►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
To
discussing
project
priorities,
sidewalk
and
traffic
calming
and
pedestrian
facility.
A
Other
matters
and
then
adjourn
so
if
we
take
from
take
off
from
the
last
meeting,
we
were.
A
Just
starting
to
talk
about
some
criteria,
so,
mr
lucas,
if
you'll
display
some
of
the
criteria.
A
Criteria,
so
these
are
the
when
I
see
number
o
is
it's
just.
These
are
the
committee's
policies.
B
That
have
been
used
in
the
past.
I
did
want
to
clarify
a
point
from
from
the
last
meeting.
B
B
To
the
other,
up
to
25
of
the
project
estimate
or
to
a
absolute
amount
of
45
000,
I
think
there.
B
Was
a
outdated
version
of
this
policy
that
was
included
so
just
a
just
a
note
there,
and
then
this.
B
Is
the
list
of
objective
factors
that
are
meant
to
kind
of
operationalize
the
the
committee's.
B
Criteria
and
the
committee
left
off
last
week,
I
think,
discussing
both
these
criteria.
B
And
the
committee
process
itself,
so
I
know
we've
got
mallory
here.
A
Well,
I
guess
I'd
like
to
throw
open
the
floor
to
committee
members.
Do
we
have
comments.
A
Yes,
mr
sims,
thank
you,
mr
chair,
I
think
at
our
last
meeting
and
it
could
be,
I
hope,
I'm
not
wrong.
C
With
this,
but
miss
rosenberger
in
planning
and
transportation,
I
believe
indicated
that.
C
C
Today,
I'm
not
so
sure
what
we
could
add
or
take
away
during
this
time.
It
might
be
more
prudent.
C
To
we
can
wait
for
that,
update,
have
some
input
on
the
process
of
them
updating
and
I
think.
C
C
Possibly
be
incorporated
in
the
updated
criteria,
which
I
think
long
term
would
help.
C
Thoughts,
I
we're
kind
of
in
mid
stream
here,
I'm
not
so
sure
about
doing
a
whole
lot
of
things.
A
We
can
pretty
much
we're
at
the
point
where
we
still
have
to
operate
under
this
criteria.
A
But
moving
forward
we'll
change
based
on
some
further
development,
mr
rallo
or
or.
A
Miss
rosenberger,
would
you
kate,
would
you
like
to
have
a
comment
on
the
criteria
and
processes.
D
Yes,
thank
you,
okay.
I
don't
I'm
sorry,
I
feel
a
little
scattered,
but.
D
In
general
is
just
decreasing
the
equity
in
how
we
distribute
these
funds
for
sidewalks,
so.
D
These
things
so
staff
anytime,
but
I
think
the
alternative
transportation
budget
is
now.
D
For
deciding
how
this
funding
is
allocated
and
also,
I
wouldn't
mind
some
clarification,
I'm
going.
D
B
Any
other
part
of
that
part
of
the
committee's
funding
comes
from
excess
revenues
from
the.
B
Neighborhood
parking
permit
program.
I
do
think
that
that
doesn't
fully
fund
the
committee's.
B
B
B
Come
forward
to
the
full
council
to
either
shift
that
money
or
reallocate
it
to
a
different.
B
Again,
it
could
could
be
something
that
that
the
the
council
or
this
committee
requests
from.
B
At
least
for
the
last
several
years,
the
amount
made
available
to
the
committee
has.
B
Has
basically
gone
up
by
some
percentage
meant
to
keep
pace
with
inflation
so.
B
B
Similar
increments
in
in
past
years,
and
that
that
comes.
B
Of
this
committee's
work
in
the
past
and
has
has
wanted
to
to
fund.
E
Oh,
I
don't
know
if
there's
any
questions
that
I'll
answer
that
you
didn't.
I
can
confirm.
F
I
think
kind
of
asking
whether
the
whether
the
alt
trans
budget,
whether
there's
a
piece.
F
F
You
know
we're
the
ones
that
actually
administer
the
contracts
and
kind
of
do
the
projects.
F
This
committee,
specifying
certain
projects.
You
know
we
want
you
to
spend
this
much
on
this.
F
D
A
D
D
D
Okay
thanks:
okay,
thank
you
very
much,
mr
rallo.
G
Fund
geographically,
where
it's
derived
in
the
city.
A
All
right
that
and
then
you'll
pardon
me
and
then
you'll
send
those
out
to
all.
B
In
public
I
that
may
be
information,
and
this
doesn't
matter,
but
that
needs
to
be
from
parking.
