►
From YouTube: March 27, 2017 - City Council Work Session
Description
March 27, 2017 - City Council Work Session
http://www.cityblm.org
View meeting documentation:
http://www.cityblm.org/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/6017/17
Music by www.RoyaltyFreeKings.com
A
C
B
C
A
D
D
We
had
an
incident
for
an
accident
rather
or
a
vehicle
left
the
roadway
drove
into
our
front
yard,
struct,
light
pole
in
the
corner
of
our
yard
and
hit
it
with
enough
speed
and
force
to
take
down
the
light
pole
and
send
the
vehicle
all
the
way
across
the
roadway
and
through
potential
oncoming
traffic
before
came
to
rest
in
the
front
yard
of
one
of
my
neighbors
across
the
street.
Luckily,
no
one
was
hurt,
but
it
could
have
been
much
worse.
D
So,
although
I'd
often
wondered
why
the
speed
limit
on
this
stretch
of
road
was
set
at
40
miles
an
hour,
this
is
the
event
that
motivated
me
to
inquire
about
it
and
find
out
why
it
is
what
it
is
and
what
I
could
do
to
see
it
set
lower.
So
shortly
after
this
date,
I
submitted
a
formal
request
to
lower
the
speed
limit
on
fox
creek
road
between
oakland
avenue
and
stone
hedges
court
to
30
miles
an
hour.
I've
worked
closely
with
my
alderman
Dave
sage
has
been
very
helpful
throughout
the
process.
D
Most
recently,
the
city
hosted
a
neighborhood
meeting
to
discuss
the
speed
limit
on
March
7th
at
the
Box
creek
golf
course
clubhouse.
We
had
great
a
tendon
from
the
residence
of
Fox
Creek
neighborhood,
as
well
as
several
city
officials
present,
including
David
Hales,
Jim,
karch,
mohan
and
alderman
sage.
A
big
thank
you
goes
to
them
for
making
themselves
available
to
hear
this
important
discussion
they're
easily
over
100
people
in
attendance
enough.
So
at
least
where
we
needed
to
go
dig
out
more
chairs
to
accommodate
seating.
D
Throughout
the
discussion
it
became
clear.
There
was
unanimous
support
of
the
city
taking
measures
to
reduce
the
speed
of
vehicles
traveling
along
this
stretch,
namely
lowering
the
speed
limit
to
30
miles
an
hour.
This
stretch
of
road
is
only
seven
tenths
of
a
mile
long,
yet
acrylic
features
six
cautionary
speed
limit
signs
of
30
miles
an
hour.
For
this
reason,
several
others
that
I
don't
have
the
time
to
get
to
today.
D
I
would
like
to
encourage
you,
the
members
of
the
City
Council
to
support
city
manager,
David
Hales,
recommendation
of
a
30
mile,
an
hour,
speed
limit
on
this
stretch
of
road
like
to
thank
the
city
officials
that
have
been
engaged
on
this
topic
and
like
to
thank
this
group
for
their
time
for
their
time
and
hearing
my
comments.
Thank
you.
Thank.
A
E
You,
mayor
and
city
council
tonight
we
are
going
to
be
talking
about
Fox,
Creek,
Road,
speed,
limit
change
in
this
area.
We
are
going
to
be
looking
from
Oakland
Avenue
to
stone
hedges
court.
We
are
going
to
be
considering
tonight
talking
about
three
different
options,
but
first,
let's
get
into
some
of
this
with
the
road.
The
road
in
that
area
was
built
in
nineteen.
Ninety
seven
in
that
area,
just
as
mr.
wing
and
talked
about
at
seven
tenths
of
a
mile,
the
area
in
particular.
E
It
was
built
for
the
long
term
to
be
able
to
serve
that
large
southwest
side
of
the
community,
both
that,
but
that
is
in
the
long
term.
Currently
it
is
a
collector,
a
minor,
collector
road.
You
can
see
to
the
east
over
by
the
interstate,
that's
more
of
an
arterial
road,
but
right
now
that
section
of
road
has
they
either.
E
You
know,
somewhere
between
1500
to
3000
cars
a
day
a
bit
over
Fox
Creek
Road
over
further
by
veterans
park
where
he
serves
about
10,000
cars
a
day
and
so
the
cross
section
of
the
road
right
now.
