►
From YouTube: Design Review Board June 1, 2021
Description
Design Review Board
June 1, 2021
6:30 PM
Call to Order
Minutes
Old Business
A) Application CERH21- 046- AMENDMENT: Applicant Sarah Brennan Heilig requests approval of economic hardship for replacement windows at 223 Trafalgar St SW ( TMP 105- 07- 05- 004). CONTINUED FROM MAY 4, 2021 MEETING
New Business
A) Application TAX027: Applicants Faith and John Hawks request preliminary certification of the Special Tax Assessment for Historic Properties for renovations at 725 Grace Ave SE ( TMP 121- 14- 12- 002).
Information
Adjournment
A
To
our
june
meeting
of
the
design
review
board-
and
we
thank
you
all
for
coming
tonight-
we
have
some
minutes
that
our
board
members
will
be
reviewing
for
may
work
session
and
actual
meeting
and
then,
as
we
proceed
into
the
meeting,
we'll
have
our
secretary
mary
tilton
here
last
week.
I
believe
too
weren't
you,
I
was
yeah
welcome
to
the
but
we'll
have
have
you
read
the
application
and
then,
after
that,
have
the
applicant
come
to
this
microphone
so
you'll
be
on
the
record.
A
C
We
have
application
number
cerh21-046,
it's
an
amendment
applicant
sarah
brennan
heilig,
request:
approval
of
economic,
economic
hardship,
replacement
windows
at
223,
trafalgar
street
southwest
tax
parcel
number
one:
zero:
five:
zero,
seven,
zero,
five,
zero,
zero,
four
and
you'll
remember.
This
was
continued
for
our
may
4th
2021
meeting.
B
E
F
E
B
B
A
A
F
E
G
I
think
well,
I
think,
because
you
and
y'all
know
because
I
talked
to
y'all
about
this
before
they
I
didn't
know.
I
had
to
do
this
because
I
was
I
did,
I
didn't
understand
and
they
they
didn't
know
at
all,
because
the
guy
who
actually
came
is
the
guy
who
came
in
before
I
bought
the
house,
he's
the
one
who
came
and
measured
all
the
windows,
and
I
don't
think
that
they
do
enough
stuff
in
this
district,
and
I
don't
think
they've
done
enough.
G
I
found
out
because
the
guy
who
had
that
for
a
little
while
had
mary's
job,
he
said
so
when
the
world
called
to
get
a
building
permit
or
the
permit
to
do
the
windows
because
they
weren't
and
they
weren't
done
then,
and
they
said
oh
no.
This
has
to
go
through
the
design
review
board,
and
so
then
they
are
the
ones
who
emailed
me
the
application.
The
first
time
that
I
didn't
get
it
myself,
because
they
they
sent
it
to
me
for
me
to
fill
out
to
send
it
back.
That's
how
I
ended
up
here.
G
A
E
E
G
Yeah,
but
I
got
a
construction
loan
and
there's
not
money
in
the
loan
to
do
this,
and
I
don't
have
the
money
to
pay
for
it
and
it
would
have
to
come
out
of
my
pocket.
I
don't
know
where
it's
going
to
come
from,
so
I'm
left
in
limbo
with
a
construction
loan
that
I
can't
go
back
and
get
more
money.
It's
all
done
and
I
don't
have
10
000
more
dollars
to
give
to
the
window
company
the
economic.
B
B
D
E
E
Understood
yeah
I
mean
I'm
just
saying
I.
I
have
difficulty
applying
the
rule
to
this
situation
and
you
know
again
I'm
I'm
willing
to
offer
up
as
a
compromise
that
you
wouldn't
have
to
repair
the
the
small
windows
that
you
could
use
use
those
as
is,
but
I'm
not
willing
to
bend
on
the
big
windows,
because
I
think
that's
an
important
part
of
the
house
in
the
historic
district.
E
E
A
D
A
B
D
A
B
A
I'll
write
about
on
the
way
home,
okay,
let's
let's
go
ahead
and
we'll
see
if
anyone
else
would
like
to
speak
regarding
this
application
for
economic
hardship-
and
I
don't
see
anyone,
and
so
I
would
say
that
it
looks
like
just
in
terms
of
the
numbers
she
put
together.
The
you
know
requested
information,
I'm
not
sure
how
applicable
it
is,
but
what
I
did
derive
from
it
is
that
she's
paying
about
257
000
before
you
do
any
improvements
and
that
you're
putting
around
forty
one
three
in
improvements.
A
H
A
Right,
301.
so
you're
right
in
there
within
a
couple
thousand
dollars
and
so
you're
in
some
sense
you're
now
putting
more
money
in
the
house
than
it's.
Then
it's
the
bank
or
the
appraiser
says
it's
worth:
you're
you're,
you'll
you'll
be
have
you'll
roughly
have
three
hundred
and
eight
thousand
in
you
know.
301
now,
and
you
know
some
some
people
could
make
the
case.
A
A
E
E
A
F
F
E
D
D
A
Personally,
I
think
that
that
it's
a
unfortunate
situation
that
I
think
sarah
admits
that
she
didn't
have
all
the
facts
and-
and
she
made
a
mistake
and
it's
it's
a
now
eight
or
ten
thousand
dollar
error,
and
it's
also
not
the
it's.
It's
not
the
palmata
golf
club-
and
you
know
our
green
boundary-
are
some
of
the
well-known
estate
houses.
It's
a
cottage
and
she's
trying
to
improve
a
house
that
has
stucco,
has
rotted
out
windows
and
she's.
A
F
A
G
A
A
E
A
That
is
true,
you
can
do
you
can
you
could
then
have
a
sort
sold
an
alternate
motion,
but
it
sounds
like
that
that
would
might
work
if
there
were
10
she
was
going
to
have
to
rework
instead
of
21.
right.
