►
From YouTube: Bloomington City Council, May 18, 2022
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
Them
and
it
calls
into
question
the
whole
all
the
assumptions
that
we
make
about.
C
C
C
C
C
Risser
that
this
is
a
matter
that
we
should
be
thinking
about,
that
we
all
maybe
take
for
granted.
C
C
C
C
Have
whose
trailer
didn't
have
brakes
and
was
not
connected
properly
to
handle
its
weight.
C
A
A
A
A
number
of
anxieties
and
and
mental
issues
for
people,
and
so
their
caseloads
have
skyrocketed.
A
Needless
to
say,
but
the
therapists
involved
here
have
stepped
up
to
the
job
and
it's
just.
A
A
A
D
D
D
D
Recommendations:
three
through
five
through
two
deliverables,
two
action
items
and
I'll.
D
D
D
D
D
D
Which
is
awesome,
I
know
mciris
does
a
lot
of
work
because
the
invasive
species
throughout.
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
D
A
A
E
Presentation
very
much
I
I'd
be
interested
in
hearing
more
about
the
kind
of
feedback
you.
E
Received
during
your
meetings
with
neighborhood
associations,
could
you
comment
on
that.
D
Yeah,
I
mean
linda
said
it
best.
I
remember
she
said
it
a
few
a
few
months
ago
that
she
said
it.
D
D
It
was
really
only
people
that
were
interested
in
this.
It
was
kind
of
just
a
trial
run.
D
D
D
D
D
And
whether
or
not
it's
prone
to
flooding
and
and
various
things
like
that
ice
linda,
do
you
know.
D
D
Important
for
the
next
fellow
whoever
wants
to
work
on
this
to
digitize
some
new
layers
from.
D
D
D
A
G
There
was
city
staff,
has
corrected
and
or
brought
in
line
some
fee
structures.
Fee
changes.
G
On
the
consent
agenda,
which
is
a
little
bit
different
than
city
council,.
G
They
just
withdrew
their
petition
for
pud,
and
so
that
was
just
approved.
The
last.
G
G
G
As
as
a
result
of
conversations
with
people
out
in
the
community
and
my
colleagues
on
council.
G
So
we
had
a
great
discussion
about
what
can
be
done
to
to
make
that
look
different.
G
So
we
did
have
a
really
good
discussion
last
night
about
that.
I
introduced
an.
G
G
B
Certainly,
thank
you
for
the
report
council
member
in
the
context
of
monolithic
buildings.
B
B
Always
found
the
anti-monotony
standards
like
in
the
udo
to
be
inadequate
to
meeting
that.
That.
B
Issue
when
we're
talking
about
like
block-sized
buildings
has
was
the
topic
of
maximum
building.
B
G
It
was
recognized
that
the
udo
is
inadequate
in
addressing
the
monolithic
appearance.
G
And
building
of
of
those
kind
of
buildings,
so
I
think
the
plan
commission
is
they
were.
G
That's
where
we're
gonna
go
is
to
try
to
figure
out
a
way
to
mitigate
that
great.
Thank
you
sure.
A
To
our
council
attorney
for
assistance
here,
if
there
are
members
out
there
watching
on
zoom.
A
H
A
A
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
A
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
H
H
K
K
K
K
K
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
A
A
slightly
different
order,
we're
going
to
move
to
legislation
for
first
readings.
Madam
president,.
F
A
A
H
It
but
isn't
ready
to
take
final
action.
The
council,
when,
when
you
come
to
that
item,
may
wish.
H
A
Resolutions-
madam
president,
just
I
read
the
wrong
title
for
ordinance:
22
15..
Would
you
like.
M
M
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
Yes,
I
have
a
couple
of
questions:
the
clothing
allowance
in
the
new
contract.
It
reduces
the.
O
Officer's
clothing
allowance
by
one
thousand
one
hundred
dollars,
so
the
new
total
is
five.
N
N
N
N
O
O
A
N
N
Over
the
years,
so
just
just
to
clarify
that
it
may
be
net
cost,
as
opposed
to
total
cost.
N
N
N
N
For
that
provision,
so
what
do
police
officers
current
pay
currently.
O
In
when
the
city
implements
a
parking
cash
out
program,
which
has
been
talked
about
for
city.
O
A
P
Good
evening,
council
members,
paul
post
president
fop
lodge88
I'll
answer
a
couple
of
those.
P
P
We're
gonna
make
do
with
that
out
of
what
I've
my
prepared
comments,
I'm
pleased
to
be
here.
