►
From YouTube: Bloomington City Council, April 7, 2021, Part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
B
First
I'll
also
note
that
when
we
had
this
petition
at
committee,
the
the
petitioner
also.
C
I
I
doug
doug
bruce
is
here
from
the
petitioner,
and
I
don't
know
if.
C
If
they
do
have
anything
planned,
but
mr
bruce
should
be
able
to
unmute
and
respond.
D
A
Presentation
of
mr
gurlick,
I
could
we
we've
sent
in
quite
a
few
things
since
the
land.
D
That
maybe
haven't
seen
this
or
again
or
do
you
just
want
us
to
answer
questions?
Do
you.
D
How
you'd
like
to
handle
this?
Thank
you
we'll
just
proceed
with
questions
from
council.
E
Changed
since
land
use
committee
that
I
would
like
to
hear
a
presentation
from
the
petitioner.
A
Okay
is
that
the
prevailing
feeling
of
council
members-
okay,
mr
bruce,
if
you're
ready,
we're.
A
D
D
D
With
jeff
banyo
from
finance
they're,
the
civil
engineers
on
the
project
and
tom
brennan
is.
D
Here
also
he's
the
petitioner
and
my
client,
and
then
his
attorney
david
coleman
is
also
here.
D
You
know
as
a
storage
and
offloading
for
tvs
for
rca
and
then
thompson,
so
the
pud
doesn't.
D
D
A
residential
use
here
and
then
we've
worked
on
this.
This
site
has
seen
it
only
has
one
access.
D
D
The
park
a
few
things
here-
this
is
in-field
development
and,
as
we
look
at
green
development,.
D
And
as
we
went
to
countless
sprawl,
this
is
the
type
of
development
that
we
need.
This
is.
D
Certainly
not
set
up
to
be
student
housing.
This
is
set
up
in
a
place
where
people
can
walk
to
work.
D
D
Again,
promising
to
meet
weed
silver
and
lead
for
homes
on
the
town,
homes,
and
I
had
done
some.
D
D
D
Green
buildings
to
our
inventory
of
thinking
about
the
future,
this
is
another
way
again
to
meet.
D
D
D
Process
of
this
building,
seven,
which
is
a
lot
on
south
hillside
when
we
were
at
the
planned.
D
D
D
D
Two
levels
of
parking
and
you'll
see:
we
can
ask
the
questions
about
that,
but
there's
84.
D
D
D
Those
buildings,
what
we've
we've
as
you've,
seen
by
the
the
varying
sites.
D
D
D
For
that
site,
but
also
have
access
to
to
our
trial,
we've
also
tried
to
put
this.
D
D
D
D
Housing
issues
and
it
didn't
add
anything
to
the
the
development
there
that
they
saw
what.
D
D
D
Of
its
shape
and
size
and
density
that
could
be
individually
owned,
so
these
won't
be
300
000.
D
D
So
then,
with
that
we
came
to
the
meeting
last
week
and
out
of
that,
it
seemed
that
there
were.
D
Some
questions
and
a
lot
of
discussion
on
impervious
service,
and
so
that's
been
our
our.
D
Change
that
we
have
made
to
what
you
see
before
you
tonight
that
mr
boland
has
been
probably.
D
D
Been
80
impervious
of
what
we've
requested
from
the
day,
one
with
the
plan
commission
again
since.
D
D
With
that,
I
think
in
in
some
of
the
public,
this
is
a
pdp
and
in
the
tv
you
write
your
own.
F
D
D
Know
mixed
use
some
some
different
standards,
and
so
that's
what
we
brought
forward
and
we.
D
Did
was
it
literally
increased
our
buffer
zone,
our
landscape
buffer
zone?
That
would
be,
you
know.
D
Landscape
on
our
west
property
line
between
us
and
the
existing,
I
think,
seven
or
nine
residences.
D
D
D
That,
except
at
70
in
our
proposal
this
evening,
our
parking
ratio
for
that
with
the
spaces
is
0.50.
D
Block
two
is
the
building
just
north
of
that
building
the
other
commercial
building.
D
D
D
D
And
we
have
again
32
spaces
there
on
surface
parking
for
those
19
pound
homes.
D
D
With
lot
for
building
seven,
the
south
hillside
that
I
went
over,
that
one
has
84
spaces
inside.
D
D
D
D
D
D
And
so
we
had
to
account
for
that,
because
that
could
happen
down
the
road.
D
With
that,
that
really
concludes
what
I
have.
I
would
just
say:
this
is
compact
urban
form
where.
