental
increases,
as
well
as
the
mandated
paid
parental
leave,
and
then
our
charter
school
and
Meeting
Street
payments
and
as
well
as
our
operation,
contractual
increases.
Our
total
require
increase
required
increases
are
approximately
39.5
million.
C
We
did
not
include
the
school
data
review
recommendations.
In
this
particular
scenario.
We
did
not
include
the
learning
Services
expansions.
We
did
include
the
net
positions
possibly
gained
due
to
the
upcoming
and
we
included
other
considerations
such
as
the
non-teacher
salary
increase,
which
is
a
two
and
a
half
percent
Cola,
along
with
a
step
increase,
insurance
premium,
increased
and
then
a
legal
increase.
So
the
total
other
considerations
was
approximately
10
million
dollars.
C
We
used
approximately
11.5
million
dollars
in
strategies
to
balance,
which
did
not
include
the
elimination
of
departmental
positions
and
did
not
include
the
non-salary
budget
reductions
that
we
had
been
working
on
and
so
the
remaining
to
fund
the
fy24
balance
on
this
particular
scenario
was
a
negative
with
a
negative
22.2
million.
That
is
what
we
were
short
without
doing
a
millage
increase
with
trying
to
do
all
these
other
considerations.
C
The
second
scenario
he
asked
to
ask
for
us
to
do
is
scenario
29.
It
included
a
7.1
mil
increase.
The
teacher
salary
increase
was
2500
plus
a
step
out
to
40
steps
which
again
would
take
the
teacher
salary
schedule
from
forty
three
thousand
one.
Forty
six
to
forty
five
thousand
six,
forty
six.
The
funds
available
for
allocation
with
this
particular
millage
increase
is
about
42
million
dollars.
We
factored
in
the
required
increases
at
about
approximately
39.5
million.
C
We
did
include
the
possible
enrollment
changes
at
4
million,
as
well
as
the
other
considerations
which
included
non-teacher
salary
increases
and
those
other
items
listed
below,
which
was
approximately
10
million.
The
we
were
able
to
balance
this
particular
budget
with
with
the
strategies
to
balance
of
things
that
we
knew
we
could
do.
11.5
million,
and
so
the
remaining
two
from
this
balance
was
a
was
a
positive
183
000.
So
we
were
able
to
balance
this
budget
or
this
scenario.
C
Excuse
me
the
next
scenario
scenario:
31
included,
a
7.1
mil
increase
this
particular
scenario
in
factored
in
a
five
thousand
dollar
salary
increase
for
all
teachers,
plus
a
step
and
the
step
going
out
to
40
steps.
This
would
take
their
beginning
salary
from
forty
three
thousand
one.
Forty
six
to
forty
eight
thousand
one.
Forty
six,
the
funds
available
for
allocation
were
approximately
42
million,
and
here
again
we
included
the
required
increases
at
51.4
million.
That
number
has
increased
because
of
the
teacher
salary
piece
at
five
thousand
dollars
per
teacher.
C
C
So
the
remaining
to
excuse
me
and
then
taking
in
consideration
the
strategies
to
balance
which
are
things
we
know
we
can
do
without
eliminating
positions
or
reducing
salary
or
non-salary
budgets.
We
were
still
short
11.7
million
dollars
for
this
particular
scenario
and
then
the
last
scenario
scenario
30
with
a
10
mil
increase.
Here
again,
the
teacher
salary
increase
would
be
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
up
to
plus
a
step
up
to
40
steps.
C
So
the
funds
available
for
allocation
are
approximately
51
million.
We
did
include
the
required
increases.
Unfortunately,
we
were
not.
We
did
not
include
the
school
data
reviews,
recommendations
or
the
learning
Services
expansions.
We
did
include
the
enrollment,
the
projected
enrollment
changes
and
plus
the
other
considerations
and
taking
into
consideration
strategies.
This
balance,
this
budget
was,
was
actually
balanced
at
2.8
million,
but
when
we
took
in
consideration
the
other
strategies
to
balance,
we
were
able
to
end
this
particular
budget
with
an
8.6
million
dollar
Surplus.
M
C
Oh
yes,
sir
I.
Yes,
sir,
forgive
me
scenario
22,
which
was
the
7.1
mil
increase.
C
This
is
the
one
that
staff
had
repeatedly
recommended,
and
this
is
also
the
scenario
that
the
audit
and
finance
committee
adopted
earlier,
and
this
included
the
the
teacher
salary
increase
of
five
thousand
dollars,
plus
the
step
and
then
going
out
to
40
steps,
and
it
also
included
a
two
and
a
half
percent
cost
of
living
adjustment
for
non-teachers
funds
available
for
this
allocation
with
this
particular
millage
increase
is
approximately
42
million
the
thing
the
the
positive
thing
about
this
scenario
is,
we
were
able
to
include
all
of
the
required
increases.
C
The
learning
Services
expansions,
the
as
also
the
enrollment
changes
that
that
you
know
we're
projecting
all
of
the
other
considerations
from
HR
risk
management
and
legal
and
taking
into
consideration
all
the
strategies
that
we
had
recommended
to
balance,
which
are
approximately
32
million
dollars.
We
had
a
balanced
budget
with
this
particular
scenario,.
M
A
But
the
downside
to
that
one
we
had
the
elimination
of
the
departmental
positions
we
had
to
elimination
of
departmental
positions.
B
M
B
I
think
you
know
the
the
key
the
goal
to
this
discussion
with
this
committee.
Is
you
know
that
we
really
need
today
to
try
to
come
up
with
a
document,
a
scenario
you
know
based
upon
the
staff's
recommendations,
I
really
appreciate
meeting
with
Ms
Carla
shortly
after
the
meeting
and
and
working
through
this
and
I
appreciate
how
you
laid
out
the
different.
You
know,
scenarios
for
this,
the
board
and
the
committee
to
review
I.
Think
it's
really
critical
on
us
to
today
to
come
up
with
a
very
strong
recommendation.
B
I
also
appreciate
receiving
all
of
the
Esser
documents.
The
the
vendor
documents.
I
know:
Dr
Carroll
I
mean
Temple
Dr,
Temple
Hadlock.
A
lot
of
questions
has
did
a
lot
of
board
members
as
to
you
know
how
the
SR
funds
were
being
spent,
and
then
you
know,
I
appreciate
it
and
we'll
be
talking
about
this
document.
I
guess
in
the
next.
You
know
action
item
you
know.
Looking
at
you
know
the
amount
you
know
there
had
been
talk.
B
You
know
about
using
Esser
funds
into
you
know
to
help
offset
the
salary
expenses,
but
definitely
talking
to
the
staff.
You
know
that
was
made
clear
that
that's
not
really
when
you're
looking
at
a
long-term
situation
that
it's
just
better
to
roll
it
into
the
general
operating
fund
today
and
and
deal
with
it
today,
because
it's
going
to
be
there
next
year
too,
so
to
use
funds
that
are
going
to
go
away,
is
not
you
know,
physically
smart,
so
I
do
appreciate
you
building
the
scenarios.
B
This
way,
I
do
think
in
looking
at
all
the
documentation
that
was
being
produced.
I
am
going
to
ask
that
you
add
to
the
budget
or
definitely
for
the
first
reading.
You
know
for
the
board
in
in
June,
just
like
we
do
with
the
federal
funding
Monies
to
do
some
type
of
itemization.
