►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 7/15/20
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello
and
welcome
to
Pittsburgh
City
Council's
standing
committees,
meeting
for
Wednesday
July
15th
2020.
My
name
is
Kim
Clark,
Baskin
and
I'm
the
assistant
city
clerk
with
us.
Today
we
have
our
sign
language
interpreter
Nick,
Miller,
the
following
is
a
list
of
legislation
up
for
discussion
by
Pittsburgh
City
Council,
the
finance
and
law
committee.
Mr.
Laval
is
the
chair.
We
have
new
papers.
A
Bill
number
509
resolution
authorizing
the
issuance
of
a
warrant
in
favor
of
curtain
and
heathyr
LLP
in
an
amount
not
to
exceed
eleven
thousand
eight
hundred
sixty-four
dollars
in
five
cents.
For
professional
legal
services
and
expert
advice
regarding
source
of
income
litigation
bill
number
five,
ten
resolution
amending
Resolution
587,
which
is
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
city
solicitor
to
enter
until
professional
services,
agreement
with
Fox
Rothschild
LLP
for
professionals,
consulting
and
legal
services
in
relation
to
False
Claims
Act
litigation
by
increasing
the
total
cost
from
forty
five
thousand
dollars.
A
Bill
number
512
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
city
solicitor
to
enter
into
a
professional
services
agreement
with
the
Jones
Pass
as
PLLC
for
professional
legal
services
for
an
employment
related
matter
before
the
Human
Relations
Commission
amount
not
to
exceed
twenty
four
thousand
dollars
bill
number
five:
thirteen
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
in
the
city
solicitor
to
enter
into
a
professional
services
agreement
with
Couzens
O'connor
for
professional
legal
services.
In
connection
with
an
employment
related
matter
for
an
amount
not
to
exceed
fifteen
thousand
dollars,
Public
Works
Committee,
mr.
Coghill
is
the
chair.
A
Bill
number
502
resolution
granting
unto
mark
de
Natali.
Their
successors
in
assigns
the
privilege
to
light
the
privilege
and
license
to
construct
maintained
in
use
at
their
own
cost
and
expense
to
install
a
new
retaining
wall
and
fence
at
Sycamore,
Street
and
red
oak
way
in
a
19th
Ward.
Second
Council
District
land
use
and
Economic
Development
Committee.
Mr.
Wilson
is
the
chair.
A
We
have
deferred
papers,
they
have
bill
number
492
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Office
of
Management
and
Budget
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
community-based
organizations
for
Community
and
Economic
Development
for
planning
assistance
in
various
neighborhoods
in
the
city
and
providing
operating
support
for
these
groups
and
provide
for
the
payment
at
a
cost
not
to
exceed
$500,000
innovation,
performance
and
asset
management
committee.
Mr.
Strassburger
is
the
chair.
We
have
new
papers,
we
have
bill
number
505.
A
Resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
city
solicitor
to
enter
into
an
agreement
with
sicom
Data
Systems
Inc
for
professional
services
relating
to
continuing
maintenance,
support
and
upgrades
to
city
law,
the
Department
of
laws,
legal
case
management
and
administrative
support.
Software
system
cost
not
to
exceed
eleven
thousand
three
hundred
and
seventy
six
dollars.
A
C
D
Are
you
able
to
hear
me?
Yes,
we
can
all
right.
Okay,
first
I'd
like
to
thank
Council
for
having
me
today
and
for
considering
mayor
Peduto
appointment
of
me
to
the
gender
equity
Commission
I'd,
also
like
to
thank
mayor
Peduto
for
considering
me.
I
see
this
as
an
opportunity,
one
just
sort
of
by
nature
of
birth
being
black
and
female,
obviously
I
mean
also
being
an
economic
development.
Professional
here
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
D
I
see
this
as
an
opportunity
to
help
implement
a
lot
of
the
recommendations
that
have
already
been
done
by
the
great
work
of
the
Commission
I.
Think
that
we
have
had
cycle
of
planning
and
trying
to
understand
what
our
issues
are
as
a
city
and
I
think
that
we've
reached
the
juncture
where
it's
become
a
moral
and
economic
imperative
that
we
figure
out
how
to
address
these
concerns
and
issues
and
that
we
start
putting
teeth
to
the
recommendations
so
again,
very
honored
by
this
appointment
in
your
consideration.
D
C
D
E
Nice
to
see
you
and
thanks
for
being
here
with
us,
can
we
talk
a
little
bit
about
trans
women,
especially
trans
women
of
color,
and
how
we
can
do
our
best
to
serve
what
is
really
very
much
so
an
underserved
community
in
terms
of
gender,
whether
it
is
gender
identity
or
whether
it
is
a
more
fluid
sexuality
and
I
just
would
be
curious
about
what
your
thoughts
might
be
about,
how
that
would
affect
the
job.
You
do
absolutely.
D
So
I
will
say
that
it
is.
It
is
challenging
in
this
country
in
this
city
to
be
black.
It
is
challenging
in
this
city
to
be,
you
know,
to
be
female
and
it
is
challenging
in
this
city
to
be
trans,
and
it's
even
more
so
and
so
I
think
that
trans
women
have
unique
needs.
They
deal
with
the
level
of
bias
and
a
love
and
some
barriers
that
you
know.
D
But
those
qualitative
narratives
and
those
experiences
are
going
to
be
are
going
to
be
very
important
to
bring
to
the
forefront
I'm,
also
very,
very
alarmed
by
the
number
of
trans
women
that
are
being
murdered
and
how
those
murders
are
not
installed,
that
it's
not
being
taken
seriously
and
I.
Think
that
we
really
need
to
focus
on.
You
know
dealing
with
some
of
the
ignorance.
That's
out
there
around
what
it
means
to
be
a
trans
woman
of
color.
And
so
we
have.
F
E
So
there
are,
there
are
small
glimmers
of
hope
out
there
and,
and
they
they
give
me
Curie
courage
and,
and
that
things
things
can't
will
change
they
will
but
we're
responsible
for
that
change
right.
We
are
the
change
we
wish
to
see
in
the
world
right
and
where
we
are
the
leadership
that
calls
out
for
that
change.
Right.
E
I
had
the
pleasure
of
watching
a
documentary
on
Netflix
called
disclosure
and
I
have
spoken
to
a
couple
of
council
members
about
it.
I
thought
I
was
actually
going
into
the
subject
as
someone
that
was
I
would
like
to
say
enlightened
on
the
subject
of
trans
people
and
and
the
different
hurdles
and
obstacles
and
challenges
that
they
faced.
But
I
came
away
from
watching
that
documentary
thinking,
boy
I,
don't
know
when
I
think
I
know
and
even
I
need
to
polish
up
mine.
E
You
know
how
quickly
the
world
changes
and
how
important
it
is
to
to
be
respectful
and
mindful
everyone
that
you
know
has
a
foothold
on
the
planet
here
and
to
make
certain
that
they
are
loved
and
welcomed
and
nurtured
and
nourished,
and
so
any
of
those
out
there
that
might
not
have
had
an
opportunity
to
watch
disclosure.
It
is
streaming
on
Netflix
and
it
was
incredibly
powerful
and
quite
enlightening
on
the
subject
very.
D
Much
so
and
there's
a
lot
and
I
do
not
pretend
to
be
an
expert
on
trans
women
issues
and
I
am
not
I.
Do
know
that
I
have
a
heart
that
wants
to
make
sure
that
anybody
that
is
being
marginalized
across
the
lines
of
difference
has
a
seat
at
the
table
and
that
their
voice
is
being
respected
and
heard
and
on
the
point
about
disclosure,
I
watched,
the
documentary-
and
it
was
very
illuminating
and
very
enlightening-
and
one
is
one
of
my
favorite
takeaways-
was
the
fact
that
Sandra
Caldwell
she
was
a
character.
D
E
It
harkens
back
to
Harvey
Milk
in
a
very
simple
message:
he
had
that
you
just
come
out
right.
You
just
were
just
honest
and
truthful
of
who
we
are
and
then
people
come
to
see
that
we're
adjust
your
sons
and
daughters
and
brothers
and
sisters,
and
you
know
doctors
and
lawyers,
and
you
know
cashiers,
you
know,
and
we've
run
the
full
spectrum
right.
