►
From YouTube: Pittsburgh City Council Standing Committees - 12/7/22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
You
our
next
order
of
business,
is
public
comment,
I'd
like
to
remind
all
speakers
at
the
rules
of
council
state
that
comments
are
limited
to
matters
of
concern.
Official
action
or
deliberation
which
are
or
may
be
before,
city,
council
and
profanity
will
not
be
permitted
after
you
recall,
please
restate
your
name
and
neighborhood
for
the
record.
You'll
be
given
three
minutes
to
speak.
Our
first
registered
speaker
is
Naomi
Mullen.
D
E
D
D
Without
the
peace,
safety
and
happiness
of
the
people,
there
is
no
valid
governance,
open
deals
and
Bonaire
councilman
Krauss
got
a
deal
to
gain
McKinley
Park
from
us.
Now
we
want
a
green
space
in
place
of
the
detrimental
school
building,
acquire
Bon
Air
school
for
a
dollar
tear
it
down,
use
Pittsburgh
trees
and
parks,
tax
money
to
make
a
green
space.
D
Michael
J
Mullen
Reflections
by
battalion
chief
Douglas
praskovich,
we've
hired
deputy
chief
Mike
Mullen,
touched
the
lives
of
many
people.
His
uncompromising
dedication
to
his
sworn
duty
to
provide
for
the
safety
of
the
citizens
of
Pittsford
was
truly
exceptional
and
one
that
should
be
emulated
by
every
firefighter.
He
loves,
sharing
his
knowledge
of
firefighting
in
all
its
many
aspects.
To
make
our
firefighters,
safer,
smarter
and
more
efficient
on
the
fire
ground
Mike
knew
most
of
the
firefighters
on
the
entire
Pittsburgh
Bureau
of
Fire
by
their
first
name
and
was
always
approachable
regardless
of
ranks.
D
If
you
had
a
question,
he
would
stop
what
he
was
doing
to
answer
it.
He
was
tirelessly,
but
also
energetically,
his
entire
career,
the
pursuit
of
more
knowledge.
His
legacy
will
serve
our
citizens
and
firefighters
for
many
years
to
come.
Michael
J
Mullen
lived
a
full
life
as
his
obituary,
so
accurately
described
Mike
with
passionate
tireless
dedicated,
highly
conscientious
and
caring
well
done.
Michael
well
done
rest
in
peace.
My
friend
we,
the
people
of
Bonaire,
have
maintained
our
properties
and
participated
in
many
functions
here.
D
A
A
F
My
name
is
javonne
f,
Brown
I
live
at
715,
Mercer
Street,
that's
at
the
senior
citizen
home
up
at
the
top
where's
the
Civic
Arena
used
to
be
you
know.
Yesterday,
ass
came
and
I
was
kind
of
upset
talking
to
Mr
Burgess
about
how
he
came
out
and
was
hollering
at
me
and
treating
me
so
bad,
but
you
know
something:
I'm
I'm
walking
through
the
neighborhood
and
I
deal
with
the
homeless,
but
a
homeless
man
showed
me
something
that
I
had
thought
about.
Someone
was
messing
with
me.
He
said
I
seen
a
homeless
man.
F
He
did
like
this.
This
is
my
space
like
that.
I
wish
I
had
seen
that
homeless.
Man
before
he
came
back
because
when
he
come
back
hollering
at
me,
I
would
have
did
the
same
thing.
This
is
my
space.
I
am
upset
because,
like
I
said,
my
husband
is
crippled.
He
worked
for
this
city
first
with
Ura
then
went
to
Housing.
Authority
I
want
to
explain
for
years
to
understand.
He
worked
out
there
as
Auburn
times
the
three
maintenance
man
because
of
asbestos.
All
of
them
had
stroke.
Alan
smart
died.
F
First,
then,
in
a
couple
months,
then
there
was
another
man,
I
can't
remember
his
name.
It's
been
in
a
couple
months,
my
husband
and
that's
because
of
his
bestest,
because
he
used
to
cut
dude
on
the
weekend.
I
used
to
drive
him
because
he
would
have
to
empty
the
garbage
and
stuff
and
he
they
had
a
little
room.
I
would
lay
down
while
he
go
empty
the
garbage,
but
he
had
been
letting
this
man,
the
other
man,
do
that
he
said
baby.
F
You
don't
have
to
get
up
every
morning,
but
the
man
that
was
the
maintenance
man
would
empty
the
garbage
and
and
would
get
stuck
in
the
shop
in
the
shoot,
and
my
husband
was
talking
about.
There
was
times
that
he
would
have
to
be
it's
a
half
an
hour
boom
boom
boom,
trying
to
get
that
garbage
to
come
down.
That's
why
he
had
the
stroke
because
of
the
work
that
he
did.
All
three
of
them
had
Strokes,
so
it
had
to
be
the
building.
I
want
you
to
understand.
F
I
come
down,
I
have
a
right
to
speak,
I
believe
anytime.
My
husband
is
crippled
because
he
worked
for
this
city.
He
worked
for
the
Housing
Authority
I.
Had
my
nephew
I
found
out.
Two
of
them
worked
for
the
city
Gary.
When
I
was
talking
about
my
nephew,
Gary
Miss
Harris
cut
me
off.
That's
when
the
men
from
the
city
came
in,
they
were
upset.
They
said
how
nasty
she
was,
but
Gary
used
to
work
for
this
city.
F
I
had
two
nephews,
my
husband,
my
two
nephews,
but
my
husband,
the
main
thing
because
he
was
active
and
he
drank
carrot
juice
every
day,
so
he
shouldn't
have
had
a
stroke,
but
anytime,
that
is
asbestos
and
stuff
is
coming
down
on
you
every
weekend.
So
he
finally
stopped
the
man
he
said.
Yvonne
you're
gonna
have
to
take
me
because
I
can't
take
that
garbage
coming
down
on
me.
I
want
you
to
understand
that
Ginger's
sitting
here
and
you're,
acting
like
you're
doing
something
and
we'll
ask
when
I
ask
questions.
F
You
won't
answer
saying
that
you
can't
when,
then
you
ask
you
pick
and
choose
who
you
want
to
answer,
because
I
was
explaining
to
my
councilman
I
said
that
how
I
asked
them
questions
he
would
say.
I
can't
answer
you,
because
it's
against
the
law
so
I
asked
to
how
come
all
the
instruments
didn't
go
to
jail,
because
you
would
run
back
here
and
answer
questions
anytime.
Your
people
come.
H
G
My
name
is
Flora
Shapiro,
Williams
and
I
am
a
resident
at
715,
Mercer
Street
in
the
hill
this
week
and
I'm
coming
down
here.
I
do
I
want
everyone
to
know
that
my
coming
here
has
not
been
in
vain.
A
door
has
been
opened
for
us
to
obtain
Security
in
the
building.
G
They
bring
a
church
where
the
elderly
are
not
able
to
get
back
out
to
the
churches
like
they
used
to.
So
we
have
a
church
and
a
building
to
accommodate
them
now
so
they're
not
able
to
so
now.
This
is
all
I
need
now.
I
need
a
pro
bono
attorney
to
inspect
the
law,
because
coming
down
here,
I've
been
going
up
to
the
law
library
and
looking
to
see
what
laws
that
I
can
find
to
obtain
Security
in
our
buildings,
because
the
people
that
on
the
building
do
not
want
to
pay
for
security.
G
G
I
I
Having
said
that,
I
recently
received
hundreds
in
dollars
in
repairs
to
my
chair,
without
which
I'd
be
homebound
again.
However,
they
also
discovered
damage
to
the
steering,
tiller
and
lights.
Electrical
knocking
loose
due
to
the
slamming
of
potholes
and
wheelchair
easements
simply
put
connectors,
get
knocked
off.