D
D
G
A
major
effort
to
put
something
together
that
is
going
to
be
environmentally
great.
I
think.
G
I
think
is
terrific.
I
think
that
the
many
people
have
arguably
said
that.
G
My
building
is
the
obvious
building
in
bloomington,
and
I
pretty
much
have
to
agree
with
them.
G
And
I
think
that
what
he's
put
together
is
it's
an
architectural.
G
This
plan,
and
I
want
to
thank
the
like
to
thank
the
planning
commission
they've,
been
playing.
G
Wonderfully
compatible
feature
to
the
to
the
park,
in
addition
to
the
city
of
in
general,.
G
And
and
and
the
the
land
use
committee
was
very
helpful-
I
think
they
gave
us
some.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
for
the
presentation.
I
do
believe
we
are
ready
for.
A
B
To
vote
on
and
consider
the
two
reasonable
conditions
that
were
recommended
do
pass.
B
A
Reasonable
condition,
one
and
three
is
that
correct:
okay,
councilmember,
piedmont,
smith,.
A
Yes,
please
thank
you,
so
the
land
use
committee
did
meet
twice
to
discuss
this.
H
Up
this
ordinance
and
on
the
march
10th
meeting,
of
course,
we
got
the.
H
The
applicable
portions
of
the
udo
that
should
be
applied
here
with
the
amendment
of
a
pud.
H
Jefferson,
jefferson,
shreve
and
or
his
attorney
he
is
the
owner
of
the.
H
And
we
were
assured
by
the
petitioners
engineer
that
this
is
feasible
and
that,
if.
H
H
Maximum
impervious
then,
on
the
31st
of
march
we
had
another
meeting
and
we
started
talking.
H
Trying
to
decrease
the
the
paved
area
north
of
hillside
drive
by
decreasing
the
size
of
the.
H
H
Be
implemented,
and
I
think
it
was
a
very
productive
conversation
both
times
and
we
have.
H
So
I
think
that's
it
as
you,
as
was
stated
by
the
clerk
earlier.
The
final
vote
on.
H
The
petition
was
one
yes
vote
and
three
abstentions,
and
the
abstentions
were
because
there.
D
A
A
A
C
To
display
any
of
the
reasonable
conditions,
if
that's
helpful
for
members,
they
were
broken
up.
C
A
Okay,
I'm
seeing
none
of
those
requests
so
so
we're
we're
prepared.
Yes,
ma'am.
A
H
H
H
That
wanted
to
make
sure
it
wasn't
going
to
be
a
towering
structure
next
to
their.
H
I
A
Council
members
for
questions
councilmember
volin.
Yes,
I
have
a
fire
question.
E
The
is
the
height,
are
we
talking
about
building
seven
south
of
hillside,
and
the
height
of
it
is.
E
I
The
average
of
that,
for
the
most
part,
the
area
south
of
hillside,
is
completely
flat,
so.
I
E
I
E
Included
well
the
maximum
height
on
all
of
them.
Whether
there
is
a
five-story
building
that.
I
I
E
Thank
you.
I
thought
council
member
flaherty.
J
B
If
you
would
like
to
ask
petitioner
with
regard
to
the
reasonable
condition
as
well.
B
Was
discussed
but
just
thought
I'd
mention
it
well.
I
had
assumed
it
was
proper
to
just
ask.
A
The
staff,
since
they
are
working
in
conjunction
and
if
that
is
incorrect,
then
please,
I
think.
A
Okay,
see
none
we'll
go
to
public
for
public
comment
on
reasonable
condition.
A
One
for
ordinance
21-07,
please
indicate
by
using
a
raised
hand,
function
on
zoom.
A
After
we
get
the
reasonable
conditions,
I
just
want
to
make
that
clear.
Okay,
please,
please
go.
A
Okay,
seeing
none
can
we
go
to
the
clerk?
Please
call
the
rule.
L
L
L
A
As
well-
I'm
sorry
council,
member
flaherty,
that's
me
so
I'd
like
to
move
the
reasonable.
B
Have
that
option,
but
simply
this
reasonable
condition
requires
that
the
roof
of
each
building.
B
And
as
we
discussed
at
committee,
of
course,
these
buildings
are
already
committed
to
meet.
B
Leed
silver
designation,
but
in
particular,
because
that's
a
point-based
system.
B
I
thought
it
was
important
to
ensure
that
we
do
specifically
make
make
sure
the
the
roofs
are.
B
A
cooler
vegetated
roof
of
some
kind,
in
particular
because
of
the
greater
impervious.
