►
From YouTube: Bloomington City Council, April 21, 2021, Part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
We
do
have
more
legislation
for
second
reading
council
member
clarity.
Yes,
mr
president,
I
move.
B
D
B
Reading
of
the
ordinance,
my
apologies,
I
was
raising
your
hands
that
has
been
properly
moved.
A
That
ordinance,
21-19
being
read
by
the
clerk
by
title
and
synopsis
and
label
the
clerk.
Please.
D
F
It
requires
environmentally
sensitive
areas
to
be
placed
in
a
common
area.
Again,
this
matches.
F
Old
udo,
regulate
or
yeah
regulation,
it
also
sinks,
neighborhood
intersection.
A
Thank
you
very
much
within
the
council
for
any.
A
Seeing
none
will
now
go
to
the
public
for
comments.
We'll
ask
the
public
to
please.
A
A
Okay,
saying
that
will
the
clerk
please
call
the
roll
ordinance
21-19.
D
A
9-0
council,
member
flaherty.
Mr
president,
I
move
that
ordinance
21-20
be
introduced.
B
D
G
Okay,
okay,
let
me
get
to
my
place
here.
It
has
been
moved
and
seconded
that
clerk
will.
A
Ordinance
21-20
has
been
properly
movement.
Second,
mr
roblin
you're
still
on.
A
F
F
F
F
Erosion
control
bonds
are
not
required
by
the
city
projects,
as
the
entity
itself
cannot
bond.
A
E
Thank
you.
I
believe
we
spoke
last
week,
mr
roble,
about
coming
back
to
us
with
some
data
about.
E
E
F
Of
this
year
to
2016
11
sites
would
have
still
gone.
11
sites
would
have
been
reviewed.
F
Former
code
was
much
less
strict
than
the
current
one,
so
we
don't.
F
Expect
it
to
change
or
modify
with
just
the
this
small
change,
otherwise,
small
change.
A
Thank
you
further
questions
from
council
members.
Seating
will
go
to
the
public.
A
Zoom
or
send
our
meeting
post
note
and
chat
to
indicate
your
intent
to
speak
on
ordinance.
A
E
Second,
thank
you
have
been
properly
moved.
In
second,
will
the
clerk
please
call
the
roll.
D
A
A
D
A
F
2121,
so
this
petition
clarifies
some
existing
definitions
and
proposes
some
new
definitions.
K
Not
scrolling
there
we
go
sorry,
so
family
syncing,
the
adu
reference
with
the
changes
that.
F
F
And
finally,
for
the
amended
ones,
we're
amending
the
definition
related
to
housing.
F
Defined
use
clarifies
administration
of
that
use
and
small
livestock
adding
a
definition
in.
A
Thank
you
again,
mr
robling.
We'll
move
to
council
for
any
questions,
ordinance,
21-21.
A
D
Yes,
councilmember
flaherty;
yes,
piano
smith;
yes,
smith;
yes,
sandberg,
yes,
rallo!
Yes,.
A
Thank
you,
ordinance
21-21.
It's
adopted
9-0.
A
G
A
Clark,
please
call
the
world
council
member
piedmont
smith,
yes,
smith;
yes,
fanberg,
yes,
rallo!
Yes,.
D
F
K
Oh,
hang
on
sorry
screen's
freezing
on
this
end,
okay,
so
the
the
first
will
add.
F
A
15-day
limit
to
existing
temporary
use
special
event
it'll
add
an.
F
There
we
go
as
opposed
to
the
unit
being
both
sides
of
the
two
hoses
it'll
amend
the
existing.
F
F
F
Is
in
the
use
in
that
area?
Excuse
me
limit
parking
garage
space
in
student
housing
so
that.
F
For
livestock
add
a
setback
requirement
for
structures
containing
small
livestock
that
are.
F
F
F
F
It'll
clarify
that
the
gross
floor
area
for
a
detached
adu
references
so
that
it'll,
clear.
