►
From YouTube: City Council meeting Aug 23 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Do
we
have
any
departmental
reports?
C
D
E
Tisdale
well,
since
the
mayor's,
not
here
the
just
one
announcement,
then
award
five
meeting
is
wednesday
september
7th
at
6
pm
at
the
snyder
recreation
center,
and
that
that
meeting
is
open
to
the
public.
Wait
wait.
I
think
I
hear
hoof's
on
the
rooftop
there.
E
Just
want
to
check
with
you:
I've
mentioned
carsich
park
a
couple
of
weeks
ago.
There's
a
there's
a
broken.
I
guess
podium
with
where
there's
a
memorial
plaque
on
that
and
the
benches
have
been
removed
and
the
water
fountain
is
not
working.
If
there's
anything
been
done
on
that,
okay
also,
I
know
there's
an
inhabited
rv
on.
E
If
we
can
see
the
better,
do
we
have
a
date
and
time
for
the
public
hearing
on
the
budget.
I
know
that's
coming
up.
D
E
F
E
D
E
I
know
that
some
of
them
would
like
to
be
here,
but
they
don't
know
what
the
topics
are
when
we're
going
to
discuss
that
again.
So
that's
why
I'd
be
advantageous
to
get
that
information.
Maybe
when
we
get
the
agenda
on
thursdays,
it's
just
some
people
want
to
be
here
and
they
some
of
them
show
up
every
workshop
and
some
of
them
would
show
up
if
they
knew
when
their
topic's
going
to
be
discussed.
C
D
E
B
I
got
a
few
items
I
just
need
to
get
on
the
record.
First
and
foremost,
I'd
like
to
congratulate
councilman,
he
is
going
to
represent
he's
going
to
be
one
of
the
representatives
on
the
board
of
directors
for
illinois.
So
congratulations
for
your
leadership
and
continued
leadership.
Thank
you
very
much.
B
A
couple
of
reasons.
The
potential
was
646
wetzel
drive,
put
in
a
request
for
a
owner
who
is
trying
to
put
in
a
driveway
and
some
of
the
water
stone.
Water
is
being
diverted
in
that
area
where
she
wants
to
put
her
driveway
ask
for
a
solution.
I've
also
asked
for
someone
to
contact
me
if
they
want
to
ride
out
there
and
look
at
it.
So
I
just
haven't
heard
from
anyone
in
over
a
week
if
we
can
kind
of
get
that
looked
at
I'd
appreciate
it.
B
B
He
is
a
physically
challenged,
vet
and
he's
having
difficulty,
because
the
car
is
parking
along
the
curb
that
he
can't
get
to
his
mailbox.
He
can't
get
to
his
garbage
and
put
his
garbage
or
retrieve
the
garbage
out,
because
a
car
is
blocking
it.
Maybe
we
can
look
at
some
sort
of
designation
of
a
person
that
is
physically
challenged.
C
B
And
then
hickman
recently,
I
put
in
a
work
request
to
take
a
look
at
hitman.
There
seems
to
be
some
chillers
that
have
been
dropped
off
peculiar
and
I
don't
know
if
this
is
within
code
or
not
there's
someone
living
in
a
trailer
or
some
kind
of
makeshift
housing
and
then
they're
selling
water.
I
don't
know
if
they're
within
the
proper
permits
of
selling
water
to
residents
and
non-residents,
they
have
a
sign
up,
they're
advertising
it.
My
understanding
is
that
they
have
a
world
and
they're
trying
to
dispense
of
it.
F
B
875
v
street
there's
a
pump
station
and
there's
some
commercial
trucks
that
are
coming
encroaching
on
a
resident
that
there's
right
there
at
the
pump
station
875
v
street
and
the
the
asphalt
is
being
broken
up
and
they're
rolling
over
the
grass
and
putting
in
kind
of
creating
a
new,
ditch
and
all
that
kind
of
stuff.
I
know
someone
suggested
possibly
ballard's,
but
if
we
can
look
at
whoever
the
trucks
are
delivering
the
tanks
there
or
maintaining
it.
B
C
C
D
We're
concentrating
on
the
same
we
had
a
couple
of
minutes
from
saying
that
was
her
prime.