B
Or
mixed-use
neighborhood
scale,
we
had
this
discussion
at
land
use
committee
and
I
believe
the.
A
And
before
we
go
there,
I
do
again
would
like
to
ask
staff
of
their
input
on
this.
I
We
we
don't
have
any
objection
to
that.
Okay,
thank
you
and
thank.
A
You
for
councilman
flaherty
for
stating
that
the
petitioner
was
on
board
as
well.
A
Council
does
council
members
have
any
questions
on
reasonable
condition.
Number
three
to
the
author.
A
Okay,
seeing
none
with
a
crook,
please
call
the
roll
on
reasonable.
L
Yes,
council,
member.
M
N
L
A
B
B
B
Whole
lot
of
connectivity
to
other
sites,
but
in
looking
at
the
b
line
as
the
frontage
for
the.
B
Property,
if
we
were
thinking
about
the
the
if
this
was
on
a
street,
for
instance,
I
think
we.
B
A
Okay,
I
do
have
a
question.
You
said
the
rin,
rendering
that
we
saw
it
does
show
that
there
is
a.
A
A
L
L
Sims,
yes
and
reasonable
condition:
number
four
as
revised
board
is
21.7.
It's
about
at
nine
zero.
A
A
A
I'm
sorry
I
do
apologize.
Will
you
care
to
present
mr
flaherty?
Yes,
mr
president,
so
this
reasonable.
B
Condition
memorializes
commitments
that
the
petitioner
has
agreed
to
in
previous
committee.
B
Meetings
to
offer
the
affordable
units
in
the
multi-family
and
townhouse
buildings
at
an
income.
B
Level
that
is
10
lower
of
an
ami
than
would
be
required
by
the
udo
in
the
affordability.
B
Incentives
so,
in
particular
the
the
udo
to
take
advantage
of
housing,
affordability.
B
A
For
our
council
members,
who
have
any
questions
to
counselor,
I'm
sorry,
council,
member.
D
With
that
and
have
agreed
to
meet
that
condition
that
reasonable
condition.
A
A
Reasonable
condition:
number
five
of
ordinance
21-07,
please
use
the
raised
hand,
function.
A
On
zoom
or
send
host
the
meeting
hosts
a
note
through
chat.
If
you
desire
to
speak
publicly.
C
Dave
askins
with
the
b-square
beacon,
mr
askin,
says
a
question
about
the
wording
and.
C
A
Okay,
thank
you.
I
was
muted,
so
having
see,
no
more
public
comments,
we'll
go
back
to
council
on.
B
Sure,
of
course,
yeah
and
that's
that's
an
astute
observation.
We
had
discussed
108
ami
initially.
B
At
land
use
committee
and
yes
that
would
be
take
arrived
at
by
taking
10
of
120
and.
B
Subtracting
it,
but
I
believe
city,
staff
and
council
staff
concert
consulted
with
city
legal.
B
Ami
level,
so
when
we
talk
about
ami
levels
in
percentage
points,
I
think
10
percent
lower.
B
Level
from
120
would
be
110,
so
that
was
the
legal
interpretation
from
city
legal
staff.
B
It
makes
sense
to
me,
as
the
most
reasonable
interpretation
of
the.
B
Plain
language
of
the
udo,
so
that's
why
this
reasonable
condition
reflects
that
number.
A
I'm
sorry
I
admitted
thank
you
and
I
think
I
just
understood
what
you
just
said,
but
if
we.
A
B
B
Think
it's
that
description
of
a
percent
of
ami
level.
You
know
if
you
said
it.
B
B
Lower
level
is
just
10,
lower
ami
level
than
120
so
120
down
to
110.
Sorry.
B
I
know
it's
a
bit
confusing,
but
again
that's
city,
legal's
interpretation,
which.
B
A
L
A
Forward
is
21-07
was
adopted,
9-0
reasonable
condition,
number
six.
A
H
Yes,
thank
you,
so
this.
H
H
Both
in
the
multi-family
houses
and
in
the
townhouse
buildings.
A
Okay,
thank
you
very
much
for
that
in
your
discussion
with
staff.
What
is
this
acceptable.
A
To
them
I
don't
know,
or
should
I
ask
staff
sorry
I
had
to
apologize.
Yes,
certainly
acceptable.
I
A
Thank
you
very
much
sounds.
A
Very
reasonable,
no
pun
intended
do
we
have
any
other
comments
or
questions
from
council
members.
A
Raised
hand
function
in
zoom
or
you
can
send
a
message
to
our
meeting
host
through
via
chat
and.
C
Name
paul
ash
and
they
should
now
be
able
to
unmute.
