►
From YouTube: 2021.10.18 City Council Work Session
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
B
Thank
you,
okay,
so
we
have
folks
from
about
a
deal
group
today
to
talk
to
us
a
little
bit
about
the
audit.
H
B
Doing
well,
thank
you
for
being
here
being
here
tonight.
So
tell
us
tell
us
what
you
have
for
us.
C
Okay,
I'm
gonna
have
jake
share
his
his
screen
and
we're
gonna
go
through
a
quick
presentation
that
shows
us
the
audit
results
for
the
year
so
starting
on
page
two.
C
C
We
did
most
of
it
remotely
this
year,
which
is
obviously
a
a
bit
of
a
challenge,
but
you
know:
we've
we've
gotten
pretty
good
at
it
and
chuck
and
his
staff
are
very
flexible
and
we
certainly
appreciate
all
their
hard
work
and
getting
us
to
this
point.
So
that
being
said,
what
did
we
do?
C
This
is
a
clean
opinion.
This
is
the
highest
level
of
assurance
that
we
can
give
you
it's
exactly
what
you're
looking
for
the
second
bullet
there,
we
are
required
to
look
at
your
internal
controls
to
make
sure
that
they
are
properly
designed
and
operating
properly.
Happy
happy
to
report
no
findings.
There.
No
issues
in
terms
of
audit
adjustments.
C
I
Anyone
just
interrupt
me
if
you
have
questions
on
anything,
starting
with
the
government-wide
financial
statements
that
show
the
city
as
a
whole.
The.
B
Total
net
position-
hi
jake
jake,
I'm
sorry
to
interrupt
you
we're
having
a
really
hard
time
hearing.
You
clearly
not
sure
why,
maybe
you
can
come
a
little.
I
I
Okay,
so
again,
the
starting
with
the
government-wide
financial
statements
that
show
the
activities
of
the
city
as
a
whole.
At
december,
31
2020,
the
total
net
position
of
the
city
is
about
164
million.
That
includes
governmental
activities
in
that
position
of
about
160
million
and
the
remaining
4
million,
or
so
related
to
business
type
activities.
I
That
report
the
activities
of
vldc
and
borah
of
this.
We
always
make
sure
to
point
out
that
the
government-wide
financial
statements
are
heavily
driven
by
the
long-term
activities
of
the
city,
one
of
which
being
the
pension
liabilities
at
year-end.
The
total
pension
liabilities
were
a
little
over
39
million.
I
I
At
year
end
capital
assets
amounted
to
about
314
million
and
total
long-term
liabilities
were
about
278
million,
and
that
includes
general
obligation
debt.
So
your
bonds
of
about
170
million,
and
that
was
reflective
of
total
net
activity.
For
the
year
of
a
little
over
9
million,
and
in
the
current
year
there
was
the
one
debt
refunding
that
refunded
about
eight
million
dollars
of
bonds.
I
Moving
on
to
your
fund
financial
statements,
the
general
fund
reported
a
decrease
of
fund
balance
of
a
little
over
1
million
dollars
that
compares
to
the
expected
decrease
of
fund
balance
for
the
modified
budget
of
about
3.8
million
and
you'll,
see
in
the
financial
statements
and
the
budgetary
schedules
the
details
of
what
makes
up
that
about
2.1
million
dollar
of
a
favorable
variant
when
you're.
I
In
the
general
fund
sales
tax
revenues
pretty
consistent,
they
were
down
about
100
000
from
the
prior
year
sitting
at
13.2
million
about
200k
over
budget
and
expenditures
were
a
large
part
of
that
favorable
budget,
actual
variance
coming
in
at
about
3.3
million,
less
than
budgeted
amount,
and
the
primary
contributor
in
that
was
related
to
the
employee,
benefits
expenditures
being
about
1.1
million
dollars
less
than
budgeted.
I
As
far
as
the
other
funds,
the
one
thing
we
draw
attention
to
is,
if
you
look
at
the
fund
financial
statements,
you'll
see
a
significant
negative
fund
balance
in
the
capital
projects
fund
that
relates
primarily
to
the
65
million
dollar
bond
anticipation,
note
that
shows
as
a
liability
in
the
fund
and
when
that's
converted
into
long-term
debt
that
will
wipe
out
the
negative
fund
balance
of
that
fund
and
at
year-end
for
that
fund
of
those
debt
proceeds
there's
about
16
million
dollars
in
restricted
cash
for
those
ongoing
projects.
I
Lastly,
this
year,
we'll
point
out
to
you.
The
major
reporting
change
was
the
required
adoption
of
gas
b84
relating
to
fiduciary
activities.
I
This
was
required
to
be
adopted
for
your
current
year-end
overall,
not
a
huge
impact
to
your
financial
statements
compared
to
what
you
see
might
see
at
other
municipalities,
but
the
key
changes
that
you
will
see
reviewing
your
statements
this
year
are
agency.
Funds
no
longer
exist
under
the
standard.
I
There
is
a
custodial
fund
reported
in
the
fiduciary
funds
of
the
city
now,
but
what
is
remaining
in
that
is
significantly
reduced
from
what
you
would
see
in
prior
years
in
the
agency
fund.
The
main
thing
related
to
your
activities
was
the
removal
of
employee
payroll
withholdings
under
the
new
accounting
standard.
I
These
no
longer
meet
the
definition
of
fiduciary
activities,
so
the
cash
held
at
year-end
and
the
related
liability
is
now
reported
as
part
of
the
general
fund
and
in
making
these
adjustments
to
the
statements
at
the
prior
year
end.
It
would
be
about
350
000
that
was
no
longer
reported
in
the
agency
fund
and
moved
to
the
general
fund.
But
as
a
result
of
these,
these
adjustments
and
adoption
of
the
standard
there
wasn't
any
impact
on
the
beginning
balances
of
equity.
In
your
financial
statements.
J
I
So
that
was
your
unassigned
fund
balance
in
the
general
fund.
Total
fund
balance
in
the
general
fund
was
just
over
20
million
dollars
and
the
unassigned
portion
of
that
being
amounts
that
haven't
been
restricted
for
any
purposes
either
externally
or
internally,
or
the
amounts
appropriated
already
for
the
2021
budget.
B
Okay,
anything
else
that
you'd
like
to
add
on
chicken.
C
I'll
just
add
that
you
know
with
all
the
onyx.
You
know
all
the
things
that
went
on
in
2020.
This
is
certainly
a
good
financial
report
to
have
the
the
results
were
were
likely
better
than
expected
and
and
again
to
have.
No
internal
control
deficiencies
is,
is
certainly
a
testament
to
to
your
staff.
There.
B
B
All
right
so
we're
going
to
move
on
to
our
discussion,
cdac
fy48
annual
action
plan.
Steve
and
marianne-
are
you
guys
here
I
am-
I
am
here
yes
hi.
How
are
you.
K
B
L
I
guess
I
will
begin
what
we'd
like
you
guys
to
do
is
to
make
sure
if
you
can,
that
you
appoint
someone
from
your
district
to
join
the
cdac,
we're
running
short
of
members.
We
have
a
problem
sometimes
making
quorum,
and
this
has
caused
us
to
have
to
stop
meetings
or
not
start
them,
and
what
we
do,
as
you
all
know,
is,
is
pretty
important.
