►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
Good
evening
eric
good
evening,
thank
you
very
much.
B
Council
members-
and
so
I
will
just
kind
of
briefly
go
through
the
site
and
a
little
bit.
B
Of
the
petition
that
was
approved
by
the
plane
commission,
so,
as
you
mentioned,
this
is
for.
B
To
give
you
an
idea
of
where
this
is
so,
the
alley
is
currently
paved
and
extends
into
a.
B
Smokestack
as
part
of
the
johnson
creamery
that
has
existed
here
for
a
long
time,
this
particular.
B
B
That
kind
of
bisect,
7th
and
8th
street
and
contains
a
good
majority
of
the
smokestack.
B
B
B
B
So
this
is
the
south
side
of
the
building
and
the
smoke
sac
there.
In
the
background.
B
So
with
that,
the
plan
commission
approved
the
petition,
as
I
mentioned
subsequent
to
the.
A
Thank
you,
mr
garlic.
Is
there
anything.
C
Okay,
okay,
so
good
evening.
Everyone-
and
I
have
a
few
slides.
You
have
copies
and
please
introduce.
A
Yourself,
oh
I'm
sorry,
bethgate
corporation
council
city,
and
I
don't
know
if
those
are.
C
C
To
the
next
slide,
so
the
administration
recommends
that
the
council
obtain
the.
C
Johnson
creamery
district
and
the
stack
along
with
an
easement
to
allow
installation
of.
C
C
C
C
C
To
bring
in
artists
who
could
be
able
to
do
the
sort
of
public
art
project
that
we
have
seen.
C
C
C
C
C
C
The
lines
that
you
all
have
seen
elsewhere,
so
if
you
could
advance
steven,
thank
you.
C
C
C
C
C
A
Thank
you,
miss
kate,
thank
you
for
your
presentation.
Do
we
have
anything
additional.
C
Believe
someone
from
pure
list
was
going
to
be
joining
possibly
remotely,
but
I,
mr
lucas,
I.
D
A
Good
evening
welcome
and
please
proceed
if
you
have
something
to
add.
E
Good
evening
everybody
you
know,
I
I
just
want
to
add
that
we
we
pushed
back
against
this.
E
Something
you
know
that
would
commemorate
the
historic
significance
of
the
smoke
stack.
E
As
it
is,
is
over
three
million
dollars
over
budget,
so
we
don't
know
if
this
is
even.
E
Going
to
happen,
add
to
that
you
know
that's
not
taking
into
account
350
000
to
repair
the
smoke.
E
Stack
which
we've
been
ordered
to
do
the
loss
of
income
and
value
by
losing
at
t
as
a
tenant.
E
E
Figure
out,
how
are
we
going
to
even
pay
for
this
demolition
in
repair
of
the
smoke
stack?
We.
E
A
Well,
thank
you,
mr
cordero.
I'm
sure
questions
will
follow,
and
so
we
appreciate
your
your.
A
Your
comments
to
begin
and
let's
go
to
council
questions,
I
think
councilmember
sandberg.
F
Before
we
vacate
the
alleys,
was
that
discussed
with
the
petitioner
in
advance
of
this
meeting.
F
C
C
C
I
think
specific
proposal,
so
so
yes,
in
that
sense,
yeah,
so
they've
got
that
and.
C
Peerless
we've
had
numerous
times
when
we've
suggested
sitting
down
and
talking
about
this.
C
C
C
The
we
we
just
don't
have
the
money,
but
but
so
yes,
in
response
to
your
question,
we.
F
F
Or
you
know
that's
incorporated
within
the
the
development
correct.
I
you
are
correct
about.
C
A
Discussion
about
this,
so
we
we
were,
we
were
contacted
by
the
deputy
mayor
yesterday
around.
E
Five
o'clock
central
time,
maybe
4
30
central
time,
giving
us
a
heads
up
about
this
250
000.
E
Request,
but
I'd
also
like
to
say
that,
every
time
prior
to
this,
when
we
said
listen,
we
were.
E
Sticker
shock
and
then
we
were
made
to
look
like
a
bad
guy
for
not
even
being
willing
to
put.
E
C
Would
like
to
respond,
because
I
was
in
a
meeting
where
either
you
or
another
representative
from.
C
We
will
give
you
an
easement,
the
easement
part
of
that
had
been,
I
think
something
peerless.
A
A
G
E
Dollars
of
design
and
engineering
work
in
another
another
year
of
time,
and
you
know
frankly.
G
Like
that,
do
you
have
a
sense
of
that?
It
would
probably
reduce
the
project
by
four
or
five.
E
We
we
don't
have
time
to
redesign
we.
We
bought
this
with
the
intention
of
being
a
long-term.
E
Owner
in
bloomington,
through
an
opportunity
zone
program,
our
investors
that
we're
working
with.
E
E
Back
completely
redesign,
we
again,
we
don't
have
the
we
don't
have
the
time
or
the
capital
to.
E
E
H
C
C
H
E
Is
a
write-off
component
if
it
was
a
donation,
so
that
means
you
know,
you're
talking
about
30.