F
F
F
F
A
Thank
you
very
much.
We'll
move
the
council
for
any
questions
on
ordinance,
21-17.
F
I
only
had
plan
commission
recommendation
on
there.
Okay,
sorry,
never
mind.
E
M
Roebling
for
the
presentation,
I
would
ask
if
you
will
clarify
when
you
say
in
building.
M
Floor
plate,
will
you
explain
that
to
me
and
to
the
general
public?
What
does
that
mean.
F
It's
only
it's
regulated
by
the
walls
of
the
building,
rather
than
other
impervious
surfaces.
M
F
The
actual
structure
so
it'd
be
the
the
four
walls
or,
however
many
walls
there
are
that
are.
F
The
exterior
and
then
the
area
in
between
that
okay
and
that's
for
student
housing,
correct.
M
F
So
a
home
occupation,
there's
multiple
uses
that
are
our
home
occupations,
but
don't
require.
F
Any
size,
restrictions
or
anything
like
that,
but
for
everything
else.
F
F
Maximum
customer
of
one
at
a
time
or
employees,
but
so
these
are
non-excluded,
uses
that.
F
Fifteen
percent,
which
is
often
a
small
percentage
of
the
home
to
fifty
percent.
F
To
reflect
the
fact
that
most
people
ne
at
least
in
the
current
time
and
are
moving
toward.
F
F
Expect
that
there's
a
meeting
or
maybe
some
sort
of
further
conversation
in
a
public
realm
that.
F
F
Is
the
only
buy
right
use
that
would
require
a
notification
with
no
associated
hearing.
N
And
there
is
no
hearing
yeah,
so
the
letter
does
actually
say
that.
Currently
it
does
mention
that.
F
The
there
is
no
hearing
and
it
just
lists
out,
so
I
don't
understand
the
confusion,
so
it.
N
Explicitly
says:
there's
no
hearing
and
people
expect
one.
I
believe
mr
rucker
is
going
to.
O
O
O
O
O
O
But
where,
where
it
uses
by
right,
the
legal
notice
is
just
confusing,
and
it's.
N
Well,
first
of
all,
I
think
that
it
doesn't
it
shouldn't
mandate
anything
it
should
invite.
O
O
Dialogue
between
neighbors
really
are
innumerable.
We
could
sit
here
all
night
and
come
up
with.
O
O
H
N
O
Say
we
are
constantly
trying
to
learn
from
policies
that
we
enact
and
improve
and
we.
O
O
O
P
Well,
I
wouldn't
this
is
their
grueling
city
planning
department,
so
the
notification.
P
Than
a
conditional
use,
you
know
we
kept
in
the
notification
requirements.
You
know
for
a
lot.
P
P
People
about
those-
and
they
said,
hey
when's,
the
hearing
and
we're
like
hey.
There
is
no
hearing.
P
Been
well
why,
why
am
I
getting
this
letter?
And
we've
explained
that
it's
just
because
it's
still.
P
A
requirement
so,
as
we've
gone,
to
try
to
make
accessory
dwelling
units
easier
to
occur
to.
P
Interactions,
no
meetings
that
have
transpired
that
we've
been
at
they
just
mail
out
notices.
They.
P
Wait
to
ten
days
and
then
we
issue
the
permit,
so
it's
really
just
become
a
kind
of
a
stumbling.
P
P
At
this
point-
and
so
you
know,
as
mr
workers
tried
to
say,
you
know-
we've
just
been
trying
to.
P
Streamline
this,
to
make
it
easier
for
folks
and
to
increase
the
amount
of
housing
so,
but
could
I.
N
P
Submitted
we
would
have
no
idea
whether
anything
changed
on
the
the
plans
or
whether
or
not.
P
There
were
any
interactions,
you
know
we
no
longer,
you
know
because
there's
not
a
hearing.