The
problem
is
the
majority
of
them.
Are
the
ones
she's
got
to
rework
so
you're,
still
seven
thousand,
instead
of
ten
thousand,
so
that
that's
a
nice
idea?
I
agree
well.
B
A
A
B
A
Okay,
we've
got
the
motion,
we've
got
a
second
and
I
think
we
were
raising
or
not
raising
our
hands,
but
we
want
to
now
raise
your
right
hand
if
you're
in
favor
of
denying
the
the
application
as
it's
presented.
If
raise
your
right
hand,
okay,
if
you're,
if
you
vote
or
against
this
motion,
raise
your
right
hand.
B
A
D
D
A
A
G
A
D
C
A
B
E
A
A
B
Let
me
let
me
restate
it
since
I've
changed
it,
okay,
so
let
me
see.
I
can
word
this
to
be
clear,
so
I
make
a
motion
that
we
eliminate
the
requirement
for
exterior
applied
grids
on
all
the
windows
on
the
house,
except
for
the
windows
that
are
on
the
main
body
of
the
house.
The
main
body
of
the
house
that
are
have
road,
frontage
and
there's.
D
A
B
B
B
A
B
A
D
B
B
C
B
A
B
A
B
H
G
Thank
y'all
for
your
help.
That's
and
I
will
tell
y'all
when
y'all
are
going
to
revamp
how
you'll
tell
people
is
this.
The
information
that
you
need
is
very
hard
to
find,
and
it's
and
it's
here
and
it's
there
and
it's
and
it's
in
not
in
plain
language,
and
it
is
very
hard
to
decipher,
because
y'all
sent
me
things
from
the
office
after
this
and
it's
been
hard
to
find,
and
it's
not.
I
wish
it
was
in
one
like
you
could
come
get
a
book.
You.
G
H
E
D
E
D
C
A
A
D
A
A
I
I
D
I
A
D
A
I
Probably
the
thing
that
I'm
unsure
about-
and
I
need
to
talk
to
a
roofer
is
what
the
material
should
be
for
the
for
the
roof.
We'd
love
to
do
this
cedar
shake
because
the
other
buildings
on
site
are
cedar
shake,
but
I'm
worried
about
having
such
a
low.
You
know
low
slopes
and
big
crickets
with
cedar
shake.
A
But
it
may
be
the
combination
that
you,
you
could
have
metal
for
the
low
area
and
then
have
this,
whether
it's
shingle
or
shake
that's
a
little
bit
easier
to
detail.
I
think
you'd
run
your
metal
up
underneath
it
probably,
but
then,
when
it
gets
flat,
it
just
becomes
a
gutter
almost
and
that
it
almost
looks
like
it
would
be
better.
If
it
it
could
be
even
a
wider.
A
D
A
A
A
Properties,
but
also
removing
chimneys,
particularly
if
it's
a
ornate
chimney
and
we
can't
really
tell
because
you're
wrapping
plastic
but
but
having
a
roof
leak,
a
terrible
roof
leak
problem
and
never
that
roof
has
never
been
right.
I
don't
think
since
they
joined
these
things
together,
but
that
might
be
a
reason
for
removing
a
chimney.
If
you
can't,
you
know
you
come
back
with
the
application,
I
think
we're
doing
two
things
not
discussing
these
sort
of
potential
issues
that
you're
trying
to
solve
and
then
also
does
it
look
like
it's
a
qualifying
project.
D
A
A
A
A
B
A
D
A
A
A
A
I
think
I
think
you'll
have
a
a
real
application.
This
is
sort
of
a
starter
right
application
to
talk
about
whether
it
qualifies
and
we'll
we'll
officially
vote
on
that.
And
then,
if
I'm,
not
second
they're
going
to
have
you
submit
a
an
application
that
shows
exactly
what
you're
doing
and
you
you'll
probably
have
to
look
at
it
and
do
some
more
measuring.
D
E
I
A
D
D
A
E
A
In
this
case,
that'll
be
part
of
the
of
the
tax,
we'll
we'll
may
come
back
and
look
to
see
what
you've
done.
I
guess
we
could
say
lucy,
we
could
say
we
don't
believe.
That's
part
of
this
conservation
zone
is
that
what
we're
calling
it
in
which
case
she's,
free
to
knock
out
any
wall
she
wants
to
that's
right
is
that
is
that
right.
D
A
So
those
are
the
things
so
actually
the
if
you're
in
agreement,
that's
not
a
particularly
wonderful
original
kitchen,
it
may
be
the
original
kitchen,
but
it's
not
a
little
kitchen.
So
I
don't
think
we
we
need
to
that's
it.
It's
going
to
be
on
your
drawings,
I'm
sure,
and
I
always
think
it's
good
to
have
a
floor
plan
when
we're
looking
at
exterior
it's
hard
to
look
at
exterior
and
not
have
a
plan.
E
A
E
D
D
E
A
A
A
B
A
you
know:
it's
a
it's,
an
older
property,
it's
in
the
historic
district
of
town.
The
property
needs
a
lot
of
work.
You're,
certainly
going
to
do
enough
cost
to
justify
a
special
tax
assessment
and-
and-
and
I
think
when
you
finish,
it's
going
to
be
a
vast
improvement
to
the
property
in
terms
of
its
integrity
and
its
aesthetics.
A
A
A
I
I
D
C
A
D
A
But
these
were
these
were
not
people
that
were
certified.
Wonder
builders,
I
don't
think
so
now
anything
else
we
need
to
discuss.
I
don't
see
anyone
here
who
wants
to
speak
against
this
application,
and
so,
if
y'all
would
like
to
make
a
motion,
I
believe
we're
we're
moving
to
to
say
that
it
that
qualifies
for
the
special
tax
assessment.