You
know
on
the
S3
funding.
You
know
that
can
show
us.
B
You
know
the
challenge
that
you
know
we're
going
to
be
faced
with
in
the
next
year
with
all
of
these
positions,
these
FTE
positions
that
are
funded
using
you
know,
funding
that's
going
to
end
at
the
you
know
the
year,
because
I
think
we're
going
to
have
to
be
making
some
serious
or
hard
decisions
as
to
assessing
what
programs
are
really
working
and
what
are
I
mean
I
think
this
discussion
needs
to
start.
You
know
right
away
as
soon
as
we
pass
this
budget.
P
Did
you
hear
that
Mr
grazowski
incomplete
transparency?
Regarding
answer
three
and
positions
we've
been
in
a
constant
state
with
Mrs
Simmons
team
and
Buffy
Roberts
of
assessing
the
effectiveness
of
of
how
of
both
programs
and
people
and
how
they're
maintained
several
example
of,
for
example,
of
folks
funded
by
us
or
two
those
those
positions
have
been
eliminated
as
we've
looked
toward
efficiency
and
Effectiveness,
and
how
people
have
been
used
to
impact
student
achievement.
P
That
is
our
primary
goal,
and
so
our
principals
already
know
and
are
aware
that
this
funding,
sunsets
and
as
such,
unless
there
is
a
a
significant
impact
on
student
achievement
from
people
per
se,
that
those
positions
will
dissolve
and
as
many
of
those
positions
are
held
by
certified
Educators
and
as
typically,
we
hire
Mr
Brigman
how
many
teachers
per
year
we
have.
We
have
strong
feelings
in
conversations
with
Bill's
team,
who
is
collaborating
with
with
us
that
we
should
be
able
to
find
homes
for
the
most
of
those
people.
P
Again,
we
understand
the
the
is
problematic
to
build
a
lot
of
ftes
into
grant
funding,
but
yet,
knowing
that
assessing
Effectiveness
and
understanding
that
certified
folks
are
needed
in
our
system
to
teach
kids,
we
understand
it's
challenging,
but
we
we
feel
confident
that
we'll
be
able
to
to
provide
the
board
some
resolve
on
how
to
do
that.
Just
kidding.
L
Yeah,
and
so
thank
you
so
in
addition
to
the
analysis
that
Ms
Hogan
said
it's
ongoing
has
been
on
going
for
a
while.
If
you
take
a
look
at
our
fund
balance,
we
we've
talked
about
this
before
and
I'm.
L
Looking
at
the
number
now
it's
in
the
it's
actually
in
the
last
document,
Dennis
Carlin
went
over
at
the
end
where
it
says
fund
balance
projection
there
at
the
very
end
of
that
document,
that
the
schedule
it
has
the
line
items
that's
currently
assigned
for
as
a
stabilization,
22.8
million
dollars
so
that
that's
been
been
have.
Let's
have
we
have
built
that
up
over
the
last
couple
years
with
intent
of
having
the
academic
team.
Do
the
program
analysis?
L
A
The
community
organizational
organization
funding
or
is
that
is
that
including
it
or
not,
including
that
the
22
million
844
for
457.
L
Well,
so
so
the
22.8
is
not
allocated
or
assigned
to
any
specific
programs
at
this
time.
It's
just
the
amount
that
we've
been
able
to
build
up
with
the
recognition
that
some
programs
are
effective.
We
need
to
have
a
source
of
funds
to
be
able
to
begin
to
continue
those.
P
Hey
Mr
Calhoun,
some
of
the
community-based
organizations
that
submitted
proposals
built
into
their
proposals,
managers
as
a
way
to
or
management
of
of
the
actual
funds
for
us
to
be
able
to
analyze
and
assess
their
effectiveness.
For
example,
the
D20
principal
collaboration
program,
Dr
Janet
Rose,
is
a
partner
in
that
who
is
constantly
assessing
the
effectiveness
of
those
programs.
P
I
two
items
up
a
moment
ago:
item
six
H
approval
of
project.
Saga
is
another
such
example,
to
which
you
know.
Mrs
Simmons
could
could
attest
of
of
a
program
that
we
use,
or
we
implemented
with
sr3
funding
that
Buffy
Roberts
has
assessed
multiple
times
to
determine
whether
we
even
want
to
continue
using
Esther
funds.
So
so
we
do
have
some
systems
in
place.
P
Do
we
have
them
in
place?
A
hundred
percent
across
always
or
three
funding?
No
sir
I'm
not
going
to
say
that
we
do,
but
I
do
think
we're
doing
our
due
diligence
in
most
regards
to
assess
program
and
program
Effectiveness,
particularly
as
we
look
at
the
sunset
of
the
grant.
A
And
Mr
Grabowski
I
would
like
to
suggest,
as
we
as
I
mentioned
to
you
before,
because
this
is
a
committee
I
like
working
committees,
so
a
committee
that
actually
gets
to
work
on
certain
things
and
we
should
put
together
some
people
from
the
audit
finance
committee
as
we're
going
through
the
after
looking
at
evaluating
different
programs
here
and
there
and
what
should
be
brought
on
to
a
glf
or
not
that
we
have
some
folk
from
that
committee.
Working
on
that
evaluation
process
and
really
which
ones
we
took
try
to
bring
over.
A
M
R
For
a
10
mil
increase
with
the
2500
teacher
salary,
I
mean
why
don't
we
have
a
budget?
That's
a
10
mil
with
the
5
000
teacher
salary
I
mean
what
is
that
going
to
do
I
mean
I'm.
Looking
at
we
got
22
it's
in
the
area.
We
got
31
scenario,
I
think
we
should
be
looking
at
budgets
that
give
teachers
five
thousand
dollar
future
salary
increases,
and
then
what
is
the
millage
that
keeps
our
organizations
intact?
I
mean
the
thing
I
like
about
and
I
guess
it's
31.
Is
that
we're
not?
R
R
Time
we're
not
losing
we're,
not
eliminating
Department
positions
or
non-salary
budget
reductions.
Just
in
my
view,
if
those
are
important
positions,
we
need
to
keep
them.
We
don't
need
to
dismantle
our
organization,
so
we
need
a
budget
that,
in
my
view,
you
know
what
millage
do
we
need,
so
that
our
teachers
get
five
thousand
and
we're
not
eliminating
the
department
positions
or
the
non-salary
budget
reductions.
So.
A
You're
basically
saying
we
need
a
a
model
that
has,
you
know
the
everything
static
and
then
we
just
changing
around
the
village
just
play
with
the
millage
on
it.
So
basically.
L
So
just
make
sure
I
understand
because
I
got
I
didn't
hear
the
last
piece,
so
Dr
Temple,
so
you're
asking
for
a
scenario
that
includes
all
the
the
expenditures
that
we
have
on
the
7.1
without
the
departmental
reductions,
I'm
assuming
the
ones
that
are
filled,
I'm
I'm,
gonna
assume
that
you're
not
talking
about
the
ones
that
have
been
musicians
been
vacant
for
two
years
and
then
also
no
non
salary
reduction.
That's
what
you're
asking.
R
Don't
I
want
us
to
find
what
we
need
to
be
effective
in
our
organization.
I,
don't
want
to
see
us
people
who
support
important
elements
of
our
educational
process.
So
what
is
it
the
budget?
