►
Description
City of Bend Neighborhood Leadership Alliance Meeting for Tuesday, June 9, 2020 at 4:00 PM.
A
B
C
D
A
E
F
I
J
I
A
A
E
J
I
A
B
K
K
F
K
I
F
F
B
L
So
this
table,
so
the
the
green
is
stuff
we're
trying
to
get
done
this
summer.
Southeast
15th
is
completed.
We're
getting
some
good
positive
feedback
for
that.
Hopefully
works
for
neighborhood
is
is
okay
with
that
Harmon
crosswalk
construction
starts
in
a
couple
weeks
or
within
the
week
they're
working
on
Milwaukee
right
around
the
corner,
so
they're
going
to
start
that
one
soon
Jones
is
about
to
be
bid.
L
So
we
should
be
able
to
get
that
this
later,
this
summer
fall
before
the
snow
flies.
Wells
acres,
we're
working
on
finalizing
plans
we're
trying
to
get
that
constructed
in
time
for
school.
So
one
of
the
things
I'm
working
on
right
now
is
a
quick
bid
for
the
islands,
so
I'm
gonna
send
that
out
to
a
group
of
contractors
and
they're
gonna,
give
me
a
price
quote
and
then
I'm
meeting
with
our
streets
guys
they
will
be
able
to
get
it
signed
and
striped
before
school.
L
They
saw
the
value
and
adding
the
bike
lanes,
but
they
were
concerned
that
their
convenient
parking
would
be.
You
know
like
a
couple
houses
away
on
on
the
side
street
and
they
have
a
boat
and
things
like
that,
and
they
thought
it
would
be
a
little
bit
much
for
them
to
juggle.
It
seems
like
it's
a
multi-generational
family
that
lives
there.
So
there's
definitely
a
number
of
cars.
We
could
add
the
on
street
parking
and
this
if
you
go
to
the
next
slide
one.
L
L
L
We
can
get
anywhere
between
16
and
18
parking
spaces.
If
we
do
that,
I
think
Franklin's
working,
fine,
I
reviewed
it
in
the
field
yesterday
and
there's
just
a
little
bit
of
a
braiding
of
the
markers
for
the
parking
just
a
tiny
bit,
but
the
bike
lanes
were
fine,
and
so,
if
you
guys
want
that,
I
can
add
that
to
the
project.
L
A
L
L
We've
got
a
couple
things
to
check,
but
we
think
there's
a
transformer
that's
closed,
so
we
won't
have
to.
If,
if
that
transformer
has
room,
we
will
be
able
to
have
a
pretty
affordable
power
system.
We
just
have
to
trench
two
blocks
to
get
the
conduit
in
for
a
lamp,
because
I
was
most
worried
about
the
cost
for
the
lamp,
but
I
think
that's
gonna
come
in.
Okay,
we've
budgeted
eighty,
some
thousand
eighty
one
thousand
for
this
project.
L
M
L
E
L
J
L
E
L
This
would
this
would
continue
that
and
I.
We
can't
swing
it
further
west
into
this
curve,
because
when
vehicles
turn
they
take
up
more
room
than
when
they're
going
straight
and
that's
too
tight
of
a
cross-section
to
run
through
the
curves.
So
we
could
only
do
it
for
this.
You
know
half
block
right
here
and
my.
E
L
I
agree,
and
it
it
it
it
doesn't.
It
has
a
great
entry.
You
know
you
could
do
a
painted
curb
extension,
just
like
we
did
at
Broadway
right
at
weeping
willow,
but
it
does
not
have
a
real
strong
way
to
end
it,
because,
usually
you
would
end
it
at
an
intersection,
and
it's
really
easy
and
obvious.
This
would
just
kind
of
have
a
change
in
paint.
I
I'm
I'm
not
super,
confident
that
it
would
work
great.
So
if
you
guys
want
to
make
a
recommendation
that
we
don't
do
it
I,
would
you
come
forth
Oh.
N
J
J
N
L
A
Robin
to
your
question
about
recommendation,
it's
only
I,
guess,
I'm
hearing
two
voices
of
concern-
that's
obviously
speaking
on
behalf
of
the
residents
and
I'm
speaking
to
just
the
budget
piece
of
this,
because
it
is
a
bit
beyond
the
scope,
usable
project
and
if
we
have,
if
things
continue
to
come
in
favorable
I'm
excited
about
the
product.
The
possibility
excuse
me
of
doing
an
additional
project
rather
than
enhancing
this
one.
That
would
be
my
input.
I,
don't
know
what
you
need
from
an
early
formally,
but
that
would
be
my
imprint
yeah.
A
L
C
K
C
L
Intersection
is
pretty
good
right
now,
I
feel
like
what
needs
to
happen
is
the
intersection
at
the
parkway
needs
to
be
adjusted
and
we've
been
working
with
ODOT
on
designs
for
that
to
reduce
the
speeds,
as
they
come
off
of
the
parkway,
so
that
there's
that
transfer
from
going
you
know
45
to
50
or
a
little
bit
faster
on
the
parkway
to
this
25
and
and
it
needs
to
have
a
little
bit
more
of
a
transition
right
at
that
intersection.
So
we've
been
working
with
or
not
on
that.
Thank.
C
J
J
L
Most
people
wanted
it
on
the
east
side
and
I
did
my
field
review
with
ppl
and
it
looks
like
it's
gonna
be
very
straightforward
to
get
that
eliminated,
so
we're
gonna
move
ahead
with
design
of
that
one
and
it's
I'm
bundling
it
with
the
Sizemore
sidewalks.
So
that's
gonna
be
very
Smith
and
we
should
be
able
to
get
that
out
to
bed
next
spring
Campbell
Road.
G
K
L
Great
ARCA
in
peril,
the
city
has
hired
someone
to
go
out
and
grind
three-d--
market
at
Admiral
and
Reed
market
at
5th,
and
the
city
will
be
able
to
go
in
and
in
lay
the
crosswalk
markings
we
should
be
able
to
get
that
done
soon
and
then
read
lean,
we're
still
working
on
plans,
so
it's
probably
gonna
be
some
City
and
some
bid
so
that
one's
pretty
straightforward.
It's
gonna,
look
very
similar
to
what's
out
on
southeast
15
and
have
a
marked
crosswalk
with
an
island.
B
B
K
B
O
O
O
A
O
P
Okay,
so
my
name
is
Emily
I'm,
the
legal
intern
here
this
summer,
I'm
going
to
start
off
with
a
little
bit
of
the
legal
background
for
how
Havel's,
Bend
and
other
small
local
governments
are
able
to
address
more
aerialists
facility
sites
and
then
once
I
touch
on
that
Colin's
gonna
come
in
and
talk
about
how
been
particularly
handles
things
and
then,
hopefully
this
is
clear
and
you
guys
learn
a
lot.
Okay,
just
a
little
bit
of
background
information
on
a
little
bit
of
the
technology
behind
cellular
networks.
P
P
So
for
3G
and
4G,
you
see
those
big
sort
of
stereotypical
towers
and
Bend
there's
the
picture
of
it
on
the
side
right
there.
You
can
kind
of
see
the
the
big
monopole
that's
disguised
as
and
a
fir-tree,
perhaps
not
terribly
convincingly,
but
for
5g.
What
they're
deploying
5g
with
their
tiny?
Well,
not
tiny,
but
you
know
significantly
smaller
electrical
equipment,
sometimes
the
size
of
a
backpack
or
a
microwave,
that's
often
described
as
and
those
typically
go
on
top
of
existing
infrastructure.
