►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
All
right
I'd
like
to
call
to
order
this
meeting
of
the
city
council,
land
use.
A
B
Estheticians
for
the
property
located
at
the
intersection
of
east
third
and
state
road,
446.
B
And
pud
21,
which
is
the
baker
stevens
pd?
The
portion
of
these
beauties.
B
B
It
uses
to
the
on
the
remaining
portion
of
pud
21
to
the
west,
so
the
petitioner's.
B
Just
a
little
bit
of
background
on
the
site,
central
village
was
originally
proposed
in
1975.
B
The
baker
stevens
pud
was
approved
in
1984
and
remained
largely
unchanged,
allowing
for
limited.
B
Commercial
uses,
including
office
and
retail,
and
a
restaurant.
The
comprehensive
plan.
B
Has
identified
the
petition
site
as
two
future
land
use
areas?
The
comprehensive
plan
is
aware.
B
B
B
B
So
site
plans
are
not
required
as
part
of
zoning
map
amendments.
However,
the
petitioner.
B
Five
total
buildings,
three
residential
with
one
mixed
use
along
third
on
the
north
portion
of.
B
The
property
there
and
one
self-service
storage
area
on
the
south-
you
can
see
it
there,
the.
B
Third
and
then
here's
the
conceptual
elevation
for
a
self-service
storage
use
which
would
be
on.
B
The
southern
portion,
in
conclusion,
the
portions
of
the
pudu
that
were
proposed
to
be
rezoned.
B
Were
largely
undeveloped
since
1975,
with
the
exception
of
some
surface
level,
parking
areas.
B
B
B
B
Two
baker,
stevens
and
century
village
and
rezoned
to
those
two
base:
zoning
districts.
B
B
Recommendation
with
one
condition
which
would
seek
to
preserve
the
existing
tree
preservation.
B
C
C
Thank
you
for
seeing
the
hand
up
mike
carmen
for
the
petitioner.
The
petitioner
is
bill,
brown.
C
C
C
And
then
the
staff
initiated
this
project
to
try
to
take
a
hard
look
at
all
the.
C
Pds
throughout
the
city
and
rezone
all
of
them.
This
surfaced
for
us
quickly
to
to
do
that
and.
C
C
C
Understand
doing
that
and
think
that's
appropriate
here,
while
ryan
commented,
the
site
plans
are.
C
C
C
C
C
C
A
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
carmen.
Are
there
any
questions
either
for
mr
robling.
A
Or
for
mr
carmen
from
committee
members.
A
Yes,
councilmember
flaherty
sure
thank
you
for
the
presentation
and
for
the
statement.
D
From
petitioner,
I
was
reviewing
the
mixed
use
corridor:
zoning
in
the
udo
ahead
of
time.
D
D
The
effort
to
move
towards
a
more
urban
mixed-use
district
here
encourages
that
type
of.
D
Orientation
with
the
street,
can
you
speak
to
that
anymore
about
what's
required
in
the
in
the.
D
District
sure
so
yeah,
so
the
mc
district
has
a
front
building
setback
minimum
of
15
feet
so.
B
D
D
Less
dictates
that
the
building
will
be
oriented
sort
of
building.
First
to
the.
D
A
Council,
member
of
olin,
please
go
ahead.
Thank
you.
First,
a
general
question
from
mr
robling.
Is
it.
E
The
department's
intent
to
eliminate
all
puds
from
the
city,
no,
not
all
peds,
there
are.
B
B
To
retire
puds
they're
not
supposed
to
exist
in
perpetuity
necessarily
that's
not.
E
B
There
is
a
hundred
that
are
expected
to
be
converted
to
base
zoning
districts.
E
B
F
Manager,
that
is
on
the-
if
you
go
to
the
website
for
the
plan,
there
is
information
there
about
the.
F
Exact
numbers
just
fyi,
and
to
just
to
back
up
what
ryan's
saying
has
been
in
the
code
for.
F
A
very
long
time
that
planning
transportation
with
council
should
be
reviewing
puds
as
they're.
E
E
Cities
enforce
their
their
code
with
differing
degrees
of
fervor,
depending
on
what
part
of
the.
E
F
Where
those
that
have
should
have
been
expired,
you
know
20
30
years
ago,
do
have
base
districts.
F
Instead,
okay,
so
is
the
corner
property
here,
the
actual
corner,
where
buildings
and
the
parking.
