►
Description
Bloomington Historic Preservation Commission Documents:
https://bloomington.in.gov/boards/historic-preservation/meetings
A
B
C
D
E
F
C
A
Approval
minutes
the
we
had
a,
we
had
a
Sam,
you
approved
it
and.
A
Yeah,
it
could
be
yes,
so
we
have
removal
for
to
approve
minutes.
Sam
second,
is
that
right.
I
first
did
reversed
it
second,
so
we
need
you
to
do
the
Roll
Call.
A
A
Right
great,
thank
you,
Dee
all
right.
Let's
move
to
a
student
certificates
of
appropriateness
staff
review,
which
is
going
to
be
Gloria
so.
C
We
had
one
staff
review
case
at
1205,
South
Rogers
Street.
This
is
a
non-contributing
in
the
McDonald
historic
district.
The
petitioner
requested
new
Windows
Doors
and
siding
staff
comments.
The
the
following.
The
proposed
doors
and
windows
complied
with
the
acceptable
threshold
within
the
guidelines
and
the
petitioner
acquiesce
to
using
horizontal
siding
in
order
to
comply
as
well.
C
The
petitioner
originally
wanted
vertical
siding
and
staff
was
not
going
to
approve
that,
but
would
let
him
allow
him
to
bring
it
to
the
HPC,
but
instead
he
might
went
ahead
and
modified
his
application
to
include
cement
board
horizontal
cement
board
siding
so
the
photo
of
the
structure
how
it
is
now
and
some
of
the
materials
that
are
being
proposed
at
me,
make
this
small,
okay,
so
yeah.
That's
it
for
staff
approvals.
A
All
right,
thank
you.
Gloria,
okay,
we're
gonna,
move
on
to
COA
23-48,
so.
C
We're
reversing
the
order
of
it.
However,
let
me
see
is.
C
Is
John
McDowell
or
Pat
online?
If
not
I'll
skip
them
if
they're,
not
online,
yeah
I,
don't
see
them
yet
so
I
went
ahead
and
reverted
and
put
all
this
all
the
very
small
projects
in
front
to
get
through
them
quicker
and
I
had
put
516
East
a
West
3rd
Street,
because
the
petitioners
are
in
a
different
time
zone
and
have
limited
access
to
the
internet.
But
if
they're,
not
here
they're,
not
here
so.
A
We'll
postpone
them
and
see
if
they
join
us
here
shortly.
Let's
move
on
to
COA
23-44
301
North,
Morton
Street.
C
C
C
C
However,
one
of
the
signs
is
proposed
to
hang
from
the
awning,
which
is
inappropriate
for
the
historic
structure.
However,
the
sign
could
be
placed
on
the
wall
as
long
as
it
does
not
cover
windows
or
other
historical
detailing.
Therefore,
staff
recommends
conditional
approval
of
COA
23-44,
with
a
caveat
that
all
four
signs
be
placed
against
the
wall
without
covering
windows
or
architectural
details
or
hanging
from
the
awning,
so
basically
from
the
canopy.
So
this
is
the
location.
We
all
know
this
building
and
walk
past
it.
C
It's
going
to
be
given
a
new
life
as
as
in
retail,
and
so
the
proposed
signs,
with
the
yellow
back
and
the
black
look
very
much
like
the
existing.
The
frame
and
everything
emulate
the
existing
historic
railroad
signs,
without
imitating
them
too
closely.
However,
this
one
rag
stock
sign
that
you
see
that's
hanging
is
staff
recommend
that
it
be
placed
against
the
wall
and
not
be
just
clipped
there
hanging,
because
it
just
breaks
with
the
flow
of
the
historic
structure
so
yeah,
and
with
that
I
leave
it
to
you.
A
All
right
thanks,
Gloria
Bruce,
do
you
have
anything
to
add.
H
No,
the
picture
you
have
is
the
I
think
I
adjusted
that
sign
that
was
hanging
there
and
was
showing
that
on
the
wall.
But
that's
that's
not
a
problem.
There's
space
up
there
for
what
we
want
to
do.
Okay,.
F
Let's
see
so,
the
signs
are
aluminum
with
a
wood
frame
and
vinyl
letters.
What's
the
back
of
the
sign,
especially
if
you
were
planning
to
hang
it
from
the
awning?
Would
that
be
an
additional
sign
facing
the
other
way
or
what's
the
back
surface
of
that
look
like.
H
No,
it
would
just
be
the
back
of
the
aluminum
is
white,
and
then
the
frame
that
we're
going
to
build
around
it
would
be
black,
like,
like
Gloria,
said
to,
for
example,
the
existing
sign.
That's
on
the
south
end
of
the
building,
but
they'll
all
be
now
with
the
change.
Everything
will
be
back
up
against
the
building,
so
you
won't
see
the
back
of
any
sign.
F
F
H
Thought
I
resubmitted
that,
but
it's
going
to
go
up
above
the
a
little
bit
of
a
roof.
That's
over
that
East
Elevation,
where
the
sign,
if
you
have
the
picture
that
shows
the
sign
in
handy,
it's
going
to
go
above
that
roof
on
that
elevation,
so
it'll
be
on
the
wall,
just
like
the
others
of.
H
C
F
F
H
If
it's
going
to
go
above,
it's
going
to
be
on
the
East
Elevation,
if
you
are,
are
you
looking
at
a
drawing
that
shows
the
sign
the.
A
I
H
J
H
Yeah,
that's
that's
a
printed
that
will
change
and
it's
going
to
be
beside
the
window.
It'll
be
a
framed
piece
as
well,
but
it'll
just
have
a
printed
graphic
inside
that
black
frame
in
all
of
that
conforms
within
the
allotted
square
footage
by
city
planning
for
the
sign
code.
H
E
J
J
E
J
C
You
I
never
received
I
have
an
email
where
you
stated
that
you
were
going
to
be
back
in
front
of
us,
but
I
actually
don't
have
give.
C
I
have
okay,
the
last
email
was
about
resubmitting
and
that
there
were
no
changes
and
looking
for
earlier.
C
C
Any
I
have
an
email
where
you
said
where
you
stated
looks
like
the
project
is
back
on
what
is
the
next
meeting
day
and
there
are
no
changes
from
what
was
submitted
earlier.
H
And
do
you
have
that
drawing
because
I
think
I,
if
I
I
mean
I'm
sure
I
sent
it
because
I
thought
I'd
talk
to
you?
Possibly
somebody
said
that
the
one
hanging
on
the
canopy
was
probably
not
going
to
be
allowed.
I
made
a
change
and
resent
it
so
yeah
I
mean
it
could
possibly
have
been
deleted,
but
that,
whatever
day
I
talked
to
and
I
thought
it
was
you
Gloria,
but
I.
Wouldn't
you
know
I
can't
swear
with
that,
but
whoever
I
talked
to
that
said
it
would
not
be
allowed
hanging.
H
I'll
see
if
I
can
get
it
I'm,
not
sure
if
I
can
or
not
the
problem
is
these
guys,
certainly
don't
want
to
wait
another
month
and
I,
don't
know
any
way
around
that
I
can
look
and
see,
and
I
could
also
just
send
it
to
you
first
thing
in
the
morning,
but
if
the
only
change
that
you
have
over
the
drawing
that
you
started
with
is
just
that
one
sign
is
on
the
wall
above
the
canopy
and
then
we'll
omit
the
one,
the
one
with
the
graphic,
the
small
one.
E
C
C
Were
proven
based
on
their
oudo
plant
city,
planner
staff
is
here
he
can
respond
to
that.
C
So
I
mean
it's
it's
kind
of
like
a
Band-Aid,
but
a
lot
of
companies
have
done
it
when
they're
opening,
but
yeah
like
the
first
option
might
be
reasonable.
Would
you
yeah?
This
is
a
second
option
in
case
you
wanted
to
explore
that.
Well,.
H
H
It's
it's
up
above
under
the
the
second
floor,
Windows.
A
H
Yeah,
it's
a
it's
a
30,
it's
what
they're
allowed!
What
city
planning
allows
is
100.
It
would
be
100
square
feet
of
signage
because
there's
two
elevations
on
public
rightways,
so
the
three
signs
and
that
the
signs
are
25
square
feet
each
so
we're
essentially
using
75
square
feet
of
the
hundred
allotted
to
us.
Each
side
would
have
a
25
square
foot
sign
and
if
we
could
at
least
approve
the
west
and
south
side,
they
could
they
could
be
up
and
running.
H
And
then
next
month
we
could
I
will
resend
that
picture
again
of
the
one
on
the
east
side,
and
we
can
approve
that
at
the
next
meeting,
because
they've
waited
a
month
since
because
that
last
meeting
was
canceled
and
then
after
that
yeah
and
then,
after
that
the
sale
fell
through.
But
now
it
was
back
on.
So
that's
why
we're
here
yeah.
A
H
Because
the
freight
sign
is
at
the
lobby
the
or
the
little
parapet
wall
that
comes
out
wherever
they
would
refer
to
that
right.
So
it'll
be
above
that,
so
that
sign
is
25
square
feet.
Identical
on
the
west
side
is
25
square
feet.
If
we
could
get
those
approved,
then
waiting
to
get
the
one
on
the
east
side
would
be
a
minimal
issue,
because
they'd
have
two
on
the
two
busiest
streets.
They'd
have
those
two
and
they
could
get
get.
We
could
get
those
into
production.
A
Okay,
thanks
Bruce
yeah
questions,
I
left
off
with
them,
Elizabeth
Duncan.
A
Okay,
I
think
I.
Think
I've
asked
my
questions.
Sam,
do
you
have
any
other
questions?
I,
don't
have
questions
or
comments
all
right.
Let's
move
the
comments
and
Sam.
F
I
I
don't
feel
we
can
move
forward
with
this
I
don't
feel
we
know
where
the
signs
are
I,
don't
feel
we
know
what
the
times
look
like.
I
know.
We
know
the
size
of
the
materials
of
them,
but
reading
the
graphics
is
impossible.
It
would
be
good
for
the
next
submission
to
have
the
drawing
labeled.