L
So
if
you
could
think
about
it,
please
find
someone
in
your
district
who
cares
about
the
city
and
who
would
like
to
come
on
board
and
promise
them
that
when
they
do,
we
are
a
very
user-friendly
group,
we're
extremely
normal.
If
you
will,
we
do
not
stand
on
ceremony
and
if
someone
comes
in
completely
green,
we
will
help
them
along
it's.
It's
not
something
they
have
to
worry
about.
Steve
is
an
excellent
person
to
guide
us.
L
He
has
been
golden
in
doing
what
he
needs
to
do
to
make
sure
that
we
move
forward.
So
if
you
could,
please
make
sure
that
you
have
all
of
your
appointments
done,
because
we
want
to
let
you
know
that
we're
always
improving
our
process
too
this
year
we're
going
to
be
doing
an
interview
form.
It
will
have
basic
questions
that
we
will
pass
out
to
everybody
with
whom
we
do
interviews.
L
B
M
You,
council
president,
thank
you
for
that
announcement.
Mrs
callahan,
can
you
clarify
there
are
appointments
already
made,
but
there
are
vacancies
that
are
outstanding,
correct.
L
That's
right,
but
can
you
highlight
the
vacant
season?
Steve
will
take
care
of
that.
Thank
you.
She
will
take
care
of
that.
I
just
want
to
let
you
know
that
I
would
like
you
also
to
consider
checking
in
with
your
person
every
once
in
a
while
who's
on
the
cdac
see
what
we're
doing
and
at
the
end
of
the
process.
If
you
could
say
thank
you
to
your
person,
it
would
be
really
greatly
appreciated.
L
L
It
was
agreed
between
the
mayor
and
the
county
executive
that
cdac
members
could
park
inside
the
parking
lot
that
you
all
park
in
when
you
go
to
town
town
meetings
and
if
we
get
there
before
six
with
county
security,
and
our
name
was
on
the
list,
we
were
able
to
park
there.
If
we,
when
we
start
again,
we
would
really
appreciate
it
if
we
could
continue
that
process.
It
makes
it
so
much
easier
for
everybody
to
do
so.
K
Thank
you.
Thank
you,
marianne.
So
specific
vacancies
still
existing
second
district,
the
sixth
district.
We
just
received
someone
from
the
seventh
district,
so
thank
you
for
that.
My
understanding
is
the
at-large
appointment
may
become
may
have
resigned.
I'm
not
sure
I
don't
want
to
speak
to
this
individual,
but
that
is
my
understanding
and
then
there's
also
a
mayoral
appointment,
I'm
sort
of
addressing
this
to
both
city
council
in
the
mayor's
office.
It's
just
a
meeting.
K
I
want
you
all
to
be
also
be
aware
that
all
of
the
odd
number
districts
the
terms
end
at
the
end
of
this
year.
There
is
no
city
council
election
this
year
that
please
correct
me
if
I'm
not
if
wrong.
So,
therefore,
anyone
who
is
in
city
council
now
can
appoint
someone
for
that.
Next
two-year.
K
Length
of
time,
so
please
do
many
of
the
current
members
are,
are
willing
to
go
on
and
do
it
for
another
term
and
they're
all
excellent.
Thank
you
by
the
way,
you've
chosen
very,
very
smart
individuals,
very
caring
individuals
to
be
involved
in
the
community.
K
So
that's
that
situation
there's
an
appointment
with
the
mayor's
office
that
does
end
at
the
end
of
this
year,
and
so,
therefore,
the
new
mayor
will
end
up
be
filling
that
position.
Well,
has
the
authority
to
fill
that
position,
but
the
vacant
position
can
still
be
filled
this
this
term.
K
So
I
wanted
to
just
let
you
know.
Just
like
marianne
said
you
know
we.
We
actually
lost
a
meeting
because
we
failed
reform
right
now.
We
only
have
eight
members
that
are
technically
appointed
and
we
need
six
at
least
for
quorum.
So
if
two
people
can't
even
make
it
that
makes
it
difficult,
councilman.
B
D
K
Yeah,
it's
odd
districts,
odd
years.
That's
when
the
terms
end
and
then
then
they
they
have
two
year
appointment
periods.
So
right.
The
next
appointment
period
would
be
from
1-1
2022
to
12
31
2023.
K
Thank
you
so
just
also
explain.
What's
going
on
the
action
plan
process
is
a
little
different.
This
year
we've
been,
I
believe,
even
some
council
members
asked
us
to
clarify
this
and
cdac
had
asked
us
to
clarify
it
too,
so
so
fiscal
year
47
will
be
for
the
first
eight
months
only
of
next
year
that's
already
been
well,
it's
quasi
been
approved.
K
We
had
an
issue
with
hud
and
we
will
have
to
bring
it
back
before
city
council
to
reapprove
the
budget
with
a
30-day
public
comment
period,
but
they
have
to
approve
the
initial
budget
first,
so
currently
working
on
fiscal
year
48
that
will
extend-
and
this
is
in
case
people-
ask
what
we're
doing
now.
This
will
be
september,
2022,
so
august
2023.
N
K
Going
to
have
a
new
mayor
next
year
and
in
2022
we're
going
to
have
departments,
make
recommendations.
That'll
include
the
mayor's
office,
the
new
mayor's
office
to
city
council.
The
way
we
did
it
last
year
too,
that
was
extremely
useful.
We
got
a.
K
From
the
mayor's
office
on
that
I
want
to,
I
want
to
say
I
really
enjoyed
that
at
the
same
time,
just
to
agree
with
what
marianne
said.
City
council
has
a
voice
in
this
too,
although
technically
cdac
members
represent
the
community
and
they
represent
the
person
that
appointed
them.
Cbac
members
are
not,
you
know,
omniscient.
K
So
if
you
hear
something
from
the
community,
if
you
would
like
your
cdac
member
to
maybe
talk
to
someone,
of
course,
I
can
talk
to
them
as
well,
but
it
serves
much
better
if
it
goes
to
the
cdac
or
your
ears,
because
you're
able
to
understand
that
need
for
something,
and
so
it's
a
good
idea
for
the
cdac
members
to
be
involved
so
that
they
know
this
stuff
as
well.
K
So
so
one
of
the
big
changes
next
year
will
be
the
30-day
public
comment
period
that
will
be
done
after
whoever
is
the
chair
of
the
cdac
at
that
time
makes
a
recommendation
to
city
council.
Our
goal
is
to
plan
that
in
march,
so
with
the
new
mayor,
you
know
we'll
have
we'll
present
the
budget
to
the
city
council
mayor.
The
new
mayor
will
then
have
to
make
a
budget.
That
budget
then
goes
to
city
council
well
for
public
review
for
30
days.
K
There
will
need
to
be
a
public
hearing
at
that
point,
just
like
you
normally
do,
but
that's
going
to
qualify
as
the
official
second
public
hearing
of
the
30-day
public
notice
of
the
action
plan.
K
All
this
has
to
be
done
and
has
to
be
approved
before
mid
july
as
normal,
and
I
think
that's
where
we're
at
with
that.
So
just
letting
you
guys
know
some
of
the
changes
to
the
process.
This
will
be
the
process
going
forward.
This
puts
the
city's
hud
year
and
contracts
and
programs
in
sync
with
the
the
actual
entitlement
here
the
city
is
signed
up,
for
it
allows
the
public
to
have
a
full
review
of
the
final
mayoral
city
council
budget
for
the
action
plan
with
time
to
provide.