If
we
look
up
on
the
screen,
you
can
see
there's
one
lane
in
each
direction,
with
the
bi-directional
turn
lane
the
key
I'd
like
to
highlight
for
you,
though,
is
the
parking
Lane
you
can
see.
E
There
is
on
street
parking
available
and
that's
going
to
come,
that's
going
to
be
a
key
factor
later,
as
we
continue
to
talk
some
of
the
areas
that
were
pointed
out
by
residents
in
this
section.
You
can
see
this
yellow
golf
course:
advisory
sign
in
conflict
of
the
white
speed
limit
sign
and
that's
one
of
the
factors
that
has
caused
confusion,
but
for
some
of
the
residents
and
just
that
the
the
proximity
of
where
they
are
at
in
relation
to
the
speed
limit
sign
the
advisory
signs
were
placed
years
ago.
E
In
response
to
concerns
back
in
the
early
2000s,
the
2000,
we
actually
have
the
ability,
as
a
staff,
to
put
up
advisory
signs,
but
they're,
not
regulatory,
that's
a
key
point
is
the
their
advisory.
There
are
any
time
you
see
the
yellow,
those
yellow
signs.
Those
are
advisory
in
nature.
Sometimes
they
can
be
either
for
a
hidden
drive
or
a
curve,
but
they're,
not
regulatory,
and
so
that's
that's
one
of
the
keys
that
cause
confusion
with
with
folks
public
involvement.
E
Actually,
the
one
thing
disappoints
me,
as
I
wasn't
able
to
get
a
picture
of
this
great
message
board.
We
we
used
something
different
this
time
with
the
discussion
we
we
think
we're
going
to
try
to
capitalize
that
on
the
future
we
use
the
message
board
on
Fox
Creek
Road
on
the
either
end
of
this
section
of
pavements
of
people
traveling
through
there
we
also
did
direct
mailers,
but
the
message
board,
I
think,
really
captured
a
broader
audience,
and
so
it
really
kind
of
allowed
for
more
robust
dialogue.
E
We
thought
that
was
a
very
good
thing,
so
it
was
a
good
public
engagement
process
for
for
this
discussion.
So
let's
talk
about
the
three
different
options:
option
one
leave
it
at
40
miles
an
hour
option
to
lower
to
35
option.
Three
is
lowered
to
30
miles
an
hour
option.
One
is
not.
Staff
recommended
north
city
manager
recommended,
but
but
it
is
important
to
talk
about
it
for
a
minute.
From
this
standpoint,
there's
not
a
high
violation
rate.
E
The
road
was
designed
at
40
miles
an
hour
with
the
curve
in
mind,
so
it
was
designed
with
a
curve
20
to
have
people
travel
slower.
We
about
Complete
Streets
as
a
council.
This
was
designed
to
slow
traffic
down.
Sometimes
our
trio
roads
are
straight
shots.
You
can
see
as
far
as
as
far
as
the
eye
goes
well,
that
encourages
wide
lanes
straight
straight
with
no
distractions
on
the
side
cause
people
to
want
to
go
faster.
So
in
this
area,
actually
the
design
was
correct.
They
designed
it
for
40
and
the
speeds.
E
The
speed
studies
show
that
it
meets
exactly
what
it
was
supposed
to
people
it's
hard
to
actually
travel
over
40,
most
people.
The
prevailing
speed
is
right
at
around
40,
so
the
B.
That's
why?
Whenever
there
have
been
speed
studies
done
in
the
past,
it
shows
that
keep
it
at
40
miles
an
hour
in
the
future,
and
other
reason
that
that
is
consideration
for
40
is
the
future
land
use
and
the
southwest
part
of
Bloomington.
E
While
it
seems
as
if
you
know
right
now,
the
discussion
is,
you
know,
there's
there's
not
a
lot
of
growth,
we
see
not
expansive
growth,
we
saw
back
in
the
90s
and
2000s,
but
50
years
from
now.
What
will
the
community
be,
and
so
this
type
of
road
will
be
that
major
that
major
connector
for
a
lot
of
the
communities
further
to
the
southwest.
So
all
of
that
being
said,
as
we
continue
to
look
forward,
staff,
though,
is
is
from
a
professional
standpoint.
We
absolutely.
E
A
A
E
And
there
is,
there
is
the
argument
in
the
future
of
violation
rates.
Or
can
you
know,
let's
say
you
it's
lowered
or
whatever?
