►
From YouTube: Aiken City Council - Nov 26, 2018
Description
Join us live for Aiken City Council meeting in the Council Chambers at 7 P.M. Agenda: https://edoc.cityofaikensc.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=434996&dbid=0&repo=City-of-Aiken-LF
A
A
Have
bestowed
upon
us,
we
thank
you
Lord
that
you
brought
us
safely
through
Thanksgiving
season.
You
suffered
no
serious
harm
or
danger
to
come
upon
us.
You
enabled
us
our
Father
to
assemble
at
this
appointed
place,
one
more
time
and
Lord.
We
ask
you
for
this
dog
wound
that
whatever
is
done
and
said
here
tonight
would
be
done
and
said
to
the
glory
of
that
name.
I.
Ask
you
Lord
to
bless
the
decision
makers
bless.
This
city
bless
our
Father
this
nation.
All
these
blessings.
B
We
want
to
welcome
everything,
thank
you
for
being
here
tonight,
quick
outline
of
our
guidelines
for
our
City
Council
meetings.
These
are
public
forums
in
which
many
opinions
are
expressed
and
the
business
of
the
city
must
be
conducted
as
such.
Disciplined
honorable
and
professional
decorum
is
paramount,
and
courteous
and
respectful
communication
is
expected
during
public
hearings.
All
questions
and
statements
from
the
public
shall
be
directed
to
the
chair
and,
if
you
wish
to
speak,
raise
your
hand
and
I
will
certainly
recognize
you.
B
Please
approach
the
podium
and
state
your
name
and
address
in
order
to
allow
an
opportunity
for
everyone
who
wishes
to
address
council.
The
speakers
should
limit
their
comments
to
the
subject
being
discussed.
Each
speaker
will
be
given
five
minutes
to
address
an
issue.
It
may
only
address.
You
address
an
issue
once
unless
questions
from
Council
or
posed
to
the
speaker
without
I'd
like
to
go
down
to
additions
and
deletions
to
the
agenda
and
I
will
recognize
our
senior
councilmember
this
time,
because
our
Mayor
Pro
Tem
6
tonight.
So
this
council
won
twice.
C
B
B
E
We
regret
to
report
that
mr.
Peterson
recently
is
past
with
me,
but
we
do
have
John
Mac
Mahan
and
John
Hef
and
Traer,
who
attended
the
conference
November
14th
in
Greenville
to
accept
this
award
at
the
state
level.
We
will
have
a
presentation
that
we
would
like
to
acknowledge
their
work
at
the
local
level,
so
I
invite
Jessica
Campbell
our
Parks
and
Recreation
and
tourism
director
to
come
forward.
B
This
is
something
when
you've
done
it
for
ten
years
and
you're
a
rookie.
Well,
let
me
say
it
just
say-
is
enjoying
and
participating
in
some
of
these.
Some
of
the
concert
series
what
a
professional
job
that
was
done.
Mr.
Peterson
will
certainly
be
missed,
but
certainly
not
forgotten
because
of
the
great
work
and
dedication
that
the
committed
and
gave
to
the
city,
and
we
really
do
appreciate
it.
It's
it's
a
true
task
of
love
to
to
deal
with
sound
with
fussy
musicians.
I
know
because
I'm,
a
fussy
musician,
but
y'all
guys
did
great.
B
E
E
Councilwoman
price
has
recommended
the
reappointment
of
two
individuals:
Ms
Veliz
Cummings
reappointment
to
the
Design
Review
Board
for
a
term
that
would
expire,
December,
31st
2020
in
Carolyn,
McPherson
reappointing
reappointment
to
the
general
aviation
commission
for
a
term
that
would
expire,
September,
1st
2020.
Also
the
chair
of
the
Energy
and
Environmental
Committee
Elise
Fox
has
submitted
an
email
with
the
Earth
Day
coming
up.
She's
asked
that
some
consideration
for
appointments
be
considered
as
those
board
members
do
a
lot
of
work
getting
that
program
together.
E
B
Is
there
a
motion
to
accept
these
appointments
so
I'm
a
motion?
Second,
this
waltz
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
hand
and
that's
unanimous
this
time,
we'll
entertain
names
for
Naumann
nominations
for
our
next
called
meeting
and
I'll
say
my
my
any
committee
member
has
resigned.
So
I
will
try
to
have
a
name
to
you
before
our
next
meeting,
so
we
can
get
to
get
on
that
time.
Any
other
names
to
be
considered.
Our
next
meeting
I.
D
B
Very
good
any
other
names
for
our
next
meeting
to
be
considered
all
right.
Thank
you.
Moving
down
old
business
number
two.
This
is
a
second
reading
of
public
hearing
of
an
ordinance
accepting
the
FY
2017
18
audit,
my
title:
an
ordinance
accepting
the
fiscal
year,
2017
2018
audited,
audited
financial
statements
and
authorizing
variances
to
the
fiscal
year,
2017
18
budget
ordinance.
Is
there
a
motion?
So
mr.
E
You,
mr.
mayor,
we
do
have
second
reading
tonight
of
an
ordinance
to
approve
our
fiscal
year.
2017
18
budget
excuse
me
audit
that
was
performed
on
Alden
and
Jenkins.
Mr.
Miller
Edwards,
the
principal
a
principal
with
the
firm,
was
here
last
meeting
to
discuss
the
audit
at
a
work
session
and
then
here
for
first
reading
and
no
material
weaknesses
nor
instances
of
non-compliance
were
found.
So
is
a
clean
opinion.
So
we
have
four
second
reading
denied
approval
of
our
fiscal
year,
2017
18
audit
report.
Thank
you.
Mr.
bean
ball.
Any.
B
Comments
from
the
audience
comments
from
Council
I'm
hearing,
none
all
those
in
favor
on
this
I'm
on
second
reading.
Please
raise
your
hand
and
that's
unanimous.
Thank
you.
Moving
down
old
business
to
item
number
three.
This
is
a
second
reading
in
public
hearing
of
an
ordinance
for
budget
adjustment
for
Park
and
Recreation
Development
grant
by
title
an
ordinance
amending
the
budget
of
the
city
of
Aitkin
for
the
fiscal
year,
beginning
July,
1,
2018
and
ending
June
30
of
2019
is
their
motion.
C
B
E
Mayor,
thank
you.
We
do
have
second
reading
of
a
budget
amendment.