P
P
Their
goal
is
to
get
network
service
all
across
the
United
States
as
quickly
as
possible
as
easily
as
possible
and
standardize
the
methods
with
which
those
services
get
pushed
out,
and
they
specifically
want
5g
out
as
quickly
as
possible,
because
a
lot
of
the
cool
new
technologies
that
are
gonna
be
pushed
out
in
the
next
decades
or
so
like
autonomous
vehicles
or
like
remote
medical
procedures.
Those
are
gonna
rely
on
5g,
so
they
have
a
couple
of
things
in
place
to
accomplish
this
and
I
hope
that
slide
changed
for
everyone
else
too.
P
So
the
doctrine
that
they
rely
upon
is
called
preemption,
and
this
is
it
comes
from
the
Constitution
itself,
it's
in
the
Supremacy
Clause
and
basically
the
idea
is
that
when
the
federal
government
creates
a
law
that
conflicts,
the
state
level
or
local
level
laws,
the
federal
law
must
be
followed
instead.
So
if
they
overlap
sir
conflicts
in
any
way,
you
got
to
do
what
the
feds
say.
So,
in
this
case,
until
the
communications
context,
the
feds
have
passed
an
act
called
the
Telecommunications
Act
of
1996.
P
So
it's
it's
pretty
old
at
this
point,
but
it
has
a
lot
of
bear
over
the
situation
and
it
preempts
what
local
governments
can
do
in
how
they
regulate
insight.
Telecommunications
facilities.
In
these
specific
ways
here
you
can
read
those
bullet
points.
The
point
is
to
standardize
and
to
deregulate
the
permitting
processes,
so
these
cellular
companies
can
come
in
and
get
as
many
tappers
out
as
quickly
as
possible,
and
so
local
governments.
This
act
cannot
outright
ban
or
prohibit
facilities
or
cannot
pass
anything
that
has
the
effect
of
doing
that.
P
If
a
local
government
denies
permit,
it
must
be
in
writing
and
supported
by
substantial
evidence
must
respond
to
permit
applications
have
been
a
reasonable
amount
of
time,
and
local
governments
cannot
regulate
cell
towers
on
the
basis
of
radio
frequency
emissions
if
those
missions
are
within
federally
mandated
standards.
So
that
is
an
area
that's
really
important.
They
cannot
regulate
it
at
all
if
those
emissions
are
within
standards.
P
So
the
FCC
is
the
agency
that
sort
of
controls,
this
area
and
the
FCC
also
issues
things
called
to
court
declaratory
rulings
and
orders
that
clarify
existing
rules,
and
so
they
put
out.
You
know
many
of
these.
A
couple
of
recent
ones
clarify
when
deadlines
to
respond
they're
supposed
to
start
how
terms
should
be
interpreted
and
when
certain
procedures
are
required
and
generally
when
there's
a
conflict
between
in
what
the
industry
wants
and
what
local
government
wants.
The
FCC
is
going
to
decide
with
what
the
industry
wants.
P
However,
those
regulations
have
to
be
sourced
from
the
local
governments
existing
applicable
code,
and
what
that
means
is
that
each
each
time
the
local
government
gets
a
permit
for
one
of
these
facilities
and
is
reviewing
that
permit.
It
has
to
review
that
permit
per
its
code.
It
cannot
invent
new
regulations
each
time
and
it
has
to
apply
all
the
criteria
and
processes
that
it
has
within
its
code
if
it
doesn't
do
that,
it's
going
to
be
a
violation
of
substantial
evidence,
rule
that
you
can
see
in
the
bullet
under
Telecommunications
Act
right
there.
P
So
in
the
slide
after
this
one
I'm
going
to
show
you
a
couple
ways
that
generally
local
governments
can
regulate,
but
this
is
a
huge
caveat
that
it's
really
important
to
remember
that
each
review
process
is
so
dependent
on
the
situations
unique
and
a
specific
local
governments
code.
So
not
one
method
or
solution
is
going
to
apply
to
all
situations.
So
these
are
just
you
know,
broad
strokes,
general
ideas.
P
P
However,
with
the
caveat
that
the
applicable
code,
so
the
code
that
the
local
government
government
is
drawing
from,
has
to
allow
for
consideration
of
aesthetics
and
character
in
order
for
local
governments
to
validly
apply
those
criteria
to
its
permit
review
process,
and
in
order
to
make
you
know
valid
regulation
or
denial
or
action
upon
the
permit
based
on
aesthetics,
there
has
to
be
good
evidence
in
the
record.
So
specific.
P
You
know,
complaints
about
aesthetics,
not
just
general
complaints
about
towers
in
general
and
that
sort
of
thing,
so
it
has
to
be
specific,
in
particular
to
the
situation
at
hand,
and
there
has
to
be
an
applicable
code
to
base
it
upon.
Local
governments
can
apply
traditional
zoning
regulations
like
heightened
setback
again
as
long
as
it's
within
the
applicable
code
and
then
nuisance
conditions
which
again
you
have
to
source
from
within
the
applicable
code
and
just
to
touch
on
the
RF
emissions
again,
because
I
know
this
is
a.
Q
P
Permissions
there's
a
little
bit
of
a
chain
chain
there,
so
concerns
about
RF
emissions
are
impacting
their
property
values
and
courts
have
said.
Unfortunately,
that's
not
a
valid
basis
to
regulate
permits
on
either
so
property
values.
Cannot
you
know
you
can't
do
that
as
well?
You
can't
indirectly
regulate
a
basis
of
RF
emissions,
either
courts
can
sort
of
tell
because
they're
gonna
look
at
the
record
and
see
what
sort
of
evidence
is
there
and
whether
or
not
the
proposed
facility
would
be
located
by
a
school.
P
R
I'll,
take
it
from
here
so
good
to
see
everybody
even
in
a
virtual
format.
It's
been
a
little
while
so
I'm
explain
how
we
regulate
cell
towers
well
and
really
all
telecommunication
facilities
within
the
city
of
them
and
I
hope.
Everybody
seen
the
memo
that
was
circulated
on
the
topic.
This
recently
Emily
and
there's
three
pages
at
the
end
single-spaced
to
talk
about
how
we
do
this,
how
the
pen
development
code
works.
So
there's
a
lot
of
detail
here,
but
I'll
get
it
from
a
high
level.
R
So
chapter
3.7,
there's
a
whole
chapter,
that's
dedicated
to
the
regulation
of
wireless
communication
facilities
and
it
was
adopted
in
2011,
but
we
started
on
it
in
2009
and
before
that
we
had
some
really
antiquated
rules.
That
would
basically
just
talk
about
utilities
and
and
things
like
call
boxes
downtown.
Remember
like
the
old
call
boxes,
that's
what
we
dealt
with
and
the
code
at
that
time
didn't
even
contemplate
cell
towers.
So
we
really
started
from
scratch.
R
We
put
together
a
pretty
comprehensive
committee
with
citizens,
industry
planning,
commissioners
and
counselors
that
for
months
and
months
and
finally,
we
went
to
the
Planning
Commission
with
with
a
recommendation
the
council
in
Chapter
3.7,
in
place
for
coming
up
on
10
years.
We
did
amend
it
yeah
just
last
year
to
update
it
with
some
changes
that
had
happened
generally
and
then
also
more
specifically,
to
accommodate
the
new
5g
technology.
As
Emily
said
earlier,
it's
they're,
smaller
they're,
putting
them
on
existing
or
similar
facilities
like
a
light
like
streetlights,
and
things
like
that.