Putting
me
in
danger,
I
can't
go
to
Senior
Center
for
computer
time,
because
Ada
doors,
as
of
last
I,
checked
still
don't
work
the
buttons
it's
too
painful,
fighting
with
the
illegal
fake
heavy
doors
that
are
supposed
to
be
Ada
accessible
to
go
to
the
library.
I
Instead,
I
can
use
the
only
perfect
wheelchair
sidewalk
ramp
at
the
new
Faith
Orchard
parklet
by
councilman
Cog
Hill's
headquarters,
but
I
can't
get
to
the
library
that
way
due
to
those
stupid
detour
signs
and
it's
only
like
feet
away,
but
I
can't
get
there.
I
make
a
running
start
literally
to
try
to
get
up
the
easement
the
handicap
easement
in
front
of
the
library
which
is
totally
illegal.
It's
it's
about
three
to
four
inches
high.
I
A
E
J
J
C
a
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor,
the
Office
of
Management
and
budget,
the
department
of
City
Planning,
the
Department
of
Finance,
the
department
of
innovation
and
performance,
the
Department
of
Public
Works,
the
Department
of
Public
Safety
and
the
housing
authority
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
to
temporarily
address
the
public
health
emergency
of
homelessness
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
and
to
provide
for
policies
and
programs
to
address
the
lack
of
affordable
housing
and
their
consequent
contribution
to
Chronic
homelessness.
As
directed
here
in
until
more
permanent
Solutions
can
be
implemented.
J
K
I
just
want
to
in
four
weeks
is
a
long
time
and
and
I
know.
You're
I
want
to
thank
you
for
leading
the
charge
with
the
committee
with
the
task
force
and
for
all
the
task
force
members.
Thank
you
all
for
for
serving
on
I'm,
just
hoping
that
we
come
up
with
some
solutions,
or
at
least
some
recommendations
before
the.
J
J
J
I
could
if
I
could
respond
and.
J
Okay,
absolutely
just
recommendations.
We
are
working
on
it.
It's
been
tough
because
of
the
holiday
season,
of
course,
four
weeks
you
know
every
time
we
hold
this,
it
comes
around
so
quickly,
but
I'm
actually
meeting
with
the
architect
the
Second
Avenue
Commons
today
and
he's
coming
to
me
with
some
ideas,
I
plan
to
meet
with
the
committee
I
hope
before
you
know,
Christmas
at
least
and
yeah
we're
working
on
it.
I
will
tell
you,
but
we
do
need
a
little
more.
K
J
D
C
M
There
are
two
two
landowners
who
both
kind
of
want:
the
same
property
if
it
goes
to,
if
I,
if
I,
if
I
continue
to
do
this,
they
will
have
to
bid
each
other
and
it
would
and
I'm
trying
to
get
give
them
time
to
work
it
out
versus
they
go
to
a
court.
Where,
though
we
are,
you
know
we're
there.
M
And
so
that's
why?
Because
this
this
there
there's
two
of
them.
We
first
did
this.
There
was
only
you
know
one
kind
of
senior
woman
who
kind
of
wanted
this
and
we
were
working
with
her,
but
another
neighbor
has
gotten
involved,
and
so
this
goes
through
the
property
more,
let
more
likely
will
not
be
in
her
hands
and
so
I'm
giving
them
time
to
work
it
to
try
to
figure
out
a
way
that
they
can
work
it
out.
You
know
peacefully.
A
L
Yeah,
thank
you.
I'm,
just
wondering
about
the
legalities
of
rescinding
a
sale.
M
L
A
C
1019
a
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
The
Office
of
Management
and
budget
to
enter
into
an
agreement
or
agreements
with
cities
for
financial
empowerment
fund
Inc
for
the
purpose
of
receiving
and
spending
grants.
Grant
funds
in
the
amount
of
seventy
thousand
dollars
to
integrate
banking
access
into
the
2022-2023
city
of
Pittsburgh's,
Summer,
Youth,
Employment,
Program,.
O
O
P
Absolutely
Felicity
Williams
Deputy
Chief
of
Staff
to
Mayor
Gainey.
Well,
thank
you
for
that
question.
I'm
happy
to
talk
about
it
a
little
bit
more.
You
guys
know
that
we
have
some
challenges
with
our
youth
and
finding
ways
and
activities
to
keep
them
engaged,
moving
away
from
disruptive
behaviors
to
more
productive
behaviors,
and
so
one
of
the
strategies
around
doing
that
is
youth
employment
and,
as
part
of
our
Youth
Employment
Program.
The
city's
had
a
long
time.
P
Partnership
with
the
county
and
a
partner
for
work
supporting
summer,
learn
and
earn
summer
youth
employment
programs.
One
of
the
elements
that
we
want
to
add
to
that
program.
We
piloted
a
little
bit
this
past
year
and
looked
to
expand
and
grow
it.
This
upcoming
summer
is
related
to
financial
education
and
banking
access
for
our
youth,
so
they
are
receiving
payment
for
their
participation
in
the
program.
P
We
want
to
make
sure
that
as
part
of
that
payment
that
they're
also
getting
these
life
skills
and
financial
education
skills
to
help
them
to
continue
to
develop,
and
so
that
is
what
the
program
is.
We
are
continuing
to
learn
from
what
the
we
piloted
earlier.
This
summer
and
we'll
build
upon
that
working
with
partners
for
the
upcoming
year.
P
P
So
some
of
these,
depending
on
their
age,
maybe
non-custodial
accounts
so
we'll
be
working
with
banking
Partners
in
the
region
to
create
these
types
of
programs.
Some
banks
do
not
currently
have
non-custodial
youth
accounts
and
then,
if
they
are
older
age,
they
are
able
to
just
you
know
open
their
own
accounts.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
they're
having
the
financial
responsibility
they're
getting
the
education
along
with
receiving
income
and
earnings.
O
P
That's
what
we're
working
with
partner
for
work
right
now.
We
want
every
kid:
that's
in
our
learn
and
earn
program
to
have
a
requirement
to
get
this
financial
education.
We
cannot
require
that
they
open
a
bank
account,
of
course,
but
we
want
to
create
all
of
the
opportunities
and
access
for
them
to
do
so.
O
P
We're
looking
right
now,
there's
about
12
hours,
that
are
training
periods
that
are
separate
from
their
work
site
activities
through
the
learn
and
earn
program,
and
so
we're
looking
at
how
we
plan
out
those
12
hours.
All
12
would
not
necessarily
be
dedicated
to
financial
education,
we're
looking
at
what
other
types
of
skills.
We
want
to
make
sure
that
our
youth
are
getting
to
continue
to
make
this
program
just
that
much
more
attractive
and,
to
you
know,
bring
more
youth.
O
To
it,
so
we
used
to
manage
this
program
in-house
in
parks
and
rec,
and
one
of
the
parts
of
partnering
with
the
county
was
the
argument
that
we
would
be
able
to
build
a
kind
of
a
more
of
a
career
ladder,
because
that
that
partnership
with
partners
for
work
would
bring
in
employment
opportunities
that
were
of
a
higher
skill
set,
maybe
at
a
bank
or
at
a
hospital
or
something
that
was
more
than
just
working
in
our
city,
job
opportunities.
O
So
that's
what
I'm,
imagining
here
right
so
you're
talking
about
kind
of
if
someone,
especially
as
a
participant
summer
after
summer,
or
is
that
an
older
age?
What
is
the
range?
Does
it
just
go
up
to
18
I
can't.
P
And
to
your
point,
these
are
conversations
that
we've
been
having
with
partner
for
work
is
how
do
we
build
upon
grow
and
expand
the
learn
and
earn
program?