P
You
know
we're
not
listing
contact
information
for
the
prospective
person,
so
it's
just
a.
P
Notification
that
a
adu
has
been
applied
for
for
a
specific
address
and
that
a
permit.
A
Thank
you
see
no
more
council
questions,
councilmember,
piedmont,
smith.
Yes,
I
move
amendment.
A
Thank
you
all
right,
so
this
is
about
this
section
on
student
housing
and.
H
The
the
ordinance
as
written
make
some
changes
in
both
location
and
building
floor
plate.
H
And
says
in
both
of
those
cases
that
if
the
affordable
housing
incentive
is
used,
then.
H
The
requirements
are,
are,
are
less
or
are
more
liberal,
so
this
amendment
just
seeks
to
add
the.
H
H
Let
me
say
that
way
so
that
if
either
of
those
incentives
are
used
of
the
separation.
H
Can
be
less
and
the
building
floor
plate
can
be
greater,
so
it's
just
adding
the
sustainable.
Q
Our
intent
when
drafting
this
change
to
the
udo
we
did
want
to
include
both
the
affordable
housing.
Q
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Having
heard
from
council
comments
and
and
staff
will
now
go
to.
I
G
A
Mr
president,
I
would
like
to
move
amendment
two
second.
Second,.
A
N
Yes,
well,
this
has
been
part
of
the
discussion
that
we
just
entertained
a
bit.
It
retains
the.
N
Current
policy
of
interested
party
notification
and
the
process
of
noticing
consists
of.
N
N
N
Better
outcome:
I
realized
that
it
might
lead
to
confusion,
but
I
think
that
depends
upon
the
nature.
N
Of
the
of
the
notice,
of
course,
some
people
might
misinterpret
it.
In
any
case,
I
guess.
N
But
it
is
still
a
relatively
recent
allowance
that
we've
created.
N
A
Council,
member
scam,
blurry,
yes,
thank
you
and
I
this
may
be
directed.
E
To
the
planning
department
order,
council
member
rollo
letter
h,
roman
numeral,
3.4.
E
Any
other
information
relevant
to
the
petition
required
by
the
director.
What
could
that
include.
P
Elevations,
you
know,
without
getting
into
obviously
personal
details
of
you
know
who.
P
P
P
E
Thank
you
very
much.
May
I
ask
a
second
question,
mr
president,
and
so
if
council
member.
N
Well,
I
could
I
could
answer
that
just
a
little
bit,
so
we
do
have
a
pre-made
form.
P
Other
petitions,
but
we've
obviously
edited
to
remove
any
mention
of
a
hearing
date,
so
we.
P
Prepare
the
form
with
the
basic
information
and
then
you
know,
maybe
include
a
site
plan
or.
P
E
A
N
N
N
This
is
simply
an
invitation
to
dialogue
with
your
neighbor
if
you're
interested.
P
Director
has
to
act
on
the
petition
and
that's
pretty
much
the
extent
of
the
letter.
M
M
You
could
just
you
could
adapt
the
letter
right
if
you,
if
to
try
to
help
allay
any
confusion.
Yes,.
P
P
Permits
that
we
see-
and
you
know
we
get
calls
from
people
about
fences,
you
know
why.
P
P
Buy
right
petitions
you
know
and
as
mr
brooker
said
you
know,
certainly
we
could.
P
Require
notification
for
any
number
of
things,
but
you
know:
there's
not
a
legal
right
behind
this.
Q
Q
A
Okay,
you
have
any
further
questions
from
council
members:
okay,
seeing
none
we'll
go
to
the
public.
A
This
is
for
questions
for
amendment
two
of
ordinance
21-17.
Please
indicate
your
intention.
A
S
I
will
say
it
is
confusing
to
get
a
notice
such
as
this.
It
happened
when
my
neighbors
built
an
adu.
A
Thank
you,
mr
lucas.
Yes,
we
also
have
a
comment
via
chat
from
dave
askins,
with
the
b
square.