E
Lot
currently
are:
is
that
also
a
pud,
the
yes,
that's
p
to
the
north
and
east?
That
is.
B
However,
it
is
expected
to
be
under
review
in
the
upcoming
pud
exploration.
You
expect.
E
To
see
the
century
village
pud
itself
converted
to
base
zoning,
yes,
is
it
not
owned
by
mr
brown.
C
Not
all
of
it
steve,
there's
one
use
in
there
an
office
building.
That's
the
wbw
radio
stations.
C
C
On
it
right-
and
we
I
personally
contacted
them
about
joining
in
this
pud
this.
This.
C
C
Not
willing
to
voluntarily
step
up
to
rezone
permitted
use
to
a
conditional
use,
not
knowing.
C
C
Part
of
it
you
you've
hit
on
a
subject.
That's
very
interesting
to
me,
mr
carmen,
so.
B
I
have
a
communication
with
linda
thompson
and
senior
environmental
planner
that
they.
B
B
Suspect
they'll
have
further
comment,
but
we
did
it
make
sure
to
include
that
a
tree
preservation.
B
B
A
Sound
management
llc
with
some
concerns
about
their
radio
tower,
perhaps
not
being
allowed.
C
E
I
do
I've
got
a
couple
of
things
here.
Let's
start
with
the
tower,
mr
robling.
E
Cannot
be
part
of
this
district
that
you
want
to
rezone
it
to
so
it's
not
that
they
can't.
B
They're,
just
conditional
they're
not
by
right
permitted
in
the
allowed
use
table
so.
B
E
E
Regardless
of
what
the
council
decides
overall
or
the
plant
commission
on
this,
it
doesn't.
E
E
Do
you
see
what
I
mean?
No,
I
do
understand
the
question.
I
don't
know
that.
Unfortunately,
I'm
the.
B
Best
suited
to
answer
that,
if
jackie
is
still
on
the
line
she
might
be
better
suited.
I
am
here.
E
Wants
to
answer,
but
mike
ricker
that
I
mean
you're
talking
about
in
a
rezone
putting
a.
F
F
E
Railroad
tracks
they're,
you
know
very
difficult,
so
we
can
talk
to
mr
ricker
about
that
tomorrow.
D
My
sort
of
assumption
was
because
we
have
pre-existing
non-conforming
uses
such
as.
D
Duplexes,
for
instance,
in
in
currently
current
residential
zones
that
only
have
detached
single.
D
D
Uses,
or
in
this
case,
conditional
that
that
wouldn't
affect
the
current
operation
of
a
tower.
D
How
current
existing
uses
may
be
treated
if
that
use
is
conditional
under
under
under
the.
D
B
They
would
be
lawful
non-conforming.
The
issue
would
be
if
there
they
would
need
to
modify.
B
B
D
A
Additional
questions,
and
then
we
also
have
an
amendment
we
need
to
get
to
at
some
point.
Council.
E
And
one
of
the
things
that
I
see
is
sort
of
a
relative
lack
of
integration.
E
E
Or
the
petitioner's
thoughts
on
if
these
were
a
unified
parcel,
how
would
these
designs
change
the.
C
C
C
E
C
There
the
develop
the
existing
devel
property
on
the
east
side
of
this,
where
the
century
suites.
C
C
C
C
C
F
F
List
to
ask
mr
brooker,
but
it
may
be
something
we
need
to
talk
to
with
council
council
about
too.
G
Parcel,
depending
on
the
specifics
of
what
you
are
wanting
to
require,
it
may
take
some
further.
G
The
the
landowner
to
make
that
that
may
affect
whether
they
want
to
go
forward
with
the
rezone.
G
I
I
would
suggest
that
you
get
in
contact
with
with
council
office.
E
A
C
C
To
over
446
the,
but
that's
is
just
one
of
the
options:
how
to
properly
develop
a
property.
C
We
know
I
know
that
the
the
likely
developer
is
aware
of
the
transportation
plan,
which
calls.
C
C
Fully
developed
as
a
public,
road
or
or
just
an
interior
connecting
road
for
the
development.
C
Is
not
yet
determined
and
that's
going
to
be
an
issue
to
resolve
with
the
planning
department.
A
Taken
up
it
just
makes
sense,
rather
than
to
have
two
parallel
drives.
You
know
10
feet
apart.
F
Know
as
you
as
you
said,
we
did
discuss
having
them
be
shared
and
then
the
last
petition.
