►
From YouTube: Board of Zoning Appeals Meeting 07-08-08
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
The
board
operates
according
to
the
coffee
following
procedure.
The
chair
will
name
describe
the
kids.
A
court
enforcement
representative
will
cite
the
specifics
for
the
refusal
for
mental
state
the
case
testimony
next
will
be
taken
from
those
who
support
granting
the
appeal,
then
those
who
wish
to
speak
in
general
comment
and
those
who
speak
in
to
support
denial
up
to
eight
field.
Following
all
testimonies,
the
board
will
receive
concluding
remarks
from
the
appellant
discussion
from
the
floor
then
will
be
closed.
A
The
board
will
deliberate
and
render
a
decision
under
AB
the
city
code,
section
23
of
ins,
both
refeed.
The
board
has
the
power
to
grant
such
variance
system
of
code,
as
will
not
be
conferred
contrary
to
the
public
interest,
so
that
the
spirit
of
the
code
shall
be
observed.
Public
safety
and
welfare
secured
and
substantial
justice
done.
A
Exceptional
circumstances
must
exist,
exceptional
circumstances
or
conditions
applying
to
the
property
use
that
do
not
in
general,
apply
to
the
properties.
In
the
same
zoning
district
number
three
preservation
of
equal
property
rights-
it
must
be
determined.
The
literal
interpretation
of
the
code
would
deprive
the
appellant
of
rights
commonly
enjoyed
by
others
in
the
same
vicinity.
Granting
the
variance
would
not
convey
special
privilege
number
4
minimum
variance.
A
The
board
also
is
empowered
to
hear
and
decide
applications
for
conditional
use,
substitution
for
non-conforming
uses
temporary
uses,
and
it
feels
where
it's
alleged
by
the
appellant
there's
an
error
in
the
decision
made
by
the
Zoning
Administrator
any
person,
who's
aggrieved
by
the
decision
of
the
board
from
a
file
and
a
field
to
the
Court
of
Common
Pleas.
Such
petition
must
be
filed
with
the
days
after
the
mailing
of
the
board's
resolution
to
the
appellate
this
evening.
There
are
four
cases
on
the
agenda
is
number
zero.
A
Eight
one,
six,
three
four,
fifty
South
Court
Street
zoned
b-two
D
Michael
Federer,
is
the
appellant
number
zero.
Eight
one,
seven
B
430
Westfield
place,
zoned
r3
Cecilia
Hanson
is
the
appellant
number
zero.
Eight
one,
eight
D
for
a
for
Evans
Street
zone,
r1,
Rebecca
Kevin
is
the
appellant
and
number
zero
a
19's
for
seven
fired
Street
zone.
R1
Sean
Jones
is
the
appellant.
The
board
is
required
by
law
to
take
testimony
under
oath
anyone
wishing
to
speak
this
evening.
Please
stand
to
be
sworn.
A
On
the
agenda
this
evening,
then
our
first
case
is
number
0-8,
16450
South
Court
Street
in
Zone
B
to
D
Michael
Federer
is
the
appellant
requesting
a
variance
from
Section
2303
1-3
i1i
to
permit
a
wall
signed
with
a
forty
one
and
a
half
percent
wall
coverage
where
40%
is
the
required,
primitive
maximum
and
a
wall
sign
with
an
N
wall.
Setback
of
2.3
percent
or
10
percent
is
the
permanent
minimum,
and
this
evening.
B
My
name
is
Paul
Assenmacher
I'm,
the
Acting
Secretary,
but
I'll
be
presenting
the
case
facts
tonight.
Just
a
few
pertinent
facts
about
this
I'm
sure
the
appellant
will
be
able
to
explain
things
as
well
about
the
specifics
of
the
case.
The
sign
on
the
court
Street
sign
is
you're
facing
the
front
of
the
building
is
the
sign
that's
proposed
to
be
a
little
bit
too
large
and
the
sign
on
the
side.
The
East
Union
Street
side
is
the
one
that
has
the
problems
with
being
too
close
to
the
edge
of
the
wall.
B
In
the
past,
the
Zoning
Board
has
heard
other
cases
of
this
time
in
the
Uptown
area,
including
two
cases
in
94,
one
427,
North
Court
Street
for
the
court
Street
Bakery
65
north
court
for
the
Athens
Historical
Society
at
38,
north
court
Street,
where
the
pigskin
is
located.
In
all
those
cases,
it
was
a
about
sign,
location
being
too
close
to
the
edge
of
the
wall
and
in
all
those
cases
the
board
approve
those.
B
B
B
Part
of
the
sign
ordinance
that
references
specifically
says
that
any
signs
cannot
be
any
closer
to
the
edge
of
the
wall
than
10%
of
the
width
of
the
wall.
In
other
words,
if
it's
a
hundred
foot
wall,
it
can't
be
any
closer
than
10
feet
to
the
edge
of
that
wall.
The
sign
on
the
east
Union
side.
They
would
like
to
have
located
almost
directly
above
that
corner
entrance
that
they're
proposing.
A
D
E
There
are
two
aspects
of
the
code
that
that
we
ran
into
problems
with
the
the
first
one
that
was
mentioned
was
the
size
of
the
union
street
sign.
Forgive
me,
the
court
Street
side.
We
have
no
issue
with
that.
We're
happy
to
scale
that
down
to
meet
code.
That
was
mostly
a
mathematical
situation
and
indeed,
we've
already
done
that
the
sign
size
has
been
adjusted
to
the
legal
limit
and
we
have
no
qualms
with
that.
So
that's
already
done.
E
As
far
as
we're
concerned,
the
issue,
the
the
unique
situation
we
find
ourselves
in
with
this
building
is
that
we've
got
being
situated
on
the
corner
with
a
corner
entrance
to
the
building
and
having
that
really
being
the
only
entrance
to
the
store
is
on
the
corner
and
we
have
a
multiple
direction
of
traffic
flow
to
deal
with.
We
get
traffic
both
from
the
south
from
the
west
and
from
the
southwest
on
that
multi-directional
corner.
E
E
E
The
difficulty
we
face
is
one
of
directing
customers
to
the
entrance,
since
it's
a
strange
entrance
on
the
corner
of
the
building
and
that
the
Union
Street
side
of
the
building
really
doesn't
have
much
functioning
other
than
the
entrance
on
the
corner
we
felt
like
if,
if
the
sign
was
placed
elsewhere,
it
would
cause
it
misdirection
to
the
customers.
How
do
I
get
in
particularly-
and
this
is
also
a
very
unique
situation-
that
no
other
appellant
would
ever
face.
I,
don't
believe,
we've
got
a
sight
line
issue
with
the
vendor
buggies
that
are
always
here.
E
So
customers
approaching
from
this
from
the
south
from
the
college
gate
area,
could
not
see
through
or
pass
the
buggies,
thereby
would
have
no
way
of
knowing
that
the
door
isn't
down
here
somewhere
and
so
signage
above.
That
would
indeed
imply
to
a
customer
your
looking
for
a
door
over
here
somewhere,
not
on
the
corner.