B
Parking
enforcement,
but
I
imagine
they
would
have
that
data
so
I'll
follow
up.
G
Mr
chair,
yes,
mr
rowland,
I've
I've
got
a
response.
This
is
the
appropriate
time
just.
G
Councilmember
rosenberger
talked
about.
You
know
whether
this
committee
should
exist
or
you.
G
Know
whether
it
should
have
a
budget-
and
I
had
something
to
add-
you
know
please.
A
Please
please
reflect
on
that.
I
think
right
now
we
we're
kind
of
deciding
that
the
criteria.
G
And
we
were
talking
about,
including
you
know,
equitable
distribution
throughout.
G
The
city
and
that
sort
of
thing,
which
I
think
is
a
good
consideration
that
should
be
included.
G
You
know
focus
on
connectivity
and,
and
things
like
that,
but
I
just
I
had
a
general
comment
about.
G
You
know
being
I
having
been
on
this
committee
since
2003,
that
for
one
thing,
every
member
of.
G
G
That
we
have
to
accomplish-
and
so
it's
really
been
kind
of
a
major
task
to
just.
G
Try
to
lobby
to
get
to
get
more
funding,
and
so
you
know
the
administration
has
been
has
been
good.
G
G
G
But
this
has
been
hard-won
money.
I
think
that
council
has
really
really
lobby
to.
G
Get
the
budget
to
where
it's
at
and
you
know,
because
we
have
a
strong
mayor
system,
the.
G
American
direct
funding
to
places
that
he
or
she
feels
is
a
priority
for
the
city,
which
is.
G
Good
and
the
council
gets
kind
of
a
lot
less,
and
so
I
would
be
really
really.
G
G
Catalan,
how
many
people
here
work
at
university?
How
would
you
get
there?
Are
there
deficiencies
in.
G
G
Anything
we
get
too
little
money
for
all
of
the
projects
that
we
have
to.
G
A
Rallo
was
speaking
about.
Is
there
another
way
to
get
more
funds
for
sidewalks
in
in
the
city.
A
That
maybe
you'd
like
to
describe
to
us.
You
know
in
brief
to
give
us
an
idea.
A
Mr
copper,
or
or
miss
rosenberger
any
thoughts
I
can.
I
can
chime
in
on
some
of
that.
F
Know
the
city
has
a
has
a
very
large
budget
compared
to
what
we're
talking
about
here.
So.
F
What
you're
asking
other
there
are
outside
sources
of
funds
that
we
use
the
biggest
one.
F
To
actually
get
prioritized
the
other
there
are,
there
are
occasionally
grant.
F
That's
that's
the
that's.
What
initially
comes
to
my
mind,
if
any
other
staff
went
away
and
if.
F
A
Is
there
a
way
to
to
just
kind
of
ballpark
that
for
us
off
the
top
of
my
head,
I'm
I'm
not
going.
F
To
offer
you
a
ballpark
we
have
in
the
past,
we
have
separated
out
spending
on
bicycle
and.
F
A
C
Question
through
the
court,
through
the
controller
and
and
where
they
pull
funds
from
as.
C
C
C
C
Audit
can
be
considered
and
may
be
incorporated
so
that
we're
a
more
equitable
criteria
and.
C
An
application
and
lastly,
I
will
support
and
just
piggyback
on
what
councilmember
rollo
said.
C
Point
I
will
not
support
dissolution
of
this
committee,
even
though
moving
forward
could.
C
Be
a
consideration,
I
think,
is
worth
further
discussion,
but
as
it
is
now,
I
think
there's.
C
A
Thank
you,
mr
sims,
so
we've
kind
of
oops,
mr
rallo,
sorry
just
to
add.
I
think
in
our.
G
G
A
Thank
you
very
much
all
right,
I
think.
Perhaps
we
should
move.
A
To
the
next
section
is
we're
going
to
ask
if
there
anyone
has.
A
Disclosures
of
any
conflict
of
interest
do
you
live
on
the
sidewalk
I
guess
is
that
is
that
the.
A
B
B
That
would
bring
a
financial
benefit
to
to
the
individual
that
lived
along
that
that.
B
Location,
so
if,
if
committee
members
have
any
conflicts
of
interest,
they'd
like
to
disclose.
B
Sidewalk
locations
to
to
make
that
known,
and
I
don't
know
if
any
members.
B
A
Mr
ralph
just
some
point
of
clarity,
mr
lucas,
when
you
say
live
along,
is
it
within
a
certain.
G
B
I
think
that's
too
too
removed
at
you
know
sidewalks
anywhere,
you
know,
could
theoretically.
