►
From YouTube: Board of Zoning Appeals April 26, 2022
Description
Board of Zoning Appeals
April 26, 2022
5:30 PM
Call too Order
Minutes
Old Business:
Final Orders
New Business
1) App 22- 93007 — Petitioners Beverly and William Burch are requesting a Variance to Zoning Ordinance Section 4.2. 1. to permit an approximately four (4) foot side yard setback from the east property line to construct an attached carport on property
zoned Residential Single -Family ( RS- 15) and generally located at 791` Boardman Rd. SE-( TPN: 121- 17- 15- 005).
Adjournment
A
C
A
A
D
E
A
D
Posted
yes,
mr
chairman
notice
has
been
properly
posted.
Any
inquiries
that
you
wish
to
share
with
the
board.
The
planning
department
did
not
receive
any
written
responses
to
mail
notice
from
property
owners.
The
compliments
excuse
me.
The
comments
included
in
exhibit
f
of
your
agenda
packet
were
submitted
with
the
application
itself.
D
D
As
indicated
by
the
submitted
site
plan,
the
applicant
desires
to
add
an
approximate
17
foot
by
20
foot
attached
carport
to
the
east
of
the
existing
carport,
the
carport
edition
would
cover
an
existing,
concrete
slab
and
accommodate
two
vehicles.
This
was
a
picture
submitted
by
the
applicant
illustrating
the
location
on
the
east
side
of
the
property
there.
D
The
subject
properties
developed
with
a
one-story,
1,
693
square
foot,
residence
and
zoned
residential
single
family
rs-15.
The
structure
itself
was
constructed
circa
in
1953..
The
primary
residence
does
not
comply
with
current
side
yard
setback.
Regulations
along
the
western
property
line
you
can
see
here.
D
D
A
D
Current
setback
requirements
were
not
in
place
when
the
properties
in
the
neighborhood
were
developed.
So
as
a
result,
in
conjunction
with
the
regularly
shaped
lot,
as
I
mentioned,
the
orientation
of
the
primary
structure
is
not
centered
on
the
lot
and
it
crouches
in
the
current
side
yard
setbacks
on
the
west
side
there.
This
again
is
illustrated
here.
D
D
D
There
appear
to
be
other
examples
of
legal
non-conforming
structures
in
the
area
that
do
not
meet
current
setback
requirements,
including
the
neighboring
structure
itself
to
the
east,
not
789,
boardmen,
107,
jackson,
drive
and
203
dunbarton.
These
were
some
more
examples
provided
by
the
applicant
just
to
illustrate
the
extent
of
the
non-conforming
structures
in
the
neighborhood
again.
D
D
Planning
staff's
evaluation
of
the
request,
as
well
as
the
applicant's
response
to
the
required
six
variance
criteria
can
be
found
starting
at
page
two
of
the
agenda
packet
and
finally,
exhibit
f,
as
I
mentioned,
contains
comments
from
neighboring
property
owners
submitted
by
the
application,
with
the
application.
Excuse
me,
which
indicates
support
for
the
proposed
carport
edition.
A
D
A
A
G
A
G
H
G
H
G
B
G
There
come
down
here
be
on
this,
and
then
the
back
post
actually
is
the
because
you
go
back
the
the
actual
porch,
because
the
actual
addition
is
further
away
from
the
property
line,
because
the
property
line
kind
of
goes
this
way.
Yeah
the
fortune
goes
this
way.
So
all
this
this
would
be
the
addition
right
here
and
I
think
it's
17
feet
from
the
extreme
out
here
to
the
house.
H
Okay
yeah,
so
so
I
understand
that
just
in
the
packet
it
was
the
desire
to
get.
I
thought
you
were
preserving
the
existing
carport
and
then
trying
to
get
a
two-car
complex
to
there
so
that
you
could
get
three
cars
under
cover.
But
this
way
it
seems
to
me
that
your
carport
becomes
some
other
sort
of
space
to
the
garage
with
its.
H
H
G
G
One
yeah
there's
always
the
possibility,
but
I
think
the
you
know
by
time
you
open
the
door
and
bang
each
car
and
stuff
like
that.
I
think,
and
staying
on
the
concrete
was
the
was
the
instead
of
going
past,
the
concrete
just
staying
on
the
concrete
how
we
came
up
with
the
17.
I
think
the
17
feet
right.
H
G
And
more
than
likely,
the
primarily
there's,
primarily
it's
him
and
his
wife,
but
his
two
daughters
have
children
and
so
they're
over
there
a
good
bit.
