►
From YouTube: Bloomington City Council, May 3, 2023
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
C
A
C
A
E
D
We'll
begin
tonight
with
our
land
and
labor
acknowledgment
for
the
city
of
Bloomington.
We
recognize
that
the
city
of
Bloomington
sits
on
native
land.
The
city
as
well
as
City
administrative
buildings,
are
on
the
traditional
homelands
of
the
Miami
Delaware
Potawatomi
and
Shawnee
people,
and
we
acknowledge
that
they
are
past
present
and
future
caretakers
of
this
land.
D
We
also
acknowledge
that
much
of
the
economic
progress
and
development
in
Indiana
and
specifically
Bloomington
resulted
from
the
unpaid,
labor
and
forced
servitude
of
people
of
color,
specifically
enslaved,
African
labor.
We
acknowledge
that
this
land
remains
home
to
and
the
site
of,
gathering
and
healing
for
many
indigenous
and
other
people
of
color
and
commit
to
work
to
the
work
necessary
to
create
and
promote
a
more
Equitable
and
just
Bloomington.
D
We'll
now
move
into
agenda
summation
we'll
begin
this
evening.
With
the
approval
of
minutes,
we
have
a
set
from
May
4th
2022
regular
session
and
from
the
February
23
2023
state
of
the
city.
We'll
then
move
into
reports
included.
There
are
council
member
reports
I'm
not
aware
of
any
from
the
mayor
and
city
offices.
At
this
point,
reports
from
Council
committees
will
then
move
into
our
first
of
two
periods
of
public
comment
for
items
not
on
the
agenda.
D
We'll
then
take
up
appointments
to
boards
and
commissions
and
then
move
into
legislation
for
second
readings
and
resolutions.
Under
that
heading
we
have
resolution
23-07
to
approve
an
interlocal
cooperation
agreement
between
the
city
of
Bloomington
and
Monroe
County
Indiana.
Regarding
a
joint
Bloomington
Monroe
County
Human
Rights
Commission.
D
We
also
have
ordinance
2309
to
amend
Title
II
of
the
Bloomington
Municipal
Code
entitled
Administration
and
Personnel.
Regarding
the
creation
of
a
joint
City
County
Human
Rights
Commission,
we
then
have
ordinance
23-08
to
amend
the
traffic
calming
and
Greenways
program
Incorporated
by
reference
into
title,
15
vehicles
and
traffic
of
the
Bloomington
municipal
code
regarding
amending
the
traffic
calming
and
Greenways
program
Incorporated
by
reference
into
Bloomington
Municipal
Code,
section
15.26.020.
D
D
D
A
F
E
A
D
G
Thank
you,
I
just
want
to
thank
everyone
who
voted
in
yesterday's
primary
elections.
It's
important,
especially
in
this
community,
to
vote
and
I,
want
to
thank
everyone
who
who
ran
for
office
it's
important
to
stand
for
elective
office
and
to
stand
for
frankly,
anything
I
don't
want
to
get
into
cliches
all
of
a
sudden
if
you
don't
stand
for
something
anyway.
Thank
you
again.
F
No
report,
except
the
echo
councilman
revolin's
sentiments.
Thank
you.
D
I
D
Thank
you
and
I
will
just
add
an
extended
invitation
to
Mike
May
constituent
meeting
coming
up
this
Saturday
May
6th
at
1,
30
PM,
we'll
conduct
that
via
zoom
and
the
link
is
available
at
sue
for
citycouncil.com
there's
a
join
button.
All
you
have
to
do
is
click
on
that.
So
thank
you.
Everyone
I'm
not
aware
of
any
reports
from
the
mayor
and
city
offices.
Are
there
any
reports
from
Council
committee.
D
J
D
H
Thanks,
my
name
is
Greg.
Alexander
I
still
want
to
talk
about
this
Cascades
path.
Kind
of
thing
you've
got
to
understand
how
useless
it
is
for
transportation.
H
It's
got
three
endpoints,
that's
where
you
start
with
a
connectivity
analysis,
the
ends
of
it.
It
does
connect
to
the
dog
park.
H
It
does
connect
to
something
the
dog
park,
but
it
stops
just
short
of
the
Griffey
Trails
it
if
you
want
to
go
from
the
Cascades
pass
to
the
Griffey
Trails,
which
I
Do
by
the
way
want
to
do
that.
You
have
to
you,
have
to
forward
the
creek.
The
Griffey
Spillway
has
a
creek
and
you
have
to
cross
it
and
there's
a
bunch
of
options
for
crossing
it
and
they're
all
weather
dependent
kind
of
Fallen
trees
dependent.
It's
it's!
It's
not
connected
to
that.
H
Cath
to
that
property,
that's
at
a
Park's
property
to
the
West.
It
does
run
along
Clubhouse
Drive.
It
goes
up
that
hill
and
it
comes
out
onto
Kinser
Pike,
just
south
of
the
golf
course
it
doesn't
connect
to
any
sidewalks
up
there,
there's
a
sidewalk
on
the
other
side
of
kinzer
Pike,
and
if
you
want
to
cross
Kinser
Pike
without
any
sort
of
assistance,
you
can
and
there's
no
bike
facility
on
Kinser
Pike
full
stop
none
the
South,
oh
God,
the
South,
so
it
does
connect.
H
There
is
one
other
destination,
two
destinations
on
the
entire
path
system.
It
does
connect
to
the
playground
at
lower
Cascades.
It
really
does
connect
to
that
playground,
that's
it
that
is
it.
It
doesn't
go
south
of
there.
So
if
you
want
to
get
all
the
way
to
the
southern
edge
of
Park's
property,
you
have
to
walk
in
the
street,
which
you
know
now
that
there's
speed
humps.