We
received
a
$20,000
grant
from
the
state
Department
of
Parks
Recreation
and
tourism
for
a
shelter
renovation
and
the
$5,000
match
in
funding
is
necessary,
but
what
we
need
the
budget
ordinances
for
is
to
amend
the
budget
with
the
grant
amount
of
the
grant
award
of
20
no
$20,000
of
an
increase
in
revenue
and
the
corresponding
expenditure
of
$20,000,
and
that
is
before.
Council
today
is
second
reading
of
the
ordinance
to
adjust
the
budget
to
reflect
the
grant
award
Norlin.
B
B
Moving
down
the
agenda
to
new
business
item
number
one
I've,
no
one's
the
first
ring
of
an
ordinance
to
rezone
11
lots
on
Waterloo
Street
from
limited
professional
LP
to
general
business,
gb
business
lb
by
title
and
ordinance
amending
the
zoning
of
11
properties
located
on
Waterloo
Street
from
limited
Professional
LP
to
limited
business
lb.
Is
there
a
motion
so.
B
E
Mayor,
thank
you
at
their
November
13th
Planning
Commission
meeting
the
Commission
did
consider
request
a
reason:
13
properties
along
Waterloo
Street,
which
stretches
from
Richland
Avenue
to
Haines
Avenue.
This
goes
back
in
July
council
made
a
request
to
the
Planning
Commission
to
evaluate
the
zoning
for
Waterloo
between
Haines
and
Richland,
due
to
concerns
about
density
and
the
number
of
vacant
properties,
as
well
as
the
potential
for
reinvestment
in
the
area.
The
Planning
Commission
had
several.
E
They
received
the
referral
at
the
July
10th
work
session
had
discussions
at
their
work
session
on
August
14th
and
then,
if
their
October
9th
meeting
directed
staff
to
notice
the
reasoning
of
the
properties
and
properties
were
noticed.
26
days
ahead
of
time,
I
will
say
for
the
record.
There
was
some.
We
were
informed
that
there
the
signage
was
removed
early
that
afternoon,
but
of
November
13th
inadvertently.
But
after
review
with
staff
and
the
city
attorney,
it
was
felt
that
it
did
meet
their
posting
requirements
and
we
regret
that
they
were
removed.
E
Early
after
reviewing
and
studying
the
Waterloo
area,
the
Planning
Commission,
those
in
attendance
with
one
commissioner
absent
unanimously,
recommended
six
to
zero.
To
recommend
the
approval
of
the
application
to
rezone
all
of
the
property,
with
one
can
addition
that
the
two
properties
currently
zoned
general
business,
specifically
one
zero
three
and
one
one
three
Waterloo
Street-
would
continue
to
be
rezone.
E
General
business
would
continue
to
be
zoned
general
business
and
not
being
rezone
to
limited
business,
and
we
do
have
attached
in
the
packet
an
email
from
one
of
the
business
owners
who
owns
the
the
structure
at
the
property
at
one
one,
three
Waterloo
Street,
requesting
that
it
state
general
business
and
also,
in
addition
to
the
Planning
Commission
packet,
that
reflects
the
recommendation
from
the
Commission
and
the
staff
from
memorandum.
We
did
attach
also
a
comment
from
a
resident
that
we
received
Rachel
dr.
model
and
Payne
Avenue
submitted
something
in
writing.
E
November
20th
the
day
the
agenda
was
released
and
we
did
have
a
number
of
meetings
to
discuss
this
matter
and
as
part
of
the
and
as
well
as
part
of
the
overall
idea
to
renovate
Richland.
Avenue.
Excuse
me
to
consider
Richland
Avenue
West.
This
was
part
of
that
discussion,
but
there
were
I
believe
in
talking
with
the
plain
director
eleven
meetings
where,
where
this
has
been
discussed
so
before
council
tonight
is
first
reading
of
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
zoning
of
these
eleven
properties
on
pain.
E
B
B
I
Good
evening
my
name
is
Rachel
Donner
Mont,
1111,
hane,
Avenue
I,
submitted
a
letter
to
you
and
I
won't
bore
you
to
death
by
reading
it
because
I,
don't
read
all
that
well,
but
I
do
want
to
point
out
some.
Some
things
highlight
them.
I
have
been
on
Haines
Avenue
since
1980
my
children
are
now
adults.
They
were
born
living
in
this
neighborhood.
I
It's
a
wonderful
neighborhood,
a
lot
of
the
people
that
I've
known
my
whole
life,
I've
known
from
rezoning
meetings,
because
we've
been
doing
this
since
1980
and
probably
do
it
in
Waterloo.
Street
is
ugly.
Waterloo
Street
has
been
let
go,
it
has
not
been
maintained,
but
it's
closed
during
the
evenings.
It's
closed
during
the
weekends
and
it
doesn't
bother
the
neighborhood.
I
Think
that
rezoning
this
will
erode
the
adjacent
residential
rather
than
strengthen
it.
I
think
the
property
owners
will
have
trouble
enjoying
their
own
properties
because
they
will
have
I,
don't
know
if
you've
been
worked
near
a
restaurant
or
been
near
a
store
at
the
end
of
the
day,
but
the
employees
come
outside
and
they
get
a
cigarette
and
they
laugh
and
they
carry
on
so
yeah.
You
close
the
businesses
at
10:00,
which
is
already
too
late
for
residential
neighborhood,
but
there's
still
noise
even
after
there
they're
closed
I.
I
Think
I
think
this
will
cause
creep
farther
into
the
residential
neighborhoods
when
these
neighbors
are
not
enjoying
their
own
homes,
anymore.
They're,
going
to
rent
them
out
and
historic
homes
do
not
do
well
as
non
owner
occupied
homes.
They
just
do
not
last
they
will
deteriorate,
and
then
there
goes
our
historic
district.
I
Other
retails
sales
and
service,
as
you
saw
on
the
letter,
is
anything
that
is
not
listed
specifically
on
the
youth
chart.
So
when
you
say
there's
just
a
minor
differences
that
is
not
the
case.
I
was
part
of
creating
this
ordinance
and
I
worked
in
the
planning
department.
Enforcing
this
ordinance
for
14
years.
Other
retail
sales
and
service
is
a
catch-all
for
everything
parking.
There
is
so
little
parking
already
on
that
street.
When
shell
house
has
a
funeral
they
park
in
front
of
our
homes
when
other
there's
a
try,
development
and
not
development,
I'm.
I
I
One
thing
we
don't
have
with
prepare
limited
professional
is
delivery
trucks,
but
you
can't
have
restaurants
or
retail
without
delivery
trucks,
so
we're
going
to
instead
of
somebody
taking
their
little
Honda
Fit
over
to
Staples
and
getting
supplies.