I
Q
I
just
would
like
to
say
that
this
was
debated
thoroughly
at
the
planned
commission.
They.
Q
Did
their
job
and
considered
the
the
trade-offs
it
did
pass
out
of
their
9-0
with
staff's.
Q
Q
And
mr
gulick
I'd
also
like
to
point
out
the
community
development
software
that
we're
working.
Q
Q
N
I'd
want
to
streamline
things
too.
I
think
the
confusion
might
arise
from
the
nature
of.
N
Access,
I
mean
we,
we
still
have
populations
that
probably
aren't
computer
savvy
and
would.
N
N
Courtesy
that,
I
think
could
be
useful
because
it
notifies
people
from
the
onset
and
you.
N
N
H
It
makes
no
sense
to
require
notification
for
something
that
is
by
right,
since,
when.
H
I
mean
what
we
we
don't.
There's
no
point
in
this
in
this
notification
in
this
official.
H
H
It
just
makes
no
sense,
I
mean
the
confusion
over
the
letter
is
not
the
point.
The
point
is.
H
That
an
adu
is
the
by-right
construction
that
people
can
do
and
so
what's
the
point
I
mean.
A
Thank
you
any
further
comments
from
council
council
council
person
scandal.
Thank
you.
E
When
people
can
talk
about
projects
before
they
ever
happen,
so
I
think
we
do
get
better.
E
E
A
Okay,
c9
I'll
make
a
final
comment.
I
have
agreed
with
much
of
what
I've
heard
this
evening
and.
A
Thank
council
member
rallo
for
bringing
this
the
term
courtesy
was
mentioned,
and
I
I
see
that.
A
Really
tough
to
legislate
many
times
we
talk
about
fiscal
impact
on
certain
things,
I
think.
A
To
a
certain
extent,
even
gets
into
privacy
issues.
I
also
think
if
it's
permitted
and
it.
A
A
A
A
Better
than
the
rate
do
we
have
any
other
final
comments
from
council,
okay,
say.
A
Councilman
baralo
well
just
to
say
I
appreciate
everyone's
dialogue
and
and
discussion
about.
A
T
A
Okay:
okay,
thank
you
amendment
three
of
the
ordinance
21-17.
I
think
that's
what
I
heard.
H
A
Correct
on
that,
it's
probably
moving.
Second,
would
you
care
to
present
councilman
p,
my
smith.
H
Yes,
this
again
is
about
student
housing,
and
this
time
it's
about
parking.
H
In
a
building
that
is
designated
student
housing,
there
was
a
an
amendment.
H
Sorry
about
that,
that's
okay!
So
this
amendment
is
about
ground
floor
parking
in
a
student
housing.
H
Building
the
ordinance
2117
includes
a
revision
brought
forward
by
the
staff
that
says
no
more.
H
And
I
know
there
was
some
talk
about
this
at
the
plan
commission
level
as
well,
and
some.
H
Structured
parking
to
service
parking,
so
I
didn't
want
to
make
it
too
difficult
to
have.
H
Structured
parking
for
student
housing,
so
this
amendment
deletes
that
revision
and
instead.
A
Thank
you
very
much.
Do
we
have
any
questions
of
council
member
piedmont,
smith.
A
From
our
fellow
colleagues
council
member
volume,
could
we
hear
staff's
opinion
of
it.
A
A
Their
position
on
that
here
I
am,
I'm
so
sorry-
development
services
manager,
jackie
ski
inland,.
U
Yes,
we
are
fine
with
that
change.
We
think
that
makes
sense
and
meets
the
intent
of
what.
U
We
were
wanting
to
do
with
the
50
and
it's
a
little
cleaner
and
we're
fine
with
it.
Thanks.
A
Okay,
I'm
seeing
that
we'll
go
to
to
the
public
for
comments
on.