P
P
A
A
Yes,
just
to
say
I'm
very
pleased
with
the
the
agreement.
I
think
it's.
F
A
real
important
step
in
the
right
direction.
It
certainly
makes
us
more
competitive.
F
Recruitment
and
retention,
whether
these
this
pay
and
benefits,
is
beginning
to.
F
A
A
A
M
A
Q
Q
Q
What
we
brought
forward
before
you
this
evening
with
that
said,
there's
certainly
an
opportunity
to.
Q
Would
be
to
pass
a
resolution
to
direct
the
planned
commission.
Q
Q
Q
Q
R
Oh,
oh,
it
needs
to
be
on
conference
yeah.
R
R
A
R
One
this
evening
is,
as
I,
as
I
said,
ordinance
2209.
This
went
to
the
plan
commission
as
zeo
1122.
R
And
this
particular
ordinance
is
zoning
updates
to
chapter
three,
which
is
our
use
regulations.
R
So
you
can
see
that
reflected
in
the
red
line.
That's
in
the
packet,
as
well
as
the
associated.
R
Excel
document
that
highlights
each
by
description
only
so,
basically
what
we.
R
Were
trying
to
do
in
this
chapter
with
these
brief
amendments,
one
is
to
address
the
building
floor.
R
In
our
various
multi-use
districts,
so
the
idea
is
to
lower
the
base
and
so
a
building
floor.
R
R
About
earlier
something
that
we
hear
about
a
lot,
so
the
idea
is
to
lower
the
by
right.
R
Size
and
then,
if
you
decide
to
use
one
of
our
incentives,
affordable
housing
incentive.
R
Increases
again,
or
in
the
case
of
the
multi
mixed
use,
student
housing
district
that
goes
back.
R
Of
student
housing
developments
in
some
of
our.
R
Again
mixed
use
districts
and
we
included
some.
R
Excuse
me
some
changes
to
building
floor
plate
so
that
you
again
related
to
the
incentives.
R
So
that
buildings,
with
more
than
20
dwelling
units,
have
a
limited
floor
plate
and
then
again,
if.
R
They
use
incentives
that
those
maximums
can
those
floor.
Plate
maximums
can
be
increased.
A
Councilmember
rollo,
thank
you
miss
ganlin.
My
question
is:
what
is
the
typical
size.
R
We
we
received
them.
Oh
excuse
me,
yeah.
Sorry,
I
would
say
we
received
complaints.
You
know
based
on.
R
R
R
R
Of
our
larger
buildings
is
going
to
be
larger
than
some
of
the
maximums
allowed,
even
with.
R
The
option
in
for
developers
to
have
an
easier,
larger
build
if
they
do
the
incentives
right,
so
it.
F
Could
be
half
the
scale
of
small
wood,
but
it
would
have
to
suffice
in
terms
of
housing
and
and
or.
F
R
R
Use
neighborhood
scale,
the
largest
the
building
floor.
Plate
could
be,
is
5,
000.
R
Square
feet:
that's
still
very
small,
but
just
trying
to
give
a
range
to
make
the.
C
T
The
report,
I
think,
for
the
third
time-
maybe
but
anyway,
mr
robinson
and
either
one
of
you-
can.
T
T
These
amendments
and
you
stated
to
recalibrate
sustainability
and
affordability,
incentives.
T
R
I'll
just
I'll
I'll
say
and
then
he
can
correct
or
add
on
which
is
basically
that
you
know.
R
Since
the
udo
was
whole
cloth,
updated
first
in
2019
2020,
we
what
we
said
to
the
council
in
the.
R
R
Working
in
a
way
that
we
intend,
which
is
to
generate
more
affordable
housing
and
more.
R
Sustainable
development
design,
then
we'll
want
to
try
to
change
them
to
to
make
that
happen.
So
we.
R
Use-
and
we
have
seen
some
sustainability
development
incentive
use,
you
will
see.
R
That
we
will
be
proposing
some
changes
to
that
as
well.
We
think
that
the
sustainable
development.
R
Incentives
may
be
too
lacks
too
easy
to
get
and
that
we're
not
really
haven't
been
able
to.
R
Maximize
for
the
community,
the
benefits
that
that
they
were
intended
for
so
we're
trying
to.
R
Find
a
new
level
where
development
will
still
be
possible,
of
course,
but
that
it
would.
B
I
wanted
to
follow
up
on
a
point
from
earlier
in
the
evening
with
mr
smith's
report,
but
actually.