Excuse
me,
they're
gonna,
be
bringing
trucks
into
the
neighborhood
akin
advertises
itself
as
historic,
downtown,
Aiken
and
I
see
this
as
detrimental
to
the
preservation
of
historic
homes,
I'm
afraid
we're
going
to
dilute
the
downtown
business
by
spreading
retail
and
other
services
out
from
the
downtown
business.
I
I
I
Study
after
study
after
study
has
said,
we
need
more
residential,
downtown,
more
multifamily
downtown
and
we
need
to
preserve
our
historic
press,
historic
districts.
Those
are
not
being
done
with
this
proposal.
I'm
almost
done,
the
downtown
of
many
cities
has
deteriorated.
You
go
up
to
places
like
Johnston
and
edge
field,
and
there
are
these
beautiful
old
homes
next
to
a
quick
shop
or
next
to
some
other
business,
because
they're
no
longer
viable,
neighborhoods
Aiken
isn't
there.
Yet
we
could.
This
could
be
the
council
that
turns
Aegon
around
and
sends
it.
I
B
And
I'm
gonna
I'm
gonna
do
this
because
Rachael
had
a
stand
and
it's
not
in
lieu
of
trying
to
just
stop
anyone
from
speaking
your
mind,
but
she'd
asked:
if
I
would
those
who
are
here
in
favor
of
what
Rachael
Rachael's
words?
Would
you
mind
raising
your
hands
at
this
time?
Okay,
all
right!
Thank
you
for
that.
Thank,
You
Rachael,
all
right,
any
other
comments
from
the
audience.
J
I'm
William
Mann,
G
auntie.
This
is
my
wife
Diane.
We
live
at
174,
five
Highland
Park
Drive.
We
have
for
29
years.
That
puts
us
within
walking
distance
of
the
proposed
change
area
and
we
can
see
how
this
kind
of
a
change
could
actually
work
for
the
improvement
of
the
area,
especially
in
concert
with
the
redevelopment
of
the
old
county
building
on
the
other
side
of
the
street.
J
I'm
gonna
turn
the
podium
over
to
Diane
for
in
a
minute,
because
she's
got
some
recommendations
to
make
of
things
that
the
city
could
do
to
kind
of
show
a
good
faith
effort
in
making
this
change
positive
and
making
it
happen.
I
thought
we
had
several
questions
to
ask,
but
we've
read
through
the
background
materials
that
were
provided
out
front
here
and
you
did
a
good
job
of
putting
those
together.
I
guess.
J
J
B
E
J
B
K
K
Therefore,
I
would
suggest
that
the
city
improve
the
pedestrian
friendliness
of
the
street
by
extending
the
existing
streetscaping
of
Haines
and
and
the
alley
which
comes
down
Haines
but
including
sidewalks,
pavers,
plantings
and
lighting
fixtures,
so
that
it
is
a
more
pedestrian
friendly
place
and
maybe
then
the
businesses
would
be
more
attractive
for
sale
and
reinvestment.
The
city
has
ample
evidence
of
the
long
term
improvements
that
occur
in
areas
where
you
have
added.
K
These
sorts
of
upgrades
to
the
city
has
already
invested
heavily
on
the
other
side
of
Richland
Avenue
from
Waterloo
in
upgrades
to
private
homes.
Non-Commercial
properties
on
Waterloo
should
be
evaluated
for
similar,
improve
comments.
Perhaps
through
the
akin
corporation
I
was,
as
was
accomplished,
on
the
corner
of
Greenville
and
Richland,
and
up
Morgan
Street
stabilizing
the
existing
residences
on
Waterloo
Street
will
help
it
retain
its
function
as
a
transition
to
the
surrounding
residential
area
and
third,
if
appropriate,
the
city
could
establish
a
small
Public.
K
Safety
presence,
which,
with
improved
lighting
mentioned
earlier,
would
provide
additional
deterrence
to
crime,
something
always
welcome
to
both
commercial
and
residential
owners.
Positioning
officers
here
might
also
positively
impact
crime
on
West,
Richland
Avenue.
So
to
summarize,
pedestrian
friendly
streetscaping
upgrades
to
existing
residential
properties
on
Waterloo
and
a
small
detachment,
perhaps
of
Public
Safety,
would
make
Waterloo
Street
immediately
more
attractive
for
its
current
or
possible
future
intended
mixed-use
and
as
a
buffer
to
the
residential
areas.
K
J
L
Thank
you
for
letting
us
speak
today.
My
name
is
rocky
nope
here,
I
own
property,
at
143,
Trafalgar,
Street,
limited
professional
and
I've,
been
there
for
29
years,
I'm
disappointed
in
the
way
this
entire
process
is
going
back.
During
the
summer,
I
received
an
invitation
to
attend
the
meeting
over
beat
hall
and
I
really
didn't
know
what
the
meeting
was
about.
It
was
like
there's
some
changes
coming
to
your
neighborhood.
Would
you
like
to
be
there
come
come?
Let
us
hear
from
you.
L
L
The
question
that
was
presented
to
the
group
for
the
majority
of
that
evening
was
we're
going
to
be
making
some
changes
to
your
neighborhood,
just
bounded
by
Greenville,
painting
and
christen
Avenue,
and
what
we
want
to
know
is
what
level
of
commercialization
are
you
willing
to
accept?
You'll
accept
a
mile
amount
or
moderate
amount
or
heavy
amount?
L
Of
rezoning
these
pieces
of
property
to
limited
to
general
business
or
limited
business,
my
property
on
Trafalgar
Street,
it's
limited
professional,
that's
different
to
the
whole
of
the
segment,
that's
contained
within
the
commercialisation
bracket
and
that's
not
delineated
on
this
map,
and
it
needs
to
be.
The
second
thing
is
not
delineated
on
this.
Now
is
there
number
of
limited
professional
properties
on
this
map
that
are
being
used
for
residential
purposes
that
may
be
zoned,
limited,
professional,
but
they're
being
lived
in
by
residents
and
are
being
used
for
commercial
purposes?
L
L
That's
not
shown
on
this
map,
so
I,
don't
know
what
the
real
story
is.
When
I
take
a
glance
this
map
and
I,
don't
think
everybody
in
this
room
that's
either
and
I
think
that
needs
to
be
fixed
about
ten
years
ago.
I
guess
it
was
maybe
longer.