F
So
you
know
that
especially
it's
I
think
this
is
the
South
elevation
over
on
the
right
hand,
corner
I
did
a
front
on
elevation
photo
of
whatever
you're
going
to
do
there,
because
that
one
in
particular
is
egregiously
difficult
to
read.
I
guess.
The
only
other
comment
is
that
I
I
don't
agree
with
staffs
assertion
that
awning
signs
are
inappropriate
on
this
building.
If
you
look
back
at
railroad,
you
know
historic
railroad
structures,
they
have
signs
in
weird
places.
F
They've
got
them
like
where,
where
the
petitioner
is
going
to
put
them,
but
they
also
have
them
mounted
above
the
gutters
as
like
fin
signs,
they
have
them
hanging
from
awnings,
it's
more
rare,
but
that
does
happen
and
it's
you
know
it
was
in
large
part
so
that
you
know
people
coming
in
on
the
train.
They
were
big
enough
and
the
the
font
was
big
enough,
so
they
could
read
it
at
speed.
So
I
would
not
actually
have
an
issue
with
the
awning
sign
it,
provided
that
it
was
hung
more
in
a
manner.
That's.
F
G
More
and
more
of
that
sort
of
time
to
say
that
I
don't
think
I
have
enough
information
about
water
signs
are
going
to
look
like
to
make
a
decision.
So
thank.
A
You
Elizabeth
comments:
Duncan.
J
H
H
J
So
to
resume
my
comment:
I,
don't
think
this
is
if
it
has
been
thought
through
to
the
satisfaction
of
the
clan
it
hasn't
been,
it
hasn't
been
presented
as
if
it
were
so,
we
need
to
be
able
to
see
not
only
the
sign
and
its
content
and
its
color
and
its
scale
to
the
building
which
this
doesn't
appear
to
be
in
scale
and
and
then
be
able
to
see
the
location
which
is
the
way
we
do
all
our
signage
and
I'm.
J
Sorry
that
we're
stuck
on
this,
because
it
should
be
something
that's
very
perfunctory,
but
in
this
case
it
just
it's
just
it's
impossible
for
us
to
evaluate
it
and
then
the
confusion
with
the
face
image
or
whatever
it's
described
as
in
the
window.
Just
add
it
to
the
to
my
confusion
anyway.
So
I
would
like
to
see.
I
I
would
like
to
see
something
done
to
expedite
their
ability
to
move
the
business
in,
but
I'm
not
satisfied
that
we
have
a
reliable
graphic
to
vote
on.
A
I,
don't
have
any
additional
comments
other
than
other
than
if
we
could
get
you
approved
for
something
temporary
and
you
come
back
to
to
our
next
meeting
with
a
better
go
to
photographs
and
better
graphics.
So
we
can
understand
what
your
your
total
plan
is.
Okay,
so
I
need
a
motion.
C
What's
the
clock
on
this
one
Gloria
give
me
one.
Second,
I
can
go
that
for
you.
F
Okay,
thank
you.
I'm
gonna
move
to
continue
this
one.
E
A
Right,
Bruce
we're
going
to
continue
to
the
next
meeting
in
gory
I'll
work
with
you
about
a
temporary
sign,
so
you
guys
can
get
open.
A
A
C
H
A
favor
since
the
last
meeting
was
canceled
and
then
this
one
you
can't
find
a
picture.
Is
there
any
way
because
they
are
gonna,
they
may
pull
up
pull
the
plug
on
the
thing,
because
he
was
Furious
that
the
first
meeting
was
canceled.
H
F
A
Okay,
we'll
we'll
put
you
on
our
next
agenda,
which
our
next
meeting,
which
will
be
the
27th
okay,.
A
H
A
H
So
yeah
I'll
I'll
have
it
again
in
the
morning
and
I'll.
Let
my
customer
know
it's
another
30
days,
but.
A
A
What
is
that?
One.
C
No
they're
not.
G
C
I
I
A
C
So
COA
23-46
the
petitioner
Leslie
parishes,
requesting
for
new
railings
on
the
back
deck
of
the
house.
C
623
South
Woodlawn
Avenue,
a
notable
structure
in
the
elm
Heights
Historic
District
staff
comments
that
the
materials
are
considered
appropriate
for
the
historic
district.
However,
the
railing
design
does
not
reflect
the
building's
style
or
design
the.
However,
the
materials
do
face
the
back
of
the
building,
even
though
the
back
of
the
building
also
faces
a
public
alley.
The
previous
railing
was
not
historic,
and
this
is
located
over
a
more
recent
double
garage.
So
there's
points
in
favor
and
against
the
style
is
not
really
very
congruent
with
the
historic
district.
C
However,
due
to
its
sort
of
secondary
facade
or
tertiary
facade,
one
can
even
argue,
staff
does
recommend
approval
for
23-46.
However,
staff
also
understands
if
the
commission
doesn't
see
it
that
way,
staff
did
send
the
application
into
the
Heights
historic
district
construction
subcommittee,
and
at
least
one
of
the
members
also
saw
it
so
I
sent
it
to
them
twice,
and
at
least
one
of
them
saw
it.
However,
I
didn't
receive
any
comments
of
in
favor
or
against
this
project.
C
So
this
is
the
proposed
material
and
design,
and
it's
to
change
the
railing
on
the
upstairs
deck
previous
rain
railing
consisted
of
wood
posts
and
iron
rail
rails.
This
would
also
be
a
six
foot
tall,
six
foot
tall
railing,
so
it's
more
like
a
privacy
fence
on
the
second
floor,
and
this
is
the
site.
This
is
a
location,
it
would
be
towards
the
back
towards
the
east
and
the
deck
is
towards
the
back.
So
there
are
two
Alleyways.
C
It
is
quite
visible
from
those
alleys
yeah,
and
this
is
one
of
those
cases
where
I
can
understand.
Yeah
Commissioners
I'll
leave
it
to
you
to.
A
Gloria
Leslie:
do
you
have
some
additional
comments
for
us.
M
E
M
Don't
have
any
additional
comments,
it
is
facing
the
the
back
alley,
so
it's
it's
not
visible
to
from
the
street.
So
it's
really
just
my
neighborhood.
That
would
be
affected
and.
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much.
Sam
questions,
no
questions,
Bernard
questions,
Elizabeth
Duncan,.
E
J
Right
on
top
of
garage
right,
so
you
can't
there's
no
transparency
there
so
not
appropriate
to
call
it
a
railing.
But
that
said,
if,
if
I
could
see
through
it,
I'd
feel
more
comfortable
about
it
than
than
I
do
I
went
by
there
as
a
totally
private
to
the
street.
You
can't
see
it
you're
right.
So
if
it's
a
party
deck
it's
a
party
deck
but
I,
just
I
think
the
materials
and
the
the
construction
of
it
just
seems
antithetical
to
this
building.
J
Actually,
the
one
that
they
took
down
I
understand
it
was
deteriorated,
seems
much
much
more
appropriate
to
me
and
it
the
reason.
I
say
this
is
because
when
you
you
want
to
be
able
to
see
the
facades
of
a
historic
building,
you
don't
want
to
put
up
things
to
obscure
them,
and
this
this
fence
obscures
it.
So
I
would
be
more
comfortable
with
it
if
it
were
actually
a
railing
and
you
and
you
could
see
through
it,
I
get
that
you
need
one.
J
If
you're
going
to
be
hanging
out
up
there,
but
I,
don't
I,
don't
think
this
design
is
very
good
for
the
application
even
being
on
the
back
of
the
building.
Thank
you.
Thank
you.
A
F
I
I
would
reiterate
what
Duncan
said,
and
you
know
this
is
sort
of
considered
an
addition
and
one
of
the
lines
on
construction
of
an
Edition
says:
select
exterior
service
materials
and
Architectural
details
for
additions
that
are
complementary
to
the
existing
building
in
terms
of
composition,
module
texture
pattern
and
detail
and
I
find
this.
The
proposed
replacement
incompatible
that
I
won't
support
it.
I
A
That
can
I've
made
my
comment.
All
right,
Matthew,
well,
I,
I,
I
I,
can
totally
understand
what
Sam
and
Duncan
are
saying
and
I.
Don't
think
it's
I
mean
I
I
can
understand,
I
think
it
makes
sense.
However,
I
I
feel
differently,
because
I
think
that
the
garage
Edition
has
already
thrown
off
any
sense
of
the
properties,
original
historic
character
from
the
rear
and
fence
is
not
going
to
be
visible
from
the
street.
Those
are
reasons
I'm,
not
I'm,
not
concerned
with
it.
A
A
Thank
you
Matthew.
You
know,
I
agree
with
Sam
and
Don
cannon
in
Matthew
in
a
lot
of
ways.
I
think
it's
able
to
come
back
with
a
different
kind
of
material
or
different
kind
of
design,
because
I
understand
the
need
for
privacy.
I
mean
you
know,
you
don't
want
people
looking
up
there,
seeing
what
you're
doing
so.
That's
my
comment.
M
M
Audited
in
2014,
so
it
was,
it
was
newly
remodeled
at
that
time.
F
I'm
going
to
move
to
deny,
but
can
encourage
the
petitioner
to
come
back
with
a
different,
more
comp,
artificially
compatible
design.
A
E
A
K
A
Three
knows
and
two
yes's:
okay,
confusing
yeah.
Well,
so
that
means
we
would
either
you
know
we
need
to
have
another
motion
to
approve
wait.
Have
you
voted?
I
did
okay
I
said
agreed?
No,
no!
Okay!
So
can
I
get
a
motion
to
approve
subject
to
changes.
B
L
A
A
We
would
have
to
deny
this
one
or
postpone
it
so
that
they
could
resubmit
with
different
material
or
we
can
approve
it
as
they've
submitted
it
right.
A
A
K
M
M
Recipients,
it
needs
to,
you,
need
to
be
able
to
see
the
the
deck
and
then
I'm
not
sure
what
you
mean
by
changes
to
the
materials.