A
Amendment
three
for
ordinance
21-1-7:
please
indicate
your
intent
to
speak
publicly
by.
A
A
message
on
chat:
do
we
have
any
takers,
mr
lucas,
not
that
I
see
no.
A
Okay,
seeing
none
before
we
go
to
the
clerk,
I
do
just
kind
of
want
to
make
a
point.
A
And
parliamentarians
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on
this
for
amendments
that
says
the.
A
Final
comments,
seeing
none
with
a
per
please
call
the
roll
on
amendment
3
for
ordinance,
21-17.
C
G
And
sandberg,
yes,
thank
you.
Amendment
three
passes
nine
zero
council
member.
J
Before
I
introduce
it,
I
wanted
to
ask
a
question
of
staff.
If
that's
okay,.
J
A
J
Ms
scanlon,
I
wanna
call
your
attention
to
the
table
that
you
and
I
have
been
discussing
table034.
U
J
The
column
maximum
footprint,
so
so
under
the
various
r's
you
know,
there's
a
limitation
on
the.
J
Maximum
footprint
of
accessory
structures,
so
that's
not
the
same
thing
as
an
adu.
I
mean
what.
J
J
U
So,
for
example,
in
the
r3,
if
you
had
a
garage
that
was
on
your
first
floor
and
then
it
had
an.
U
The
maximum
square
footage
for
your
adu,
so
the
adu
language
that
we're
proposing.
U
We
think
that
it
already
says
this,
but
we're
trying
to
clarify
with
with
what
we've
the.
U
Change
that
we
proposed
that
the
actual
space
that
you're
using
to
live
in
the
living
space
for.
U
Your
adu
is
has
the
maximum
square
footage
so
that
it's
not
gross
floor
area
of
the
entire.
U
Feet
right
so
we're
clarifying
that
you
can
have
400
square
feet,
whether
it's
a
one-story
400.
U
Square
foot
or
two-story
gross
floor
area
800
square
foot,
where
only
the
second
floor
is
an
adu.
J
U
Square
feet,
but
you
could
have
you
could
have
a
garage
level
use
on
the
ground
floor.
That's
400.
U
Square
feet
and
an
80,
an
adu
square
footage
use
on
the
second
floor,
the
way
that
it's
written
now.
U
Without
our
change
makes,
it
seem
like
the
gross
score,
the
gross
floor
square
footage.
U
Anyone
else
can
jump
in
if
I've
described
that
weirdly,
but
I
think
what
you're
getting
at
is.
J
A
400
square
foot
adu
is
something
that
will
incentivize
its
construction
in
r4.
U
Think
that
existing
language,
which
only
discusses
maximum
gross
floor
area
of
any
detached
adu.
J
If
it's
the
latter
amendment
4
would
allow
the
same
size
as
r3s.
In
other
words,
it
would
increase.
U
Sure
so
yes,
we
would.
We
would
not
suggest
doing
that
because,
for
example,
if
you,
if
you.
U
U
U
U
Those
maximums
were
included
in
the
20
2019
proposal
and
actually,
I
believe,
if
someone
can.
U
U
U
Where
it
was
slightly
lower,
it
is
possible,
of
course,
to
live
in
400
square
feet.
Is
that.
U
Ideal
for
everyone,
no
probably
not,
we
are
trying
to
with
the
maximum
accessory.
U
Structure
size
in
general,
you
know
trying
to
make
those
buildings
compatible
in
size.
U
As
accessory
structures
to
likely
structures
on
the
lot,
I
understand
what
you're
saying
about
r3.
U
I
do
think
that
puts
us
in
an
a
tough,
a
pretty
tough
situation
and
a
property
owner
in
a
tough.
U
U
An
adu,
for
example,
if
you
sell
the
property
and
the
new
owner
does
not
want
to
have
that.
U
You
have
to
remove
the
kitchen
and
that
that's
the
really
the
only
physical
change.