That
is
staff?
Would
project
they're,
actually,
projections
as
to
what
what
kind
of
violation
rate
you
would
have,
and
so
violation
rates
could
be
very
high
and
it
could
justify
in
the
future.
But
those
are
options
so
option
two
lowering
the
speed
limit
of
35.
This
is
from
a
from
a
professional
staff
recommendation.
E
We
we
do
have
civil
engineers
on
staff,
professional
engineers
and
what
they
do
is
we're
required
whenever
we
make
a
recommendation
to
base
it
upon
standards
of
some
sort-
and
this
is
the
hard
rub.
This
is
the
hard
difficulty
from
a
from
a
staff
perspective.
We
understand
there
can
be
more
factors
than
than
this,
but
from
our
perspective
we
have
to
go
from
the
the
numbers
of
what
is
there.
It
does
take
into
account
things
like
crashes.
E
We
can
talk
about
in
a
minute,
but
there
is
illinois
department
of
transportation
policy
out
there
that
we
go
by,
which
is
also
used
by
the
FHWA
and
most
municipalities.
So
if
we
talk
about
the
the
from
a
professional
standpoint,
what
we
have
done
in
the
past,
we
actually
have
done
speed
studies
along
this
road.
It
was
to
be
built
in
1997
right
away.
It
didn't
take
long
for
for
the
folks
who
live
along
there
to
say
wow
this
we
this
is.
This
is
fast.
We
don't
like
the
40
miles
an
hour
right.
E
I
know
that
the
road
was
built
before
we
had
a
house,
but
now
that
we're
here
it's
just
too
fast,
and
we
don't
like
that.
So
we've
done
studies
in
2001,
2007,
2012
and
actually
again,
the
violation
rates
are
very
low.
So
it
there's
not
excessive
speeding
beyond
the
regular
that
it
do
people
speed
of
times
they
do
all
over
town.
But
this
is
not
one
of
those
that
is
excessive
in
nature.
What
I
will
say
so
what
we
do
then
is.
We
also
then
look
at
some
key
metrics.
E
Whenever
we
look
at
what
is
the
prevailing
speed,
but
then
also,
we
can
take
into
account
how
many
driveways,
how
many
crashes,
what
type
of
is
a
parking
available.
All
of
those
allowed
staff
to
dig
into
it
and
say
that
we
were
actually
able
to
make
the
recommendation
of
lowering
this
to
35
miles
an
hour.
Some
of
the
key
metrics
were
this:
it
actually
wasn't
crashes.
That's
it's
important
for
you
to
know.
It
wasn't
crashes
that
actually
made
this
kind
of
kicked
down
to
35.
E
There
were
three
crashes
in
the
last
four
years:
none
of
those
were
from
none
of
those
were
from
XX
excessive
speed.
The
crashes
in
the
last
three
years
were
from
distracted,
driving
or
weather,
and
so
there
there
really
isn't
a
lot
of
the
of
the
crashes
that
we
saw.
That
would
would
justify.
But
what
did
justify
it
is
the
number
of
driveways
it,
the
nutty,
that
there
is
parking
on
the
street.
All
of
those
were
factors
that
we
were
able
to
weigh
into
account
to
make
the
recommendation
of
35
miles
an
hour.
E
So
let's
talk
about
30
miles
an
hour
from
a
30
mile,
an
hour
standpoint.
This
is
this
is
city
manager
recommended
we
have
talked
about
as
the
council
has
talked
about,
Complete
Streets,
we've
heard
from
recent
conversations
on
on
her.
She
rode
that
there
that
speed
is
a
factor
in
crash
severity
that
is
important
to
know
this
is,
and
there
are
studies
out
there
that
show
the
faster
the
cars
are
traveling.
E
If
there
are
mistakes
that
are
made,
it's
harder
to
correct,
it
is
harder
to
control,
and
so
there
there
is
the
argument
and
balance
as
a
community
of
where.
Where
does
this
commune?
Where
does
the
council
want
to
land
on
speeds,
taking
into
account
that
speeds
can
vary
for
arterioles
collectors
and
residentials?
We
talked
about
that
from
a
key
perspective,
so
the
the
thing
I'll
leave
you
with
is
that
tonight
is
just
for
discussion.
This
is
not
for
action.
E
F
E
F
E
F
E
Doesn't
mean
that
we
there's
justification
for
it
to
be
30
miles
an
hour.