H
This
is
what
happens
when
we
let
Parks
and
Rec
bureaucrats,
design,
Transportation
facilities.
We
spent
millions
of
dollars
on
this
and
it
doesn't
connect
to
anything
except
two
parks
facilities.
It's
supposed
to
connect
to
three.
It
doesn't
even
connect
to
the
third
Parks
facility.
It
doesn't
connect
any
housing,
it
doesn't
connect
any
schools,
it
doesn't
connect
any
businesses,
it
doesn't
connect
to
any
shopping
any
restaurants.
It
doesn't
connect
to
a
single
thing
except
two
parks
properties.
It
is
useless
for
transportation.
H
It
has
no
value
whatsoever
for
transportation
because
it
doesn't
connect
to
anything
and
that's
why
I
talk
about
connected
Networks
and
that's
why
it's
important
to
listen
to
our
planners.
They
will
always
tell
you,
if
you're
willing
to
listen,
that
connected
networks
start
near
the
middle.
You
have
to
connect
your
new
facility
to
at
least
one
old
facility,
or
your
new
facility
is
going
to
be
useless
for
transportation.
H
K
Evening
Council,
this
is
Christopher
mg
from
the
greater
Bloomington
Chamber
of
Commerce
site.
Thank
you
for
the
time
tonight.
I
want
to
Echo
council
member
of
olin's
remarks
about
those
who
voted
yesterday.
I
know
what
was
seemingly
a
record
amount.
It
still
was
only
8
000
and
some
change
in
a
community
of
80
000
well
I
commend
those
who
voted.
We
still
need
to
get
that
up,
but
I
also
want
to
thank
everybody
who
ran
for
us
office.
It
is
a
tough
racket.
Congratulations
to
those
who
who
won
but
I.
K
You
know
I
made
several
calls
before
the
primary
to
try
to
get
people
to
run
and
and
they
you
know
laughed
at
me
on
a
couple
occasions.
It's
a
lot
of
work,
the
questionnaires,
the
forums,
the
door-to-door
I
admire
that
and
we
had
a
lot
of
great
candidates
who
were
Community
minded,
and
that
is
a
blessing
here
in
Bloomington.
The
second
item
I'm
going
to
bring
up
is
the
the
committee
on
the
council
process
which
meets
tomorrow.
I
will
not
make
it,
but
I
want
to
give
my
public
comment
tonight.
K
Item
a
on
that
agenda
is
the
boarding
commission's
reform
and
I've
to
council
member
Flaherty
about
this,
but
that
was
the
Novak
report
that
the
mayor's
office
instituted
and
I
think
there
was
a
process
involved
that
didn't
have
the
council's
input,
but
I
think
this
is.
This
particular
committee
is
a
chance
to
do
that
where
we
really
maximize
utility
on
boards
and
commissions,
I
think
they're
important
tools
for
government
here,
but
they
can't
just
be
a
means
to
an
end
themselves.
K
L
Good
evening,
Jim
Shelton
also
with
the
chamber
here
to
follow
my
boss,
but
I'll
speak
at
night
on
behalf
of
recording
Point
Special
Advocates.
A
Casas
I
want
to
make
sure
the
public
is
aware
that
the
cost
of
spring
training
is
coming
up
in
just
a
few
weeks.
It
will
start
the
22nd
of
May
and
runs
through
June
14th
it'll,
be
on
Monday
Wednesdays
and
Thursdays
from
5
30
to
8
30..
L
We
really
need
people
to
get
involved
and
to
serve
as
volunteers
for
these
children
who
are
in
the
court
system,
not
for
anything
they've
done,
but
for
what
their
parents
have
either
done
or
actually
mostly
lately
have
not
done
so.
You
can
get
this
training
it'll
be
about
33
hours
and
then
you
would
be
sworn
in
by
judge
Harvey
and
become
a
concert,
an
agent
of
the
court.
L
If
you
will-
and
your
job
would
be
another
set
of
eyes
and
ears
to
help
the
court
know
what
is
going
on
with
the
children
and
with
their
parents
and
with
service
providers
Etc.
So
the
best
possible
decision
decisions
can
be
made
to
help
these
children
get
into
a
permanent
good
situation
going
forward.
So
you
can
go
to
Monroe
County
constant.org
click
on
the
volunteer
link
and
you'll
learn
a
bunch
of
details.
L
If
you
need
those
to
decide
and
then
you
could
actually
fill
out
the
application
to
be
a
casa
on
the
website
and
submitted
so
invite
people
to
think
about
that
application
will
be
due
here
in
the
next
10
days
or
so,
and
we
really
need
people.
We've
got
like
30
children
right
now
who
we
do
not
have
a
volunteer
to
assign
to
their
case.
So
thank
you
for
the
opportunity
to
use
this
forum
to
let
people
know.
D
M
Yes,
thank
you
on
behalf
of
interview,
Team
B
I
would
like
to
move
appointment
of
Patty
moon
to
C3
of
the
community
advisory
and
Public
Safety
Commission.
Second,
it's.
F
A
F
N
F
G
M
D
A
Resolution
2307
to
approve
an
interlocal
cooperation
agreement
between
the
city
of
Bloomington
and
Monroe
County
Indiana
regarding
a
joint
Bloomington
Monroe
County
Human
Rights
Commission.
The
synopsis
is
as
follows.
This
resolution
approves
an
interlocal
agreement
between
the
city
of
Bloomington
and
Monroe
County
pursuant
to
state
law
to
establish
and
fund
a
joint
Bloomington
Monroe
County
Human
Rights
Commission.
A
The
agreement
provides
that
the
city
of
Bloomington
shall
be
responsible
for
Staffing.
