►
From YouTube: Chattanooga City Council Mtg
Description
Chattanooga City Council Mtg - Captured Live on Ustream at http://www.ustream.tv/channel/chattanooga-council-meeting
A
B
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
I'd,
like
to
do
the
invocation
from
the
lectern
tonight.
People
have
been
asking
me
the
last
few
days
how
I'm
doing
and
if
I'm,
okay,
I
appreciate
it
very
much,
but
no
matter
what
adversity,
I
and
others
may
endure.
I
have
49
brothers
and
sisters
who
can
fight
on
no
more
it's
up
to
us
to
honor
their
legacy.
A
A
C
D
Chair
members
of
the
City
Council
we're
here
tonight
to
honor
an
individual
for
some
life-saving
efforts.
Surprisingly
enough,
it's
not
a
firefighter
so
there's
other
people
saves
lives.
Besides,
firefighters,
fire,
police,
Public
Works,
they
all
say
glass
every
year,
they're
honored
in
award
ceremonies,
but
this
year
we
have
a
different
person
that
stepped
forward
to
show
what
a
great
team
we
have
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga.
E
So
most
of
the
council
know
who
Chris
Smith?
Is
you
probably
don't
know
who
the
Bron
Caylor
is
LeBron?
Is
a
up-and-comer
in
the
world
of
IT?
He's
been
with
us
now
for
probably
about
a
year,
and
he
started
off
in
our
telecom
area
and
has
now
moved
up
to
become
a
full-fledged
business.
Analyst,
so
you'll
probably
be
seeing
a
lot
more
of
him
around
the
city
as
time
goes
on,
but
Chris
here
are
pretty
much
guy
go-to
guy
for
a
lot
of
stuff
in
the
process
of
moving
some
equipment.
E
Out
of
our
fourth
floor
on
the
annex,
where
we're
located
for
a
renovation,
that's
going
on
there
Chris
accidentally
twisted
sideways
with
a
piece
of
glass
and
sustained
a
life-threatening
injury
during
that
time
period
with,
like
literally
seconds
LeBron,
acted
quickly,
ripped
his
shirt
off
his
back
tied
a
tourniquet,
disconnected
everything
on
the
vehicle
that
he
could
to
get
Chris
safely
out
to
the
hospital
which
was
down
the
road
and
when
he
got
there,
the
emergency
room
staff
said
that
he
literally
saved
his
life
because
it
was
a
pretty
bad
cut.
So,
chief,
so.
D
In
honor
of
that,
with
a
fire
department
worried
about
saving
Lifeson
property,
that's
our
number
one
priority.
When
we
heard
this
story,
it
touched
us
and
we
wanted
to
honor
him,
and-
and
thank
you
again
for
this
opportunity.
First,
we
have
a
token
to
show
our
appreciation
for
what
you
did
in
recognition
of
your
life-saving
action.
Most
people
will
have
a
fight
or
flight
syndrome.
They
either
run
or
panic
or
they
take
action.
Thank
goodness.
He
takes
action
and
save
this.
D
A
Thank
You
Brandon
Chris
for
that
that
presentation
it's
heartwarming
for
tonight
we
have
no
ordinances,
has
been
properly
moved
in
a
second
that
we
approved
the
minutes.
All
in
favor
of
the
motion.
Let
it
be
known
as
saying
aye
opposed,
nay
motion
carries
as
we
have
no
ordinances
on
final
reading
for
tonight,
but
we
do
have
some
ordinances
are
on
first
reading,
madam
clerk:
let's
go
what
item
6a
an.
A
F
Ordinance
to
amend
chattanooga
city
code,
part
2,
chapter
38,
zoning
ordinance.
So
it's
a
reasonable
properties
located
at
101
and
103
Glendale
Drive
and
two
unaddressed
properties
in
the
1100
block
of
signal.
Mountain
road,
more
particularly
described
herein
from
our
one
residential
zone
and
c2
convenience
commercial
zone
to
see
to
convert
convenience
commercial
zone.
A
G
You
mr.
chair,
as
you
or
where
the
case
first
is
going
to
be
presented
by
the
Office
of
planning
and
development,
our
PA
applicant
should
then
be
provided
for
seven
minutes
for
all
presentation,
plus
two
minutes
for
a
bottle.
For
a
total
time
of
nine
minutes,
spokespersons
for
the
opposition
will
be
granted
equal
time
of
nine
minutes.
H
If
you
so
desire,
I
should
give
you
a
brief
overview
since
I
give
you
a
full
presentation
at
committee
meeting
last
week,
sure
this
is
a
request
simply
to
rezone
a
two
point:
seven
acres
site
located
at
101
and
103
Glendale
Drive
from
R
1
and
C
2
to
C
2,
to
accommodate
a
neighborhood
market
with
fuel
stations,
staff
and
Planning
Commission
recommended
denial
request,
mainly
as
it
relates
to
traffic
safety
concerns
of
that
location.
I'm
also,
potential
impact.
H
There's
a
slope
area
in
the
back
of
the
rear
that
rear
the
property
that
we
were
staff
had
some
concerns,
in
particular
terms
of
grading,
to
extend
the
c2
that
far
back
so
both
staff
and
Planning
Commission
recommended
denial.
There
was
public
opposition
at
the
meeting.
We
received
also
a
number
of
petitions
in
opposition,
so
both
Planning
Commission
and
staff
recommended
all
okay.
L
A
Thank
you.
Man,
you've
heard
the
instructions
of
the
city
attorney.
The
opposition
now
has
a
total
of
nine
minutes
in
which
to
speak.
Do
you
have
representatives
who
will
do
the
speaking
okay?
So
you
can
divide
the
nine
minutes
between
the
the
three
of
you.
Yes,
go
ahead,
give
your
name
your
address
in
the
district
in
which
yes.
N
Hello,
my
name
is
Amanda
brown
I
live
at
1
1
0
blend
Hill
Drive
in
district
1
I'm.
Here
today,
representing
myself
and
other
Lindo
Drive
residents,
who
have
signed
a
petition
opposing
the
rezoning
of
parcels,
hike,
Lindo
drive
and
Sigma
Mountain
Road
I
have
lived
on
Glendale
for
roughly
16
years
and
I'm
very
concerned
about
the
problems
my
neighbors
and
I
will
be
subjected
to
if
this
land
is
Riis
owned
and
developed.
My
options
at
this
time
I
ask
you
to
recall
an
email
expressing
our
concern:
assent,
GE,
On,
June,
7th.
N
The
email
goes
into
more
detail
about
these
problems.
That
I
were
briefly
discussed
today.
We
do
not
feel
as
though
the
convenience
store
nursery
store.
Complex
is
an
appropriate
use
of
this
land.
According
to
the
RTA,
the
rezoning
would
set
a
precedent
for
future
rezoning
in
our
neighborhood
and
our
Lots
are
already
relatively
small,
and
we
do
not
wish
to
be
encroached
upon
by
commercial
development.
Nor
do
we
want
our
Road
wand
or
any
other
concerns
that
come
along
with
that
that
are
discussed
in
our
pays
report.
N
The
ARP
a
report
also
spoke
of
this
land
is
being
sensitive.
A
development
of
this
size
will
not
be
aesthetically
pleasing,
nor
would
enhance
the
natural
space
in
the
area,
since
several
mature
hardwood
trees
will
be
removed
in
layers
of
dipping
or
slanted.
Sedimentary
rock
will
need
to
be
cut
for
a
massive
retaining
wall.
Swarm
water
will
also
increase
and
fluence,
who
are
already
sometimes
saturated
properties.
N
Finally,
we
feel
as
though
the
development
will
not
be
beneficial
to
our
well-being.
Traffic
is
already
heavy
here
and
sometimes
it's
nearly
impossible
to
make
a
left-hand
turn
off
of
Glendale.
We
do
not
welcome
any
increase
in
traffic,
nor
do
we
welcome
noise
and
light
pollution
that
would
come
with
this
project.
We
are
not
a
community
who
is
underserved
by
grocers
or
gasoline
stations,
there's
simply
not
a
need
for
this
development
in
this
location,
I
respect,
Jenni
decision.
That's
me
mission,
the
withdrawal,
but
due
to
a
very
ambiguous
message
we
received
from
the
applicant.
O
Rebecca
little
live
at
412
Thompson
Street.
The
experts
at
our
PA
have
recommended
that
you
read
that
you
deny
the
rezoning
and
the
Planning
Commission
also
unanimously
denied
the
rezoning,
because
they
agree
with
neighboring
residents
that
a
commercial
development
of
this
scale
is
not
compatible
with
surrounding
residential
uses.
It
would
create
a
nuisance,
prevent
the
quiet
enjoyment
of
our
land.
Decreased
property
values,
threaten
the
environment
and
post
serious
safety
hazards
to
Chattanooga
and
Hamilton
County
residents.
O
I
speak
on
behalf
of
my
family
property
owners
of
over
40
parcels
in
the
neighborhood
above
the
site
and
in
support
of
Glendale
residents,
my
seven
siblings
and
I
own
the
forested
land
that
is
contiguous
with
the
proposed
commercial
development
to
the
north
and
west,
and
we
have
preserved
it
in
its
pristine
condition
for
nearly
20
years
for
the
benefit
and
enjoyment
of
the
entire
residential
area.
Above
and
beneath
it.
O
It's
our
opinion
that
the
footprint
of
a
small
store
that's
been
spots
owned
on
a
flat
piece
of
land
immediately
on
the
city,
road
and
then
abandoned
for
decades,
doesn't
justify
commercializing
a
pristine
area
ten
times
as
large,
especially
one
that
will
require
significant
alteration
of
land
topography
and
the
installation
of
bio,
hazardous
chemicals
below
the
ground
service.
Exactly
where
for
streams
from
our
property
to
the
north
converge.
O
Although
the
IGA
will
take
up
about
half
the
footprint,
the
developers
want
to
rezone
the
entire
two
point:
seven
acres
to
see
two
will
so
no
doubt
open
the
area
up
for
future
development,
as
our
PA
said
at
the
Louisville
store,
Hutchins
Louisville
store,
they
reasoned
a
larger
piece
of
property
than
their
store
footprint.
The
area
around
it
continued
to
be
developed,
resulting
essentially
in
a
commercial
strip
mall,
and
there
was
supposed
to
be
a
map
here.
O
But
if
you
look
at
a
map,
we
created
a
map
that
we
sent
to
you
of
all
of
the
properties
that
opposed
the
rezoning
around
it.
You'd
see
that
the
only
ones
that
don't
oppose
that
are
the
ones
who
are
probably
going
to
sell
their
land
to
developers
and
abandon
their
properties,
leaving
the
longtime
residents
behind
a
deal
with
the
hazards
to
withdraw.
O
This
ordinance
would
allow
the
company
to
come
back
with
the
same
proposal
as
soon
as
this
one
is
withdrawn
and
will
force
residents
to
do
this
all
over
again,
but
the
key
factors
that
drove
everyone
to
agree
that
this
rezoning
is
unacceptable,
won't
change
next
week
next
year
or
in
a
decade
to
deny
this
rezoning
is
not
anti-business.
It
would
simply
send
the
message.
Welcome
to
Chattanooga.
We
welcome
you
to
put
your
business
here
in
a
proper
and
safe
place,
but
we're
not
gonna
place
our
residents
at
risk
unnecessarily.
O
P
My
name
is
Wendy
Morgan
and
I'm,
representing
the
hundreds
of
Mountain
residents
who
drive
Signal
Mountain
Road
every
day.
We
are
the
individuals
that
house
and
States
they
want
to
catch
on
their
way
home
from
work.
The
ones
Houchins
hopes
will
make
this
convenience
store.
Our
last
stop
on
the
way
up
the
mountain
I'm
here
to
tell
you
that
the
mountain
residents
do
not
want
to
see
a
development
of
this
size
placed
on
the
first
major
curve
going
up
the
mountain
at
an
already
dangerous
intersection.
P
We
want
you
to
vote
on
it
tonight
and
we
want
you
to
deny
this
request.
Please
putting
a
convenience
store
and
gas
station
here
makes
absolutely
no
sense
and
would
be
absolutely
irresponsible
at
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
the
people
who
drive
single
mountain
road
every
day
know
how
dangerous
it
is
to
turn
left
on
Glendale.
The
turn
lane
is
only
long
enough
for
two
cars,
the
third
card
protrudes
into
traffic
descending,
the
mountain.
P
Not
only
do
you
have
to
worry
about
getting
your
car
all
the
way
into
the
turn
lane
when
turning
left
on
to
Glendale,
you
have
to
hope
the
traffic
coming
up.