F
Is
a
very
different
style
than
the
existing
house,
and
when
we
talk
about
incompatibility,
it
looks
like
a
fence
that
you
would
put
on
a
modern
house
or
a
contemporary
house,
and
this
house,
even
you
know,
even
in
the
smaller
details,
the
addition
is
less
so,
but
the
previous
railing
that
was
taken
down
is
actually
more
compatible,
much
more
compatible
than
what
you're
proposing
now
I'm,
not
saying
that
you
got
to
put
up
exactly
what
you
took
down,
but
I
would
take
a
look
at
period
houses.
F
These
are
you
know,
Bungalows
four
squares
from
the
20s
and
see
how
those
sorts
of
things
were
done.
It's
usually
pillars
with
infill
fences
which
can
be
of
varying
degrees
of
opacity,
usually
they're,
all
wood.
They
can
be
wood
and
metal,
but
what
you're,
showing
us
in
this
Photograph
that's
up
here-
is
the
black
iron
railing
and
the
the
horizontal
Cedar
one
by
six,
as
it
looks
like,
or
maybe
one
by
fours.
F
That
is,
you
know
it's
it's
it's
not
necessarily
a
fence
type,
that's
associated
with
that
period
of
house
and
the
elm
Heights
historic
guidelines
are
some
of
the
I
think
I.
Could
probably
still
say,
because
nobody
else
has
finished
them
yet
that
they're,
probably
the
strictest
ones
in
the
city,
so
try
to
pay
a
lot
of
attention
to
compatibility
and.
F
N
G
M
C
Feel
free
to
this
is
Gloria
from
Staff
feel
free
to
call
me
tomorrow,
we're
on
our
next
Tuesday
and
we
can
talk
and
like
look
at
different
as
staff
I
can
assist
you
as
much
as
possible
in
looking
at
different
models,
and
another
exercise
you
can
do
is
look
at
a
walk
through
the
neighborhood.
C
If
you
are
in
the
neighborhood
this
weekend
and
if
you're
not
in
the
neighborhood,
walk
through
it
via
a
street
view
on
Google
Maps,
if
you're
traveling-
and
you
know
just
to
see
like
what
the
presidents
are,
with
the
caveat
that
some
buildings
have
had
changes
done
to
them
before
it
was
a
historic
district.
C
But
that
is
one
idea
to
see
like
sort
of
a
lay
of
the
land
and
another
one
is
for
us
to
yeah,
have
a
phone
call
or
a
meeting.
We
can
schedule
that
tomorrow,
if
you
would
like.
C
A
All
right,
thank
you
very
much
so
Gloria,
which
one
we
want
to
go
to
next.
Well,.
A
C
They're
all
a
little
out
of
order,
so
thank
you
for
your
patience,
so
the
petitioner
Leila
Taylor
for
fastest
Sciences,
applying
for
new
signage
at
360,
North,
Washington
Street,
so
staff
comments.
The
following.
The
placement
of
the
sign
does
not
physically
impact
the
historic
material
of
the
building
itself
for
adversely
affect
the
site.
Landscaping
staff
does
recommend,
like
best
practices,
that
the
material
in
the
sign
be
is
compatible
with
the
historic
structure
as
possible.
C
Therefore,
staff
recommends
conditional
approval
of
COA
23-45,
with
a
recommendation
of
matching
at
least
one
of
the
colors
or
the
gray,
to
sort
of
go
with
the
warmer
tone.
So,
instead
of
Maybe,
the
cool
gray
use
a
slightly
warmer
gray,
a
stone
color
and
just
wanted
to
show
you.
So
this
is
the
site
and
the
location.
So
both
the
map
and
the
photograph
show
the
location
proposed
location
for
the
sign,
and
here
we
have
the
sign.
The
sign
is
proposed
to
be
in
black
gray
and
white
and
less
than
10
inches
thick.
A
Okay,
do
you
have
anything
to
add.
A
I
A
Thank
you.
So
let's
do
questions
I'm
going
to
call
Matthew.
First
I
have
no
questions.
Duncan,
yeah,
Elizabeth.
K
A
A
K
F
Sam
Can,
the
petitioner,
talk
to
me
a
little
bit
about
the
orientation
of
the
sign
and
the
construction
of
the
sign.
It
says
it's
made
of
aluminum
painted
with
vinyl
graphics,
but
I.
Don't
quite
understand
is
it
you
say
it's
like.
So
it's
a
box
of
aluminum.
F
A
I
haven't
got
any
questions
and
it
looks
like
a
nice
design.
Sam
comments.
F
It
just
feels
a
little
big
but
I'm
glad
it's
not
in
the
building.
A
A
A
I'm
willing
to
approve
COA
2345,
with
the
requests
that
the
petitioner
find
some
colors
that
match
the
corners
of
the
house
as,
as
was
state
I'll.
Second,
that
all.
D
D
K
M
A
Right,
thank
you,
Dean
all
right,
so
we're
going
to
move
over
to
COA
23-40
917
North,
Fairview,
Daniel
you're
with
us
tonight
very
good
Gloria,
okay,.
C
So
this
proposal,
the
petitioner,
is
calling
for
an
addition
to
an
existing
building
using
an
a
pre-existing,
detached
unit
is
going
to
attach
it,
so
the
addition
would
be
barely
visible,
especially
now
from
the
street
and
Alleyway,
especially
now,
with
the
edits
done
to
the
design.
The
height
of
the
Edition
has
been
lowered
from
the
previous
image.
We
we
have
previously
seen
the
materials
and
proportions
are
not
typical
of
the
neighborhood.
C
However,
the
property
itself
is
eclectic
and
we
do
have
a
lot
of
neighborhood
comments
and
a
neighborhood
representative
here,
so
staff
recommends
approval
of
COA.
23-40.
C
Here
are
lots
of
comments,
so
the
Maple
Heights
construction
subcommittee,
and
if
we
want
to
you,
can
look
at
it,
but
if
we
want
to,
we
can
let
the
Committee
Member
himself
talk
about
this,
but
does
not
oppose
the
addition
of
a
tiny
house
to
the
main
house
household
of
970
North
Fairview.
This
property,
although
designated
as
contributing,
does
not
materially
contribute
to
the
historic
District's
character.
The
tiny
house,
Edition
is
largely
shielded
from
the
public
right-of-way
neighbors,
who
are
most
effective,
have
spoken
up
in
support
of
that.
C
We
are
aware
of
I,
do
have
three
letters
that
I
that
you
can
find
on
the
desk.
I
didn't
put
the
letters
on
the
presentation
and
the
and
going
back
to
the
comments.
The
addition
of
the
tiny
house
does
not
is
not
in
compliance
with
the
drafted
guidelines,
materials
and
fenestration
wise,
but
the
committee
does
not
object
to
it,
since
it
is
not
viewable
from
the
right
of
way.
We
defer
to
the
commission
on
any
advisement
to
the
petitioner
for
design
review.
C
K
C
So
here
are
some
photos
of
how
the
site
looks
like
now
and
in
fact
the
first
image
is
sort
of
like
where
the
the
addition
would
be
the
most
viewable
and
with
that
it
should
be
hypothetically.
Very,
very
barely
viewable
here
are
additional
photographs
of
the
back
of
the
building
where
the
structure
would
be
located.
Here
is
the
structure
itself,
as
it
is
right
now
and
here's
a
roof
plan,
there's
additional
there's
a
more
recent
actually.
C
No.
These
are
sorry.
I
think
that
you
emailed
some
more
recent
documents
that
we
can
I
can
pull
up
in
a
second.
L
C
Wise
elevation,
wise,
let
me
see,
did
I
yeah
I
think
these
are
the
more
recent.
So
this
is
the
more
recent
elevation,
so
you
can
see
that
the
roof
line
has
been
lowered
quite
a
bit
from
the
previous
time
that
you
saw
the
proposal
and
here's
a
rendering,
basically
of
the
same
image
that
we
had
seen
a
few
pages
previous.
So
that's
basically
this
same
view
on
the
left.
E
L
Speak
to
the
three
changes
I
made,
so
Sam
has
asked
about
roof
plans,
I
extruded
the
roof
line
that
connects
the
structure
to
the
main
house
from
the
existing
Edition
off
the
back.
I've
pulled
that
from
its
location,
all
South,
so
now
that
roofline
will
be
the
common
to
the
roof
line.
That's
back
there.
On
the
previous
Edition
to
the
house,
I
went
down
a
step
into
the
hallway.
The
connection
has
stepped
down
in
the
tinyum
that
reduced
the
overall
height
between
14
and
16
inches
and
then
I'm.
L
Sorry,
I,
don't
remember
your
name,
sir,
but
you'd
asked
about
the
hyphen
about
having
so
I
did
end
up
doing
a
glass
connection
piece
there
for
two
reasons:
it's
the
same
kind
of
glass
paint
as
the
front
door
of
the
house
and
it's
36
inches
wide
to
meet
building
codes
requirement
to
have
egress
of
36
inches
somewhere
on
the
house
which
I
did
not
previously
have,
and
then
the
walls
it
turns
will
be
siding.
Matching
the
tiny
house
take
it
off.
L
C
Though
give
me
one
second,
that
I
checked
my
email,
we
do
have
some
new.
L
E
L
A
F
Would
you
go
back
to
that
axonometric
for
a
minute
that
we're
just
looking
at
so
is
this
surface
contiguous
with
that
surface.
L
F
So
what
I'm
trying
to
ask
is
this
piece
of
wall
with
the
door
above
it
in
planes
with
this?
It's
if
it's
within
a.
F
Yeah,
okay
and
you're,
saying
that
the
tiny
house
siding
is
going
to
go
here.
L
F
L
L
F
You
have
something
from
this
away:
Northeast
all
right.
Sorry,.
F
L
F
I
think,
that's
all
what
I
got.
Thank
you.
F
Has
signed
off
on
this
one
is
that
what
we've
not
gotten
to
it
I
would
love
to
hear
from
them
before
they're.
F
Okay,
this
is
a
weird
one,
I'm
pleased
that
it's
come
down.
I
think
the
the
roof
is
a
little
bit
of
a
train
wreck,
but
the
whole
house
is
a
little
bit
of
a
train
wreck
with
all
of
the
the
additions
I
I
would
just
you
know
you
don't
want
to
make
a
bad
problem.