E
We
feel
like
those
are
all
exceptional
circumstances
and
we
feel
like
it's.
The
equal
property
rights
would
be
granted
to
us
based
on
the
fact
that
what
we're
trying
to
do
is
indicate
to
our
customers
where
the
entrance
is
we
accomplished
that
on
the
Court
Street
side
and
we
feel
like
we
need
to
accomplish
that
from
the
Union
Street
side.
Because
of
the
situation
of
the
building,
we
do
think
it's
the
minimum
variance
required
again.
E
We've
scaled
it
down
to
meet
the
size,
it's
a
very
dignified
and
small
sign
compared
to
the
length
of
the
building.
It's
just
a
matter
of
where
we
position,
so
we
don't
think
we're
asking
for
much
more
than
what
would
be
logical
and
what
would
function
well
and
we
absolutely
don't
feel
there's
any
detriment
to
anyone
else.
E
Indeed,
we
think
this
follows
the
spirit
of
the
code,
a
hundred
percent,
because
what
we
think
you
want
to
do
is
prevent
us
from
encroaching
on
our
neighbors
and
if,
as
the
diagram
shows
pretty
clearly
we're
80
some
feet
from
our
nearest
neighbor
on
both
sides.
So
we
don't
think
we're
encroaching
it
off,
and
so
we
feel
like
it
meets
all
the
criteria
of
your
variance,
and
so
we
respectfully
hope
that
you
will
agree
with
that
and
we'd
be
happy
to
answer
any
questions
you
may
have.
F
E
G
G
Larry
Van
Dyke
one
two,
three,
six,
six
scatter
read,
read
and
I
have
been
sworn
and
I'm
the
owner
of
performance
signs.
Basically,
it
came
up
if
you
have
any
questions
as
far
as
construction
or
anything
of
the
signage
I
would
be
the
one
that
you
know
fittings
are
that
for
you
they
are
internally
lit
the
word.
College
is
front
lit
and
the
bookstore
is
a
reverse
halo
for
the
actual
letters
are
metal
and
you
would
just
kind
of
see
the
outline
of
the
letters
that
says
bookstore
and
they
are
led.
G
H
A
H
A
H
H
You've
got
that
also
and
and
I
look
at
signs
down
the
street
when
I
come
back
and
some
of
them
have
been
quite
an
improvement
over
the
years
and
I
speak
favorably
in
favor
of
this,
and
it
would
help
me
to
get
into
place.
You
understand,
I,
know
the
doors,
but
I
know
exactly
what
the
problem
is
and
when
those
buggies
are
there,
you
might
as
well
forget
where
you're
going
as
a
matter
of
fact
many
times
I
had
students
tell
me
they
just
went
to
the
door
they
hold
open
for
me.
A
A
C
A
Visibility,
the
length
of
the
wall
and
the
fact
that
they
cannot
recoup
relocate
the
door
because
of
the
interior
construction
with
the
wall
that
doesn't
permit
a
change
in
the
door,
so
they
don't
really
there's
sort
of
stuck
with
that
door.
Okay,
exceptional
circumstances,
corner
corner
entrance
and
preservation
of
equal
property
rights.
F
A
A
Yeah,
going
is
looking
great
so
far.
Thank
you
very
much
all
right.
Our
next
case
this
evening,
then,
is
number
zero.
Eight
one
1730
Westfield
place,
which
is
insane
trees,
are
appellant,
she's,
requesting
a
variance
from
section
2008
one
zero,
a
to
commit
occupancy
of
a
dwelling
unit
by
two
tenants
it.
What
accessible
in
one
non
accessible
parking
place
where
two
accessible
spaces
are
required.
B
Just
a
few
extra
points
here,
this
Hansen
came
before
the
board
two
years
ago
in
case
zero,
six
zero,
three
B's
with
a
similar
request.
Only
then
she
was
asking
for
three
tenants
for
the
two
parking
spaces,
one
of
which
is
not
accessible,
in
other
words,
two
stacked
parking
places
that
was
turned
down,
and
she
came
back
the
very
next
month
in
caso
610
t
where
she
requested
and
received
a
temporary
use
permit
for
the
length
of
one
year
to
have
those
conditions
as
a
rental
with
stacked
parking.
B
B
What
is
more,
precisely
correct
as
if
it
was
owner
occupied
only
I
didn't
want
to
give
you
the
impression
that
if
it
was
some
kind
of
boarding
house
where
she
was
renting
out
rooms,
it
would
be
okay,
no
she'd
have
to
come
under
compliance
with
the
parking,
even
if
she
was
renting
out
rooms
in
the
place
that
she
was
living
there,
but
the
only
time
this
comes
in
to
where
you're
excused
from
the
news.
If
you
live.
I
B
B
Only
asking
for
two
tenants,
so
the
only
variance
or
anything
that's
needed
here
is
for
the
idea
of
stacked
parking
one
non
accessible
space.
Okay,
also,
even
though
the
board
has
no
authority
or
anything
over
deed
restrictions
from
that
subdivision
were
included,
and
I
just
wanted
to
point
out
a
couple
of
things
there.
Nowhere
in
the
deed
restrictions
does
it
say
that
rentals
are
not
allowed.
So
even
in
this
neighborhood
deed
restrictions,
they've
not
put
forth
that
idea
and
number
19
of
the
deed
restrictions.
B
It
mentions
the
pocket
parking
which,
in
other
words
the
public
parking,
but
if
you
have
to
go
out
there
today,
if
you
got
around
to
paving
and
stuff
that
they
were
doing,
they
do
have
some
part
of
public
parking
spaces
here
and
there
along
the
place.
Also
number
26,
it
does
say,
as
close
as
it
comes
to
mentioning
anything
about
rentals,
is
that
no
more
than
three
unrelated
people
would
be
allowed
in
any
of
these
places.
B
If
that
was
the
idea
of
the
owner
to
have
it
as
a
rental,
they
could
not
have
it
in
or
than
three
and
again,
as
I
said,
miss
Hanson
has
asked
him
for
two,
as
for
other
similar
cases
in
this
neighborhood,
the
board
has
heard
two
before
in
the
past
several
years
in
2001
in
case
along
27
3
at
15
and
over,
he
asked
for
the
exact
same
thing:
variance
to
allow
stacked
parking.
It's
one
of
those
houses
on
the
way
out
to
Westfield
place.
B
F
D
I
K
B
That's
correct:
if
you
saw
the
minutes
from
two
years
ago,
you
saw
that
the
those
who
are
against
the
Baron's
request,
we're
neighbors
and
most
of
their
concerns
were
with
three
tenants
there
and
two
spaces
that
somebody
would
be
using
the
public
parking.
All
the
time,
I
would
assume
was
two
tenants
there.
If
this
is
allowed
with
two
tenants
and
two
parking
spaces,
that
would
not
be
a
problem
or
it
would
not
be
any
more
of
a
problem
than
anybody
else
out
there.
Having
visited.
J
B
Once
it
becomes
an
approved
rental,
we
inspect
once
every
two
years.
