►
From YouTube: Bloomington City Council, May 13, 2021, Part 2
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
Hi
folks,
I
don't
want
to
repeat
anything,
that's
already
been
said,
but
I
did.
I
do
appreciate
the.
C
C
Barbara
brought
up
the
petition
signatures
that
I
hope
you
embrace
and
I
just
would
encourage.
C
Jim
rosenberger's
plan,
so
I
ask
you
to
vote
no
on
the
on
this
udo.
You
know
that
the
last.
C
Speaker
said,
it's
been
an
interesting
process,
he's
enjoyed
it,
that's
good.
I've
enjoyed
it
to
a.
C
A
Do
we
have
any
further
participants?
I
don't
have
any
additional
raised
hands
at
this.
B
B
B
B
B
D
D
Happened
there
I
don't
think
what
I'll
say
has
will
have
any
bearing
on
what's
going
to.
D
D
D
D
D
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
E
F
B
I
from
constance
glenn,
I
echo
the
many
who
have
said
that
this
extremely
divisive
and.
B
B
B
B
Housing
that's
impossible
to
purchase
in
greater
homogeneity.
Connie
cook,
glenn
and
jim
glenn.
A
Please
recognize
that
person.
I
will
thank
you.
A
This
this
is
jeff
richardson,
who
should
be
able
to
unmute.
I
I
think
the
thoughtful
comments
by
steve-
lowland
council
member
of
olin,
about
framing.
I
And
it
reminds
me
when
I
moved
back
here
to
retire
in
october
of
last
year.
I
think
this.
I
Issue
was
framed,
sadly,
as
those
who
were
for
poor
people
or
those
who
were
against
those
who.
I
Were
who
were
for
racial
equality
or
those
who
were
against
those
who
were
classes?
And
those.
I
Who
were
not,
happily,
I
think
it
evolved
and
I
think
it
evolved
into
a
density
issue
in
part.
I
Because
of
jim
sims
and
others
who
decided
and
and
spoke
out
that
this
was
really
more
about.
I
Conversation
and
I
think
that's
a
lesson
learned,
I
think
the
point
that
council
member
flaherty.
I
Was
making
about
eleanor
ostrom
and
tommy
allison's
comments
were
instructive
in
part.
I
But
it's
not
just
about
listening,
it's
also
about
engagement
and
not
only
working
with
tommy
on.
I
The
council,
but
in
state
government
and
and
many
not-for-profit
and
foundation
enterprises.
I
I
Should
be
addressed
here
not
directly
related
to
but
informed
by
this
whole
zoning.
I
Think
there
are
some
systems
changes
that
perhaps
are
in
order,
and
maybe
this
will
lend
itself.
I
At
the
end
of
this
process
for
some
introspection
after
living
22
years
in
washington,
dc.
I
I
A
Miss
lacy,
I
see
no
more
hand
raised
hands.
Do
you
have
any
chat
messages.
J
J
J
I've
been
for
a
couple
of
generations,
I
think
the
lack
of
comments
tonight
is
telling
I
think.
J
J
Us
whose
neighborhoods
are
already
transitioning-
and
I
think
that's
why
you've
heard
from
us.
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
J
A
I'm
sorry,
yes
exhausted
your
time.
Okay!
Thank
you.
I
hope
that
you
will
consider
us
in
the
future.
J
K
I
also
deeply
appreciate
the
work
of
council
members
sue
scandaleri.
K
K
K
K
K
B
L
Speak
again
this
evening,
I'll
be
brief.
The
dynamics
of
the
this
process,
although
arduous.
L
M
Hi
again,
I
will
say
my
comments
about
and
reference
to
what
I
said.
M
Not
just
of
your
own
ideology,
your
own
thoughts,
your
own
thinking,
what
bloomington
this.
M
M
And
desire
to
make
things
more
dense
and
more
environmentally.