Worse,
I
I
I,
like
that
you
are
densifying
the
site,
I,
think
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
ecologically.
F
Although
you
know
that's,
not
our
purview
here
or
purview
is
historic
preservation
and
the
argument,
the
last
time
for
approving
the
Adu,
was
looking
at
the
context
of
the
building
on
the
site
for
president
and
this
one
is
like
that
one
had
a
little
bit
of
distance
and
that
distance
I
think
you
can
mitigate
some
of
those
differences
between
all
the
craziness
going
on
in
edu
versus
the
different
kind
of
craziness
going
on
in
the
house.
F
I
think
it's
much
improved,
I'm
still
a
little
leery
about
how
the
building
and
the
the
tiny
house
come
together,
especially
at
the
roof.
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
the
perfect
right
answer
is
this
one's
much
better
than
the
last
one,
especially
bringing
it
down,
but
it
it
still
feels
a
little
forced.
It
feels
I
mean
porches
kind
of
slide
up
into
it,
and
this
one
is,
doesn't
it's
a
you
know?
One
of
these
things
is
not
like
the
others
kind
of
situation.
H
G
G
E
G
G
I
I
don't
see
that
happening,
but
thank
you
for
your
comment.
Eclectic.
G
G
Adding
this
thing
that
doesn't
fit
simply
because
there
are
lots
of
other
things
on
this
building
that
doesn't
exist.
That
doesn't
make
sense
to
me
in
any
objective
reality.
It
doesn't
I
see
this
effort
as
being
forced
I.
Have
this
thing
and
I
want
to
use
it
and
so
I'm
going
to
chop
and
change
and
force
and
twist
and
cajole
it
onto
this
building
because
I
have
it
and
I
don't
know
what
else
to
do
with
it
and.
G
I
I
cannot
support
this
and
we
would
be
doubling
down
on
a
precedented
which
I,
don't
believe
should
be
said.
I
don't
believe
there
was
any
justification
of
sitting
in
the
first
place
and
I'm
not
gonna
continue
when
I
believe
was
a
wrong
decision
with
another
wrong
decision,
so
I
would
not
support
this
thing.
K
I
know
we've
gone
around
and
around
about
this
and
I
appreciate
the
changes
and
trying
to
accommodate
with
me.
I
do
feel
kind
of
like
Bernard
I
didn't
care
that
much
for
it.
But
if
your
neighbors
don't
have
a
problem
or
who
am
I
going
to
say
so,.
G
L
J
Think
you
know
the
the
new
structure
is
just
incompatible
with
the
house
and
I.
You
know
following
compatibility
guidelines
as
I
understand
them
through
secretary
standards,
it's
hard
for
me
to
justify
making
it
fit,
assuming
those
those
standards
need
to
be
followed
and
I
believe
they
do.
J
And
it's
kind
of
like
I,
feel
I
feel
I.
Don't
know
who
said
It
felt
forest
was
you,
but
it
imagine
if
I
take
my
Bambi
Airstream
and
back
it
up
to
my
house
and
make
a
connection
to
it
and
call
it
part
of
the
house.
Is
it
compatible
because
I
did
that?
No,
it's
not!
You
know
if
I
back
my
camper
up
to
my
porch
and
make
a
connection
to
it,
it
makes
it
part
of
the
house,
but
it
doesn't
make
it
compatible
with
the
house
and
I.
J
A
Thank
you
well,
I
was
comfortable
with
the
last
design,
and
so
it
would
be
kind
of
weird
for
me
to
not
be
comfortable
with
this
one
when
in
fact,
you've
lowered
it
and
solved
a
couple
of
other
problems.
So
I
don't
I,
understand
the
concerns.
Just
don't
share
them.
A
A
E
I
A
I'm
sorry
Mr
McDowell
is
with
us,
so
we're
gonna
back
up
one
more
time:
Royal
go
to
COA
23-48,
516,
West,
3rd
Street.
C
So
this
is
for
COA
23-48
at
516,
West
3rd
Street.
The
petitioners
are
requesting
new
awnings
for
three
windows
on
the
west
facade.
So
this
the
colors
are
carefully
matched
to
the
rest
of
the
house
and
the
canvas
awnings
are
considered
as
a
material
are
considered
appropriate
in
the
Prospect
Hill
historic
district,
so
staff
recommends
approval
of
COA
23-48.
C
So
this
is
the
canvas
material
that's
being
proposed,
and
that
is
the
location
and
design
on
the
on
the
photo
buy.
It
and
I
have
John
McDowell
online.
C
Software
context,
John
McDowell,
is
at
a
public
library
in
Montana
right
now
trying
to
connect.
C
M
C
Hello
hi
is
this
Pat.
This
is
Pat
hi
Pat.
You
are
at
the
Bloomington
history,
Bloomington
historic
preservation.
C
Yes,
I've
been
trying
to
invite
you
to
unmute
so
that
you.
C
You
can
actually
ask
questions
right
now
or.
C
A
C
O
A
Do
you
have
any
additional
comments.
E
A
O
A
Hi,
do
you
we've
Gloria
has
given
us
the
presentation
already
about
your
awnings?
Is
there
any
additional
information
you'd
like
to
give
to
us
before
we
ask
you
questions.
A
O
O
This
would
be
very
good
to
keep
the
heat
away
out
in
the
summertime,
also
when
it
rains
now
that
side
of
the
house
is
getting
more
Fierce
rain,
and
so
we
were
thinking
that
that
would
protect
the
house
against
the
windows
and
the
and
the
window,
the
woodwork
around
the
window
from
any
kind
of
damage.
So
we're
really
doing
we're
doing
an
aesthetic
thing,
but
we're
also
doing
a
practical
thing.
All.
A
F
I
guess
they're
just
dimensional
questions.
You've
got
the
fabric
sample
you're,
going
to
run
the
fabric
in
the
direction
that
the
the
image
shows
sort
of
you
know
vertically,
and
then
are
you
going
to
do
the
scalloped
edges,
as
shown
yes,
okay,
and
how
far
out
are
you
coming,
because
that
photograph
looks
like
there's
a
a
pretty
wide
difference
between
where
the
trim
stops
and
where
the
awning
starts?
O
Well,
if
you
were
to
specify
exactly
how
wide
you
want
them,
I
could
probably
tell
this
is
just
a
computer
image.
If
you
want
to
give
measurements,
you
know
tell
me
where
you
want
them:
I
could
have
the
people
who
are
going
to
make
them
do
the
measurements
that
you'd,
like.
D
E
A
No
questions
and
I
have
no
questions,
so
let's
move
Matthew
yeah.
F
Guess
my
only
comment
would
be
that
in
looking
at
a
lot
of
sort
of
more
Victorian
awnings
like
that
might
not
necessarily
I
mean
this
is
the
era
in
which
the
sort
of
pre-air
conditioning
era,
when
all
these
things
came
out,
a
lot
of
them
were
coincident
or
maybe
even
a
little
in
from
the
side
of
the
of
the
trim,
so
I
would
I
would
Advocate
to
basically
match
the
width
of
the
awning
to
the
width
of
the
the
trim
on
each
side
of
the
window
so
that
it
doesn't
overhang.
F
A
Okay,
Duncan.
J
J
Fit
has
to
do
with
how
the
the
framework
is
built,
and
there
used
to
be
these
old,
pipe
clamp,
type
things
that
you
bolted
actually
to
the
side
of
the
house
and
not
to
the
window
frame,
in
which
case
they
came
out
a
little
farther
I'm,
not
sure
how
these
Mount,
but
I
agree
they
should
they
should
just
barely
beat
the
window
trim
or
be
even
with
it
to
look
the
best.
All.
A
F
K
A
B
A
Thank
you
all
right,
so
we're
going
to
move
on
to
our
our
final
petition
tonight.
Coa
Dash,
23
43.,
is
the
petitioner
with
us
I.
P
And
clients
representative,
as
well
very.
C
So
this
is
a
northernmost
structure,
I
believe
existing
structure,
so
the
petitioner
has
taken
into
consideration
feedback
from
from
the
HPC
and
has
created
a
carefully
designed
alternative
for
the
east
facing
facade
with
sympathetic
materials
to
the
industrial.
Aesthetic
of
the
building.
The
utilities
would
be
carefully
hidden
in
the
height
changing
elements
do
not
distract
distract
or
detract
from
the
historic
structure.
So
we've
seen
this
project
over
the
last
few
years.
C
The
last
time
was
a
few
months
ago
with
a
presentation,
but
the
petitioner
is
here
for
a
COA
as
sort
of
like
complete.
This
would
overhaul
and
and
replace
the
previous
coas
for
this
site.
So
all
right,
I
would
actually
ask
clarification.
Is
this
considered,
like
still
a
COA
for
a
phase?
One.
P
Some
undetermined
future,
so
I
think
it
should
be
reviewed
really
as
a
building
that
could
exist
for
without
phase
two
happening
right.
Who
knows
what
future?
E
P
The
right
hand,
side
is
a
diagram
that,
on
the
North
side,
is
connecting
the
where
they
used
to
store
the
logs
and
The
Sawmill.
P
It
would
come
down
a
rail
line
and
and
then
it
would
go
into
the
Kilns
with
the
little
horizontal
lines
and
then
would
come
back
out
of
the
Kiln
and
would
go
into
the
mill
as
you
head
south,
so
diagrammatically.
This
is
sort
of
describing
the
process
of
the
wood
moving
through
moving
through
the
manufacturing
of
furniture,
so
that
became
a
really
important
axes
for
the
site
and
on
the
Mill
Side,
there's
still
the
opening
for
that
those
cards
to
come
through
with
the
wood,
and
so
that
was
all
very
important.
C
P
I
just
want
to
say
I
want
to
say,
because
this
is
a
phase
one
building
and
at
some
point
likely
phase
two
will
happen.
But
of
course
you
know
we're
not
sure
how
long
that's
going
to
be.
The
addition
of
the
entry
element
on
the
east
side
of
the
building
for
us
was
important
because
that's
the
main
entry
to
the
building,
that's
the
accessible
entrance
to
the
building,
even
though
it's
on
the
Alley
side
really
have
six
entrances
to
this
building,
but
the
one
on
the
east
side.