B
Something
ms
scanley
just
referenced
as
well,
which
is
the
way
buildings
are
perceived
by.
B
Whatever
it's
called
the
the
building
a
floor
plate,
sorry
floor,
plate
kind
of
gets
it
fit.
B
But
but
you
can
have
a
an
area
figured
in
a
lot
of
different
ways,
whereas
controlling
the
maximum.
B
To
go
with
floor,
plate
versus
regulating
something
like
maximum
building
widths.
R
That
is
something
I
think
that
that
we
could
do.
I
think
we
started
with
building
floor
plate.
R
Q
A
Any
questions
from
council
council
member
volun
got
a
hot
mic
here.
Have
we
ever
considered
a.
C
H
Of
amendments,
we
we
didn't
consider
that
it
might
be
just
as
fast
to
go
through
them.
B
As
amended
yeah,
just
just
a
brief
note
to
say,
first
of
all,
thank
you.
I
appreciate.
B
Staff's
work
on
this
and
support
the
iterative
approach
to
considering
incentives
and
trying
to.
B
Update
those
and
tweak
those
over
time,
based
on
what
we're
seeing
so
definitely
appreciate
that.
B
B
Or
really
anyone
on
the
street
for
that
matter
and
that
even
with
a
these
kind
of
reduced
sizes.
B
With
an
odd-shaped
lot,
you
could
still
end
up
with
a
very
wide,
but
shallow
building
that
kind.
B
B
For
context,
the
small
wood
building,
formerly
called
smallwood
is
almost
300
feet
long.
The.
B
B
A
Councilmember
rallo
yeah
just
to
say
I
think
this
is
a
step
in
the
right
direction,
but
I
I
like.
F
My
colleague
feel
that
more
needs
to
be
done,
and
I
think,
building
with
us
is
a
good
approach.
F
You
know
certain
incentives,
sustainable
and
otherwise,
but
and
then
the
other
is
to.
F
Get
a
human
scale
landscape.
That's
you
know,
that's
the
consequence
of
large
building
mass.
A
A
A
A
A
Price
points
down
the
need
for
us
to
be
more
mindful
of
climate
change
and
and
our
our
efforts.
A
A
C
Tune
of
at
least
140
000
a
year,
so
I
think
that
says
two
things
one
is
you
know,
while
we.
C
Agreed
to
greatly
reduce
the
use
of
puds
and
a
lot
of
them
had
to
go.
I
know
that
councilman
baralo.
C
Matter
is
that
one
person's
horror
at
tall
building
is
another
person's.
C
C
C
C
C
C
M
R
Meeting
march
2022
meeting
as
well,
it
was
recommended
with
a
positive
recommendation
with
a.
R
R
Our
development
standards
and
incentives
chapter
as
miss
bolden
said
there
are
21
amendments.
R
And
they
they
have
a
pretty
wide
range,
so
I'll,
just
briefly
go
over
them.
R
One
is
a
change
to
the
dimensional
standards
table
in
order
to
align
some
of
the
dimensional.
R
R
Other
parts
of
chapter
four,
adding
those
two
tables
as
well
for
clarity.
R
R
R
Districts
again,
where
multi-family
uses
don't
have
minimum
parking
so
taking
that
out,
we.
R
R
We
had
some
questions
at
committee
related
to
the
removal
of
maples.
I
think
I
said
at
committee.
R
R
R
Elm
trees
that
are
being
asked
to
be
put
back
in
related
to
more
specific
disease
resistant.
R
Based
on
the
way
that
the
code
currently
is
written,
I
and
stephen
can
correct.
R
R
Will
add
to
2023
and
work
with?
If
this
is
approved,
we
will
work
with
landscapers
to
make
sure.
R
That's
being
done
even
before
it
is
codified,
so
yeah
others
were
just
some
correction
or.
R
Square
foot
excuse
me,
projecting
signs
could
be
located,
which
is
something
we've
been
getting.
R
Putting
in
more
allowance
for
a
larger
sign
than
300
square
feet,
which
is
the
typical
max.
R
Cattlemen
building,
so
those
are
addressing
variances
we've
seen
since
the
code
was
updated.
F
One
pardon
me
I'd
like
to
introduce
amendment
one
after
it
was
introduced
being
introduced.
G
At
a
request
of
the
planning
staff,
this
is
on
chapter
four
I'll.
Second,
it
thank
you.
R
R
R
It
was
just
left
out,
so
this
is
our
changes
proposed
changes
to
the
incentives
section
which.