The
commission,
which,
together
with
staff,
shall
engage
in
human
rights,
education
and
awareness
activities
and
enforce
both
City
and
County
Human
Rights
ordinances
in
exchange.
The
county
shall
make
semi-annual
payments
to
the
city
controller
share
the
cost
of
these
activities
once
approved,
together
with
the
corresponding
changes
to
the
city
and
county
human
rights
ordinances,
The,
seven-member,
Joint,
Bloomington,
Monroe,
County,
Human,
Rights
Commission
will
be
made
up
of
three
mayoral
appointments:
two
common
Council
appointments
and
two
appointments
by
the
Monroe
County
Commissioners.
O
Thank
you,
council
members
and
Beth
Kate
Corporation
Council
for
the
city
of
Bloomington,
when
we
came
before
Council
earlier
this
year
to
amend
the
Bloomington
municipal
code
and
shift
the
Human
Rights
Commission
from
the
legal
department
to
the
community
and
family
resources
department.
We
indicated,
then
that
we
were
in
negotiations
with
the
county
to
create
a
merged,
City
County,
Human,
Rights
Commission,
to
better
serve
residents
and
to
expand
opportunities
for
public
Outreach
and
education,
and
that
we
would
come
back
here
once
those
negotiations
were
concluded.
O
O
That
are
before
you
tonight
that
are
designed
to
create
and
Empower
and
fund
a
new
Bloomington
Monroe
County
Human
Rights
Commission
director
calendar
Anderson
of
cfrd
and
assistant
City
Attorney
Audrey
birdingham
are
here
at
as
well
Audrey
staffs
the
Bloomington
Human
Rights
Commission
and
we'll
staff
The
Joint
Commission
from
our
office
going
forward
and
we're
all
able
to
answer
your
questions
so
that
you
may
have
I
also
just
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Barbara
McKinney
who's.
Here
in
spirit.
O
She
launched
us
on
this
path
last
year
before
she
left
and
worked
diligently
to
bring
us
to
this
point,
and
I
also
want
to
give
a
shout
out
to
Jeff
Cockrell
over
at
the
county
and
to
our
friends
and
County
government
who
have
been
working
on
this
as
well.
In
fact,
I
got
word
from
Jeff
that
the
County
Commissioners
approved
the
interlocal
and
corresponding
changes
to
their
code.
Excuse
me
to
their
code
today
earlier
today,
so
as
Clark
Bolden
read
resolution
2307,
it's
the
first
item
for
your
consideration
tonight
on
this
effort.
O
It
approves
an
interlocal
agreement
between
the
city
and
the
county
whereby
effectively
the
city
will
staff
The
Joint
Commission
with
the
Hume
human
rights
director
and
human
rights,
Administrative
Assistant
Plus
legal
support
from
Audrey,
as
I
mentioned
from
an
assistant,
City
attorney
The
Joint
Commission,
with
staff
support,
will
investigate
and
resolve
discrimination,
complaints
under
both
city
and
county
codes,
which
are
substantially
the
same.
There
are
a
few
differences
But,
whichever
code
applies
to
a
given
complaint
will
be
used
and
The
Joint
Commission,
with
staff
support
will
conduct
the
public,
Outreach
and
education
efforts.
O
Staff
under
this
agreement
will
provide
an
annual
report
to
the
Commissioners
in
February
of
each
year,
starting
in
2024
on
the
work
of
the
joint
commission
and
the
county
will
pay
half
of
the
salary
and
benefits
of
the
human
rights
director
and
the
human
rights
Administrative
Assistant,
adjusted
for
the
percentage
of
their
time
that
is
dedicated
to
Human
Rights
functions.
So
if
that
position
is
split
with
other
duties,
then
the
county
is
only
paying
for
the
half
of
the
human
rights
function
and
that's
the
formula
that
you
see
in
the
interlocal.
O
The
initial
term
of
this
agreement
is
three
years.
We
really
don't
know
what
the
caseload
of
a
joint
commission
is
going
to
look
like.
We
know
what
the
caseloads
of
the
respective
city
and
county
commissions
look
like
right
now,
but
we
don't
know
what
may
happen,
particularly
with
perhaps
increased
cases
coming
out
of
the
county,
with
increased
educational
efforts
and
things
like
that.
That's
some
of
the
speculation
that
our
County
counterparts
have
been
engaging
in.
O
So
we
made
the
initial
term
three
years
in
order
to
give
us
some
time
to
accrue
some
experience
and
then
go
ahead
and
evaluate
that
experience
and
thereafter
the
interlocal
can
be
renewed
for
five-year
periods
and
we
can
make
whatever
adjustments
we
need.
At
that
point,
as
I
mentioned,
the
County
Commissioners
have
already
approved
at
the
interlocal.
Actually,
the
County
Council
had
already
appropriated
the
35
000
payment
that
you
see
reflected
in
here.
O
That's
effectively
the
amount
for
what
will
be
a
prorated
eight
months
worth
of
joint
commission
function
under
the
formula
that
you
see
so
that
payment
will
be
made
to
the
city
this
year
and
then
going
forward.
It's
as
you
see
in
the
formula
in
the
agreement,
the
interlocal
references
making
Necessary
code
changes
to
reflect
the
combined
Human
Rights
Commission.
That's
the
next
item
on
your
agenda.
After
this
one
and
I'll
be
back
to
discuss
that
and
those
changes.
O
But
in
the
meantime,
I'm
happy
to
answer
any
questions
on
the
resolution
and
the
interlocal
and
I
think
you
got
today
some
a
revised
interlocal
that
reflects
what
were
some
changes
the
county
had
negotiated
with
us.
If
we
had
put
in
there
but
didn't
make
it
to
you
earlier
so
so
that
reflects
just
a
clarification
of
what
the
actual
dollar
payments
would
be
going
forward.