P
Not
only
is
it
a
main
entrance,
but
it's
also
a
very
visible
part
of
entering
into
trades
District.
Really.
The
first
thing
you
would
see
entering
from
the
Northeast
side
of
District,
so
the
other
change
that
you're
seeing
here
now
is
that
the
masonry
of
the
PowerHouse,
if
we're
looking
at
the
East
Elevation,
it's
a
relatively
thin
masonry,
especially
compared
to
the
Kiln
and
somewhat
tall
and
the
removal
of
all
of
that
masonry
and
adding
all
of
the
glass
Not
only
was
going
to
potentially
disturb
the
structure,
but
also
across
the
alley.
P
You're
really
looking
at
a
cinder
block
wall
and
so
to
maintain
the
historic
character
of
this
utility
building,
which
was
the
PowerHouse
which
had
had
a
number
of
fenestrations
punched
in
it
in
a
variety
of
different
places.
Over
the
years
for
various
reasons,
we
decided
to
go
ahead
and
capture
those
historic
fenestrations
on
the
outside
of
the
building
and
maybe
just
added
a
few,
a
few
extras
just
to
balance
it
out.
So
we
get
this
more
random
placement
of
Windows,
which
is
in
keeping
with
the
history
of
this
building.
P
And
these
are
just
the
doors.
These
are
the
storefronts.
Everything
is
storefront,
as
opposed
to
the
Marvin
Windows
that
we
were
looking
at
before.
We
decided
that-
and
we
actually
talked
about
this
in
the
last
hvc
meeting-
that
would
be
more
appropriate
to
keep
it
storefront.
It's
more
utilitarian
and
less
residential.
B
P
The
middle
detail
on
the
bottom
is
a
railing.
This
is
in
response
to
comments
from
the
last
meeting.
This
hides
the
cooler
behind
Soma,
so
we're
creating.
Basically
this
system
for
railings,
which
is
going
to
be
some.
It's
either
going
to
be
black
or
dark
bronze.
We
can
talk
about
that
later,
but
you
can,
you
can
have
wire
mesh
in
there.
We
can
have
it.
We
can
have
handrails
on
this
system.
We
can
also
put
in
Wood
slats
and
I'll
talk
a
little
bit
more
about
materials,
but
we'll
put
wood
slats
in
there.
P
The
trellis
there
was
a
move
to
simplify
the
material
palette
a
bit
and
basically
it's
going
to
be
brick,
black
or
dark
bronze
painted
steel,
aluminum,
storefront
Etc,
but
then
we're
going
to
play
off
of
the
silvered
wood
that
is
happening
at
the
Mill.
That
is
happening
as
part
of
the
landscape
design
with
the
benches
and
the
trash
enclosures
Etc.
So,
instead
of
creating
a
big
black
steel
trellis
we're
going
to
create
a
steel
base
with
a
little
bit
more
of
a
substantial
base.
P
This
10
inch
round
pipe
and
then
cover
this
with
it'll,
be
a
western
red
cedar
product
most
likely
and
we're
going
to
let
that
silver
out
we're
not
going
to
try
to
maintain
the
color
and
again.
This
is
important
for
the
axis
that's
going
through,
but
it's
also
really
important,
as
the
previous
petitioner
had
pointed
out,
it's
getting
hotter.
This
is
the
western
side
of
the
building.
So
this
is
a
really
great
way
to
add
some
shade
to
the
western
side
of
the
building,
so
that
we
can
maintain
the
transparency,
but
also
have
some
shading.
P
One
more
thing:
if
you
can
go
back
just
a
second,
if
you
can
see
back
on
the
left
hand,
side,
there's
a
taller
wood,
slatted
wall
there
as
well,
that
flushes
out,
on
top
with
the
railing,
that's
on
the
east
side
and
that's
also
a
privacy
screen
that
is
basically
shielding
sort
of
the
trash
enclosure
and
the
cooler
enclosure
behind
Soma.
So
we're
kind
of
wrapping
that
wood
around.
P
But
yeah
and
we
were
there-
was
a
lot
of
discussion
about
maintaining
the
historic
red
corrugated
doors
there
off
to
the
west.
But
we
thought
glass
would
be
better
I'm
open
to
comments
from
that.
P
The
bottom
middle
image
is
the
middle
trash
enclosure.
This
is
a
glass
deal
and
again
what
I
like
to
call
silvered
Wood.
P
If
you
go
back
Gloria,
please
the
the
structure
on
the
top
right,
which
is
the
entry
structure
off
of
the
alley,
the
soffit
on
the
bottom
side
of
that
ceiling.
It
will
be
continuous.
The
glass
basically
comes
all
the
way
up
to
the
ceiling.
Storefront
comes
all
the
way
up
to
the
ceiling
and
all
the
way
over
to
the
brick.
So
I
think
it
creates
a
really
nice
transparency
that
really
highlights
the
PowerHouse
and
then
that
ceiling
is
going
to
carry
through
and
we
see
that
ceiling.
P
N
P
Getting
either
solar
or
water
exposure,
the
material
for
the
material
for
the
siding
on
the
new
addition
and
again,
if
you
can
go
back,
please
I
think
a
good
place
to
land.
Gloria
would
probably
be
this
slide
where
this
one
right
here,
you
can
leave
it
here.
We
previously
had
brig
on
the
lower
portion,
which
would
be
the
future
stair
Tower,
which
is
just
to
the
right
of
this
larger
Edition
again
in
response
to
comments
from
the
last
meeting.
P
Instead
of
pulling
brick
around
we're
just
going
to
let
the
entire
Edition
be
just
the
black,
the
sort
of
the
matte
black
standing
seam
material
and
there
you
can
see
the
wood
we
have
I've
had
this
issue
before,
where
you
have
multiple
front
sides
of
a
building,
and
you
try
you're,
trying
to
figure
out
how
to
handle
the
utilities.
Really.
P
The
only
place
for
us
to
put
a
dumpster
enclosure
is
off
the
alley
which
is
in
keeping
with
what
the
mill
did,
which
is
putting
a
dumpster
enclosure
off
the
alley
and
and
then
just
creating
a
really
clean
vertical
wood
structure
there
for
for
the
for
the
dumpster
enclosure,.
A
All
right
is
that
cover
it
all.
P
Yeah,
if
you
look
at
the
so
the
dumpster
enclosures
in
the
foreground
in
this
image.
But
if
you
look
beyond
the
dumpster
enclosure,
you
can
see
the
railing
with
the
wood
slats
and
that
wall
that
you're,
seeing
on
the
bottom
right
is
the
same
height
as
the
railing
with
the
wood
slats.
I
F
P
Couple
ways
of
looking
at
this
number
one
is
that
the
railing
language
is
being
carried
through
in
a
number
of
locations.
If
you
look
to
the
left
of
the
main
entrance,
we
have
railings
there.
Those
are
guard
rails,
the
42-inch
guard
rails,
I
did
not
render
the
wire
mesh
because
it
kills
everything.
So
you
have
to
just
use
your
imagination
there.
P
The
inside
of
all
those
openings,
is
going
to
be
the
welded
wire
mesh,
so
I'm,
maintaining
that
same
language
as
it
comes
around
to
the
top
of
the
wall,
because
we
need
that
railing
there,
but
as
it
turns
the
corner,
it
turns
into
something
different,
which
is
really
more
of
a
a
privacy
wall
and
it's
much
taller
yeah.
F
Yeah
I
mean
I'll
get
to
that
in
a
comment,
but
I
think
the
only
other
question
I
have
is
there's.
N
P
P
P
P
Is
that
existing
there's
a
big
hit
there?
It's
a
four
foot
drop
cool,
okay,
yeah,
so
we're
able
to
you
know
the
base.
Two
and
three
are
one
business,
the
Sprout
box,
and
so
we
have
all
the
accessibility,
stuff
and
Bay
three
and
then
you
know
stares
down
to
a
work
area
and
then
stairs
up
to
a
little
Loft.
So
it's
it's
it'll,
be
pretty
pretty
slick.
Thank
you.
A
J
So
I
the
the
window
issue
on
the
PowerHouse
that
you
talked
about
the
sort
of
randomness
of
it
so
are
all
those
original
or
or
pre
Your
Design
existence.
J
P
Picture
I'd
have
to
I
think
we
have
existing
pictures
of
that
facade.
I
would
say
there
are
probably
four
or
five
existing
openings,
but
it's
it's.
It's
really
messy
masonry
right,
I
mean
there
are
lentils
here
and
there
has
been
filled
in
by
Brick
some
of
the
openings
I
shortened
a
little
bit
because
you
know
it's
adjacent
to
the
ram.
P
P
A
Matthew
any
question:
no
I
have
no
questions,
I,
don't
know
I,
don't
have
any
questions
for
you
Lucas,
so
we'll
move
to
comments
and
we'll
just
start
with
Matthew
this
time.
A
Well,
I'm
going
out
on
a
limb
without
all
the
well,
not
being
a
professional
architect.
But
honestly
I
feel
like
this
is
looks
like
great
adaptive.
Reviews
I
mean
I,
I.
Think
yeah,
there's
some
tinkering
with
the
feeling
with
the
original
sort
of
sense
of
the
structure,
but
it's
very
compatible.
If
you
preserve
a
lot
of
what
it's,
how
the
architecture
reflected
the
function
and
honestly
I
think
it's
very
sensitively
done
and
appreciate
all
the
appreciate.
A
J
Overall
I
really
like
it
I
like
it
a
lot
and
I've
thought
about
this
building
a
lot
having
worked
on
the
one
we're
sitting
in
and
the
Johnson
Creamery,
and
you
know
the
whole
context
here
and
having
and
having
had
to
Grapple
with
those
those
issues
of
making
something
that
because
use
is
not
only
obsolete,
but
this
place
in
the
culture
is
pretty
much
absolutely
and
so
I've
always.
You
know.
J
J
The
pergola
and
and
the
entrance
on
the
on
the
east
side
and
everything
I
underst
I,
understand
how
those
additions
need
you
need
those
in
order
to
make
the
thing
work
well
and
I.