E
So
I
do
I
because
of
my
work
with
you
and
my
experience
with
you
I
believe
that
your
true
and
honest
in
and
what
you
put
forward
and
I
know
you're
gonna,
do
an
amazing
job
on
the
gender
equity
Commission
I
am
happy
to
vote
for
you're,
not
endorsement.
Forgive
me
your
appointment
and
as
always,
it's
a
genuine
pleasure
to
have
you
here
in
the
city
and
to
be
able
to
work
with
you.
Diamante
thank.
D
You
it's
an
honor
and
I
really
do
appreciate
the
wonderful
comments.
I've
had
the
pleasure
of
working
with
you
across
a
couple
of
different
issues,
and
it's
really
been
an
illuminating
experience
for
me
understanding
more
about
your
district
in
the
needs
in
that
community.
So
thank
you
very
much.
Thank.
G
You
I
don't
have
any
questions
actually
I
just
want
to
say
thank
you
to
director
Walker
for
all
the
work
that
she
does
both
of
the
URA
on
the
various
boards
that
she
sits
on
as
well
as
this
new
Commission
issue,
be
a
part
of
I
think
the
work
she
does
in
this
city
is
extraordinary.
So
I
just
want
to
thank
her
for
her
time
in
her
efforts.
Thank.
C
C
Although
we
have
a
great
director
I
think
that
I
see
your
work
impacting
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
in
areas
I've
never
seen
benefiting
from
development,
and
it's
just
and
just
your
understanding
of
the
communities
is
just
so
so
amazing
and
your
willingness
to
work
and
roll
up
your
sleeves
and
get
things
done
and
I
just
want
to.
Thank
you
because
you've
really
helped
us
a
lot
with
the
porter
project,
you're
helping
us
a
lot
with
that.
C
H
C
And
so
they're
doing
the
interviews
this
week.
So
to
me,
Chrissie
Porter
is
amazing:
she's,
just
steamrolling
she's
going
forward
and
she's
getting
to
get
this
place
open
and
it's
gonna
benefits
community
in
so
many
ways,
but
especially
with
employment
and
services.
So
I'm
excited.
So
thank
you
for
your
help
with
that.
But
I
just
want
to
say
your
help
with
the
land
bank
and
and
all
sorts
of
things
you're,
just
so
easy
to
work
with
so
easy
to
talk
to
and
so
knowledgeable
in
all
these
areas.
C
C
Even
though
you
not
work
for
the
city
I've
never
seen
anybody
sit
on
the
board
that
works
for
the
city,
that's
so
free
to
say
whatever
she
wants
to
say
and
I
love
that
about
I
love,
that
you're
gonna,
give
your
own
opinion
and
you're
gonna
say
whatever
you
think
is
really
needs
to
be
done.
So
I
want
to
tell
you
I
know,
that's
a
difficult
situation.
Cuz
I've
done
it
myself
before
in
other
areas,
but
it's
I
appreciate
that
you're
so
willing
to
put
yourself
out
there
and
and
stand
by
your
convictions.
D
C
It
I
love
that
about
you,
I
love
that
about
you.
So
I
think
this
will
be
up
for
vote
next
week
and
everybody's
gonna
be
so
eager
to
give
affirmative
recommendation
to
your
not
to
your
appointment,
and
so
that's
I
think
that's
it
for
me.
I
just
want
to
talk
about
about
you
as
a
person
and
how
great
you're
doing
so.
C
Thank
you
thank
you
and
the
person
you
were
Russa
City
that
that's
it
me
so
now
we're
just
gonna
wait
for
councilman
about
to
start
the
10
o'clock
meeting,
which
has
about
10
minutes
to
go
so
we're
just
gonna
stay
logged
on
council
members
and
we'll
wait
for
councilman
LaValle
to
start
that
meeting.
But
thank
you
Giamatti
your
you
know.
Thank
you
sign
off
for
sticking
around
for
our
meeting.
If
you'd,
like
all.
D
G
Good
morning
and
welcome
to
the
City
Committee
meeting
for
Wednesday
July
15th
2020
Council
will
continue
to
me
virtually
on
Tuesdays
and
Wednesdays
until
further
notice.
All
meetings
were
streamed
live
on
the
city's
YouTube
channel.
Our
first
order
of
business
is
public
comment
and
I
would
like
to
remind
all
speakers
at
the
rules
of
the
council
state
Oh.
G
I
I
I
Back
in
the
fifties,
I
ended
up
with
five
going
to
see
somebody
to
say
goodbye,
because
we
were
going
on
a
road
trip
and
what
did
I
see
an
African
American
who
came
out
and
mouth
mouth
off
to
his
boss
and
the
boss
picked
him
up
and
threw
him
like
a
piece
of
garbage
over
a
4-foot
dock,
and
that
was
the
start
of
it.
I
did
on
your
side
ever
since.
I
What
about
all
with
liberty
and
justice
for
all
it
doesn't
say
for
all
white,
it
doesn't
say
for
blue
or
black.
It
says
for
all
of
us,
Jewish
Catholic,
whatever
we
believe
in,
but
it's
for
the
liberty
and
justice
for
all,
and
then
we
go
to
another
little
piece
of
writing
We
the
People.
In
order
to
form
a
more
perfect
union.
I
G
J
Greetings,
everyone
greetings.
You
did
so
much
better
this
time
it
is
shaman,
just
the
correct
pronunciation.
Oh
my
you
got
a
hit.
You
got
a
dead-on.
Thank
you
for
that.
So
again,
I
am
here
to
speak
for
the
Iroquois
Confederacy
of
Aborigine,
American
peoples
and
following
what
this
man
has
said,
just
gives
more
clarity
and
it
gives
more
of
a
foundation
and
puts
things
into
a
clearer
perspective
for
everyone
here
that,
when
we
are
talking
about,
the
injustice
is
no
one
can
talk
about.
J
The
injustice
is
until
they
start
to
begin
to
address
the
in
justices
of
the
aborigine
people
that
were
here
on
these
lands
that
we
call
America,
that
you
call
America,
that
you
call
the
United
States
of
America,
of
meaning
being
the
specific
point
here
of
America.
We
are
the
original
Aborigine
American
people.
We
are
the
foundation.
Our
roads
were
laid
already.
J
This
is
a
silent
thing
that
media
gives
no
attention
to,
but
we're
here
giving
attention
to
it,
and
you
will
give
attention
to
this.
You
will
give
attention
to
us
because
we
are
a
peaceful
people
and
we
helped
set
the
foundation
that
all
immigrants
enjoy
all
immigrants,
you
yourselves
descendants
thereof
or
the
sentence
of
those
who
are
saying
they
came
here
through
a
slave
trade.
We
were
here
before
that
happens.
J
We
are
saying
to
you
and
to
all
of
the
people
as
we
are
rising
and
waking
our
own
people
up
to
their
true
identity
after
the
genocide.
After
the
mislabeling
of
our
people
from
colored
Negro
black
African
American,
even
till
today,
I
am
NOT
African.
My
grandmother's
on
both
sides
of
my
families
were
not
African.
They
told
us
the
stories
of
the
atrocities,
we
have
kept
our
records,
we
have
been
silent
and
we
are
silent.
No
more.
J
J
K
K
K
You
know,
I,
have
some
footage,
some
videos
of
them
following
me,
you
know
I'm,
just
well.
I
just
need
somebody
to
help
me
with
this.
I
went
to
the
NW
n
double
acp.
They
advised
me
to
get
some
proof.
I
got
some
proof,
but
then
they
acted
ignorant
or
to
me
you
know,
I
really
need
some
help
on
it.
So
I
need
somebody
to
help
me
with
this,
because
they'll
really
harassing
me
they're
getting
neighbors
after
me
to
try
to
you
know,
do
bodily
physical
harm
to
me.
K
K
K
K
K
B
F
L
L
Yet
you
are
going
to
vote
to
honor
a
man
that
took
away
black
people's
freedom
for
his
own
gain.