This
is
elizabeth
cox
ash,
and
this
is.
K
K
K
A
9-0,
we'll
move
on
to
reasonable
condition:
number
seven
council,
member
flaherty,
yes,.
B
A
Moved
in
second,
would
you
care
to
present
sir?
Yes,
this
is
this
reasonable
condition.
B
Seen
with
some
some
previous
puds
in
the
last
year
or
two,
it
is
brought
to
help
better
align.
B
The
project
with
our
comprehensive
plan
goals,
focusing
on
efficiency
with
parking
and
with.
B
Incentivizing
sustainable
modes
of
transportation,
in
particular
decoupling,
the
park
parking
of.
B
Pricing
from
sorry,
the
pricing
of
parking
from
the
price
of
rent
is
a
form
of
transportation.
B
Demand
management
it
helps
to
incentivize
modes
such
as
transit
and
walking
and
bicycling.
B
B
Instead
of
mandating
their
inclusion
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
that,
thank
you.
First.
A
Question
I'll
ask
is
of
staff
or
petitioner
their
input
on
reasonable
condition.
Seven.
I
A
Okay,
thank
you
just
wanted
to
check
with
staff
it's
what
I
thought.
I'd
heard
debated
in
the.
A
Land
use
committee
council
members:
do
we
have
anyone
that
have
any
comments
or
questions
of.
A
B
I
intended
it
to
apply
to
all
parking,
including
owner-occupied
parking.
B
I
think,
as
drafted,
that's
how
I
would
interpret
it
is
applying
to
every
everywhere.
H
But
it
says
and
not
include
parking
spaces
in
rent
and
if
they're
not
paid.
B
B
On
my
part,
I
guess
I'm
curious
if
the
petitioner
would
like
to
weigh
in
on
whether.
B
In
particular,
townhomes
or
or
staff
as
well,
if
either
would
like
to
weigh
in.
A
D
Jeff
you
wanna
yeah,
I'm
sorry.
I
have
an
objection
to
this
reasonable
condition.
A
B
B
B
Address
all
homes,
which
is
actually
what
my
intent
was.
So
I
guess
if
the
petitioner.
F
This
is
jeff
fano;
we
don't
don't
object
to
it
applying
to
all
units.
Okay,
thank
you.
A
How
would
that
the
price
of
a
town
home
for
sale?
How
would
that
be
calculated
if.
A
F
Parking
the
parking
costs
would
be
the
same
for
both
the
town,
homes
and
the
rental
units.
A
A
I
Unit
and
the
person
owns
a
parking
space
that
goes
with
that.
So
I
I
that
that
might
be.
B
Yeah,
I
guess
it's
an
interesting
question
in
that
it's
the
same
basic
issue
of
sort
of
requiring.
B
Everyone
to
meet
the
same
system,
whether
or
not
they
need
it,
I
think,
actually,
by
removing
the.
B
And
it
just
says
that
I
mean
basically,
parking
is
just
rented
separately
no
purchased
unit.
B
I
guess
well,
yes
that
would
that
would
be
the
case.
I
mean
you're
in
theory,
always
paying
for.
B
The
the
parking
space-
it's
just
it's
included
automatically,
so
you.
B
B
For
selling
you
know
every
town
home
unit
with
one
parking
space
exactly
and
the
option
to
rent.
B
More
or
is
that
something
that
the
petitioner
has
not
gotten
to
yet
in
planning
stages,.
D
D
You
know
we
only
have
in
that
area
for
for
that,
that
lot
three,
we
have
a
total
of
32
parking.
D
H
Yes,
earlier
this
evening,
a
member
of
the
public
reminded
us
to
be
consistent
in
applying
our
rules.
E
Yeah
customer
flaherty-
I
just
wanted
to
sort
of
ask
a
clarifying
question.
Is
it
safe
to
say.
E
E
Town
home
owner
has
the
right
to
buy
a
permit.
You
know
half
a
permit
for
every
bedroom.
E
Rather
than
right
to
a
guaranteed
reserved
space
and
that
you
know,
however,
the
petitioner.
E
Wants
to
manage
the
spaces
you
know
if,
if
they,
if
they
want
to
guarantee
a
space
to
every
bedroom,.
E
That's
that
many
fewer
spaces
that
the
non-owners,
the
renters
and
other
apartments.
E
A
I
see
one
mr
lucas
from
the
screen
of
paul
ash,
but
we
don't
know
who
it
is
so.
C
Can
you
elizabeth
cox
ash
and
they
just
be
able
to
unmute?
Yes,
this
is
elizabeth
cox,
ash.