H
H
Question
in
the
memo,
actually,
it
was
in
the
packet
from
last
week.
H
I
I
I
I
Expressed
their
desire
to
move
forward
because
they're
concerned,
he,
mr
cordano,
expressed
their.
I
That
really
quite
honestly,
kind
of
goes
back
to
the
fact
that
it
was
unclear
at
the
time.
I
I
Member
sims
I've
been
here
since
2002
and
I
can
think
of
maybe
three
or
four
alley.
Vacation.
H
H
H
H
A
Would
just
like
to
ask
miss
kate
what
the
intention
of
the
250
to
300
000
is
in
terms
of.
C
J
Outcome
is
to
be
determined,
but
I
think
the
the
broad
brushed
approach
would
be
to
do.
J
J
It's
necessary
to
really
have
you
know
substantial
and
reasonable
funding
available.
J
To
be
able
to
to
attract
the
right
kind
of
art
piece
that
would
celebrate
that
structure.
J
J
You
know,
I
think,
if
you
look
at
the
the
graduate
hotel,
the
the
artist
involved
is.
J
Industry
and
and
the
city
in
terms
of
yielding
an
outcome.
You
know,
I
think
I'd
be
I'd,
be
guessing.
J
In
terms
of
what
potentially
could
be
the
solution
here,
but
the
idea
would
be
that
that
we
really.
J
J
Significant
and
and
unfortunately,
you
know,
and
the
cost
of
that
is
significant
as
well.
A
K
Everybody's
asking
the
questions
already
asking
was
going
to
ask:
do
we
is
there
an
opinion.
C
C
That's
this
process
does
not
really
involve
the
hpc
yeah
yeah.
That's
right
sure.
A
President
sandberg,
thank
you
if
mr
crowley
is
still
on
the
call
here,
I'm
questioning.
F
F
Is
that
kind
of
where
this
was
the
idea
that,
if
we're
going
to
give
up
something
of
benefit,.
F
We
want
to
be
sure
we're
getting
something
back
in
return
with
respect
to
the
the
look
and
the.
J
Know
very
integral
to
the
structure
widely
recognized
as
such
widely
appreciated
as
such.
J
J
This
amount
as
being
appropriate
and
reflective
of
what
we've
seen
elsewhere
all
right.
Thank
you.
A
Council,
member
smith,
I
think
he
has
a
question
sure
I
I
just
wanted
to
clarify
for
me.
C
Changed
so
initially
it
was,
it
included
more
space
in
the
parking
lot
on
the
north
side,
and
it.
C
C
This
is,
you
know,
you're,
you
would
be
vacating
a
public
asset
to
allow
for
an
expanded
version.
C
C
And
we
don't,
you
know,
I'm
not
faulting
that,
but
it
raises
then
okay.
So
what
are
the.
A
G
I'm
going
to
stumble
over
this
question
a
little
bit.
I
I've
heard
you
describe
this.
G
Project
as
a
nightmare-
but
I
haven't
heard
a
hard
no
this
evening,
so
I'm
wondering
what.
E
E
000
contribution
next
steps
on
our
side
are
a
title
claim
with
our
title:
insurance
company,
who.
E
Missed
this
alley,
vacation
what
I
did,
I
had
my
hand
raised
to
comment
that
you
know
this.
E
Just
an
access
right
away,
it
hasn't
been
used
by
the
public
in
probably
a
hundred
years.
E
A
Council
president,
my
question
has
to
do
with
the
smokestack.
Is
it
my
understanding
that.
E
Remove
their
equipment,
which
means
that
their
new
tower
is
up
and
functioning
and
tested.
E
You
know:
250
000
is
10
years
worth
of
rent.
You
know
paid
by
paid
by
at
t
more
than
10.
A
Any
other
second
round
questions
from
council
seeing
none
I
have
one,
and
that
is
maybe
to.
A
Mr
garlic,
I'm
curious
about
this
topic
being
discussed
at
plan
commission.
B
B
Commission
does
not
approve
valley
vacations
or
make
recommendations,
so
it
was
just
left.
B
Open-Ended
that
that
was
something
that
would
have
to
be
resolved.
I
see,
could
you
describe.
A
And
what
are
the
materials
yeah,
and
certainly
the
petitioner
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong
on.
B
Any
of
this,
it
was
a
mix
of
some
brick,
some
metal
and
then
cementite
siding.
B
A
Is
that
what
I'm
that
would
be
a
fiber
cement
signing,
I
see
and
then
just
a
little
bit
more.
A
That
was
my
other
question.
Oh,
how
many
units
is
the
development
I
was
51
units
51
and
four
to
five.
A
A
B
Ten
foot
of
the
building,
so
everything
on
that
vertical
plane.
All
five
stories
would
be
affected.
A
How
to
employ
this,
these
conditions
would:
how
would
how
would
it
occur
in
terms
of
this.
D
Attorney
this
is
a
novel
I
think,
idea
for
a
right-of-way
vacation.
The
administration
has.
D
Laid
out
what
I
believe
in
in
the
slides
was
an
agreement
that
would
accompany
the
ordinance.