The
mountain
is
paying
attention
because
it
is
very
easy
for
that
traffic
to
drift
into
your
lane,
with
coming
around
that
major
curve,
more
than
once,
I
have
had
to
lay
on
my
horn
in
order
to
get
the
attention
of
someone
who
is
ascending,
the
mountain
and
drifting
into
my
lane
head-on.
You
also
have
the
issue
of
speed.
P
People
are
attempting
to
gain
speed
here
for
their
ascent
up
the
mountain
and
those
coming
down.
The
mountain
are
on
a
steep
decline
that
naturally
tends
to
increase
speed
of
cars
coming
down.
To
put
a
stop
light
here
is
equally
dangerous,
especially
for
those
coming
down
the
mountain.
Who
will
have
to
stop
traffic
very
easily
can
get
backed
up
into
a
blind
spot
that
will
make
rear-end
collisions
inevitable.
P
It
is
truly
crazy
to
think
of
the
danger
this
development
will
create
to
the
people
who
live
on
Glendale
Drive
and
the
people
who
drive
this
mountain
every
day.
Besides,
all
this
Houghton
says
their
delivery
trucks
and
their
fuel
trucks
will
turn
left
out
of
Glendale
on
to
Signal,
Mountain
and
and
they'll
enter
and
exit
without
home
to
Sigma
Mountain,
and
currently
there
are
restrictions
forbidding
large
commercial
vehicles
on
Glendale.
P
With
this
development
we
would
have
large
trucks
turning
left
off
of
Glendale
on
to
signal
Mountain
Road
on
a
major
curve
with
ascending
and
descending
traffic,
something
Glendale
and
Signal.
Mountain
residents
have
never
had
before.
As
you
already
know,
from
your
review
of
this
location
in
the
one-mile
stretch
from
this
proposed
development
to
the
highway
27
on-ramp,
there
are
already
five
convenience
stores
and
gas
stations
with
a
6-1
on
the
way,
and
pumps
will
soon
be
out
of
that
Food
City.
P
Not
only
will
this
be
the
seventh
convenience
store
in
this
one-mile
stretch,
it
will
be
the
largest
and
it
will
be
the
only
one
where
Signal
Mountain
Road
decreases
from
seven
lanes
to
three
lanes.
As
you
know,
it
will
be
11,000
square
feet,
3,000
square
feet,
larger
than
Dollar
General.
It
will
have
50
parking
places
will
involve
the
removal
of
tons
of
mature
trees.
P
It
will
cut
into
the
side
of
the
mountain,
a
huge
retaining
wall
will
be
erected
and
it
will
destroy
the
residential
character
of
Glendale
Drive
and
the
natural
setting
of
the
beautiful
Portland
disc-off
Park.
It
would
be
senseless
and
truly
irresponsible
for
the
city
of
Chattanooga
to
resign.
This
land
commercial,
when
there
is
commercial
land
already
for
sale
in
safe
locations
along
Signal,
Mountain
Road,
and
if
Hodgins
were
applying
to
build
on
that
land.
You
would
not
have
any
of
us
standing
here
in
opposition
today.
P
J
J
My
clients
have
met
with
the
community
members
several
times
and
they've
heard
their
concerns
and
realized
that
this
was
a
battle
that
we
were
not
going
to
be
able
to
come
to
an
agreement
on,
and
that's
why
they've
asked
for
the
withdrawal
and
on
that
point
out
also
asked
for
everyone
to
remember
that
the
applicant
is
not
the
owner
of
the
property,
but
a
purchaser
under
a
purchase
agreement
of
the
property.
So
a
denial
would
effectively
prohibit
the
current
owners
or
any
future
purchaser
from
making
any
application
to
rezone.
A
G
J
J
So
that
that
was
what
all
I
was
saying,
so
you
know
at
we
don't
have
the
capability
under
the
contract
to
go
the
period
of
time.
That
would
be
necessary
to
reapply
and
go
through
the
whole
process,
as
that
would
require
starting
from
the
beginning
with
the
Planning,
Commission
and
whatnot.
So
the
only
thing
I'm
asking
is
that
we
don't
do
something
detrimental
to
the
property
owners
which
are
not
the
applicant
I.
J
Believe
that's
truly,
my
only
and
those
are
not
my
clients
also
I'll
say
that
I'm,
just
as
a
level
of
logic
here,
throwing
that
out
there
for
the
council
to
consider
and
I
did
probably
send
an
email
to
the
community
that
may
have
been
interpreted
as
vague.
That
was
not
intentional.
It
simply
said
that
we
were
making
the
request
to
withdrawal,
as
I
heard
that
yesterday
evening,
I
just
send
it
on
to
them
so
that
they
would
know
as
well.
K
K
K
Q
K
Thank
You
mr.
chair,
let
me
just
say
this
I've
gotten
to
know
a
lot
of
great
people
on
Glendale
Drive.
Through
this
process
we
attended
a
community
meeting
and
I
will
say
this,
even
though
they
they
had
strong
opposition
to
this
project.
They
always
kept
a
level
head.
They
were
civil
I
thought
they.
They
did
this
in
a
great
and
a
great
process
and
I
agree
with
the
neighbors
I.
Think
having
this
grocery
store
at
this
location,
woulda
beat
would
be
a
bad
idea.
However,
at
it.
B
You
mr.
chairman
I'll,
second,
my
colleague
from
district
1
on
that,
and
this
and
I
agree
with
everything
about
the
Glendale
Drive
residence
I've
heard
from
plenty
of
them
too,
and
and
it's
great
to
see
people
who
were
engaged
in
the
process
in
a
really
constructive
manner.
I
will
say
that
we
all
represent
districts
here.
B
We
all
represent
one
ninth
of
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
and
there
was
a
time
when
people
who
lived
outside
of
the
city
of
Chattanooga
but
who
maybe
lived
in
the
outskirts
and
owned
property
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga
could
vote
in
our
elections.
And
you
know,
councilman
Freeman
remembers
those
times,
and
it's
told
me
about
them.
Wasn't
that
long
ago,
it's
unfortunate
to
me
that
there
has
been
so
much
letters
to
the
editor
phone
calls.
B
Communication
with
us
from
people
who
do
not
live
in
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
so
I
feel
compelled
to
say.
My
support
of
the
withdrawal
is
my
respect
for
councilman
Henderson
and
the
leadership
of
his
district
and
respect
for
the
people
of
Chattanooga.
I
have
a
great
many
friends
and
relatives
who
live
on
Signal
Mountain
I
have
never
taken
an
on
city
residents,
opinion
into
account
on
a
city
of
Chattanooga
voting
zoning
matter,
nor
will
I
in
the
future,
but
I'm
happy
to
support
the
motion
to
withdraw.
A
F
A
H
H
Again,
this
is
a
request
to
rezone
a
4.2
acre
site
located
between
jarn
again
and
I.
Go
Gap
Road
address
70
127
on
Google
Road,
from
r1
to
r4
special
zone
to
accommodate
a
medical
office
building
staff
and
reviewing
this
request
really
didn't
have
concerns
about
the
use
as
the
condition
of
the
road
Jharna
ghen
Road,
which
serve
the
property,
is
very
narrow
and
we
had
some
fire
safety
concerns
in
terms
of
adequate
access.
H
We
see
comments
from
both
the
fire
marshal's
office
and
the
Chattanooga
part
of
Transportation
in
terms
of
concerns
of
making
sure
we
had
adequate
fire
access.
So
for
that
reason,
staff
have
recommended
denial
at
Planning
Commission.
There
were
some
opposition
two
or
three
residents
who
came
out
in
opposition.
The
applicant
presentism
conditions
to
address
the
staff
concerns
as
well
as
some
of
the
points
of
the
opposition.
I
think
when
the
concerns
opposition
was
accessed
on
to
I,
go
Gap
Road.
H
So
the
conditions
that
were
offered
by
the
applicant,
where
the
following,
which
were
approved
by
Planning
Commission
one,
is
low
impact.
Lighting
two
is
no
access
from
my
googa
probe,
three
to
increase
the
buffer
from
ten
to
thirty
feet,
along
a
Gap
Road
and
along
the
Western
property
line
and
four
to
widened,
John
Eagan
Road.
Those
are
the
conditions
that
were
presented
by
the
applicant
and
Planning
Commission
move
forward
with
so
I'll
close
it.
There.
L
A
L
L
So
that
is
one
and
the
other
is
there
had
been
to
some
discussion
between
the
developer
mr.
price
and
myself
in
terms
of
a
berm
along
I
go
Gap
Road,
that's
not
going
to
be
practical
because
of
the
of
the
grove
of
dogwood
trees
along
I
go
Gap
Road.
So
in
Council
the
second
point
in
consultation
with
the
City
arborist,
we
will
be
on
site
and
discuss
about
the
placement
of
vegetation
for
a
solid
hedge.
So
those
two
points
if
we
could
amend
the
conditions
for
those
in
whatever
route
we
need
to
take
on
that.
A
Special
conditions
in
that
they
only
lead
to
meetings,
there's
no
action
with
regard
to
the
property
that
I
heard
you're
not
requiring
them
to
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
You're,
not
saying
you
need
a
certain
tree,
you're,
not
saying
you
need
a
certain
number
of
trees,
you're
just
saying
you're
gonna
have
a
meeting
and
to
the
extent
that
that
could
be
attached
time.
I
would
ask
to
city
attorney
to
to
give
me
some
advice
with
regard.
H
To
that
I
have
one
thought
to
add:
just
we
had
maybe
or
have
a
tree
preservation
plan
approved
by
the
City
arborist
we've
had
that
before.
Like
similar
thing
about
traffic
improvements
to
be
approved
by
seedot,
you
could
do
the
same
thing
if
the
applicant
wants
to
speak
to
that.
That
could
be
one
way
of
so
that
there's
a
plan
that
submitted
as
part
of
the
building
permit
process
where
the
City
arborist
signs
off
on
what
trees
are
gonna,
be
protected
on
the
site
that.
A
Q
H
L
L
H
A
R
A
S
Thank
You
mr.
chairman
Mike
price,
MEP
engineers.
We
did
receive
Planning
Commission
approval
for
this
particular
project
and
we
do
have
a
set
of
conditions.
I
know
that,
with
these
additional
conditions
that
have
been
discussed
here,
I
might
suggest-
maybe
for
consideration
of
this
body,
that
if
it
is
approved
tonight
that
you
give
two
weeks
because
I
think
in
order
to
get
the
language
perfectly
or
or
more
adapt
ly
correct
for
what
we
need.
It
may
take
two
weeks
to
give
it
a
certain
city
attorney's
office
in
our
PA.
S
So
if
you
do
approve
it,
maybe
we
contingent
it
to
be
heard,
then,
in
two
weeks,
not
next
week
to
give
the
proper
time,
but
essentially
what
we're.
Looking
at
here
in
medical
office,
there
is
currently
medical
office
next
door.
Southeast
medical
is
located
next
door,
which
there's
a
lot
of
work
on
individuals,
eyes
and
we're
looking
at
a
medical
place.
That
would
be
here.
Two
buildings
is
kind
of
how
we
envision
is
taking
place.
S
The
property
sits
in
a
sort
of
a
bowl,
and
so
we've
limited
the
height
as
it
relates
to
the
building
and
what's
proposed,
and
we
have
exceeded
the
landscape
requirements
as
it
relates
to
buffers
and
and
also
screening.
We
have
agreed,
as
it
relates
to
the
widening
of
Jernigan
Road
to
Bella
Vista,
and
so
we
think
that
provides
adequate
access.
If
you
look
at
the
land
use
plan
that
was
adopted
some
1516
years
ago,
it
talks
about
medium
density,
basically
sort
of
high
density,
so
you're,
looking
at
eight
or
more
units
per
acre.
S
We
don't
really
think
that
that
would
be
appropriate.
We
think
that
certainly
office
use,
which
is
more
of
an
eight
to
five
and
certainly
medical,
would
be
more
appropriate
and
less
disturbing
to
the
neighbors
in
the
area.
So
with
that,
we
would
hope
that
we
would
gain
your
support
this
evening
for
that.
But
thank
you.
Okay,.
R
I'm
Debbie
Lee
hi
I
live
at
7001,
Palermo
Drive,
my
home
in
Bella
Vista,
for
about
three
years
and
in
speaking
with
mr.
grown
in
the
last
couple
days,
I
it's
my
understanding
that
I
think
I
speak
for
a
number
of
our
residents
in
her
neighborhood
that
we
we
we
realized.
There
has
to
be
some
progress,
but
we
don't
want.
R
We
want
to
lessen
the
impact,
both
visually
and
environmentally
the
impact
on
our
residential
neighborhood,
and
so
the
only
way
that
I
would
personally
not
be
opposed
to.
This
is
if
mr.
Brown's
additional
requirements
are
met,
you
know
taking
care
of
the
old-growth
trees,
making
sure
there's
plenty
of
green
space.