This
is
such
a
wonderful
opportunity
to
really
engage
Our
Youth
and
help
develop
skills
with
our
youth,
and
so
we
are
still
in
conversations
with
them
about
what
that
looks
like
we're.
Looking
at
some
changes
that
we
can
adopt
in
the
in
the
upcoming
year
and
looking
at
you
know
where
how
we
can
roll
in
more
changes
to
your
point
about
making
this
a
multi-year.
P
Perhaps
it's
year-long
program
where
you
have
work
in
the
summer,
but
other
skill
trainings.
You
know
that
we
recently
launched
the
youth
Civic
Leadership
Academy
as
filling
a
gap
between
you
know
when
there
is
the
summer
learning
earn
opportunities,
and
so
we're
trying
to
continue
to
build
that
pipeline
that
keep
our
youth
engaged
resume.
O
So
could
you
speak
to
about
how
you
might
be
reporting
back,
because
it's
been
a
while
that
we
have
received
a
report?
It's
been
we've
been
in
a
pandemic,
so
I'm
not
exactly
sure
how
it's
been
functioning.
But
so
what
do
you
anticipate
like?
How
are
you
kind
of
establishing
residency
and
also
following
kids
through,
if
you're,
going
to
stay
in
touch
with
them?
So.
P
We
do
have
a
process
that
that
reviews
applications
to
confirm
City
residency,
but
it
is
a
partnership
also
with
the
county,
so
the
county
puts
in
dollars
to
serve
youth
that
are
outside
of
the
city
in
the
county.
The
city
of
Pittsburgh
puts
in
dollars
as
well,
and
we
are
also
in
negotiations
around
what
the
new
mous
will
look
like
for
those
Partnerships.
So
looking
at
how
we
do
reporting
tracking
metrics,
all
of
those
things
are
conversations
that
are
currently
unfolding.
O
You
know,
as
a
city
council
I
think
we
probably
said
so
at
the
time,
but
we'll
say
it
again.
I'll
say
it
again
on
behalf
that
you
know.
While
we
want
to
be
sure
that
our
city
money
is
not
being
used
for
another
municipality
because
we
are
a
municipality,
it
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
that
the
county
money
should
exclude
City
residents,
because
if
the
county
is
covering
the
cost
for
129
other
municipalities,
youth
to
participate,
I,
don't
know
why
they
would
exclude
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
because
we
are
also
County
residents.
H
K
You
and
actually
councilwoman
gross
asked
some
of
the
things
I
was
going
to
ask
about
the
reporting
back,
but
knowing
the
reporting
back,
but
the
part
with
the
county
and
what
they're
contributing
to
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
I
hear
that
we're
we're
putting
money
in
but
I
think
there's
an
election
coming
up
for
County,
Executive
I.
K
Think
it's
going
to
be
one
of
the
things
that's
going
to
be
important
to
me
on
who
I
support
is
whether
or
not
they
recognize
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
is
part
of
the
county
and
that
they're
willing
to
contribute
to
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
So
I'll
just
say
that
part,
but
the
reporting
part
I
would
also
like
to
get
a
list
of
our
city
residents
and
and
how
we're
serving
them.
But
I
do
want
to
thank
the
mayor's
office
for
expanding
this
and
doing
this
work.
I
think
it's!
It's
really
good.
K
K
A
N
Thank
you,
Mr
chair,
thank
you
for
being
here
today.
I
think
I,
agree.
I,
think
this
is
wonderful,
that
we're
doing
this
and
participating
and
so
I
have
two
questions.
One
is
I,
guess
a
request
or
a
con
I,
don't
know
what
it
is.
The
hardest
part
about
getting
feedback.
N
But
do
you
have
thoughts
about
how
you
can
either
you
like
us
ourselves
as
a
city
with
the
amazing
data
analysts
we
have
in
public
safety
and
in
other
departments
or
working
with
an
external
partner
to
get
that
sort
of
even
a
correlation
of
like
okay,
we've
been
doing
this
X
Y
and
Z
for
the
last
few
years,
and
what
we've
seen
is
we
don't
know
exactly
the
cause
of
it,
whether
it's
violence,
interruption
or
whether
it's
this
or
whether?
N
It's
that
how
can
we,
you
know,
look
at
the
results
in
sort
of
a
more
holistic
way,
because
I
know
that
the
office
is
so
focused
on
intersectional
work.
So
I
don't
know
if
you're
even
able
to
answer
that
at
this
point
or
if
you're
thinking
about
that.
P
Yeah
I'll
say
those
are
definitely
things
that
we're
thinking
about
when
we
talk
about
you
know
what
is
the
data
collection
that
we
want
to
see?
What
is
the
reporting
that
we
want
to
see?
How
can
we
use
that
information
to
help
inform
our
continued
growth
and
Improvement
in
these
programs?
P
Looking
at
you
know,
making
sure
that
we
are
targeting
the
youth
that
we
know
are
the
subject
Focus
area
and
making
sure
that
they
are
brought
into
the
fold
again
for
these
programs
that
they
have
access
opportunities
them,
so
we're
working
on
an
Outreach
plan
to
make
sure
that
we
are
getting
that
Outreach
done
to
neighborhoods
and
communities
partner
for
work
has
identified
neighborhoods
and
communities
where
they
have
had
low
participation.
P
Previously,
we
can
line
that
map
up
with
what
are
considered
hot
spots
or
areas
of
concern
or
areas
of
need.
Oftentimes
is
the
way
it
is
described,
the
different
breakdowns,
so
we
can
line
those
Maps
up
and
try
to
you
know,
make
sure
that
we're
making
those
connections
and
then
use
the
data
that
we
get
to
inform
us.
K
N
Be
as
in
as
important
as
quantitative
data,
so
absolutely
great.
My
second
point
was
around
fund
my
future
and
whether
this
is
integrated
into
the
financial
empowerment
right
like
if
people
are
setting
up
an
account
or
you're,
urging
them
to
also
making
them
aware
of
the
benefits
of
savings
or
529
account.
So.
P
A
Thank
you
before
going
on
the
second
round.
I
would
only
add
that,
as
you
all
were
identifying
those
target
areas
that
it
would
probably
also
make
sense
to
have
a
conversation
with
the
group
balance
intervention
workers
regarding
the
youth
that
they're
intercepting
to
get
ensure
that
they're
folded
into
the
program.
Second,.
K
A
Council
president.
P
For
the
learning
art
program-
yes,
I
don't
have
how
many
are
actually
eligible.
Last
year
there
were
over
3
000
applications.
I
know
that
came
in
and
about
1
545
youth
were
accepted
into
the
program.
One
of
the
ways
that
we
landed.
That
number
was
because
the
pay
rate
was
increased.
We
wanted
to
again
as
we
try
to.
We
don't
want
the
program
to
ever
try
to
compete
with.
P
You
know
you
could
go
out
and
get
a
market.
You
know
an
opportunity
or
a
job
on
the
market,
but
we
do
want
it
to
be
more
attractive
to
Youth,
and
so
we
did
increase
the
rates
there,
and
so
what
we're
looking
for
at
2023
is
of
the
three
the
the
fact
that
we
had
that
gap
of
you
know
about
half
of
the
youth
that
weren't
able
to
be
accepted
into
the
program.
K
D
K
A
L
You
I'm,
ultimately
going
to
motion
to
hold
one
week.
I
had
a
extensive
conversation
with
deputy
mayor
Pollock
yesterday
I'm
going
to
ask
for
a
briefing
for
Council
Members
as
well
too,
because
of
the
the
length
and
the
terms
and
the
complexity
of
this
agreement
and
what
it
would
mean
to
continue
it.
So,
with
that
I've
invent
emotions
for
a
one-week
hold
requested
by
Deputy
Mayor
Pollock,
and
also
asked
to
schedule
a
briefing
for
board
members.