K
K
K
K
A
Back
to
council
for
any
final
comments:
council
member
flaherty.
Yes,
I'd
actually
like
to
move.
B
To
amend
reasonable
condition,
seven
to
remove
the
clause
at
the
end
of
the
sentence,
and
I.
B
Believe,
mr
lucas
has
that
edit
ready
to
display.
I
need
a
second
as
well,
of
course.
Second,
thank
you.
A
Okay,
so
I
guess
that
question
is
how
that
has
been
amended.
How
do
we.
A
Handle
that
we
need
is
separate,
sorry
yeah.
We
need
to
vote
on
the
amendment
and.
A
Oh
sorry,
oh
you
know
you
did
and
I
just
seconded
it.
Yes,
yes,
okay
seconded
for
discussion,
okay,.
A
Purchased,
and
even
if
it
is
decoupled,
there's
been
no
real
thought
on
it.
What
that
means
from
a.
A
I
guess
that
precludes
a
consensual
vote
based
on
that
so
parliamentarian.
How
do
we
proceed
now.
A
Even
with
your
re,
your
revision,
as
amended,
I
mean
because
she
struck
the
last
sentence.
B
So
that
was
a
motion
on
the
table.
I
think
thank
you,
yeah.
Thank
you.
Okay,
before
we
go
to
public.
A
H
H
I
I
don't
see
that
as
needing
to
be
resolved
at
this
point,
I
think
that.
H
H
H
A
B
If
no
one
objects,
I
would
be
happy
to
yes,
okay,
and
I
see
no
objections.
A
E
A
Zero
now
we
move
on
to
reasonable
question
condition:
number
eight
sponsored
by
council.
H
Course
of
discussions
on
this
proposal
and
this
reasonable
condition
just
makes
it
clear.
H
That
what
we
would
like
to
see
is
the
most
recent
site
plan
that
was
submitted.
A
Okay,
thank
you.
Any
input
council
member
of
clarity.
B
A
Saying
none,
mr
berlich,
how
what
is
staff's
input
please.
So
I
did
have
a
chance
to.
I
Talk
to
the
fire
department
today,
and
they
were
they
were
not
supportive
of
the
revision.
I
A
Rendition
is
that
am
I
confused
on
that?
I
I
can
answer
so
we've
we've
kind
of
gone
back
and.
D
Forth
because
trying
to
work
with
the
fire
department
and
fire
department
apparatus
turning.
D
D
D
D
Roundabout
at
the
north
end
or
in
the
middle,
we
just
need
to
get.
You
know
complete
confirmation.
D
On
where
it
needs
to
go,
I'm
in
agreement
with
council
member
piedmont
that
we
have.
D
But
the
exact
location
of
this.
Ideally,
we
would
like
to
have
it
on
the
north
end
because
it
serves.
D
As
a
turnaround
for
all
traffic,
not
just
fire
traffic
and
and
mr
faneuil,
our
civil
engineer,.
D
But
that's
not
something
that's
pleasing
to
mr
clap
right
now,
so
eric
grulick
and
I.
D
With
planning
and
and
the
fire
department
we're
agreeable
to
wherever
you
would
like
to.
H
Describes
the
latest
site
plan
with
angled
parking.
So,
mr
bruce,
are
you
saying
that
if
the.
D
D
H
So
I'm
a
little
confused
because
the
most
recent
documents
that
you
relate
to
us
today.
D
Daniel
saying
our
our,
I
think,
we're
the
same
on
the
impervious
surface.
D
I'm
I
think
the
the
discussion
that
I
had
with
planning
was
at
the
end
of
the
day.
I.
D
D
F
F
D
On
with
us
and
the
in
the
fire
officials
to
come
to
an
agreement
on
where
this
needs
to
go.
D
D
O
Mr
president,
can
I
ask
a
question?
Yes,
you
may
would
the
authors
of
the
reasonable.
O
Condition
number
eight
make
a
change
that
the
council
prefers
the
modified
preliminary
plan.
A
Council,
member
flaherty
or
councilman
piedmont
smith.
Yes,
if,
if
councilmember
pima
smith's.
B
They're
still
working
on
some
details
of
it
point
of
order
and
you
yes
comes
from
memorabilia.
E
I
mean
the
the
problem
is
that
the
very
idea
of
a
reasonable
condition
is
essentially
a.
E
Requirement
and
that,
without
the
condition
we
we
can't
compel,
you
know
like
if,
if
we're.
E
So
I
mean
this
is
our
opportunity
to
ensure
that
something
must
get
done
instead
of
may
get
done,.