This
issue
came
up
on
Waterloo
about
rezoning,
a
piece
of
property,
we're
gonna,
take
it
from
limited
professional
and
beauty
shop
and
I
was
against
that
then
Hart.
Our
neighborhood
was
against
that
then
I'm
still
against
it
tonight.
L
There's
no
urgency
proceeding
Council
to
proceed
down
the
path
to
this.
Proceeding
of
this
particular
point
in
time.
Nowhere
you
see
whatsoever
and
there's
a
lot
of
other
changes
that
are
going
to
be
going
on
in
the
neighborhood
like
over
the
old
county
hospital
property
that
could
have
an
impact
on
what
would
be
best
to
do
and
what
early
based
on
what
you've
told
us
tonight,
you
don't
have
a
input
from
all
the
property
owners
on
Waterloo.
What
you're
doing
here
is
highly
speculative.
L
It's
not
well
thought-out
and
its
detrimental
to
the
residents
that
are
living
in
properties
that
are
sown
limited
professional
and
it's
detrimental
to
the
residents
that
are
living
in
properties
that
are
sown
residential
and
I.
Urge
you
to
stop
this
process
and
do
this
at
a
more
appropriate
time
in
the
future
in
a
manner
that
is
better
thought
out.
That
is
currently
being
done
tonight.
Thank
you.
Thank.
M
B
M
M
They
bought
that
piece
of
property
behind
our
property.
Ours
was
all
bricked
in
and
everything,
but
the
house
next
er
I,
was
told
by
a
city
council
member
here
and
the
reason
I
got
involved
in
this.
The
first
place
was
that
we,
the
city,
wants
to
expand
the
downtown
business
district
and
we
want
to
take
from
Waterloo
down
to
Haines
and
Richland
Avenue,
and
we
want
to
turn
into
general
business.
What
was
initially
what
I
was
told,
or
at
least
that's
the
way
I
understood
it.
I
was
told
that
I
didn't
understand
anything,
but.
M
Just
some
of
the
things
I've
said
before
that
were
brought
up
and
I,
don't
know
who
the
lady
was
up
here
when
I
get
I
guess
it
was
now
it
wasn't.
Gail
somebody
mentioned
that
these
people,
these
poor
people,
that
owned
this
property,
couldn't
sell
their
property,
and
it's
been
mentioned
before
you
know
you
don't
change
zoning,
because
somebody
can't
change,
sell
their
property
if
I
can't
sell
my
property
someday.
Is
somebody
going
to
come
along
and
help
me
out.
M
We
do
have
plans,
we
do
have
a
program
in
their
City
where
we
do
sell
down,
tear
down
properties
and
I.
Think
that's
been
mentioned.
If
somebody
would
have,
the
city
would
have
helped,
instead
of
changing
the
whole
zoning,
if
they
would
have
torn
down
something
and
made
it
more
conducive
for
somebody
who
want
to
come
along
and
build
a
house
I
mean
the
way
it
look
now.
I
wouldn't
want
to
build
a
house
and
not
knowing
what
was
going
on
there
or
going
to
go
on
you
know.
M
M
So
it
was
a
problem
than
one
woman,
apparently
maybe
didn't
want
to
sell
and
kind
of
mess
up
the
deal,
but
they
were
going
to
put
residential
next
door
and
do
something
with
that
building
and
he
said
also
the
one
and
I
don't
know
that
this
to
be
true.
I
was
just
told
this
that
the
building
on
Haines
next
to
him,
the
little
building
that
sold
after
hughbanks.
B
M
M
I
understand
the
difference
and
stupid,
but
all
these
ones
that
are
marked
in
green
look
to
everybody
as
if
they're
just
hardcore
commercial
use.
Well,
there's
a
difference
between
limited
professional
and
limited
business,
or
we
wouldn't
be
going
through
that
and
I
think
cert
11
Waterloo,
there's
11
right.
What
is
it
13
that
are?
What's
the
number
of
13
and
11
there's.
B
M
B
G
M
G
G
M
Another
thing
that
just
kind
of
concerns
me
is
the
parking
and
I
know
you're,
allowing
your
wedding
in
the
list
of
the
parking,
because
everybody
is
concerned
about
the
cars
around
the
back
and
the
sides
of
the
building
that's
gonna
affect
now.
If
it
comes
down
like
we
saying
if
the
city
decides
that
they
want
to
take
on
my
street
and
all
those
streets
down
there
and
do
this,
the
house
next
to
me
is
from
here
to
that
way
my
bedroom
and
there's
not
a
thing.
I
can
do
about
it.
M
If
the
business
goes
in
there,
and
you
know
it's
open
till
10:00
o'clock
at
night,
you
know
so
it's
gonna
change
the
quality
of
life
for
some
people
and
I.
Think
even
there
was.
It
was
mentioned
in
the
last
meeting
that
somebody
does
have
that
backing
right
up
to
their
bedroom,
that's
possibly
in
the
historic
district
on
the
other
side
of
water.
M
I
just
go
along
with
what
rocky
said
that
you
know
I
think
we
really
need
to
everybody's
jumping
on
this
because
of
the
hospital
I
was
told.
Oh
no,
it
has
nothing
to
do
with
the
hospital.
Has
everything
to
do
with
what
they're
doing
at
the
hospital
allow
for
more
walking
too?
You
know,
but
it
takes
a
lot
of
cups
of
coffee
to
sell
to
make
up
for
what
a
dentist
or
a
doctor
brings
in
as
far
as
a
tax
base.
So
that's
about
all
I
can
say
I
just
think.
M
M
Do
we've
got
the
ridiculous
colors
on
these
buildings,
I
mean
really
Richland
Avenue
looks
like,
and
the
Kwik
shop
on
the
corner
looks
like
Tijuana
and
that's
the
way
we
come
out
of
our
driveway
and
I
would
just
like
to
see
things
upgraded
instead
of
degraded
and
I,
really
think
you
need
to
protect
the
historic
district
and
I
agree
with
the
things
that
Rachel's
saying.
Thank
you
very
much.
Wayne.
B
G
G
The
zoning
does
not
necessarily
mean
that
people
are
going
to
come
out
of
the
woodwork
and
I
will
add
this,
because
he
seems
to
be
some
consensus
that
people
have
come
to
us
and
talk
to
not
one
person
has
actually
talked
to
me
about
an
idea
going
forward.
That's
on
the
table.
There
was
some
talk
about
Irish
pub
that
the
Irish
pub
is
doing
right
here
in
the
alley,
from
what
I
understand
so
and
I.
Quite
frankly,
thought
that
was
a
little
far-fetched.