You
know
I
think,
point
to
make
sure
that
it's
done
and
that's
where
we're
concentrating
as
far
as
recognizing
her
community
effort,
so
we'll
get
some
some
pretty
solid.
You
know
portraits
and
some
other
dedications
towards
you
know
ms
glott.
So
that's.
C
C
D
B
H
This
was
requested
last
week
and
we
put
some
things
together.
I
got
it
earlier
today,
so
I'm
going
to
try
to
explain
it.
I've
read
over
it
a
couple
of
times.
I
think
I
understand
it,
but
captain
moran
the
one
who's
responsible
for
putting
this
together.
Our
intel
analyst
is
in
the
back
of
the
room.
So
if
I
can't
explain
it,
hopefully
he
can.
H
So
if
you
can
read
that
from
where
you're
at
we
had
received
a
request
from
the
atlanta
police
department
or
a
member
of
the
atlanta
police
department
concerning
their
ongoing
study
of
potential
public
safety
impacts
on
short-term
designated
properties
with
specific
jurisdictions,
and
they
had
asked
for
some
information
from
us
in
their
study.
And
you
can
see
the
information
that
they
ask
for
there.
H
H
You
can
see
the
reporting
data
indicated
that
0.8
or
really
two-thirds
of
a
percent
of
one
percent
or
all
the
addresses
address
points
in
biloxi
where
designated
short-term
rentals
exist,
short-term
rentals
accounted
for
less
than
a
half
of
percent.
Of
all
the
incident
reports
taken
in
biloxi,
three
percent
of
the
total
addresses
designated
short-term
rentals
recorded
law
enforcement
reports
of
all
the
reports
initiated
at
short-term
rental
locations.
Three
were
overtly
related
to
short-term
rentals
or
patrons
all
right,
and
that
you
know
this
is.
H
This
is
very
difficult
information
to
pull
to
begin
with,
because
there's
a
lot
of
variables
in
it.
We
have
an
address
that
we
that
was
designated
a
short-term
rental,
but
it
doesn't
mean
that
the
report
that
was
taken
there
had
anything
to
do
with
the
short-term
rental.
It
could
have
been
a
traffic
stop
in
front
of
the
location.
H
It
could
have
been
somebody
a
police
officer,
doing
anything
where
he
you
know.
Where
are
you
at
well,
I'm
in
front
of
this
address,
so
it's
a
little
a
little
bit
hard
to
to
get
you
an
actual,
an
actual
account
also
a
lot
of
times.
Short-Term
rentals
may
be
affiliated
with
an
apartment
complex
where
there
may
be
four
or
five
short-term
rentals
in
the
apartment
complex,
but
that
address
there
may
have
been
many
calls
to
that.
Address
that
may
or
may
not
have
had
something
to
do
with
short-term
rentals
there.
H
So
you
can
look
at
the
you
can
look
at
that
slide
up
there.
The
address
points
in
biloxi.
This
is
the
total
addresses
that
we
have
or
forty
four
thousand
nine
hundred
and
six
total
law
incidences.
That's
that's
a
that's
where
an
actual
written
report
was
taken.
H
We
would
have
responded
many
many
more
times,
but
an
actual
written
report
was
taken
13
180
times
in
a
year
in
a
year
from
august
of
2021
to
august
of
2022,
then
you
see
that's
broken
down
by
total
law
incident
locations
and
then
locations
where
a
specific
address
exists.
So
the
total
law
incident
locations
could
be
an
intersection
right,
but
this
specific
address
would
be
the
actual
address
itself.
H
Total
addresses
designated
short-term
rental
was
361
incident
locations
designated
short-term
rentals,
and
this
is
where
we
actually
had
an
incident
was
11
and
then
the
total
incidence
at
short-term
rentals
was
53,
but
I
think
out
of
that
53
I
think,
lewis,
you
looked
at
all
53
right
and
it
was
three
out
of
all
53
that
there
was
three
that
actually
mentioned,
or
we
could
determine
that.
It
was
actually
related
to
a
short-term
rental.
H
H
Eight
were
the
property
owners
that
called,
and
it
could
be
anything
from
them
calling
saying
hey.