E
H
Fire
department
work
on
what
is
the
the
best
plan.
I
am
disappointed
that
we
can't
do.
H
The
angled
parking,
if
the
fire
department
insists
that
the
that
the
roundabout
needs
to.
H
Be
at
the
center
of
the
site,
but
we
need
to
follow
the
fire
department
rules.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you,
council,
remember
flaherty.
What
is
the
process
you
just
withdrawed
and
that
is
now.
A
Off
the
board,
reasonable
condition-
eight,
it's
just
I
can
see
it
was
a
motion
on
the
table.
So
if.
B
A
E
Have
been
in
contact
with,
I
spoke
with
the
fire
chief
today
about
topics
like
this,
including
this.
E
Particular
project-
one
thing
he
told
me
was
that
the
roundabout
on
the
north
end,
even
at
the.
E
E
Require
an
aerial
truck
to
reach
the
far
end
on
the
park
side.
If
there's
a
fire
on
that
side
of.
E
That
would
require
this
kind
of
big
turnaround
and
while
he
couldn't
because
you
know
like.
E
The
details
of
the
project
are
still
up
in
the
air
while
he
couldn't
commit
to
anything
because
mr.
E
E
Configuration
I
mean
I'm
I'm
okay
with
allowing
the
fire
department,
the
planning.
E
And
the
petitioner
to
negotiate,
I
mean
the
chief
even
suggested
permeable
parking
spaces
so.
E
E
It's
like,
in
my
understanding
as
angle
spaces
reduce
the
pervious,
the
impervious
surface.
E
E
Understand
that,
but
you
know
again,
mr
clapp
has
to,
by
the
nature
of
his
job,
go
with
the
strictest.
E
E
E
O
Okay,
well,
actually,
it
wasn't
unanimous,
I'm
sorry
unanimous
consent.
So
I
don't.
A
Know
if
we
can
withdraw,
we
might
have
to
vote
on
it.
My
comment
is
a
it's
a
safety
factor.
A
A
A
A
On
the
total
radius
for
all
vehicles
that
we
have
available
council
member
flaherty,
I
think
you.
A
B
The
chair,
I
would
like
to
hear
from
council
staff
our
council
attorney
rather
about
the.
B
Yeah
any
thoughts
there
well,
I
I
will
say
that
the
council
typically
doesn't
adopt
reasonable.
C
Conditions
to
pick
from
preliminary
plans,
I
think
this
came
up
because
in
talking
with.
C
To
the
legislation
essentially,
so
I
I
don't
think
there
would
be
any
sort
of
binding
effect.
I
Fire
department
review
parking
requirements,
the
setback
standards,
the
impervious
surface
standards.
I
Something
we
we
prefer
the
same
thing
you
know
we
want
to
try
to
accomplish
that,
but
you
know.
A
Okay,
I
do
remember,
I
listened
to
the
land
use
committee
and
one
of
the
discussions
that.
A
A
That
just
didn't
seem
sound
right
to
me
at
the
time
and
until
that's
clear
to
me.
A
This
particular
reasonable
condition
when
we
vote
I
I
won't
be
able
to
support
that.
A
H
Did
we
put
a
motion
on
the
table
to
withdraw
the
reasonable
condition?
I
don't
recall
you.
A
A
A
A
Are
you
there?
Actually,
I
just.
A
Okay
with
a
clerk,
please
call
the
roll
okay
council,
member
rallo,
no.
L
E
A
A
A
You
that
that
can
come
and
comment
council
comments
here
in
just
a
second,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,.
H
Comment
yes
soon
as
we
enter
yes,
yes,
we
do.
E
This
is
for
the
petitioners.
First
of
all,
will
the
buildings
be
sprinkled.
D
They
have
parking
under
the
lower
level,
so
they'll
be
two
hour
separations
and
all
that.
D
D
May
not
save
buildings,
but
they
certainly
save
lives.
So
it's
we
haven't
gotten
that
far
on.
E
Multi-Family
buildings
will
be
sprinkled,
but
when
the
chief
pointed
out
that.
E
E
E
Those
because
of
the
limited
vehicle
access
to
this
project,
because
it's
hard
on
the
park.
E
D
Disagree
with
you
again,
it's
for
the
townhomes
one
of
the
one
of
the
aspects
that
we
like
the.
D
D
To
those
buildings,
that's
the
only
only
thing
I
would
say
to
that.
I
think
again,
it's
certainly.
D
E
Trail
and
the
buildings,
maybe
that
would
be
sufficient
and
less
expensive.