R
R
So
chapter
3.7,
what
what
we've
done
is
tree.
You
really
used
the
aesthetic
elements
of
the
different
types
of
facilities
number
one
to
define
the
facility
and
two
to
set
forth
a
review
path.
There
are
four
categories
of
facilities
you
can
see
on
the
slide
and
it's
they're
based
on
aesthetics.
In
fact,
three
at
least
three
of
the
four.
It
actually
says:
visibility
in
the
definition
of
them,
so
there's
stealth.
Those
are
really
small:
training
facilities,
low
visibility,
facilities,
moderate
visibility,
facilities
and
then
high
visibility
facilities.
R
So
off
the
top
of
my
head,
I
can't
read
the
different
definitions
right
now,
but
like
health
facility
would
be
something
we
can't
see
at
all.
Low
visibility
facility
would
be
a
small
antenna.
That's
perhaps
mounted
on
a
building.
A
moderate
visibility
facility
would
be
a
flow
tree
and
a
high
visibility
facility
would
be
just
a
mono
pine
without
any
of
camouflage
treatment
to
it
at
all.
R
You
site
your
facility
be
easier
to
review
tract,
and
so
the
converse
is
also
true
as
well,
so
the
more
the
more
visible
it
is,
the
higher
the
visibility
facility
and
the
closer
and
even
within
the
residential
districts,
more
rigorous.
The
review
track
is
so
remember.
The
type
1
review
is
the
least
rigorous.
There
is
no
notice
to
surrounding
property
owner
no
ability
to
appeal.
We
really
only
use
these
4
for
the
low
visibility
outside
of
residential
district.
R
It
could
be
in
a
potential
districts,
but
usually
there
they're
not
located
there,
but
ones
that
really
have
no
impacts
to
surrounding
property
on
them.
The
type
2
review
is
for
the
more
moderate
visibility
facilities
and
anything
that's
within
a
residential
district
or
within
500
feet
of
a
residential
district,
and
this
is
where
we
go
into
the
type
to
review,
and
this
is
the
more
standard
type
of
reviewer.
The
notice
goes
out
to
the
surrounding
property
owners.
R
So
if
there
is
any
kind
of
controversy
or
neighborhood
concern,
I'm
usually
inclined
to
send
one
of
those
to
a
public
hearing
initially
before
the
hearings
office
to
get
one
of
us
back.
There's
anyone
for
the
one,
that's
coming
up
market
and
Empire
I.
Believe
it's
going
to
be
a
mid-july
or
another
area
on
our
next
slide.
I.
R
A
Colin
Hans
Jorgensen
here
you
mentioned
a
carrot
approach,
obviously
using
aesthetics
as
your
leverage
you
incentivize,
to
have
the
least
visible
or
stealth
there'll,
be
some
physical
limitations
to
that.
But,
to
the
extent
that
we
have
control
over
defining
those
four
classes
of
visibility,
is
that
something
that
we
can
tighten
up
if
presidents
feel
strongly
the
aesthetics
is
subjective,
but
if
residents
felt
strongly
that
we
were
being
overly
lenient,
could
we
revisit
those
definitions
of
visibility
and
further
incentivize.
R
Yes,
you
can
and
used
to
expand
on
that
or
a
little
bit
more.
So
it's
it's
not
only
how
they
look,
but
but
it's
where
they're
located.
So
if
they
were
going
to
be
deepening
in
about
an
industrial
zone
anywhere
close
to
residential,
they
have
a
cleaner
path
to
to
an
approval,
same
thing
for
commercial
if
they're,
located
or
way
further
away
from
residential.
But
to
your
question:
yes,
you
can.
R
We
do
have
the
local
ability
to
define
aesthetic
breakdowns
of
what
we
would
consider
to
be
one
of
these
four
categories
or
we
can
expand
the
number
of
categories.
But
what
we
can't
do
is
create
regulations
within
that
that
would
have
the
effect
of
eliminating,
limiting
or
eliminating
the
ability
for
a
tower
to
site
where
it
needs
to
be
sited
in
order
to
meet
its.
It's
broadcasting
needs
the
technical
jargon,
but,
but
you
can't
regulate
it,
have
too
many
regulations
that
it
has
the
effect
of
banning
the
facility
to.
J
A
Were
able
to
articulate
the
effect
on
aesthetics
did
not
speak.
I
can't
speak
for
everyone,
but
I
think
that
generally,
it
would
be
understood
that
in
industrial
areas,
people
might
feel
a
little
less
conflicted
by
some
of
these
things
in
residential
areas.
It
seems
to
be
where
the
aesthetics
are
more
of
an
issue,
so
you
know
I'm
not
suggesting
you
know.
We
really
try
and
tighten
this
up
and
and
fight
the
fence,
but
it
does
seem
like
we
could.
We
could
visit
this
with
residents,
especially
in
residential
applications,.
R
O
The
hard
part
is
yes,
you,
you
have
to
look
at
the
facts
of
an
individual
case,
so
Wow
a
tower
15
years
ago.
What
they
were
building
on
a
church
steeple
might
have
had
the
ability
to
regulate,
based
on
aesthetics,
something
camouflage
today
your
ability
to
call
that
aesthetics.
The
problem
is
that
if
the
record
is
made
that
that's
not
your
real
reason
or
if
you
try
to
ban
everything
in
residential,
yes,
it's
really
hard
and
I
know
citizens
like
to
say
well
in
this
city
they
did
whatever.
O
But
you
know
one
of
the
problems
we've
had
as
Colin
said
and
then
is
that
we
have
so
many
residential
zones
that
to
start
to
try
to
really
prohibit
or
make
it
extremely
difficult
to
say
in
our
multitude
of
residential
zones.
We
talked
about
this,
whatever
sent
back
in
2009
concern
from
the
industry.
That
would
have
the
effect
of
prohibiting
them
that
attacked
when
the
technology
to
camouflage
wasn't
nearly
as
good
as
it
is
now.
O
Nor
could
they
build
a
small
of
facilities
as
they
can
build
now
now,
there's
a
lot
smaller,
more
camouflage,
so
it
does
come
back
to
what
is
your
real
reason
for
wanting?
Is
it
truly
aesthetics
and
if
so,
you
could
wrap
the
code?
You
just
have
to
recognize
that
for
many
residents
that
isn't
what
their
real
concern
is
right.
H
Yes,
so
I
guess
it's
a
question
for
Colin
about
the
process
when
we
have
something
that
fits
into
the
type
2
category
and
so
does
have
some
sort
of
a
hearing
is
realistically?
Is
there
any
possibility
of
anything
really
changing
based
on
that
hearing?
If
everything
that
is,
you
know
it's
dictated
by
the
feds
and
it's
more
or
less
meeting
all
of
the
code
requirements.
So
is
this
just
more
or
less
a
formality
to
give
people
the
opportunity
to
talk
about
that
pretty
much?
Nothing
will
happen
out
of
it.
R
Well
I
mean
you
said
something
pretty
important
in
your
question,
and
that
is
if
it
meets
the
code
requirements
and
yeah
I
mean
if
it
meets
the
code
requirements.
We
don't
have
to
approve
it
if
it
goes
to.
If
it
is
a
conditional
use
permit-
and
it
goes
through
hearings
officer,
there
is
some
discretion
in
there
about
compatibility,
but
it's
probably
going
to
be
more
related
to
the
screening,
the
height
of
the
fence,
something
related
to
ameliorating
and
some
of
the
some
of
the
effects
of
it.