R
We
mentioned
earlier
briefly
a
couple
of
the
bigger
things
we
are
proposing
to
remove
the.
R
At
one
time,
desirable
for
developers
and
also
for
the
city
to
be
getting
good
benefit
from.
R
Those
and
we
haven't
seen
much
use
positive
use
of
the
linkage
study
thus
far.
R
We're
proposing
to
take
that
out.
We
are
also
proposing
to
slightly
increase
the
development.
R
Bulk
incentives
in
the
affordable
housing
section
and
amending
the
current
payment
in
lieu.
R
Options
again
in
the
affordable
housing
section
and
then
in
the
sustainable
development
section.
R
Get
the
be
able
to
utilize
that
incentive
and
then
the
last
part
is.
R
The
system,
the
sustainable
development
bonus
we
broke
that
up
by
tier,
which
the
affordable.
R
Additional
sustainable
development
bonus
to
mirror
those
tiers
again
encouraging
people
to.
R
B
Housing
incentives
if
memory
serves
through
the
course
of
the
udl
being
developed
and
discussed.
B
B
Back
but
the
idea
that
developers
are
choosing
not
to
to
include
affordable
units
within.
B
The
the
development
itself,
but
instead
making
a
payment
you
know
to
to
as
a
substitute.
B
And
that
was
again
sort
of
frowned
upon
by
a
number
of
folks.
And
this.
B
B
Somehow
concentrating
very
low
in
low
income
housing
that
sort
of
thing,
because
again,
when.
B
B
Is
a
lot
of
affordable
housing
in
one
place
where,
whereas
the
the
theory
seems
to
be
it
would.
B
Be
better
to
integrate
that
with
market
rate
housing
in
more
cohesively.
So
I
I
guess.
B
I'm
wondering
what
motivated
this
change
given,
given
the
somewhat
recent
you
know.
B
Q
The
question
councilman
flaherty,
you
know
and
again
this
is
based
on
our
assessment
of
requests.
Q
Q
The
linkage
study-
that's
something
that
typically
people
here
don't
do.
It
seems
to.
Q
Be
more
common
practice
elsewhere,
you
know
our
consultant
said:
oh
they're
easy
to
do.
Q
Q
Q
Those
conversations
in
in
developers,
I
believe
mr
zodi
from
hand-
is
available.
Q
Via
zoom,
if
you
have
questions
on
the
how
the
housing
development
fund,
but
thank
you.
B
B
Is
part
of
the
motivation
to
kind
of
reinstate
an
option
to
to
have
revenue
for
that?
For
that.
B
Q
As
student
housing
just
to
be
clear,
and
so
again
these
are
the
the
type
of
projects
that.
Q
We're
generally
seeing
and
how
do
we,
leverage
that
that
housing
engine
to
help
kind
of
provide.
Q
Other
benefits
to
the
community,
so
it's
common
practice
everywhere.
We
enabled
it
with
the
current.
Q
Q
B
Q
Q
Q
A
A
Of
the
questions
that
was
just
posed,
no,
no
president
zamberg
just
happy
to
answer
questions.
U
Councilmember
flaherty
asked
about
the
revenue
source.
There
isn't
a
consistent
revenue
source.
U
For
the
housing
development
fund,
as
many
of
you
know
there,
it
is
we
get
contributions
in
there.
U
A
couple
of
you
mentioned
a
few
minutes
ago
is,
is
doing
a
payment
in
lieu
there,
so
we.
U
Will
see
some
some
revenue
coming
to
the
housing
development
fund
because
all
of
you,
we'll.
E
E
Changes
to
the
payment
in
lieu
of
section
and
as
I
read
as
I
read
your
proposed
changes,
it.
E
Q
Because
I
don't
have
the
ordinance
in
front
of
me,
oh
because
the
way
it's
structured
now.
Q
Q
E
O
Clarify
mr
robinson
said:
I
mentioned
that
this
payment
in
lieu
of
change
is
actually.
Q
Q
Student
housing
type
developments
so,
but
you
know
by
definition,
some
of
the
the
projects
that.
Q
R
Anyone's
that
most
of
that
has
been
student
housing
defined
when
we're
using
incentives.
R
Period
thus
far,
okay,
so
would
it
be
accurate
to
say
that
so
we're
not
getting
developers
to.
O
O
R
I
didn't
know
yours
go
ahead,
mr
robinson
yeah,
that's
correct
and
again
you
know,
you
know
kind.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
H
V
Okay,
yes,
it's
unmuting!
Now
this
is
actually
jan
sorby
calling
in
and
I
wondered
about
how.