I
think
you've
done
a
really
really
nice
job,
particularly
with
the
the
entryway
and
the
use
of
that
of
that,
carrying
that
black
through
the
project
I
was
I,
was
kind
of
I
grapple.
J
Idea
for
quite
a
while,
but
but
I
I
sort
of
came
to
the
same
conclusion
about
making
the
outdoor
space
usable
and
keeping
the
heat
off
the
building,
and
you
know
we're
doing
that
now
in
lots
of
ways
that
are
that
are
pretty
creative,
but
none
of
them
seem
to
fit
this
building.
You
know
the
kind
of
screening
that
is
done
on
classroom
buildings
and
things
to
keep
the
sun
down.
J
I
I,
my
own
strategy,
for
when
things
aren't
done
that
well
or
when
they're
pulled
when
they're,
when
they're
been
filled
in
occasionally
in
these
buildings,
you'll
find
lentils
just
buried
in
the
wall
because
the
window
was
gone
or
they
filled
it
in
because
there
was
some
reason
to
do
it
back
in
1920
and
and
and
for
instance,
on
the
Johnson
Creamery
building.
We
just
left
all
that
stuff
in
the
wall.
J
So
you
could
see
it,
so
you
could
so
somebody
who
knew
about
it
could
walk
by
and
say
well
see
they
had
Windows
here,
but
there
used
to
be
a
loading
dock
here
and
that's
why
those
windows
were
there
and
when
the
loading
dock,
the
loading
dock,
wasn't
original
to
the
building.
So
the
windows
blah
blah
blah,
but
we
even
let
the
masonry
be
mixed
up
in
terms
of
brick
collar
because
there
were
so
many
infill
locations
that
you
couldn't
come
to
one
unitary
color.
So
we
just
let
it
be.
J
You
know
that's
a
at
least
a
symbolic
reference
for
it,
so
I
I,
you
know
I'm,
with
the
exception
of
the
dumpster
location,
which
I
guess
is
inevitable.
I.
P
Was
I
wish.
J
E
P
J
P
J
J
So
you
so
you
could
see
it
so
I
know
that's
an
aesthetic
that
doesn't
track
with
residential
and
commercial
and
business
uses,
but
these
buildings,
their
utilities,
showed
okay
matter
of
facts
for
your
frequently
hung
panels
right
on
the
outsides
of
the
building,
so
I
wouldn't
be
too
I.
Agree
with
you
that
you
probably
won't
see
any
of
that,
but
I,
wouldn't
it
for
my
sake,
I
wouldn't
be
too
worried
about
it.
Utilities
are
part
of
the
expression
of
industrial
buildings.
That's
just
the
way
it
is
okay,.
P
All
meter
Bank
on
that
little
thin
piece
of
standing
seam
over
there
on.
J
D
J
And
then
the
only
other
thing
was
the
discussion
about
phase
two.
You
understand
that
this
approval
for
the
CFA
does
not
include
NO
phase
two
or
three.
J
J
J
I
mean
I,
remember
the
long
discussion
we
had
about
whether
we
thought
there
should
even
be
a
second
floor.
So
you
know,
and
then
it
was
a
railing
and
then
it
was
a
patio
and
then
you
know
it's
like
been
on
been
through
these
iterations
and
I.
Frankly
think
this
is
the
best
solution
to
come
up
with
so
far
by
far,
and
it
doesn't
include
a
second
story
so.
P
We're
planning
there's
an
elevator
we're
putting
an
elevator
pit
in
and
we're
putting
foundations
in
for
stairs.
D
K
G
E
F
E
F
Want
to
follow
up
on
something
that
you
were
talking
about.
Duncan
and
timeline.
I
I
got
a
building
approved
a
little
less
than
two
years
ago
and
they
expire
every
two
years.
So
that's
another
thing
that
bear
in
mind
and
I'll
be
putting
this
back
in
front
of
you
all
my
building
and
a
meeting
or
two
or
three
I
love
this
building
I.
Think
from
like
it's
been
a
couple
years,
at
least
since
we
saw
the
first
iteration
and
it
is
so
much
cleaner.
F
It
is
so
much
tighter
and
I
wore
with
you
know.
My
I
I
appreciate
what
Duncan
is
saying
about.
Having
all
the
you
know,
all
the
infrastructure
and
utilities
junking
it
all
up
and
that's
an
industrial
building,
and
that's
fine,
but
I
love
how
clean
it
is.
So
it's
there's
an
Elegance
to
this
and
I
I.
Think
Duncan's
comment
about.
F
You
know
artistically
interpreting
the
the
window
open
the
punched
window,
openings
I,
think
that
carries
through
with
the
pergola
and
how
it
you
know
it
traces
or
reinforces
the
entry
sequence
for
the
wood
as
it
comes
into
the
mill.
So
it's
you
know
it's!
It's
hearkening!
Back
in
subtle
and
symbolic
ways
to
functions
that
that
came
before
that
are,
aren't
there
any
longer
and
I
think
there's
an
Evidence
to
that
which
I
really
appreciate
and
I
just
noticed
on
the
I
thought
it
was
really
cool
that
it
comes
down.
That's
super
fun.
F
The
only
thing
that
I
can
see
that
would
make
this
better
in
an
easy
way.
Is
you
know
this
is
going
back
to
Simplicity.
I!
Think
that
the
little
fence
that
turns
the
corner
is
an
additional
element
which
you
don't
need.
F
I
would
just
take
that
tall
fence
and
have
that
turn
the
corner,
because
it's
basically
doing
the
same
job
and
you
know
I,
like
you
know
the
way
I
think
about
stuff
is
like
you
have
a
system
that
does
a
job
and
you
don't
need
to
bring
it
into
another
system
that
basically
does
the
same
job,
keep
it
as
spare
and
simple
as
possible.
So
you.
F
It's
shorter
just
turn
the
corner
on
it
and
I
think
that'll
probably
be
a
little
bit
cheaper
to
do
and
easier
and.
P
With
you
know
how
those
two
are
kind
of
coming
through
differently
I,
but.
F
Yeah,
it's
like
you're
you're,
it's
a
it's
a
utility
fence
of
some
kind
and
it
probably
is
going
to
be
a
little
bit
thinner
on
that
side,
because
you're
not
running
a
dump
truck
or
a
garbage
truck
into
it
all
the
time.
I
guess.
The
only
other
thing
is
that
the
the
dumpster
is
almost
like
a
big
sign,
so
we
could
put
some.
A
I
I
can't
see
anything,
everybody
started
taking
the
words
out
of
my
mouth
really
great
work
because
I
like
what
you're
doing
I
like
how
this
is
going
to
turn
out.
So
we
need
a
motion
for
23-40.
D
K
A
C
Have
any
new
business
which
doesn't
need
a
vote,
so
we
do
not
need
a
legal
Forum,
but
the
more
eyes
we
have
on
this.
The
better.
Let
me
see
to
take
out
the
address
correct
some
around
here.
C
934,
not
9
36,
okay,
okay,
so
do
you
want
to
present
it.
N
I
I
yeah
sure
I
can
talk
about
it.
Yeah
can
I
come
up
to
the
channel
well,
anyway.
First
again,
thanks
a
lot,
as
obviously
being
involved
in
the
calendar.
I'm
excited
that
building
survived
the
chopping
block
a
few
years
ago
when
it
was
kind
of
on
the
path
to
destruction
and
I'm
glad
the
project
survived
covid
because
yeah
it
was
March
of
2020.
N
When
we
got
kind
of
went
through
it
the
first
time
and
then
you
know
the
the
economics
of
the
project
got
sideways,
so
I'm
glad
we
stuck
with
it
and
you
know
modified
it
that
we
could
still
keep
it
going.
So
thank
you,
so
I
don't
want
to
take
any
more
of
your
time.
Thanks
for
this
is
just
a
discussion
because
I'm
looking
for
feedback
before
we,
you
know
look
at
before
my
wife
and
I.
This
is
a
personal
project
for
my
wife
and
I,
so
934
West,
2nd
Street.
N
This
is
a
bungalow
it's
in
Prospect
Hill.
It
has
at
least
since
1991
not
had
anybody
any
person
living
in
it,
so
it
hasn't
been
maintained
as
a
residence.
It
hasn't
really
been
conditioned.
N
It
may
have
been
vacant
before
that,
but
I
know
in
1991
when
the
medical
building,
next
to
it
at
1010,
West,
2nd
Street,
was
built
this
you
know
this
building
was
you
know
as
part
of
that
that
situation
so
for
I
mean
I
think
for
at
least
32
years
it's
been,
you
know,
kind
of
an
unconditioned
uninhabited
space,
and
so
what
my
wife
and
I
would
like
to
to
or
like
to
do.
N
We
want
to
bring
this
residential
parcel
and
Prospect
Hill
back
to
being
a
functioning
residential
parcel,
and
so
in
looking
at
this,
I
had
Kevin
I've
had
a
couple
of
people,
I've
had
some
Prospect
Hill
folks
I've
actually
had
some
people
that
have
formally
been
on
this
committee.
Look
at
this
from
a
historical
perspective
and
then
Kevin
Potter
also
came
out,
and
there
should
be
a
report
in
the
packet
where
he's
looked
at
the
structure
itself.
N
Essentially,
if
you,
if
you
were
to
deconstruct
this
building
in
order
to
rehabilitate
it
I
mean
the
the
floor
system,
is,
is
partially
collapsed,
the
roof
system
is
partially
collapsed.
The
masonry
porch,
that
was
a
really
cool
feature,
has
been
struck
by
a
truck
that
found
its
way
off
Second
Street
through
the
trees
and
into
the
corner
of
it.
So
that
took
that
out,
it's
got
a
wet
basement
and
you
know
the
windows
are
rotting.
N
It's
just
you
know
it
currently
has
vinyl
siding
on
it
over
several
layers
of
other
types
of
siding
that
have
been
glommed
onto
it
over
the
years.
So
by
the
time
you
would
peel
it
back.
You
know,
there's
really
not
much
left
and
what
we
would
like
to
do-
and
this
is
the
discussion
is-
is
we
would
like
to
build
a
bungalow
here
that
meets
the
Prospect
Hill
neighborhood
association,
design
guidelines,
but
before
we
go
down
the
path
of
you
know
the
time
and
money
to
design
it.