K
You
know
a
good
quality
amount
of
good
quality
feedback
and
time
to
respond
to
the
suggestions
just
like
last
year.
This
won't
just
be
general
ones,
you're,
not
just
going
to
be
approving
streets
or
whatever.
This
will
be
specific
streets,
specific
parks
projects,
specific
social
service
projects.
These
will
be
things
that
the
community
will
actually
see,
and
so
this
is
all
part
of
the
changes
in
the
action
plan
process
which
hud
is
is
has
told
us.
You
know,
make
sure
you
start
following.
Is
this
a
little
bit
more
strictly?
K
So
that's
what
I
have
to
say
about
that.
Does
anyone
have
any
questions
for
me
or
for
marianne.
B
B
Hi
ron,
how
are
you
okay,
so
we
have
rl
21-218,
tell
us
a
little
bit
about
that.
N
B
I
don't
see
any
hands
up
ron
since
we
got
you
here,
you
have
any
updates
by
any
chance
regarding
the
chambers
that
route.
N
Yes,
but
the
reason
the
reason
it
takes
so
much
time
is,
we
can't
start
the
inside
work
until
the
roof
is
put
on
and
they
have
started.
They
have
started
the
roof,
but
this
rain
slowed
them
down,
but
once
because
penetration
of
the
of
the
fasteners
for
the
roof
knock
off
some
asbestos
inside,
so
that's
why
we
can't
start
the
inside
work
until
this
is
completely
done.
B
Yes,
oh
sorry,
councilman
burns.
Sorry,
I
didn't
see
your
hand.
J
N
J
N
Well,
I
think,
they're
I
think
they're
okay
for
now,
because
the
season's
almost
over
mm-hmm
and
I'm
trying
to
work
it's
going
to
need
a
comprehensive
solution.
It's
not
just
fixing
that
one
pipe!
That's
going
to
be
the
answer.
I
think
we
also
need
to
stop
a
lot
of
that
flow.
Coming
off
of
the
from
the
road
and
running
right
down
through
the
park
into
the
glen.
I
would
like
to
divert
some
of
that
and
take
it
off
to
the
take
it
off
to
the
west
before
it
gets
there.
O
B
F
A
O
P
B
Doing
okay
tell
us
about
rl
21-225,
please.
P
Okay,
this
was
taking
place
before
I
took
office
here
my
spot,
but
I've
been
informed
and
included
into
going
forward
and
we're
looking
to
transfer
some
funds
to
help
get
some
vehicles
through
the
year.
We've
got
three
new
garbage
trucks
coming
next
year,
but
we
do
have
some
very
old
vehicles
that
need
repair
and
we
just
don't
want
to
be
left
without
those
on
the
road.
Q
G
A
P
Okay,
I
started
with
a
city
in
89
the
city
of
bampton.
I
started
on
the
back
of
a
garbage
truck.
I
worked
my
way
all
the
way
up
without
skipping
one
spot
to
a
assistant
supervisor,
then
I
went
to
a
supervisor
in
the
blacktop
department.
I
worked
at
for
probably
seven
years
and
then
I
transferred
over
a
singles
shop
and
I
worked
at
for
probably
another
seven
years,
so
I
got
about
32
and
a
half
years
total
in
service.
M
Thank
you
council
president.
Forgive
me
bernice,
I'm
not
sure
we've
seen
you
before.
Can
you
tell
us
your
role.
Q
As
well,
I'm
a
street
superintendent
with
the
city
I've
been
in
that
position
for
about
seven
and
a
half
years
now.
So
I
kind
of
oversee
a
lot
of
the
mill
and
pave
program
and
just
some
day-to-day
operations
for
public
works.
Q
B
All
right
we're
moving
on
to
jared
it's
jared
on.
O
The
first
one
is
to
use
arapa
funds
to
pay
for
water
and
sewer
improvements.
This
is
mostly
when
we
did
the
budget
over
the
last
couple
weeks.
I
mentioned
to
you
that
we
didn't
put
any
water
and
sewer
lines
into
a
bonding
thing.
We
were
going
to
use
our
funds.
This
is
the
rl
now
bringing
down
the
2
million
dollars
for
sewer
lines
and
750
000
for
water
lines
that
we
believe
we're
going
to
need
for
next
year's
street
reconstructions.
O
O
If
you
remember,
we
didn't
fund
some
of
the
things
like
for
luma,
the
parades
dick's
open,
some
of
those
other
to
I-fest,
I'm
trying
to
name
a
few
up
top
my
head.
This
will
give
the
next
administration
the
opportunity
to
actually
fund
luma
more
if
they
want
to
or
other
projects
that
may
come
about.
This
isn't
hopefully
going
to
be
for
one
year.
Hopefully,
this
is
for
a
multi-year
project.
B
Any
questions
for
chuck
councilman,
riley.
M
O
M
Okay
and
that
plan
is
out,
you
said
it's
out
there:
where
is
it
posted.
M
Okay,
can
you
share
something
with
us
that
is
describing
the
priority
at
this
point
that
may
be
adjusted
by
the
next
administration.
G
Yes,
I
did
thank
you,
hi
chuck.
A
G
G
O
G
Oh,
I
see
okay,
so
I
did
I
actually
now,
I'm
I'm
looking
at
the
legislation,
so
the
the
one
from
september
1st
says
water,
filtration
plan
and
sewer
and
water
pump
stations.
So
this
is
you
what
what
is
the
difference,
then,
between
that.
O
G
J
O
I'm
not
100
sure
sitting
here
I
got
a
spreadsheet,
I
can
put
it
together
and
send
it
out
to
everybody,
I'm
gonna!
Guess
it's
take
three
million
dollars
off.
I
think
we're
about.
I
think,
before
we'd
allocated
about
25
million.
I
think
if
you
take
this
out
of
there,
this
is
another
three
million,
so
you'd
have
about
28
out
of
the
46,
whatever
that
leaves
18.
Maybe
all.
A
Is
that
for
me?
Yes,
yes,
all
right,
I
I
just
thought
chuck.
I
I'm
just
going
to
make
a
commentary
there's
miles
and
miles
of
water
and
sewer
lines
in
the
city
that
are
50,
60,
even
100
years
old,
which
obviously,
as
a
city,
would
have
enough
money
to
fix
all
those.
Now
I
I
think
it's
a
good
start
here,
but
I
I
think
people
should
realize
that
there's
so
many
miles
of
old
old
pipe
underneath
the
roads
that
need
to
be
addressed
at
some
point.
Obviously
thank
you.
O
Tom,
let
me
add,
to
that
a
little
bit.
We
could
take
46
million
dollars,
arpa
funds
and
you
still
wouldn't
have
enough
money
to
fix
all
the
underground
work.
O
There's
more
sewer
work
out
there
that
needs
to
be
done
today
than
water,
but
they're
both
expensive
and
right.
Now,
there's
more
sewer
problems
than
there
are
water
problems.
M
Councilman
right,
thank
you
again
and
that's
why
we
would
like
to
know
what
roads,
what
pipes
are
prioritized
based
upon
their
age.
We
need
something
we
have
nothing.
So
I
would
like
to
know
how
the
priority
has
been
defined
and
what
areas
of
concern
are
the
primary
target
for
this
money.