What
is
the
millage
that
gives
us
the
quality
education
that
our
students
deserve,
and
then
we
we
also
have
talked
about
the
I
mean
there's
out
there,
the
7
000.
Are
we
gonna
pull
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
more
from
Esser
and
I?
Don't
see
budgets
that
reflect
that
at
all.
B
I,
don't
think
it's
wise
to
use.
Esser
funds
towards
salaries
like
I
could
see
using
Sr
funds
for
a
one-time
bonus,
but
you
do
not
use
something.
You
know
that
is
part
of
your
general
operating
fund.
When
we
don't
even
know
what
it's
going
to
be
for
24.25,
you
really
need
to
live
with
what
you're
doing
I
think
for
transparency
sake.
The
reason
I
was
asking
the
s
or
be
included
into
the
budget
is
just
so
that
you
know
there's
a
document.
It
should
be
just
like
the
federally
funded
money.
B
It
should
be
the
same
way
and
done
the
same
way
because
they're
two
of
the
same
thing,
the
restricted
funds.
So
we
really
should
know
you
know
how
it's
being
spent,
and
that
also
gives
a
good
picture
of
what
we're
going
forward
now.
I
understand
Dr
kemple.
What
you're
asking
for
what
you're
asking
for
is
what
I
would
call
the
worst
case
scenario
for
the.
B
L
Well,
let
me
tell
you
so:
I
just
did
a
quick
calculation
and
so
I'm,
so
this
is
real
quick.
So
it's
ballpark
was
very.
L
Very
close,
so
what
do
what
Dr
Temple
said,
but
with
the
8.4
million
dollars
that
says
departmental
positions,
we
would
still
eliminate
the
the
the
portions
that
have
been
vacant
for
two
years.
It
makes
no
sense
to
year
after
year
to
carry
those
forward.
I,
don't
think
we
believe
the
7.5
in
and
so
that's
going
to
draft
costs
up
to
about
11
million
about
about
11
to
11.5
million
and
so
you're
going
to
add
another
four
mil
roughly
just
slightly
under.
B
L
I'm
sorry
we'd
be
at
11.,
that's
right
around
11
Mills
about
11,
mil
to
do
what
and
so
and
then
the
last
point
about
about
Dr
Temple,
about
making
sure
that
we
try
to
understand
what
schools
need.
That's
exactly
what
we've
done
so
when
it
says
student
data
review
section
there
that
10
million
dollars
I
think
it
is.
L
We
have
spent
a
lot
of
time
this
spring
and
late
winter,
engaging
with
principals
and
with
their
staff
to
make
sure
that
we
understand
what
their
needs
are
for
next
year,
and
so
those
needs
are
captured
both
both
in
that
section
on
the
student
Daily
Review
section,
as
well
as
with
the
student
data
clerks,
the
data
clerks,
rather
as
well
as
with
what's
what's
what's
what
you
what's
been
presented
by
the
finance
team
to
whenever
was
last
week
with
the
S
of
three
dollars.
I
Well,
where
are
we
in
terms
of
in
terms
of
coming
to
a
resolution
on
this
I
mean
the
staff
originally
had
a
proposal?
Kind
of
the
board
considered
it
I
was
at
the
board
meeting,
but
I,
don't
know
where
the
direction
of
the
board
was.
But
if
we're,
if
your
your
suggestion
is,
let's
we
need
to
make
this
kind
of
a
working
session
to
come
to
correct.
B
And
Andrew
I
think
this
needs
to
be
a
working
session
so
that
we
can
come
up
with
three
options
and
let
the
board
you
know
rely
on
the
three
apps
I
do
think
the
one
option
they
need
to
see,
which
is
the
zero
base
option
if
we
do
nothing.
This
is
what
happens
and
as
we
know,
if
we
do
nothing
with
no
billage
rate,
we
can't
balance
the
budget
right
now.
So
we
know
that
and
I
think
that's
good,
that
the
board
knows
that
and
understands
it.
B
We
do
the
other
option
which
the
board
unanimously
wanted
to
do,
and
that's
raised
teacher
salaries.
So
we
have
to
come
up
with
a
middle
ground
option
of
you
know
what
what
can
we
do
at
a
middle
ground
option
to
give?
You
know
the
raise
the
5
000
across
the
board?
That's
them
so
that
includes
also,
hopefully
the
2.5.
The
state
is.
B
Give
us
I
mean
it's
going
to
require
us,
so
you
have
that
option
and
then
there
is
the
option
which
I
agree
with
Dr
Temple
and
I'm
assuming
Mr
Calhoun
is.
That
is
what
is
the
millage
rate
to
give
without
any
cuts
and
everything
the
principles
would
like,
which
would
be
the
highest
millage
rate.
So.
I
From
a
process
perspective,
you
know
we
have
a
bunch
of
scenarios
and
we
can
give
them
three
scenarios,
but
it
seems
like
to
do
our
job.
We
should
be
recommending
one
we
should
be
approving
it
specifically.
We
can
give
them
other
scenarios
sure,
but
we
should
say
what
and
so
what
I?
What
I
think
I
just
heard
is
I
I
heard
there
was
support
for
making
the
adjustment
to
teachers
salaries.
I
So
if
we
bake
that
in
then
I
think
the
doctor's
suggestion
makes
sense
that
we
back
solve
straight
to
what
keeps
our
fiscal
our
fund
balance
consistent,
because
I
do
think
again.
From
this
committee's
perspective,
or
at
least
my
opinion
of
this
committee's
perspective,
maintaining
that
fund
balances
is
Paramount.
B
L
Well,
let
me
so
so:
I
don't
have
to
speculate
anymore.
I'll
be
rough,
so
at
the
we're
over
the
board
meeting
date
was
in
May
that
we
we
did
not
present
it
would.
In
the
in
the
package,
there
were
three
scenarios
with
balanced
budgets
that
I
think
captures.
What
we're
talking
about
here.
L
One
is
the
7.1
mil
increase
that
was
recommended,
but
we
have
two
other
options
that
are
balanced
and
one
is
of
8.3
mil
increase
and
all
three
by
the
way
includes
the
five
thousand
dollar
teacher
teacher,
salary
increase
and
then
only
and
the
third
one
was
a
9.8
mil
increase,
and
the
only
difference
between
that
nine
eight
point
middle
increase
scenario-
that
was
that
was
in
the
board
package
and
what
we
just
talked
about
for
the
11
million
was
that
we
we
did
not
take
out.
L
We
kept
in
this
seven
I,
think
the
7.5
million
dollar
non-salary
reductions
and
then,
at
the
end
of
that,
each
of
those
scenarios
is
the
layout
for
the
projected
fund
balance
and
in
each
of
those
cases.
In
addition
to
balancing
the
budget,
the
funds
balance
in
each
of
those
scenarios-
income,
in
conformance
with
the
fund
balance
policy.
L
So
I
mean
so
if
if
this
is
a
working
session,
maybe
the
the
starting
point
is
to
take
a
look
at
those
three
scenarios
that
were
that
the
staff
you
know
put
together
in
the
last
month
and
then
we
can
maybe
deviate
the
Dominican
DBA
from
those
right
and
so
as
opposed
to
that,
because
we
got
I
think
we
have
about
what
28
29
36.
A
So
I
guess
again
we
find
in
our
constant.
We
have
5
000
five
thousand
bottom
correct
everybody
online
as
well.
Five
thousand
dollars.