I
don't
know.
D
Yeah
again
yeah,
we
were
just
asking
if
there
was
a
water
line,
even
a
water
line.
There.
D
But
but
yeah
all
very
good
points
and
in
in
a
part
of
the
discussion
that.
D
E
A
problem
with
back-end
angled
parking
since
you
have
the
dual
drive
lanes
and
the
turnaround.
D
No,
no,
I
again,
I
think
you
know
it's
been
discussed
before
it's
something
I'd
like.
D
E
Onto
the
sidewalk,
instead
of
having
to
walk
around
it
right,
the
other
question
is.
A
A
P
P
Likely
to
have
answers,
and
then
at
that
point
what
mechanisms
are
available
to
that
owner.
P
P
Guess
is
my
question
so
that
that
specificity
would
be
worked
out
with
the
building
permit.
A
Is
all
of
that
a
fire
department
question?
Because
if
I
remember
correctly,
some
of
those.
I
Building
code
and
then
any
damages
to
the
building,
you
know
that's,
that's
honestly.
You.
I
Private
property
owners,
so
you
know
that
would
be
a
question
for
their
legal
departments.
Okay
and.
P
A
A
A
E
The
petitioner
to
look
at
this
well,
thank
you,
noah
you'll
be
allowed
to
do
that.
I
want
to
check.
A
Remind
me
what
our
process
is,
after
that,
if
you
will
please
go
ahead
council
member
volo,
I.
E
E
Grassy
permeable
parking
spaces-
I
I
don't
suppose
you
have
any
problem
with
this
sort.
E
Of
thing
in
principle,
do
you
expect
this
to
be
more
expensive
than
a
simple
asphalt,
paving.
F
Are
ex
many
times
more
expensive
than
asphalt,
you
have
to
buy
the
in
this
case,
they're.
F
They're
polyethylene
or
plastic
extruded
grid,
and
then
you
have
to
you,
put
the
seed
in.
F
Away,
we've
done
some
things
like
this
and
say
it's,
I
hate
to
say
exactly
it's.
It's
probably
two.
E
A
Chat
and
mr
lucas,
I
think
I
see
three
hands
raised.
Yes.
First
up
is
I'm
going
to
assume
elizabeth.
K
C
N
And
I
thank
council
members
that
were
at
the
land
use
community
meetings
as
well
for
listening.
N
N
N
N
N
N
Seven
could
even
be
proceed.
They
can
even
proceed
with
construction
at
this
point,
given.
N
One
of
them
would
be
that
we
realized
that
it
came
to
mind
this
evening,
which
would
be
the.
N
N
N
N
N
C
Q
Okay,
how
about
now
we
hear
you
all
right,
beautiful
good
evening,
council
members,
my
name
is
chris.
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
Q
A
Thank
you
very
much
for
your
comments.
Do
we
have
anyone
else,
mr
lucas.
H
Yes,
thank
you
very
much
this.
This
development
is
just
down
the
street
from.
H
First
of
all,
I'd
like
to
address
some
things
that
a
member
of
the
public
said
during
her
comments.
H
H
Project
and
there
was
no
vote
taken
by
the
neighborhood
against
it,
so
I
just
wanted
to.
H
H
Speaking
on
behalf
of
the
neighborhood
association
also,
I
do
want
to
emphasize
that.
H
If
mr
brennan
will
would
decide
to
sell
it,
I
really
do
think
that
this
is
a
great
project
for.
H
Affordable
housing,
we
will
get
15
percent
of
the
units
at
a
cost
point
that
is
affordable.
H
The
impacts
to
the
the
neighbors
directly
to
the
west,
I
think,
will
not
be
negative.
I.
H
The
future
they'll
have
a
buffer
yard,
a
drive
and
in
the
latest
version
85
feet
before
there's
an.
H
Having
attended
the
neighborhood
meetings,
I
have
not
heard.
H
Negative
comments:
after
I
explained
the
the
distance.
H
Have
to
be
dependent
on
a
car
to
get
to
where
you
work
or
live,
work
or
play,
or
do
your
shopping.
H
Sustainability
in
our
transportation
plan
and
the
bottom
line
is
they're
replacing
a
95.
H
I
think
it's
it's
unfortunate.
They
can't
meet
the
sixty
percent
of
the
mixed
medium
income.
H
As
in
the
udo
as
the
maximum
impermeable
surface,
but
I
think
they've
they've
already.
H
Permeable
surface
goes
and
it'll
be.
H
I
think
a
good
showcase
for
green
building
in
a
residential
development
here
in
bloomington.