O
B
Okay,
chuck
you're
still
with
us,
so
we're
moving
on
to
rl
21
215.
O
This
is
to
allocate
another
30
000
arpa
funds
to
cover
coronavirus
expenses.
As
of
this
morning,
I
had
another
15
000.
It
was
requested
by
the
fire
department
for
their
ambulance
use.
So
if
I
could
increase
this
to
45
000
instead
of
30
I'd
appreciate
that
this
is
basically
to
take
care
of
all
the
cleaning.
The
masks,
the
gloves
and
things
of
that
nature
for
all
city
employees
and
cleaning
that
takes
place
inside
here.
O
We
have
used
all
the
money
that
we
have
for
I'm
going
to
call
it
ppe
type
stuff
related
to
covet.
M
Okay
and
and
now
remind
me,
so
we
would
request
that
information
about
that
budget
from
you
correct.
M
Well,
I
know
we
we
had
steve
outlining
some
of
the
allocations,
but
in
terms
of
the
movement
of
that
fund
into
city
lines,
would
that
be
steve
in
the
reporting?
Would
that
be
steve
or
would
that
be
you
chuck.
O
M
Okay,
because
those
are
two
different
lines
yet
the
city
did
receive
funding
from
the
cares
and
the
covet
to
cover
the
cleaning
which
is
necessary,
and
I
I
know
there
were
several
allocations,
so
I
just
want
to
be
accurate
in
terms
of
who
I
seek
for
certain
reporting
lines.
B
Okay,
rl
21-216.
O
O
217
is
a
very
similar
situation,
except
for
this
is
a
grant
line
that
came
from
the
federal
government
for
explosive
detective
k9
grant
and
that
grant
did
not
spend
2
249
dollars.
So
I'm
removing
that
from
the
expense
line
and
the
revenue
line.
G
You
thank
you,
madam
president,
so
this.
If
we're
closing
the
grant
line
for
this
explosive
detection,
canine
my
we
still
have
an
explosive
detection
canine
on
the
police
force
now
correct.
O
G
O
27
is
too,
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me,
but
I
know
it's
roughly
85
000
for
demolitions,
where
the
money
is
gonna,
come
from
an
individual's
health
or
insurance
line.
So
there's
been
a
house,
I'm
just
gonna.
I
don't
have
it
in
front
of
me.
I
think
it
was
57
front
street
or
74
front
street
where
there
was
a
fire
and
we're
going
to
go
after
the
owner
to
either
pay
for
it
or
have
his
insurance
pay
for
the
demolition.
B
O
B
How
are
you
doing
well,
you
are
up
and
you
have
the
rl21219.
H
Wonderful
well
tonight
is
my
pleasure
to
put
on
my
director
of
personnel
on
safety
hat
and
report
that
the
csea
as
a
bargaining
unit
voted
in
support
of
the
2022-2024.
H
H
Most
people,
I
would
say
most
council
members-
are
probably
interested
in
how
much
this
costs.
The
city
proposed
and
csea
accepted
a
three
percent
increase
for
2022,
a
three
percent
increase
for
2023
and
a
2
increase
for
2024,
so
for
a
total
of
an
8
percent
increase
over
the
life
of
the
contract.
H
In
addition,
due
to
pandemic
concerns
and
predominantly
because
csea
took
a
zero
in
2021
at
a
time
where
we
were
bootstrapped
and
had
no
idea
what
the
future
would
look
like
csa
is
a
smaller
bargaining
unit
comprised
of
52
members.
The
city
also
proposed
in
csea,
agreed
to
a
two
thousand
dollar
stipend
for
each
of
those
52
members
payable
within
30
days
of
contract
ratification.
H
H
The
two
thousand
dollar
stipend,
payable
within
30
days
of
contract
ratification
was,
it
would
be
approximately
and
four
thousand
dollars.
In
addition,
we
have
some
csa
members
who
are
essential
workers
like
code
enforcement
that
continue
to
perform
their
duties
during
the
pandemic.
I
would
include
our
engineers
in
this
category.
They
continue
to
expose
themselves
not
only
to
members
of
the
public
so,
for
example,
our
sanitation
department,
those
were
the
guys,
those
refuse
workers
who
were
picking
up
people's
tissues
and
other
garbage
during
the
pandemic.
H
So
what
we
did
and
proposed
was
the
creation
of
a
ten
thousand
dollar
pool
from
arpa
and
individual
employees.
I
should
say
code
enforcement
engineers
etc.
Not
teamsters
excuse
me
would
be
eligible
to
apply
to
the
comptroller
for
a
part
of
this
pool
of
money
of
this
ten
thousand
dollars.
H
That
amount
would
be
determined
based
off
of
not
their
currently
hourly
rate,
but
their
ten
thousand
dollars
total
number
of
hours
divided
by
ten
thousand
dollars
would
be
the
rate
we
would
be
paying
any
eligible
employee
under
arpa
with
a
max
of
two
thousand
dollars
limited
per
person.
So,
for
example,
our
workers
in
our
treasury
department
or
mailroom,
who
literally
had
to
open
people's
mail
and
saliva
during
the
pandemic.
Things
like
that
who
were
receiving
first-hand
exposures
might
be
eligible.
H
The
way
that
we
created
this
small
arpa
pool
was
to
make
application
to
the
comptroller
and
upon
approval
by
bonadio
our
auditing
group
saying
that,
yes,
they
are
eligible,
then
they
would
be
eligible
to
receive
that
very,
very
small
amount
of
arpa
funding,
so
that's
kind
of
where
we
are
on
the
monetary
side,
so
we're
looking
at
a
total
increase,
cost
to
the
contract
of
approximately
325
000,
and
that
would
include
your
stipend
as
well
as
your
salary
increases.
H
The
stipends
don't
go
to
longevity
or
base
pay
and
are
likely
not
to
be
pensionable.
With
regards
to
other
highlights,
similar
to
the
last
contract,
I've
presented,
we
edited
the
language
with
regards
to
dues
deduction
to
be
consistent
with
the
supreme
court's
decision.
In
janus,
we
updated
the
language
in
the
contract
to
be
gender
neutral.
We
added
the
federal
holiday
of
juneteenth.
H
We
clarified
some
other
issues
in
the
contract
that
were
unclear,
for
example,
when
you
have
to
present
a
physician's
certification,
so,
for
example,
in
this
particular
contract,
you
needed
approval
from
the
department
head
in
order
to
take
sick
leave.
As
many
of
you
know,
that's
a
violation
of
law.
So
a
lot
of
the
changes
that
we
made
were
to
be
consistent
with
both
law
and
policy.
One
of
the
other
things
I'm
excited
about.
H
That's
in
this
contract
is
we're
granting
csea
members
the
opportunity
for
two
days
of
bereavement
leave
in
the
event,
god
forbid
that
they
do
need
it.
They
didn't
have
that
before
they
had
to
take
their
vacation,
pl
or
otherwise.
Unpaid
time.
With
regards
to
health
insurance,
like
the
last
contract,
I
presented
it's
one
of
the
mayor's
priorities
to
make
sure
those
health
insurance
numbers
continue
to
increase
because
they
constitute
a
large
financial
burden
to
the
city.
So,
for
example,
our
classic
blue
plan.