The
nomination
of
this
house
is
a
slap
in
the
BLM's
face,
as
this
house
is
being
saved
for
circle
status
and
funding
money.
You're
voting
on
the
side
of
anti
late,
poorly
written
laws.
Judge
Jamis
ruling
confirms
that
the
learn
sells
egg
holders
were
agreeable
to
the
house
being
torn
down
for
three
pound
homes
when
they
lost
in
zoning.
L
Court
is
when
they
filed
this
purple
nomination,
who
are
setting
up
precedents
that
will
create
nonprofits
to
help
development
of
the
city.
Lawrenceville
used
to
be
a
run-down
poor,
neighborhood
and
now
flourishing.
All
do
do
to
developers
who
have
invested
millions
now,
you're
funneling,
much-needed
money,
revitalizing
black
neighborhoods
I,
wonder
how
many
good
hard-working
black
families
will
have
Earthlings
unjustly
taken
off
of
them
for
this
earth
or
Big
Boss.
His
laws
are
unconstitutional
and
meat.
L
Ain't
Bernie
you're
voting
to
ignore
a
sealed
structural
engineers
report
begins
this
house
dangerous
and
not
worthy
of
preservation,
even
based
on
the
PL
eyes
response.
They
concurred
that
this
house
is
structural
defects
and
can
possibly
fall
on
yet
you're,
ignoring
this
danger
to
the
community.
When
this
house
Falls
I
put
the
city
on
notice.
That
is
your
liability.
L
As
we
tried
to
do
the
right
thing
to
demolish
for
you're
voting
to
not
want
to
bring
a
much
needed
revenue
for
the
city,
whereas
you're
laying
off
hundreds
of
hard
work,
a
burger,
we
could
lose
this
tax
revenue
to
save
dot.
Five
you're
voting
to
uphold
a
flood
law
that
takes
away
an
inheritance
from
us
into
financial
ruin.
This
is
not
a
commercial
property
where
we
are
investors
making
millions
of
dollars
your
family.
That
has
tried
to
do
the
right
thing
now
that
we
have
lost
in
zoning
court.
We
have
no
sales
agreement.
L
This
was
never
about
money.
The
house
still
needs
to
come
down
due
to
all
these
reasons
stated
above
Reverend
Burgess
yesterday,
you
stated
you're
not
empowered,
and
you
don't
use
mind
anything
publicly,
outspoken
if
you're
against
the
unjust
taking
of
property
without
just
compensation,
don't
be
a
Power
today
and
put
this
back
on
the
table,
stand
up
for
our
families
and
up
for
the
black
community
and
our
firm.
That's
right!
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
your
consideration.
I
wish
you
will.
M
Thirty-Plus
bill
choice,
one-seven-one
44th,
Street,
30,
plus
year
Lawrence
bill
resident
I'm,
an
architect
with
considerable
experience
with
the
adapt
abuse
of
historic
buildings,
including
several
National
Register
properties.
I
strongly
support
the
Evolve
house
historic
nomination
and
continued
to
be
troubled
by
the
inaccurate
and
disingenuous
statements
made
by
the
rupert's
and
the
representatives.
Yet
at
yesterday,
714
20
council
meeting
miss
rupert
introduced
herself
using
186
home
street
Morrisville.
As
her
address
186
home
street
is
the
address
of
the
Ewald
house.
Miss
rupert
does
not
live
there.
This
Rupert
is
not
a
city
resident.
M
She
has
no
interest
in
Lawrenceville
or
quality
quality
of
life
issues
affecting
Lawrenceville.
As
you
know,
Judge
James,
appropriately
reversed.
The
numerous
variance
is
granted
by
the
Zoning
Board
that
would
have
permitted
the
developer
to
shoehorn
five,
poorly
designed
townhouses
with
garages
on
the
front
facade
onto
this
site.
The
Lawrenceville
fakers
stakeholders
never
stated
the
house
should
be
torn
down.
The
historic
issues
were
deemed
not
relevant
and
I
believe
were
not
admissible
for
the
zoning
appeal
process.
M
Just
judge,
judge
James
should
be
commended
and
the
Zoning
Board
admonished
the
Zoning
Board
consistently
grants
variances
that
have
a
negative
impact
on
our
city.
Neighborhoods
particularly
Lawrence,
though
miss
Rupert
and
her
attorney
continued
to
make
statements
per
defect
at
the
OE
boat
houses,
unsafe,
dangerous
and
falling
down.
I
believe
David
green,
a
fellow
architect
and
the
city's
assistant
director
of
construction
agrees
with
me,
as
he
has
stated
that
the
Ewald
house
does
not
pose
an
imminent
danger
to
the
public.
M
Yesterday's
meeting
the
Rupert's
attorney
suggested
it
was
the
Lawrenceville
stakeholders
who
said
that
the
eave
old
house
only
needs
some
PLC
that
language
comes
directly
from
the
Rupert's
own
original
Zilla
description
of
the
Ewalt
house
and
I
quote
all
of
historic
details.
We
here
have
it
back
to
a
spectacular
historic
mansion.
Structurally
sound
just
need
some
TLC,
don't
miss
out
on
this
one-of-a-kind
estate.
H
N
Thank
you.
My
name
is
John
axtell
I
live
in
friendship,
I
moved
to
Lawrenceville
in
1982,
I
purchased
and
restored
a
house
on
Main
Street
in
1985,
which
I
still
owned,
I've
been
active
with
Lawrenceville
revitalization
and
preservation.
Efforts
continuously
for
close
to
40
years
I'm,
in
speaking
in
support
of
the
nomination
of
the
old
houses.
A
City
Historic
Site
I
wish
to
address
some
of
the
assertions
made
by
the
property
owners
and
the
proposed
developers.
Our
opponents
assertion
that
the
stakeholders
attorneys
use
of
a
hypothetical
build-out
in
the
course
of
last
fall.
N
Zoning
hearing
for
the
property
that
indicates
support
for
demolition
of
the
he
walled
house
is
a
false
and
misleading
characterization
of
neighbors
and
their
lawyer
in
opposing
the
developers
request
for
zoning
variances.
The
issue
of
historic
preservation
was
not
before
the
Zoning
Board,
knowledgeable
real
estate
professionals
and
their
attorneys
should
know
this
to
suggest
otherwise
is
to
traffic
in
misinformation.
Taken
out
of
context.
Such
statements
call
into
question
the
credibility
of
other
assertions
made
by
the
owner
and
developers
of
Ewald
house.
We
should
expect
both
public
officials
and
our
neighbors
to
abide
by
the
law.
N
Pittsburgh's
Preservation
law
provides
for
the
protection
of
buildings
of
extraordinary
significance
in
the
expert
judgment
of
both
the
pittsburgh
historic
Review
Commission
and
the
Planning
Commission
that
you
old
house
merits
the
criteria
of
extraordinary
significance
set
forth
in
the
preservation
ordinance.
The
current
owners
of
the
old
house
apparently
had
the
good
fortune
to
receive
a
financial
windfall.
They
inherited
a
sizable
investment
property
which
is
not
the
home.
They
live
in
in
Lawrenceville
a
neighborhood
undergoing
a
dramatic
economic
boom.
N
I
urged
council
members
to
check
the
current
state
of
the
law
on
the
preservation
ordinance.
Neither
newspaper
reports
nor
the
owners
statements
actor
really
accurately
reflect
the
effect
on
the
property
of
the
current
hold
on
the
nomination.
This
is
not
a
de
gret
draconian
measure.
It
leaves
the
owner
in
the
same
situation
as
other
law-abiding
Pittsburgh
property
owners.
We
urge
the
owners
to
use
conventional
marketing
for
the
property
should
the
current
development
deal
fall
through
as
a
result
of
the
court
decision.
N
O
It
is
fundamentally
the
argument
for
why
this
historic
nomination
should
not
be
seen
through
is
that
the
current
sellers
of
the
property
expect
a
financial
windfall
based
on
a
theoretical
scenario
of
market
rate
development.
So
every
zoning
variance,
hearing
and
argument
has
been
to
support
the
demolition
of
a
structurally
sound
historical,
significant
building
to
fund
and
build
five
high-density
luxury
townhomes
that
are
not
legal,
pers
owning
law
and
are
frankly,
not
the
kind
of
structures
that
we
need
in
Marcel
anymore.