G
Lp's
LP,
it
is
that
and
doctrine
appear,
brings
it
up
and
go
back
residential.
You
can
go
back
residential,
be
the
way,
but
somebody's
going
to
have
to
be
willing
to
buy
the
properties
and
change
them
to
residential,
as
it
is
now
these
on
one
house
actually
being
lived
in,
that's
a
that's,
not
an
office.
The
rest
have
been
converted
to
offices
and
and
that's
fine,
that's
what
LP
was
really
kind
of
designed
to
do,
but
it
is
what
it
is
and
it
it's
gonna
be
hard
for
it
to
go
back.
G
L
G
L
G
G
For
the
sake
of
the
story,
five
of
the
properties
are
office
like
dr.
Eubanks,
building,
they're,
absolutely
offices,
the
LA
Maddox
pharmacy
is
actually
a
retail
store
and
then
the
bottom
corner
down
on
Haines
Avenue
is
a
parking
lot
for
shell
house
funeral
home,
so
out
of
13,
seven
or
actual
commercial
in
the
sense,
if
something
outside
of
LP,
maybe
even
a
little
bit,
you've
got
the
houses
that
have
been
converted
up
at
the
top
that
are
offices
on
the
left-hand
side,
the
two
houses
on
the
other
side,
if
you
count
the
vacant
one.
N
I'm,
gay
Smith
and
I
live
in
1311
hanging
Avenue,
making
their
most
of
my
life
I'd
like
to
ask
the
members
of
City
Council
how
they
would
feel
if
the
Dollar
General
were
to
put
be
put
in
Waterloo
Street
and
all
the
generals
are
popping
out
popping
up
everywhere.
I,
don't
feel
that
that
would
be
appropriate,
but
that
is
a
would
be
allowed
under
the
general
business
of
the
linnaeus.
B
N
D
G
B
O
Retail
use
so
that
type
of
store
would
it's
not
necessarily
to
use
story
about
a
discount
store,
I
suppose
so
it
kind
of
different
how
that
fall
in
in
all
practicality,
the
limit
on
size
wouldn't
allow
a
dollar
general
dictate
only
nine
to
ten
thousand
square
feet.
Cap
on
square
footage
in
business
is
five
thousand
or
twenty
percent.
O
N
O
N
B
B
N
Like
to
also
let
you
know
that
when
we
were
having
these
Planning
Commission
meetings,
that
I
tried
to
make
some
comments
there
and
twice
at
least
I
was
cut
off
by
your
chairman
there.
He
would
not.
Let
me
make
my
comments.
In
fact,
mr.
hunter
made
the
comment
that
this
is
the
way
it's
going
to
be,
and
you
can
like
it
or
leave
it.
G
E
G
P
7:07
hain,
why
do
we
have
a
map
like
this?
It
was
just
that
already
been
discussed,
because
the
whole
discussion
for
the
last
four
months
has
been
the
difference
between
limited
professional
and
limited
business,
and
you
look
at
this
map
and
all
of
its
commercial.
But
it's
not.
We've
always
distinguished
an
akin
since
I've
been
here
between
professional
and
commercial
use
and
the
Planning
Department
came
up
with
this
map
and.
P
Example,
on
Waterloo
Street
on
the
right
side,
there's
a
/,
that's
a
purple.
This
is
residential
right.
We
moved
here
in
74
that
building
has
never
been
residential.
It
was
dr.
lights
office
for
years
and
years
and
years,
and
it
has
never
had
a
residential
use.
I'm,
sorry
I,
just
can't
I
was
going
to
be
quiet,
but
I
can't
sit
here
and
look
at
wrong
information
being
presented
as
the
basis
for
a
decision
and
I
just
thought.
You
should
know
that.
Well.
G
P
G
B
G
P
G
P
So
the
people
bought
property
and
they
were
willing
to
accept
what
was
there
as
a
neighbor
and
it's
when
they
change
it,
that
they
start
worrying
and
when
you've
got
a
lot
of
these
uses
like
restaurants
and
grocery
stores
that
are
conditional
uses.
Now,
restaurants
are
conditional
uses,
they
don't
have
a
hearing
before
anybody,
they
just
go
to
Ryan
and
the
Planning
Department.
J
P
D
P
G
I
think
you
know
from
the
standpoint
of
zoning
its
zoned
one
thing:
then
the
county
has
it
assessed
and
they
designated
the
two
residential
properties
on
Waterloo,
because
I've
looked
at
this
a
lot
today.
They
they
have
them
as
residential,
not
commercial,
and
that
may
be
part
of
the
mix
up,
because
you've
still
got
GB
in
there
you've
got
LP,
you
got
residential
in
an
LP,
it
gets
kind
of
convenient
property.
P
E
G
B
Q
My
name
is
dawn
blunt
I
live
at
10
to
23
paint
Avenue,
which
is
residential
one,
that's
kind
of
larger
than
the
others
there
on
Main
Avenue
I
can't
get
into
the
details
that
you
guys
have
been
getting
into
about.
What's
a
zoned
and
this
and
that
and
so
forth.
But
it
seems
to
me
that
there's
a
large
general
question
about
Waterloo
being
not
as
attractive
as
it
could
be,
and
so
the
way
we
will
make
it
get
more
attractive
is
will
encourage
people
to
bring
businesses
in
there
and
I.
Q
Don't
think
that
would
be
all
that
attractive.
It
would
be
convenient.
I
could
walk
from
my
house
to
I,
don't
know,
buy
a
popsicle
or
something
I,
don't
know,
and
so
I
think
that
the
point
that
was
made
earlier
by
Rachael
that
we
could
slow
this
thing
down
a
little
bit.
I
mean
here.
We
are
discussing
this
with
inadequate
information
and
most
of
us
live
our
lives,
not
paying
all
that
much
attention
to
zoning
I'm
impressed
with
how
much
you
guys
know
about
it.
Q
But
still
you
were,
you
were
contemplating
making
a
very
large
change
to
our
neighborhood
and
when
we
went
to
this
kind
of
like
thing
back
in
I,
don't
know
July
or
something
where
we
had
other
maps
and
other
colors
I,
don't
think
it
was
presented
to
us
from
the
very
beginning
that
one
of
the
options
would
be
leave
things
alone.
Let
things
kind
of
generally
slowly
evolve.
Rather
than
saying
we
going
to
come
up
with
some
sort
of
wonderful
plan,
just
gonna
solve
that
problem,
while
of
course
creating
other
problems
that
cannot
be
anticipated.