I
think,
there's
only
a
handful
of
employees
remaining
on
this
plan.
H
I
think
you
had
to
be
here
for
at
least
20
years
to
be
eligible
to
be
on
this
plan.
Everything
is
cost
neutral
for
year,
one
that's
2022,
and
then
the
percentages
go
up
in
each
following
year,
so,
for
example,
for
classic
blue
in
2023,
that
percentage
would
be
21
contribution
and
in
2023
would
be
22
contribution.
H
In
contrast,
the
ppo
which
is
currently
at
18
will
stay
cost
neutral
for
2022
increased
to
19
for
2023
and
then
go
to
20
in
2024,
which
is
where
we
tried
to,
which
is
where
we
got
police
to
be
at
the
end
of
their
contract
as
well,
so
that
keeps
everything
in
parity.
H
Other
adjustments
to
health
insurance
includes
clarifying
language
with
regards
to
the
health
savings,
account
the
city's
right
to
actually
change
insurance
companies,
which
was
not
in
the
prior
contract.
In
the
event,
there
is
a
better
rate
and
ensuring
that
everyone
receives
the
same
amount
if
they
are
entitled
to
the
health
insurance
incentive.
What
that
is,
if
you
are
eligible
for
either
your
spouse,
your
military
or
another
employee's
plan
such
like
an
electrical
union.
H
We
incentivize
you
by
paying
you
twenty
six
hundred
dollars
in
the
past
csva
had
a
very
complex
provision
that
paid
you
more
money
depending
on
the
number
of
people
participating,
but
ultimately
they
never
got
higher
than
that
2600
amount.
So
it's
just
removing
unnecessary
contract
language.
This
contract
also
acknowledges
the
calendar
creep.
That
is
sometimes
you
have
27
fridays
or
payable
fridays.
In
a
given
year.
You
will
see
I
will
be
coming
back
to
you,
along
with
likely
our
comptroller
to
have
some
similar
charter
language
added.
H
What
that
means
in
layman
terms,
is
this
year
we
were
on
27
pay
periods,
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
that's
part
of
the
contract,
so
our
employees
are
on
notice
that
at
times
that
can
happen
happens
about
every
decade
or
so
we
cut
the
merit
increase
pool
and
we
cut
leave
of
absences
for
other
employment.
The
other
employment
provision,
for
example,
used
to
apply
to
you,
could
take
a
leave
of
absence
to
work
for
another
city
agency.
The
city
used
to
house
bha,
for
example.
We
don't
anymore.
H
So
this
is
another
provision
that
would
kind
of
be
null
and
void,
because
there
isn't
another
city
agency
for
an
employee
to
go
to.
It
leads
to
employee
confusion,
and
so
that's
been
cut.
We
clarified
what
a
promotion
is,
that
is
a
promotion
to
a
higher
rate
of
pay
or
a
direct
line-
title,
let's
say
from
engineering
tech
to
assistant
engineer.
So
we
clarified
that
language,
our
prior
language
made
it.
H
Essentially,
if
you
want
to
go
to
another
job
within
the
bargaining
unit,
you
automatically
got
a
seven
percent
increase,
so
it
wasn't
in
line
with
what
the
city
actually
means
by
promotion,
we
agreed
to
do
a
salary
study.
I
actually
think
some
of
you
might
be
interested
in
that,
so
we
agreed
to
do
a
salary
study
with
a
deadline
of
2023
to
present
to
the
commission.
H
One
of
the
reasons
why
that
is
csda
like
some
of
our
management
tested
employees
are
notoriously
underpaid
for
their
particular
positions,
but
it's
difficult
to
know
that
outside
of
anecdotally
okay,
so
you
can
see
on
our
salary
schedule.
We
have
some
starting
salaries
that
are
still
in
the
mid
to
high
20s
right,
very
difficult
to
hire
at
those
rates,
but
rather
than
relying
on
anecdotal
information.
H
For
that
we
put
the
onus
not
only
on
csda
but
also
on
the
city,
to
look
at
comparable
bargaining
units,
comparable
types
of
activities
and
not
solely
rely
on
the
title
of
that
activity
right
and
that
way
we
can
update
our
titles
and
our
job
descriptions
and
make
sure
that
we
are
compensating
people
fairly
for
what
we
expect
them
to
do
so
you'll
see
some
of
that
salary
study.
Language
is
all
in
article.
What
is
it
article
12
sections?
One
is
the
salary
sections
two
is
this
study?
H
The
other
change
is
to
parking
when
csda's
last
contract
is
in
effect,
the
collier
street
ramp
was
still
standing
not
anymore,
so
our
csea
employees
used
to
be
entitled
to
five
parking
spots
over
at
collier
street,
and
so
we
had
to
adjust
that
most
of
most
of
our
cse
employees
park
over
at
the
state
street
ramp
for
15
an
hour.
That's
also
in
the
contract.
That's
an
automatic
right.
They
have
the
right
to
do
that
with
regards
to
the
other
employees
who
don't
want
to
walk
that
far.
H
There
are
updated,
quote
schedules:
schedule
a
is
the
starting
salaries
with
all
of
the
titles
schedule
b,
I
believe,
is
the
40
hour
a
week,
employees,
so
those
employees
who
work
eight
hours
a
day
within
the
bargaining
unit.
I
believe
schedule
c
is
the
retained
titles.
Those
are
all
the
positions
that
are
still
within
the
bargaining
unit
that
are
just
not
filled.
H
We
don't
actively
have
them,
but
we
retain
them,
because
if
we
didn't,
then
we
could
potentially
lose
them
and
not
be
able
to
use
those
transferable
titles
and
exhibit
d
is
the
proposed
arpa
application
for
those
essential
workers
who
want
consideration
for
the
10
000
arpa
pool?
I
just
blew
that
blue
by
all
of
that
very
very
fast,
as
is
my
practice,
but
I
am
happy
to
take
any
questions
either
in
detail
now
or
follow
up
via
email.
B
You're,
muted,
I'm
not
thank.
D
You,
madam
president,
no
that
was
me.
Thank
you,
madam
president.
Hey
sharon
good
evening.
How
are
you
good
good
great
to
see
you?
Thank
you
again
for
that
great
review
of
that
you
always
you
always
hit
the
nail
on
the
head
with
these.
I
had
two
questions.
Actually,
so
the
first
one
is
with
respect
to
the
new
federal
holiday.
D
H
So
that's
a
very
good
question
for
dpw.
My
presumption
is,
as
with
all
of
our
federal
holidays,
based
off
of
contract.
If
they
fall
on
a
saturday,
then
it's
gonna
affect
the
friday
schedule.
If
they
fall
on
a
sunday,
it'll
likely
affect
the
monday
schedule.
I
can't
imagine
it
would
be
any
different
than
that,
but
I'm
happy
to
follow
up
with
dpw
to
make
sure.
D
I
appreciate
that.
Thank
you.
The
second
question
I
had
was,
and
please
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
I
believe
in
prior
csea
contracts,
management
tested
positions,
are
they
covered
under
those
or
not
covered
under
those?
Aren't
they
generally
covered
under
csea
contracts.
H
H
124
sub
39,
through
40.
and
and
essentially
what
it
does
is
it
lists
the
number
of
management
tested
employees.