It
seems
to
be
a
very
concerned
and
locked
for
lack
of
a
better
term,
watchful,
neighborhood
association.
They
are
free.
If
anybody
believes
there
are
more
than
three
people,
two
people
in
the
house
to
report
it
to
us
and
we
can
do
the
best
we
can
to
check
and
see,
but
otherwise
we
just
have
an
approved
permit
for
two.
B
A
B
A
B
B
B
This
has
again
nothing
to
do
with
this
case,
but
something
I
read
a
long
time
ago
about
whether
cities
have
the
right
to
even
regulate
the
number
of
family
members
in
their
house,
but
that's
something
I
don't
want
to,
because
I
don't
want
to
regulate
how
many
people
you
can
have
in
your
family
and
house,
but
yeah
if
she
would
her
rent
to
a
family
as
long
as
they
were
all
related
under
the
rules
and
just
would
be
a
lot.
Okay.
L
My
name
is
Mike
Miller
I'm
attorney
here
in
Athens.
My
office
is
located
at
19
and
a
half
south
court
Street
and
I'm
here
as
a
representative
of
miss
Hanson.
She
wishes
she
could
be
here
today,
but,
as
indicated,
she
has
begun.
A
four-year
residency
at
I
was
forget
the
name
of
it.
St.
Barnabas
Hospital
in
the
Bronx
New
York
I
started
beginning
of
June
and
will
run
through
end
of
May,
beginning
of
June
of
2012.
L
L
Her
ultimate
goal
is
to
once
that
four-year
residency
in
emergency
medicine
is
completed
to
return
to
Athens,
to
live
here,
take
up
practice
here
and
hopefully
teach
at
the
Ohio
State
College
of
Medicine,
but
she
needs
to
get
to
her
residency
first.
So
her
ultimate
goal
is
to
return
this
property
to
owner-occupied,
her
being
the
only
one
living
there,
but
with
the
fact
that
she's
gonna
be
living
in
New
York
for
four
years.
She
needs
to
find
something
to
do
with
the
property.
Her
short
term
solution
would
be
to
turn
it
into
a
rental
property.
L
L
However,
we
did
said,
however,
she
set
up
the
rental
situation.
She
would
need
a
variance
of
some
sort,
either
variance
to
offer
staff
parking
on
two
rentals
on
two
parking
spaces,
or
variance
to
allow
only
one
parking
space
three
to
one
tenant.
I
advised
her
to
to
go
the
routes
without
allow
her
a
little
more
flexibility
and
that
being
the
ASP
asking
for
the
variance
for
staff
parking.
L
Forty
tenants,
rather
than
a
reduction
to
one
tenant,
I
discussed
with
with
miss
Hanson
the
possibility
of
doing
a
temporary
permit,
because
she
had
that
the
past
no
success
has
discussed
and
it
was
in
place
for
approximately
a
year.
As
far
as
I
know,
there
were
no
complaints
about
any
the
neighbors
about
me
and
the
tenants
that,
were
there
ever
been
independent
congestion,
do
the
parking
one
of
the
difficulties
with
having
a
temporary
permit.
L
L
L
So
the
fact
that
it's
only
the
fact
that
it's
being
changed
to
a
rental
permit
is
a
reason
stack
is
not
being
permitted
now,
I'm,
not
sure
how
many
of
you
have
gone
out
to
the
property.
It's
a
pretty
restrictive
property.
It's
three
buildings,
three
townhouses
all
attached
together,
there's
almost
no
possibility
for
creating
additional
onsite
free
on-site
parking.
F
L
C
A
L
Think,
out
of
all
the
solutions
that
that
would
probably
be
the
greatest
eyesore
to
create
to
try
to
create
parking
in
this
situation.
You
know
she
can't
put
it
in
front
of
the
house
while
she
need
a
variance
to
do
that
again.
This
is
ideally
going
to
be
and
maintain,
as
a
almost
almost
exclusive,
at
least
majority
owner
occupied,
so
having
to
create
parking
in
the
back.
So
you
know
that
that's
been
suggested
in
other
situations.
L
This
is
going
to
somewhat
destroy
that
that
air
now
in
this
situation,
again
she's
not
going
to
be
able
to
use
it
as
owner
occupied
for
at
least
four
years.
Washy
finishes
her
residency.
So
in
this
situation,
if
the
variance
is
denied
she's
left
with
you
know
two
options
essentially
one
is
to
sell
the
house
again:
that's
not
her
desire.
She
wants
to
return
to
Athens
practice
here
and
teach.
The
other
is
that
the
house
remains
vacant,
that
nobody
lives
there
at
all
and
just
have
a
have
a
vacant
house.
Well.
C
I'm
not
I,
don't
know
a
family.
What
about
renting
to
a
family
watching
to
her
family,
renting
to
their
family?
I,
don't
understand,
like
not
individuals
but
to
family
members.
I'm.
L
L
L
No
I
did
attach
to
the
documents
as
we've
gone
over
is
a
number
of
the
deed
restrictions
as
she
has
and
as
indicated
it's
a
it's
a
fairly
restrictive
listing
and
there's
a
homeowner's
association
that
will,
you
know,
keep
up
to
date
with
that.
So
if
a
concern
is
turning
it
into
a
student
rental
is
the
degradation
of
the
property
and
the
neighboring
properties.
You
know
she
has.
You
know
the
neighborhood
association
has
recourse
against
her.
L
If
that
ever
comes
up,
you
know,
so
there
shouldn't
be
any
concern
about
property
values
going
down
or,
or
you
know,
unkept
properties,
because
again
they
have
legal
recourse
and
again
she's,
not
gonna.
Let
this
situation
get
out
of
control
because
again
her
desire
is
to
reoccupy
the
home
once
a
residency
is
completed,
so
her
desire
is
to
maintain
the
house
in
good
working
order,
whether
or
not
that
can
easily
be
done.
L
If
the
house
is
vacant,
you
know,
there's
not
be
somebody
there
to
shovel
the
drive
in
the
wintertime
somebody
there
to
make
sure
the
mow
the
lawn
is
mowed.
You
know
on
a
regular
basis.
The
leaves
are
raked
that
all
the
stuff
to
maintain
the
house
on
a
day
to
day
basis
is
going
to
be
done
so
I
think
in
the
end,
granting
the
variance
is
actually
a
an
improvement
to
the
community,
because
you
have
somebody
there.
A
Probably
I
keep
on
running
up
against
every
time.
We
have
a
variance
request
like
this
is
that
this
is
going
to
be.
Like
you
know,
all
of
the
things
that
we're
saying
about
this
owner
and
her
plans
for
the
cops
are
make
everything
quite
desirable,
but
where
she
just
sell
it
to
somebody
else,
the
variance
will
still
be
in
place
for.
L
A
L
I
think
one
you
know
you
know
help
where
that
is
the
fact
that
again
she's
asking
for
two
more
tenants.
This
isn't
a
situation
where
she's
asking
for
the
full
three
tenants
that
she
could
ask
one
of
under
the
under
the
code
in
this
zone.