H
So
in
the
case
of
the
type
2
ones,
where
you're
having
a
meeting
and
you're
not
dealing
with
any
code
variation
requests,
you're,
not
asking
for
extra
height
you're,
not
asking
for
anything
else.
What
do
you
accomplish
by
having
a
meeting?
Is
it
just
a
punitive
thing
to
help
to
encourage
them
to
make
them
nicer,
looking
or
smaller,
or
something
or
what
is
actually
being
accomplished?
H
R
Well,
they
would
have
the
neighborhood
public
meeting,
which
we
talk.
A
lot
about
the
developer
would
have
to
have
that,
but
if
it's,
this
great
type
without
a
conditional
use,
permit
that's
issued
administratively
by
staff
without
public
hearing
it
can,
if
it
were
to
go
to
a
conditional
use
permit
or
the
type
appeal.
R
R
R
It
needs
to
be
related
to
the
criteria
and,
as
you've
heard
in
this
presentation,
the
criteria
can't
be
related
to
our
Commission's,
and
we
did
a
large
amount
of
testimony
on
that
for
any
of
these,
and
so
I
think
if
people
feel
frustrated
is
because
they're
testifying
to
things
that
we
can't
face
a
decision.
So
I
would
encourage
you
to
make
sure
that
those
people
talk
to
about
this.
About
participating.
S
S
But
when
you
have
that
hearing
the
thing
that's
different
to
me
is:
it
provides
a
little
bit
more
of
a
crucible
to
test
those
great
that
make
sure
they're
established
and
met,
because
the
public
hearing
really
allows
different
voices
to
come
in
and
again,
if
they're
focused
on
the
criteria
as
Colin
says
it's
true,
there's
maker
or
it
it's
just
a
more
stringent
test.
When
you
have
people
poking
at
them,
so
people
sometimes
feel
like
it
doesn't
make
a
difference
but
opportunity
to
really
test
those
criteria.
G
G
Example:
'yes
yeah.
Do
we
have
any
examples
that
we
could
use
or
advise
residents
to
say,
focus
on
these
I
hear
Colin
say:
you've
got
to
focus
basically
on
the
code,
so
if
they,
if
the
application
is
for
40
feet
and
the
code
allows
35
feet
and,
of
course,
there's
some
standing
there.
But
what
else?
What
other
standing?
What
other
terms
will
be
using.
O
Within
our
code
itself,
that's
what
Colin
was
saying
it
categorizes,
the
different
kinds
of
facilities,
so
the
code
created
aesthetic
criteria,
so
there's
the
general
principle
that
you
can
regulate
based
on
aesthetics
and
then
our
code
did
that
within
the
code
like
I'm,
just
this
is
kind
of
coming
back
to
me.
It
we
have
our
code,
the
maximum
number
of
high-visibility
facilities
per
lot
or
Parcel,
and
only
one
is
allowed.
We
had
this
discussion
back
in
2009.
O
Some
people
thought
it's
better
to
cluster
facilities,
so
you
want
a
whole
bunch
in
one
spot,
so
that
kind
of
the
ugliness
is
in
one
spot
and
then
other
people
that
thought
no.
You
should
disperse
them
and
only
allow
one
per
lot
that
the
aesthetic
discussion
on
what
is
better
for
been,
and
it
came
down
to
a
criteria
that
had
a
maximum
number
per
lot
that
is
baked
into
the
code
itself.
A
Yeah
and
let's
not
overlook
Beth
I,
see
her
hand
still
up
to
that
point
Mary.
So
when
we
talk
about
the
concept
of
trying
to
keep
keep
these
facilities
in
one
place,
the
reality
is
what
we're
really
tart
to
deal
with
these
days
are
the
5g
with
lower
penetration.
They
have
to
be
dispersed
to
accomplish
their
goal,
so
we
can't
really
go
down
that
path.
Correct,
correct.
O
O
E
You
that's
ringing
yeah.
This
question
is
for
Colin.
The
the
public
hearing
in
July
is
going
to
be
on
the
butler
market.
27Th
Avenue
cell
tower
siding
I
believe
and
that
one
is
exceeding
the
height
requirement
for
residential
areas
is
a
ground
to
oppose
that.
That
sighting.
Is
that
strong
enough
to
oppose
that
siding.
R
Well,
I
mean
you
can
certainly
oppose
that
that
proposal,
but
the
way
that
the
code
is
written
is
that
these
towers
can't
exceed
the
maximum
height
of
the
underlying
zone.
If
they're
processed
conditional
use
permit
and
that's
what
that's,
what
the
provider
has
chosen
to
do
on
this
one,
so
they're,
subject
to
additional
criteria
to
exceed
the
height
limit
of
the
underlying
zone.
R
So
what
we're
doing
for
this
one
and
then
also
there's
something
to
understand
one
another,
one
of
the
regulations
that
we
have,
that
we
can
do
and
then
adopted
are
setbacks
and
we
do
require
that
the
tower
to
be
setback
at
least
the
height
of
the
tower
from
any
adjoining
residential
property.
So
you
know
with
the
theories
if
it
were
to
fall,
it's
not
going
to
fall
onto
a
residential
property,
and
so
we're
looking
at
that
as
well
and
I.
Believe
it's
been
cited
to
accommodate
there.
O
Thank
you.
Custom
for
ayrenn
ayrenn
Henson
is
also
on
this
WebEx
and
he
does
a
lot
of
the
citing
C
questions
from
citizens
on
the
designation
of
an
alternate
alternate
location.
How
often
Erin
do
we
look
at
alternate
locations
as
a
condition
of
approval
or
required
that
the
applicant
analyze
alternate
locations.
M
Very
so
that
comes
into
a
play
for
like
a
new
poll
or
mana
pine,
one
of
the
larger
facilities.
They
are
required
to
do
an
alternative
site
analysis
showing
us
what
other
sites
that
they
consider
what
was
available
in
order
to
meet
their
coverage
needs.
So
typically,
they
will
show
us
their
search
area
and
within
that
temp
area
existing
towers.
Hopefully
they
find
an
existing
tower
to
co-locate
on.
If
there
aren't
any
available,
then
they
look
at
places
to
install
a
new
tower
and
our
code
encourages
them
to
choose.
M
C
C
M
C
B
B
T
T
O
There
is
an
FCC
order
that
completely
excluded
the
5g
from
NEPA
review.
There
is
a
case
out
of
the
East
Coast.
That
said,
the
FCC
order
went
too
far,
there's
nothing
from
the
Ninth
Circuit,
but
it
is
still
our
read
of
the
case
law
that
small
cell
deployment
is
probably
exempt
so
with
typically
an
issue
anyways
for
us,
but
that's
our
understanding.
T
All
it's
all
under
a
categorical
exclusion,
so
only
certain
things
will
pop
it
above
the
categorical
exclusion
level,
but
those
are
some
of
the
things
that
I
would
think
that
we
should
be
looking
at.
I
would
get
the
Oregon
spotted
frog
down
there
in
the
old
mill
district
I,
don't
know
if
there's
still
penguins
proposed
for
down
there
or
not,
but
there
you
go.
T
G
Okay,
you,
this
is
such
a
fascinating
topic,
so
I
think
I've
got
two
questions.
First,
from
a
past
life
up
in
Washington,
whenever
we
had
cell
phone
towers,
then
that
represented
at
least
to
the
city
and
which
I
was
affiliated
and
I'm
curious.