F
Came
through,
which
I
think
would
be
ideal,
and
so
we
would
try
to
work
with
a
development.
A
A
Watch
for
that
with
the
site
plan
development.
Are
there
other
questions
from
council
members.
A
Council
member
flaherty
yeah
could
staff
speak
with
any
more
specificity
to
the
site
plan
review.
D
D
For
review
walk
me
through
that
a
little
bit,
if
you
don't
mind
sure
so,
with
a
site
plan.
If.
B
With
the
subdivision
that
that
trigger
is
comes
into
play,
so
they
are
proposing
to
do.
B
Compliant
with
the
two
proposed
plan
roadways
that
mr
harmon
talked
about
connecting.
B
Morningside
and
the
property
to
the
west,
so
those
will
come
in
they
plan
commission
could
to.
B
D
And,
do
you
mean
an
anticipated
future
subdivision
or
are
you
considering?
Is
this.
B
No,
this
is
not
the
trigger
the
the
petitioner
has
a
a
follow-up
petition
for
both
the.
B
Site
future
site
plan
and
for
a
subdivision,
so
they've
already
started
the
process
a
little
bit.
D
Okay
and
since
since
we're
breaking
up
a
pud
potentially,
is
it
all
one
lot.
D
Right
now,
like
vibra
or
two,
I
guess
so
is
the
sub.
Is
the
subdivision
of
lots.
B
This
could
be
developed
without
a
subdivision
if
that's
what
they
wanted
to
do.
Yeah
the.
B
The
five
parcels
are
already
existing
and
they
already
exist
on
their
own
got
it
thanks.
A
Council,
member
of
olin
yeah,
I
guess
I
wanted
to
hear
from
the
petitioners
like
how
they.
E
Years
ago,
the
century
village
proposal
from
two
years
ago
is
there
anyone
who
can
speak
to.
C
Builder
of
student
housing,
university
student
housing,
that's
the
project!
You
had.
C
C
C
The
potential
development
there
and-
and
that's
that's
just
not
on
the
table
with
this
development.
E
Was
the
the
alignment
with
morningside
drive
the
continuation
of
it
south
into
the
project.
E
How
you
you
came
to
sketch
that
that
way
like
is
there?
Was
there
no
way
to
put
parking
around.
E
The
storage
building
so
that
you
could
make
parallel
some
more
parallel
or
angled
parking.
C
C
C
Parking
space,
you
count,
those
you
don't
see,
find
your
your
required
parking
in
the
tree.
Islands.
E
Okay,
yeah,
I
mean
I'm
also
curious.
Now
as
to
I
mean
the
thing
is
that.
E
Proposal
is
related,
I
mean
the
corner
of
third
and
446
is
crying
for
development
and
I
wonder
if.
E
Against
third
street,
but
if
this
other
property-
I
don't
know,
maybe
it's
premature
to.
E
Think
about
I
just
and
let
me
let
me
clarify
I'm
saying
I
didn't
say
this
before,
because
I'm.
C
C
I
mean
I
see,
I
have
a
map
in
front
of
me.
I
just
can
you
describe
where
the
tower
is.
C
C
C
C
I'll
pull
that
up.
You
can
see
the
outline
of
it
right
there
that
see
that
tiny
little.
C
C
C
E
A
We
have
about
22
minutes
left
and
I
do
want
to
give
the
public
an
opportunity
to
weigh
in.
A
E
Okay,
this
is
a
I
gotta
find
it
on
my
screen
here.
This
is.
E
Parcels
that
don't
have
addresses
because
they're
sort
of
buried
in
the
in
the
deep
of.
E
Of
these
properties,
so
it
also
corrects
the
street
address
of
parcel
one
which
was
mistakenly.
E
Put
down
as
310
instead
of
300
south
state
road
446.,
so
it's
pretty
much
housekeeping,
but
I'm.
E
I'm
also
pretty
sure
that
it
meets
with
the
satisfaction
of
petitioner
and
staff
as
well.
A
All
right,
thank
you,
mr
roebling
is
the
staff
in
agreement
with
this
amendment.
G
A
All
right,
let's
go
back
to
the
committee
on
the
amendment,
does.
A
All
right,
so,
let's
take
a
straw
poll
vote
on
the
do
pass
recommendation
council,
member
bowling.
A
On
the
rezoned
petition
for
part
of
century
village
and
the
baker
stevens
pud
to
be
rezoned
to.
G
D
In
our
my
most
recent
questions
to
mr
robling,
we
got
a
little
bit.