N
You
know
and
I
I
just
wanted
to
have
I
wanted
to
start
with
a
discussion
because
is,
is
the
concept
of
you
know,
building
a
new
bungalow
on
this
site.
Is
that
something
that
the
HPC
could
could
support.
N
The
existing
situation
there's
the
floor
system
that
is
rotted
out
again.
It's
just
it's
been
like
I,
said
an
unconditioned
and
uninhabited
space
for
at
least
three
decades.
N
So
it's
been
pretty
rough
rough
shape
and
it
just
seems
like
it's
the
it's
really
the
first
residential
lot
remaining
as
you
come
from
the
West
on
Second
Street
is
the
first
one
you
see
and
as
you
kind
of
start,
hitting
the
houses
along
Second
Street
there
on
the
north
side
of
Second
Street-
and
you
know
our
goal
would
be
to
come
back
to
HPC
I
mean
I'm,
assuming
we
would
have
to
come
back
through
HPC
with
the
design
for
a
property
that
would
need
to
be
approved
by
HBC
and
also
by
Prospect
Hill.
N
N
I'm,
just
looking
for
General
comments
on
I
mean
there's
nothing
to
approve
tonight.
It's
just.
Obviously
it
takes
time
and
money,
and
time
is
money
to
you
know,
put
the
thought
into
what
we
would
build
here
that
honors
Prospect
Hill
honors.
What
is
there
now?
You
know,
and
you
know
functions.
You
know
within
the
parameters
of
the
current
zoning
and
guidelines
and
all
of
that,
but
before
we
go
down
that
path,
you
know
to
get
General
feedback
is.
Could
what
is
what
are
the
general
thoughts?
It's
really
just
discussion
at
this
point.
N
A
So,
let's
we,
we
have
some
comments.
Sam.
F
F
F
Understand
why
you're
doing
what
you're
doing
so
I
I
am
one
who
one
I
like
to
hear
what
the
neighborhood
has
to
say
about
it.
So,
in
addition
to
coming
to
us,
I
would
strongly
suggest
you
talk
to
the
neighborhood
association
and
get
their
read
on
it,
because
everyone
often
has
a
pretty
huge
impact
on
what
this
body
does.
A
When
did
you
guys,
you
purchased
the
property?
When
did
you
guys
take
it
over.
N
It
we,
let's
see
it
had
been
vacant
for
I,
think
15
at
least
well
at
least
15
years
before
we
when
we
purchased
the
medical
building
in
2005.
This
was
part
of
because
it
was
all
on
those.
Actually,
three
lots
were
all
what
were
sold
when
that
Medical
Practice
sold,
and
so
you
know
in
the
medical
practice
has
been
operating
there
and
and
is
still
actually
that
building
is
still
functioning
as
a
as
a
medical
practice.
N
This
this
has
always
been
kind
of
the
the
the
eyesore.
N
J
D
G
N
J
Know
exactly
where
it
is
now:
I
I
wanted
to
go
and
just
walk
around
and
get
my
own
sense
of
it.
But
you
know
my
experience
with
Kevin's
reports.
Is
that
they're
very
thorough
but
I'm
always
I
I
always
look
to
his
sort
of
underlying
recommendation,
which
in
this
case,
is
here's
what
you're
going
to
have
to
do
to
save
this
building.
J
You
know,
and
after
years
with
Bri
and
years
of
working
with
HUD
Grant
projects
for
the
city,
I
I
know
how
remodelable
this
is
and
I
mean
I
I
know
how
bad
it
is
and
I
know
how
we
have
done
projects
that
were
so
much
worse
than
this,
so
I,
wouldn't
so
so
I
wouldn't
just
give
up
on
it.
I
mean
usually
when
we've
taken
a
house
and
reduced
it
to
its
bones
and
then
put
it
back
together.
It's
still
been
cheaper
than
building
a
new
house.
J
So
that's
not
everybody's
consideration
for
sure
and
you're
you're
still
dealing
with
a
footprint
and
a
floor
plan
and
size
and
masking
and
everything
that
you
may
not
personally
want
to
have
to
deal
with.
But
let's
just
say,
as
an
advocate
for
the
homes,
it's
it
it's
it's
not
it's
not
a
lost
cause,
it's
as
bad
as
it
is.
It's
been
empty,
that's
bad!
For
it.
The
roof
is
obviously
leaked
into
every
room,
and
so
conditions
are
bad.
But
most
of
that.
I
J
You
see
in
there
is
very
cheap.
You
know
lightweight,
paneling
and
stuff.
That
was
this
is
all
remodeled
stuff
in
there.
That's
none
of
us
the
original
material,
except
probably
the
floor
plans.
Originally
I
was
going
to
walk
around
it
only
because
not
because
I
don't
believe
Kevin,
because
I
do
but
just
to
see
if
it's
straight,
because
if
it's
standing
straight
and
the
foundation
has
a
differentially
settled,
you've
gotta
you've
got
a
probably
a
pretty
good
house.
J
You
know
the
rest
of
it
is
always
finished,
I
mean
drywall's
cheap,
you
know,
but
you
would
have
to
strip
it
out,
probably
to
the
to
the
studs,
and
you
might
have
to
replace
some
as
Kevin
points
out
so
I
I.
Just
my
my
my
inclination
in
historic
districts
is
not
to
look
at
what,
if
we
demolish
it,
but
how
are
we
going
to
save
it?
J
And
so
you
know
that's
the
way,
I
approach
it
and
that's
the
way
I've
been
trained
to
approach
it
so
and
as
a
carpenter,
I
know
how
possible
it
is
so
I'm
kind
of
on
the
I.
Don't
know
if
I'd
call
that
optimism,
because
some
people
are
like
no
forget
it
I'm
not
doing
that,
because
that's
not
what
I
want
anyway
and
that's
really
what
the
decision
for
you
comes
down
to.
But
the
decision
for
us
is
how
do
we
protect
these
buildings
that
are
in
historic
districts
and.
J
Pushing
and
pulling
on
that
issue,
as
opposed
to
what
the
petitioner's
issue
may
be,
which
is
I
sure,
would
like
to
have
a
new
house
here
and
I:
don't
mean
to
mean
that,
because
it's
a
totally
legitimate
thing
to
do
to
want,
but
from
the
standpoint
of
people
who
are
supposed
to
be
protecting
historic
districts.
That
said,
you
know
how.
N
J
N
D
A
E
A
So
I
do
have
an
idea
of
a
question.
You
guys
acquired
this
in
2005.
M
N
N
A
N
Right
yeah
so
I
mean
about
like
I
said
it
had
been
uninhabited
for
at
least
15
years
prior
to
that,
but
so
yeah
we
I
mean
again:
we've
tried
to
keep
it
from
collapsing
in
on
I
mean
it
probably.
If
we
hadn't
done
anything
to
it,
it
probably
would
have
our
the
whole
back.
Half
of
the
house
probably
would
have
already
collapsed
in
on
itself.
A
All
right
thanks,
thank
you!
Is
there
any
other
comments
or
Direction
we'd
like
to
give
them
right
now,
but
I
like
talking
I
want
I,
have
not
walked
around
and
I'm
sure
by
it.
I
can't
Camp
how.
E
N
I'd
be
happy
to
you
know
again:
I
mean
we've,
you
know
obviously
we're
you
know
we
live
in
Bloomington,
you
know
we're.
You
know,
we've
been
in
the
Prospect
Hill
Neighborhood
for
a
while
now
and
you
know,
I
think
we've
been
a
pretty
good
business.
Neighbor
I
mean
we've,
you
know
assisted
the
police
with
crime
investigations
in
the
area,
and
you
know
you
know
so
I
feel.
N
Like
we've
been,
you
know
pretty
diligent
about
being
trying
to
be
a
good
business,
neighbor
and
and
again
our
our
intent
here
is
not
to
tear
it
down
and
build
something
completely
inappropriate.
I
mean
I
would
hope
that,
through
discussions
with
the
neighborhood
association
and
the
HPC
that
a
design
could
be
developed
that
meets,
you
know
the
historical
design
criteria
I
mean
that
would
be
our
intent.
J
N
I
mean
we
and
we've
had
people,
you
know,
try
to
buy
this
property
from
us.
I,
don't
know
what
their
intent
was
with
it,
but
you
know
so
you
know
we've
just
you
know.
That
was
our
thought.
That's
what
we
would
just
like
to
you
know
return
it
to
be.
You
know
a
habitable
Bungalow
and
just
felt
like
the
based
on
the
condition.
You
know
that
it's
by
the
time
we
peel
it
meticulously
peel
it
back.
N
A
A
N
A
J
N
P
J
N
C
To
do
something
like
apply
for
a
partial
demolition
for
the
part,
that's
like
completely
gone
and
use
that
as
a
moment
to
explore,
like
what's
behind
the
other
walls
and
see
if
the
bones
are
really
good
or
you
know
like
because
of
the
there's
part
of
this
house
that
is,
go
I.
I
entered
this
building.
E
C
Like
my
my
my
mask
and
it
it
was
pretty
pungent
in
there
and
that
the
room
that
the
Kevin
Potter
set
has
to
go.
It
has
no
floor
like
it's
sunken
and
you
can
see
from
the
outside
of
the
window,
but
it's
that
that
room
is
gone
like
gone.
The
rest
of
the
house
might
have
amazing
bones,
but
the
skin
and
the
muscles
are
gone.
You
know
like
it
would
have
to
be
the
literally
the
bones
but
I'm
wondering
if
that
could
be
like
an
in-between,
because
there
are
various
Solutions
it.
C
C
E
C
But
rather
like
there
is
part
of
this
building
that
is
fully
gone.
I
I
went
in
there
and
Karen
Potter
stayed
at
the
same.
The
rest
is
like
the
whole.
Skin
is
moldy
and
Flappy
the
roof
has
to
go,
the
walls
have,
but
that
stuff
is
replaceable.