The
county
wanted
those
spelled
out
and
what
happens
if
we
don't
give
them
notice
of
what
the
salary
will
be
in
the
next
year
going
forward.
P
Yes,
thank
you,
Miss
Kate.
Just
on
that
point
about
number
four
in
the
interlocal
agreement
and
I'll
have
some
other
questions
later,
but
on
that
particular
point
that
slightly
revised
I,
don't
understand
why,
if
the
initial
three-year
term
portion
is
30
is
70
percent-
oh
half
the
portion!
Okay,
all
right
now,
I'm
I'm,
just
answering
my
own
question
here,
because
70
plus
35
was
105.
That
was
very
confusing
to
me,
but
you're
saying
it's
half
of
the
70.
it's
half
of.
D
P
Ahead,
please
yeah
I
wanted
to
ask
a
couple
other
questions
if
I
may
and
let
me
find
them
in
my
document
here.
P
D
J
K
Good
evening
again
Council
this
is
Christopher
and
Jeep
from
the
greater
Bloomington
Chamber
of
Commerce,
and
we
are
in
full
support
of
this
agreement
with
the
county.
I
think
this
is
a
great
example
of
collaboration
that
we
have
really
been
pushing
for
some
of
you
attended
our
Better
Together
luncheon.
This
is
the
type
of
area
that
I
think
can
be,
can
create
a
public
that
is
less
cynical
about
government.
There's
a
lot
of
work
and
a
lot
of
collaboration
to
come
with
the
county.
We
have
a
new
Justice
Center
that
needs
to
be
built.
K
We
have
a
Convention
Center
expansion
that
still
is
sort
of
Lost
in
in
limbo,
but
here
we
have
at
least
an
area
where
they
came
together.
My
compliments
to
council
Kate
and
Jeff
Cockrell
for
putting
this
together
and
if
you
notice,
the
the
county
only
has
two
two
members
on
the
seven
member
Council,
so
it's
it
probably
was
some
give
and
take,
and
I
spoke
earlier
today
to
the
Commissioners.
This
is
you
know
this
may
not
be
perfect,
but
you
can't
throw
out
perfect
for
good.
So
this
is.
K
This
is
good
and
a
good
process.
Moving
forward,
I
mean
I've,
seen
some
of
the
awkwardness
in
in
the
kind
of
a
County
City
collaborations
at
NPO
meetings
and
I
think
we
are
at
a
point
where
we
can
turn
the
page
on
that
collaboration
where
we
have
a
collective
and
a
not
adversarial
relationship.
I.
Thank
you
for
your
time
tonight.
J
D
P
Well,
I
would
just
say:
I
agree
with
Mr
mg.
I
think
this
is
a
great
opportunity
for
collaboration
and
especially
given
the
the
duplication
now
in
our
human
rights
ordinances
being
very,
very
similar.
I.
Think
County
government
city
government
agree
on
the
principles
behind
this
and
want
to
prevent
discrimination
in
our
community
and
and
broaden
the
education
on
these
topics.
So
I
think
this
is
a
good
move
and
I
appreciate
those
who
worked
on
it.
A
F
I
P
F
F
P
A
Ordinance
2309
two
men,
Title
II
of
the
Bloomington
Municipal
Code,
entitled
Administration
and
Personnel
regarding
the
creation
of
a
joint
City
County
Human
Rights
Commission.
The
synopsis
is
as
follows:
this
ordinance
approves
of
changes
to
Title,
II,
Administration
and
Personnel
of
the
Bloomington
municipal
code
in
order
to
create
and
Empower
a
joint
Bloomington
Monroe
County
Human
Rights
Commission,
which
will
place
the
city
and
county
individual
rights
commissions.
F
O
You
Beth
K
Corporation,
Council
I
am
back
so
ordinance.
2309
amends
the
code
of
to
reflect
the
creation
of
this
joint
Human
Rights
Commission.
The
changes
to
the
code
are
minimal,
since
the
substance
of
the
work
of
the
commission
will
not
be
changing
really.
As
council
member
Piedmont
Smith
rightly
noted,
the
county
in
the
city
share
the
principles
underlying
the
human
rights
ordinances
they're
substantially
similar
ordinances.
O
So
this
commission
is
a
seven-member
commission,
that's
what
the
city
and
the
county
each
had
going
into
this
joint
effort,
and
we
did
discuss
that
and,
as
the
chamber
noted,
it
remains
a
seven-member
commission,
that's
with
agreement
by
the
city
in
the
county,
but
spreading
the
appointments
across
the
mayor
and
the
common
Council
and
the
County
Commissioners.
O
So
the
mayor
and
the
common
Council
used
to
have
four
and
three
now
they
have
three
and
two
and
the
remaining
two
are
with
the
County
Commissioners,
as
we
were
going
through
and
thinking
about
the
terms
today.
We
realized
that
actually,
a
provision
of
the
Bloomington
Municipal
Code
2.080202
requires
that
for
new
commissions
that
are
created
after
2014
December
2014,
the
enabling
legislation
has
to
provide
for
a
staggering
of
their
terms,
and
that
was
not
covered
in
what
we
had
originally
provided
to
you
as
the
code
changes.
O
O
So
that's
the
nature
of
that
Amendment
other
than
that
I'm
just
happy
to
answer
questions,
and
we
are
are
happy
to
answer
questions
that
the
members
of
the
council
may
have.
D
F
F
2.08.202
of
the
code,
initial
commission
terms
shall
be
staggered
as
fouls
one
mayoral
pointy
Shall
Serve
and
an
initial
term
of
one
year
and
two
mayoral
points:
He
Shall
Serve
in
an
initial
term
of
two
years,
and
one
each
of
common,
Council
and
county
commissioner
pointy
shelter
serve
an
initial
term
of
one
year
and
one
each
Shall
Serve
an
initial
term
of
two
years.