V
They
are
how
hand
is
monitoring
at
this
time
the
apartments
that
have
taken
on
that
burden
of.
V
G
Working
on
the
incentives,
you
know
we,
we
certainly
have
to
try
different
things
to.
A
A
A
Monitored
monitored
currently,
do
you
have
anything
to
add
to
that
sure
thanks
president
sandberg.
U
And
thanks
to
ms
sorby
for
asking
the
question,
we
do
monitor
that
and
let
me
just
give
you.
U
A
quick
summary
of
where
hands
what
the
level
of
activity
there
is.
We
have.
U
We're
in
the
process
of
sort
of
rounding
out
the
setup
of
the
program,
so
we
started
last
year.
U
Talking
about
how
we
could
do
this,
and
we
have
luckily
you
know
and
and.
U
With
the
support
of
the
council
and
the
community
developed
quite
a
few
units
of
affordable.
U
Housing
about
1100
plus
units
of
affordable
housing
over
the
last
six
years,
and
so.
U
Question
then
becomes
okay.
How
do
we
make
sure
those
are
in
place
and
and
a
number
of
them
about.
U
Close
to
500
or
so
are
done,
and
so
we
have
we've
put
a
process
in
place
at
the
first
of.
U
As
it
goes,
and
so
we
have
finished
the
outreach
to
all
of
those,
we
are
largely
seeing
compliance.
U
Step
is
to
and
in
the
units
I'm
talking
about.
Let
me
be
clear
that
the
the
1100
plus
those.
U
Are
sort
of
the
private
investment
so
not
necessarily
the
bullington
housing
authority.
U
Has
maybe
gotten
some
some
public
dollars
or
just
private
private,
affordable
housing.
U
U
U
U
With
ihcda,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
all
those
affordable
housing
types
are
done
in
sort
of.
U
Us
by
a
certain
time,
we
think
we're
going
to
get
notice
about
out
this
summer
about
having
a.
U
To
other
entities,
and
so
we
want
to
make
sure
that
we're
having
that
process
sort
of
streamlined.
U
U
A
cohesive
program
so
we're
very
active
in
doing
that
now
and
it's
been
a
busy
spring
working.
U
U
U
Walnut
street
that'll
break
ground
next
month
and
so
we're
rolling
along
with
affordable
housing.
A
M
O
Yes,
I
will
move
amendment
two
to
ordinance
2210.
A
And
now
we
were
on
to
amendment
three-
and
this
is
council
member
flaherty.
B
B
B
B
Is
that
there
are
other
changes
that
are
justified
and
hope
well
beyond
what
is
proposed
here.
B
B
B
B
B
B
R
R
Something
that
we
explored
various
options
of
how
to
get
the
do
this
type
of
change
in
the
code.
R
So
I
think
we
do
acknowledge
that
it
could
be
done
in
another
way,
the
overlays
that
we
have
now.
R
R
That
overlay
we
used
to
in
the
old
code
call
them
out
all
separately
and
then
the
new.
R
Zoning
district
is
in
the
overlay
and
split
up
by
section
for
the
different
requirements.
R
Mixed-Use
medium
scale,
only
a
quite
small
portion,
and
so
when
we
were
determining
the
best
way
to.
R
Kind
of
put
that
in
here
it
was
determined
by
staff
that
amending
these
tables.
R
Would
provide
the
outcome
that
we
were
looking
for
to
align
with
the
design
outcomes
of
the
plan.
R
Via
footnote
and
these
types
of
tables,
as
you
can
see
in
your
packet.
R
Q
Udo
update
process
with
clarion
we've
had
a
lot
of
conversations
about
overlay
districts.
Q
Q
Q
Used
as
maybe
an
easy
way
to
create
something
that
that
should
be
a
unique,
you
know.
Q
Of
overlays
generally
now
they
seem
to
use
more
for.
Q
Hazard
mitigation,
historic
preservation.
So
again
I
think
you
know,
in
the
spirit
of.
Q
Of
a
very
specific
area
within
the
city,
the
udo
does
have
a
a
map.
Q
Very
targeted
focus
tweaks
to
standards
in
the
udo,
but
again
you
know
certainly
hope
that.
Q
Q
And
not
the
entirety
of
all
of
the
hopewell
neighborhood,
just
specifically
within.
Q
Q
B
B
To
to
allow
the
site
to
develop
in
line
with
their
plans,
I
guess
in
other
words,
did.
C
Mr
robinson,
it's
an
interesting
question.