B
Benefit
anyone,
so
if
it's
in
front
of
your
house
essentially
gotcha,
thank
you.
A
All
righty
please
communicate
to
mr
lucas,
should
you
feel,
like
you,
have.
A
By
the
planning
department,
using
the
objective
measures,
I
would
say
mr
rosenberger
and
or.
H
H
It's
not
like
a
new
ranking
system,
it's
just
here's.
Some
data
on
the
map.
H
For
for
thinking
about
and
that
we
have
mallory
looked
up
some
other.
H
Cities
and
how
they
do
rankings
and
kind
of
provided
a
proposal
of
what
we
could
do
with
it.
D
A
Okay,
my
one
of
my
duties,
I
think
in
stephen
lucas,
mr
lucas,
is
to
keep
an.
A
Eye
on
the
clock,
so
please
go
ahead.
Miss
rosenberger
and
touch
on
both
items.
H
Okay,
so
it's
just
four
maps.
The
first
is
median
household
income
or
household
median
income.
H
This
is
by
census,
block
group
in
the
city.
Let
me
minimize
this
for
a
second.
This
is
just
the
key.
H
H
Trend-
and
so
this
goes
from
the
lowest
census
block
groups
having
between
5
and
13
people
of.
H
Color
and
the
highest
having
between
33
and
67
people
of
color,
and
I
don't
know
that
I
have.
H
H
Percent
of
the
population-
that's
native
american
or
alaskan
indian
and.
H
H
H
H
H
H
A
Yes,
yes,
I
mallory,
would
you
be
able
to
cover
that
and
and
mallory
too
I'll
jump
in
and
say
I'm.
B
Happy
to
to
pull
up
those
locations,
I've
got
google
earth
ready
to
go
if
the
community
would.
B
Like
to
take
a
look
at
those
two
okay
spots,
so
yeah,
that
would
be.
That
would
be
super
helpful.
I
The
projects
that
we
recommend
for
funding,
and
so
we
had
two
additions
this
year
and
that.
I
I
On
dunn
street
north
dunn
street-
and
I
think
that's
that's
the
portion
right
there
so.
I
When
we
originally
sent
out
the
rankings,
I
was
just
learning
how
to
fill
out
each
of
the
criteria.
I
And
I
believe
we
are
going
to
be
finishing
some
work
on
17th
street,
so
that
is
an
opportunity.
I
Then
cs69,
which
I
believe
is
the
name,
is
failing
me
right
now.
I
A
36
and
for
for
folks
on
the
meeting
I'd
like
to
post
the
the
list
that
we're
referring
to.
B
Okay,
this
is
yes
along
north
crescent
road.
I
believe
the
request
from
fountain
drive
here.
B
At
the
south
to
marquee
drive,
that's
correct,
yes,
and
so
I
believe
that
was
a.
B
Oh
okay,
I
don't
believe
they
specified
a
side.
I
don't
know
looks
like
there
may
be
some
stretches.
B
G
Maybe
by
next
time
tell
us
to
what
extent
that
trail
extends.
Can
I
just
jump
in
real,
quick.
F
The
city
actually
has
a
project
here,
it's
in
design
already
to
install
multi-use
path
along.
A
All
right,
great,
those
are
the
two
new
ones
that
were
added
to
our
prioritization
list
by
city.
A
Staff
is
there
anything
in
a
preliminary
sense
before
we
begin
discussing
the
priorities
of
the.
A
Committee
members,
that
we
need
to
discuss
that
we
need
to
bring
forward
mr
rallo.
G
Just
to
ask
plenty
in
transportation,
miss
rosenberger
or
mr
copper.
What
is
your
in
terms.
G
Matrix
right
now
of
the
various
components
of
consideration,
is
it?
Is
it
your
opinion
that.
H
The
criteria
are
flawed
and
we
do
the
best
we
can
with
it,
and
I
it's
just
really
hard.
I.
H
Think
until
we
make
changes
to
it,
saying
that
we
feel
the
most
confident
and
only
using
that.
H
H
A
Council
member
rosenberger,
thank
you
is
I
mean
helping
with
this
timeline.
Can
we.
H
I
think
it
depends.
I
know
it's
a
yes,
it
just
depends
what.
B
B
Administration
staff
to
to
put
these
projects
into
motion
and
get
as
much
done
during.
B
B
Or,
or
integrate
new
objective
metrics
into
the
ranking
sheet,
you
know
if
that
took
a
month.
B
You
know
in
april
may
june
time
frame
and
again
that
that's
not
impossible.