Do
we
generate
any
revenue
from
these
cell
towers,
3G,
4G.
S
So
there
are
a
couple
different
different
aspects
of
that
in
terms
of
the
prayut
airy
function
of
the
city
as
a
property
owner.
There
are
some
wireless
facilities
on
property.
You
know
not
speaking
of
public
right
away,
but
publicly
owned
property
that
we
have
to
be
facilities.
For
example,
we've
got
utility
facilities
all
over
the
place,
so
pilot
viewed
other
places.
S
So
on
some
facilities
we
have
some
lease
agreements
with
one
with
service
providers
for
facilities
result
in
some
revenue
for
the
city,
I
will
tell
you
that
the
revenue
is
material
in
terms
of
our
utilities,
Department,
which
is
where
most
of
these
things
are
harder
and
there
this
is
a
little
inside
baseball,
but
the
inconvenience
for
them
of
having
some
of
these
facilities
on
and
within
their
facilities,
I
think
far
outweighs
the
revenue
will
bring
to
this.
But
but
we
do
have
some
of
that.
G
M
This
is
there
and
I
have
records
in
that
we
can
generate
such
maps
through
the
been
organ
online
mapping
tool.
At
this
point,
none
of
the
5g
facilities
have
been
deployed.
Yet
I
do
have
one
map
that
I
could
share
with
you.
That
shows
the
roughly
15
small
cell
sites
that
are
in
the
process
of
deployment
that
were
by
Sprint.
If
anyone
would
like
to
see
that.
B
I
I
H
H
And
this
is
a
summary
slide
of
what
we've
come
to
where
we
are
now.
You
know
what
what
has
been
going
on
up
to
this
point
kind
of
our
discussions
that
have
been
going
on
since
last,
July
of
with
City
Planning,
a
legal
staff
about
land
use
and
land
use
education
with
outside
interest
groups,
including
been
neighborhood
coalition.
We
have
had
land
use,
chairs
involved
in
the
discussion.
H
We
had
a
survey
with
land
use
chairs
and
had
their
input
as
to
what
education
needs
that
they
have.
We've
also
put
out
a
land
use
education,
community
survey,
which
just
came
back
last
week,
and
we
saw
some
of
the
preliminary
results
at
our
last
meeting
on
that.
So
all
of
these
evolved
into
what
it
is
that
we're
going
to
present
to
Council,
and
so
the
areas
that
we
plan
on
focusing
on
are
the
ones
that
are
listed
here.
H
We're
talking
about
designing
a
new
land
use
section
on
the
city
of
Bend
website,
creating
new
land
use
education
resources
for
community
members
that
they
can
refer
to
and
reach.
So
it's
kind
of
in
two
categories
of
Education
materials.
One
is
the
things
that
we
push
out
as
the
need
arises
and
other
things
that
people
can
draw
from
from
the
webpage.
H
And
so,
if
you
have
a
question
or
curiosity,
you
can
go
to
the
web
page
and
find
information
if
you
are
getting,
for
instance,
and
notice
in
the
mail
that
you
will
also
get
information
along
with
that
that
it's
educational
material
that
will
help
you.
For
instance,
in
a
neighborhood
public
meeting,
we
are
looking
to
improve
the
practices
for
a
neighborhood
public
meetings
for
developers
and
so
that
they
are
more
consistent
from
developer
to
developer
as
the
kind
of
materials
that
they
present
and
that
they
are.
H
It
makes
it
clearer
to
the
people
who
show
up
for
neighborhood
public
meetings.
What
things
are
a
given,
what
things
as
Colin
said,
are
kind
of
going
to
happen
because
they
all
comply
to
code
and
what
things
there
are
flexibility
on
and
and
that
they
have
some
ability
to
influence
so
that
kind
of
information
we
hope
to
provide
more
uniformly
at
all
these
neighborhood
public
meetings,
and
then
this
targeted
landing
education
for
specific
groups.
So
if
you're
somebody
who's
thinking
about
moving
here,
maybe
there
will
be
some
targeted
information.
H
H
It's
like
a
one
full
page
kind
of
document
that
has
a
list
of
resources
and
we're
going
to
be
going
over
that
in
our
meeting
this
week
on
Thursday
and
hope
to
set
some
priorities
and
as
to
what
things
will
look
like
for
any
particular
topic.
So
if
it's
say,
for
instance,
I
don't
understand
zoning,
do
we
want
to
do
a
video?
Do
we
want
to
do
an
interactive
map?
H
So
there
are
some
administrative
changes
that
are
already
in
the
works.
We
have
already
begun:
emailing,
land-use
notifications
to
neighborhood
associations,
in
addition
to
the
mail
notifications,
we've
already
implemented
plain
language,
information
on
a
paragraph
on
land
use
notifications
and
so
that
the
hopefully
better
understood
when
they
come
to
somebody's
in
somebody's
mailbox,
we're
planning
on
some
redesign
of
notification,
signs
and
clearer
language
on
the
notification
signs
that
are
on
properties
that
are
actively
being
developed
and
trying
to
provide
these
new
education
resources
for
the
developers.
H
H
When
it
comes
to
code
changes,
there
are
a
few
changes
that
we
are
recommending.
One
is
to
increase
the
notification
area
for
for
mailed
notifications.
Now
this
slide
says
double
I.
Think
that
there's
if
we
double
the
area,
that's
if
you
double
the
radius,
it's
four
times
the
area,
but
if
you-
and
that
would
be
four
times
the
number
of
notifications
but
I-
don't
think
that
applies
to
every
type
of
notification
that
goes
out.
H
There
may
be
some
kind,
some
categories
of
no
Takai
notifications,
that
we
don't
need
to
have
that
much
of
an
increase,
and
there
may
be
others
that,
maybe
that's
not
sufficient.
So
there's
some
discussion
about
code
changes
that
still
needs
to
happen.
That
will
come
up
with
what
we
would
specifically
recommend
about
code
change
for
mail
notifications.
H
There's
some
discussion
of
email
notification
requirements
for
that
as
well
notification
soundings.
We
want
to
change
the
code
to
have
a
requirement
that
the
sign
be
visible
from
the
right-of-way
and
that
we
require
signs
to
be
posted
for
the
duration
of
the
comment
period.
That's
not
currently
in
the
code,
and
we
also
want
to
require
when
it
comes
to
neighborhood
public
meetings,
that
the
developers
send
the
P
Z
number
two
all
neighborhood
public
meeting
participants
and
so
that
they
have
an
opportunity
to
weigh
in
and
written
comment
form
lists
for
being
notified.
H
A
See
Ron's
here
so
speaking
to
the
increasing
the
area
of
notification
and
I
know
originally,
we
said
well,
maybe
instead
of
250
feet,
it's
500
feet
and
yes,
that's
four
times
the
area,
but
then
and
then
there
would
be
some
incremental
cost
to
that.
But
at
the
same
time
you
were
talking
about
there
may
be
times
when
we
don't
have
to
reach
out
that
far,
so
we
may
be
able
to
save
some
situations,
maybe
for
something
like
short-term
rentals
or
something
like
that.
H
I
would
I
would
imagine
that
that
will
be
part
of
our
discussion
to
try
to
figure
out
what
ones
are
the
ones
of
real
critical
concern,
rather
than
just
make
it
a
blanket
across-the-board
increase
everything
by
four
times
the
area
that
it
doesn't
make
sense
from
a
cost
point
of
view.
So
I
think
we
still
need
to
have
a
good
conversation
with
planning
to
figure
out
what
ones
are
the
ones
that
are
most
critical.