O
A
M
O
B
And
and
that's
why
I
think
it's
so
critical
that
this
Esser
is
part
of
the
budget,
because
that
is
going
to
be
the
biggest
challenge
that
we
have
moving
forward
is
how
we
address
that
in
the
24-25.
You
know
error
once
we've
built
in
all
these
other
budget,
I
mean
pay
races
into
the
budget,
I
mean
if
we
do
a
really
great
job.
We
have
a
foreign.
B
Looking
at
the
budget
a
lot
easier,
but
you
know
it's
something
that
has
to
start
and
and
we
look,
we
started
in
November
and
it
was
a
learning
curve
and
obviously
there
are
a
lot
of
bumps
in
the
learning
curve.
The
shame
on
us
to
start
in
September
in
October
or
October,
like
you
recommended,
which
is
built
into
the
charter.
B
Things
start
getting
this
right
and
looking
at
what's
working,
what's
not
working,
because
we
have
to
do
it
this
year
because
technically
it's
over.
So
that's
why
I
would
like
the
s
for
transparency
purposes
to
do
it
just
like
we
do
on
the
federal
funds
and
then
I
agree
with
you,
Mr
Kennedy
I
think
we've
got
three
scenarios
that
are
pretty
close
to
you
know
based
upon
all
the
extra
documentation.
We
got
that
solved
a
lot
of
the
questions
that
were
given
and
we
saw
an
awful
lot.
B
I
mean
it's
a
it's
amazing
when
you
look
at
you
know
these
the
list
of
vendors
that
we're
using
and
especially
look
at
the
names
and
some
of
the
people
that
are
involved,
I
mean
to
us.
It
makes
no
sense,
but
you
know
that's
where
we
you
have
to
sometimes
trust
staff
or
any
questions
staff,
but
it
starts
earlier
rather
than
later,
as
it
came
in
it,
it.
M
B
But
sending
him
so
am
I
satisfying
you
Dr
Chapel.
R
Yeah
sort
of
I
mean
yes,
I,
think
we're
moving
positively,
because
I
really
think
that
our
our
teachers
deserve
more
and
so
I
I
want
to
see
us
get
that
five
thousand
dollars
out
of
gof
into
their
salary.
But
then
I
there's
another
item
on
here
about
a
bonus.
So
if
we
could
get
to
two
thousand
twenty
five
hundred
dollars
more
out
with
the
Esser
as
a
incentive
bonus,
that's
good!
You
know.
If
we
can
move
to
that
direction,
I
think
is
so
important
for
our
teachers
to
work.
A
B
A
In
June,
so
miss
Colin,
looking
at
scenario
27
with
the
9.8
now
with
the
5
000,
plus
the
40
steps
and
2.5
column.
A
That's
that
5
000
would
it
be
5,
000,
plus
the
required,
in
addition
to
the
required
20
2500
by
the
state,
or
is
that
included?
It's
included.
C
Five
thousand
dollars
total.
It
includes
the
2500..
We
have
looked
at
trying
to
do
the
7
500
increase
to
get
teachers
to
a
50
000
starting
salary.
We
have
looked
and
tried
to
figure
out
all
kinds
of
different
ways
to
do
it
and
we
just
don't
have
the
revenues
coming
in
and
we
don't
have
the
capacity
to
to
cover
it
years
out.
I
mean
we've
looked
at
so
many
different
options.
I'm
not
saying
we
don't
need
to
put
together.
C
A
B
I
think
that's
the
challenge,
I
think.
Once
we
pass
this
budget,
that's
going
to
be
the
challenge.
You
know
it's
looking
exactly
how
to
streamline
it,
and
then
you
know,
as
we
get
closer
this
time
to
the
end
of
next
year,
we'll
know
how
well
we
did
and
then
we
can
address
the
salary
issue
at
that
point,.
I
And
not
to
beat
a
dead
horse,
but
when
it
does
go
back
to
the
board,
if
we
could
add
back
that
I
know,
you've
done
you've
got
the
models
that
show
the
three-year
fund,
balance,
impact
and
I
know.
This
is
just
a
one-year
decision,
but
we
need
to
constantly
keep
an
eye
on
the
three-year
piece
of
it,
because
that's
some
of
these
scenarios
do
work
for
the
current
year,
but
I
remember:
I
can
try
to
pull
them
up
when
we
looked
at
before
I
know
some
of
them
don't
work
in
years.
B
I
But
you
just
need
to
make
sure
that
that
your
Governor's
expenses
are
still
working
in
the
out
years.
Correct
right,
not
opposed
to
using
Esther
funds
in
the
short
term
to
build
fund
balance.
Yeah.
L
But
I
would
also
say:
I
mean
I.
Always
when
we
talk
about
federal
funds,
always
go
to
whatever
the
source
of
the
federal
funds
are
always
go
to.
What's
the
intent
of
those
allocations.
If
you
look
at
the
Essa
funds,
they
were
to
make
sure
that
we
had
safety
announced
in
our
schools
the
way
to
open
schools
up.
You
know
my
predecessor
Dr
supposed
to
wait
along
with
them
Mr
Roy.
They
did
an
outstanding
job,
making
sure
that
our
schools
were
safe
to
open
up
and
follow
the
2020
and
through
2021.
L
L
But
if,
if
we
reallocate,
then
that
means
when
school
starts
again,
this
coming
August
there's
going
to
be
less
dollars
to
support
students.
L
L
A
C
Oh
so
scenario
27
that
was
part
of
the
presentation
that
I
was
trying
to
do
on
May
22nd,
but.
C
A
G
A
I
I
A
O
A
In
a
little
bit
and
this
scenario
27
the
step,
5K
14.
with
the
9.8
email.
G
R
Other
comment
I
was
going
to
make,
is
you
know
with
Esther
I?
Don't
know
you
know
we
we
get
these
monies
and
we
get
in
sometimes
in
a
position
of
spend
it
or
lose
it,
and
so
I
think.
If
there's
anything,
that's
hanging
out
there
that
we
really
don't
need
to
spend,
let's
not
lose
it,
because
I
think
we
can
use
that
towards
future
incentives.
R
I
think
they
need
to
be
really
cautious
about
that
not
get
into
that
frenzy
of
feeling
like
we
have
to
spend
it
if
it's
not
worthwhile
for
our
students
and
teachers.
Now.
L
So
Dr
Temple,
just
so
so
we've
actually
I'm,
not
sure
I.
Think
it's
bank,
it's
first
part
of
April,
maybe
sometime
in
April
we
actually
instituted
a
a
spend
and
freeze
on
most
of
our
expenditures
so
that
we
could
not
would
not
get
into
the
situation.
You're
talking
about.
B
Because
the
only
reference
in
last
year's
budget
or
I
guess
this
year's
budget
introduces
you
know
on
the
second
reading.
Tesser
was.
It
was
three
lines
you
know
unless
I'm
reading
this
wrong
and
which
just
gave
the
total
amount,
you
know
adopted,
budget
proposed
budget
and
then
the
variances,
and
this
is
on
the
specialty
funds.
B
N
I
B
A
Yeah
to
answer
your
question:
yes,
I
would
like
to
at
least
use
that
as
our
Baseline,
you
know,
you
know
we
got
the
at
least
a
9.8
million
increase.