You
know
so
that
we
we
really
I
mean
we
love
our
neighborhood
and
we
don't
want
to
lose
the
quality
of
that.
S
Thank
you
I
believe
that
it
relates
to
the
use
that
this
is
it's
about
as
unobtrusive
of
uses
you
could
have
as
it
relates
to
the
neighborhood
and
eight-to-five.
We've
already
agreed
to
limit
the
light
pollution
by
directing
and
lighting
away
from
all
residential
areas,
and
again
we
have
increased
buffers
over
what's
even
call
for
in
the
ordinance.
S
So
this
is,
you
know
you
don't
have
a
lot
of
parties
going
on
at
medical
office
and
I'm
aware
of
unless
it's
a
Christmas
party,
but
beyond
that
I
think
this
is
about
as
unobtrusive
that
you
could
get
in
as
it
relates
to
the
neighborhood.
So
hopefully
with
that
that
would
would
gain
your
approval
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
L
T
A
H
Again,
we
gave
you
a
full
presentation
last
week,
so
I'll
give
it
a
synopsis
tonight
for
the
purpose
of
providing
the
context
again.
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
a
six
point:
eight
acre
site
located
at
41:55,
Randolph
Circle
from
a1
to
m1
special
zone
for
light,
manufacturing,
building,
warehouse
and
sales
staff
and
reviewing
this
had
concerns
about
m1
because
it
has
a
pretty
broad
range
of
uses
that
would
not
be
appropriate
with
because
there
is
some
housing
in
the
area
we
feel
like.
H
That
would
not
be
consistent,
particular
the
plan
recommendation,
which
calls
for
like
a
commercial
business
mix.
So
we
recommended
denial
of
the
m1
approval
of
m2
and
that's
only
for
a
portion
of
the
property,
because
the
site
plan
is
submitted
to
us
basically
showed
about
two-thirds
of
the
site,
the
eastern
two-thirds
being
used
for
that
business
and
the
other
third
closer
to
where
the
some
residences
were
was
not
being
proposed
for
use
at
this
time.
H
So
we
recommend
leaving
that
as
it's
currently
zoned,
that
recommendation
was
conveyed
to
Planning
Commission
Planning
Commission,
looked
at
staffs
request
and
recommended
approval
of
the.
There
was
a
slight
adjustment
to
the
boundary
a
little
bit
moving
a
little
bit
further
west
on
the
property,
but
the
concurred
with
staffs
recommendation
to
deny
and
wanna
prove
em
to.
A
V
W
T
Yes,
sir,
my
name
is
Chris
Mahon
I'm,
a
second-generation
owner
of
Felton's
clutch
and
brake
we've
been
in
mr.
Anderson's
district.
Now
for
53
years
we
are
a
family-owned
we've
been
in
Chattanooga,
since
1964
I
started
working
there
in
1988
my
father
passed
away
six
years
ago,
which
I've
taken
over
the
business.
T
The
business
continued
to
grow
over
the
years
and
weird
I'm
in
the
south
side
down
there,
and
we
are
just
completely
slapped
out
of
room
if
you'll
know
the
name,
such
as
a
and
I'll
give
you
some
four
instances
of
what
we
do
car
to
bus.
We
keep
those
buses,
stopping
no
one
else
in
town
can
do
what
we
do
for
them.
The
incline
mr.
T's
loves
us
because
we
keep
it
from
going
through
their
window.
Okay,
TVA.
We
do
most
of
the
breaks
on
the
dam.
They
have
a
break
that
ratchets.
T
That
opens
the
doors
we
keep
most
of
those
running
for
the
state
of
Tennessee
in
Kentucky
the
the
boat
for
the
aquarium.
It
has
a
little
clutch
that
keeps
the
air
conditioner
working.
Well,
they
were
told
it
was
completely
obsolete
and
thanks
to
us
they
have
air
conditioner
on
that
boat.
On
that
boat
this
year,
public
works.
T
The
piece
of
property
that
I'm
looking
at
is
surrounded
pretty
much
by
m1
I
asked
for
m1,
because
that's
what
our
property
is
right
now,
as
looking
through
the
city
ordinance
and
going
through
the
Planning
Commission
meetings,
they
decided
that
we
could
do
m2
and
I'm
fine
with
that.
I
don't
have
a
problem
with
that.
We
do
lot
manufacturing
we're,
not
heavy
manufacturing
company
and
we
do
a
lot
of
retail
business
and
I'm
looking
to
get
into
more
retail
truck
parts.
That's
why
I
need
more
space
to
have
more
inventory
and
more
employees.
T
T
We
have
a
it's
called
a
bake,
Oh
burn
off,
oven
and
what
it
does
there
there
used
to
be
chemicals
used.
We
have
a
lot
of
grease,
I,
don't
know
if
you're
familiar
with.
If
you
work
on
auto
parts,
especially
on
a
wheel
self,
a
wheel
seal
blows
out
on
your
bus
or
anything.
Sometimes
we
get
breaks
it
or
dripping
with
grease
and
that
grease
has
to
be
burnt
off.
It
used
to
be
put
in
a
container
with
trichloroethylene
chemical,
which
is
highly
it's
bad
stuff.
So
they've
come
up
with
an
oven.
T
You
get
the
grease
up
to
about
600
degrees
and
it
burns
the
grease
off
and
dissolves
it.
It
comes
ash
and
we
do
have
all
the
like.
I
said:
I've
been
in
mr.
Anderson's
district
for
53
years,
there's
houses
that
are
all
around
it
in
new
development
and
as
far
as
I
know,
there's
never
been
a
complaint
and
we
can
ask
him:
if
he's
ever.
Had
anybody
complain?
T
X
T
Oh
truck
parts
such
as
what
Lee
Smith
does
or
truck
Pro
fleet
pride,
but
yeah
they
grow
to
the
business
I
mean
we
are
I've,
invited
several
council
members,
town
of
the
business,
a
couple
of
the
guys
from
Planning
Commission
I
have
nowhere
else
to
go.
I
mean
I'm,
surrounded
by
new
development.
The
piece
of
property
next
to
me
used
to
be
rider.
Development
I
was
offered
that
for
biggest
mistake,
I
ever
made
I
was
offered
that
property
for
300,000
about
seven
years
ago.
Now
it's
for
sale
for
1.3
million.
T
Q
T
T
Q
T
In
manufacturing,
ma'am
I
mean
just
like
chickens.
There
there's
a
by-product
to
it,
I'm
sorry
I'm,
not
gonna,
stand
here
and
and
like
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
one.
That's
going
to
be
yes,
I'm,
not
gonna.
Tell
you
what
you
want
to
hear.
I'm
gonna,
tell
you
the
facts
and
doing
what
we
do
honestly
and
and
I'm
gonna
I'm,
just
gonna,
be
honest:
I'm
not
trying
to
lie
to
anybody
or
tell
you
what
you
want
to
hear
in
manufacturing
and
we
do
the
light
manufacturing.
T
I
T
Y
We'll
try
this
how's
it
sound.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much
counsel.
My
name
is
Craig
mcgarvey
I'm,
president
water,
Haven,
homeowners
association,
we're
just
a
three
or
four
tents
down
Harrison
pike,
and
we
have
approximately
well
we'll
be
a
build-out
we'll
have
about
130
homes
in
that
development.
By
the
end
of
the
year.
We
have
concerns
the
councilman
Bert's
just
brought
up
in
councilman
Gilbert,
so
those
are
addressed
and
I
think
that's
wise
direction
to
move.
Y
Y
If
the
city
wants
to
take
that
on
the
promos
proposed
permitting
4m2,
it
I
don't
know
which
category
because
there
are
more
than
26
listed,
but
it
appears
to
me
that
this
is
more
of
an
m3
because
of
the
applicants
desire
to
move
more
retail
than
he's
doing
right
now,
which
the
truck
parts
and
the
parking
and
the
etc
etc.
So
it
appears
that
the
desire
for
em
may
be
there
that
it
does
increase
the
value
of
the
land.
Y
For
other
reasons,
and
for
other
purposes
which
were
not
aware,
the
signage
is
taken
care
of
very
clearly
under
the
ordinance.
We
haven't
heard
anything
about
the
natural
vegetation
to
the
far
west
of
the
property.
We
would
want
that
natural
vegetation
to
remain
because
it
is
a
buffer
from
being
of
it
being
seen
from
Harrison
pike.
Oh
I
miss
one
point
going
back
to
the
entrance
egress
on
to
Harrison
on
to
Randolph
that
road
is
not
wide
enough
to
handle
any
kind
of
commercial
traffic
at
all
any
any
truck.
They
just
don't
use
that
road.
Y
Z
A
Z
Z
F
Z
For
63
in
total,
as
some
four
to
five
million
dollars
in
investments
there,
so
we're
concerned
I'm,
not
frankly,
I'm
not
up
here
as
a
opponent,
an
opponent
I'm
up
here
to
really
gain
some
some
information
as
to
what
this
operation
really
is
and
I.
Frankly,
with
that
type
of
investment,
I
I
was
out
looking
at
Chris's
facilities
and
and
trying
to
ascertain
what
this
would
look
like,
as
as
as
he
developed
the
property
in
question.
But
anyhow,
the
the
property
and
I've
got
a
correct
Chris
a
little
bit.
Z
You
know
that's
a
point
that
I'm
on
Chris's
side
with,
but
the
the
important
point
is
that
in
one
area
I
do
want
to
correct.
Chris
is
the
fact
that
it's
not
bordered
his
plan
purchased
is
not
bordered
by
m1
zoning.
His
plan
purchased
is
bordered
by
r1.
Zoning
generally
speaking,
is
m1
in
the
area
in
spots,
but
it's
bordered
by
residences
and
that's
the
one
difference
that
I
found
in
my
study
was
that
you
know
Chris's
operation
is
not
closed
to
residents,
as
generally
speaking,
but
downtown
by
Mountain
View.
Z
There
are
some
residences
down,
maybe
a
quarter
to
whatever
half
a
mile
down
there.
There
are
some
new
facilities
and,
in
the
in
the
plan,
acquisition
there's
residents
all
around,
including
mine,
now
nine
townhomes
in
the
on
the
back
end,
so
that's
an
important
factor
and
as
a
Carroll
as
Miss
mispers
was
talking
about
her
odor
concerns.
My
concerns
are
that
I
really
don't
know
the
the
environmental
issues
there
of
the
of
the
burning
process.
Z
I,
don't
know
the
ecological
issues
of
the
burning
process
and
I,
don't
certainly
know
the
odor
issues
of
the
burning
process
and
I'm
further
concerned
by
the
fact
that
across
the
street
from
the
property
I'm
concerned,
I'm
not
saying
I'm
an
opponent
but
I'm
concerned,
and
we
have
a
church
across
the
street
and
another
religious
operation
next
door.
So
we're
bordered
by
residences.
We've
got
a
church
across
the
street.
Z
Z
A
U
T
Sir
I
would
just
like
to
address
the
church
issues.
I
have
a
letter
here
from
the
pastor's
saying
that
they're,
okay,
with
the
business
coming
in
to
the
area
from
both
the
pastures
here
I,
also
have
in
53
years
we've
never
been
open
on
a
Sunday
and
with
the
Lord's
help
53
more.
If
I'm
running,
it's
not
going
to
be
open
on
Sunday
I've
talked
in
Napa
about
becoming
a
Napa
franchise
and
even
moving
it
out
there.
One
of
their
requirements
is
that
I've
opened
on
Sunday,
I,
totally
told
Napa.
T
That
I
was
not
going
to
be
on
Sunday,
and
then
they
referred
to
tell
me
that
I'm
not
going
to
be
in
that
for
storage,
so
I
mean
we
all
put
our
foot
down
somewhere.
So
there's
not
going
to
be
an
issue
on
Sunday
as
far
as
burning
of
anything
or
any
business
being
being
done
there.
And
if
you
look
at
my
drawings
done
by
Wayne
McCoy
of
Miller
McCoy,
all
of
my
injures
in
entrances
and
exits
are
going
to
be
on
South
access.
T
A
U
U
He
actually
said
that
that's
maybe
a
concern
of
his
too
far
as
the
actual
smell
the
brakes.
I
don't
know
if
you
know
that
your
particular
product
that
you're
looking
at
that
you
know
you
got
to
leave
one
point,
six
of
water
on
that
property
at
all
time.
For
us,
the
water
quality
know
about
their
water
quality
issue.
No.
U
W
U
U
Their
water
quality
issues
concerns
Scott's
doing
that
property.
Also
I
know
that,
will
you
know
over
there
at
Lake
Haven,
there
is
a
park
that
we
found
develop.