Second,
part
of
that
is
the
Lawrenceville
inclusionary
zoning
and
affordable
housing.
O
Overlaid
does
not
apply
to
this
development.
So
again,
it
will
be
purely
a
financial
windfall
for
the
sellers
at
inflated
price,
the
developers
and
the
end
affluent
buyers
and,
in
addition
to
the
fact
that
Lawrenceville
as
a
changing
community
has
been
reinvested
in.
We
are
also
in
a
situation
where
it
has
lost
a
lot
of
its
historic
character
and
the
residents
who
used
to
call
it
home
and
for
various
reasons,
have
not
been
able
to
participate
in
the
revitalization
of
the
neighborhood
I'm.
O
Confident
that,
after
being
designated
at
the
local
historic
landmark
addition
to
the
fact
that
Lawrenceville
itself
is
a
national
historic
district,
the
property
will
sell
for
a
fair
price
that
reflects
its
current
condition
and
the
decades
of
neglect
by
the
owners
and
in
addition
to
that
designation
potential,
historic
tax
credits
and
other
forms
of
subsidies
such
as
the
Pennsylvania
neighborhood
assistance
program.
Perhaps
grants
and
loans
sourced
from
the
ura
and
other
local
entities
could
feasibly
restore
this
building
to
its
former
glory
and
have
a
productive
and
positive
effect
on
the
community.
K
Can
you
hear
me
yes,
yes,
I
was
I
wanted
to
make
a
comment
on
yeah
I
feel
zero,
four,
four,
seven!
Okay,
so
I
understand
it.
You
know
that
there's
what
I
tried
to
expand
on
and
then
when
I
put
some
new
languages
in
home
of
Troy.
My
my
statement
is
that
councilman
Burgess
should
not
be
sponsoring
this
bill.
First
and
foremost,
he
doesn't
even
believe
in
the
homework
charted.
Yes,
if
he
had
violated
his
oath
with
the
Home
Rule
Charter,
so
he
has
a
lot
of
nerve
to
be
sponsoring
the
bill.
K
He
doesn't
even
believe
in
hunger
charter,
we're
going
to
court
right
now
about
his
violations,
violations
of
the
Home
Rule
Charter.
So
he
has
a
lot
of
nerve
to
try
to
make
it
look
like
he's
so
that
he
really
cares
about
again
black
people
because
he
does
it
okay.
This
is
this.
Like
I
said
this
is
another
exploitation
of
black
people.
This
is
what
he's
doing
and
you
have
to
nerve
councilman
Burgess
to
sponsor
a
bill
in
the
name
of
the
Home
Rule
Charter,
you
don't
even
believe
in
the
Home
Rule
Charter.
K
You
have
violated
the
Home
Rule
Charter
and
we're
going
to
be
and
we're
going
to
and
I'm
going
to
prove
it
will.
We
go
to
trial
we're
moving
on
to
trial
now,
but
you
got
a
lot
of
nerve
when
you
do
not
believe
you
know
what
you're
you
have
plugged
in.
You
have
violated
sure.
Oh,
yes,
you
did
and
now
you
want
a
sponsor
and
you
want
to
implement
something,
and
you
want
to
insert
something
and
Hubble
charted
that
you
don't
even
believe
in
that's.
H
Q
My
name
is
Robert
Casey
I'm,
a
resident
of
the
10th
Ward
I'm,
calling
today
in
regards
to
the
multiple
sewage
facility
planning
modules
that
have
been
passed
and
delayed
multiple
times
by
council
councilmen
gross
stated
yesterday
that
her
staff
has
been
tracking
and
checking
the
status
of
the
projects
that
are
requesting
sewage
facilities,
planning
planning,
module
approvals
on
one
stop.
If
this
is
true,
then
they
should
be
aware
that
the
39th
Street
52nd,
Street
and
Duncan
Street
projects
all
have
their
zoning
and
pl/I
approvals
and
their
building
permits
have
been
issued.
Q
The
only
outstanding
permit
that
these
projects
need
to
complete
construction
is
the
PWSA
tapping
permit.
However,
PWSA
do
not
issue
the
tapping
permit
without
the
sewage
facilities
planning
module
approval
by
the
Department
of
Environmental
Protection
and
the
DEP
cannot
approve
the
sewage
facilities
plan
planning
module
until
City
Council
approves
these.
Q
These
planning
modules
have
already
been
reviewed
and
approved
by
PWSA
alkis,
an
and
Allegheny
County
Health
Department
PWSA
reviews
the
planning
module
to
confirm
that
their
sewer
infrastructure
has
capacity
to
convey
the
development
flows
to
Allison
and
help
us
and
confirms
that
they
can
treat
the
sewage
they
receive.
We
are
all
aware
of
the
many
issues
PWSA
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
faced
with
replacing
degrading,
sewer
infrastructure
and
lead
water
lines.
You
developing
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
is
helping
correct
these
issues
in
many
different
ways.
Q
First,
they
are
providing
additional
funds
to
increased
happen
fees
and
water
bills
to
help
pay
for
improvements.
Second
developers
are
required
to
cap
existing
open,
sewer,
lateral
lines
along
with
a
lot
of
their
developments,
to
prevent
groundwater
from
entering
the
sewer
lines
and
reducing
your
capacity.
Third,
new
developments
are
required
to
provide
on-site
stormwater
management,
which
separate
from
the
sanitary
sewer,
that
is,
that
is
being
treated
by
how
to
send
that
and
would
provide
outs
and
with
more
treatment
capacity.
Also,
new
developments
are
required
to
provide
on-site.
Q
G
G
R
Motion
to
approve
a
brief
discussion.
Second,
first
of
all,
I
would
like
to
thank
Public
Safety
Director
is
rich
and
chief
Schubert,
who
we've
met
with
I,
want
to
thank
their
using
of
Kelly
mystic
a
law
department.
I
want
to
thank
that
Pittenger
and
her
solicitor
was
to
be
reward
for
their
input
and
so
over
the
last
few
weeks
or
week,
or
so.
We
have
hopefully
built
this
three-legged
stool.
We
have
gotten
input
problem,
the
Public,
Safety
Director
and
from
Chief
of
Police,
so
that
he
was
comfortable.
R
H
G
R
G
S
E
T
E
E
Police
Review,
Board
I
know
you
have
entered
into
extensive
discussions
with
the
councilmen,
with
the
Public
Safety
Department,
with
your
own
solicitor
and
just
for
a
matter
of
the
record
I
would
just
like
to
have
you
say
that
you
have
come
into
agreement
that
you
support
the
bill
is
written
now
and
that
it
does
indeed
assist
you
in
doing
the
work
that
you
are
charged
to
do.
Yes,.
T
Councilman
it
does.
We
were
able
to
work
with
mr.
Carter
on
behalf
of
Reverend
Burgess
and
our
board,
chairperson,
dr.
Emma
Lucas
Darby,
and
our
solicitor
Bill
Ward
who's
with
us
this
morning
and
we're
able
to
work
through
some
of
the
details
that
were
kind
of
confusing
to
the
mission
of
the
board.
But
it's
all
been
resolved
and
we're
quite
comfortable
with
the
language,
as
proposed
now
great.
E
U
P
U
V
U
Can
you
speak
to
us
and
city
residents
for
a
minute
about
how
you
see
these
two
efforts,
the
change
in
our
home
role
charter?
To
add
this
language
for
the
City
CPR
bee
and
the
and
the
County
efforts?
Do
they
are
they
complementary?
Are
they
irrelevant
to
each
other?
Just
I
think
it's
important
to
speak
to
that
for
one
minute
and
then
I'll
have
some
follow-up
questions.
Thank.
T
You
can
because,
as
you
all
know,
well,
municipalities
in
Pennsylvania
are
established
with
certain
autonomy
and
self-determination,
the
what
the
electeds
are
responsible
for
the
quality
of
policing
in
their
municipality.
So
you
have
that
local
control,
policing
is
a
local
issue.