I've
never
thought
of
before.
Is
it
the
city's
intent
to.
Q
Acres,
it's
not
the
entirety
of
the
hopewell
neighborhood
right.
You
know
once
the
city.
Q
And
I
will
say,
pace
our
experience
with
the
trades
district.
We're
not
seeing
a
lot
of
activity.
C
Yeah,
I
get
it
it's,
it
wasn't
a
well-formed
question,
but
I
appreciate
the
answer.
So
let
me.
C
C
C
C
Q
The
garage
internally,
as
you
know,
the
garage
is
currently
enshrined
in
a
demolition
zone
for.
Q
Goals
of
how
much
land
do
we
actually
have
to
try
to
achieve
that?
That
is
why
that.
Q
We
only
looked
at
tweaking
the
impervious
surface
coverage,
I'm
not
finished,
mr
mullin.
Q
Just
for
a
second
councilman
john
vaughan,
the
fact
that
there
are
both
planned
and
pro.
Q
Q
Recalibrating
to
the
impervious
surface
coverage
with
the
greenway,
the
storm
on
site,
storm
water.
Q
C
In
an
area
that
we
know
is
going
to
be
very
dense
that
the
administration
is
saying
they
want.
Q
Commission
and
common
council
on
that
statement
for
me
to
bring
that
forward,
I'm
just
being.
Q
Ways
to
utilize
the
the
parking
structure
and
what
have
you.
I
do
know
that
when
we
were
working.
Q
Q
Q
C
I'm
a
little
surprised
that
we're
still
talking
using
phrases
like
parking
needs,
there's
demand.
C
C
Q
Artificially
hinder
that
option
right
out
of
the
gate
for
the.
C
I
I
appreciate
that,
and
I'm
just
let
me
wrap
up
my
statement
that
I
I
recognize
everything
you.
B
So
the
parking
minimums,
certainly
just
looking
at
the
mixed
use
medium
scale.
B
District
dimensional
standards.
I
note
too,
that
four
stories
is
the
primary
structure
structure.
B
Which
I
mentioned
earlier,
that
should
that
merit
unique
consideration
within
this.
A
Lowballed,
so
if
there
are
no
further
questions
for
either
council
member
flaherty
or
staff.
H
A
Council,
member
flaherty,
yes,
I
just
wanted
to
note
a
couple
points.
First,
on
the
feedback.
B
That
that
the
consultant
that
you
know
advised
that
we
don't
create
an
overlay
or.
B
B
B
B
Transparent
and
cohesive
way
to
tackle
a
suite
of
issues
related
to
that
that
geographic.
B
Area,
just
specifically
with
respect
to
parking
minimums
again
what
we're
we're
not
talking
about.
B
B
B
B
B
You
know
because,
because
all
of
the
land
is
being
used
for
housing
and
folks
don't
have
to
it.
O
O
O
O
O
I
would
agree
with
council
member
flaherty,
although
he
didn't
use
this
term,
but
in
in
some.
O
O
So,
with
all
due
respect
clarion
and
the
the
amount
of
experience
they
have,
I
I
would
say.
C
C
But
the
whole
point
the
whole
prospect
of
hopewell
the
reason
why
it
excites
the
community.
C
As
it
does
is
because
here's
a
chance
to
remake
the
community
in
the
image
we
want
it
to
be
to.
C
C
C
Alleys
as
well,
but
you
know
this
is
we're
recognizing
what
asks
of
a
city
work
so.
C
Semantics
of
the
word
overlay
that
we
should
have
a
more
formal
acknowledgement
that
hopewell.
C
But
because
the
city
is
directly
controlling
its
future
and
I
don't
I
mean
I
I'm
not
content
to.
C
See
it
just
sort
of
mentioned
in
passing
in
the
udo.
If
this
was
a
more,
you
know
expedient
way,.
C
To
make
the
changes
planning
believed
needed
to
be
made.
I
understand
that.
C
That
that
discussion
will
happen,
despite
the
the
hopewell
plan
having
avoided
council.
A
M
A
Passes
eight
one
zero.
So,
with
the
three
amendments
dispatched,
we
now
move
to
ordinance
22-10.
A
Yeah
councilmember
rallo,
thank
you,
ms
scanlon,
so
as
you
alluded
to,
but
I
didn't
really.
F
Understand
the
explanation:
there
was
a
tree
that
is
a
hybrid
eurasian
tree
with
a
sycamore.
R
I'm
sorry,
I
don't
have
more
details
other
than
the
trees
that
we
got
from
the
urban
forester.