Trust
of
public
land,
I
talked
to
one
of
them
spoke
with
them.
They
have
some
concerns
too,
about
the
older
quarry
trying
to
fill
up
the
particular
area
with
the
Greenway
we
just
put
in
X
by
millions
of
dollars
to
develop
Carroll
cattleman
birds
do
make
an
issue
of
the.
U
U
So
that's
the
main
concern,
not
necessarily
your
trailer.
It's
not
necessarily
your
the
way
you
work,
but
just
the
odor
in
that
area
and
there's
a
lot
of
oil
one
there.
You
have
a
school
above
the
hear
from
you.
You
got
our
one
directly
behind
you.
You
got
some
down
the
street
like
havens,
one
is
r12
and
you
also
got
two
churches
across
the
street,
so
I'm
looking
at
this
at
that
represented
my
people
that
call
and
say
they
did
not
want
it
and
I'm
gonna
ask
for
them.
Now.
A
I
A
X
X
Okay,
well
we'll
move
on
something
else
too.
What
what
I'm
looking
at
is
when
a
community
of
people
move
around
an
airport,
it's
very
difficult
to
say
something
about
the
noise,
because
you
knew
what
was
there
when
you
were
coming.
In
my
view,
this
is
the
reverse.
You
have
people
who
have
made
major
investments,
maybe
the
largest
investment
in
their
life
in
that
community,
and
you
want
to
come
into
that
community
and
some
of
the
answers
you
would
get
you've
been
giving
it.
X
In
part
where
it's
created
health
issues
for
people-
I,
don't
I
can't
say
these
brakes
would
do
that.
But
I
think
that
if
we
talk
about
allowing
you
to
do
this
and
I
think
it
negates
the
major
investments
that
have
been
made
there
by
the
community.
So
if
and
when
my
colleague
makes
that
motion
I'm
going
to
support
it
to
deny.
K
Councilwoman
burrs
was
considering
maybe
some
conditions
of
the
afterburner
put
on
something
else.
I
was
thinking
about
and
I'm
no
immediate
meteorologist,
but
I
know
that
just
from
observation
smoke
coming
out
of
a
chimney,
sometimes
just
hovers
over
the
land.
In
other
days,
it's
going
straight
up
due
to
lower
high
pressure.
Have
we
ever
conditioned,
or
could
you
condition
to
burn
only
on
high
pressure
days
where
there
were
obviously
the
smell,
that's
going
to
escape
and
I.
K
B
B
B
B
It's
Jason
to
Jefferson,
Heights
and
I
will
tell
you
that
I've
caught
a
faint
whiff
every
now
and
then,
but
it
is
correct
that
the
chicken
plant
across
Washington
Street
from
you
is
a
far
greater
odor
and
in
my
neighborhood,
when
the
winds
blow
in
a
certain
way,
and
it's
you
know
today,
like
a
hundred
degrees,
I
will
say
I've.
Never.
You
asked
like
eight
times
so
I'm
gonna
tell
you.
You
know
I've,
never
gotten
a
complaint
about
the
smell.
B
It's
your
plant,
but
I
can't
count
how
many
complaints
I've
gotten
about
the
erratic
parking
around
your
building
either
either
parked
and
people
are
always
parked
in
travel
lanes
on
Washington
Street
or
around
the
corner.
Rossville
Avenue
there's
loading
and
unloading,
where
maybe
there's
not
supposed
to
be
and
I,
don't
think
that's
an
environmental
hazard
or
anything
else.
But
to
be
fair,
you
asked
if
I'd
ever
gotten
complaints.
I'd
never
have
about
the
smell,
but
the
parking
I
get
pretty
frequently
well.
B
A
F
A
AA
H
Give
you
a
synopsis,
give
you
full
briefing
last
week.
This
is
a
request
to
rezone
a
roughly
half
acre
portion
of
the
site
located
a
thousand
block
of
Oak
Street.
This
is
near
the
intersection
of
McCauley
and
Central
Avenue,
but
they
would
like
to
resume
this
portion
of
the
block
of
Oak
Street
from
r3
to
c3
central
business
owned
to
accommodate,
basically
a
larger
site
for
their
apartment.
Building.
H
The
other
other
element
was
setting
precedent
for
what
might
be
future
rezoning,
which
are
taking
most
of
the
block
to
c3
when
you
got
some
older
homes
in
the
area.
So
for
that
reason,
staff
recommended
denial,
the
at
Planning
Commission.
The
case
was
presented.
We
look
at
my
notes
as
far
as
opposition,
just
from
second.
H
You
have
Planning
Commission,
there
was
not
any
opposition
at
the
meeting
and
then
upon
deliberating
here
in
the
request
from
the
applicant
Planning
Commission
recommended
C
3
and
asked
staff
to
develop
conditions
for
the
consideration
of
council,
which
we
did
it's
incorporated
into
the
ordinance.
So
we
provided
the
standard,
C
3
conditions
that
goes
with
this
request,
and
so
it
comes
with
you
with
a
recommendation
from
Planning
Commission
to
approve
C
3
with
conditions.
H
A
V
You
mr.
chair
David
Hudson
with
our
tech
design
group
representing
Macaulay
Commons.
Excuse
me.
We
were
here
in
February
of
2015,
in
which
you
did
rezone
to
c3
a
tract
of
land,
bordered
by
oak
street
Oh,
Neil,
McCauley
and
central.
Since
that
time
the
developer
has
hooked
up
with
an
out-of-town
developer,
who
specializes
in
student
housing
and
has
recommended
that
the
project
be
increased
in
size
to
get
a
critical
mass
to
make
it
more
successful.
V
By
doing
so,
we're
also
able
to
take
the
original
plan
that
had
a
parking
garage
that
was
exposed
on
McCauley,
Avenue
and
O'neill
Street,
and
we're
able
to
take
the
parking
garage
now
and
put
it
into
the
center
of
the
building
and
wrap
it
with
apartment.
So
you
will
not
see
the
parking
garage
from
anywhere
in
the
neighborhood.
V
In
addition,
it
allows
us
to
manipulate
the
architectural
bit
that
we're
not
able
to
with
the
previous
rezoning
I
would
like
to
point
out
that,
under
the
current
zoning
of
the
properties,
we're
asking
for
three
houses
to
be
rezone
three
Lots
under
that
current
zoning,
which
is
our
three
right
now,
you
could
tear
those
houses
down
and
build
a
four-story
building,
and
that's
all
we're
asking
to
do
except
we're
asking
to
do
and
undersea
three
conditions
rather
than
under
our
three
conditions.
We
met
with
the
neighborhood
before
the
Planning
Commission
meeting.
V
We've
also
met
with
representatives
of
fort
wood
recently
in
the
past
few
days,
and
they
have
been
very
gracious
and
have
worked
with
us
and
we're
trying
to
work
with
them
and
though
the
the
current
property
that
you
rezone
last
year
is
c3.
It
is
also
in
the
form
based
code
zone
for
mx-5
and
we're
okay
with
that,
with
certain
conditions
on
that.
V
A
V
V
V
H
H
V
V
AB
Thank
You,
mr.
chairman,
my
name
is
Hal
Baker
921
Vine,
Street
I'm.
The
current
vice
president
of
the
forward
Neighborhood
Association
live
in
district
8.
As
you
can
imagine
this
proposal,
this
project
has
caused
quite
a
bit
of
consternation
and
quite
a
bit
of
thought,
quite
a
bit
of
involvement
among
the
entire
neighborhood,
the
fort
wood,
historic
district.
AB
We've
got
from
McCauley
to
Oak
Street
to
central
to
O'neill
that
they
can
use
their
skills
and
abilities
to
design
something
to
put
in
that
place
that
complements
the
historic
district
meets
their
needs,
assist
the
university
and
student
housing
and
that
we
come
out
all
together.
So
if,
if,
if
the
forum
code
is
used
implemented,
we
end
up
with
a
good
project
the
consensus
of
the
board
of
directors.
Is
we
really
have
no
opposition.
X
AB
N
V
Yes,
I
would
like
to
say
that
in
concept
we
have
no
problem
with
what
Hal
is
saying.
What
we're
a
little
reluctant
to
do
is
to
say
that
we
will
comply
with
the
letter
of
the
forum
based
code
because
we
feel
like
there's
some
things
that
still
need
to
be
shaken
out
of
the
code.
We
are
willing
to
say
that
we
will
comply
with
the
spirit
of
the
code
and,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
the
concern
is
that
it's
not
so
much
the
use.
V
K
H
Don't
I
think
I
think
there's
an
intense
between
intent
versus
conditions.
What
you're
adopting
tonight
is
a
c3
zone
with
conditions.
I
think
what
the
applicant
is
offering
is
they
are
committing
to
achieve.
The
same
standards
are
better
than
what
the
c3
is
concourse.
What
I
understand,
so
you
are
not
this
case
tonight
is
not
about
adopting
a
form
based
code
district
at
this
site.
This
case
tonight,
as
far
as
what
you're
adopting
about
ordinance
the
ordinance
you're
considering,
is
a
c3
zone
with
conditions.
H
I
think
it's
that
making
it
a
understand
from
the
applicants
make
it
a
matter
of
public
record
that
they
are
going
to.
They
will
be
basically
looking
at
their
proposal
that
pros
design
they're
going
to
a
strive
to
meet
the
intent,
as
laid
out
in
the
form
based
code
in
terms
of
building
scale,
transparency
on
the
ground
floor.
Pedestrian
interest
is
on
the
street
parking
setbacks,
and
so
on.
That's
my
understanding
so
that.
H
X
H
There
are
a
lot
of
parallels.
I
will
say
that
between
the
c3
conditions
and
what's
in
the
form
based
code
in
terms
of
putting
the
building
close
to
the
street,
we
have
a
maximum
height
requirement
parking
to
the
rear.
There's
a
lot
of
parallels
not
to
every
detail,
you
know
standard,
but
there
are
a
lot
of
parallels
between
c3
conditions
and
the
form
base
code.
Thank
you.
Okay,.
A
A
First
of
all,
I
am
delighted
to
have
this
just
development.
In
my
district,
which
I
always
said,
I
wanted
to
see
continuous
development
take
place
in
the
community.
Secondly,
all
of
the
property
sellers
people
who
want
to
sell
their
property
have
a
relationship
with
me.
I
the
friend
church
member
acquaintance,
classmate
our
distant
relative
and
so
I
have
been
approached
by
all
of
them
as
well.
So
the
sellers
are
my
friends
too.
A
So
it's
it's
in
that
vein.
That
I'm
on
all
for
the
size
I
would
now
entertain
a
motion
to
to
approve
the
oh
I'm.
Sorry,
the
opposition
I
had
one
Harold
yeah,
so
mister
Mitchum
I
move
approval.
It's
been
properly
moved
in
second,
that
the
motion
just
decide
and
be
approved.
All
in
favor
I
see
some
lights
other
than
miss.
Talking
no
no
lies
miss
Danson
I
was
just
going
to
do
the
same
okay.
It
has
been
properly
moved
in
second
that
this
item
be
approved
all
in
favor.
A
H
Just
she'll
give
a
she's
gonna
provide
an
overview
just
of
the
text,
changes
that
came
before
so
I'm,
not
sure
we'll
need
them
if
we
do
have
PDF
files
available
if
we
need
to
get
so
when
we
couldn't
pull
the
screen
down
just
in
case,
but
again,
just
when
I
remind
you
that
there's
two
separate
ordinances,
one
is
for
the
text
change,
which
is
the
current
before
you.
The
second
will
be
for
the
zoning
map
change.
H
I
do
want
to
thank
everybody
who
participated
in
a
long
journey
about
a
year
and
a
half
if
I'm,
not
mistaken,
and
so
my
heartfelt
thanks
goes
out
first
to
Mayor
Burke
for
being
sponsor
of
this
started
us
on
this
road.
I
also
want
to
thank
all
the
public
has
been
to
all
the
public
meetings:
property
owners,
stakeholders
in
the
neighborhood
who
participated
the
many
meetings
going
way
back
to
the
Charette
a
year
and
a
half
ago
in
the
spring.
H
I
want
to
thank
the
business
community
stakeholders
who
also
reviewed
the
draft
and
gave
us
very
specific
helpful
feedback.
I
also
want
to
thank
our
City
Council
members,
who
actually
they'll
be
putting
some
of
the
final
changes
on
tonight's
ordinance.
I
just
think
it's
a
good
example
of
a
Civic
deliberative
process
and
coming
up
with
a
ordinance
that
everyone
can
live
with
and
will
advance
our
city
become
a
great
urban
city.