A
B
But
when
you,
when
you
look
at
that
second
reading
of
this
year's
budget,
like
one
of
the
point
of
contentions
when
everybody
was
going
through
and
discussing
it
after
the
board
meeting,
was
co-20
or
127
the
very
school,
and
it
was
my
understanding
that
that
was
an
amount,
a
safety
Reserve
amount
and
even
though
you
had
it
budgeted,
you
didn't
spend
it
all.
No
am
I.
C
Missing
it,
we
don't
have
a
safety
Reserve
in
general.
Operating
fund
0127
is
a
district-wide
location.
So
if
we
don't
know
where
something
needs
to
be
budgeted,
but
we
know
we're
going
to
spend
it
whether
it's
over
10
schools,
20
schools
or
80
schools,
Ricoh
copiers,
we
don't
charge
every
single
school
for
their
Ricoh
copiers.
We
just
absorb
it
in
10127.,.
M
L
Yeah
and
then
we
I
think
with
that
thing.
I
know
the
finance
team
sent
out
a
list
of
everything,
that's
in
127
and
and
if
I,
if
I
recall
correctly,
because
I
know
I
did
do
the
items
in
there
mostly
reflect
what
Lisa
and
jacket
just
just
talked
about,
so
I
mean
if
I
would
roll
through
here
quickly
a
copier
leases,
the
employee,
employee
assistance
program,
graduation,
rentals,
homebound,
Services,
Insurance
interest,
tax
anticipation,
International
faculty
Kronos
related.
L
That's
our
time
keeping
system
Laura
Brown
funds,
math
coaches-
we
did
not
know
when,
where
they
were
going
to
be
what
schools
they
were
going
to
be
in.
So
you
guys
go
down
that
list.
These
are
the
things
that
when
the
budget
is
is
built,
we
don't
know
where
the
ultimate
cost
is
either
going
to
be,
and
once
we
find
that
out,
we
allocated
later
in
the
year
or
something
that
makes
sense,
that
it's
a
central
control
thing
like
the
copy
of
leases,
foreign.
L
Back
to
your
point
about
the
out
year,
I
think
I
think
in
the
May
Oregon
finance
committee
meeting,
when
we
we
made
the
recommendation
of
7.1
Mill
increase.
That
is
the
only
scenario
that
we
did
out
here:
projections
and
then,
which
would
have
been
which
the
fund
balance
would
have
been
reflected
in
that
with
these
other
two
scenarios,
we
did
not.
B
I
think
we
need
to
keep
in
the
one
scenario
that
shows
the
2500
increase
to
teach
your
salaries,
because
that's
what
we're
anticipating
the
state
will
eventually
get
around
to
proving.
So
we
have
to
anticipate
that
one
if
we
don't
do
anything,
no
millage
increase,
but
with
that
twenty
five
hundred
dollars,
because
it's
we
think
that's
coming
down
the
road
and
they're
gonna.
That's
one
scenario
we
have
to
keep
in
for
consideration
in
the
budget,
I
mean
for.
M
L
M
L
L
So
we
can
put
that
in
there,
but
but
if
that's
up
I
can't
I
can't
recommend
to
the
board
unbalanced
budget.
M
B
So
you've
got
to
show
that
so
that
we
can
push
this
through
now.
What
we've
got
to
do
is
is
to
come
up
with
two
that
you
know,
gives
the
board
an
option
and
so
I
think
we
just
got
to
find
the
two
best
and
and
obviously
there's
one
that
is,
you
know
you
show
what
it
would
take
to
give
the
board
everything
they
want,
and
then
we
find
the
Middle
Road
One.
A
And
I
actually
would
like
to
hear
from
other
committee
members
as
well
to
see
what
y'all
are
where
y'all
are
sitting
at,
because
we've
been
going
back
and
forth
with
the
board
on
this.
The
whole
time
I
would
like
to
hear
from
the
actual
committee
members
so.
B
I
B
M
M
B
Because
I
think
a
lot
of
the
board's
concerns
you
were
addressed
in
the
documents
that
you
produced,
you
know
definitely
towards
the
Esser,
the
vendors
and
a
lot
of
expenditures
and
then
once
again,
I
think
a
lot
of
it
is
just
getting
the
right
dashboards.
So
the
board
can
find
these
documents
in
the
future
and-
and
that's
why
I
think
going
forward
starting
this
discussion
earlier
in
October-
is
going
to
be
a
much
easier
process.
C
So
that
I
know
that
I'm
clear
we're
going
to
do
another
document
with
scenarios
22
27
and
28..
What
am
I?
You
know
how
the
first
time
with
your
recommendation,
we
we
excluded
things
over
to
the
right,
so
they
could
pick
and
choose.
Do
you
want
to
do
that
again
or
you
want
to
leave
these
just
like
they
are
I.
B
B
B
M
C
B
B
I
I
B
M
C
B
O
Okay,
because
I
I,
just
and
I
understand
and
I'm,
not
I,
certainly
understand
Jackie
the
timeline.
But
if
there's
any
way
once
the
board
has
some
kind
of
consensus,
what
they're
thinking
as
far
as
teacher
pay,
it's
it's
really
critical,
because
June
I
mean
we
already
we're
obviously
recruiting
candidates
and
we've
had
candidates
turning
us
down
here
in
the
last
week,
because
they're
not
clear
on
pay
and
so
I.
O
L
So
so
the
the
detailed
information
that
that
was
present
to
you
all
whenever
it
was
last
week
that
made
me
through
the
weekend.
It's
essentially
on
the
on
this.
Let's
say:
that's
a
recommendation
of
one
of
these
scenarios
coming
from
the
committee
to
the
board
and
the
board
approves
that
then,
essentially
in
that
budget
book,
you
have
the
same
type
of
detail
and
more
of
a
reasonable
format
for
the
public.
L
But
so
one
one
option
that
you
might
want
to
consider
is
if,
if,
if
there's
a
desire
on
the
board
to
adopt
a
budget
in
the
current
fiscal
year
for
next
year,
work
on
summary
data.
Now
that
you
have
the
detail
and
then
subsequent
to
the
June
30
the
June
30
vote,
we
could
Circle
back
of
this
team
the
circle
back
and
provide
the
detailed
budget
book.
So
that's
one
option,
but
otherwise
there's
not
gonna
be
enough
time
between
now
and
in
in
the
June.
I
To
paraphrase
to
make
sure
I
understand
it
correctly,
there
could
be
a
summary
budget
prepared
by
Monday
for
the
full
board,
and
the
board
could
approve
that
summary
budget
subject
to
an
opportunity
to
review
the
more
detailed
one
later.
But
you
would
have
a
an
approved
big
budget
which
would
then
give
you
the
specific
data.
You
need
to
go
out
and
recruit
teachers
right.
I
B
R
B
L
But
that,
but
they
don't
they
don't
become
locked
in
into
the
board
adopters
because
and
I
would
say
to
so
it's
not
for
the
committee
of
the
whole
summary
documents,
not
for
the
committee
of
the
home
right.
That's
interesting!
It's
for
the
June
26
board,
meeting
right,
which
is,
and
so
I
need
to
pause
for
a
second
just
look
at
the
team
here
summary
document.
M
L
M
R
Timeline
to
firm
up
this
budget
well.
L
And
so
then
we
have
the
What's
called
the
the
public
hearing.
So
we
need
to
know
no
later
than
we
need.
We
need
to
either
Tuesday
of
next
week
at
the
latest.