It
would
just.
B
Shorten
the
window
that
staff
would
then
have
to
actually
make
progress
on
the.
B
On
the
projects
during
the
calendar
year-
neil,
I
don't
know
if
you've
got
any
other.
G
Mr
ralph
just
to
say
that
part
of
the
criteria
redo,
I
think,
should
include
a
couple
things.
One
is.
G
Redundancy,
so,
in
other
words,
you
know
we
just
saw,
for
instance,
the
sidewalk
on
christian
street.
G
G
G
B
Or
get
together
kind
of
ballpark
estimates
to
give
at
least
a
rough
idea
of
what
the.
B
Sometimes
utility
or
stormwater
work
and
then
construction
again.
The
the
committee
is.
B
B
Would
like
to
to
make
or
have
in
place
is
sort
of
a
re-examination
or
a
reinvention
of
the.
B
B
B
It's
it's
really
up
to
the
committee
again.
I
I
will
remind
the
committee
that
there
are.
B
How
many
new
projects
it
might
like
to
to
look
at?
I
will
say
the
more
projects
that.
B
B
We
we
are
coming
up
on
the
the
end
of
the
year
here,
so
staff
may
be
out
for
holidays
or
other.
B
C
Which
time
frame
were
we
talking
about?
With
regard
to
you
all
starting
updating
the
criteria.
H
I
think
it
adding
population.
I
know
it's
already
started
to
a
certain
extent.
C
H
Put
it
on
the
other,
but
so
yeah,
I
would
say
two
weeks
minimum
well,
no.
I
was
speaking
more
broadly.
C
I
think,
with
return
with
regard
to
updating
it
with
equity
criteria
and
that
sort
of
thing.
C
Is
moving
on
and
how
we
would
like
to
get
this
processed
and
met
by
the
end
of
this
year.
C
In
order
to
try
to
for
funding,
I
think
the
best
place
to
start,
and
I
think
mr
lucas.
C
C
C
Point
to
do
the
construction,
I
think
so
there
has
to
be
a
break
in
there
somewhere
and
that's.
C
Money,
if
you
take
away
the
encumbered
amount,
I
guess
I'm
wondering
how
much.
C
Is
remaining,
and
is
it
possible
that
what's
remaining,
we
could
do
design
and
construction.
C
Of
our
rating,
it's
going
to
have
to
be
a
clean
break
somewhere,
but
that's
just
kind
of.
C
C
I
know
I'm
assuming
we'll
have
another
meeting
and
I'll
be
prepared
to
have
more
prioritizations.
C
But
based
on
the
funding
that
we
have
available
and
then
we
can
see
the
cost
of
the
projects.
A
Okay,
gotcha,
so
so
does
that
I
guess
part
of
the
question
that
I
was
trying
to
get
to
was.
A
And
then
see
how
much
that
is
coming
out
to
be
estimates,
or
what
kind
of
is
our
next
move
on.
G
Sorry
well
well,
I'm
I'd
just
like
to
just
reiterate:
maybe
what
councilman
sim
said.
I
think.
A
B
Information
about
the
sidewalk
projects
from
last
year
and
what
those
construction
costs
may
be.
B
B
That
were
either
partially
funded
for
design
work
or
completely
funded,
were.
B
The
south
walnut
street
project
from
winslow
to
ridgeview
and
then
a
sidewalk
along
adams.
B
Street
from
kirkwood
to
fountain
that
was
the
lowest
priority
project
and
mr
copper,
I
don't.
F
Were
able
to
partially
encumber
that
design
contract,
so
I'm
just
rough
numbers
if
the.
F
F
Street
project
also,
we
are
expecting
it
will
require
some
right-of-way
acquisition,
which
is.
F
F
Fifty
thousand
dollars
in
right
away
acquisition
construction
of
that
project
would
probably
be.
F
It
might
be
challenging
to
do
that
within
the
same
year
as
as
from
starting
design.
Considering.
F
The
other
project
south
walnut
street,
that
design
is
fully
encumbered.
I
do
think
it.
F
F
F
F
F
You
also
don't
reach
a
year
where
you
have.
You
know
nothing
but
construction,
where
you
don't
get.
F
H
Yes,
just
to
follow
up
on
that
out
of
the
chart
for
this
year,
the
top
six
projects,
so
the
first.
H
H
H
Along
for
us
to
know,
and
then
I
would
say,
the
others
are
really
interesting
projects.
H
H
Traffic
calming
would
be
a
more
appropriate
tool
for
that
space,
but
anyway,
so
the
north
dunn
is.