Q
I
just
wanted
to
compliment
Sue
on
on
her
work
on
this.
It's
it's
a
nice
list
and
it's
you
know.
From
my
perspective,
it
seems
very
well-balanced.
It's
very
educational
for
the
most
part
and
will
resolve
some
issues
it'll.
If
people
want
to
avail
themselves
of
becoming
informed
about
the
things
around
them,
they
certainly
will
have
opportunities
like
I.
Just
wanted
to
thank
you
for
for
the
work
you
put
in.
S
A
Q
U
U
S
A
H
A
B
Can
do
that,
and
so
for
those
of
you
who
aren't
aware
the
neighborhood
leadership
Alliance
made
the
outreach
and
engagement
working
group,
which
was
formerly
the
communications
group.
This
group
has
been
meeting
over
the
since
March.
Basically
when
we
got
sent
home
with
the
stay
home
order
and
we've
just
been
working
on
different
tasks
that
are
outstanding,
that
could
help
neighborhood
associations
with
communication
and
some
of
what
has
come
out
of
that.
B
We
wanted
to
share
with
you
tonight
last
in
LA
meeting
you
heard
about
our
recommendations
for
a
social
media
management
tool
and
a
survey
platform,
and
tonight
we
just
wanted
to
give
you
a
little
bit
of
a
better
insight
as
to
how
those
will
work
and
so
we're
gonna
start
off
going
through
HootSuite
and
Lisa.
Mussel
is
actually
going
to
lead
that
part
of
this
presentation.
I
will
pull
up
my
slides
in
just
a
second
here.
G
G
G
Community
one
of
those
topics
that
we've
really
struggled
with
in
century
West,
Neighborhood
Association,
just
the
consistency
of
sending
out
messages,
how
to
tackle
social
media
in
addition
to
newsletters
and
being
very
consistent
about
it,
go
ahead
and
go
to
the
next
slide.
Please
so
I've
been
doing
a
little
bit
of
research
and
I
know
there
are
many
tools
out
there,
but
one
that
I
have
found
that
I
really
like
is
HootSuite,
because
this
is
giving
us
some
of
the
ability
to
manage
the
social
media
presentations
with
what
HootSuite
does
what
the
platform
does.
G
It
allows
us
to
create
the
efficiencies
and
consistency,
because
we
are
able
to
plan
our
messages
and
we're
also
able
to
schedule
the
repeat
messaging.
It's
a
pretty
simple
tool
where
all
you
have
to
do
is
is
create
a
spreadsheet
decide
what
your
messages
are
going
to
be.
You
actually
create
your
messaging.
G
G
G
We
wish
that
they
worked
with
next-door
because
some
of
us,
our
reach
to
our
it
does
not
work
with
next-door.
Currently
I
threw
some
numbers
around
some
time.
Savings,
so
I
estimated
that
a
social
media
post
takes
about
maybe
10
minutes
to
create
each
social
media
post.
So
if
a
Neighborhood
Association
is
posting
three
times
per
week
on
two
different
channels,
then
you're
gonna
arrive
at
about
52
hours,
managing
those
social
media
channels
over
the
course
of
a
year.
G
Now,
if
we
apply
that
to
all
of
the
thirteen
neighborhood
associations
doing
these
individual
posts,
especially
when
we
know
that
many
of
us
are
posting
the
same
things,
we're
spending
about
six
hundred
and
seventy
six
hours
per
year
on
social
media
posts
like
we've,
got
some
opportunities
for
if
the
agencies
here
next.
So
how
does
it
work?
We've
identified
about
a
hundred
and
fifty
posts?
Each
year
that
we
could
be
doing
for
our
members,
so
what
I
do
is
I
create
the
posts
in
the
spreadsheet
and
it
takes
a
little
bit
of
time.
G
But
if
you
invest
the
time
initially,
what
is
really
great
is
you
could
just
copy
those
posts
into
the
next
year
and
then
schedule
them
out.
So
you're
only
doing
this
once
you,
you
just
go
through
your
messages
and
figure
out
which
of
those
can
be
repeated
for
the
next
year,
so
you're
gonna
save
a
lot
of
time
after
you
create
all
of
these.
These
initial
posts
you
set
up
the
CSV
file
upload.
G
So,
for
example,
typically,
we
would
have
the
pet
parade
each
year
for
our
fourth
of
July
celebration,
but
this
year,
because
of
kovat,
we
all
know
that
the
pet
parade
is
canceled
and
the
fourth
of
July
parade
is
kind
of
canceled.
So
you
can
set
up
the
event
to
approve
before
it
actually
gets
posted
to
any
of
your
social
media
accounts.
That
would
be.
You
would
probably
want
to
do
that
for
any
event,
because
of
a
situation
like
this,
who
knew
that
things
were
going
to
get
canceled
like
this
next,
this
is
kind
of
well.
G
It
doesn't
look
very
good,
but
this
is
the
spreadsheet,
so
you
can
see
the
is
didn't
want
it
to
post.
This
is
where
you
can
kind
of
take
a
advantage
of
the
social
media
gurus
that
tell
you
when's
the
right
time
to
be
making
all
these
posts.
The
next
column
is
your
content,
and
if
you
have
any
links,
if
you
have
any
pictures
or
anything
that
you
want
to
include
with
that
post,
you
can
do
so
and
the
column
D.
G
What
I've
done
is
I've
kind
of
started,
a
cat
or
cat
or
started
to
categorize
all
of
the
different
posts.
So
I
can
see
how
often
I'm
hitting
on
certain
topics.
I
want
to
have
a
little
bit
of
a
balanced
approach
to
manage
social
media
where
I
want
to
include
city
of
Bend
information,
but
I
also
want
to
focus
on
safety.
I
want
to
focus
on
some
fun
things
as
well.
G
G
Programs
pretty
intuitive
in
terms
of
setup.
This
is
where
I
mentioned
previously,
the
the
bulk
composer.
So
this
is
where
you're
just
matching
your
CSV
file
to
that
spreadsheet,
and
you
can
see
over
here
under
post
too.
We
we
decide
who
wants
to
or
which
accounts
we
need
to
post
the
the
message
to.
G
G
Next,
it
doesn't
eliminate
all
the
work,
but
what
I
am
really
enjoying
is
I
know
I,
don't
have
to
think
about
century
West's
posts
I
know
there's
at
least
going
to
be
two
or
three
each
week
once
I
have
this
all
built
out
and
at
least
I'm
staying
active
on
social
media
I
think
it's
going
to
make
the
job
for
most
of
our
Neighborhood
Association
communications
people
a
little
bit
easier
if
they
choose
to
to
work
with
this
I
am
also
envisioning.
Eventually
we're
going
to
have
some
consistency
and
messaging.
G
So
right
now
we've
got
thirteen
communications,
people
creating
messages,
and
you
know
sometimes
different,
depending
on
the
Neighborhood
Association.
So
if
we
get
a
few
neighborhood
associations
choosing
to
participate,
we
can
get
some
consistency,
I'm,
hoping
that,
by
being
consistent
by
having
frequent
messages
that
we
will
be
driving
membership,
I
am
starting
to
see
some
additional
activity
on
century
West
I'm,
starting
to
see
our
numbers
increase
in
terms
of
the
number
of
people
that
we
have
enrolled
on
our
face.
Paige
and
I'm
really
pleased
to
see
that
I.