There
was
some
damage
you
know
to
this
unit
and
we
believe
the
people
before
you
know
that
had
it
rented,
you
know
did
the
damage
it
could
be.
That
could
be
a
lot
of
things.
H
Long-Term
residents
23
have
called
about
a
short-term
rental
property
problem
and
then
the
short-term
renter
was
two
and
I
take
it
that
that
was
actual
renters
that
had
called
themselves
about
an
issue.
H
I
I
I
don't
think
they're
any
more
if
we
have
statistics
on
on
long-term
rentals,
month-to-month,
rentals
or
hud
housing,
or
things
like
that,
I
can
almost
say
that
we'd
see
the
same
type
of
statistics
for
just
about
every
neighborhood
and
every
type
of
housing
that
we
we
look
at
we're
talking
about
53
calls
or
so
out
of
13
180..
I
It's
a
very
minute
amount
to
to
raise
red
flags.
In
my
opinion.
Again
perception
is,
is
relative
to
the
person
perceiving
it
and
I'm
sure
george
thinks
that's
a
cause
for
concern
and
we
should
probably
hire
a
whole
task
force
just
for
short-term
rentals.
But
in
my
opinion
those
statistics
don't
seem
alarming
and
I
don't
know
what
your
take
on
that
is
chief,
but
that's
what
I
heard
well.
H
C
H
No
it
it
have
to
be
a
a
computer
at
the
police
department
that
that's
set
up
to
to
out
of
our
records
management
system,
so
everything
is
going
to
come
out
of
our
record
management
system
and
that's
not
open
source.
Anybody
except
the
police
department,
is
restricted
by
by
the
department
of
justice.
H
C
H
G
I'm
pretty
much
like
councilman,
you
know
the
numbers
are
not
really
annoying.
The
only
thing
that
I'm
really
interested
in.
G
The
opening,
I
think
that
will
help
us
streamline
us
a
little
bit
better.
Thank
you,
mr
park.
E
Right,
yes,
thank
you,
mr
glavin,
just
like
to
point
out
that
I
believe
what
the
chief
said
was.
This
is
the
best
available
data.
I
think
if
he
was
a
betting
man,
I'm
sure
he's
not,
but
if
he
was
a
betting
man,
he
wouldn't
bet
anything
much
less
his
farm
on
this
data.
E
So
I
don't
know
you
know
the
validity
or
the
reliability.
It's
just
the
information
that
was
collected
using
probably
the
gentleman
from
atlanta,
maybe
as
a
guide
or
something
along
this
route
that
that
being
said
to
gather
more
relevant
information
to
actually
look
at
incidences
of
crime
related
to
short-term
rentals.
E
Probably
you
need
a
series
of
questions
that
every
officer
who
made
every
stop
or
visited
every
location
would
ask,
and
that
takes
time
in
addition
to
whatever
they
usually
do.
So
I
would
just
say
probably
my
opinion
is
that
we're
not
really
collecting
relevant
information,
we're
collecting
what's
easily
collected,
but
we're
really
not
correct,
collecting
enough
discrete
information
to
draw
any
conclusions
from
this.
Would
that
be
accurate
chief?
Do
you
feel.
E
J
That
the
chief
mentioned
that
there
were
461
that
are
appear
to
be
an
alexis
that
are
off
the
radar
that
doesn't
necessarily
mean
their
little
lexi,
because
we
check
on
that
a
great
deal.
That
means
that
they're
just
actually
using
bullets
and
because
of
the
name
recognition
they
could
be
in
the
county,
they
could
be
in
ocean
springs
or
somewhere
else.
J
F
J
I
think
john
had
mentioned
there
were
forty
four
thousand.
B
K
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
the
local
history
and
genealogy
department
is
having
a
program
this
saturday,
it's
at
11
o'clock
at
the
downtown
library
and
it's
going
to
be
presenting
for
the
first
time
a
lot
of
images
that
have
been
donated
to
us.
It's
focusing
on
two
separate
collections
that
have
been
given
to
us.
K
So
a
lot
of
those
images
that
they
have
in
their
archives
are
in
the
middle
of
being
processed
right
now
and
cataloged.