D
C
C
K
J
A
L
Yeah,
thank
you.
Although
we
don't
do
discussion
on
a
holder,
did
we
change
it
anyway?
This
is
I'm
happy
to
support
that
I
I'm,
just
asking
for
the
courtesy
of
consideration
in
that
the
the
complexity
of
this
bridge
is
that
it
splits
between
right
down
the
middle
of
it.
It
splits
between
two
council
districts
and
so
I,
represent
this
as
well
too
and
I'm
just
asking
for
the
courtesy
of
consideration
when
these
kinds
of
decisions
are
made.
Thank
you
so
much.
K
Thank
you
and
I
will
say
that,
well,
they
were
waiting
for
the
councilwoman
elect
to
be
elected.
I
still
represent
that
area
too,
and
I
know
that
she
has
a
meeting
scheduled
to
address
the
issues
that
her
constituents
brought
to
her,
but
I
so
I.
That
was
one
of
the
reasons.
I
know
she
has
a
meeting
scheduled
with
mayor
Gainey.
So
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that.
K
J
J
L
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
council
president.
Thank
you.
Councilman
coghill,
the
yes
there
are
there
is
a
meeting
scheduled
to
discuss.
I
will
be
an
attendance
in
that
meeting
as
well
too.
Thank
you.
J
I
I
K
A
C
Bill
1020
a
resolution
amending
resolution
211
of
2022,
which
authorized
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Department
of
Human
Resources
and
civil
service
to
enter
into
amended
Professional
Services
agreements
or
contracts
with
Ceridian
human
Capital
Management
Inc
by
extending
the
contract
through
2025
at
an
additional
cost
not
to
exceed
one
million.
One
thousand
dollars.
N
I
K
A
L
Madam,
can
you
tell
me,
please:
is
there
an
amendment
on
the
table
for
this
Bill?
Yes,.
N
O
O
A
O
A
L
Thank
you,
councilwoman.
Thank
you.
It's
become
a
little
more
complex
than
the
three
of
us
might
have
thought
it
would
be
at
this
point
in
time.
The
motion
we're
requesting
is
to
amend
the
changes
that
have
been
made
to
this
point
in
time
and
then
we're
going
to
ask
deputy
director,
Dash
and
arzoni
administrator
Corey
Layman
to
come
to
the
table
to
instruct
us
as
to
what
our
responsibility
is
at
this
point
in
time
to
either
move
this
bill
or
to
hold
this
bill
for
further
discussion.
O
Right
I
mean
so
I've
been
looking
at
them
during
I
mean
so
when
we
walked
in
the
room.
We
found
this
on
the
table
and
so
I've
just
been.
You
know
reviewing
it
as
we've
been
doing
our
other
voting
on
other
legislation,
and
it
looks
substantive
to
me
right
and
I
think
that's
the
threshold.
If
it's
substantive,
then
it
has
to
go
back
to
Planning
Commission.
O
I
mean
I
I,
try
to
be
I,
I
don't
represent
any
part
of
Oakland
I
haven't
been
involved
in
all
of
these
negotiations.
Certainly
I've
had
to
try
to
move
zoning
legislation
through
Council
and
I.
I
appreciate,
council
members,
respecting
you
know,
having
greater
knowledge
about
all
of
the
Amendments
or
at
the
table
and
I
I
I
do
acknowledge
all
of
that.
So
but
I
just
want
to
be
clear.
A
O
N
G
K
K
N
Them
after
a
conversation
as
councilman
Krause
indicated,
but
the
intention
I
think
is
to
motion
to
hold
for
further
discussion
and
possibly
for
their
Amendment.
K
You
I
think
that
I
know
everyone's
been
doing
a
lot
of
work
on
this,
including
the
mayor's
office
and
I
want
to
thank
them
for
their
work.
K
But
I
want
to
say
that
this
is
really
significant
and
there's
a
lot
here
and
as
much
as
I
appreciate,
Andrew,
Dash
and
Corey
Layman
I
also
would
like
to
hear
whatever
they
say,
supported
by
our
Law
Department,
so
that
we're
making
you
know
right
decisions
here,
but
they
also
there's
so
much.
I'll,
probably
just
abstain
today
until
we
have
the
briefing
and
have
an
opportunity
to
learn
a
little
bit
more
about
it
all
and
how
it
affects
some.
N
L
Mr
chair,
thank
you.
Yes,
so
do
we
have
our
administrator
Mr
Landon
here
and
deputy
director
Dash?
We.
K
L
L
So
just
everyone
knows
that's
why
I'm
at
home
this
morning,
but
so
we
had
very
lengthy
light
conversations,
councilwoman
strasberger,
councilman,
Lavelle
myself,
and
there
was
some
communication
with
our
zoning
administrator,
Corey
Layman
and
some
questions
we
have
for
our
solicitor
as
well
as
Deputy
Dutch.
L
Here's
what
we're
struggling
with
at
this
moment
in
time,
as
as
we
have
gone
through
this
process
of
fulfilling
our
obligation
of
hosting
a
public
hearing
within
the
time
required
by
stature.
We
we
did
begin
the
the
hearing
on
September
the
14th
and
then
we
recess
so
as
to
have
taken
further
consideration,
comment
on
from
multiple
stakeholders
and
understanding
the
complexity
of
the
of
the
topic.
That's
before
us.
We
wanted
to
make
sure
that
we
gave
everyone
an
opportunity
to
do
so.
L
Reconvene,
the
public
hearing
on
Monday
and
concluded
that
this
is
where
we're
struggling
to
disappoint
in
time.
It
has
been
my
understanding
and
and
my
what
I
was
I
believed.
I
was
being
taught
in
this
process
that
we
are
under
a
obligation
to
complete
the
our
our
duty
here
within
a
certain
time
frame
and
that
time
frame
was
to
be
discomforting
December.
The
13th
would
meet
our
legal
obligation
to
complete
our
Our
obligation
to
bring
this
recommendation
from
the
Planning
Commission
to
fruition.
L
Then
late
last
night,
I
learned
that
perhaps
that
is
not
what
Our
obligation
is
and
that
possibly
the
clock
or
the
90-day
time
frame
in
which
council
is
obligated
to
meet
its
obligation
either
began
when
we
started
the
public
hearing
on
September
the
14th
or
when
we
finish
the
public
hearing
on
December
the
5th
and
so
now,
rightfully
so,
councilman
Lavell
councilwoman
strasberger
myself
were
confused
as
to
why
we
have
been
given
one
recommendation
and
now
are
receiving
a
second
recommendation
as
to
what
our
obligation
is.
L
So
I
don't
mean
to
be
prickly
here,
but
I
I
I'm
a
little
frustrated
that
that
we
are
perhaps
not
receiving
the
the
the
kind
of
information
that
we're
supposed
to
to
be
receiving,
and
so
I
believe
that
I
appreciate
councilman,
strasberger's
diligence
in
in
communicating
and
and
also
bringing
this
to,
the
attention
of
the
solicitor.
Now
I
have
not
talked
to
this
listener
about
this
personally.
L
I
believe,
ultimately,
she'll
come
into
the
conversation
and
advise
us
as
well,
but
to
for
the
benefit
of
members,
so
that
they
understand
sort
of
what
we're
doing
here.
We
amended
by
substitution
today,
so
if
there
was
a
possibility
that
we
indeed
are
under
a
thought
to
complete
our
work
by
December,
the
13th
that
the
bill
would
indeed
be
amended
with
what
we
have
had
before
us.
What
was
guarded
through
the
process
of
public
hearing
and
we
could
meet
a
obligation.