M
Not
to
bloomington,
indiana
and
and
it,
but
if
you're
in,
if
you
insist
on
going
your
own
way.
M
Go
your
own
way,
but
you're
not
going
to
remain
in
office.
That's
for
sure,
and
this.
M
A
B
It's
a
different
person
on
this
screen
name,
who
can
now
state
their
name
for
the
record.
N
Amended
language,
so
that
we
can
get
on
with
the
business
of
adding
some
much
needed
density.
N
To
bloomington,
and
also
to
show
you
know
some
of
the
detractors
that
this
is
good
for
the
city.
N
And
and
the
sky
does
not
fall,
so
thank
you
all
for
your
hard
work
and
I
look
forward
to
a
yes
vote.
A
O
Excuse
me,
I'm
still
getting
over
my
cold.
There
are,
of
course,
you
know
much
deeper
conversations.
O
To
to
be
had,
and
I've
been
having
these
conversations
with
many
residents
over
months.
O
Are
disagreements,
of
course,
on
various
aspects
of
policy.
I
definitely
want
to
thank
the.
O
Many
members
of
the
public
who
have
engaged
with
this
process
in
any
form
city
staff
for
their.
O
O
Of
course,
council
and
clerk
staff-
I
don't
want
to
dwell
well
actually
I'll.
Just
leave
that.
O
I
do
think
this
is
an
important
step
forward
for
bloomington
and
to
re-allow
some
small-scale.
O
Of
that
type,
much
much
reduced
from
what
was
initially
considered
when
the
when
the
planning.
O
O
Us
meet
our
sustainability,
affordability
and
inclusion
goals.
It's
really
far
too
detailed.
O
To
go
into
in
debate
or
council
comment,
but
I
did
quote
affordability
statistics
last
night
that.
O
Point
to
how
how
much
deeper
moderate
income
affordability
is
provided
by
by
missing
middle.
O
Housing
as
opposed
to
detached
single-family
housing
and
happy
to
continue
the
conversation.
O
O
A
A
From
council
members,
councilmember
piedmont
smith,
yes,
this
has
been
a
very
difficult
issue.
P
And
I
I
have
heard
a
lot
of
good
arguments
from
both
sides
and
I
respect
that.
Everybody.
P
That
I've
heard
from
has
the
best
interests
of
the
community
at
heart,
from
the
research.
P
It's
this
ordinance
is
a
good
step
forward
in
allowing
duplexes
and
no
longer
favoring
the
most.
P
P
P
Q
Q
You
know
I
support
affordable
housing,
the
udo
as
amended
here,
it's
better
than
it
was.
Q
I
was
stunned
by
the
udo
in
its
current
form.
It's
allowing
900
beds
that
are
mostly.
Q
Q
Money
and
impact
a
lot
of
people
in
great
ways
with
20
million.
I
haven't
heard
much
of
that.
Q
R
Again,
I
think,
has
caused
quite
a
bit
of
pain
and
we
have
work
to
do.
Thank
you.
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
S
A
A
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
T
A
A
I
really
appreciate
your
flexibility
through
the
time
that
we've
dedicated
to.
A
Also,
your
flexibility
on
the
multiple
special
sessions
that
I
have
been
compelled
to
schedule.
A
U
T
U
O
A
Been
properly
moved
in
segment,
do
we
have
who
do
we
have
from
this
city?
Is
it
miss
scanlan
all.
W
Related
to
title
20
of
the
bloomington
municipal
code.
W
Version
has
been
online
this
whole
time
and
is
available
included
in
this.
W
Is
the
gray
areas
that
are
currently
in
a
lot
of
the
southern
part
of
the
city?
Those.
W
Are
our
puds
and
many
of
them,
as
I
mentioned
before,
103
are
being
proposed
to
be
re-zoned.
W
So,
as
I
mentioned,
we
have
new
zoning
districts
that
came
out
in
the
update
to
the
unified.