R
R
By
five
tree
pits,
so
this
was
one
of
the
trees
that
she
had
recommended
that
that
can
do.
R
Well,
in
some
of
our
limited
situations,
that's
what
I
know
about
it:
okay,
well,.
F
F
You
know
it's
like
calorie
pair,
so
it's
a
bit
late
for
an
amendment,
but
I
guess
I'm
delving.
F
Into
a
comment
here
instead
of
a
question,
so
thank
you.
Yes,
when
will
we
next
revisit
the
udo.
R
Or
sooner
so,
as
I
said
in
at
committee
of
the
whole
for
this
particular
issue
of
street
trees,.
R
R
Course
exclude
invasives,
but
more
particularly,
we
change
the
code
so
that
they're
native
only.
R
R
Sycamore
but,
as
I
said
at
committee
of
the
whole,
I
do
think
we
will
be
bringing
forward
a.
R
Package
sometime
in
the
next
year
to
kind
of
go
over
this
in
more
detail
and
see
if
there
are.
R
Our
street
trees
are
planted,
and
sometimes
they
last
longer
or
or
are
healthier
longer.
R
More
detailed
from
this
list-
okay,
just
to
follow
up.
This
is
code
for
the
the
development.
F
R
Only
so
thus
far,
we
asked
for
feedback
and
comments
on
trees
that
they
would
want
to
see.
R
Not
heard
anything
specifically
about
this
tree
being
desired,
for
that,
would
you
commit
to
the
the.
F
R
R
F
Colleague,
councilman
flaherty
for
his
amendment,
because
I
I
think
that
the
hopewell
site.
F
F
That
we're
essentially
sending
this
exotic
into
the
gene
pool
of
the
local
sycamore
community.
F
F
C
Members
wanting
to
revisit
the
udo
I
mean,
I
certainly
concur
that
we
should
be
thinking
about.
C
It
soon
the
next
year,
but
I
also
wanted
to
put
in
a
pitch
for
what
I'll
be
pushing
for,
which
is.
C
C
C
C
Space
and
then
hope:
well,
we
have
a
garage
we
shouldn't
need
anywhere
near
even
now,
I'm
still.
C
C
C
The
udl
and
I
hope
it's
soon,
mr
ello-
we
need
to
revisit
the
question
of.
C
M
R
There
is
a
typo,
there
are
actually
18
amendments
listed
in
the
red
line,
as
well
as
the
table.
R
A
positive
recommendation
six
to
zero,
so
I
will
briefly
go
over
these.
The
first
you'll
see
is.
R
We
are
you'll
see
in
this
and
in
the
next
next
code.
I'm
sorry
the
next
ordinance.
R
Right
now
they
vary
whether
or
not
they
are
21
or
10
days.
We
are
proposing
to
require
that
all.
R
Going
to
our
boards
or
commissions
that
that
will
be
while
we
always
have
that
available.
R
In
the
department
that
that
will
be
available
and
more
easily
found
online
and
that
the.
R
Appropriate
and
provide
enough
time
for
input
for
those
who
haven't
possibly
engaged
otherwise.
R
R
R
Plan
review
section
and
just
referencing
back
to
the
minor
thresholds.
We
are
also
proposing
to.
R
It
be
the
base
we
are
proposing
to
amend
the
grading,
permit
exemptions
so
up
to
2500.
R
R
R
To
be
able
to
read
it
in
the
udo
as
well,
so
putting
that
back
in,
we
did
some
other.
R
Small
changes
clarifying
statements
of
in
our
definitions,
adding
in
a.
A
A
M
M
M
R
Positive
recommendation
of
six
to
zero:
this
is
our
more
technical
ordinance,
so
making
corrections.
R
Zoning
appeals
in
a
couple
of
the
district
names.
A
word
was
missing,
so
adding
that
back
in.
R
R
Oriented
business
section
related
to
buffering.
Well,
we
don't
have
a
definition
for
homeless.
R
There
and
then
not
proposing
to
replace
that
with
supportive
housing
as
that
use.
R
Existed
in
chapter
four
into
chapter
two
so
trying
to
make
the
code
a
little
bit
easier
for.
R
Someone
using
it
and
having
references
in
multiple
places
again
doing
some
corrections.
R
Where
engineering
needed
to
be
referenced,
doing
some
terminology
updating,
for
example,
changing.
R
We
needed
to
change
that,
so
I
think
those
are
the
major
changes
and
I
can
answer
any
questions.