L
If
that
is
not
the
case,
we
still
have
a
bill
before
us
on
the
table
that
could
possibly
go
out
for
further
consideration
now
that
we
think
we
may
have
extended
time
to
complete
Our
obligation.
Now,
that's
a
lot
of
information.
I
put
out
there
and
I
probably
didn't
do
it
in
the
best
chronological
order,
but
with
that
whoever
feels
most
comfortable
beginning
either
that
the
dash
or
Mr
Layman
I'm
welcoming
your
comment.
H
Thank
you,
councilman
yeah,
just
to
clarify.
There
are
two
timing
mechanisms
in
the
zoning
code
in
chapter
922.05
regarding
zoning
code
legislation,
one
is
in
a
120
day
clock
for
there
to
be
a
public
hearing
from
the
date
of
the
Planning
Commission
action,
and
you
know
when
we
talked
about
this
in
the
in
the
hearing
on
Monday
my
commentary
or
my
understanding
was.
H
The
question
was
regarding
that
clock,
that
clock
had
been
extended
by
zoning
or
by
the
planning
department
as
applicant
a
couple
of
times,
and
that
clock
I
believe
is
the
one
that
we're
talking
about
that
would
expire
on
December
13th.
But
the
hearing
did
conclude,
and
so
there
are
that
that's
the
beginning
of
the
90-day
clock,
which
is
90
days
for
city
council
to
then
act
after
the
hearing
and
was
able
to
confirm
with
law
that
that
that
clock
starts
at
the
conclusion
of
the
hearing.
H
L
And
forgive
me
for
for
not
being
present
it's
the
solicitor
with
us
this
morning.
She.
K
L
L
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
solicitor
I
apologize
that
we're
sort
of
dumping
this
all
in
your
lap
with
this
late
hour,
but
we,
you
know
we're
we're
diligent
in
our
work
and
we
want
to
make
certain
that
we
are
meeting
our
obligations
and
and
doing
our
due
diligence
and
and
making
certain
that
we
are
within
keeping
with
the
law
so
solicitor.
It
is
your
understanding
as
well
that,
under
the
the
statutes
under
which
we're
operating
that
we,
the
time
frame
Now
by
which
Council
must
complete
action
on
this
bill.
L
That
90-day
period
began
on
I'm,
going
to
say,
Tuesday
the
6th
as
opposed
to
Monday
or
I.
Guess
it
would
be
Monday
the
5th,
because
that
was
the
day
we
concluded.
The
public
hearing.
Is
that
your
understanding.
L
R
R
The
council
would
take
would
either
approve
or
deny
it
otherwise,
at
the
expiration
of
that
90
days.
It
would
be
a
deemed
to
denial.
L
Right,
meaning
that
the
council
failed
to
act,
and
so
then
it
it
is
assumed
to
be
denied
by
Council.
R
L
So
the
90-
forgive
me-
please
I-
should
have
done
my
math,
but
the
90
day,
then
from
the
completion
of
December,
5.
I'm.
Doing
very
rough
would
be
January,
February,
March,
5.,
give
or
take
right
in
that
time
frame
would
be
the
day
by
which
we
we
must
complete,
but
we
are
not
obligated
to
take
that
full
90
days
to
complete.
If
it
were
the
wish
of
the
council
today
we
could.
L
R
L
I'm,
not
an
attorney
solicitor
I'm
trying
to
sort
of
Wade
through
this
and
understand
it
myself,
as
well,
so
so
and
and
for
the
very
short
notice
of
having
you
be
here
physically
president
chamber
and
making
those
accommodations
I
greatly
appreciate
that
you,
you
made
the
the
effort
to
do
that.
L
So
with
that
members,
where
we,
where
we
are
right
now
with
the
advice
from
planning
zoning
and
our
Law
Department,
is
that
we
have
a
mostly
completed
no,
we
have
a
completed
bill
before
us,
having
considered
all
the
communications
that
we
have
received
to
date,
but
I
do
believe
it
would
be
the
wish
of
myself,
councilwoman,
strasberger
and
councilman
Lavelle
to
continue
to
take
him
to
see
if
there
are
any
further
admissions
or
subtractions
that
could
benefit
the
zoning
amendments
you
see
before
us,
so
I
do
believe
that
ultimately,
the
wish
or
the
will
of
us
will
be
to
ask
for
a
vote.
L
So
we
can
continue
to
take
input,
but
with
that,
I
will
relinquish
the
floor
because
I'm
sure
other
members
will
have
either
question
or
comment
again.
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
Mr
chair
and
thanks
to
everybody,
for
your
patience
through
this
very,
very
difficult
consideration
before.
Thank
you.
N
You
Mr
chair,
thank
you
all
for
answering
our
questions
and
helping
us
confirm
the
timeline
that
we're
that
we're
currently
on.
We
have
significant
and
significantly
more
time
than
I
think
we
thought
we
had
just
a
couple
of
days
ago
and
given
the
comments
that
we
heard
from
stakeholders
in
Oakland,
even
if
some
of
the
comments
we
heard
were
contradictory
to
one
another,
I
recognized
the
amount
of
time
that
our
planning
staff
have
taken
to
walk
our
stakeholders
through
the
changes
from
you
know.
N
J
N
I
am
volunteering
myself
to
help
to
do
that,
work
to
mollify
some
of
the
concerns
and
really
to
make
sure
that
the
third
largest
downtown
in
the
Commonwealth?
Is
that
we're
getting
it
right
that
we're
really
getting
the
zoning
right
for
this
very
critical,
downtown
Center,
where
there's
a
lot
of
interest
and
a
lot
of
potential
development
and
a
lot
of
potential
impacts
to
Residents.
N
So
I
am
grateful
for
for
the
time
that
we
have
to
continue
to
work
and
I'm
here
for
the
work
and
I,
you
know,
I
think
the
the
structure
of
what
that
looks
like
going
forward
is
is
forthcoming.
But
you
know
I
appreciate
the
appreciate
the
work
and
the
diligence
of
everyone
who's
who
has
put
in
that
time,
both
City
staff,
my
fellow
council
members
and
the
stakeholders
who
have
provided
comment.
O
I
appreciate
it
so
I'm,
just
remembering
working
on
the
expansion
of
inclusionary
zoning
to
Bloomfield
and
polish
Hill,
and
it
was
unclear
whether
other
neighborhoods
or
Footprints
would
want
to
join
in,
and
so
we
were
trying
to
figure
out
kind
of
like
well.
When
do
we
put
this
on
the
table?
O
You
know
it
was
really
urgent
that
the
stakeholders
in
Bloomfield
and
polish
Hill
really
wanted
us
to
go
ahead
and
put
the
legislative
language
on
the
table
for
the
expansion,
but
other
people
were
still
kind
of
like
chewing
on
it
deliberating,
and
so
this
was
the
open
question
that
we
had
like.
Well.
If
we
put
the
legislation
on
the
table
now,
what
happened
like?
O
How
much
can
we
amend
it
later
without
kind
of
having
to
put
the
planning
department
through
kind
of
double
processes
or
having
it
come
back
to
council,
but
then
having
to
go
back
to
Planning
Commission
and
even
after
we
started,
especially
so
it's
like
okay,
we've
started:
we've
got
the
legislation
on
the
table.
It's
going
through
Planning
Commission
how
much
change,
either
in
the
map
or
in
the
technical
specifications
of
the
zoning
requirements.
O
Within
the
same
map
that,
for
example,
what
if
we
raised
the
number
of
units
right
from
10
to
20
percent,
like
some
people,
wanted
what,
if
we
raise
the
or
change
the
Ami,
instead
of
being
at
50,
what
if
we
took
it
down
to
30
what
if
there
was
some
hybrid
that
other
you
know,
developments
are
now
kind
of
EX.