W
Here
on
the
right,
basically,
city-owned
property
that
is
used
for
parks
purposes,.
W
Specifically
to
the
types
of
buildings
and
uses
that
are
common
on
city-owned
park,
property.
W
Secondly,
we
have
the
mixed
use:
student
housing,
zoning
district.
We
looked
at
locations
for.
W
Housing
that,
because
of
the
age
of
the
buildings
and
the
sites,
will
very
likely.
W
Soon,
redevelop
we
also
identified
areas.
East
of
excuse
me,
west
immediately
west
of
campus.
W
In
this
area
here
near
10th
woodlawn
and
we
removed
a
mixed-use
student
housing.
W
Code
update
an
r4
district
location
map
was
obviously
included
in
the
public
outreach
draft.
W
W
The
r4
locations
and
reduced
the
land
area
of
where
r4
was
being
proposed
by
78
percent.
W
Either
in
use
or
size
of
size
and
dimensions
of
parcels
or
additionally,
areas.
W
Such
as
here
immediately
east
of
hillside
and
henderson
between
the
commercial
corridor
at.
W
They
are
surrounded
by
districts
that
are
of
higher
intensity,
so,
for
example,
this
area
here.
W
Allowing
for
some
ins
and
intensification
of
the
residential
in
those
areas
as
well.
W
Of
the
zoning
code
that
the
r1
districts
that
we
are
showing
are
basically
those.
W
W
W
Those
that
may
need
to
be
addressed
and
made
some
changes
based
on
those,
so
these.
W
Are
that
we
added
some
excuse
me
that,
along
the
new
seven
line
location,
some
of
this.
W
Zoning
was
changed
here
to
help
support
the
intensification
of
that
district.
There.
W
We
also
changed
some
zoning
down.
You
can
see
here
on
the
south
side
of
town
ooh,
sorry
wrong
way.
W
And
then
our
biggest
land-wise
change
is
our
plan
unit
developments
so.
W
Udo
and
the
previous
studio
have
written
expectation
into
the
pd
into
the
pud
regulations.
W
W
Petition
if
they
had
ever
had
any
petitions
done
and
we
identified
103
of
those
that
we.
W
W
Where,
at
least
excuse
me,
those
puds,
or
at
least
95
percent
has
been
built
out
or
that
they
are.
W
Considered
abandoned
and
we
are
proposing
to
put
those
to
base
zoning
districts
so
leaving
16.
W
W
W
Members
of
the
public
be
able
to
more
easily
access
information
about
their
zoning.
Some
of.
W
W
Uses
and
setbacks
in
a
much
easier
manner
than
having
to
go
to
the
historic
data
always
to.
W
W
And
have
to
go
to
each
one
every
time,
so
there
were
two
amendments
that
were
approved.
W
By
the
plan,
commission,
you
see
those
already
in
the
already
in
the
map.
That's
at
the
beginning.
W
And
I
just
wanted
to
clearly
mention
that
they
were
the
first
one
was
just
three.
W
A
portion
of
a
pud
along
clariz
to
be
rezoned
to
mixed-use
healthcare
and
both
of
those
were.
W
Approved
unanimously
by
plan
commission,
I
can,
let
me
just
check
my
notes
here
briefly.
W
One
more
moment
and
then
I'll
be
happy
to
take
questions.
We
just
wanted
to
clarify.
W
Of
the
overhaul
of
the
ordinance
and
the
of
the
overall
ordinance
and
the
zoning
map
that.
W
Was
directed
in
the
ordinances
when
we
did
the
conversion
map,
when
we
did
the
first
overhaul.
W
Public
outreach
council
per
state
law
just
for
those
watching
have
three
options
to.
W
Adopt
reject
or
take
no
action
and
we,
I
am
happy
to
answer
any
questions.
Thank
you.
A
Thank
you
for
that
presentation.
Miss
stanley
council
questions,
councilmember
rallo
thank.