H
Something
that
is
not
our
purview
really
and
if
there
are
legal
issues
after.
H
If
this
is
approved
tonight
and
the
plan
moves
ahead,
there's
certainly
legal
recourse
and.
H
Engineering
reports
that
will
need
to
be
done,
and
I
think
that
that
you
know
that's
not.
H
Really
our
purview
here,
so
I
leave
that
to
the
lawyers
later
on
so
in
in
some.
H
I
think
this
is
a
really
great
project
and
I
look
forward
to
having
more
neighbors
in
my
hood.
O
Yes,
I
think
that
this
is
an
excellent
development.
I
think
it's
a
actually
a
precedent.
O
Being
an
exceptional
project,
it's
sort
of
a
setting
of
the
bar
example
in
my
mind,.
O
Of
what
to
see
in
redevelopment
petitions,
and
so,
needless
to
say,
I'll
support
it.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
any
other
final
comments
from
council
members,
councilmember
flaherty.
B
Sure,
just
briefly,
I
I
shared
most
of
my,
I
guess
more
extensive
thoughts
at
the
second
land
use.
B
B
B
Appreciate
it
there's
a
lot
of
great
things
to
like
about
this
project
and
just
a
note
on.
B
Affordability,
too,
obviously,
the
deed,
restricted,
affordable
housing
is
incredibly
important,
but.
B
B
Development
here
in
bloomington
thanks,
thank
you
for
the
final
comments
from
council
members.
E
Yeah
I
just
I
just
want
to
say
that
I
generally
agree
with
my
colleagues.
E
The
reason
that
we
were
all
sort
of
competing
over
the
question
of
where
the
roundabout
would.
E
If
we
can
reduce
the
width
of
the
drive
lane
in
the
roundabout
alone
from
27
feet
to
12
feet,.
E
Which
may
not
be
possible,
but
if
we
can
do
that,
it
would
gain
another
2400
square
feet.
E
You
know
like,
while
we
could
have
striven,
for
it,
demanded
something
more.
I
think
this.
E
I
think
mr
shreed's
concerns
are
serious
ones.
I
think
that
the
petitioner
can
address
them.
E
E
While
the
other
buildings
go
up,
I
am
confident
that
a
building
that
has
been
assembled
can
be.
E
So
in
general,
I
want
to
say
that
I'm
supportive
of
this
too
and
I'll
be
voting
for
it.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
very
much.
Any
other
final
comments
from
council
members.
A
Okay,
will
the
clerk
please
call
the
roll
for
ordinance
21-07
as
amended.
L
A
Go
to
additional
public
comment,
I
would
like
to
remind
everyone
that
we
normally
set
aside
25.
A
C
No,
I
don't
at
the
moment,
okay,
thank
you
and
seeing
none.
We
are
now
at
council.
C
Will
be
able
to
hear
about
legislation,
that's
going
to
be
coming
to
you
all
in
the
next.
C
A
couple
of
legislative
cycles:
one
such
item
is
a
title
15
ordinance
that
would
amend
various.
C
Related
to
the
udo-
and
I'm
sure
you
all
have
been
following
along
with
what's
been
going
on
with.
C
The
plan
commission,
the
plan
commission
wrapped
up
its
work
on
udl
related
items.
C
C
Will
be
headed
your
way,
so
the
work
session
this
friday
could
present
an
opportunity
to.
C
Get
a
brief
preview
there's!
You
know
10
10
ordinances
in
total,
so
I
think
staff.
C
I
don't
believe
that
would
include
a
discussion
of
the
zoning
map
change
or
the
amendment.
C
Might
happen
it
would
not
be
next
week,
but
again
I
think,
he's
looking
at
a
special
session
next.
C
Wednesday,
followed
by
a
committee
of
the
whole
to
begin
discussing
the
other
as
many
of
the
other.
C
Eight
proposals,
as
you
might
be
able
to
get
to
so
I
I
know
it's
late
tonight,
so
I
would
I
would.
C
But
I
wanted
to
put
both
of
those
meetings
on
your
radar.
I
assume
members
would
be.
C
That
one
title
15
ordinance
that
may
be
coming
forward
later
in
april.
I'm
happy
to
answer.
C
A
Thank
you
so
we'll
have
work
session
noon
friday
and
mr
lucas
was
absolutely
correct.
A
Things
I'm
looking
for
input,
but
it'll
be
really
difficult
right
now
to
give
up
for
lack.
A
C
C
Of
legislation,
so
thank
you,
you're
quite
welcome,
and
I
have
eight
colleagues
that
I'm
pretty.