So
we're
going
to
have
a
lot
of
those
on
display.
Also,
there
is
a
local
photographer
named
chauncy
hinman.
He
was
a
professional
photographer
in
the
50s
all
the
way
to
the
80s,
and
he
took
a
wonderful
array
of
amazing
photographs.
Some
of
it's
simply
buildings,
some
of
its
architectural
things,
some
of
its
weddings.
He
had
a
really
broad
range
and
there
are
literally
thousands
and
thousands
of
photographs
that
we
were
given.
K
So
it's
a
national
competitive
grant.
We
applied
for,
we
received
ten
thousand
dollars
from
them
and
that
has
paid
for
equipment,
temporary
assistance
to
do
scanning
and
digitizing.
So
we
can
make
these
things
available
online,
as
well
as
in
print
version
and
also
housing
and
storage
for
them,
because
they
all
need
to
be
cared
for
in
a
very
specific
way.
K
So
we'd
love
to
see
you
there
and
if
you
can't
make
it,
if
you
check
out
our
facebook
page,
we
have
two
posts
a
week
from
both
of
those
collections
we've
had
through
the
summer,
our
latest
one,
how
to
reach
55
000
people
so
we're
getting
a
lot
of
exposure
from
it
and
they're
just
really
fun.
To
look
at.
L
L
They
basically
just
bought
these
properties
that
they
can't
use
them
as
intended
and
with
that
being
said,
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
afford
to
keep
them
because
their
business
model
was
based
on
a
projection
of
numbers.
That's
not
going
to
be
valid
if
they
can't
get
a
short-term
rental
permit.
L
So
you
know
just.
I
would
just
ask
some
really
careful
consideration
be
given
to
that,
because
you
know,
especially
in
zones
like
cb,
or
you
know,
the
high
density
residential
areas,
where
it's
a
use
by
right
or
a
conditional
use.
If
people
already
have
properties
there,
they're
not
going
to
be
able
to
do
it
if
there's
a
moratorium,
but
they
have
the
use.
They
have
that
right.
L
A
F
J
We're
doing
here
is
now
that
we
have
medical
cannabis
as
a
part
of
what
we're
doing
or
allowing
biloxi
we're
taking
a
regulated
business,
yes
table,
that's
in
the
laboratories,
we're
adding
the
cannabis
dispensaries
to
that
table
and
we're
showing
we're
just
following
what
the
state
law
says:
we're
showing
that
cannabis
dispensaries
have
to
be
at
least
a
thousand
feet
from
daycares
and
schools.
We
already
have
the
provision
in
there
for
the
places
of
places
of
worship,
so
all
we're
doing
is
adding
in
exactly
what
the
state
requires.
I
Mr
creel,
at
this
we're
removing
the
facility
frequented
by
16
to
18
year
olds.
I
saw
that
the
distance
is
stricken.
Those
words
aren't,
but
that's
the
intention.
I
guess
what
I'm
asking
is.
Is
this
an
error?
Is
this
like
something
that
was
on
the
photocopy
or
are
we
actually
striking
that
out
of
here?
No.
J
Actually,
we
started
out
with
that
under
consideration,
but
places
frequented
by
six
to
18
years
old
is
very
subjective.
I
mean
that
would
eliminate
anything
close
to
a
convenience,
store,
baseball
stadium
or
anything
else.
So
it's
not
something
that
you
can.
We
understand
that
language
being
in
there
for
the
adult
entertainment,
which
is
also
a
part
of
this
table,
but
for
the
medical
cannabis
injuries
at
the
planning
commission,
it
was
decided
that
that
was
a
little
bit
too
subjective,
so
that
was
taken
out.
I
But
in
the
state's
infinite
wisdom
they
actually
included
the
waiver
for
certain
facilities.
So
I'm
going
to
make
an
amendment
I'm
going
to
I'm
going
to
move,
to
amend
this
to
include
the
language
from
the
state
law
that
provides
a
waiver
for
medical
dispensaries
to
reduce
the
distance
from
places
of
worship,
daycares
and
schools
to
what
the
statutory
language
says.