S
You
president
sims
ms
scanlon,
regarding
the
conversion
of
pods
to
some
standard
zoning.
S
That
ability
it
definitely
diminishes
the
council's
involvement.
So
my
question
is.
S
S
Housing
with
this
change,
those
two
aren't
the
same
thing
I'll
try
to
address
your
first
question.
W
So
or
your
first
comment:
yes,
puds
provide
council
with
the
opportunity
to
leverage
common.
W
W
Their
weight
to
get
what
they
could
from
that
pud.
It
was
never
the
intention
that
the
council.
W
In
2021
would
also
then
be
re-leveraging
to
let
them
you
know,
add
a
use
that
maybe
wasn't.
W
W
Play
so
your
second
point
about
trinitas
at
the
former
kmart
site
is
a
little
different.
W
They
were
going
to
do
lots
of
very
interesting
and
positive
things
when
this
council,
along.
W
Originally
said
they
were
going
to
do
this
council,
as
proposed
by
the
administration.
W
Made
changes
just
this
last
month
to
make
that
more
difficult
to
lower
those
thresholds.
So.
W
That
we
can
either
buy
right
meet
some
of
our
goals,
because
incentives
will
be
used.
W
Or
obviously
the
pd
option
is
still
open,
so
I
kind
of
get
what
you're
circling
or
what.
W
W
They're
not
requesting
anything,
they
are
francis
renwick,
for
instance.
Yes,.
W
Yes,
old
ones
are
more
common,
but
yes,
renwick
is
not
entirely
built
out,
which
is
why
it
is.
W
Aren't
easily
sent
into
our
base
districts,
but
yes,
the
other
ones
I
was
speaking
of
are.
W
S
S
O
You,
ms
scanlon,
for
the
presentation.
I
had
a
sort
of
related
follow-up.
O
As
fairly
complicated,
not
not
mapping
well
to
a
base
zoning
district
in
the
in
the
udl.
O
My
question
is
essentially,
I
would
imagine
you
looked
at
existing
puds
and.
O
Regulation
in
that
particular
pud
was,
but
my
question
is
if,
if
there
were
still
discrepancies.
O
What
happens
now
are?
Are
there
uses
in
the
puds
proposed
to
be
rezoned
to
base
districts
that
now.
O
Have
lawful
non-conforming
uses
because
those
uses
aren't
allowed
in
the
base
zoning
district.
O
For
instance,
or
lot
sizes
or
other
things
like
that,
what
happens
in
those
cases
where
there's.
O
Still
a
point
of
conflict:
yes,
so
if
there
are
items
such
as
uses
or
dimensional
standards,.
O
Is,
and
is
that
is
that
of
concern
at
all,
and
or
is
that
very
extensive?
I
know.
O
W
Extensive
based
on
the
research
that
we
were
able
to
do,
but
you
know
we
can
only
do
so
much.
We
do.
W
W
W
We
are
able
to
kind
of
match
those
through
time,
but,
yes,
it
is
possible
that
that
will
happen.
A
Thank
you
any
more
questions
from
council.
Q
Ms
scanlon,
I
is
there
any
negative
impacts
that
what
what's
the
pros
and
cons
of
that?
I.
Q
Q
Q
Cons
there
is
there
negatives
for
people
who
own
property
or
businesses
in
those
areas.
I
mean.
W
Getting
at
is
there
are
there
some
uses
where
they
become
lawful
non-conforming.
If
a
use
is.
W
Existing
there
and
then
are
those
restricted.
If
you
are
lawful
non-conforming,
then
there
are.
W
Only
certain
things
you
can
do
you
can
go
on
in
perpetuity,
of
course,
with
the
use
that
you.
W
Have
but,
for
example,
you
can't
expand
so
that
could
that
is
a
risk
again,
because
we
put
out.
W
W
W
The
main
pro
is
just
providing
regularity
and
predictability
for
people
who
own
property
or.