I
think
that's
under
sub
two
there
and
then
it
has
a
provision
that
says
the
mayor
is
authorized
to
provide
salary
increases
on
parity
with
csea
for
management
tested
employees.
You
know,
and
a
salary.
H
Is
generally
those
raises
that
we
were
talking
about
in
2020,
csea
took
the
zero
and
this
particular
the
two
thousand
dollar
stipend
is
in
consideration.
For
that
you
know,
I'm
not
sure
the
mayor
has
made
a
decision
as
to
whether
or
not
that
stipend
is
going
to
go
to
management
tested
employees.
What
I
will
tell
you
is:
there
are
benefits
under
the
csea
contract
that
don't
necessarily
inert
to
management
tested
employees
parking,
for
example.
H
I
don't
believe
management
tested
was
given
parking
over
at
collier
street
there's
a
provision
of
the
csva
contract
that
has
to
do
with
flexible
hours,
and
I
I
don't
believe
management
tested
has
that
particular
benefit
you
know,
but
when
you're
talking
about
monetary
benefits
and
what
can
be
construed
as
salary,
you
know
there's
potentially
an
argument
to
be
made
that
the
mayor
has
some
authority
to
keep
that
stipend.
H
I'm
not
sure
if
he's
choosing
to
do
that,
if
we
budgeted
for
that,
but
I
certainly
think
that
that's
a
relevant
inquiry
and
I'm
happy
to
follow
up
with
him
tomorrow,
but
my
understanding
is
that
csea
will
be
given
the
salary
increases
that
management
tested.
Employees
will
be
given
beginning
in
about
20,
I
should
say
in
2022,
2023
and
2024
right.
D
Now
I
I
appreciate
that
the
the
the
particular
area
with
respect
to
this
contract
is,
I
guess
you
could
say,
covet
related.
I
I
was
wondering
specifically
with
respect
to
the
the
the
pandemic
considerations
are.
Is
there
any
way
you
can
confirm
or
deny
just
kidding
whether
management
tested
positions?
D
H
So
the
the
pandemic
provisions
and
csea
are
kind
of
broken
down
in
two
parts.
One
is
the
stipend
and
the
other
is
the
very
small
arp
pool
okay.
So
I
don't
actually
have
a
final
answer
on
either
of
those.
I
know
that
the
way
that
we've
set
up
the
arpa
pool
is
is
very
much
limited
to
csea
employees
as
to
whether
or
not
the
mayor
is
going
to
consider
that
stipend
as
part
of
the
salary
increase
for
2021.
H
Happy
to
follow
up
with
mayor
and
chuck
tomorrow,
I
understand
the
consideration,
seeing
as
many
of
them
make
the
same
rate
or
similar
rates
as
our
csea
employees
and
had
similar
exposures.
You
know,
and
if
that's
something
the
council
is
interested
in,
you
know
advocating
for
to
the
extent
that
the
mayor
has
a
contrary
position.
I
have
no
information
to
believe
that
he
he
doesn't.
I
just
don't
have
any
information
confirming
that
the
that
management
tested
is
going
to
receive
that
1000
stipend
within
30
days
of
contract.
D
H
G
Thank
you,
hi
sharon,
hi
councilwoman.
Thank
you
as
always
for
a
thorough,
yet
also
succinct.
I
don't
know
how
you
managed
to
do
that,
but
thank
you
for
presenting
this
contract
to
us.
I
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
could
talk
more
about
article
19.
It
just
says
education
reserved.
H
Oh
sure,
so
that's
a
great
question.
So
one
of
the
things
that
came
up
during
our
contract
negotiations
was
this
issue
of
an
educational
incentive
in
many
of
our
contracts.
We
give
a
a
small
stipend
each
year
in
the
form
of
about
a
hundred
or
two
hundred
dollars.
If
you
some
some
up
to
three
hundred
dollars,
I
believe,
if
you
have
a
associates
or
a
bachelor's,
usually
there's
the
difference.
Right
is
your
pen
paying
a
smaller
amount
for
the
associates
and
maybe
a
higher
amount
for
bachelor's.
H
There
was
some
discussion
about
that
this
year.
We
wanted
to
reserve
it
so
that
we
continue
to
have
that
discussion.
H
There
was
mixed
feelings,
even
amongst
the
membership
about
whether
or
not
we
were
rewarding
some
people
who
had
the
luxury
of
going
to
get
an
education
when
other
people
didn't
and
they
had
to
enter
the
workforce,
and
therefore
we
were
rewarding
people
who
had
the
luxury
of
getting
an
education
incentive,
and
you
know
essentially
penalizing
people
who
had
to
enter
the
workforce
right
away
due
to
monetary
or
familial
considerations,
so,
rather
than
pretending
that
we
didn't
have
that
discussion
at
all.
H
Often,
what
municipalities
and
unions
do
is
we'll
reserve
it,
because
we
want
to
make
sure
that
it
comes
up
again
during
the
next
negotiating
session
and
educational
incentives
generally
are
a
mandatory
subject
of
bargaining.
I
don't
know
who's
going
to
be
here
in
2024,
but
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
that
it
that
the
discussion
continues.
G
G
H
G
So,
in
that
case,
if
this
contract
is
approved
for
the
education
stipend,
would
that
be
the
same
as
like
would
would
we
be
using
the
old
education
agreements
until
discussed?
Otherwise.
H
Yeah,
let
me
clarify
so
csv.
I
never
received
an
educational
incentive,
they've,
never
gotten
one,
so
we
I
try
and
make,
especially
as
we're
looking
at
multiple
contracts.
At
the
same
time,
provisions
and
other
contracts
available
to
this
bargaining
group
csda
is
one
of
the
few
bargaining
groups
that
does
not
receive
any
type
of
incentive
for
education.
So,
for
example,
fire
receives
an
education
incentive
if
they
wind
up
taking
getting
a
certified
class
or
a
degree
in
a
particular
area.
That's
useful
for
the
fire
department.
H
Emergency
management,
for
example-
csa-
didn't
have
anything
like
that.
So
there's
no
education
agreement,
that's
a
default.
You
know,
rather
it's
making
sure
that
every
year,
even
if
we
decide
to
do
nothing,
there's
some
discussion
about
whether
or
not
we
should
be
incentivizing
members
of
csda
to
get
an
education
or
really,
conversely,
how
it
applies
to
us
how
we
incentivize
people
with
educational
experience
and
credentials
to
come
to
the
city
right.
E
Thank
you,
madam
president,
tried
to
jump
on
before,
but
that's
fine.
I
just
wanted
to
affirm
councilman
springs
question
to
to
you
sharon.
I
just
I
don't
wanna,
maybe
advocates
too
strong
a
word,
but
I
would
like
to
investigate
further
in
and
support
your
at
least
you
know
inquiring
about
that.
I
I
think
similarly
situated
employees,
I
don't
want
to
say
fair,
but
we
did
have
a
lot
of
other
employees
that
worked
through
the
pandemic
as
well.
That
probably
are
not
overpaid.
E
D
J
You,
yes,
thank
you,
madam
president,
yeah.
I
too
would
agree
with
that
that
the
people
work
through
the
pandemic,
whether
or
not
they're,
you
know
management
tested
or
not.