U
That
you
have
to
do
where,
in
the
case,
if
we
let
you
build
an
adu
that
was
larger
than.
U
I'm
not
sure
how
we
would
be
able
to
address
that
fairly.
Okay
I'll
I'm
still
confused.
J
I
don't
quite
this
this
none
of
this
is
very
clear.
My
worry
has
been
that.
J
Going
to
introduce
the
amendment
now,
but
I'm
still
trying
to
understand,
what's
going.
J
On
and
maybe
it's
moot
but
I
did
agree
with
the
member
of
the
public
who
wrote
saying
that.
J
400
square
feet
does
not
seem
like
it
would
be
enough
incentive
to
get
built.
You
know
in
r4.
U
Converting
to
an
adu,
we
do
have
obviously
smaller
ones
in
the
historic
I
think
we
do
have
at.
U
P
That
was
allowed
for
a
detached.
You
know
there
were
a
lot
of
those
that
got
built
but
that
they.
P
U
Garage
is
going
to
be
roughly
that
size
and
we
have
seen
some
of
those,
and
that
is.
U
Where
we
likely
derived
that
number
from
initially
the
440
and
now
it's
even
smaller,
very
close.
U
To
that
yeah,
okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Thank
you,
mr
president,
for
the
extended
question.
A
Quite
welcome,
I
think,
was
a
worthy
debate.
I
take
it
that
you're
not
introducing
amendment
four.
J
A
Seeing
none
will
not
go
to
the
public
for
any
public
comments
on
ordinance,
21-17.
G
A
B
A
G
D
D
A
A
Has
been
moved
and
properly
second
to
be
adopted,
miss
scanlan,
I
assume
you
have
the
baton
now.
U
We
have
21
proposed
amendments
in
this
chapter
and
as
you'll
recall,.
U
The
first
is
ten
that
are
clarifications,
and
these
are
very
much
some
literally.
U
Just
adding
some
text
in
and
then
clarifying
some
existing
standards
to
meet
existing
intent.
U
And
practice
so
some
of
that
includes
changing.
For
example,
the
encroachment
allowed.
U
Clarifying
some
of
our
flood
hazard
reduction
requirements
that
they
apply
to
all
knots.
U
All
lots
not
just
platted
lots
addressing
alley
access
for
development
in
r4
in
a
similar.
U
Way
as
it's
addressed
in
r3
and
also
again
addressing
single-family
use
parking
standards.
U
In
our
multi-family
districts,
as
though
they
were
single,
acknowledging
that
they're.
U
Single-Family
use
not
multi-family
and
then
doing
some
more
clarifications
of
existing.
U
Quite
make
it
through
as
clear
as
we
wanted
to
in
the
code
update
and
then
duplicating
standards.
U
Through
r3
is
available
for
those
incentives
with
the
reduced
setbacks
or
lot
sizes
in.
U
The
terminology
from
the
new
new
after
the
update
transportation
plan
and
that.
U
Is
changing
from
local
road
to
neighborhood
road
four
related
to
parking?
One
is
an
increase
in.
U
The
medical
clinic
parking
maximum
from
3.3,
which
is
a
standard
that
we
have
to.
U
Variances
and
be
able
to
show
that,
because
of
the
way
they
operate
with
overlapping.
U
Appointments
and
then
having
overlapping
patients
plus
staff-
that
is
a
use
we've
seen.
U
U
Proposing
to
increase
that
to
five
again
more
clarification
on
how
properties
need
to
access.
U
Their
parking,
if
they
have
alley
access
and
if
they're,
having
driveways
into
their
property.
U
Off
of
an
alley,
how
that
needs
to
be
set
back
at
least
15
feet
from
the
road.
U
To
make
those
more
functional,
we've
found
that
the
those
types
of
developments
can
still
be
made.
U
In
those
districts
as
well
and
then
three
landscaping
changes,
two
that
are
kind
of.