W
And
know
what
what
is
available
and
what's
an
option
on
those
sites,
and
you
know
to
miss.
W
V
One
of
the
16
that
didn't
qualify
for
rezoning
but
was
impressed
by
what
I
saw
there.
V
To
loan,
okay,
yeah,
so
so
to
back
to
council
member
rallo's
question
a
preliminary
plan.
W
W
Or
ten
years
after
the
approval
of
the
preliminary
plan,
if
final
plans
have
started.
W
But
there
are
sections
that
haven't
been
done
so
in
the
in
the
cases
of
the
puds
that
do
exist.
W
Abandonment
level,
either
the
ones
I
just
mentioned
or
of
the
ones
I
just
mentioned,.
W
V
W
Yes,
many
conversations
were
had
around
that
that
question
and
we
were
advised
by
the
legal.
W
Department
that
we
should
not
be
recommending
splitting
puds,
so
that
is
so,
for
example,.
W
W
Of
it
we
do
see,
we
have
seen
recent
development
and
approvals,
for
example,
the
habitat
project
on.
W
The
southern
end,
or
all
of
the
the
expansion
and
development
happening
at
catalin
so
as
a.
W
Pud
as
a
whole,
it
has
seen
recent
developments,
so
we
left
it
in
place.
We
will,
of
course,
we.
W
We
were
advised
that
we
should
not
recommend
splitting
them.
Okay,
that's
helpful
and
I
have.
V
A
Here,
okay,
I
I
wish
I
could
find
a
more
elegant
way
to
ask
this
question,
but
I'll
just
ask
it.
W
Regulations
and
see
if
we
think
they're
see
if
we
think
that
they're
friendly
to
development.
W
Were
created
for
right
so
that
in
areas
where
you
maybe
can't
get
to
exactly
what
you're
looking.
W
For
with
traditionally
the
traditional
way
that
basis
owning
districts
were
laid
out.
W
That
you
could
propose
a
mix
of
them
and
then
have
uses
be
mixed
in
a
way
that
they.
W
Had
gotten
away
from
in
zoning,
you
know
earlier
when,
when
zoning
had
become
popular.
W
W
For
puds,
I
don't
know,
as
you
know,
to
what
council
member
rallo
said.
I
don't
know
how
much.
W
Even
when
they're
small,
you
know
like
you
mentioned,
or
I
think,
council
member
rolo,
maybe.
W
Mentioned
renwick
or
the
trinitas
project
on
17th
street,
that
is
kind
of
a
more
traditional
pd.
A
Any
first
round
questions:
okay,
moving
second
round
councilman.
Thank
you
well
just
to
say
that
I.
S
2019,
when
r4
was
first
proposed
and
described,
I
believe
the
question
came
from
council.
S
S
S
S
In
october,
no,
I
don't
no,
I
don't
believe
so
so
again,
this
is
kind
of
two
questions,
but.
W
Yes,
some
people
did
have
said
that
they
always
thought
that
r4
would
only
be
used.
W
W
We
wanted
to
try
to
start
with
with
a
proposal
for
r4
that
was
based
on
an
analysis
that
we
could.
W
Get
comments
so
that
was
why
you
saw
what
you
saw.
We
obviously
got
tons
of
feedback,
which
was.
W
Great
and
then
we
made
changes
based
on
that
and
we
went
back
to
you
know
what
we
heard
a
ton.
W
W
W
In
those
transitional
areas,
and
then
again,
as
I
mentioned
before,
of
course
also
some
puds
that
had.
A
Okay
scene,
none
will
now
go
to
the
public
for
public
comment,
we'll
remind
everyone
that,
if.
A
To
public
speak,
we
would
also
ask
that,
if
there's
more
than
one
person
on
your.
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
A
What
do
we
have
next
miss
lacy?
Next
we
have
a
person
with
oh.