Thereafter,
all
commission
terms
shall
be
for
two
years.
F
D
You
are
there
questions
Miss
Kate.
Did
you
have
anything
additional
on
the
amendment
beyond
what
you've
already
shared
the.
O
Only
thing
I'll
mention
about
the
amendment
is
the
code
provision
that
we
are
complying
with
and
offering.
This
amendment
also
requires
that
the
Staggering
be
spread
as
evenly
as
practicable
among
the
appointed
authorities,
and
so
that's
why
you
see
the
complicated
one
year
two
year
between
all
of
the
appointing
authorities
that
you
do
because
we're
trying
to
make
that
as
even
as
possible
and
retain
a
quorum.
Obviously
for
the
second
year
after
one
year,
appointees
are
are
off
the
commission.
Of
course,
there
would
be
they'd
be
replaced
by
someone
else.
Presumably.
D
D
G
D
P
Yes,
some
of
my
questions
are
not
about
the
changes
they
are
about.
The
ordinance
itself.
I
hope,
that's.
Okay,
I
think
this
is
a
great
opportunity
for
Council
to
actually
read
this
part
of
Municipal
Code
and
better
understand
it.
So
I
was
looking
at
the
definitions
section
and
in
a
couple
places
it
says
that
there's
an
exception
in
those
particular
instances
where
religion,
sex
or
national
origin
is
a
modified
occupational
qualification
reasonably
necessary
to
the
normal
operation
of
that
particular
business
or
Enterprise.
P
Q
Assistant
City,
Attorney,
Audrey
birdingham,
to
be
honest,
I
have
not
seen
that
situation
arise
and
I,
don't
think
I've
seen
anyone
claim
it
thus
far
in
a
similar
situation
in
a
similar
circumstance,
like
the
religious
exception
like
that
that
you
pointed
out,
council
member
I
think
there
could
be
circumstances
that
arise
where
it
might
be
an
important
consideration.
We
haven't
seen
that
happen.
Surely
it
would
be
such
an
incredibly
limited
circumstance
that
I
can't
even
I
can't
think
of
one
right
now
either.
O
I'll
just
add
that
I
think
what
you're
seeing
here
is
long-standing
language
that
tracks
language
that
comes
out
of
federal
law.
That
doesn't
mean
that
it
isn't
worth
revisiting
and
as
far
as
when
sex
or
national
origin
might
be
bona
fide
occupational
qualification
I'm
having
a
hard
time
thinking
of
one
right
now
that
would
be
relevant
in
today
for
sex
in
a
world
in
which
women
are
serving
in
combat
roles.
In
the
military,
for
example,
I
mean
some
of
the
things
that
historically
would
have
been
deemed
a
sex-based
differential
qualification.
O
National
origin
is
not
the
same
as
citizenship.
Sometimes,
citizenship
is
actually
a
requirement
for
certain
types
of
restricted
positions,
but
that's
different
from
national
origin,
so
I
wouldn't
think
of
those
in
the
same
immigration
related
terms,
immigration
law
related
terms.
So
there
you
have
it
old
language
that
continues
to
exist.
I
believe
in
this
way,
in
federal
law
as
well,
so
I
think
that
codes
are
pulling
from
that.
Okay.
D
P
Ahead,
please
so
I
I
think
I.
Well,
okay,
let
me
ask
this
one
first,
so
in
let's
see
it's
Paige
Bona
page
39
of
our
packets,
so
it's
the
powers
and
duties
of
the
commission
number
four.
P
O
Blimey
I
think
it
should
I
think
you're
right
I
think
that
it's
just
an
oversight.
Thank
you
for
catching
that,
and
we
should
fix
that
because
I
looking
at
it
I'm
not
sure
why
it
shouldn't
be
in
violation
of
the
relevant
code,
whichever
that
one
is
Bloomington
or
the
Monroe
County
code.
O
So
so
let
me
I,
don't
know
how
you
want
to
handle
that.
Do
you
want
to?
We
can
offer
an
amendment
on
the
fly
to
that
language
and
I.
Think
the
amendment
I
would
offer
would
be
to
believe
that
discrimination
and
violation
of
I
don't
know
if
we
can
just
say
the
relevant
code
and
refer
back
or
either
the
Bloomington
Municipal,
Code
or
the
county
code.
A
Monroe
County
code
will
work,
but.
J
I
would
suggest
simply
adding
a
language
that
says
whether
probable
cause
exists
to
believe
the
Discrimination
violation
of
the
Bloomington
Municipal
Code
section
2.23.100,
and
following
a
and
the
relevant
portion
of
Monroe
County
code,
it's
rather
than
strike
any
language
just
also
add
a
reference
to
the
relevant
portions
of
Monroe
County
code
I'll
work
on
drafting
that
up
here.
Okay,
thank
you
just
a
moment.
Thank.
P
O
P
O
P
It
was
some
kind
of
legalese
and
then
there's
something
that
I
I
I
think
I
sent
you
an
email
about
earlier
today
and
that's
with
I
think
it's
in
the
definition
section,
with
defining
a
discrimination
on
the
basis
of
sexual
orientation
and
I
was
wondering
if
it
references,
homosexuality,
heterosexuality
bisexuality.
It
does
not
reference
asexuality
and
I
wonder
if
that
is
something
I
mean
we
don't
have
to
do
that
tonight.
Obviously,
but
if
that's
something
that's
ever
been
considered
to
be
added.