I
got
a.
D
Little
bit
lost
in
the
discussion
of
whether
a
subdivision
of
the
property
was
expected
or
not.
D
B
Is
required,
I
do
believe
you
could
seek
a
deviation
or
variance
from
that.
F
Our
processes
for
subdivision
control
waivers,
but
I
think
that
would
be
difficult
if
possible,.
A
Thanks
well
then,
I'd
like
to
follow
up
with
mr
carmen.
Is
it
do
you
do
you
know
whether.
C
Ryan
was
referring
to
is
that
mr
brown,
who
owns
the
other
parcels
in
this
pud
that
are.
C
Going
to
be
come
up
next,
with
the
statistician
we've
been
looking
at
a
reply
to
that
amended
plat.
A
On
on
the
corner
of
446
and
east
third-
that's
not
part
of
this.
Oh
sorry,
just
to
clarify
mike
you.
C
A
So
then,
a
follow-up
from
mr
roblink.
So
would
that
since
it's
just
the
corner
property,
then,
where.
B
I've
seen
so
far,
it
would
be
because
it
actually
does
touch
in
that
area.
It's
not
on
these.
B
A
A
Pud,
that's
not
part
of
this
free
zone
that
what
was
shown
would
impact
all
of
them.
D
Sure,
thanks,
I
don't
have
much.
I
think,
we've
seen
a
few
rezones
recently
that
are.
D
Fairly
in
line
with
what's
kind
of
coming
down
the
pike
anyway,
with
the
udo
proposed
map.
D
D
As
well
as
the
sort
of
street
orientation
of
of
the
buildings
to
to
help
this
move
into
a
more.
D
And
the
answers
to
questions
tonight,
I'm
happy
to
consider
a
dupas
recommendation.
A
Say
is
exactly
what
councilmember
flaherty
said,
so
I
I
won't
repeat
it
councilmember
vollen.
E
Yeah,
well,
I
think
this
is
interesting
yeah.
I
can't
help
but
compare
it
to
what
came
before.
E
Us
two
years
ago,
since
it's
it
was
a
subject
of
much
contention,
but
then
it
was
proposing.
E
Much
heavier
use
of
the
property
than
what's
being
discussed
here.
You
know
just
the
idea
that
it's.
E
One
and
two
bedroom
units
is
far
cry
from
the
student
housing
that
was
proposed
before,
on
the.
E
E
I
agree
with
the
characterization
of
it
as
an
urban
corridor.
I
you
know,
I
am
sort
of.
E
And
third
street
so,
like
I'm
very
interested
in
the
petitioner's
plans,
for
I
mean
I
think,
an.
E
So
you
know
I'd
like
to
know
more
about
that.
I'd,
like
some
more
clarity
about.
E
You
know
what
and
when
any
requirements
can
be
made
for
connectivity.
I
mean
I
don't
want
to
see.
E
And
so
I'm
a
bit
ambivalent
about
passing
it
on
until
I
know
more,
but
I'm
not
sure
that.
E
It's
something
we
couldn't
find
out.
You
know
I
mean
I
I'm
reluctant
to
pass
it
on,
but
I'm.
E
Not
sure
I
think
it
may
be
moot,
I
just
don't
know
I
just
don't
know
so.
I
I
have
to
just
express.
E
E
Be
developed
in
a
way
that
is
sort
of
consistent
with
today's
standards.
That
will
be
denser.
E
So
I
just
have
to
say
I'm
ambivalent,.
E
And
I
you
know,
I
wish
we
had
more
answers
and
I
don't
know
what
we
should
do
about
it.
So.
A
All
right,
well,
I
will
just
add
that
I
wish
our
society
had
less
need
for
self
storage,
because
I.
A
Agreed
on
this
petition
with
what
council
member
flaherty
said,
the
environmental
protection.
A
For
the
trees
and
the
the
building
forward,
design
councilmember
golan
also
mentioned.
E
I
just
want
to
say
I'm
not
going
to
oppose
moving
it
to
the
full
council.
I
would
it's
against
my.
E
Better
judgment,
but
with
counselor
rosenberger
not
being
here,
I'm
not
going
to
oppose
it.
A
A
A
All
right,
you
can
arrange
that
all
right,
so
we
do
have
on
the
same
zoom
link.
We
have.
A
But
I
think
that's
it
for
land
use
committee
tonight,
we'll
of
course
also
pass
forward.
The.