Y
Hi,
this
is
gene
simonian,
I'd
like
to
echo
council
member
rollo's
memory.
I
not.
Y
Y
Y
Y
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
Z
B
AA
I
just
wanted
to
make
a
brief
comment
about
an
area
proposed
to
be
r4
north
of
hillside
between.
AA
AA
Between
palmer
and
grant
is
very
narrow
and
the
road,
I
would
imagine,
a
substandard
width.
I.
AA
Don't
see
a
lot
of
issues
with
you
know:
increased
density
up
to
maybe
the
r,
the
the
quadplex,
but.
AA
B
There
are
no
more
raised
hands
presently
and
I
do
not
have
any
more
messages
in
the
chat.
A
A
Host
indicating
your
intent
to
speak
publicly,
you
will
be
allowed
three
minutes.
I
think
I
see.
A
R
Hi
thanks,
I'm
frankly,
really
I'm
not
really
sure
whether
I
want
to.
R
Super
disappointed
in
the
how
few
are
for
how
small
the
r4
zones
are
council,
member
rallo.
R
And
these
two
thoughts
are
directly
in
conflict
and
confusing
me.
So
now
that
the
r4
zones
have.
R
R
H
Something
is
better
than
nothing
you
know,
but
just
to
comment
on
people
who
are
talking
about.
H
B
A
Our
slash
questions
council,
member
of
volun
and
then
council
member
clarity.
T
Yes,
could
staff
explain
to
us,
even
though
some
of
us
what
may
be
familiar
already,
the.
AB
AB
AB
Excuse
me,
so
I
think
that
answers
your
question.
Councilmember
volin,
if
not
it's
close,.
T
Yeah.
Thank
you
for
that,
but
it's
close,
but
under
normal
circumstances
something
that
comes.
T
From
plan
commission
we
can
amend
it
and
then
it
goes
back
to
plan
commission.
But
that's
not
the.
T
AB
Plan,
commission
council
only
has
those
three
options
to
take
at
this
point
in
time.
So
just.
T
To
be
perfectly
clear,
if
the
council
were
to
reject
this
map,
then
the
administration.
T
Would
have
to
start
from
scratch
the
process
of
remapping,
the
the
city
zoning-wise.
AB
The
map
that
would
be
in
place
there
would
be
some
consequences
of
that.
There
was
a
lot
of.
AB
Discussion
about
the
puds,
so
all
the
puds
would
not
be
rezoned
to
the
base.
Zoning
as
ms
scanlan.
AB
That
would
jeopardize
the
core
administration
building
that
we're
trying
to
reuse
for.
AB
A
low
income,
low
income,
housing
tax
credit
with
a
partner
there's
also
the
r
e
zone
that.
AB
Essentially
was
removed
from
the
udl,
so
all
those
zones
no
longer
exist,
so
that
would
create
some.
AB
AB
A
request
for
information
and
we
entertained,
I
believe,
six
proposals
interviewed
three.
AB
Development
partners
and
we're
in
the
process
of
negotiating
that
right
now,
one
of
the
criteria.
AB
So
that
would
jeopardize
their
application
process.
I
believe
the
nine
percent
application
is
due.
AB
Either
june
or
july
of
this
year,
so
they
would
forego
a
full
year
of
that.
T
O
Public,
I
believe,
an
attorney
representing
a
number
of
property
owners
or
a
single.
O
Property
owner
along
first
street,
who
had
anticipated
using
their
property
for.
O
O
This
brought
up
when
the
map
was
before
plan
commission
at
all,
and
I
guess,
regardless
of.
O
What
the
answer
to
that
is
wondering,
b,
what
recourse
would
that
owner
have
if
they
wanted
to.
O
To
reconsider
or
or
seek
some
recourse
in
the
future,
my
guess
would
be
that
they
would
have
to.
O
AB
First
question:
thank
you.
Councilman
flaherty
part
of
the
the
the
delay
in
the
mapping
process.