Even
if
the
situation
arises
that
were
she
what
were
forced
to
solve
for
some
unforeseen
circumstances,
she
had
a
financial
hardship
that
she
couldn't
afford
to
maintain
the
house
worst
case.
There's
two
tenants
in
there,
though
2/10
3/10
living
there
before
when
there
was
a
temporary
permit.
L
As
far
as
I
know,
there
are
no
difficulties,
no
complaints
made
by
the
neighbors
about
increased
traffic,
increased
congestion,
a
that
sort
of
problems.
They
never
complained
to
her
in
regarding
any
of
that
sort
of
difficulties.
So
again,
you
know
worst
case
scenario.
She
sells
the
house
to
somebody
and
they
get
two
tenants
in
there
if
they
ever
want
to
get
more,
if
they
ever
want
to
get
the
three
tenants
that
they
could
under
the
owner
of
the
zone.
L
Yes,
but
again,
she's
asking
for
to
not
not
the
three
that
she
could
be
asking
for,
because
again
she
wants
to
minimize
it
the
situation,
ideally
she's
gonna,
run
to
one
on
ideally
she's,
going
to
return.
She
actually
has
and
I
think
this
is
mentioned
in
the
paperwork-
a
contract
with
the
state
that
she
has
to
return
to
the
state
of
Ohio
to
practice
medicine
for
a
period
of
time
after
she
completes
her
residency.
She
like
that
that
occur
in
Athens.
L
L
She
doesn't
have
a
home
here
and
then
I,
don't
know
what
her
all,
what
her
plans
would
turn
into
I
think
I,
think
I
think
any
potential
negatives
are
outweighed
by
the
the
benefits
and
again
just
remember
that
if
she
were
living
there,
herself
there'd
be
no
issue
about
her
stacking
parking
only
because
it's
being
shifted
into
the
rental
realm.
Is
there
any
issue
over
past
at
parking.
L
H
Remember
when
I
went
out,
there
must
have
been
a
connection
in
this
previous
case,
because
I,
the
land
and
I
always
look
at
the
land
and
say
what's
the
best
use
and
it
didn't
make
sense
to
me
to
start
talking
about
putting
other
than
partly
in
the
back.
You
might
from
the
street
think.
So
when
you
walk
up
in
the
property
you
can
tell
and
as
I
remember
being
there,
this
is
a
fairly
vacant
kind
of
location.
H
It's
a
nice
place
and
somebody
was
there
I
think
when
I
was
there
and
and
the
stack
parking
would
solve
the
problem,
I
think
and
there's
not
that
much
traffic
on
that
Street
I
hardly
saw
anybody.
I
had
a
hard
time
finding
the
place,
because
I
didn't
expect
it
to
be
there,
and
so
I
did
and
I'd
to
get
my
map
out
now
now
I
recall
and
there
is
it
there's
crazy
land
if
I
may
use
the
term,
the
topography
is
not
conducive.
H
However,
you
know
you
could
spend
enough
money
and
build
anything
as
they
show
you
in
California
and
then
it
comes
down
when
you
have
slides.
That's
about
a
story
hires.
The
board
favorable
to
consider
this,
and
this
makes
sense
to
me-
there's
a
good
use
and
it's
a
good
intention
to
have
the
people
and
I'm
not
surprised.
There
were
no
complaints,
because
I
did
that's.
I
I
I
I
Chris
nicely
15o
coat
road,
also
we're
speaking
for
the
South
Side
community
association
and
noted
that
quite
frequently,
people
live
leave
town
for
a
period
of
one
or
two
years
and
rent
their
houses
when
they're
gone.
She
said
this
South
Side,
Neighborhood
Association,
approved
of
that
and
thought
that
it
would
be
good
if
the
City
Council
would
new
legislation
which
would
more
easily
allow
people
to
do
this
to
rent
their
houses
on
a
temporary
basis
and
Bojinka.
Bishop
also
of
westfield
place
spoke
against
the
variance
and
noted
that
parking
was
very
difficult
day
and
again.
I
I
A
A
I
L
Yes,
a
couple
of
the
main
concerns
that
came
out
of
those
minutes
were
again
that
there
were
three
parking
spent
three
work
tenants.
You
know
some
of
those
tents
would
have
to
use
public
parking
spaces.
That's
obviously
not
a
situation
here,
there's
a
garage
and
the
property
actually
underneath
the
town
has
been
in
the
driveway,
which
would
be
used
by
the
tenants
in
this
situation.
The
other
situation
is
the
owner
occupancy
desire.
L
Now
gerelds,
maybe
you'd
like
to
turn
this
back
into
an
owner-occupied,
but
it
also
know
that
there
are
other
rental
situations
in
that
zone.
They're
set
up
in
a
better
situation
where
they
had
access
to
the
rear
parking,
so
they
were
able
to
rent
the
property
without
having
to
come
to
the
DeBoer,
with
the
desire
for
zoning
for
variance
that
was
not
miss.
Hanson
situation,
she's
not
set
up
where
she's
able
to
have
a
double
driveway
to
get
two
tenants
in
there.
L
So
there's
already
a
precedent
set
in
the
neighborhood
for
for
some
rental
situations
and
again
this
is
on
a
limited
basis
up
to
two
tenants
again
her
desires
to
have
one
there,
but
actually
the
tenant.
That
she's
been
into
discussions
with
again
is
a
follow.
You,
professor
of
marketing,
I,
believe
who
be
there
about
half
the
week,
so
I
think
some
of
the
concerns
that
were
from
oh
six
would
be
addressed
with
this
more
limited
variance.
In
addition,.
L
Careful
watch
over
all
the
houses
in
the
zone,
all
the
neighbors
in
the
neighborhood
receive
notice
of
this
hearing.
The
neighbor
Association
received
note
to
the
end,
and
at
this
point
there's
nobody
here
speaking
in
opposition
I
can't
take
that
in
that
they
don't
have
a
problem
with
her
writing
it
to
two
people,
since
it
won't
have
an
impact
on
public
parking,
it
won't
be
an
eyesore
you
won't
have
so
as
far
as
having
far
to
park
here,
they're
everywhere,
as
I
believe.
The
concerns
from
2006
have
been
adequately
addressed
in
more
limited
variants.
Applause.
I
A
A
I
C
I
I
C
I
A
I
B
B
C
I
B
I
B
F
C
B
Possibility,
although
it's
not
guaranteed,
is
if
she
does
and
she
says
and
comes
back
here
to
live
it's
possible.
She
may
want
to
renew
to
the
rental
per
minute,
but
it's
also
possible
she'll.
Let
it
lapse
which
it
does
lapse
for
a
period
of
the
year.
Then
all
the
your
variances
and
temporaries
stuff
go
out
the
window.
Whoever
is
there
whether
it's
her
the
next
owner
has
to
come
back
again
if
they
wanted,
rather
for.
A
A
new
rental
permit,
but
the
variance
permitting
stacked
parking
would
stay
in
effect
forever
yeah,
but
she
would
still
she
would
have
to
come
back
for
a
rental
permit
she
or
she
or
whoever
the
rental
permit.