So
what
an
ombudsman
can
do
is
facilitate
the
communication
toward
a
resolution,
but
the
ultimate
disposition
of
a
complaint
would
be
in
the
hands
of
the
local
elected
officials.
Now
I
recommended
that
they
consider
encouragement
of
development
of
small
panels
in
each
of
those
municipalities.
It
would
be
a
municipal
decision.
T
U
T
U
Stanford
for
the
public,
the
city
is
in
the
county,
just
as
the
other
hundred
and
eight
police
departments.
Are
it
because
we
are
we
because
we
have
I'm
assuming
language
in
our
home
will
charter.
It
is
not
superseded
by
the
counties
that
is
correct.
Councilwoman
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
get
make
sure
that
people
understand
because
there's
a
lot
of
interest
in
these
topics,
and
we
want
to
make
sure
that
people
understand
we've
had
our
citizens.
Please
review
board,
we've
remind
us
all
for
how
many
for
how
long
now,
23
years,
23.
F
U
Thank
you,
and
but
but
since
these
conversations
are
ongoing
and
since
there
is
so
much
community
interest,
I
have
a
technical
question.
Maybe
mister
Carter
would
be
the
most
expert
person
we
have
on
the
call
and
mr.
Burgess
himself
because
were
as
the
council's
is
different
than
last
year's
referendum,
which
was
put
on
by
petition
in
this
action
where,
if
the
City
Council
of
Pittsburgh
is
putting
the
language
on
the
November
ballot.
So
what
if
we
in
a
month
decide
that
we
want
to
change
the
language
so.
R
I
can
answer
that
question.
First
of
all,
this
is
an
inherent
power
that
council
has.
We
did
this
I
think
you
are
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
were
on
council
I
think
you
were
a
member
of
council
when
we
put
on
the
ballot
question
of
whether
police
should
leave.
You
may
not
have
been
so
we've
done
this
before
when
we
put
on
the
question
as
to
whether
police
can
live
in
the
city.
So
we
put
that
the
same
process
is
councils
rights
in
the
past,
when
in
the
civilian
review
board,
was
first
established.
R
The
reason
it
went
through
the
ballot
signature
is
because
City
Council
refused
to
put
it
on
the
ballot,
and
so
that's
so
they
had
to
go
through
signatures
and
showing
you
be
the
date,
but
we
can
only
change
the
section
of
the
Home
Rule
Charter
every
is
it
seven
years
showing
was
the
number
four
size
right
here?
So
after
we
cannot
change,
we
can
only
change
a
section.
U
Is
slightly
different,
though
whatever
window,
my
question
is
slightly
different:
George.
Oh,
yes,
council
has
the
power
to
do
this
and
has
exercised
it
previously.
But
what
if,
since
there's,
really
very
active
public
conversation,
we
as
a
body
decide
that
we
want
a
slightly
different
language
on
the
November
ballot.
We.
W
U
W
U
This
is
it's
just
a
hypothetical
but
I.
Thank
you
for
indulging
me
because
again,
there's
just
I
think
so
much.
This
is
relatively
quickly,
I
think
in
the
kind
of
community
conversation,
since
it
says,
there's
so
many
different
conversations
going
on
about
police
oversight,
so
I
just
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
get
that
technicalities
clarified.
I
appreciate
it
is
that
I
don't
have
no
more
questions.
X
All
right
thanks,
sorry
I
had
a
sticky
key
there.
So
I
want
to
ask
the
question
about
this
being
put
on
the
ballot
to
the
line.
Well,
the
question
that
I
see
there
is
a
lot
more.
You
know
when
you
click
on
the
text
that
would
be
added
to
our
Charter,
and
so
just
like
the
parks
text,
that's
already
added
to
our
Home
Rule,
Charter
and
I
was
just
curious.
You
know
when
I
look
at
that,
where
that's
added
already.
W
Legislation,
councilman
Wilson,
thank
you
for
the
question.
This
legislation
will
require
that
every
registered
elector
in
the
city,
regardless
of
party,
be
sent
a
summary
of
the
charter.
Amendment
approved
by
council
that
that
is
the
council
will
have
to
agree
what
the
summary
should
say
prior
to
it
being
sent.
Then
it
will
be
sent
within
30
days
of
the
election
to
every
registered
elector
in
the
city
so
that
they
can
see
the
entire
question
and
counsels
explanation
of
what
it
will
do.
Okay,.
W
E
You
that
was
similar
to
a
question:
I
was
going
to
pose
myself,
but
I
think
what
would
be
helpful
is
if
I
don't
know
if
instructor
Pittenger
or
Sean
or
councilman
Burgess
could
actually
read
the
language
that
will
appear
on
the
ballot
that
people
will
see
and
then
question
number
two
incurring
the
cost
of
the
mailing
to
every
registered
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
Does
it
fall
under
the
cost
of
the
city
because
we're
approving
this
or
is
the
county
board
of
elections
that
would
assume
that
cost?
Thank
you.
Okay.
W
E
E
U
Madam
clerk,
could
you
also
check
the
register
link
so
after
councilman
Wilson's
question
I
wanted
to
look
at
the
full
text
and
it
I
only
see
the
summary
and
the
link
doesn't
seem
to
be
loading
anything
and
the
agenda
that
we
sent
isn't
the
full
packet.
When
you
all
for
me,
maybe
I've
opened
the
wrong
link
in
my
email,
I
think
when
you
guys
send
us
an
email
with
the
I.
Don't
you.
U
B
B
U
G
G
V
I'm
here,
director.
V
V
G
E
G
G
B
Y
G
G
G
B
Resolution
amending
Resolution,
587,
Arthur
izing,
the
mayor
and
the
city
solicitor
to
enter
into
a
professional
services
agreement
with
Fox
Rock,
Charles
LLP
for
professional,
consulting
and
legal
services
in
relation
to
False
Claims
Act
litigation
by
increase
in
the
total
cost.
Forty
five
thousand
dollars
from
two
hundred
and
thirty
five
thousand
dollars
to
two
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars.
G
B
G
X
Z
This
is
a
professional
services
agreement
with
respect
to
a
matter
where
the
city
law
department
is
defending
a
matter
before
the
Human
Relations
Commission,
and
we
have
hired
outside
counsel
to
represent
one
of
the
other
parties.
To
talk
further
about
the
details,
we
would
need
an
executive
session
so.
Z
E
Z
E
Z
Councilman
I'm,
not
the
attorney
handling
the
case
directly
again.
This
would
be
more
appropriate
in
an
executive
session.
I
can
say
that
the
if
legal
defense
fees
being
paid
are
done
pursuant
to
the
applicable
provision
of
the
political
subdivision,
Tort
Claims
Act,
which
requires
defense,
not
necessarily
indemnification,
but
defense
under
certain
circumstances
and.
E
Z
B
B
G
E
Chair
if
I
may,
my
preference
would
be
being
that
the
law
department
does
not
feel
qualified
to
be
briefed
in
a
in
a
competent
way
to
speak
to
the
bill
that
we
schedule
executives.
Oh
so
I'd
be
happier
yeah
I
would
be
happy
than
to
change
my
motion
to
schedule
executive
session
on
bill
12,
and
we
could
do
that
with
voice
vote.
Yes,.
E
E
G
G
G
C
G
G
G
F
V
Realized
my
mistake,
so
the
earlier
bill
that
you
approved
actually
sets
the
fee
that
was
in
the
Finance
Group,
and
that
is
the
proposed
fee
structure.
This
bill
is
the
bill
that
allows
us
to
engage
and
rate
ibly
use
agreements
using
that
fee
structure.
So
this
is
the
one
that
was
recommitted
just
in
response
to
the
industry's
desire
for
different
terminology,
so
that
it
can
be
consistent
with
their
common
industry,
language
as
well,
and.
V
AA
Briefly,
I
know
director:
we
talked
about
this
bill
last
week
and
you-
and
maybe
somebody
can
just
get
me-
the
final
numbers
you
had
mentioned-
that
Philly
pays
a
couple
thousand
per
pole
or
there
they
get
paid.
That
amount.
Now
to
my
knowledge,
that
was
prior
to
the
FCC
ruling,
Chicago
used
to
pay
a
couple
of
thousand,
and
now
they
pay
a
couple
hundred
and
I.