H
So
I
just
want
to
give
my
heartfelt
thanks
out
to
everybody
who
played
a
role
in
that
I
want
to
now
turn
it
over
to
Karen
Hunt,
who
will
be
giving
you
an
overview
of
some
of
the
changes
that
have
been
brought
in
by
staff
in
response
to
the
public
hearing
that
you
had
as
a
council
last
week
and
then
we'll
turn
it
over
the
city.
Turning
from
there.
AC
Thank
you,
John
I
will
also
echo
all
of
John's
thank-yous.
It's
been
a
really
good
process
and
we
appreciate
everyone's
input.
All
around
dan.
You
might
want
to
pull
up
the
the
one
file
I,
think
it
says,
text
changes
or
text
amendments
I,
can't
remember
the
exact
title
of
it.
I
also
have
hard
copies.
If
some
of
the
council
members
would
like
me
to
pass
these
around.
AC
AC
AC
It
reads:
following
the
effective
date,
there
will
be
a
six
month
grace
period
during
which
time
property
owners
will
have
the
option
to
belt
to
develop
under
either
the
former
zoning
or
this
downtown
code.
All
we
did.
There
was
ed
the
word
former
just
to
make
it
clear
what
we
were
talking
about.
It's
a
very
minor
changed
there.
The
second
change
is
one
that
appears
throughout
the
entire
document.
We
are
just
changing
the
title
director
of
codes
administration
to
director
of
the
land
development
office
that
is
Gary
Hill,
Hilbert's
official
title
right
now.
AC
The
third
change
is
a
little
more
substantial.
This
is
something
we're
adding
to
the
administration
section
in
the
document
in
section
38,
six.
Ninety
six,
we
are
adding
a
section
that
reads:
step
two
neighborhood
review
and
basically
what
it
says
is
that,
before
someone
submits
an
application
for
plan
review,
they
must
meet
with
a
Neighborhood
Association
and
that's
the
Neighborhood
Association
that's
listed
with
the
community's
economic
and
Community
Development
Department.
AC
There
are
a
couple
exceptions
to
that.
If
it's
a
residential
development
with
fewer
than
five
units,
they
are
exempt
from
that
requirement.
If
it's
non-residential
development
with
less
than
4,000
square
feet,
they
are
exempt,
or
if
the
development
is
not
within
any
neighborhood
association
boundary
and
not
within
300
feet
of
a
Neighborhood
Association
boundary,
they
would
be
exempt.
Otherwise
they
would
have
to
meet
with
the
Neighborhood
Association
number
two
states
that
it
will
be.
AC
The
applicant
applicants
duty
to
contact
the
Neighborhood
Association
president
to
schedule
a
meeting
and
then
third,
that
applicant
also
has
to
submit
documentation,
including
a
sign-in
sheet
from
the
meeting,
with
the
Neighborhood
Association
showing
who
was
there
that
has
to
be
submitted
to
the
land
development
office
along
with
their
application.
So
again,
as
you
all
know,
this
is
in
response
to
a
lot
of
comments
and
concerns
from
residents
in
the
downtown
who
wanted
the
neighborhoods
to
have
more
say
in
the
process.
AC
AC
Basically,
this
is
just
to
clarify
the
process
a
little
bit,
but
it
states
that
any
applicant
or
citizen
aggrieved
with
a
decision
of
the
staff,
may
appeal
to
the
forum
based
code
committee
for
further
consideration
within
30
days
of
the
staffs
decision.
A
signed,
written
request
must
be
received
by
the
director
of
the
land
development
office
from
the
aggrieved
party.
So
basically,
they
have
30
days
after
the
staff
makes
a
decision
to
file
a
written
request
with
the
city
saying
they
want
to
appear
before
the
forum
based
coding
committee.
A
AC
X
AC
AC
AC
AC
Each
city
council
representative,
whose
district
is
located
in
the
form
based
code
area,
must
submit
for
the
mayor's
consideration
up
to
three
candidates
that
are
a
resident
property
owner
or
business
owner
that
meets
the
qualifications
noted
above
the
mayor
will
consider
this
list
and
developing
the
committee
appointments
to
the
City
Council
for
final
approval
and
then
be
at
least
one
resident
from
each
city.
Council
district
located
within
the
forum
based
code
area,
must
be
represented
on
the
form
based
code
committee.
AC
The
sixth
one
has
to
do
with
vehicular
parking
requirements.
As
you
all
know,
we've
had
a
lot
of
discussion
about
parking.
In
this
case
we
had
a
public
parking
forum
about
a
week
or
so
ago,
at
the
public
library
had
good
turnout
for
that,
and
so
some
of
this
comes
the
comments
we
received
at
that
forum.
One
of
the
changes
we're
proposing
to
make
is
to
change
the
requirement
for
multi-unit
living
from
0.75
spaces
per
unit
to
one
space
per
unit,
so
that
requirement
goes
up
a
little
bit.
AC
AC
Previously,
we
had
said
if
you
provided
remote
parking
within
a
quarter
mile
of
the
property,
you
could
get
some
discounts
and
a
lot
of
folks
that
attend
to
the
parking
forum
and
send
his
comments
said.
Well,
that's
just
that's.
Just
too
far,
that's
a
long
way
to
walk
for
some
people.
So
we've
lowered
that
distance
a
little
bit
so
now
it
says
that
offsite
parking
less
than
300
feet
may
be
counted
toward
the
parking
minimum
and
offsite
parking
between
300
feet
and
900
feet
can
be
counted
toward
25%
of
the
parking
minimum.
AC
AC
K
AC
That
is
correct:
okay,
okay,
the
seventh
area
that
we're
changing
is
in
the
definition
section
here.
We
just
added
a
definition
for
breweries
and
wineries.
We
found
realized
they,
we
didn't
have
a
definition
in
the
form
base
code
or
in
the
regular
zoning
ordinance.
So
we
added
some
definitions
there
and
also
the
live
work
unit.
We
just
referenced
another
section
cross-reference
to
say
in
the
foreign
base
code
where
it
goes
into
quite
a
bit
of
detail
explaining
what
live
work
units
are
and
then
finally,
the
last
section
we
change
were
the
use
tables.
AC
These
are
the
tables
that
are
within
each
of
the
four
context
area
sections
in
the
code.
Basically,
we
just
changed
some
references
to
uses
like
liquor,
stores,
alcohol
distilleries
wineries
and
late-night
entertainment
event,
facilities
just
to
make
sure
they're
totally
consistent
with
other
parts
of
the
zoning
ordinance
and
other
parts
of
the
city
code.
So
we
don't
have
any
conflicts
there
and
those
are
the
amendments
being
proposed.
B
B
H
B
B2
has
that
parcel
in
it,
okay
and
just
to
clarify
something.
We
I
was
talking
about
the
100
block
of
Cherry
Street,
as
well
as
the
200
block,
but
the
200
block
was
actually
acted
on
by
Regional
Planning
Commission
yesterday,
so
we
don't
have
jurisdiction
to
take
their
recommendation
yet
and
regardless
of
their
recommendation,
I
told
you
earlier
today,
I'll
be
moving
to
keep
that
residential
and
no
more
than
4
storeys
going
forward,
no
commercial,
no
six
storeys,
but
that
that's
my
intention
for
next
month.
You.
H
Guys
remind
y'all
what's
carrying
what
over
was
the
elements
that
was
released
on
Friday
and
was
currently
on
the
website.
You've
got
some
additional
amendments
tonight,
so
this
will
be
clear.
I
know,
there's
some
more
changes
which
I
know
you'll,
be
speaking
to
when
you
get
into
liberation
as
a
council
on
the
final
Ward's
draft.
But
this
is
what
we
presented
to
you
all
and
Friday
in
terms
of
amendments
to
the
orders
draft.
AD
On
on
your
agenda
for
this
evening,
there
are
a
number
of
items
on
item
F,
here's
for
the
code
and
what
Karen
just
went
over
here,
for
you
is
the
ordinance
a
that
was
recommended
for
approval
by
the
our
PA
and
the
City
Attorney's
staff
after
we
had
a
chance
to
meet
and
get
those
changes
inserted
here.
As
of
June,
the
10th,
as
of
today
I've,
had
other
requests
from
council
members,
which
I
have
also
provided
in
your
references
here
for
headings
under
item
F.
AD
You
will
now
see
under
the
agenda
as
of
5:10
this
afternoon,
a
2
as
amended
including
language,
from
a
3,
a
4
and
a
5.
As
of
the
515
revised
agenda,
we
have
a
3
on
there,
which
is
a
request
by
councilman
Mitchell
to
include
one
amendment,
and
that
amendment
was
for
a
code
modification
to
section
38,
696
4,
to
delete
subsection
5.
That
was
just
shown
to
you
previously
that
allowed
the
director
of
land
development
office
to
increase,
increase
the
building
heights
up
to
5
feet
of
the
maximum
building
height
than
the
zone.
AD
Without
having
to
go
to
the
committee.
This
deletion
would
require
all
increases
a
building
height
to
go
before
the
forum
based
code
committee
and
would
not
allow
the
discretion
to
be
in
that
director
of
the
land
development
office.
That
is
also
on
your
agenda.
If
you
want
to
vote
on
that
one
this
evening
as
ordinance
a
3
as
ordinance
a4,
we
also
had
a
request
from
councilman
Henderson
this
afternoon
for
a
change
to
section
38
696
5,
regarding
the
establishment
of
the
form
based
code
committee.
AD
Just
saw
the
language
shown
to
you
here
that
was
suggested
on
Friday,
but
section
b1
entitled
appointment
procedure
was
also
tweaked
a
little
bit
this
afternoon
to
have
language.
Now
that
would
read
each
city
council
representative,
whose
district
is
located
in
a
form-based
code
area,
shall
submit
up
to
three
candidates
that
are
a
resident
property
owner
or
business
owner
that
meet
the
qualifications
noted
above
for
the
mayor's
consideration.
AD
The
mayor
will
pick
a
member
selected
by
each
council
member
in
developing
the
committee
appointments
or
request
additional
names
from
the
affected
council
member
before
submitting
all
members
of
this
committee
to
the
City
Council
for
final
approval.
It's
just
a
another
option
that
if
the
three
that
are
picked
here
by
the
council
member
for
some
reason,
do
not
work,
then
there
would
be
an
option
for
additional
names
to
be
submitted.
So
that
is
on
your
agenda
this
evening
for
ordinance
number
a
four.
AD
If
you
just
want
to
accept
that
one
recommendation
and
don't
want
to
accept
the
rest
of
them,
and
we
also
have
another
request
by
councilman
Henderson
that
is
shown
on
your
agenda
as
ordinance
number
a
five.
That
is
an
amendment
to
section
38,
741
entitled
vehicle
parking,
and
it's
regarding
the
discounts
that
are
provided
in
one
section
of
the
forum
based
code
under
741
for
property,
which
provides
long
term
bike
parking,
and
the
language
that
is
proposed
in
that
section
is
to
receive
one
vehicle
parking
space
credit
for
every
to
long
term.
AD
Bike
parking
spaces
provided
on
site
for
up
to
25
percent
of
the
total
required
minimum
parking
and
long
term.
Bicycle
parking
must
be
located
in
an
enclosed
area,
providing
protection
from
weather
and
must
be
accessible
to
intended.
Users.
That
is
a
one
vehicle
parking
space
for
two
bike
spaces,
as
opposed
to
what
it's
currently
in
the
code
here
that
was
proposed
on
Friday
of
one
to
one.
So
those
changes
are
in
front
of
you
on
your
agenda
this
evening.
You
can
choose
to
adopt
some
or
all.
B
AD
AD
AD
The
changes
that
are
included
on
that
three-page
sheet
I
believe
that
you
got
there
are
all
in
the
ordinance,
with
the
exception
of
the
I,
guess
the
provisions
here
regarding
the
makeup
of
the
committee
that
councilman
included
this
afternoon,
that's
slightly
different
in
that
regard,
but
all
the
rest
of
them
are
in
there.
Thank
you.
Yes,
sir.
A
AD
A
G
S
You
Mike
price
MEP
engineers,
I,
add
one
question
with
regards
to
the
agreed
process
and
that
is,
it
said
any
decision
by
staff.
So
my
question
is
this:
if
someone
comes
in
and
proposes
a
particular
use
in
the
forum
based
code
and
it
is
approved
by
staff
and
meets
all
the
tenants
of
the
forum
based
code,
does
the
agreed
public
then
have
the
ability
to
appeal
the
staff
decision,
because
I
thought
the
whole
idea
is
with
forum
based
code?
S
Is
that
if
you
meet
what
is
indeed
intended
in
forum
based
code,
then
you
were
good
to
go,
but
it
sounds
like.
Have
we
created
a
situation
where
I
have
a
development
I
meet
all
the
requirements?
Every
bit,
I
didn't
need
any
variances.
Now
it
could
be,
and
back
to
a
committee
and
possibly
denied.