What
would
what
would
prevent
a
rental
permit
of
for
two
people
if
she
had
all
the
everything
that
she
needed?
She'd
have
her
variance
for
parking.
There
would
be
nothing
to
prevent.
F
A
F
A
I
We
know
why,
because
if
you
have
more
than
one
tenant
and
try
the
name
of
the
cause
right
and
presumably
the
parking
laws
have
changed
since
West
Bay
a
place
or
whatever
its
name
is,
was
built
because
as
it
was
built
and
then
our
three
you
shouldn't
have
been
able
to
have
sat
on
any
circumstances
right.
It's
our
three.
So.
B
Projects
it's
private
homes
doesn't
only
have
to
do
that.
Okay,
the
other
thing
that
can
be
argued-
this
is
just
my
opinion-
is
that
when
the
parking
law
concerning
stacking
was
written
I,
everybody
understands
why
you
would
not
want
that
parking
for
a
duplex,
triplex
or
even
a
big
Ruby
pals.
Okay,.
J
B
Don't
know
I,
don't
know
whether
is
for
uniformity
of
the
parking
ordinance
or
for
whatever,
but
is,
if
that's
just
the
one
thing
to
in
my
personal
opinion,
seems
imperfect
about
the
changes
in
the
parking
codes.
They
lumped
a
single-family
home
with
three
people
in
it
with
all
the
other
uses
that
are
possible
in
an
r3,
in
my
opinion,
that
a
single
home
three
people
or
less
in
it
that's
allowed
stack
parking.
Artoo
is
not
going
to
be
any
different
of
the
use
in
in
r3,
but
that.
A
C
M
F
A
A
B
L
My
grade
is
concerned
with
discussing
it
as
a
temporary
use
permit,
rather
than
the
variance
variance
is
requested.
All
the
time
they're
granted
frequently
on
parking
situations
now,
looking
at
the
code
for
this
to
work
out
as
a
temporary
permit,
which
again
there's
going
to
be
difficulties,
handling
that
because
of
her
inability
or
difficulty
in
returning
to
request
the
renewal.
L
But
the
greatest
difficulty
is
the
36
36
month
limit
on
it
to
address
some
of
the
question
that
what
happened
before
was
the
temporary
permit
was
granted
2006.
It
ran
through
2000
through
that
school
year,
the
Oh
607
school
year,
at
which
time
miss
Hanson,
returned
to
the
area
that
reach
of
the
property
has
owner-occupied.
She
resided
there
for
that's
the
o-72
an
eight
school
year
and
now
moved
on
to
her
residency.
Once
she
returned
to
reoccupy
the
house
as
owner
occupied,
she
didn't
renew
the
permit
the
temporary
permit,
because
there
was
no
need
to.
L
She
wasn't
renting
it
not
for
her
to
try
to
address
the
situation
with
a
temporary
permit,
once
she'd
have
to
find
some
way
to
return
every
year
to
renew
the
permit
to
after
that
36
month.
Period.
To
then
need
to
come
back
to
the
zoning
board
and
find
some
new
temporary
permit,
because
if
she
wanted
again
to
try
for
that
same
exact
permit-
and
my
reading
of
the
law
would
prevent
her
from
doing
so
because
of
have
a
permit
for
long
within
36
months,
so
that
to
be
almost
a
brand-new
permit
similar
to.
L
If
somebody
comes
to
the
board,
with
a
variance
request
which
is
denied
that
they
would
have
to
wait
a
year
to
present
that
one
or
at
least
substantially
change
it
presented
again
to
the
board
so
for
her
to
seek
a
fourth
year
of
permit,
you'd
have
to
substantially
change
that
permit,
request
and
I
at
this
point
in
time.
Don't
know
how
she
could
change
it,
so
they
fit
significantly
enough
to
get
what
she
needs
out
the
situation
and
still
be
allowed
to
get
a
permit.
L
You
understand
there's
some
concern
about
having
a
variance
attached
to
a
property.
Again,
this
is
a
fairly
minimal
variance.
It's
less
than
the
permitted
the
permitted
number
that
you
could
have
in
the
zone.
That's
three
she's
asking
for
two.
You
know
every
time
the
variance
comes
up
for
the
Zoning
Board
that
that's
an
issue
that
it's
going
to
be
a
permanent
situation,
the
sine
case
earlier
today.
That's
a
permanent
situation
with
the
building,
so
I,
don't
think
that
should
be
the
end-all,
be-all.
L
I
think
that
she
does
meet
the
requirements
for
the
variance
you
know
she
can't
there's
no
way
that
she
can
get
additional
sleep
standing
parking
on
that
lot.
She
can't
rent
it
out.
So
the
only
way
to
use
that
property
of
anyway
is
to
get
a
variance
either
stack
parking
for
allow
one
tenant
in
that
situation.
110,
instead
of
and
therefore
one
parking
spot,
either
way
to
use
that
variance
or
to
use
the
property
at
all.
L
She'd
need
a
variance
of
some
sort
that
would
attach
so
I
think
there
are
unique
circumstances
that
have
given
the
nature
of
the
property.
The
nature
of
the
restrictions
on
the
on
the
property-
that's
no
detriment
again.
That's
viewed
by
the
fact
that
there
are
no
complaints
in
the
year
that
she
was
using
it
as
the
temporary
permit
and
that
there's
no
no
residents
or
no
representatives
of
the
homeowners
association
here
to
contest
it.
It's
a
minimal
variance
and
I
think
that
she,
you
know,
meets
the
requirements
for
variance
I.
L
L
L
F
L
Was
to
write
to
one
person
I
advised
her
to
put
down,
because
that's
the
minimum
number
of
parking
spaces
you
have
to
have
on
any
rental
property,
so
alternate.
What
would
have
been
to
come
to
the
board,
with
a
zoning
request
of
one
parking
spot
for
one
tenant
need
either
way,
that's
a
variance
that
runs
at
the
property
and
allows
for
rental.
L
C
M
I
A
A
To
permit
conversion
of
a
single-family
attached
drilling
to
rental,
yet
the
rental
purposes
for
two
unrelated
persons
for
two
parking
spaces
exists
in
a
minimum
of
two
or
one
per
committed.
Occupant
is
required
and
section
2300
801
a
to
permanent
access
to
only
one
parking
space
for
access
to
all
parking
spaces
is
required
and
that
it
was
the
motion
for
the
variance
and
I
presume
well.
I,
don't
presume
I
see
that
it
was
because
they
could
find
for
none
of
the
findings.
There
was
no
hardship
and
difficulty
that
was
specific
to
the
property.
A
I
A
I
A
A
A
parking,
but
it's
the
comment:
it's
it's
it's
the
way
the
agreement
crosses
up
with
these
athens
city
code.
That
presents
the
problem
because
the
the
people
who
framed
the
deed
restrictions
do
not
didn't
intend
to
restrict
them
from
having
three
unrelated
tenants.
But
the
way
the
athens
city
code
is
written
effectively
denies
them
that
ability
in
this
particular
zone
well.