I
The
law
and-
and
it
just
gives
the
ability
for
the
administrator
of
those
facilities,
whether
it's
the
church,
the
daycare
or
the
school,
to
sign
off
on
reducing
that
that
required
distance
of
a
thousand
feet
to
500
feet.
And
this
is
in
the
language
of
the
state
law.
I
think
we
spoke
earlier
and
you
are
okay
with
adding
that
language.
So
I'm
going
to
make
a
motion
to
amend
this
and
add
the
suggested
language.
B
The
chair
asks
that
I
give
councilman
barrett
on
the
regular
discussion
and
then
we'll
come
back
to
your
amendment.
Absolutely
okay!
Thank
you,
mr
donald,
mr.
I
have
nothing.
Okay
go
ahead
and
continue.
I.
I
Will
just
restate
my
my
my
motion
for
an
amendment
to
the
text,
language
in
the
ordinance
to
reflect
the
state's
waiver
inclusion.
B
All
right,
so
the
clarifier
mr
demon,
is
making
an
amendment
to
and
adhere
to
the
state's
recommendation
that
anyone
in
these
categories
can
apply
for
a
waiver
or
submit
a
waiver
on
behalf
of
the
operator
of
the
cannabis.
B
Is
that
correct,
correct?
Okay,
so
you
want
to
keep
it
at
the
500
feet
unless
the
school
or
daycare
offers
it's.
I
I
B
It's
just
a
minute:
there's
been
just
a
minute:
it's
been
motioned
and
seconded.
Now
we
have
discussion.
Okay,.
J
What
I
was
going
to
suggest,
if
you
would
like
to
table
this,
and
let
us
put
the
language
in
we
can
bring
a
clean
copy
back
to
the
council
so
that
y'all
can
vote
on
it
at
the
same
time.
It's
it's
entirely
up
to
you.
G
I
B
K
J
Well,
the
actually,
what
happened?
We
pulled
back
up
the
moratorium
where
this
had
been
presented
to
the
council
one
time
before,
and
the
six
months
was
already
in
that
moratorium
and
at
that
time
I
think
there
were
some
other
things
that
were
involved
where
it
looked
like
it
was
going
to
take
six
months,
but
we're
we
have
the
phase
one
of
the
overlay
district
that'll
be
going
to
the
planning
commission.
J
I
believe
next
week
next
thursday,
now
we're
going
to
have
to
do
that
in
phases
in
order
to
get
it
to
a
level
where
we
can
present
it
to
the
planning
commission
and
to
the
council
for
them
to
be
able
to
look
at
each
area
one
at
a
time
it
may
take
six
months
to
do
that,
but
we're
gonna
we're
gonna,
keep
bringing
them
to
the
council
as
they
get
through
the
planning
commission.
So
we're
not
gonna
waste
any
time
on
it.
F
E
From
our
the
council's
approval,
the
first
short-term
rental
which
was
probably
about
I
wanna,
say
three
and
a
half
or
four
years
ago,
jerry
mr
foster,
yes,
sir
on
battlefield
subdivision
and
I
voted
against
it
at
that
time.
Simply
because
we
had
no
ordinance
zero
ordinances
on
the
book
related
to
short-term
rentals,
and
we
had
a
couple
of
workshops
and
we're
still
having
workshops
and
still
having
moratoriums.
E
And
I
I
would
hope
that,
with
this
proposed
moratorium
that
we
would
finally
devote
the
time-
and
I
think
we
are
with
with
what
the
community
development
department
is
doing
now-
related
to
short-term
rentals,
where
they're
permitted,
where
their
condition
is.
J
E
I
understand
but,
but
I'm
pleased
that
we're
moving
forward
and
I
think
we
need
to
take
the
time
and
nail
this
down
what
get
folks
against
folks
enabled
in
in
residential
neighborhoods,
particularly,
is
the
creep
of
short-term
rentals
and
what
the
implications
are
in
terms
of
setting
precedence.
So,
hopefully
we'll
be
able
to
resolve
some
of
these
once
this
phased-in
overlay
is
presented
to
the
council.