P
O
Will
check
my
outbox,
but
I
thought:
okay,
no
I'm
sure
you
have
but
I
I've
been
in
Indianapolis
in
meetings
all
day,
so
I
have
not
seen
it,
but
but
I'll
have
happy
to
take
a
look
and
see
whether
that
suggests
an
any
additional
changes
to
the
code.
Is
that
what
you're
asking.
P
P
Be
considered
for
an
update,
okay,.
D
P
So
then,
duties
upon
finding
of
discrimination-
page
41
number
two:
you
know
the
area
of
housing
or
acquisition
of
real
property.
It
made
me
think
of
discrimination
in
the
the
banking
and
and
mortgage
sector
that
we've
heard
of
here
in
Indiana.
P
You
know
Ohio,
Supreme,
home
appraisals
and
and
issuing
loans
to
purchase
a
home.
That's
an
area
where
discrimination
still
occurs.
Is
there
anything
we
can
do
about
that.
P
It
and
maybe
maybe
I-
didn't
read
the
previous
paragraphs
thoroughly
enough,
but
it
sounds
like
it's
just
in
the
area
of
housing
like
you're,
trying
to
rent
a
place
or
you're
trying
to
buy
a
place.
It's
not
in
the
area
of
banking,
where
you're
trying
to
get
a
loan
in
order
to
buy
the
house
or
would
the
banking
part
be
included
in
this.
O
Well,
I
would
have
to
look
back
at
we
have
some
housing
discrimination,
there's
a
separate
housing
discrimination
provision,
but
in
terms
of
discriminatory
housing
practices,
I
think
it's
the
definition.
There
may
be
what
you
want
to
take
a
look
at,
for
example,
refusing
to
rent
to
an
individual
or
family
on
the
basis,
a
familial
status,
refusing
to
allow
a
tenant
with
a
disability
to
make
reasonable
accommodations
Etc.
O
There
are
various
things
in
there
if
you're
talking
about
financial
practices
redlining
or
things
like
that
in
particular,
if
they,
let's
see
if
they're
not
adequately
covered
in
here,
is
your
question:
can
we
do
something
in
the
code
to
adequately
address
those
I
think
that
would
be
something
for
the
for
the
council
to
consider?
O
If
you
know
we
can
sit
down
and
go
through
this
and
let
you
know
whether
we
think
anything
in
here
adequately
addresses
that
if
it
doesn't
then
I
think
that's
an
issue
that
perhaps
the
council
will
want
to
discuss
further
and
that
we
would
need
to
take
a
look
at
relevant
state
and
federal
law
to
decide
whether
or
not
there
is
any
sort
of
preemptive
quality
to
laws
that
may
address
that
at
another
governmental
level.
That
would
apply
here.
P
D
D
P
All
that's
necessary
yeah
I
mean
it's
just
I
think
it
was
just
an
oversight
that,
since
it's
now
a
joint
City,
County
Commission,
it
needs
to
refer
to
county
code
as
well
as
city
code.
F
D
E
C
A
C
D
And
that
passes
9-0.
Thank
you
so,
which
now
takes
us
to
ordinance
2309
as
adopted
or
excuse
me
as
amended.
Are
there
any
additional
questions?
C
Thank
you.
This
is
the
corporate
Council,
I,
think
or
someone
I'm,
not
so
sure,
but
down
at
the
hate
crime
statistics
and
it
pretty
clearly
states
here
what
hate
crimes
could
include,
but
with
regard
to
collecting
that
data
and
issuing
reports
are
hate
crimes
defined
as
I
know
it's
criminal
in
nature
and
has
to
be
criminal,
but
is
that
a
is
a
conviction
involved?
C
O
My
understanding
council
member
Sims
is
that
a
conviction
is
not
required
for
the
hate
crimes
report
that
the
city
has
been
producing
and
that
this
joint
commission
will
produce
to
be
included
in
that
report.
We
have
incidents
that
are
reported
to
the
commission,
and
then
they
are
reported
in
that
report
and
how
they
are
resolved
is
reported
as
well.
So
I
don't
know
if,
if
director
calendar,
Anderson
or
attorney
vernium
have
anything
to
add
to
that
or
if
we're.
O
Q
Hi
Assistant
Attorney,
Audrey,
birdingham
I
believe
when
it's
self-reported
someone
fills
out
a
form
online
counselor,
that's
called
a
bias
incident
report
and
we
track
that
a
little
bit
separately
from
hate
crimes
where
it's
still
it's
my
understanding
that
hate
crimes
don't
require
conviction
but
I
think
hate
crime.
Data
is
tracked
more
by
law
enforcement.
That's
my
understanding
and
then
we
track
bias
incident
reports
which
are
which
can
be
self-reported.
C
Q
Q
I'm,
not
certain
I
think
that
the
hate
crimes
again
I
believe
that
that's
what
that
hate
to
be
a
hate
crime,
that's
tracked
by
law
enforcement,
so
I
think
they
have
their
own
definition
and
I
am
not
certain
exactly
what
that
is
right
now,
I
could
look
into
that
and
let
you
know,
but
when
we
track
it
ourselves
in
terms
of
someone's
self-reports
online,
we
don't
call
it
a
hate
crime.
We
call
it
a
bias
incident
report.
C
Q
So
I
know
hate
crime.
Data
is
collected
by
many
law
enforcement
agencies
across
the
United
States.
We
collect
bias
incident
reports
within
our
city
and
I.
Think
it's
largely
just
used
by
the
I
mean
we
make
the
the
information
public
I,
don't
know
how
other
agencies
use
it.
I
know
the
Human,
Rights,
Commission
sort
of
looks
at
it
in
terms
of
the
work
that
they're
doing
and
tries
to.