M
B
B
Essentially,
a
duplicate
of
the
amendment
that
the
council
just
passed
with
the
vote
of.
B
81
for
ordinance
22-10
the
same
three
notes
dealing
with
the
geographic
area
in
the.
B
Mixed
use
medium
scale
in
the
hopewell
development
area.
We're
called
out
here
as.
B
Chapter
four,
so
this
does
again
the
same
thing
that
amendment
three
did
for
ordinance:
22-10.
B
And
for
the
sake
of
consistency,
I
think
it
makes
sense
to
to
pass
it
as
well
as
for.
B
The
same
substantive
reasons,
thank
you
all
right.
Any
questions
regarding
amendment
two.
A
R
Comment,
unless
mr
robinson
is
standing
is
that
yeah
separate
from
the
substantive.
R
R
R
Think
separate
of
the
substantive
question
that
it
should
that,
because
you
didn't
adopt
it.
R
Because
you
didn't
include
the
footnotes
in
chapter
four:
they
should
not
be
included.
R
C
The
changes
to
the
udo:
when
do
we
expect
that
the
changes
will
be
effective
once
the.
C
This
and
the
previous
ordinances
I
mean
with
the
others
that
have
been
adopted
already,
but.
C
R
The
mayor
signs
it,
which
I
I
think
is
usually
a
reasonably
short
amount
of
time,
but
I'm
not
quite.
R
Positive,
it's
definitely
it's
definitely
not
immediate,
because
he
does
have
to
sign
them,
but.
C
R
R
C
H
H
Three,
should
the
plan
commission
approve
of
the
council's
amendments.
I
believe
those.
Q
C
M
F
H
M
H
Did
you
have
a
question
so
it
has
been
moved
and
segmented.
We've
all
agreed
to
hear
it.
H
H
H
Selection
committee
on
the
council
made
up
of
the
three
at-large
members
have
conducted
several.
H
Interviews
of
applicants
have
looked
at
the
applications
that
we
have
received
and
are
still.
H
H
Efforts
and
have
come
up
short,
so
I'll
walk
through
the
changes.
There
are
changes
first,.
H
Simplifies
how
we
determine
whether
they're
an
independent
member
or
not.
H
H
Finding
five
qualified
you
know
enough:
qualified
members
for
the
seats,
let
alone
an
alternate.
H
For
each
of
those
seats,
so
this
would
eliminate
that
part
of
the
commission.
It
would
also
sort
of.
H
H
H
H
A
Member
volun,
yes,
I
want
to
thank
my
colleagues
for
bringing
these
changes.
C
C
I
mean
it
was
hard
to
get
that
many
people
harder
than
it
seemed.
I
mean
that
was
a
statewide.
C
Size
the
monroe
county's
registering
commission,
which
was
appointed,
proved
that
they
could
get.
C
The
job
done
with
four
people,
and
so
I
am
quite
content
to
to
see-
I
mean
all
the
changes.
C
Seemed
reasonable
but
then
the
ordinance
itself
seemed
reasonable
in
december
2020.
C
But
I
had
to
bring
changes
in
january
that
turned
out
to
be
insufficient.
I'm
a
little
surprised.
C
C
C
H
H
Requirements,
that's
been
a
challenge,
so
there's
been
interest.
It's
I
think,
as
written
this.
H
Excludes
a
lot
of
the
folks
most
likely
to
be
interested
so
again
that
it
was
modeled
on.
C
B
B
The
work
that's
already
gone
into
trying
to
select
folks
outreach,
also
members
of
the
public
and.
B
Others
who've
helped,
you
know,
facilitate
outreach
and
try
to
get
qualified
applicants.
B
I
do
think
it's
a
good
approach.
I
appreciate
customer
revolunt,
you
know
bringing
this
to
begin.
B
Are
here
and
and
the
way
that
interacted
with
several
other
requirements.
B
B
You
know
had
been
here,
I
guess
yeah,
not
long
and
we're
sent
home.
You
know
so
it'd
be.
B
Very
surprising
if
they
would
have
registered
to
vote
already
and
voted
in
bloomington.
B
A
A
H
Just
one
reminder,
I
believe,
actually.
H
H
H
I
I
believe,
the
last
meeting
before
the
summer
recess,
the
council
will
be
considering.
H
Uncertainty
around
the
economic
development,
local
income
tax
proposal
that
meeting
has
yet
to.
H
H
A
A
A
O
A
A
H
Present
or
we're
listening
on
friday
to
to
kind
of
tee
up
the
may
31st
and
again
the
june
14th.