You
know
approaching
or
proposing
like
well,
we'll
do
10
at
80
Ami,
but
then
we'll
do
another
10
at
50
Ami,
you
know.
O
So
what
is
how
much
can
we
amend
it
and
I
thought
for
kind
of
all
of
the
examples?
I
just
gave
that
it
would
be
substantive
change
and
have
to
go
back
to
Planning
Commission.
That
was
the
advice
I
thought
I
was
given
in
so
when
I
look
at
this
number
of
changes,
and
this
isn't
the
giant
packet
it
would
take.
O
H
Yeah
I
can
I
guess.
I
can
speak
a
little
bit
to
substantive
amendments
to
the
extent
that
that's
not
a
defined
term
in
the
code.
It's
not
something
for
staff
to
determine.
H
It's
I
think
my
general
understanding
is
that
if
we're
talking
about
an
overlay
like
in
a
mapped
area
and
the
the
change
would
be
to
expand
that
area
to
areas
that
hadn't
been
noticed
and
hadn't
been
a
part
of
the
initial
map
amendment
that
that
would
be
a
pretty
clear-cut,
substantive
change
that
would
go
back
to
the
Planning
Commission
in
the
case
where
it's
changing
Provisions
or
requirements
within
a
legislation
there
isn't
you
know
it's
not
something
that
that
I
can
determine
it's.
I
O
We
will
be
getting
a
briefing
we
have
because
we
had
a
briefing
on
the
The
Plan
before
these
changes
and
as
as
members
have
acknowledged,
it's
a
rep,
it's
a
new
way
of
represented
by
three
members,
but
it's
the
third
largest
employment
destination
in
the
state
of
Pennsylvania,
and
this
these
amendments
will
make
a
difference
in
what
is
built
and
how
Oakland
changes
into
the
future.
So
I
guess
that's
all
the
questions
that
I
have
right
now,
Mr,
chair,
I,
appreciate
it.
A
Thank
you
any
further
discussion,
if
not
I,
will
simply
both
thank
the
Planning
and
Zoning
staff
for
your
work
over
these
many
years
now.
I'm
trying
to
bring
this
to
fruition
and
I'll
also
thank
my
colleagues
for
their
willingness
to
try
to
get
this
as
right
as
possible.
I
think.
At
the
end
of
the
day,
we
probably
will
not
make
most
happy,
which
is
probably
the
art
of
compromise,
but
I
do
thank
them
for
their
willingness
to
try
to
get
as
many
parties
comfortable
with
this
bill
as
as
humanly
possible.
L
Which
takes
us
right
into
the
first
week
of
January
gets
us
through.
Why
don't
we
say
something
more
like
six
weeks
to
get
us
into
the
heart
of
of
being
back
and
reorganized
and
and
ready
to
hit
the
ground?
What.
L
E
Motion
to
approve
discussion.
Second,
thank
you,
Mr
chair,
so,
as
as
you
can
see,
we
have
a
yellow
sheet
coming
around
that
yellow
sheet.
Is
the
amendment
to
this
bill?
I
will
I'm
going
to
allow.
E
S
Good
morning,
counselors
Sarah
kinter,
director
of
the
Department
of
permits,
licenses
and
inspections
before
you
is
an
amendment
to
a
bill
that
was
held
last
week
for
support
services
for
pli
in
regards
to
remediation
for
landslides.
The
previous
bill
was
written
in
2018
and
it
was
poorly
written
and
I
apologize
for
that.
So
this
should
be
more
descriptive
as
to
the
services
and
the
actual
costs
borne
by
the
department
to
remediate
landslides.
S
So
the
original
Bill
had
a
cap
of
1.5
million
dollars,
we're
not
spending
anywhere
near
1.5
million
dollars
on
Landslide
remediation
work,
and
you
can
see
there's
a
an
accompanying
letter
that
provides
what
we
have
spent
since
2019,
which
totals
about
a
hundred
and
eighty
thousand
dollars.
S
So
we
are
asking
for
an
amending
and
extension
of
this
contract
with
Apollonia.
They
perform
several
services
for
us.
They
perform
soil
and
site
assessments
for
a
landslide
cases
that
are
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
They
also
assist
us
with
providing
and
creating
construction
drawings
for
Landslide
remediation
work
that
we
are
performing
as
we
demolish
condemned
properties
that
are
on
Landslide
prone
areas
in
the
city.
E
Thanks
for
explaining
explaining
that
I,
don't
have
any
questions
if
other
members
do.
O
Thank
you
thank
you
for
being
here
director,
because
we
we
had
some
discussion
at
the
table
about
you
know.
How
are
we,
how
are
we
treating
different
landslides
right
and
what
are
what
are
our
kind
of
legal
boundaries,
but,
but
so
that
we
all
have
a
common
understanding,
so
we
can
make
choices
right,
and
sometimes
we
have
administrative
choices
that
really
aren't
the
legally
required
that
we
could
go
further,
but
we're
not
because
of
costs
or
some
other
kind.
You
know,
other,
you
know
very
legitimate
considerations,
so
landslides
are
increasing.
O
I
think
we
all
can
agree
on
that,
and
sometimes
they
are
affecting
public
property,
usually
roadways
and
that
the
city
kind
of
kind
of
comes
in
and
is
the
Main
actor
and
covering
all
the
costs
for
building.
You
know
a
retaining
wall
on
a
roadway.
An
example
of
my
district
is
right
now:
El
Paso,
where
we're
building
a
300
foot
retaining
wall
and
that's
in
dpw's
jurisdiction
right
but
other
times,
they're
on
private
property.
O
Only
and
we've
lived
through
this
as
well
in
my
district
and
you
flipped
through
it
with
us,
with
having
condemned
property
I,
had
a
family
that
was
out
of
their
house,
a
family
with
kids
who
weren't
allowed
to
even
step
foot
in
their
house
for
two
years,
because
it
might
fall
off
the
hill
and
it
involved
many
private
Parcels.
But
in
that
case,
could
you
kind
of
describe
to
us
what
your
role
is
and
how
you
understand
the
city's
obligations,
but
limits.
S
Appreciate
it
so
pli
is
a
role.
Part
of
our
role
is
to
enforce
the
construction
code,
and
we
also
have
a
role
to
perform
code
enforcement
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
so
where
we
find
that
there
are
unsafe
conditions
due
to
land
Movement,
we
would
issue
citations
to
private
owners
and
take
them
through
the
process
to
get
to
abatement.
S
Ultimately,
it's
the
owner's
choice
to
decide
what
that
abatement
looks
like
sometimes
it's
demolition,
sometimes
it's
building
walls,
sometimes
it's
land
regrading,
and
to
work
with
a
an
engineer
that
can
help
them
design
a
solution
for
whatever
their
parcel
looks
like
at
the
time
that
they
come
up
with
that
solution.
They
would
come
through
the
code
and
excuse
me,
the
construction,
permitting
process
for
our
review
and
approval.
S
Pli
is
also
responsible
for
demolishing
unsafe
structures
in
the
city
of
Pittsburgh.
Some
of
those
unsafe
structures
are
in
Landslide
prone
areas,
or
they
are
structures
that
are
experiencing
Landslide
conditions.
When
we
demolish,
we
need
to
be
held
to
our
own
standards
of
construction
and
demolition
to
ensure
that
when
we
are
demolishing
we're
doing
it
in
an
appropriate
way
with
an
engineered
solution,.
S
O
In
in
a
situation
like
I've
seen
once
maybe
twice
in
my
district,
that
their
the
landslide
is
occurring
basically
in
people's
backyards
and
there's
no
right-of-way,
we
even
dug
through
archives
to
make
sure
there
wasn't
still
a
paper
Street
back
there.
That
we
could,
you
know,
be
part
of
the
solution
on
public
property.