Don't
really
need
a
response
if
somebody
can
just
email
me
with
those
city's
pay
now
that
would
be
very
helpful
for
final
bow.
Thank
you.
Thank.
U
You
I
just
wanted
to
re-emphasize
the
councilman
O'connor
corrected
himself.
Those
cities
receive
right,
$1,000
per
poll
there
as
we're
dissipating,
as
we
mentioned
last
week,
we're
anticipating
there
may
be
several
thousand
polls
in
Pittsburgh
alone.
So
when
you
look
at
those
multipliers,
it
really
starts
to
add
up
as
income
to
the
taxpayer
and
I'm.
Just
gonna
reiterate
what
I
said
last
week,
I
I
object
ideologically
that
the
federal
and
state
governments
have
preempted
our
local
land
use
Authority
and
are
not
allowing
the
people
of
Pittsburgh
who
owned
their
streets
to
say
no.
U
E
U
Y
You
mr.
chair
and
thank
you,
a
councilman
gross
I
agree
with
everything
that
you
said
and
even
just
to
put
a
finer
point
on
it
again:
it's
not
just
income
for
the
city,
its
income,
that
we
have
justified,
that
our
directors
have
justified
for
the
actual
cost
that
it
will
take
to
ensure
that
that
equity
component
is
a
piece
of
of
the
of
the
decision-making
criteria
that
goes
into
the
siting
for
these
facilities.
S
B
Bill
531
ordinance,
amended
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
hold
up
ordinances
entitled
for
public
places
and
property;
article
1
public
right
away;
chapter
416
obstruction,
section,
4,
1620
approval
process
for
sidewalk
cafe,
including
permits
and
fees
to
provide
for
certain
temporary
expedited
measures
for
the
city.
Sidewalk
cafe
permit
application
process.
V
E
If
you
will
that's
existent
in
Market,
Square
now
and
so
I
have
a
vested
interest
in
this
and
I'm
very,
very
supportive
of
sidewalk
cafe
and
very
protective
of
public
right-of-way,
because
we
are
a
pedestrian,
friendly
and
walkable
city
and
want
to
make
sure
that
everybody
does
and
so
I
have
no
reason
to
believe
that
any
that
will
be
jeopardized
by
this
by
any
way
and
I
am
supportive.
My
questions
are
around
at
this
moment
in
time.
E
V
E
As
strange
as
this
may
sound
much
of
what
drove
us
wanting
to
codify
the
process
of
obtaining
sidewalk
cafe
was
really
fire
safety
points
of
ingress
and
egress,
and
that
we
were
seeing
storefronts
that
were
blocking
fire
exits
with
round
tables,
with
eight
seats
and
umbrellas
with
furniture
that
looked
like
it
belonged
on
a
patio
in
Wexford
or
cranberry
and
God
forbid.
Anything
were
ever
to
happen
in
a
place
of
business
needed
to
evacuate
on
a
moment's
notice.
E
People
would
die,
there's
just
no
question
about
it,
and
so
I
just
want
to
make
certain
that
all
the
qualifications
remain
in
place.
I
want
to
help
in
assist
every
way
I.
Can
we
love
the
idea
of
outdoor
dining
I
love
the
idea
of
being
able
to
expand
to
your
next
storefront
if
that
business
owner
gives
you
permission
to
extend
into
their
space
happy
to
support
that
just
want
to
be
mindful
and
cautious
that
occupancies
are
granted
I
apologize.
E
V
E
E
V
E
And
I
want
to
help
in
that.
Believe
me,
those
of
us
that
have
large
food
beverage
service
communities
I
want
to
do
everything
in
my
power
to
support
I
I,
don't
know
anybody
the
second
a
bigger
hit
than
food
beverage
service
workers
in
in
this
pandemic
and
I
want
to
do
everything
I
can
to
assist.
But
if
I
understand
this
correctly,
these
will
sunset
at
some
point
in
time.
These
are
not
what's
the
word
I'm
looking
for
ad
this.
V
V
F
E
G
X
V
This
one
will
this
one
still
has
the
30
day
period.
We
we
want
to
see
how
this
goes
and
then
we
we
will
continue
to
resume
it,
but
yes,
it
just
as
a
30
day
period
for
now
and
you'll
need
to
reassert
that.
But
this
should
get
us
through
the
bulk
of
the
project.
So
I
guess
I
should
say
that
these
permits
will
this
process
will
last
for
30
days.
The
permits
actually
extend
through
the
end
of
the
calendar
year
that
are
issued
under
this
okay.
X
Well,
this
process,
if
we
approve
it
next
week
and
then
there's
an
ass,
come
back
to
Council
in
30
days
to
approve
this
process
of
expediting
this
substitute
two
days
for
the
departments
to
respond
Madame
clerk.
Does
that
put
us
out
like
inside
the
recess
for
for
that
approval?
Next
time,
I
mean?
Do
we
extend
this
so
that
we
don't
have
to
come
back
I?
Don't
I
don't
want
to
put
us.
Are
you
know
this
legislation
at
risk
of
being
stalls
as
businesses.
V
U
E
Very
brief:
may
I,
yes,
yeah
thanks
mr.
chair
yeah
I'm
happy
to
support
that
we're
really
limited
to
the
amount
of
time
that
we
really
have
to
be
doing
outdoor
dining.
We
are
looking
at,
let's
just
say:
August
September
October,
we're
only
looking
at
about
90
days
really
before
it's
going
to
be
difficult,
especially
if
you
have
a
rainy
fall.
E
Were
things
like
that
to
be
able
to
do
it
so
I'm
unhappy
to
just
support,
even
if
it
were
to
be
the
90
days
to
to
get
us
through
the
weather
unhappy
to
consider
that,
because
we
are
really
on
a
very
limited
timeframe
here,
the
weather's
going
to
change
shortly.
I
was
out.
Where
was
I
I
forget
yesterday,
everything
for
Thanksgiving
and
Halloween
was
out.
E
U
The
motion
60
days,
but
still
just
to
say,
I
know
we
don't
want
it
to
expire
during
recess
for
sure,
but
I'm
wondering
kind
of
how
the
I
understand
those
fees
are
waived,
but
I
know
that
I
have
designed
sidewalk
cafe,
permits
since
I've
been
in
office.
Are
you
still
going
to
be
including
that
director
so.
V
V
U
So
this
ordinance
amended
amendment,
but
it's
in
front
of
us
gives
you
the
ability
to
not
charge
the
fees
which
I'm
supportive
of,
but
also
does
it
like
permanently
eliminate
the
council
only
tariff.
So
it's
the
whole
thing
temporary,
so
yeah.
This
is
why
I'm
kind
of
a
little
mixed
up,
I
apologize
to
every
two
members
thing.
U
Let's
say
I
am
cafe
in
Bloomfield
and
we
passed
this
amendment
and
then
I
sign
up
for
side,
Rock
Cafe,
which
is
again
I,
don't
think
we
said
today
but
like
sidewalk,
seating
means
I
can
buy
my
sandwich
inside
and
sit
outside,
but
this
is
sidewalk.
Cafe
means
I
can
sit
down
at
a
table
outside
and
a
waiter
or
waitress
is
going
to
be
able
to
come
to
me.
Take
my
sandwich
order.
Maybe
even
give
me
a
beer
with
my
sandwich
right.
U
V
U
The
end
of
it
got
it:
okay,
I,
just
I,
think
I
knew
there
were
probably
two
different
times
listed
in
here,
so
it's
a
90
day
permit
in
either
case
we're
just
talking
about
when
the
ordinance
should
sunset
and
B
have
to
be
renewed,
so
I'm
comfortable
with
the
motion
as
well.
I
apologize,
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
I
knew
it.
I
was
voting
on.
Thank.
G
H
X
Right
so
director
I
wanted
to
ask
about
the
exit
plan
for
people
that
have
been
turd
into
this
well
they'd
be
grandfathered
in
at
all.
Is
there
any
strategy
as
trying
you
know,
once
they've
passed
their
approval
from
different
departments
and
once
the
hopefully
expand
them?