Is
that
what
I'm
hearing.
AE
A
H
H
Is
we
added
a
30-day
window
so
that
that
was
the
only
change
from
the
original
draft?
So
but
the
intent
is
meekly
when
you
come
for
an
application.
The
of
course
you
have.
You
would
have
met
with
the
ring
of
the
residence
prior
to
submitting
your
application,
but
at
that
point
staffs
reviewing
it
and
if
staff
makes
a
decision
that
the
applicant
is
not
happy
with,
they
can
appeal
that
within
30
days
to
to
to
the
form
based
code
committee,
but
it
does
say
or
Greece
citizens
so
actually
technically.
X
I
think
we're
sitting
on
the
front
end
you're
still
dealing
with
the
community.
You
developer
as
I'll
use
the
term
going
through
all
the
hoops
right
received
the
okay
to
move
forward,
and
the
way
it's
written
right
now
is
that
if
a
person
in
the
community
who
disagrees
feel
aggrieved,
then
he
would
have
to
go
back
to
a
process
again.
All.
H
H
Only
it's
four,
if
you're
applying
for
a
minor
modification
and
you're
not
happy
for
what
staff
has
decided
related
to
a
request
for
that,
then
you
can't
appeal
that
decision
to
form
based
code
committee-
okay,
so
it's
not
like
you
go
through
a
continuous
circuit.
It's
just
it's
only
if
you
disagree
with
the
staffs
decision
for
that
minor
modification,
then
it
is
consistent
with
what
also
language
you
have
the
form
based
code
committee,
when
the
form
based
code
committee
reviews
a
a
request
and
if
somebody's
aggrieved
to
that
decision,
you
have
the
same
thing.
H
L
Mr.
prices
point
minor
modifications
that
are
approved
by
staff.
I
thought
that
our
concern
about
citizen
involvement
was
in
terms
of
the
listing
of
major
modifications
that
would
require
that
would
allow
extra
building
height
or
anything.
That's
a
major
one,
so
I'm
confused
into
as
form
bait
based
code
seems
to
be
minor.
L
Modifications
would
be
handled
at
the
staff
and
LDO
level,
whereas
major
modifications
would
require
the
developer
to
talk
to
the
Neighborhood
Association
as
part
of
the
process,
so
I'm
confused
on.
Why
we're
allowing
if,
if
a
developer,
meets
all
the
requirements
I'm
their
only
minor
modifications,
then
why
are
we
going
to
make
a
developer?
Wait
an
extra
30
days,
just
in
case
someone
might
feel
aggrieved
on
a
minor
modification
actually.
H
The
way,
the
way
that
works
is
to
be
heard
again,
the
intent
is
to
be
considered
to
be
peeled
for
form-based
code
committee
review.
The
applicant
has
to
submit
some
kind
of
could
I
was
asking
if
you
pull
the
PDF
up.
Please
thank
you,
I
think
it's
important.
We
look
at
that
language
and,
if
you
would
mind
can
what
follows
that
I'm.
AC
L
Thank
you,
as
it
addresses
minor
modifications
and
major
modifications.
Yes,
we're
trying
to
establish
a
code
to
streamline
the
process
and
I'm
just
wondering
if
we
put
in
a
a
safety
net
for
citizen
participation
and
input,
it
was
my
understanding
that
we
were
talking
about
major
modifications
where,
as
it
seemed
like
in
streamlining
the
process,
that
minor
modifications
could
be
handled
at
a
staff
and
LDO
level,
actually.
H
AC
H
It
does
go
in
the
mine,
okay,
the
again
and
the
reason
for
the
change.
In
fact,
what
drive
was
driving
that
change
if
I
get
res
attention
is
the
desire
to
make
sure
that
there
was
no
specific
time
period.
So
we
added
the
30
days
because
the
concern
was
when
do
we
know
your
Tom's
up
to
appeal
a
staff
decision,
so
that
was
a
reason
for
adding
the
30
days
to
that
line
item
my
recommendation,
as
I
stated
before
we're
going
to
live
with
this
for
at
least
the
next
six
months.
H
If
there's
an
issue
the
way
as
its
as
it's
written,
clearly
we
will
make
that
change,
but
the
intent
when
we
made
that
change
was
there
was
no
30-day,
as
I
recall,
to
say,
he's
got
to
have
some
sunset
at
what
point
do
you
appeal
staff
decision,
so
we
inserted
the
30
days
so
that
at
some
point,
there's
a
sunset
to
that
that
was
the
change.
I
hear
your
point
about
who
I
think
your
question
is:
who
can
make
the
appeal
the
applicant
versus
the
public
at
large?
H
A
X
H
Correct
this
is
an
amendment
to
the
minor
section,
because
there
was
not
a
time
period
involved
after
peeling
a
staff
decision,
both
in
terms
of
interpretation
of
the
code
like
we
do
today
for
Board
of
Zoning
Appeals.
If
you
don't
agree
with
the
staffs
interpretation,
you
appeal
that
the
Board
of
Zoning
Appeals,
so
we
added
a
time
period
of
30
days,
so
there
had
to
be
some
sunset
after
which
your
time's
up.
So
that
was
the
purpose
of
adding
that
30
days.
Okay,.
S
X
H
Leave
if
you're
trying
to
limit
to
the
applicant
and
not
just
the
community
at
large
right
now,
is
the
applicant
or
the
community
at
large.
If
you
want
to
make
it
more
specific
to
the
applicant
for
a
staff
review
because
remember
we're
not
a
committee.
Yet
this
is
just
for
a
staff
decision.
Then
you
would
take
out
our
citizen
agree.
I!
Think.
H
I'm
here,
okay,
sorry,
sir
I
miss,
maybe
the
feedback
where
I
hear
you.
So
what
you're
saying
is:
there's
no.
Let's
say
that
they
just
there's
no
request
for
a
minor
modification
I'm
just
submitting
a
application.
It
means
there's.
No
minor
modification
approved
by
staff
is
just
a
permitting
process.
Can
I
still
ask
for
a
appeal
this?
This
is
in
the
minor
modification
section.
So
if
you're
not
getting
a
minor
modification,
then
that
would
not
apply
so
you
would
then
basically
just
get
your
approvals
and
move
forward.
Okay,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Q
H
Q
Yes,
all
right
now,
I'm
hearing
you
say
that
if,
if
a
developer
has
the
proper
meetings
has
all
all
the
input
of
the
residents
does
all
the
right
things
and
makes
application,
which
is
the
purpose
of
forum
based
code?
They
can
consider
it
a
done
deal
except
now,
we're
saying
at
the
other
end,
mm-hmm,
there's
other
hearings
and
I.
Don't
think
that's
what
you're
meaning
to
imply
it's.
H
A
A
S
If
I
could
follow
up
with
that,
please
again
not
looking
to
belabor
the
point.
There
are
some
specifics
as
it
relates
to
them.
Recep's,
for
instance,
you
have
to
have
entering
a
building.
So
let's
just
say
it's
for,
but
I
can
only
do
two
because
of
great
constraints
on
the
back
side.
I
now
have
to
get
a
variance
if
there's
one
person
in
the
neighborhood
that
was
aggrieved
they
now
can
apply
for
this
to
be
heard
at
the
form-based
code
committee,
in
which
to
put
the
entire
project
in
jeopardy.
S
I
think
that
major
modifications,
certainly
any
citizen,
should
have
that
right
and
that
ability
to
make
a
appeal,
but
minor
modifications
should
only
be
appealed
by
the
applicant
themselves
to
the
committee,
not
the
community
at
large.
So
that
would
be
my
ask
if
you
will
is
that
minor
modifications
be
handled
internally
between
the
developer
and
that
committee
major
anything
that's
requested,
there
certainly
should
go
back
to
the
community.
That's
that's
just
my
thought.
Suggestion
thank.
A
AA
However,
to
the
positive
the
parking
requirements
have
been
substantially
strengthened.
The
recent
addition
of
mandated
community
input
via
our
neighborhoods
is
a
very
welcome
one.
The
city
has
striven
to
empower
neighborhood
associations
with
training
and
support,
and
this
is
the
most
welcomed,
opportunity
and
obligation
for
them.
Unfortunately,
there's
been
precious
little
time
to
absorb
the
implications
of
these.
Many
recent
updates
some
even
less
than
a
day
before
this
meeting
today,
many
community
members
have
spent
many
hours
of
their
time
participating
in
this
process,
which
will
help
shape
the
city
for
generations
to
come.
AA
We
believe
this
is
truly
the
Chattanooga
way.
They
rightfully
should
have
the
opportunity
to
review
these
changes
before
they're
acted
on
a
number
of
the
exception
cases
that
came
before
the
Planning
Commission.
Just
yesterday,
can't
be
heard
by
this
body
for
weeks.
I
personally
feel
it
would
be
best
to
have
the
completed
plan
with
all
the
properly
vetted
amendments,
so
the
public
can
see
what
is
getting
in
advance
rather
than
after
the
fact.
AA
However,
if
you
are
determined
to
vote
on
this
sweeping
legislation
tonight,
hopefully
you
can
take
action
to
remove
some
of
the
most
negative
last-minute
additions,
specifically
the
bonus
credits
for
providing
long
term
bicycle
parking
on
a
one-to-one
basis.
I
mean
you
can
park
10
bicycles
in
a
car
space
to
give
a
1
or
a
1
to
2
from
all
of
the
areas.
This
was
not
even
going
to
affect
the
new
regulations,
the
North
Shore
Southside,
m.l.king
riverfront,
and
now
we
are
having
parking
basically
swiped
away
through
this
long
term.
A
B
Just
just
to
clarify
a
couple
of
things.
Mr.
chair,
we
didn't
start
talking
about
downtown
parking
restrictions
today
or
five
minutes
ago.
We've
been
talking
about
it
for
a
year
and
a
half
in
many
public
meetings.
Today
there
are
no
parking
requirements
in
the
downtown
core
for
residential
development.
What
this
does
is
creates
them.
Thank
you.
AF
I'm
Franklin
McCauley,
15,
16,
15,
Reed
Avenue,
miss
dancing,
you're
right,
but
where
I
support
mr.
Chapin
in
this
we
do
know
that
a
month
ago
we
got
something
new
for
the
fringe
areas
and
we
talked
about
it
and,
thank
goodness
it
was
taken
back
now
for
the
bicycle.
I
have
to
admit
that
over
a
month
ago
there
was
something
in
there
about
the
bicycles
and
one
for
one
up
to
25
percent.
AF
Forgive
me
for
not
being
able
to
piece
through
this
entire
thing
and
understand
every
piece
of
it
all
the
way,
but
to
take
a
listen,
I
won't
bicycle
spaces,
but
not
to
give
one
to
one
or
one
to
two
bicycle
spaces
should
be,
should
stand
on
its
own
one
unit.
One
space
for
parking
per
one
unit
ought
to
be
what
we
have
and
bicycles
ought
to
stand
on
their
own.
Let's
do
something
else
with
bicycles.
AF
AF
That's
what
that
is,
and
I
can't
quote
it
exactly
where
the
900
feet
comes,
but
part
of
that
is
not
part
of
its
300
feet
and
part
of
its
900
feet.
I'd
like
that
to
be
looked
at
again,
plus
one
thing
that
it's
not
in
there
I
I,
don't
think
I
haven't
seen
it
I'm,
not
sure
I,
hope
we're
not
talking
about
letting
developers
have
credit
for
parking
for
metered
parking
across
the
road.
We're
not
thank
you
I,
wasn't
sure
about
that.
So
I
will
admit
to
not
understanding
everything
about
this.
AF
This
form
based
code,
but
the
things
I
do
understand
the
the
bicycle
being
given
credits
taken
away
from
parking.
Please
don't
do
that
to
us
and
the
two
different
things
the
300
feet
I
appreciate
that
a
lot
when
it
gets
to
the
900
feet,
I'd
like
for
you
to
look
at
that
again.
Thank
you
very
much.
Mr.
X
H
X
H
H
Basically,
to
encourage,
because
there
were
folks
who
would
like
to
see,
encourage
more
long-term
bike
parking
in
it.
It's
part
of
development,
so
what
we
try
to
do
to
create
an
incentive
for
providing
that
is
offer
credit
so
for
every
I
think
it'll
be
amendment
tonight
as
I
understand
it
to
change
the
current
ratio,
but
right
now
what
Karen
had
gone
over
with?
You
is
a
one
to
one
ratio,
one!
You
get
one
credit
for
one
parking
space
for
every
long-term
bike,
this
parking
space
you
provide!
H
X
H
That's
short-term
parking.
The
difference
is
for
people
who
particularly
commute
regularly
using
their
bikes
is
important
to
have
a
sheltered
space
in
the
building.