Wednesday
I
can't
remember
the
day
which
state,
but
that's
that's
the
absolute
deadline
to
be
able
to
to
by
State
Statute
publicized
in
the
media,
the
the
the
public
hearing,
so
that
has
to
be
the
week
week,
follow
I
think
the
week
of
the
19th
yeah.
A
Have
some
feedback
yeah
and
I
like
I
said,
like
Dr
Temple
said
we
or
even
Mr
grabrowski
said
we
know
we
gonna
have
to
spot.
At
least
we
just
now
we're
playing
with
the
military
to
see
them.
L
Working
speaking
of
the
military,
so
I
know
we
said
scenarios
22
27
28.,
but
if
you
take
a
look
at
scenario
which
didn't
talk
about
26,
which
is
the
8.3
mil
it's
8.3
mils,
and
that
what
the
difference
between
that
and
the
9.8
is
that
the
26
mil?
Let
me
excuse
me:
scenarios
26
and
8.3
mil.
L
O
L
B
Honestly,
other
than
that,
you
can't
say,
yeah
that's
correct
way.
The
audit
finance
committee
would
like
to
see
okay
that
in
place
and
the
board
can
make
it
that's.
Why
I
say
we
keep
it
simple
because
then
it's
just
going
to
come
down
to
a
discussion
about
military
race
and
we
better
be
prepared
for
that.
B
B
B
B
I
M
M
B
C
So
the
Board
of
Trustees
approved
a
motion
on
May
22nd
to
instruct
District
staff
to
prepare
a
proposal
for
the
June
26
board
meeting
that
would
provide
certified
classroom
teachers
to
include
media
Specialists
and
guidance.
Counselors.
A
one-time
five
thousand
dollar
bonus
using
available
sr3
funds.
C
Those
costs
are
are
included
in
this
information
we
also
compiled
through
May
30th,
our
sr3
analysis
by
category
of
what
had
been
spent.
What
was
projected
to
be
spent
by
the
end
of
this
fiscal
year?
What
was
projected
to
be
spent
by
24,
including
positions
as
well
as
non-fte
expenses,
to
give
everyone
just
an
idea
by
category
of
of
how
these
Esser
funds
were
projected
to
be
used?
You
know
through
nine
24.,
so
in
looking
at
the
totals.
C
The
projected
remaining
at
the
end
of
at
the
end
of
FY
23
is
approximately
83.2
million
dollars
and
we're
projected
to
use
approximately
45
million
dollars
for
fy24.
That's
what's
wrong.
I'm.
F
Go
ahead,
Lisa!
No!
So
we
have
in
the
plan
we
have
planned
to
spend
the
entire
remaining
83
million
dollars.
The
44
million
is
showing
what
additional
learning
Services
requests.
We
have
what
the
school
plans
are
and
what
positions
we've
already
planned
for
for
fy24
the
gray
columns
all
the
way
to
the
right
show
what
the
rest
of
it
is
planned
for.
F
So
that's
that
the
the
gray
is
just
in
the
38
or
I
can't
even
read
that
number.
The
amount
that's
left
and
the
gray
explains
what
those
pieces
are.
F
A
Right
and
I
think
that
the
hard
part
with
that
is
because
we
have
not
had
the
evaluations
done
yet
or
coming
back
to
us.
We
don't
know
what
to
take
out.
So
we
have
a
plan
for
going.
We
got
24
20
this
upcoming
year.
We
have
everything
already
basically
allocated
with
the
state
or
whatnot,
but
we
haven't
had
any
evaluations
of
the
programming
that
things
done
yet.
M
P
Yes,
sir
I
mean
we've,
we've
been
doing
those
things
ongoing,
as
that's
the
onset
investor,
I
mean
again
just
to
use
Saga
for
an
example,
and
we've
completed
at
least
three
program-
evaluations
of
saga-
just
to
bring
it
before
you
today
to
think
about
considering
Saga
and
Esser
for
an
additional
year.
So
we
have
some
program
evaluations.
P
We
may
not
have
them
for
everything,
that's
been
implemented,
but
we,
but
we
certainly
have
been
assessing
Effectiveness,
we've
already
just
discontinued
some
things,
for
example,
and
gotten
rid
of
some
allocations,
for
example,
that
we
didn't
believe
the
cost
effective
or
provided
a
significant
return
on
investment.
A
N
Holding
and
speaking
out
of
Esther
to
eliminate
those
as
well
not
to
try
to
pursue
fortifying
those
positions.
Because
we
knew
we
were
about
to
Sunset
and.
B
B
To
start
the
discussion,
because
then
we
would,
as
I
understand,
we'd
even
have
to
go
to
the
state
to
ask
permission
to
do
it.
So
it's
not
something
that
we
can
say
or
recommend.
I
mean
that
the
board
can
do.
We
can
make
a
recommendation.
They
look
into
this
based
upon
this
kind
of
documentation
being
presented,
and
then
it
can
be
an
option
that
can
be
provided.
M
I
B
Okay,
so
sooner
or
later,
sooner
than
later,
that's
why
we
started
in
the
discussion
now
right,
but
that's
that's
also
why
you
know
we
didn't
you
know
after
looking
at
it
talking
with
you,
know,
Bill
and
everybody
and
even
Dr
Kenneth
I
mean
Mr
Kennedy
and
everything
thinking
about
it.
It
didn't
make
any.
E
M
B
R
I
think
we
could
look
at
a
bonus
and
see
where
we
can
pull
it,
where
we're
not
using
that
answer.
The
2000
2500
something
like
that
because
we
know
I
mean
we
still
want
to
address
the
learning
loss
that
our
students,
you
know,
have
experienced
because
they're
not
it's
not
over
yet,
and
but
if
there
are
places
where
you
know,
staff
can
see
we're
not
going
to
spend
that
money
or
it's
not
effective,
I
I
think
it
would
do
great
for
morale
for
us
to
give
our
teachers
a
bonus.
O
One
piece
I
did
get
information
from
outside
Council
that
it
can
be
part
of
this,
the
the
salary
throughout
the
year.
If
it's
identified
that
way,
just
FYI
I
know
when
we
initially
talked
it
needed
to
just
be
a
bonus.
Oh.
B
That's
great
but
I
I
also
like
that's
that's
good,
that's
excellent
here,
but
I
like
how
you
put
this
down
so
that
you
know.
When
the
board
looks
at
this,
they
can
say:
okay,
here's
an
amount
if
you're
going
to
give
an
incentive
here
it
is.
This
is
what
it's
going
to
cost
and
then
all
we've
got
to
do
is
make
the
hard
choices.
What's
working,
what's
not
working
and
we'll
find
the
money
so
because
I
just
I
think
using
some
of
these
funds
where
we
know
the
assessment
is
easy.
B
So
I
I
think
really
it's
I
think
the
board.
This
is
still
in
discussion.
Just
needs
to
be
advised
that
this
is
a
good
starting
point,
and
these
are
the
challenges,
and
you
know
it's.
The
audit
so
I'd
like
to
make
a
motion
to
recommend
to
the
board
that
it
continues
working
with
staff
and
trying
to
determine
a
bonus
using
a
sequence
to
teachers.
A
Q
Q
We
had
a
lot
of
discussions
from
the
committee
members
focused
mostly
around
software
and
how
we
manage
software
corporately.