Q
You
know,
compare
see
how
many
people
might
be
actually
reaching
out
to
the
commission
versus
just
filing
an
incident
report
and
and
seeing,
if
there's
a
disconnect
and
where
those
numbers
lie.
That's
where
that's
that's,
how
I
understand
it's
sort
of
looked
at
from
the
Human
Rights
Commission
standpoint,
I'm,
not
sure
how
other
agencies
might
use
that
information,
because
we
do
make
it
public.
Q
O
The
council,
member
Sims,
if
you
look
at
the
hate
incidence
report,
which
is
what
it's
actually
called
out
of
the
Human
Rights
Commission,
the
Bloomington
Human
Rights
Commission
so
far,
but
again
this
would
carry
over
to
the
Joint
Commission.
If
you
look
at
those
effectively
what
they
say
is
they
take
the
reports
from
police
departments
so
from
law
enforcement,
for
example,
things
that
would
constitute
crimes.
Potentially
they
take
reports
of
incidents
from
individuals
from
groups
Etc
and
what
they
do
is
they
compile
those
data
and
then
report
on
them.
They
don't
really
investigate
them.
O
What
they
do
is
they're
reporting
on
those
data
and
I
think
that
it
informs
as
well
the
educational
and
public
Outreach
efforts
that
go
on
with
the
human
rights
director
and
that
the
Commission
participates
in
and
we
would
expect
for
that
to
continue
as
well.
In
other
words,
it's
an
indicator
of
what
may
be
happening
or
people
are
perceiving
and
happening
in
the
jurisdiction
and
what
may
need
some
additional
attention
by
way
of
Outreach
and
education.
So.
D
Seeing
none,
let's
go
to
the
public
for
comment
on
ordinance
2309
as
amended,
is
there
well,
we
take
a
look
here
in
Chambers.
If
there's
anyone
who
would
like
to
offer
comment,
please
approach
the
podium
Mr
Lucas.
Can
you
extend
our
invitation
on
Zoom?
Please.
J
Yes,
if
there
are
any
comments
on
the
ordinance
under
consideration,
please
let
us
know
by
using
the
raise
hand,
feature
which
you
can
find
in
your
control
bar
by
clicking
the
reactions
button
or
the
more
button.
You
can
also
send
a
chat
to
the
meeting
host
to.
Let
us
know
you'd
like
to
speak.
A
L
D
A
P
A
Ordinance
2308
to
amend
the
traffic
calming
and
Greenways
program
Incorporated
by
reference
into
title,
15
vehicles
and
traffic
of
the
Bloomington
municipal
code
regarding
amending
the
traffic
calming
Greenways
program
Incorporated
by
reference
into
Bloomington
Municipal
Code,
section
1526020
the
synopsis
as
follows.
This
ordinance
adopts
an
amended
traffic
calming
and
Greenways
program.
Traffic
calming
and
Greenways
program
sets
the
standard
for
the
prioritization
and
placement
of
neighborhood
traffic
calming
and
related
traffic
control
devices
and
requires
a
consistent
procedure
for
resident-led
and
staff-led
processes.
E
D
M
M
Right,
councilmember
yeah.
Just
to
summarize
the
motivation
for
the
motion
and
some
context,
we
considered
a
previous
numbered
version
of
this
ordinance
late
last
year,
as
council
members
will
recall
and
tabled
until
now
and
prior
to
that,
the
the
bicycle
pedestrian
safety
commission
had
briefly
discussed
I
think
at
one
of
their
meetings.
M
I
thought
it
was
best
to
have
them
formally
consider
and
make
a
recommendation
with
respect
to
the
ordinance
yes
or
no
suggested
changes
that
sort
of
thing
I
reached
out
to
some
Commissioners.
In
anticipation
of
this
motion
and
several
got
back
to
me
and
supported
that
idea
as
well.
M
What
one
word?
No,
it
is
debatable,
but
yeah
the
timing
is
good,
because
the
commission
is
meeting
on
May,
8th
and
I
believe
I,
believe
Council
staff
confirmed
with
Hank
Duncan
the
staff
liaison
that
this
could
be.
They
were
amenable
to
adding
this
to
the
agenda
for
their
Monday
meetings.
So
that's
why
the
motion
to
postpone
is
only
for
one
week
later,
the.
F
Yeah
I
just
would
like
to
say
that
I
don't
have
any
objection
to
the
postponement
for
consideration
by
the
my
commit
safety.
Commission
I
know
that
it
was.
It
was
presented
by
assistant
playing
Transportation
director
rosenbarger
at
a
meeting
in
the
fall
and
I
found
out
rather
late
about
it.
F
It
was
substituted
for
an
item
on
the
agenda
and
as
I,
recall
and
and
and
discussed,
and
I
I
commented
at
that
meeting
in
terms
of
my
intention,
but
I
have
no
problem
with
the
some
further
time
another
week
or
so
for
the
bike
and
pet
safety
commission
to
consider
whether
they
want
to
make
a
commandant.
Thank
you.
M
M
C
C
I
mean
part
of
this
is
so
that
it
can
now
go
to
the
bike
and
bed
to
get
us
a
recommendation.
We've
been
talking
about
this
for
a
while.
What's
taking
it
so
long
to
not
be
on
the
bike
impaired
agenda
months
ago,
so
that
you
know
this,
this
is
going
to
extend
things
and
I'm
okay
with
it,
the
postpost
for
obvious
reasons,
but
we're
talking
about
processes
and
all
these
things
so
I
just
kind
of
want
to
know.
C
M
Just
briefly
suggest
that
we
there's
no
formal
policy
or
practice
that
I'm
aware
of
on
either
the
council
side
or
city
staff
side
of
when
something
goes
through
a
board
of
commission
or
not
I,
sort
of
mentioned
this
in
an
email
to
to
fellow
council
members
that
some
departments
like
planning
a
transportation,
for
instance,
tend
to
take
almost
all
legislation
through
a
border
commission
or
multiple
boards
or
commissions
on
the
way
to
the
council
to
secure
recommendations.