So
I
think
I
think
the
main
objective
was
to
sit
there
and
stay
on
the
concrete
and
that
way,
like
I
said
earlier,
you're
not
putting
two
big
cars
in
there.
G
G
G
G
F
D
A
H
Very
very
sympathetic
to
the
homeowner
here
trying
to
get
cars
covered
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
We,
I
don't
look
at
precedent
or
anything,
but
we
I
want
to
say
several
years
ago
in
a
neighborhood,
literally
probably
to
the
south
of
here
off
of
millbrook
looked
at
and
it
wasn't
a
carport,
but
it
was.
It
was
for
an
outbuilding
and
justification
being.
Certainly
he
had
a
lot
of
stuff
to
put
in
it
and
it
was
the
wild
west.
In
that
neighborhood
there
was,
I
mean
there.
H
H
H
H
E
H
Something
something
is
all
the
way
out,
there
doesn't
mean
you
can
you
should
you
can
build
your
house
all
the
way
to
your
driveway
line
and
my
driveway
line
is
literally
within
just
six
or
eight
feet
of
my
border
too.
I
didn't
build
my
house
out
over
my
driveway,
though
all
the
way
as
far
as
wise,
my
driveway
is
yes.
F
H
F
It's
not
going
to
crowd
the
lot
and
if
you
I
looked
up
all
these
people
that
signed
the
letters
and
they're
right
next
door
and
right
across
the
street,
and
nobody
is
in
opposition
to
it,
and
I
don't
think
it
would
be
a
detriment
to
the
property.
If
you
did
move
it
in,
I
think
it
would
kind
of
architecturally
look
a
little
bit
funny
to
have
the
posts
in
the
middle
of
the
concrete.
Instead
of
you
know,
out
to
the.
E
F
E
Mr
chairman,
I
more
of
a
question
and
it
might
be
something
maybe
I
needed
to
direct
to
the
city
as
far
as
setting
precedent,
if
this
were
to
be
approved,
the
way
that
it's
written
should
the
property
convey
in
a
sale
to
a
new
owner.
Does
the
structure
then
dictate
that
someone
could
come
in
and
do
a
renovation
of
a
small.
E
Mother-In-Law
suite
for
lack
of
a
better
word
and
and
keep
you
know
the
carport,
but
then
create
a
very
small,
albeit
small,
but
enclose
it
to
then
become
something
that
would
require
permitting
and
building
and
then
would
result
in
not
an
open
space,
but
something
that's
very
closed
in
and
close
to
the
property
line.
I'm
not
sure
is
that
a
question
more
for
the
city
or
just
something
to
contemplate
to.
A
D
E
D
That's
a
good
question.
I
would
have
to
get
clarification
on
that.
My
I
believe
in
particular
the
the
question
is
for
the
the
variance
to
the
setback
requirements.
So
if
that
setback
requirement
is
reduced
down
to
four
feet,
that
would
apply
to
future
construction
yeah
future
construction,
that's
my
understanding.
So.
F
E
Because
that's
my
only
kind
of
point
is
I
I
think
this
is
great.
I
understand
from
protecting
cars
from
the
sun
beating
down
when
you're
unloading
groceries
to
be
able
to
be
covered.
You
know,
depending
on
the
ages
and
stages
of
the
the
residents.
I
I
I
approve
of
this,
but
I'm
trying
to
think
sort
of
to
brendan's
point
of
future
thinking
and
setting
a
precedent
that
and-
and
this
might
be
a
little
speculative,
but
it
was
just
something
that
kind
of
popped
in.
E
If
it's
setting
a
precedent
to
then
say
have
maybe
create
a
a
solid
structure
that
changes
the
nature
of
the
building
in
the
future
with
a
different
owner.
And
could
you
amend
this
in
some
manner
to
say
that
it's
that
that
limits
that
I
don't
know
what
the
language
might
be?
If
that's
something
that's
making
someone
hesitate
to
fully
go
forward
on
this.
G
So
I'm
asking
for
approval
to
put
that
in
for
a
carport,
only
open
air
carport,
whatever
that
can't
be
closed
in
or
something
of
that
nation.
So
if
that's
stated
and
that's
what
the
if
that's,
what
the
forefoot
variance
is
agreed
to,
then
that's
what
I
want
it
for.
I
don't
want
to
build
a
house
there
or
anything
like
that,
so
that
pretty
well
takes
out
anybody
building.