So
I
would
urge
my
colleagues
to
vote
for
this
moratorium
that
gives
community
development
too
much
time
to
finish
what
they've
started.
G
Yes
and
dr
brought
up
something,
that's
just
interesting
when
mr
barry
foster
first
came,
I
think
I
was
sitting
on
the
planning
commission
while
we
were
trying
to
figure
this
out.
Mr
crayon
myself.
G
When
it's
finished
so,
if
you're
finished
up
in
a
couple
of
months,
you
know
maybe
they
can
move
past
this
here.
Six
months
is
a
long
time.
G
E
And
I
would
assume
that
would
include
limited
business
as
well.
Well,
it
doesn't
say
that
the
resolution,
but
I
think
the
previous
speaker
during
citizens
comments
was
worried
about
folks
who
may
be
in
the
process,
so
we're
not
discussing
that.
This
doesn't
study
those
commercial
districts
where
they're
permitted
by
right
we're
just
talking
on
the
basis
of
this
resolution
about
our
m20
and
rm30
residential
multi-family
conditional
uses.
J
B
I
have
a
couple
comments.
I
got
a
problem
moratorium
on
anything,
whether
it's
casino
or
short-term
rental,
without
a
little
bit
more
time
to
give
a
heads
up
to
the
business
community
or
to
other
entities
that
may
have
an
interest.
You
know
these
short-term
dental
cases
come
before
the
planning
commission.
They
vet.
It
recommend
it
comes
to
us
and
we
take
the
time
whether
we
like
it
or
not.
We
take
the
time
to
look
at
it.
Listen
to
the
council
person
in
that
award.
B
Listen
to
the
residents
in
that
word
and
then
weigh
the
decision.
Does
it
fit
in
that
particular
zone
and
what
may
be
around
that
zone,
so
I'm
struggling
with
supporting
the
military
at
this
time
without
having
maybe
an
additional
workshop
or
something
of
that
sort.
So
that's
that's
my
two
cents,
mr
bart.
F
I
I
agree
with
kenny
to
an
extent.
I
believe
that
I
mean
this
is
what
some
people
do
for
a
living
and
at
the
end
of
the
day,
it
goes
before
the
planning
commission
and
it
comes
before
the
council
and
there's
a
vote.
Sometimes
it's
70.
Sometimes
it's
4-3,
sometimes
it's
5-2,
whatever
the
two
or
three
people.
F
That
vote
no
aren't
happy
with
the
outcome,
but
that's
why
we
have
seven
people
sitting
on
this
board
and
there's
times
that
I
don't
like
the
outcome
of
the
vote
and
there's
times
that
others
on
this
board.
Don't
like
the
outcome
of
a
vote,
but
that's
why
we're
all
here?
That's
why
we
have
a
planning
commission
to
make
recommendations
to
us.
F
I
agree
with
mr
graham
I
would
like
to.
I
would
like
to
have
a
workshop
to
see
exactly
what
the
right
process
would
be
and
I
will
not
support
six
months,
even
if
we
went
to
that.
I
would
support
something
more
along
the
lines
of
two
months
and
we
bust
our
butts
and
get
it
done
because
we
are
a
tourist
town
and.
I
I
don't
have
much
more
to
say
than
mr
glavin
eloquently
said
and
and
followed
by
mr
barrett.
The
one
thing
I
would
remind
everyone
is
that
this
moratorium,
and
I'm
assuming
by
the
language
the
word
specifically
means
that
it's
only
reflective
of
rm20
and
rm30
right.
It
doesn't
affect
any
other
district.
This
proposed
moratorium.
If
it
were
to
pass
it,
would
only
it
would
only
prevent
short-term
rails
new
short-term
mails
from
a
period
or
applying
an
arm.
J
I
Was
that
the
intent
right,
nonetheless,
I'm
not
in
favor
of
the
moratorium?
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
exactly
what
is
on
the
table.
I
think
that
we
are
a
public
entity
and
I
think
public
notices
is
extremely
an
extremely
important
aspect
of
that,
due
process
that
everybody's
provided
and
being
that
this
does
interfere
with
the
business
ongoings
of
many
people.