L
L
Under
extreme
circumstance,
the
hardship
is,
she
can't
use
the
property
in
any
way,
shape
or
form
at
this
point
other
than
her
herself
residing
there,
and
that's
not
an
option
at
this
point
to
it
and
then
the
option
selling
it
that's
not
making
reasonable
use
of
the
property,
then
disposing
of
the
property
yeah.
Exactly
so.
L
At
this
point,
the
only
reasonable
use
that
she
couldn't
expect
to
make
of
it
is
to
rent
it
on
a
limited
basis,
and
that
again
is
requesting
a
rental
situation
less
than
the
total
that
she
could
be
requesting
indicating
a
minimal
variance
request.
Again.
This
is
situation
she's
asking
for
if
she
rents
it
to
one
family
man,
one
family
of,
say
two
adults:
okay
she'd
still
need
to
have
two
parking
spaces,
regardless
of
that
you're
still
gonna
have
situations
back
and
forth.
L
You
know
if
she
could
sell
it
to
a
couple
who
resided
it
as
owner-occupied
they're,
gonna
staff
parking.
You
know
if
there's
two
adults,
they're
gonna
be
pulled
back
and
forth
the
same
as
she
would
have
in
a
rental
situation.
So
it's
not
adding
an
undue
hardship
on
the
community,
allowing
her
to
rent
in
the
situation
would
be
giving
her.
The
equal
rights
of
those
other
people
who
were
more
fortunate
in
the
parking
situation
should
be
allowed
to
rent
this.
L
Without
so
either
sits
vacant
or
she
sells
it
and
again,
that's
not
making
reasonable
use
of
the
property
I
think
making
it
have
to
be
done
through
attempt.
Permit
is
making
a
relatively
simple
situation
exponentially
more
complex
again
with
her
difficulty
in
returning
for
the
renewal
process
and
then
after
the
36
months,
trying
to
find
a
new
permit
request
that
would
allow
for
a
one
year
span
now,
I
represent
her
by
contract
to
the
Center
for
student
legal
services.
L
At
the
time
that
this
situation
arose,
she
was
a
student
at
Ohio
University,
so
is
privy
to
their
services
and
that's
how
I
represent
her
in
this
situation.
My
representation
of
her
ends
at
the
end
of
this
year,
so
she'll
need
to
find
new
representation
or
she
would
need
to
appear
on
her
own,
which
again,
it's
difficult
for
her
due
to
the
nature
of
what
she's
going
through
at
the
moment,
so
I
think
making
it
be
a
temporary
permit
exponentially
complicates
it
rather
than
giving
a
variance
for
staff
parking
for
two
people
in
the
situation.
A
I
J
A
Strikes
me
as
creating
a
heart:
it's
big
we're
creating
a
hardship
if
we
set
it
up
in
such
a
way
that
the
only
thing
she
can
do
is
to
sell
her
property
I
think,
actually
it
might
even
really,
but
because
it's
reasonable
for
a
person
who
owns
a
property
to
be
able
to
either
occupy
it
or
rent
it.
If
you
have
the
proper.
J
J
A
C
D
I
C
I
M
D
I
C
J
A
Exceptional
in
one
not
entirely,
there
are
other
apartments
that
are
built
in
the
way
that
hers
is,
but
there
are
also
others
in
the
same
area
that
are
built
with
more
parking,
and
there
appear
anyway
to
be
some
people.
Who've
created
parking
in
a
rather
unsightly
way,
but
you
saw
something
that
had
been
created
so
her
mystics
is.
It
is
different
from
those
anyway
in
that
she
has
none
and
some
others
in
the
same
neighborhood
do
have
her.
A
Her
building
is
different
from
some
other
buildings,
I
think
that
makes
it
exceptional,
but
I
guess
we'd
have
to
get
out
the
dictionary
figure
out.
What
exactly
exceptional
means
then,
but
I
think
it's,
except
for
the
fact
that
her
building
has
no
parking.
It's
the
same
as
buildings
that
do
have
parking.
A
A
A
She
said,
but
okay,
now
I'm
out
of
a
general
nature,
Oh
absence
of
detriment
would
granting
the
variance
be
a
substantial
detriment
to
adjacent
properties
and
would
have
materially
impair
the
purposes
of
the
code
of
public
interest
purposes
of
the
code
and
public
interest
are
to
keep
people
from
parking
on
the
street
right.
Mm-Hmm.
C
A
A
M
I
A
I
A
There,
it
is,
it
is
case,
number
Oh,
8,
1,
8,
v,
4
4
Evans
are
on
Rebecca
Gavin
is
the
appellant
requesting
variances
from
2008
Oh
1a
and
2300
401
B
2
2
provement
expansion
of
an
existing
vehicular
state
access
driveway
of
approximately
40
feet,
which
approximately
60
feet
where
20
feet
is
permitted
maximum
and
to
permit
the
parkings
created
by
the
expansion
to
be
used
on
another
lot
for
parking
on.
A
lot
is
only
for
the
exclusive
use
of
the
residents
and.
B
B
As
I
said
a
familia
meaning
to
your
provided,
a
copy
of
the
plan
of
where
they
intend
proposed
to
put
the
parking
spaces,
which
is
slightly
uphill
towards
Franklin
Avenue
for
the
current
parking
rates,
this
is
a
rather
unique
building.
It
used
to
be
attached
to
two
2016
State
Street
in
the
50s
and
60s
that
whole
complex.
There
was
owned
by
mcbeatty
and
it
was
a
guest
house
business
guest
house
where
businessmen
would
come
in
from
the
bees
for
conferences
and
stuff
and
stay
there.
B
This
is
about
the
only
place
that
you
could
do
it
as
far
as
if
this
proposed
parking
is
put
in.
Will
it
be
taking
out
any
street
parking
by
my
measurements
that
it
probably
take
out
one
possibly
two,
but
there
is
a
yellow
line
coming
up
from
the
existing
parking
that
that
cuts
off
some
of
that.
So,
in
my
opinion,
I,
don't
think
it
cut
off
any
more
than
one
street
parking
place.
J
B
If
you
wanted
to
say,
if
that
open
space
in
a
16
foot
setback,
could
they
park
there,
the
rules
are
legal
parking.
Space
has
to
be
a
180
square
feet
and
it
has
to
be
at
least
nine
feet
wide,
so
mine
by
2010,
by
18
12
by
15
I
mean
if
you
have
short
enough
cars
who
technically
they
could
be
considered
legal
parking
spaces,
but
12
by
15
shape
parking
space
is
probably
not
too
practical
right.
B
A
N
The
Jesse
Robbins
one
I'm
Rebecca
Galvin,
currently
residing
at
2403
Middlesex
Drive
in
Toledo,
Ohio
I,
believe
you
have
our
home
address.
I
may
have
put
business
address
on
there,
which
would
be
3209,
Sylvania
Avenue,
former
resident
of
Athens
I
did
take
some
photographs
today.
If
I
may
show
them,
they
may
help
illustrate
for
you,
because
when
I
did
my
drawing
I
did
the
drawing
only
at
four
Evans
I
didn't
do
it
of
the
whole
lot,
which
includes
2:36
and
to
Evans.