That's
it
that's
a
key
indicator.
This
is
important
for
the
council
to
know
throughout
the
community.
Whenever
you
have
advisory
signs
they're
just
that
there
you
can
see
them
driving
by
a
park.
Sometimes
you
can
see
them
driving
by
other
areas,
so
that
that
doesn't
indicate
that
that
its
regulatory
police
officers
are
not
able
to
tick
it
off
of
those
advisory
signs.
But
but
there
can
be
side
things,
parks
or
other,
or
there
likes
golf
course.
F
E
Is
another
key
for
we
can?
We
can
set
this
at
35
30,
whatever
the
council
directs,
within
that
coyote
altered,
speed,
limit
or
regulatory
speed
limit?
That's,
but
it's
important
to
know
a
speed
limit
sign
and
chief
Hefner.
Could
it
could
answer
this
as
well?
It's
tough
to
to
actually
without
enforcement,
it's
hard
to
get
that
compliance,
and
so
that's
where
you
have
those
things
of
violation
rates
and-
and
that
is
indicative
of
how
accurate
does
that?
E
The
answer
to
that
is,
advisory
signs
are
able
to
be
set
based
upon
what
this
side
they
it's,
not
something.
That
is
it's
something
that
we
actually
set
based
off
of
a
meaty
CD
other
standards.
So
this
the
reason
why
they're
there
is,
you
have
the
ability
of
staff
to
be
able
to
say
now
again,
I
wasn't
here
as
well.
So
it's
hard
for
me
to
defend
the
actions
but
I'm
just
referencing
the
fact
that
when
you
have
an
advisory
sign,
you
have
to
go
off
of
even
standards,
then
by
what
what
it
is.
E
A
G
Just
going
to
say,
without
looking
at
the
report,
all
I
can
taste
that
the
officers
do
take
all
the
information
that
they
can
gather
at
the
scene
to
determine
the
cause
ations
and
if
they
thought
it
were
speed,
they
would
have
denoted
that,
if
you
witness
statements,
statements
from
the
driver
are
physical
evidence
from
the
scene
that
that's
what
they
would
do.
But
that's
all
I
can
comment
on
Thank.
C
I
think
we
need
to
be
careful
here.
I
I'm,
not
sure
that
we
did
the
right
thing
with
the
Hershey
Avenue
I,
don't
think
we
reached
out
the
community
quite
enough.
It
is
important,
however,
to
realize
that
this
is
a
collector
Street
and
it's
not
a
through
Street
for
a
large
volume
of
traffic,
so
I
would
wonder
it
approximately
how
much
traffic
we
are
seeing
here
as
compared
to
some
of
those
other
areas
and
I
have
to
assume
this
is
almost
all
neighborhood
traffic.
E
Good
question,
as
so
earlier
on,
we
reference
the
fact
that,
right
now,
the
the
adt,
the
average
daily
traffic
is
between
1500
and
3000.
The
the
Fox
Creek
Road
over
by
veterans
parkway,
is
10,000
by
comparison
her.
She
rode
in
the
area
where
we
were
considered
was
eighteen
thousand
by
comparison
so
10
times
the
very
rough
number,
but
even
ten
times
the
amount
of
traffic
along
one.
So
those
on
her.
She
rode.
E
It
is
definitely
an
arterial
road
that
there's
a
lot
of
through
traffic
people
going
from
the
definition
of
an
arterial
collector
by
nature
is
again
just
that
is
this
is
a
minor
collector,
and
so
this
isn't
even
one
of
the
major
major
roads,
and
so
the
from
as
mayor
pointed
out
earlier,
maybe
in
the
future
is,
is
it
continues
to
develop?
It
would
become
that
and
then
the
council
can
always
future
councils
can
always
consider
that
if
growth
continues
to
happen,
it's.
C
H
E
E
We
take
down
the
advisory
signs,
there's
no
need
for
an
advisory
sign,
reflecting
exactly
what
the
regulatory
sign
says
and
so
the,
but
when
we,
whenever
we
make
a
change
in
a
speed
limit,
we
put
up
flags,
we
probably
would
put
up
message
boards
so
that
there
is
an
indication.
So
people
have
some
awareness.
We
leave
that
up
for
for
a
length
of
time,
evaluation
evaluation
would
come
in
the
form
of
a
speed
study
that
Polly
would
be
done.