It
goes
away
at
some
point,
you
know
that
is
a
strategy
for
them
to
keep
some
of
the
seating.
V
Yeah
they
they
won't
be
grandfathered
in
per
se,
but
they
will
have
95
of
the
documentation
and
reviews
that
they
would
need
to
get
than
the
regular
kind
of
permit.
They
wouldn't
need
to
go
back
and
get
the
councilmember
sign
off
on
it
and
then
they'd
have
to
pay
the
fees.
That's
really
all
they
would
have
to
do,
but
we
would
have
already
done
the
reviews
PLI
City
Planning,
so
it
should
be
a
a
hopefully
a
relatively
painless
process
to
do
it
in
the
ordinary.
Y
Y
Creative
use
of
our
public
realm
I
think
is
a
really
good
thing,
so
I'm
hoping
that
this
can
be
sort
of
proof
of
concept
for
a
lot
of
restaurants.
Second,
as
others
have
mentioned,
this
is
just
probably
one
of
the
most
hardest
hit
industries
in
terms
of
unpredictability
of
their
business
and
their
employees
and
their
status
and
food
orders
and
all
sorts
of
things
and
customer
base,
so
anything
that
we
can
do
to
help
them
get
outside,
because
the
key
and
I
really
want
to
give
major.
Y
C
You
I
just
want
to
thank
you
director
for
the
work
that
you've
done
in
our
district.
You've
really
helped
a
lot
of
businesses,
stay
open
and
quickly,
and
so
I
just
really
want
to.
Thank
you
for
that.
It's
really
working
well
and
for
some
cases
there's
some
places.
We
still
need
to
look
at
a
curbside.
Pickup
is
the
other
thing.
People
are
looking
at
and
so
you've
been
very
flexible
with
trying
to
keep
the
businesses
or
someone.
Thank
you
for
that.
C
V
V
We
do
review
them
for
a
DA
access
and
then,
additionally,
we
have
our
right-of-way
inspectors
go
out.
We
have
authorized
our
inspectors
to
have
some
additional
time
in
evenings
and
weekends
when
the
outdoor
dining
is
more
prevalent
so
that
they
can
do
the
reviews.
488
accessibility.
We
do
know
that
tables
and
chairs
tend
to
Creek,
and
so
we
we
do
need
to
to
be
vigilant
and
remind
our
business
owners
that,
while
we
really
want
to
help
them
thrive,
we
need
to
make
sure
that
our
public
rights-of-way
are
still
traversable
for
people
of
all
abilities
and.
C
So
it
was
better
for
us
to
shut
down
the
street
because
the
the
ramps
this
the
safety
and
all
those
things
were
on
the
sidewalks,
and
that
was
a
little
bit
safer
for
our
residents
that
are
in
wheelchairs.
So
I
just
want
to
say
that
it
depends
I
think
in
the
area,
but
the
other
concern
I
have
is
with
some
of
the
businesses
and
how
you're
notifying
other
businesses
of
things
that
you're
shutting
down
streets.
Sidewalk
cafes
anything
is
there
any
input
that
they
have
as
well.
They.
V
F
V
V
We
have
not
been
able
to
independently
verify
that,
so
we
are
going
on
faith,
but
the
applicants
have
closed
the
loop
with
their
fellow
businesses
and
every
one
of
them
is
conditioned
that
if
we
receive
complaints
from
from
the
other
businesses,
if
they
did
not
do
their
due
diligence
in
that
that
we
will
rescind
the
permit
and-
and
they
will
not
be
able
to
have
this
outdoor
space
than
if
they
haven't
done
that
communication
with
their
fellow
businesses.
That's.
C
H
H
H
G
G
U
V
V
G
B
G
Y
Y
Innovation,
InP
at
Department
of
City,
Planning,
Police,
Fire,
EMS,
DPW
domains
and
3-1-1,
and
its
have
to
do
with
the
GIS
software
that
we
use,
and
so
it
would.
The
recommendation
from
those
apartments
to
InP
and
then
to
me
and
to
Council
is
that
we
have
an
enterprise
agreement
so
that
count
the
different
apartments
can
create
and
also
share
among
the
departments.
U
Where
were
new
buildings,
and
now
we
know
that
we
are
under
a
lot
of
change
and
in
some
neighborhoods
and
we
really
need
I
think
as
a
body
to
be
able
to
gauge
where
things
are
happening
and
where
they
are
not
aware.
Different
things
are
happening
for
our
districts,
so
that
we
can
kind
of
come
together
and
figure
out
the
best
policies.
U
We
have
these
discussions,
a
lot
where
you
know
what
very
often
it's
district
7
that
is
different
than
many
of
the
other
districts,
because
we
have
so
much
an
intensely
hot,
real
estate
market
and
I
think
this
was
gonna,
lend
us
a
lot
of
power.
You
know
that
I'm
often
skeptical
of
the
power
of
these
things
that
I
actually
think
I
just
got
like
it
ESRI
newsletter
in
the
mail
this
week
I've
been
pumping
tifs
and
the
power
of
GIS
software
for
for
a
couple
of
decades.
U
Now,
since
I
was
doing
my
own
graduate
work
in
sociology
and
looking
at
how
to
talk
about
the
changes
in
cities
over
time,
so
I
am
supportive
of
this.
That
literally
just
happened
to
be
there.
I
didn't
actually
notice
this
on
the
agenda
today
or
didn't
I
didn't
actually
put
that
together.
So
this
is
not
a
lot
of
money
for
the
kind
of.
U
Underpinning
of
all
the
various
other
sets
of
software
that
we've
been
expending
money
on,
so
that
other
departments
again
will
just
be
able
to
more
easily
send
data
back
and
forth
and
share
and
overlay
their
data
is
way
I'm,
understanding
this
and
then
also
I,
want
to
make
sure
that
it's
since
it
says
it's
an
enterprise
license
that
city,
council
and
city
council
members
will
also
have
access,
because
they're
very
many
times
that
I
am
hounding
city
departments.
To
try
to
give
me
data
geographically,
and
it's
it's
sometimes
they're
busy
and
is
are
not.
U
U
Thank
you
and
I
want
to
say
a
special
thanks
to
miss
Abdullah,
say
me,
who
is
printing
paper
maps
for
one
of
my
community
groups
today
and
so
I
appreciate
that
and
I
really
appreciate
the
tight
but
quick
turnaround,
because
I
know
that
we're
all
kind
of
working
remotely
and
and
city
staff
are,
you
know,
struggling
to
to
do
the
work.
That's
physical
work
and
I'm
getting
physical
maps
for
a
food
kitchen
doing
meal
delivery
today,
so
I
really
appreciate
that
so
I'm
very
supportive.
Today,
thank
you
for
answering
my
questions.
G
AC
Y
B
521
resolution
repealing
amending
and
re-enacting
resolution
number
18,
which
authorized
and
direct
the
bureau
of
cable
communications,
Department
of
Public
Works
broadcast
all
of
councils,
regular
legislative
sessions,
Standing
Committee,
meeting
sitting
for
the
responsibilities
of
the
Department
of
innovation
and
performance
with
respect
to
meetings
of
City
Council
and
to
reflect
various
changes
in
the
city's
departmental
organization
structure
and
other
changes
to
reflect
technology
below
innovation.
Since
1983
motion
to
approve
I
think
we
have
a
request
from
councilmember
just
to
hold
for
one
week.
Oh
there
he
is
motion.
C
U
G
B
U
AD
U
E
W
Thank
You
councilman
cross
Thank
You
Reverend
Burgess,
as
you
know,
there's
a
Jewish
synagogue
at
327,
North
Negley
Avenue
in
Garfield
on
the
border
of
East,
Liberty
I,
believe
it
used
to
house
the
urban
Academy
Charter
School
and
it
is
now
being
converted
into
housing.
Now
we
have
on
the
line
by
representative
from
the
ura
and
a
representative
from
the
developer
entity.
W
If
you
have
any
questions,
but
primarily
because
the
site
is
of
historic
significance,
the
city,
the
housing
authority,
the
Urban,
Redevelopment
Authority,
the
State,
Historic,
Preservation,
Office
and
the
developer
will
require
to
enter
into
an
agreement
which
is
also
entered
into
by
the
Pittsburgh
History
and
landmarks
foundation
and
preservation
Pittsburgh
to
lay
out
certain
responsibilities
and
certain
conditions.