J
J
H
H
So
it's
an
amount
up
to
ten
thousand
dollars
that
they
would
be
eligible
for
not
necessarily
the
whole
thing,
and
what
that
has
to
do
with
is
the
number
of
essential
workers
who
apply
the
amount
of
work,
the
actual
hours
that
they
worked
in
the
field
or
in
the
office,
so
it
would
not
be
eligible
or
employees
who
worked
from
home
would
not
be
eligible
for
that
time.
Employees
who
took
furlough
would
not
be
eligible
for
that
time.
H
It's
just
the
days
that
they
put
in
working
either
in
the
field
or
essentially
in
city
hall,
doing
their
essential
work.
And,
frankly,
not
every
member
of
cse
is
going
to
be
eligible
because
not
all
of
them
are
essential
workers.
So
it's
a
much
smaller
pool,
so
you
might
remember
with
police
right
we
did.
We
used
a
general
calculation
3.75
for
premium
pay
for
those
essential
workers
who
actually
worked
and
were
available
during
the
pandemic.
H
H
To
the
extent
that
people
suffer
from
the
exposures
right
and
you
know
actually
worked,
and
these
people
would
be
eligible
for
the
ten
thousand
dollar
pool
by
application.
But
it's
envisioned
that
not
necessarily
all
the
ten
thousand
dollars
would
be
spent,
although
I
think
it
likely
would
be.
H
Helps
yeah
it's
based
off
of
an
hourly
rate,
so
no
management
tested
wouldn't
be
wouldn't
be
eligible
for
that
small
article.
O
Hey
sharon:
this
is
chuck,
let
me
say
a
couple
other
things
to
help
clarify
a
few
things
last
year
when
we
knew
nothing
about
what
was
going
on
in
this
community
with
covet
the
mayor
sat
down
with
every
single
union,
csea
police,
fire
and
teamsters
union
and
asked
them.
Are
you
willing
to
work
with
us
csa
and
fire
both
agreed
to
take
a
zero?
At
that
time?
Police
agreed
to
work
with
us
on
the
contract,
but
not
take
a
zero
teamsters
walked
away
from
the
table.
O
Saying
we're
not
willing
to
help
you
this
two
thousand
dollars
that
we're
giving
to
all
the
csa.
People
is
really
for
them
willing
their
willingness
to
work
with
us.
O
The
lowest
paid
group
in
the
city
were
willing
to
take
a
zero
because
they
didn't
know
what
covet
was
going
to
bring
to
the
city
and
that's
the
main
reason
for
that
2000,
not
necessarily
because
they
had
to
work
in
difficult
situations,
because
some
of
them
did
as
sharon's
clearly
pointed
out
the
people
in
code,
the
people
in
engineering,
a
lot
of
the
other
ones,
were
able
to
work
different
schedules.
O
Some
weeks
on
some
weeks
off
and
different
things,
so
the
2000
is
really
for
their
willingness
to
work
with
us.
The
ten
thousand
dollars
is
to
assist
the
other
people
that
did
have
real
covert
exposure
type
situations
where
the
police
and
fire
they
had
to
come
to
work
every
single
day.
H
So
the
other
thing
I
would
add
and
chuck
is
better
at
this-
is
the
two
thousand
dollars
on
average
would
be
the
equivalent
of
about
a
2.06
increase
if
we
were
incorporating
it
into
salary.
So
it's
a
way
of
recognizing
the
zero
that
they
took
without
it
burdening
our
fica
retirement
tax
kind
of
dollars.
So
we
can
still
give
them
that
eight
percent
without
having
to
do
it
via
10,
so
that
it
saves
the
city
money
on.
H
M
Thank
you,
council,
president
again
sharon.
Thank
you
for
the
comprehensive
report,
and-
and
maybe
this
is
a
chuck
question
as
well
once
this
is
approved
as
you've
presented
it
do
we
know
which
line
the
coding.
Is
this
covet
additional
portion
part
of
the
entire
prop
package
you've
presented,
or
is
that
a
separate
line
that
we
would
then
have
to
approve
and
allocate
out
of
another
tranche?
M
Okay
and
because
we
are
speaking
of
csda,
which
again
we
I
believe
we
all
support.
If
you
wanted,
if
council
wanted
to
create
a
program
that
then
compensated
the
management
tested,
we
could
do
so
separately,
but
you're
bringing
it
as
part
of
this
contract,
which
is
why
we're
focusing
on
this
target
population.
It
doesn't
mean
that
we're
not
considering
or
have
the
potential
to
consider
other
units
correct,
correct.
M
Thank
you
now
in
terms
of
the
rubric
to
assess
who
will
be
funded
using
that
application
is
that
bonadio
who's
assessing
the
validity
of
the
additional
funding
in
the
ten
thousand
dollar
trench.
O
Basically,
the
employee's
going
to
put
down
what
their
tasks
were
and
why
they
feel
they're
eligible
for
it
that
will
be
submitted
to
my
office.
I
will
submit
that
to
bonadillo
to
see
if
they
agree
that
this
meets
the
premium
pay
situation
in
the
code,
and
if
it
does,
then
that
person
will
be
deemed
like
jabon.
We
will
look
at
everybody
as
a
whole.
At
that
point
in
time,.
M
H
Exactly
so,
the
way
that
we've
structured,
it
is
provided,
council
approves
the
contract,
of
course,
that
applications
by
individual
employees
at
least
that
form,
should
be
submitted
to
my
office
no
later
than
november.
30Th,
then,
distributions
made
under
that
in
order
to
make
sure
that
it's
fair
and
everybody
receives
an
hourly
rate
and
due
evaluation
will
be
distributed
in
march
of
2023..
H
M
H
Sorry,
it's
article
12,
section,
5b,
the
pool
and
it
goes
into
the
payment-
is
based
on
the
number
of
hours
worked.
Not
the
rate
of
pay
payment
under
this
section
shall
be
calculated
by
the
total
number
of
hours
divided
by
ten
thousand
dollars
to
determine
the
hourly
rate,
and
no
employees
shall
receive
more
than
two
thousand
dollars
and,
oh
I'm
sorry,
payment
should
be
made
no
later
than
march
31st
of
2022..
H
So
that's
on
page
13,
I'm
sorry
councilman.
It's
easy!
I
should
have
gone
with
the
page,
that's
easier
for
you.
Thank.
M
H
Correct
and
well,
I
should
say
the
we'll,
send
them
to
bonadio
and
then
we'll
take
their
determinations
and
then
we'll
do
the
overall
calculation,
so
everyone's
receiving
the
same
rate
of
pay
and
the
reason
why
we
kind
of
have
to
do
it.
This
way
is
premium
pay.
It
can
be
pensionable
under
the
new
york
state
retirement
system,
in
addition
to
having
the
eligibility
criteria
that's
set
by
the
fed,
there's
also
the
criteria
under
new
york
state
retirement.
H
So
what
we
want
to
do
is
make
sure
that
it
actually
truly
meets
both
because
if
it
meets
one
and
not
the
other,
there's
an
issue
as
far
as
what
we're
giving
to
the
employee
and
how
that
winds
up
being
calculated
by
us.
So
what
we
have
right
now
is
language
that
we're
certain
will
enable
it
to
be
pensionable,
but
you
have
to
meet
the
requirements
of
the
federal
act
for
eligibility
and
bonadio
is
kind
of
the
best
entity
to
make
sure
that's
being
done
consistently.
J
Thank
you
for
chuck
chuck
you
there.