E
I
would
recommend,
after
the
completion
of
the
bridge
after
the
completion
of
the
Fox
Creek
Road
bridge,
that
is
a
set
to
begin
the
construction
season
of
2018
and
the.
Why?
Why
would
that
make
a
difference?
Because
speeds
are
affected
even
along
a
long
long
route?
Whenever
you
have
construction,
and
so
we
might
be
able
to
do
a
preliminary
speed
of
speed
study,
but
I
would
hesitate
to
to
be
definitive
with
it
with
that
with
construction.
Major
construction
in
the
area,
because
that
affects
who's
traveling
and
how
they're
out
routes
are
going.
H
I
It
is
less
desirable
for
people
who
want
to
live
there.
All
of
those
factors
which
you
can't
easily
calculate
and
put
into
a
calculation.
This
seems
in
that
same
regard
when
it
comes
to
a
vehicle
going
40
miles
per
hour.
It
has
substantially
more
likelihood
of
causing
great
harm
when
that
drivers
distracted,
I
mean
you
showed
the
nice
chart
with
the
different
fatality
rates
and
those
are
different
factors
that
we
now
is
a
city
council
really
want
to
be
taken
into
account,
so
I'm
hopeful.
I
We
can
find
a
way
to
start
merging
these
recommendations,
so
we
get
a
single
recommendation,
but
but
I
think
this
one
is
a
difficult
one
because
for
you
from
an
engineering
standpoint
are
starting
almost
where
their
assumptions
that
have
been
made
that
you
had
nothing
to
do
with,
which
is
that
this
road
should
be
built
to
go
40
miles
per
hour.
And
lo
and
behold
we
shouldn't
be
surprised
at
traffic
goes
40
miles
per
hour.
It
was
a
well-designed
road,
but
that
doesn't
answer
the
bigger
question
of.
I
Should
the
road
accommodate
40
miles
per
hour,
or
should
we
be
looking
at
30
miles
per
hour
and,
if
they're
a
justification
to
deviate
from
that
state
standard
which
is
30
miles
per
hour?
If
there
is
30
miles
per
hour,
the
appropriate
minimum
or
maximum
stress
minute,
the
appropriate
experience
that
everyone
in
a
residential
neighborhood
should
should
should
have
so.
You
know
I,
but
I
appreciate
the
fact
that
we've
multiple
recommendations
here
because
weaken
as
a
council
can
really
begin
to
explore
these
different
factors
and
what
weight
we
want
to
give
to
all
of
them.
J
Yes,
thank
you,
I.
First
of
all,
I
support
this
going
to
30
miles
per
hour
and
I
think
there's
an
awful
lot
of
parallels
here
with
our
conversation
as
a
council
about
her.
She
rode
and
the
and
the
way
that
that
matches
what
we're
doing
with
Complete
Streets
it's
about
more
than
managing
cars.
It's
about
managing
pedestrians
in
schools
and
bicyclists,
and
particularly
I
think
it
was
pointed
out
that
there
will
be
a
lot
more
access
to
Constitution
trail
once
that
work
is
done.
J
So
it's
a
very
different
lens
that
we
look
through
for
this
and
I
appreciate
all
the
work
that
went
into
talking
with
the
neighbors
about
this
I
appreciated
all
the
work
that
went
in
that
ottoman
painter
put
into
talking
with
people
about
her.
She
rode
I
I.
Really.
I
think
that
option
three
from
my
perspective
is
the
one
that
takes
us
again
a
little
bit
further
to
embracing
and
understanding
what
complete
streets
are.
Okay,.
F
Think,
guy
too,
would
be
inclined
to
go
with
the
30
I
think
for
different
reasons
and
maybe
Karen
his
spit
out.
So
maybe
we
can
match
these
up
and
what
I
recall
about
her?
She
is
consistency
was
important,
so
we
wanted
30
up
and
down
her
she
her.
She
had
very
few
driveways
very
few
streets,
especially
between
college
and
GE
her.
She
also
had
a
lot
of
pass
through
what
I'll
call
going
to
north
of
college.
F
So
if
we
made
the
decision
to
go
to
30
there,
what
I
see
on
this
one,
what
I
see
is
different
here
is
you've
got
more
driveways.
You
don't
have
the
pass
through
that
you
have
on
her.