If
anything,
if
any
unnecessary
alterations
happen
to
the
site,
it's
pretty
Stuckart.
W
E
E
U
E
G
Being
none
all
those
in
favor
say:
aye
aye
aye
the
bill
is
recommended
that
does
exhaust
our
agenda.
However,
I
need
to
do
two
things.
Our
budget
director
brought
it
to
my
attention
that
we
did
not
approve
the
P
cards.
I
didn't
see
them
in
my
packet,
so
I
apologize.
So
we
do
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
P
cars
so.
F
G
G
Maybe
she
did
not
stay
on
the
line.
Okay,
I,
don't
believe
she
did.
She
indicated
she
was
going
to
wait
to
speak
with
that
will
now
move
on
to
our
meeting
announcements.
Cablecast
public
hearing
is
scheduled
for
this
afternoon
at
5:00
p.m.
on
bills,
404
405
and
410,
as
they
relate
to
to
stop
the
violence
fund
and
policing.
G
G
Discussion
on
bills,
404
405,
4,
6
and
14
as
relate
to
the
stop
the
violence
fund
and
policing
at
10:00
a.m.
and
on
Monday
July
27.
Also
at
10:00
a.m.
we
public
hearings
will
occur
on
Saturday
July
18th
at
12:00,
in
Tuesday,
July
21st
and
with
a
July
22nd
book
at
6:00
p.m.
the
register
to
speak
at
these
hearings,
pinko,
please
go
to
city
clerk's
office
at
school
by
5.
P
E
P
E
Yes,
I'm
talking
it
today,
too
much
coffee,
I,
think
I'm
bill
521,
wait
out
for
a
week
introduced
by
council
member
of
urges,
I,
don't
know
if
it's
the
council
member
you
or
the
clerk
could
we
have
a
summary
set
with
that
there's
no
further
information
other
than
the
title
of
the
bill,
I'd
just
like
to
explore
what
it
is,
we're
Altima
ting
to
be
voting
on
next
week.
Thank
you.
C
I
just
want
to
say,
if
you
think
we
do
have
the
post
agenda
on
Thursday,
but
in
the
hearings
that
you
have
mentioned,
we
have
to
post
agendas.
I
did
send
an
email
out
asking
members
if
they
wanted
to
have
anyone
that
they
want
to
invite
I,
think
Reverend
Burgess.
He
responded
and
since
some
name,
someone
over
in
councilman
cross
and
I
spoke
and
he
sent
so
whenever.
But
if
any
other
members
want
somebody
to
be
a
part
of
the
post
agenda.
C
Reason
makes
sure
that
you
send
an
email
or,
let
me
know
it's
better
through
email,
so
I
can
with
the
clerk's
office
known
as
well,
and
but
we
do
have
the
list
and
that's
going
out
and
they
think
we
have
a
very
diverse
group
of
people.
So
we
still
think
of
there's
a
few
other
people
that
we'd
like
to
hear
from.
C
So
when
they,
when
people
have
been
calling
us
and
asking
us
to
have
another
vote,
I
actually
think
a
lot
of
people
voted
for
because
they
really
care
the
ones
who
did
vote
for
it
care
a
lot
about
preservation.
For
me,
I
really
do
think
that
the
community
deserved
a
vote,
and
so
that's
why
I
could
have
been
for
that
at
the
time.
But
I
do
think
that
members
did
their
research
and
they
knew
what
they
were
voting
for.
So
I
don't
want
I,
don't
know
that
it
wasn't.
C
C
S
AC
I'm
a
bit
disgruntled
after
having
to
keep
calling
into
the
office
to
get
this.
What
I
had
to
say
out
my
title
is
tick
on
and
how
Makena
calling
on
behalf
of
the
Iroquois
Confederacy
of
Aborigine
American
people
and
what
I
wanted
to
say
was
I
want
it.
For
specifically,
receivers
is
to
visit
downstairs
in
the
corridor
of
the
city
county
building,
and
you
will
see
that,
as
of
1701
17
step
through
1778,
the
placards
at
fear.
H
H
AC
H
H
H
AC
S
Wait
for
the
right
good
I
just
want
to
add
my
two
cents
on
that
Ewald
house.
The
first
of
for
most
I
have
a
problem
with
the
Historic
Preservation
Committee.
I
really
think
that
we
need
to
take
a
deep
look
at
that
and
how
they
operate.
I
respect,
Historic
Preservation!
You
know
my
own
house
was
built
in
1880
and
if
the.
S
They'd
say:
oh
there's
the
house,
because
it
looks
identical
when
I
planned
it
that
way
and
I
built
it
that
way.
I
really
respect
the
people
of
Lawrenceville
and
the
stakeholders,
and-
and
you
know
and
and
I
know,
that
the
development
there
is
just
out
of
control
and
then
I
do
side
with
them.
I
do
want
this
house
saved,
you
know,
but
I
have
questions
as
to
how
we
went
about
it
and
when
councilman
Wilson,
you
know
voted
to
hold
that
bill.
I
was
kind
of
scratching
my
head
about
it.
S
S
C
I'm
gonna
say
just
one
more
thing
about
I,
just
I,
I'm
gonna
say
that
I
think
that
you
should
call
for
the
post
agenda
and
I
think
you
should
do
today
and
then
we'll
schedule
when
we
get
back
but
I
think
that's
the
whole
thing
is
we
have
a
lot
of
questions
about
the
process
and
I
do
feel
badly
for
these,
for
the
property
owners
and
but
I
also
feel
that
I
don't
know
that
area
as
well
as
councilman
gross
know.
C
She
doesn't
know
my
area
as
well
as
as
I
do
and
and
I
think
that
other
respect
for
our
colleagues,
we
try
to
do
what's
best
here,
but
I
do
think
that
I,
prefer
I
would
have
preferred
a
vote
to
have
taken
place
so
that
there
would
be
none
of
this
later,
but
but
I
do
I.
Do
think
that
the
whole
process
is
something
that
we
need
to
look
at.
Something
Reverend
Burgess
has
been
talking
about
for
years.
I.
C
Think
now
is
the
time
for
us
to
actually
do
something
and
change
the
way
that
we're
doing
some
of
these
things,
because
if
now
I
mean,
if
anything,
we're
looking
at
statues
in
the
store
documents
and
other
things
across
the
entire
country.
And
it's
definitely
a
time
for
us
to
look
at
how
we
do
how
we
historic
preservation
in
the
city,
I,
think
and.
L
C
E
U
It
yeah
I'm
fully
supportive
of
the
idea
of
the
postage
I'm
happy
to
vote
for
that.
I
also
agree
that,
as
in
many
times,
you've
heard
me
say
that
some
of
our
ordinances
and
our
policies
around
things
are
maybe
a
little
dated
and
since
there's
especially
with
increased
development
pressure
like
in
my
district,
but
also
increasingly
other
parts
of
the
city,
we
want
to
revisit
it.
U
We
want
to
I
think
it's
our
responsibility
as
the
council
to
figure
out
a
way
that
doesn't
fit
these
two
things
against
one
another
and
creates
better
policies
that
are
more
fair
to
property
owners,
but
also
more
fair
to
preservation,
so
that,
instead
of
having
as
councilman
Carl
said
very
very
well.
Thank
you
that
it
doesn't
come
to
this
kind
of
a
battlefront
right
that
we
know
that.
There's
a
lot
of
work
that
we
could
have
done
better
as
a
city.
Around
preservation.
U
We've
been
reminded
in
recent
months,
maybe
last
year
that
there
was
work
many
years
ago
in
creating
these
kinds
of
lists
to
proactively
protect
places.
And
yes,
maybe
we
should
put
better
funds
in
and
I
would
like
to
see
more
participation
for
that
kind
of
funding
from
the
preservationist
community
itself
and
we,
it
seems,
like
we've,
just
kind
of
lost
our
way
and
actually
proactively,
protecting
and
financially
supporting
places,
probably
because
of
15
years
of
bankruptcy
and
austerity.