So
you're
not
subject
to
the
elements
is
usually
if
it's
the
bike
rack.
The
intention,
just
like
you
have
on
street
parking
the
short
term
bike.
Racks
are
really
intended
as
short-term
parking
because
you're
out
in
the
elements,
and
so
the
idea
is,
you
would
go
to
that
space.
H
H
X
AF
AF
Long-Term
biking,
long-term
bike
spaces
are
terrific.
We
want
them.
We
want
them
for
all
our
Billings
okay,
but
to
trade,
those
for
four
parking
spaces
for
cars.
Those
people
that
have
their
bikes
as
I
do
are
going
to
have
cars.
I
don't
want
to
trade.
Those
but
I
do
want
them
to
have
long
term
bike
spaces.
Thank
you,
sir.
Thank.
AG
Smith
913
Park,
Avenue,
m.l.king,
neighborhood,
district
8
I
have
a
just
a
general
concern,
a
question
and
it's
about
the
six
months
grace
period
for
development
and
only
from
the
standpoint
of
parking,
I,
I.
Think
I
heard
someone
say
at
the
last
meeting:
the
developer
that
under
C
3
or
C
7
or
whatever
all
the
C's
are
that
parking
wasn't
really
required.
H
Concern-
and
it
may
be
clear,
there
is
a
parking
review,
there's
just
no
specific
parking
minimum.
The
see
three
conditions
in
c7.
There
is
a
review
of
parking,
it's
just
those
baseline
parking
minimum
required.
So
what
happens
is
is
the
as
it's
done
today.
The
applicant
will
meet
with
the
on
land
development
office
and
then,
through
the
staff
review
of
that
project.
They'll,
look
at
the
use.
What
parking
provided
on-site,
what
can
be
provided
off-site?
Sometimes
the
parking
plans
required
and
then
they
will.
We
will
determine
the
appropriate
amount
of
parking
to
require
for
on-site.
H
A
AG
AE
Hate
to
come
after
my
wife
with
my
name
is
all
William
sniff
at
9:13,
Park,
Avenue
and
I
have
two
questions
and
comments,
and
one
is
when
you
take
credit
for
the
offsite
parking.
That's
went
within
300
feet
of
the
residents
who
pays
for
that
offsite
parking
would
I,
be
the
residents
responsibility
or
the
developer.
That's
taking
credit
for
that
parking
lot
that
they
resident
may
have
to
pay
for.
H
As
far
as
the
review
I
mean,
staff
will
require,
if
it's
all
site,
usually
show
an
agreement
with
the
property
owner
to
provide
that
parking.
So
we
know
that
there's
some
kind
of
a
contractual
arrangement
that
it's
going
to
be
provided
off-site,
whether
or
not
the
developer
charges
that
to
their
tenants
or
whoever
that's
really
between
the
developer.
And
there
is
that
what
you
mean
in
terms
of
the
people
living
on
the
property?
That's
more
a
decision
between
the
developer
and
whoever
there.
However,
they
want
to
set
that
up.
H
What
we're
going
to
make
as
far
as
a
review
is
to
make
sure
that
that
space
is
being
provided
and
accounted
for,
and
so
as
I
understand
it.
And
this
is
what
I've
talked
to
some
folks
at
CDOT.
They
look
to
see
if
there's
some
kind
of
a
parking
agreement,
so
there's
something
to
fall
back
on
in
terms
of
holding
the
applicant
accountable
for
making
sure
that
there's
all
sites
park,
parking
spaces
are
being
provided
for.
AE
Okay,
so
sound
like
the
resident
would
have
to
pay
for
what
was
up
to
the
developer
then
and
the
second
coming
I
had.
Was
it
it's
hard
to
keep
up
with
everything
that's
going
on
when
some
of
the
documents
that
you
have
available
I
don't
have
those
available
you
didn't
have
enough
copies
outside,
so
that
I
could
go
through
and
follow
what
you're
adopting
so
I
went
to
your
website
for
the
City
Council
for
the
current
agenda
and
it's
one
week.
AE
K
Got
a
follow-up
if
I
may
muddy
the
water
little
bit,
hey
John,
let's
go
back
just
a
minute
to
the
aggrieved
citizen
process.
Yes,
is
there?
Is
there
any
way
that
we
could
put
that
on
the
front
end
when
they
meet
with
the
community
with
their
neighbors
Association,
so
that
it
sort
of
gets
that
process
out
at
the
beginning,
rather
than
going
through
the
neighborhood
process
and
then
going
through
staff
recommendations
and
then
having
something
come
up
at
the
end?
Well,.
H
H
That
was
a
mistake
on
my
part
as
we're
looking
at
the
document,
the
30-day
window
happens
when
you're
applying
for
a
major
modification
and
you're
denied,
then
that's
where
actually,
then
also
the
forum
based
code
can
be
that's
where
you
have
citizens
and
the
applicant
in
the
room
asking
for
a
major
change
and
that's
where
that
language
applies.
So.
A
A
X
I
guess
what
I
want
to
say,
you
know:
I,
we've
heard
a
lot
about
not
having
information
as
we
have
it
more
time
to
go
over
it.
Things
of
that
nature.
I
do
not
feel
we're
going
to
come
up
with
a
perfect
document,
and
if,
if
we
decide
on
what
we're
going
to
do
tonight
or
wait
still,
there
gonna
be
changes
that
people
want
to
make
and
I
guess.
I
would
like
to
see
the
council
get
off
the
dime.
In
other
words,
we
put
something
in
place.
X
We're
gonna
have
six
months
to
review
it,
make
modifications
I'm
inclined
to
go
with
the
100%
dealing
with
cars,
but
there
I
guess,
give
and
take.
We
have
to
have
in
this
process,
and
so
I
would
like
to
see
the
council
move
forward
on
something
knowing
that
in
the
next
six
months,
they're
gonna
be
modification
that
we
probably
will
have
to
make
I
just
wanted
to
make
that
comment.
That's
chairman,
okay,.
B
Agree
more
with
my
colleague
from
district
9
and
I'll
say
that
we
have
to
start
the
clock,
so
the
six-month
review
process
can
get
here
six
months
in
terms
of
development
and
chatting
is
a
flash.
Very
little
construction
will
occur
or
even
be
approved
in
a
six
month
window.
There
is
no
amount
of
years
of
planning
to
account
for
every
eventuality.
Before
we
enact
form-based
code,
all
of
my
amendments
came
from
citizens
from
within
my
district
and
from
those
forums.
A
I
F
Ordinance
to
me
and
Ted
and
ago
cynical
part,
two
chapter
38
zoning
ordinance
known
as
the
zoning
ordinance
so
as
to
rezone
specific
properties
within
the
downtown
Chattanooga
form-based
code
area,
boundary
more
particularly
described
here,
ending
in
the
downtown
zoning
study
attached
to
they
made
a
part
here
of
by
reference
from
in
one
manufacturing
zone
C
through
central
business.
Almost
c7,
North,
Shore
commercial
mixed
use
zone
are
three
residential
zone.
F
C
two
convenience
commercial
zone
are
four
special
zone,
are
one
rest
residential
zone,
RTC
residential
townhouse,
zero
lot
line
zone
RT,
one
residential
townhouse
song,
UTC
urban
general
commercial
zone
old
one
off
its
own
and
m2
light
industrial
zone
to
the
following
songs
within
a
downtown
Chattanooga
form
based
code,
drm
residential
multi-use
zone
multi-unit
zone.
Dcx
commercial
makes
you
so
das.
F
A
shopfront
makes
you
so
DC
RV
civic
zone,
dpk
parts
and
open
space
song
RF
riverfront
zone
are:
are
the
Riverview
zone,
our
CRV
civic
zone,
RPK
parks
and
open
space
on
you,
Rd
residential
detached
zone?
You
are
a
residential
attached
zone,
URM
residential
multi-unit
zone,
ucx
commercial
emission
zone-
us
a
shopfront
makes
use
them.
You
IX
industrial
mixed
use,
zone,
UCC
commercial
corridor,
you
in
industrial
zone,
UCAV
civic
zone,
you
PK
parks
and
open
space,
stone
your
erd
residential
detached
own
er,
a
residential
attached,
so
erm
residential
multi-unit
zone.
F
A
B
Dance
Thank
You.
Mr.
chairman,
hey
guys
the
bullet
point
version
since
we've
already
covered
this.
We
have
ordnance,
be
ordnance,
b1,
ordinates
v2.
This
ordinance
be
to
encompass
all
of
the
amendments
from
councilman
Mitchell
council,
chairman
Freeman,
and
myself,
including
my
parcel
on
the
100
block
of
Cherry
Street,
going
back
to
residential
and
four
storeys
I
would.
AD
A
B
A
AH
Okay
before
that
begins,
let
me
just
point
out
the
differences
between
the
three
ordinances
that
before
you,
the
first
one
was,
as
it
was
last
week,
B
one
included
chairman
Freeman's
changes,
most
of
them,
not
all
of
them
and
then
B
to
the
one.
That's
been
moved
before
you
have
the
changes
from
councilman,
Anderson,
council
and
Mitchell,
and
also
chairman
Freeman.
A
C
Anita
Polk
Connolly
at
10:20,
East
10th
Street
I,
just
wanted
to
clarify
that
at
the
corner
lot
of
10th
and
central
it
is
right
now
I
think
it
was
at
cx-3.
It
should
be
a
tardy
because
it
actually
faces
10th
Street
and
it
has
a
pretty
high
elevation
for
anything
that
could
be
facing
Central
Avenue.
So
I
just
wanted
to
be
sure
that
that
was
included
in
this
change.
It.
C
A
C
AI
Good
evening
my
name
is
Ron
Feldman
I'm,
my
office
address
is
736
Georgia
Avenue
I'm,
an
attorney
I
represent
mr.
William
wise,
the
owner
of
commercial
property
at
120,
Market
Street,
which
runs
through
two
Cherry
Street.
His
property
is
the
subject
of
councilman
Anderson's
amendment
and
I
wanted
to
take
a
few
moments
and
address
those
his
concerns.
AI
The
history
of
this
property
goes
back
to
2009
when
he
applied
for
rezoning.
At
the
time
the
property
was
owned.
The
frontage
on
Market
Street
was
m1.
The
rear
of
the
property
along
Cherry
Street
was
our
four
special
zone
in
order
to
redevelop
the
property
he
went
through
the
rezoning
process
and
this
council
approved
rezoning
to
c3,
which
permitted
redevelopment
mr.
wises
relied
on
the
activity.
The
approval
by
the
City
Council
yet
and
entered
into
a
long-term
lease
with
the
National
tenant.
AI
The
existing
concrete
block
structure
on
the
building,
which
had
been
used
as
a
car
wash
for
many
years,
was
demolished
and
a
new
modern
building
was
constructed
in
its
place
under
the
form
based
code.
The
Planning
Commission
staff
initially
proposed
a
split
zone
with
sh6
and
on
the
front
of
the
property
on
Market,
Street
and
rm4
on
the
rear
of
the
property
on
Cherry
Street.
AI
At
our
request
and
after
consideration
by
the
staff,
the
plant,
the
staff
recommended
and
the
Planning
Commission
considered
rezoning
the
entire
property
to
sh6
because
of
its
actual
use
and
because
of
a
severe
topographic
difference
between
the
rear
of
the
property
and
the
a
finished
area.
The
driving
lane
of
Cherry
Street
at
the
May
meeting
of
the
Planning
Commission
recommended
the
sh6
zone
for
the
entire
property,
with
a
4-story
limit
on
the
property
on
the
building's.
In
order
to
accommodate
concerns
about
view
of
the
residents
on
Cherry
Street,
there
was
opposition
at
that
meeting.
AI
The
residential
use
of
the
rear
portion
of
this
property
is
simply
not
feasible.
If
you
look
at
the
topographic
map
that
should
have
been
handed
to
you,
you'll
see
that
the
Cherry
Street
grade
is
it's
700
feet
above
sea
level.
The
light
contour
lines
are
ten
foot
intervals
and
that
the
rear
of
the
120
Market
Street
is
below
the
seven
680
line,
probably
around
676
75.
So
that's
a
20
to
25-foot
grade
differential.
AI
If
you
built
a
four-story
building
on
that
parcel
to
two
of
the
floors
at
least
would
be
below
great
below
ground
level
on
Cherry
Street,
which
would
render
to
them
effectively
unless
a
bowl,
and
if
all
you
could
do
if
the
property
is
build,
a
residents
multi-family
residence
on
it.
You
really
couldn't
do
anything
with
it
because
you
couldn't
get
to
it
and
nobody
would
lease
it.
AI
If
the
objective
of
the
ordinance
is
to
protect
the
view
from
Cherry
Street,
we
would
submit
that
that's
probably
not
going
to
be
achieved.