So.
N
I
N
N
We
understand
that
we
could
do
student
rental,
but
it
has
been
our
preference
because
those
are
such
nice
units,
they
they
all,
have
living
room,
formal
dining
rooms,
eat-in
kitchen
fireplace
three
bedrooms:
one
bath
with
a
sort
of
a
half
bath
in
the
basement.
We
have
rented
them
to
families
to
faculty,
and
that's
all
we've
ever
had
in
there
and
my
mother
and
stepfather
Mary
and
Roger
Pedigo
used
to
live
at
four
Evans.
N
F
N
N
There
are
four
individual
garages.
The
house
was
built,
my
understanding
around
1925,
so
those
garages
are
pretty
narrow
and
well.
One
of
them
is
very
er.
Two
of
them
are
very
short
and
then
the
third
and
the
fourth
one
are
a
little
bit
longer
a
little
bit
deeper
for
a
larger
car
to
get
in,
but
it
has
caused
a
little
bit
of
problem
for
some
of
our
tenants.
You
know
if
they
have
families
and
they
have
an
SUV
or
if
they
have
a
more
of
a
sedan
type
car.
N
They
can't
get
their
car
in
the
garage,
so
they
use
those
garages
to
store
their
belongings.
They
park
their
smallest
car
outside
the
garage
door
and
then
with
their
second
car.
They
park
on
Evans
and
perpendicular
to
their
car
and
block
it
in,
and
you
know,
that's
kind
of
it's
an
illegal
situation
there,
but
they
have
done
it
and
they've
not
had
any
problem.
I
mean
the
police,
don't
don't
find
them
for
that.
N
Whichever
you
know
you
would
prefer
so
that
we
can
get
it
to
spots
to
parking
spots,
to
keep
people
off
the
street,
because
that's
there
either
parking
further
down
on
Evans
toward
East,
eighth
Street
or
they
go
over
and
they
park
on
Elmwood
and
walk
across,
and
we
have
had
a
couple
situations
in
the
past
where
it's
been
husband
and
wife
faculty
members
and
they
have
teenage
children
or
a
teenage
child.
Who
also
has
a
car.
N
So
that
gives
them
three
cars
and
it
creates-
and
it
just
creates
a
real
parking
issue
there,
because
one
car
always
has
to
be
over
either
on
East,
8th
Street
up
a
little
farther
where
there
is
parking
allowed
or
they
have
to
go
over
to
Elmwood
and
as
far
as
it's
saying
that
the
parking
on
that
lot
is
for
for
Evans.
Only.
That
was
the
misunderstanding
from
my
drawing
that
that
is
one
lot
for
all
three
units.
So
it's
through
that
yard,
space
and
parking
space
is
usable
for
all
three
of
those
units.
N
C
N
N
Overnight,
company
they've,
you
know
they
perk
somebody
else
in
and
then
we
got
a
call
or
my
mother
who
manages
the
property.
Mary
Pedigo
gets
a
call
in
the
middle
of
the
night.
I
can't
get
my
car
out
because
somebody
parked
me
in
and
they
don't
know
which
unit
it
was
from.
So
it
would
just
decrease
congestion,
I
think
on
the
street,
as
well
as
on
that
piece
of
property
and.
F
N
A
N
No
but
berries
have
two
cars
and
currently
that
we
are
renting
to
two
single
professors.
So
there
is
only
one
car
per,
but
the
lady
at
2:36
has
I
believe
that's
her
Jeep,
Grand,
Cherokee
or
whatever.
That
is
in
that
one
picture,
she's
parked
down
beside
her
unit
because
her
car's
a
little
too
long
to
get
in
in
the
little
spot
outside
her
garage
door
and
the
she
has
one
of
the
short
garages,
because
there
is
a
utility
room
at
the
end
of
her
garage
for
her
apartment
or
for
apartment
number.
N
Four
in
her
three
excuse
me:
I'm
confused
is
just
a
lot
of
congestion.
Our
daughter
at
one
point
our
oldest
daughter,
lived
at
2:36,
and
even
she
and
her
husband
ran
into
that
kind
of
problem.
They
ended
up
parking
one
car
right
beside
236
on
Evans
and
the
other
one
back
end
back
in
the
garage
under
for
Evans.
A
A
A
J
Grant
a
variance
to
for
Evans
Street
from
section
twenty
three
point:
zero.
Eight
point:
zero
one:
a
in
twenty
three
point:
zero
four
point:
zero
one
B
to
to
perm
in
expansion
of
an
existing
vehicular
Street
access,
driveway
of
approximately
40
feet
to
approximately
sixty
feet.
Where
twenty
feet
is
the
permitted
maximum
intimate
permit
parking
created
by
the
expansion
to
be
used
on
another
line
where
parking
on
a
lot
is
only
for
the
exclusive
use
of
the
residence.
I
I
D
A
K
A
A
C
A
F
A
A
C
D
A
A
C
A
A
Absence
of
detriment
would
granting
the
variance
be
of
substantial
detriment
to
adjacent
properties.
I
can't
see
how
it
could
it's
gonna
provide
an
additional
parking
place,
taking
one
more
car
off
the
street
and
that's
not
going
to
impair
the
purposes
of
the
code
of
public
interest.
It's
actually
serving
the
code
and
the
Public
Interest,
because
the
objective
is
to
get
people
off
this
off
street
parking.
So
disagree
on
that
one,
not
a
general
nature,
is
it
of
a
general
nature.
A
A
I
M
B
I,
don't
have
much
of
a
thing
to
add
I'm
sure
mr.
Jones
can
cover
most
you're
just
reminding
the
board
that
again,
this
is
the
substitution
and
therefore
don't
have
to
go
through
if
you
gets
that
point
you're
not
to
go
through
the
findings,
and
we
just
have
to
make
a
motion
and
discuss
amongst
ourselves.
If
you
think
it's
more
objectionable
or
not
more
objectionable.
Mr.
Jones's
plant.
A
C
B
B
A
O
Shawn
Jones
10,
misty,
Linda,
Plains
and
I
have
been
previously
smaller.
Thank
you,
hi
I
was
here.
I
guess
was
back
in
April
couple
months
ago
and
the
time
the
United
bearings
from
that
I
was
discussing
it
with
somebody.
You
know
he
said
that
I
did
it
backwards,
so
I
went
back
and
talked
to
Steve
about
it.
It
Steve
said
well.
He
admitted
that
he
said
probably
made
a
mistake
in
that.
O
Well,
he
should
have
known
as
we
should
have
gone
from
substitution
first
and
then
Astro
variance
that
was
denied
and
so
under
the
provision
of
substitution.
This
would
work
well
in
that
he
asked
for
it
and
he
was
specifically
mentioned
that
I
guess
was
a
jaxxed
over
that
had
asked
for
substitutions.
They
said
it's
actually.
In
our
situation,
a
little
more
makes
a
little
more
sense
to
ask
for
a
substitution
and
a
variance
because
oh
you're
staying
the
footprints.