G
Haven't
started
using
the
analytics
yet,
but
the
product,
effectiveness
and
it'll
show
us
what
posts
are
getting
attention
and
what
our
interactions.
And
if
we
choose
to
go
with
the
team
version,
we've
got
some
custom
reporting
ability.
It
does
track
our
shares.
It
does
track
messages,
so
whoever
is
going
to
be
the
administrator
of
the
product
or
multiple
people
will
be
able
to
to
take
a
look
and
see
what
the
activity's
activity
is
associated
with
each
of
the
posts
and
pricing.
G
So
century
West
has
already
signed
up
for
the
professional
one
user
product
and
that
will
allow
us
right
now,
I
think,
oh,
my
got
it
set
up
for
Facebook
and
Twitter.
We
haven't
spent
much
time
on
LinkedIn
in
particular,
and
I
haven't
done
Instagram,
because
I
kind
of
feel
like
Instagram
is
mostly
about
pictured
there,
but
we
were
able
to
get
a
discount.
G
We
can
schedule
as
many
posts
as
we
want
and
that's
the
difference
between
a
free
version
versus
a
paid
version.
The
free
version
only
allows
you
I,
think
up
to
30
posts,
total
and
you'd
be
amazed
how
quickly
you
can
create
30
posts,
so
the
professional
package
would
be
good
for
maybe
up
to
five
days,
and
so
this
would
be
one
possibility
here.
We
would
have
one
used.
That
means
that
person
would
coordinate
or
manage
the
social
posts.
G
We
could
always
share
a
password
or
share
login
information,
but
we'd
have
to
talk
through
how
that
would
work
in
this
proposal,
each
na
would
get
two
channels.
The
the
benefit
would
include
a
$50
per
month
in
ad
spend.
So
if
we
wanted
to
buy
some
ads
on
Facebook,
then
each
neighborhood
association
we
get
up
to
$50
and
this
would
be
at
a
cost
of
$34
and
80
cents
per
year
per
na.
G
That's
it's
a
pretty
pretty
great
deal
for
a
lot
of
efficiencies.
If
we
wanted
to
have
more
than
five
Emmys
participate,
then
I
think
we'd
have
to
look
at
the
teams.
Package
teams
would
be
beneficial
for
maybe
up
to
ten
neighborhood
associations,
and
this
again
would
give
each
in
a
two
channels:
you'd
get
and
be
seventy
seven
to
forty
cents.
So
I
guess
it
just
depends
on
how
many
people
are
interested
in
participating
in
terms
of
which
package
we
really
will
really
fit
for
us.
G
B
So,
like
Lisa
was
saying
the
group
of
this,
the
working
group
for
outreach
and
engagement,
their
real
role,
is
for
the
in
LA
to
focus
on
communications
of
folks
that
want
to
have
a
say
in
what's
going
on
at
the
council
level
and
and
in
responding
to
speakers
that
are
public
comment
that
comes
just
various
in
LA
tasks.
But
what
we've
recognized
as
a
group
is
that
if
the
New
York
associations
are
not
successful
at
an
operational
level,
then
the
neighborhood
leadership
Alliance
is
also
going
to
fail.
B
And
so
what
we
want
to
do
is
provide
these
options
for
anaise
to
opt
in
it's,
not
something
that
everyone
has
to
participate
Paden.
It
would
be
relevant
to
have
citywide
content
that
would
be
relevant
to
all
of
the
na
s,
but
it
wouldn't
take
away
the
ability
for
them
to
still
post
timely
and
relevant
information
for
their
specific
neighborhood,
and
so
it's
just
really
supplementing
the
work
that
they
already
do
and
hopefully
is
taking
off.
Some
of
that.
B
I
guess
stress
so
that
social
media
can
add
in
and,
as
you
saw
in
in
the
examples
that
Lisa
shared
there.
These
are
things
like
citizen
service
requests
and
how
to
file
a
citizen
service
request
what
to
do
if
there's
a
pothole
that
is
bugging
you
or
on
your
street,
how
you
report
that
about
the
membership
in
general,
how
to
find
your
neighborhood
association,
those
kind
of
things
that
could
be
going
out
in
addition
to
the
social
media
manager
and
I'll,
make
it
quick
here
cuz.
B
You
know
we're
running
short
on
time,
but
we,
sir,
we
went
through
a
variety
of
different
survey
tools
and
compared
to
them
SurveyMonkey
survey,
gizmo,
Google,
Forms,
and
really
what
we
ended
up
with
liking.
The
mostess
survey
planet.
So
you
all
know
what
a
survey
does
you
know
how
they're
used
in
neighborhood
associations
we're
asking
our
membership,
how
we're
doing
we're
asking
them?
What
they're
concerned
about
within
the
city
and
what's
going
on
at
a
policymaking
level?
B
Could
add
your
own
logos
as
you're
sending
out
the
surveys,
make
it
look
a
little
bit
more
professional.
It
has
attractive
exports.
So
when
you
do
send
out
a
survey
and
you
get
the
data
back
you're
able
to
export
it
into
a
PDF,
it
has
visuals,
and
it's
not
just
messy
data
that
you
have
to
sort
through
it's
easily
shareable.
So
you
can
have
been
embedded
into
enews
letters
or
on
your
websites.
You
can
email
it
and
you
can
share
links,
there's
the
ability
for
anonymity
and
then
it
also
creates
surveys
in
different
languages.
B
But
I
think
my
favorite
opportunity
is
with
this
duplicate
surveys
again,
it's
we
ask
similar
questions
in
our
annual
surveys.
If
we
do
send
them,
you
can
select
from
questions
that
were
previously
used
in
in
a
surveys
already,
so
you
don't
have
to
rethink
your
own
and
it's
really
just
a
matter
of
helping
limit
that
workload
and
so
looking
at
the
team
plan.
B
If
fourteen
people
were
to
practice
or
to
purchase
this
or
go
in
on
an
account,
then
it'd
be
a
hundred
and
twenty
six
dollars
for
neighborhood
association
annually,
and
then
we
get
15%
off
of
that
and
that
does
not
change
if
there
are
fewer
neighborhood
associations
that
apply
so
a
survey
planet
if
he
only
had
five
people.
The
number
wouldn't
change
very
much
from
that.
One
hundred
and
twenty
six
dollar
figure.
A
Mikayla,
what
would
be
in
terms
of
next
steps?
I
mean
I-
would
hope
that
not
not
every
rep
is
present
tonight,
but
I
would
hope
that
you
could
distribute
this
to
be
sure
that
we
get
it
in
front
of
all
the
boards
and
then
we
get
a
count
both
on
HootSuite
and
the
survey
planet
account
on
the
people
that
are
interested
in
it.
Obviously,
it's
an
opt-in
opt-out
right.
So
there's
no
pressure,
but
oh
I
mean
one
of
the
values
I
see
in
it.
Every
na
needs
to
be
relevant.
Every
na
needs
brightness
for
information.
A
One
example
Lisa
had
in
there
something
you
do.
You
know
when
winter
comes
around.
You
know
she
had
one
they're
new
to
winter
driving
new
tube,
and
here
are
some
resources.
That's
the
sort
of
thing
that
we
could
schedule
and
once
you
get
once
you
get
those
standard
things
scheduled
and
populated,
they
come
out
when
they're
supposed
to
come
out.
Maybe
it's
fireworks
in
mid
June,
but
once
we
get
those
populated
at
the
any
level,
we
send
out
a
consistent
message,
timely
relevant
and
you
still
have
the
opportunity
to
customize
at
their
local
na
level.