We
all
know
that
stuff
and
we
have
seen
other
buildings
in
this
area
that
have
been
taken
down
to
the
bones,
but
I
I
also
know
that
you
kind
of
just
bought
a
new
building
there,
so
that
could
be
like
talk
to
the
neighborhood.
I
C
You
present
more
formally
plant.
What
would
you
be
willing
to
really
support
me
and
plan
a
plan
b
or
plan
C?
However,
when
you
come
back
to
the
HPC,
it
might
be
a
good
idea
to
know
which
plan
you
really
are
going
to.
Are
you
going
to
apply
for
that
full
demolition?
Are
you
gonna
apply
for
a
person?
Demolition
like
I
know
we're
not
giving
you
the
best.
The
like
the
advice
you
might
want
to
hear,
but
also
the
point
of
the
HPC
is
to
try
to
save
the
buildings.
E
C
I
C
In
this
building,
it's
like
yeah
part
of
it
is
gone,
but
part
of
it
is
still
there
underneath
the
the
all
the
underneath,
the
fluttering.
You
know
the
scaly,
you
know
all
of
the
all
the
ongoing
issues.
Part
of
it
is
still
really
there
so
and
it
is
a
contributing
building.
Had
it
been
non-contributing,
it
would
maybe
have
been
easier
to
negotiate,
but
it
is
a
contributing
structure
in.
E
C
C
You
can
do
is
like
hey.
Do
you
want
to
set
a
time
and
date
for
some
Commissioners
to
actually
step
and
see
you
know,
and
they
might
say
the
same
thing
afterwards.
I
don't
know,
commissioner,
has
a
different
point
of
view
in
a
different
specialization.
I,
don't
know
what
everybody
else
thinks
I'm
just
throwing
sure
I.
N
Mean
I
do
think
it's
you
know
it's
a
it's
a
good
idea,
I
mean
I,
you
know
absolutely
I
mean
I
mean
want
to
have
the
support
of
neighborhood
association.
I
mean
I,
can
only
imagine
well.
I
mean
I
have
talked
to
some
of
the
people
that
live
in
Prospect
Hill,
some
of
which
are
involved,
but
the
association,
and
they
were
like.
N
Please,
you
know
we
would
love
to
have
that
that
that
lot,
return
to
you
know
a
functioning
residence,
so
you
know
I
know
they
would
support
the
effort.
The
question
is:
is
you.
P
N
Is
it
you
know,
there's
the
and
I
surely
wasn't
trying
to
steer
this
conversation
to
well.
You
know,
you
know,
here's
why
I'm
asking
I'm
it's
you
know
from
a
from
a
you
know,
from
what
I
do
for
a
living.
You
know,
I
just
know
the
tedious
nature
of
deconstructing
a
building,
and
you
know
there's
like
it.
You
know,
there's
just
the
economic
reality
of
it
may
not
make
economic
sense
to
to
to
to
to
to
to
do
that.
N
And
so
then
we
have
a
decision
of
yeah.
What
what
you
know
because
again
the
the
per
the
use
is,
we
would
like
to
have
a
the
space.
You
know
for
family
members
and
you
know,
and
to
serve
as
a
place
where
you
know
people
will
live.
So
you
know
that's
the
goal,
but.
N
Also
has
to
you
know,
make
some
there
has
to
be
some
economic
sense
to
behind
it
as
well,
and
so
that's
what
we're
just
trying
to
balance.
Let's.
A
Hold
the
the
really
just
a
couple:
things
have
come
to
my
mind
and
what
these
are
tough,
every
time,
they've
come
in
front
of
us
and
you
know
I,
don't
know
if
there's
a
way
to
Ballpark
out
some
of
those
costs,
because
you
know
the
a
lot
of
the
language
in
our
statutes.
Do
you
say
things
like
you
know?
A
You
know,
definitely
is
more
expensive
to
to
rehab
it
than
to
knock
it
down
and
build
something
that
makes
our
lives
a
little
easier.
I,
don't
know
how
to
Ballpark
that
kind
of
thing,
so
I'm
wondering
about
that.
A
little
bit,
I
I'm,
sitting
I
I
did
really
like
what
Gloria
said
about
what
about
you
know,
because
what
is
characteristic
as
I
look
at
this
from
the
street
is
that
sort
of
I
mean
I
might
have
called
I.
A
Don't
know
it's
a
little
I'm
going
to
get
jumped
on
by
the
architectural
specialist,
but
I'm
going
to
call
it
a
cross-wing
cottage,
the
and
it's
so
it's
that
characteristic
of
the
the
front-facing
Gable
portion
than
the
longer
portion
of
the
porch.
That
to
me
is
what
says,
you
know
what's
historical
about
this
building,
if
there's
a
way
to
hang
on
to
that
somehow
I'm
sounding
like
I'm
talking
about
a
facadectomy
and
maybe
I
am
but
in
particular,
because
you're
not
proposing
them
most
of
the
horrible
facade
activities.
A
I've
seen
like
the
thing
behind
it
is
like
out
of
proportional.
It
looks
like
the
original
thing
crashed
into
this
concrete
building.
That
would
look
like
that
with
what
you're
talking
about,
like
maintaining
a
small
art
cottage
style
house,
pushing
it
back,
would
be
kind
of
cool
I'd
love
to
see
that
that
porch
wall,
reconstructed,
I,
can't
see
or
subversion
of
that
that
must
have
been
fairly
cool.
So
really,
what
would
make
me
amenable
to
it
is
something
that
would
kind
of
it
would
be
preserving
really
as
much
as
possible
in
that
street
view
right.
A
N
N
It's
part
of
the
context
of
this
neighborhood,
and
so
whether
it's
you
know
that
specific
one
or
you
know
some
other
style-
that's
prevalent
there.
But
you
know
again.
E
N
Haven't
even
started,
you
know
down
the
road
of
starting
a
design,
so
I
mean
it
could
be
that
that
I
mean
clearly
a
porch
is
highly
prevalent
in
Prospect
Hill.
You
know
so
I'm
sure
there
would
be
a
porch
feature.
You
know
the
front-facing
Gables
are
a
pretty
prominent
feature,
but
you
know
so
it
you
know,
and
it's
a
near
a
lot,
so
you
can't
really
do
a
whole
lot.
It's
not
like
you
can.
N
You
know,
there's
not
a
lot
of
room
to
do
a
bunch
of
different
things,
so
it
the
depth
of
the
house
of
any
I
mean
whether
you
preserve
this
and
the
depth
is
going
to.
Basically,
you
would
have
to
demolish
the
back
of
the
house
and
go
back.
You
know,
but
you
know
it's,
you
know
it
would
end
up
being
a
deeper
structure
either
way.
E
E
A
N
Again,
our
it's
our
desire
to
have
it
be
habitable
and
be
functioning,
and
that's
that's
what
we're
trying
to
solve
for
it's
been.
It's
been
an
eyesore
for
for
long
enough,
and
you
know
whether
it's
something
that
we
do
or
you
know
someone
else
ends
up
doing.
You
know
it's
kind
of
time
for
it
to
to
serve
a
purpose.
Again.
Sorry,
all
right,
thank.
A
there
is
one
other
thing:
I
was
going
to
bring
up
a
new
business,
but
since
there's
nobody
left
well,
Sam
is
here
it
has
to
do
with
Cascades
Park.
It
has
been
brought
to
attention
that
they
want
to
close
the
road
down
there.
There
were
three
options:
there's
a
member
that's
put
out
and
Gloria
brought
up
the
fact
that
that
is
a
historic.
A
To
the
town,
do
you
exactly
and
so
there's
talk
of
wanting
to
shut
Cascades
road
down,
so
you
can't
travel
that
either
direction
anymore,
so
I
didn't
know
if
it's
something
that
the
commission
would
like
to
hear
make
a
comment
to
city
council
about
or
or
not
we
don't
have
enough
members
here
to
make
that
decision.
What's.
A
I
went
to
so
they're
having
they're
having
a
meeting
the
22nd,
and
this
is
just
no
elected
officials.
You
know
that's
what
they're
planning
to
do
I'm,
not
sure
when
it
goes
in
front
of
City
Council.
A
J
I
So
what
is
the
wrong
of
it
like?
What
is
the
role
of
planning
and
transportation
in
the
in
the
potential
closing?
Is
that
something
that
planning
us.
A
Not
there's
a
memo
that
was
that
can
be
put
out
on
this
for
the
city,
but
not
from
where
I
essentially
remember
yeah.
I
A
C
I
C
Or
their
the
application,
so
that
has
been
sent
and
it's
being
processed
with
national
parks
and
the
the
road
being
part
of
the
historic
Dixie
Highway
is
an
integral
and
an
incredibly
important
part
of
that
historic
district
per
se.
So
I
mean
if
the
road
is
closed,
but
it's
kept.
You
know
like
they
don't
fill
it
in
with
grass
or
something
that
there
could
be
an
argument
to
that.
C
C
That's
something
that
I'm
going
to
be
looking
at
because
yeah
they're
there
is
action
being
taken
on
this
and
in
fact,
when
it
was
closed
before
it
was
precisely
due
to
the
repairs
that
were
being
done
to
the
River
or
the
stream,
which
involves
inevitably
ended
up
involving
the
Corps
of
Engineers
and
and
and
invoke
section
106,
which
is
why
this
ended
up
being
nominated
for
the
national
register.
In
the
first
place.
F
C
We
need
to
deal
with
them:
I'm
gonna
meet
with
legal;
soon
legal
is
going
through
shifts
and
hey
Colleen
I'm.
So
sorry
for
the
novs,
they
were
just
being
whites
covering
the
meetings
going
forward.
L
I
C
Yeah,
it's
just
yeah.
We
need
to
get
those
out.
It's
been
on
the
priority
to-do
list
of
just
send
out.
At
this
point.
It's
just
going
to
be
send
out
fines,
there's
just
no
more
to
do
we've,
given
them
a
lot
of
opportunities,
a
lot
of
rope
to
hang
themselves.
C
A
All
right,
very
good,
I,
don't
think
we
have
anything
else
to
talk
about,
so
let's
just
go
ahead
and
reserve
or
during
the
meeting
this
evening
thanks.
Thank
you
for
staying.