We
also
listed
our
2023
summer
projects
and
some
of
the
things
we're
tackling
this
summer,
and
then
we
had
a
security
update
which
was
actually
a
positive
number,
showing
that
their
vulnerabilities
are
reducing
and
we're
actually
really
on
top
of
those.
That
is
my
report.
B
S
Good
afternoon
Mr
Grabowski
committee
members
and
superintendent
Kennedy
I'd
like
to
present
the
April
capital
projects
report
Revenue
collections
for
the
2023
through
2028
program,
where
one
hundred
and
eleven
thousand
below
our
cash
flow
projection
based
on
the
most
recent
collections
with
two
percent
growth
over
the
prior
year.
That
would
be
our
March
collections.
G
Good
afternoon
I
provided
the
are
you
able
to
hear
me:
okay,
okay,
I,
provided
the
analysis
of
the
135
day,
average
daily
membership,
which
compares
the
counts
to
the
current
year
45
day
and
the
prior
year,
135
days,
average
daily
memberships.
These
are
the
numbers
that
are
reported
to
the
State
Department
of
Education
they're
used
for
the
current
year
to
reconcile
our
student
funding
for
2223,
and
they
are
also
used
to
project
our
revenue
for
the
2324
school
year.
G
I,
provided
not
only
the
comparison
that
is
based
on
the
funding
categories,
which
is
what
is
used
by
the
state,
but
I
also
provided
the
funding
category,
the
fund,
the
average
daily
membership
by
School
in
the
same
format
with
school
detail.
G
The
major
shift
in
the
funding
categories
are
between
the
high
school
category
and
the
vocational
Ed
category.
That
is
a
normal
fluctuation,
where
we
actually
receive
additional
funding
for
our
vocational
educational
students
and
then
the
additional
difference
between
those
two
categories
represent
the
spring
graduations
and
the
fact
that
those
children
are
of
age
and
no
longer
required
to
attend
under
compulsory
attendance
logs.
B
M
G
M
C
Thank
you,
sir
I
am
so
happy
to
finally
tell
you
that
Lisa
and
the
business
intelligence
information
management
team
have
finally
finished
the
Esser
dashboard
it's
a
little
complicated.
So
we
didn't
want
to
just
push
it
out
to
everybody,
so
we
will
be
having
I
didn't
even
tell
you,
this
Mr
Kennedy
I'm.
C
Sorry,
we
will
be
having
people
present
it
at
the
upcoming
audit
and
finance
committee,
as
well
as
the
board
in
July,
but
it
looks
really
nice
if
we,
if
we
can
we'll
try
to
get
some
some
screenshots
to
at
least
show
you,
but
it's
it's
not
something
we
just
wanted
to
roll
out
and
without
going
over
it
with
everyone.
C
Okay,
so
now
for
the
user
report,
eser1
has
not
changed,
of
course,
because
we've
expensed
it
all.
To
date,
the
sr2
section
foi
23
actual
today
we
have
spent
approximately
21.1
million
so
we're
up
an
additional
1.5
million
from
last
month.
We've
uncovered
4.5
million
and
the
remaining
to
be
spent
is
3.8
million
dollars.
We
have
reimbursed
to
date
62.8
million
dollars,
which
includes
FY
22
expenses
of
44.2
million
dollars
for
sr3
FY
23
actual
to
date.
We
have
spent
approximately
54
million
dollars.
C
We
are
up
5.1
million
dollars
from
last
month,
we've
encumbered
14
point
million,
the
remaining
to
be
spent
is
approximately
83
million
and
we
have
been
reimbursed
to
date,
approximately
61
million
of
which
part
of
this
includes
FY
22
expenditures
of
12
million,
and
that
concludes
my
report
on
Esther
funding.
C
We
received
an
additional
1.5
million
dollars
that
we
weren't
expecting
in
local
tax
revenues
for
a
tiff
reimbursement
from
the
city
of
North
Charleston,
and
we
also
received
an
additional
four
million
dollars
in
local
sources
for
interest
earned.
We
are
earning
a
lot
of
money
on
on
our
our
banking
cash
accounts
right
now,
actual
expenditures
are
projected
to
be
9.6
million
dollars
under
budget,
and
this
is
mostly
due
to
savings
and
salaries
and
benefits.
C
Total
transfers,
which
includes
our
charter,
schools
and
Meeting
Street
payments
are
projected
to
be
about
10
point
million
dollars
over
budget.
This
is
due
to
the
variance
between
the
budget
and
enrollment
and
their
final
135
day.
Enrollment
and
I.
Don't
know
I,
don't
know
if
y'all
recall
this,
but
last
month,
I
kept
pointing
that
out.
C
That
I
was
that
this
could
be
a
surprise
for
us
at
the
at
the
end
of
the
year
and
unfortunately,
it
was
so
through
when
you
look
at
revenues
over
expenditures
we
are
going
to
at
this
point
end
with
a
surplus
of
1.5
million
and
then
looking
ahead
through
the
through
year
in
through
May
and
June
I'm,
still
waiting
to
get
final
Tiff
numbers
which
could
impact
our
revenues.
C
So
I
just
want
to
make
sure
everyone's
aware
of
that,
and
then
I'm
also
looking
to
find
out
our
final
economic
rebates,
which
reduces
our
local
revenues
as
well,
and
hopefully,
I'll
have
those
from
the
Charleston
County
Treasurer's
Office
very
very
soon,
and
that
concludes
the
April
Financial
update.
C
C
You
I
didn't,
have
the
coffee
with
me,
yes,
and-
and
we
did
see-
probably
our
largest
increase
in
Charter
School
enrollment
from
beginning
to
the
end
of
the
year,
was
Meeting
Street
at
Brentwood
and
then
Carolina
Voyager.
C
A
Right
and
if
we
were
to
pull
going
back
to
the
last
time,
we
would
have
Porter,
Charters
and
the
meeting
streets
out,
then
we
will
see
a
dip
inside
of
our
inside
of
our
traditional
schools,
just
looking
at
taking
a
small
stab
at
the
numbers,
just
looking
at
it.
But
if
they
were
pulled
out,
then
we
wouldn't
be
we'll,
probably
be
in
a
negative.
As
far
as
to
change
from
the
prior
year,
growth.
C
B
Further
questions,
okay,
then
we
will
move
on
to
item
7,
f
and-
and
this
really
is
just
for
informational
purposes
to
the
committee.
It's
a
process.
We
had
started
back,
you
know,
as
per
the
schedule
in
January
and
kind
of
got
sidetracked
on
it.
B
I
had
sent
over
to
miss
Carlin
a
proposed
Charter
change,
and
one
of
them
was
to
bring
the
committee
the
auditing
finances
committees
to
lower
the
amount
of
expenditure
reviews
from
250
000
down
to
50
000,
which
I
think
is
the
procurement
level
in
which
an
RFP
has
to
be
issued
in
talking
with
Mrs
Carlin
about
it.
There
are
obviously
that
would
have
been
an
incredible
potential
waste
of
time,
a
lot
of
work
on
staff's
part.
B
Surprisingly
enough,
you
know
when
we
looked
at
it
and
it's
still
I
when
I
look
at
the
vendor
list
and
I
and
I
add
up
some
of
these
vendor
costs.
They
don't
make
sense
to
me,
but
I'm
sure
you
know
next
year
when
we
start
working
closer,
possibly
on
developing
more
of
a
committee
system.