Q
L
C
C
O
F
F
This
I
I
appreciate
you
responding
to
an
inquiry
here
Ryan,
but
to
the
community.
This
is
not
representative
of
the
11
meetings
and
everything
else
that
we've
heard
in
discussions
so
I
struggle
with
this
as
well
and
I
understand
the
county.
Has
it
summed
up
that
way
and
it's
a
land-use
map
and
all
that,
but
it
just
sets
a
point
of
confusion
across
the
board
and
I
think
that
was
very
clear.
Today,
cuz
even
I
was
confused
up
here.
O
O
F
O
This
is
the
most
recent
zoning
now
those
are
all
along
Waterloo
Street
because
of
the
zoning
all
limited
professional
is
in
small
office
uses,
with
the
exception
of
on
the
northeast
corner.
There
are
the
southeast
of
Waterloo
and
Richland.
That
is
the
pharmacy,
which
is
not
permitted
in
the
LP
district,
and
then
you
on
the
northwest
corner
of
pain
and
Waterloo.
That
property
is
a
parking
lot
related
to
the
funeral
home,
and
that
is
also
wouldn't
be
allowed
in
the
LP
district,
the
remaining
along
there.
O
O
O
O
H
What
we've
heard
tonight,
I,
don't
think
one
map
can
satisfy
everybody
I
think
we
need
a
map.
That's
gonna
show
the
zoning,
the
current
zoning,
which
is
in
our
packet,
and
it
clearly
shows
that
of
the
thirteen
properties
here
at
Waterloo.
There
are
two
general
business
and
the
rest
are
currently
zoned
limited
professional
attend
going
back
to
Councilwoman
Gregory's
question
about
use.
That
makes
a
difference
as
well,
and
there
probably
ought
to
be
a
map
that
shows
the
use
that
you
know
very
clearly
but
yeah.
You
know
I.
H
C
Let
for
clarification
for
use.
What
we're
addressing
is
because
some,
what
something
is
zone
is
LP,
someone
may
be
living
in
it,
and,
and
so
we
have,
we
still
don't
at
the
properties
that
my
family
owned
is
its
own
one
thing,
but
we
have
a
child
that
we
living
there.
It
doesn't
impact
the
zoning
of
that
property.
O
R
D
O
O
O
O
A
significant
US
wants
to
do
what
attorney
if
somebody
were
to
need
to
make
a
sufficient
change
where
they
would
put
fifty
percent
of
value
into
the
property.
So,
if
you're
going
to
do
a
significant,
we
have
to
move
a
new
business.
Don't
have
to
be
brought
up
to
current
standards
with
landscaping
parking
into
the
design
standards.
They
have
it
be
a
residential
appearance.
O
H
G
Without
you
know
the
the
the
vacant
one
I,
don't
know
how
much
work
needs
to
be
done
there,
but
yes,
if
Huey
fir
decided
that
he
wanted
to
convert
it
to
an
office.
It
wouldn't
take
a
whole
lot.
You
might
want
to
do
a
little
bit
more
but
know
that
you
can
go
that
now.
Elbe
he's
pretty
much
the
same
thing
in
a
same
process.
R
O
G
Yeah
there's
only
shell
houses
down
there
on
the
corner,
so
you've
got
four
that
would
meet
that
extender
that
as
I
remain
over
and
look
at
them.
But
you
would
be
surprised
how
many
houses
in
the
downtown
area,
East,
Side
west
side
are
zoned
a
commercial
zoning
either
GB
or
LP,
and
their
houses
and
they're
being
lived
in
and.
H
Question
Ryan:
there's
a
provision
in
the
elbe
zoning
for
dine
in
or
carry
out
slash
delivery,
eating
establishments
with
limited
hours
of
operation,
no
drive-thru,
no
outdoor
entertainment
or
speaker
system
and
no
internally
illuminated
signage.
The
outdoor
entertainment
is
that
include
outdoor
dining.
O
H
O
O
R
F
H
H
F
H
B
H
Comment
is
I
just
want
to
focus
on
something
that
that
Rachel
said
that
I
think
is
extremely
important.
We're
we're
talking
about
zoning
in
a
neighborhood.
That's
going
to
be
could
be
severely
affected,
with
whatever
happens,
with
a
county
government
center
and
I.
Think
it's
I
think
it's
quite
frankly
premature
and
that
there's
there's
one
extreme
that
I'm
hearing
about
the
county
government
center.
It's
going
to
be
a
bunch
of
section,
8,
housing
and
the
other
extreme.
H
Is
it's
going
to
be
more
upscale
I,
don't
know
what
the
answer
is:
I,
really
don't
the
property
hasn't
been
sold,
there's
been
two
offers
on
it.
I
am
hearing
that
it
wouldn't
close
until
at
least
the
May
June
timeframe,
because
one
of
the
developers
needs
that
time
to
be
eligible
for
the
credit,
so
I'm
not
sure
we
need
to
be
in
a
rush
to
do
this
zoning
at
this
point
until
we
have
a
better
sense
of
what's
going
on
with
that
government
building.
H
You
know,
that's
that's
my
view.
I
think
that's
a
very
important
consideration
because
whatever
goes
in
there,
the
businesses
that
support
that
just
has
happened
with
the
hospital
and
just
says
happened
with
a
government
center
are
going
to
go
on
Waterloo
and
it
will
make
a
big
difference
whether
they're
Section,
eight
housing
or
more
upscale
housing.
That's.
G
B
F
F
That's
who
what
how
we
want
is
own
it
which
we
have
in
our
packet,
but
maybe
even
a
little
bit
more
off
behind
it.
What
are
we?
What
are
we
thinking?
This
is
gonna
project
into
and
to
your
point
on
our
discussion
earlier
I
think
you
know
what
are
the
true
uses
that
we
see
in
the
future
as
a
city
as
a
community,
we
need
to
make
it
a
little
bit
more
visionary
and
right
now
we
don't
have
that
so
I'd
like
to
see
that.
D
J
C
8
housing
for
those
of
you
who
hear
this
for
folks,
that
is
only
a
Fiat
attic.
Okay,
that
is
a
fear
tactic
to
you.
You
have
a
body
that
will
listen
to
you.
That
will
do
the
right
thing.
Any
time
someone
throws
up
in
your
face
a
section
eight
they're
trying
to
get
you
riled
up.
We
don't
even
know
what
the
property
of
the
county
owned
will
be,
and
until
you
know
that,
then
you
make
judgment
and
you
have.