O
Is
there
a
legal
in
your
knowledge
to
extent
of
your
knowledge,
which
may
not
cover
here
and
I?
Don't
need
to
have
the
discussion
at
the
table
because
I'm
supportive
of
this
contract,
but
is
there
a
Prohibition
to
the
city
participating
in
remediating,
remediating
or
even
covering
the
cost
of
landslides
on
private
property.
O
The
answer
to
that
question,
and
so
yeah:
it's
still
an
open
question
and
I
kind
of
keep
asking
various
entities,
because
again
we're
experiencing
this
more
and
so
it's
it's.
It's
impacting
more
and
more
residents,
but
I
almost
feel
like
there's,
probably
a
role
the
city
should
play
because
I
I
just
don't
think
that
all
of
these
things
are
so
isolated.
I
almost
feel
like
if
that's
an
unstable
Hillside
and
one
parcel
is
being
affected.
O
You
know
we
know
what's
happening
geologically
or
hydraulic,
hydrologically
I,
don't
actually
know
the
right
vocabulary
here.
I
feel
like
this
is
like
an
area.
The
council
needs
to
increase
its
knowledge
on
and
then
ex
have
further
discussions
about
what
are
the
limits
of
our
jurisdiction
or
and
and
are
we
doing
as
much
as
we
maybe
should
be
doing
in
this
area,
to
participate
in
in
making
sure
that
we
have
stable,
secure
land
hillsides
that
aren't
lanceypone
and
and
threatening
the
kind
of
stability
with
the
housing
on
those
hillsides?
O
So
that's
a
big
big
topic,
so
I'll
stop
and
leave
it
there,
but
I've
brought
it
up
in
other
discussions
that
you
know
it
was
I.
Think
councilman
rudiak
proposed
that
we
add
a
soil.
Hydrologist
in-house
I
brought
up
the
same
topic
about
how
much
we're
spending
for
out
of
house
expertise
and
subcontracting
around
this
area
in
the
domey
budget.
Hearing
yesterday
it's
so
it's
just
something.
That's
on
my
mind,
so
appreciate
your
answers.
Thank
you.
K
You
I
just
I'm
just
curious
what
one
an
RFP
go
out
for
this.
Initially,
yes,.
D
K
Okay-
and
it
says
on
this
agreement
that
they
provide
expert
testimony
of
properties
and
I'm
wondering
do
you
use
them
when
we
take
someone
to
court,
yes
correct,
so
were
they
involved
in
the
one
on
Greenleaf
Street
where
the
house
collapsed
and
we
cited
them,
and
yet
the
magistrate
did
not
issue
a
fine
I.
A
N
A
K
A
A
K
Thank
you
Reverend
motion
to
hold
for
one
week,
councilman
Wilson,
one.
A
C
And
12.
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
director
of
Parks
and
Recreation
and
Director
of
Finance
to
enter
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
into
an
amended
sublease
agreement
or
agreements
with
the
Boys
and
Girls
Club
of
Western
Pennsylvania
for
continued
operation
of
the
Lawrenceville
senior
center
located
within
Leslie
Park,
as
originally
authorized
by
resolution
resolution,
numbers,
55
and
91
of
2011
at
an
overall
cost
of
198
thousand
dollars
and
with
the
term
expiring,
March
31st
2024.
A
C
Bill
997
a
resolution
amending
resolution,
644
of
2020
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Department
of
innovation
and
performance
on
behalf
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh,
to
adopt
an
existing
government
contract
and
enter
into
any
related
agreements
or
agreements
and
amendments.
There,
too,
with
caresoft
technology
Corp
to
provide
Google,
Cloud
subscription
services
and
add
Google
assured
workloads
to
provide
Secure
Storage
for
sensitive
data
on
the
city's
Cloud
platform.
Add
an
amount
not
to
exceed
4
million
282
824.38
cents.
N
You
Mr
chair,
this
was
what
I
would
consider
to
be
mostly
a
technical
Amendment,
but
because
of
the
amount
of
language
and
and
the
additional
cost
with
76
000
additional
in
2022
and
240
000
additional
in
2023
I
did
want
to
recommit
it
rather
than
make
a
a
voice
Amendment
yesterday.
So
if
folks
do
have
questions,
we
do
have
the
director
here,
but
mostly
just
wanted
to
clarify
that.
A
C
1021
resolution
authorizing
the
mayor
and
the
director
of
the
Department
of
innovation
and
performance
to
enter
an
agreement
or
agreements
and
amendments
there,
too,
with
computronix
USA
Inc
for
three
years
to
handle
day-to-day
maintenance
and
support
of
One
Stop
Pittsburgh,
including
the
address,
including
to
address
any
defects
that
may
arise
with
the
system
and
to
Define
service
level
agreements
for
resolution
time
meeting
the
needs
of
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
at
a
sum
not
to
exceed
1
million.
Two
hundred
twenty
four
thousand
482
dollars.
N
C
E
A
O
A
O
O
O
Q
This
will
be
the
sixth
annual
this.
O
Is
the
sixth
annual
allocation
of
10
million
and
thank
you
and
I
don't
believe
that
we've
ever
amended
any
of
the
proposed
allocations,
which
is
great
but
there's
some
some
of
the
line
items
here
that
I
wanted
to.
O
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
it's
the
same
table
the
rental
Gap
financing
I
wanted
to
give
you
a
minute
to
expound
on
the
demand
that
you're,
seeing
and
hearing
from
the
community
because
we've,
you
know
been
through
the
pandemic,
Council
allocated,
I,
think
17
million
dollars
so
far
federal
funds
for
emergency
rental
assistance
program
and
so
kind
of
like
what
are
you
seeing
kind
of
and
is
all
of
that
e-wrap
expended
to
the
best
of
your
knowledge,
it's
kind
of
a
separate
we've,
Test
action,
housing
and
the
county
collaboration
with
that.
Q
O
If
you're
talking
about
building
more
affordable
housing,
do
we
have
any
rent
payment
assistance.
Q
Yeah,
so
we
have
seen
since
e-wrap
ended.
We've
worked
with
DHS
very
closely
with
this
program
that
demand
is
Rising
for
this
program.
I
believe
that,
as
recently
as
Monday,
we
were
informed,
there
were
400
people
on
the
waiting
list
for
either
rental
assistance
or
legal
assistance,
which
we
also
also
fund
down
lower
in
the
table
here.
So
we
with
the
drop
off
of
e-rep,
we
are
expecting
there
to
still
be
very
high
utilization
of
these
programs.
O
No,
that
was
actually
my
second
question,
so
I'm
glad
you
brought
it
up,
so
council
members
will
see
kind
of
in
the
middle
of
the
table.
There's
legal
assistance
program
lab
and
why
don't
you
go
ahead
and
describe
that
for
members
so
that
I
don't
misrepresent
it.
Q
Again
sure,
so
the
legal
assistance
program
helps
both
renters
and
homeowners
in
any
type
of
in
getting
representation
for
any
type
of
dispute
that
they
might
be
party
to
with
either
if
they're
a
homeowner.
Perhaps
it's
Tangled
title
issues
or
forbearance
of
their
mortgage
if
it's
a
rent,
her
a
lot
of
times,
there's
disputes
with
landlords
over
things
like
potential
evictions
going
to
the
magistrate's
office
to
straighten
that
out.
Q
So
we
work
with
a
handful
of
service
providers
throughout
the
city
that
actually
provide
representation
to
these
people
and
they've
begun
to
expand.
It
I
believe
in
October
they
launched
the
lawyer
of
the
day
program
where
these
attorneys
are
sort
of
scouting
out
the
schedules
at
these
magistrates
office
and
being
present
to
represent
people.