I.
D
Don't
know
that
that
would
become
part
of
this
ordinance.
You've
also
heard
the
petitioner.
D
D
I
think
that's
a
good
question
whether
the
council
could
just
add
this
as
an
amendment.
D
D
In
corporation
council
kate's
presentation
at
the
time
the
ordinance
is
voted
on.
So
I
don't.
D
D
A
Council
member
simmons
has
a
question
one
more
there's
250
to
300
000
that
we're
talking
about.
H
Apparently
that
has
started
at
5
30
yesterday.
Well
and
again,
I
would
answer
that
in
sort
of
two.
C
C
Ask
from
the
city-
and
I
was
not
actually
in
on
that
conversation,
so
I
can't
give
you
the.
C
And
talk
with
peerless
about
finding
an
option
here
that
makes
sense
that
is
workable,
and
that
is.
C
Is
what
we're
looking
for
by
way
of
public
benefit
in
exchange
for
what
is
in
public
asset
and.
C
C
C
Esd,
because
of
their
close
work
with
public
art
and
and
that
figure
alex.
If
you
want
to
jump
in.
C
And
speak
a
little
bit
more
to
that.
I
know
you
made
some
comments
earlier,
but.
J
Sure
alex
crowley
director
director
of
sustainable
development,
so
councilmember
is.
J
The
you
know,
the
process
we
undertook
was
beyond
just
a
sort
of
baseline.
C
H
H
H
Maintenance
are
we
talking
in
perpetuity
with
this
fund
going
to
take
it
for
the
next
10
years.
A
Rendered
I
mean
what
was
your
expectation
going
through
this
process
that
that
this
vacation.
E
That
this
alley
had
been
vacated
in
the
90s
when
they,
I
believe,
when
they
were
doing
the.
E
Not
knowing
that
this
was
an
issue,
we
raised
it
immediately
with
our
title
company
and
started.
E
Of
it
being
vacated
previously,
so
we
came
into
this
in
the
dark
in
terms
of
this
being
an
issue.
E
E
Insurance,
they
did
a
you
know,
thorough
search
of
the
records
they
could
not
find
it
and.
E
They
they
came
to
that
conclusion.
I
want
to
say
in
either
december
or
january
of.
E
Well
underway,
in
terms
of
our
construction,
drawings
and
design
work.
Okay,
could
it
could.
A
I
just
you
know
again
to
find
out
a
little
bit
more
about
this
history,
mr
robinson,
when.
B
So
I
can
comment
on
that
real
quickly,
as
I
was
the
case
manager
for
this.
So
as
the
petitioner.
B
Said
you
know
they
had
an
ulta
survey
that
they
had
done.
They
submitted
to
us
that
appeared.
B
B
B
We
had
not
found
yet,
but,
as
they
did
more
research,
nobody
could
find
any
documents.
B
A
A
B
This
came
up,
this
was
actually
the
second
hearing
or
the
second
round
of
approvals.
For
this,
the.
B
First
time
that
this
went
to
the
plane
commission
in
2019,
you
know
we
we
didn't
really
delve
into.
B
B
Complexities,
removing
the
culvert
and
they
had
to
redesign
it.
I
Intelligence,
I
think
you
know
the
petitioner
stated
that
you
know
their
title
company
missed.
I
Instance:
okay,
thank
you.
That's
clarifying
any
other
questions
before
we
go
to
public
comment.
A
It
doesn't
look
like
there
is
any
public
in
the
gallery.
Are
there
any
on.
A
L
This
process
all
the
way
through
and
what
I'm
hearing
here
is.
This
is
basically
hardship.
L
L
So
I
am
saying
that
there
are
ways
of
filing
for
hardship
that
a
historic
building
of
this.
L
And
I
guess
I'm
here
to
say
that
I
think
vacating
the
alley
and.
A
Council
president
sandberg,
did
you
have
a
comment?
Yes,
this
council
traditionally.
F
F
G
G
G
G
It
I
cannot
help
but
notice
it
doesn't
contribute
to
our
affordable
housing
goals
or
or
anything.
G
H
H
From
boards,
that
sort
of
thing,
and
one
of
the
things
that
I
put
at
the
forefront,
is
that.
H
H
K
K
A
very
cooperative
way
with
you
know
the
city,
historic
preservation
and
mr
cordero
all
kind
of.
K
Working
together
and
so
now
it's
it
seems
like
it's
really
kind
of
gone
off
the
rails
now
and
I'm.
K
Not
really
sure
why-
and
I
would
also
agree
with
mr,
as
mr
sims
has
said,
that
it's
it's.
K
K
Went
this
direction
you
know,
maybe
it's
time
for
us
to
all
go
our
separate
ways
on
this.
One.
K
A
I
I
need
to
consider
this
vacation
whether
to
proceed.
What
utility
that
easement
has
whether.
A
Thank
you
all
for
your
input.
This
has
been
very
helpful
to
us
and
do
we
have
a
recommendation.
A
Council,
member
scandillary:
no,
I
will
vote
pass
council
councilmember,
sandberg,
no
councilmember.