Other
departments
have
not
been
engaged
in
that
practice
as
actively
and
I.
M
Don't
I
think
it's
a
favorable
practice
I
think
it's
something
we
should
work
to
better
Define
and
set
expectations
around
we've,
seen
it
with
council
members
developing
ordinance
as
well
and
taking
it
to
commissions
first
before
coming
here,
but
you
know
to
be
fair
to
the
ordinance
to
sponsor,
while
I
would
suggest
that
go
at
his
initiative
to
the
bike.
Ped
safety.
Commission,
you
know
it's
not
a
formal
requirement
of
any
kind.
Just
something
I
would
like
to
see
so.
I
hope
that
helps
some.
It
could
have
gone
to
the
bike.
M
F
B
Robinson,
director
of
planning
and
Transportation
thank
you,
council,
member
Flaherty
for
explaining
kind
of
General
policy,
most
staff
driven
almost
all
our
staff
driven
ordinances
that
we
bring
before
you.
We
typically
bring
to
plan
Commission
bike,
ped,
commission
traffic
commission
parking
commission,
depending
on
what
the
ordinance
is,
because
this
was
a
ordinance
drafted
by
a
council
member.
That's
something
that
we
didn't
didn't
do.
We
were
notified
of
the
scheduling
of
that
ordinance,
and
so
we
were
here
prepared
tonight
to
respond
to
that.
B
So
we
could
have
probably
scheduled
that
as
a
best
practice
in
the
future.
But
no
we
typically
don't
do
that
because
it
was
a
sponsor
originated
ordinance.
If
you
recall,
when
we
did
the
tro
overlay
for
the
zoning
ordinance,
one
of
the
things
that
I
asked
the
council
to
do
is
pass
a
resolution.
To
give
me
the
the
ability
to
take
your
initiative
to
before
the
plan.
Commission
and
I
do
that
mostly
because
I
want
to
understand
where
the
majority
of
you
stand,
giving
me
direction
to
go
forward.
B
So
in
this
instance,
it
might
be
unique
for
me
to
take
a
legislation
proposal
by
a
council
member
before
a
commission
without
necessarily
having
acknowledgment
that
they
could
or
could
not
attend
without
knowing
the
kind
of
general
direction
of
this
body.
So
you
know
I
think
moving
forward.
We
could
certainly
work
that
out
in
the
future,
but
that's
probably
why
it
wasn't
heard
specifically
at
bicycle:
pedestrian
safety,
Commission
thanks.
G
I
was
just
going
to
say,
I
think
that
this
discussion
sort
of
underscores
the
importance
of
discussing
yet
another
Council
process.
That
I
mean
I
do
believe
that
our
boards
and
commissions
have
been
slightly
under
appreciated
even
by
the
council,
with
respect
to
the
handling
of
legislation.
So
you
know
I
think
it
should
be
a
matter
of
course
that
such
legislation
that
there
were
there's
a
clearly
a
commission,
that's
devoted
to
that
topic
should
be
consulted,
but
I
mean
that's
a
matter
for
the
the
committee
to
to
consider
later,
but
I
support
the
motion.
D
F
G
D
G
E
C
A
C
A
Ordinance
2310
to
amend
Title
20,
unified
development,
ordinance
of
the
Bloomington
municipal
code
regarding
amendments
and
updates
set
forth
in
Bloomington
municipal
code,
20.03
and
20.04.
The
synopsis
is
as
follows.
This
petition
contains
amendments
in
Chapter,
3
of
the
Udo
related
to
chicken
flocks
and
chapter
4
of
the
Udo
related
to
maximum
parking
standards.
D
Thank
you
and
we
will
take
that
up
next
at
our
regular
session
on
May
10th
10th
10th.
Okay,
great,
thank
you.
That
brings
us
to
our
second
of
two
periods
of
public
comment.
If
there
is
anyone
in
council
chambers
who
would
like
to
offer
comment,
if
you
would
please
approach
the
podium
Mr
Lucas,
can
you
extend
our
invitation
on
Zoom?
Please.
J
Yes,
if
there
are
members
of
the
public
who
have
not
already
spoken
earlier,
that
would
like
to
comment
now.
Please
let
us
know
by
using
the
raise
hand,
feature
in
Zoom.
You
can
find
that
in
your
control
bar
under
the
reactions,
tab
or
the
more
tab,
you
can
also
send
a
chat
to
the
meeting
host
to.
Let
us
know
you'd
like
to
speak.
D
N
N
I'm,
a
student
I've
lived
in
Bloomington
for
almost
10
years
and
I'm
a
current
commissioner
on
the
bike
and
pedestrian
safety
Commission
and,
as
we
consider
the
effects
of
ordinance
23-08,
which
would
require
the
action
of
counsel
on
each
traffic
calming
and
Greenway
project,
no
matter
how
small
it's
worth
observing
how
this
legislation
has
acted.
Thus
far,
the
predecessor
of
23-08
was
22-3-5,
which
did
not
make
it
out
of
2022
due
to.
N
N
I
had
other
points
for
whenever
it
is
discussed,
but
I
just
hope
to
add
some
points
regarding
that
tonight.
Is
that
not.
N
D
I
would
suggest
offering
comments,
then,
when
we
take
that
item
up
so
public
comment
is
intended
for
items
that
are
nowhere
on
the
agenda.
Oh
that's
evening,
so
all
right!
Sorry
for
that
confusion,
Madam.
G
Anticipation
of
next
week,
which
is
a
comment.