C
If
you
don't
approve
it,
then
there's
an
opportunity
to
come
to
two
County
Council
to
address
that
change,
but
you
are
not
comfortable
with,
but
to
dismiss
people
is
what
I
see
when
you
say
section.
Eight
some
of
your
family
members
may
have
may
need
section
eight
one
day
and
I
hear
that
a
lot
in
our
community-
and
this
is
not
what
a
knish
about
we're
about
doing
the
right
thing
for
people
we're
all
humans.
C
H
L
B
B
G
B
Is
correct
so
noted
in
the
comments
all
those
in
favor
raise
your
hand
and
that's
unanimous
new
business.
This
is
a
first
ring
of
an
ordinance
to
sell
property
and
governor
Aiken
part
to
Tom
and
Christian
cheer.
My
talent
ordinance
approving
the
sell
three
Lots
and
governor
in
part
to
Tony
and
Chris
this
year.
Is
there
a
motion
so
moved
Thank,
You,
councilman
Jared?
Oh
there,
a
second.
B
J
G
B
H
H
B
Her
five
hundred
new
business
as
a
first
reading
of
an
ordinance
reasonable
property
in
1706,
the
University
Parkway
from
planned
commercial
to
general
business
by
tile,
an
ordinance
amending
the
zoning
of
real
estate
located
at
1706
University
Parkway
from
planned
commercial
to
general
businesses.
Their
motion.
H
E
Security
Federal
Bank,
the
owner
and
applicant,
has
requested
the
rezoning
of
parcel
at
1706
University
Parkway
from
playing
commercial
to
general
business,
and
the
property
was
before
the
Planning
Commission
at
their
November
13th
meeting.
They
unanimously
recommended
approval
of
the
request
to
reason
from
playing
commercial
to
general
business
and
that's
for
a
council
consideration.
Okay,.
O
O
B
Thank
all
those
in
favor,
please
I
hear
and
that's
thank
you.
Moving
down
the
agenda
new
business
number
six.
This
is
a
first
ring
of
an
ordinance
rezone
property
known
as
South
Park
Commons
from
limited
professional
LP
to
residential
single-family
rs6
by
title
in
ordinance.
Amending
the
zoning
of
twelve
properties
located
in
South
Park
Commons
from
limited
professional
to
residential
single-family
rs6
is
their
motion.
G
E
You
mr.
mayor
South,
Park
Commons
subdivision
located
off
of
Colony
Parkway
is
12
Lots
and
was
zoned
limited
professional
and
they
are
built
out
to
12,
single-family
residential
properties
with
rear
alley
garage
access,
and
they
have
requested
rezoning
to
from
limited
professional
to
residential
single-family
rs6
and
the
Planning
Commission
considered
the
request
for
rezoning
and
unanimously
recommended
the
the
application
for
a
rezoning
from
limited
professional
LP
to
residential
single-family
rs6.
Okay,.
D
B
S
H
E
At
the
request
of
the
Planning
Director,
we,
the
Planning
Commission
reviewed
changes
to
the
zoning
ordinance
regarding
small
cell
wireless
and
amateur
radio
and
the
regarding
small
cell
Wireless.
Our
zoning
ordinance
describes
the
standards
for
specific
use
for
telecommunications
facility
facilities.
E
The
proposed
new
section
adds
definitions
to
the
code
for
small
cell
technologies
to
ensure
current
processes
for
other
telecommunication
facilities
and
regarding
amateur
radio.
The
current
zoning
ordinance
does
not
differentiate
between
commercial
and
amateur
telecommunications
and
FCC
regulations
regarding
these
installations
are
regulated
to
a
lesser
extent
and
planning
staff
did
conduct
substantial
research
and
recommended
to
the
Planning
Commission
amendments
to
provide
a
clear
distinction
between
these
use
types
to
and
to
create
a
regulatory
for
brain
works
specifically
for
the
treatment
of
amateur
radio
installations.
E
So
any
amateur
radio
installation,
under
a
total
height
of
75
feet
for
commercial,
above-grade
and
meeting
other
stated
conditions
will
not
be
subject
to
special
exception
or
technical
review,
and
those
that
do
not
meet
height
requirement
and
number
of
conditions
will
be
subject
to
the
special
exception
and
technical
review
process
in
the
proposed
amendment.
And
this
will
bring
our
regulations
into
compliance
with
FCC
regulations.
And
another
proposed
change
to
the
zoning
ordinance
regarding
amateur
radio
is
that
submissions
for
EE
will
be
directed
to
the
planing
director
and
at
the
November
13th
meeting.
E
The
Planning
Commission
reviewed
the
proposed
amendments
to
the
zoning
ordinance
regarding
these
changes
and
recommended
these
amendments
for
approval.
I
do
want
to
state
that
today,
I
received
phone
calls
from
SCE
and
G
Scott.
Mr.
Scott
Neely,
who
could
not
be
here
tonight
and
also
from
AT&T
s
representative
mr.
Ted
Creech,
you
is
here
they
I
know.
Mr.
Creech
worked
with
the
Municipal
Association
on
the
drafting
of
the
model
ordinance
for
this,
which
ours
used
as
a
template.
E
We
made
some
slight
some
modifications
too,
but
I
know
SC
Eng,
whose
holes
a
lot
of
this
technology
will
go
on.
You
know
they
are
federally
required
to
allow
their
use,
but
they
are.
He
was
just
made
aware
of
this.
I
guess.
Excuse
me:
their
staff
at
scan
is
reviewing
this
statewide
and
between
now
and
second
reading,
we
could
have
some
minor
wording,
changes
based
on
input
from
scanner
or
SCE
and
G
and
perhaps
AT&T
as
well.
B
O
These
small
civilizations
that
to
fill
in
their
criticism
fill
either
backhaul
through
five
or
typically
to
a
larger
tower
so
or
some
of
them
will
be
line-of-sight
to
give
back
to
order
power
to
move
the
signal,
but
as
we
had
no
in-between
in
the
orbital,
so
he
didn't
have
to
go
through
a
special
acceptor,
but
when
they
would
be
essentially
a
fairly
small
modification
to
existing
the
utility
pole
or
something
similar.
And
so
there
were
enough.
O
S
There's
director
for
AT&T
in
South
Carolina.