A
B
Thank
you
for
asking
that
ons.
As
far
as
next
steps
go.
What
we
want
to
do
is
we've
developed
a
letter
that
preface
--is
what
our
intent
is,
as
well
as
the
details
on
the
recommendations
that
we've
showed
you
tonight.
We're
gonna,
send
those
out
to
the
neighborhood
associations
and
ask
for
their
them
to
respond
with
their
interest
by
Friday.
So
I'll
send
this
out
tonight
and
then,
if
they
are
interested,
we're
gonna
schedule
a
demo
so
that
they
can
come
and
actually
play
in
the
product
with
us.
B
And
then
we
were
also
going
to
use
that
opportunity
to
talk
about
a
process
about
how
this
is
going
to
be
managed
and
what
the
rules
of
everyone
would
be
before
the
NA
s
have
to
make
a
decision
or
ask
their
board
for
approval.
So
everyone
will
have
all
of
the
details
before
they
have
to
make
a
decision.
U
G
Dave
I
don't
have
a
good
answer
for
you:
there
I
it
all
13
neighborhood
associations.
If
some
of
the
Neighborhood
Association
only
used
one
channel
to
go
to
an
enterprise
level,
their
third
level
gets
really
really
spendy
and
I'll
have
to
get
back
to
you
on
that.
But
I
think
at
this
point
curious
to
know
how
many
neighborhood
associations
are
interested
in
this
and
then
how
many
channels
do
they
actually
have,
or
would
they
be
interested
in
having
yeah.
B
U
G
V
G
V
V
B
Okay,
what
I
would
say
is
that
you
should
reach
out
to
them
as
soon
as
possible
and
then
I'm
gonna
be
sending
up
the
demo
day
and
the
conversation,
and
so
hopefully
by
the
time
that
rolls
around
will
invite
you
and
if
you
just
it's,
not
something
you
want
to
be
a
part
of
that's
fine.
It's
just
simply
saying
I've
seen
your
presentation,
I
think
it
has
merit
and
invite
me
to
learn
more
okay.
D
Hi
I
just
had
a
question
about
the
timeline,
because
our
issue
is
how
many
emails.
We
have
a
concern
about
sending
out
too
many
emails
and
we
do
it
through
Constant
Contact
right
now.
I
think
we
have
a
concern
about
how
much
that
generates
and
what
it's
worth
in
terms
of
cost.
So
that's
what
I'm
thinking
yeah.
B
B
B
Visitor
Cassie
this
is
this
is
just
for
na
boards.
It's
not
something
that
your
membership
is
gonna,
be
involved
in,
and
so,
if
you
have
questions
about
bylaws
and
how
that
would
work,
it's
just
like
whoever
posts
on
your
River
West,
Neighborhood,
Association,
Facebook
page.
Those
are
the
people
that
are
gonna,
be
working
on
this
project
right.
D
U
A
Q
Q
It's
visit
Ben's
budget
and
tourism
proposals
coming
up
before
council
next
week.
Sometime
and
it
historically
has
only
been
treated
as
a
business
issue,
and
so
it
goes
to
beat
out,
but
it
occurs
to
me
that
tourism
also
affects
things
like
crime.
Transportation
used
to
public
facilities,
Forest
festivals
and
noise,
which
are
all
visibility,
is
just
I,
didn't
know
if
be
dab,
wanted
to
have
a
voice
on
how
tourism
is
promoted
within
bent,
but
it's
a
voice.
We
don't
hear.
Q
Well,
so
this
every
year
visit
Ben
has
to
go
to
beat
up
first
to
get
their
marketing
plan
approved,
and
that
goes
to
Council
for
approval.
After
that
they
spend
roughly
three
million
dollars
historically
on
tourism
promotion
of
one
sort
or
another
and
the
the
ask
is:
does
the
it
seems
like
the
NLA?
Would
the
be
tab
gives
it
a
business
focus
like
what's
good
for
businesses
around
tourism
and
that
sort
of
thing,
but
there's
no
neighborhood
livability
perspective
on
promoting
treatment
impacts,
our
community
and
I?
Q
Q
Yeah
you,
you
can
spend
it
on
tourism
facilities,
for
instance,
you
don't
have
to
promote
tourism,
there's
a
number
of
there's
a
bright.
What
there's
it's
much
wider
than
whether
you
Motors
rock
and
part
of
the
question
and
visit
bin
will
have
is:
do
you
want
us
to
advertise,
say
in
San,
Francisco
or
different
areas
of
geographies
on
you
know
how
on
who's
going
to
visit,
re-emphasizing,
shoulder
seasons
or
peak
seasons,
or
you
know,
there's
a
hole
there.
It's
more
detailed
I
think
you'll
require
a
follow-up
presentation
from
I
guess.
S
Just
quickly,
if,
if
that
is
something
that
you
know
the
in
LA
and
or
council
members
are
interested
in
pursuing
it's
probably
worth
pointing
us
of
reviewing
and
approving
business
plan
of
going
to
be
tab
and
then
going
to
chemical
at
a
certain
time.
Every
year
is
in
the
city's
contract.
With
visit
bent,
there
was
interest
in
changing
or
menteng
that
process.
It
would
probably
require
amendments
to
the
contract
with
visit
Bend
to
work
that
in
a
new
process,
so
just
wanted
to
point
out
that
that
would
have
to
be
probably
accomplished.
I
A
Being
said
in
the
answer
to
Bill's
question,
not
not
trying
to
avoid
the
issue
of
timing
or
contracts
or
anything
else,
I
think
that
residents
would
be
well
served
to
have
some
input
and
allow
for
resident
input
to
be
considered
along
with
business
input.
We
know
that
from
historical
city
surveys,
the
livability
issue
has
always
been
a
big
big
topic
for
council.
So
my
point
of
view,
I
would
think
that
any
residents
would
like
an
opportunity
to
have
some
imprint.
S
O
S
I
mean
I,
don't
like
I,
said:
I,
don't
think,
there's
anything
really
stopping
individuals
or
even
bodies
from
providing
input.
I
think
if
I'm,
if
I'm
a
party
to
a
contract,
I
might
say:
okay,
that
that's
good
and
but
here
supposed
to
consider
the
recommendation
or
input
from
B
tab
and
again
it's
not
to
say
that
they
can't
hear
and
think
of
other
things.
But
it's
not
a
formal
part
of
the
process.
G
G
S
Q
J
B
A
G
C
A
I
I
D
I
E
U
Yes,
we
mapped
last
night,
we
got
our
share
of
the
no
firework
signs
and
we've
figured
out
a
way
to
distribute
them.
We
also
talked
about
using
the
slow
down
signs
because,
especially
with
all
of
the
work
that's
going
to
be
going
on
on
15th
Street,
there
gonna
be
a
lot
of
couplers
through
our
neighborhood,
so
we're
very
interested
in
getting
some
of
the
slowdown.
This
is
our
neighborhood
kinds
of
signs
other
than
that
about
business.
As
usual,
we
talked
about
the
BLM
marches
and
you
know
what,
if
one
of
our
our
board?
N
T
H
We
have
not
been
meeting
virtually
a
couple
of
months.
We
are
going
to
have
our
first
meeting
actually
in
somebody's
backyard,
with
social
distancing
on
Monday,
just
up
the
board,
with
people
having
the
ability
to
call
ahead
of
time
or
be
available
by
phone
if
they
have
questions
or
concerns
that
they
want
us
to
address
and
we're
also
looking
forward
to
getting
our
fireworks
signs.