Whenever
you
know
those
answers
can
be
answered,
a
lot
easier
in
the
future,
but
I
just
as
chairman,
when
I
went
through
it
and
had
been
working
with
Miss
Williams
on
it.
B
That
had
been
one
of
the
discussions
that
I
was
trying
to
get
to
look
at
and
then,
when
I
sent
it
over
to
staff
staff
had
some
concerns.
So
that's
why
I'd
asked
Miss
Carlin
to
you
know,
think
about
it
and
I
also
asked
the
committee
that
uses
the
thinking
you
know
matter
or
working
matter
to
see
if
we
can
come
up
with
a
number
that
we
feel
is
not
as
intrusive,
but
at
the
same
time
gives
the
board
a
little
better
feeling
that
you
know
that
we
are
looking
at.
C
I
had
one
of
our
procurement
officers.
Take
a
look
at
this
to
see.
You
know
how
difficult
it
would
be
to
produce
something
like
this.
So
if
that's
the
level
of
detail
that
you
want
to
see,
we
can
certainly
do
that.
Providing
the
you
know
the
purchase
order,
number
the
department
that
entered
it,
the
vendor
name,
the
entry
date,
the
PO
amount
and
then
the
opening
the
open
amount.
So
I
mean,
if
that's
the
kind
of
detail
that
that
audit
and
finance
would
like
to
see,
we
can
certainly
produce
that.
C
B
You're
part
of
it,
which
you
what's
your
thought
process,
I
mean
I
I,
have
no
problem.
Keeping
the
approval
at
250,
I
think
the
oversight
you
know
because,
as
it
was
worded,
it
was
almost
like.
The
audit
and
finance
committee
had
no
Opera.
You
know
in
the
wording
of
the
way
the
charters
worded
now.
The
audit
finance
committee
has
no
oversight
of
anything
under
250
000.
That's
the
way
it's
worded,
but
I
can
see
wording
it
to.
Where
is
it
to
make
recommendations
to
board
for
approval
of
anything
over
250?
That's
a
different
issue:
yeah.
I
I
I
Cautious
on
that
front,
I
do
recall
that
when
we
the
time
that
was
spent
on
this
Charter
a
number
of
years
ago,
there
was
a
focus
by
a
gentleman
who's
no
longer
on
the
committee,
but
who
I
think
was
really
pushing
that
this
committee's
you
know
best
utility
to
serving
the
board
was
to
focus
on
making
sure
that
the
audit
function
was
working,
because
this
this
sent
back
to
some
issues
that
the
district
had
long
before
I
was
around,
probably
most
of
us
around,
but
focused
on
making
sure
the
audit
was
done
properly.
I
Making
sure
that
you
know
any
items
found
in
the
audit
that
they
were
addressed
in
a
timely
manner.
Folks
on
this
and
then
focus
on
overall
Financial
prudence
and
forecasting
and
and
really
big
picture
Finance,
and
at
the
time
I
recall
the
board
wanted
to
retain
the
authority
to
approve
certain
transactions.
I
So
the
folks
on
this
committee,
at
the
time
felt
like
it,
was
redundant
to
rehash
a
transaction
if
the,
if
the
full
board
wanted
to
dig
into
those
transactions
there
was
at
the
time
there
was
a
resistance
from
this
committee
wanting
to
get
into
approving
individual
transactions
in
part,
because
when
I
look
at
the
list
of
transactions,
I
find
it
hard
to
I.
Don't
know
this
is
a
great
contractor.
If
they're,
a
good
contractor
or
back
contractor
I,
presume
a
good
faith
that
the
staff
were
working
on
it.
I
You
know
if
we've
already
approved
this
expenditure
as
part
of
the
overall
budget,
so
this
specific
contract
is
really
just
a
fulfillment
of
the
commitment
that
we
are
not
commitment
but
of
the
approval
that
the
board
gave
through
the
budget
process
so
I,
and
if
we
really
want
to
approve
transactions,
I
almost
feel
like
we
need
to
specifically
and
I'm,
not
sure
it's
a
I'm,
not
sure
it's
some.
You
know,
I'm,
not
sure
it's
us
I'm.
You
know
it's
almost
like
having
a
second
procurement
audit
right.
A
I
Which
development
velma's
more
way
more
practiced
in
this
area
than
I
am
but
it's
to
me
it's
a
different
function
than
the
high
level
function.
That
I
think
the
committee
has
tried
to
focus
on.
B
Melma,
are
you
still
there
I
think
she
dropped
off
yeah,
because
I
would
have
looked
at
her
too
for
advice
on
how
to,
and
maybe
that's
what
I'll
do.
Is
I'll
I'll.
Take
your
comments
and
comments
from
Miss
Carlin
and
push
forward
on
it
and
see
what
we
can.
You
know
work
out
because
I
I
really
don't
think
you
know
as
to
approval
I,
think
that
250
is
high.
You
know
that
I
don't
think.
B
That's
the
number
I
think
that
the
real
issue
is
is
coming
in
on
the
audit
function
because
I
I
did
add,
I
had
a
conversation
with
the
Auditors
for
the
first
time
and
they
were
very
good
and
they
said
come
talk
to
them.
More
often,
you
know
it's
just
one
of
the
things
you
learn
in
the
learning
curve
that
you
know
maybe
she'd,
do
it
and
go
talk
to
them
more
often
and
but
then
again
you
know
the
Auditors
are
directed
to
look
at
a
certain
area.
B
B
We
see
them
trying
to
figure
out
what
they're
doing,
but
it's
hard
to
put
them
together
because,
like
looking
in
a
PO
I,
don't
know
what
they're
doing
I
can
I
can
point
out
that
name
and
say
here
you
know,
make
education,
do
your
job
and
figure
out
what
this
is
all
about,
and
now
we
look
at
the
assessment
like
with
you.
B
So
let
I
think
I
think
we'll
just
continue
to
work
on
it
again
and
and
try
to
figure
out
a
you
know,
a
happy
medium
on
that.
But
I
agree
with
you
and
I
and
I'd
like
to
go
back
to
board
and
say
yeah
and
I.
Don't
think
we
should
be
approving
anything
under.
I
The
250
000
is
a
lot
of
money
to
anybody,
but
we
but.
B
I
Filipino
so
you're,
looking
at
half
of
0.1
percent
I
mean
you're
really
getting
into
a
small
relative
number,
and
so,
where?
Where
are
we
going
to
be
most
value
added
to
the
district,
I
kind
of
think
it's
going
to
be
on
the
bigger
picture
strategy?
You
know
love
that
where
they
just
say,
you
know,
seven,
probably
seven
million,
maybe
six
but
six
million
dollars
on
on
refunding
our
debt,
like
those
are
bigger
things,
bigger
impact
yeah
too,.
R
B
L
M
A
B
C
So
would
you
like
for
us
to
bring
this
back?
Is
another
information
item.
N
G
C
C
B
B
C
C
A
M
K
If
I
can
offer
clarification
on
one
of
the
answers
provided
earlier,
Miss
Shaw
asked
me
to
let
you
all
know:
Mr
Calhoun's
question
an
item
by
Delta
on
one
stall
would
be
complete.
The
current
completion
is
in
fact
December
of
2025,
as
she
mentioned,
but
with
the
additional
work.
That's.
A
B
Okay
item
nine:
the
next
upcoming
meeting
will
be
July
6th.