H
H
H
G
I
think
maybe,
as
we
proceed
since
it's
one
o'clock,
you
know
maybe
we
should
get
some.
G
G
H
Would
actually
reduce
it,
which
is
great
the
total
distance
needed
as
well
as
I
think
there
could.
A
Thanks
all
right,
so,
mr
sims,
I
just
wanted
to
quickly
say
how
much
is
it?
Would
it
be
an.
C
I
don't
know
10,
maybe
too
many,
but
understanding
that
the
indian
avenue.
C
Won't
be
part
of
that
list
because
it's
been
funded
elsewhere
and
I
think
that'll
give.
C
But
my
next
question
is:
where
are
we
at
on
the
14th
street
project?
That's
cs05
from.
C
F
Yes,
that
that
project
has
been
awarded
for
construction
you've
already.
F
Paid
for
that
and
coordinated
with
media
development
block
grant
funds.
Okay
and.
C
Okay,
that
answered
my
question,
but
I'm
like
council
remember
all
of
we.
If
it's
not
too
much.
C
Trouble
for
you
all
just
give
us
those
estimates
on
the
top
five
or
six,
and
then
I
think.
A
All
right
do
we
need
a
motion
to
to
make
that
an
official
suggestion.
A
Or
request
well,
could
I
just
ask
roy,
is
that
doable
I
mean
I,
you
know
we're
kind
of
giving.
G
B
The
staff
involved
here
to
to
do
anything
like
what
the
committee
is
asking
before
the
the
start.
B
Of
the
new
year-
and
I
don't
recommend
a
meeting
either
beginning
or
middle
of
january,
which
may.
B
Give
roy
enough
time
to
look
at
these
these
locations
and
may
also,
even
if
the
committee.
B
Didn't
implement
any
new
criteria
may
provide
beth
or
other
planning
staff
time
to.
B
Put
together
recommended
metrics
that
maybe
the
committee
wants
to
recommend.
B
For
use
next
year,
if
it
doesn't
feel
right,
those,
mr
ayton,
if
we
say
middle
of.
A
January,
how
many
projects
should
we
ask
to
be
reasonable
for
you
to
give
us
the
numbers
on.
G
G
A
Can
we
include
that
estimate
fair
enough,
mr
ayton,
if
that's
possible.
A
When
we
meet
next,
for
which
project,
I'm
sorry
for
the
right
away,
acquisition
for
atoms.
J
J
G
Sure
that's
great
okay
sounds
good.
Okay,
then
I
would
like
to
ask
if.
A
A
F
See
if
we
can
clean
up
the
numbers
a
little
bit
for
next
time
and
then
within
that
top
10.
F
F
Us
to
skip
that
there's,
just
not
interest
in
miss
rosenbarger
had
mentioned
that.
F
F
It,
but
if,
if
there's
agreement
that
it's
not
going
to
be
a
high
priority
project,
then
I
would.
G
G
G
7Th
street,
where
you
get
you
know
you
can
you
can
get
a
underneath
whatever
46
right,
the
bypass.
G
So
could
we
have
the
numbers
on
both
like
what
a
sidewalk
would
cost
versus
the.
G
You
know
some
kind
of
traffic
calming
yes,
I
I
mean
that's
certainly
possible.
I
think
you
know.
F
Even
even
more
ballpark,
maybe
to
start
out
with
so
for
the
next
meeting.
You
know
these
numbers
are.
F
F
A
G
G
G
A
You
all
right,
so
I
think
then,
we've
agreed
that
we're
going
to
look
at
that
subset
of.
A
Mr
lucas,
I
will
remind
the
public
if
you
want
to
weigh
in
and
comment
on
the
sidewalk
committee.
A
K
And
value
that
equity
is.
K
That
staff
will
be
devising
in
early
2021
and
just
I'm
a
resident
of
mr
rella's
district.
K
Consideration,
because
there
are
so
many
folks
who
you
know,
depend
on.
K
A
B
Half
roy
of
neil
those
are
the
the
first
that
would
be
the
second
week
in
january.
C
C
Toes
I'm
perfectly
well,
it
does
january
12th
on
tuesday
at
noon.
Work
for
everybody.
A
Okay,
please
set
that
mr
lucas
and
it
looks
good
for
rosenberger
2
from
the
city.
A
I'd
like
to
thank
the
city
planning
and
transportation,
always
excellent
job
from.
B
B
World
will
look
like
in
a
month,
but
we
will
of
course,
post
notice
of
the
meeting.