We
probably
should
table
this
until
we
can
get
adequate
notice
to
the
operators
in
our
industry
that
they
provide
these
types
of
services.
I
So
that's
all
I
have.
Mr
president,
okay.
M
So
I
choose
not
to
raise
my
breath
on
where
I
stand,
but
I'm
going
to
specifically
say
that
I'm
not
for
a
moratorium
at
all
period.
Thank
you.
G
B
B
On
the
condition
that
we
hold
a
workshop
and
have
those
findings
agreed
with
the
with
the
six
months,
remember
that
up
to
all
right,
you
go
to
first.
Do
I
have
a
second
I'll
make
that
second,
second
by
mr
tuesday
discussion
just
to
be
sure,
I
understand
what
I'm
saying
just
one
second
discussion.
E
There's
a
moratorium
for
up
to
six
months
or
until
the
community
development
concludes
their
study
and,
following
the
conclusion
of
their
study,
they'll
be
a
workshop
for
the
council,
absolutely
on
what
they're
proposing
or
what
their
findings
are.
Absolutely
there
we
go
yeah
I'll.
Stick
with
that.
Second,
thank
you.
F
It's
on
this
piece
of
paper,
except
we're
sticking
that
we're
gonna
have
a
workshop
in
it.
I
will
agree
to
have
a
workshop
and
then
go
forward
from
there
and
see
what
you
decide,
but
I
can't
support
a
moratorium
without
first
knowing
what.
C
G
J
The
reason
the
reason
that
was
in
there
is
because
you
know
twice
before
the
council
has
asked
us
to
go
back
and
consider
removing
short-term
rental
from
residential
altogether
and
create
an
overlay
district,
and
we've
done
that
twice
and
each
time
we
brought
it
back
to
the
council.
The
overlay
district
failed.
J
So
basically,
what
we
did
is
go
back
and
pull
up
the
same
language
from
that
last
order
that
the
council
had
sent
out
about
creating
the
overlay
district
so
that
you're
kind
of
reviewing
something
you've
already
reviewed
twice
me
just
add
one
one
thing:
real,
quick:
we're
in
a
position
right
now,
where
every
and
we
did
this
on
purpose,
where
every
short-term
rental
in
rm20
and
rm
30
does
have
to
come
to
you
for
approval.
B
B
If
you
vote
for
the
amendment
up
to
six
months
up
to
up
to
six
months,
okay
call
for
the
question
all
in
favor
of
the
amendment
all
opposed.
F
B
N
D
O
D
O
P
E
E
If
you
look
at
the
third
way
as
each
of
the
six
subjects
being
retained,
blah
blah
blah
and
then
we
go
down
to
section
two:
there's
all
plastic
surgeon
service
agreements
for
each
of
the
ten
copiers,
I'm
assuming
it's
six
because,
what's
listed
on
the,
I
think
it's
a
copy
and
paste
error
on
exhibit
today
you've
got
six
copiers
listed.
That's
all
I'm
just
trying
to
clarify
that.
E
B
B
B
Any
objections
anybody
have
any
objections
to
any
or
other
than
mr
and
being
known,
go
ahead
and
vote
on
the
consent.
All
in
favor,
as
opposed
motion
case,
move
on
to
just
a
note
about
code
enforcement.
The
case
has
been
resolved,
so
we
do
have.
We
don't
have
a
hearing
today.
Thank
you,
director
motion
on
the
routine.
P
Good
afternoon
council,
so
last
tuesday
we
spoke
about
the
2.15
million.
We
did
receive
that
2.15
million
from
nema
last
thursday
and
we
have
an
additional
1.57
million.
That's
already
in
step,
four
or
five.
It's
been
there
about
four
years,
so
we
should
have
it
here
in
the
next
10
business
days.
B
You
thank
you
for
any
other
questions
on
the
routine
call
for
the
question
all
in
favor.
Those
opposed
motion
kills
that
you
will
entertain
a
motion
to
adjourn.
Secondly
by
mr
lawrence,
saying
about
mr
tisdale
in
favor.
Those
opposed
will
john
will
just
take
a
brief
minute
or
two
for
the
clark
to
get
reset
we'll
start
our
special
meeting
on
the
budget.