O
O
The
house
was
really
due
for
it
and
also
it's
brought
up
that
I
get
some
trooping
housing
on
the
West
End
and
specifically,
in
that
long
term,
plan
that
the
city
commissioned,
and
so
you
know,
here's
somebody's
willing
to
spend
big
bucks
to
renovate
a
house
on
that
side
of
town
and
do
some
major
improvement
for
it.
We're
not
required
to
in
any
way
I'm
just
like,
like
I,
say,
improves
that
house
hopefully
get
better
tenants
and
and
trying
to
keep
that
neighborhood
up.
I.
A
O
Okay,
well,
what
seven
buyer
Street
is
it's
a
it's
a
small
two-bedroom
house
and
when
I
bought
it
maybe
15
years
ago,
we
did
the
kind
of
a
minor
renovation
to
them.
We
we
insulated,
put
in
new
windows
rewired
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
nothing's
really
been
done
to
it
for
that's
15
years,
so
in
the
tents
were
complaining
about
the
roof
leaking.
So
when
we
went
up
to
the
attic
to
try
to
find
the
leak,
we
sort
of
discovered
I
suppose
that
the
entire
attic
was
a
giant
open
space.
O
So
I
occurred
to
us
that
it
made
more
sense,
since
that
helps
to
do
for
a
renovation
to
go
ahead
and
try
to
use
that
space.
The
bathroom
in
this
this
house
is
just
absolutely
tiny
and
a
sigh
just
sort
of
tacked
on
ports
and
something
stuck
on
there.
You
know
who
knows
how
long
we
go
yeah,
that's
not
just
it's
always
wet
and
just
really
cramped
and
everything.
O
So
we
would
like
to
do
we'd
like
to
take
the
bathroom
out
of
there
move
it
to
where,
when
the
bedrooms
is
and
then
move
when
the
bedrooms
upstairs
and
in
the
process
of
renovating
this
house,
every
time
we
try
to
redo
a
house,
we
try
to
completely
very
insulate
it
and
do
it
right.
Well,
we're
up
in
the
attic
of
rafters
in
this
thing
are
pretty
randomly
spaced
and
crooked.
So
we'd
like
to
take
the
whole
top
of
house
off
and
replace
it
with
a
new
truss
system.
What
will
happen
is
this?
O
The
pitch
of
the
roof
will
change
slightly.
It's
changed
right
now,
it's
something
like
seven
to
twelve
and
we
want
to
go
to
a
twelve
twelve,
which
would
give
it
a
little
more
room
in
the
Attic
for
the
bedroom
and
with
the
new
trust.
That's
in
everything.
Hopefully
we
can
get
everything
nice
and
straight
and
insulate
it
well,
and
the
only
thing
that's
really
going
to
change
from
the
outside
appearance.
The
house
is,
the
roof,
will
be
I.
O
J
O
O
I
I
O
I
O
O
C
At
the
house
and
I
went
all
the
way
around,
they
don't
seem
to
me
to
be
beyond
renovation.
I
mean
it's,
the
foundation
is
still
the
old
tractor,
oven
and
sightings.
You
know
I'm
there
can
you
still
get
away
that
to
be
structurally
sound
or
ever
and
the
roof
already
to
me
something
look
like
being
to
a
flop
pitch
almost
so
it's
so
it's
not
gonna.
O
J
J
O
Your
no
we
have
to
stabilize
it
first,
but
will
will
stay,
will
go
into
there
well
stabilize
it,
but
there's
only
so
much
we
can
do
without
tearing
up
the
city
ball.
The
city
doesn't
want
us
to
tear
up
their
wall,
so
we're
kind
of
stuck
until
I
took
the
wall
gets
worse.
Essentially
so
now
one
of
the
problems
of
that
house
and
I
think
it's
caused
the
problem
with
both
that
wall
in
the
corner
houses.
It
has
those
built-in
gutters
those
Melrose
have,
and
they
never
really
work
very
well.
O
I
O
O
A
A
O
J
O
I
F
A
J
B
B
F
A
Well,
the
letter
that
they
came
from
Suzanne
slow
says
that
Shawn
Jones
has
shared
with
me
the
plans
for
changes
at
seven
Byard
Street.
As
a
concerned,
neighbor
I'm
compelled
to
write
to
his
support,
I
owned
and
occupied
the
house
at
21
Pratt.
Oh
I
believe
that
Shawn
is
right
in
his
assertion
that
an
icer
property
of
Allah
to
protect
nicer,
tenants,
I
own
and
occupy
the
house
at
21,
Pratt
Street
and
my
backyard
shares
a
property
line
with
the
backyard
of
seven
fire.
A
Most
of
the
surrounding
houses
are
owner
occupied
and
it
shows
in
the
level
of
care
for
the
homes
and
respect
to
the
neighbors
when
the
tenants
at
seven
Byard
are
not
respectful
of
the
property
in
the
neighborhood.
It
affects
me
and
my
family,
as
well
as
surrounding
neighbors,
by
creating
an
eyesore
of
unattended,
garbage
and
obnoxious
parties.
A
On
the
other
hand,
Shawn's
rental
house
on
the
same
property,
23
Pratt,
is
obviously
well
cared
for
by
the
tenants
and
I
know
from
talking
with
them
that
they
appreciate
the
comfort
of
the
house
and
the
renovations
that
have
been
done.
There
I've
respect
for
shot
as
the
landlord
because
of
that,
and
they
in
turn
have
pride
in
the
name
in
the
property
and
neighborhood
I
believe
Shawn
is
genuine.
It
is
interested
in
proving
the
neighborhood
by
improving
his
property.
A
This
is
obvious
and
effect
he's
not
proposing
to
increase
the
number
of
bedrooms
or
tenants,
but
only
to
improve
the
comfort
of
the
carpet
print
and
the
quality
of
the
home
structure.
These
seriously
consider
Shawn's
application,
sincerely
cévennes
low.
So
just
that's
the
one
in
support
I
see
no
one
here
wanting
to
speak
in
general
comment
or
against,
and
so,
unless
you
have
something
further
you'd
like
to
say,
I,
think
we're
going
to
close
the
commentary
from
the
floor
and
I'm
going
to
have
somebody
make
a
proposal
for
a.
A
K
Move
that
we
grant
a
request
for
a
substitution
of
a
non-conforming
use
for
a
not
more
objectionable,
non-conforming
use,
specifically
to
permit
renovations
to
an
existing
structure
in
a
non-conforming
situation.
Two
structures
on
one
lock
were
only
one
is
permitted,
that
would
add
a
new
bedroom
and
bath
area
and
renovate
an
existing
bath
area.
I
M
A
F
I
A
I
A
C
I
J
A
A
A
A
A
F
A
F
B
A
Work
all
right.
Thank
you
very
much,
I
think,
mr.
agro,
you
have
now
yeah,
but
do
you
think
you
are
it's
appropriate
you
shanghaied
now
a
full
member,
even
though
you
are
going
to
be
abroad
for
a
while,
but
we
still
need
two
additional
alternates,
and
this
is
for
someone
to
please
contact
the
mayor's
office
and
say
a
police
should
be
to
do
this.
Thank.