U
One
that's
a
cleanup
that
just
didn't
make
it
over
quite
the
way
we
had
hoped
from
the
previous.
U
U
And
then
the
slightly
more
complicated
ones,
one
is
that
sometimes
we
require.
U
Requirement
because
we
have
been
advised
by
by
staff
and
them
and
the
senior
environmental.
U
Planner
also
working
with
landscapers
and
developers
in
town
that,
because
we.
U
Over
from
the
old
code,
so
we're
asking
to
remove
that
and
then
just
two
cleanups
for
signage.
U
Can
either
be
wall
or
projecting
signs
and
planned
commission
also
recommended
approval.
Nine
zero.
U
And
I
believe,
committee
of
the
whole
is
eight
zero
one.
I
can
answer
any
questions.
J
Second,
okay:
it's
been
moved
in
second
amendment,
one
for
ordinance,
21,
18.,.
A
Please
present,
sir,
thank
you.
Well
I'm
very
much
in
favor
of
most
of
ordinance
21-18,
but
this.
J
Thousand
square
feet
is
already
a
high
standard
for
parking.
You
know
25
years
ago,
donald
trump.
J
Found
that
in
most
cities
the
average
was
closer
to
to
two
to
two
point:
five
per
thousand
square.
J
J
Like
other
clinics
have
to,
5.0
is
really
going
against
the
spirit
of
the
climate
action
plan.
J
That
we
heard
presented
tonight
and
if
you
look
at
the
goal
4.6
in
the
comprehensive
plan.
J
J
Work,
so
this
amendment
simply
restores
that
standard
instead
of
allowing
it
to
increase
to
5.0.
J
A
Questions
to
the
amendment
author,
yes,
I
guess
this
is
the
staff
and
you
know
how
many.
U
The
last
few
years
I
would
say
yeah
that
we're
we're
not
trying
projecting
out
how
many.
U
U
Are
trends
then
try
to
see
if
there's
a
way
to
address
that
that
maybe
code
is
mismatched
with.
U
U
N
Needs
one
is
councilmember.
Vollen
said
that
you
know
he's
noting
correctly,
that
you
know
we.
We
did.
N
U
We're
always
trying
we're
always
addressing
competing
needs.
I
mean
especially
with
amendments.
U
That
become
controversial
or
that
have
you
know
more
than
one
site.
That's
definitely
something.
U
Know
if
they
have
an
existing
location,
we
ask
for
a
basically
parking
survey
of
you.
U
U
Seen
that
this
particular
use
is
able
to
show
that
they
that
they
do
need
more
parking.
U
Opportunities
they
don't,
they
don't
have
shared
parking
and
they
don't
have
street
parking.
So
we.
U
Felt
that
this
was
a
way
to
address
an
issue
that
we've
seen
pop
up
repeatedly
over
time.
U
U
Every
time
as
well
as
there
is
some
language
in
the
code
that
allows
for
us
to
to.
U
Increase
those
maximums
if
a
use
can
be
shown
to
be
quite
unique.
We
were
just
hoping
to
codify.
U
P
P
P
Other
use
they're
still
held
to
those
standards,
you
know
and
also
medical
clinics.
You
know.
P
P
P
There's
lots
of
things
that
make
that
specific
use
unique.
You
know
and
as
mrs
scalia
pointed.
P
Out
you
know
these
are
uses
that
we've
had
to
do
variances
for
and
if
we
recognize
that
they're.
P
P
A
Garlic,
do
we
have
any
more
questions
from
council
members,
council,
member
sandberg?
Thank
you.
R
R
R
Some
sort
of
surgery
situation
and
needing
a
driver
that
it
is
critical
for
us
to
keep
up.
R
U
That
are
around
the
existing
hospital
are
starting
to
change
over
and
we
are
expecting
that
those.
U
U
The
new
hospital
in
areas
where
obviously
there's
not
street
parking,
you
know
out
at
10th
in.