Thank
you
for
your
consideration
of
this
and
thank
you
for
your
proactivity
in
terms
of
working
to
establish
an
ordinance
that
allows
for
small
cells
just
to
follow
up
on
Ryan's
comments,
small
cells
and
in
the
end
they
come
in
different
forms
and
shapes
in
designs
than
just
that
they
can
blend
in
very
well
with
the
surroundings
and
with
the
community
and,
as
Ryan
said,
the
the
small
cells
they
might
broadcast
a
signal
for
use
by
customers,
maybe
a
thousand
twelve
hundred
feet
or
so.
S
But
what
our
engineers
tell
us
is
that
is
that
in
certain
specific
areas
we
need
to
not
so
much
spread
our
wireless
signal
farther
out
but
to
add
capacity
to
spots
where,
where
the
signal
already
is
so,
if
you
have
more
and
more
and
more
people
using
their
smartphones
to,
for
example,
watch
their
football
game
on
their
smartphone
downloading
or
streaming
video,
for
example,
that
takes
up
a
lot
of
capacity
in
the
wireless
network.
And
so
we
need
help
in
those
specific
areas
to
meet
the
demand
of
those
specific
targeted
areas.
S
But
when
we
do
that
with
a
small
cell,
we
also
help
the
large
macro
tall
cell
tower
continue
providing
good
service
for
folks,
even
a
mile
around.
If
you
don't
have
a
small
cell,
where
you
need
it,
then
the
technical
resources
are
going
to
be
sucked
from
the
tall
tower
to
that
spot
and
that
can
diminish
over
time.
The
effectiveness
of
the
cell
signal
fall
for
a
large,
larger
community,
so
not
only
needed
for
small
specific
areas,
but
also
needed
for
the
existing
macro
cell
towers
to
continue
functioning
well.
S
G
S
There
there
are
different
colors
that
that
can
be
utilized
and
different.
Some
different
designs
that
can
be
utilized
as
well,
so
I
just
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
you
you
you
were
aware
of
that,
so
that
you
didn't
look
at
these
two
pictures
and
say
that's
all
the
industry
can
do
that's
not
all
the
industry
can
do.
We
can
do
different
kinds
of
designs.
We
might
decide
to
utilize
an
existing,
say
wooden
pole
and,
put
you
know
a
cylindrical
antenna
at
the
top
of
that
wooden
pole.
S
S
B
You,
sir,
any
other
comments,
questions
and
all
those
in
favour
of
first
reading
Jane
and
that's
unanimous.
Thank
you
number
eight
under
new
business.
This
is
an
acceptance
of
brownfields
assessment
grant
and
first
reading
of
an
ordinance
to
amend
the
FY
2018
19
budget
to
include
the
Bryant
Browns
field,
grant
by
title
in
ordinance
amending
the
budget
of
the
city
of
Aiken
for
the
fiscal
year,
beginning
July,
1,
2018
and
ending
June
30th
2019.
Is
there
a
motion.
Tell.
E
E
In
the
downtown
in
our
general
downtown
area,
we
would
use
this
money
for
assessments.
You
did
approve
the
contract
with
the
consultant
to
to
do
this
work
for
us
and
then,
hopefully,
by
identifying
it.
We
can
leverage
this
and
ultimately
get
money
for
the
cleanups
provided
owners
would
would
be
okay
with
that,
it's
typically.
B
You
know
the
comments,
questions
from
Council,
okay,
all
those
in
favor.
Please
raise
your
hand
and
that's
unanimous.
Thank
you.
Moving
down
when
you
business
item
number
nine.
This
is
a
first
reading
of
an
ordinance
to
amend
FY
2018
19
budget
to
receive
revenue
from
winter
storm
packs
and
allocate
expenditure.
Is
there
a
motion
so
moved
all
right,
Thank
You,
councillor
waltz?
Is
there
a
second
mr.
Garrideb
comments.
E
From
staff
Thank
You
mr.
mayor,
we
did
receive
rather
quickly
after
the
General
Assembly
overrode
their
veto.
Our
final
amount
of
ice
storm
money
from
the
2014
weather
event
for
two
hundred
forty
two
thousand
and
change,
and
we
again
need
to
do
a
budget
amendment.
For
this
we
propose
we
allocate
up
to
15
1600
for
one-time
employee
compensation
next
month
and
then
the
remaining
amount
be
put
into
designated
special
holding,
and
that
is
in
the
form
of
proposed
ordinance
to
council
tonight.
Thank.
G
B
Right
all
those
in
favor
of
the
ordinance
raise
your
hand
and
that's
unanimous,
moving
down
to
petitions
in
request
number
one.
This
is
an
approval
of
resolution
to
close
ICM
a
plan,
a
by
title
resolution
of
the
city
of
Aitkin
to
terminate
the
city
of
Aitkin
testing
money
purchase
plan.
Is
there
emotion.
C
E
This
plan
was
set
up
back
in
March
of
16
council,
adopted
by
resolution
plan
for
providing
the
benefits
to
the
to
a
former
city
manager
pursuant
to
his
imperial
contract,
and
we
have
attempted
to
close
it,
but
they,
since
it
was
opened
via
resolution,
needs
to
be
closed.
To
be
a
resolution.
We
are
told
Thank.
B
You
Sharon
comments
from
the
audience
comments
from
Council
all
those
in
favor
of
the
resolution.
Please
raise
your
hand
in
this
unanimous.
Thank
you.
Item
number
200
petitions
and
requests.
This
is
a
request
for
approval
of
a
resolution
to
revise
city
water
at
934,
East,
pine
log
Road
by
title,
a
resolution
authorizing
the
prison
of
provision
of
water
utility
service
to
property
located
at
934
use
pine
log
Road.
Is
there
a
motion
so.
F
E
E
B
B
B
R
Sir
I've
said
it
earlier
and
I'll
repeat
myself
here:
I
think
when
we
get
these
things,
we
should
put
design
standards
on
these.
When
we
were
questioned
when
the
requesting
suit
services
promise,
we
don't
have
to
accept
these
metal
buildings.
We
we
certainly
have
the
right
to
make
our
towns
as
good
as
we
can
I
think
this
one's
out
of
the
barn
we
got
to
go
with
it,
but
from
now
on
I
think
we
should
consider
that
good
point.
T
Doctor
your
comments
are
and
you're
spot-on
and
we
have
a
a
submitted,
upgraded
height
and
signage
requirement,
sell
architectural
elevations,
as
required
with
why
working
with
Ryan
and
Mario
staff
to
make
sure
it's
what
a
quality
product
out
there.
So
we
have
have
done
that
and
tried
to
adhere
to
some
of
the
planned
plan:
commercial
zoning
guidelines
and
y'all
ordinances.
Even
though
it's
enough
I
appreciate.