G
The
house
after
they
sell
it
or
anything
I
agree,
but
I
think
then
put
that
in
there
that
this
is
approved
for
that
and
in
reference
to
the
neighborhood,
if
you
rode
through
the
neighborhood,
you
can
ride
through
that
neighborhood.
First
of
all,
if
miss
murphy's,
not
complaining
having
lived
in
aitkin
have
got
tons
of
friends
in
that
neighborhood.
My
daughter
owns
a
house
in
that
neighborhood.
G
F
E
Driving
through
with
you
know
the
contiguous
properties
but
kind
of
to
brendan's
point
of
setting,
you
know
the
standard
and
what
we've
ruled
on
before.
I
just
wanted
to
kind
of
throw
that
out
there
as
consideration,
because,
like
you
said
you
might
not
want
to
be
four
feet
from
whatever
that
could
be
in
the
future
and
perhaps,
if
not
running
with
the
land.
It
runs
with
the
current
owner.
H
H
H
If
anything,
there
are
exceptional
conditions
that
I
think
should
caution
us
to
grant
the
waiver
he's
already
way
out
of
variance
on
the
other
side
of
his
house,
we're
just
we're
you're
going
to
have
a
you're
going
to
have
a
house
and
a
structure
there.
That
literally
is
going
to
go
from
property
line
to
property
line,
regardless
of
whether
we
craft
it
in
such
a
way
that
an
open
carport
can
never
be
filled
in.
H
Number
three:
due
to
the
conditions,
the
application,
the
ordinance,
the
particular
piece
of
property,
would
effectively
prohibit
or
unreasonably
restrict
the
utilization
of
the
property
redesigning
that
to
be
two-car
he's
not
going
to
get
more
than
two
cars
in
that
area.
Anyway,
I
mean
I
can
I
can
look
at
it
and
tell
that
just
make
it
a
two-car
garage.
H
The
whole
argument
about
you
know
he
needs
two
cars
covered,
I'm
sympathetic
to
that,
getting
groceries
in
and
out
of
the
rain
for
two
cars.
I'm
I'm
I'm
on
board,
but
I
think
you
can
he
he'll
never
achieve
three,
not
from
what
I'm
looking
at
there
so
make
it
two
and
make
them,
and
I
think
I
think
if
you
look
at
it,
you
can
stay
another
six
feet
off
the
driveway
and
be
the
10
feet
variance.
So
I
guess
that's
where
I'm
at
I
don't.
I
think
it
would
be.
H
B
Would
yeah
you
could
possibly
get
one
car
in
there
he's
got
an
existing
car
existing
carport
for
one
car.
The
way
I
see
it
and
to
me
with
it
open
like
that,
I
see
why
it's
got
to
be
open
too.
If
he's
going
to
get
access.
That's
why
I
asked
the
question
in
the
first
place:
have
it
open
so
he
can
get
to
the
backyard
and
have
access
to
his
backyard.
Just
like
he's
got
now,
but
he
didn't
build
a
house
on
the
east
on
the
west
side.
B
B
It
there
so
yeah
if
he
wanted
to
do
anything
on
the
on
the
west
side.
He
couldn't
do
it
for
love
no
money.
I
see
what
he's
trying
to
do.
I
agree
you're
not
going
to
have
three
cars
abreast
in
there.
You
have
two,
maybe
two,
two
regular
sized
cars
and
a
small
car,
but
I
I
know
the
neighborhood
very
well.
I
know
the
very
instructions
I
hear
the
word
president.
I
think
if
we,
if
the
question
before
us
is
a
carport,
I
think
it
should
remain
a
carport.
B
D
B
D
B
D
F
B
B
A
I
think
I
like
the
rest
of
the
board.
I
struggle
with
this
one
and
looking
at
the
area
and
the
way
this
house
was
oriented
versus
the
way
all
the
other
houses
in
the
area
were
over
in
it.
This
one
is
weird
and
that
on
the
west
side
is
only
about
three
or
four
feet
to
the
property
line,
and
you
got
20
plus
feet
on
the
east
side
and
with
the
application
I
didn't
know.
If
we
were
trying
to
swap
sides.
A
As
applicants
stated
you
could
you
can't
get
two
large
size,
a
pickup
truck
or
suv?
You
get
two
comfortably.
The
third
one
would
have
to
be
a
real
small
vehicle
and
from
the
presentation
I
understand
that
this
small
will
be
for
the
kids
when
they
visit
and
in
my
opinion,
when
the
kids
visit
they
park
on
the
concrete,
not
necessarily
under
the
roof.
So.