U
The
bypass
and
yes,
that
we
we
are
anticipating.
That's
a
good
point
that
we
are
anticipating.
U
That
those
uses
will
migrate
to
the
east
side
and
northeast
side,
and
so
that.
U
E
Yes,
thank
you.
I
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I'm
understanding
this
correctly.
E
A
The
public
for
comments
on
amendment
one
for
ordinance
21-1-8.
You
can
please
indicate.
A
A
message
to
our
meeting
host
via
chat
the
chat
function.
You
see
anyone,
mr
lucas.
A
M
A
little
extra
space
people,
their
mobility
is
really
reduced
and,
as
our
population
ages,.
M
It
sure
seems
like
this
is
just
a
little
a
little
bit
of
a
make
it
easier
for
the
facility
to.
H
To
have
more
surface
parking,
I
I
will
also
be
opposed
to
this
voting
against.
H
This
amendment,
because
of
the
use,
as
I
mean
even
the
most
ardent.
H
H
Medical
appointment
that
said
a
bicycle
parking
should
also
be
required
for
medical
clinics.
I.
H
Had
to
lock
my
bike
to
a
lamppost
the
other
day,
but
anyway
yeah,
I
I'm
sorry,
I'm
it's.
J
J
Making
to
contribute
to
the
same
goal
that
that
is
imbued
through
our
comprehensive
plan.
J
Maybe
three
clinics
that
have
called
for
this,
so
we're
sort
of
you
know.
J
Any
place
to
park,
surely
we
can
make
medical
clinics
think
a
little
bit
for.
J
But
again,
if
it's
a
medical
clinic,
it's
not
a
hospital
they're,
not
using
it
24
7.
they're
using.
A
This
is
a
business
and
in
this
particular
point-
and
I
understand
everything
else,
I've
heard.
A
Case
so
having
said
that,
I
won't
be
able
to
support
that.
Do
we
have
any
further
final.
A
A
Okay,
now
we'll
return
to
council
for
any
further
questions
on
ordinance,
21-1-8.
A
As
oh,
I'm
sorry,
it
wasn't
a
minute,
I'm
sorry,
we
have
any
other
minutes
offering.
D
B
Second,
thank
you
has
been
properly
moved
in
second
read
by
tyler
on
synopsis
only
or.
A
D
E
Second,
thank
you
has
been
properly
moved
in
second,
mr
robling
assume
you're
presenting.
F
Presidential
estate
and
r1
residential
large
lot
zoning
districts
by
removing
the
re.
F
District
from
the
code
and
from
the
map
it'll
also
amend
the
r1
uses
to
incorporate.
F
A
A
In
a
second
that
ordinance,
yes,
ordinance,
21-26,
be
introduced
and
read
by
the
clerk.
A
By
title
and
synopsis
only
will
the
clerk,
please
call
the
rule.
Yes,
councilmember
smith,.
D
D
D
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
reading
that
this
president's
preference
to
refer.
A
A
Okay,
swimmingly,
seeing
that
we
can
address
matters
of
council
schedule.
I
Yes,
thank
you
and
I'll
be
brief.
Two
items
the
work
session
for.
I
Items
that
will
be
ready
for
a
preview
in
the
upcoming
legislative
cycle.
I
I
And
that
is
a
meeting
scheduled
as
part
of
the
council's
annual
2021
legislative
schedule.
I
I
May
be
headed
toward
the
city
of
bloomington
and
rather
than
then
hold
that
budget
advance.
Next.
I
And
then
move
the
budget
advance
to
sometime
in
june
early
june,
where
they
believe
it.
I
Would
be
more
beneficial
for
you
all
to
have
a
discussion
about
budget
priorities.
I
Happy
to
answer
any
any
questions
on
that
date
and
time:
6
p.m.
Next,
tuesday,.
A
April
27th
correct
all
right,
gotcha
any
further
matters
of
council
schedule.