If
you
look
at
the
grant
the
last
page
of
your
handout.
This
is
a
scale
view
of
the
profile
of
the
120
Market
Street
property,
with
the
Reza
four-story
residence
on
Cherry
Street,
a
four-story
residential
structure
at
the
rear
of
120,
Market
Street
and
then
a
six-story
structure
at
the
front
of
Market
Street.
AI
If
you,
if
you'll
note
there,
the
view
of
the
four-story
building
on
Market
Street
on
Cherry
Street
would
be
blocked
by
a
six
story
structure
and
a
on
Market
Street.
Another
item
I,
wanted
to
point
out
that
I
noticed
in
the
proposed
form-based
code
is
that
the
uses
that
are
permitted
under
the
proposed
RM
for,
in
addition
to
multifamily
residences,
the
property
could
only
be
used
for
such
things
as
a
bed-and-breakfast,
home
occupation,
offsite
parking
and
a
daycare
with
a
special
permit.
AI
AI
It
seems
to
us
that,
based
on
the
unique
topographic
features
of
the
property
in
question
that
an
RM
zone
would
render
this
property
nearly
worthless
when
the
property
is
redeveloped
in
a
number
of
years,
and
that
the
proposed
restriction
in
fact
create
some
unequal
treatment
under
the
law,
because
the
opposite
side
of
Cherry
Street
could
be
used
for
a
restaurant
or
a
retail
store.
And
mr.
AI
B
AC
Okay,
let
me
turn
to
a
couple
things
here:
I'm
not
sure
I
was
following
everything
mr.
Feldman
was
saying,
but
in
the
downtown
core
in
the
our
end
zone,
which
is
residential
multi-unit,
you
can
have
single
unit
living.
You
can
have
multi
unit
with
as
many
units
as
you
can
get
on
your
lot,
depending
on
the
size
of
the
lot
live
work
units
churches,
those
sorts
of
things,
schools.
AC
B
AC
AC
AI
E
B
So
I
will
say
that
Planning
Commission
did
make
a
different
recommendation
than
what
I
would
want
to
go
with.
I've,
perhaps
never
seen
such
a
strong,
one-sided
view
from
a
group
of
neighborhood
residents
than
I
have
on
this,
and
while
Planning
Commission
is
not
obligated
to
follow
the
will
of
the
people
who
live
in
my
district
I
feel
that
I
am
and
I
would
oppose
such
a
change
and
would
encourage
council
to
go
along
with
the
wishes
of
the
residents
in
that
area.
Who
wish
to
push
the
amendment
that
I've
pushed
forth
tonight.
A
B
Q
AI
Q
AI
Q
B
Know
chairman,
the
beauty
of
the
forum
based
code
is
that
it's
not
forever
and
the
other
view
one
of
the
other
beauties
of
it
is
that
it
forces
developers
to
engage
citizens
and
nearby
residents
on
the
front
end
rather
than
at
a
city
council
meeting
I
would
strongly
encourage
the
council
to
pass
this
amendment
as
I
presented
and
encourage
the
applicant
to
approach
this
process
differently
going
forward
in
the
future.
Engage
the
neighborhood
explain
what
you
want
to
do
with
the
property
and
and
be
good
corporate
developer
citizens
working
hand-in-hand
with
our
residents
downtown.
A
AJ
My
name
is
Ben
Bowers
I
live
in
the
North
Shore
108
Baker
Street
I've
been
up
here
like
four
times,
I,
guess
and
I
didn't
really
know
what
I
was
wanting
or
doing
before
and
now
with
more
research
and
some
help
I've
found
out
that
I'm,
currently
c7
and
I,
think
it's
being
proposed
for
RA
to
and
I
would
like
to
try
to
get
his
own
Rd,
because
what
that
would
do.
It
would
actually
just
give
me
a
little
bit
of
buffer
in
between
the
next
property
that
they're
proposing
to
build
four-story
condos.
AJ
It
was
just
you
know.
15
feet
would
be
two
stories
and
in
30
feet
they
could
do
the
four
stories
still,
but
it
wouldn't
be
just
like
right
next
to
me
it
would
still,
hopefully
not
take
away
my
view
and
I
just
wouldn't
have
a
four-story
building
right
next
to
my
property
line
and
it's
consistent
with
the
r1
and
the
r2
that's
around
that
area.
So
it's
really
not
that
the
only
thing
that's
different.
Is
it
just
give
me
a
little
room.
A
AJ
W
AK
I'm
Ned
Woggle
and
I
own
a
piece
of
property
at
305,
West,
Manning,
Street,
I
I'm
a
little
confused
as
to
what's
in
b2,
because
we
we
can't
see
it
and
we
don't
know
what
changes
were
made.
But
I
was
my
property
was
recommended
by
the
by
the
staff
and
the
Planning
Commission
to
be
our
X
3
and
I
was
trying
to
figure
out.
If
that's
in
the
be
the
b2
that
you're
that
you
have
a
motion
to
approve.
A
AK
AK
AK
AL
Hellen
burn
sharp
129,
Walnut
Street,
didn't
plan
to
speak
tonight,
but
and
I
appreciate.
The
council's
support
initially
want
to
explain
a
little
bit
about
the
perspective.
I
live
in
the
condo
complex,
that's
right
across
from
the
back
of
mr.
wises
property,
Buffalo,
Wild
Wings,
and
what
you
have
there.
You
have
three
rectangular
pieces
of
property
where
Cheeburger
Cheeburger
is
and
where
Buffalo
Wild
Wings
is
and
where
the
stand
up,
paddleboard
shop
is,
or
whatever
all
of
those
run
from
Market
Street
all
the
way
to
Cherry
Street.
AL
Feldman
requested
that
it
all
be
zoned
commercial-
and
we
understand
I-
mean
the
fact
that
that
the
back
of
the
property
might
be
developed
and-
and
you
know,
on
Cherry
Street-
we
get
that
it
may
not
always
stay
that
way
and
in
fact,
right
next
to
it
as
you
go
towards
first
Street
they're,
coming
up
with
those
condos
that
currently
end
halfway
up
that
steep
hill
and
are
going
to
have
four
residential
flats
along
that
portion.
So
it
can
be
developed
and
it
can
be
developed,
residentially
and
and
in
fact
it
is
being
developed
residential.
AL
What
I
would
ask
you
to
under
to
consider
is
that
the
character
of
Cherry
is
so
different
from
the
character
of
market
and
when
you
go
from
Cherry
Street
from
1st
Street
all
the
way
over
to
third
over
to
riverfront
park
light.
It
is
all
has
a
residential
designation
in
the
form
base
code.
Everything
so
here
what
you
could
be
doing
if
you
allowed
this,
would
be
a
spot
zone
with,
with
residential
on
either
side
and
the
only
parcel
on
Cherry
Street
over
that
would
have
a
commercial
designation.
It
can
be
developed
residential
II.
AL
K
A
We're
ready
to
go
back
to
a
regular
there's,
a
motion
on
the
floor
and
a
second
if
they
yeah
we're
ready
to
vote.
The
question
has
been
called
for
all
in
favor
the
motion,
let
it
be
known
by
saying
aye
opposed,
nay
fives
have
it.
The
motion
carries
all
right.
That
gets
us
through
that
item.
Madam
clerk,
we're
now
ready
to
go
to
resolutions,
let's
start
with
7a
a.
F
B
A
F
Amending
resolution
number
286
to
0
declaring
surplus
and
authorizing
the
mayor
to
execute
a
quitclaim
deed
to
donate,
to
the
Tennessee
Valley
Railroad
Museum,
the
interest
of
the
city
of
Chattanooga
in
bat
text,
parcels
136,
EF,
0,
0,
1,
137,
ba
0,
0
8,
137,
8000,
3,
&,
136,
LS,
0,
0,
5,
point
0,
0,
1
and
as
jointly
owned
by
the
city
of
Chattanooga,
a
Hamilton
County
with
the
five
properties
having
a
total
assets,
value
of
$19,800
to
amend,
parcel
136,
EF
0
0
1
2
parcel
136.
We
have
0
1
1
misgiving.
A
F
A
F
W
A
A
F
Authorizing
the
administrator
for
the
Department
of
Public
Works
to
a
war
contract
number
w09,
1,
5,
2,
0,
1,
2,
sh,
k,
construction,
LLC
of
O'fallon
Missouri,
Carter,
Street,
CS,
OTF,
outfall,
sewer
rehabilitation
in
the
amount
of
three
hundred
forty
six
thousand
five
hundred
eighty
dollars
with
a
contingency
amount
of
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
for
an
amount
not
to
exceed
three
hundred.
Eighty
one
thousand
five
hundred
eighty
dollars,
72
s,
RF
loan
approval,
mister.
I
A
AM
Mccarty
there's
five
items
for
your
consideration
this
evening.
The
first
item
is
for
the
purchasing
department.
It's
a
blanket
contract
renewal
for
to
blanket
contract
renewals
for
natural
gas
is
to
be
word
to
Chattanooga
gas
and
south
star
energy,
sir,
is
for
an
estimated
annual
expenditure
of
$250,000.
AM
Next
Alana
is
for
General
Services
is
a
blanket
contract
renewal
for
fire
and
garbage
and
other
truck
maintenance
it's
to
be
awarded
to
truck
HN
ago
truck
center
for
an
estimated
annual
expenditure
of
$100,000.
The
third
item
is
for
general
services.
It's
a
blanket
contract
renewal
for
garbage
garbage
trucks,
it's
to
be
aware
to
Stringfellow
Inc
for
an
estimated
annual
expenditure
of
1
million
$100,000
next
time.
Miss
Republic
works.
AM
It's
a
blanket
contract
for
vibration,
analysis
and
demography
services,
that's
to
be
awarded
to
current
technologies
for
an
estimated
annual
expenditure
of
$75,000
and
finally,
for
Public
Works.
It's
a
blanket
contract
renewal
for
satellite
imagery
to
be
wore
to
I
cubed
information
integration
for
an
estimated
an
expenditure
of
$36,000
Thank.
A
G
You
mr.
chair
quickly,
let
me
say
that
this
weekend
the
Tennessee
Municipal
Attorneys
Association,
gathered
in
Gatlinburg
and
I
have
a
couple
of
airbrushed
jackets
for
you
all
not
going
to
distribute,
but
I
do
want
to
say
that
this
year
we
had
an
opportunity
to
elect
a
new
president
and
I
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
field
Noblet
who
was
elected.
The
president.
AK
A
Anyone
want
to
make
a
committee
report,
if
not
we'll
just
moved
to
the
next
item,
is
the
agenda
for
next
week
any
questions
or
concerns
anyone
act.
Ok,
now
we're
at
the
point
of
the
agenda
where,
if
anyone
who
wishes
to
speak
to
us
about
any
matter,
that
is
a
non
agenda
item,
they
may
do
so
at
the
stamps
that
come
on
up
to
the
map
state
your
name
now
and
wait
a
minute
until
he
gives
you
the
instruction
as
to
the
process.
AN
Thank
You
mr.
Hinton,
my
name
is
Kevin
bate
I
live
at
1511
Duncan
Avenue
in
Highland,
Park
I
am
the
artist
working
on
the
mural
for
the
Fallen
5:00
on
McCauley
Avenue
and,
as
we
draw
to
the
close
in
the
painting
of
that
we're
going
to
be
unveiling
that,
on
the
anniversary
of
the
shootings
I
wanted
to
reach
out
and
by
each
of
you
personally
to
come
out
that
night
we
will
start
around
sunset.
AN
Wtci
is
got
a
documentary
that
will
be
premiering
there
at
the
building
at
1715,
McCauley
Avenue,
that's
the
Tennessee
wholesale
florist
building.
Once
the
documentary
is
over,
we
will
light
the
murals
from
then
on.
They
will
be
lit
all
the
time.
All
night
there'll
been
a
photo
I.
So
when
the
Sun
Goes
Down,
the
lights
will
come
on
when
the
Sun
comes
up,
the
more
the
lights
of
golf
that'll
be
lit
from
now.
Until
the
end
of
time,
I'd
like
to
invite
you
all
to
come
out,
please
feel
free
to
bring
friends.
AN
M
Evening
my
name
is
Ellie
Stafford
I
live
at
2016,
Ashmore,
Avenue
and
I
want
to
talk
about
the
budget
coming
up.
I
know
you'll
be
discussing
it.
You
have
been
discussing
it.
I
haven't
been
able
to
attend
the
budget
meetings
at
all
since
they're
in
the
middle
of
the
workday,
which
is
not
accessible
to
a
lot
of
people,
but,
along
with
many
other
Chattanooga
pnes
I
have
some
concerns
about
the
proposed
budget.
My
concern
is
that
we
are.