AB
AB
So
that's
what's
in
the
zoning
map
is
the
recommendations
from
that.
There
was
a
lot.
AB
Of
outreach
and
and
feedback
through
that
process,
so
that's
you
know
how
we
folded
that
process.
AB
G
T
T
T
T
It's
a
very
difficult
thing,
but
in
contrast,
15
years
later,
this
map
is
not
as
complicated.
I.
T
The
changes
that
are
being
made
here-
it
was
I
I
want
to
thank
ms
scanlan
in
particular
for.
T
But
I
think
that
the
map
itself
is
a
very
good
first
step.
I
think
that
in
the
same
way
that.
T
T
T
A
long
and
extensive
process
to
make
these
changes,
but
it's
a
dually
prescribed
process
by
statute.
T
And
it
is
the
kind
of
process
that
is
intended
to
get
public
input
as
extensive
as
possible.
T
That
you
know
and
and
that's
something
that
the
council
comes
to
council
as
surely
as
puds.
T
Or
changes
to
title
20
do
so
I'm
I'm
confident
that
we
will
be
able,
as
a
community,
to
make
those.
A
Member
bola,
we
are
still
in
council
final
comments.
Do
we
have
any
other
council
members.
A
O
Commission
and
members
of
the
public,
who
engaged
with
the
mapping
process
for
all
your
work.
O
O
About
updating
a
panoply
of
old
puds
to
a
base
zoning
district-
I
know
the
administrative.
O
Burden
with
with
planned
union
developments
is
quite
large,
and
we
had
very
quite
a
lot
of
them.
O
Forward
I
thought
greg
alexander
had
a
really
great
comment
and
highlighted
some
challenges.
O
And
issues
with
kind
of
scaling
back
what
the
r4
district
is
really
meant
to
be,
which
is.
O
Which
is
an
urban
mixed,
mixed
housing
type
residential
zone
that
very
much
does
match
the.
O
O
He
pointed
out
some
of
the
some
of
the
things
that
happen
and
the
disincentives
for.
O
O
Mixed
housing
types,
I
think
that's
something
that
can
be
revisited
and
thought
about
critically.
O
Being
needed
to
be
needing
to
be
more
viable
through
smaller
lot
minimums,
I
know
at
least.
O
One
prominent
opponent
of
the
duplex
amendment
is
a
proponent
of
subdividing
corner
lots.
O
O
Back
half
of
the
lot
fronts
on
the
street,
etc.
So
I
think
that's
something
that
we
can
explore.
O
O
As
well,
miss
weaver
made
a
good
comment
about
that.
I
think
that's
something
we
can
continue.
O
To
develop
and
revisit
both
in
the
context
of
this
map
and
housing
plans
that
we
develop.
O
With
in
principle,
though,
disagreed
with
its
incompatibility
with
with
missing
middle.
O
S
Thank
you,
president
sims.
Well,
just
referring
back
to
the
your
initial
r4.
S
Originally
not
including
core
neighborhoods,
and
then
it
came
in
a
very
expansive
form.
S
S
S
Council's
resolve
back
in
2019
to
not
use
up
zoning
in
what
I
would
call
kind
of
a
broad
brush.
S
Rather
reckless
fashion,
so
I'm
quite
dismayed
by
the
process
which
I've
indicated
already.
U
B
Let's
see,
I
believe
that
there
is
a
the
allocation
meeting
for
the
jack
hopkins.
B
Civil
services
committee
is
next
tuesday,
shoot
sorry
guys.
May
the
18th
beginning
at
6
pm.
A
A
Going
on
with
the
public
safety
committee,
but
the
caps
commission,
but
that's
probably.
A
I
move
that
we
adjourn
I'll
I'll
make
the
motion
the
movie
adjourned
this
evening.
Second,.
A
Moved
in
second,
do
we
have
any
opposition
or
objections
to
a
journey.