She
two
different
two
different
scenarios
here
and
I:
keep
thinking
about
consistency
and
I'm
thinking
about.
Why
not
take
this
all
the
way
to
veterans
parkway,
that's
what
we
wanted
on
her.
She
we
wanted
it
as
long
as
we
could
at
30
think
about
what
you've
got
between
veterans
and
interstate
I
wrote
down
a
couple
of
them.
F
You
had
a
care
you
had
senior
living
soon
to
be
open.
You
had
a
garden
center.
You
got
a
gas
convenience
store,
you
got
a
union
hall,
you
got
the
UPS
and
if
daycare
and
senior
citizens
and
everything
else
doesn't
enter
the
mix
here,
it
really
argues
the
factor
this
45
40
35,
it's
changing.
So
if
consistency
was
important
to
us
on
her,
she
and
I'd
be
consistent
to
us
here
and
all
I
would
suggest
going
forward.
F
Since
I'm
going
to
be
hold,
the
applause
gone
may
one,
but
I
hope
the
council
doesn't
spend
their
time
talking
about
her
she's
and
Fox
Creek,
very
important
topic
tonight
respectfully,
but
there's
a
dozen
of
these
out
there.
So
if
you
want
to
spend
your
third
monday
of
the
month
talking
about
her
she's
and
fox
creaks
and
everything
else,
I
can
bring
you
a
dozen
as
a
new
public
citizen.
So
let's
get
a
handle
on
this
consistency.
F
A
K
E
K
Be
curious
because
I
live
on
the
south
end
of
her.
She
and
I'm
always
wondering,
especially
when
one
of
our
friendly
police
officers
are
sitting
there
in
rolling
brook
park.
You
know
I've
looked
down
to
see
because
I
don't
remember,
I
still,
don't
even
remember
what
the
speed
limit
is
on
my
part
of
her.
She
rode
well,
unfortunately,
I
think
you're
right,
because
when
I
look
down
sometimes
I'm
going,
you
know
more
than
30,
but
I've
been
lucky
so
far
and
show
me
we're
talking
consistency
I'm
just
wondering
you
know.
L
In
Scott,
fine,
thank
you.
Thank
you.
Jim
yeah,
I
I.
Don't
really
have
a
strong
opinion
about
this.
I
would
defer
to
alderman
sage
mean
it's
his
word,
I,
don't
know
what
the
neighbors
are
speaking
on
this
issue,
although
it
sounds
like
a
lot
of
the
public,
outreach
has
been
done,
so
I
think
that's.
It
always
speaks
very
highly
of
staff
and
the
level
that
we
try
to
go
to
get
feedback
publicly.
I
just
want
to
put
my
two
cents
in
that.
L
L
I
just
think
it's
incumbent
upon
us
to
craft
a
process
that
engages
the
public
when
these
discussions
come
forward
because
we'll
be
spending
every
third
Monday
talking
about
each
one
of
these
types
of
streets
and
I.
Think
that
that's
not
the
best
practice
for
us.
So
in
terms
of
my
feedback,
I'd
be
happy
with
either
of
them.
I
get
referring
to
option
two
or
three
I.
Think
four
years
is
some
compelling
evidence
why
that's
too
fast,
but
regardless
of
how
we
got
to
now,
that's
my
feedback.
Ok,.
A
Any
other
questions
mr.
karge
and
as
I
am
sharing
with
alderman
sage.
Just
before
we
began
and
private
conversation,
I
was
out
there
the
other
day.
It
was
kind
of
dusk
and
it
was
a
little
scary.
I
didn't
see
anybody
walking
across
the
bridge,
but
you
know
it
was
definitely
scary.
I
don't
know
how
fast
I
was
going.
I,
wouldn't
quote
it
if
I
did,
but
probably
too
fast,
but
anyway.
Thank
you
so
much.
It
sounds
like
we
might
very
well
bring
a
an
ordinance
back
to
change
it
to
30.
A
If
there's
a
majority
is
35,
that's
a
very
simple
amendment
for
us
to
make
so
I
think
we
have
reasonable
direction
for
staff
as
we
go
forward.
Thank
you
very
much.
Okay
at
this
point,
is
there
a
motion
to
adjourn
by
all
the
woman
Schmidt?
Is
there
a
second
second
second
by
ultimate
helmet,
all
in
favor
signify
by
saying
aye
returned,
and
we
begin
in
two
more
minutes
so.