Yes,
here
yeah,
so
we're
saying
that
the
teamsters,
those
that
you
know
pick
up
the
garbage,
etc,
aren't
eligible
for
this,
because
they
walked
away
and
wouldn't
give
us
anything
in
our
negotiations
with
during
covet,
but
was
it
that
was
it
the
union
that
walked
away.
I
mean.
H
J
J
During
the
pandemic-
and
I
remember
when
masks
first
came
about-
they
were
out
there
without
masks
picking
up
garbage.
Now
I
don't
know
if
each
individual
just
said
we're
not
going
to
work
with
the
city.
Where
was
that
just
a
union
member
that
said
they
weren't
going
to
work
with
the
city
and
then
all
those
workers
are
going
to
be
punished
because
even
though
they
themselves
did
show
up
for
work
every
day
and
a
lot
of
them
got
covered,
so
I
just
think
that
we're
punishing
them.
J
For
you
know
I
just
find
that
kind
of.
I
don't
know,
I
don't
think
it's
right,
but
so
what
is
the
answer?
That
chuck?
Are
we
punishing.
H
O
O
That
basically
said
they
didn't
want
to
work
with
the
city
and
if
you
were
sitting
in
those
negotiations,
not
knowing
where
a
lot
of
people's
paychecks
may
be
coming
in
the
near
future,
and
you
hear
two
unions
not
want
to
work
with
you.
It
leaves
a
bad
taste
in
your
your
mouth
and
then
when
they
find
out,
someone
else
is
getting
premium
pay.
O
They
feel
they're
entitled
to
it,
and
do
I
agree
with
what
councilman
burns
said
that,
yes,
there
was
a
lot
of
people
out
there
working
hard
on
the
garbage
trucks.
100,
okay,
but
I
also
know
there
was
teamsters
unions
that
stayed
home
for
weeks
at
a
time
that
were
that,
didn't
do
everything
and
when
you
deal
with
the
union,
you
have
to
deal
with
them
all,
not
individuals.
B
Thank
you,
chuck.
Okay,
if
there
are
other
questions,
let's
move
on.
Thank
you
chuck.
Thank
you
sharon.
I
see
you.
B
D
I'm
so
sorry,
I'm
sorry,
madam
president,
thank
you
sharon
again,
so
just
as
a
follow-up
when
they
submit
the
applications
with
respect
to
the
pool
of
10
000
and
it's
relegated
to
the
number
of
hours
worked
right.
It
is
not
the
number
of
hours
worked,
but
rather
the
number
of
hours
worked
that
meet
the
criteria
for
right.
So,
for
example,
if
somebody
took
a
furlough
or
if
somebody
used
vacation
days
or
something
like
that,
is
that
correct.
H
That's
correct
and
in
this
situation
taking
a
furlough
as
was
encouraged
by
this
administration
for
some
employees,
would
it
would
not
render
them
ineligible
for
right
cool.
It's
just
that
when
you're
looking
at
the
hours
worked
or
the
number
that
that
actually
worked
while
exposed
or
should
say
while
they.
D
H
Before
I
leave
you
today,
there
were
a
couple
of
items
that
you
wanted.
Some
follow-up
on,
one
was
the
inquiry
with
regards
to
management
tested
and
the
stipend
which
I
can
check
with
with
the
mayor's
office
tomorrow.
H
D
I
don't
think
I
had
anything
else,
but
with
for
follow-up
purposes,
sharon
again
just
to
get
on
the
record
right.
So
there's
there's
two
pools
broadly
there's
two
pulls
of
money
here,
right,
the
stipend
and
then
the
10
000,
as
the
proposed
contract
stands
right
now.
Just
for
purposes
of
clarity,
could
you
please
articulate
again
for
each
of
those
respective
pools
those
in
management
tested
positions
as
it
stands
right
now,.
N
H
My
pleasure
and
if
you
think
of
things
over
the
course
of
the
next
week
and
a
half
two
weeks
as
you're
reviewing
this,
please
do
not
hesitate
to
reach
out
to
me
either
by
phone
or
email
or
even
in
person.
I
understand
that
it's
a
long
contract
and
there
are
multiple
considerations
and
I'm
happy
to
field
any
follow-up
increase
that
you
have.
B
O
Supplied
the
mayor,
all
the
costs
of
management
tested,
okay,
he's
looking
at
the
cost
of
it.
If
I
had
to
make
a
guess,
I
think
he's
gonna
see
if
he
can't
do
everything
exactly
like
csca
okay,
but
he
has
not
said
that
to
me
directly,
but
he
also
has
the
same
type
of
situation
that
he
has
with
the
appointment,
which
is
very
similar
in
nature
to
the
management
test
that,
where
cse
management
tests
follow
csea
point
is
based
off
of
all
the
total
contracts
and
no.
D
I
definitely
no,
I
and
thank
you
for
that
chuck
and
I'm
I'm
very
sure
that
certain
that
you
know
the
mayor
is
taking
that
under
serious
consideration.
It
was
just
something
that
kind
of
jumped
out
and
I
just
wanted
to
see
if
I
could
get
some
clarity,
but
thank
you
for
that
as
well,
though
I
appreciate
it.
B
We'll
move
on
to
steve,
if
he's
still
with
us,
I
think
he
is.
K
I'm
still
here,
hi
steve
hi,
so
the
rl.
B
K
Yep
222.:
this
is
an
extension
and
continuation
of
the
coveted
business
assistance
funding
we've
been
doing
for
the
last
year
and
a
half
two
years.
We
opened
the
applications
up
for
another
round
and
we
received
three
applications.
K
There's
still
some
outstanding
issues
with
some
of
them
with
some
forms
and
documentation
they
need
to
provide,
but
we
decided
to
go
ahead
and
send
this
down
for
city
council
approval,
so
we
can
get
some
of
this
rushed
out
the
door.
I
do
want
to
say
we
may
be
reaching
the
end
of
the
usable,
the
business,
the
the
existing
plan
on
business
assistance.
We
only
got
three
applications.
This
time
we
keep
getting
less
and
less
every
time,
there's
an
application
period
open.
K
So
we
are
looking
at
ways
we
can
use
the
fund,
the
money
that
we
still
have
to
assist
businesses
with
covid,
but
we're
still
exploring
that
so
the
three
businesses
that
applied
were
vista
property
management
here
by
simone
simone
sorry
and
fuller
sons
and
daughters,
gift
shop.
M
K
It's
so
the
money
the
source
of
this
money
is,
is
the
cares
covered
cdbg
money
we
could
in
theory,
we'd
have
to
do
a
amendment
to
the
action
plan.
I
mean
the
the
code.
Funding
itself
was
amendments
to
the
action
plan,
so
we
would
amend
that
to.
N
K
M
B
F
M
Well,
all
of
the
lines
actually
related
to
cares,
as
chuck
alluded
to
earlier,
he's
handling
the
arpa
lines
and
you
are
all
of
care,
so
that
would
help
us
understand
our
stance
at
this
point
and
even
if
you
have
a
comprehensive
list
of
businesses
that
have
been
allocated
resources
or
approved
for
funding,
that
would
be
great
too.
F
Yes,
so
we
have
nine
items
for
wednesday
night.
Two
of
them
were
held
over
from
our
previous
business
meeting.
Those
are
rl
21,
213
and
rl21208.