Q
O
Yeah,
that's
I
really
appreciate
that
so
I
I
think
this
is
what
council
has
been
hoping
to
see
and
so
I'm
really
appreciative
that
you're
at
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund
are
developing
this
and
allocating
some
funds
to
it.
So
we've
been
talking
about
how
do
we
be
more
responsive
when
people
have
these
needs
and
where,
where
are
all
of
the
places
that
we
could
be
kind
of?
O
Getting
almost
kind
of
you
know,
get
deploy
bullying
people
face
to
face
to
help
our
residents
through
the
needs
that
they're
experiencing,
and
it's
it's
a
tough
role
for
us
right.
You
know
we
basically
do
the
basics,
you
know
Fire
EMS,
roads
parks
and
so
it's
a
little
bit
more
of
what
we
found
ourselves
having
to
do
over
these
last
few
years
of
providing
this
in
this
case,
not
social
services
but
legal
services
and
again
we're
we're
partnering
but
we're
providing
the
revenue.
O
You
know
the
cash
for
the
program,
so
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
for
members
I
think
it's
the
right
thing
to
do:
I'm,
supportive.
We
maybe
even
need
more
than
we're
allocating
here,
but
I
just
wanted
to
highlight
that
this
is
something
again
that
there's
a
gap
out
there
in
the
support
systems
for
our
residents
and
we're
we're
adjusting
and
trying
to
fill
those
gaps.
Even
if
it's
not
all
the
you
know,
we
can't
fill
the
whole
Gap.
So
I
know
that
you
know
I'm.
O
Could
you
maybe
talk
a
little
bit
about
one
of
my
favorite
topics
with
councilwoman
Smith,
which
is
the
limited
Equity
housing
co-ops
I
I
keep
as
I've
been
asking
you
already
this
whole
year.
Let's
make
sure
that
any
of
the
kinds
of
financing
programs
that
we
have
aren't
by
negligence,
excluding
Collective
ownership,
so
could.
Q
You
speak
yeah
absolutely,
and
we
appreciate
you
pushing
us
on
this
topic,
because
it
is
a
growing
demand
here
in
the
city
and
we're
hearing
more
about
it.
So
as
it
stands
right
now,
we
have
several
changes
that
are
slated
for
what's
shown
here
is
the
for
sale
development
program
to
expand
that
program's
ability
to
fund
different
types
of
housing
than
what
we've
traditionally
seen,
which
is
just
the
standard
sale
to
an
end?
Buyer
and
one
of
those
changes,
will
be
accounting
for
limited
Equity
housing,
co-ops.
O
I
O
O
Q
Sure
so
that
would
be
our
down
payment
and
closing
cost
assistance
program,
which
is
the
third
item
down
on
the
first
page
here
there
are.
We
honestly
would
have
to
review
the
guidelines
to
see
that
it's
truly
excluded,
I'm
actually
unsure
if
someone
possibly
has
purchased
shares
of
a
limited
Equity
Cooperative
using
the
down
payment
program.
Q
But
I
do
think
it's
a
very
fair
point
that
if
we're
going
to
support
it
through
the
brick
and
mortar
construction,
we
should
ensure
that
people
are
able
to
access
it
with
our
other
down
payment
programs.
Q
We
have
seen
certain
projects
come
through
and
get
funded
with
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund,
where
perhaps
at
the
expiration
of
the
initial
low-income
housing
tax
credit
compliance
period,
which
is
15
years,
it
flips
to
home
ownership,
and
everyone
who
lives
in
those
units
is
given
the
opportunity
to
purchase
them.
That
is
allowable
under
the
program
and
I.
Think.
If
a
developer
were
to
come
with
some
type
of
rent
to
own
initiative
and
it
fit
into
our
program
guidelines,
we
would
certainly
be
all
ears
for
it.
O
So
when
you
do,
when
you
change
these
program
guidelines
or
develop
them,
do
you
have
to
come
back
to
the
advisory
or
you
do
that
in
collaboration
with
the
Housing
Opportunity
fund,
Advisory
Board,
yes,.
Q
O
K
Thank
you
and
thank
you
for
your
work.
I
I
want
to
actually
also
acknowledge
Megan
Winters,
who
serves
for
District
Two
on
here
and
she's,
been
there
for
a
long
time.
Someone
thank
her
for
her
work,
but
and
I
also
want
to
thank
councilwoman
gross.
One
thing:
I
can
tell
you
she's
a
fighter
for
the
community
and
she's
gonna
just
continue,
no
matter
whether
you
know
people
like
it
or
not,
she's
going
to
do
what
she
thinks
is
best.
K
So
I
appreciate
that
about
her
She's
Come
sometimes
gives
me
a
hard
time
too.
Okay,
anyway,
I
do
want
to
say
that
one
of
the
things
I
when
I
was
on
there
that
I
thought
we
were
missing
the
mark
on.
Is
we
don't
really
work
well
with
the
magistrates?
So
when
we
have
people
that
are
getting
fined
and
cited
for
their
properties,
we
don't
have.
K
We
don't
do
a
good
job
of
telling
people
what's
available
to
them
to
help
them
so
that
they're
not
losing
their
homes,
so
they're
not
paying
a
fine
that
they
don't.
They
can't
really
afford
and
a
lot
oftentimes
the
magistrates
you
know
torn
between
issuing
a
fine
which
they
can't
afford
in
the
first
place
or
allowing
them
to
you
know
giving
them
a
continuance
which
allows
them
to
you
know,
fix
the
property
hopefully,
and
then
they
still
don't
have
the
money.
K
So
I
wish
that
we
would
do
a
better
job
of
communicating
with
our
with
our
Housing
Court
with
our
magistrates.
Even
if
it
you
know,
we
can't
be
there
for
every
case,
I
mean
it'd,
be
nice.
I
really
think
what
the
city
of
Pittsburgh
needs
is
just
a
housing
Committee
in
general.
You
know
just
one
that
oversees
and
puts
all
these
efforts
and
all
these
programs
together,
because
we
have
so
much
to
offer
people,
but
people
don't
know
how
to
navigate
the
system
there.
K
A
Any
further
discussion,
if
not
I'll,
also
simply
thank
you
all
for
your
work.
I
I
will
have
one
question,
and
this
is
I
know
the
answer,
but
I'm
just
making
a
larger
point.
The
funding
that
is
here
is
it
enough
to
fund
the
various
amounts
of
projects
we
have
before
us
at
the
Ura.
Q
Likely
not
we
we
do
our
best
to
manage
and
you
know
sequence
projects
but
yeah.
It's
there's,
there's
certainly
more
demand
than
what
we
can
that
provide
funding
for.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
All
those
in
favor
say
aye.
K
A
We
do
have
meeting
announcements.
Council
budget
hearings
continue
this
afternoon
at
1
30
PM,
with
the
commission
on
human
relations
chaired
by
council
person,
strasberger
the
Carnegie
Library
Chair
by
councilwoman
Smith
and
the
Oakland
business
improvement
district
and
the
PDP
Chair
by
myself
on
Thursday
December,
8th
council's
10
a.m.
A
Budget
hearing
is
with
the
Department
of
Public
Works,
including
the
administration
Environmental
Services
facilities,
operations
and
capital
projects,
which
is
chaired
by
councilman
Cargill
at
1
30
PM
Council
will
hold
budget
hearings
with
the
park
tax
trust
fund,
chaired
by
councilman
coghill
in
the
department
of
Parks
and
Recreation
Chair
by
councilman
Burgess
on
Monday
December
12th
at
10
A.M.
We
will
hold
the
swearing-in
Ceremonies
for
our
incoming
newly
new
member
councilwoman-elect
Barbara
Warwick
care
and
council
chambers.
A
Okay,
if
not
need
a
motion
to
approve
the
minutes
and
adjourn
the
meeting
so.